REVIEW COMMENTS
· MAP UPDATES
.
July 18: Hemingway Square and Casa del Mar
August 1: no approvals
August 15: no approvals
September 6: no approvals
September 19: no approvals
October 17: Boynton Ba~els
December 5: Bamboo, 2n round
January 2: no approvals
January 16: Miraflor (DCA processing as a large scale)
February 13: no approvals
March 5: no approvals
March 20: no approvals
April 3: no approvals
April 17: no approvals
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
o CC April 3rd
o TCEA: report sent; amendment letter sent 3/2
o CRALLS
Commencing in June, 2007 the City shall prepare and submit an annual report that
monitors traffic volumes on the affected roadway link and intersections, and
provides a status report on compliance with all of the mitigation measures
identified in this policy, Should any of the mitigation measures for the
Congress/Old Boynton CRALLS not be satisfactorily completed, it shall be
deemed that the City is in violation of the provisions of the CRALLS and no
further building permits requiring the CRALLS for concurrency shall be issued.
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME /
NUMBER:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-156
STAFF REPORT
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and
Mayor and aty Commission ...-::f"
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP -t:
Planner
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
August 18, 2005
Boynton Village / NWSP 05-004
New site plan approval to construct a large scale, mixed-use development
consisting of 80 dwelling units, 135,641 square feet of retail, 14,541
square feet of restaurant, and 10,000 square feet of office, all on a 20.33-
acre parcel in the SMU Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district.
Property Owner:
Applicant:
Agent:
Location:
Existing Land Use:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Uses:
Acreage:
Adjacent Uses:
North:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Klatt Family Partnership & Klatt Enterprises, Inc.
1950 Congress Avenue, LLC
Mr. Russell C. Morrison, P.E. with Kimley-Horn and Associates
Northeast corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue, just south of
the SFWMD C-16 canal (see Location Map - Exhibit "A")
Mixed Use Suburban (MX-S)
Suburban Mixed Use (SMU)
80 dwelling units
135,641 square feet of retail
14,541 square feet of restaurant
10,000 square feet of office
20.33-acre portion of the 106.5-acre parcel
Right-of-way for the SFWMD C-16 Canal, then farther north is developed
property with townhouses of Phase I of the Renaissance Commons Master
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 2
South:
East:
West:
Plan with a Suburban Mixed-Use (MX-S) land use classification, zoned
Suburban Mixed Use (SMU), Northeast is undeveloped property proposed
for condominium use within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master
Plan with a Suburban Mixed-Use (MX-S) land use classification, zoned
Suburban Mixed Use (SMU);
Undeveloped property proposed for commercial use within the Boynton
Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3), then farther
south is right-of-way for Old Boynton Road, still farther south is developed
commercial property (Oakwood Shopping Center), with a Local Retail
Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial
(C-3);
Immediately east is right-of-way for the proposed main north/south road
within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan, then farther east
is undeveloped property proposed for townhouses within the Boynton
Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Suburban Mixed-Use (MX-S)
land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU), still farther east
is right-of-way of the LWDD E-4 Canal, still farther east is developed
single family residential (Sky Lake) with an Low Density Residential (LDR)
land use classification, zoned Single Family Residential (R-l-AA); and
Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, then farther west is developed
commercial property (Boynton Beach Mall) with a Local Retail Commercial
(LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3).
Site Characteristic: The subject site is the location of pastureland commonly referred to as the
Winchester Property. On February 15, 2005, the City Commission approved the
applicant's request for a change to the land use classification and to rezone (LUAR
04-006) 81.814 acres of the property from Single-family Residential (R-l-AA) to
Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU) and also approximately 25 acres at the southwest
corner of the parcel (LUAR 04-007) from Single-family Residential (R-l-AA) to
Community Commercial (C-3).
Proposal:
The Winchester property is bounded by the LWDD C-16 Canal to the north, the
LWDD E-4 Canal to the east, Old Boynton Road to the south, and Congress Avenue
to the west. The SMU Master Plan shows that the subject property is an
irregularly-shaped parcel, carved out from the original 106.5 acre parcel. This
20.33-acre portion fronts on Congress Avenue and extends eastward towards the
center of the 106,5-acre Winchester property. The survey shows the property
contains a variety of mature trees. The species include the follOWing: Oak tree,
Cabbage palm, Gumbo Limbo, and Citrus trees, The SMU Master Plan depicts this
parcel as Phase I SMU Parcel 6 (20.333 acres),
BACKGROUND
Mr, Russell C. Morrison, P.E., with Kimley-Horn and Associates is requesting new
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 3
Concurrency:
Traffic:
Utilities:
site plan approval to construct a large-scale, mixed-use development within a
106.5-acre project. The site plan would consist of 80 dwelling units, 135,641
square feet of retail, 14,541 square feet of restaurant, and 10,000 square feet of
office, All proposed uses are permitted in the SMU zoning district.
ANALYSIS
Generally, a project's anticipated traffic is generated by two factors, namely the
proposed use and its intensity. A letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
was received indicating that the entire Master Plan meets the traffic performance
standards, with a series of conditions which limit or time aspects of the
development with certain roadway improvements, Additionally, the City has
petitioned the County for a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of
Service) designation for Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and the respective
intersections, Palm Beach County has transmitted the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment associated with the CRALLS designation to the Department of
Community Affairs for review and comment prior to adoption, Formal adoption of
the CRALLS would remove the requirement for certain roadway improvements,
including the necessity to improve the entire segment of Old Boynton Road
between Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard to a five (5) lane section.
However, even if the CRALLS is adopted by Palm Beach County, the following
roadway improvements would still be required for the project: 1) Intersection
improvements at Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and
Gateway Boulevard, and Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road; 2)
Improvement of Gateway Boulevard to six (6) lanes from Congress Avenue to High
Ridge Road; 3) Improvement of Old Boynton Road to five (5) lanes from Congress
Avenue to the Spine Road (the main north/south roadway within the proposed
Master Plan, connecting Old Boynton Road to Gateway Boulevard), transitioning to
three (3) lanes west of the E-4 Canal bridge, and continuing a three (3) lane
section east to Boynton Beach Boulevard. This would also include the construction
of a new three (3) lane bridge over the LWDD E-4 Canal; and 4) various access
point improvements to entrances/exits to the 106.5-acre parcel (see "Exhibit C"-
Conditions of Approval).
The City's water capacity, has increased through the purchase of up to 5 million
gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the
projected potable water needs for this project. Local piping and infrastructure
improvements may be required for the project, dependent upon the final project
configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the
responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting
(see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Sufficient sanitary sewer and
wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve this project, subject to
the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site
plan.
Police/Fire: The Police Department reviewed the subject request relative to the Master Plan as
a whole and how it would impact their level of service. The Department reports,
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 4
"With the projected growth for this area, additional officers for this zone will be
needed to handle the increase of calls for service, Service requirements for the
Police Department will be impacted greatly and the demand for more police
personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and
projected traffic."
The Fire Department reviewed the subject request and reports that Fire Station #5
should be expedited to ensure adequate service delivery levels and effective
response times, Additionally, a traffic light pre-empt should be pursued to aid the
response of emergency apparatus on Congress Avenue. Also, upgrades in
emergency dispatch capability should be made, including new technology related to
CAD, GIS and AVL and adequate staffing.
Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The
Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is
recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time
of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other
drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit
"C" - Conditions of Approval),
School: The School District of Palm Beach County has approved the project for school
concurrency.
Driveways: The site plan proposes three (3) major points of ingress / egress, Four (4)
alternate driveway openings are proposed internal to the subject property, The first
major driveway opening would exist along Congress Avenue. It would be the first
of two (2) openings proposed along Congress Avenue (for this phase). It should be
noted that a third curb-cut is proposed along Congress Avenue in conjunction with
the development of the Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) project. The site
plan shows that this southernmost opening (for this phase) would be 100 feet wide
at the property line. It would consist of four (4) lanes, two (2) for ingress, and two
(2) for egress. Each lane would 12 feet wide. The ingress lanes would be
separated from the egress lanes by a 10-foot wide landscaped median. This
opening would be a signalized intersection on Congress Avenue and require off-site
roadway improvements. The off-site improvements include but are not limited to
removing the existing concrete sidewalk and curb / gutter along Congress Avenue
in order to construct a deceleration lane into the development. This would
necessitate the reduction in width of the existing medians along Congress Avenue
in order to accommodate new left-turn (east) lanes into the development.
Regarding egress from this southernmost opening, it would allow for both right-turn
(north) and left-turn (south) traffic movements onto Congress Avenue.
The second major point of ingress / egress is also proposed along Congress
Avenue, It would allow for ingress to the out-lots of the subject project. When
scaled, this northernmost opening would be approximately 95 feet in width. It
would consist of one (1) lane for ingress and two (2) lanes for egress. Similar to
the other opening proposed along Congress Avenue, an existing signal would serve
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 5
this expanded intersection and require off-site roadway improvements. It would
allow for right-turn (north) and left-turn (south) traffic movements onto Congress
Avenue.
The third major point of ingress / egress is proposed along the spine road, When
scaled, the site plan shows that it would be approximately 90 feet wide at the
property line, As a point of egress, it would allow for both right-turn (south) and
left-turn (north) traffic movements onto the spine road. Likewise, the ingress and
egress lanes (within this driveway) would be separated by a 10-foot wide
landscaped median.
As previously mentioned, alternate driveway openings are proposed internal to the
development. Two (2) driveway openings are proposed adjacent to the Phase II
condominium buildings. The other driveway openings are proposed along the C-3
parcel (Boynton Town Center) to the south,
Parking Facility: The project proposes a mix of residential, retail, restaurant, and office uses. One
(1) bedroom units require one and one-half (1- V2) parking spaces while two (2)
bedroom units require two (2) parking spaces each, The project proposes 22 one-
bedroom units and 58 two (2) bedroom units, The required parking for the
commercial uses have been based on a "shopping center" rate (1 space per 200
square feet). Therefore, this project would require a total of 950 parking spaces.
The plans would provide for 719 surface parking spaces and 222 parking garage
spaces for a total of 941 parking spaces, a deficiency of nine (9) spaces. However,
the intent is to share the excess parking with the C-3 parcel (Boynton Town Center
proposed directly to the south). The master site data plan (sheet MSD) indicates
that the Boynton Town Center site plan has an excess of 43 parking spaces.
Therefore, a cross parking / cross access agreement would be required at time of
permitting (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
The parking required for the 80 residential units would be 149 spaces, These
parking spaces would occur within the four (4)-level parking garage of Building "H",
As previously mentioned, the parking garage would contain 222 spaces. The first
level would have 41 spaces, the second and third levels would have 78 spaces
each, and the fourth level would have 25 spaces. The parking garage would
provide more than enough to accommodate the needs of the residents, The intent
is to share with the commercial uses. Should the developer choose to limit the
access to certain levels of the parking garage, the developer should ensure the
availability of these spaces for the residents of the apartment building (see Exhibit
"C" - Conditions of Approval).
Throughout most of the subject project, the internal circulation system would
consist of parking lots with 25-foot wide drive lanes. The Detail of the typical 90-
degree parking stall shows that the parking spaces would be dimensioned nine and
one-half (9- V2) feet wide and 16- V2 feet in length with two (2) feet of vehicular
overhang. The handicap space would be 12 feet in width with five (5) feet of
striping and 16- V2 feet in length with two (2) feet of vehicular overhang.
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 6
Landscaping:
The master site data plan indicates that 6.158 acres (30,2%) of the subject
property would be landscaped surface, Much of this pervious surface would be in
the form of the landscape buffer proposed along Congress Avenue, The Overall
plant list indicates that 64% of the 194 canopy trees would be native, 53% of the
184 palm trees would be native, and 61 % of the 7,061 shrubs / groundcover would
be native. The plant list includes the following species: Coconut palm, Florida
Royal palm, Cabbage palm, Washington palm, Slash pine, High Rise Live Oak,
Mahogany, Pond Cypress, Pink Trumpet tree, and Purple Glory tree. It should be
noted that the project frontage along Congress Avenue is very lengthy and
therefore, facilitating the important role that landscape buffers have for the project,
which in turn, increases the importance of having consistent landscape material
between the proposed project and the approved landscape buffer of the
Renaissance Commons project. Staff's intent is to encourage Congress Avenue to
become more of an aesthetically pleasing corridor and staff feels that this can be
accomplished, in part, with consistent landscape material. However, the developer
has informed staff that while that it is also their intent to make the corridor as
aesthetically pleasing, it is their desire to remain as an autonomous unit, distinct
from Renaissance Commons. Furthermore, it is the developer's opinion that the
proposed landscape plans provide above and beyond what code requires, and that
as proposed, would be aesthetically pleasing in and of itself, Staff concurs to a
certain extent. As a comprise, staff and the developer have agreed that along
Congress Avenue, the proposed landscape plan should have the same tree species
and quantity of plant material for this project, as that of the Renaissance Commons
project, but that the species of shrubs and groundcover and its configuration would
be autonomous (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
The SMU zoning district requires a 25-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer around
the entire project. This requirement of the zoning district would be applied to the
west landscape buffer, along Congress Avenue. The landscape plan shows that
Mahogany and Pink Trumpet trees are proposed within this buffer as well as Ixora
"Nora" Grant, Sandankwa Viburnum, and Plumbago. Again, the above-paragraph
describes the agreement between staff and the developer regarding the proposed
plant material,
A note on the Cortina at Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001) landscape plan indicates
that "Spine Road Landscape by Others" would provide for trees proposed along the
spine road, It also suggests that the trees would be an oak species. However, the
proposed landscape plan shows the Foxtail palm trees are proposed on each side of
the spine road. The landscape medians would contain Florida Royal palm trees,
Ixora "Nora" Grant, and Dwarf Yaupon Holly shrubs. The function of the roadway
is primarily to alleviate traffic congestion on Congress Avenue, Gateway Boulevard,
and Old Boynton Road. As shown on the plans, the spine road would directly link
Gateway Boulevard to Old Boynton Road. However, it does not show the plant
material proposed on the portion of the spine road within the Renaissance
Commons project. It is staff's intent to create a park-like boulevard effect for the
spine road, This would be best achieved by incorporating canopy trees into the
design of the roadway (as was done in the Renaissance Commons project) thereby
maintaining consistency of plant material proposed within the right-of-way of the
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 7
two projects. The Renaissance Commons project proposed Live Oak trees along
the spine road, In this project, the Foxtail palm trees proposed along the spine
road would be inconsistent and disjointed from the remaining portions of the
roadway. Therefore, at time of permitting, staff recommends substituting the
proposed Foxtail palm trees with oak trees (along the spine road) to maintain
consistency in landscaping along this roadway (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval).
It should be noted that much of the interior landscape material (for the out-lots)
has not been shown on these plans, The design of these out-lots are incomplete at
this time and each out-lot would require separate site plan review. For all intents
and purposes, landscaping is one of the only key elements of the site plan missing
for Building "L". Therefore, staff recommends that foundation landscaping (with
trees) be installed along the north, south, and west sides of Building "L", All other
out-lots would require separate site plan review and approval (see Exhibit "C" -
Conditions of Approval).
Building and Site: The Mixed Use Suburban (MX-S) land use classification allows up to 20 dwelling
units per acre. Boynton Village is just one (1) component of the Boynton Village
Master Plan. The entire master plan is proposed at a project density of 13.69
dwelling units per acre. This phase of the master plan proposes a density of 3.93
dwelling units per acre.
The project proposes a multitude of buildings and uses for this 20.33-acre portion
of the Winchester property, The plans show that the majority of building square
footage for this phase would occur along the mainstreet. The site plan proposes 11
separate buildings, three (3) of which, would be located on out-lots (or out parcels)
along Congress Avenue. All the other eight (8) buildings would front on
mainstreet. Mainstreet is designed with angled parking and flanked with six (6)
buildings on both the north and south sides,
Mainstreet would commence at the main entrance along Congress Avenue and
terminate at the spine road, The mainstreet is proposed in an east-west direction
and would have one (1) round a bout. Buildings "J", "K", and "H" would be located
on the north side while Buildings "E", "I", "G", "F", and "D" would be located on the
south side of, Building "L" would be located on the northernmost out-lot and its
details will be discussed later in this section.
Starting at the westernmost point of the mainstreet (at the project entrance along
Congress Avenue), Building "J" would be located on the north side. It is proposed
as a (2)-story tall building with 8,100 square feet of retail on the ground floor and
5,000 square feet of office space on the second floor. Similarly, Building "K", which
is also proposed on the north side, just north of Building "J", would have 9,930
square feet of retail on the ground floor and 5,000 square feet of office on the
second floor. On the south (opposite) side of the mainstreet, Building "I" would be
one (i)-story tall and consist of 12,495 square feet of retail. Building "E", which is
proposed just east of Building "I" on the south side of the mainstreet, would be one
(i)-story tall and consist of 25,290 square feet of retail space.
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 8
The site plan proposes four (4) other buildings along the mainstreet, east of the
round-a-bout. These buildings are labeled as follows: Building "H", "G", "F", and
"0". Building "H" is the largest of the 11 buildings, It is proposed east of the
round-a-bout on the north side of the mainstreet, while Buildings "G", "F", and "0"
are proposed east of the round-a-bout on the south side of the mainstreet.
Building "H" would be four (4)-stories tall and consist of both residential and
commercial uses, Along mainstreet, the ground floor of Building "H" would consist
of 23,468 square feet of retail. The residential units proposed on the ground floor
of Building "H" would be located at the eastern portion of the building, facing the
lake that fronts on the spine road, As previously mentioned, Building "H" would
consist of 22 one-bedroom units and 58 two (2) bedroom units for a total of 80
dwelling units. The Unit Mix chart on sheet Al indicates that the smallest unit (Al)
would be 910 square feet in area while the largest unit (TH1), designed as a
townhouse, would be 1,871 square feet in area. The fitness room would be 1,300
square feet and the clubhouse would be 1,550 square feet. Building "H" would
have the four (4)-level interior parking garage. Building "G", proposed east of the
round a bout on the south side of mainstreet would be one (l)-story tall and
consist of 9,753 square feet of retail. Likewise, Building "F" would also be a one
(l)-story building with 10,430 square feet in area, It should be noted that Building
"0" would not be aligned with Building "F" or "G". Building "0" would have a row
of parking stalls between it and the mainstreet parking spaces, thereby diminishing
the "mainstreet" feeling of the site plan. Building "0" would be 28,000 square feet
in area.
At this time, the only completely designed out-lot is the northernmost out-lot,
labeled as Building "L" on the site plan. Building "L"would be an 8,175 square foot
retail building, All other out-lots would require separate site plan review and
approval (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval),
The maximum building height in the SMU zoning district for townhouses is 55 feet.
Also, the SMU zoning district has a minimum building height of 35 feet. This
minimum height threshold would apply to buildings that have a fac;ade with arterial
roadway frontage. In this case, it would apply to several of the mainstreet
buildings and all out-lots, As per the SMU zoning district, multiple story buildings
are encouraged along arterial roadways, such as Congress Avenue. The intent of
this provision is to create the appearance, or simulate the intensity of, a minimum
two (2)-story building. The northernmost out-lot (Building "L") is proposed as a
one (l)-floor but designed to appear as a two (2)-story structure. The elevations
show that the peak of the pitched roof would be 35 feet in height. This meets the
intent of the SMU code. The east elevation of Building "K" would be 47 feet in
height while the peak of the decorative tower would be 74 feet in height. This is a
problem, Although the developer's intent was to meet the SMU minimum height
requirement (along Congress Avenue), the plans would in fact, require conditional
use approval due to the fact that a portion of the proposed building exceeds the
55-foot threshold of the SMU zoning district, Therefore, at the time of permitting,
the decorative tower height shall be reduced to 55 feet or conditional use approval
would be required prior to the issuance of any building permits (see Exhibit "c" -
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 9
Conditions of Approval). The elevations show that the south fa~ade of Building "J",
which would be located on the north side of the mainstreet, would generally
exceed 30 feet. Decorative trellis-work has been added to this fa~ade in an
attempt to make the building appear as a two (2)-story structure along the
mainstreet.
On the south side of the mainstreet along Congress Avenue, the west elevation of
Building "I" shows that it was designed to appear as a two (2)-story structure. The
peak of the pitched roof would be 47 feet in height and the decorative tower would
be 74 feet in height. Again, this exceeds the 55-foot threshold and would be
subject to the same condition of approval as Building K. The same trellis-work is
proposed to the west fa~ade of Building "I" as it is for Building "K". The front door
of Building "E", however, is proposed along the east fa~ade rather than along the
mainstreet. The fa~ade of Building "E" that faces the mainstreet (the north
elevation) was designed as a two (2)-story structure. The peak of the parapet wall
on the north fa~ade would be 28 feet in height. The peak of the pitched roof
(proposed on the east fa~ade) would be 36 feet in height.
The buildings proposed along mainstreet, east of the round a bout are designed to
be compatible with the buildings along mainstreet west of the round a bout. On
the north side of mainstreet, the south elevation of Building "H" shows that it
would be 55 feet in height at the peak of the decorative towers. When scaled, the
lower parapet wall would be 48 feet in height while the upper parapet wall would
be approximately 52 feet in height. Again, the same trellis-work proposed on the
other buildings was incorporated into the design of Building "H". On the south side
of mainstreet, east of the round-a-bout, the north elevations of Building "G" show
that it would be 27 feet - four (4) inches in height (at the lower parapet wall) and
29 feet - four (4) inches in height at the upper parapet wall, The peak of the
pitched roof would be 34 feet - four (4) inches in height. The north elevation of
Building "F" shows that the dimension of the parapet wall would be 29 feet - four
(4) inches in height and the peak of the pitched roof would be 36 feet - eight (8)
inches in height. Building "D" is proposed at 27 feet in height at the top of the
parapet wall and 42 feet in height at the peak of the pitched roof,
The SMU zoning district requires 20% usable open space for commercial and
mixed-use projects, This translates to 4,067 acres of required usable open space,
The Usable Open Space plan (sheet MaS) indicates the plan would provide for a
total of 5.401 acres of usable open space. It should be noted that the plans
utilized the pervious surface of the 25-foot wide landscape buffer along Congress
Avenue, The plans also show that the plazas would also count towards usable
open space. The master plan would provide a total of 23,8 acres of usable open
space.
Design:
The Boynton Village Master Plan is essentially separated in half by the spine road.
For this particular project, all buildings are proposed west of the spine road, The
project is enhanced with easily accessible public spaces (greenway) that would be
open to the public in perpetuity, The buildings are proposed in a modern
architectural style and are aesthetically pleasing. The building facades are
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 10
enhanced with trim, banding, columns, shutters, medallions, score lines, and
trellises. Staff endorses the concept of a mainstreet.
However, the plans do have limitations in terms of its overall performance, appeal,
and function. Staff did not envision stand-alone buildings on out parcels when
creating the SMU zoning district, While there is no code to enforce this position, it
was staff's intent to have a more "substantial" building at the northernmost out-lot
(Building "L") than the other out-lots immediately to its south. Staff opines that the
surrounding condominium and townhouse buildings should not dwarf the proposed
commercial building, Staff also opines that this building should anchor the
development. The applicant responded by proposing a building that lends itself the
appearance of a two (2)-story structure. This meets code requirements of the
SMU, The applicant states that the ability to increase the mass of Building "L" is
limited by the zoning with respect to the total square footage of building area
allowed within this parcel, Staff disagreed and maintained that stand-alone
buildings were not envisioned for the SMU zoning district, especially along a major
arterial such as Congress Avenue, Staff is disappointed that no elevations have
been proVided for the out-lots and anticipates that a developer will seek conditional
use approval for one (l)-story buildings to accommodate the proto-typical bank or
restaurant that are frequently attached to such sites (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions
of Approval). Staff was hopeful for a new urban type of development but in reality
the inclusion of out-lots only reduces the uniqueness and contributes to this project
appearing like any other strip-commercial shopping center.
