APPLICATION
,
L
PROJECT NAME: .. '
BoyntvlI Town Center 1
LOCATION:
PCN:
I FILE NO.: LUAR 04-007 II TYPE OF APPLICATION: I
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: The Klatt Family Limited
Ruden, McCloskey, Smith, Schuster & Partnership 1& Klatt Enterprises, Inc
Russell, P .A. ADDRESS: 9290 Nickels Road Boynton
ADDRESS: 222 Lakeview A venue Suite 800 Beach, FL 33425
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 FAX:
FAX: 514-3442 PHONE:
-
PHONE: 838-4542
Date of submittal/Projected meetin2 dates:
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITTAL 4/1/04
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: N/A
PUBLIC NOTICE: Mail: 5/24/04 Publish: 6/12/04 6/22/04
TRC MEETING: N/A
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A
(SITE PLANS):
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 6/22/04
MEETING:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT N/A
AGENCY BOARD
CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 7/6/04
COMMENTS:
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1 \LUAR 04-007\2004 PROJECT TRACKING INFO.doc
....1.'
','
."t
APPLICATION ACCETABLE DATE: RECEIVED BY STAFF MEMBER:
. FEE PAID: RECEIPT NUMBER:
HAS APPLICANT ATTENDED A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING? Y.es DATE: 03/10/04
"
..
CITY OF ~OYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
..
LAND. USE AMENDMENT ANDIOR REZONING APPLICATION
..
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and submitted, together ..Wlth the
materials listed in Section II below. in two (2) copies to the Planning Division. Incomplete
applications will not be processed.
..
,I
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL INFORMATION.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name: Boynton Town Center I
2. Type of Application (check one)
x a. Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
b. Land Use Amendment Only
c. Rezonin~ only
3. Date this application is accepted (to be filled out by Planning Division)
4. Applicants Name (person or Business entity in whose name this appli~ion is made)
Boynton Beach Place, LLC
Address: .
1450 South JohnsonuFerry Road - ~l1if'''' lnn
Atlanta, GA 30319
Phone:
561-391-6570
(Zip Code)
FAX: 561-391-2423
5. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant
Address:
Ruden. McCloskv. Smith. Schuster & Russell. P.A.
(Kim Glas-Castro, AICP and Bonnie Miskel, Esq~)
222 Lakeview Avenue. Suite 800
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone:
561-838-4542
(Zip Code)
FAX: 561-514-3442
... .
,
.,
..
."
. '
6.
Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:
, I
. The Klatt-Family Limited Partnership #1 and Klatt Enterprises. Tnc.
Address: . 9290 Nickels Blvd.
Boynton Beach,FL
33425
(Zip Code) .
Phone:
FAX:
7. Correspondence Address (if different than applicant or agent).
-This is the only address to which all agendas, letters, and other materials will be
mailed '
8. What is the applicant's interest in the subject parcel: (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder,
Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc.)
9.
Contract Purchaser I Developer
Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel:
NE Corner of Old Boynton Road
and Congress Avenue
PCN (s)
08-43-45-20-01-000-0680 and 08-43-45-20-01-000~0090
10. Legal Description of Subject Parcel (please also provide on disk in "Word" format):
~po:> At-t-.....},pr!
11.
Area of Subject Parcel (to nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre:
25 acres
12. Current Land Use Category: Moderate Density Residential
13: Proposed Land Use Category: Local Retail Commercial
14. Current Zoning District: RIM
15. Proposed Zoning District: C-3
16
Intended use of subject parcel:
~omrnercial Retail
17.
Developer or builder:
Boynton Beach Place, LLC
18.
Architect:
DTI
','
j
>,'
. ,
19.
Landscape Architect:
(DTI) Design "Tech International
"
"
20.
Site Planner:
DTI
21.
Civil Engineer:
DTI
. ,
I
22.
Traffic Engineer:
Pinder Troutman
23.
Surveyor:
Davis & Purmont
II. MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
The following materials shall be submitted in two (2) copies, unless otherwise indicated:
(please check)
:'
_a. This application form.'
_b. A copy of the last recorded warranty deed.
_c. The following documents and letters of consent:
_(1) If the property is under jOint or several 'ownership: a written consent to the application
by all owners of record,
_(2) If the applicant is a contract purchaser: a copy of the purchase contract and written
consent of the owner and seller, and,
_(3) If the applicant is represented by an authorized agent: a copy of the agency
agreement, or written consent of the applicant, and
_(4) If the applicant is a lessee: a copy of the lease agreement, and the written consent o(
the owner, and
_(5) If the applicant is a corporation or other business entity: the name of the officer or
person responsible for the application, and written proof that said person has the
delegated authority to represent the corporation or other business entity, or in lieu
thereof, written proof that he is in fact an officer of the corporation.
_d. A sealed boundary survey of the subject parcel by a surveyor registered in the State of Florida,
dated not more than six (6) months prior to the date of submission of the application, at a scale
prescribed by the Planning Division, and containing the following information:
_(1) An accurate legal description of the subject parcel.
_(2) A computation of the total acreage of the subject parcel to the nearest hundredth
(1/100) of an acre.
_(3) A tree survey, which conforms to the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach Tree
preservation Ordinance. (Also refer to Page 6, Sec. \I h.(12) of this application if
property is occupied by native vegetation.) This requirement may be waived by the
Planning Director where found to be unrelated to the land use or zoning issues
involved with the application.
" '
_e.
. ,
. ,
,
"
A complete certified list of all property owners, mailing addresses, and legal descriptions for.all .
properties within at least four hundred (400) feet of the subject parcel as recorded in the latest
official tax. rolls in the county courthouse shall be furnished by the applicant, including a tax map
showing placement of 400 feet boundary. Postage, and mailing labels or addressed envelopes
must also be provided. Said list shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating that to the best of
the applicant's knowledge said list is complete and accurate. Notification of surrounding
property owners will be done by the City of Boynton Beach. .
, ,
_f. A copy of the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's maps showing all of the properties
referred to in paragraph e. above, and their relation to the subject parcel. .
J.
A statement by'the applicant justifying the zoning requested, including reasons why the'property
is unsuitable for development under the existing zoning and more suitable for development
under the proposed zoning. The statement should address the following criteria which the
Planning and Zoning Division utilizes in evaluating land use amendment and rezoning
applications:
1) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be consistent with applicable
comprehensive plan policies. The division shall also recommend limitations or requirements
that would have to be imposed on; subsequent development of the property in order to
comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
2) Whether the proposed land use amendmenUrezoning would be contrary to the established
land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as
contrasted with the protection of the public welfare.
3) Whether changed or changing conditions make.the proposed land use amendment/rezoning
desirable. ' '
4) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be compatible with utility.
systems, roadways and other public facilities.
5) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be compatible with the current
and future use of adjacent and nearby properties or would affect the property values of
adjacent and nearby properties.
. 6) Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing land .
use designation/zoning.
7) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning is of a scale that is reasonably related
to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
8) Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed.
_h. A comparison of the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed zoning,
with the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed zoning, with the
impacts that would be created by development under the existing zoning, which will include:
_(1) A comparison of the potential square footage of number and type of dwelling units
under the existing zoning with that which would be allowed under the proposed zoning
or development.
'"
I
'.
.~.'. "
,
"
_(2) A statement of the uses that would be"allowed in the proposed zoning or development,
and any particular uses that would be excluded.
_(3)
_(4)
_(5)
Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
For proposed zoning of property to commercial or industrial districts, where the area of
the subject parcel exceeds one (1) acre, projections for the number of employees.
A comparison of traffic which would be generated under the proposed zonirig or
development, with the traffic that would be generated under the current zoning; also,
an analysis of traffic movements at the intersections of driveways that would 'serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements that would' be necessary to
accommodate such traffic movements. For projects that generate more 'than fNe
hundred (500) net trips per day, a traffic impact analysis must be submitted which
complies with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of the Palm Beach County'
Traffic Performance Standards Ordin~nce. "
II
(a) For projects that generate two thousand (2,000) or more net trips per day,th'e
traffic impact analysis must be submitted to the City at least 30 ,days prior to the
deadline for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by the City's traffic consultant and Palm
Beach County. The applicant shall be billed for the cost of review by the City's
traffic consultant.
