REVIEW COMMENTS
7.A.l
RENAISSANCE COMMONS PHASE VI
(NWSP 04-015)
NEW SITE PLAN
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECf:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-267
Chair and Members
Planning & Development Board
Mike Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP
Planner
if
November 18, 2004
Renaissance Commons Phase VI
COUS 04-008
Request conditional use / new site plan approval for the construction of
four mixed-use buildings between 55 feet in height and 75 feet in height.
These buildings would accommodate 348 multi-family dwelling units,
58,645 square feet or retail, 49,240 square feet of restaurant, and 176,097
square feet of office on an 18.126-acre portion of the 86-acre project
known as Renaissance Commons, zoned Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU).
Property Owner:
Applicant:
Agent:
Location:
Existing Land Use:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Uses:
Acreage:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Compson Associates of Boynton II, LLC
Compson Associates of Boynton II, LLC
Mr. James Comparato and Mr. Carl E. Klepper
Southeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue (see
Location Map - Exhibit "A")
Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
Suburban Mixed Use (SMU)
348 multi-family dwelling units
58,645 square feet of retail
49,240 square feet of restaurant
176,097 square feet of office
18.126 acres (789,568 square feet) portion of the 85.552-acre mixed-
use master plan
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 2
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
Adjacent Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Right-of-way for Gateway Boulevard, further north is developed
commercial property (Shoppes of Boynton) with a Local Retail
Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community
Commercial (C-3);
Undeveloped land (Phases III and V of Renaissance Commons) with a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) land use classification, zoned
Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU);
Undeveloped land (Phase IV of Renaissance Commons) with a
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) land use classification, zoned
Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU); and
Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, further west is developed
commercial property (Catalina Center) with a Local Retail Commercial
(LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3).
PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION
Owners of properties within 400 feet of the subject conditional use were mailed a notice of this request
and its respective hearing dates. The applicant certifies that they posted signage and mailed notices in
accordance with Ordinance No. 04-007.
BACKGROUND
The subject site is the location of the former Motorola Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The
original Motorola DRI as approved in 1979 was, upon buildout, to contain 825,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of
industrial, research and development, and office uses. Following approval, 625,000 sq. ft. of industrial
and office uses were constructed, with the remaining 200,000 sq. ft. of approved office use left
undeveloped. In 2002, both the DRI development approval and the future land use designations were
amended to allow the development of 63,500 square feet of commercial uses and 500 multi-family
residential units in place of the unbuilt 200,000 sq. ft. of office use. On July 20, 2004, the City
Commission approved the applicant's request to rezone (LUAR 03-009) the entire site from Planned
Industrial Development (PID) to Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU), which included the establishment of new
maximum development thresholds from the conversion of built and undeveloped industrial square
footages. As part of the most recent DRI amendment, a "conversion" matrix was adopted that allows up
to 30% adjustment in the total number of dwelling units and square footage of non-residential uses.
This conversion matrix allows for flexibility to change between the uses and their intensities to meet
market demand while ensuring that the balance of cumulative impacts would be below the concurrency
threshold as it relates to vested traffic. This translates into adjustments of new development thresholds
equaling 1,691 dwelling units, 176,097 square feet of office, and 165,365 square feet of commercial
upon completion of the Renaissance Commons project. This conversion matrix is consistent with the
vested trips approved with the DR!. This is the final phase of development for Renaissance Commons.
Staff has ensured that, with the approval of this site plan, the total densities and intensities of the overall
development are consistent with Policy 1.24.2.b of the Comprehensive Plan (stated below).
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 3
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
Policy 1.24.1.b
Consistent with the Renaissance Commons DRI Development Order, the
approved land uses and intensities shall be as follow:
Land Use (as defined in Policy 1.16.1) Minimum-Maximum
Intensitv
Hiqh density Residential 1,085 du to 2,016 du
Office Commercial 173,460 sf to 322, 140 sf
Local Retail/General Commercial 149,100 sf to 276,900 sf
Compson Associates of Boynton II, LLC is seeking conditional use / new site plan approval for the sixth
and final phase of their project known as Renaissance Commons. The sixth phase is an 18.126-acre
portion of the 85.552-acre parcel of land previously occupied by Motorola (DRI). Dissimilar to the other
phases, this sixth phase is the commercial and mixed-use core of the master plan, consisting of a six (6)-
story mixed-use building known as Building "J", which would house 185 multi-family dwelling units and
6,836 square feet of retail. Building "L", proposed at five (5) stories (75 feet in height), would also be
mixed-use with 13,981 square feet of restaurant, 13,637 square feet of retail, and 163 multi-family
dwelling units. Building "I" would be four (4)-stories (70 feet in height), consisting of 25,718 square feet
of retail, 12,300 square feet of restaurant space, and 109,312 square feet of office. Building "K" would
be three (3)-stories (75 feet) and consist of 12,454 square feet of retail, 22,959 square feet of
restaurant, and 66,785 square feet of office. All proposed uses are allowed in the SMU zoning district.
However, the SMU zoning district requires conditional use approval for buildings proposed over 55 feet in
height. Therefore, this phase of Renaissance Commons requires conditional use approval because all
buildings have portions of their structures that exceed the 55-foot height threshold (see Exhibit "c" -
Conditions of Approval). No phase lines were shown on the master plan (sheet MP-1) or site plan (sheet
SP-1).
CONCURRENCY
Originally, the Palm Beach County School District approved the entire Renaissance Commons site for
1,001 multi-family dwelling units. The applicant submitted new information and requested concurrency
approval for the additional condominium units. As of October 4, 2004, the entire Renaissance Commons
site (85+ acres) has school concurrency for a total of 1,700 units (1,442 multi-family units and 258 high-
rise apartments). However, at the time of permit review, the applicant would be required to submit
updated information so that staff can easily confirm the cumulative number and type of residential units
approved through Phases One through Six (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). This information
is required by staff in order to monitor the entire Renaissance Commons project for school concurrency
purposes.
The project is projected to require approximately 150,000 gallons of potable water per day. The City is
currently negotiating a bulk water purchase agreement with Palm Beach County Water Utilities that will
secure up to 5 million gallons per day in capacity for the city's system. No approvals will be issued
without this agreement in place and adequate water capacity being available.
Generally, a project's anticipated traffic is generated by two factors, namely the proposed use and its
intensity. On December 30, 2003, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division reviewed the master plan for
traffic concurrency purposes and determined that it met the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) of
Palm Beach County. Phases One through Five were covered under the original approval for the
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 4
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The DRI's current approval was for 1,551 multi-family dwelling
units, 247,800 square feet of general office, 198,000 square feet of general retail, and 15,000 square
feet of daycare. On October 25, 2004, the applicant submitted a traffic equivalency determination for
review and approval. However, no response has been received from the date of this report. Therefore,
the traffic equivalency determination must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division prior
to the issuance of any building permits for this phase (see Exhibit "CIf - Conditions of Approval).
The Engineering Division of Public Works reviewed the drainage plans to ensure compliance with all
applicable codes and regulations regarding legal positive outfall. The conceptual plans submitted herein,
are acceptable to the Engineering Division but as per staff policy, a more detailed version would be
required at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "CIf - Conditions of Approval).
Police: The Police Department is currently reviewing the subject request for impact on their level of
service and the results will be relayed to the Board and Commission if received timely.
Fire: Fire-Rescue personnel continues to support development of the Renaissance Commons project;
however, with the understanding that additional resources are needed through hiring of
inspection personnel, the timely completion of stations #4 and #5 to ensure adequate service
delivery levels and effective response times in the northeast section of the City and as a backup
in the northwest section of the City, and solutions provided (i.e. funded) for mapping and
dispatching issues.
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDmONAL USES AND ANALYSIS
Section 11.2.D of the land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which
conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Division's evaluation of the application as it pertains to each of the standards.
The Planning & Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are
authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant
conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the
dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined
necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny
conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an
application for conditional use approval, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings
certifying that satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following standards, where
applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access
in case of fire or catastrophe.
The subject phase, as illustrated on the master plan, is located at the northwest corner of the parcel,
north of Phases Three and Five and west of Phase Four. Vehicles would enter Phase Six by four (4)
different points of ingress / egress. The main point, the northernmost entrance, is proposed along
Gateway Boulevard. The site plan (sheet SP-l) does not indicate the width of the entrance but it
would accommodate two (2)-way traffic movements. Upon entering from Gateway Boulevard,
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 5
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
vehicles can either make an immediate right-turn (west) or move towards the interior of the phase
(south). This northernmost opening on Gateway Boulevard also would allow for three (3) directions
of egress. Vehicles may turn left (west), straight (north), or right (east).
The second point of ingress / egress is proposed west of the five (5)-story building (Building "L "); on
one of the developments drive aisles in Phase Three. This drive aisle has direct access onto
Congress A venue and would allow for two (2)-way traffic movements.
The third and fourth points of ingress / egress are proposed along the ''spine road" of the
Renaissance Commons development. One opening would be a major entrance, the other, a
subordinate entrance. The major entrance would allow vehicles to directly access the interior portion
of the phase. The other entrance would primarily allow for vehicles to access the parking areas
proposed along Gateway Boulevard. The applicant states that "ingress and egress for the project
has been carefully planned to provide exemplary pedestrian access throughout the site in a safe and
convenient manner. The applicant has worked with the Fire Department to develop the fire
department design guidelines in case of fire or catastrophe'~ Staff concurs and agrees that fire,
police, and service vehicles could easily maneuver through all above-referenced driveway openings,
drive aisles, and curb-cuts.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in
subsection above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on
adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
This phase of the Renaissance Commons project proposed a mixture of different types of uses. One-
bedroom apartment units require one and one-half (1 0) parking spaces. Two and three bedroom
apartment units require two (2) parking spaces each. The project proposes two (2) large
condominium buildings consisting of a total of 144 one (1)-bedroom units, 158 two (2)-bedroom
units, 46 three (3)-bedroom units, and a recreation area. Restaurants require one (1) parking space
per 100 square feet of gross floor area or one (1) space per 2.5 seats; whichever requires the
greater number of spaces. Retail establishments require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet
of gross floor area. Lastly, one (1) parking space is required for 300 square feet of office use. The
project proposes 49,240 square feet of restaurant, 58,645 square feet of retail/commercial, and
176,097 square feet of office space. A total of 2,001 parking spaces would be required based on the
aforementioned uses and their respective intensities (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval).
Since the total number of seats for the restaurants is undetermined at this time, the parking
methodology would be based on the gross floor area (49,240 square feet), which would limit the
project to 1,231 seats.
The cover sheet tabular data indicates that 1,804 parking spaces would be provided, a deficiency of
197 spaces. However, the applicant believes that the peak hour demand for parking varies between
the uses and that they are prepared to submit quantitative evidence demonstrating the sharing of
parking spaces. The applicant would submit a shared parking analysis at the time of permit review.
It should be noted that Phase Six is just a small portion of the Renaissance Commons development
and staff reviews each phase (cumulatively) to ensure compliance with code. The cover sheet
tabular data indicates that there are 262 extra parking spaces left over from the previous five
phases, so therefore, Phase Six would comply with code by virtue of being a component of the
Renaissance Commons project. The majority of the provided parking spaces would occur inside the
parking garages (1,268 spaces), while 536 spaces would occur as off-street parking.
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 6
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The ground floor plan of Building '']'' (sheet A-1) shows that this six (6)-story building would have
several trash rooms. The site plan shows that the trash trucks would have enough space to
maneuver around to pick up the containers because of wide back up areas. The trucks would access
the garbage rooms at the west fa~ade. The ground floor plan of Building ''/'' (sheet A-3) shows two
(2) trash rooms and loading zones would occur on the east fa~ade. The ground floor plan of Building
"K" (sheet A-5) indicates that this building would have one (1) trash room. It would be accessed at
the south fa~ade. The ground floor plan of Building ''L'' shows that its trash room would be placed
along the south fa~ade. No trash trucks would have to enter any of the buildings. Staff reviewed
the plans and determined that the number, location, and orientation of the enclosures and the pick-
up area are adequate for efficient trash removal.
4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility.
At the time of permitting, the applicant would be required to submit a timeline that clearly illustrates
when water and sewer services would be needed. The commencement date should start at the date
of City Commission approval. Also, the applicant would be required to provide milestone dates
regarding permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter.
Utilities staff would use this timeline in order to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater
treatment capacity upon the projects completion (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval).
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character.