The buildings would come in a variety of colors and have either metal or tile
roofing. The project colors are proposed as follows:
Masonry B1 Red
B2 Pink
B3 Pearl Grav
Pavers Pi Buff
P2 Harvest
P3 Charcoal
Precast Sl White
S2 Buff
Fa<;ade Body Color (EIFS or
Stucco) E1 Abode Accent
E2 Smoked Salmon
E3 Muskmelon
E4 Honey Gold
ES Nacho
E6 Manor White
E7 China White
Awnings A1 Sunbelt Black
A2 Sunbrella Aspen
A3 Sunbrella Linen
A4 Sunbrella Terra Cotta
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 11
Storefronts
ST1 Champagne
ST2 Clear
ST3 Terra Cotta
T1 White
T2 Off-white
Trim Colors
The intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap the
garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to disguise the
garage and create continuity in street-level activity by maintaining interest for
pedestrians and passing motorists, Principal structures that include parking
garages shall be designed to blend the architecture of the garage with the
remainder of the structure or adjacent buildings. Portions of freestanding parking
garages that are not screened with habitable space and are in view from the
general public shall utilize design measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall
landscaping, etc, to soften their impact (Chapter 2, Section 5,H.7.b,). Staff
recommends that in addition to the series of arches proposed at ground level, a
series of stucco openings emulating windows shall be added to the 2nd level. These
openings shall be centered over the ground level arches. This wall treatment
would give the parking deck less of a utilitarian fa~ade and more residential
character. In addition, staff recommends adding plant material to the north side of
the parking deck in order to help break up that fa~ade (see Exhibit "CIf - Conditions
of Approval).
Within any SMU project, feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers,
entrances, and exits is encouraged. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises
an benches shall be encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 10.H.),
The developer included a Hardscape and Amenities Plan that indicates the location
of benches, ashtrays, planters, bicycle racks, trellises, and fountains. The detail of
the outdoor freestanding lighting fixture (sheet SL1) shows that the height of the
poles would be 25 feet in height. The poles would be round tapered steel black
poles.
Signage:
No project signage was included with this submittal. Therefore, staff recommends
submittal of a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions,
exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5,H.9.), The sign
program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs,
identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument signs,
canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs as regulated
by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. It is recommended that the
applicant provide a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs
and indicate their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include
the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color (see Exhibit "CIf -
Conditions of Approval),
Staff Report -Boynton Village (NWSP 05-004)
Memorandum No PZ 05-156
Page 12
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff recommends approval, contingent upon
successfully satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional
conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the
Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village SMU NWSP OS-004\Staff Report,doc
EXHIBIT A
..
BOYNTON VILLAGE AND BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I
LOCATION MAP
o
Local Retail Commercial
Industrial
BOYNTON CANAL
.._...........................n.............n...\
..
i
i
.
.
;
.
i
i
.
I
i
.
i
.
III I
'..
~
E
~
:::
III
...
GI
It
...
III
0
...
~,\'f~:~''''~
'^'.' '"
Q(".,..,..,."".,.,.\~.
Q., ~ .lI.J
j." /V
I'v,~" ,',',/<,.
'.0"'>
BOYNTON VILLAGE
LUAR 04-006
Suburban Mixed Use
81.814 acres
LUAR 04-007
Local Retail Com erelal
25,00 acres
......--
_..................n.J
1m _
W+E
S
-
-
"1..
C~:::'::~:':'.:':~':~':':,::'::.:~";:::'::~':::':~C~~::::':,'::.~~~.~~:,,~",,,,_.,, """0 " '"5" "'" S<Com 0, ',m',",,", EXHIBIT B
I ; ,~., .-~.._.. -., ,. --" -, ,,-- .._"'.. ~- ,--- - ,.. .-.-, ...., -". ,._,.,,- -. -.",~" '_r""" "-"-""" -, -,,, -- - -- ~
~w _, =-=- ___~~~1.,.,.'GI~-~-~ -{ I/___~____ ----- L_I!~!!!:~!I!'!I!I!!!I!I!!!I!U!II"c
;; I =-=-=-=-= =-=-~~.;.~-;-~==~~.:=-.::.-- .-If 1=--- -- -------- ,;~.;:-~-==~....:;;.::~~ ~ !!!! lillhhtllf~f~f~f!!I!lt.H
~~ ~, Si ~, ,=---=- =-- ~- =- ~~I~1I1 \ 1m h~W!r~iii~fl~f,Hm l!ll~it
q I ~ I == I "HI 11:1,1.; :1 ~i i ':I J iiii.~~ll.
____ ________---, \ \ \ H!~ ,-,II!' III.,. .1, hili
I I \'1 \ HH II It ,:! l.:!:j!i!!',' I afl'i~;
I 'I 'ur J ~ 0 d'l.ol 1 1- tl I"
'" ~ I I I \ I i' liJf' i I' j ! il'l!' i ,!: i Ih.l'
~B~~ I \ ~ \ \ I!! 1 II , ; , b! j !!; : !:!il:
~..el~ \ \1 I Ini ! -: !' ~ ! :ll i 1,1 II~Hi{
!l! '" I I I~ ,1,,' I h ' 1 I ,., I I' I "'II,
~ I I 'I' , .t_ J d to 1ft t If I; -H~I
Co> I \ \ \ ,~".!,., ~ 1 ! ,!, ,,1 I' lit,', '
I ;0 "I'" I'j . 11 'II! I
\ \ 'I!J!',!' l l; ~; ~! ~I
, \ I \1 I,.. I Ii ' f ' II! ,!I I '~lll!
I 1 \ lU ~ [~ ! I ~ iif i ~i ~ r~IlJli
n_u___..-J I \ II I' : ,'! , ! ! ~J' ,'I I Jlh!l!
_un \ \ ,~ ,," ,I l Ell 1"\'
I I I I (, 8 ! i 0 l! 8 l! t. Gf. I'
I \ " !.; I Ii! ! I: I i! ell.
I \ \ \ I I j! I I ! ' ; " 1 1"1"
\ j . - " 1Il ~ It . ~ ~ -!"
I \ I' I . I , " I. I H "I
tg ~ I: II 1 I I: II 1 Jl !II
h'I~~ I 1\\ Ilil!!':" If' II
-!!ll~ \\\\ i!I",I.I~ "'I
!ll .. '" \ 1 I! Ii; I ! I! ; i! ~l
fJl ! "f I'" i' 'I
\ '- I Ii ; : ' , ! iii,
/~ \ \ !hliHi!i lH!!
r-~ ~ ~\. \~~',' o,~; ~<
~\ ~~~~~~~~jj~~ ~~.':\V
,,~t;!i;!;!~~.~~~~ ~.~ \'
\ :\ ~~hdh~~'.' d~ ' \~
~ ~~~~~~>~~~~~~ ~~~ \ .
\ \\ ~~~~~ p~~ ~ ~o~ \ ./
~\ ~g~,;,.;;~~~~~e~h df \ ": '
~~~g~:.~!~J~~~ ~~~ \ \ \/
~ Co>Jl~ '~~Ya~i" w~~~ ~~~ ' \\
;~~~ ;!i2~~Y~~~~~~~ "~~ \\ \'
!ll~S:~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ig ~~. \\ "
fJl i;l- ~~~2~~~~~~.a~~ ~~ \\, 'I
1'1 ~~~mj~~~~~! ~~ 1 \\ \
'!I ~i~m",i~~~~~;~ \ II
\~ " . ~~r~~3~i~;i ~i \ I I'
~ ~ ~ " : II
I, r I II
\ I I II'
~-~~JJ ::;1,1
I!E!^IE!5!'i"'I""i""'!I'O ~ III II'
!iW,IIIIP~~lil'i'!!~~1 n ~, I
p! Ii~i,il l:il!,i~11111 i:!I ~ I I I
III:! ill"I!!! III ii;i!li'jil !i!jrnlll I'
< 'I' , !I iii' ,I' 11'- I 'I
tg ~ hi !,i,.jl ill 'i! II11 ,'II! ~ II '
h I' I :,I~ li!!!li Iii hli; liI:1 ji!1 I' I I I
~"lOr' if. , , 'l: <II ~ hi:: ijl I
.., .1 ~ ~ lOll' i' ., Iii! 'I
'" Iii: i 'I, :' I'l lilj I!;' I I ' I
" II, 'II i~ I:i :1, H~ lilh !, III I \ q III j
i I 'II 'I. 'I " , .! Ii:' /'1' j
1:1 ; I ~ I " .~ II i I' Iii; : II 'I
"I, I ! !Ii" i I' ; : jl i ;, I I
II i ! i!, Iii ill" i~11 II I
Ii i :I! " :, I! ;1',' ,II I
_____ ,> , I' I, ~ 'II ~ I
--II!I---;~-:~--H('l ~II \1
fJl ~ '" ~ 8 z I I I II
'I ~ I \ 'II
~ ;! I I I I
~ ~ i \ I \1
- ~\I' \1
(
^ >.
~ ~;
be
! i~
~ ~c
i !~
r- ~~i:~~~ u
~ ,~..~:~ 2~
~ ~~n~~~ ~g
~2:t~d ~
~i;~i~ ~
'~;:!d
~; ~a~~
U:i~~
-<~~~i~ ~S
"
~.~ :
~J Olr5BO~ONROAO
, I :c .t _: ~ - -
fU ~ 'iH ~ ~~ !~U. -i' "lra"l.a~"..-I~I..~.._..J -
~., . .," ., ~8H' ~x~ ~'~~"~i,~.~...~..<~.g"~i~~np~ ,..~ ~ ~".
j!' ," ,",'>~~ ~_i ~,i~ ,,; .:.g ..~~i.l:~-~~!1'.~""?~ -.: :::' '~~i~
~. ., io~~ '~i "~' '~l"'--" I . ~'i~"op'~;' .~c! ~ .~~
" 'I : o~: ~ i I · E~. ~ -, 1 d i~m, I I- ~ h ' q ~,~ ~ i ~i' ~
I . ~ ill i 'iI~~ ; ~~~uI~ ~ 9 ~ ~~ ~ i ~ 11 ~ ~ r "...f ~
~ S ~,,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ii j !~.~ ~~~ I; ! ~ ~ ; ~
I ~ · ~ m~ m ~: ~~ ; p ~ i - U;E Hi
- . .." ~~ i:' M- l ~ "" d!
,,~ i € ~ ~ _ ~ 0; ~ =, ~ ~! I" . ~ 000 ~ - ~ ~ 1
" ^ ^ ^^ ~ U H ~i i ~ ,~ ."""" ,,; ~ "; JIWd m ~ i
" r;:l~~ '::~;~;; ~ ;;; ~ ~
~
;~
Ilm
8~
~~
~~
",-<
~
0-
() ;! ~o
w &;o~~
@~~
BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU
DEVELOPER:
1950 CONGRESS AVE., LLC.
BO'i'NTQN BEACH FLORIDA
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SCAL(AS NOTED [)ESlQIl EtfQNE~
DUICHED BY RUSSEll MORRISON ~-~ KInIey-Hom
DRA~ BY COR n.OFIIDA IlEClS1AA1'lOfO _SER, - an:t Associates, Inc.
TAY 51567 @~!<INL.EY-HOR\'lNlDASSQCI"'TEs'INC
4431 Emb<rcadoro 011..., W..l Polm B.o<1l, n. 33407
_o(!l61)M5l1l185 ~.>c('>8')MJ8175
_lUIollEY-HORNCOM CAOOOOO896
Addition of Outlol~ 5 ond 6
REVISIONS
J-15-05TAY
DATE BY
C~O<EOBY
''''
EXHIBIT B
Drgw,ng "om.. H \047148007-BO)O'lton VilI,,~\47141HlO7\CADD\oPEN SPACE CALCS ~ ..,.-511. Plon-8 d.g "'ASTER Aug 12, 2005 9 46am by. Jim Jenk,na
Th..____\ho_...~_...._...-._..,_m..t..__.."'....'_....1...._~....__......,.... ....../l__A_......d___........_._.__....__.......1/l__....___...._..._-....~___
,
:i: .,;;
<.~,
,'j
';1
.;!
" ;;1
;,
,~
~~,
/" ;,
11 ~~
'~ (
,
"I, ",
;~
.;". ,,'~
,
"
; \
ij
! ~ ,
'"
51
~~
i~:~
.
'fY;-
>:,~""":
""-;"~';:
, ~, ~V"J t -'.T }\~-
, f, t~:
,(
It
.; l
~
-
,1
I
{
,I
J
'1
, .,~
~.,.v.;.::''';''''-<~,:;.;'J<
'~~::~:}~'; ,
~~;::t.'::~~~, :
,-1 '
;"f;""))
"',~ "";";',
0, "..-'..:~\
~;;.
. '!f
: ~ ,t.
~ ", ,
f,i:::C'
. ,,;';. ,
::/,{
'~
l~ ~. .: ,
r ..
, ..
? /' ,.
"
";'~
'./
"u ~ !
d~"
lOo~~
fJlm~~
en :;" ,
>-'
!lll~J!J!J!J!J!J!
;H~~~~~~
i!i!"~"~"~7
UUHU
<;l!ImiliH1111
~!ii ---~~
~~ ---n
ell U
-I<
~
~
;.
I
"
I
!
I
;:r"
,~ ;
iIliHl~El~i!l
<<S;;!i1s;;i!ii!~
~~['j;l;1!I ~!i!
"~<;l:;;~ liS
~~~~~ ~i
~~~n ~
~ ~ ~H ~
H~ ::
I "..~ Iii
~~~ S
~ll~ i!!
~B ~ I
'"
r
l~_'
u~ I
u ~
In Fii G)
n
H
I<hl
..
!l p
\l
d
~
~
, ,h:: '
i :~'~-~:::J
to",
e
o
,.
m
m
o
!l!
lii
~
~l
JI
"--,,....._~
iiU!H;!i;;~~.5
~ :
ill
i;~ !: 82ii "t;l !:
:
i i'!
i!!~ii! !:
P' ~
!:: ~.. ~
ili \Hi iBs2i ,.
: ~
i'!
" ~~ ~ !l! l;" :....~ ..
-
"", ~
...:....
~
. ",.,
~ BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU
~~ DEVELOPER:
~ 1950 CONGRESS AVE,. LLC.
BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA
:: :rOTUl OES:sr;;r:~SON ....,.n K1mtey.Hom
CDfl fUlRIlA REGlSlItA'JIOIl MMllDl IiIIr.J_U and Associates. Inc.
DllAlWIBY rAY 51567 443.R=c~(Y:':~~~7
l)iEQ(ED BY __ (Ml) ~~ Fe>>< (~1) .3-81~
RCt.l _KllIlEY___COol (:0\_
MASTER USABLE OPEN
SPACE PLAN
_::=-:=--~~===:-i~"'~~-::~:~: ~;;;;;~ ;~~'~--'I;o ~ tl ~.8-~ .,------
-------l -------------- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t- ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~CNW. . _ - - - - - 5:i;P)>)>)>)> ~ 5;)> ~ 0 ~ ~ ~
~_.jL ::~~'~;.=.;:-~=::~~.;:-~::=::; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,; ~ :! ~ ~ ~
I~I ~ ~ ~
IH ~ ~p
,,, ~ ~ ~
,\\1 "" II!
\~ \,~
~ (\: ii~ ~~
I I, "$ "$
\\ \ n>i~1 n~' i~ ~~~~~.~Z
\\( ~~~',~it.~p~~~2i~z
II \ !~~~i~ i~;~" ~ ~~ ~M~~
\ '~c"~" -~.. .!~m
\ ~.~.~~ ~~o ~ ~ !~o ~~
\' .~ ~~ ~i ~ ~ -~.~
'\ \ ~ :f > 2, ~.~
\ "~h .~C!
\ o~
\\ \ ~~ /" "v/ .
~ ~"'i'Y.. ,\\\ .
, ~ ~ ,,~v/. ',\ \ . ,:
\'\. ;\ ~" . /~" \ \;-. /,/
\; \\ '" ~ \\~(" \ ~;\ '.
.~~ ~, / ' ~""
\\-:0..\ \\,... ,...~, '.
\ \' '\~~ \ \./, .. \ ';
, \\', \' ' ,/.
\ 't.\'\ \ __'
\\ \ \~",
\~\\ \~~~
\~\ \\
\. \\ \ \
\' 1 \
\ \,
1\ 1\:
\\ 'I III
1\ Ij
1\ I
II 'I 1
II I
U II' :1
I ~ II
[,' II
I I II
I II II
11: i I' I: :
ill~I' Ii
\ hi .1 , \
Iii; t~' Il
II S 'I' I'
Ii I I
II ,I I
II 'III
\1 :, II
I 1:,11
\ I ~ \1
\ II
\ I'
I
I
........---~"'"
, - - - - - - - - -r. --r-,C-':T=.'-'~-'-- .. -'{.)!]
\ II ~,,.,.,.,,,........_,,,,, , 1,,"
,I: ~~":.~.~i~! 1,I,:,m _mmm_~"~~ !}j"!1
\ :' I ! ': . --:! . · .;, " Ii
Lw_._'-'._' ~~
...,.,""'__...........-tM~......t...__...
===
ill
..
~
Ill/"
~~~ I
"~6 =
"
rn
~
:: ~~
~ m
~-
o
l!l
/ ,
/,
, /
// ../" // , /"
/ ~;/.. //tal
// "': .~ It
// ~.. z, ta ,
// ~~ :E"~ ~ .
~/.' ..l!l /z C
o
,',(') m
/// m ,,0
,/ Z
/'///-1
'm
;:c
/
"~
II
]1
~
B ~'!,
~i
II
H
~
~
1
,
I
,
'l
I
j;
,/
.. /
/- ,
/, /
/ / "
/.
/
, ' // "
/ '
/ / /
/' ,.- ,/
//,
/,',.
_ ~BOYNION~ _ _ _ _ _ __
nt'~, IlI.:JWl:U.
'lfOTd.~.l)l()Oll.lV1d
~a::=-=~
.uNtftX)lIB'Id013/\3OOrftOlft"'lll'l'W't'tm3lN'l'td
..
"
c:
rn
;;
~..
Ill/,,"
~s.=.t~i
~~n~
r.oi~
rn
~
fi
i
]
~~
~~u
~;o"m
m~=
..~
~] a; BOYNTON VILLAGE
17; ;~ b~ DEVELOPER:
"U ~~~. 1950 CONGRESS AVENUE, L.L.C.
BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA
SMU
MASTER PLAN
$CAllAS NOTED ca:S;'~ORRISON ~_n Kimley..fiorn
llE$l\lNEO BY KHA FUIIIDA 1lE1lISTRATlOII NUIlIl(lt IIIII....I_U Md Associates, Inc.
DR.....,y 50S 51567 801~S~~~~-400."'"~~~~30
CNECl(EO BY - (n2) M,1-1SI81 fAll (7n) "2-841"
COR _1lIlILEY-HORIUXlIl Co\. 0000I)6"
EXHIBIT B
0"'01'"
;ii ~~~ C>
~ -u)>o
~~~~~~' ~'
ni r~ : g ~
:' ~ .
P z i!
~ g
8
OJ
o
-<
Z
-I
o
Z
<
r=
>
G>
m
;1
I
II~
]
PEA CITY ~ BOYNTON BEAa-l
PER CITY Of' BOYNTON BEAQ;
PER CITY (:K' BOYNTON BEA~
RE'o1S1ONS
1 J-05 COR
121-0'l.CDR
11504CDR
DATE BY
Drawing n"",e: H:\D471-48007-60)'ltDn VlIlage\.7145D07\CADD\CDNST\ZDNINC_g,jU\~~":.:i'ASTER-SI1t:-PlN.dW9 C5 Aug 12. 2005 g'4ODm by. Jim.Jenkln.
EXHIBIT B
...... __ __...._ _......... ...--'-'_ _......,..,..,. -' _...._.... .............-..._................."'" ft _ _-. R_-'.... __........ __. ......... _w-...._.... __.... b...-,.............. __........ ...--..-..........----
1.~;;'E!FI.!.rli.ii.lp.lr<.iilllO ~
lii:IN~I:!:!i:~:!lll!!:1 ~i'i!!iili!
!!I~i~ jlljij;nl:I:!l;!!!lijl!!IUI ffi
1:I!b ,l!!il!il.:li;lllji :, II!!) I~z~~
IHI! II H iill,!j ;11,1! II ! ji!;!1 =
itl! ! :1 : i I III; I!' I !I ; II!,.
liil : !;I II Ii Ii: illll ;l!ll
1!1I I q ~ ~~ 1'! 1< I ilii;
UI
;' ~
~h
~
..
!il
o
o
z
..
il
5
~
eU~~~~ a fU ~ u! ~ ~~mn
" ~ i"'g'~ ~i! ~8. · .... "l.~..
~ .~.~.i;l! ~a.. ~ ~~ ~ '., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I
>01 :.~~.~.~~. ~ ~H' ~ ~
. i '.'~'" · .: ~ ~-
L, ~~~~~! ~ R ; ~ m -
! ~~ l'f~ah 1lI ~ 11 S ~ ~ ~ E
i ii .~;~;~.} '!.. p ; m; .
l!~ .~~...,~..! !!" .;; g ,;
~~ ~~ ~ ~i';~ if if>li.u _i
ri~. &~ll!T! IH;~i.iHI;IH~U ~ i~ ~ i Ig~~l
. 0 ."~ . ..> i'i.~i5di~ ~. ~ i
>" "a. .... .". .. 5 9 =.~<''''
.'.~.. · ..t.""" I ."" I"H.
j~. 0"" I ~,~.." . ~.:!Il~I'
,. .~ . .' 1". < > ,~o I
i" . ~~M;;~ i I. ~> > ·
~ ~ l I~.. -j <0;:;0 R ..
~. i ~~.::'" . j
,. " . 'i'. ,
~~ i~ ~ M~ j :
~!"' ;;; ~ - ;"p~;
i U 'S'...... ~..: '~I"
... .... ~ ",~::j:jl; ~~I~~;;
a "I" .
~ i!! ~
~ q~ 0
dl";.~ ~
~ ~ ! ~ ~
! ~ IE' z
G , 0 ~
. P i '1
j ~ ~ :;
n
~ >
() ~~ ~o
01 ~~ ~~
ep lJl
BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU
DEVELOPER:
1950 CONGRESS AVE., L.L.C,
BOYNTON BEACH FLORIDA
SITE PLAN
sc'/uASNOTEOO~!NGl1lWl: .....-,.n Kimley-Hom
~lMDlff~ n~s~:~ IIa..J_U aldAssociates,lnc.
DRAWN e" TAY 51567 443'1@~: ~':....,.us:::~ ~7
C1iECl<EDBYRct.l Phane:~~~~F."'J~S175
OrllWln9 ngm., H:\047148007-Bg)"tOl1 VlIloge\47148007\CADO\CONST\ZONING~L
s: 0
~ ~O
(') ~ RJ
F ~f;
z m;:o
m fTirn
(j) ~@
ili ig
m
-<
()
'"
Ii. !
.~ .
"1
1~
r ~f '
l r
'"
c:
1~
.z
'Q
Q
z
o
....
" !II
0....
:11m
Cl"
0""
~~
....0
:IIz
c:,...
Cl-<
....
5
z
';1~ g BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU
~ ~~"9~ DEVELOPER:
~~ ~ 1950 CONGRESS AVE., L.L.C.
BO'I'NTON BEACH FLORIDA
,STER-SlTE-PLN.d_!1 C6 ""909. 20m; !l:OOgm by. Jim.Jenkln.
EXHIBIT B
o
o
Zo>
~~
~f;
p!~
rn",
~@
ig
!~:~
MATCHLlNE SHEET C7
! 'I liB:; i3i IS!' iill:llj r "'li",11 ': I ii'll= ~
I! '111'~~i:l:llll;~iltl!i! !118~1111:11!! !~
"1..11 111111"ll 11h! I II I 11!1 ;;1
Ili>lnl!~ I > IlIlI!II!1 =1' 111<IH'li;!.
: IN jeii!iilll~'11 .JII,! I lll!i!! ill
I ~il II' j. II !>I II · I !