(b) For projects that generate between five hundred (500) and two thousand (2,000)
net trips per day, the traffic impact analysis must be submitted at the application
deadline for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by Palm Beach County. However, if it is
the desire of the applicant to utilize the City's traffic consultant for review of the
traffic impact analysis prior to review by Palm Beach County, then the procedure
and requirements outlined under item "a" above shall be followed.
NOTE: Failure to submit traffic impact analysis in the manner prescribed above may
delay approval of the application.,
_(6) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the water demand for
development under the proposed zoning or development with water demand under the
existing zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such demand, unless a
registered engineer justifies different standards. Commitment to the provision of
improvements to the water system shall also be included, where existing facilities
would be inadequate to serve development under the proposed zoning.
_(7) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of sewage flows that would be
generated under the proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows shall be estimated using the
standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows, unless a registered engineer justifies different standards. Commitment to the
provision of improvements to the sewage collection system shall also be included,
where the existing facilities would be inadequate to serve development under the
proposed zoning.
_(8) For proposed residential developments larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the
projected population under the proposed zoning or development with the projected
,'.
.,.
. ,I
population under the existing zoning. . Population projections according to age grou.ps
for the proposed development shall be req\.lited where more than fifty (50) dwellings, or .
50 sleeping rooms in the case of group housing, would ,be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
_(9) At the request of the Planning Division, Planning and Development Board, or City
Commission, the applicant shall also submit proposals for minimizing land use conflicts
with surrounding properties. The applicant shall provide a summary of the nuisances.
and hazards associated with development under the proposed zonjng, as well as
proposals for mitigation of such nuisances and hazards. Such summary shall also
include, where applicable, exclusion of particular uses, limitations on hours of
operation, proposed location of loading areas, dumpsters, and mechanical equipment,
location of driveways and service entrance, and specifications for site 'lighting.
Nuisances and hazards shall be abated or mitigated so as to conform to the
performance standards contained in the City's zoning regulations and the standards'
contained in the City's noise control. ordinance. Also, statements conceming the
height, orientation, and bulk of structures, setbacks from property lines, and measures
for screening and buffering the proposed development shall be provided. At the
request of the Planning and Development Board or City Commission, the applicant
shall also state the type of construction and architectural styles that will be employed in
the proposed development. .
_(10) At the request of the Planning Division, Planning and Development Board, or City
Commission, the applicant shall also S,tibmit the following information:
_(a) Official soil conservation service classification by soil associations and all areas
subject to inundation and high ground water levels.
_(b) Existing and proposed grade elevations.
. .
_(c) Existing or proposed water bodies.
_(d) Form of ownership and form of organization to maintain common spaces and
recreation facilities.
_(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary facilities for storm
drainage, water supply, sewage collection and treatment, solid waste disposal,
hazardous waste disposal, fire protection, easements or rights-of-way,
roadways, recreation and park areas, school sites, and other public
improvements or dedications as may be required.
_(11) For rezonings to planned zoning districts, the specific requirements for submission of
applications for rezoning to such districts shall also be satisfied. Furthermore, all
materials required for a subdivision master plan shall also be submitted.
_(12) Where conformance with the county's Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance is
required, an Application for Alteration of Environmentally Sensitive Lands
(Environmental Impact Study) must be submitted to the Palm Beach County
Department of Environmental Resources Management (copy to City) prior' to or
concurrent with the submittal of the Land Use Amendment and/or Rezoning
Application to the City.
_13) All applications for a land use amendment and rezoning for any residential
development submitted after June 27, 2002 must submit a School Concurrency
Application and Service Provider Form. Applications are not deemed complete
"I'
.,'
,
. '
, .
until the City receives notification from the Palm Beach County School District.
,
,
III. APPLlCA liON FEES
Fees shall be paid at the time that the application is submitted, according to the fees which have
been adopted by ordinance or resolution. The Planning Division will inform the applicant. as to
the fees which are required. All fees shall be paid by check, payable to the City of Boynton
Beach.
IV. Representative of the project must be present at alllechnical Review Committee,
Planning and Development and City Commission meetings held to review this project.
. . :.~ '.
'.
" ,
.,
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR.OFFICE USE ONLY
,
. ,
Review and Processing Schedule:
'. I.
~Date Accepted by Planning Division
Date Transmitted to City Clerk
---:,Date Notifications Mailed to Surrounding Property Owners
. Dates of Advertisement in Newspaper (rezoning and/or land use amendment)
- '
----
i
I
--:.-.Dates of Adve,rtiseme~t in Newspaper (annexation)
Date of Transmission of Departmental Review Forms to Department Heads
- 0,
_Date of Review by Technical Review Committee
_Date of Pre-Hearing Conference
. .
_Date of Public Hearing Before Planning & Development Board
_Date of Public Hearing Before City Commission
Date of Transmission of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Florida Department of
- Community Affairs, pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (1) (a)
Date of Transmission of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Other Governmental
- Agencies Requesting Notification, Pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (1) (b)
Date of Receipt of Notice from Florida Department of Community Affairs Regarding
- Comprehensive Plan Amendment, pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (4)
Date of Hearing Before Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, Pursuant to Florida Statutes,
-F.S. 163.3184 (5) (b)
Date of Hearing Before City Commission on Revised Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
-Pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S.163.3184 (6) (a)
Date of Transmission of Revised Comprehensive Plan Element to Florida Department of
- Community Affairs, Pursuant to Florida Statutes, F.S. 163.3184 (6) (a)
_Date of Receipt of Notice from Florida Department of Community Affairs Regarding Revised
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
. ,
'Iil
.,.
.'
Date of Hearing Before Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, Pursuant to Florida Statutes,.'
F.S. 163.3184 (7) .
Date of First Reading of Ordinance to Annex
. Date of First Reading of Ordinance to Rezone and Amend Future Land Use Map
Date of Second Reading of Ordinance to Annex
Date of Second Reading of Ordinance to Rezone and Amend Future Land Use Map
Date of Expiration of Zoning
_Date of Expiration of Time Extension for Zoning
Ii
..'~ .
. MAR-30-2004 ll':48AM FROM-SCHROEDER &. '!E,P.A.
T-731 P.OOS/OOS F-1S4
.,'
AGENT CONSENT,FORM
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF Dll~Cl.. \
)
) ss:
)
" ,
, BEFORE ME, this day, pen;ona1ly appeared Bll..LR. WINCHESTER (t'Affianttt), who being
duly sworn, deposes and says that:' '
1. THE KLATT FAMIL YLIMITED P ARTNERSHIP#l, a Florida limited partnership'
(ttPartnership"), is the owner of a portion of the r~property legally described in Attachment nAil,
and KLATT ENTERPRISES. INC., a Florida corporation, is the owner of the remainde=r
(ttEnterprisestt). .
2. Affiant is the President of KLATT. INC., a Florida corporation, which is the general
partner of partnership, and he is also the President of Enterprises.
3. In his capacity set forth in Paragraph 2. above. Affiant, on behalf ofPartnersbip and
Enterprises, designates the Authorized Agents designated below to act on behalf of Partnership and
Enterprises for the purposes of seeking a change to the Future Land Use Map designation and/or
Zoning classification of the real property legally descn"bed in Attachment ttA. n
4. Affiant has examined the foregoing Future Land Use Map amendment and/or
Rezoning application and understands how the proposed change may affect the real property legally
descn'bed in Attaclunent "A".
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.