The cover sheet tabular data shows that the pervious area for Phase Six equals 3.194 acres or
17.62% of the 18.126-acre site. The landscape material would consist of a large quantity of shade
trees, palm trees, and shrubs / groundcover. The landscape plan (sheet L6 of 6) shows that the
shade trees would consist of the following species: Brazilian Beautyleat, Live Oak, Gumbo Limbo,
Silver Buttonwood, Mahogany, and Seagrape. The palm trees would be comprised of the following
species: King Alexandra, Medjool Date, Florida Royal, Cabbage, Maypan Coconut, Roundleaf Fan,
Wild Date, Christmas, and Foxtail palm trees. A note on the landscape plan indicates that 71 % of
the shade trees, 50% of the palm trees, and 50% of the shrubs would be native. Areas of special
concern include the south fa~ade of the three (3)-story building (Building "K'? and the west fa~ade of
Building "L'~ These facades propose opening into their trash rooms and parking areas, which may
be visible from Congress A venue. Therefore, staff is recommending installing additional trees and
shrubs inside the roadside park area approved in Phase Three (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of
Approval).
Trees would be installed at varying heights in order to lessen the impact of the height of the
buildings. For example, Royal Palm trees, installed at 22 feet of gray wood (28 feet overall height)
would be placed along the east fa~ade of the six (6)-story Building '']'; which would face the Spine
Road. The Seagrape trees would be installed at 16 feet in height. However, staff recommends
installing the Royal Palm trees at 22 feet of gray wood along the south fa~ade of Building '']'' instead
of the proposed 12 feet (of gray wood) in order to be consistent with its east fa~ade (see Exhibit "c"
- Conditions of Approval). The theme of the 22-foot gray wood Royal Palm trees would be installed
along the facades of Building ''/'' and Building ''K'~ The landscape plan of Building ''L'' (5-stories tall)
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 7
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
shows that Cabbage palm trees would be installed at 24 feet in height and Coconut palms at 16 feet
in height.
The shade trees proposed within the landscape buffers along Congress A venue and Gateway
Boulevard are not exactly the same species (Mahogany versus Live Oak) as proposed within the
other phases, but the spacing, heights, and overall effect would remain constant throughout all
phases. The Redtip Cocoplum hedges, however, would be continued within these buffers. The
proposed plant material in Phase Six would be appropriate for commercial types of uses. The
applicant states that the proposed ''screening buffering, and landscaping are far in excess of the
minimum required and was designed to augment the architecture of the building with color, height,
and varying of plant and tree materials'~ Staff concurs.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and
compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
The proposed signage would be consistent with the previous five (5) phases of the Renaissance
Commons development. Three (3) monument signs are proposed within this final phase. The site
plan (sheet SP-1) shows that the one of the signs would be located at the northwestern corner of the
subject property. It would face the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Congress A venue. The
other two (2) freestanding monument signs would be placed at the main point of ingress / egress
along Gateway Boulevard. All monument signs are required to be setback a minimum of 10 feet
away from the property line. Likewise, it could be measured from the outside of the curb along the
spine road and access road (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). No exact details were
provided regarding the monument and wall signs. The applicant intends to submit a sign program
that would encompass the entire Renaissance Commons development (all six phases). The sign
program would require Planning & Development Board and City Commission review and approval
(see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The applicant states that the ''signs and all exterior
lighting have been designed to direct their lighting pattern in a manner to achieve maximum
coverage while being compatible and harmonious with adjacent properties'~ Staff concurs.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
The zoning for Phase Six has been changed from Planned Industrial Development (PID) to Suburban
Mixed Use (SMU). The ''height setback envelope" is not applicable within this phase because there is
no single-family residential development directly adjacent to this phase. The site plan shows the
buildings would be setback no more than 90 feet from Gateway Boulevard and Congress A venue and
therefore, the project complies with code in that respect.
The SMU zoning district requires usable open space for single-family detached, single-family
attached, and all other uses. All uses proposed within this phase would be considered ''all other
uses'; and therefore, 20% of usable open space would be required. A total of 3.62 acres or 157,913
square feet would be required for usable open space. The usable open space plan shows that 4.55
acres would be devoted to usable open space. However, there are certain elements of the design,
such as terminal and landscaped parking islands that cannot be counted towards usable open space.
After discussing the pervious and impervious surfaces of the plan, staff believes that the project still
complies with code because approximately 3.62 acres of land would be set aside for usable open
space. Therefore, at the time of permitting, the applicant would be required to revise the plan to
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 8
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
accurately show the usable open space in order to comply with Chapter 2, Section 6. G. 4 of the Land
Development Regulations (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval).
8. General compatibility with adjacent property and other property in the zoning district.
The current approval to give the entire Renaissance Commons parcel a single land use designation
and single zoning district would allow for a greater integration of uses and a more innovative design
for the entire property. The SMU zoning district is compatible with the Quantum PID uses to the
east of the property, and with the Community Commercial (C-3) uses to the north and west. The
Land Development Regulations for the Suburban Mixed Use district are designed to lessen the
impacts on surrounding existing development by keeping the taller and more intense structures away
from the perimeter of the property. Additionally, the property is separated from adjacent properties
by roadways or canals. The proposed mixed-use and commercial buildings are an appropriate use for
the subject site.
9. Height of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and
nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The SMU zoning district is appropriate for low- to mid-rise developments that provide for medium
density residential uses. The district allows for a maximum building height of 55 feet and a
residential density of 20 dwelling units per acre for mixed-use projects. Building heights between 55
feet and 75 feet measured to the peak of the structure or any architectural details may be allowed
only for interior buildings (those buildings separated from property line by another project building or
use) but only as a conditional use. All four buildings have portions of their structure that extend
beyond the 55-foot threshold, so therefore all buildings would require conditional use approval. The
placement of the buildings within the Renaissance Commons property qualifies this phase for
conditional use review (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The proposed building heights
would not exceed the SMU zoning districts maximum height limitations and would compatible in
comparison with the neighboring commercial and residential properties of the other phases. The
applicant states, "the height of the structure (75 feet) is located toward the center of the
Renaissance Commons project to create a wedding cake approach to height. This allows lower
structures on the perimeter of the SMU zoning district to shield the higher structures, which would
conform to the conditions and intent of the SMU zoning district. Staff agrees.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The proposed development is expected to substantially increase the Citys tax-base. The proposed
development for the site is consistent with Policy 1.19.2 of the Comprehensive Plan in that the
project (as a whole) would provide both commercial and residential development and is expected to
generate approximately 1,090 jobs, and provide goods and services, as well as add to the range of
housing opportunities in the City. According to the applicant, "economically, the project will have a
positive effect on the tax receipts of the City and provide substantially more in tax revenue than
expense to the City. With the average cost of homes in excess of $200,000 each, the benefit to the
City is economically advantageous.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements, which apply to site, plans, as set forth in Chapter
19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan Review).
Renaissance Commons Phase VI COUS 04-008
Page 9
Memorandum No. PZ 04-267
With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project would comply with all requirements of
applicable sections of city code.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance
standards within Section 4.N. of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2; also, conformance to
the City of Boynton Beach noise Control Ordinance.
With incorporation of all conditions and staff recommendations contained herein, the proposed
buildings would exists in a manner that is in compliance with the above-referenced codes and
ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. The project would not create smoke, odors, fumes, or
toxic matter that would negatively impact the neighboring properties. It would be atypical for
residential developments to violate the City's performance standards.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the discussions contained herein, compliance with development regulations, and consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan, staff recommends that this request for conditional use be approved
subject to satisfying all conditions of approval as contained in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval.
Furthermore, pursuant to Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 11.2 Conditional Uses, a time limit is to be set
within which the proposed project is to be developed. Staff recommends that a period of one (1) year
be allowed to initiate this project.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renaissance Commons\Site Plans\Phase VI COUS Q4-008\Staff Report.doc
EXHIBIT "A"
RENAISSANCE COMMONS LOCATION MAP
-LDR.c.....'DnsIty--RHlthmtlaI .
MODR - Moderate Density Residential
LRC . Local Retell Commercial
.~::::~ .~.~.
S
LEGEND
.._u..-.-..--...--.F.uture Land.uses:.
o 200 <<10 100 1.200 ,.1ll!!1.t
~
_, EXHIBIT "B"
~ f .;~"..'.~1.'''..~. . ..
N TH C.ON<SRE55 AVENUE i
~
I
~
9
.:}
I-f-~-~"~~ ':':"'\.
, " r
i /.
+,:,~ ;.'."'I'.;-'~-u;.,....-=-~/.
I '- '-
I ..
, '
"
A
--
~;)
d
w
'@
B
"'"
RENAISSANCE COMMONS PHASE 'VI
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
"'.
Compson Associ:ates ofBoyn!on H. L.L.C.
MOURIZ
SALAZAR
ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS
\lO\JII'Z/s.ou.v.R"-'SSCCIAltS.hC
~
l- ~ 1
~ ~H
"
J
~
U3
1\
.r
~
'ili
.
Dll!!
I!1ll
OJ
C
r
Cl
Z
G)
'-
..
EXHIBIT "B"
.. .,i'
r' ~!l
g5
0:8
~
t~
~ ! ~il
o I !
\!II I
~ i
~
IJl
fx
!%
ar
C
r=
CJ
-
Z
Ci'
....
L
I
1-
t-
~
*-..
l~
~
~
I
4.
.'
EXHIBIT "B"
,..
~
I
I
+11
;f,-'
~
~
IJJ
C
r
o
Z
G)
c:...
~
l..}j
~
,
:c
,:1.
.=1
'Il
T-
EXHIBIT "B"
~ I
I
~~
I~~
I~
i I r
'1}J t.-
~.
ll"l;;! ~
0" "
'" it
OJ
C
r
CJ
Z
G)
c....
~'I
~~
t~
'I'
.\-,,!
..j,~
h
~~
~~
~+1l
I!.
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "B"
.AVE:
NOKTH CONGRESS AVE.
2
~
~
&
Vl
n
OJ
~
>-;
II
w
q
Q~
~~
~~~
~~~":::i
~;::~
~~~
~~O\
::::s
~t';.
~
~
~O)
j"r" . rU'1 Renaissance Commons m~ 11":tn ~
j1iJi ~ ; I-I
ip.r I! irll (1) g
i}.]~ N ~:I ;liU~
ill;' ~ 'I i'~ a [t~. (1)
Iii 0) I. f ~. ~
Il I! Boynton Beach, Florida
Ii
EXHIBIT "B"
~~~j-+ ")
X' of'
ffi- ~ ~
:-:: ,::::s ~
11- ~rt;
~~~
, ~~~
~t;jc\
- ~
· ~l"\.
~&\tif
gWJ::::s
tow. rill! Renaissance Commons m~ il'i:1:9 ~
i1il~ ,
f1ir .1 iq I (l) ::t.
qUI'" J, , rl il~U~ I~ ~ 'Ii !.~
Iii;' ~ i!
-!I OJ
lu Ii Boynton Beach, Florida
"
EXHIBIT "B"
If) ----
n
'"
!If
f;;'
~~
~~~
n,&~
~Cli~
, ~'"
~tijo\
- :::s
· ~l'\.
~&\~
~WI~
II
w
"<
i"!l~ ~
',lll! 0
r,ir
..lii .,.
iih~ ~
III 0)
r~i~Uli
II - '110 0 I
,! ,~," 6 0
Hi: ~ , ~It~
Renaissance Commons
Boynton Beach, Florida
IHiif" rill a: ~ ~
~J I I ~ ..... ~
~i I Jig' g
~
EXHIBIT "B"
Q
'\, .If "\ t'
\ ! L "~ ,# + \! \ ,v.".=....\
U + ,~: ~\
r
Vl ~
n
OJ
~
..... ~V:l
II
w Yi~~
q ~~~
~(\:i
~~C\
. ~<"\.
Z .~
0
;:+
::r
I~n.. ~ rill! Renaissance Commons n~1 nIl 5g ~
jlil! 0
r1ir- II
,.liI '" ~ <llliU~
iih,. ~ j! ~~ J f 8' CD
Iii <Jl ~ I oo.~
II .1 Boynton Beach, Florida
II ~
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
File number: CODS 04-008
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a November 2, 2004 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
. II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II,
Section 10-26 (a).
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
3. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5 .H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles
along Gatewav and Congress
4. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
5. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
6. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water
and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
7. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with
COA.doc
11/18/04
2
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
8. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid
for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the
Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan
approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
9. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
10. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
11. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer
services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for
the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also, provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon its
completion. Please be as accurate as possible.
12. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments:
13. At the time of permitting, please update the master sign program to include
building addresses and subdivision identification signs.
14. At time of permitting, all buildings shall include fire sprinkler systems in
accordance with NFP A 13 and / or 13R.
15. At time of permitting, all buildings six (6) stories or higher shall comply with
Ordinance 04-005. Further review for its applicability will be determined at
the time of permitting.
COA.doc
11/18/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
16. Smoke scrubbers are required if an exhaust fan is proposed within 10 feet of a
window or other building opening. Further review for its applicability will be
determined at the time of permitting.
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
17. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure
that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
18. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
19. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in
2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
20. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of
construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the
building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001
FBC.
21. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openinl!s oermitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
22. Every exterior wall within IS feet of a property line shall be equipped with
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
23. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are
signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida
shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
24. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (psf) on the plans for the building design.
25. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic
COA.doc
11/18/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
26. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the
location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject
request.
27. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
28. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The
building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable
building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual"
below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheets A-17, A-18. However,
add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of
the handicap accessible entrance doors to each building. The location of the
doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are
depicted on the site plan drawing. Submit floor plans for the commercial
buildings (retail/office/storage).
29. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the
future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act
Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within
the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
30. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
a. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
31. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations",
submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each
property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the
buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property
line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides.
32. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story
clubhouse, provide the following:
a. Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only?
b. Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to
the clubhouse?
c. Will there be any additional deliveries to the site?
d. Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to
the site?
COA.doc
11/18/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be
sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the
applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their
determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse.
33. Add to the floor plan drawing of the clubhouse a breakdown of the floor area.
The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, covered area
outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated for the
clubhouse and other uses located within the building. Specify the total floor
area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor spaces.
34. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily
available
35. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
36. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
37. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
38. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
COA.doc
11/18/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t))
39. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall
include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable
floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
a. Covered stairways;
b. Common area balconies;
c. Entrance area outside of a unit;
d. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
e. Garages (not part of a unit);
f. Elevator room;
g. Electrical room;
h. Mechanical room;
1. Trash room;
J. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
k. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
40. This structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a
threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the
architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best
of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications
comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the
local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
41. 348 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $228,288
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
COA.doc
11/18/04
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
42. This project requires conditional use approval from the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. If approved, staff recommends
that a period of one (1) year be allowed to initiate this project (obtain a
building permit).
43. Based on the proposed uses and respective building areas, the entire Phase VI
project would require 2,00 I parking spaces. However, only 1,804 spaces
would be provided, a deficiency of 197 parking spaces. This should be
labeled as such on the cover sheet and master plan tabular data. The number
of seats for the restaurant is limited to 1,231 seats, which in turn, is based
upon the gross floor area of the restaurant space. The applicant may submit a
shared parking analysis, which would be reviewed at the time of permitting.
The City may issue no building permits until the number of required parking
spaces is provided, the City approves the shared parking analysis, or relief is
granted.
44. The project has school concurrency approval for 1,700 units but there is an
inconsistency between the type and number of units between the School
District's approval letter and the proposed master plan's tabular data
(townhouses versus condominium). This is a minor inconsistency, so
therefore, at the time of permit review, the applicant will be required to
submit an updated School Concurrency approval letter that is consistent with
the number and types of dwelling units, approved through Phases One
through Six.
45. At the time of permitting, provide detail drawings of the entry wall and sign,
gazebos, trellis structure, fountains and clock tower. Staff recommends
installing a considerably more substantial structure at the entry drive off of
Gateway Boulevard.
46. The square footages for Building "L" do not match between Sheet SP-l and
Sheet A-7. Please make sure the square footages match for all building floor
plans versus the site plan and site data, and that the parking calculations
accurately correspond.
47. Bicycle racks should be placed appropriately throughout the site.
48. The plans indicate "storage" as a potential use. However, self-storage uses
require conditional use approval.
COA.doc
11/18/04
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
49. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded pnor to
issuance of a building permit for the project.
50. The traffic equivalency determination must be approved by the Palm Beach
County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes prior to the issuance of any
building permits (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.).
51. The usable open space plan shows that 4.55 acres would set aside as usable
open space. However, there are certain elements of the design, such as
terminal and landscaped parking islands that cannot be counted towards
usable open space. After discussing the pervious and impervious surfaces of
the plan, staff believes that the project still complies with code because at
least 3.62 acres of land would be set aside for usable open space. Therefore,
at the time of permitting, the applicant would be required to revise the plan to
accurately show the usable open space in order to comply with Chapter 2,
Section 6.GA of the Land Development Regulations.
52. Since the total number of seats for the restaurants is undetermined at this
time, the parking methodology would be based on the gross floor area (49,240
square feet), which would limit the project to 1,231 seats.
53. At the time of permitting, on the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-1), indicate
the proposed floor-area-ratio (excluding the garages) to ensure compliance
with Chapter 2, Section 6.GA.
54. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
55. All outdoor freestanding monument signs shall be located at least 10 feet
from the property line. If proposed near the spine road, then it must be
located at least from the outside of the curb along the spine road and access
road
56. At the time of permitting, indicate by note that there will be no provision for
outdoor patios, concrete patios, screen enclosures, or solid-roof enclosures.
57. On the landscape plan (sheet L2 of 6), the dimension of width of the
landscape buffer along Congress A venue and Gateway Boulevard must be at
least 25 feet in width. No vehicular encroachment may occur within these
buffers (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3. Revise the Cross-Section of the
Congress A venue buffer (on sheet L6 of 6) to show the above requirement.
58. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. On the landscape plan (L6 of 6),
indicate the total quantities for all proposed native plant material.
COA.doc
11/18/04
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
59. A bus stop and shelter should be depicted on Gateway Boulevard. Its location
should be coordinated with Palm Tran and its design should reflect the
architecture and materials used on adjacent buildings, not the standard Palm
Tran shelter.
60. Where possible, staff recommends the use of stone balustrades on the west
elevation of Building "J" (sheet A-lO) in the same manner that they are used
on the east elevation of Building "L" (sheet A-16).
61. Staff recommends adding extra trees and plant material with the landscape
buffers in order to help screen the parking garage openings of Buildings "K"
and "L" from Congress Avenue. This can be accomplished, in part, by
adding more trees to the public park in Phase III of Renaissance Commons.
62. The sign program, which includes the monument signs and all wall signage,
would require Planning & Development and City Commission review and
approval. No sign permits may be issued until the City approves the sign
program.
63. Staff recommends installing a more decorative monument "one way" sign
within the traffic circle as opposed to the standard mount.
64. Staff recommends installing a fountain feature in the center of the Phase
Three park.
65. Staff recommends adding benches within the 25-foot wide landscape buffers
adjacent to the Congress Avenue and Gateway Bouevard, where possible,
taking into consideration the proposed grading of the buffer.
66. Staff recommends installing the Royal Palm trees at 22 feet of gray wood
along the south fayade of Building "J" instead of the proposed 12 feet (of
gray wood).
67. Staff recommends using another variety of tree (such as Pigeon Plum or
Dahoon Holly) in the parking lot other than Seagrape due to the leaf drop and
messv nature.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS:
Comments:
68. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Comments:
69. To be determined.
MWR/elj
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renaissance Commons\Site Plans\Phase VI COUS 04-008\COA.doc
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kemmer, Rodger
Wednesday, November 17, 2004 3:03 PM
Johnson, Eric
Bingham, William
FW: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
Eric,
Our position remains the same. We identified several concerns involving these projects. We are not saying that we
support these projects as having no impact on our staff/infrastructure. We can support them with the understanding
additional resources are needed such as inspection personnel, opening of the new fire stations, and solutions provided
(funded) to our mapping and dispatching problems. While we anticipate that these issues will be sufficiently addressed,
we are not signing any blank checks here. These caveats should be identified to the commission, indeed that is what they
requested that we provide.
Ro~1" MI1fI1fe.I", CFPS
Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal
-----Original Message-----
From: Bingham, William
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 20042:42 PM
To: Johnson, Eric
Cc: Kemmer, Rodger
Subject: RE: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
Eric,
I know I've made this request before, but please forward this type in formation to Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Rodger
Kemmer and copy me. Rodger is the FD contact person on these issues and will be preparing the necessary impact
statement.
Thank you,
Bill Bingham
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:50 AM
To: Bingham, William; Gage, Marshall; Mazzella, Pete; Gomez, Nem
Cc: Breese, Ed; Rumpf, Michael
Subject: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
Gentlemen,
The Technical Review Committee has completed their review of the site plan (COUS 04-008)) known as the
Renaissance Commons Phase VI. This project is now scheduled for the November 23, 2004 P&Z meeting
and the December 7,2004 City Commission meeting. The site plan proposes four (4) buildings, namely
Buildings "I" through "L". This is a high intensity mixed-use development. It is the sixth and final phase of the
project known as Renaissance Commons. The subject property is an 18.126-acre parcel located on the
southeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. A set of plans were given to Laurinda Logan,
John Huntington, and Rick Lee for their review.
Building "I" consists of 25,718 square feet of retail, 12,300 square feet of restaurant, and 109,312 square feet
of office. Building "J" consists of 185 multi-family units and 6,836 square feet of retail. Building "K" consists of
12,454 square feet of retail, 22,959 square feet of restaurant, and 66,785 square feet of office. Building "L"
consists of 163 multi-family units, 13,637 square feet of retail and 19,981 square feet of restaurant.
For our staff report and per the request of the Commission, P&Z needs to know what kind of impacts these
townhouses will have on your level of service. In the past, you sent us something that indicates that your
current staff / infrastructure would be able to support the proposed townhouse project. Please confirm.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
1
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Gage, Marshall
Tuesday, November 16, 2004 2:43 PM
Johnson, Eric
RE: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
This project is a little more involved than past projects where we indicated we could support the development with existing
resources. We are presently facing the reality that we are at maximum capacity of our service limits. I will ask staff to
prepare a report on the impact that we would expect to feel from this project.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:50 AM
To: Bingham, William; Gage, Marshall; Mazzella, Pete; Gomez, Nem
Cc: Breese, Ed; Rumpf, Michael
Subject: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
Gentlemen,
The Technical Review Committee has completed their review of the site plan (COUS 04-008)) known as
the Renaissance Commons Phase VI. This project is now scheduled for the November 23, 2004 P&Z
meeting and the December 7, 2004 City Commission meeting. The site plan proposes four (4) buildings,
namely Buildings "I" through "L". This is a high intensity mixed-use development. It is the sixth and final
phase of the project known as Renaissance Commons. The subject property is an 18.126-acre parcel
located on the southeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. A set of plans were given
to Laurinda Logan, John Huntington, and Rick Lee for their review.
Building "I" consists of 25,718 square feet of retail, 12,300 square feet of restaurant, and 109,312 square
feet of office. Building "J" consists of 185 multi-family units and 6,836 square feet of retail. Building "K"
consists of 12,454 square feet of retail, 22,959 square feet of restaurant, and 66,785 square feet of office.
Building "L" consists of 163 multi-family units, 13,637 square feet of retail and 19,981 square feet of
restaurant.
For our staff report and per the request of the Commission, P&Z needs to know what kind of impacts
these townhouses will have on your level of service. In the past, you sent us something that indicates that
your current staff / infrastructure would be able to support the proposed townhouse project. Please
confirm. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Eric Johnson
1
,.
;I
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a
threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the
architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best
of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications
comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the
local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
Acknowledgement, will be addressed at the time of permit application set.
73. Sheet A-5 - Indicate the handicap parking space on the plan. A van
accessible parking space shall be provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-
4.1.2(5)(b ).
Noted, A-5 will contain a clearly marked van space
74. Sheet A-6 - Indicate on the plan if parking spaces are located on the roof.
The few spaces that are located on the "roof' occur only where garage top is flat.
75. Sheet A-7 - Building "L". A total of eight handicap parking spaces shall be
provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
More than eight (8) are provided, see plans for this building.
76. Design option "A" of the Fair Housing Act requires that all bathrooms in
the covered dwelling unit shall comply with the FHA. See Unit "B"
(Bellini) model.
Mismarked as an "A" and changed to a "B" on the A-17 sheet.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
77. 348 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $228,288
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
Acknowledged
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
78. Address the design, layout and landscaping associated with the south
elevation of Building "K" as the service areas (trash room, loading area,
etc.) are in full view of northbound traffic on Congress A venue
79. Indicate the berm at the north and the west perimeter buffers and provide
cross-section details from the right-of-way to the buildings.
Berm locations and cross section are provided on the landscape plans.
80. The Bougainvillea standard should be continued down the center of the
landscape median of the west entry from gateway.
"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
12
"
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
The plans have been revised as requested.
81. Suggest using another variety of tree in the parking lot than Seagrape due to
the leaf drop and messy nature.
Seagrape trees have been replaced with Gumbo Limbo in the parking areas.
82. Please indicate what the 36 (LI) trees depicted on Sheet L5 of 6 along the
quad walkway are, as the do not appear to be listed in the Plant List.
The plant list has been revised
83. A bus stop and shelter should be depicted on Gateway Boulevard. It's
location should be coordinated with Palm Tran and it's design should reflect
the architecture and materials used on adjacent buildings, not the standard
Palm Tran shelter. Developer shall work with palm tran to provide a bustop
as soon as possible
84. Can a more decorative monument "one way" sign be utilized within the
traffic circle as opposed to the standard mount? The final signs are being put
into a master signage design ( a courtesy copy will be available at Trc)
Please request discussion to review at the meeting
85. The lift station location and sidewalk location appear to conflict in the quad
between Sheets SP-l and C6.