!i!!lll lilll.ill,! 1;I',I! !111!! lil;l!l.
itil~l~ ., l !l.lll! I' 'I. I 11 ,ii~illl
Ii II ~ I! ;; "'1;1 II -' I 11 I'll!,
, I l. , I I I II
SITE PLAN
SCALE"'S NOTED llE9GN EMGINfElt: .......,_n Kimley-Hom
DESIGtED BY RUSSELlIdORRlSON III.....J_U lIld AssocIates, Inc.
~A"BY :fWlIlARE;:;~~ 443<P:::_NlD~~~
cttECKEDBY _(!!olI')lM5-llIlI5F"",(!!olIlj_J-IIl7!l
RCM _,KIMlLY__CON c.o. 0lIlIIIllH5
OrOW'~':I1l0me; H;\047148007-Bo)'1lon Villo':le\47148007\CAOO\CONST\ZONING_SMU.~ ,~ASTER-snE-PLN.dw':I C4 Au,:! 09, 200S 7;S9om by: Jim,Jenkills
EXHIBIT B
..,~ '''110'''''' ...r.~ t.. <COlCopt. "". ._0 ...._... _.... .. "" ...t"""...I or _.. I. ..t....... only'" tho .,O<flle p"'P'" "". d_t .... '""ld> It ...0. P'_'" R...... or "". ......._ '''<IfI<>O "" "". .
-~- ~--
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~-~-~~~~~~~~~--::~~~~~~-~-::~;:::~~=~-=-j ~~~~-=---=--- I
,
r
I
I I -,~~~
~ /- '/< ~ ~ -... '/' "Br'S''''E C. BOYNTON CANAL C-16 _
SECOON20.r~~s.fI".X ", -'1:.-- ---
----- ---- --- --- '--sr~%~nd4--- - (210'~~)
I j_ ~ii.~~~~~;~;;~~~ =~ =~=~~~~~;~;~~;~~ ~;~ ~;~-~~~~~~;F~~~~~-~'
I ~ i~
I ~ Q
~
()
o
I~
;0
1m
en
~
m
Z
c
m
, t
~
r
~
~
"
;)l
~
~
~
~
~
'Iii '111:11/ I
:!I!!~I;111
'd! liil 'j I,
11l11!1 , I
1'11.1 I
i II iii ! I
I I! i
Ii
I ~ 25
SITE PLAN ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
~~ a BOYNTON VILLAGE. SMU
o ;~;;~ DEVELOPER:
-I'> ~~~. 1950 CONGRESS AVE" L.L.C,
SITE PLAN
BOYNTON BEACH
FLORIDA
\-
~
~
~
II
SMU - PARCS 1
RESIDENTlA
1.279 ACRE.
~
~:::i~
a~C;:::n
Q)C):n~
:h ~ f..
n ....., ~:dl'
~~~~
CIj"f"-:
-I:l..
MATCHLlNE SHEET C5
II
~::'l
,~
I"
,~
II
.,
~g
II
g,
~!
~
!II mil;! I j! I~;l!! I 1111i;! PI' I!I'I"J'II'II'
1..'1'11 .i.J." , .,.,." '1.1..i 'j
lell~J."d ilj !!!"'"lIl'I1I''' ! I'
~~~'~j5f~8~lig1( sj~.~j~j~jg5.g..:~i;1 it
!wl~'i!<l <I?' 1l1;1;1!11?I<P'1 11.1,1
IIP'f"'I'II,'1 'lfl,I, ,'fl1l11, 1'10 '
!..llif!l!l;i; !l :1 i.;,;,1I Iii;: II!I;!
,PHil' Ilh;~; ! ;'IIIII:!;'iIH ' LI'
S.I1I,H!!II'''i1IL'''I'I'I,J1 u, .i i
ll,Uii l 2',(ll,J,-{ ~ 'll(~jo 6 Lil '''' 'I .
InJ,/I,lli11i.!' ..:I'I'I':',!' 'f"l, "',1
fJ:'! ~ 'f 1 1 .. ij &ll, 11,1 '1.' 'l'.. 2
!IJI!!fi.lllllj' i1IPI1II,I"!IHI Iii!"
,.l ! 1 ." I, 1 .. 'J' I "" 1!!1 II i
I!! 1J 1:!I;"~J 'I:Pi'!!P''''' ;.,
Iffif~ j'1!iHI. ,;: l:i!l:J~!i! 1 ~ i~H
!jjJ ! Jlh:HH !H !iWi !: i ! I liP
;:: ! lili;!: ; ill ~l!lll I! ; I ! 111/
I; I l.~::~i ~ ;il 'liid ~, , i I I,;!
II' l':<tl.\.1 I i!l.r G .. lOll" l!: j - 1 h .i
~t <, J~ii I.. "t:: Iii ii, 8 ll, ~ ill If
, . h. ,! I' .." I ! 1 'I
I' ; !!~ I,:' I .(1 '1;1'1 II! .!iJ
I .' ," lJ..1 ll, ii ~!' ~ I ~ j" .l t;; l
, .1' I .'" ',' ! I
SCAlE....SNOTEO OC9~E~ER
OCSICNrn BY RUSSELL ~ORRISON
CORf1.<NlARfQ'SlRAlI(I<~
: I _/~
------ 0-1\ Ii
\
\
i~:~
. I
!
~uu mm;lili~!~ll:
I.. , 1""I',IIII~i'ii
Iii j i'I~'I'!llii II
· · , II "ei' II "'I
fl! I ';1 1'1'11,! iii
;.1 I,lii !U % ill' ill!
:i! di;l hi ~N I:;! i!:i
!;i ! iElli1 ill;:m Ill!
.,1 ,"" I' ! I 1"1 '1'1
. ! . O,f I .; '! :'1
Iii Iii! !I! Ii ! II!! iiil
1:\ · :i! i '1 I! ! ! I < li!~
:' ! 'Ii' ! II ; : II i~'I'
,I , !!. !. I I ill'!
Ii ! ill' I :.! I il'l
, , I! !"
51567
~=~ ~re
@~I<Nl.ErHORNNlOASSOOA,TES.IHC
..31 Emb<r",,",oO"... W..tPolmgeo<:h,Fl JJ~7
Pl>""~~~:::;=~FO"'C~~;;BI75
CllEa<EOBr
''''
I..f- a a a
a a a
!: a a
...
~ a a
Ul
n
:I: Ii/l
III
I:
~
n 0
."
r
0
0 p..
:II
"II
~ 16I
z
II a a
C
;::
a
i a a
Cl
a
a a
~'"
~:"
f1:IW
o
'"
Ul
n -
:I:
III
I:
~
n
."
r
o
o
:II
"II
~
Z
II
C
6
i
Cl
Ul
III
~
l:I
J>
...
w
~
.-
o
o
"
"'en
~~
.o!e
m....
~n
N
o
i~
".~
-<0
~8
a
a
a
a
a
a
""
LI
m
<0
("")Z'"
omc
tJj~r=
-IOS2
:U:uZ
C-<G)
0.-
-Is::'
5m~
z:u."
'Oce
en)>U1
LlZen
~~~
;><m
..-~
m
:u
m
o
~ (
p..
or..
p..
Boynton Town Center
Mixed Use Development
Norl1t~A_
BO)'IWMBesdl,FlorldD
a
a
a
a
a
a
a a
:;!
LI
m
<0
("")Z
om
zen
en-l
-10",,,,
:U:U""C
c-<or
(")100
-Is::o-
omenz
~~:n~
en)>
LIZ
:u:::!
~hi
..-~
m
:u
m
o
Oi
...
'"
C
,,;=
:uS2
oz
S::G)
",0
-:!:I:
om
S::G)
-:I:
;Z-l
-I en
0:;;
8i~
6_
s::Z
S<~
. Z
G)
m
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
,,,..
'"
,,~
:U"-
0S2
s::z
d",G)
SO!!m
fTiS:...
:uz-
:!:i:.....fli
:I:OGi
!!!ti~
G) -en
:I:S::<
c:~~
~~~
...-IZ
. :I:
:i!~
mG)
m
:;!
LI
m
<0
OZ'"
om~
Zen..-
en-lo
-10-
~~~
O.m
:::!S::'
~~~
'("")ce
en)>o
Llzen
:u -I .
zr=:-n
;><m
..--
m
:u
m
o
~
9"<
9" b::
~
'I, i, 'I.',:~ . ~
, 1 II, ,
I · II. ,
- -1-,-- -i- '~
: i ~I~I ~
I ~I!I:I Ii
p..
EXHIBIT B
<i._<i._ g:;:
mm ~~
i~
!i
~i!.
~~
~i
~ s ~ i':il~ -Ii
~ 8- 8 ~ii,!!'li' "
ii '" ~ g:- ~ ~
:J i ~ f ~~! ~ !~
i ~ ~ '''~~i g
o ,,_t; f!~i< ~
t: - .. 8: cB'~ :;
~, -'!' H ~
~ i ~ 5- !2
Imp i!
~ I H "
; $[
i~
.~
'l.cr
[:-
~i!
" "
~!::.
"'..
.~g
~~
~.
~i
~g.
"'0:
~i
...
m;;;
" .
-.
H
;""11
<0
~
~
I
~
~!!' U H~ '~
!.f ~.~. !i!:& I
~ i ; ~ ~i ~ t
!D.N . ~ ~- S" !:
~ ~ ~p ~
. . .;,~ ~
- i -~< il
~ ii' ~~ ~
t. ~ H E
~ i i~!
if 01 ~
~. I ~~-
" !O
."....w
mo.
~~~
~~Ei
~=l~
.... '
~~~
en'-i!'
~~~
::!oom
~~Q
~oen
~~~
. 00
irn~
om....
~8~
Fn~z
_....0
Si!!l:i!
. m
-0
....ON
j\;O'
fTi~t:
8"m
. ~~
~~
en"
;1:0
".""
.- m
.-z
~~
;2::;
~~
~
~
'"
p
...
,....
o
o
;:g
LI
>
Z
G')
m
z
m
~
,....
Z
o
-I
m
en
-
F
~
8
"
""
';
z
en
>
"
m
o
o
z
o
~
i!'
z
~
ill
~:IIi
~Ill
r:u<
z"ll
~E
.....~
mo.
""'~
'i!cr
~~6
!jl~gJ
~'i!~'
:.a;;~
"'0
~~~
~~~
8~~
-~~
~n~
i~~
igl
~m'i!
~g~
J;;ti~ ~
gj~8 [;
Om 0
6~ ~
z~ i
~~ ~
82 m
~~ 8
..:\: Z
~~ ~
'i!~ i"
8 z
~ ~
' ill
~i:l
..oC
z"l
~E
=< <P~
-0
m
<0 "tIl ~[
;:c!;:;
(")ZtIl 0,
omc s::52
zen-
~b2 ",z
c>'!Gl <P[
;:C;:cz s::';;
C-<Gl -:I:"
(")', :Z!!J
:::!s::. -lGl
amp> O:I:
Z;:c~ ~~
.(").... ~
en~en s::::;;
;g:::!~ ~~
-,"
zm
p~ ~
~ m
;:c
m "...
0
11 n Center
Boyntu.on DO~velopment
Mixed se
~O:-~i,=
"..
~~ =< tIl
~.~ -0 "'( :B"
m 00
j~ <0 s::z
~'N ../ ~~ (")ZtIl "'Gl
~i~ / Om!;:; "'D ~ ~
Zen,
iii; /' ~b52 . s::!!J
;:C;:cz -Gl
c-<Gl Ii :Z:!i
I~ ~~ (")." "
:::!s::.:. ~r b~
I" omo
I'" z;:c:,.. w)>
"l;:c
I~ '(")w &-<
~~ en)>o
-0 Zen ~( ~~
~:::!"
~ Z '"
;>:;m
,~ J m
z [ m
. ~
c 0
i"
a
! II ~
IIII
I: 9"'
/
/,
/'
,../
..,//
./'
~
!~
I~
I~
Ii
~:
f
~~
II ~
=<
-0
m
<0
(")ZtIl
omc
Zoo;::
en-lo
;d~z
C-<Gl
(")'Gl
:::!s::,
Om<a
z;:c-:...,
'(")en
en)>w
-0 Zen
:::c:::t:"
Z ~.
p-
m
;:c
m
o
!!!li!
!llih
lin'i
!I~ih
lip!,
loW
Il!i!
'''1
,ill.
ih;!
EXHIBIT B
"..
tIl
c:
"r=
;:c52
~
i~~ III
".'" ".'" 5;
".'" S. S. r-
5.5. !:. E. a:c: g~mt c
c:c: Z
0:0: :i' 5" S" S" ::Jco". G>
5" S" lQlQ ~a;Ci'
lQlQ lQlQ ~ "T1 ~..e ~ !
III r- III Gl or
~ iii" iil iii" !" "'-0
III ~ ~~O'
ex> CD ~
:;; :... :,. o3~
'" w 8~~
'" w 0 c:
'" '" '" ~g~ S
;-. ;-. ;-.
III III III ~~ is
::J ::J ::J Z
0. 0. 0. ::J 0 ~
lD::J
iii" iii" iii" III !!l. III
~" ~. ~" iil 2 c:
:T :T :T III g, 6
:r :r 5" !!!.o Z
:T :T :T 5" :;> G>
:E co
co co co co ::J 'II
!!!. !!!. !!!. c.", G>
i i 5" O'~ ..
~ ~ co "
-a Q.
". 0" 0" ff~ r-
CD CD CD
~
)> c:::> -c
I~"'::J:: '-
!(') II:ICl'
I ~ ~ :: r1"1 ::c :;
~'rl ~ ::c ;:;::; r1"1
i~ (')::c~
I;~~""~
I '"
I~g;!
I ~q
I "l! ~
I -"-.
0-=
Fg
" "."
" " 0'
g. i ~
ell m 5"
" " c
"o.~
~m5
0' 8 ~'
ij"::lO
~~~
. 0' '"
~~"
6'~
'" ii1
" -
~ ~r
_"
; ~.
" 0.
"
0.
~ '" Ic:"''''....
~ ~ .
0."
a!
" "
a~
"''''
~.!
E ~.
g1l.
ll~
c 0'
uc
'C =
<Do.
i~:
..
if
i.
...
g
if
~~
,,0:
~~'
,,^
2:(jj'
g~
5:8
:i"Ul
"''''
" (,
ii1 "
" -
, ".
"
'"
~
0.
~
~
or
~
5.
i~
,,0:
~~.
" ^
e:.(jj'
~.rD
~~
0. 0
5' (1:1
to:-+.
!!! 0'
" "
!"".
"
'"
~
0.
~
~
~.
~
5'
~i~
~. ~ m'
=~S!:
" "
fir .e 01
~gg
8;~
0"..,
~~i
c _
~<
5.8
'" "
" '"
~ [
~ o'
0' "
~ ~
~.g
6'0'
~ i>
~"
ffg:
-<
3:(ij"1J
~ ~.~
3.li~
~~CD
~.- g:
",5'0
:"laiC'
03~
0"..,
Ox,<
",."
;-..g~
~<
~.~
" '"
m~
~6'
0' "
~ ~
0.-5
6'a
~i>
~$l.
'" "
so.
-<
~Ii -'" -'" ~~~ 3:Ui' "'tI ~ '" '"
ii~ iE. ~~.~ a =. c:
a CD Cil ,,0. !..E!; S' :) -I ~J 6
~~ ~.s m "''' ::Jg:~ Z
3.~~ ~lf if~i" !:: ...
~!i ,,'- ,,'- ;;8 ~
Q: u;- g: iii' ~.~ g:
" '" "", ",,,.0 a~
" "." ~g ~:o g~Q' ...... CD cr U
~ ~ g 0:0 0:0 03~ ~
D. ia 'P ::i" !>> .g'~ 0".., g=~ p. 0
IID5 "',. ~~i ~g! 0'[ c:
lil"c " 0 " 0' c_ ~
o.~ ii1 " ii1 " ~~
~15 " - ~St 5:< 5:< 0
. ". 5.8 ~.~
" " .a~ z:
g: 8 ~. '" '" '" " '1'
" " 0 "!Il. " '" i~
" a ~[ '"
~~~ 8 c iiI 2 ~i c:
" " " " 6
c.~ii 0. 0. m::!: ~ (;-
~ ~ H 0" z
sj l~ f ...
Ie !it " " i. <...
~ " 0."
1 ~r " 6'a 6'a
0. 0. ~i> ~i> ...
Cita ~. ~' ~$l. ~$l. g
il~ ~ ~ a-~ u ~
II 5. 5. -< -<
!:
in
..
..
III
n
:I:
m
I:
~
n
..
~
m
:II
..
..
o
o
:II
"I
E
..
c
;::
"
i
Cl
III
..
.
z
..
:II:
~.
.=<!
0-0
:::Em
g:j<:
"oS:::'"
8~~~ V"[
::O-l)>Oro
.::OZ::Oc
coC-I-<-
-oj=,'t"'_
~:::!!!!S:::g Y[
~~~~5
=-n1~O="
s:::enzc
m-omen ~[
::o2:!enm
oz$,
)>;>;
z'
~~ V"
m 0,...
~
o
/"
o
c:
S
o
z:
'"
=<! C
-0 -0
m -0
<: gJ
o -n
o ·
~ g
-I ;oro
;:::OU1[DC
~8~j=
-fO-Q
oenzz
z~mG>
, . en ^
en 0
~ 8
z C
^ -0
hi ~
::0 0
[g -<
EXHIBIT B
=<! C
-0 -0
m ril
<: ;0
o -n
o ·
Z g
~ ::0
~b~~
~8~Ei
o!>>jifi~
z -n en y_
o en '-
o
o
o
C
-0
~
o
-<
en
-0
::0
Z
;>;
.
m
::0
m
o
::0
o
o
"
ro
m
.
o
:::E
gja~ ~r' ~ I;'
'i'~~ m~~ ,8
~!ill" !l~~ ~ '"
-:::~ ...
!i!~ ~
~,.~ ~; ~
pj~~ fi1
~ z:
~~~ ~~ m
2TI! ~~ I ~
~ ~ ;:0' z:
,,~ 0
~~!!l iil
UI 1! '" ..
-;ii ill i
li!~
~c
~:II:
~~
~5
.
...
;"
~
III
n
:I:
m
I:
~
n
c
"I
"I
m
:II
."
..
o
o
:II
"I
~
Z
..
C
;::
"
i
Cl
III
..
.
z
"
:II:
~
;=
c
Z
...
'"
;0
o
o
"
ro
m
.
o
:::E
~~ .'1' ~!! !Ii >
-- -- !I!! . !' I!' Ii; '" c:::> ""'ClI
'II. I n ::t:: ~
Boynton Town Center III Iii :I: c:J
I" r1"'1 r1"'1
,., Ill!il ::::c
5 Mixed Use Development !illl ~'r~ --i ""'ClI
0 NOt'IIo~Jh'.._ Ii'" ::::c
J> \'" .. l~ ~ Boy<<tollBtadI,Ftorldt1 i ~ 5 rt"1 rt"1
... ~~ ;:5': I,ili ; g n ::::C2:
U. '-~ :!<~ ,I" .Ill! --i ~
..::;j 11;: 8 ;11:1 V>
",n
....
~
m
.
m
~
o
;0
.
o
ro
ro
-<
"..
::0
0<
O)>I
6)~!!!
)>)>"~
zz::O-l
ooOen
~~~;B
,;-nJ;:::O
o~ .ro
;o-o-l~
-1-05
O~w_
:::EIClJZ
g:j[gCS~
::0'-
;0 "go
8>""
6)-1
~
~ ~
BUILDING J
2 - STORY - MIXED USE
MERCANTILE/BUSINESS)
TYPE IV CONSTRUCTION - SPRINKLERED
LOWER FLOOR 8,100 Sit.. MERCANTILE
V" ~ V" V" V"
~=
~
I
"
I @
!
1i' ..
i -@
t ...
I
...... ;~ ......
.~ ~o
ll:~ 9'"
g"
;n ..
~ ...
"01
ll!r
~~
~"
EXHIBIT B
i I
F
"'>
m",
>!J:!
Fn
'"
~
en
p
"
-<
LU!i
U~
n~
o
'"
'"
-<
"'>
!:!l'"
>!J:!
Feo
~
~
...
~
en
p
:!l
~ "'>
m",
<" ~~
-<
I
'" ., >
c:: ~
~
<:>
<:>
en
p
:!l
I " , '--_____..J ....______..J L_____J
'-______..J ~_____~
~fi ~ ~ ~~8~~~g~;~~~ >::I:Q1t/lm ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~fllB;;P"'88:-' Z
~ SQi:u~~ 'I'm
~~ ~ !BZZ>Ul;Zlor->O:n ~~~~~ F~ ~~6~~~ ~~:~~!!l~'ii~~ 0
~ ~ -I
cn6fiRl~~~rn~~2l ~?! ~~~~ig ~1~n~~?!~5~ m
~~ ~ 8Dl~rniii~1;~~:ii~~ ~~~~~ om ~ ~ ~E~~~ (Jl
~S ~~~~~~
o~ ~ ! ~1Il~;~:;~~~~O~ ~~~~~ ~~ p ~hmx~~
gg ~ ~ ~~~f;; ji!B~~~~ ~2lHl~~ OQ .:i~~i~ ~ ~ ~~88~
~~ ~ lD::D -";:o:;5:""tfI ~~ ~~ 8h~~z~
~~ . mag ~~IZ~gO ~i~~~rn
m~ ~ :%l!;~~:t zQ ...or-~n~
~~ x ~F~ ~~ ~~lJ;~ ~~~!~ ~~ ~~~rn~~ g~ ~~~:E'!~~
m ~~
~n x SCII >8 > .0 ~~~~~ ~~ m~~~~~ g::t . ~~~ gcn
~~ ~ ~s~ :::~~~ ~~ z2 ~~~50 ~~ ~~r~8~~
6 _m;ccn n~
~~ ~~ ~n ~ 2~ ~Rl
F< !B?Z ~. ~m?!~ ~a o5~\II ~
~ " F tile 1l z F
il Niles Bollon Associales. Inc. n;
~ One Buckhead Plus.
I 3OlIO hulhtrw Road. n. ~ " p.
... ..... toO
. . ........- f
... 404-ae6-?8O(l
. . ru: 404-186-7810
... .H~com
~~~~I~ ~ ~~> >''(11) ~~~~ ~~~~~ > ~I CD
~~~ (1~ril~ 5 c
~~:::;~z~ ;~~ ~;:O;:(10 ~~~~ ~~~~~ ! c F
~~~~ ~
ri' ~~ xQ~ ~~f;iQ ffif!~l!F 0
, " " ~ ~~ ;~~ ~~~:r ~~~5 ~r:' 'I ~~ Q Z z
~~!!!~~ ~CIl ~n ~~~~ ~~.. ; !~~~~ ~ ~~ ffi~ ~ G>
P 000 n 6 ~ )> I
~~~~~ ~ ~~ 00", .. " ~ ~~~.. ~ PQ
~~~ ~~ ~,~ " ~~ ~Kl ::j
o ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~
~ 0 ~ rn~ ~~ ~' Z
~ ~~ -
~ ~~ - ~~ ~ ~~ ~
0
~ ~ ~~ ~ 56 "
og} g} Q~ ~
~ >0
~~
Q~
~ Boynton Town Center "1,i
> .11 .
I Bo,aIaD a.dl JIIarII1a Ii :ii
~ lmco1n Property Olmpmy !lii
." DUAIml roa~.
h
If
l- l-
ill! g'lJI
s.~
m:I: m:I:
! ~ -
~ ~r
[
......
EXHIBIT B
A~~ IIIl' II Nilea Bolton Associates. Inc. p~
~ Boynton Town Center "1IJ
> .11 . i One Buckhead Plua ~ ~ i
I IIaipabl &.dl FIarIdI l::ii I aoeo huhlrM ao.d. D.
... .... ...
00 ........- i
lmco1n Property C'ompIl1y !l:j . . ~185-'P800
... J\u: 4CWo-ae6-'l'810
. . --
...
"'" III:I.&WIDnnt~.
H H
~ i
. ~ . -
lD P!
<r
mx
!! ~
~r-
g
I
Ii
~
EXHIBIT B
..'-eo
~
A~~ Hn' ij Niles Bolton Associates. Inc. IP
~ Boynton Town Center "11'
~ ~ .11 ' ~ One Buckhead PlaIIs ~ ~ I
I IIopmaD a.dl FIartiIa Ij :ij I aoeo PMohtrw Rod. n.