MP~~
. Bll..L R. WlNCHESTER ~ '
9290 Nickels Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33436 .
Authorized Agent(s): Boynton Beach Place, LLC and/or Ruden McClosky
J:\7\CUENTS\KJ.}.11'\salc 1 06aeres\AGENT CONSENT.wpd
. MAR-30-200. .11 :49AM FROM-SCHROEDER & L.~r.1E ,P .A.
"
T-731 P.004/006 F-164
./
H
STATE OF FLORJDA
COUNTY OF: DV\ \lQ. \
)
) ss:
)
: /,
The foregoing instnnne~t was acknowledged before me this 3L day of _lVl ~ <::::-h .
2004, by BILL R. WINCHESTER, as President of KLATT; INC.,.a Florida corporation, general
partner of THE KLATT FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP #1, and as President o(KLATI
ENTERPRISES, INC. He is _ personally known to me or ~ has produced a current Florida
driver's license as identification. .FL- b(,.. 3- 30~ :0...5
~ t)j, ~.
Nopuy Public, State of Florida .
. '.
,
"
.",. ~ llm EJkrIcIge
{~. . MycOmminionDD18M21
'\1;./ ExplreI FebnJaly 11, 2007
My Notary Seal:
My Commission Number:
My Commission Expires:
I
I,
"
,
"
J:\7\CUENTS\KlA rI'\sBlc 1 06acrts\AGENT CONSENT. wpd
Agent Authorization
BOYNTON BEACH PLACE, LLC certifies that it is authorized to act as Applicant and Owner's
Authorized Agent (see attached) and that it further authorizes RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITIi,
SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A to act as agent for comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning,
site plan approval, platting and pennitting matters related to development of said property.
By: Boynton Beach Place, LLC
By: ~ (
Signature:
Printed ~ame: J'OSeph A. F i I ippe.\l'1
Title: V\c:.e presiden+
Address:
1450 South Johnson Ferry Road
Suite 100
Atlanta, GA 30319
Phone:
(404) 847-1800
Subject property: 08-43-45-20-01-000-0680 and -0090
WPB:131026:36
...
'..
.;
,
"
. ,
. .
V. APPLICANT'S OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT
"
,
..;.'
.,
STATE OF FLORIDA
'COUNTY OF PA~M BEACH
, . ,
BEFORE ME THIS DAY P.~RSONALL Y APPEARED j(,/\'\ C:::\(\~. (~lWHO BEIN'G
DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT:
,.'
. ,I' '
.',
"
1.
2.
, .
:
3.
4.
5.
6.
He/she is the owner, or the owners authorized agent, of ' the real property legally desciibedin
Attachment A;
He/she underst~nds the Future Land Use Map amendment and/or Rezoning application fee is"
nonrefundable and in no way guarantees approval of the proposed amendment; , .
The statements within the Future Land Use Map amendment and/or Rezoning application are
true, complete and accurate; ,
He/she understands that all information within the Future Land Use Map amEmdment and/or
Rezoning application is subject to verification li>y City staff;
He/she understands t~at false statements may result in denial of the application; and' ,"
He/she understands that he/she may be required to provide additional information within a
prescribed time period and that failure to provide the information within the prescr!bed time
period may result in the denial of the application.
,
"
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. I
. \
The for oing instrume was acknowledged before m~ this }6 \- day of ~,;,.,l ,20 U\..l, by ,
" ~ \co c...s~C) (Name of Person Acknowledging) who is personally
known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as
identifi tion ~WhO did (did n~t) take a'Jath. . :' ~ ~ /' . /l
. /k7~ . ~,,'~L~
(Si ature of Person Taking Acknowledgment) ~ Applicant's Signature
K\~C; \!):~~ G.~-\c~.
. (Name of Acknowledger Typed, Printed or Stamped) .-r::- ~ f'\~pre~Name (Print) :
?';).~~ l~b~'~e~~ ~~~()
(Title or Rank) Street Address
\,J .~ b
,f~ 33Lte:> 1
I City, State, Zip Code
Telephone (~ t <g.-sg ~ \.fsLJ ~
(Serial Number, if any)
(Notary' Seal)
..,. '!040. Janet M Hood
~ ~~ My ~minion 00262023
~ or "I Expires December 1e, 2007
Agent Representing Applicant: Ruden McClosky
"/\
. '.
.1
NOTICE OF AFFIDJ\. VIT
"
..
STATE OF FLORIDA
" COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
BEFORE ME TIllS DA Y PERSONALL Y APPEARED Kim Glas-Castro. AICP
(print, type or stamp name) WHO BEING DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS:
1. The attached property owners list is, to the best of my knowledge, a complete and
accurate list of all property owners, mailing addresses and property control numbers as
recorded in the latest official tax rolls obtaipedfrom the Property Appraisers Office in the
County Courthouse for all property within 400 feet of the property which is the subject of
~~~ .
2. The attached property owners' list' includes, to the best of my knowledge, all affected
property owners, municipalities, coUnties, homeowner associations, and property owner
::~:ns~~m~~CiryOfBo~tonBe~.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged befqre m~ this 1 st day of April .
2004 , by _Kim Glas-Castro (name of person acknowledging), who is [ ~rsonallY known
to me or who has produced [ ] (type of identification!"" one) as
ide . ation and who . did not (circle one) take an oath.
Signature of Person Taking Acktlowledgment
An rfrtf}~/1611t c!k-nlino
Name of ~owledger
Title or Rank
NOTARY'S SEAL
Serial Number
"'~';f;':;"",,, ANIi "REGEN" ROMANO
t:"f'.tb. ~;\ MY COMMISSION. CC 980817
~.~.~1 EXPIRES: November 8, 2004
......l:Rf:-Xlll Bonded Thru Notary Public UrKtarwrite...
RE: Boynton Place
WPB:167775:1
~ Ruden
~il McClosky
222LAKEVlEW AVENUE
SUITE 800
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401-6112
(561) 838-4542
FAX: (561) 514-3442
KIM.GLAS CASTR Q(llR UDE N.COM
5/7/2004
BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Land Use Change)
LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL CATEGORY:
Boynton Beach Place, LLC, (the "Applicant") is requesting amendments to the Boynton
Beach Comprehensive Plan in conjunction with the proposal of a new commercial center on 25
acres across from the Boynton Beach Mall.
The Applicant desires to change the land use on approximately 25-acres to a commercial
land use category that facilitate a major retail anchor to draw upon the retail market that is
already established within the Congress Avenue corridor.
The Applicant proposes to change the land use designation of the 25-acres located at the
comer of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road from Moderate Density Residential (up to
7.26 du/ac) to the Local Retail Commercial land use designation.
The proposed commercial uses will be designed with complimentary architectural style
and features to abutting uses.
Rezoning
REZONING TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (C-3)
The Applicant is requesting rezoning of::!: 25 acres of the subject property to the C-3
district. A site plan for Boynton Town Center I will be submitted for subsequent approval.
Consistent with the criteria contained in Section 9.C.2. of the Zoning regulations, the
Applicant offers the following for the City's consideration:
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies. The proposed rezoning to C-3 is consistent with the proposed land use
WPB:175501 :8
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAU DERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES · PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBU RG . TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 2
designation of Local Retail Commercial (being concurrently processed). Rezoning to C-
3 will enable a major retailer to be established on the Property.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern,
or would create an isolated district unrelated to acijacent and nearby districts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted
with the protection of the public welfare. Rezoning to C-3 will promote efficient use of
the subject property. The subject property's size and location presents ideal
characteristics for a major retail store that will be a viable operation in an established
retail and service market area. The proposed commercial uses will complement the
Congress Avenue corridor. Uses and buildings will complement one another,
internally, as well as with adjacent properties' improvements. The proposed C-3
district is consistent with the zoning of other commercial properties along the Congress
Avenue corridor.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. The
subject property is currently underutilized as an agricultural operation. The RlAA
zoning allows single family residential up to 5.4 units per acre. Rezoning to
commercial will allow flexibility in uses and building design (i.e., maximum building
footprint) that cannot be accomplished under the SMU district. This flexibility will
allow major commercial users to occupy the visible comer tract and attract passerby
traffic, in addition to its own consumers.
d Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and other public facilities. The proposed rezoning and resulting development project
will not negatively impact public facilities and services. The proposed development
will meet the adopted level of service standards established pursuant to the City's
concurrency management system. A traffic study is being submitted as part of the
request to document the proposed mixed use project's impact on the surrounding
roadway network.
