The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS 7.C.I BOYNTON TOWN CENTER (NWSP 05-003) NEW SITE PLAN TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT NAME / NUMBER: REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-161 STAFF REPORT Chair and Members Planning and Development Board and Mayor and City Commission Eric Lee Johnson, AICP if' Planner . . to -tJlC ( ~/ Michael W. Rumpf' Director of Planning and Zoning August 18, 2005 Boynton Town Center / NWSP 05-003 New site plan approval to construct 231,000 square feet of retail, 13,771 square feet of restaurant, and 4,127 square feet of office, all of which, would be on a 24.6s-acre parcel in the Community Commercial (C-3) zoning district. Property Owner: Applicant: Agent: Location: Existing Land Use: Existing Zoning: Proposed Uses: Acreage: Adjacent Uses: North: PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Klatt Family Partnership & Klatt Enterprises, Inc. Boynton Beach Place, LLC Mr. Russell C. Morrison, P.E. with Kimley-Horn and Associates Northeast corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue (see Location Map - Exhibit "A'') Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Community Commercial (C-3) 231,000 square feet of retail 13,771 square feet of restaurant 4,127 square feet of office 24.6s-acre portion ofthe 106.s-acre parcel Undeveloped property proposed for mixed-use within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Suburban Mixed-Use (MX-S) land use Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 2 South: East: West: classification, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU), then farther north is undeveloped property proposed for condominium use within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Mixed-Use Suburban (MX-S) land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU), still farther north is undeveloped property proposed for townhouses within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Mixed-Use Suburban (MX-S) land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU), still farther north is right-of-way for the SFWMD C-16 Canal, still farther north is developed property with townhouses of Phase I of the Renaissance Commons Master Plan with a Mixed-Use Suburban (MX-S) land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU). Right-of-way for Old Boynton Road, still farther south is developed commercial property (Oakwood Shopping Center), with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3); Immediately east is right-of-way for the proposed main north/south road within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan, then farther east is undeveloped property proposed for townhouses within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Mixed-Use Suburban (MX-S) land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU), still farther east is right-of-way of the LWDD E-4 Canal, still farther east is developed single family residential (Sky Lake) with an Low Density Residential (LDR) land use classification, zoned Single Family Residential (R-l-M); and Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, then farther west is developed commercial property (Boynton Beach Mall) with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3). Site Characteristic: The subject site is the location of pastureland commonly referred to as the Winchester Property. On February 15, 2005, the City Commission approved the applicant's request for a change to the land use classification and to rezone (LUAR 04-006) 81.814 acres of the property from Single-family Residential (R-l-M) to Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU) and also approximately 25 acres at the southwest corner of the parcel (LUAR 04-007) from Single-family Residential (R-l-M) to Community Commercial (C-3). The subject property was the parcel rezoned to C-3. The Winchester property is bounded by the LWDD C-16 Canal to the north, the LWDD E-4 Canal to the east, Old Boynton Road to the south, and Congress Avenue to the west. The master site plan shows that the subject property is a square- shaped parcel, carved out the original 106.5 acre property. This 24.6s-acre portion has frontage on both Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, and extends eastward towards the center of the 106.s-acre Winchester property. The survey submitted for this packet was a boundary survey, which does not show the existing conditions. Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 3 Proposal: Concurrency: Traffic: Utilities: BACKGROUND Mr. Russell C. Morrison, P.E., with Kimley-Horn and Associates is requesting new site plan approval to construct a large scale, commercial development within 106.5- acre project. The project would consist of 231,000 square feet of retail, 13,771 square feet of restaurant, and 4,127 square feet of office. All proposed uses are permitted in the C-3 zoning district. ANALYSIS Generally, a project's anticipated traffic is generated by two factors, namely the proposed use and its intensity. A letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering was received indicating that the entire Master Plan meets the traffic performance standards, with a series of conditions which limit or time aspects of the development with certain roadway improvements. Additionally, the City has petitioned the County for a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service) designation for Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and the respective intersections. Palm Beach County has transmitted the Comprehensive Plan Amendment associated with the CRALLS designation to the Department of Community Affairs for review and comment prior to adoption. Formal adoption of the CRALLS would remove the requirement for certain roadway improvements, including the necessity to improve the entire segment of Old Boynton Road between Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard to a five (5) lane section. However, even if the CRALLS is adopted by Palm Beach County, the following roadway improvements would still be required for the project: 1) Intersection improvements at Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and Gateway Boulevard, and Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road; 2) Improvement of Gateway Boulevard to six (6) lanes from Congress Avenue to High Ridge Road; 3) Improvement of Old Boynton Road to five (5) lanes from Congress Avenue to the Spine Road (the main north/south roadway within the proposed Master Plan, connecting Old Boynton Road to Gateway Boulevard), transitioning to three (3) lanes west of the E-4 Canal bridge, and continuing a three (3) lane section east to Boynton Beach Boulevard. This would also include the construction of a new three (3) lane bridge over the LWDD E-4 Canal; and 4) various access point improvements to entrances/exits to the 106.s-acre parcel (see "Exhibit C" - Conditions of Approval). The City's water capacity, has increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water needs for this project. Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required for the project, dependent upon the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve this project, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site plan. Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 4 Police/Fire: The Police Department reviewed the subject request relative to the Master Plan as a whole and how it would impact their level of service. The Department reports, "there were 2,547 calls for service. Forty percent of these calls were traffic related. Although a traffic assessment had indicated that this project supports current roadways, it did not reflect on traffic related calls for service and the impact that these calls have on current manpower. The new developments will have a direct impact on future public safety issues, to include calls for service. The demand for more police personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and non-residential traffic into our city". The Fire Department reviewed the subject request and reports that Fire Station #5 should be expedited to ensure adequate service delivery levels and effective response times. Additionally, a traffic light pre-empt should be pursued to aid the response of emergency apparatus on Congress Avenue. Also, upgrades in emergency dispatch capability should be made, including new technology related to CAD, GIS and AVL and adequate staffing. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: The level of service regarding school concurrency would not be impacted by this type of project. Driveways: The site plan proposes two (2) major points of ingress / egress. Additionally, four (4) alternate driveway openings are proposed internal to the subject property. The first major driveway opening would occur along Congress Avenue. This curb-cut proposed on Congress Avenue would be one (1) of three (3) openings proposed on Congress Avenue for the entire master planned development. However, it would be the only curb-cut on Congress Avenue for this particular project. The second and third curb-cuts proposed on Congress Avenue would be in conjunction with the development of the Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) project. The site plan shows that this opening would be approximately 90 feet wide at the property line. The main drive aisle into the development would be 25 feet wide and consist of two (2) lanes, namely one (1) for ingress and one (1) for egress. This opening would not be a signalized intersection on Congress Avenue but would still require off-site roadway improvements, such as the removal of the existing concrete sidewalk and curb / gutter along Congress Avenue in order to construct a deceleration lane into the development. Regarding egress from this southernmost opening, it would allow for right-turn only (north) traffic movements onto Congress Avenue. Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 5 The second major point of ingress / egress is proposed along Old Boynton Road. It would directly align with Hoadley Road. When scaled, this opening would be approximately 50 feet in width. It would consist of one (1) lane for ingress and two (2) lanes for egress. This opening would also allow for ingress to the out-lots of the subject project. This intersection would not be signalized. Regarding egress, it would allow for right-turn (west) and left-turn (east) traffic movements onto Old Boynton Road. As previously mentioned, alternate driveway openings are proposed internal to the development. Two (2) driveway openings are proposed along the Spine Road (to the east); the others are proposed adjacent to Boynton Village (to the north). Parking Facility: The project proposes a mix of commercial uses: Retail, restaurant, and bank. The required parking for these commercial uses has been tabulated on a "shopping center" rate (1 space per 200 square feet). Therefore, this project would require a total of 1,246 parking spaces. The plans would provide for a total of 1,289 spaces, or an excess of 43 spaces. However, a deficiency of nine (9) spaces occurred within the Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) project. The intent is to share the excess parking of this project with the Boynton Village project (proposed directly to the north), leaving a surplus of 34 parking spaces. A cross parking and cross access agreement would be required at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Landscaping: Throughout the most of the subject project, the internal circulation system would consist of parking lots with 2s-foot wide drive lanes. The Detail of the typical 90- degree parking stall (sheet C7) shows that the parking spaces would be dimensioned nine and one-half (9- V2) feet wide and 16- V2 feet in length with two (2) feet of vehicular overhang. The handicap space would be 12 feet in width with five (5) feet of striping and 16- V2 feet in length with two (2) feet of vehicular overhang. The parking areas would be interrupted with large walkways, which would further ensure pedestrian safety. The master site data plan indicates that 3.39 acres (13.7%) of the subject property would be landscaped surface. Unlike the other projects within the master plan, the C-3 zoning district has no provision for minimum pervious area; it is simply a matter of how legal positive outfall is achieved. Much of this pervious surface would be in the form of the landscape buffer proposed along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. The plant list indicates that 78% of the 291 canopy trees would be native, 60% of the 280 palm trees would be native, and 55% of the 12,940 shrubs / groundcover would be native. The plant list includes the following species: Coconut palm, Florida Royal palm, Cabbage palm, Washington palm, High Rise Live Oak, Mahogany, Pond Cypress, Pink Trumpet tree, and Purple Glory tree. Staff has no problem with the proposed species and plant material. It should be noted that the project frontage along Congress Avenue is very lengthy and therefore, facilitating the important role that landscape buffers have for the project, which in turn, increases the importance of having consistent landscape material between the proposed project and the approved landscape buffer of the Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 6 Renaissance Commons project. Staff's intent is to encourage Congress Avenue to become more of an aesthetically pleasing corridor and staff feels that this can be accomplished, in part, with consistent landscape material. However, the developer has informed staff that while that it is also their intent to make the corridor as aesthetically pleasing, it is their desire to remain as an autonomous unit, distinct from Renaissance Commons. Furthermore, it is the developer's opinion that the proposed landscape plans proVide above and beyond what code requires, and that as proposed, would be aesthetically pleasing in and of itself. Staff concurs to a certain extent. As a comprise, staff and the developer have agreed that along Congress Avenue, the proposed landscape plan should have the same tree species and quantity of plant material for this project, as that of the Renaissance Commons project, but that the species of shrubs and groundcover and its configuration would be autonomous (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). In an attempt to mimic the SMU projects to the north, the landscape plan of the subject property is proposing 20-foot wide landscape buffers along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. The landscape plan shows thatWashingtonia palm and Mahogany trees are proposed within this buffer, along with Florida Gamma grass, Plumbago, and Dwarf Trinette Arboricola. Again, the above-paragraph describes the agreement between staff and the developer regarding the proposed plant material within these buffers. The details of the landscape buffers proposed along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road are illustrated by the Typical Section (on sheet LA-4), which show a two (2)-foot tall earthen berm, low shrubs, palm trees, and canopy trees. Live Oak, Cabbage palm, and Pink Trumpet trees are proposed within the interior and terminal landscape islands of the parking lot. The pedestrian walkways that would connect to the out-lots would contain an alternating pattern of pavers and planter areas (with Live Oak and Coconut palm trees). The planter areas would also have Redtip Cocoplum and Ixora "Nora" Grant hedges. Individually, landscaped areas containing Florida Royal palm, Washingtonia palm, and Live Oak trees would be placed in front of Building "A", Building "B", and Building "C". The Hardscape and Amenities Plan indicate that two (2) planter beds are proposed in front of the stores as well. However, staff recommends installing additional decorative 4s-gallon planters in front of the buildings to help soften the hardscape surface. This would include additional planter containers on the west side of Building "B" and Building "C" as well (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The landscape plan shows the Foxtail palm trees are proposed on the east side of the spine road. The function of the roadway is primarily to alleviate traffic congestion on Congress Avenue, Gateway Boulevard, and Old Boynton Road. As shown on the plans, the Spine Road would directly link Gateway Boulevard to Old Boynton Road. However, it does not show the plant material proposed on the portion of the spine road within the Renaissance Commons project. It is staff's intent to create a park-like boulevard effect for the spine road. This would be best achieved by incorporating canopy trees into the design of the roadway (as was done in the Renaissance Commons project) thereby maintaining consistency of plant material proposed within the right-of-way of the two projects. The Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 7 Renaissance Commons project proposed Live Oak trees along the spine road. In this project, the Foxtail palm trees proposed along the spine road would be inconsistent and disjointed from the remaining portions of the roadway. Therefore, at the time of permitting, staff recommends substituting the proposed Foxtail palm trees with oak trees (along the spine road) to maintain consistency between the two plans (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). It should be noted that much of the interior landscape material (for the out-lots) has not been shown on these plans. The design of these out-lots are incomplete at this time and each out-lot would require separate site plan review (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Building and Site: As previously mentioned, this project is a 24.6s-acre portion of the 106.s-acre site. The site plan shows that three (3) main buildings are proposed, namely Building "A", Building "B", and Building "C". Building "A" would be 185,000 square feet in area and would have an outdoor garden center located at the north end. Tenants are not yet determined (or made publicly known) at this time for Buildings "B" and "C". Building "B" would be 10,000 square feet in area and Building "c" would be 30,000 square feet in area. The 24.65 acres also includes four (4) out-lots. At this time, the developer has not created outparcels and staff understands that these out-lots would be leased. The site plan shows that Out-lot 1 would have a 6,668 square foot restaurant. Out-lot 2 would have a 4,127 square foot bank, Out-lot 3 would have a 7,103 square foot restaurant, and Out-lot 4 would have a 6,000 square foot retail store. Certainly, it would have been staff's preference to have one (1) continuous building rather than four (4) separate buildings. Furthermore, it would have been preferable to have a larger store that wrapped the corner to serve as a visual anchor to the intersection of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. Additionally, this building would help screen the vast parking area in front of the proposed Target building. At this time, no elevations or landscape plans have been submitted for the out-lots and each would require separate site plan review and approval (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The maximum building height in the C-3 zoning district is 45 feet. The site plan indicates that all proposed buildings would be one (l)-story tall, including the buildings proposed on the out-lots. The west elevations of Building "A" indicate that the height dimension of the lower parapet wall would be 34 feet - two (2) inches. The upper parapet wall would be 42 feet in height. It should be noted that the peak of a decorative tower would be 52 feet - four (4) inches in height. This is a problem. Although staff recommended incorporation of additional architectural features, such as varying the heights of the parapet walls along the entire west elevation, the plans, would in fact, require height exception approval due to the fact that a portion of the proposed building exceeds the 4s-foot threshold of the C- 3 zoning district. Therefore, at the time of permitting, the decorative tower height shall either be reduced to 45 feet or height exception approval would be required prior to the issuance of any building permits (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The elevations show the varying heights of the west facades of Buildings "B" and "C". The height dimension of the lower parapet wall would be 23 feet - eight (8) inches tall while the peak of the pitched roof would be 40 feet - eight (8) inches tall. Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 8 Design: The Boynton Village Master Plan is essentially divided in half by the proposed spine road. For this particular project, all buildings are proposed west of the spine road. The project is enhanced with tree-line pedestrian paths. The buildings are proposed in a modern architectural style and are aesthetically pleasing. The building facades are enhanced with trim, banding, columns, shutters, medallions, score lines, and trellises. However, staff does recommend the use of a smooth stucco finish on all buildings associated with this project (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The buildings would come in a variety of colors and have either metal or tile roofing. The project's colors are proposed as follows: Masonry B 1 Red B2 Pink B3 Pearl Gray Pavers P 1 Buff P2 Harvest P3 Charcoal Precast Sl White S2 Buff Fal;ade Body Color (EIFS or Stucco) El Abode Accent E2 Smoked Salmon E3 Muskmelon E4 Honey Gold Es Nacho E6 Manor White E7 China White Awnings Al Sun belt Black A2 Sunbrella Aspen A3 Sunbrella Linen A4 Sunbrella Terra Cotta Storefronts STl Champagne ST2 Clear ST3 Terra Cotta Trim Colors Tl White T2 Off-white The above-referenced colors, accents, roof styles, and trims would be the same for this project that is used throughout the Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) project. Within any large-scale project, feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 10.H.). The developer included a Hardscape and Amenities Plan that indicates the location of benches, ash trays, planters, bicycle racks, trellises, and fountains. The detail of the outdoor freestanding lighting fixture (sheet SLl) shows that the height of the Staff Report -Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Memorandum No PZ 05-161 Page 9 poles would be 25 feet in height. The poles would be round tapered steel black poles. As a safeguard to maintain compatibility all of the Boynton Village and Boynton Town Center projects, staff endorses the use of the same freestanding lighting fixtures that is proposed throughout the entire Boynton Village (NWSP 05- 004) project. The intent of this recommendation is to discourage a situation where the Target store or any of the leased parcels would have taller, brighter lights that stand-out among the rest of the shopping center's lights, thereby drawing more attention to the parcel at night than during the day, which in turn, would be a direct conflict with code. Also, the lighting levels should be such that they proVide for a safe environment for pedestrians and vehicles but not luminous as to be considered obnoxious or attention-getting (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Staff also has concerns with the lack of information regarding the future build-out of the out-lots. Staff wants to ensure consistency and compatibility between the out-lots and the main parcel with special emphasis on architectural design, project signage, landscaping, and building colors. Therefore, staff recommends the creation of a Design Program that includes but is not limited to architectural design, signage, landscape, and building colors for each out-lot and its relationship to the principal buildings. The design of these out-lots are incomplete at this time and each out-lot would require separate site plan review (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Signage: No project signage was included with this submittal. Therefore, staff recommends submittal of a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section s.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. The applicant will be required to provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff recommends approval, contingent upon successfully satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Town Center (Target) NWSP OS-003\Staff Report.doc EXHIBIT A ...", "'-" BOYNTON VILLAGE AND BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I LOCATION MAP Local Retail Commercial Industrial o BOYNTON CANAL ..........11....11...........1........1........11..., i i BOYNTON VILLAGE . i . I . i I I . .lfJ i ii ~ i E ~ i == lfJ 'toO &! ... lfJ 0 ... LUAR 04-006 Suburban Mixed Use 81.814 acres LUAR 04-007 Local Retail Com erela' 25.00 acres M tIIO - - ~- W+E S III ;~Iill' .1 J. ilh~ ill!. "t..~ e;~ "IV II I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i Ii IT ~I!I ~ iM iJ~I~ ~ f i III ! ~ i ~ ~s u t!'l!~m "'~ l'l~ I ih~! =XHIBIT B .. . i i i ~~l ml . _ ~7L~ _~~. ~! I 1 ~. -- --.......---- '" , --" .~ __~.. . _';_'."'" _:;" _.~.,-.::;;;...-2.I\: =.",,-.=.r~ DET~OF3 ' , mm> . ' . ,,- -~ - L j ... , ".- . ~,~~:. .'" '-" -=-. ~ ~- 1::1" Ii ", ~'_ i , 1 . , n' , .~,~--' , -- ~<~=.t 1'1" 111~ 'I \ i Ill! I, I il,ll ,\. '1' i 1'\ -~~. I ,. __ _ _, ' , ,., : ~,'I;' , " " · , " , "II ~~ M~l:r-~~7~:~~J;h\:f~7;1!';/b~~l'X}i)' !I .l~ I '~' I,,' -------'--~-- / ..>-:0 --- --. --.,--- 'I' II -:- . " ._, ___ _ /,___ __----> y_"-- 1 " I ~. I ____-~ \ \: ____-- \ __---- ------ '.!.. ". . .'. . ".. 1\ b I~ //, . ,," _->.---::------,.- /_ a I '. \ · \ l ' , , ~ - Q i I ~ : ' . ' :. . ____--~ '. _____-- ~ i~ '.' \ .':' & .,~ I D I -,,' ~ .",' ~.,. ....,.:, ' ~... ~"."'~ ~ ~~ ~~ .",." . . .0 e " '.. -.' - !~d! ~ Ii .~ ~ ! il'li ,! '\ j, .. ,:i :!'II ~ ,. Ill!I!';:: \ i ,. I L '" ! ; A_~I ...- '. 3."~ ' . , . .. . 'Ii '" ~- - I IR ;::, i !!ol"'" ,~.--....~ ;;;.,Sl . ... --~'- ......... _,~ ! ;:: ~ ,,/CC., \, :-";.;', 'il' I . ~",.."..,,,,,,~ ,'20(100...." /' ' ~", , . c..-,. " ~~. -- .... /' ~. ,.~..' -J1/ - - -~ - <" ...' \ \ ,- ~, . I ,-. ~-- / //..., '/~.... . .1 ' , .. .~.! ... .'. . _,- . ~.._ ..__'._ _.. -... _..E-4 . ~.- ... /' ~,\.\~'(' .;:lC, : Tl [ 1~T8 _' .'\':'~' ~~,,-~~. \....,-':-_?:-....:i;;i" . 1 I ~ i~ I ': J~: H','" r. T:-~ ~;I1'~ w:- ..~ ' . ~(;;i~?~ ~....... , .. I .'. . _ -iu",,,_' ,-,_ ~ (<..: ' I -' U ~_._:::~ I' " I ~ U J\jl<l ,l< ~ ,~ [~ t '. ,(, ~, ~ 5'15 -51' = .. '11- . .TN ~I~ '.1. ._ __~~~, 5, .~,~ · ['J =~_~m__ ! ij}~!;f~iil;rrlqrYijlfll!lll~~I~tJ!~;.~fi.~i~ · ....I:!iiif!i ~ ! Ii Iir.jl i ~ j ':1; ':1' ,i, !~!1111~11'i!' ll~l' It!' ;11, j! ~ ! i r~!~ll~! !~!!~!!!! Ii I~~~ !~i~~ ~1!~~1 !m~11 ' ! I ~ 1M !~Ill !il ~ll ~ i~j!r!i I~ ~~i~~; ~~~ ~ I ' I ! H ill [! If! I ib I'll !f'l y~ia ~~r~~~ ~Illlj i! I I lit I I I rJ ~II I ~~ I If. ii ,[.I~I hilt I, ' i i: I: I ~' ~I! Ilq i i J!l1 t'l~ ii n ij!!!I ! 1(1 P 1 I d I' I'l~ ~ ~ 11::1 ~~~j [I h I I I !l ~ J 1 I I' I.' I I ~. , II' fi 11 ~ i I . ~ " (t (' I I Iii f' , '1 I · d ~ I I ,i ~ I I I III I J. f (I > I a · t ,,- I " _ ., .,' I 1" l 1" · I p': q n n jl ill I I i'l 'I : 1 i! [ , I fi fi ~ ; !ill : I: 1 :! : it ,1~ _ i rl't ~ . f I I I I I il H~f il II l , ~ i It! ui~ l~ i~ : I: ! ~! II ~I i 111'i t e ~ . ,. ?,,~ l~ i- t 'ij il h ., &' a , J J" I i ~ hlS 5 'S S it S te I~ Ii ~ J~ i t J iii HP1Il,' 1 Ii 1 iPi ;} I rill , , 11 I n Il.r~ l' I In u id' ,.ti ~ I I i I~l ,'" II ~ I i I fr Ii ,~l l,1 , II ~ I Jrl 'I l. I I I It It i~ ' lal~ ilP~ l~il!li !i~r~H~: n rI tl i~n~ I' i ii ~ !p!Iq Ht'~ r , ' , I 'I! Jl !. I ~ ,I' 'Ill r , ,P " ~U~! IP p!: i i ~ ie~1 _ J I 'I' " I~ '11, I' II II 8 ~ I' l, ?~ ~ 1 ~ i 11.~1 } ! led h ~: ~ ~ I & II .l~l I I Ig,.- u 8 i: ~ ! I a f'l~ j a . ]'. I Ii I I I , "I I t . ~ '(a ~ I I, I ~ I l ~ 1 I I. ,I i lit J, .1 ~ li~ " Ii. I I' III ,I r r I. I l ';i I ,~, r' I ',' I ~Ii I~III ~ l"f'en I r Il II l~l'l jU' i ij .ti~ il~ e~ ~II ~ II! 11!i ;, P' II il:~ !il! I: ~ 1!I~i~ il.~1 ~II' f J!I~,1 ~~I ' "I ~ I .,~6.1 i~ I; i~li ijlb~ '11~r>I' ~ lIt ~illll 'lill lIil . ;1= li~!! a! d I~I . !lliI1m,i Ii WI: i ;i ;i I; ;11I; IIIW; I ,d III1 .. Y I 1,1 'I'U- Ii !'l!1 I~l lid I p' III I ti ~ ~ 1111 a filii ~ Ii: II~ .; ~~~Ili I ~ 1111"i~l.i III, ~ !! U*W;~~ ~ . "I'! I" I .. I I" :' ." I I ... ! III !!:I i!~di: ! ~ I ,Ii, I !iiili i l i ,i ,i W;!! Ii! !! !nil n I ! illlii ! Ii!!! I: ! !! "!II ! d I II i I: 1:1 . Ill!! i I I ' ~ !!li ~ ~!~ It~ ---- .. .--., _...~.. --".. -- -,~ '-.". ~.,. -' .,.- ~,~.. - -.. -, ~ -~" - ~ -... -- -_... --, - -,. ~- - - ~-'-,ii'i'iI"i:";I.r.m.....i.1~- ______~_________________ ----oWl, ,,!!!!!!h'!~mmm~! !I~.~ :~;"'~~~~~'~~~~~'~) \ I i 111!WIWllllillll'l mil I~ ,i i i;iHi 1:' !i,~li!li I ll!<, : i \ ~ 1 i'im I!i !HH!'l~ ~ ,~!~: " i' .f.h' '1! 1''''",l'l i hi'"' I"'"p : l I ii ~J; ~1~.! l!; '" ii~~:r '+ '[';'Hu'llL'l"ih'!~ II ." ~ [t "";;;' p J St 'i;;8t~," 'b,n :' I":,' l , ,- ~:ri'. i ..'~' I I CD.'l:. I . f l< I - I . "'5"M:I12, . [t~ClI 1 'i 'I!! !,,: 't 'l.,h' '''I'~ ::, 'J~iiljill'il!g:iii' \~ , .} 'i ,I !~~, '." .li~! ." . '. 'I: .! !n' ; Ir'Q, ~~~l' f ~~= !.~~~a.!!:e;a&; i[~~ ;~ \ ~ ~: ~I ~ l g ~h! ~ ~ ~l l~" I ~:!; ill I ,i!l 'I i!H. i\ II ~ t Q. if It. . - it ,~~ ~ "'~il \ \ ~ a.; III ~ t i i Hi.. i:.h~ : \ ~ ! H ! i f i H ! i !m~ , I . i' ", 8, I I' 1 , It l't \ I ~ ! ~ II. ~ till I ~ ! ~i ~ r \ I ~ ~ ~ I; f l!!~ t: 1 ~Jhl- \ \ iff i! i [r i t ~ ii~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ · I Iii ! I ~'l ,I ; ~: I ~ 1 i ii' , [i \\ ~ [f r;: i f 0 i ! Ii " !!! i [! I f i i I ..1 ! IIi ! 1 I I I i I ~t 'ii!U~ !ll i \~{~1 i i i i ii ~~:\tlll a B g w~, I' " " I \\\ : I I I I I \, ill I I I I "I "II I I I I ~lIll1i II If If If If If ~ ,I " \ \\ '~ ' , , , \! i I ~! i i: i :: i II , :: I ,I , ~i il II i ~ Sf : i i II , i! ! : I I " ' " I ,Ii I' "1 _II ' 'I I Ii! ' ~ I I I H ti I ill' ! !1 I f q i ! : 1 ~! II :~!, i! i:~11 f II h~111 \\ J~!i i 1 ~!:: \: i!i \, =- II II.::..,....~ \\ ! t .y :~~~~~~.;:;:::~~;:~~:":.;.~-:~g-~~~~f~~~~~~~~::~. '~~.~.~.:;~~.~~~~_~ ~___~~.~::=~~~y~~ 'd~__~~~'::"~~+.~+ ;:~1i2i~t5~~L::::?~~~i1:1W0E~'~~'i~~i4~~~=~F~4;.:..~;~~:f ~~ ~!g, @~o~o~o~o~ ~ ~~i~~~i~.~~!:~ ~~~ s g:~~~ liliM 1'" "'li '!I""- ~.. !IIC:z~. ~~a~ 00 ::::, .:,~. B,~~i' Gio "~,~, ..- E~ ~~~'6~ iM~d~ -- M~~~E ~~~ ~ ~~~d _~ ~~~~~ ~ij~~.. ii:; ~~ .. t;l _ III III z,~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ i . , "" ~~~. h~ ! · i · .; ~. 0 · H ", ~~ ~, " . 8 ~~ z j;\d.:J e l; '~ i d, d ~o~ ..h '"~"! Cl :!:JIll:! to::l ~ 8;;~; D~awlng name: H:\0471~7-Ba)'ll"" Vollage\47148007\CADD\CONST\ZONING_., ~~~~~~~~~:~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~>~~~~~ ~~~ f~~~~~~;~i~.~ .~~ ~~j~~~>~~~.~~ ~;. ~.~~' H_~'" ~ ~.! '~y~~;~~i2~~~ I~I ~~~~~~~~~I~~~ ~~~ .!~:~~~g~.~~i ~~i ~B2'SY~~i.c~~ ""~ ~~ "- 2' ~ CO " ~ ~ ;,~~~~~~~~~~~ . ~~ ~~2~>~~,Pp~~ ~. ~i~~2~i~~~~~~ a~ ~-~~B~I~z ~~f ~< ~~g~~g~~~ji~~ "9 !~I ~~~~~.~8 ~~ ~ ~ JCl )> ;0 m )> z o -l Z o r C o m o IUiliijli:ilnilejiii illl fi!I:!j! l!ii!h11111i i;U i'ii:U! III I::lbil 1;11 ik.ill ill 'liG !:!i /I! 1jil!Iij ;'11..1 Iii! 'il! !,!Il!:i I;i !I;! 11:1 !iil' I:!! I!: 1.11 I;!: il~; III I Ii', d !,I! Ii!' I. 'l'I',ll! ili!i l ;i!! Hil I 101 II! 'i Ill! II: i' III '. f I ",I IN I:., III I' 'il ;! I' !II! '!h iii' 8 ! II ; : II ia;'! I' Ii ! Ill! l 1,1 'I Ii. 'i II il'i j, I ,I m ~l~~!i' ~ ~h ~~;I o ~~hi~~ ~~!~~i ,~i~~~ ii~~~~ 2~~;J;~ -~~U~ , ! ~ s ~ i ~ 9 gg il!l!il\ H ,." .,., · > !'iiii'~aj 1~ 00; '"~~. .~o 00 '." 0, a~i~~'~l. n Ii ~i!~. '~~:J~~~~ a~ f'.. d~~ ~ ~ ~~H ~ ~ I: ~. ~~~ ~g ~~ ~j~ F~ ~ 'Ill g ~ :!ll;;': ~1> a ~ ;lqlll~lll ~hi:le " B-1 ;!: i~ z"".. i ~~~ C? E~ ~ !CPR ~:::j::'l:'l jt:", ,." o "I '"~ :t l!: &: ~ ~ ~ SITE PLAN ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION H ~ ~ o (..) o BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I - C3 ~~ DEVELOPER: -. il BOYNTON BEACH PLACE, L.L.C. BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA $CAU: OE9GNEtiCINEDI: ~ :,OTW RUSSEll MORRISON 11I"'"1_'" Kilriey-Hom COR flORlDA IlEGlSTRATKlN NlMD: a.......J_U and Associates, Inc. ORA....'y lAY 51567 &01~~~~or:o.N<<J'OO~~~KO Cl€Cl([l)ty PHONE(772)5Il2-1lHl1 f1iX(m)~-_ RCl.l _.K....H_HlJItN.COIII CAlllIlXICllIlIll Addilian Df o...lIala 1 - 4 REVISIONS MASTER SITE PLAN I~:~ . J-l~-05 lAY DATE BY l>- .",. --------+ II: I !!!!I )> ~ '" c::> -c II!'H I i n ::::I:: ~ il" ~ ~ Boynton Town Center 11';!l ~ :r: r1"'1 r1"'1 , Mixed Use Development IU!ll or! :;::c 5 (1)1 NonhCoIIgres,fAVli''''''' '" --< :;::c -c J:- 0(") I~ ~, BOY"'QIIBeach,Florido !liil ~ ~ ~ r1"'1 ;0 "', r1"'1 ~ ~ !I 'iT n :;::c . ?< pi ,,! I * ~ --< ~ ~ ,. (") ~ 8, ill;1 U'> ~ ... :.. ~ llt n Z m I: ~ n ." .. o o :II "lI ~ Z ill I' ~---iW mo. ~~~ ffi:g~ ~~~ : ~ ~ ~ ; tn 5 ~ ig~m I' ~ l; ~ ~o'" 2l-"c I;:; ~ ~ 1 ~ 51 ffi i c m ~ : i 8 ~ I ~ c ~ 1- ~ ~ 1 ~ m ,~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ I~I ~~~ ~ '~I ~~ ~ i~ ",;0 > ~ * ti fiJ, r z ~ 21 o Z m m If'" " ~ ~~ ~ r-I ~ 0 rn 21 ;~ ~ I~I ~ ~ I - ---~~ jl' u- '\ z"ll 1 ~!; z I EXHIBIT B [!~~i~i~j~~ ~ g~. i; ~! if 8 ~~. J s.>o~ o"!:,.'O 3 s.~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~.~; -a :::ra.~ ~~""':J.m =i ::IE oonl 6-=""'-< -{g m 3~h5a~S.g:lOlo il;1~9.~~-!.~;f[ aa~~~~; fJa~ 'i;<c-9-:a.a :::](ii....., ~m:~glCij' ;CD~ ~.E:::2l5.g;0l i" ~g: ~ ~ fJ ~ ~ ~i; ~. fl e. 3.~m~gm :E~i S"c5?ls=;a.~ !.Q3" m ~ i ~ ~ ~i i 9-:r Os''i c:::l::e ~: :~~. ~~~ g:g :=. en c5~' ~:T li"('")~ [[1- a.eD '#. 0:-0. e.~~~~~~~~:g~ j if~~~i~i~ ~~ ~ ~~j~:c!-.iii ll..-~ ,r"3.g a g ~'-8 ~ s.~r~ ~~ a8!::3~- i~3a~-g&.~2~Q :;g-s,s 0.5 =t~CXlO?<~ ~~~g.~'<~~~[~ g-c5 *~~ Q'g- ~< C:e9.'<1O !.= ~8 -; i~~ r.5 ~ t>> ij i. a Cfl CD 0,10 Cil 2 ll9'[3 3" "90 Cfl CL Q) C'O iE !!!.. 0 a :5' ffi ~ lii" ~ 7' urlO a III ~ 5 [l~ ~ Q'l 9'~~ ll-n ~!i.g 6' s8. ~ ~ g-< - a -~ ~I 5 c ~ ....1 ~I ~I 12, ~I I - -r----- 198'.""_ 1 I>- I>- I>- o , l>- I>- ~ I>- ~ ~ u-= ~ g ~ ~~~i ~:~~ ~~~~ I>- ~r~ ~~~~ !! l>- t ~51~ ~ ~ i . , o , , I>- I~~~~~ i n~~~ ~>~'rn ~~~~2 ~=~~~ ~~~~~ I ~ ~@ I>- EXHIBIT B o 0 0 o o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 U i. ililf' ~ I!i!! I )> , I ~ 0 """C --1+ j '" c ~ ~ z ~ I 0 ::::t: , II lil" ~ Boynton Town Center I il.:11 :I: g:J ,.,.., ,.,.., ." Ii 1'1' i: :::=cI 5 I I Mixed Use Development 11 in ,i,ll ~'r~ ..... """C 0 NurtJt~AWlllIIt' !ii "Ill S ~ :::=cI :. '" ! iN BO)'II""'IJit,d"F/orltkz --1-1- ilia Iii ; 1""1'" 1~li ,1.1. 8 ,.,.., ..a. i~ ~ !~ !I!!i 0 . I 'iE ..... N 1~16 ,gig i; ill;, , '" ~~~ '! ! .:; qp jju~3~ I,.....::::;~ r ~ f = ~ ~ ; : ~ :~~~l~r:~ . ~ ~ : ! [ ~ : 2 r z ;';" '*' ~ ~ ~ O:'lL~2 ~ ~ [. ;; - ; ... " llil : ;: :: lI: ., - "~ g .. ;; ~ " v ~ .... wl<... ,. # ..... - ..,. ... :- :; '" ,. .... .. r ... ; : . ;; . ... ~ ., ". t:l "' L .. lI: ~ 11I11.;' :. ;; ~ ~ .. : ~ :. " ~ .. >J Z ... ~ .. . " ;.. : ;. -: '" :I': ." -< ;; II iIII.~ : :: :: :: ~ -: "( : : r: ~ ~ ;. ~ -,f- ~ ~ ~ ~ -"t ;- : ! ; -; ! .1IIli!l~ :: ~ ~ ; , " ... ~ " v . . ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT B ""'''' ",_, o. \"'''OO7\''OO\CON''\J.~OSC'''' '''",\O-''''CAN'-OO.'", m-CH" .., ,,-, .., co, '''''' "",m " T~.","' EX H I BIT B """ __~ ,__ "''''.... .............. .....9"....-................ on In,,.........,, 0' _.. It "'ft.............. "'0 _lia............. 01... lor "'",., I...... ...._... _......... _.. ,.._..... ,... _, ........ .....".. ............_ ...v'~...,_ .'M--,.............. _'- -......... _, _t,.. M_.............. _tn..... ~L;--~;~~~~~~':.;~~~;;~~~~~~~~;:+.--0"=:~~~:;~;~:=;=~ I~:~ ~ : S;~ - , C CN....l. ~ o BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I - C3 ~~ DEVELOPER; o~ ~ BOYNTON BEACH PLACE, L.L.C, BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA ~'" AS NOrm OAVlO T. WOOOW.I.RQ ...-J_n Kimley-Hom IIlo..J_U and Associates, Inc, 601~S~~":~~~~400~~="~~l'";~ _~7~~~:;~.~rAx~7=;6M8' OATt: BY LANDSCAPE PLAN EAST PORTION (C-3) DESlGNEOll OTW flOlI(IA RtGl$TJIlAI'IOH WND LA1168 O'I(O(EOBY ",. EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 3rd review revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a August 9,2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 2. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 3. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 4. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 5. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 6. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has COA.doc 08/18/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 7. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 8. The Fire flow test conducted on November 8, 2004 cannot be used as fire flow information. Only when the connections on the east side of Congress A venue are connected can staff evaluate the fire flow for the subject project. This condition will remain and no building permits may be issued until fire flow test are conducted and determined adequate by staff. POLICE Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 9. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. 10. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 11. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 12. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. COA.doc 08/18/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 13. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 14. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 15. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 16. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 17. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 18. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 19. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 20. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 21. Sheet SL-1 - The light poles shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 1606 to withstand 140 mph wind loads. COA.doc 08/18/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 22. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan (Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2). 23. Staff recommends preserving, where possible, all existing desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers (Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.). 24. All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement (Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.e.). 25. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-way. Staff recommends creating a three (3)- foot tall berm at Retention Pond #3. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 26. No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes, trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is 24.42 acres, it would be preferable to submit a survey that matches said acreage. 27. The project is subject to the limitations and timing at which development may proceed as outlined in the Palm Beach County Traffic approval letter or the conditions contained within the CRALLS amendment upon its adoption. COA.doc 08/18/05 5 DEPARTMENTS 28. The project proposes a mix of commercial uses: Retail, restaurant, and bank. The required parking for these commercial uses has been tabulated on a "shopping center" rate (1 space per 200 square feet). Therefore, this project would require a total of 1,246 parking spaces. The plans would provide for a total of 1,289 spaces, or an excess of 43 spaces. However, a deficiency of nine (9) spaces occurred within the Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) project. The intent is to share the excess parking of this project with the Boynton Village project (proposed directly to the north), leaving a surplus of 34 parking spaces. A cross parking / cross access agreement would be required at the time of permitting. 29. It should be noted that the peak of a decorative tower would be 52 feet - four (4) inches in height. This is a problem. Although the developer's intent was to enhance the west fayade of the big-box, the plans, would in fact, require height exception approval due to the fact that a portion the proposed building exceeds the 45-foot threshold of the C-3 zoning district. Therefore, at the time of permitting, the decorative tower height shall be reduced to 45 feet or height exception approval would be required prior to the issuance of any building permits. 30. At the time of permitting, submit a scaled drawing (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) that clearly illustrates all proposed building elevations (of all sides - north, south, east, and west), including the garden center proposed north of Building "C". All building elevations shall indicate the height, exterior dimensions, exterior color, and materials used (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.1.). All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. 31. Provide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of all buildings proposed on the out-lots (Chapter 4, Section 7.), or they will be subject to formal review when submitted at a later date. 32. At the time of permitting, revise the landscape plan to show trellises along the south fayade of Building "C". 33. The site plan and landscape plan should match each other with respect to the configuration of the sidewalks / pervious space internal to the development. 34. Unloading and loading areas shall be screened from streets and public view by a buffer wall, continuous vegetative buffer, or landscape barrier. Vegetative buffers or barriers shall be comprised of shrub and tree species having dense foliage and of a size and spacing to form a continuous screen of plant material as required by the Community Design Plan (Chapter 9, Section 10.C.1.) and the Landscaoe Code (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.3.6.). 35. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers adiacent roadways (internal and external) shall contain two lavers of plant INCLUDE REJECT COA.doc 08/18/05 6 DEPARTMENTS material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). The landscape buffer along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same quantities, and species of trees but different species and configuration of plant material proposed within the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.). The City Forester will coordinate this effort with the project landscape architect during the permitting process. 36. Staff recommends installing additional decorative 45-gallon planters in front of the buildings to help soften the hardscape surface. This would include additional planter containers on the west side of Building "B" and Building "C" as well. 37. The landscape plan shows the Foxtail palm trees are proposed on the east side of the Spine Road. The function of the roadway is primarily to alleviate traffic congestion on Congress Avenue, Gateway Boulevard, and Old Boynton Road. As shown on the plans, the Spine Road would directly link Gateway Boulevard to Old Boynton Road. However, it does not show the plant material proposed on the portion of the Spine Road within the Renaissance Commons project. It is staffs intent to create a park-like boulevard effect for the Spine Road. This would be best achieved by incorporating canopy trees into the design of the roadway (as was done in the Renaissance Commons project) thereby maintaining consistency of plant material proposed on within the right-of-way of the two projects. The Renaissance Commons project proposed Live Oak trees along the Spine Road. In this project, the Foxtail palm trees proposed along the Spine Road would be inconsistent and disjointed from the remaining portions of the roadway. Therefore, at the time of permitting, staff recommends substituting the proposed Foxtail palm trees with oak trees (along the Spine Road) to maintain consistency between the two plans. 38. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). 39. No project signage was included with this submittal. Therefore, staff recommends submittal of a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs as regulated bv Chapter 21 of the Land INCLUDE REJECT COA.doc 08/18/05 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Development Regulations. Provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color. 40. Indicate on the photometric plans (sheet 1) that the freestanding outdoor lighting poles will be black. 41. Loading dock operations on the C-3 parcel should be better concealed, through service court walls and or denser landscaping. 42. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast corner of the greater proiect (at Old Boynton Road). 43. The southwest corner of the property (at Old Boynton Road) should be accentuated with a sizeable building that wraps the corner with raised fa<;:ade, appropriate features, and pedestrian links to connect to corner. 44. The detail of the outdoor freestanding lighting fixture (sheet SLl) shows that the height of the poles would be 25 feet in height. The poles would be round tapered steel black poles. As a safeguard to maintain compatibility between these "Winchester" projects, staff endorses the use of the same freestanding lighting fixtures that is proposed throughout the entire Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) project. The intent of this recommendation is to discourage a situation where the Target store or any of the leased parcels would have taller, brighter lights that stand-out among the rest of the shopping center's lights, thereby drawing more attention to the parcel at night than during the day, which in turn, would be a direct conflict with code. Also, the lighting levels should be such that they provide for a safe environment for pedestrians and vehicles but not luminous as to be considered obnoxious or attention- getting. 45. The front of the stores would have individual planter areas containing Florida Royal palm, Washingtonia, and Live Oak trees. The Hardscape and Amenities Plan indicates that two (2) planters are proposed in front of the mam entrance to the stores. Staff recommends installing additional decorative 45-gallon planters in front of the buildings to help soften the hardscape surface. This would include additional planter containers west of Building "B" and Building "C" retail as well. 46. Staff recommends the use of a smooth stucco finish on all buildings associated with this project. 4 7. Parking lot trees, especially proposed within the wider pedestrian walks, should be shade trees, not coconut palms or other various palm trees. 48. Staff also has concerns with the lack of information regarding the future COA.doc 08/18/05 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT build-out of the out-lots. Staff wants to ensure consistency and compatibility between the out-lots and the main parcel with special emphasis on architectural design, project signage, landscaping, and building colors. Therefore, staff recommends the creation of a Design Program that includes but is not limited to architectural design, signage, landscape, and building colors for each out-lot and its relationship to the principle buildings. The design of these out-lots are incomplete at this time and each out-lot would require separate site plan review. 49. The link to the large retail store is vital. Pedestrian path should continue from main street, buildings should similarly front this aligned street, C-3 building facades should repeat mam street themes/elements including outdoor pedestrian seating/cafes (perhaps as part of the popcorn/hotdog concession at one end, and a deli in the produce section of the store at the other for balance. Both placed near outer walls with large windows and access to corresponding outdoor seating areas with trees and tables with umbrellas, fountains, or the like. 50. Provide an additional cross-walk connecting the front entrance of Building "C" and parking lot, including stop signs to control traffic accordingly. ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS: Comments; 51. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: Comments: 52. To be determined. MWR/elj S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Town Center (Target) NWSP 05-003\COA.doc ~ FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal DATE: May 20,2005 SUBJECT: NWSP 05-003 NWSP 05-004 NWSP 05-020 NWSP 05-019 Boynton Town Center Boynton Village Boynton Village Parcel 3 Condos Parcel 4&5 Traffic Congestion and population density is a concern in this area with the mall and the Renaissance Commons project in close proximity. During the holidays Congress Avenue is already difficult to travel for responding emergency apparatus due to blocked lanes of traffic. This situation will get worse as the density increases. Pursuit of traffic light pre-emption is essential as a remedy. To meet the increased demand additional resources are required such as personnel, apparatus, and equipment. It is imperative that Fire Station #5 be expedited to insure adequate service delivery levels and effective response times in the NE section of the City and as a back-up in the NW section of the City. This situation also increases the potential for mass causality events when large numbers of people occupy confined areas. This is becoming more prevalent in many areas of the city. Every added new commercial and multi-family occupancy increases the annual fire prevention inspection workload as required by ordinance. Although there have been a large number of these occupancies added in the past several years, our inspection staff has decreased. This situation has reached a point that may soon require changes in our inspection schedules that may negatively affect our future success. The past and current service level has prevented any significant fires in these occupancies for several years. New development projects involving multi-family or high-density commercial projects should be approved contingent upon consideration of future upgrades in emergency dispatch capability. These enhancements include new technology related to CAD, GIS, and AVL capability, as well as adequate staffing. All other factors (personnel, training, technology, fire station placement, building design features, etc) depend on a reliable and efficient method of getting the resources provided where they are needed in time to mitigate the consequences of an emergency, regardless of the type of response. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: May 18, 2005 FILE: NWSP 05-003 FROM: John Huntington, Officer Crime Prevention Unit SUBJECT: Boynton Town Center REFERENCES: Impacts of Proposed Site Plan On Department Services ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the impact for services for the proposed project, Boynton Town Center, to be located on the north east comer of Old Boynton Road and Congress Ave. This mixed-use project will include This property is located just south of Gateway Blvd. and east ofN. Congress Avenue. The plans call for mixed use, primarily residential and retail. I have attached a Reporting Area Report for all calls for service for reporting area 902 for December 2003 through October 2004. The report shows that there were 2,547 calls for service. Forty percent (1,014) of these calls were traffic related. Although a traffic assessment had showed that this proj ect supports current roadways, it did not reflect on traffic related calls for service and the impact that these calls have on current manpower. You must also consider that business and residential alarm calls will increase substantially and will represent fifteen percent of the calls to this area. Currently, there are numerous site plans for future residential/retail projects in Quantum Park. 1. Canterbury at Quantum Village 2. Quantum Park & Village Commercial (Future Publix Plaza) 3. Quantum Park & Village South 4. Quantum Park & Village North 5. Quantum Townhouse West The new developments will have a direct impact on future public safety issues, to include calls for service. The traffic assessment does not reflect these issues. Traffic congestion is becoming heavy in many areas of the city and emergency response will be impacted greatly. This increase in residential developments will also place a larger demand for new business growth. In addition, there are plans for a new retail center, Boynton Village, at Old Boynton Road and N. Congress Avenue. The demand for more police personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and non residential traffic into our city. ~Skh i7q/os 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 2nd review revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21. 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the V east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. 2. This plan depicts an 8-inch force main coming from the Lift Station that has a V dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan V submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control t/ devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article ILM.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 5. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be V reflected on all appropriate sheets. 6. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional / comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 7. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the ~ LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 8. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction t/ 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit aoolication. UTILITIES Comments: 9. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water /" and sewer systems serving this proiect (CODE, Section 26-12), 10. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code V requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 11. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid V for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or exoected demand. 12. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has V approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this proiect, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 13. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability t/ at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit aoolication. FIRE Comments: 14. The water flow data was derived from tests performed on the west side of ; Congress A venue, which does not satisfactorily and / or accurately reflect ,/ water flow rates to the subject property. Therefore, a fire flow test shall be conducted before any fire safety systems are installed, when main water feeder lines are connected. POLICE Comments: None 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 15. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional / comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 16. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in V 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. 17. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of ~ construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. 18. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall V' openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. 19. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the ~ minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. / v 20. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 21. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic V sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 22. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the 1// location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. / 23. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the / proposed construction. 24. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The V building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheetJs . However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. 25. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may / not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 26. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that / utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 27. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and ~ the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 28. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. V For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 29. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, V the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 30. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction / documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 31. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, / Section 11-4.29.2. 32. The type of construction and occupancy type of each building shall be legible t/' 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT and placed in a conspicuous place on the plans. 33. According to Table 500 of the 2001 FBC, Building "A" and Building "c" t/ exceed the allowable building area permitted by code. 34. Sheet SL-l - The light poles shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 1606 to V withstand 140 mph wind loads. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. Mulch should be eucalyptus or melaleuca. Notes and plant list are inconsistent. 36. Irrigation coverage must be 110%. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Map of Boundarv and Topoeraphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 ( previously submitted. not in this current packet. Existine Trees Manaeement Plan / 37. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.1 38. Staff recommends preserving, where possible, all existing desirable trees that c// are located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2- 1.2 39. All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the / specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.p.101 40. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height / and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article n Sec. 5.CA p. 101 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 41. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how / the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress A venue and Old Boynton Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-wav. Irril!ation Plan-No Irril!ation Dlan included in the submittal /' , 42. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 43. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate / zones and time duration for water conservation. 44. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the V' root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.l PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: X Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As V such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at the time of permitting. .t(\ +~ .'i tV No survey was \'JtlKded withU; Ithis packet of plans. Submit a survey of the subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes, t/ trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is 24.42 acres, it would be preferable to submit a survey that matches said acreage. ~ 5hol.~ Th.9 ~. ~~ Ov\..J""kR 0 on.. ... .A'~_,-q 47 ubmit a scaled drawmg (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) that clearly illustrates all proposed building elevations (of all sides - north, south, east, and west, J including the outlots). The elevations shall indicate the height, exterior dimensions, exterior color, and materials used (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.1.). The ledger sized pages of the colored elevations that you submitted are great supplements, but the packet still requires the full sized elevation drawings. ~provide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of all buildings proposed on the out-lots (Chapter 4, Section 7.), or they will be subject to formal review when submitted at a later date. 49. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. If concurrency does exist, please provide this office with a copv of a letter 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 7 INCLUDE REJECT DEPARTMENTS from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division indicating compliance with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach Coun '" uestion: On the master plan (sheet C3) and site plan (sheets C4 and C5), is- the SQUth property line shown ail it e1UTeRt~' ixa[ti: tQaay (}f will this be the location of the south property line after the required improvements to Old Bo ton Road? . . The site plan (sheet C5) shows that a drive-through facility is proposed on Out-lot 2. The "drive-through" aspect of it would require conditional use a roval. Please make an a lication for conditional use a roval. . The site plan should indicate the location of any proposed fences and buffer walls. The site plan and buffer wall detail should include the dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions, exterior finish, and color s Cha ter 4, Section 7.D. . . All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and awning sam les. . Overhead doors shall not be located on a building fa~ade that faces Old Boynton Road (Chapter 9, Section 11.J.1.). Revise the elevations so that the overhead doors are placed at the rear (east fa~ade) of the building instead of along the south elevation. If the intent is to have the overhead bay doors face Old Boynton Road, apply for and receive a Community Design Plan Appeal CDP A with miti ation measures such as a landsca e barrier. i5. nloading and loa1f::t areas s al b~scee d from streets and public view by a buffer wall, continuous vegetative buffer, or landscape barrier. Vegetative buffers or barriers shall be comprised of shrub and tree species having dense foliage and of a size and spacing to form a continuous screen of plant material as required by the Community Design Plan (Chapter 9, Section 10.C.1. and the Landsca e Code Cha ter 7.5, Article n, Section 3.B.3.6. . -z . The building fa~ade of Building "C" that faces Old Boynton Road shall be designed to be as attractive in appearance as the front of the building (Chapter 9, Section 11.I. . 57. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The colored renderings should be cli ed onto a board and not as a sheet within this acket. -roJAt 10 K~M 58. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers ad. acent roadwa s (internal and external) should contain two la ers of lant v- ./ t/ v v ~ / 'v v 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 8 DEPARTMENTS material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). The landscape buffer along Congress A venue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same approximate quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed within the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.). Staff will be recommend~n& tris as a project.condition of approval if the plans are not revised. TOvlI'L.. to tfi") INCLUDE REJECT . The Washingtonia palm trees proposed along the sides of the principal building shall be installed at Y2 the building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.M. . . Slow growing multi-trunked palm trees shall be installed within the planter areas proposed just south of Building "C" (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.). With special emphasis on the front of the buildings, staff recommends extending the landscape planters along the entire front (west fayade) of the three (3) big box buildings, allowing for intermittent openings for pedestrians and shopping carts. The planting strips need to be at least five (5) feet in width, which would be wide enough to accommodate palm trees with a narrow trunk. These planting strips are especially needed in front of the large Target building. The landscape strips should be wide enough to accommodate clusters of tall palm trees. Please note that the islands shown on the landscape plan (as proposed) are still too narrow for such a large building. Therefore, staff recommends incorporating even wider planter areas. The intent is to break up and soften the great expanse of wall, and also to provide for foundation landscaping as well. Bottom line: more trees in the front and less pavement. Please revise plans accordingly. If not, staff will be recommending wider planting strips and foundation landsca in as a condition of a roval. / 63. 11 shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 / inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately ,V after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.4. . 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 9 DEPARTMENTS ? 64. 11 proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends submittal of a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. Provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In this case, the property line would be measured from the edge of the right- of-wa line for the Sine Road. NO &e.c:.c.'rah~ P&'t~6 ~"t~I>, 65. Indicate on the photometric plans (sheet 1) that the freestanding outdoor li htin oles will be black. . Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 1O.H.). Provide details of said amenities. The architectural lans lack detail. 68. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the commercial / ublic s aces. Show their location on the architectural lans. 69. Loading dock operations on the C-3 parcel should be better concealed, throu service court walls and or denser landsca in . 70. Staff recommends incorporating additional architectural features, such as varying the heights of the parapet walls along the entire (east) elevation of the three 3 rinci al buildin s. 72. The southwest corner of the property (at Old Boynton Road) should be accentuated with a sizeable building that wraps the corner with raised fayade, a ro riate features, and edestrian links to connect to corner. 73. Staff recommends installin a fountain into the desi of all lakes. INCLUDE REJECT v 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 10 DEPARTMENTS 75. Parking lot trees, especially proposed within the wider pedestrian walks, should be shade trees, not coconut palms or other various palm trees. INCLUDE REJECT 76. Staff has concerns with the lack of information regarding the future build-out of the out-lots. Staff wants to ensure consistency and compatibility between the out-lots and the main parcel with special emphasis on architectural design, project signage, landscaping, and building colors. Therefore, staff recommends the following: Submit full and complete site plan packages for each out-lot; or Submit a Design Program that includes but is not limited to architectural design, signage, landscape, and building colors for each out-lot and its relationship to the principle buildings. 77. The link to the large retail store is vital. Pedestrian path should continue from main street, buildings should similarly front this aligned street, C-3 building facades should repeat mam street themes/elements including outdoor pedestrian seating/cafes (perhaps as part of the popcorn/hotdog concession at one end, and a deli in the produce section of the store at the other for balance. Both placed near outer walls with large windows and access to corresponding outdoor seating areas with trees and tables with umbrellas, fountains, or the like. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Town Center 1 NWSP 05-003\3rd REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 1<( ~~~I~~~u1AS~'~~ wwtR 31 ~ o.;f- 72~t~vfv~ f",,~ s .1~.. II" 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 5 y~~ )' IA .0 <3 '-1 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT and placed in a conspicuous place on the plans. 33. According to Table 500 of the 2001 FBC, Building "A" and Building "c" exceed the allowable building area permitted by code. 34. Sheet SL-l - The light poles shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 1606 to withstand 140 mph wind loads. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. Mulch should be eucalyptus or melaleuca. Notes and plant list are inconsistent. 36. Irrigation coverage must be 110%. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: Map of Boundarv and TOPol!raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 ( previously submitted. not in this current packet. Existinl! Trees Manal!ement Plan 37. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] 38. Staff recommends preserving, where possible, all existing desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.1. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2- 1.2 39. All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the V specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.101 40. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height / and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA P. 101 Add ib COM.MeV\."1S: (tlR~y TR e e pcdct~ tJ f \ /'TA;/'l ,..t~ ~ (~aM~ tL &.~ 0 1< blf/;. (7 ~,12.. ^ __ (( ,/~ ..... 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 41. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how V the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-way. Irril!ation Plan-No Irril!ation plan included in the submittal V 42. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 43. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate V zones and time duration for water conservation. 44. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the t/ root ball. rEnvironmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.1 PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 45. Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at the time of permitting. 46. No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes, trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is 24.42 acres, it would be preferable to submit a survey that matches said acreage. 47. Submit a scaled drawing (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) that clearly illustrates all proposed building elevations (of all sides - north, south, east, and west, including the outlots). The elevations shall indicate the height, exterior dimensions, exterior color, and materials used (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.1.). The ledger sized pages of the colored elevations that you submitted are great supplements, but the packet still requires the full sized elevation drawings. 48. Provide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of all buildings proposed on the out-lots (Chapter 4, Section 7.), or they will be subject to formal review when submitted at a later date. 49. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. If concurrency does exist, please provide this office with a copy of a letter " 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan JoO'--\ 1< h.J E12.5 ~l '; LoS >-'~ Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 2nd review revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21. 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. 2. This plan depicts an 8-inch force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO)' 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article ILB.2 and Article 11M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 5. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all aoorooriate sheets. 6. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 7. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permittinjl;. 8. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction ..'~~ ... 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT and placed in a conspicuous place on the plans. 33. According to Table 500 of the 2001 FBC, Building "A" and Building "c" exceed the allowable buildin~ area permitted by code. 34. Sheet SL-l - The light poles shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 1606 to withstand 140 mph wind loads. PARKS AND RECREATION '[)e~q1"'\ O+- -tht q n=e-o W~'1 ~hou...ld 'o-e. \()COy~~ ~ / Comments: \r'\ -\-0 ~'f"& \ o \~("'\ \ 35. Mulch should be eucalyptus or melaleuca. Notes and plant list are /' inconsistent. I t/ 36. Irrigation coverage must be 110%. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Map of Boundarv and TOPol!raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 ( previously submitted. not in this current packet. Existinl! Trees Manal!ement Plan 37. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.1 38. Staff recommends preserving, where possible, all existing desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.1- Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2- 1.2 39. All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.p.lOl 40. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.4 p. 10] ~~. ~ tv/ /ftiI2/ ~ g/q/o~ , "" -Bo'l ~') " -rovJu C~\tet. 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 08/08/05 3 ----- / - DEPARTMENTS BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 15. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at ermit review. 16. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Cha ter 3. 17. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. 18. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and un rotected wall 0 enin s ermitted er 2001 FBC, Table 600. 19. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of ermit a lication. 20. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load s on the lans for the buildin desi 21. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit a lication. 22. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject re uest. 23. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the ro osed construction. 24. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable buildin codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor Ian la out is conce tual" INCLUDE REJECT ~ v v t/ / ;/ v t/ v vi .... 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 08/08/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s . However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. 25. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may ~ not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 26. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that / utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 27. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. / b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 28. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. ~ For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 29. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, t/ the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 30. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction / documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 31. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, / Section 11-4.29.2. 32. The type of construction and occupancy type of each building shall be legible ~ .. 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 08/08/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT and placed in a conspicuous place on the plans. 33. According to Table 500 of the 2001 FBC, Building "A" and Building "c" V exceed the allowable building area permitted bv code. 34. Sheet SL-l - The light poles shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 1606 to J/ withstand 140 mph wind loads. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. Mulch should be eucalyptus or melaleuca. Notes and plant list are inconsistent. 36. Irrigation coverage must be 110%. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: Map of Boundarv and Topoeraphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 ( previouslv submitted, not in this current packet. Existine Trees Manaeement Plan 37. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] 38. Staff recommends preserving, where possible, all existing desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.n. 2.]. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2- 1.2 39. All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chanter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.101 40. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10] ,,-- ... '. 'jCji' 9j ~ > - , X~ .et>/J~ Jl ~() \ / I J 3 .t~/LV 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan fjcrU'{.. D" Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 2nd review revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21, 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking, DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road, 2. This plan depicts an 8-inch force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article II.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 5. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 6. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 7. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 8. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 10 DEPARTMENTS 75. Parking lot trees, especially proposed within the wider pedestrian walks, should be shade trees, not coconut palms or other various palm trees. 76. Staff has concerns with the lack of information regarding the future build-out of the out-lots. Staff wants to ensure consistency and compatibility between the out-lots and the main parcel with special emphasis on architectural design, project slgnage, landscaping, and building colors. Therefore, staff recommends the following: Submit full and complete site plan packages for each out-lot; or Submit a Design Program that includes but is not limited to architectural design, signage, landscape, and building colors for each out-lot and its relationship to the principle buildings. 77. The link to the large retail store is vital. Pedestrian path should continue from main street, buildings should similarly front this aligned street, C-3 building facades should repeat mam street themes/elements including outdoor pedestrian seating/cafes (perhaps as part of the popcorn/hotdog concession at one end, and a deli in the produce section of the store at the other for balance. Both placed near outer walls with large windows and access to corresponding outdoor seating areas with trees and tables with umbrellas, fountains, or the like. MWR/sc INCLUDE S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Town Center 1 NWSP 05-003\3rd REVIEW COMMENTS.doc ... r . .1 A ~ / I' .,; 14--' /" . .,//. ../ ~' J. .~ '''1 .-1' /.' ~ .J.--./.<, /! _,~:V~!--V/ ~"ll " ;>')/ C 7~ r/t':-:,ul:~'V /6,' _b;A:(:,r ,Ct-/) .lit' . -- " .~J/ /--:M4'" v'~ v - - :: - -', ",f !7) '. . ~~ ......../7" ~ ',/'!3rt/)'./L'7i/t''Z~~,' 1-:.>'7':/ J", '-h-,.,. ///:L /~<\... -,: n<:/(1.~; :: -C-' : //)-:-7 /~~ A'- _2c.~4P' .~-<'~ Y A-/~7//iM/ /W~ d~/;f;;u/4~ A/l'fi/i?A~ ./i~ !~~~I-( .744/~~/ . . l/IJL./ti '~LL _ C'!r:<:"71 / U. (' /:'7' l./ CZ';; { //~rt'c>'J( C-; n./l'f):~7~ --c'. 'j , ~ ./ v- .\. 1 :>.., .. J;' '9 " -. I. /' . U'tl] I~""Y ~ C;U' ~'Cf j ~11 /1UI'-Y ...... ~ fj,/4'7 ..z:; &..b'7 j},k11,;f ~.;z .(4!J.AJ# - 1.$./ .H L~A .,() ~,~P/ ~~k~,~'r x-'j.--U...~./1AJ$_/~~I'Lj <d.~~ ''1~t. ~~ .. ,~ ..G:P.-.t 0""7--<- ~ ..dU" Ii 0 ~. t6 d . /' - .----c.--t .~-~-./ /.7 , ~'t ....-r... , ~ / 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 2nd review revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21. 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the '" east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. 2. This plan depicts an 8-inch force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force , main or the dumpster enclosure. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, " directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article n.B.2 and Article n.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 5. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 6. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not .. ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 7. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. , 8. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction 3rd REVIEW COMMENTS 08/02/05 2 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 9. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 10. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 11. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 12. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this proiect, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 13. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 14. The water flow data was derived from tests performed on the west side of Congress A venue, which does not satisfactorily and / or accurately reflect water flow rates to the subject property. Therefore, a fire flow test shall be conducted before any fire safety systems are installed, when main water feeder lines are connected. POLICE Comments: None l,~ E~{~~S i ~l60~ ~S. ^ ^ /11c..:..,-+-n,""", 'TMJ. '1-i 1st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS IVlLr\;.)I~ \ '711'- \ New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 1 slreview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with an Mav 5,2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article t/ II, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted 2. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off L/ the spine road. POH to provide drawings with auto-turn program showing proper access to all dumpster 3. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a ~/ dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main relocated so that dumpster enclosure does not encroach on the proposed easement 4. Live Oaks are specified adjacent to the dumpster enclosure north of ~ Building "A" and will cause a vertical conflict. Please relocate these trees or replace with a palm species. The location of the Oaks in question has been modified to reduce the potential for vertical conflict. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan ~ submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). Traffic analysis previously submitted 6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, / directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "c" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article ILB.2 and Article II.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Signing and marking plan added to site plan, see sheets C6 & C7 / 7. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These 7 improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. Please, see attached roadway improvement plan, see sheets C24 & C25 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE Comments: 8. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencIes such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. General noted added to plans 9. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be / reflected on all appropriate sheets. V Comment noted 10. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the T ART /' process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated V by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted 11. This plan depicts primarily building of the Super Target structure and the associated parking. The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support building construction. Please, see attached roadway improvement plan, see sheets C24 & C25 12. The lighting design shall provide a minimum average light level of one foot- candle. Glare which is readily perceptible at any point at or beyond the property on which the use is located is prohibited (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 4.N.7.) Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (LDR, Chapter 9, Section IO.F.5.) The lighting design provided is rather high and will throw glare onto adjacent roadways as well as overwhelming adjacent businesses. No lighting was provided in the rear of the Building "A", "B", and "c" creating safety concerns. Please correct the Lighting plan to address these items. Lighting plan has been corrected to meet minimum footcandle requirements for the project. 13. The medians on Congress Avenue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information. Comment noted, see note #13 on sheet C3 14. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light REJECT ~ ~ ~ / 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06120/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, / Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.I. b.). Comment noted 15. Green Malayan Coconuts are specified within the parking lots. These may /' present a hazard to vehicles if not properly maintained when bearing fruit. It is recommended that an alternate palm species be specified. A Landscape Maintenance plan will be developed to reduce the potential hazard. 16. Trees are shown on the western edge (Sheet LA-I) that were not identified. t/ Please correct. Trees identified in landscaping plans 17. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article / II, Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Congress Ave. and Old Boynton Rd. Sight triangles shown on landscaping plans 18. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there t/ shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Note corrected 19. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of / permitting. SFWMD permit with full drainage calculations approved at June 8 Governing Board meeting by consent 20. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on Drainage plan. / Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. Storm sewer diameters, inlet types, elevations, have been added to plans, see sheets C8, C9 & C 1 0 21. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction / acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted UTILITIES Comments: 22. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date / for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. See attached "Exhibit A" 23. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the / water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Comment noted I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 24. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, V' Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Fire flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on 11/8/04 and meet city requirements 25. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. While this proposed plans reflects this coverage in general, it does not cover future Buildings "I" & "J" completely in the next phase. It may be beneficial to this development to rectify this concern at this time to prevent retrofitting in the future. / Out Lot #1 appears to be weak in fire hydrant coverage; provide an additional' hydrant on the main perimeter water system loop at approximately the southeast comer of the Out Lot. In addition, Master Plan Sheet reflects the following note: "Construction Type: IV Unprotected - Sprinklered Occupancy: Merchantile What this note means is unclear; no specific note appears on the proposed plan indicating that the (all) mercantile buildings shall be sprinklered i.a.w. the NFPC. Therefore, sufficient coverage must be provided to meet the 1,500 gpm fire flow requirement for a four (4) hour duration of time. The applicant shall demonstrate that this condition shall be complied with. Additional F.H. added to cover bldg "I" and "J", another F.H. was relocated to allow for better coverage of bldg. "I". Additional F.H. added on SE comer of out lot # 1 to allow for better coverage. "Construction Type IV-Unprotected - Sprinklered" describes type of construction as defined in 2001 FBe, Chapter 6. "Occupancy: Mercantile" describes occupancy per 2001 FBC Chapter 3. 26. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Comment noted 27. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Comment noted 28. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted / / ~ v %. 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 5 DEPARTMENTS 29. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. Comment noted 30. Clarify the direction of flow of the proposed 8-inch force main along the north line of this development phase; it is flowing to or from the proposed lift station located east of proposed Building "D" (I am going to assume from at this point)? If this is correct, flow is being directed away from the routing to the regional wastewater treatment plant. Please clarify the master Utility plan system (including all lift stations) for this proposed development. Direction of flow depicted on plans, see sheets C9 & C 1 0 31. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main relocated so that dumpster enclosure does not encroach on the proposed easement, see sheet C 1 0 32. This plan depicts utilities that must be installed to support this project, including relocation of the lift station. This plan is deficient in showing a realistic "plan of attack" to have utilities installed prior to building construction. Additionally the plan cuts off utilities at the project limits with no indication of how the utilities will tie into the adjacent developments. Please clarify this information. Please, see note on sht. C-I0 for existing lift station relocation. Utilities at project limits to be tied into by developer of each individual parcel. Engineer to coordinate during design. 33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. Utility construction details includcd in plans that adhere to Utility Department standards. FIRE Comments: 34. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP A I, Fire Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 1997 edition. Comment noted 35. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less INCLUDE REJECT / v / / / / / .. 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonT ownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute. Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all building, within a 200' radius of the hydrant (with the exception ofa small portion of bldg. "A" in the center). In addition, hydrants around the buildings have been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the 16" WM off Congress A venue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04 and meet City requirements. 36. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in /' service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2. Comment noted 37. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum ./ performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of information for responding emergency personnel. Comment noted 38. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing /' and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23, Section B.2. Fire lanes and signing and marking for Fire lanes added to plans 39. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained ./ throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1. Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lane access during construction phase 40. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFPA 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at ./ the start of the project and maintained until completion. Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lane access during construction phase "" 41. Fire sprinklers will be required. / All buildings will be sprinklered POLICE Comments: 42. Show all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs and 7 Do Not Enter signage on site plans. Signage and marking plan added to site plan, see sheets C6 & C7 BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 43. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional ~/ comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted I 44. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as V defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. " I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Type IV Unprotected - Sprinklered has been indicated on site plan 45. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. / Each bldg. is classified as Mercantile Occupancy, and has been indicated as such on the site plan. 46. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the V building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. Site architect will comply with this requirement 47. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall / openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. Note added to all elevations 48. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and ./ the provisions of2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Site architect will comply with this requirement 49. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the / loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. Calculations will be provided at the time of permitting 50. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic / sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. Site architect will comply with this requirement 51. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents / the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. The limits of construction of each parcel is the parcel line which is labeled on the site plan 52. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the /' proposed construction. Comment noted 53. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap t/ accessible entrance door/s to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3. Accessible entrance location symbol placed on all bldgs on site plan 54. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable / building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 8 DEPARTMENTS mCLUDE location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. Site architect will comply with this requirement 55. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door/ to each building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified In the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. Accessible route shown on plans 56. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations. Number of handicapped spaces were calculated using the table provided in 200 I FBC, Section 11.4.1.2.5.a 57. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are / readily available. Comment noted, well to be used for landscaping 58. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that / utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the II permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. Comment noted, water use permit currently under review at SFWMD 59. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: / a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how REJECT ~ / 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Comment noted 60. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or / tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Comment noted 61. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, / the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted 62. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- / family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. Developer to comply 63. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TRC plan / submittals. Photometric plan has been submitted. At this time, photometrics have not been performed considering proposed landscaping. This plan will be produced at the time when landscaping plan has been completed and accepted by the City 64. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, / Section 11-4.29.2. Comment noted 65. The type of construction and occupancy type of each building shall be / legible and placed in a conspicuous place on the plans. Plans to be re-Iabeled by site architect 66. According to Table 500 of the 2001 FBC, Building "A" and Building "C" / exceed the allowable building area permitted by code. Per site architect, Buildings A, Band C meet the requirements of unlimited building area in Section 503.4.8. 67. Sheet SL-l - The light poles shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 1606 to ~ withstand 140 mph wind loads. Comment noted, light poles will meet the 140 mph wind load criteria 68. Sheet C4 - Parking Summary - Five handicap accessible parking spaces are ~ V required and tabulation shows four spaces. Revise parking plan to show the required five spaces. Parking plan has been changed accordingly PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 69. It is recommended that Royal Palms have a 20' clearance in which fronds to , ~~((W - ~., (LD(d)b L.i;fIv1Ml3VTS t+""V~. ~~6T t7E80 . ~a~~Dy2-E~~V- C?/~ft~~ 1 J -\ ,-. l1illREVIEW REVISED COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: IS'review revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with an May 5.2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted 2. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. POR to provide drawings with auto-turn program showing proper access to all dumpster 3. . This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main relocated so that dumpster enclosure does not encroach on the proposed easement 4. Live Oaks are specified adjacent to the dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" and will cause a vertical conflict. Please relocate these trees or replace with a palm species. The location of the Oaks in question has been modified to reduce the potential for vertical conflict. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). Traffic analysis previously submitted 6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article II.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Signing and marking plan added to site plan, see sheets C6 & C7 7. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. Please, see attached roadway improvement plan, see sheets C24 & C25 ENGINEERING DIVISION .. 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36_3_05 06/20/05 6 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute. Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all building, within a 200' radius of thc hydrant (with the exception of a small portion of bldg. "A" in the center). In addition, hydrants around the buildings have been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the 16" WM off Congress A venue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04 and meet City requirements. 36. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2. Comment noted 37. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of information for responding emergency personnel. Comment noted 38. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23, Section B.2. Fire lanes and signing and marking for Fire lanes added to plans 39. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1. Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lane access during construction phase 40. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFPA 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at the start of the project and maintained until completion. Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lane access during construction phase 41. Fire sprinklers will be required. All buildings will be sprinklered POLICE Comments: 42. Show all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs and Do Not Enter signage on site plans. Signage and marking plan added to site plan, see sheets C6 & C7 BUILDING DIVISION Comments: / 43. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional ./ comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not v ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted 44. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. # I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonT ownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 7 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Type IV Unprotected - Sprinklered has been indicated on site olan 45. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. c/ Each bldg. is classified as Mercantile Occupancy, and has been indicated as such on the site plan. 46. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the V building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. Site architect will comply with this requirement 47. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. L/ Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. Note added to all elevations 48. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and J the provisions of2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Site architect will comply with this requirement 49. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the t/ loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. Calculations will be provided at the time of permitting 50. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic ,J sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. Site architect will comply with this requirement 51. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the V subject request. The limits of construction of each parcel is the parcel line which is labeled on the site plan 52. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the V proposed construction. Comment noted 53. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap V accessible entrance doorls to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3. Accessible entrance location symbol placed on all bldgs on site olan ) 54. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The V building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20105 8 DEPARTMENTS location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. Site architect will comply with this requirement 55. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door/ to each building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified In the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. Accessible route shown on plans 56. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations. Number of handicapped spaces were calculated using the table provided in 2001 FBC, Section 11.4.1.2.5.a 57. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Comment noted, well to be used for landscaping 58. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F .S. 373.216. Comment noted, water use permit currently under review at SFWMD 59. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how INCLUDE REJECT ~ v J l. / v .. . ~ , ... " 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36_3_05 06/20/05 9 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Comment noted 60. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City / computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Comment noted 61. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for J review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted 62. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- ~ family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. Developer to comply 63. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (Chapter 4, Section 7 .BA) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TRC plan submittals. Photometric plan has been submitted. At this time, photometries have not been performed considering proposed landscaping. This plan will be produced at the time when landscaping plan has been completed and accepted by the City 64. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 200 I FBC, Section 11-4.29.2. V Comment noted 65. The type of construction and occupancy type of each building shall be legible and placed in a conspicuous place on the plans. ~ Plans to be re-labeled by site architect 66. According to Table 500 of the 200 I FBC, Building "A" and Building "c" exceed the allowable building area permitted by code. V Per site architect, Buildings A, Band C meet the requirements of unlimited building area in Section 50304.8. 67. Sheet SL-I - The light poles shall comply with 200 I FBC, Section 1606 to V withstand 140 mph wind loads. Comment noted, light poles will meet the 140 mph wind load criteria 68. Sheet C4 - Parking Summary - Five handicap accessible parking spaces are required and tabulation shows four spaces. Revise parking plan to show the required five spaces. - Parking plan has been changed accordingly PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 69. It is recommended that Royal Palms have a 20' clearance in which fronds to I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 10 K~ t~l\ O~ ., I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT drop. The zone should not have roads, sidewalks or parking areas in it. It is suggested that the Royals be substituted with another palm. Substitutions have been made where necessary. 70. Mulch should be eucalyptus or melaleuca. Mulch specification has been revised to shredded eucalyptus. 71. Do not recommend using Tabebuia trees due to low wind tolerance; however, the Tabebuia herterophylla did better than the Tabebuia chrysantha. Noted. 72. The cover page indicated there were irrigation plans. There were none. Noted. 73. Irrigation coverage must be 110%. Noted. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 74. Map of Boundarv and TOPol!raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 (previouslv submitted. not in this current packet. Existinl! Trees Manal!ement Plan The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on V site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] An Existing Tees Management Plan was previously submitted. 75. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing / desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Noted. 76. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2- 1.2 All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the / V specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida # 1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.p.to] Revisions to tree specifications have been made as requested. 77. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, ~ Article II Sec. 5.CA p. to] Noted. 78. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should /' include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be V measured at time planting and inspection. Revisions to detail has been made as requested. 79. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress A venue and Old Boynton / Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-way. The proposed landscaping shall buffer the parking lot with the code required height of plant material on top of a landscape berm of approximately 2' -3' height and supplemented with canopy and understory trees. 80. Irrieation Plan-No Irrieation plan included in the submittal The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume V water conservation using non-portable water. Noted. 81. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate ~ zones and time duration for water conservation. Noted. 82. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to ~ v the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] Noted. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 83. At the technical advisory review team meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. Comment noted, all plans will be provided at TART meeting 84. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8 Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Comment noted, all plans will be provided at TART meeting 85. Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at the time of permitting. Comment noted 86. No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes, trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is 24.42 acres, it would be preferable to submit a survey that matches said acreage. Survey will be submitted. Survey provided is for overall site, and includes additional parcels. Survey will include subject parcel, but will also include information from adjoining parcels. .JC:>'f> '\ ~ \-lUZ-? . 1 st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 1 slreview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with an May 5,2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted 2. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. POH to provide drawings with auto-turn program showing proper access to all dumpster 3. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main relocated so that dumpster enclosure does not encroach on the proposed easement 4. Live Oaks are specified adjacent to the dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" and will cause a vertical conflict. Please relocate these trees or replace with a palm species. The location of the Oaks in question has been modified to reduce the potential for vertical conflict. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). Traffic analysis previously submitted 6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article II.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Signing and marking plan added to site plan, see sheets C6 & C7 7. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. Please, see attached roadway improvement plan, see sheets C24 & C25 ENGINEERING DIVISION ~ 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 10 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT drop. The zone should not have roads, sidewalks or parking areas in it. V' It is suggested that the Royals be substituted with another palm. 0 ~ Substitutions have been made where necessary. . l I. 70. Mulch should be eucalyptus or melaleuca. No~ ~ P\~~ l\t> r- \f',U " -/ . \ , Mulch specification has been revised to shredded eucalyptus. 71. Do not recommend using Tabebuia trees due to low wind tolerance; however, the Tabebuia herterophylla did better than the Tabebuia ~ / chrysantha. Noted. 72. The cover page indicated there were irrigation plans. There were none. ./ Noted. 73. Irrigation coverage must be 110%. ./ Noted. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 74. Map of Boundary and Topoe:raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 (previously submitted. not in this current packet. Existine: Trees Manae:ement Plan The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species oftrees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] An Existing Tees Management Plan was previously submitted. 75. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Noted. 76. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2- 1.2 All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height ofthe trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.p.l0] Revisions to tree specifications have been made as requested. 77. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10] Noted. 78. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time planting and inspection. Revisions to detail has been made as requested. 79. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how ""-" ,",..; ~ V--... \ ~ .... 1 st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 1 slreview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with an May 5,2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted 2. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the ~.. east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off tlte spine road. POH to ovide drawings with auto-turn program showing proper access to al pster 3. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main located so that dumpster enclosure does not encroac on the proposed easem 4. Live Oaks are specified adjacent to the dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" and will cause a vertical conflict. Please relocate these trees or replace with a palm species. The location of the Oaks in question has been modified to reduce the potential for vertical conflict. q;\~ .~ f PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). 0'\'l~ : fie analysis previously submitted N):' L,;6 t'l'66.~Ql\9(.' On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic co trol devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "c" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article II.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Signin and markin Ian added to site lan, see sheets C6 & C7 7. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. ,-- Please, see attached roadwa im rovement plan, see she C25 ./ ~. ENGINEERING DIVISION I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonT ownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 2 DEPARTMENTS Comments: 8. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. General noted added to plans 9. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Comment noted 10. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted 11. This plan depicts primarily building of the Super Target structure and the associated parking. The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be planned and phased so that all improvemen~s A aref.v in-place to support building construction. (jJ/Jv ' Please, see attached roadway improvement plan, see sheets C24 & C25 12. The lighting design shall provide a minimum average light level of one foot- candle. Glare which is readily perceptible at any point at or beyond the property on which the use is located is prohibited (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 4.N.7.) Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (LDR, Chapter 9, Section IO.F.5.) The lighting design provided is rather high and will throw glare onto adjacent roadways as well as overwhelming adjacent businesses. No lighting was provided in the rear of the Building "A", "B", and "C" creating safety concerns. Please correct the Lighting plan to address these items. Lighting plan has been corrected to meet minimum footcandle requirements for the roject. 13. The medians on Congress Avenue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information. Comment noted, see note # 13 on sheet C3 14. It may be necessary to re lace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to li ht INCLUDE REJE ~~~ / ) \ C.,- I' ,n '.' V\,y\\Oj 'I v: 'I( 6')\~~. "I.' l 0 Sp \",'<- ~ ~~e ~ \.,\. 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 3 DEPARTMENTS fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b.). Comment noted reen Malayan Coconuts are specified within the parking lots. These may present a hazard to vehicles if not properly maintained when bearing fruit. It is recommended that an alternate palm species be specified. A Landscape Maintenance plan will be developed to reduce the otential hazard. 16. Trees are shown on the western edge (Sheet LA-I) that were not identified. Please correct. Trees identified in landscaping lans 17. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Congress Ave. and Old Boynton Rd. Sight triangles shown on landscaping plans 18. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) ate corrected 9. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. SFWMD permit with full drainage calculations approved at June 8 Governing ard meeting by consent 20. pecify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on Drainage plan. dicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Indicate material s . ns for storm sewer. Storm sewer diameters, inlet type~, elevations, av. .,een.a plans, see sheets C8, C9 & ClO , ~ . L: 21. Paving, Drainage and Site details ot e reviewed for c struction acceptability at this time. All en in ering cons . s shall be in accordance with the applicable Cit f Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Han book and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted UTILITIES Comments: 22. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. See attached "Exhibit A" 23. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Comment noted INCLUDE 1/ J '. ~~() (' --r ~rryt:../ ~~ .p- 'f "-., .. " I STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 4 DEPARTMENTS 24. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Fire flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on 11/8/04 and meet city requirements 25. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. While this proposed plans reflects this coverage in general, it does not cover future Buildings "I" & "J" completely in the next phase. It may be beneficial to this development to rectify this concern at this time to prevent retrofitting in the future. Out Lot # 1 appears to be weak in fire hydrant coverage; provide an additional hydrant on the main perimeter water system loop at approximately the southeast comer of the Out Lot. In addition, Master Plan Sheet reflects the following note: "Construction Type: IV Unprotected - Sprinklered Occupancy: Merchantile What this note means is unclear; no specific note appears on the proposed plan indicating that the (all) mercantile buildings shall be sprinklered i.a.w. the NFPC. Therefore, sufficient coverage must be provided to meet the 1,500 gpm fire flow requirement for a four (4) hour duration of time. The applicant shall demonstrate that this condition shall be complied with. Additional F.R. added to cover bldg "I" and "J", another F.H. was relocated to allow for better coverage of bldg. "I". Additional F.H. added on SE comer of out lot # 1 to allow for better coverage. "Construction Type IV-Unprotected - Sprinklered" describes type of construction as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. "Occupancy: Mercantile" describes occupancy per 2001 FBC Chapter 3. 26. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Comment noted 27. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Comment noted 28. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted INCLUDE .. ,<iJ 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 5 DEPARTMENTS 29. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. Comment noted :C::--' . '1 . \~' C~'" --,. c./ ,,"~ . -#= ~ ~ 30. Clarify the direction of flow of the proposed 8-inch force main along the north line of this development phase; it is flowing to or from the proposed lift station located east of proposed Building "D" (I am going to assume from at this point)? If this is correct, flow is being directed away from the routing to the regional wastewater treatment plant. Please clarify the master Utility plan system (including all lift stations) for this proposed development. Direction of flow depicted on plans, see sheets C9 & C 1 0 31. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main relocated so that dumpster enclosure does not encroach on the proposed easement, see sheet C 1 0 32. This plan depicts utilities that must be installed to support this project, including relocation of the lift station. This plan is deficient in showing a realistic "plan of attack" to have utilities installed prior to building construction. Additionally the plan cuts off utilities at the project limits with no indication of how the utilities will tie into the adjacent developments. Please clarify this information. Please, see note on sht. C-I 0 for existing lift station relocation. Utilities at project limits to be tied into by developer of each individual parcel. Engineer to coordinate during design. 33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. Utility construction details included in plans that adhere to Utility Department standards. FIRE Comments: 34. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 1997 edition. Comment noted 35. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less INCLUDE .nnt ~ ",",.,,$ "." 1 st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 1st review revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with an May 5.2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted 2. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. POH to provide drawings with auto-turn program showing proper access to all dumpster 3. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main relocated so that dumpster enclosure does not encroach on the proposed easement 4. Live Oaks are specified adjacent to the dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" and will cause a vertical conflict. Please relocate these trees or replace with a palm species. The location of the Oaks in question has been modified to reduce the potential for vertical conflict. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Infrastructure improvements must be made based on the traffic analysis before issuance of any certificate of occupancies (CO). Traffic analysis previously submitted 6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "c" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article II.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Signing and marking plan added to site plan, see sheets C6 & C7 7. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. Please, see attached roadway improvement plan, see sheets C24 & C25 ENGINEERING DIVISION \0, 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonTownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 29. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. Comment noted 30. Clarify the direction of flow of the proposed 8-inch force main along the north line of this development phase; it is flowing to or from the proposed lift station located east of proposed Building "D" (I am going to assume from at this point)? If this is correct, flow is being directed away from the routing to the regional wastewater treatment plant. Please clarify the master Utility plan system (including all lift stations) for this proposed development. Direction of flow depicted on plans, see sheets C9 & C 1 0 31. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 8" force main relocated so that dumpster enclosure does not encroach on the proposed easement, see sheet C 1 0 32. This plan depicts utilities that must be installed to support this project, including relocation of the lift station. This plan is deficient in showing a realistic "plan of attack" to have utilities installed prior to building construction. Additionally the plan cuts off utilities at the project limits with no indication of how the utilities will tie into the adjacent developments. Please clarify this information. Please, see note on sht. C -10 for existing lift station relocation. Utilities at project limits to be tied into by developer of each individual parcel. Engineer to coordinate during design. 33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. Utility construction details included in plans that adhere to Utility Department standards. FIRE Comments: 34. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts UrYL'\ 1, F;,e IAe~eiltign rock, 1997 8aiti6fl, MiS }IFPA lQl, Lift Sufdj' C:Hle, l~ <diti6n. J..ocrit ~.~ ~ ~ Comment noted 35. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less v 1 STReviewedRevisedComments-BoyntonT ownCenterC-36-3-05 06/20/05 6 DEPARTMENTS than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute. Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all building, within a 200' radius of the hydrant (with the exception ofa small portion of bldg. "A" in the center). In addition, hydrants around the buildings have been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the 16" WM off Congress A venue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04 and meet City re uirements. 36. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per NFPA, (~Section 41-2.3.2. Comment noted ;{00:3 37. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of information for responding emergency personnel. Comment noted 38. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23, Section B.2. Fire lanes and signing and marking for Fire lanes added to plans 39. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1. Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lane access during construction phase 40. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFPA 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at the start of the project and maintained until completion. Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lane access during construction phase 41. Fire sprinklers will be required. All buildin s will be sprinklered . ~~~~.~~~ )j,df)t~ r~ Comments: 0 L { c r; 42. Show all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs and Do Not Enter signage on site plans. Signage and marking plan added to site plan, see sheets C6 & C7 BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 43. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted 44. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. ~ REJECT v v ~ v v /' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: May 23, 2005 FILE: NWSP 05-003 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Boynton Town Center (revised) REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: 1. Show all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs and Do Not Enter signage on site plans. ~ Rivers, Jody To: Subject: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie Site Plan Review - Boynton Town Center (revised) Project: File No.: Boynton Town Center Revised NWSP 05-003 The Recreation and Parks Department have the following comments: 1. It is recommended that Royal Palms have a 20' clearance in which fronds to drop. The zone should not have roads, sidewalks or parking areas in it. It is suggested that the Royals be substituted with another palm. 2. Mulch should be eucalyptus or melaleuca 3. Do not recommendusing Tabebuia trees due to low wind tolerance; however, the Tabebuia herterophylla did better than the Tabebuia chrysantha 4. The cover page indicated that there waere irrigation plans. There were none. 5. Irrigation coverage must be 110%. JodtJ RLvevs, Parks Superintendent City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 (561) 742-6226 (561) 742-6233 (fax) 1 TRC Memorandum Page 1 of 2 -~-- " Coale, Sherie From: Hallahan, Kevin Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 20052:28 PM To: Breese, Ed Cc: Coale, Sherie Subject: Boynton Town Center (revised) -TRC Review comments Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Ed Breese, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Boynton Town Center - (Revised) New Site Plan - 1st Review NWSP 05-003 Date: May 24, 2005 Map of Boundary and Topographic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 (previously submitted, not in this current packet) Existing Trees Management Plan 1. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] 2. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Landscape Plan Sheets LA-l,2 3. All shade and palm trees on the Plant lists must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.1O] 4. All ofthe shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10] Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 5/25/2005 TRC Memorandum Page 2 of2 .. ..... 5. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time planting and inspection. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 (con't) 6. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed buildings and parking lot facilities from the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road rights-of-way. Irrigation Plan-No Irrigation plan included in the submittal 7. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 8. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 9. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] Kjh 5/25/2005 // DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-064 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: May 23,2005 RE: Review Comments New Site Plan (Revised)- 1 st Review Boynton Town Center File No. NWSP 05-003 The above referenced Site Plans, received on May 12, 2005, was reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). 2. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. 3. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 4. Live Oaks are specified adjacent to the dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" and will cause a vertical conflict. Please relocate these trees or replace with a palm species. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to approval of this Site plan. 6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article II.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 7. Off-site improvements are indicated in conjunction with the development of this project as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide all required off-site improvement plans. Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-064 Re: Boynton Town Center, New site Plan (Revised) _1st Review May 24, 2005 Page 2 ENGINEERING 8. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 9. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 10. Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 11. This plan depicts primarily building of the Super Target structure and the associated parking. The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support building construction. 12. The lighting design shall provide a minimum average light level of one foot-candle. Glare which is readily perceptible at any point at or beyond the property on which the use is located is prohibited (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 4.N.7.) Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (LDR, Chapter 9, Section 10.F.5.) The lighting design provided is rather high and will throw glare onto adjacent roadways as well as overwhelming adjacent businesses. No lighting was provided in the rear of the Building "A", "B", and "C" creating safety concerns. Please correct the Lighting plan to address these items. 13. The medians on Congress Avenue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information. 14. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b.) 15. Green Malayan Coconuts are specified within the parking lots. These may present a hazard to vehicles if not properly maintained when bearing fruit. It is recommended that an alternate palm species be specified. 16. Trees are shown on the western edge (Sheet LA-1) that were not identified. Please correct. Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-064 Re: Boynton Town Center, New site Plan (Revised) _1st Review May 24,2005 Page 3 17. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Congress Ave. and Old Boynton Rd. 18. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 19. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 20. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on Drainage plan. Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. 21. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES 22. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 23. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 24. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 25. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. While this proposed plans reflects this coverage in general, it does not cover future Buildings "I" & "J" completely in the next phase. It may be beneficial to this development to rectify this concern at this time to prevent retrofitting in the future. Out Lot #1 appears to be weak in fire hydrant coverage; provide an additional hydrant on the main perimeter water system loop at approximately the southeast corner of the Out Lot. In addition, Master Plan Sheet reflects the following note: "Construction Tvpe: IV Unprotected - Sprinklered Occupancy: Merchantile" Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-064 Re: Boynton Town Center, New site Plan (Revised) _1st Review May 24, 2005 Page 4 What this note means is unclear; no specific note appears on the proposed plan indicating that the (all) mercantile buildings shall be sprinklered La.w. the NFPC. Therefore, sufficient coverage must be provided to meet the 1,500 gpm fire flow requirement for a four (4) hour duration of time. The applicant shall demonstrate that this condition shall be complied with. 26. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 27. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 28. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 29. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 30. Clarify the direction of flow of the proposed 8-inch force main along the north line of this development phase; it is flowing to or from the proposed lift station located east of proposed Building "D" (I am going to assume from at this point)? If this is correct, flow is being directed away from the routing to the regional wastewater treatment plant. Please clarify the master Utility plan system (including all lift stations) for this proposed development. 31. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 32. This plan depicts utilities that must be installed to support this project, including relocation of the lift station. This plan is deficient in showing a realistic "plan of attack" to have utilities installed prior to building construction. Additionally the plan cuts off utilities at the project limits with no indication of how the utilities will tie into the adjacent developments. Please clarify this information. 33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. LUck Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., PEl P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Boynton Town Center, New Site Plan (revised) 1st rev..doc ~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-101 TO: Ed Breese Principal Planner FROM: Timothy K. La;-~ TRC Member/~sion DATE: May 27,2005 SUBJECT: Project - Boynton Town Center (Revised) File No. - NWSP 05-003 1. The type of construction and occupancy type of each building shall be legible and placed in a conspicuous place on the plans. 2. According to Table 500 of the 2001 FBC, Building "A" and Building "C" exceed the allowable building area permitted by code. 3. Sheet SL 1 - The light poles shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 1606 to withstand 140mph wind loads. 4. Sheet C4 - Parking Summary - Five handicap accessible parking spaces are required and tabulation shows four spaces. Revise parking plan to show the required five spaces. tkl:bf S:\Deve/opment\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Town Center (Revised) Page 1 of 1 f FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal r ; MAY 2 3 ZOOS . \ 1\ \ DATE: May 20,2005 L~ -.-'- --~. - ... - -.. . r:::,' , i, I . ._~~---~ SUBJECT: NWSP 05-003 NWSP 05-004 NWSP 05-020 NWSP 05-019 Boynton Town Center Boynton Village Boynton Village Parcel 3 Condos Parcel 4&5 , . ~-, ._,--~--" Traffic Congestion and population density is a concern in this area with the mall and the Renaissance Commons project in close proximity. During the holidays Congress Avenue is already difficult to travel for responding emergency apparatus due to blocked lanes of traffic. This situation will get worse as the density increases. Pursuit of traffic light pre-emption is essential as a remedy. To meet the increased demand additional resources are required such as personnel, apparatus, and equipment. It is imperative that Fire Station #5 be expedited to insure adequate service delivery levels and effective response times in the NE section of the City and as a back-up in the NW section of the City. This situation also increases the potential for mass causality events when large numbers of people occupy confined areas. This is becoming more prevalent in many areas of the city. Every added new commercial and multi-family occupancy increases the annual fire prevention inspection workload as required by ordinance. Although there have been a large number of these occupancies added in the past several years, our inspection staff has decreased. This situation has reached a point that may soon require changes in our inspection schedules that may negatively affect our future success. The past and current service level has prevented any significant fires in these occupancies for several years. New development projects involving multi-family or high-density commercial projects should be approved contingent upon consideration of future upgrades in emergency dispatch capability. These enhancements include new technology related to CAD, GIS, and AVL capability, as well as adequate "\ .i{ ,I \'. ': ! staffing. All other factors (personnel, training, technology, fire station placement, building design features, etc) depend on a reliable and efficient method of getting the resources provided where they are needed in time to mitigate the consequences of an emergency, regardless of the type of response. Johnson, Eric From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Logan, Laurinda Monday, May 23, 2005 7:25 AM Johnson, Eric Breese, Ed RE: Boynton Town Center NWSP 05-003 I am not knowledgeable enough to opine on the light pole heights, just the lighting levels. Lei -----Original Message----- From: Johnson, Eric Sent: Friday, May 20,20054:29 PM To: Logan, Laurinda Cc: Breese, Ed Subject: Boynton Town Center NWSP 05-003 Laurinda, The photometric plan (sheet SL 1) shows that project would have freestanding lighting poles that would be 25 feet in height. What do you think about the height of the poles? Are they too short, too tall, or just right? I was hoping they would have the same sized poles throughout the entire commercial portion (including the SMU). I haven't looked at the other plans yet. Your comments please. Thanks, Eric 1 Johnson, Eric From: Sent: To: Subject: Breese, Ed Monday, May 23, 2005 8:46 AM Rumpf, Michael; Coale, Sherie; Johnson, Eric FW: Impacts of proposed site plan - Boynton Town Center and Boynton Villages For your info and inclusion in appropriate reports. Ed -----Original Message----- From: Rivers, Jody Sent: Monday, May 23,20058:25 AM To: Breese, Ed Subject: Impacts of proposed site plan - Boynton Town Center and Boynton Villages Projects: NWSP 05- Boynton Town Center NWSP 05-003; Boynton Village NWSP 05-004; Boynton Village Parcel 3 Condos 020; Parcel 4 & 5 NWSP 05-019 The Recreation and Open Space Element and the Capital Improvement Element of the Comp Plan states that at the time the Klatt Property(Winchester/Boynton Villages) is to be rezoned for residential use, the City will require dedication of sufficient land for a neighborhood park. Approximately 5 acres has been set aside for this use. The development of the park is estimated to be $2,000,000. Upon development of the park, the Department of Recreation and Parks will require the addition of 1.0 FTE (approximately $32,000) and approximately $15,000 in equipment. Joottj Ri.vers Parks Superintendent City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 (561) 742-6226 (561) 742-6233 (fax) 1 , 1 st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 1 streview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with an May 5, 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article n, Section 10-26 (a). 2. The dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" may need to be rotated to the east to provide a straighter approach to the dumpster from the driveway off the spine road. 3. This plan depicts an 8-in. force main coming from the Lift Station that has a dumpster enclosure encroaching on the easement. Either relocate the force main or the dumpster enclosure. 4. Live Oaks are specified adjacent to the dumpster enclosure north of Building "A" and will cause a vertical conflict. Please relocate these trees or replace with a palm species. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Defi~~ exist in this analysis thatmustbeadclressed prior to app+o.valof-this mteptan. ! I ; .' ('i ' c. I ;' . ~ , " ~ ,," , . 6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control 1 , devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, - .- J directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Provide a fire lane for . , Buildings "A", "B", and "C" (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.B.2 and Article n.M.) See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 7. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 8. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required " -; . 1\ fUV { fe1) - Coat /fII fPT!; '"'" 1st REVIEW COMMENTS' V New Site Plan /UoT p~ Project name: Boynton Town Center AP~~!;?~9 ~ ---<:;L,~ t/ File number: NWSP 05-003 , 1--q 0 ~ - "'/ V''' - y-- Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an October 13,2004 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561- 742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). Noted 2. Show the orientation of dumpster openings on the plans so pick up route can be evaluated. Only three dumpsters located. Opening locations to be shown. 3. Walls for the enclosure shall be provided on three sides and are to be a minimum of 6 ft. high and shall be CBS construction with a finish matching that of the adjacent buildings(s). Accent shrubs shall be provided along the screen walles) (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.1., and Article III, Section 9.A.9.a, and Chapter 9, Section 10.C.3.) Citv of Bovnton Beach Dumostcr Enclosure Detail (Detail G-4) added to olans PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to approval of this site plan. Traffic analysis was previously submitted 5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Signing and marking plan added to site plan 6. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. Offsite improvement plans included, see attached roadway plans ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: , ,. ~ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 2 DEPARTMENTS 7. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. General note added to plan 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Noted 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Noted 10. This plan depicts primarily building of the Super Target structure and the associated parking. The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support building construction. Noted 11. Please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan submittal - it is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit! Photometrics have been submitted, see plan. 12. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FOOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Congress Ave. and Old Boynton Rd. Sight Triangles have been shown. 13. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Note will be revised upon next submittal. INCLUDE REJECT ~ ',-", 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 14. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not permitted. The Green Island Ficus has been removed from the plant list. 15. Live Oaks are specified within small landscape squares in the larger parking areas. Staff recommends not planting large canopy trees in areas too small to support their future health and growth. The large canopy trees in the diamond shaped landscape islands have been replaced with Washington Palms. 16. Staff recommends the use of the cultivars High Rise or Cathedral for the Live Oaks. The landscape plant list has been revised to incorporate the High Rise Live Oak cultivar. 17. Landscaping is shown for areas that the Master Site Plan (Sheet C3) indicates are not included in this submittal. Noted 18. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Hom is making assumptions about the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. Drainage Calculations performed to meet SFWMD criteria. 19. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. See note 4 on sht. C-ll 20. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Noted 21. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). See note on sheet C-17 and C-20 22. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. Storm sewer diameters, inlet types, elevations, etc., have been added to PGD plans 23. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. '" , 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Noted UTILITIES Comments: 24. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible See attached "Exhibit A" 25. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is incomplete as submitted. However, the proposed Site Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where utility support is available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the proposed site plan as submitted at this time. Additional comments may be required after a utility plan has been submitted. Utility plan submitted with pipe type/length/locationletc. 26. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights- of-way. Utility easements shown on plans and landscaping plans 27. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Noted 28. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Fire flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on 11/8/04 and meet the City requirements 29. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by 'wi". 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 5 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT showing all hydrants. Fire hydrants are placed at locations to be within 200 feet of all points in a building, with the exception of a small portion of Building' A', in the center. 30. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Noted 31. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. Noted 32. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Section 26-33(a). Utility easements shown on plans and landscaping plans and will be dedicated at a later time 33. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Noted 34. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Noted 35. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP. All water lines changed to DIP 36. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. Noted. 37. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. " , 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 6 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT All offsite connections to existing utilities are shown on plans 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. See note 14 on sheets C-3, C-4 and C-5 39. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Utility construction details are included in plans that adhere to Utility Department standards. FIRE Comments: 40. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997 edition. Noted 41. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute. Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all buildings, with a 200' radius of the hydrant (the exception of a small portion of Building 'A', in the center). In addition, hydrants around the buildings have been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the 16" WM off Congress Avenue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04 and meet City requirements 42. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2. Noted 43. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has' developed an Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of information for responding emergency personnel. Noted 44. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for ,"",... " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 7 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23, Section B.2. Noted 45. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1. Noted 46. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at the start of the project and maintained until completion. Noted 47. Fire sprinklers will be required. Noted POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 48. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ( ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Noted 49. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. ~ Type IV Unprotected - Sprinklered (per POB - Loman) has been indicated on site plan 50. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined V in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. Each bldg is classified as Mercantile Occupancy, has been indicated on site plan 51. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the ~ building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. Noted. 52. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. V Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 53. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the J minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that 'k';1" ,. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Noted 54. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the V loads and forces encountered per the 200 I FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. Noted 55. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic vi calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. Noted 56. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the V subject request. So as not to clutter the site plan, this request will be fulfilled at time of submission of construction plans 57. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the V proposed construction. Noted 58. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the j proposed construction. Noted 59. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to each building. 200 I FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, V 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3. Accessible entrance location symbol placed on all buildings on site plan 60. As required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s V However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. Floor plan submitted by architect 61. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door/ to each building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not V the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the ..... <' , 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 9 DEPARTMENTS drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified In the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. Accessible route shown on plans 62. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations. Numbers of handicapped spaces were calculated using the table provided in 200 I Florida Building Code, Section 11.4.1.2.5.a 63. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Property line identified in site plan 64. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the building/so The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. Front, rear and side setbacks have been added to plans. 65. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Noted. 66. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. Noted 67. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Noted INCLUDE REJECT v' 7 J 1/ /' V t/ "." " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 10 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 68. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Noted 69. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. t/ Note added to plans (See sheets C3, C4 and (5) 70. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must \; incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Noted 71. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be V noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. Noted 72. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TRC plan t/ submittals. Photometric plan has been submitted. At this time, photometries have not been performed considering proposed landscaping. This plan will be produced at time when landscaping plan has been completed and accepted by the City. 73. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, 7 Section 11-4.29.2. Noted PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 74. Map of Boundarv and Topoe:raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 Existine: Trees Manae:ement Plan The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated Tather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, '"' .# 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] An Existing Trees Management Plan will be prepared and submitted to the City upon completion. 75. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2 All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12' -14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.p.to] So noted. 76. The landscape design should include installation of City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at all of the project ingress/egress locations. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.2 p. 10] Signature Trees have been provided at the project entries. 77. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.4 p. to] So noted. 78. The note "All existing vegetation to be removed" should be taken off of this sheet. Note has been removed. 79. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height of the tree and the caliper @ dbh (4.5' off the ground) will be measured at time of planting and inspection. The detail has been revised aecordingly. 80. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time planting and inspection. So noted. This will be revised prior to next submittal. 81. Revise the note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. The note has been revised accordingly. 82. The mulch note should be changed to say 3" Pine Bark Nuggets mulch to be used on the Large and Small Tree planting detail. Mulch notes has been revised to read 3" Pine Bark Nuggets. 83. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how '..- ~ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 12 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-way. A cross section has been provided in the Civil Engineering drawings. Irrie:ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal 84. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. So noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date. 85. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. So noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date. 86. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] So noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 87. The Boynton Village / Town Center site will be treated as one (1) master planned project. Therefore, the master site plan (sheet C3) should include graphics and data for all three projects (Cortina at Boynton Village, Town Center, and Boynton Village) because all three projects are linked together on the 106.6-acre parcel known as the "Winchester" property. Please revise the master site plan to show graphical and tabular data for all three (3) projects. Please, see Key Plan on cover page to delineate parcel lines and zoning 88. Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department regarding the size, type, and placement of the open-space / park space. 89. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting. The analysis must include all uses and intensities for the entire 106.6-acre property because this site plan is liked to the Cortina at Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001) and Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) projects. The analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). The proposed uses and intensities on the traffic study must be consistent with the proposed uses and intensities itemized on the master plan (sheet C3). This has been previously submitted 90. The master site plan (sheet C3) should indicate the total gross project acreage and net buildable land area in acres and square feet (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.1.). Staff recommends itemizing each of the three (3) site plans as an individual phase, regardless of the zoning district. For example, Cortina at Boynton Village could be labeled Phase One, Boynton Town Center could be '..if .. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town CenteT-C-3.doc 05/04/05 13 DEPARTMENTS labeled as Phase Two, and Boynton Village could be labeled as Phase Three. Please note that project phasing can easily be changed during the permitting process so this staff recommendation should not be viewed as an impediment to project build-out. The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this particular project. 91. The master site plan and site plan (sheets C3 and C4) shall clearly indicate the separation between the SMU and C-3 zoning districts. Separation indicated on Site Plan. Please, also refer to Key Plan on cover sheet 92. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space, vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies, building height based on both 106.6 acres and on 24.89 acres (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). The developer respectfully disagrces with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this patticular project. 93. On the master site plan (sheet C3), the line thickness of the perimeter of the property should be greater than the line thickness of the project phase line, which in turn, should be a different line thickness than the edge of the pavement for the Spine Road or the line thickness for the outparcels. All outparcels are a component of the master site plan and therefore, their information should be included as such. Please revise the master site plan to show more order and varying line thickness to easily distinguish between each graphical element. Master site plan modified accordingly 94. The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Town Center) and the other two (2) projects (Cortina and Boynton Village). Revise the plan (show signage, striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are maintained throughout the entire 106.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 9.T.). Plan has been revised to show pedestrian connections throughout the specific zoning district. 95. The site plan (sheet C4) requires more detail (i.e. setback lines, colonnades and their supporting columns, sidewalk locations, traffic control markings) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B. Additional information has been added, including setback lines, sidewalk loeations, and traffic control markings 96. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). INCLUDE REJECT '.if " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 14 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT At the time of this submittal, this detail has not been determined. This information will be provided prior to final site plan approval. 97. Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so, show its location on the site plan (sheet C4). Lift station has been provided for the proposed development. It can be found on the SMU project plans. 98. Will there be an area for temporary outside shopping cart storage? If so, indicate their location on the site plan (sheet C4). New site plan shows location of shopping cart cages 99. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded pnor to issuance of a building permit for the project. Noted 100. The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either unmarked or marked bicycle lanes. Noted 101. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Engineering regarding the required improvements to Old Boynton Road. Add marked or unmarked bike lanes into the design of Old Boynton Road. See attached "Roadway Improvement Plans" for Old Boynton Road "".# , 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 15 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT to2. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) should accurately indicate the number of required parking spaces. The required parking for all three (3) projects is as follows: Proposed Uses Required Provided Parkine: Parkine: 78 One-bedroom units @ 1.5 parking spaces 117 60 Two-bedroom units @ 2 parking spaces 120 472 Three-bedroom units @, 2 parking spaces 944 Two (2) recreation pool areas @ 5 spaces per area to Retail: 337,075 square feet @, 1/200 1686 Office: to,OOO square feet @, 1/200 50 Total required parkin2 2,927 Total required parkin2 with Shared Parking Analysis Please complete Garage parking spaces (Cortina) Please complete Drivewav parking (Cortina) Please complete On-street parking Please complete Parking Garage (Boynton Village) Please complete Total Parking Provided Please complete Net Difference Please complete The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this particular project. 103. Parking spaces required in this ordinance for one use or structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the required parking spaces of another use or structure if quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking demand for the different uses or structures would occur on different days of the week or at different hours. Quantitative evidence shall include estimates for peak hour / peak season demand based on statistical data furnished by the Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering or land planning and design organization (Chapter 2, Section 11.H.13.). Notcd 104. The master site plan (sheet C4) should show the building footprint and parking layout within each outparcels. The buildings proposed within the outparcels should be of the same architectural style as the principle buildings. Also, the building and uses proposed on the outparcels should be consistent with the same in the traffic study. Building footprints and parking layout for out parcels shown on plans. 105. Will the match line (as shown on sheets C4 and C5) be the property line? If so, landscape buffers are required along the perimeters. Also, will the outparcels be leased or sold off separately? Match line and property line are different. to6. On the site plan (sheet C4), show the required landscape buffers. Landscaping buffers shown on site plan ",. ./ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 16 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 107. Please note that required setbacks are applicable to property lines and not to zoning district lines. Noted 108. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plans for all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Please, see floor plan by architect to9. Indicate the proposed and maximum allowable lot coverage on the site plan tabular data on sheet C4 (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). Please note that the proposed lot coverage is based on the entire C-3 parcel, including the outparcel buildings. Information included on site data table 110. On all elevations, indicate the dimension (in feet) of the varying heights of the parapet walls proposed on all buildings. See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 111. Provide north, south, east, and west elevations of all buildings, including the outparcels (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Sec bldg. elevation drawings by architect 112. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and awning samples. See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 113. Overhead doors shall not be located on a building fa~ade that faces Old Boynton Road (Chapter 9, Section 11.1.1.). Revise the elevations so that the overhead doors are placed at the rear (east fa~ade) of the building instead of along the south elevation. See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 114. The building fa~ade of Building "C" that faces Old Boynton Road shall be designed to be as attractive in appearance as the front of the building (Chapter 9, Section 11.1.). See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 115. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The colored rendering should be clipped onto a board and not as a sheet within this packet. Noted. 116. On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant material for all three (3) projects combined. '" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 17 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE D 1-. 117. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers of plant.material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.D.). So noted. 118. Increase the amount of landscape materials just north of the retention pond to create landscape screen between the spine road and the rear loading areas. A landscape barrier is a near solid element combining a wall and / or natural vegetation intended to block all direct and reasonable views to a given use such as overhead bay or service doors. The landscape barrier shall be comprised of a berm, buffer wall, or other natural vegetation consisting of various trees species planted tip-to-tip in tow or more staggered rows. Various shrub species shall be in varying height, installed from 30 inches to 36 inches in height (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.3.b.). This area will be analyzed to determine the best screening solution due to the proximity of the lake and utilities in this area. 119. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover. Landscape quantities have been checked and the plant list has been revised to separate the matcrial into the categories requested. 120. Complete the required and provided landscape information on the Landscape Calculations table on sheet LA-2. Also, include a note that indicates that one (1) tree is required for every 10 parking spaces (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.G.). Landscape Information has been completed and the note added as requested. 121. The Washingtonia palm trees proposed in along the side of the principal building shall be installed at Yz the building height ofthe building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.). So noted. 122. Slow growing multi-trunked palm trees shall be installed within the planter areas proposed just south of Building "C" (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.). Site Plan has been revised and there is not adequate room for the landscaping requested. 123. Landscape areas shall require protection from vehicular encroachment. Encroachment is defined as any protrusion of a vehicle outside of a parking space. Wheel stops shall be placed at least two (2) feet from the edge of such landscaped area as well as two (2) feet from any preserved or planted tree (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.4.). So noted. ,-" # " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 18 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE RE.....A.-'.1. 124. The landscape buffer along Congress A venue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed within the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.). We will review the Renaissance Commons landscape plans once they are made available. 125. All stand-alone dumpsters shall have accent shrubs installed along the screen wall (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J.). This would apply to the dumpster proposed along the rear of the principal building. City of Boynton Beach standard detail G-4 'Dumpster Enclosure Detail" added to plans 126. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. So noted. 127. Each separate landscape area in the parking lot shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet and have a minimum dimension of at least five (5) feet and shall include at least one tree having a clear trunk of at least five (5) feet, with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs, ground cover or other authorized landscaping material not to exceed three (3) feet in height (Chapter 7.5, Section 5.G.). So noted. 128. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. Noted 129. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). Noted 130. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of the project entrances (along U.S. 1 and Old Dixie Highway). The signature trees must have eight (8) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Forester / Environmentalist review and approval. Signature Trees have been provided at the project entries. 131. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). 132. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.4.). So noted. " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 19 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 133. The landscape material and design proposed within the landscape buffer along Congress Avenue should resemble the same buffer (along Congress Avenue) approved in the Renaissance Commons project. In addition, provide a cross-section of the Congress Avenue landscape buffer. We will review the Renaissance Commons landscape plans once they are made available. A cross section of this buffer is provided in the Civil Engineering drawings. 134. What will be the dimensions of the interior and terminal landscape islands? See Site Plan 135. All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. Noted 136. All slgnage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. Provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In this case, the property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-way line for the Spine Road. Noted 137. Provide a detail of a typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The detail of the typical freestanding outdoor lighting fixture should include the overall height, exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum) and color(s). The lighting fixture height, style, design, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design and height and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.). The height of the lighting fixtures should be the same throughout the entire commercial/mixed-use areas. To be submitted at a later date 138. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.2.). Noted 139. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits IS encouraged (Chapter 9, Section to.F.3.). Noted 140. Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.4.). Please submit a photometric plan so that staff can review the photometric levels (footcandles). Photometric plan has been submitted 141. Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.5.). Noted . . " >/ ,. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 20 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 142. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 10.H.). Provide details of said amenities. Please, refer to architectural plans 143. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the commercial/public spaces. To be provided at a later date 144. Loading dock operations on the C-3 parcel should be better concealed. To be addressed at a later date 145. On sheet C4, the loading dock operations for the building identified, as "Building D" would not function properly as turn radius and parking areas (in its current configuration) would not allow for maneuverability of trucks and large vehicles. Staff recommends relocating the building northward so that trucks can maneuver easier at the rear of the building. Moving the building northward also would align "Building D" with buildings "F" and "G". This makes sense from an urban design perspective. Area has been modified to address this comment 146. Does Target intend to have an outdoor nursery department, which is typical of these big-box supercenters? If so, where and how will it be designed for compatibility with the project? Nursery will be located on the north end of the bldg. Please, refer to architectural plans for details 147. Staff recommends creating roundabouts or other traffic calming devices into the design of each intersections of the Spine Road. Spine Road design will not accommodate roundabouts 148. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village projects. Noted 149. With special emphasis on the front of the buildings, staffrecommends extending the landscape planters along the entire front of the three (3) buildings allowing for intermittent openings for pedestrians and shopping carts. The landscape strip should be wide enough to accommodate clusters of tall palm trees. Noted 150. Staff recommends incorporating additional architectural features, such as varying the heights of the parapet walls along the entire (east) elevation of the three (3) principal buildings. Please, refer to architectural plans 151. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast corner of the greater project (at Old Boynton Road). Please, refer to architectural plans 152. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress Avenue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in front of the main street buildings (note next comment). Additional sidewalks have been added along main street. Please see site plan ,..... '" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 21 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 153. The southwest corner of the property (at Old Boynton Road) should be accentuated with a sizeable building that wraps the corner with raised fa~ade, appropriate features, and pedestrian links to connect to corner. To be discussed at a later date 154. The link to the large retail store is vital. Pedestrian path should continue from main street, buildings should similarly front on this aligned street, C-3 building facades should repeat main street themes / elements, including outdoor pedestrian seating / cafes (perhaps as part of the popcorn / hotdog concession at one end, and a deli in the produce section of the store at the other for balance). Both placed near outer walls with large windows and access to corresponding outdoor seating areas with trees and tables with umbrellas, fountains, or the like; Please, see sidewalk plan for connectivity. Final plan with main street themes to be determined at a later date. 155. Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance (both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same pedestrian system in front of these buildings. Per conversations with the City, the buildings have been modified but not aligned with the buildings to the east 156. The second rotary intersection (eastern one) should be the main focal point: adjust what is needed to align the north-south links, bring the south side building closer to align with the remainder of main street buildings (parking distributed to front, side (west) and rear (south), add a building or outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary intersection, and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east of the rotary intersection. Please see revised site plan for implemented changes 157. Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's design. Noted 158. Pedestrian paths oriented east-west in the large parking area should be lengthened to link with outparcels and connect with the associated parking areas to accommodate sharing. Pedestrian paths modified to link out parcels with main parking area. See site plan 159. For Outparcels 1 through 4, staff recommends utilizing only one north-south circulation drive aisle rather than one at the periphery of Target and one within these outparcels, again to increase the amount of green / pervious space. Noted 160. The buildings in the outparcels would not effectively screen the Target parking. Please consider moving the outparcel buildings closer to each other so that the Target parking area would be more effectively screened from Congress A venue. Per discussions with City staff, building locations will remain as shown on site plan .... '"' " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 22 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 161. Consider shifting the southernmost buildings westward to provide a terminating point, which also shifts it farther from the adjacent residential area. Noted 162. Staff recommends installing a fountain in all lakes. Noted, see landscape plans. MWRlscl20 H:\047148007-Boynton Village\CityComments\IST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc '! y "..tst REVIEW COMMENT~,; New Site Plan . . Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 1 slreview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an October 13,2004 Plannin2 and Zoning Department date stamp markin2. I n DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561- 742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). Noted 2. Show the orientation of dumpster openings on the plans so pick up route can be evaluated. Only three dumpsters located. Opening locations to be shown. 3. Walls for the enclosure shall be provided on three sides and are to be a minimum of 6 ft. high and shall be CBS construction with a finish matching that of the adjacent buildings(s). Accent shrubs shall be provided along the screen walles) (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.1., and Article III, Section 9.A.9.a, and Chapter 9, Section 10.C.3.) Citv of ~ovntoIl_ Beach Dumostcr Enclosure Detail (Detail G-4) added to ol<\ns PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to approval of this site plan. Traffic analysis was previously submitted 5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Signing and marking plan added to site plan 6. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. Offsite improvement plans included, see attached roadway plans ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: ~ """ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 2 ''II DEPARTMENTS 7. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. General note added to plan 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Noted 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Noted to. This plan depicts primarily building of the Super Target structure and the associated parking. The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support building construction. Noted 11. Please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan submittal - it is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit! Photometrics have been submitted, see plan. 12. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Congress Ave. and Old Boynton Rd. Sight Triangles have been shown. 13. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Note will be revised upon next submittal. / INCLUDE REJECT ~ "- 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 3 " .. I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 14. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not permitted. The Green Island Ficus has becn removed from the plant list. 15. Live Oaks are specified within small landscape squares in the larger parking areas. Staff recommends not planting large canopy trees in areas too small to support their future health and growth. The large canopy trees in the diamond shaped landscape islands have been replaced with Washington Palms. 16. Staff recommends the use of the cultivars High Rise or Cathedral for the Live Oaks. The landscape plant list has been revised to incorporate the High Rise Live Oak cultivar. 17. Landscaping is shown for areas that the Master Site Plan (Sheet C3) indicates are not included in this submittal. Noted 18. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. Drainage Calculations performed to meet SFWMD criteria. 19. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. See note 4 on sht. C-Il 20. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Noted 21. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). See note on sheet C-17 and C-20 22. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. Storm sewer diameters, inlet types, clevations, etc., have been added to PGD plans 23. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ""'" /' 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town CenteT-C-3.doc 05/04/05 4 \0 I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Noted UTILITIES Comments: 24. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible See attached "Exhibit A" 25. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is incomplete as submitted. However, the proposed Site Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where utility support is available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the proposed site plan as submitted at this time. Additional comments may be required after a utility plan has been submitted. Utility plan submitted with pipe type/length/location/etc. 26. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights- of-way. Utility easements shown on plans and landscaping plans 27. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Noted 28. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Firc flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on 11/8/04 and meet the City requirements 29. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by ....", 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 5 " .. I " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT showing all hydrants. Fire hydrants are placed at locations to be within 200 feet of all points in a building, with the exception of a small portion of Building' A', in the center. 30. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Noted 31. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. Noted 32. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Section 26-33(a). Utility easements shown on plans and landscaping plans and will be dedicated at a later time 33. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Noted 34. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and! or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Noted 35. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP. All water lines changed to DIP 36. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. Noted. 37. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. ,.. .,; 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 6 '. I I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT All offsite connections to existing utilities are shown on plans 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. See note 14 on sheets C-3, C-4 and C-5 39. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Utility construction details are included in plans that adhere to Utility Department standards. FIRE Comments: 40. The site plan and 1 or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 1997 edition. Noted 41. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute. Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all buildings, with a 200' radius of the hydrant (the exccption of a small portion of Building 'A', in the center). In addition, hydrants around the buildings have been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the 16" WM off Congress Avenue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04 and meet City requirements 42. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2. Noted 43. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has - developed an Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of information for responding emergency personnel. Noted 44. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for ,.'" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 7 " ,; I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23, Section B.2. Noted 45. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1. Noted 46. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFPA 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at the start of the project and maintained until completion. Noted 47. Fire sprinklers will be required. Noted POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 48. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Noted 49. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. Type IV Unprotected - Sprinklered (per POH - Loman) has been indicated on site plan 50. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. Each bldg is classified as Mercantile Occupancy, has been indicated on site plan 51. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. Noted. 52. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 53. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that '-" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 8 .. I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Noted 54. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. Noted 55. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. Noted 56. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. So as not to clutter the site plan, this request will be fulfilled at time of submission of construction plans 57. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Noted 58. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings ofthe proposed construction. Noted 59. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3. Accessible entrance location symbol placed on all buildings on site plan 60. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheetls However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. Floor plan submitted by architect 61. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door/ to each building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the ......... 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 9 DEPARTMENTS drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified In the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. Accessible route shown on plans 62. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations. Numbers of handicapped spaces were calculated using the table provided in 2001 Florida Building Code, Section 11.4.1.2.5.a 63. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Property line identified in site plan 64. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the building/so The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. Front, rear and side setbacks have been added to plans. 65. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Noted. 66. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. Noted 67. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Noted INCLUDE REJECT ~ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 10 , " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 68. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Noted 69. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. Note added to plans (See sheets C3, C4 and (5) 70. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Noted 71. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. Noted 72. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TRC plan submittals. Photometric plan has been submitted. At this time, photometrics have not been performed considering proposed landscaping. This plan will be produced at timc when landscaping plan has been completed and accepted by the City. 73. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.29.2. Noted PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 74. Map of Boundary and Topoe:raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 Existine: Trees Manae:ement Plan The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, ,- ,i! 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 11 . II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] An Existing Trees Management Plan will be prepared and submitted to the City upon completion. 75. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2 All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.p.10] So noted. 76. The landscape design should include installation of City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at all of the project ingress/egress locations. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.2 p. 10] Signature Trees have been provided at the project entries. 77. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.4 p. 10] So noted. 78. The note" All existing vegetation to be removed" should be taken off of this sheet. Note has been removed. 79. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height of the tree and the caliper @ dbh (4.5' off the ground) will be measured at time of planting and inspection. The detail has been revised accordingly. 80. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time planting and inspection. So noted. This will be revised prior to next submittal. 81. Revise the note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. The note has been revised accordingly. 82. The mulch note should be changed to say 3" Pine Bark Nuggets mulch to be used on the Large and Small Tree planting detail. Mulch notes has been revised to read 3" Pine Bark Nuggets. 83. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how """ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 12 -'" . II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-way. A cross section has been provided in the Civil Engineering drawings. Irrie:ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal 84. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. So noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date. 85. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. So noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date. 86. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] So noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: k: . . The Boynton Village / Town Center site will be treated as one (1) master planned project. Therefore, the master site plan (sheet C3) should include graphics and data for all three projects (Cortina at Boynton Village, Town Center, and Boynton Village) because all three projects are linked together on the 106.6-acre parcel known as the "Winchester" property. Please revise the master site plan to show graphical and tabular data for all three (3) projects. Please, see Key Plan on cover page to delineate parcel lines and zoning ...--.. rssloordinate with the Parks and Recreatinn Department regarding the size, type, and placement of the open-space / park space. ~ o-""tlwI CPf~ ~ w 89. S bmitt;' traffic impac na sis prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting. The analysis must include all uses and intensities for the entire 106.6-acre property because this site plan is liked to the Cortina at Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001) and Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) projects. The analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). The proposed uses and intensities on the traffic study must be consistent with the proposed uses and intensities itemized on the master plan (sheet C3). This has been previously submitted 90. The master site plan (sheet C3) should indicate the total gross project acreage and net buildable land area in acres and square feet (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.1.). Staff recommends itemizing each of the three (3) site plans as an individual phase, regardless of the zoning district. For example, Cortina at Boynton Village could be labeled Phase One, Boynton Town Center could be ......... 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town CenteT-C-3.doc 05/04/05 13 '" DEPARTMENTS labeled as Phase Two, and Boynton Village could be labeled as Phase Three. Please note that project phasing can easily be changed during the permitting process so this staff recommendation should not be viewed as an impediment to project build-out. The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this particular project. 91. The master site plan and site plan (sheets C3 and C4) shall clearly indicate the separation between the SMU and C-3 zoning districts. Separation indicated on Site Plan. Please, also refer to Key Plan on cover sheet 92. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space, vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies, building height based on both 106.6 acres and on 24.89 acres (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this particular project. 93. On the master site plan (sheet C3), the line thickness of the perimeter of the property should be greater than the line thickness of the project phase line, which in turn, should be a different line thickness than the edge of the pavement for the Spine Road or the line thickness for the outparcels. All outparcels are a component of the master site plan and therefore, their information should be included as such. Please revise the master site plan to show more order and varying line thickness to easily distinguish between each graphical element. Master site plan modified accordingly 94. The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Town Center) and the other two (2) projects (Cortina and Boynton Village). Revise the plan (show signage, striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are maintained throughout the entire 106.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 9.T.). Plan has been revised to show pedestrian connections throughout thc specific zoning district. 95. The site plan (sheet C4) requires more detail (i.e. setback lines, colonnades and their supporting columns, sidewalk locations, traffic control markings) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B. Additional information has been added, including setback lines, sidewalk locations, and traffic control markings 96. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). INCLUDE REJECT '-" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 14 '" DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT At the time of this submittal, this detail has not been determined. This information will be provided prior to final site plan approval. 97. Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so, show its location on the site plan (sheet C4). Lift station has been provided for the proposed development. It can be found on the SMU project plans. 98. Will there be an area for temporary outside shopping cart storage? If so, indicate their location on the site plan (sheet C4). New site plan shows location of shopping cart cages 99. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded pnor to issuance of a building permit for the project. Noted 100. The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either unmarked or marked bicycle lanes. Noted 101. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Engineering regarding the required improvements to Old Boynton Road. Add marked or unmarked bike lanes into the design of Old Boynton Road. See attached "Roadway Improvement Plans" for Old Boynton Road ""'" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 15 ," . LI DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 102. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) should accurately indicate the number of required parking spaces. The required parking for all three (3) projects is as follows: Proposed Uses Req uired Provided Parkin!! Parkine: 78 One-bedroom units @ 1.5 parking spaces 117 60 Two-bedroom units @ 2 parking spaces 120 472 Three-bedroom units @ 2 parking spaces 944 Two (2) recreation pool areas @ 5 spaces per area 10 Retail: 337,075 square feet @ 1/200 1686 Office: 10,000 square feet @ 1/200 50 Total required parking 2,927 Total required parking with Shared Parking Analysis Please complete Garage parking spaces (Cortina) Please complete Drivewav parking (Cortina) Please complete On-street parking Please complete Parking Garage (Boynton Village) Please complete Total Parking Provided Please comolete Net Difference Please complete The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this particular project. 103. Parking spaces required in this ordinance for one use or structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the required parking spaces of another use or structure if quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking demand for the different uses or structures would occur on different days of the week or at different hours. Quantitative evidence shall include estimates for peak hour / peak season demand based on statistical data furnished by the Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering or land planning and design organization (Chapter 2, Section l1.H.13.). Noted 104. The master site plan (sheet C4) should show the building footprint and parking layout within each outparcels. The buildings proposed within the outparcels should be of the same architectural style as the principle buildings. Also, the building and uses proposed on the outparcels should be consistent with the same in the traffic study. Building footprints and parking layout for out parcels shown on plans. 105. Will the match line (as shown on sheets C4 and C5) be the property line? If so, landscape buffers are required along the perimeters. Also, will the outparcels be leased or sold off separately? Mateh line and property line are different. 106. On the site plan (sheet C4), show the required landscape buffers. Landscaping buffers shown on site plan -" ',-, 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 16 , II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 107. Please note that required setbacks are applicable to property lines and not to zoning district lines. Noted 108. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plans for all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Please, see floor plan by architect 109. Indicate the proposed and maximum allowable lot coverage on the site plan tabular data on sheet C4 (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). Please note that the proposed lot coverage is based on the entire C-3 parcel, including the outparcel buildings. Information included on site data table 110. On all elevations, indicate the dimension (in feet) of the varying heights of the parapet walls proposed on all buildings. See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 111. Provide north, south, east, and west elevations of all buildings, including the outparcels (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Scc hldg. elevation drawings by architect 112. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and awning samples. See bldg. elevation drawings by architcct 113. Overhead doors shall not be located on a building fa~ade that faces Old Boynton Road (Chapter 9, Section 11.J.1.). Revise the elevations so that the overhead doors are placed at the rear (east fa~ade) of the building instead of along the south elevation. See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 114. The building fayade of Building "C" that faces Old Boynton Road shall be designed to be as attractive in appearance as the front of the building (Chapter 9, Section 11.1.). See bldg. elevation drawings by architect 115. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The colored rendering should be clipped onto a board and not as a sheet within this packet. Noted. 116. On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant material for all three (3) projects combined. FuL ORt) 1JJJS ~t6D(CO 0 ~hslos U/J bilt). 04 ~ o~'7 ".,# " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 17 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 117. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers of plant.material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). So noted. 118. Increase the amount of landscape materials just north of the retention pond to create landscape screen between the spine road and the rear loading areas. A landscape barrier is a near solid element combining a wall and / or natural vegetation intended to block all direct and reasonable views to a given use such as overhead bay or service doors. The landscape barrier shall be comprised of a berm, buffer wall, or other natural vegetation consisting of various trees species planted tip-to-tip in tow or more staggered rows. Various shrub species shall be in varying height, installed from 30 inches to 36 inches in height (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.3.b.). This area will be analyzed to detennine the best screening solution due to the proximity of the lake and utilities in this area. 119. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover. Landscape quantities have been checked and the plant list has been revised to separatc the material into the categories requested. 120. Complete the required and provided landscape information on the Landscape Calculations table on sheet LA-2. Also, include a note that indicates that one (1) tree is required for every 10 parking spaces (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.G.). Landscape Information has been completed and the note added as requested. 121. The Washingtonia palm trees proposed in along the side of the principal building shall be installed at Yz the building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.). So noted. 122. Slow growing multi-trunked palm trees shall be installed within the planter areas proposed just south of Building "C" (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.). Site Plan has bcen revised and there is not adequate room for the landscaping requested. 123. Landscape areas shall require protection from vehicular encroachment. Encroachment is defined as any protrusion of a vehicle outside of a parking space. Wheel stops shall be placed at least two (2) feet from the edge of such landscaped area as well as two (2) feet from any preserved or planted tree (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.4.). So noted. .. ,"",-- "'. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 18 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 124. The landscape buffer along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed within the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.). We will review the Renaissance Commons landseape plans once they are made available. 125. All stand-alone dumpsters shall have accent shrubs installed along the screen wall (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J.). This would apply to the dumpster proposed along the rear of the principal building. City of Boynton Beach standard detail G-4 'Dumpster Enclosure Detail" added to plans 126. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. So noted. 127. Each separate landscape area in the parking lot shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet and have a minimum dimension of at least five (5) feet and shall include at least one tree having a clear trunk of at least five (5) feet, with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs, ground cover or other authorized landscaping material not to exceed three (3) feet in height (Chapter 7.5, Section 5.G.). So noted. 128. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. Noted 129. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). Noted 130. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of the project entrances (along U.S. 1 and Old Dixie Highway). The signature trees must have eight (8) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Forester / Environmentalist review and approval. Signature Trees have been provided at the project entries. 131. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). 132. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.4.). So noted. .. ""'" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 19 " INCLUDE I REJECT 11 DEPARTMENTS 133. The landscape material and design proposed within the landscape buffer along Congress Avenue should resemble the same buffer (along Congress Avenue) approved in the Renaissance Commons project. In addition, provide a cross-section of the Congress Avenue landscape buffer. We will review the Renaissance Commons landscape plans once they are made available. A cross section of this buffer is provided in the Civil Engineering drawings. 134. What will be the dimensions of the interior and terminal landscape islands? See Site Plan 135. All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. Noted 136. All slgnage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. Provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In this case, the property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-way line for the Spine Road. Noted 13 7. Provide a detail of a typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The detail of the typical freestanding outdoor lighting fixture should include the overall height, exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum) and color(s). The lighting fixture height, style, design, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design and height and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.). The height of the lighting fixtures should be the same throughout the entire commercial/mixed-use areas. To be submitted at a later date 138. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.2.). Noted 139. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). Notcd 140. Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.4.). Please submit a photometric plan so that staff can review the photometric levels (footcandles). Photometric plan has been submitted 141. Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.5.). Noted .. - ''''' 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 20 '" INCLUDE I REJECT n DEPARTMENTS 142. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 10.H.). Provide details of said amenities. Please, refer to architectural plans 143. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the commercial/public spaces. To be provided at a later date 144. Loading dock operations on the C-3 parcel should be better concealed. To be addressed at a later date 145. On sheet C4, the loading dock operations for the building identified, as "Building D" would not function properly as turn radius and parking areas (in its current configuration) would not allow for maneuverability of trucks and large vehicles. Staff recommends relocating the building northward so that trucks can maneuver easier at the rear of the building. Moving the building northward also would align "Building D" with buildings "F" and "G". This makes sense from an urban design perspective. Area has been modified to address this comment 146. Does Target intend to have an outdoor nursery department, which is typical of these big-box supercenters? If so, where and how will it be designed for compatibility with the project? Nursery will be located on the north end of the bldg. Please, refer to architectural plans for details 147. Staff recommends creating roundabouts or other traffic calming devices into the design of each intersections of the Spine Road. Spine Road design will not accommodate roundabouts 148. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village projects. Noted 149. With special emphasis on the front of the buildings, staff recommends extending the landscape planters along the entire front of the three (3) buildings allowing for intermittent openings for pedestrians and shopping carts. The landscape strip should be wide enough to accommodate clusters of tall palm trees. Noted 150. Staff recommends incorporating additional architectural features, such as varying the heights of the parapet walls along the entire (east) elevation of the three (3) principal buildings. Please, refer to architectural plans 151. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast corner of the greater project (at Old Boynton Road). Please, refer to architectural plans 152. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress Avenue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in front of the main street buildings (note next comment). Additional sidewalks have been added along main street. Please see site plan . .- .. ""'- 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 21 DEPARTMENTS ,; INCLUDE I REJECT " 153. The southwest corner of the property (at Old Boynton Road) should be accentuated with a sizeable building that wraps the corner with raised fa~ade, appropriate features, and pedestrian links to connect to corner. To be discussed at a later date 154. The link to the large retail store is vital. Pedestrian path should continue from main street, buildings should similarly front on this aligned street, C-3 building facades should repeat main street themes / elements, including outdoor pedestrian seating / cafes (perhaps as part of the popcorn / hotdog concession at one end, and a deli in the produce section of the store at the other for balance). Both placed near outer walls with large windows and access to corresponding outdoor seating areas with trees and tables with umbrellas, fountains, or the like; Please, see sidewalk plan for connectivity. Final plan with main street themes to be determined at a later date. 155. Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance (both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same pedestrian system in front of these buildings. Per conversations with the City, the buildings have been modified but not aligned with the buildings to the east 156. The second rotary intersection (eastern one) should be the main focal point: adjust what is needed to align the north-south links, bring the south side building closer to align with the remainder of main street buildings (parking distributed to front, side (west) and rear (south), add a building or outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary intersection, and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east of the rotary intersection. Please see revised site plan for implemented changes 157. Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's design. Noted 158. Pedestrian paths oriented east-west in the large parking area should be lengthened to link with outparcels and connect with the associated parking areas to accommodate sharing. Pedestrian paths modified to link out parcels with main parking area. See site plan 159. For Outparcels 1 through 4, staff recommends utilizing only one north-south circulation drive aisle rather than one at the periphery of Target and one within these outparcels, again to increase the amount of green / pervious space. Noted 160. The buildings in the outparcels would not effectively screen the Target parking. Please consider moving the outparcel buildings closer to each other so that the Target parking area would be more effectively screened from Congress A venue. Per discussions with City staff, building locations will remain as shown on site plan /' 0# ._ " ~ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 05/04/05 22 -~ ..", . .. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 161. Consider shifting the southernmost buildings westward to provide a terminating point, which also shifts it farther from the adjacent residential area. Noted 162. Staff recommends installing a fountain in all lakes. Noted, see landscape plans. MWR/sc120 H:\047 I 48007-Boynton Village\CityComments\IST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Town Center-C-3.doc 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Town Center File number: NWSP 05-003 Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an October 13, 2004 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp markin2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561- 742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section to-26 (a). 2. Show the orientation of dumpster openings on the plans so pick up route can be evaluated. 3. Walls for the enclosure shall be provided on three sides and are to be a minimum of 6 ft. high and shall be CBS construction with a finish matching that of the adjacent buildings(s). Accent shrubs shall be provided along the screen walles) (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J., and Article III, Section 9.A.9.a, and Chapter 9, Section 10.C.3.) PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to approval of this site plan. 5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 6. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 7. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. to. This plan depicts primarily building of the Super Target structure and the associated parking. The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support building construction. 11. Please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan submittal - it is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit! 12. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5 .H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Congress Ave. and Old Boynton Rd. 13. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 14. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species_are not permitted. ~ 15. Live Oaks are specified within small landscape squares in the larger ~ JJ1 parKing areas. Staff recommends not planting large canopy trees in areas ~ ~ /1j~ (,"'-~ too small to support their future health and growth. ~~ ~ 16. Staff recommends the use of the 9.!!!tivars High Rise or ~Cathedral for the f- ~LF~l , l.::.ive Oaks. 17. Landscaping is shown for areas that the Master Site Plan (Sheet C3) 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT indicates are not included in this submittal. 18. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. 19. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 20. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 21. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). 22. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. 23. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 24. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the proiect's completion, so please be as accurate as possible 25. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is incomplete as submitted. However, the proposed Site Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where utility support is available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the proposed site plan as submitted at this time. Additional comments may be required after a utility plan has been submitted. 26. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJ.bC 1 determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights- of-way. 27. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 28. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 29. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 30. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 31. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. 32. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Section 26-33(a). 33. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 34. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 35. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP. 36. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 37. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 39. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 40. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A to 1, Life Safety Code, 1997 edition. 41. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute. 42. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per NFPA, (997) Section 41-2.3.2. 43. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT information for responding emergency personnel. 44. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23, Section B.2. 45. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1. 46. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at the start of the project and maintained until completion. 47. Fire sprinklers will be required. POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 48. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 49. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. 50. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. 51. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. 52. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. 53. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 54. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 7 DEPARTMENTS loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 55. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 56. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 57. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 58. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 59. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3. 60. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. 61. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door/ to each building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified In the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade INCLUDE REJECT 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT elevations along the path of travel. 62. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations. 63. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 64. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the building/so The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 65. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 66. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 67. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. C. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 68. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 69. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 70. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 9 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 71. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 72. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (Chapter 4, Section 7 .B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TRC plan submittals. 73. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.29.2. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 74. Map of Boundary and Topoe:raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 Existine: Trees Manae:ement Plan The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] 75. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2 All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.to] 76. The landscape design should include installation of City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at all of the project ingress/egress locations. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.2 p. 10] 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 10 " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 77. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.4 p. 10] 78. The note "All existing vegetation to be removed" should be taken off of this sheet. 79. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height of the tree and the caliper @ dbh (4.5' off the ground) will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 80. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time planting and inspection. 81. Revise the note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. 82. The mulch note should be changed to say 3" Pine Bark Nuggets mulch to be used on the Large and Small Tree planting detail. 83. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress A venue and Old Boynton Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-way. Irrh!ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal 84. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 85. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 86. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 87. The Boynton Village / Town Center site will be treated as one (1) master planned proiect. Therefore, the master site plan (sheet C3) should include 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 11 DEPARTMENTS graphics and data for all three projects (Cortina at Boynton Village, Town Center, and Boynton Village) because all three projects are linked together on the 106.6-acre parcel known as the "Winchester" property. Please revise the master site plan to show graphical and tabular data for all three (3) projects. 88. Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department regarding the size, type, and placement of the open-space / park space. 89. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting. The analysis must include all uses and intensities for the entire 106.6-acre property because this site plan is liked to the Cortina at Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001) and Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) projects. The analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). The proposed uses and intensities on the traffic study must be consistent with the proposed uses and intensities itemized on the master plan (sheet C3). 90. The master site plan (sheet C3) should indicate the total gross project acreage and net buildable land area in acres and square feet (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.1.). Staff recommends itemizing each of the three (3) site plans as an individual phase, regardless of the zoning district. For example, Cortina at Boynton Village could be labeled Phase One, Boynton Town Center could be labeled as Phase Two, and Boynton Village could be labeled as Phase Three. Please note that project phasing can easily be changed during the permitting process so this staff recommendation should not be viewed as an impediment to project build-out. 91. The master site plan and site plan (sheets C3 and C4) shall clearly indicate the separation between the SMU and C-3 zoning districts. 92. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space, vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies, building height based on both 106.6 acres and on 24.89 acres (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). 93. On the master site plan (sheet C3), the line thickness of the perimeter of the property should be greater than the line thickness of the project phase line, which in turn, should be a different line thickness than the edge of the pavement for the Spine Road or the line thickness for the outparcels. All outparcels are a component of the master site plan and therefore, their information should be included as such. Please revise the master site plan to show more order and varying line thickness to easily distinguish between each graphical element. 94. The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Town Center) and the other two (2) projects (Cortina and Boynton Village). Revise the plan (show INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT signage, striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are maintained throughout the entire to6.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 9.T.). 95. The site plan (sheet C4) requires more detail (i.e. setback lines, colonnades and their supporting columns, sidewalk locations, traffic control markings) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B. 96. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 97. Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so, show its location on the site plan (sheet C4). 98. Will there be an area for temporary outside shopping cart storage? If so, indicate their location on the site plan (sheet C4). 99. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded pnor to issuance of a building permit for the project. 100. The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either unmarked or marked bicycle lanes. to1. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Engineering regarding the required improvements to Old Boynton Road. Add marked or unmarked bike lanes into the desi211 of Old Boynton Road. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 13 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT to2. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) should accurately indicate the number of required parking spaces. The required parking for all three (3) projects is as follows: er area Required Parkin 117 120 944 10 1686 50 2,927 Please com lete Provided Parkin Proposed Uses Net Difference Please com lete Please com lete Please com lete Please com lete Please com lete Please com lete 103. Parking spaces required in this ordinance for one use or structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the required parking spaces of another use or structure if quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking demand for the different uses or structures would occur on different days of the week or at different hours. Quantitative evidence shall include estimates for peak hour / peak season demand based on statistical data furnished by the Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering or land lannin and desi or anization (Cha ter 2, Section II.H.13.). 104. The master site plan (sheet C4) should show the building footprint and parking layout within each outparcels. The buildings proposed within the outparcels should be of the same architectural style as the principle buildings. Also, the building and uses proposed on the outparcels should be consistent with the same in the traffic stud . 105. Will the match line (as shown on sheets C4 and C5) be the property line? If so, landscape buffers are re uired alon the erimeters. Also, will the ou arcels be leased or sold off se aratel ? district lines. 108. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plans for all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 109. Indicate the proposed and maximum allowable lot coverage on the site plan tabular data on sheet C4 (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). Please note that the proposed lot coverage is based on the entire C-3 parcel, including the outparcel buildings. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 14 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 110. On all elevations, indicate the dimension (in feet) of the varying heights of the parapet walls proposed on all buildings. 111. Provide north, south, east, and west elevations of all buildings, including the outparcels (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 112. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and awning samples. 113. Overhead doors shall not be located on a building fa~ade that faces Old Boynton Road (Chapter 9, Section 11.J.1.). Revise the elevations so that the overhead doors are placed at the rear (east fa~ade) of the building instead of along the south elevation. 114. The building fa~ade of Building "C" that faces Old Boynton Road shall be designed to be as attractive in appearance as the front of the building (Chapter 9, Section 11.1.). 115. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The colored rendering should be clipped onto a board and not as a sheet within this packet. 116. On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant material for all three (3) projects combined. 117. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers of plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). 118. Increase the amount of landscape materials just north of the retention pond to create landscape screen between the spine road and the rear loading areas. A landscape barrier is a near solid element combining a wall and / or natural vegetation intended to block all direct and reasonable views to a given use such as overhead bay or service doors. The landscape barrier shall be comprised of a berm, buffer wall, or other natural vegetation consisting of various trees species planted tip-to-tip in tow or more staggered rows. Various shrub species shall be in varying height, installed from 30 inches to 36 inches in height (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.3.b.). 119. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 15 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 120. Complete the required and provided landscape information on the Landscape Calculations table on sheet LA-2. Also, include a note that indicates that one (1) tree is required for every 10 parking spaces (Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.G. . 121. The Washingtonia palm trees proposed in along the side of the principal building shall be installed at ~ the buildin hei ht of the buildin Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.). 122. Slow growing multi-trunked palm trees shall be installed within the planter areas proposed just south of Buildin "C" (Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.). 123. Landscape areas shall require protection from vehicular encroachment. Encroachment is defined as any protrusion of a vehicle outside of a parking space. Wheel stops shall be placed at least two (2) feet from the edge of such landscaped area as well as two (2) feet from any preserved or planted tree (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.4.). 124. The landscape buffer along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed within the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.). 126. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P . Please cate orize as follows: Shade trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. 127. Each separate landscape area in the parking lot shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet and have a minimum dimension of at least five (5) feet and shall include at least one tree having a clear trunk of at least five (5) feet, with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs, ground cover or other authorized landsca in material not to exceed three 3 feet in hei ht Cha ter 7.5, Section 5.G. . 128. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. 129. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). 130. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of the project entrances (along U.S. 1 and Old Dixie Highway). The signature trees must have eight (8) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the Cit Forester / Environmentalist review and a roval. 131. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) caliper inches at the time of their installation (Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 16 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 132. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.4. . 133. The landscape material and design proposed within the landscape buffer along Congress Avenue should resemble the same buffer (along Congress Avenue) approved in the Renaissance Commons project. In addition, rovide a cross-section of the Con ess Avenue landsca e buffer. 134. What will be the dimensions of the interior and terminallandsca e islands? 135. All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other si s as re ulated b Cha ter 21 of the Land Develo ment Re lations. 136. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. Provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum to feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In this case, the property line would be measured from the ed e of the ri ht-of-wa line for the Sine Road. 137. Provide a detail of a typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The detail of the typical freestanding outdoor lighting fixture should include the overall height, exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum) and color(s). The lighting fixture height, style, design, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design and height and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section to.F.1.). The height of the lighting fixtures should be the same throughout the entire commercial/mixed-use areas. 138. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section to.F.2.). 139. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section to.F.3. . 140. Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.4.). Please submit a hotometric Ian so that staff can review the hotometric levels (footcandles). 141. Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws more attention to the building or ounds at ni ht than in the da (Cha ter 9, Section to.F.5.). 142. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be encouraged within the site design Cha ter 9, Section to.H. . Provide details of said amenities. 143. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throu hout the commercial / 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 17 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT erations on the C-3 arcel should be better concealed. 145. On sheet C4, the loading dock operations for the building identified, as "Building D" would not function properly as turn radius and parking areas (in its current configuration) would not allow for maneuverability of trucks and large vehicles. Staff recommends relocating the building northward so that trucks can maneuver easier at the rear of the building. Moving the building northward also would align "Buildin D" with buildin s "F" and "G". This makes sense from an urban desi ers ective. big-box 147. Staff recommends creating roundabouts or other traffic calming devices into the design of each intersections of the Sine Road. 148. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Villa e ro' ects. 149. With special emphasis on the front of the buildings, staff recommends extending the landscape planters along the entire front of the three (3) buildings allowing for intermittent openings for pedestrians and sho in carts. The landsca e stri should be wide enou h to accommodate clusters of tall aIm trees. 150. Staff recommends incorporating additional architectural features, such as varying the heights of the ara et walls alon the entire (east) elevation of the three (3) rinci al buildin s. 151. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the main street entrance (along Con ess Avenue and at the northeast corner of the eater ro'ect (at Old Bo ton Road). 152. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress Avenue sidewalk and the edestrian s stem that should be in front of the main street buildin s note next comment). 153. The southwest corner of the property (at Old Boynton Road) should be accentuated with a sizeable building that wraps the corner with raised fa~ade, appropriate features, and pedestrian links to connect to corner. 154. The link to the large retail store is vital. Pedestrian path should continue from main street, buildings should similarly front on this aligned street, C-3 building facades should repeat main street themes / elements, including outdoor pedestrian seating / cafes (perhaps as part of the popcorn / hotdog concession at one end, and a deli in the produce section of the store at the other for balance). Both placed near outer walls with large windows and access to corresponding outdoor seating areas with trees and tables with umbrellas, fountains, or the like; 155. Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance (both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same edestrian s stem in front of these buildin s. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 11/15/04 18 INCLUDE I REJECT II DEPARTMENTS 156. The second rotary intersection (eastern one) should be the main focal point: adjust what is needed to align the north-south links, bring the south side building closer to align with the remainder of main street buildings (parking distributed to front, side (west) and rear (south), add a building or outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary intersection, and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east of the rotary intersection. 157. Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the proiect's desi211. 158. Pedestrian paths oriented east-west in the large parking area should be lengthened to link with outparcels and connect wthe associated parkin2 areas to accommodate sharing. 159. For Outparcels 1 through 4, staff recommends utilizing only one north-south circulation drive aisle rather than one at the periphery of Target and one within these outparcels, again to increase the amount of green / pervious space. 160. The buildings in the outparcels would not effectively screen the Target parking. Please consider moving the outparcel buildings closer to each other so that the Target parking area would be more effectively screened from Congress Avenue. 161. Consider shifting the southernmost buildings westward to provide a terminating point, which also shifts it farther from the adiacent residential area. 162. Staff recommends installin2 a fountain in all lakes. ~ Af)f) 41/5 ~ f1.,{.J ~ b e - 1vuLI..e . MWRlsc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Town Center 1\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Master Plan Revised 11/3/04 Project name: Boynton Village File number: LUAR 04-006 Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Master Plan with a September 15, 2004 Plannin2 and Zoning Department date stamp markin2 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Solid Waste collection will be provided by the City of Boynton Beach. The storage and handling of refuse shall be in accordance with the CODE, Article II, Section to-26 (a). 2. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 feet to approach dumpsters. Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.2.b.) PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 4. The traffic analysis shall include impacts associated with full build-out of the project. The provided analysis only considers Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village. 5. Permits will be required from Palm Beach County for the signalization of Old Boynton Road and the proposed spine road. 6. Please acknowledge that many of the off-site improvements referenced in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. will require acquisition of additional public right-of-way. Identify those areas and address resulting impacts to private properties. 7. Provide preliminary road layout to illustrate lane alignment at the intersections of Congress/Old Boynton and Congress/Gateway. Include the roadway widening impacts to the Renaissance Commons Phase VI and show roadway re-configuration on Gateway Blvd. from Congress to Park Ridge Rd. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1 st Review Comments 11/15/04 2 DEPARTMENTS 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 10. This master plan needs to include all information regarding existing and proposed roadways, water and sewer lines, lift stations, and stormwater management. The provided plan is inadequate to serve for infrastructure construction. Three separate site plans have been submitted for various portions of this overall site and also do not include the information needed to evaluate the resources of the City to provide the needed support facilities. UTILITIES Comments: 11. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 12. Only a conceptual skeleton utility plan was included with this submittal (as shown on sheet MIP which is considered unacceptable), therefore the Utilities Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However, the proposed development plan is located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where utility support is available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be generated after a utility plan has been submitted. 13. We have reviewed the Boynton Village preliminary utilities under separate cover. This development reflects ties into the "Spine Road" distribution systems, which is a part of this plan. Unfortunately, this plan does not reflect those changes that are required off-site in order to support this development. As an example, the new proposed 10-inch water main is shown connecting with an existing 8-inch along Old Boynton Road. The existing 8-inch will have to be upgraded to a INCLUDE REJECT 1 st Review Comments 11/15/04 3 " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT minimum 12-inch water main in order to support the proposed lO-inch line. All other off-site water mains will have to analyzed to determine any and all segments that will require upgrading. Provide the water supply requirements to justify the concept shown on this submittal. 14. The master plan indicates the entire water main system being supported by an 8 inch and a 10 inch water main. Please provide calculations showing that these will support the needed fire flows and demands. 15. In regards to the skeleton sanitary system shown. It is believed that one (1) proposed lift station cannot support the total development of both the Town Center project(s) and the Boynton Village project. Provide the sanitary calculations to justify this concept. As a side bar, the minimum water service to any lift station is 1 Yz-inch. 16. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. 17. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. FIRE Comments: POLICE Comments: BUILDING DIVISION Comments: PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: M,tte / f2AeI{ F7u ~ -rJ.It IS( l2e-VtE:'IU ~~~ p~. P~€ {2€- Vt€Yll AND ~. ~t~1 E-D }AI ~ I ~ 1$ ~ ~ tA:IU~~ ~ ChO ~/~ P;6A- COA ~b ~ ~ 11'1 'n/€, .:d1tFF ~ u : 77JAFf1 e. ~~C:J. AJI()lll~~ I()~ ~ ~ ,TE"'f . 24- ~ ~ nfE. ~~(2&~/N 77* ,SMtL SI~ ~? ~D -~C!?_~_~.~____~€~_~~__~ /fJOr Ge> ~~ c9A. ~~ /J:€ t2.E?()Vt4.Q) "--1D~ -8e-hf1Irseb~"'-t;/'IIt!:Jtt:} "71J;Mt::ic: .-- __.._/~~ _~_T!ft~_~~_~__~-____ W~ UM::.$, /lL~()IIl.I~ fJz;nooTlM-/J.J- ...- --- ('~--#J-'-~""~~~~ -8F- ~.._OttJ~m.__.- ~J.) ~ /AJ~~ ,,.._ ---"--PMvGiJ.IiiiIiS-.i-;ii>'~-~eiji'-~"'_. ...-... --- 4ct;WSI TlO4J-~_.'1f)-~p_--_...- L./.$I-f ~ I~€~. --7iifi'n-Fi-/J-'~'i'!/F:-7fHGlZJfi(Jr-~-- ..._-. -'-'_'_~~;;:ry~:t-::: ~~~~.__._.. ---'-'7f-~-bESf~*"T1fj,1tJ--tJ;ItT-~~.~-...--- -- ___..._.___f;t!..~_~k~_! s -~~~"!.~"!t?~_____ TfIe; ~ GEv~'" PlU;eea:>. .v~,_..._t,~~._ _~_,.'_.~_.~_'._ .-.,'__.___~.~_" ..""~ ,..._.__ ...~~^_....._'.. .<._..._.,....~...~~._, ~.>w", ___...._" ,._.",_ _,~,~....__..."._,.~.. ........_.".,. _,,~,~.. 1 st Review Comments 11/15/04 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: The following deficiencies per Chapter 2, Section 5. H. 11. a. are as noted: 18. Proposed ingress and egress points along the spine road should be shown on the plan, along with any proposed access points from the property to the excluded parcel (Boynton Town Center). 19. Tabulations showing percentages of acreage proposed to be devoted to the several land use types should be included on the master plan 20. Tabulations demonstrating the proposed numbers of dwelling units, square footages of commercial, office and other uses should be shown on the master plan. 21. Building colors and color pallet options included with the design themes should indicate paint manufacturer's name and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule to accurately depict the proposed colors. In addition, the following items should be considered: 22. Survey measurements and angles differ from those previously filed and used for land use amendment and rezoning ordinances. Sizes of overall property and size of the excluded parcel (Boynton Town Center) differ. Inconsistency must be reconciled. 23. While a master plan is not required for development under the C-3 commercial regulations, the synergy between the two properties is a dynamic that must be considered to ensure compliance of the remaining portion (SMU portion) with the objectives of the SMU ordinance, particularly with regard to traffic flow and pedestrian linkages between the properties and also to indicate ingress/egress points on Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. 24. The development of this master plan will represent a significant increase in projected populations for this area, relative to that allowed under the existing Future Land Use Classification. This fact reinforces the importance to implement Section H.4 (Building and site regulations), which provides the definition and minimum requirements for usable open space. Staff 1 st Review Comments 11/15/04 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT strongly recommends that the majority of this space be concentrated in the southeast corner of the project, and ultimately provide for approx. 14 acres facilitating public-private efforts to provide a large park for both residents and general public. Retention area and public spaces should be placed and oriented to take advantage of same. 25. The spine road is not fully contained within the master plan. Indicate what legal instrument will secure the additional right-of-way from owners of adjacent parcels, realizing that, at the present time, there is ownership overlap. In the future, however, this could change. 26. Lack of detail of proposed master plan precludes the review for compliance with the design objectives that regard interconnectivity, public spaces, "higher quality environments", innovative design and vertical and horizontal integration of uses. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\LUAR 04-006\SMU Master Plan\1st Review Comments.doc Page 1 of5 Rumpf, Michael From: Breese, Ed Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 20044:31 PM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: FW: SMU Master Site Plan comments Importance: High -----Original Message----- From: Rumpf, Michael Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:27 AM To: 'Richard Foreman' Cc: Greene, Quintus; Breese, Ed; Hudson, Dick (Orran) Subject: RE: SMU Master Site Plan comments Importance: High Richard, As promised I would forward cursory comments collected from our first team review of the conceptual comprehensive site plan (CSP). I wanted to generate these timely to allow incorporation, where applicable, into individual site plans currently being prepared. Where a visual aid is necessary, we can review the notes when you return to Boynton, otherwise I hope these written descriptions are clear. First, our principal objectives, which contribute toward creating a "sense of place" (in random order): 1 . Creating vistas; 2. Symmetry in design elements; 3. Linkages; 4. Optimal connection and transition of principal uses (residential and main street areas, and main street to C- 3 component); 5. Creating a focal point and good transitions to same; 6. Maximizing the Main Street component; 7. Repeated signature design elements; 8. Architectural design continuity of all commercial components; and 9. Minimizing impact of parking areas through location, sharing, and design attributes. Initial comments to further the objectives include (I understand that not all would be shown on the CSP): Main Street 1. Add and repeat signature features at both sides of the main street entrance and at the northeast corner of the greater project (at Old Boynton Road); 2. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress Avenue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in front of the main street buildings (note next comment); 3. Move the first buildings at the main street entrance (both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same pedestrian system in front of these buildings; 4. The second rotary intersection (eastern one) should be the main focal point: adjust what is needed to align the north-south links, bring the south side building closer to align with the remainder of main street buildings (parking 10/26/2004 u V c:.....r 6 L' /7 Page 2 of5 {! //-/}. . .P _. _ oy f ~~t;'! -L ~kC/~ 5.,.........U'" 'tf"cp'f-~,/L- '::"'~-b'=-<>- (""-'1""--' ~ ~A...(...~'oI-~~".-.~ '] distributed to front side (west) and rear (south), add a building or outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with J;f\ 4- outdoor seating facing the small lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary intersection, and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could also be enhanced with a colonade repeated on both sides of the street, east of the rotary intersection; Townhomes and park 5. Orient last two town homes located along spine road and north of lake, toward the spine road, and repeat ~,,; ori~n.tation of th~se buildings along spine road located south of lake and park (facades should be fronts of "d- \~ bUildings for optimal streetscape); .J~ II I Dc, <!'