The sidewalk has been revised.
86. Provide detail drawings of the entry wall and sign, gazebos, trellis structure,
fountains and clock tower. We are looking for very substantial structures at
the entry drive off of Gateway Boulevard, and the trellis structures do not
appear to provide that massing or scale.
Consistent with sim. structures on adjacent sites in the Master Plan, still being
considered. Massing of trellis structure and/or clock tower to be further discussed.
87. Provide a photometries plans and typical lighting fixtures to be utilized.
Photometric plan to be included with resubmittal. (see E I)
88. Where parking occurs on the roof level, do the parapet walls completely
obscure the cars?
Parapet walls and other architectural features will hide all roof level parking.
89. What is the proposed roofing material on the dome structure depicted on
Building "K"?
Dome is to be constructed of copper colored sheet metal that will not oxidize.
90. Signage locations on the buildings and as entry monuments are not depicted
on the plans. Please provide the necessary detail and indicate the
conformance with the proposed Sign Program for Renaissance Commons.
Please refer to the pre-approved signage package for the entire Master Plan.
91. Does the wall around the terrace at the NW comer of Building "K" have
continuous stone balustrades or do they terminate after the first two
columns? They should be continued around that portion of the terrace.
Yes, continuous stone balustrades.
92. Provide an updated Use Conversion Matrix depicting the various uses in
square footages and dwelling units, based upon the increase in dwelling
units from 1,551 to 1,683. Please see letter from Ruden McClosky dated 10-
1-04
93. It would seem appropriate to locate some handicap parking on the west side
of Building "K".
...
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
13
, 11
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Noted and completed, see updated site plan.
94. The square footages for Building "L" do not match between Sheet SP-l and
Sheet A-7. Please make sure the square footages match for all building floor
plans versus the site plan and site data, and that the parking calculations
accurately correspond.
Site data is now coordinated with individual building plans
95. Indicate the off-site improvements required by FDOT as part of the DRI
Amendment, for an additional westbound through lane at the intersection of
Gateway Boulevard and Congress A venue.
Off-site improvements and additional R.O.W. dedications are clearly marked
96. Bicycle racks should be placed appropriately throughout the site.
Site plan depicts one bike rack per building, four total.
97. Provide an explanation of the "storage use" as indicted on the floor plan of
Building "I" (sheet A-3 and A-4). Are these accessory storage spaces for
theoffice use or are they self-storage bays? Self-Storage requires
Conditional Use approval. The SMU also regulates Self Storage, which may
not exceed 20,000 square feet.
The second, third and fourth floors are being permitted as Office/Storage because
the eventual use is still undetermined. SMU regulations will be followed.
98. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to
issuance of a building permit for the project.
Noted, (re) platting will occur prior to permit application submittal.
99. Submit a traffic impact statement or equivalency determination prior to the
Technical Review Committee meeting. It must be approved by the Palm
Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes prior to the
issuance of any building permits (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). Please see letter
dated October 25th from Pinder Troutman
100. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
County regarding school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
IOJ. The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and
rights-of-way is subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works'
review and approval.
Acknowledged. We believe the plan meets the code with respect to these items.
102. On the master plan (sheet MP-l), identify each phase of the Renaissance
Commons project with a Roman numeral.
Noted and completed.
103. On the master plan (sheet MP-l), indicate the number of stories for each
proposed building within Phase VI only.
Noted and completed.
104. Depict the required setbacks in conformance with Suburban Mixed Use
(SMU) zoning category. In the SMU zoning district, the maximum
allowable setback along Congress A venue for Building "K" can be no more
than 90 feet (Chapter 2, Section 6.G.4.). On the master plan (sheet MP-l),
indicate the proposed setback of Building "K" from the west property line to
ensure compliance with this requirement. It appears that in certain areas
along Congress Avenue, the building is proposed with a setback of more
than 90 feet.
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
I 1101104
14
"
. II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Buildings are dimensioned to required 90'-0" setback. However it should be
noted that the structure is not proposed to be parallel to the property line and the
diagonal nature of the property line causes a setback greater than 90' -0" at other
locations on the~:e buildings (I and K). Dimension is marked on site plan.
105. A building height over 55 feet and up to 75 feet is allowed in the Suburban
Mixed Use zoning district but only as a conditional use. This project will
require conditional use approval from the Planning & Development Board
and City Commission. Provide written responses to the standards for
evaluating conditional uses.
Noted, building L & J will be subject to conditional use approval. Please see
attached responses for Standards for evaluating conditional use attached in the
rear of this package.
106. On the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-I), indicate the proposed floor-area-
ratio (excluding the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section
6.GA.
Floor area ratios will be determined once individual buildings are developed and
will be submitted as a part of the permit review sets.
107. On the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-I), the required parking for the
commercial use is incorrect because 106,510 square feet of commercial @ I
/ 200 equals 532 spaces; not 539 spaces. Also, the required parking for the
condominium buildings was not included in the parking methodology. Staff
calculated that a total of 1,748 parking spaces are required for the entire
project.
Site data has been re-evaluated and updated with corrected numbers, see SP-I.
108. Are dentist and / or doctor offices proposed in the future? Dentist and
doctor office require one (I) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor
area (Chapter 2, Section II.H.16.d.( 19).).
Noted. At present there are no plans to include a doctors/dentists office.
109. According to the Total Parcel Data - Phase VI cover sheet, this project
(Phase VI) will dedicate 20.29% for Usable Open Space in order to comply
with Chapter 2, Section 6.GA. However, it is unclear where this usable
open space occurs. Therefore, please provide a separate drawing within this
packet that delineates and highlights the usable open space areas.
A supplemental site plan will be provided as an exhibit at the TRC review meeting.
110. Include the north arrow (direction) on all floor plans.
Noted and completed.
Ill. The required parking for offices is based on gross floor area, which includes
closets, storage, and the like.
All parking calculations are base on gross floor areas since tenant spaces are still
undefined.
112. The ground floor plan of Building "J" (sheet A-I) shows only one (1) trash
room? Is this sufficient? The method of trash removal will be subject to
Public Works' review and approval.
Trash room added in Building J, see sheet A-I. Note dumpster pad added outside.
113. On the floor plans of Building "J" (sheet A-I and A-2), differentiate
between the spaces allocated for commercial parking versus residential
parking. The allocation should correspond with the site plan tabular data
(sheet SP-I) for Building "J".
....
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
15
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
There is no control point to limit retail parking vs. residential parking. Adequate
spaces occur on the ground level for retail use, remainder to residential above.
114. The "Unit Mix Chart Building "J" (sheet A-I) incorrectly indicates that 66
parking spaces are required for unit type "C"; 68 parking spaces are
required.
Noted and corrected.
115. The ground floor plan of Building "K" (sheet A-5) indicates that 24 parking
spaces are proposed, but when counted, only 23 spaces are provided. Please
clarify.
Noted and corrected.
116. The third floor plan of Building "K" (sheet A-5) indicates that 42 parking
spaces are proposed, but when counted, only 41 spaces are provided. Please
clarify.
Noted and corrected.
117. The "Unit Mix Chart Building L", as shown on sheet A-7, reflects incorrect
data as it relates the minimum number of required parking spaces for each
unit. Also, five (5) parking spaces are required for the recreation area
(Chapter 2, Section II.H.16.e.(12).). This information may impact the
project's total number of required and proposed parking on the site plan
(sheet AP-l).
Noted and corrected. However, please note that the only "recreational spaces" in
building L are the one B unit, used as an amenity and the pool area. This building
has a number of "extra" parking spaces that may be allocated to this area.
118. The "Unit Mix Chart Building L", as shown on sheet A-7, indicates that 33
dwelling units are proposed on LevelS, but when counted, 35 units are
provided. Please clarify.
Noted and corrected.
119. Explain "amenity Level 2" on the floor plan of Building "L" (sheet A-7).
This "B" unit on all floors above is to be alternatively used on the 2nd floor only as
an amenity space for the adjacent pool area. Plan shows typical floors 2-4.
120. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review
Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.).
All buildings will be displayed in color during the TRC meeting.
121. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.0.).
All Sherwin Williams colors are called out on elevation sheets; color charts
(scheduled finishes) by building are also submitted to clarify the intended palette.
122. Indicate the mean height dimension of the elevations of Building "J" (sheet
A-9).
All heights are clearly marked at varying points on all elevation sheets.
123. On the elevations for Building "K" (sheet A-13), please label them as
follows: "North Elevation - Gateway Boulevard" and "West Elevation -
Congress A venue".
Noted and completed.
124. On the elevation of Building "I" (sheet A-II), please label as follows:
"North Elevation - Gateway Boulevard".
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
1 \/0 \/04
16
,<;...
DEPARTMENTS
Noted and completed.
125. Will there be a provision for outdoor patios, concrete patios, screen
enclosures, or solid-roof enclosures? Please discuss these amenities with
staff prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting.
No provisions for patios, can be discussed during TRC meeting.
126. Is a security gate anticipated in the future? If so, show its location on the
first floor plan (sheet A-2.) and provide a detail indicating its dimensions,
materials used, exterior finish, and colors (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.).
No security gate is anticipated.
127. On the landscape plan (sheet L2 of 6), provide a dimension of width of the
landscape buffer along Congress A venue and Gateway Boulevard. The
SMU zoning district requires that they be at least 25 feet in width.
Noted.
128. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. On the landscape plan (L6 of 6),
indicate the total quantities for all proposed native plant material.
See sheet L6 of 6 for native calculations.
129. Where possible. staff recommends the use of stone balustrades on the west
elevation of Building "1" (sheet A-I 0) in the same manner that they are used
on the east elevation of Building "L" (sheet A-16).
Noted and corrected.
130. Staff recommends adding extra trees and plant material with the landscape
buffers in order to help screen the parking garage openings of Buildings
"K" and "L" from Congress A venue. This can be accomplished, in part, by
adding more trees to the public park in Phase III of Renaissance Commons.
Additional trees and shrubs have been provided to buffer these areas.
INCLUDE
REJECT
~~[\ s{-ee
15t REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Project name: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
File number: NWSP 04-015
Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with a September 22. 2004 Planning and Zoning
ki
Denartment date stamn mar 'n~.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster. ~.
Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge
of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.2_b.)
2. Indicate how trash is to be accessed by Solid Waste. Most shown trash rooms
do not appear to be accessible. V'
3. Only one trash room is shown for the residential component of Phase VI. L..,../ V
This is not adequate
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance V
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, /
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details
6. Show all off-site improvements needed for this project. These plans depict /"
work that will require review, approval and permits from outside agencies.
7. Add "One-Way (wlRight Arrow)" signs in the median across from the two /
egress points to Renaissance Commons Blvd. South (along the east side of
Phase VI.)
./
8. Delete the northbound to eastbound right turn arrow south of the driveway, 1/'
south of the main entrance from Gateway Blvd. Add a "No Right Turn"
sign in advance of this driveway
9. Add a "Stop" sign and stop bar at the east end of the median of Commons
Way. Extend median by using striping at this location. Coordinate l/
landscaping south (phase ill) of this intersection to ensure no line of sight
problems.
1/
10. Staff recommends pulling back the Type "D" curb (decrease radius) at the J
outside of the northwest comer drive aisle adjacent to the northwest comer
of Building 12 to provide more room for turning movements.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
It. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, /
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be v"
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
,
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional /
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
14. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter /
4, Section 7.B.4.) Provide photometries as part of your TRC plan
submittals
15. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light /'
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR,
Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.t.b.)
16. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to /
roadways to ensure no vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as
Fire/Rescue and Solid Waste.
17. Green Malayan Coconut Palms are listed under "Shrubs." They should be /
placed in the "Palm Tree" section.
18. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, ~
Section 5 .H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles
along Gateway and Congress
19. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there l/
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.).
20. Landscaped areas shall be protected from vehicular encroachment by a
continuous, raised curb (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.A. and V
Chapter 22, Article II, Section E.)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
21. The medians on Congress and Gateway have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the ~
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response
and add a note to the plans with the above stated information.
22. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways /'
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P).
23. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in /
LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.
24. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the /
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
25. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in /
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
26. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer
services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date ~
for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible
27. All utility easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as
well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which
appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, V
palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements.
Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and
branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the
foreseeable future_ The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives
public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
28. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUD~ REJECT
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). ./
29. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) /
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
30. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be ,/
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
31. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be
included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on ~
the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The
easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
CODE Sec. 26-33(a).
32. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer ./
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
33. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department /
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
34. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please ~
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition. Our review indicates that
the south and east wings of Building #14 (sheet 6 of 7) are inadequately
covered to meet this requirement.
35. In accordance with the Utilities Engineering Design Manual, Rolled Type ~
"K" copper service lines are required if either terminal end of the service is
located under pavement.