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of
acijacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of acijacent and
nearby properties. The proposed rezoning to C-3 is compatible with adjacent uses:
SMU to the north (proposed for the balance of the subject property, and for Renaissance
Commons); C-3 south and west; and RlAA to the east. The subject property fronts
roadways on its south and west sides. The buildings, uses and architectural elements
that will be utilized along the site's perimeters will be harmonious with and
complement existing buildings and uses on neighboring properties. Landscape buffers
will enhance overall aesthetics of the project and promote compatibility between the
subject property and other properties.
WPB:175501:8
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS -FT. LAUDERDALE - MIAMI- NAPLES - PORT ST. LUCIE -SARASOTA-ST. PETERSBURG -TAllAHASSEE -TAMPA -WEST PALM BEACH
Page 3
f Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning. Currently zoned as RIAA, the property sits underutilized. Rezoning to C-3 will
enable an economically viable, timely development project to be developed on the site.
The proposed commercial uses will compliment the adjacent residential use with
personal and retail services and employment opportunities.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of
the neighborhood and the city as a whole. The location of the Klatt family property on
the Congress Avenue corridor at the comer of Old Boynton Road lends itself to a major
retailer. The tract will enable an established retail operation to relocate into expanded
space, offering more services and goods - and employing more of the area residents.
The proposed use is consistent with other commercials uses along the corridor.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed The subject property is the largest uncommitted
tract along the Congress Avenue. This commercial corridor offers residents a variety of
national and local retail and service businesses to meet their needs, all within a single
portion (corridor) of the City. The Boynton Beach Mall was most likely the impetus of
this retail and service corridor that now serves the City and surrounding communities.
The proposed Local Retail Commercial land use and C- 3 zoning will compliment
existing uses and provide needed area for major retailer growth.
BOYNTON TOWN CENTER
The Applicant offers documentation to demonstrate new demand generated by
development under the proposed zoning (C-3). The Applicant feels that any impacts can be
mitigated to ensure compliance with concurrency requirements.
Boynton Town Center, located on approximately 25 acres, is proposed for 250,000 s.f. of
retail commercial uses.l
This compares to the 181 residential units that could be developed pursuant to the
maximum density allowed by the existing Moderate Density Residential land use category.
1 Based on performance standards within the C-3 district, 40% lot coverage might be obtained,
which would result in 435,600 s.f. of commercial uses. Constraints presented by required
parking and needed pervious and landscaped areas, however, restrict the maximum coverage
from being obtained. This maximum development level would also necessitate DR! review
(commercial threshold is 400,000 s.f.), and the proposed intensity is one that could be proposed
at the local level without requiring state and regional review through the DRI process.
WPB:175501 :8
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG · TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 4
Specific non-residential uses and businesses that occupy Boynton Town Center will be
consistent with the chart of permitted uses and supplemental requirements in the C-3 district
regulations.
The Boynton Town Center project will be improved in a single phase, prior to the
buildout date of 2008 assumed in the traffic analysis. The project will be subject to subsequent
technical site plan approval.
Based on the above described uses, Boynton Town Center would provide jobs for 5002
employees. Housing opportunities will be available within the adjacent mixed-use
neighborhoods for some of these employees.
Development of the proposed uses will be phased to roadway improvement projects so
that the project does not generate significant traffic impacts. Other public facilities and services
will not be negatively impacted by the change in uses. Water and sewer demand, based on the
rates identified in the attached table, have been evaluated and the resulting demand can be served
by the existing capacity at the City's water and sewer treatment plants. An analysis of the
immediate infrastructure (lines, pumps and lift stations) is being conducted and will determine
whether the water/sewer distribution system needs to be upgraded to serve the proposed project.
Population projections under the existing and proposed uses are compared below. These
estimates are based on the 2000 Census figure of 2.27 persons per unit as a citywide, average
household size.
Existing Land Use:
Proposed Uses:
181 du's 411 persons
no residential within this component
2 Employment Assumption:
I employee per 500 s.f. retail
WPB:175501:8
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS -FT. LAUDERDALE - MIAMI- NAPLES - PORT ST. LUCIE - SARASOTA-ST. PETERSBURG -TALLAHASSEE -TAMPA-WEST PALM BEACH
\r')
Q)
~
~
Z
o
~
~
~
o
U
E-<
U
-<
~
~
......
....... rJl
...
('.l M t"'- s:::
\0 II ~~
rJl
....... II ~ II .a
000
0"C 8 "C..s::: rJl I
..s::: Q) Q) ~ ono I
U Q) .......~....~ I
ooZ u.:l ::r:....... I
......
s::: 0
0 rJl
.... ~
~
Q)r- ~ rJl
I-<"C ~
U Q) ~ I
Q) Q) I
~Z ~ 0.. I
I
\0
s:::
U 0 ~ :g
~ ....
<+-< ~ 0..
Cd I-< t"'- o
I-< Q)
E-< s::: \0 t"'-
Q) C't t"'-
d ....... 00
Q) ~
...
rJl
Cd.,., "C
--
~ s::: ~ rJl
0 .D
.... .......
~ "C 0
--
"C I-< \0 0
Q) 0
.... s::: 0'1 ~~
....... 00
o Q)
ood ('.l~ .......
I-<
~ "C"C "C"C
Q)",," 5t5t 0..0..
00] on on
I::; ~o 00
0'10 \r') \r')
~ 8 \O~M ('.l~ ('.l~
~Q t"'- ~ ....... .......
\O~ MM
\r')
Ms:::
....... 0
Cd '.p rJl
. ... Cd s:::
~.......
2 ~ 0
....... rJl
I-<
o 0 ....... Q) I
~~ ~ 0.. I
~ ....... .......
Q) Cd Cd
8 .... ....
U U
0.. I-< I-<
Q) Q)
0 ~ ~
....... .......
Q) Cd
;> ....
Q) ~ 0 0
Q Q) (.) (.)
~ ... t,..; t,..;
0
~ vi vi
8 0 0
.... ;:::S 0 0
~ "C 0 o~
~ ....... o~ \r')
00 \r') M
....... ('.l :~
--
11) ~
2 ~ 0
,,-.., 11}
....... ;;;J
0 Cd rJl
.... "0 ,Q)
0 U 'I-<
~ I-< ~ ,....
Q) 11} :~
'-" Q) ~ Q
Q) rJl ~ :~
rJl ::J Q : '-"
::J 0 100 'rJl
"C U~ 'Q)
"C ~ ....... rJl
~ .... ::J
.....:l Cd
.....:l ... ~
"C ~
on Q)
s:: lZl ....... :8
.... 0 Cd
... i'~
rJl 0..(.)
.... o 0
~ I-<.....:l j~
u.:l ~ '-"
~
~
Q)
S
Q)
~
'"
C!
II
'0
o
..c::
(.)
'"
..c::
OJ)
:E
....
.0
I
'"
gj
0..
'#.
r-
oO
N
.g
.~
<,..;
'"
o
o
o
-
'tIl
.9-
./::
'<t
C!
II
'0
o
..c::
(.)
'"
Q)
::a
"'0
's
.b
~~
~oo
"'0
::Svi
\c)<">
on
II -;
'y
-; ...
.u ~
... E
~ E
E Q
EU
Q
U
u.:l
00
::J
o
~
.....:l
'"
;::l
'"
I::
Q)
U
o
o
o
N
...
Q)
0..
I::
o
.~
"3
0..
o
0..