(' ol'__ -{c-l f\. - J G( 1\,e-- \ '^"~) J-<-~ \ 'l"\. U fC:<ltn<,. -"r:.eJ 6. Locate aligned with the main rotary intersection (focal point) within the park at the lake~a stage feature with 1 columns or colonade similar to that at Bryant Park in Lake Worth (sample pictures can be provided) to accommodate public and private activities and events. The spine road looks to point toward this feature (at both directions) before bending toward the crossing between the main street and the open park. Colonade in park will help connect Main Street and park. An expansion of this park area, the public activity stage, and surrounding improvements (whether passive or active) begins to create what staff may endorse as the public contribution amenity as mentioned and expected by others early in this process; 7. Create "bulb outs" at approximately two locations around the lake oriented toward the stage feature, that include benches, lighting and open grass features; 8. Create one principal connection of the canal greenway path system to the walkway around lake by opening up a central space between four buildings (appx. 40 feet wide), and design to match the 40 foot greenway along canal. This opening should orient toward the plaza/stage; 9. Consider moving at least the northern recreation area to the lake to utilize the lake for greater recreation purposes; 'I ~t. I< ~ O.The recreation area immediately north of the main rotary intersection appears out of place; alternative ! 'J' ~1A~..1 ~cation such as internalizing it into the residential project to which it serves? r.\' r _ '~llJn 1. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature; please consider; -~ 12.lnclude pedestrian path on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village projects; 13.Townhome design south of the lake is very repetitious and lacks features to give it greater character. Staff is also spending more time to generate suggestions but please consider creation of mini town squares or a greater emphasis on open or recreation areas; C-3 Component 14.The link to the large retail store is vital. Pedestrian path should continue from main street, buildings should similarly front this aligned street, C-3 building facades should repeat main street themes/elements including outdoor pedestrian seating/cafes (perhaps as part of the popcorn/hotdog consession at one end, and a deli in the produce section of the store at the other for balance. Both placed near outer walls with large windows and access to corresponding outdoor seating areas with trees and tables with umbrellas, fountains, or the like; 15, Main entrance should be aligned with main aisle entering the parking area and designed accordingly with proper facade, trees, etc.; ~, 16.Pedestrian paths oriented east-west in the large parking area should be lengthened to link with outparcels, and connect the associated parking areas to accommodate sharing; ~ 17.The south" corner (at Old Boynton Road) should be accentuated with a sizeable building that wraps the corner with raised facade. ~ appropriate features~1 believe this was discussed during the meeting with Target reps.); and J ~'\.~ r='~tr~G--{'\. t,/' k. -h, c<::<V\~ 18.Consider shifting the southernmost building westward to provide a terminating point, which also shifts it farther from the adjacent residential area (I realize this suggestion warrants more review and may contrast greater 10/26/2004 Page 3 of5 objectives of the project). Richard, please be a spokesman for these initial comments to your development team, and return any questions you may have. We are excited to assist with this project and see great potential! Thanks for your hard work in assembling the CSP and offering it for our comments. I will be out of the office next Monday and Tuesday but will have access to e-mail. Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 561-742-6260 [Rumpf, Michael] -----Original Message----- [Rumpf, Michael] From: Richard Foreman [mailto:Richard.Foreman@sembler.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22,20045:43 PM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: RE: SMU Master Plan 9 AM on Thursday for Target sounds great. I will also send you a general preview of the topics Sembler and Target would like to discuss. P.S. - I'll see you Friday at 9:30 with additional information. Richard Foreman Senior Development Manager The Sembler Company (404)-847-1801, ext. 205 (404)-847-1818 - Fax From: Rumpf, Michael [mailto:RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach,fl.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 22,20041:39 PM To: Richard Foreman Subject: RE: SMU Master Plan Richard, I am available at 9:30 Friday morning to greet you and the submittal. I am still getting feedback from others regarding availability to meet with Target rep. Do you have an ideal time or times for next Thursday? Times here are limited but possibly at 9 am or 4 pm. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Richard Foreman [mailto:Richard.Foreman@sembler.com] Sent: Monday, September 20,20044:41 PM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: RE: SMU Master Plan Mike - Our Team is assembling a fully rendered site plan for the SMU parcel, rather than the one you saw recently where only Main Street is affected. I will have this to you by week's end. As I will be traveling to Boynton Thursday/ Friday, perhaps I can hand deliver it then. Richard Foreman Senior Development Manager The Sembler Company (404)-847-1801, ext. 205 (404)-847-1818 - Fax 10/26/2004 10/26/2004 Page 4 of5 From: Rumpf, Michael [mailto:RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 20043:09 PM To: Richard Foreman Subject: RE: SMU Master Plan Got a negative message from a postmaster indicating something didn't go through. Trying again. Richard, We've received the first portion of your package. Yes, we can continue to accept documents for the application, particularly those documents with the greater level of detail. We anxiously await your comprehensive (conceptual/draft) site plan to show details and how all parts will interconnect. We are uncomfortable processing the master plan without the details, particularly given that we see some elements being finalized like the road, lakes and accessways which could affect ultimate design and unification of the greater project. We know that the further along this project progresses the less flexible are the individual parts, as we just experienced on the Renaissance project. Changes to the detailed document would be expected, but it would gives us something to work from. Let me know if I can continue to assist with the issues and questions of your development team. Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 561-742-6260 Mike -----Original Message---n From: Richard Foreman [mailto:Richard.Foreman@sembler.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:38 PM To: rumpfm@cLboynton-beach.fl.us Cc: jcomparato@compson.com; Joe Filippelli Subject: SMU Master Plan Mike - Dick will be receiving our supplemental package for SMU Master Plan and attachments for Boynton Village today. One thing missing that you had asked for will be a rendered site plan. I plan to send to you a preliminary site plan, with the acknowledgement of it's early status, but I believe I can give you a better product and tool for your use if I can have a couple of days to make a few modifications and complete some rendering. I hope that is okay. Richard Foreman Senior Development Manager The Sembler Company (404)-847-1801, ext. 205 (404)-847-1818 - Fax Visit us online at: www.sembler.com NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 727-384-6000 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender. .. BOYNTON TOWN CENTER NWSP 05-003 1 st Review Planning November 1, 2004 The Boynton Village / Town Center site will be treated as one (1) master planned project. Therefore, the master site plan (sheet C3) should include graphics and data for all three projects (Cortina at Boynton Village, Town Center, and Boynton Village) because all three projects are linked together on the 106.6-acre parcel known as the "Winchester" property. Please revise the master site plan to show graphical and tabular data for all three (3) projects. Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department regarding the size, type, and placement of the open-space / park space. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting. The analysis must include all uses and intensities for the entire 106.6-acre property because this site plan is liked to the Cortina at Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001) and Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004) projects. The analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). The proposed uses and intensities on the traffic study must be consistent with the proposed uses and intensities itemized on the master plan (sheet C3). The master site plan (sheet C3) should indicate the total gross project acreage and net buildable land area in acres and square feet (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.l.). Staff recommends itemizing each of the three (3) site plans as an individual phase, regardless of the zoning district. For example, Cortina at Boynton Village could be labeled Phase One, Boynton Town Center could be labeled as Phase Two, and Boynton Village could be labeled as Phase Three. Please note that project phasing can easily be changed during the permitting process so this staff recommendation should not be viewed as an impediment to project build-out. The master site plan and site plan (sheets C3 and C4) shall clearly indicate the separation between the SMU and C-3 zoning districts. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space, vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies, building height based on both 106.6 acres and on 24.89 acres (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). On the master site plan (sheet C3), the line thickness of the perimeter of the property should be greater than the line thickness of the project phase line, which in turn, should be a different line thickness than the edge of the pavement for the Spine Road or the line thickness for the outparcels. All outparcels are a component of the master site plan and therefore, their information should be included as such. Please revise the master site plan to show more order and varying line thickness to easily distinguish between each graphical element. The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Town Center) and the other two (2) projects (Cortina and Boynton Village). Revise the plan (show signage, striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are maintained throughout the entire 106.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 9.T.). .. The site plan (sheet C4) requires more detail (i.e. setback lines, colonnades and their supporting columns, sidewalk locations, traffic control markings) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so, show its location on the site plan (sheet C4). Will there be an area for temporary outside shopping cart storage? If so, indicate their location on the site plan (sheet C4). Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and rights-of-way are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval. The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either unmarked or marked bicycle lanes. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Engineering regarding the required improvements to Old Boynton Road. Add marked or unmarked bike lanes into the design of Old Boynton Road. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) should accurately indicate the number of required parking spaces. The required parking for all three (3) projects is as follows: Study Required Parkin 117 120 944 10 1686 50 2,927 Please com Jete Provided Parkin Proposed Use 78 One-bedroom units er area Net Difference Please complete Please com lete Please complete Please com lete Please com lete Please com lete Parking spaces required in this ordinance for one use or structure may be allocated in part or in whole for the required parking spaces of another use or structure if quantitative evidence is provided showing that parking demand for the different uses or structures would occur on different days of the week or at different hours. Quantitative evidence shall include estimates for peak hour / peak season demand based on statistical data furnished by the Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering or land planning and design organization (Chapter 2, Section Il.H.13.). The master site plan (sheet C4) should show the building footprint and parking layout within each outparcels. The buildings proposed within the outparcels should be of the same architectural style as the principle buildings. Also, the building and uses proposed on the outparcels should be consistent with the same in the traffic study. Will the match line (as shown on sheets C4 and C5) be the property line? If so, landscape buffers are required along the perimeters. Also, will the outparcels be leased or sold off separately? On the site plan (sheet C4), show the required landscape buffers. Please note that required setbacks are applicable to property lines and not to zoning district lines. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plans for all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Indicate the proposed and maximum allowable lot coverage on the site plan tabular data on sheet C4 (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.). Please note that the proposed lot coverage is based on the entire C- 3 parcel, including the outparcel buildings. On all elevations, indicate the dimension (in feet) of the varying heights of the parapet walls proposed on all buildings. Provide north, south, east, and west elevations of all buildings, including the outparcels (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and awning samples. Overhead doors shall not be located a building fa~ade that faces Old Boynton Road (Chapter 9, Section l1.J.1.). Revise the elevations so that the overhead doors are placed at the rear (east fa~ade) of the building instead of along the south elevation. The building fa~ade of Building "C" that faces Old Boynton Road shall be designed to be as attractive in appearance as the front of the building (Chapter 9, Section 11.1.). Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant material for all three (3) projects combined. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers of plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). Increase the amount of landscape materials just north of the retention pond to create landscape screen between the spine road and the rear loading areas. A landscape barrier is a near solid element combining a wall and / or natural vegetation intended to block all direct and reasonable views to a given use such as overhead bay or service doors. The landscape barrier shall be comprised of a berm, buffer wall, or other natural vegetation consisting of various trees species planted tip-to-tip in tow or more staggered rows. Various shrub species shall be in varying height, installed from 30 inches to 36 inches in height (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.3.b.). On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover. Complete the required and provided landscape information on the Landscape Calculations table on sheet LA-2. Also, include a note that indicates that one (1) tree is required for every 10 parking spaces (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.G.). The Washingtonia palm trees proposed in along the side of the principal building shall be installed at Yz the building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.). Slow growing multi-trunked palm trees shall be installed within the planter areas proposed just south of Building "C" (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.). Landscape areas shall require protection from vehicular encroachment. Encroachment is defined as any protrusion of a vehicle outside of a parking space. Wheel stops shall be placed at least two (2) feet from the edge of such landscaped area as well as two (2) feet from any preserved or planted tree (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 3.B.4.). The landscape buffer along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed within the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.). All stand-alone dumpsters shall have accent shrubs installed along the screen wall (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J.). This would apply to the dumpster proposed along the rear of the principal building. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. Each separate landscape area in the parking lot shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet and have a minimum dimension of at least five (5) feet and shall include at least one tree having a clear trunk of at least five (5) feet, with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs, ground cover or other authorized landscaping material not to exceed three (3) feet in height (Chapter 7.5, Section 5.G.). The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of the project entrances (along U.S. 1 and Old Dixie Highway). The signature trees must have eight (8) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Forester / Environmentalist review and approval. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.4.). The landscape material and design proposed within the landscape buffer along Congress Avenue should resemble the same buffer (along Congress Avenue) approved in the Renaissance Commons project. In addition, provide a cross-section of the Congress Avenue landscape buffer. What will be the dimensions of the interior and terminal landscape islands? All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. Provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In this case, the property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-way line for the Spine Road. Provide a detail of a typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The detail of the typical freestanding outdoor lighting fixture should include the overall height, exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum) and color(s). The lighting fixture height, style, design, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design and height and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section to.F.1.). The height of the lighting fixtures should be the same throughout the entire commercial/mixed-use areas. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section IO.F.2.). Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section to.F.3.). Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.4.). Please submit a photometric plan so that staff can review the photometric levels (footcandles). Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (Chapter 9, Section 1O.F.5.). Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section to.H.). Provide details of said amenities. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the commercial/public spaces. Staff recommends creating roundabouts or other traffic calming devices into the design of each intersections of the Spine Road. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village projects. With special emphasis on the front of the buildings, staff recommends extending the landscape planters along the entire front of the three (3) buildings but with allowing for intermittent openings for pedestrians and shopping carts. The landscape strip should be wide enough to accommodate clusters of tall palm trees. Staff recommends incorporating additional architectural features, such as varying the heights of the parapet walls along the entire (east) elevation of the three (3) principal buildings. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast corner of the greater project (at Old Boynton Road). Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress Avenue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in front of the main street buildings (note next comment). Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance (both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same pedestrian system in front of these buildings. The second rotary intersection (eastern one) should be the main focal point: adjust what is needed to align the north-south links, bring the south side building closer to align with the remainder of main street buildings (parking distributed to front, side (west) and rear (south), add a building or outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary intersection, and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east of the rotary intersection. S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIBoynton Village-Boynton Town Center IIBoynton Town Center IIPlanning 1st review_doc ~. Coale, Sherie From: Sent: To: Subject: Lee, Rick Monday, November 01, 20044:06 PM Coale, Sherie BOYNTON TOWN CENTER IN ADDITION TO THE STANDARD COMMENTS PLEASE NOTIFY THEM THAT THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE FIRE SPRINKLERS AND WE MUST BE CERTAIN THAT THE WATER SUPPLY IS SUFFICIENT. 1 , ~ Plannin2: Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Ed Breese, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Enyironmentalist Subject: Boynton Town Center 1 New Site Plan - 1st Review NWSP 05-003 Date: November 2, 2004 Map of Boundary and TOPo2:raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 Existin2: Trees Mana2:ement Plan 1. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or remoyed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Enyironmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Landscape Plan Sheet LA-2 2. All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.10] 3. The landscape design should include installation of City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at all of the project ingress/egress locations. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.2 p. 10] 4. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10] 5. The note "All existing vegetation to be removed" should be taken off of this sheet. Landscape Plan Sheet LA-3 ~ '" 6. The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height of the tree and the caliper @ dbh (4.5' off the ground) will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 7. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcoyer Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time planting and inspection. 8. Revise the note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. 9. The mulch note should be changed to say 3" Pine Bark Nuggets mulch to be used on the Large and Small Tree planting detail. 10. The applicant should show an eleyation cross-section detail indicating how the height of the proposed landscape material will yisually buffer the proposed parking lot facility from the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Beach Boulevard roads rights-of-way. Irri2ation Plan-No Irri2ation plan included in the submittal 11. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 12. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 13. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to proyide water directly to the root ball. [Enyironrnental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] Kjh Cl'l'Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIuA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM / TO: Michael W. Rumpf DATE: Dir. of Planning & Zoning 10/26/04 FILE: NWSP 05-003 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Boynton Town Center I REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: No Comments. / "I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 04-176 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning RE: Review Comments New Site Plan - 1 st Review Boynton Town Center I File No. NWSP 05-003 \ " '~. FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: November 3, 2004 / . -------/ The above referenced Site Plans, received on October 15, 2004, was reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a). 2. Show the orientation of dumpster openings on the plans so pick up route can be evaluated. 3. Walls for the enclosure shall be provided on three sides and are to be a minimum of 6 ft. high and shall be CBS construction with a finish matching that of the adjacent buildings(s). Accent shrubs shall be provided along the screen wall(s) (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J., and Article III, Section 9.A.9.a, and Chapter 9, Section 10.C.3.) PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 4. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to approval of this site plan. 5. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 6. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These improvements will be required as part of this project's construction. Provide off-site improvement plans. .j Dept. of Public Works, Enginee"nng Division Memo No. 04-176 RE: Boynton Town Center I, New Site Plan - 1st Review, NWSP 05-003 November 3, 2004 Page 2 ENGINEERING 7. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 10. This plan depicts primarily building of the Super Target structure and the associated parking. The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off- site improvements shall be planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support building construction. 11. Please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan submittal - it is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit! 12. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Congress Ave. and Old Boynton Rd. 13. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 14. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not permitted. 15. Live Oaks are specified within small landscape squares in the larger parking areas. Staff recommends not planting large canopy trees in areas too small to support their future health and growth. 16. Staff recommends the use of the cultivars High Rise or Cathedral for the Live Oaks. 17. Landscaping is shown for areas that the Master Site Plan (Sheet C3) indicates are not included in this submittal. J> Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 04-176 RE: Boynton Town Center I, New Site Plan -1st Review, NWSP 05-003 November 3, 2004 Page 3 18. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is. making assumptions about the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. 19. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 20. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 21. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). 22. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. 23. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES 24. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 25. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is incomplete as submitted. However, the proposed Site Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where utility support is available. We are providing only a cursory review of the proposed site plan as submitted at this time. Additional comments may be required after a utility plan has been submitted. 26. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights- of-way. Dept. of Public Works, Enginee'ring Division Memo No. 04-176 RE: Boynton Town Center I, New Site Plan - 1st Review, NWSP 05-003 November 3, 2004 Page 4 27. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 28. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 29. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 30. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 31. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. 32. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Section 26-33(a). 33. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 34. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 35. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP. 36. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 37. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 04-176 RE: Boynton Town Center I, New Site Plan -1st Review, NWSP 05-003 November 3, 2004 Page 5 39. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. LL:jam Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:IEngineeringlOffice Associates FilelLoganl04-176 Boynton Town Center I.doc ~ SUBJECT: Project - Boynton Town Center File No. - NWSP 05-003 - 1st review L,,,,~f Acronvms/Abbreviations: ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBC - Florida Building Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F.S. - Florida Statutes LDR - Land Development Regulations NEC - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 04-244 FROM: Ed Breese Principal Planner~;.'1 Timothy K. Large ~l TRC Member/Sui '"9 Division TO: DATE: October 29,2004 We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits. Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. 3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. 4 The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC. 5 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. 6 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Town Center Page 1 of 4 { 7 Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 8 Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 9 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 10 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 11 On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in the/each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of the/each building. 12 Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3. 13 As required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s . However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door/s to the/each building/tenant space. The location of the door/s shall match the location of the accessible entrance door/s that is/are depicted on the site plan drawing. 14 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door/ to each building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. 15 Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required handicap accessible parking space/so Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations. S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Town Center Page 2 of 4 I 16 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 17 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the building/s. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 18 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 19 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 20 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 21 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 22 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 23 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 24 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 25 Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LRD, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TRC plan submittals. S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Town Center Page 3 of 4 .. 26 Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.29.2. bf S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2005\Boynton Town Center Page 4 of 4 ~ Coale, Sherie From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Majors, Wally Tuesday, November 02,20048:41 AM Coale, Sherie Johnson, Eric Site Plans Boynton Town Center I and Boynton Village The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the plans for the Boynton Town Center Project. The following comments are submitted: Recreation Facilities Imoact Fee - NA There is no residential development identified as part of this project. Therefore, the impact fee does not apply. I also reviewed the plans for the Boynton Village. Although the plans show no residential development, I was informed by Planning Department staff that the project will include 128 multi family units. Therefore, the Recreation Facilities Impact Fee is calculated as follows: 128 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $83,968 The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase. Furthermore, the Department assumes that the developer is providing no recreation amenities for this project. We recommend some type of outdoor recreation amenity such as a playground, or open playfield that would contribute to a better quality of life for the residents. Additionally, considering the density of this and adjacent projects, the Department recommends that the developer provide bikeways and bike racks as part of the project. Wally 1 " 1/,'1 r~ K~f '&'!#~TtM 7icu>v f.eNT>3Z- .J !/~ f_L/ ~~ 0 f1"\, T ttl~ - cp 47l.€ tv/fA) - (l) 14V€5 A-/;)~ TV ? ~ v<. ~ ~ l?W;/UtA.J@OT j;Ju/U)(P'(, A./EE:/)6) Ar ~et2- ~ / ~~ .r! ~ ~Y..()nM). $/-ku{.;/) A-UO 1#tV6 .4- , 1J~S/~ C6tfAl)&;Cfi c-IU (()/1').1 -me. ~eYL ../ 4vGlle:b Pltv I U o-N m TI/€ ~r ~11JC7-U9 (J/:. MA-f~ ~. S fh"Vc./:> 8t; PUB# 7f) r/.I€ ~IIICJ~ l>tV .3 SI,ge.~ ~~ ~ ~(JJ-(p ~ ~~ ()(tJ n.t€ !& ~ C()'fI)earL&b . ~ (~ ~ ~ 17~ ~ fla1:I,.(c. ~ A-r 71J€: S2.- ~ cP ~ ~ t()/lt. bor lVa!fliJYtJ " ~ '- ~ 6 ~ ~ ~~~~~~w~. J ~ ~u ~ 14- iJriZ€cr PG~&nu-MJ ~it)eCn&>ItJ I7Ie",u. c.-v~ 1 7f) Sl'bGU/44t:.s fA) ~-r- tF- /I1./h'.o $,r .s~~. ~ (.; tNJhIr If1U 77/€-_ S<z$ oP ~"~~'I<~<;n6r::lJ( IbVtJ C / 6 ~4U . ( c , I\c uP c (,), f ( 1~ I::' {(C,"'--f- 'f.f- t: /)<::.c{~. V'17.N~ u../~ i-fI.. OYl, /J 7M;: ~ae1.> k:rru7~ !IF 7UIE -Sp,.(/~ ~ taUr ~ l1A~/..v ~ II-- 1Z4-lse:z> ~ ? <t\ (it/ T tHE "vr~ 4- r 7J.I.&. IJU) ~ez- (JF 71JE. S/IA. U- .5J.k-r:J (.L) bo:t~ G I \" n \J "" \.~~. Cf)~tl~* ~0 P 1.oM f lOjAg. , Oo~~ v}Vxge ~;\J\x 0 W/tn:7L 7lJ W I.fen-€ I r IS I ~ ntC w-~ A7t>y. ~-3 ~ ~ t ~ ,~ ~ "'- i iJ ,. \.f.. ~ ~ ! ~ u- A- ~ ~u.h-B Tif-7(J71 A<.- ~ ~7CVl..E 71-h+-cJ 7U.<r TL<>o tJ-n.I€7L ~ ~ /~1t.(/ElJ / A 71!iLtf TO n.f..l: :3~. / r .$IJO'V~ A)-07 U./:Jw~ ~ 7I-IE r&c.cN.J- ~ tlD.. ~~ l!>-~ I II( M Gl>/~7€ t-3 Jf!e'.J.I-r AJ €;) I r ; . V II $Jk7VCb /n()~ nits v~ V/b/~ ~€7l-SI/ro,/",-~ ~ -I;fh,/-f/~~<~~ f:,;/~~'~;J;u~ ~._c~~~~7 ~ tJ - S .a-nu;J::....,.-s IAl 7j 1-1 ~ II-T cSfrt.l71oI ev.6 6F 171€ SMu-. ,. litJ~ 0 .ifll\~ (:(,<('1 ~ T l7WYL C ti- c?; lOlATfI c~, ~ UT>>f L ./ Il€s-r ~C/~ ~/.)..J-(b ~ TV B<,'l... JL If $ In ( . L - K. ~ ~HI 2€'fC//LckeJu73 I 7'JIQ.€6j' ~~ AtH)-/r7~M- ~ ~. 00 T~ DVr~ /1() nHE C" 3 t'( IUlrT />X.()V/ge e1/~ VISI.-UU, ..$~ItJ/.IJr;;, O}= 711€. s~ O? ~/.,uJ.4 I~ ~ q;. ~. o ~ /S 7J.Ie; ~~M€ ~ hHU/~ ~17tn() ~Q:;ft) 7~ .J/ -n;.e. tJZJ7'~ W,/'f1./- I/Qd t.?MI7EZ> ~- A-~ ? IF ~ A~ L()Dt€ ~} A- ~.Jj/~ ~ ~ A;S'~ ChnJuJ &€ B4M/~kn::i> ~ J'~ IAJCA.o1-se. 71J<.t..B A-5S 1.5 7l~ ~ / tv/7# "Tlt€. ~/~~ tJF 7MUeer~ ~ ~ ~/~ ~~~. -ro~ < 0 ~ ~ PtJ~ 7lJ Jhk)~ ~ ~11V()d.S~..r cP&r? . _ C~.. L.~ <<L- 6...:nJ- h <JW C:J t U t t &e..s l<(.\ .~<- C6'W'! h.'""- -h b t; (? -f- Y &v dlc:.... t (J~' c c.+( II? ~ /1fETJ€ S/fO"C.UA U Mb1ZtE ~.$I";_M7f) ~s.sl>>& ~ J2 I:ff ;CC"'lX/if;4 ~G, 77H!: ~/AJE ~) WlftlEt I'H.but/)J-Otb ~J1L ---I-J' 7r\Q I ~~/>-i_ ; f1CS::, ~ ~ 1lI€: 1kG>>1~ .:;0 IUl- 4- ~E:::,..:DD~"^ ..A6-r AJea> 7{; M; ~ 77>~. ' 2-d ? · tu/.l1:J ~ Wt; ~ I~ If-"r 7}1€. au~ bF ~~ ~~ C'~~ ~ 77K- .$hJ.J{i. I2.tnH> fJ?M€/l- ~ ~ ~ ?),. J (!,-/(, ) bUHrCN ~$ ..sev.se. ~ /l.t;nwt, ~ /h" cSg ~ bj; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_,11 I rJVV JV , r Ill' .J.? /t V< 1JIt.cvdJ iP("" I/P ~ 7t:J 77..Ie ~c Ce/l.C.UE -ro ~... -r7AJ~ 7'1.J.€: fYtA.,,,; SrIlO::7 .A!rEZ.. 7M-s ,S'~ ~/~r to/~ G)f/tttOl. ~ Il&~(p& ~L;;;;~&u~_';; 7 , I~II-f)-etp UArr5 -- ..., J(' ~ 1ttI./f:/ ~(~t77tJ ~ (QJOex) 77J ~ &? ,4- t . ~~ ~ II-'r /)I€. .sL ~~ 7'U.€ .s~ ? 6U. $r;~WJ.lt€'~ ~&- me ~ ? -:r ~ CD,4 ,A,vA.)~".u ~ U ~(.,Ul~ IAJ ~ ~ 'T7I€ ~. ~. , V"Jmw