... .... ...
....... - i
I.mco1n Property Qmpeny !Iii . . -----
... ilia 4M-ae&-mO
. . ilMeau.boIt.oD._
...
MOT IIUoWID roa doIlJIIluOllOlt
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 9, 2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting,
2, Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time, All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application,
UTILITIES
Comments:
3, Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water
and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
4, Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g,p,m, (500 g.p,m, some residential developments) with
20 p,sj, residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)),
5, The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid
for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the
Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan
approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand,
6, A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has
COA.doc
08/18/05
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15,
7, Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability
at this time, All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application,
FIRE
Comments:
8, The Fire flow test conducted on November 8, 2004 cannot be used as fire
flow information, Only when the connections on the east side of Congress
A venue are connected can staff evaluate the fire flow for the subject project.
This condition will remain and no building permits may be issued until fire
flow test are conducted and determined adequate by staff,
9, All one (1 )-way traffic access shall be 12 wide in the clear.
10, The clearance of the first floor parking garage shall be 14 feet - one (1) inch
in height.
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
11, Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2,1 and Table
1604,1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design,
12, Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic
sprinkler system per F,S, 553,895, Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application,
13, At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction,
14, A minimum of2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units
covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the
requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed
for each type of parking provided, e,g, surface parking, parking structures,
COA.doc
08/18/05
3
DEPARTMENTS
etc, per Title 24 CFR, Part 100,205,
15, Add to the residential buildings that are depicted on the site plan drawing a
labeled symbol that identifies the location of the proposed handicap
accessible units, Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to
identify the minimum number of required units, Also, state the code section
that is applicable to the computations, Show and label the same unit/s on the
applicable floor plan drawings, Compliance with regulations specified in the
Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and
Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100,205),
16, At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the
future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act
Title 24 CFR, Part 100,205, Section 3, Requirement #6, All bathrooms within
the covered dwelling unit shall comply,
17, Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the
Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100,205, Indicate on the plans which
design specification ("A" or "B") of the Fair Housing Act is being used, The
clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be
clearly shown on the plans,
18, Add to the floor plan drawing of the recreation building a breakdown of the
floor area, The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building,
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated
for the recreation building and other uses located within the building, Specify
the total floor area that is air-conditioned, Label the use of all rooms and
floor spaces,
19, CBBCPP 3,C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily
available,
20, A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source, A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F,S, 373,216,
21. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a, The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan,
b, If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided, The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans,
c, The number of dwelling units in each building,
d, The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e, The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
INCLUDE REJECT
COA.doc
08/18/05
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
much is for sewer,
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
22, At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of
Title form, The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one
lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that
is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form, The property
owner that is identified on each deed shall match,
23, At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review,
24. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property, The following information
shall be provided:
a, A legal description of the land,
b, The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan,
c, If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s
must be provided, The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans,
d, The number of dwelling units in each building,
e, The total amount being paid,
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
25, Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
bv the City Commission,
26, The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted,
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
27, Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area
within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area
of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where
applicable, total area of storage and garage space, If the garage and storage
areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified
within the area of the building, Indicate how many of each type of unit will be
on each floor and within the building,
COA.doc
08/18/05
5
DEPARTMENTS
28, Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building,
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building, The breakdown shall
include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable
floor plan drawing:
a, Common area covered walkways;
b, Covered stairways;
c, Common area balconies;
d, Entrance area outside of a unit;
e, Storage areas (not part of a unit);
f, Garages (not part of a unit);
g, Elevator room;
h, Electrical room;
1. Mechanical room;
J, Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
1. Any other area under roof,
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7,E,2 and 3)
29, Building "H" meets the definition of a threshold building per F,S, 553,71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements of F,S, 553,79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105,3,1 through 105.3,6,
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a, The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing
agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
construction of a threshold building,
b, All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c, All plans for the building that are required to be signed and
sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a
statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's
knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with th the
applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local
authority in accordance with this section and F,S, Section 633,
30, A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 2001
FBC, Section 11-4,1.2(5)(b),
3 1, Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per
the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4,I,2(5)(a),
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
32, Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656,OO each = $52,480,00
INCLUDE REJECT
COA.doc
08/18/05
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
33. The design of the "greenway", proposed along the east property line shall be
in conformance with the Greenways Standards. The "greenway" proposed
along the north property line shall resemble the "greenway" proposed along
the south property line of the Renaissance Commons master plan.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
34. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site.
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter
7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
35. Staff recommends that, where possible, the applicant preserve all existing
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
36. The project is subject to the limitations and timing at which development may
proceed as outlined in the Palm Beach County Traffic approval letter or the
conditions contained within the CRALLS amendment upon its adoption.
37. All proposed buildings within the out-lots shall be at minimum 35 feet in
height per Chapter 2, Section 5.RA. Conditional use approval would be
required for each if less than 35 feet in height. The east elevation of
Buildings "K" and "I" (at the peak of the roof) would be 47 feet in height
while the peak of the decorative tower would be 74 feet in height. Although
the developer's intent was to meet the SMU minimum building height
requirement along Congress A venue, the plans would in fact, require
conditional use approval because the proposed structure exceeds the 55-foot
threshold of the SMU zoning district. Therefore, at the time of permitting,
the decorative tower height shall be reduced to 55 feet or conditional use
approval would be required prior to the issuance of any buildinl! permits.
38. Provide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of all buildings proposed
on the out-lots (Chapter 4, Section 7.). If lots will be site planned in the
future, then the Design Manual shall be approved to ensure architectural
consistency (including building colors and signage) between the out-lots and
the main parcel.
39. This proiect would require a total of 950 parking spaces. The plans would
COA.doc
08/18/05
7
DEPARTMENTS
provide for 719 surface parking spaces and 222 parking garage spaces for a
total of 941 parking spaces, a deficiency of nine (9) spaces. However, the
intent is to share the excess parking with the C-3 parcel (Boynton Town
Center proposed directly to the south). The Master Site Data Plan indicates
that the Boynton Town Center Plan has an excess of 43 parking spaces.
Therefore, a cross parking / cross access agreement would be required at the
time of permitting.
40. The parking required for the 80 residential units would be 149 spaces. These
parking spaces would occur within the four (4)-level parking garage. As
previously mentioned, the parking garage would contain 222 spaces. This
surplus would be more than enough to accommodate the needs of the
residents. However, should the developer choose to limit the access to certain
levels of the parking garage, the developer should ensure the availability of
these spaces for the residents of the apartment building.
41. The ledger sized colored renderings show that many of the buildings would
have awnings but the site plans of Building "L" does not show their extent
beyond the building line. At the time of permitting, please revise the plans of
Building "L" and show the extent of the awnings. Staff recommends utilizing
a dashed line to depict their extent.
42. On the site plan tabular data, indicate the proposed floor-area-ratio (excluding
the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 5.HA. This
statistic is based on the entire SMU parcel and should include the other
developments proposed within the SMU zoning district. Don't just provide
data for just this portion of the entire project.
43. At the time of permitting, all elevation pages shall indicate the exterior
finishes, roof material, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff
recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide
color swatches and awning samples.
44. The intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap
the garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to
disguise the garage and create continuity m street-level activity by
maintaining interest for pedestrians and passing automobile traffic. Principal
structures that include parking garages shall be designed to blend the
architecture of the garage with the remainder of the structure or adjacent
buildings. Portions of freestanding parking garages that are not screened with
habitable space and are in view from the general public shall utilize design
measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall landscaping, etc. to soften their
impact (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.b.). Staff recommends that in addition to
the series of arches proposed at ground level, a series of stucco openings
emulating windows shall be added to the 2nd level. These openings shall be
centered over the ground level arches. This wall treatment would give the
parking deck less of a utilitarian fayade and more of a residential flavor. In
addition, staff recommends adding plant material to the north side of the
parking deck in order to help break up that fayade.
INCLUDE REJECT
COA.doc
08/18/05
8
DEPARTMENTS
45. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles
and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers
adjacent to roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers of
plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover
plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous
row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site
wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in
height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately
after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within
these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart
from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). The landscape buffer
along Congress A venue shall have the same quantities, and species of trees
but different species and configuration of plant material proposed within the
Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.). The
City Forester will coordinate this effort with the project landscape architect
during the permitting process.
46. No shrubs are proposed in front of any of the buildings. Staff recommends
installing decorative 45-gallon planters in front of the buildings to help soften
the hardscape surface.
47. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24
inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately
after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.CA.).
48. Staff recommends submittal of a master sign program that shows the number,
location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2,
Section 5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, including
commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision signs,
freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional
SIgnS, and all other SIgnS as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land
Development Regulations. Provide a detail of any proposed outdoor
freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback from the property line
(minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area, dimensions, exterior finish, and
letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The property line would be
measured from the edge of the right-of-way line for the Spine Road.
49. Ensure that all buildings maintain a front yard build-to line (along Congress
Avenue) at no more than 90 feet, inclusive of the 25-foot wide landscape
buffer.
50. The building proposed within the out-lot (Building "L") located at the
northwest comer of the SMU project should contain a more "substantial"
building than the other out-lots immediately to its south. The surrounding
condominium and townhouse buildings should not dwarf this proposed
commercial building. This building should anchor and be similar (in size) to
the building proposed within the southwest out-lot, proposed in the C-3
INCLUDE REJbCT
COAdoc
08/18/05
9
DEPARTMENTS
parcel. Stand-alone buildings are discouraged by the SMU zoning district.
Building mass can be increased by building size or through architectural
design without increasing area.
51. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature;
please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path on this
bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village projects;
coordination with others should achieve consistency in design.
52. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the
main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast comer of
the greater project (at Old Boynton Road).
53. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress
A venue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in front of the
main street buildings. Enhancements are only shown on colored Master Plan
document but absent on site plan set. Revise plans accordingly.
54. It is staffs intent to create a park-like boulevard effect for the Spine Road.
This would be best achieved by incorporating canopy trees into the design of
the roadway (as was done in the Renaissance Commons project) thereby
maintaining consistency of plant material proposed on within the right-of-way
of the two projects. The Renaissance Commons project proposed Live Oak
trees along the Spine Road. In this project, the Foxtail palm trees proposed
along the Spine Road would be inconsistent and disjointed from the
remaining portions of the roadway. Therefore, at the time of permitting, staff
recommends substituting the proposed Foxtail palm trees with oak trees
(along the Spine Road) to maintain consistency between the two plans.
55. Regarding discrepancies between site plan set and master plan pages, existing
at time of approval, all pages will be considered part of approval, thereby
incorporating all details (i.e. pedestrian enhancements) into the approval.
56. Staff has concerns with the lack of information regarding the future build-out
of the out-lots. Staff wants to ensure consistency and compatibility between
the out-lots and the main parcel with special emphasis on architectural design,
project sIgnage, landscaping, and building colors. Therefore, staff
recommends the following:
Creation of a Design Program that includes but is not limited to architectural
design, signage, landscape, and building colors for each out-lot and its
relationship to the principle buildings. The design of these out-lots are
incomplete at this time and each out-lot would require separate site plan
review. However, for all intents and purposes, landscaping is one of the only
key elements of the site plan missing for Building "L". Therefore, staff
recommends that foundation landscaping (with trees) be installed along the
north, south, and west sides of Building "L", unless the developer chooses to
site plan Building "L". All other out-lots would require separate site plan
INCLUDE REJECT
COAdoc
08/18/05
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
review and approval. This would apply to Out-lots "5" and "6".
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS:
Comments:
57. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Comments:
58. To be determined.
MWR/elj
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\COA.doc
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
~ S-f-<<-
9l/Q/05
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21. 2005
Department date stamp marking.
Planning and Zoning
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. A backup distance in excess of 100 feet is required for the dumpster serving C/
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
2. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and "G" V
or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this parcel.
How will Solid Waste be handled?
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan ~.
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval ofthis Site plan.
4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, v'
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See
City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. On sheet C-9, change
note #2 and #3 to indicate compliance with both the City of Boynton Beach
design standards and the MUTCD.
With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley- ./
5.
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct
accordingly.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be /
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional V'
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. The Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of /
roadway - posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum
height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is required. Additionally use of
a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the sidewalk,
curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature.
9. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about the V
ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of
Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. Remove
this note if not applicable. Provide copy of the paperwork submitted to the
South Florida Water Management District.
10. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the V
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
11. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction V
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water /
and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code V
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid V/
for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the
Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan
approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
15. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has ~
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this proiect, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
16. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability V
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments:
17. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development //'
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants.
Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart
and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a
hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches
in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less than 20 psi and
must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute.
18. New flow test required when water feeder mains are connected and approved ~
on this side of Congress Avenue.
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
19. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional i/
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure
that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
20. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as t/.
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
21. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in t/
2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
22. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall V
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
23. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with V
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
24. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2001 V
FBC, Sections 503.3, 503.3.2, and 503.3.3. Provide calculations verifying
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
compliance with the above code sections and 2001 FBC, Table 500.
25. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the ~
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are
signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida
shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
26. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the /
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
27. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic /
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
28. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the /
location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject
request.
29. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the t./
proposed construction.
30. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each V
building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height
of each building.
31. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor V'
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible
entrance doors to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3.
/ /
32. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each building.
The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible
parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each
building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the
location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location
of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area
that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the
accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall
be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress
shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate
that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in
compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6
(parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that
will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations
specified in the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be
limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
33. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units ~
covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the
requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed
for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures,
etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
34. Vertical accessibility to the second floor area shall be required per the 2001 /
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-4.1.6
(Alterations).
35. Add to the residential buildings that are depicted on the site plan drawing a
labeled symbol that identifies the location of the proposed handicap /
accessible units. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to
identify the minimum number of required units. Also, state the code section
that is applicable to the computations. Show and label the same unit/s on the
applicable floor plan drawings. Compliance with regulations specified in the
Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and
Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205).
36. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the /
future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act
Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within
the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
37. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the /
Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which
design specification ("A" or "B") of the Fair Housing Act is being used. The
clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be
clearlv shown on the plans.
38. Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the /
primary use of the building. If the building is an expansion of an existing
building, indicate with the footprint of the new and existing building the
primary use of the building.
39. Add to the floor plan drawing of the recreation building a breakdown of the I
floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building,
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated
for the recreation building and other uses located within the building. Specify
the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor
spaces.
40. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may J
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily
available.
41. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that /
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application: ~
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
43. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of /
Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one
lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that
is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property
owner that is identified on each deed shall match.
44. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. c/
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
45. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information /
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s
must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter I, Article V, Section 3(f))
46. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, J
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
7
DEPARTMENTS
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
47. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
48. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area
within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area
of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where
applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage
areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified
within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be
on each floor and within the building.
49. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall
include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable
floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
b. Covered stairways;
c. Common area balconies;
d. Entrance area outside of a unit;
e. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
f. Garages (not part of a unit);
g. Elevator room;
h. Electrical room;
1. Mechanical room;
J. Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
1. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
50. Building "H" meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements ofF.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing
agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
construction of a threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and
sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a
INCLUDE REJECT
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's
knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with th the
applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local
authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
51. According to 2001 FBC, Table 500, Building "D" exceeds the allowable
building area permitted by the code.
52. Identify Building "L" on the site plan and architectural plans. 2001 FBC,
Section 104.2. (Clearly identify all buildings on site and architectural plans.).
53. A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 2001
FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b).
54. Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per
the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
55. Sheet C13 shows the apartment building that is located northeast of Building
"H" as a one-story building with 16 units, yet the architectural sheets A1.6 &
A1.7 show the building as multi-story with more than 16 units. Clarify.
56. Indicate what amenities will be in the amenities building. Submit a floor plan
and clearly label the building on the plans. See Sheet A1.6.
57. The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted as
"area not included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under this
site plan. Indicate the parcel numbers being developed on the site data.
58. Sheet A1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section
104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
59. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine Road V
plan.
60. Irrigation coverage should be 110%. v/
61. Impact fee: 80 multi family units ~$656.00 each = $52,480.00 ,/
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: /
Man of Boundarv and Tooot!raohic Survev-Sheet 1 of 1 V
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Existinl! Trees Manal!ement Plan
62. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site.
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter
7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.1-
63. Staff recommends that, where possible, the applicant preserve all existing /
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
rEnvironmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.1.
Irril!ation Plan-No Irril!ation plan included in the submittal /'
64. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low
volume water conservation using non-portable water.
65. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate V
zones and time duration for water conservation.
66. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the ~
root ball. rEnvironmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.].
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
J( At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written 1/
. responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
~. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, also provide a full set V
of reduced drawings, sized 8'li inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
X Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As V
. such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the
Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not
shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at
the time of permitting.
X No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the V
subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes,
trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility
lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is
20.13 acres, it would be preferable to submit a survey that matches said
acreage. Survey must be signed and sealed.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
10
DEPARTMENTS
. Submit a scaled drawing (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) that clearly illustrates
all proposed building elevations (of all sides - north, south, east, and west,
including the parking garage and out-lots). The elevations shall indicate the
height, exterior dimensions, exterior color, and materials used (Chapter 4,
Section 7.D.1.). The ledger sized pages of the colored elevations that you
submitted are great supplements, but the packet still requires the full sized
elevation drawin s.
~date the project's site plan application if it changed because of the
submittals of Boynton Village Parcels 4 & 5 (NWSP 05-019) and (NWSP 05-
020.
~l proposed buildings within the out-lots shall be at minimum 35 reet in
height per Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.. Conditional use approval would be
re uired for each ifless than 35 feet in hei t.
INCLUDE
,/
74. rovide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inch~s) of all buildings proposed V
on the out-lots Cha ter 4, Section 7. . ' Ct/yU",;P
2
75. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) meeting. If concurrency does exist, please provide this office
with a copy of a letter from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division
indicating compliance with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach
Coun .
. Provide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of the parking garage and
the second floor office s ace Cha ter 4, Section 7 .
I
77. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed
residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space, vehicular
use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and ratio of
required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies, building height
for the SMU parcels only (Ch~pter 4, Section 7.E. and Chapter 2, Section
Il.H.a.7.. <<.:
,
78. e Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district requires 20% usable open space for
Multi-famliy dwelling units (Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.). On the master site
plan (sheet C3) or on a separate plan, show the "usable open space" so that
staff can determine code compliance. If shown on the master site plan (sheet
C3), do not include the 2404 acres of the Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-
003) project because this property is zoned C-3. Please note that Single-
family attached developments require 30% usable open space. This
information must be consistent with the usable open space derived from the
...
master Ian UAR 04-006.
. 1tT..~ Ct]) ~S
79. The ledger sited colored renderiilis show that many of the buildings would
have awnings but the s.ite plans do not show their extent
beyond the buildin line. Pleas and show the extent of the
/If; B/Jb L
iFJ.. .J? /At:. L-
t/
~
REJECT
l,/
v
v
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
11
DEPARTMENTS
awnmgs. Staff recommends utilizing a dashed line to depict their extent.
. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their
dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section
7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions,
exterior finish, and color s Cha ter 4, Section 7.D. .
81. e project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
Coun re ardin school concurrenc . Provide a co of the District's letter.
82. n the site plan tabular data, indicate the proposed floor-area-ratio (excluding
the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 5.HA. This
statistic is based on the entire SMU parcel and should include the other
developments proposed within the SMU zoning district. Don't just provide
data for 'ust this ortion of the entire ro'ect. '7e M.S -t;) (A..~
. Staff notes that the site plan now proposes a one-story apartment building
with 16 dwelling units at the easternmost rotary intersection where staff had
previously commented that a public plaza / outdoor seating area should be
located to make better use of the lake. Please label the residential building as
Building "?" and indicate the number of units on the site plan tabular data.
Also, indicate the number of bedrooms per unit. This is required in order to
determine parking requirements. Staff recommends adding a building or
outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small
lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary
intersection and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could
also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east of
the rot intersection
~. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating the floor plans for all buildings,
including each floor of the parking garage (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The
plans that were prepared by Pieper O'Brien Herr do not match the site plan in
terms of their confi ation, labelin , and s uare foota e.
85. arking requirements for the SMU zoning district shall be set forth by
Chapter 2, Section II.H. of the Land Development Regulations. Parking for
mixed-use developments may utilize shared parking ratios, consistent with
those prepared by the Urban Land Institute. The following calculations will
be used to determine the project's required parking:
'Oy ,
F~\pA\f
Efficiency and One-bedroom units: 1.5 spaces per unit
Two-bedroom and three-bedroom unit: 2 space per unit
Retail: I space per 200 square feet t" { . ~
Medical Office: 1 space per 200 square feet /,'\9~'
General Office: 1 space per 300 square feet
Restaurant: 1 space per 100 square feet or 1 per 2.5 seats, whichever requires
more spaces.
Sho in center: 1 s ace er 200 s uare feet
INCLUDE REJECT
L/
v
dJ
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
12
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
. On all elevations, indicate the dimension of the mean height level and the
peak of the roof for every building. Also, label each building with its
respective identification, orientation, and direction. For example, the
elevation sheet for Building "F" should indicate the following: Building "F"
front north .
~lude a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review Committee
- meetin Cha ter 4, Section 7.D. .
All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint
manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color
schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and awning
sam les.
M TlMt CV ~. ,
89. e intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap
the garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to
disguise the garage and create continuity in street-level activity by
maintaining interest for pedestrians and passing automobile traffic. Principal
structures that include parking garages shall be designed to blend the
architecture of the garage with the remainder of the structure or adjacent
buildings. Portions of freestanding parking garages that are not screened with
habitable space and are in view from the general public shall utilize design
measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall landscaping, ~tc. t soften their
im act Cha ter 2, Section 5.H.7.b. . Ov J w;' j {tlv ~ {'(~
? 90. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles
and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers
adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers of plant
material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover
plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous
row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site
wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in
height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately
after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within
these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart
from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). The landscape buffer
along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same
approximate quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed within
the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.).
Staff will be recommending this as a project condition of approval if the plans
re not revised. -r. ':"'\ e ~
. Show the landscape material proposed within the interior of the out-lots.
Show the ro osed buildin s on the landsca e Ian sheet LA-l .
v
v
v
1/
v
V'
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
13
DEPARTMENTS
the hardscape. Why is there no landscape material proposed around the
residential buildin ?
Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. According to the landscape plan
(sheet LA-I), only 46% of the palm trees would be native. Please revise to
. clude more native trees so that the lans com 1 with this re uirement.
95. 11 freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at
the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). Re-evaluate the project
entrances along Congress Avenue and plan for the location of anticipated
freestandin monument si s.
. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3)
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.C.2. . This would im act the Li strum trees.
97. ~ll shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24
inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately
after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.CA. .
. The Washingtonia palm trees proposed along the sides of the principal
building shall be installed at Yz the building height of the building (Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5.M. .
99. II proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and
City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends submittal of a
master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior
finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program
would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs,
identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument
signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs
as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. Provide a
detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate
their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign
area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
The property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-way line
for the Sine Road.
100. Indicate on the photometric plan that the freestanding outdoor lighting poles
will be black.
101. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encoura ed Cha ter 9, Section 10.F.3.
102. Scul tures, fountains,
ools, trellises an benches shall be
INCLUDE REJECT
v
v
/
v
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
14
DEPARTMENTS
encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 1O.H.). Provide details
of said amenities.
On the landscape plan (sheet LA-2), what is the "architectural
104. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the
commercial/ ublic s aces. Show their location on the architectural lans.
105. Ensure that all buildings maintain a front yard build-to line (along Congress
Avenue) at no more than 90 feet, inclusive of the 25-foot wide landscape
buffer.
106. The building proposed within the out-lot located at the northwest comer of
the SMU project should contain a more "substantial" building than the other
out-lots immediately to its south. The surrounding condominium and
townhouse buildings should not dwarf this proposed commercial building.