OJ) '" 'I:;'
.s ~ .9- Q)
;g~./:: ;S
o .o.b ..0
..d ~ oa S cJ
Q) _"O"'s"2
~ r- I:: .~ 0
~ ";iU~"7u
~a.i:=::~:E>f
>cQo..;::lQ)
!. o~'2o::Ep.
'0 ~ .~ ~ g ... 3
;::l"'02Q ~.so
Q)....E-o- <+=<
gfo 1U~><~
:.::: d rA 0. tu ~
-"'a""'O~o..
~goal::l::.El
"0 .- '-.- (d 0 ....,
... Q.. Q.. ~ ~ ';j ~
g,S~>-!a~S
",~",:-;::o..~>
I:: "''''O:S.....Q)ui'
5lO:S<O~e,:)~
~]]~b5;::l
r-SS1UO:S"'O~
N~Q)>Ir).E~
N......O<NCZl.s
t")~-n\Or---OCl'-'
00
C!
II
'0
o
..c::
(.)
'"
J:
U
<
u.J
a:>
~
2E
f-
Vl
u.J
3:;
.
<
c..
~
f-
.
u.J
.( ~
0..: :e
<
-'
-'
<
f-
.
.oJ
....J
UJ
<Jl
<Jl
:J ~
eo:: :::>
o(l fQ
eo:: u.J
UJ t::i
I- c..
<Jl ~
:J Vl
I .<
U f-
<Jl 0
I ~
t: Ji
~ ~
<Jl 0
>-' 3
~ ~
<Jl Vl
o t;;:
....J 0
U c..
u ·
~ ~
c..
Z <
UJ z
o ·
:J ~
eo:: ~
.
u.J
~
0.:
u.J
o
:::>
:s
~
u...
.
Vl
<
U
~
<
u
c;t!
C;
It)
LO
......
Iii
a.
~
Page 6
CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed land use change from MoDR to LRC is consistent with the City of Boynton
Beach Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the land use amendment is consistent with and
furthers the following City objectives:
Urban Sprawl: Objective 1.13, Policy 1.13.4 The proposed land use discourages urban sprawl
by creating a compact urban area. The commercial project will serve as a form on injill along
the developed Congress Avenue corridor. The 25 acre commercial tract will provide sufficient
land area for a major retailer to expand its operation within its existing trade area versus
developing property further west along the County's urban fringe.
Regulation of Land Development Orders: Objective 1.16, Policy 1.16.1 The proposed zoning
district, Community Commercial (C-3), is consistent with the requested land use - Local Retail
Commercial. The proposed Boynton Town Center development project is consistent with the
use, density and intensity provisions of the land use and zoning designations.
WPB:175501:8
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI · NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBU RG . TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 7
NEED FOR LAND USE(S)
Palm Beach County is known as the West Palm Beach/Boca Raton Metropolitan
Statistical Area (MSA). Growth in this region originated in the south and moved northward.
Palm Beach County's growth rate has increased steadily during the past fifteen (15) years. In
1980, the County has a population of approximately 587,000. By 1990, the County had reached
a population of approximately 870,000, which represented an increase of nearly 48%. The
County's growth rate between 1990 and 200 is less than it was between 1980 and 1990 due to
recessionary economic conditions in the early 90's. However, population growth has increased
significantly since 1990, and the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEBR) project an increased rate of growth through 2010. Population is projected to
increase from 1,008,300 in 2000 to 1,300,600 in 2010.
Employment growth (the number of persons employed) reflects the recessionary
conditions which prevailed in the 1990's. Between 1995 and 1999, the number of persons
employed grew by 58,8709, indicative of a rebounding economy in the County. Total
employment in Palm Beach County is expected to continue to rise. The services sector shows
the strongest potential for growth, with retail and wholesale trade close behind.
The City's median family income ($47,54610) is greater than that of the County as a
whole ($37,04511), and can likely support greater amounts of commercial retail space per capita
than is the case countywide.
Based on projected population growth, there is a need for additional commercial
businesses to meet the growing needs of the City's population. The subject property's location
presents an ideal site for a commercial project that will provide convenient, easily accessible
services, retail operations and employment opportunities.
9 Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security
10 2000 Census
11 2002 Demographic Profile of the Treasure Coast Region, TCRPC
WPB:175501:8
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS - FT. LAUDERDALE - MIM11- NAPLES - PORT ST. LUCIE - SARASOTA - ST. PETERSBURG - TALLAHASSEE - TAMPA -WEST PALM BEACH
BOYNTON TOWN CENTER - C-3
Existing land Use
Water and Sewer Flow Estimate
Water
Uses Unit No. of Units Water Flow Allocation Flow
Residential I 588 dwellino units dwellino unit 588 374 GPOI dwelling unit(1) 219,912 GPO
Commercial I o sq. ft. sq. ft. 0 0.125 GPOI sq. ft. o GPO
II Total Water Flow = 219,912 GPD
Sewer
Uses Unit No. of Units Sewer Flow Allocation Flow
Residential I 588 dwelling units dwelling unit 588 300 GPOI dwelling unit(1) 176,400 GPO
Commercial I o sq. ft. sq. ft. 0 0.125 GPO/sq. ft. o GPO
II Total Sewer Flow = 176,400 GPD
Notes:
1) Note for the purposes of calculation we used a 2 bedroom unit to calculate the total flow requirements for the project
BOYNTON TOWN CENTER - C-3
Proposed Land Use
Water and Sewer Flow Estimate
Water
Uses Unit No. of Units Water Flow Allocation Flow
Commercial I 250,000 sq. ft. sq. ft. 250,000 0.125 GPOI sq. ft. 31,250 GPO
II Total Water Flow = 31,250 GPO
Sewer
Uses Unit I No. of Units I Sewer Flow Allocation . Flow
Commercial I 250,000 sq. ft. sq. ft. I 250,0001 0.125 GPOI sq. ft. . 31,250 GPO
II Total Sewer Flow = 31,250 GPO
Notes:
1) Note for the purposes of calculation we used a 2 bedroom unit to calculate the total flow requirements for the project
I ________________~
I ___________
I
I BOYNTON CANAL
------------ - -------- -----~
L___
. ~ ~--:.-
,
,
1
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. r !~ Fin i = I
.J:>.~ "ll Bi I J BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I ." f' JirllJQ
"~
~~ ~" , IJ!fll(tl
A DBVELOPBR: i j111r::l
i i i i BOYNTON BEACH PLACE, LL.C.
t"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
,---
\
\
\
I
I
\
I
I
\
I
I
\
t;
~ \
~
~ \
:J: I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
,
I ,
' ,
i ~
, I
I I
~---------=-=---------l ! i
I : ! ~
, 1 " ~
i : I ~
I .... I\) 151 I r
,~ g Ul '9 S
13 i~ '13 : g
I~ 0)> ~ I
,It l/I n 'It rp
I ,...', I ....
I I, I
i I :
I I
M.~~~~~~..L::~"~, __-L__ _~
- - ~.c-: --Y.!-~ BOY_N_, ON ~~AD _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
,
,
, \
\ '-
'- "1z \
\ ~ '-
'\ ~ \
~'-
, (\"" \
\
,-
I"
i
!: @
,--------------------------\ \---
: \ 'I
I : \
: \ ~
I \ ~ \
: \ ~
I \ ~ \
" \
\
, \
\, ~ '\
\ ,,~ '-
'\ ~ \
~,
'- ~ \
\ '-
, 1
~ I
, I
i ~ !
~ I
~ I
Z I
(j) I
~ I
~
o
m
.
-.....--.....,.-....-.
------------~
---------------
L___
-..,. ~~":
,
,
L__ - - - - - -___ _ _ _ __ __ L_ ___ ___ __ ____ _--1
_________ _ OLD BOYNTON ROAD
- --------------------------
l~@
~i~11 l~~ I iI r r Ii I !
,.J BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I ~ If' IJ~
DEVllLOPER.: '11 f It:l
~ i~~~ i "~ 1)11 J :j
l! " . BOYNTON BEACH PLACE, L.L.C.