36. In accordance with the Utilities Engineering Design Manual private services /
shall not cross over water mains. Services for Buildings 12 and 13 depict
meters and RPZ's services crossing back over the main. Adjust meter and
RPZ locations to utilize parking islands adjacent to these buildings.
Additionally it does not appear as though each proposed space has a meter.
Will some businesses be sharing meters?
37. The number of grease traps shown on the plans does not appear adequate to V
serve the number of proposed restaurants.
38. The number of proposed sanitary sewer laterals does not match the number
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
of water meters proposed and does not seem adequate to handle sanitary
flows. /
39. The City of Boynton Beach will own and operate only the main line t/
portions of the sanitary sewer system shown on these plans. All sanitary
services will be private.
40. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction J
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates);
they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: Forthcoming
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
41. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional ,/
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
42. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as /
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
43. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined /
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
44. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of /
construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the
building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001
FBC.
45. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall /
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
46. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with ,/
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
/'
47. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the l../
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
48. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the /'
loads and forces encountered per the 200 I FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
49. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic /"
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
50. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents /"
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
51. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the V
proposed construction.
52. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of /
the handicap accessible parking spaces. The quantity of the spaces shall be
consistent with the regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. The accessible
parking spaces that serve a use shall be located on the shortest safety
accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance.
The 2001 FBC states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall
have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the
accessible entrance. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2(5),4.3, and 4.6.
53. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in V
each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall
heil!ht of each building
54. Add to each building/tenant space that is depicted on the drawing titled site ~ /
plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the
handicap accessible entrance doors to each building/tenant space. 2001
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
55. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The
building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable ~
building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" .
below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheets A-17, A-18. However,
add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location
of the handicap accessible entrance doors to each building. The location of
the doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are
depicted on the site plan drawing. Submit floor plans for the commercial
buildinl!s (retail/office/storage). .J'
56. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates 7
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each
building/tenant space. The installed symbol, reauired along the path, shall
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
7
DEPARTMENTS
start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible
entrance doors to each building/tenant space. The symbol shall represent the
location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or
other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not
compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked
vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The
minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at
curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than
44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol
represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with
2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (parking and
Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the
applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify
that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in
the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to,
providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
57. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units
covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the
requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally
distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking
structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
58. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for
the future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing
Act Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms
within the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
59. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum
number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code
section that is applicable to the computations.
60. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the
project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol
shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the
detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed
along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user
to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify
on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width
required by the Code is 44 inches). Add text that would indicate that the
symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in
compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act. Please note
that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing fmish grade
INCLUDE REJECT
~
/
/
/~
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
elevations along the path of travel.
61. IdentifY within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. VerifY that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site /"
r:J1a that address the following issues:
a. From the FIRM map, identifY in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specifY the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b. IdentifY the floor elevation that the design professional has established for
the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the
drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans).
62. On the drawing titled site plan identifY the property line. \/"
63. As required by the CBBCO, Part ill titled "Land Development Regulations",
submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each /
property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the
buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the
property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all
sides.
64. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story
clubhouse, provide the following:
a. Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? t/
b. Will the reside!1ts have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to
the clubhouse?
c. Will there be any additional deliveries to the site?
d. Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to
the site?
Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be
sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the
applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their
determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse.
65. Add to the floor plan drawing of the clubhouse a breakdown of the floor ~ ~
area. The area breakdown shall specifY the total area of the building,
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area
dedicated for the clubhouse and other uses located within the building.
SpecifY the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms
and floor spaces.
...
66. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may /
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are /
readily available
67. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that ../
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
68. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and /~
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
69. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. /
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
70. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of /
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
71. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown V
shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the
applicable floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
a. Covered stairways;
b. Common area balconies;
c. Entrance area outside of a unit;
d. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
e. Garages (not part of a unit);
f. Elevator room;
g. Electrical room;
h. Mechanical room;
1. Trash room;
J. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
10
-2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
k. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
72. This structure meets the defmition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements ofF.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the /
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a
threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the
architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best
of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications
comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the
local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
73. Sheet A-5 - Indicate the handicap parking space on the plan. A van /'
accessible parking space shall be provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-
4.1.2(5)(b).
/'
74. Sheet A-6 - Indicate on the plan if parking spaces are located on the roof. V
75. Sheet A-7 - Building "L". A total of eight handicap parking spaces shall be V
provided per the 2001 FBC, Section ll-4.l.2(5)(a).
76. Design option "A" of the Fair Housing Act requires that all bathrooms in /
the covered dwelling unit shall comply with the FHA. See Unit "B"
(Bellini) model.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
77. 348 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $228,288
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this Dhase.
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
78. Address the design, layout and landscaping associated with the south
... .... '~-T',,, . . ...
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
11
DEPARTMENTS
2
elevation of Building "K" as the service areas (trash room, loading area,
etc.) are in full view of northbound traffic on Con ess Avenue
79. Indicate the berm at the north and the west perimeter buffers and provide
cross-section detai s from the ri -Of-walJ the buildings.
The ougainvillea stand should be continued down the center of the
landscape median of the west entry from gateway.
81.
Suggest using another variety of tree in the parking lot than Seagrape due to
the leafdr p d,messynature. p ~~ r~t:(.~~.
l~ ec~ 1/[ . LI' .
Please indicate what the 36 (LI) trees depIcted on Sheet L5 of 6 along th
quad walkway are, as the do not appear to be listed in the Plant List.
83.
A bus stop and shelter should be depicted on Gateway Boulevard. It's
location should be coordinated with Palm Tran and it's design should reflect
the architecture and materials used on adjacent buildings, not the standard
Palm Tr shelter. ,
. .l\.u f -to U~
Can a mo decorative monument "one way" sign be utilized within the
traffic circle as 0 osed to the standard mount?
The lift station location and sidewalk location appear to conflict in the quad
between Sheets SP-l and C6.
.-;
L.
86. Provide detail drawings of the entry wall and sign, gazebos, trellis structure,
fountains and clock tower. We are looking for very substantial structures at
the entry drive off of Gateway Boulevard, and the trellis structures do not
appear to provide that massing or scale.
Provide a photometrics plans and typical lighting fixtures to be utilized.
Where parking occurs on the roof level, do the parapet walls completely
obscure the cars?
What is the proposed roofing material on the dome structure depicted on
Building "K"?
z
Signage locations on the buildings and as entry monuments are not depicted
on the plans. Please provide the necessary detail and indicate the
conformance with the proposed Sign Program for Renaissance Commons.
~"""
Does th wall around the e ace at the comer of Building "K" have
continuous stone balustrades or do they terminate after the first two
columns? The should be continued around that ortion of the terrace.
92. Provide an updated Use Conversion Matrix depicting the various uses in
square footages and dwelling units, based upon the increase in dwelling
units from 1,551 to 1,683.
INCLUDE REJECT
~
v
~
/
v
V"
v
v
v
~
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
12
?
94.
DEPARTMENTS
It would seem appropriate to locate some handicap parking on the west side
of Building "K".
The square footages for Building "L" do not match between Sheet SP-l and
Sheet A-7. Please make sure the square footages match for all building floor
plans versus the site plan and site data, and that the parking calculations
accurately correspond.
Indicate the off-site improvements required by FDOT as part of the DRI
Amendment, for an additional westbound through lane at the intersection of
Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue.
Bicycle racks should be placed appropriately throughout the site.
Provide an explanation of the "storage use" as indicted on the floor plan of
Building "I" (sheet A-3 and A-4). Are these accessory storage spaces for
the office use or are they self-storage bays? Self-Storage requires
Conditional Use approval. The SMU also regulates Self Storage, which may
c"
not exceed 20,000 s uare feet. ~
Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to
issuance of a building permit for the project.
Submit a traffic impact statement or equivalency determination prior to the
Technical Review Committee meeting. It must be approved by the Palm
Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes prior to the
issuano. of y building p=.fChapter 4. Section 8.F.).
The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
County regarding school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building
ermit.
The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and
rights-of-way is subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works'
eview and a roval.
On the master plan (sheet MP-l), identify each phase of the Renaissance
Commons project with a Roman numeral.
103. On the master plan (sheet MP-l), indicate the number of stories for each
proposed buildin~ witkin Phase VI only.
R.q ctu.J1,-
l04. Depict the required setbacks in conformance with Suburban Mixed Use
(SMU) zoning category. In the SMU zoning district, the maximum
allowable setback along Congress Avenue for Building "K" can be no more
than 90 feet (Chapter 2, Section 6.GA.). On the master plan (sheet MP-l),
indicate the proposed setback of Building "K" from the west property line to
ensure compliance with this requirement. It appears that in certain areas
along Congress Avenue, the building is proposed with a setback of more
than 90 feet.
A building height over 55 feet and up to 75 feet is allowed in the Suburban
INCLUDE REJECT
~
v
i/
v
/
v
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Mixed Use zoning district but only as a conditional use. This project will ~
require conditional use approval from the Planning & Development Board
and City Commission. Provide written responses to the standards for
~valuating conditional uses.
~On the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-1), indicate the proposed floor-area- V
ratio (excluding the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section
6.G.4.
107. On the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-1), the required parking for the
commercial use is incorrect because 106,510 square feet of commercial @ 1
/200 equals 532 spaces; not 539 spaces. Also, the required parking for the v"
condominium buildings was not included in the parking methodology. Staff
calculated that a total of 1,748 parking spaces are required for the entire
project.
108. Are dentist and / or doctor offices proposed in the future? Dentist and ~
doctor office require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor
area (Chapter 2, Section 11.H.16.d.(19).).
109. According to the Total Parcel Data - Phase VI cover sheet, this project
(phase VI) will dedicate 20.29% for Usable Open Space in order to comply /
with Chapter 2, Section 6.G.4. However, it is unclear where this usable
open space occurs. Therefore, please provide a separate drawing within this
packet that delineates and highlights the usable open space areas. ~
110. Include the north arrow (direction) on all floor plans. L,/""
111. The required parking for offices is based on gross floor area, which includes V
closets, storage, and the like.
112. The ground floor plan of Building "J" (sheet A-I) shows only one (1) trash
room? Is this sufficient? The method of trash removal will be subject to /'
Public Works' review and approval.
113. On the floor plans of Building "J" (sheet A-I and A-2), differentiate
between the spaces allocated for commercial parking versus residential ~
parking. The allocation should correspond with the site plan tabular data
(sheet SP-1) for Building "J".
114. The "Unit Mix Chart Building "J" (sheet A-I) incorrectly indicates that 66 IV
parking spaces are required for unit type "C"; 68 parking spaces are
required.
115. The ground floor plan of Building "K" (sheet A-5) indicates that 24 parking
spaces are proposed, but when counted, only 23 spaces are provided. Please /"
clarify.
116. The third floor plan of Building "K" (sheet A-5) indicates that 42 parking /'
spaces are proposed, but when counted, only 41 spaces are provided. Please
clarify.
117. The "Unit Mix Chart Building L", as shown on sheet A-7, reflects incorrect ,/
data as it relates the minimum number of required parking spaces for each
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
14
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
unit. Also, five (5) parking spaces are required for the recreation area t/
(Chapter 2, Section 11.H.16.e.(12).). This information may impact the
project's total number of required and proposed parking on the site plan
(sheet AP-l).
118. The "Unit Mix Chart Building L", as shown on sheet A-7, indicates that 33 V
dwelling units are proposed on LevelS, but when counted, 35 units are
provided. Please clarify.
119. Explain "amenity Level 2" on the floor plan of Building "L" (sheet A-7). a/
120. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review /'
Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
121. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's /
name, and color codes. Staff r@~o......rnpnr1c;: llc;:ing <> ('olor ~dl@Qyle (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
122. Indicate the mean height dimension of the elevations of Building "J" (sheet V
A-9).
123. On the elevations for Building "K" (sheet A-B), please label them as v/
follows: "North Elevation - Gateway Boulevard" and "West Elevation-
Congress Avenue".
124. On the elevation of Building "I" (sheet A-ll), please label as follows: /
"North Elevation - Gateway Boulevard".
125. Will there be a provision for outdoor patios, concrete patios, screen ~
enclosures, or solid-roof enclosures? Pleas@ discuss these amenitie'il ''lith
st M "' - . . ..... ~ meetinQ:.
", 04....
126. Is a security gate anticipated in the future? If so, show its location on the /
first floor plan (sheet A-2.) and provide a detail indicating its dimensions,
materials used, exterior finish, and colors (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
127. On the landscape plan (sheet L2 of 6), provide a dimension of width of the /
landscape buffer along Congress A venue and Gateway Boulevard. The
SMU zoning district requires that they be at least 25 feet in width.
128. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. On the landscape plan (L6 of 6),
indicate the total quantities for all proposed native plant material.
129. Where possible, staff recommends the use of stone balustrades on the west
elevation of Building "J" (sheet A-IO) in the same manner that they are used
on the east elevation of Building "L" (sheet A-16).