This building should anchor and be similar (in size) to the building proposed
within the southwest out-lot, proposed in the C-3 parcel. Stand-alone
buildin s were not envisioned when creatin the SMU zonin district
107. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature;
please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path on this
brid e to connect the eenwa aths of the Renaissance and Villa e ro' ects.
109. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress
A venue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in front of the
main street buildin s note next comment .
~: If possible, staff recommends preserving specimen trees that are currently
located within the ro osed landsca e buffer alon Con ess Avenue.
~.-Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the
retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that
additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's
desi .
112. Staffhas concerns with the lack of information regarding the future build-out
of the out-lots. Staff wants to ensure consistency and compatibility between
the out-lots and the main parcel with special emphasis on architectural design,
project signage, landscaping, and building colors. Therefore, staff
recommends the following:
INCLUDE REJECT
v
v
/
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
15
. .
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Submit a Design Program that includes but is not limited to architectural
design, signage, landscape, and building colors for each out-lot and its
relationship to the principle buildings.
MWR/elj
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\3rd REVIEW
COMMENTS.doc
-
colt;
1,,\J\rw..& ~ f~ J~~ ~ Ml,{ ~\~ IONye\
Nt' ~th"6('.u:C\M
~\\\ iL,~-\)
l~'
" ,
..
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21, 2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking
..-.
I II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. A backup distance in excess of 100 feet is required for the dumpster serving
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster relocated by Site Architect.
2. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and "G"
or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this parcel.
How will Solid Waste be handled?
Two dumpster enclosures added to the east of Bldg. K. One dumpster added
to the north of Bldg. J. One dumpster added to the south of each Bldg. 's F
andG.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
Traffic Analysis was previously submitted. Deficiencies to be addressed by
traffic consultant.
4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See
City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. On sheet C-9, change
note #2 and #3 to indicate compliance with both the City of Boynton Beach
design standards and the MUTCD.
Signage and marking plans added. See Sheets C8, C9 and C 1 O.
5. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct
accordingly.
Mr. Mutleh has contacted City staff regarding this issue and the design has been
modified to meet City staff comments
ENGINEERING DIVISION
"
'"
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
2
v".
, "
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Commcnt noted.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
Comment noted.
8. The Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of
roadway - posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum
height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is required. Additionally use of
a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the sidewalk,
curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature.
Trees havc been changed out to Foxtail Palms
9. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about the
ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of
Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. Remove
this note if not applicable. Provide copy of the paperwork submitted to the
South Florida Water Management District.
Notc has becn removed from sitc plan. Drainage calculations have been
previously submitted. Calculations meet SFWMD criteria. See attached copy
of permit on Exhibit "A"
10. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
SFWMD permit and drainage calculations approved at June 8th .
govemmg
Board Meeting by consent.
11. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Comment noted.
UTILITIES
Comments:
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water
and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
Comment noted.
"
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
3
DEPARTMENTS
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Firc Department on
11/08/04 and met City requirements.
.-.
14. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid
for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the
Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan
approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
Comment noted.
15. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Comment noted.
16. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Utility construction details are included in plans that adhere to Utility
Department standards.
FIRE
Comments:
17. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants.
Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart
and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a
hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches
in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less than 20 psi and
must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute.
Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all
buildings, within a 200' radius of the hydrant. In addition, hydrants around
the buildings have been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants
tested were off the 16" WM off Congress Avenue. Fire flow tests have been
performed on 11/08/04 and meet City requirements.
18. New flow test required when water feeder mains are connected and approved
on this side of Congress A venue.
INCLUDE REJECT
-....
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
4
"r,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJhC 1
Comment noted.
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
19. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure
that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
Comment noted.
20. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 200 I FBC, Chapter 6.
Each building has been labeled as Type IV unprotected sprinklered. See
Sheets C3 and C5. Please refer to sheet #A3 & A5 for construction type
21. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in
2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
Each building has been classified as mercantile occupancy. See Sheets C3
and CS. Please refer to sheet #A3 & A5 for occupancy type
22. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & AS
23. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with
approved opening protectives per 200 I FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & AS
24. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2001
FBC, Sections 503.3, 503.3.2, and 503.3.3. Provide calculations verifying
compliance with the above code sections and 2001 FBC, Table 500.
Please refer to sheet #A3 & AS for bldg. Area calculations
25. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are
signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida
shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
5
DEPARTMENTS
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & A5
26. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (psf) on the plans for the building design.
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
..-,
27. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
28. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the
location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject
request.
Limits of construction of each individual parcel has been labeled and
indicates 'limits of construction'. Please refer to sheet #A I for limits of
construction
29. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & A5
30. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each
building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height
of each building.
Information added to site plan. See Sheets ('3 and C5. Please refer to sheet
#A3, A4 & A5 for bldg. Plan information.
31. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible
entrance doors to each building. 200 I FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3.
Handicap accessible doors identified on Sheet C4 and C5. Note added see
sheets A I, A3, A4 & A5
32. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each building.
The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible
parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each
building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the
location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location
of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area
that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the
accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall
be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress
INCLUDE
REJECT
.J'
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
6
DEPARTMENTS
shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate
that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in
compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6
(Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit
review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that
will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations
specified in the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be
limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
.-, Accessible routes indicated in Sheet C4 and C5.
33. A minimum of2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units
covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the
requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed
for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures,
etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
Site design has incorporated this criteria. See SMlJ site data table on Sheets
C3 and C5. Please refer to sheet #A I for accessible parking locations
34. Vertical accessibility to the second floor area shall be required per the 2001
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-4.1.6
(Alterations).
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
35. Add to the residential buildings that are depicted on the site plan drawing a
labeled symbol that identifies the location of the proposed handicap
accessible units. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to
identify the minimum number of required units. Also, state the code section
that is applicable to the computations. Show and label the same unit/s on the
applicable floor plan drawings. Compliance with regulations specified in the
Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and
Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205).
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & A5
36. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the
future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act
Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within
the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
Site Architect will comply with this requirement.
37. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the
Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which
design specification ("A" or "B") of the Fair Housing Act is being used. The
clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be
clearly shown on the plans.
Site Architect will comply with this requirement.
38. Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the
primary use of the building. If the building is an expansion of an existing
building, indicate with the footprint of the new and existing building the
INCLUDE REJECT
/'
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
7
DEPARTMENTS
primary use of the building.
Please refer to sheet #A3, A4 & AS for use of bldg.
INCLUDE REJECT
39. Add to the floor plan drawing of the recreation building a breakdown of the
floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building,
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated
for the recreation building and other uses located within the building. Specify
the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor
.-, spaces.
Plans have not been developed to this stage to provide accurate information
on these particular items.
40. CBBCPP 3.C.3A requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily
available.
Comment noted. Irrigation system will utilize canal water.
41. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
Comment noted. Permit application has been submitted and generated
comments. Please, see attached Exhibit "B"
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Comment noted.
43. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of
Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one
lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that
is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property
owner that is identified on each deed shall match.
COll1ll1ent noted. Site developer will comply with this requirement.
44. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
8
DEPARTMENTS
Comment noted. Surveyor will comply with this requirement.
..--.
45. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s
must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
Comment noted.
46. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
Comment noted.
47. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
Comment noted. Site developer will comply with this requirement.
48. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area
within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area
of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where
applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage
areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified
within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be
on each floor and within the building.
Please refer to sheet #A9 for unit information
49. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall
include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable
floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
b. Covered stairways;
c. Common area balconies;
d. Entrance area outside of a unit;
e. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
.c
INCLUDE REJECT
"
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
9
DEPARTMENTS
f. Garages (not part of a unit);
g. Elevator room;
h. Electrical room;
1. Mechanical room;
J. Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
I. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
.r. Please refer to sheet #A3 & A5 for tabular area data for each building
50. Building "H" meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements ofF.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing
agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
construction of a threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and
sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a
statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's
knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with th the
applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local
authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & A5
51. According to 2001 FBC, Table 500, Building "D" exceeds the allowable
building area permitted by the code.
Allowable building area for Type IV unprotected mercantile -- one story is
27,000 SF. The building area can be increased well above the 28,000 SF
shown as allowed by the formula in Section 503.3.2 in the 2001 FBC.
52. Identify Building "L" on the site plan and architectural plans. 2001 FBC,
Section 104.2. (Clearly identify all buildings on site and architectural plans.).
All buildings identified on site plan. Building "M" changed to Building "L".
There will be no Building "M". Please refer to sheet #Al for bldg.
Identification
53. A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 2001
FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b).
Please refer to sheet #A I & A2 for van accessible parking
54. Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per
the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
Please refer to sheet #A I & A2 for all accessible parking
55. Sheet C 13 shows the apartment building that is located northeast of Building
,ii/J'
INCLUDE REJECT
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
10
11'0"',
,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
"H" as a one-story building with 16 units, yet the architectural sheets A 1.6 &
Al.7 show the building as multi-story with more than 16 units. Clarify.
Building wiII be an 80-unit multi-story building. Site plan Sheets C3 and C5
modified accordingly. Architect floor plan updatcd. Please refcr to sheet
#A3 & A5 for bldg. information
56. Indicate what amenities will be in the amenities building. Submit a floor plan
and clearly label the building on the plans. See Sheet A1.6.
Please refer to sheet #A6 for bldg. amenity information
57. The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted as
"area not included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under this
site plan. Indicate the parcel numbers being developed on the site data.
C3 parcel is part of Boynton Town Center submittal (separate) Note removed
from site plan to clarify.
58. Sheet A1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section
104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
Please refer to sheet #A I for bldg. labels
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
59. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine Road
plan.
Noted
60. Irrigation coverage should be 110%.
note for 110% has been added to notes
61. Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656.00 each = $52,480.00
Comment noted.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Map of Boundary and TOPol!raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1
Existinl! Trees Manal!ement Plan
62. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site.
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
II
.-,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
On-site meeting with staff and Tree Movers to rCVIew site and make
determination
63. Staff recommends that, where possible, the applicant preserve all existing
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
On-sitc mecting with staff and Tree Movers to rcview site and make
determination
Irrieation Plan-No Irrieation plan included in the submittal
64. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low
volume water conservation using non-portable water.
Irrigation plan is part of this submittal. Notcd
65. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation.
Irrigation plan is part of this submittal. Notcd
66. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the
root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.].
Irrigation plan is part of this submittal. Noted
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
67. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
Commcnt noted.
68. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, also provide a full set
of reduced drawings, sized 8!12 inches by II inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted.
69. Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As
such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the
Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not
shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at
the time of permitting.
Comment notcd.
70. No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the
subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes,
trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility
lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-ViIlage) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
12
DEPARTMENTS
20.13 acres, it would be preferable to submit a survey that matches said
acreage. Survey must be signed and sealed.
Comment noted. Surveyor will comply with this requirement. Subject parcel
is 19.744 acres.
INCLUDE REJECT
71. Submit a scaled drawing (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) that clearly illustrates
all proposed building elevations (of all sides - north, south, east, and west,
including the parking garage and out-lots). The elevations shall indicate the
. , height, exterior dimensions, exterior color, and materials used (Chapter 4,
Section 7.D.1.). The ledger sized pages of the colored elevations that you
submitted are great supplements, but the packet still requires the full sized
elevation drawings.
Full size renderings have been added to the submittal. Please refer to A 10
72. Update the project's site plan application if it changed because of the
submittals of Boynton Village Parcels 4 & 5 (NWSP 05-019) and (NWSP 05-
020).
Please clarify Applicant docs not understand question.
73. All proposed buildings within the out-lots shall be at minimum 35 feet in
height per Chapter 2, Section 5.HA. Conditional use approval would be
required for each if less than 35 feet in height.
Noted
74. Provide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of all buildings proposed
on the out-lots (Chapter 4, Section 7.)
Will be provided at time of building permit submittals.
75. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) meeting. If concurrency does exist, please provide this office
with a copy of a letter from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division
indicating compliance with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach
County.
Traffic Concurrency exists for Boynton Town Center, as evidenced within the
attached letter of concurrency and compliance with TPS of Palm Beach
County.
76. Provide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of the parking garage and
the second floor office space (Chapter 4, Section 7).
Will be provided at time of building permit submittals.
77. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed
residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space, vehicular
use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and ratio of
required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies, building height
for the SMU parcels only (Chapter 4, Section 7.E. and Chapter 2, Section
II.H.a.7.).
Landscape open space calculations shown on MOS (Master Open Space
Plan). Building heights provided by architect and shown on site plan. The
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
13
DEPARTMENTS
rest of the information is shown on the MSD (Master Site Data Plan).
.......
78. The Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district requires 20% usable open space for
Multi-famliy dwelling units (Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.). On the master site
plan (sheet C3) or on a separate plan, show the "usable open space" so that
staff can determine code compliance. If shown on the master site plan (sheet
C3), do not include the 2404 acres of the Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-
003) project because this property is zoned C-3. Please note that Single-
family attached developments require 30% usable open space. This
information must be consistent with the usable open space derived from the
master plan (LUAR 04-006).
Usable open space plan prepared. See Sheet Master Open Space Plan
(MOS).
79. The ledger sized colored renderings show that many of the buildings would
have awnings but the site plans (sheets C4 and C5) do not show their extent
beyond the building line. Please revise the plans and show the extent of the
awnings. Staff recommends utilizing a dashed line to depict their extent.
Limits of awning shown on plans. Please refer to sheet #A3 for extent of
awnings at the retail
80. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their
dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section
7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions,
exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
No fences are planned for the project.
81. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
County regarding school concurrency. Provide a copy of the District's letter.
School Concurrency exists via the attached Letter of School Concurrency
from the City of Boynton Beach.
82. On the site plan tabular data, indicate the proposed floor-area-ratio (excluding
the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 5.HA. This
statistic is based on the entire SMU parcel and should include the other
developments proposed within the SMU zoning district. Don't just provide
data for just this portion of the entire project.
Floor-area-ratio added to site data table
83. Staff notes that the site plan now proposes a one-story apartment building
with 16 dwelling units at the easternmost rotary intersection where staff had
previously commented that a public plaza / outdoor seating area should be
located to make better use of the lake. Please label the residential building as
Building "?" and indicate the number of units on the site plan tabular data.
Also, indicate the number of bedrooms per unit. This is required in order to
determine parking requirements. Staff recommends adding a building or
outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small
lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary
INCLUDE REJECT
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
14
DEPARTMENTS
intersection and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could
also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east of
the rotary intersection
Residential bldg. will be an 80-unit, multistory bldg. Trolley stop location has
been included on this submittal. The site plan has been revised. Please refer
to sheet A I for new site plan information.
84. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating the floor plans for all buildings,
including each floor of the parking garage (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The
plans that were prepared by Pieper O'Brien Herr do not match the site plan in
terms of their configuration, labeling, and square footage.
Site Plan prepared by Pieper O'Brien Herr match the Master Site Plan.
85. Parking requirements for the SMU zoning district shall be set forth by
Chapter 2, Section II.H. of the Land Development Regulations. Parking for
mixed-use developments may utilize shared parking ratios, consistent with
those prepared by the Urban Land Institute. The following calculations will
be used to determine the project's required parking:
Efficiency and One-bedroom units: 1.5 spaces per unit
Two-bedroom and three-bedroom unit: 2 space per unit
Retail: I space per 200 square feet
Medical Office: 1 space per 200 square feet
General Office: I space per 300 square feet
Restaurant: 1 space per 100 square feet or 1 per 2.5 seats, whichever requires
more spaces.
Shopping center: 1 space per 200 square feet
Applicant has applied the I space per 200 sf for shopping centers as the
design guidline for all retail and commercial uses other than office within the
parcel, 1 space per 300 sf for Office and 1.5 spaces for I BR residential and 2
spaces for 2 and 3 BR residential units.
86. On all elevations, indicate the dimension of the mean height level and the
peak of the roof for every building. Also, label each building with its
respective identification, orientation, and direction. For example, the
elevation sheet for Building "F" should indicate the following: Building "F"
front (north).
Mean height and peak elevations indicated on plan.
87. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review Committee
meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Color elevations provided for review.
88. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint
manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color
schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and awning
samples.
Elcvation pages indicate extcrior finishes, roof matcrial, and color. Color
Schedule indicated. Awning samples not available at this time.
INCLUDE REJECT
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
15
DEPARTMENTS
.,r,
89. The intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap
the garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to
disguise the garage and create continuity III street-level activity by
maintaining interest for pedestrians and passing automobile traffic. Principal
structures that include parking garages shall be designed to blend the
architecture of the garage with the remainder of the structure or adjacent
buildings. Portions of freestanding parking garages that are not screened with
habitable space and are in view from the general public shall utilize design
measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall landscaping, etc. to soften their
impact (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.b.).
Noted
90. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles
and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers
adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers of plant
material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful groundcover
plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous
row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site
wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum of 24 inches in
height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip spacing immediately
after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within
these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart
from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). The landscape buffer
along Congress A venue and Old Boynton Road shall have the same
approximate quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed within
the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.Q.).
Staff will be recommending this as a project condition of approval if the plans
are not revised.
Noted
91. Show the landscape material proposed within the interior of the out-lots.
Show the proposed buildings on the landscape plan (sheet LA-I).
Noted, made changes to landscape changes showing proposed material.
92. Question: Are no trees or shrubs proposed within the interior of the out-lots?
We have made changes showing the landscape for these areas. Since the site
is not definitive as to the exact size or architecture, the plans will be
modified when final plans are submitted
93. No shrubs are proposed in front of any of the buildings. Staff recommends
installing ground cover and or / hedges in front of the buildings to help soften
the hardscape. Why is there no landscape material proposed around the
residential building?
We have made changes showing the landscape for these areas. Since the site
is not definitive as to the exact size or architecture, the plans will be modified
when final plans are submitted
94. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
INCLUDE REJECT
.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
16
DEPARTMENTS
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. According to the landscape plan
(sheet LA-I), only 46% of the palm trees would be native. Please revise to
include more native trees so that the plans comply with this requirement.
Noted
95. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at
the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). Re-evaluate the project
entrances along Congress A venue and plan for the location of anticipated
,,~, freestanding monument signs.
Noted.
96. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3)
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.C.2.). This would impact the Ligustrum trees.
The Ligustrum Trees are being utilized as an under-story tree, not
being used as trees
97. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24
inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately
after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.CA.)
Noted
98. The Washingtonia palm trees proposed along the sides of the principal
building shall be installed at Y2 the building height of the building (Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.)
Noted
99. All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and
City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends submittal of a
master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior
finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign program
would address all types of signs, including commercial wall SIgnS,
identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument
signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs
as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. Provide a
detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate
their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign
area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
The property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-way line
for the Spine Road.
Comment noted. Signage plan being prepared by consultant.
100. Indicate on the photometric plan that the freestanding outdoor lighting poles
will be black.
Note added.
101. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
INCLUDE REJECT
.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
17
11'-'
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section IO.F.3.)
Comment noted.
102. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be
encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 1O.H.). Provide details
of said amenities.
A Hardscape and Amenities Plan will be provided at the Technical
Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting.
103. Question: On the landscape plan (sheet LA-2), what is the "architectural
feature"?
Architectural feature note has been eliminated
104. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the
commercial/public spaces. Show their location on the architectural plans.
Architect will include bike rack locations on the amenity plan.
105. Ensure that all buildings maintain a front yard build-to line (along Congress
Avenue) at no more than 90 feet, inclusive of the 25-foot wide landscape
buffer.
Noted
106. The building proposed within the out-lot located at the northwest comer of
the SMU project should contain a more "substantial" building than the other
out-lots immediately to its south. The surrounding condominium and
townhouse buildings should not dwarf this proposed commercial building.
This building should anchor and be similar (in size) to the building proposed
within the southwest out-lot, proposed in the C-3 parcel. Stand-alone
buildings were not envisioned when creating the SMU zoning district
Applicant's ability to increase the mass of Building L is limited by zoning
with respect to the total square footage of building arca allowable within this
parcel. Orientation of Building L has becn aligned parallel with Congress to
assist in Staffs desire for additional mass.
107. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature;
please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path on this
bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village projects.
Multiple discussions have occurred between Developer and City to determine
most beneficial design of bridge. Final design is to be determined.
108. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the
main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast comer of
the greater project (at Old Boynton Road).
Development Signage shall be present at thc Spine Road, at the comer of Old
Boynton and Congress and at one of the Congress entrances per the attached
Master Signage Plan and the Exhibits.
109. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between the Congress
.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
18
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
REJECT
Avenue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in front of the
main street buildings (note next comment).
In addition, prior submitted. See attached hard scope and amenities plan.
110. If possible, staff recommends preserving specimen trees that are currently
located within the proposed landscape buffer along Congress Avenue.
Noted
111. Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the
retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that
additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's
design.
N umber of excess parking spaces may be reduced at time of City concurrence
for the site plan parking calculations. Until we have City approval, the
required number of parking spaces is not yet determined.
112. Staff has concerns with the lack of information regarding the future build-out
of the out-lots. Staff wants to ensure consistency and compatibility between
the out-lots and the main parcel with special emphasis on architectural design,
project slgnage, landscaping, and building colors. Therefore, staff
recommends the following:
Submit full and complete site plan packages for each out-lot; or
Submit a Design Program that includes but is not limited to architectural
design, signage, landscape, and building colors for each out-lot and its
relationship to the principle buildings.
A Design program, as requested by Staff, has been included and proposed as
a part of the attachments for this Technical Advisory Review Team (TART)
meeting.
MWRlelj
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\3rd REVIEW
COMMENTS.doc
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Hallahan, Kevin
Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11 :08 AM
Johnson, Eric
RE: Boynton Village landscape buffer
Eric,
Review (in CAPS below) and see how I would suggest the comment be amended to incorporate the information. You can
keep the comment under your heading. You can also include that the "City Forester will coordinate the comment with the
project L. A." Thanks. Kevin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:56 AM
To: Hallahan, Kevin
Subject: RE: Boynton Village landscape buffer
Correct. Good conversation with Mr. Lund.
So, is the comment below sufficient enough to cover our concerns? Do you want to keep this under the P&Z
heading or do you want to switch it under the City Forester heading? I ask blc Karen may not be aware of
concerns when the project comes through permitting. Please advise. Thanks, Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:52 AM
To: Johnson, Eric
Subject: RE: Boynton Village landscape buffer
Eric,
I think you and I had the project L.A., Tom Lund agree to use the same species of trees (i.e. Live Oak, Royal
Palm) as the Renaissance Commons project along the Congress Avenue buffer.
Mr. Lund wanted to use different species of the colorful groundcover plants, shrubs and hedges. The heights
of the materials would be the same specifications noted in your descriptions. I think the type and layout of the
groundcover plants, shrubs and hedges would be different than the Renaissance Commons project. Let me
know. Thanks. Kevin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 8:55 PM
To: Hallahan, Kevin
Cc: Breese, Ed
Subject: Boynton Village landscape buffer
Kevin
I am finalizing the conditions of approval for the Boynton Village project. We met with their design
team last week. In fact, you and the landscape architect had a lengthy discussion regarding the buffer
proposed along Congress Avenue. I have the following comment that I did not address with the
landscape architect blc he said that you and him are taking care of it (which is a good thing). Should I
make keep this comment as a COA? Please advise. Thanks, Eric
The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive aisles and parking lots) from
roadways and abutting properties. Landscape buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external)
should contain two layers of plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful
ground cover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in a continuous row. The
next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd
layer) shall be a minimum of24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip
1
spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four (4) feet. Also, within
these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5.D.). The landscape buffer along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road
shall have the same QUANTITIES, AND SPECIES OF TREES BUT DIFFERENT SPECIES AND
LAYOUT OF plant material proposed within the Renaissance Commons project (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.Q.).