..........BIIACH PI.OIUDA
BOYNTON CANAL
o
o
z
G)
:;0
m
en
en
~
I~
,m
I
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
I
,
~- - --- --- --- -- - - -. ---l
05
00
s::>
3:r
m:;o
:;Om
Q-i
>>
r -
r
uJ
I
~i
~~
I~
n
~~
!l~
!l
~ ~ ~ I i~.~. i i i
~~i i~~i i
o
.--......--
~~
f,'li3
en :!'; \
enm ----1
---------------~-- -- -------
BOYNTON CANAL
.-----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--------------,
en
3:
c:
en
"0
Z
m
~
m"
10
I 0
'z
I~
m
'en
'en
I
'~
1m
I~
,m
,
I,.
,....
I
I
en
3:
c:
en
3:
c:
en
3:
c:
I
I
I
I
I
.....-----
I
I
I
I
en
3:
c:
en
3:
c:
--------------l
o
.
w
..
llJ
o
-<
Z
-t
o
Z
o b en
I :.. ~ ~ en
'0"0
I m z
I ~ ~
I !B ~
l___ -----~rr______J_ ___ ___J
t OLD BOYNTON ROAD _t
DE
L___
r---
\ \
\ ~ \\
I m
\ ~
~ ~ \
\ :J: \
~ \
\
\ \,
'. \ \
\. ~ '-
\\ ~ \
~'
'. 0"" '\
\
\
')
,
,
en
3:
c:
-- - -- -- - - - -- - --- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - ---
-----___.J
BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I
j.
!
AND
BOYNTON VILLAGE
........... ....,.. ....,..",.
~I
{
"I
,
,
1
~
c:
)>
r
N
Z
G)
o
)>
z
)>
r
~
c
m
J,.
If: @
· f
llrlt JLI
'lifl'lt:l
~ Il!,;::!
..
~
~ Ruden
~~I McClosky
222 LAKEVIEW AVENUE
SUITE 800
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401-6112
~~
~~
~n
~
~
(561) 838-4542
FAX: (561) 514-3442
KIM.GLASCASTRO@RUDEN.COM
4/26/2004
BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Land Use Change)
LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL CATEGORY:
Boynton Beach Place, LLC, (the "Applicant") is requesting amendments to the Boynton
Beach Comprehensive Plan in conjunction with the proposal of a mixed use development on
106-acres across from the Boynton Beach Mall.
The Applicant desires to change the land use on approximately 25-acres to a commercial
land use category that facilitate a major retail anchor to be designed into the project to create a
permanent and viable draw of returning patrons to Boynton Town Center. Without a major
anchor, the mixed-use project could very well follow the path of Mizner Park or City Place with
lack of sufficient patrons and retail sales to provide retailers with enough revenues to keep their
doors open; the result being high turnover of tenants and vacant storefronts. Locating a major
retail anchor will result in higher visibility and passerby capture for the smaller retailers, as
customers return to the property to shop at the major anchor.
The Applicant proposes to change the land use designation of the 25-acres located at the
comer of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road from Moderate Density Residential (up to
7.26 du/ac) to the Local Retail Commercial land use designation.
While this tract will have separate land use and zoning approvals, the intent is for this
commercial use to be integrated into the mixed-use project and serve as a patron attractor. The
proposed commercial uses will be designed with complimentary architectural style and features,
consistent with the SMU design guidelines for the adjacent tract.
WPB: 175501:6
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE · MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
..,
Page 2
Rezoning
REZONING TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (C-3)
The Applicant is requesting rezoning of:t 25 acres of the subject property to the C-3
district. A site plan for Boynton Town Center I will be submitted for subsequent approval.
Consistent with the criteria contained in Section 9.C.2. of the Zoning regulations, the
Applicant offers the following for the City's consideration:
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies. The proposed rezoning to C-3 is consistent with the proposed land use
designation of Local Retail Commercial (being concurrently processed). Rezoning to C-
3 will enable a viable mixed-use community to be planned and built on the Property.
The major anchor on the subject tract will support the adjacent mixed-use area, and
ensure its economic viability.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern,
or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted
with the protection of the public welfare. Rezoning to C-3 will promote efficient use of
the subject property. The subject property's size and location presents ideal
characteristics for a major anchor component that supports a mixed-use project. The
proposed commercial uses will complement the Congress Avenue corridor. Uses and
buildings will complement one another, internally, as well as with adjacent properties'
improvements. The proposed C-3 district is consistent with the zoning of other
commercial properties along the Congress Avenue corridor.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. The
subject property is currently underutilized as an agricultural operation. The RlAA
zoning allows single family residential up to 5.4 units per acre. Rezoning to
commercial will allow flexibility in uses and building design (Le., maximum building
footprint) that cannot be accomplished under the SMU district. This flexibility will
allow major commercial users to occupy the visible comer tract and provide a draw to
the adjacent mainstreet uses and mixed-use buildings.
d. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and other public facilities. The proposed rezoning and resulting development project
will not negatively impact public facilities and services. The proposed development
will meet the adopted level of service standards established pursuant to the City's
concurrency management system. A traffic study is being submitted as part of the
request to document the proposed mixed use project's impact on the surrounding
WPB:175501:5
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS - FT. LAUDERDALE - MIAMI- NAPLES - PORT ST. LUCIE - SARASOTA-ST. PETERSBURG-TALLAHASSEE - TAMPA-WEST PALM BEACH
.,.'
Page 3
roadway network. (Because the property is under common ownership, the Local Retail
Commercial/C-3 and Suburban Mixed Use/SMU tracts are aggregated by countywide
Traffic Performance Standards as a single project. It is the intent of the Applicant for
the uses on the two tracts to function, look and feel like a single development, despite
the two land uses and zoning designations.)
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of
adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent and
nearby properties. The proposed rezoning to C-3 is compatible with adjacent uses:
SMU to the north (proposed for the balance of the subject property, and for Renaissance
Commons); C-3 south and west; and RIM to the east. The subject property is
separated from adjacent properties by roadways or canals; however, the buildings, uses
and architectural elements that will be utilized along the site's perimeters will be
harmonious with and complement existing buildings and uses on neighboring
properties. Landscape buffers will enhance overall aesthetics of the project and
promote compatibility between the subject property and other properties.
f Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning. Currently zoned as RIM, the property sits underutilized. Rezoning to C-3 will
enable an economically viable, timely development project to be developed on the site.
The proposed commercial uses will compliment the adjacent residential use with
personal and retail services and employment opportunities.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of
the neighborhood and the city as a whole. The size of the Winchester property lends
itself to a large master-planned project. Rezoning to both SMU and C-3 will allow a
mixture of uses on the property. The area proposed for C-3 zoning will be designed to
function as though it is part of the SMU, despite its individual land use and zoning.
Rather than amend the newly adopted SMU zoning district to allow major anchor
stores, or to propose a mixed-use development project whose retailers may experience
economic shortfalls, as had happened at other mixed use projects in the County, the
concept to split the mixed-use project into two separate zoning approvals allows a
major retail anchor to be designed into the project to create a permanent and viable
draw of returning patrons to Boynton Town Center. Locating a major retail anchor will
result in higher visibility and passerby capture for the smaller retailers, as customers
return to the property to shop at the major anchor.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed. While mixed-use projects are encouraged in the
City's downtown, no site provides the same opportunities (size, location and
availability) for planning a mixed-use development project. The proposed rezoning to
SMU and C-3 allows the considerations needed to assimilate different uses in a
harmonious manner, and take advantage of efficiencies that are afforded by close
WPB:175501:5
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE · SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 4
proximity. The C-3 zoning for the major anchor is needed due to footprint limitations
within the provisions of the SMU zoning district. Rather than amend the provisions of
the SMU district, it has been suggested by staff that the C-3 zoning district be pursued
for the major anchor tract (referred to as Boynton Town Center I for distinction). The
separate zoning districts requested for Boynton Town Center will allow the integrity of
the SMU provisions to be maintained, yet allow a major retailer to be associated with
the project to ensure its viability.