'"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
15
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
130. Staff recommends adding extra trees and plant material with the landscape
buffers in order to help screen the parking garage openings of Buildings
"K" and "L" from Congress A venue. This can be accomplished, in part, by
adding more trees to the public park in Phase ill of Renaissance Commons.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renaissance Commons\Site Plans\Phase VI\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Logan, Laurinda
Tuesday, November 02,2004 1 :21 PM
Johnson, Eric
Renaissance Phase VI
Please add the following comment to Public Works - General:
Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and
handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a).
This will replace the three comments I rejected.
L.CiV
1
'. '
~st REVIEW COMMENTS'''''
......,
New Site Plan
\it
..
. ,
.' ~ . "
i ~ i I ,.
Project name: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
File number: NWSP 04-015
Reference: 151 review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a September 22. 2004 Planning and Zoning
Deoartment date stamo marking.
,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
comments( '\ 1\ : ild,(['\ li,'j I)..,:', - )
! '1' . ( . \ l\~
1. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster. l.~r\- ..-
Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge
of the dumpster pad.) (LOR, Chapter 2, Section II,I.2.b.) \ii . ~ I
\
Area in SW comer of building 1 has been adjusted to accommodate a 60'0" ,
radius, all other turning radius clearly marked. \
2. Indicate how trash is to be accessed by Solid Waste. Most shown trash rooms
to not appear to be accessible.
Each building contains at least one trash room that is accessible. Areas that are \
not will have trash relocated to a common dumpster pad (added) or another room. I
i
3. Only one trash room is shown for the residential component of Phase VI. I
j
This is not adequate l'
Additional trash rooms have been added in residential structures.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance lOt ._--,,~
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering I' . .
\; \ l {. ( I'~
A study has been contracted and will be submitted for review. See pinder
troutman letter dated October 25th 2004
5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control , .
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, '\.1-(' .,
i \{'- . -.
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the '. {.
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.1); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details
Pavement marking and signage is shown on the site and civil plans. The loading
areas have been striped as requested. I
6. Show all off-site improvements needed for this project. These plans depict I
work that will require review, approval and permits from outside agencies. !
,
Offsite improvements required with the construction of Phase 6 will include a
right turn lane on Gateway. Gateway Boulevard is a City road. i
7. Add "One-Way (w/Right Arrow)" signs in the median across from the two !
egress points to Renaissance Commons Blvd. South (along the east side of
Phase VI.)
The one-way signs have been added. \
8. Delete the northbound to eastbound right turn arrow south of the driveway, "
lo' ~ , '
south of the main entrance from Gateway Blvd. Add a "No Right Turn" "
sign in advance of this driveway I
The arrow has been removed and sign added as requested.
9. Add a "Stop" sign and stop bar at the east end of the median of Commons '.h
~
'<1
1\ .1
","
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
2
DEPARTMENTS
Way. Extend median by using striping at this location. Coordinate
landscaping south (Phase III) of this intersection to ensure no line of sight
problems.
The stop bar and stop s!gn have been added to the Phase 3 plans and shown as
existing on the Phase 6 plans.
10. Staff recommends pulling back the Type "D" curb (decrease radius) at the
outside of the northwest comer drive aisle adjacent to the northwest comer
of Building 12 to provide more room for turning movements.
The drive aisle has been revised as requested.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
11. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
Note has been added to the site plan and engineering plans (detail sheet).
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Noted.
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
Noted.
14. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter
4, Section 7.B.4.) Provide photometries as part of your TRC plan
submittals
Provided as a part of the revised submittal. See E 1
15. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR,
Chapter 23, Article II, Section A. I .b.)
Trees and palms have been positioned to eliminate conflicts with site lighting.
16. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to
roadways to ensure no vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as
Fire/Rescue and Solid Waste.
Large canopy trees have been moved away from the roadway so avoid conflicts
with large vehicles
17. Green Malayan Coconut Palms are listed under "Shrubs." They should be
olaced in the "Palm Tree" section.
'"
INCLUDE
.
{tell
\:
REJECT
I" .'
L"I'\
, \
'.
\:
ki~~' :; -
" \ ,--
\,
'j
lv~\~.-:-'~ ~ i .. 1
,
i
"
~' 1!
t
\~
"
..'"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
3
DEPARTMENTS
The plant list has been revised
18. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles
along Gateway and Congress
The FDOT sight triangles are now shown. '
] 9. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.).
Noted.
20. Landscaped areas shall be protected from vehicular encroachment by a
continuous, raised curb (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.A. and
Chapter 22, Article II, Section E.)
Curbing has been provided around all landscape areas.
21. The medians on Federal Highway and the chase area(s) immediately south
of this project have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the
City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant
material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or
replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of
Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
plans with the above stated information.
Ac know ledged.
22. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P).
Walkways across driveways are shown as pavers.
23. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified In
LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.
See the notes on the engineering detail sheet.
24. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
Acknowledged.
25. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction'
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Acknowledged.
UTILITIES
Comments:
26. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer
services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date
for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine
INCLUDE
lV.( .
\: \' / . ....j{.' l
\11 ,. .
\ I' t.. .
-tul .. .'~ _. ,.(
\ \ V( '(
\ ~
'),
F
I
\
~,~:
,
REJECT
/1("''\'" .
'. . \ \' ,'0
\ It.,.
/'.1
; \
I
\
I
,
'l
i
~'
'-
'"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/0 1/04
4
DEPARTMENTS
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
Permit application - January 2005
Start Construction - May 2005
First Water Meter - December 2005 - COMPSON TO REVIEW
27. All utility easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as
well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which
appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general,
palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements.
Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and
branches will not impact those utilities within the easement In the
foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives
public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
Acknow ledged.
28. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
Acknowledged.
29. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire Flow calculations will be provided at the time of permit application.
30. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
Acknowledged.
31. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be
included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on
the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The
easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
CODE Sec. 26-33(a).
The 12 foot utility easements are shown on the engineering plans. We
acknowledge that they shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City.
32. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Acknowledged.
33. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Acknowledged.
34. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
INCLUDE
~l,;i ,j; I.
\ !'-
, \
!
\
\
i
,
I
!
,
!
i
i
'{?
~J~! Il 1
\
I
I
T
,
,
~ ~ M;..:f
REJECT
(;~:\ ,.-
'\ \ If" ~.
,,'j
\f
li=\.--:.---
\ \ 1/. i
\
"
. ,1
\
'.
\' ,i
........-----
"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
I I/O 1/04
5
,~
",
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
building be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please "
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition. Our review indicates that .b 1 . '
;
the south and east wings of Building #14 (sheet 6 of 7) are inadc;quately
covered to meet this requirement.
Two fire hydrants have been added on the east and south side of building 14 and I
the fire hydrant on the west side has been located further south.
35. In accordance with the Utilities Engineering Design Manual, Rolled Type I
"K" copper service lines are required if either terminal end of the service is i
located under pavement. I
The water services have been labeled as copper and note #5 have been added on
sheet C7. I
i
36. In accordance with the Utilities Engineering Design Manual private services ,
I
I
shall not cross over water mains. Services for Buildings 12 and 13 depict ,
meters and RPZ's services crossing back over the main. Adjust meter and
RPZ locations to utilize parking islands adjacent to these buildings. !
Additionally it does not appear as though each proposed space has a meter.
Will some businesses be sharing meters?
The water services have been relocated so as not to cross over the water main.
Preliminarily, some retail spaces will share a water meter. \
37. The number of grease traps shown on the plans does not appear adequate to
serve the number of proposed restaurants. ,
Additional grease traps are shown on the Preliminary Engineering plans.
38. The number of proposed sanitary sewer laterals does not match the number :
i
of water meters proposed and does not seem adequate to handle sanitary
flows.
A few additional sewer laterals have been shown. The number and location of the
water and sewer services will depend upon the final mechanical design.
39. The City of Boynton Beach will own and operate only the main line i
portions of the sanitary sewer system shown on these plans. All sanitary
services will be private. .""~
\t
Acknowledged.
40. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction \r{\
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in ,
. .."'" ~ i ,;f
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design . i ( ,. .
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates);
they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Acknowledged.
FIRE
Comments: Forthcoming
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
,
, .. / I C~.{~ ,!".!H>., c.,- ...c't.0,.,-
~%~ 1 sl REVIEW COMMENTS J C:':::;~:;t;< r,-."e--je/
[I { fife iLl New Site Plan ~ ~ f"<' A}U
Project name: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
File number: NWSP 04-015
Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with a September 22. 2004 Planning and Zoning
Deoartment date stamo marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster.
Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge
of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.2.b.)
2. Indicate how trash is to be accessed by Solid Waste. Most shown trash rooms
do not appear to be accessible.
3. Only one trash room is shown for the residential component of Phase VI.
This is not adequate
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic En~neerinj:{
5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawinj:{s "K" Series for strioinj:{ details
6. Show all off-site improvements needed for this project. These plans depict
work that will require review, approval and permits from outside agencies.
7. Add "One-Way (wlRight Arrow)" signs in the median across from the two
egress points to Renaissance Commons Blvd. South (along the east side of
Phase VI.)
8. Delete the northbound to eastbound right turn arrow south of the driveway,
south of the main entrance from Gateway Blvd. Add a "No Right Turn"
sign in advance of this driveway
9. Add a "Stop" sign and stop bar at the east end of the median of Commons
Way. Extend median by using striping at this location. Coordinate
landscaping south (phase III) of this intersection to ensure no line of sight
problems.
10. Staff recommends pulling back the Type "D" curb (decrease radius) at the
outside ofthe northwest comer drive aisle adjacent to the northwest comer
of Building 12 to provide more room for turning movements.
, ...
. ,
'-1st REVIEW COMMENTS~.. ).ICC
New Site Plan ///1---~
'4)
Project name: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
File number: NWSP 04-015
Reference: ] 51 review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a September 22. 2004 Planning and Zoning
Deoartment date stamo marking
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
]. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster.
Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge
of the dumpster pad.) (LOR, Chapter 2, Section]] .1.2.b.)
Area in SW comer of building J has been adjusted to accommodate a 60'0"
radius, all other turning radius clearly marked.
2. Indicate how trash is to be accessed by Solid Waste. Most shown trash rooms
to not appear to be accessible.
Each building contains at least one trash room that is accessible. Areas that are
not will have trash relocated to a common dumpster pad (added) or another room.
3. Only one trash room is shown for the residential component of Phase VI.
This is not adequate
Additional trash rooms have been added in residential structures.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
A study has been contracted and will be submitted for review. See pinder
trout man letter dated October 251h 2004
5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section] ] .1); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details
Pavement marking and signage is shown on the site and civil plans. The loading
areas have been striped as requested.
6. Show all off-site improvements needed for this project. These plans depict
work that will require review, approval and permits from outside agencies.
Offsite improvements required with the construction of Phase 6 will include a
right turn lane on Gateway. Gateway Boulevard is a City road.
7. Add "One-Way (w/Right Arrow)" signs in the median across from the two
egress points to Renaissance Commons Blvd. South (along the east side of
Phase VI.)
The one-way signs have been added.
8. Delete the northbound to eastbound right turn arrow south of the driveway,
south of the main entrance from Gateway Blvd. Add a "No Right Turn"
sign in advance of this driveway
The arrow has been removed and sign added as requested.
9. Add a "Stoo" sign and stop bar at the east end of the median of Commons
~
1
'.
....
'"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
6
1
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
41. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not t/
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
Acknowledgement.
42. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. / .
Buildings K and I, 3 and 4 floors respectively will be type V; Buildings J & L, the
6 story mixed-use residential buildings, will be type II. Noted on plans.
43. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. V
Occupancy Group B (some are mixed-use but strictest interpretation applies).
44. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of
construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the ~
building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 200 I
FBC.
Noted, per the above comments on occupancy.
45. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and / .
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Noted on all elevation sheets, calculations to follow at time of permit application.
46. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2. V
No part of the enclosed structure is within 15' -0" of the property line.
47. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that V
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
Acknowledged and will be submitted at time of permit.
48. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table ~
1604.1. Indicate the live load (psf) on the plans for the building design.
Buildings will be structurally developed (live loads) prior to permit application.
49. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic J
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
Acknowledged, all occupied spaces will have a fire sprinkler system.
50. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents V
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
Phase VI has clearly marked parameters for the construction of the four buildings. /
51. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the 'v
proposed construction.
"
7
1.
~
1
1
'"
""
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
7
DEPARTMENTS
1
Acknowledgement.
52. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of
the handicap accessible parking spaces. The quantity of the spaces shall be
consistent with the regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. The accessible
parking spaces that serve a use shall be located on the shortest safety
accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance.
The 2001 FBC states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall
have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the
accessible entrance. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2(5),4.3, and 4.6.