2
"~,,,
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Ed Breese, DATE: May 24, 2005 FILE: NWSP 05-001
Principal Planner NWSP 05-003
NWSP 05-004
NWSP 05-020
NWSP 05-019
SUBJECT: Boynton Town Center, Boynton Village,
Boynton Village Parcel 3-4-5,
Cortina@Boynton Village
FROM: John Huntington, Officer REFERENCES: Impacts of Proposed Site Plan On Department
Crime Prevention Unit Services
ENCLOSURES:
I have reviewed the impact for services for the proposed projects. The proposed projects are on the east side of
Congress Ave., located south ofC-16 Canal to Old Boynton Road. This mixed-use project will consist of 1,126
multi-family homes and retail/office space. In addition, a Super Target is included with this project.
A crime analysis for all calls for service for this reporting area shows that there were 11,056 calls for service in
2004. This reflects that over 16 % of all calls for service in the city were dispatched to this zone alone.
Although a traffic assessment had showed that this project supports current roadways, it did not reflect on
traffic related calls for service and the impact that these calls have on current manpower. Traffic related calls
for service were 10 % for this zone. You must also consider that business and residential alarm calls will
increase substantially and are estimated to increase by 15%. With the projected growth for this area, additional
officers will be needed to handle the increase of calls for service.
This project will have a direct impact on an adequate level of service with our current infrastructure and
staffing levels. Service requirements for the police department will be impacted greatly and the demand for
more police personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and projected traffic.
.'
"""'"
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
TO:
Ed Breese, Principal Planner
FROM:
Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal
DATE:
May 20, 2005
SUBJECT: NWSP 05-003
NWSP 05-004
NWSP 05-020
NWSP 05-019
Boynton Town Center
Boynton Village
Boynton Village Parcel 3 Condos
Parcel 4&5
Traffic Congestion and population density is a concern in this area with the
mall and the Renaissance Commons project in close proximity. During the
holidays Congress Avenue is already difficult to travel for responding
emergency apparatus due to blocked lanes of traffic. This situation will get
worse as the density increases. Pursuit of traffic light pre-emption is essential
as a remedy. To meet the increased demand additional resources are
required such as personnel, apparatus, and equipment. It is imperative that
Fire Station #5 be expedited to insure adequate service delivery levels and
effective response times in the NE section of the City and as a back-up in the
NW section of the City. This situation also increases the potential for mass
causality events when large numbers of people occupy confined areas. This
is becoming more prevalent in many areas of the city.
Every added new commercial and multi-family occupancy increases the
annual fire prevention inspection workload as required by ordinance.
Although there have been a large number of these occupancies added in the
past several years, our inspection staff has decreased. This situation has
reached a point that may soon require changes in our inspection schedules
that may negatively affect our future success. The past and current service
level has prevented any significant fires in these occupancies for several
years.
New development projects involving multi-family or high-density commercial
projects should be approved contingent upon consideration of future
upgrades in emergency dispatch capability. These enhancements include
new technology related to CAD, GIS, and AVL capability, as well as adequate
.~
staffing. All other factors (personnel, training, technology, fire station
placement, building design features, etc) depend on a reliable and efficient
method of getting the resources provided where they are needed in time to
mitigate the consequences of an emergency, regardless of the type of
response.
Page I of I
Johnson, Eric
From: Tonyel Stewart [TStewart@nilesbolton.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:02 PM
To: joh nsone@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us
Subject: parking deck response #89(Boynton Beach Town Center-SMU)
Hello Eric,
Below is a statement in response to your comment #89 of the 3rd review comments. We spoke about this
response earlier this week. Please let me know if this statement is sufficient. You can contact me bye-mail or
phone. My information is attached below.
#89. Response: After speaking with Eric Johnson of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning,
some concerns were raised about the north exposed side of the parking
deck at building H. The concerns were that the parking deck should be
softened and needed to have less impact on the street as a parking deck.
We previously addressed these concerns by adding a series of stucco
arches at the exterior wall on the ground level of the parking deck.
During the TART meeting on August 9th, 2005, Mr. Johnson felt that the
arches were a step in the right direction, but the parking deck still
needed more articulation.
So, in addition to the series of arches at the ground level, a series of
stucco openings immulating windows will be added to the second level.
These openings will be centered over the ground level arches. This
treatment will give the parking deck a less utilitarian facade and it
should feel more like a residential building. Also, some additional
landscape will be added to the northsideof the parking deck in order
to help enhance that elevation.
Tonyel Stewart
Niles Bolton Associates, Inc.
phi 404-365-7600
fax# 404-365-7610
tstewart@nilesbolton.com
************************************************************
This information is privileged and confidential for the
intended recipient(s). Unauthorized distribution of
information contained in or attached to this communication
is strictly prohibited. The sender does not accept
liability for any error or virus that are a result of
transmission or receipt of this information.
************************************************************
8/12/2005
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Jot>'-l ~l--.1~
~[9l o~
"
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21. 2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. A backup distance in excess of 100 feet is required for the dumpster serving
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
2. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and "G"
or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this parcel.
How will Solid Waste be handled?
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.1); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See
City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. On sheet C-9, change
note #2 and #3 to indicate compliance with both the City of Boynton Beach
design standards and the MUTCD.
5. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct
accordingly.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
...
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/02/05
8
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's
knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with th the
applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local
authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
53. A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 2001
FBC, Section 11-4.1.2 5
54. Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per
the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2 5 a.
55. Sheet C13 shows the apartment building that is located northeast of Building
"H" as a one-story building with 16 units, yet the architectural sheets A1.6 &
A1.7 show the buildin as multi-sto with more than 16 units. Clari .
56. Indicate what amenities will be in the amenities building. Submit a floor plan
and clearl label the buildin on the lans. See Sheet A1.6.
57. The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted as
"area not included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under this
site Ian. Indicate the arcel numbers bein develo ed on the site data.
58. Sheet A1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section
104.2. Also correct the key Ian for same.
f:::~\C\lf"\ ~ --\-tAt q~~'f.
Comments: \~-\-o ~f"'d. \ \~
/'
59. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine Road
Ian.
61. 1m act fee:
$656.00 each = $52,480.00
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Ma of Bounda
and
Surve -Sheet 1 of 1
/'
v
,j
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
9
~~ ~ D~
9J .q ,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Existine: Trees Manae:ement Plan
62. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site.
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to ~
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter
7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
63. Staff recommends that, where possible, the applicant preserve all existing v---
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
Irrie:ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal
64. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low V
volume water conservation using non-portable water.
65. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate V--
zones and time duration for water conservation.
66. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the ~
root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.].
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
67. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
68. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, also provide a full set
of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
69. Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As
such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the
Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not
shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at
the time of permitting.
70. No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the
subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes,
trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility
lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is
20.13 acres, it would be preferable to submit a survey that matches said
acreage. Survey must be signed and sealed.
1J::tw.
'.... . .-
"'., ~I
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 2nd review lans identified as a New Site Plan with a Jun
De artment date stam markin .
Comments:
......
DEPARTMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS - General
INCLUDE REJECT
I. A backup distance in excess of 100 feet is required for the dumpster serving
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster relocated by Site Architect.
2. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and "G"
or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this parcel.
How will Solid Waste be handled?
Two dumpster enclosures added to the east of Bldg. K. One dumpster added
to the north of Bldg. J. One dumpster added to the south of each Bldg. 's F
andG.
Comments:
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
Traffic Analysis was previously submitted. Deficiencies to be addressed by
traffic consultant.
4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See
City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. On sheet C-9, change
note #2 and #3 to indicate compliance with both the City of Boynton Beach
design standards and the MUTCD.
Signage and marking plans added. See Shccts C8, C9 and C I O.
5. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct
accordingly.
Mr. Mufleh has contacted City staff regarding this issue and the design has been
modified to meet City staff comments
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1
({
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
4
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
Comment noted.
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
19. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure
that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
Comment noted.
v
1
20. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
Each building has been labeled as Type IV unprotected sprinklered. See
Sheets C3 and C5. Please refer to sheet #A3 & A5 for construction type
Ai?
21. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in
2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
Each building has been classified as mercantile occupancy. See Sheets C3
and C5. Please refer to sheet #A3 & A5 for occupancy type
dY
22. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & A5
23. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with
approved opening protectives per 200 I FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
Note added see sheets A I, A3, A4 & A5
24. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2001
FBC, Sections 503.3, 503.3.2, and 503.3.3. Provide calculations verifying
compliance with the above code sections and 2001 FBC, Table 500.
Please refer to sheet #A3 & A5 for bldg. Area calculations
25. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are
signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida
shall be submitted for review at the time of ermit application.
v
v
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
5
DEP ARTMENTS
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
26. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
.~,
27. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
Note added see shects AI, A3, A4 & A5
28. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the
location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject
request.
Limits of construction of each individual parcel has been labeled and
indicates 'limits of construction'. Please refer to sheet #A 1 for limits of
construction
29. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
30. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each
building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height
of each building.
Information added to site plan, See Sheets C3 and C5. Please refer to sheet
#A3, A4 & A5 for bldg. Plan information.
31. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible
entrance doors to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3.
Handicap accessible doors identified on Sheet C4 and C5. Note added see
sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
32. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each building.
The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the accessible
parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each
building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the
location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location
of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area
that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the
accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall
be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a required means of egress
INCLUDE REJECT
~
v
/
L/
v
v
/
1
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
6
,;-'.',
DEPARTMENTS
shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate
that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in
compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6
(Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit
review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that
will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations
specified in the 2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be
limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
Accessible routes indicated in Sheet C4 and C5.
33. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units
covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the
requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed
for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures,
etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
Site design has incorporated this criteria. See SMU site data table on Sheets
C3 and C5. Please refer to sheet #A I for accessible parking locations
INCLUDE REJECT
/
v
34. Vertical accessibility to the second floor area shall be required per the 200 1 ~ L/ /
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-4.1.6 ~
(Alterations).
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
I.
35. Add to the residential buildings that are depicted on the site plan drawing a
labeled symbol that identifies the location of the proposed handicap
accessible units. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to
identify the minimum number of required units. Also, state the code section
that is applicable to the computations. Show and label the same unit/s on the
applicable floor plan drawings. Compliance with regulations specified in the
Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and
Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205).
Note added see shcets AI, A3, A4 & A5
36. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the
future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act
Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within
the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
Site Architect will comply with this requirement.
37. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the
Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which
design specification ("A" or "B") of the Fair Housing Act is being used. The
clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be
clearly shown on the plans.
Site Architect will comply with this requirement.
38. Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the
primary use of the building. If the building is an expansion of an existing
building, indicate with the footprint of the new and existing building the
v
J
v
/v
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-VilIage) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
7
"
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
primary use of the building.
Please refer to sheet #A3, A4 & AS for use of bldg.
39. Add to the floor plan drawing of the recreation building a breakdown of the /
floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, ~ ~
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated
for the recreation building and other uses located within the building. Specify
the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor
spaces.
Plans have not been developed to this stage to provide accurate information
on these particular items.
40. CBBCPP 3.C.3A requires the conservation of potable water. City water may vi
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily
available.
Comment noted. Irrigation system will utilize canal water.
41. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that ~
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
Comment noted. Permit application has been submitted and generated
comments. Plcase, see attached Exhibit "B"
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan. V
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Comment noted.
43. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of
Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one ~
lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that
is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property
owner that is identified on each deed shall match.
Comment noted. Site developcr will comply with this requiremcnt.
44. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. ~
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
1
v.
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
8
DEPARTMENTS
Comment noted. Surveyor will comply with this requirement.
v~.
45. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s
must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
Comment noted.
46. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
Comment noted.
47. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
Comment noted. Sitc developer will comply with this requirement.
~
48. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area
within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area
of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where
applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage
areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified
within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be
on each floor and within the building.
Please refer to sheet #A9 for unit information
49. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall
include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable
floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
b. Covered stairways;
c. Common area balconies;
d. Entrance area outside of a unit;
e. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
INCLUDE REJECT
~
/
v
~
/
1,
f/v
~
~l
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
9
t
DEPARTMENTS
f. Garages (not part of a unit);
g. Elevator room;
h. Electrical room;
1. Mechanical room;
J. Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
I. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
Please refer to sheet #A3 & A5 for tabular area data for each building
OI,..~
50. Building "H" meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
\.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing
agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
construction of a threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and
sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a
statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's
knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with th the
applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local
authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
Note added see sheets AI, A3, A4 & A5
51. According to 2001 FBC, Table 500, Building "D" exceeds the allowable
building area permitted by the code.
Allowable building area for Type IV unprotected - mercantile one story is
27,000 SF. The building area can be increased well above the 28,000 SF
shown as allowed by the formula in Section 503.3.2 in the 200 I FBe.
52. Identify Building "L" on the site plan and architectural plans. 2001 FBC,
Section 104.2. (Clearly identify all buildings on site and architectural plans.).
All buildings identified on site plan. Building "M" changed to Building "L".
There will be no Building "M". Please refer to sheet #A I for bldg.
Identification
53. A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 2001
FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b).
Please refer to sheet #A 1 & A2 for van accessible parking
54. Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per
the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
Please refer to sheet #A I & A2 for all accessible parking
55. Sheet C 13 shows the a artment buildin that is located northeast of Building
INCLUDE REJECT
~
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
10
,.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
"H" as a one-story building with 16 units, yet the architectural sheets A1.6 &
A1.7 show the building as multi-story with more than 16 units. Clarify. V
Building will be an 80-unit multi-story building. Site plan Sheets C3 and C5
modified accordingly. Architect floor plan updated. Pleasc rcfer to sheet
#A3 & A5 for bldg. information
56. Indicate what amenities will be in the amenities building. Submit a floor plan (1//
and clearly label the building on the plans. See Sheet A 1.6.
Please refer to sheet #A6 for bldg. amenity information
57. The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted as t/
"area not included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under this
site plan. Indicate the parcel numbers being developed on the site data.
C3 parcel is part of Boynton Town Center submittal (separate) Note removed
from site plan to clarify.
58. Sheet A1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the , V
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section
104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
Please refer to sheet #A I for bldg. labels
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
59. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine Road
plan.
Noted
60. Irrigation coverage should be 110%.
note for 110% has been added to notes
61. Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656.00 each = $52,480.00
Comment noted.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
Map of Boundary and TOPol!raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1
Existinl! Trees Manal!ement Plan
62. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site.
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS (SMU-Village) (7-12-05)
08/01/05
11
.-.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
On-site meeting with staff and Tree Movers to revIew site and make
determination
63. Staff recommends that, where possible, the applicant preserve all existing
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.].
On-site meeting with staff and Tree Movers to review site and make
determination
Irrie:ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal
64. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low
volume water conservation using non-portable water.
Irrigation plan is part of this submittal. Noted
65. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation.
Irrigation plan is part of this submittal. Noted
66. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the
root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.].
Irrigation plan is part of this submittal. Noted
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
67. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
Comment noted.
68. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, also provide a full set
of reduced drawings, sized 8~ inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted.
69. Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As
such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the
Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not
shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at
the time of permitting.
Comment noted.
70. No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the
subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes,
trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing utility
lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject parcel is
1/i os
iUNfJ/d
1/ [(~ /
'if 1. 3 j f"'l ~v)/.!
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21. 2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp markinl!
.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. A backup distance in excess of 100 feet is required for the dumpster serving
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
2. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and "G"
or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this parcel.
How will Solid Waste be handled?
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See
City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. On sheet C-9, change
note #2 and #3 to indicate compliance with both the City of Boynton Beach
design standards and the MUTCD.
5. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct
accordin~ly.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
i. ~ I ~ ,1k'.7f:d:C61d ..?;/,:" / 1/:/<'/ .(~: "",Jt/,f('':''x/''''2:f~
i.?~hf'Pld-/U~'< Q"~.:h~ . ?'Ai /tt/utt'(" T",;.,.,cft" .: ~. ';d
. tl-" Y,4{.,.:J /.;a,./i.d>d Ad,f~Ji?, .A"N~ ft/a&4-z;... ,e
[f/,j#r~1S ~~ r~/1'
'~~~rv:i-/ ~Z?;;;J2, ~b~A-~;/V..e #h:d.af/-t2--7~~ ~~
,~wn_v-f/cy~ "*,,.1 //~_4.j/ - ~ f;uct Z1- /LIM./
~~ -I!u7'~ 1J~ .' '.
') .j. / ..~
,'-JJ'~...6U-4d~.r~..w,.l;4 """'~ r" : ...: ;,;( 'i?<;J~..~..::(
'. f (I, ') :7
. /
v '
;J a/!i: #-:~- A7)~ctV./...M./ /j/..;,!/~ I,J.' ",,,/,.-6 .....~ rc4..-J
3 k':~r#'} -7 f)a77/~ /.-./c.&~ /y' F' ~
""l
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
,.
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a June 21. 2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
~~-( :~;:::. ......'.
r I, ~ ' ..
. 1., A backup distance in excess of 100 feet is required for the dumpster serving ., ./
. '.
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster-accordingly. .
2. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and "G"
or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this parcel. '<
How will Solid Waste be handled?
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. DeflGiencies eKist-in-this aBalysis -that must. be addressed. prier to
apPt:o:val.oftlm'Bite-plan. . lr ' " I , . , ,
. ,
4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See
City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. On sheet C-9, change
note #2 and #3 to indicate compliance with both the City of Boynton Beach
design standards and the MUTCD.
5. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct
accordingly.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
~
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
8. The Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of
roadway - posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum ,\, ;"
height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is required. Additionally use of fl,~t) . ,
a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the sidewalk,
curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature.
9. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about the
ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of
Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. Remove
this note if not applicable. Provide copy of the paperwork submitted to the
South Florida Water Management District.
10. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
11. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water
and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with ,
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid
for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the
Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan
approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
15. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
16. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
,-'\..
3rd REVIEW COMMENTS
08/08/05
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments:
17. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants.
Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 feet apart
and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200 feet from a
hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6 inches
in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less than 20 psi and
must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute.
18. New flow test required when water feeder mains are connected and approved
on this side of Congress Avenue.
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
19. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure
that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
20. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
21. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in
2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
22. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
23. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
24. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 200 I
FBC, Sections 503.3, 503.3.2, and 503.3.3. Provide calculations verifying
1<Ec::~ [120 TM--T ~ ~C;it(t7 _
1st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS ~
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: I slreview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a May 5. 2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- ,/
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article
II, Section 10-26 (a).
Comment noted
2. A backup distance in excess of 100-ft. is required for the dumpster serving /
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster location will be adjusted for proper service
3. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and /
"G" or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this
parcel. How will Solid Waste be handled?
Dumpster enclosure to be added behind building J. The other buildings are
showing dumpsters
4. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of /
this submittal. However no dumpster enclosures have been depicted. Will
these outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the
developer to do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so
appropriate areas for solid waste will be required.
Out parcels to be developed at a later date. Full plan submittal with solid waste
plan will be submitted at that time. Developer to rough grade site and provide
utility stub out for future development.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan /
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
Traffic analysis was previously submitted, traffic consultant to address any
deficiencies
6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, /'
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details.
Signage and marking plans added to plans, see sheets C8, C9 & C I 0
7. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of tI
this submittal. However no loading zones have been depicted. Will these
outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the developer to
do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so appropriate loading
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
areas, and striping will be required.
Out parcels to be developed at a later date. Full plan submittal with solid waste
plan will be submitted at that time. Developer to rough grade site and provide
utility stub out for future development.
8. Provide off-site improvement plans for Congress Ave. V
See sheets C33, C34 and C35 for roadway improvement plans
9. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct ./
accordingly.
Mr. Mufleh has contacted City staff regarding this issue and the design has been
modified to meet City staff comments
10. Extend concrete medians on Old Boynton Rd. from VelAire Rd. west to tie ~
into the median at Hoadley Rd. This median should block both the east and
west entrances to the apartment complex on the south side of the road,
allowing westbound access to this development from the middle driveway.
Mr. Mufleh has contacted City staffregarding this issue and the design will
en corporate the City staff requirements
11. Show all existing utilities on the off-site improvement plans. 7
All existing utilities are indicated on off-site improvement plans.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be /
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Comment noted
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ~
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
Comment noted
14. This plan depicts primarily building construction and associated parking.
The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site /
improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed.
Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be
planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support
building construction.
Please, see attached roadway improvement plans, for Congress A venue, sheets
C33, C34 and C35.
15. The provided Photometrics plan provided with this submittal does not meet \/
the minimum standards required by our LDR. There are areas of the
parking lot that provide less than 0.5 ft-candles. Please correct.
Photometrics have been corrected to meet Citv code requirements
16. The Pink Trumpet trees specified between Outparcels 5 and 6, on the north J
side of the driveway, are too close to the edge of the roadway, posing a
vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as Solid Waste or delivery
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
3
DEPARTMENTS
trucks. Additionally three of these canopy trees are in close proximity to
proposed storm sewer and water lines. Canopy trees are not allowed within
a drainage easement.
The Pink Trumpet trees in question have been repositioned where possible and
removed where necessary.
17. Be consistent with the use of symbols for the various trees and shrubs. For
instance, on Sheet LA-2 the same symbol is used for both TH and SM.
Also two different symbols are used for TH. Please provide a legend for the
planting symbols.
Tree symbols have been revised to be more consistent, however, due to the
complexity of plan and overlap of material shown, the plant tags shall take
precendence.
18. The Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of
roadway - posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum
height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is required. Additionally use
of a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the
sidewalk, curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature.
The proposed spine road has a 4' bike lane on the outside of the roadway so the
trees are setback from the vehicles. A tree with a 14' of clear trunk is cost
prohibitive. We will consider the use of root barriers within the landscape verge
where the trees occur.
19. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.)
The note has been corrected as requested.
20. The medians on Congress Avenue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response
and add a note to the plans with the above stated information.
Note #13 added to sheet C6
21. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about
the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of
Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. Remove
this note if not applicable.
Note has been removed. Drainage calculations have been performed that have
been submitted to and meet SFWMD criteria.
22. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
SFWMD permit and drainage calculations approved at June 8 Governing Board
meeting by consent
23. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
INCLUDE
/
/
\/
v
REJECT
V'
/
/
"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
4
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
Comment noted
UTILITIES
Comments:
24. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the /
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). V
Comment noted
25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on 11/8/04
and meet the city requirements.
26. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
While this proposed plan reflect this coverage in general, it does not cover
Building "I" completely in this phase. Please rectify this undercoverage.
Fire hydrant relocated to allow for better coverage of building "I"
27. In addition, Master Plan Sheet reflects the following note:
"Construction Type: IV
Unprotected - Sprinklered
Occupancy: Merchantile
What this note means is unclear; no specific note appears on the proposed plan
indicating that the (all) mercantile buildings (or out lots) shall be sprinklered in
accordance with the NFPC. Therefore, sufficient coverage must be provided to
meet the 1,500 gpm fire flow requirement for a four (4) hour duration. The
applicant shall demonstrate that this condition is being complied with.
"Construction Type IV-Unprotected - Sprinklered" describes type of
construction as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. "Occupancy: Mercantile"
describes occupancy per 200 I FBC Chapter 3.
28. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
Comment noted
29. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Comment noted
/
/
v
/
/
"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
30. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to ~
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Comment noted
31. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in vi
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207.
Comment noted
32. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the /
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
Comment noted, see note # 12 on sheet C7
33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in /
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates);
they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Utility construction details are included in plans that adhere to Utility department
standards.
FIRE
Comments:
34. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire /
Protection and Prevention" . This ordinance adopts NFP A 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
Comment noted
35. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300 t/
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500 gallons per
minute.
Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all buildings,
within a 200' radius of the hydrant. In addition, hydrants around the buildings
have been place within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the
16" WM off Congress A venue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04
and meet City requirements.
36. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design t/
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
Comment noted
37. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
6
.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the mInImUm
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another /
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
Comment noted
38. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing /
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
Final design documents for anchor stores and outlots will show fire lanes for each
individual building approved by City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff.
Weare unable to provide that design at this time on the outlots due to the fact the
final layout is yet to be determined.
39. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained V
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lanes during the course of construction
40. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFPA 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion. ~
Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lanes during the course of construction
41. Any building over 30 feet in height will require a fire sprinkler system. '[/ ~
All building are sprinklered
POLICE
Comments:
42. Show all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop sings and
Do Not Enter signage on site plans.