BOYNTON TOWN CENTER
The Applicant offers documentation to demonstrate new demand generated by
development under the proposed zoning (C-3). The Applicant feels that any impacts can be
mitigated to ensure compliance with concurrency requirements.
Boynton Town Center, located on approximately 25 acres, is proposed for 250,000 s.f. of
retail commercial uses. 1
This compares to the 181 residential units that could be developed pursuant to the
maximum density allowed by the existing Moderate Density Residential land use category.
Specific non-residential uses and businesses that occupy Boynton Town Center will be
consistent with the chart of permitted uses and supplemental requirements in the C-3 district
regulations.
The Boynton Town Center project may be developed in multiple phases, prior to the
buildout date of 2008 assumed in the traffic analysis. Each phase, pod or parcel will be subject
to subsequent technical site plan approval.
Based on the above described uses, Boynton Town Center would provide jobs for 5002
employees. Housing opportunities will be available within the adjacent mixed-use
neighborhoods for some of these employees.
1 Based on performance standards within the C-3 district, 40% lot coverage might be obtained,
which would result in 435,600 s.f. of commercial uses. Constraints presented by required
parking and needed pervious and landscaped areas, however, restrict the maximum coverage
from being obtained. This maximum development level would also necessitate DR! review
(commercial threshold is 400,000 s.f.), and the proposed intensity is one that could be proposed
at the local level without requiring state and regional review through the DR! process.
WPB:175501:5
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS - FT. LAUDERDALE - MIAMI- NAPLES - PORT ST. LUCIE - SARASOTA- ST. PETERSBURG - TALLAHASSEE -TAMPA -WEST PALM BEACH
"t"
Page 5
Development of the proposed uses will be phased to roadway improvement projects so
that the project does not generate significant traffic impacts. Other public facilities and services
will not be negatively impacted by the change in uses. Water and sewer demand, based on the
rates identified in the attached table, have been evaluated and the resulting demand can be served
by the existing capacity at the City's water and sewer treatment plants. An analysis of the
immediate infrastructure (lines, pumps and lift stations) is being conducted and will determine
whether the water/sewer distribution system needs to be upgraded to serve the proposed project.
Population projections under the existing and proposed uses are compared belo\V,. These
estimates are based on the 2000 Census figure of 2.27 persons per unit as a citywide, average
household size. I
Existing Land Use:
Proposed Uses:
181 du's 411 persons
no residential within this component
2 Employment Assumption:
1 employee per 500 s.f. retail
WPB:175501:5
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE · MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
\0
Q)
OJ)
ro
p...
.... ~
C'l~f'.e::
\01I~..g
-a 00 II ~ II .a
O"l:l E"l:l...r:: rJl
...r:: ~ Q)~ OJ)O
~zm::Effi:!
e::
o rJl
',g e
e':c g
g 3 ~
~z-q:
\C
e::
(,) 0
li3',g
f.':! ~
E-o 5
d
Q)
1n
ro.,.,
~ e::
o
.....
~
I-<
"l:l Q)
;.::: 5
rJ5d
I-<
~
~~
I::; a
~ E
~o
t+-<
o
rJl
~
0..
1::
0..
f'.
\0
C'l~
....
~
~
\0
0'1
00
C'l~
"l:l"l:l
~o..
~OJ)
0'10
\00
~~
f'. ~
\O~
tr)
<"Ie::
_ 0
ro.....
._ ~ rJl
~_ e::
.s~....~
00.... ~
p... p... ~ 0..
5
tZ)
~
<
p...
::E
o
U
E-o
U
<
p...
::E
-
~
tZ)
~
Cl
~
~
~
Q)
E
0-
o
ota
~ .~
Cl.s
~~
E
.~
::E
;:i
"l:l
....
00
....
2
Cl
o
::E
'-"
Q)
rJl
~
"l:l
a
~
OJ)
s:::
.....
-
rJl
.~
~
-
~
o
f'.
f'.
00
~
~
rJl
.D
-
o
o
o
...;-
....
"l:l"l:l
51>~
00
tr) tr)
C"i C'l~
........
~~
-
ro
.~
~
o
(,)
C+-4
rJi
o
o
o
o
tr)
C'l
rJl
Q,)
rJl
Q~
.~ "C
8 ~
Q) 8 e
::J EE'
"l:l 0 ~
j]g
"l:l.D~
Q);:i~
rJltZ)~
o 1 ta
o..:x: (,)
8::E 0
p... '-" ~
"I
\0
'=!
II
'0
o
..s=
u
'"
..s=
bll
:E
:c
~
UJ
=
~
~
l-
V>
~
.
~
~
<
l-
.
UJ
< ~
a.: ~
...J' ~
...J ...J
LU <
V) l-
V) ·
::>~
0.:: ::l
~ ~
0.:: UJ
LU t:u
I- c..
V)t-=
::> ~
J: ~
Uo
V) V>
J: ~
I- ~
~ ~
V) 0
::l
~' ~
V) V>
0:;;:
02
u ·
~ ~
c..
Z <
LU Z
o ·
::> ~
0.:: ~
.
UJ
...J
<
o
eo::
UJ
o
::l
<
...J
t-=
u...
.
~
u
~
<
u
>-
.c
I
'"
gj
P..
~
~
oci
N
-5
.~
'-
'"
"<t
'=!
II
'0
o
..s=
u
'"
lU
::0
"0
's
8
o
:.;;
P..
".6
-
ro
.~
~
o
(,)
C+-4
rJi
o
o
o
vi'
~
~
,Co
~~
~oo
:9~
\OM
on,,;
~ 'E
"t) G,)
.. E
E g
EU
o
U
~
d
lU
8
lU
Q)
'"
::s
'"
=
lU
U
o
o
o
N
...
lU
P.
=
o
"i
'3
p.
o
p.
bJ) (/) 'i:'
= ~ .90 lU
"C;; ""r;j s.. ..d.....
::s tIl....
,g :f! B ;>. oo~
~.g"'==8"5!
~... ~ = ...
lU G.i~~8
~ a.i.!! ; ~ :E ><
>c:OP.::SlU
II o~'Eo~'j5..
'a~'r;;~g ...3
::s"OG.lO ~..so
bll,St::I:E-o:: ",<+=<~
50 lU,S~
:-=.. p.~.!!
-"'~.."O~p.
~=0"'==::S
"0 .8 '';:: .S-!:! 0 "0
~ c.. p. ~ ~ .~ ..i
p.E~>-.a...==
",1il",==p.~>
="''''C':!......lUuf
oC':!<Oo~~
~-g"OlU~.....::S
~C':!Ea&t> E10
r- ElUC':!"O
N~lU>""'.a
~ ~I-< P ~;i oorn g
co
'=!
II
'0
o
..s=
u
'"
,......,
~
Cl
rJl
e
.~
e
'-"
rJl
Q)
rJl
~
~
E
.~
::E
'!'!
o
lI'\
lI'\
"-
ci:i
c..
~
Page 7
CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed land use change from MoDR to SMU and LRC is consistent with the City
of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the hmd use amendment is consistent with
and furthers the following City objectives:
Urban Sprawl: Objective 1.13, Policy 1.13.4 The proposed land use discourages urban sprawl
by creating a compact urban area. The mixed-use development project will prevent strip-
commercial development on the subject property, which is prevalent along the Congress Avenue
corridor. A mix of uses will maximize utilization of public services and provide for efficient
service delivery.
Mixed-Use Projects: Objective 1.15, Policy 1.15.1, Policy 1.15.2 The proposed development
project will implement this stated desire for mixed-use projects. A mix of commercial and
residential land uses will be provided, by a unified plan of development that provides
interconnectivity, shared infrastructure and facilities, compatible architecture, and consistent
landscape themes. Residential neighborhoods, commercial centers and mixed-use areas will be
planned utilizing innovative design techniques that promotes internal harmony and unity, as well
as compatibility with surrounding uses.