All accessible parking spaces are clearly marked with the universally accepted
symbol and adjacent striping. These spaces have been placed at shortest routes.
53. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in
each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall
height of each building
Buildings are marked on the Master Plan, Site Plan and Elevations for heights.
54. Add to each building/tenant space that is depicted on the drawing titled site
plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the
handicap accessible entrance doors to each building/tenant space. 2001
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
All entry doors are accessible openings and routes to each are depicted in site plan.
55. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The
building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable
building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual"
below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheets A-17, A-18. However,
add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location
of the handicap accessible entrance doors to each building. The location of
the doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are
depicted on the site plan drawing. Submit floor plans for the commercial
buildings (retail/office/storage).
Note has been added on those sheets, floor plans for tenant spaces are pending.
56. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each
building/tenant space. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall
start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible
entrance doors to each building/tenant space. The symbol shall represent the
location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or
other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not
compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked
vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The
minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at
curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than
44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol
represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with
2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and
Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the
applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify
that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in
the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to,
'(
INCLUDE
/
REJECT
t/
t/
~
I
1.
1......
f2
(
..
...
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
8
DEPARTMENTS
~
providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
Path of accessible travel is delineated on the site plan from accessible parking to
building entrances. Ramps and required clearances have all been considered.
57. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units
covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the
requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally
distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. sUlface parking, parking
structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
There are an abundance of accessible spaces provided, exceeding the minimum.
58. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for
the future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing
Act Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms
within the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
Acknowledged and will be submitted as part of the permit application.
59. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum
number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code
section that is applicable to the computations.
'- Noted (with calculations) on each buildings floor plans - see A-I, A-3, A-5, A-7
60. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the
project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol
shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the
detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed
along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user
to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify
on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width
required by the Code is 44 inches). Add text that would indicate that the
symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed In
compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act. Please note
that at time of permit reVIew, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified In the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
Noted on A-I and A-7, via connection on the 2nd floor from building L to J.
61. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
Gata that address the following issues:
(') a. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
, that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b. Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for
the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the
drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans).
Finish floor elevation of each building is currently assumed at + 14.25 NGVD
~
..
.,
INCLUDE
v
\ It
I.(t
~
REJECT
~
/'
/
v
..
'"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
11/01/04
9
~
DEPARTMENTS
62. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
Noted on the SP-I sheet and in the Civil Engineering drawings
I 63. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations",
submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each
property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the
buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the
property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all
sides.
Buildings along Congress and Gateway show the 90' -0" setback
64. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story
clubhouse, provide the following:
a. Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only?
Restricted.
b. Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to
the clubhouse?
/
INCLUDE
No.
1
c. Will there be any additional deliveries to the site?
No.
d. Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to
the site?
No.
Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be
sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the
applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their
determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse.
Noted, to be submitted under separate cover
65. Add to the floor plan drawing of the clubhouse a breakdown of the floor
area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building,
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area V
dedicated for the clubhouse and other uses located within the building.
Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms
and floor spaces.
Area of clubhouse amenity is labeled and noted on site plan and sheet A-I.
66. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are
readily available
Irrigation water will come from on site lakes and is so noted on the landscape V
plans.
67. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 V
The SFWMD water use permit for this phase has already been obtained.
68. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be vi
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
v
REJECT
v
.... .'
/"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
I I/O 1/04
10
(
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how V
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Acknowledged.
69. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The /
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
Acknowledged.
70. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan. V
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
Acknowledged.
71. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown
shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the
applicable floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkwa~s;
a. Covered stairways;
b. Common area .balconies;. ~
c. Entrance area outside ora unit;
d. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
e. Garages (not part of a unit);
f. Elevator room;
0 Electrical room;
b'
h. Mechanical room;
I. Trash room;
j. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
k. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
Please see site information on cover sheet and updated site data on SP-l. J
72. This structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71 (7) /
and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
(
.1[
..
....
"'"
Final Responses Phase VI.doc
I I/O 1/04
II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a
threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and detai Is shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the v/
architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best
of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications
comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the
local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
Acknowledgement, will be addressed at the time of permit application set.
73. Sheet A-5 - Indicate the handicap parking space on the plan. A van
accessible parking space srall be provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11- /
4.1.2(5)(b ).
Noted, A-5 will contain a clearly marked van space
74. Sheet A-6 - Indicate on the plan if parking spaces are located on the roof. ~
The few spaces that are located on the "roof' occur only where garage top is flat.
75. Sheet A-7 - Building "L". A total of eight handicap parking spaces shall be V
provided per the 200 I FBC, Section ll-4.1.2(5)(a).
More than eight (8) are provided, see plans for this building.
76. Design option "A" of the Fair Housing Act requires that all bathrooms in
the covered dwelling unit shall comply with the FHA. See Unit "B" /
(Bellini) model.
Mismarked as an "A" and changed to a "B" on the A-17 sheet.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
77. 348 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $228,288
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
Acknowledged
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
78. Address the design, layout and landscaping associated with the south
elevation of Building "K" as the service areas (trash room, loading area,
etc.) are in full view of northbound traffic on Congress A venue
79. Indicate the berm at the north and the west perimeter buffers and provide
cross-section details from the right-of-way to the buildings.
Berm locations and cross section are provided on the landscape plans.
80. The Bougainvillea standard should be continued down the center of the
landscape median of the west entry from gateway.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
10
DEPARTMENTS
k. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
72. This structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements ofF.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a
threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the
architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best
of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications
comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the
local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
73. Sheet A-5 - Indicate the handicap parking space on the plan. A van
accessible parking space shall be provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-
4.1.2( 5)(b).
74. Sheet A-6 - Indicate on the Dlan ifparking spaces are located on the roof.
75. Sheet A-7 - Building "L". A total of eight handicap parking spaces shall be
provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
76. Design option "A" of the Fair Housing Act requires that all bathrooms in
the covered dwelling unit shall comply with the FHA. See Unit "B"
(Bellini) model.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
77. 348 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $228,288
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this Dhase.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
78. Address the design, layout and landscaping associated with the south
. ^ '~~T~" . . ~.
~ ~f II .~.C!lf
INCLUDE REJECT
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/18/04
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
k. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
72. This structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements ofF.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency
prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a
threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the
architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best
of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications
comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the
local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
73. Sheet A-5 - Indicate the handicap parking space on the plan. A van
accessible parking space shall be provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-
4.1.2(5)(b).
74. Sheet A-6 - Indicate on the Dlan if Darking spaces are located on the roof.
75. Sheet A-7 - Building "L". A total of eight handicap parking spaces shall be
provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
76. Design option "A" of the Fair Housing Act requires that all bathrooms in
the covered dwelling unit shall comply with the FHA. See Unit "B"
(Bellini) model.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
77. 348 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $228,288 Ivr
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this Dhase.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
78. Address the design, layout and landscaping associated with the south
. ..... . . ~.._-,..., . /,.. ..
./'
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 04-226
h...,...>f Acronvms/Abbreviations:
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F.S. - Florida Statutes
LOR - Land Development Regulations
NEC - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code
TO: Ed Breese
Principal Planner
FROM: Timothy K. Lar ~
TRC Member/~ion
DATE: October 7,2004
SUBJECT: Project - Renaissance Commons Phase IV
File No. - NWSP 04-015 - 1st review
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings submitted for permits.
Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352
1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional
comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001
FBC, Chapter 6.
3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC,
Chapter 3.
4 The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be
governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits
setforth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC.
5 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and
exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that
clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per
2001 FBC, Table 600.
6 Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with approved
opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
7 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind
loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the
provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind
Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the
state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2004Renaissance Commons Phase IV
Page 1 of 5
8 Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces
encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load
(pst) on the plans for the building design.
9 Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per
F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the
building plans at the time of permit application.
10 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and
perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request.
11 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction.
12 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of the handicap
accessible parking spaces. The quantity of the spaces shall be consistent with the
regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. The accessible parking spaces that serve a use
shall be located on the shortest safety accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to
an accessible entrance. The 2001 FBC states that buildings with multiple accessible
entrances shall have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the
accessible entrance. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2(5), 4.3, and 4.6.
13 On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building
including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of each building.
14 Add to each building/tenant space that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors
to each building/tenant space. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
15 As required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans
are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add
the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on
sheets A-17, A-18. However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies
the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to each building. The location of the
doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are depicted on the
site plan drawing. Submit floor plans for the commercial buildings (retail/office/storage).
16 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of
travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and
the accessible entrance doors to each building/tenant space. The installed symbol, required
along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible
entrance doors to each building/tenant space. The symbol shall represent the location of
the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings.
The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area
that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible
route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at
curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches).
Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route
and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route)
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2004Renaissance Commons Phase IV Page 2 of 5
and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit
review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that
the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along
the path of travel.
17 A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units covered under
the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of the act.
Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed for each type of parking provided,
e.g. surface parking, parking structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
18 At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the future
installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act Title 24 CFR, Part
100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within the covered dwelling unit shall
comply.
19 Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of
required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that is applicable
to the computations.
20 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of
travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible units and the
recreational amenities that are provided for the project and other common area elements
located at the site. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the
location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed
along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a
drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the
accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the Code is 44 inches). Add text
that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is
designed in compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act. Please note that
at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans
that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the
2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
21 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed
for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the
code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues:
a. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is
located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base
flood elevation, indicate that on the plans.
b. Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building
within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor
plan and paving/drainage (civil plans).
22 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
23 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site
plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge
of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the
S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2004Renaissance Commons Phase IV Page 3 of 5
overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the
buildings on all sides.
24 To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story clubhouse,
provide the following:
a. Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only?
b. Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the
clubhouse?
c. Will there be any additional deliveries to the site?
d. Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site?
Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the
impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request
that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required
for the clubhouse.
33 Add to the floor plan drawing of the clubhouse a breakdown of the floor area. The area
breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, covered area outside, covered area
at the entrances, total floor area dedicated for the clubhouse and other uses located within
the building. Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms
and floor spaces.
34 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore,
be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available.
35 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from
a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of
permit application, F.S. 373.216.
36 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach
Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building
permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The
building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for
sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
37 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes
of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded
deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit
review.
38 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or
conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2004Renaissance Commons Phase IV Page 4 of 5
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The
building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCD, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
39 Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building. Provide tabular area
data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall include the following areas and each
area shall be labeled on the applicable floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
b. Covered stairways;
c. Common area balconies;
d. Entrance area outside of a unit;
e. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
f. Garages (not part of a unit);
g. Elevator room;
h. Electrical room;
I. Mechanical room;
j. Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
I. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
48 This structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7) and shall comply
with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through
105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency prior to the
issuance of a building permit for the construction of a threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the architect or
engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best of the architect's or
engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the applicable fire safety
standards as determined by the local authority in accordance with this section and F.S.
Section 633.
49 Sheet A-5 - Indicate the handicap parking space on the plan. A van accessible parking
space shall be provided per the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b).
50 Sheet A-6 - Indicate on the plan if parking spaces are located on the roof.
51 Sheet A-7 - Building "l". A total of eight handicap parking spaces shall be provided per the
2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
52 Design option "A" of the Fair Housing Act requires that all bathrooms in the covered
dwelling unit shall comply with the FHA. See Unit "B" (Bellini) model.
bf
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2004Renaissance Commons Phase IV
Page 5 of 5
Page I of 1
/
Wildner, John
From: Wildner, John
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 3:28 PM
To: Coale, Sherie
Cc: Majors, Wally
Subject: Renaisnace Commons - Phase VI
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the plans for Phase VI of Renaissance Commons. The
Recreation Facilities Impact for this phase is calculated as follows:
348 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $228,288
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
John
9/2812004
----
J<
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 04-164
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
RE:
Review Comments
New Site Plan - 1 st Review
Renaissance Commons Phase VI
File No. NWSP 04-015
\
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer.~
DATE:
October 6, 2004
The above referenced Site Plans, received on September 27, 2004, was reviewed for Public Works,
Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LOR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
1. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster. Provide a minimum backing
clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad.) (LOR, Chapter 2, Section
11.J.2.b.)
2. Indicate how trash is to be accessed by Solid Waste. Most shown trash rooms to not appear to be
accessible.
3. Only one trash room is shown for the residential component of Phase VI. This is not adequate.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
4. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from
Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars,
stop signs. double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc.
Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings
"K" Series for striping details.
6. Show all off-site improvements needed for this project. These plans depict work that will require
review, approval and permits from outside agencies.
7. Add "One-Way (w/Right Arrow)" signs in the median across from the two egress points to
Renaissance Commons Blvd. South (along the east side of Phase VI.)
8. Delete the northbound to eastbound right turn arrow south of the driveway, south of the main
entrance from Gateway Blvd. Add a "No Right Turn" sign in advance of this driveway.