Traffic control devices added to plans, see sheets C8, C9, & CIO
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
43. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional ~
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
Comment noted
44. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as /
defined in 200 I FBC, Chapter 6.
Type IV Unprotected - Sprinklered has been indicated on site plan
45. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. /
Each building is classified as Mercantile Occupancy, has been indicated on site
plan
46. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of
construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the
building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 200 I
'"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
7
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
FBC.
Site architect will comply with this requirement
47. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall /
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Site architect added a note to all elevations
48. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with ;7
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.S
Site architect will comply with this requirement
49. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2001 /
FBC, Sections 503.3, 503.3.2, and 503.3.3. Provide calculations verifying
compliance with the above code sections and 2001 FBC, Table 500.
Site architect will provide calculations at the time or permitting
50. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the /
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
Site architect will comply with this requirement
51. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the /
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (psf) on the plans for the building design.
Site architect will comply at the time of permitting
52. Building three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic /
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
Site architect will comply at the time of permitting
53. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents /
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
Limits of construction of each individual parcel will be at the parcel line which is
indicated on the plan sheets.
54. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents ~
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
Limits of construction of each individual parcel will be at the parcel line which is
indicated on the plan sheets. /'
55. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the t/
proposed construction.
Comment noted
56. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in /'
each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall
height of each building. /
Site architect will add information to plans
57. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and \1
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
8
DEPARTMENTS
floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap
accessible entrance doors to each building. 200 I FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2,
11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
Site architect will add information to plans
58. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each
building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the
accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to
each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel,
not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The
location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a
drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan
the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an
accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a
required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the
drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route
and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3
(Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones).
Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified In the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
Accessible routes added to site plan at all H/C locations
59. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling
units covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply
with the requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally
distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking
structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
Final design will comply with this requirement
60. Vertical accessibility to the second floor area shall be required per the 200 I
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-
4.1.6 (Alterations).
Vertical circulation is shown on floor plans
61. Add to the residential buildings that are depicted on the site plan drawing a
labeled symbol that identifies the location of the proposed handicap
accessible units. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to
identify the minimum number of required units. Also, state the code section
that is applicable to the computations. Show and label the same unit/s on the
applicable floor plan drawings. Compliance with regulations specified in the
Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and
Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205).
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
62. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for
the future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
/
/
/
J
J
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Act Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms
within the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
Acknowledged-will comply with this requirement at time of permitting
63. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the
Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which
design specification ("A" or "B") of the Fair Housing Act is being used. V"
The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall
be clearly shown on the plans.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
64. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the . /
project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol t/
shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the
detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed
along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user
to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify
on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width
required by the Code is 36 inches). Add text that would indicate that the
symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in
compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act. Please note
that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified III the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
Accessible routes added to site plan at all H/e locations
65. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development
Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions /
from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading V
edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy
to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings
on all sides.
Front, rear and side setback lines have been indicated on the site plan. Distance
between buildings has been indicated. Location of building canopies to be
provided by site architect
66. Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the /
primary use of the building. If the building is an expansion of an existing V
building, indicate with the footprint of the new and existing building the .
primary use of the building.
Site architect to label occupancies on site plan
67. Add to the floor plan drawing of the recreation building a breakdown of the
floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building,
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area
dedicated for the recreation building and other uses located within the
building. Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of
all rooms and floor spaces.
'"
I sf Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
10
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUD9.- REJECT
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these :7
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
68. CBBCPP 3.C.3A requires the conservation of potable water. City water may /
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are
readily available.
Comment noted, well will provide water for irrigation system
69. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that 77
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
Comment noted, SFWMD water use permit under review at this time
70. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application: 1/
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and V
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Comment noted
71. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of t/
Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as
one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each
property that is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the
form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match.
Comment noted
72. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City V
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
Comment noted
73. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information V
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s
must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter I, Article V, Section 3(f))
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
11
DEPARTMENTS
Comment noted
74. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Comment noted
75. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
Comment noted
76. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area
within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total
area of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and,
where applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and
storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and
identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of
unit will be on each floor and within the building.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
77. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown
shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the
applicable floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
b. Covered stairways;
c. Common area balconies;
d. Entrance area outside of a unit;
e. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
f. Garages (not part of a unit);
g. Elevator room;
h. Electrical room;
1. Mechanical room;
J. Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
I. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
78. Building "H" meets the definition ofa threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements ofF.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
200 I FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
/
V
/
/
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
12
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing
agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
construction of a threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted.
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and
sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a
statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's
knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the
applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local
authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
Information to be provided at time of permitting
79. According to 2001 FBC, Table 500, Building "D" exceeds the
allowable building area permitted by the code. /
Allowable building area for Type IV unprotected - mercantile - one story is
27,000 SF. The building area can be increased well above the 28,000 SF
shown as allowed by the formula in Section 503.3.2 in the 2001 FBC
80. Identify Building "L" on the site plan and architectural plans. 2001 ~
FBC, Section 104.2. (Clearly identify all buildings on site and architectural
plans. )
All buildings identified on site plan. Building "M" changed to building "L".
There will be no building "M"
81. A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 200 I /
FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b).
Comment noted, will be included in parking structure design
82. Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per
the 200 I FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a). t/
Comment noted, will be included in parking structure design
83. Sheet C 13 shows the apartment building that is located northeast of
Building "H" as a one-story building with 16 units, yet the architectural
sheets A1.6 & A1.7 show the building as multi-story with more than 16 ~
units. Clarify.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
84. Indicate what amenities will be in the amenities building. Submit a floor 1/
plan and clearly label the building on the plans. See Sheet A 1.6.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
85. The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted V
as "area not included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under
this site plan. Indicate the parcel numbers being developed on the site data. /
Phase I not included, see plan
86. Sheet A1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the V
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
13
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section
104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
Sheet A 1.6 will be corrected
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
87. Royal Palms have large fronds that they can drop on a vehicle or pedestrian
and cause substantial damage and injury. They need a minimum of 20'
diameter underneath them, that contains no roads or walks. In those
locations where there is enough clearance, suggest moving to a location
where there is or replacing with less hazardous plant material.
Adjustments have been made to the location of Royal Palms as requested.
88. Change cypress mulch to eucalyptus or melaleuca
Mulch specification has been changed to eucalyptus.
89. Need to provide note on each landscaping sheet that doesn't contain plant
list noting where the plant list that applies to that sheet is located.
Note has been added.
90. Do not recommend using Tabebuia because of low wind tolerance.
Noted.
91. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine
Road plan.
Noted.
92. Irrigation coverage should be 110%.
Percentages have been added to Sheet LA-2.
93. Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656.00 each = $52,480.00
Comment noted
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
94. Map of Boundary and TOPo2raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1
Existin2 Trees Mana2ement Plan
The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The ~/
tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in
place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All
desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the
trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the
landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p.
2.].
An existing trees management plan will be prepared and submitted to the City
once it is complete
95. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing V'
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
14
?
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comment noted
96. Landscape Plan
Sheets LA-l.2
3. All shade and palm trees on the Plant lists must be listed in the /
specifications as a minimum of 12' -14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5'
off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual).
This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger
than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.10]
Revision to specifications has been made as requested.
97. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height v/
and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter.
7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10]
Revision to specifications has been made as requested.
98. Landscape Plan ~~
Sheet LA-3
The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include
a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time
planting and inspection.
Revision to detail has been made as requested.
99. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how
the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the
proposed parking lot facility from the Congress A venue and Old Boynton V
Road rights-of-way.
The proposed landscaping shall buffer the parking lot with the code required
height of plant material on top of a landscape berm of approximately 2' -3' height
and supplemented with canopy and understory trees.
100. Irrie:ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal ~
The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low
volume water conservation using non-portable water.
Comment noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date
101. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate V
zones and time duration for water conservation.
Comment noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date
102. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to 7
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.
C.2.].
Comment noted. An irrigation plan will be prepared and submitted at a later date
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
103. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets ofrevised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
Comment noted
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
15
I
DEPARTMENTS
? 104. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, also provide a full
set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y:z inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save
each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted
taff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As
such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the
Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not
shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at
the time of permitting.
ent noted
No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the
subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes,
trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing
utility lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject
parcel is 20.13 acres, it would be pre(erable to submit a survey that matches
said acreage. (' ~ '.1\.';,] Iu Sl~cP + ~cY ,
Survey submitted. Survey will include areas outside the limits of the subject
parcel.
107. Update the project's site plan application if it changed because of the
submittals of Boynton Village Parcels 4 & 5 (NWSP 05-019) and (NWSP
05-020).
We are not familiar with the above referenced submittals. We ask the City to
clarify the question so that we may answer.
ubmit a scaled drawing (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) that clearly
illustrates all proposed building elevations (of all sides - north, south, east,
and west, including the parking garage and out-lots). The elevations shall
indicate the height, exterior dimensions, exterior color, and materials used
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.1.). The ledger sized pages of the colored
elevations that you submitted are great supplements, but the packet still
requires the full sized elevation drawings. ~o ele~tz.Wl S
rchitect to provide larger format drawings at meeting
All proposed buildings within the out-lots shall be at minimum 35 feet in
height per Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.. Conditional use approval would be
required for each ifless than 35 feet in height.
Site architect will comply
rovide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of all buildings proposed
on the out-lots (Chapter 4, Section 7.). This includes the parking garage and
the second floor office space.
Out lots will be a separate submittal - not part of this submittal
Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) meeting. If concurrency does exist, please provide this office
with a copy of a letter from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division
indicating com liance with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
L/
v
A.
1 st' Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
16
DEPARTMENTS
Beach County.
This has been previously submitted, any deficiencies to be addressed by traffic
consultant
'2 112. At the technical advisory review team meeting, provide written responses to
r all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets ofrevised plans. Each
set should be folded and stapled.
Comment noted
113. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed
residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space,
vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and
ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies,
building height for the SMU parcels only (Chapter 4, Section 7.E. and
Chapter 2, Section 11.H.a. 7.). ;?-ec h~
Master site plan data sheet prepared showing required information
't
114. The Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district requires 20% usable open space
for Multi-family dwelling units (Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.). On the master
site plan (sheet C3) or on a separate plan, show the "usable open space" so
that staff can determine code compliance. If shown on the master site plan
(sheet C3), do not include the 2404 acres of the Boynton Town Center
(NWSP 05-003) project because this property is zoned C-3. Please note
that Single-family attached developments require 30% usable open space.
This information must be consistent with the usable open space derived
from the master plan (LUAR 04-006).
Usable open space plan submitted separately
\r{' The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) is incorrect (regarding the
/\ - landscape requirement for interior parking areas). The plan indicates the
requirement is based on 20 square feet; however the code requires that each
separate landscape area shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet (Chapter
7.5, Section 5.G.). Revise the sheet to correctly indicate the requirement.
Sheet has been revised to indicate 25 square feet as the minimum requirement
M Indicate the number of proposed dwelling u~its on the master site plan
'\ (sheet C3) tabular data under the heading "Residential".
The number of proposed dwelling units under the heading of 'residential' has
been indicated on the master data sheet (MDS)
~ The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate
->'\. pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Village) and the other
two (2) projects (Cortina and Town Center). Revise the plan (show signage,
striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are
maintained throughout the entire 106.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
9.T.).
~estrian connections are shown on sheet C3 and C4 across the Spine Road
r(
\J 18. The ledger sized colored renderings show that many of the buildings would
'-/
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
/
/
J
v
,/
J
'"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
17
I
DEPARTMENTS
have awnings but the site plans (sheets C4 and C5) do not show their extent
beyond the building line. Please revise the plans and show the extent of the
awnings. Staff recommends utilizing a dashed line to depict their extent.
Preliminary Exterior Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed exterior plans to be
provided and discussed at a later date.
The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their
dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section
7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions,
exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Site plan have not developed to extent necessary to answer these comments at
time of initial submittal.
O. On the site plan (sheet C4), show the location(s) of the mailbox kiosk(s).
No applicable for commercial buildings
The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
County regarding school concurrency. Provide a copy of the District's
letter.
Concurrency already obtained
I ~. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to
/,\ issuance of a building permit for the project.
Comment noted
The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and
rights-of-way are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works'
review and approval.
Comment noted
~. The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3
,11) and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master
plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and
dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either an
unmarked or marked bicycle lanes.
Bicycle lanes are included in the design of the Spine Road
On the site plan tabular data, indicate the proposed floor-are a-ratio
(excluding the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.
This statistic is based on the entire SMU parcel and should include the
other developments proposed within the SMU zoning district. Don't just
provide data for just this portion of the entire project.
er site Ian data sheet rovided in plan set
Staff notes that the site plan now proposes a one-story apartment building
with 16 dwelling units at the easternmost rotary intersection where staff had
previously commented that a public plaza / outdoor seating area should be
located to make better use of the lake. Please label the residential buildin
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
/
v
v
/
/
".;
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
18
DEPARTMENTS
as Building "?" and indicate the number of units on the site plan tabular
data. Also, indicate the number of bedrooms per unit. This is required in
order to determine parking requirements. Staff recommends adding a
building or outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating
facing the small lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast
side of this rotary intersection and provide for trolley drop-off at this area.
This segment could also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both
sides of the street, east of the rotary intersection
Public spaces to be further developed with potential trolley stop on the Spine
oa adjacent to the lake at the Eastern entrance to main street.
Question: Where will its parking be located? Within the parking garage?
Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating the floor plans for all buildings,
including each floor of the parking garage (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The
plans that were prepared by Pieper O'Brien Herr do not match the site plan
in terms of their configuration, labeling, and square footage.
ite architect will provide this information
. Question: Will the parking for the 16 dwelling units be identified on the
floor plan of the parking garage?
Parking for all the residential units is within the parking garage
7.
130. Parking requirements for the SMU zoning district shall be set forth by
Chapter 2, Section lI.H. of the Land Development Regulations. Parking
for mixed-use developments may utilize shared parking ratios, consistent
with those prepared by the Urban Land Institute.
To be provided by site architect
The following calculations will be used to determine the project's required
parking:
Efficiency and One-bedroom units: 1.5 spaces per unit
Two-bedroom and three-bedroom unit: 2 space per unit
Retail: I space per 200 square feet
Medical Office: 1 space per 200 square feet
General Office: I space per 300 square feet
Restaurant: I space per 100 square feet or I per 2.5 seats, whichever
requires more spaces.
Shopping center: I space per 200 square feet
Comment noted
\<2. The site plan tabular data (sheet C-5) indicates that 80 dwelling units are
/~ proposed, however, graphically, it only shows 16 dwelling units. This
discrepancy impacts the parking requirements in the tabular data and the
parking methodology in the tabular data is confusing. The site plan tabular
data should accurately indicate the number of required and provided parking
spaces.
The correct number of units is 80. Parkin tabular date u dated as requested
The site plan (sheet C5) roposes 17 consecutive arking spaces in the row
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
J
v
/
v
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
19
DEPARTMENTS
located east of Building "I". Break up the row with an interior parking
island.
Additional parking landscape islands have been added to the site plan to reduce
the number of parking spaces in a row.
On all elevations, indicate the dimension of the mean height level and the
peak of the roof for every building. Also, label each building with its
respective identification, orientation, and direction. For example, the
elevation sheet for Building "F" should indicate the following: Building
"F" front (north).
Site architect to change building labels
135. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review
Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Site architect will provide larger prints of elevations for the meeting
Q All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint
D manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color
schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and
awning samples.
architect to add materials legend and materials boards
The intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap
the garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to
disguise the garage and create continuity in street-level activity by
maintaining interest for pedestrians and passing automobile traffic.
Principal structures that include parking garages shall be designed to blend
the architecture of the garage with the remainder of the structure or adjacent
buildings. Portions of freestanding parking garages that are not screened
with habitable space and are in view from the general public shall utilize
design measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall landscaping, etc. to
soften their impact (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.b.).
Site architect believes the design of the parking garage in combination with the
landscaping design will com ly with the intent of the SMU zoning district
The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive
aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape
buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers
of plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful
groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in
a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or
decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum
of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip
spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four
(4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at
maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.D.). The landscape buffer along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road
shall have the same quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed
within the Renaissance Commons project (Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section
INCLUDE REJECT
/
~
/
/
~
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
20
DEPARTMENTS
5.Q.). Staff will be recommending this as a project condition of approval if
the plans are not revised.
Noted.
139. Show the landscape material proposed within the interior of the out-lots.
Show the proposed buildings on the landscape plan (sheet LA-I).
C e out-lots are not being permitted at this time. Landscape plans will be
rov. ed with site plan permit submittal.
140. Question: Are no trees or shrubs proposed within the interior of the out-
lots?
e out-lots are not being permitted at this time. Landscape plans will be
provided with site plan permit submittal
No shrubs are proposed in front of any of the buildings. Staff recommends
installing ground cover and or / hedges in front of the buildings to help
soften the hardscape. Why is there no landscape material proposed around
the residential building?
Noted.
On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant
material for all five (5) projects combined.
Due to the fact it is very difficult to coordinate between several design
professionals to keep this data current, we will not provide this information in
tabular format for the entire project, but will provide it for individual parcels and
will combine the information for presentation to the City.
On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between
the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall
provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade
trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover.
Plant quantities have been reviewed and plans rectified.
Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. According to the landscape plan
(sheet LA-I), only 46% of the palm trees would be native. Please revise to
include more native trees so that the plans comply with this requirement.
Revi ions have been made accordingly.
The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
ent noted
II freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed
at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). Re-evaluate the project
entrances along Congress Avenue and plan for the location of anticipated
freestanding monument signs.
Comment noted
INCLUDE REJECT
t/
v/
v
v
J
v
/
.v
.
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
21
DEPARTMENTS
Q All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3)
V caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.C.2.). This would impact the Ligustrum trees.
Comment noted
Q All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
V 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.).
Comment noted
INCLUDE REJECT
The Washingtonia palm trees proposed along the sides of the principal
building shall be installed at ~ the building height of the building (Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.).
Comment noted
/
v
v
All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and
City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a
master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior /
finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign
program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs,
identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument
signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs
as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. Provide
a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate
their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign
area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section
7.D.). The property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-
way line for the Spine Road.
Signage plan to be provided to City by signage consultant
~~c~ OY\ 1W ~\OfoM..et1LLC- ~,. c.vT.7A-P . 1.
151' freestanding outdoor lighting poles. t U ~J..e. la.LL
~leasc; pIUv~Jt lItis iflf6fffl8tiOt:' l1L the next 'fcchH~vl11 Advi:>uty Review
TetlRHR@@til'lg. (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.). V
The proposed color will be black
~
Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property
(Chapter 9, Section IO.F.2.). The photometric plan fail to show the
proposed footcandle levels on the out-lots. Revise photometric plan (sheet
SL I-A).
Photometric Ian has been corrected to meet City code requirments
Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.)
Comment noted
/
/
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
22
DEPARTMENTS
'Nil Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety
A purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be
subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.FA.).
Comment noted
Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws
more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (Chapter
9, Section 10.F.5.).
Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be
encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 1O.H.). Provide
details of said amenities.
Site amenities such as benches, arbors, trash receptacles, directories and other
architectural features will be further developed and provided for staff review
Question: On the landscape plan (sheet LA-2), what is the "architectural
feature"?
exact configuration of this feature has not been completed at this point.
Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the
commercial/public spaces. Show their location on the architectural plans.
Bike racks both covered and uncovered shall be included at various locations and
be incorporated into the pedestrian / bikeway network
~ The Renaissance Commons project did not propose bike lanes within the
~ Spine Road right-of-way, however, it contained wide sidewalks throughout
its design. This project is neither proposing bike lanes within the Spine
Road right-of-way nor is the sidewalk (east of the right-of-way) wide
enough to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians. Revise the plans to
either include bike lanes into the right-of-way (which is the preferred
scenario) or widen the sidewalk to not less six (6) feet in width. Staff
recommends an eight (8) foot wide sidewalk running adjacent to the spine
road.
INCLUDE REJECT
/
j
An 8' wide sidewalk has been added to the plans per staff comments
Ensure that all buildings maintain a front yard build-to line (along Congress /
Avenue) at no more than 90 feet, inclusive of the 25-foot wide landscape V
buffer.
Comment noted
160. The building ro osed within the out-lot located at the northwest comer of
v
/
j
,.
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
23
DEPARTMENTS
the SMU project should contain a more "substantial" building than the other
out-lots immediately to its south. The surrounding condominium and
townhouse buildings should not dwarf this proposed commercial building.
This building should anchor and be similar (in size) to the building
proposed within the southwest out-lot, proposed in the C-3 parcel. Stand-
alone buildings were not envisioned when creating the SMU zoning district.
Develo er will address this with the City staff.
The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature
feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path
on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village
projects.
signature feature will be further explored for review by staff
Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the
main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast comer of
the greater project (at Old Boynton Road).
Signage structures at entrances are under development for staff review. POH
believes the tower structures at building H and I do provide a signature feature for
the project along Congress Avenue. The building design on the NEe of the
project will be submitted for separate review.
Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between
the Congress A venue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in
front of the main street buildings (note next comment).
Pedestrian access will be added to comply
Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance
(both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along
main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same
pedestrian system in front of these buildings.
Not feasible. Sembler company to discuss design constraints with City staff
Locate (by either aligning with the main rotary intersection (focal point)
within the park at the lake or on a short peninsula into the lake) a stage
feature with columns or colonnade similar to that at Bryant Park in Lake
Worth, Florida to accommodate public and private activities and events.
The Spine Road looks to point toward this feature (at both directions) before
bending toward the crossing between the main street and the open park. A
colonnade in the park will help connect Main Street and the park. An
expansion of this park area, the public activity stage, and surrounding
improvements (whether passive or active) begins to create what staff may
endorse as the public contributions amenity as mentioned and expected by
other early in this process. Sample pictures of Bryant Park in Lake Worth,
Florida can be provided to you by staff to help in your redesign.
Minimal architectural features are bein ex lored
INCLUDE REJECT
j
j
j
,/
j
v
.
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
24
DEPARTMENTS
If possible, staff recommends preserving specimen trees that are currently
located within the proposed landscape buffer along Congress A venue.
All trees that can be reserved will be.
Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the
retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that
additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's
design.
Number of excess parking spaces may be reduced at time of City concurrence for
the site plan parking calculations. Until we have City approval, the required
number of parking spaces is not yet determined.
Staff recommends installing a fountain into the design of all lakes.
ent noted
MWR/elj
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village NWSP 05-004\1st Review Revised
Comments.doc
-
f!..tv(0l SC\&t L-4/7 1;0 ~CttIo 80 ~
Exhibit 'A'
BOYNTON VILLAGE / TOWN CENTER
SCHEDULE FOR PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION
Site Plan Approval
C-3 Tract
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 161\ 2005
August 16t\ 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
Site Development Pmnitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 17th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
August 17th, 2005
August 17lh, 2005
Obtain Site Dev. Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November 1 SI, 2005
March 1st, 2006
March 1 st, 2006
March 1 st, 2006
November 1st, 2005
November 1 st, 2005
Building (Vertica~ Construction Permitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
January lS\ 2006 - May 1st, 2006
March 1 SI, 2006 - March 1st, 2007
March 1 st, 2006
March 1 S\ 2006 _ Apri11 SI, 2006
January ls', 2006 - May 1st, 2006
Obtain Building Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
Apri11st, 2006 - August 1'1, 2006
June 1 SI, 2006 - June 1 SI, 2007
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
June 1 st, 2006
June 1 st, 2006 - July 1 st, 2006
April 1 st, 2006 - August 1 st, 2006
Sitework Construction
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November 1st, 2005 - April 1'\ 2006
March 1 st, 2006 - March 1 st, 2008
March 1 st, 2006 - September 1 st, 2007
March 1 S\ 2006 - September 1'\ 2007
November 1st, 2005 - April 1st, 2006
November 1 st, 2005 - April 1 st, 2006
Building (Verticag Construction
C-3 April 1st, 2006 - June 1st, 2007
(Water Meters needed November ls', 2007 - April1S\ 2007)
SMU - Parcell and 2 June 1 st, 2006 - August 1 st, 2008
(Water Meters needed January 1 st, 2007 thru March 1",2008)
SMU - Parcel 3 June 1st, 2006 - October 1st, 2007
(Water Meters needed May 1 st, 2007)
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5 June 1st, 2006 - November 1st, 2007
(Water Meters needed May 1st, 2007 - June 1st, 2007)
SMU - Parcel 6 April 1st, 2006 -June 1st, 2007
(Water Meters needed November 1 st, 2007 - April 1 st, 2007)
11/22/2004 15:29
551354- ~
BOYNTON BEACH r
PAGE 01
0Hl0lT r l?JC
.