Regulation of Land Development Orders: Objective 1.16, Policy 1.16.1 The proposed zoning
districts, Suburban Mixed Use (SMU) and Community Commercial (C-3), are consistent with the
requested land uses - Mixed Use-Suburban and Local Retail Commercial. The proposed
Boynton Town Center development project is consistent with the use, density and intensity
provisions of the land use and zoning designations.
Range of Land Uses: Objective 1.19 The requested land uses fulfill this policy provision by
providing new housing choices, adding needed commercial uses to serve the growing West
Boynton community, providing open space, recreation and greenway connections, and adding
value to the City's tax base.
WPB:175501:5
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
.,.
Page 8
NEED FOR LAND USE(S)
Palm Beach County is known as the West Palm Beach/Boca Raton Metropolitan
Statistical Area (MSA). Growth in this region originated in the south and moved northward.
Palm Beach County's growth rate has increased steadily during the past fifteen (15) years. In
1980, the County has a population of approximately 587,000. By 1990, the County had reached
a population of approximately 870,000, which represented an increase of nearly 48%. The
County's growth rate between 1990 and 200 is less than it was between 1980 and 1990 due to
recessionary economic conditions in the early 90's. However, population growth has increased
significantly since 1990, and the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEBR) project an increased rate of growth through 2010. Population is projected to
increase from 1,008,300 in 2000 to 1,300,600 in 2010.
Employment growth (the number of persons employed) reflects the recessionary
conditions which prevailed in the 1990's. Between 1995 and 1999, the number of persons
employed grew by 58,8709, indicative of a rebounding economy in the County. Total
employment in Palm Beach County is expected to continue to rise. The services sector shows
the strongest potential for growth, with retail and wholesale trade close behind.
The City's median family income ($47,54610) is greater than that of the County as a
whole ($37,04511), and can likely support greater amounts of commercial retail space per capita
than is the case countywide.
Based on projected population growth, there is a need for additional residences and
commercial businesses to meet the growing needs of the City's population. The subject
property's location presents an ideal site for a mixed use project that will provide convenient,
easily accessible services, retail operations and employment opportunities. The residential
component of the proposed mixed-use project will provide residences in close proximity to these
businesses, and will eliminate the need to traverse the local roadway network to access to shop,
dine, and conduct business.
9 Florida Department of Labor and Employment Security
102000 Census
11 2002 Demographic Profile of the Treasure Coast Region, TCRPC
WPB: 175501:5
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Time and Date ofMeci1'i1g
T ose attendin1:meeti~:.
tt'/~CJ _ ..;{ lu
2.
PRE-APPLICATION CONTACT QUESTIONS
Applicant's Name: ~ 7''7/~" Phone,/Jj-VSyL,
1. HAVE YOU SPOKEN TO ANY STAFF MEMBER ABOUT THE PROJECT?
Yes No
(IF YES, HAVE THOSE STAFF MEMBERS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE PRE-
APPLICATION MEETING?
STAFF MEMBERS NAME: ,lh:c;t 7 ~":7L--'
LOCATION OF PROPER~Y, (CROSS STREETS/INTERSECTIONS)
P. I!{{).,[,-:J ~
/ ~4 ~</
3.
WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO?
NEW PROJECT
BUILDING EXPANSION OR MODIFICATION
CHANGE IN PRIOR USE?
IS THE STRUCTURE CURRENTLY VACANT?
VARIANCE TYPE:
POOL OR SCREEN ENCLOSURE
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY?
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY?
ll{DUSTRlALPROPERTY?
DO YOU KNOW THE ZONING CODE DESIGNATION?
. ( ,4nt-~
TIME AND DATE PREFERRED 1!:ft:'4'-h ~~ f + le( .3)
HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL BE AT THE PRE-APP MEETING? ;t
4.
5.
Note: Tell the person that someone from the Department will call them to confirm the meeting.
..................................................................................
· Pre-application meetings should be scheduled for a minimum of one (1) hour time module, and should be scheduled
no less than two (2) days prior to date/time of meeting. If urgency is sensed, discuss with Mike.
. Meetinl!s may be scheduled:
Monday afternoons
Tuesday all day
Wednesday all day
Thursday mornings
Note: Mike is not available on Mondays between 11 :30 a.m. and 2:30 p.rn.
S: \Planning\Planning\Pre-applicationcontactquestions.doc
/()~'';;44 ~~- G;/a44h
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVIEW FORM
Date .3 - 10 - 0 4- lime Started: / : :30 lime Finished:
Attending as Applicant
~ ~A/2..IJ.l'l> ~iU/~ !tt{S/~ 14M- ~c..&.C4.smo ~
) , } ~~
Phone
Fax
Proposed Project Information
Proposed Project Name and /A)/~~..$TE7e.. ~rJ
Type/Use
Site Location (Address if Available)
Site PCN
Existing Zoning
Existing Land Use/Density
Anticipated Submittal Date
Proposed Zoning
Proposed Land Use/Density
/
Vacant
Notes and Comments
Lot Area
Lot Frontage
Lot Depth
Setback
Height
Parking Requirements or Improvements
Landscaping/Buffering
Non-conforming Use or Change in Use
Other Zoning Changes Required
Environmental Review Requirements
Notes/Comments/Recommendations ~/P(P {J hlttl-~" .[)€Jft>U~ ~ 1TfA-L F6L
~ ~ ~~ (MCL ~~.1) ~Ptl!l> /hS~ IF SMLL 1>>!.nuer
~ ~r6~. -r~e- S-rv4/~ 1l:e/~(Q~. Re~t~! ~~
Pa'lntnU n; ~ u../IAJ ~ ~ Jv~€, (~.J.kw ~ ~ ~
Ofro-vt C{ Pr-~ ~ lu ey~ M (,111 3 wtc071-C? f 74<.u- ~/ ~CIL i> !4:.-VI,u
~ ~/AJ{; oFF fM) &NIIII<, I~ P.wfEJ't} ()NT7l., SIrE Pt.meIlV//\.X;. -r~ ~ ~
I ( 0~7~ UbIf'S )
WA,1" ~u- 71Ie1J. P~A.ft/; /6.~ ~/4.c- , ~f WilL ~ ~ M1 R~~ I
r! ( " ,
2719ttmo ~. ~ I /~fJa) , ornCL. ~!I A<< Il€~/.k;, 7tI€ j,()~ -
. I
NGt;{" ~ /Z€lIJ, ~J WIQ~~ 4-o1Ul> IZ-GUII~ ~ ~ ~ /J;D~ ~
NOTICE: The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall community goals, objectives,
policies and codes as related to the proposed development and to discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions expressed
at the pre-application conference are not binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forthcoming
based on actual plans submitted for review.
I ~4oy ~cD. bC#- IA/t)(~ ~ Il.ByUfllE~ ~ ~I/IJe:, PEr771~;.J .,.., 6€ ALEP
WrrU 7lJ-(.;; t/L ~ 0/1J 15tN. tlJ.. /11A-<( 12E19. WII>eXrIAJr9..Jo.-O-W k1>teA:n~
~"'- "
, ,"",'
"
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
SIGN IN SHEET
PLEASE PRINT
MEETING DATE:
. TIM:E:
ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT:
NOTICE: The purpose of this conf~rence shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall
community goals, objectives, policies and codes ass related to the proposed development and to
discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions express at the pre-application conference are not
. binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual
b . d ~ .
olans su nutte or reVIew.
City of Boynton Beach Attending for Applicant
Attendine Staff
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
~
J:\SHRDA T A\PLA."INL'iG\SHARE D\ WP\FOR.\IS\PRE-APPL t\.IEETt'iG-SIGN I:N SHEET.DOC