~
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 04-164
Re: Renaissance Commons Phase VI, New Site Plan 1st Review
October 6,2004
Page 2
9. Add a "Stop" sign and stop bar at the east end of the median of Commons Way. Extend median by
using striping at this location. Coordinate landscaping south (Phase III) of this intersection to ensure
no line of sight problems.
10. Staff recommends pulling back the Type "0" curb (decrease radius) at the outside of the northwest
corner drive aisle adjacent to the northwest corner of Building 12 to provide more room for turning
movements.
ENGINEERING
11. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's
Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following:
paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other
permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach
County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental
Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may
not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
14. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) If
possible please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan submittals - it is much easier to
identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit!
15. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate
future shadowing on the parking surface (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b.)
16. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to roadways to ensure no
vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as Fire/Rescue and Solid Waste.
17. Green Malayan Coconut Palms are listed under "Shrubs." They should be placed in the "Palm Tree"
section.
18. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference
FOOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Gateway and Congress.
19. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed
cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H.).
20. Landscaped areas shall be protected from vehicular encroachment by a continuous, raised curb
(LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.A. and Chapter 22, Article II, Section E.)
'",
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 04-164
Re: Renaissance Commons Phase VI, New Site Plan 1st Review
October 6,2004
Page 3
21. The medians on Federal Highway and the chase area(s) immediately south of this project have
existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or
replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be
the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response
and add a note to the plans with the above stated information.
22. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 in. thick
within driveways (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P).
23. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LOR, Chapter 4, Section
7.F.2.
24. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article
IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting.
25. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All
engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach
Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
26. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to
serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission
approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting
of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and
wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as
accurate as possible.
27. All utility easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and
Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with
utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy
trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those
utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1
gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility
easements or public rights-of-way.
28. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems
serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
29. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500
g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter
6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater
(CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
30. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either
upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
,
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 04-164
Re: Renaissance Commons Phase VI, New Site Plan 151 Review
October 6, 2004
Page 4
31. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility
easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum
width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
CODE Sec. 26-33(a).
32. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the
systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent
meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
33. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for
the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE,
Section 26-15.
34. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building be within 200 feet
of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition. Our
review indicates that the south and east wings of Building #14 (sheet 6 of 7) are inadequately
covered to meet this requirement.
35. In accordance with the Utilities Engineering Design Manual, Rolled Type UK" copper service lines are
required if either terminal end of the service is located under pavement.
36. In accordance with the Utilities Engineering Design Manual private services shall not cross over
water mains. Services for Buildings 12 and 13 depict meters and RPZ's services crossing back over
the main. Adjust meter and RPZ locations to utilize parking islands adjacent to these buildings.
Additionally it does not appear as though each proposed space has a meter. Will some businesses
be sharing meters?
37. The number of grease traps shown on the plans does not appear adequate to serve the number of
proposed restaurants.
38. The number of proposed sanitary sewer laterals does not match the number of water meters
proposed and does not seem adequate to handle sanitary flows.
39. The City of Boynton Beach will own and operate only the main line portions of the sanitary sewer
system shown on these plans. All sanitary services will be private.
40. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility
construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering
Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
J :\SHRDA T A\Engineering\Logan\TRC\Renaissance Commons
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
--------- .
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf DATE:
Dir. of Planning & Zoning
10/7/04
FILE: NWSP 04-015
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No comments.
Coale, Sherie
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lee, Rick
Monday, October 18, 2004 8:22 AM
Coale, Sherie
RE: Renaissance Commons VI
Sherie: I believe that the only issue right now is the addressing of the buildings for this section. We met on October 14
with the Post Office the settle this issue, but no one from the Renaissance was there. There are many issues involved
with this addressing and the placement of informational signs. Of course all the usual items that we required in the
previous sections of this project will be in force.
-----Original Message-----
From: Coale,Sherie
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 20049:11 AM
To: Lee, Rick; Hallahan, Kevin
Subject: Renaissance Commons VI
Importance: High
I need comments today. Thanks, Sherie
1
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1 .
/
Coale, Sherie
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Friday, October 08,20042:02 PM
To: Breese, Ed
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: Renaissance Commons Phase VI
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Ed Breese, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Renaissance Commons Phase VI
New Site Plan-1st Review
NWSP 04-015
Date:
October 8, 2004
No comment. The applicant has met my existing trees comments on the landscape plans.
Kjh
File
10/1412004
/
PLANNING AND ZONING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sherie Coale, Senior Office Assistant
FROM: Ed Breese, Principal Planner
DATE: October 15,2004
SUBJECT: Renaissance Commons Phase VI (NWSP 04-015)
Please include the following comments in the review of the above-mentioned project:
Address the design, layout and landscaping associated with the south elevation of
Building "K" as the service areas (trash room, loading area, etc.) are in full view of
northbound traffic on Congress Avenue.
Indicate the berm at the north and the west perimeter buffers and provide cross-
section details from the right-of-way to the buildings.
The Bougainvillea standard should be continued down the center of the landscape
median of the west entry from gateway.
Suggest using another variety of tree in the parking lot than Seagrape due to the leaf
drop and messy nature.
Please indicate what the 36 (LI) trees depicted on Sheet L5 of 6 along the quad
walkway are, as the do not appear to be listed in the Plant List.
A bus stop and shelter should be depicted on Gateway Boulevard. It's location should
be coordinated with Palm Tran and it's design should reflect the architecture and
materials used on adjacent buildings, not the standard Palm Tran shelter.
Can a more decorative monument "one way" sign be utilized within the traffic circle
as opposed to the standard mount?
The lift station location and sidewalk location appear to conflict in the quad between
Sheets SP-l and C6.
Provide detail drawings of the entry wall and sign, gazebos, trellis structure, fountains
and clock tower. We are looking for very substantial structures at the entry drive off
of Gateway Boulevard, and the trellis structures do not appear to provide that massing
or scale.
Provide a photometrics plans and typical lighting fixtures to be utilized.
Where parking occurs on the roof level, do the parapet walls completely obscure the
cars?
What is the proposed roofing material on the dome structure depicted on Building
"K"?
Signage locations on the buildings and as entry monuments are not depicted on the
plans. Please provide the necessary detail and indicate the conformance with the
proposed Sign Program for Renaissance Commons.
Does the wall around the terrace at the NW comer of Building "K" have continuous
stone balustrades or do they terminate after the first two columns? They should be
continued around that portion of the terrace.
Provide an updated Use Conversion Matrix depicting the various uses in square
footages and dwelling units, based upon the increase in dwelling units from 1 ,551 to
1,683.
It would seem appropriate to locate some handicap parking on the west side of
Building "K".
The square footages for Building "L" do not match between Sheet SP-1 and Sheet A-
7. Please make sure the square footages match for all building floor plans versus the
site plan and site data, and that the parking calculations accurately correspond.
Indicate the off-site improvements required by FDOT as part of the DRI Amendment,
for an additional westbound through lane at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard
and Congress Avenue.
Bicycle racks should be placed appropriately throughout the site.
Provide an explanation of the "storage use" as indicted on the floor plan of
Building "I" (sheet A-3 and A-4). Are these accessory storage spaces for the
office use or are they self-storage bays? Self-Storage requires Conditional Use
approval. The SMU also regulates Self Storage, which may not exceed 20,000
square feet.
-'"
RENAISSANCE COMMONS PHASE VI
1st Review Planning
October 12, 2004
Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to issuance of a building
permit for the project.
Submit a traffic impact statement or equivalency determination prior to the Technical Review
Committee meeting. It must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for
concurrency purposes prior to the issuance of any building permits (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.).
The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach County regarding
school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and rights-of-way is
subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval.
On the master plan (sheet MP-1), identify each phase ofthe Renaissance Commons project with a
Roman numeral.
On the master plan (sheet MP-1), indicate the number of stories for each proposed building within
Phase VI only.
Depict the required setbacks in conformance with Suburban Mixed Use (SMU) zoning category.
In the SMU zoning district, the maximum allowable setback along Congress Avenue for Building
"K" can be no more than 90 feet (Chapter 2, Section 6.GA.). On the master plan (sheet MP-1),
indicate the proposed setback of Building "K" from the west property line to ensure compliance
with this requirement. It appears that in certain areas along Congress Avenue, the building is
proposed with a setback of more than 90 feet.
A building height over 55 feet and up to 75 feet is allowed in the Suburban Mixed Use zoning
district but only as a conditional use. This project will require conditional use approval from the
Planning & Development Board and City Commission. Provide written responses to the
standards for evaluating conditional uses.
On the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-l), indicate the proposed floor-are a-ratio (excluding the
garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 6.GA.
~
On the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-1), the required parking for the commercial use is incorrect
because 106,510 square feet of commercial @ 1 / 200 equals 532 spaces; not 539 spaces. Also,
the required parking for the condominium buildings was not included in the parking
methodology. Staff calculated that a total of 1,748 parking spaces are required for the entire
project.
Are dentist and / or doctor offices proposed in the future? Dentist and doctor office require one
(1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area (Chapter 2, Section 11.H.16.d.(19).).
According to the Total Parcel Data - Phase VI cover sheet, this project (Phase VI) will dedicate
20.29% for Usable Open Space in order to comply with Chapter 2, Section 6.GA. However, it is
unclear where this usable open space occurs. Therefore, please provide a separate drawing within
this packet that delineates and highlights the usable open space areas.
Include the north arrow (direction) on all floor plans.
'-provide :ill @XFbt:l~i9R Qfth.e "l!tgrag8 \:Ise" M 1lnlivkd VB the fleer pl~ eflhliltiifig "I" (shc..t A-
1 aRa .^_ <1). !~n theBe tieCCllllvlY ;:,tvllige ~l'M..;:, fVl lIIl; uflice use or are they ~df-;:,tulage bays'l
The required parking for offices is based on gross floor area, which includes closets, storage, and
the like.
The ground floor plan of Building "J" (sheet A-I) shows only one (1) trash room? Is this
sufficient? The method of trash removal will be subject to Public Works' review and approval.
~-
On the floor plans of Building "J" (sheet A-I and A-2), differentiate between the spaces allocated
for commercial parking versus residential parking. The allocation should correspond with the site
plan tabular data (sheet SP-1) for Building "J".
The "Unit Mix Chart Building "J" (sheet A-I) incorrectly indicates that 66 parking spaces are
required for unit type "C"; 68 parking spaces are required.
The ground floor plan of Building "K" (sheet A-5) indicates that 24 parking spaces are proposed,
but when counted, only 23 spaces are provided. Please clarify.
The third floor plan of Building "K" (sheet A-5) indicates that 42 parking spaces are proposed,
but when counted, only 41 spaces are provided. Please clarify.
The "Unit Mix Chart Building L", as shown on sheet A-7, reflects incorrect data as it relates the
minimum number of required parking spaces for each unit. Also, five (5) parking spaces are
required for the recreation area (Chapter 2, Section 11.H.16.e.(12).). This information may
impact the project's total number of required and proposed parking on the site plan (sheet AP-1).
The "Unit Mix Chart Building L", as shown on sheet A-7, indicates that 33 dwelling units are
proposed on Level 5, but when co , 5 units are provided. Please clarify.
Explain "amenity Level 2" on the floor plan of Building "L" (sheet A-7).
Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes.
Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Indicate the mean height dimension of the elevations of Building "J" (sheet A-9).
On the elevations for Building "K" (sheet A-13), please label them as follows: "North Elevation
- Gateway Boulevard" and "West Elevation - Congress Avenue".
On the elevation of Building "I" (sheet A-ll), please label as follows: "North Elevation -
Gateway Boulevard".
Will there be a ovision for outdoor patios, concrete patios, screen enclosures, or solid-roof
enclosures? Please discuss these amenities with staff prior to the Technical Review Committee
meeting.
Is a security gate anticipated in the future? If so, show its location on the first floor plan (sheet A-
2.) and provide a detail indicating its dimensions, materials used, exterior finish, and colors
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
nee
On the landscape plan (sheet L2 of 6), provide a dimension of width of the landscape buffer along
Congress Avenue and Gateway Boulevard. The SMU zoning district requires that they be at least
25 feet in width.
Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. On
the landscape plan (L6 of 6), indicate the total quantities for all proposed native plant material.
Where possible, staff recommends the use of stone balustrades on the west elevation of Building
"J" (sheet A-10) in the same manner that they are used on the east elevation of Building "L"
(sheet A-16).
Staff recommends adding extra trees and plant material with the landscape buffers in order to
help screen the parking garage openings of Buildings "K" and "L" from Congress Avenue. This
can be accomplished, in part, by adding more trees to the public park in Phase III of Renaissance
Commons.
~
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renaissance Conunons\Site Plans\Phase VI\Planning 1st Review.doc