(, ..
.(7
.. \V
v. .
\ ~ ~,' .
~~ 2?ead 7i1te ~~
FLOW TEST
Request Date: 1118104
Company: Kimley-Horn & Associates
601 21st Street, Suite 400
Requested From: Chris Ralph
Telephone Number: 772-794-4088
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Facsimile Number: 772-562-9689
Location: Boynton Town Center I Boynton Village
· DIAGRAM *
(Include direction, street names, hydranllocations. intersections and main sizes)
i ~ C
H#@ 0
N
N G
R
E
5
5
H#<D
A
V
E OLD BOYNTON ROAD
I r
Hydrant 1:
Hydrant 2:
Static Reading: 56 psi
Flow Reading: 46 psi::: 1141 gpm
Residual Reading: 52 psi
Assign Date: 11/8/04
Tested By: FF II Aaron
Test Date: 11/18/04
Time Tested: 10:30 hrs
AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL: 3,747 gpm
11/22/04 MON 16:55 ITX/RX NO 6708}
~'~
~'~
\~
~.
[
~
..
.....""
~,#
1 st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 1 streview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a May 5.2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article
II, Section 10-26 (a).
Comment noted
2. A backup distance in excess of 100-ft. is required for the dumpster serving
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster location will be adjusted for proper service
3. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", \,F'i and
~or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast corner'ot'tjis
parcel. How will Solid Wasfe handled? /"
Dumpster enclosure to be added behin b' din '. e other buildin s .
showing dumpsters '-
4. Roadways and parking areas are shown fo, t cels that are part of
this submittal. However no dumpster enclosures have been depicted. Will
these outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the
developer to do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so
appropriate areas for solid waste will be required.
Out parcels to be developed at a later date. Full plan submittal with solid waste
plan will be submitted at that time. Developer to rough grade site and provide
utility stub out for future development.
'1~~. ~i,~J
, ~,\ ' ~ CCY'T
. (;~\'\ ~. '.. ,L~
? ~" :> '\
..r:1- I
IiJ ~~\\l\ rr~
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
Traffic a~aly~is was previousl~ ?ubmittefl, tr~ffic \. consultant to address any
defiCienCies ~ \J '" ,,jJ ,z"!";-\,^ ~.', \/Ve. C ;. ,
6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all n cessary traffic control'
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone"f
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping ail~ C~().\J
Si age and marking lans added to lans, see sheets C8 9 ClO
7. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of
this submittal. However no loading zones have been depicted. Will these
outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the developer to
do the avin , grading and drainage at this time? If so a propriate loading
~
.- ~
\\.UA~~
GO ":~
~I
./
"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
2
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
areas, and striping will be required.
Out parcels to be developed at a later date. Full plan submittal with solid waste
plan will be submitted at that time. Developer to rough grade site and provide
utility stub out for future development.
8. Provide off-site improvement plans for Congress Ave.
ee sheets C33, C34 and C35 for roadway improvement plans
9. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-
Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was advised to carry the five-lane section through ~
VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the intersection. Correct ""',
accordingly.
Mr. Mufleh has contacted City staff regarding pis is~ and the de~ign has been
modified to meet City staff comments . /} V -2- cJ.._ ~
10. Extend concrete medians on Old Boynton Rd. from VelAire Rd. west to tie
into the median at Hoadley Rd. This median should block both the east and
west entrances to the apartment complex on the south side of the road,
allowing westbound access to this development from the middle driveway.
Mr. Mufleh has contacted City staff regarding thO issut apd the desi~~wi.ll
encorporate the City staff requirements '~), ''\-- <:"""~-ko-C
11. Show all existing utilities on the off-site improvement plans.
All existing utilities are indicated on off-site improvement plans.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Comment noted
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
ent noted
14. his plan depicts primarily building construction and associated parking.
he plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site
improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed.
Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be
planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support
building construction. tiJ.j
Please, see attached roadway improvemel)l: plans, for ngress
C33, C34 and C35. I I \(J~'~ /l 0"
15. The provided Photometrics plan pr vided with this submittal does not meet
the minimum standards required by our LDR. There are areas of the
parking lot that provide less than 0.5 ft-candles. Please correct.
Photometrics have been corrected to meet City code re uirements
16. The Pink Trumpet trees specified between Outparcels 5 and 6, on the north
side of the driveway, are too close to the edge of the roadway, posing a
vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as Solid Waste or delivery
..
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
3
II
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
trucks. Additionally three of these canopy trees are in close proximity to
proposed storm sewer and water lines. Canopy trees are not allowed within
a drainage easement.
The Pink Trumpet trees in question have been repositioned where possible and
removed where necessary.
17. Be consistent with the use of symbols for the various trees and shrubs. For
instance, on Sheet LA-2 the same symbol is used for both TH and SM.
Also two different symbols are used for TH. Please provide a legend for the
planting symbols.
Tree symbols have been revised to be more consistent, however, due to the
complexity of plan and overlap of material shown, the plant tags shall take
ndence.
he Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of
roadway - posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum .~
height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is required. Additionally use
of a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the
sidewalk, curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature.
The proposed spine road has a 4' bike lane on the outside of the roadway so the
trees are setback from the vehicles. A tree with a 14' of clear trunk is cost
prohibitive. We will consider the use,of root ba . ers within the ndscape verge
where the trees occur. 'v-2, 1\ '\\.' (1) c (f' . '_' '\
19. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the ight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.)
The note has been corrected as requested. L
20. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigati n and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response
and add a note to the plans with the above stated information.
Note #13 added to sheet C6
21. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about
the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of
Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work. Remove
this note if not applicable. : '. ., " . , . ' " .' f /1
Note has been removed. Drai .... have beeQ p rformed that h ve
been submitted to and mee SFWMD criteria. . " :' t. Jii' I'"
22. Full Drainage plans, inclu i ns, in accordance w h the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
SFWMD permit and drainage calculations approved at June 8 Governing Board
meeting by consent
23. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit ap lication.
:(~
~y
~~
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
4
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
Comment noted
UTILITIES
Comments:
24. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
Comment noted
25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on 11/8/04
and meet the city requirements.
26. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
While this proposed plan reflect this coverage in general, it does not cover
Buildin "I" completely in this hase. Please recti this un
Fire hydrant relocated to allow for better coverage of building "I"
27. In addition, Master Plan Sheet reflects the followingnoTe:
"Construction Type: IV
Unprotected - Sprinklered
Occupancy: Merchantile
What this note means is unclear; no specific note appears on the proposed plan
indicating that the (all) mercantile buildings (or out lots) shall be sprinklered in
accordance with the NFPC. Therefore, sufficient coverage must be provided to
meet the 1,500 gpm fire flow requirement for a four (4) hour duration. The
applicant shall demonstrate that this condition is being complied with.
"Construction Type IV-Unprotected - Sprinklered" describes type of
construction as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. "Occupancy: Mercantile"
describes occupancy per 2001 FBC Chapter 3.
28. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
Comment noted
29. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Comment noted
.',
c~
\
"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
5
DEPARTMENTS
30. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Comment noted
31. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207.
Comment noted
32. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
Comment noted, see note #12 on sheet C7
33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates);
they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Utility construction details are included in plans that adhere to Utility department
standards.
FIRE
Comments:
34. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
Comment noted
35. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500 gallons per
minute.
Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all buildings,
within a 200' radius of the hydrant. In addition, hydrants around the buildings
have been place within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the
16" WM off Congress Avenue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04
and meet City requirements.
36. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
Comment noted
37. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
INCLUDE
....
\<~ \+ /
c,/2IjO)
1st Review Revised Comments. doc
06/02/05
11
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
85. The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted
as "area not included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under
this site plan. Indicate the parcel numbers being developed on the site data.
86. Sheet A 1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section
104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
87. Royal Palms have large fronds that they can drop on a vehicle or pedestrian
and cause substantial damage and injury. They need a minimum of 20'
diameter underneath them, that contains no roads or walks. In those
locations where there is enough clearance, suggest moving to a location
where there is or replacing with less hazardous plant material.
88. Change cypress mulch to eucalyptus or melaleuca
89. Need to provide note on each landscaping sheet that doesn't contain plant
list noting where the plant list that applies to that sheet is located.
90. Do not recommend using Tabebuia because of low wind tolerance.
91. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine
Road plan.
92. Irrigation coverage should be 110%.
93. Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656.00 each = $52,480.00
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
94. Map of Boundarv and Topoe:raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1
Existioe: Trees Manae:ement Plan
The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The V l/
tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in
place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All
desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the
trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the
landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p.
2.1,
1st Review Revised Comments. doc
06/02/05
12
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
95. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers. ~
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
96. Landscape Plan
Sheets LA-l.2
3. All shade and palm trees on the Plant lists must be listed in the
specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5'
off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). ~
This includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger
than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.l0]
97. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height
and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. ~
7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10]
98. Landscape Plan
Sheet LA-3
The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include ~v
a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time
planting and inspection.
99. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how
the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the ---
proposed parking lot facility from the Congress A venue and Old Boynton
Road rights-of-way.
100. Irrie:ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal ~ ~
The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low
volume water conservation using non-portable water.
101. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate ~
zones and time duration for water conservation.
102. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to ~-
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.
C.2.1.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
103. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
104. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, also provide a full
set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save
each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
.Joo-.-t R\~~
-~
.....~,.
1 st REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS
New Site Plan
".;
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 1 slreview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a May 5,2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article
II, Section 10-26 (a).
Comment noted
2. A backup distance in excess of 100-ft. is required for the dumpster serving
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster location will be adjusted for proper service
3. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and
"G" or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this
parcel. How will Solid Waste be handled?
Dumpster enclosure to be added behind building J. The other buildings are
showing dumpsters
4. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of
this submittal. However no dumpster enclosures have been depicted. Will
these outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the
developer to do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so
appropriate areas for solid waste will be required.
Out parcels to be developed at a later date. Full plan submittal with solid waste
plan will be submitted at that time. Developer to rough grade site and provide
utility stub out for future development.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
Traffic analysis was previously submitted, traffic consultant to address any
deficiencies
6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details.
Signage and marking plans added to plans, see sheets C8, C9 & C 1 0
7. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of
this submittal. However no loading zones have been depicted. Will these
outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the developer to
do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so appropriate loading
....,
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
13
~
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section
104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
Sheet A 1.6 will be corrected
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
87. Royal Palms have large fronds that they can drop on a vehicle or pedestrian
and cause substantial damage and injury. They need a minimum of 20'
diameter underneath them, that contains no roads or walks. In those ~
locations where there is enough clearance, suggest moving to a location
where there is or replacing with less hazardous plant material.
Adjustments have been made to the location of Royal Palms as requested.
88. Change cypress mulch to eucalyptus or melaleuca v'
Mulch specification has been changed to eucalyptus.
89. Need to provide note on each landscaping sheet that doesn't contain plant
list noting where the plant list that applies to that sheet is located. i/
Note has been added.
90. Do not recommend using Tabebuia because of low wind tolerance. /'
Noted. nv \.r;.vo p,,~ ,\~ 6~
~~\ .u.
91. Need to add the percentage of dative plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine
Road plan. .~
Noted.
92. Irrigation coverage should be 110%. /
Percentages have been added to Sheet LA-2.
93. Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656.00 each = $52,480.00 /
Comment noted
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
94. Map of Boundarv and TOPo2raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1
Existin2 Trees Mana2ement Plan
The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The
tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in
place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All
desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the
trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the
landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p.
2.].
An existing trees management plan will be prepared and submitted to the City
once it is complete
95. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
of
C(JvUfvtvJrS HWL /\JCJT'~ f~()p€f2-L '{ ~tJT;JRYh€D
BtJ t L}(~I\'.vG DelV (Eb -- (p / tJ--; /o'!J - r ~A /7 C? -
1 S REVIEW REVISED COMMENTS V~ ~
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 1 slreview revised plans identified as a New Site Plan with a May 5,2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article
II, Section 10-26 (a).
Comment noted
2. A backup distance in excess of 100-ft. is required for the dumpster serving
Buildings "E" and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster location will be adjusted for proper service
3. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and
"G" or the 16-unit single-story retail building in the northeast comer of this
parcel. How will Solid Waste be handled?
Dumpster enclosure to be added behind building J. The other buildings are
showing dumpsters
4. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of
this submittal. However no dumpster enclosures have been depicted. Will
these outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the
developer to do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so
appropriate areas for solid waste will be required.
Out parcels to be developed at a later date. Full plan submittal with solid waste
plan will be submitted at that time. Developer to rough grade site and provide
utility stub out for future development.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this Site plan.
Traffic analysis was previously submitted, traffic consultant to address any
deficiencies
6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details.
Signage and marking plans added to plans, see sheets C8, C9 & CI0
7. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of
this submittal. However no loading zones have been depicted. Will these
outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the intention of the developer to
do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so appropriate loading
.~.
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
Comment noted
38. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
Final design documents for anchor stores and outlots will show fire lanes for each
individual building approved by City of Boynton Beach Fire Department staff.
We are unable to provide that design at this time on the outlots due to the fact the
final layout is yet to be determined.
39. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lanes during the course of construction
40. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFPA 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
Comment noted, contractor to provide fire lanes during the course of construction
41. Any building over 30 feet in height will require a fire sprinkler system.
All building are sprinklered
POLICE
Comments:
42. Show all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop sings and
Do Not Enter signage on site plans.
Traffic control devices added to plans, see sheets C8, C9, & CIO
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
43. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not V
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
Comment noted
44. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as /
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
Type IV Unprotected - Sprinklered has been indicated on site plan
45. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. ~
Each building is classified as Mercantile Occupancy, has been indicated on site
plan
46. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of
construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the
building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 200 I
'.
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
7
,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
FBC.
Site architect will comply with this requirement
47. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall f./t lL~l/.
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. [MJ69 -
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and f7cJ Jw I rrt"/)
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600. V
Site architect added a note to all elevations
48. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with V
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705. 1. 1.2.S
Site architect will comply with this requirement
49. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2001
FBC, Sections 503.3, 503.3.2, and 503.3.3. Provide calculations verifying ./
compliance with the above code sections and 2001 FBC, Table 500. t
Site architect will provide calculations at the time or permitting
50. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and /
the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
Site architect will comply with this requirement
51. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the /
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
Site architect will comply at the time of permitting
52. Building three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic /
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
Site architect will comply at the time of permitting
53. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request. V
Limits of construction of each individual parcel will be at the parcel line which is
indicated on the plan sheets.
54. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the /
subject request.
Limits of construction of each individual parcel will be at the parcel line which is
indicated on the plan sheets.
55. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the V
proposed construction.
Comment noted
56. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in ~
each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall
height of each building.
Site architect will add information to plans
57. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
8
DEPARTMENTS
floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap
accessible entrance doors to each building. 200 I FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2,
11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
Site architect will add information to plans
58. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each
building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the
accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to
each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel,
not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The
location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a
drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan
the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an
accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a
required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the
drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route
and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3
(Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones).
Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified III the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
Accessible routes added to site plan at all H/e locations
59. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling
units covered under the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply
with the requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally
distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking
structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
Final design will comply with this requirement
60. Vertical accessibility to the second floor area shall be required per the 2001
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-
4.1.6 (Alterations).
Vertical circulation is shown on floor plans
61. Add to the residential buildings that are depicted on the site plan drawing a
labeled symbol that identifies the location of the proposed handicap
accessible units. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to
identify the minimum number of required units. Also, state the code section
that is applicable to the computations. Show and label the same unit/s on the
applicable floor plan drawings. Compliance with regulations specified in the
Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and
Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205).
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
62. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for
the future installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing
INCLUDE REJECT
J
v
/
tI
I
/
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
9
DEPARTMENTS
Act Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms
within the covered dwelling unit shall comply.
Acknowledged-will comply with this requirement at time of permitting
63. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the
Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which
design specification ("A" or "B") of the Fair Housing Act is being used.
The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall
be clearly shown on the plans.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at T ART meeting.
64. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the
project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol
shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the
detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed
along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user
to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify
on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width
required by the Code is 36 inches). Add text that would indicate that the
symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in
compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act. Please note
that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
Accessible routes added to site plan at all H/e locations
65. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development
Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions
from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading
edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy
to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings
on all sides.
Front, rear and side setback lines have been indicated on the site plan. Distance
between buildings has been indicated. Location of building canopies to be
provided by site architect
66. Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the
primary use of the building. If the building is an expansion of an existing
building, indicate with the footprint of the new and existing building the
primary use of the building.
Site architect to label occupancies on site plan
67. Add to the floor plan drawing of the recreation building a breakdown of the
floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building,
covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area
dedicated for the recreation building and other uses located within the
building. Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of
all rooms and floor spaces.
INCLUDE
/
/
/
REJECT
/
/
1//
l._~.
1
~
l:J3Jtrn
3:Gfl'l:JNI
((J)t: UOn::l~s 'A ~P~llV 'I l~l t!l{:J 'O:JHH:J)
'p~t!d ~u~~q lunowt! It!lOl ~l{l .~
'~u~p{!nq l{:)t!~ u~ sl~un ~Um~Mp JO l~qwnu ~l{l .p
'sut!Id ~Hs p~AOlddt!-uo~ss~wwo:J ~l{l uo P~lOU
st! ~wt!s ~l{l ~q lsnw Sl~qwnu ~u~p{!nq ~l{l 'p~p~AOld ~q lsnw
s/l:}qwnu ~u~p{!nq :}l{l 'p;}fOJd A{!Wt!J-mnw t! s~ p~fOJd :}l{l JI '::l
'Ut!Id :}l~S p:}AOlddt!-uo~ss~wwo:J :}l{l put! l~plO
lu:}wdopA:}G ~l{l UO slt!:}ddt! l~ st! l::l~fOJd ~l{l JO ~wt!u IlnJ :}l{l 'q
'put!I ~l{l JO uond~:>s~p It!~~I V .t!
:p~p~AOld ~q Ilt!l{s
UOnt!WlOJU~ ~u~MoIloJ ~l{l 'All:}dold JO ~::lUt!A~AUO::110 ~:}J p~t!d t! Aq p~!.Jsnt!s
u:}:}q ~At!l{ Slu~w~l~nb~l ~~d Pt!dWI UOnt!~l::l~"}I put! S){lt!d l{:>t!~H UOlUAOH
JO AlD :}l{llt!l{l uont!::l!.J~~A Hwqns 'uont!::l!{ddt! HWl~d ~u~p{!nq JO ~wn lV .t:L
P:}lOU lU:}WWO:J
'M~~A~l HWl~d JO ~wn It! p~mwqns ~q Ilt!l{s p~~p p~plO::l~l ~l{l
'pt!lllO p::llt!d 'loI l{::lt!~ 10J p~~p p~plO::l~l ~l{l JO Ado:> t! ~p~AOld 'l~lndwo:>
AH:J ~l{l u~ d~l{Sl~UMO put! All~dold dn ~uHl~s JO s~sodmd 10d 'Pt!ll
10 p::llt!d 'lOI l{:>t!~ JO sA~Ams ~lt!lt!d~s Hwqns 'M~~A~l HWl~d JO ~wn lV "U
P:}lOU lU:}WWO:J
'l{::llt!W Ilt!l{s p~~p l{::lt!~ uo p~!.Jnu~p~ s~ It!l{ll~UA\O All~dOJd ~l{l 'WlOJ
~l{l sS~::lOJd Ol p~mwqns ~q Ol p~l~nb~l s~ 'p~mun ~upq s~ It!l{l All~dold
l{:>t!~ JO 'suond~::ls~p It!~~I l{l~M p~~p p~plO::l~l ~l{l JO AdO::l V 'lOI ~UO
st! p~u~qwO::l SPt!ll 10 sp::llt!d 'slOI lIt! ~q~::lS~p Ilt!l{s WlOJ ~l{l 'WlOJ ~nu
JO l~ufl HH:J p~ln::l~X~ pUt! P:}l~IdwO::l t! ~p~AOld 'M~~A:}l l~Wl~d JO ~wn lV . 1 L
P~lOU lU~WWO:J
(vt:-n SUon:>~s 'II ~P~llV '9Z l~ldt!l{:J 'O:JHH:J)
'l~M~S 10J s~ l{:>nw
MOl{ pUt! l~lt!M 10J s~ l{:mw MOl{ Olu~ P~z~w~H pUt! p~t!d lUnowt! It!lOl ~l{l .~
'Hun ~Um~Mp l{::lt!~ u~ SWOOJp~qJO l~qwnu ~l{l 'p
'~u~PI~nq l{:)t!~ u~ SHun ~Um~Mp JO l~qwnu ~l{l .:>
'sut!Id ~l~S p~AOJddt!-uo~ss~wwo:J
~l{l uo P~lOU st! ~wt!s :}l{l ~q lsnw sl~qwnu ~u~p{!nq ~l{l 'p~p~AOld
~q lsnw sfl~qwnu ~u~p{!nq ~l{l 'p~fOld A{!Wt!J-mnw t! s~ p~fOJd ~l{l JI 'q
'ut!Id ~l~S p~Aolddt!-uo~ss~wwo:J ~l{l
put! l~plO lU~wdopA~G :}l{l UO slt!~ddt! H st! P~fOld ~l{l JO ~wt!u IlnJ ~l{l .t!
:uont!::l!{ddt! HWl:}d ~u~p{!nqJo ~wn ~l{llt! p~p~AOld
~q Ilt!l{s UOnt!WlOJU~ ~u~MoIloJ ~l{l 'lu~wllt!d~G s~mHlfl l{:>t!~H UOluAOH
JO AH:J ~l{l Ol ~::lUt!Apt! u~ p~t!d ~lt! (l~M~S put! l~lt!M) s~~J AlH~::lt!J It!Hdt!::l JI 'OL
:}wq S~4llt! M:}~A:}ll:}pun l~Wl:}d :}sn l:}lBM aWMdS 'P:}lOU lU:}WWO.:)
'9IZ.t:Lt: 'S'd 'uont!::l!{ddt! l~Wl~dJo ~wn ~l{llt! p~mwqns ~q Ilt!l{S l~Wl~d
~l{l JO AdO::l V '~:>lnos SH st! l~lt!M JO Apoq 10 Il~M t! W01J l:}lt!M S~Z!{nn
It!l{l W~lSAS UO~lt!~~~ ut! 10J p:}l~nb~l s~ GWMdS wOl] l~Wl:}d ~sn-l~lt!M V '69
W:}lSAS UO~lt!~~~ 10J l:}lt!M ;}p~AOJd mM Il:}M 'p:}lOU lU~WWO:J
':}lqt!{!t!At! A{!pt!~l
~1t! S~::llnOS l~l{lO ~l~l{M uont!~~~ ~dt!::lsput!I 10J p:}sn :}q ':}lOJ:}l:}l{l 'lOU
At!W l~lt!M Al~:J 'l~lt!M ~lqt!lOdJo uont!Al:}SUO::l ~l{l s~l~nb:}l V'C:rt: dd:JHH:J '89
'~un~~w 1,"}IV l It! p~ssn:)s~p put! p~p~A01d
:}q Ol sut!ld mOil p:}dol~A~P l:}l{llnd 'It!lHwqns It!n~u~ JO ~wn It! SlU~WWO:)
:}S~l{l l~MSUt! Ol A.rt!SS:}:):}U lU:}lX:} Ol p~dopA~p lOU sut!ld 100ld A.rt!U~W~I~ld
SlN3W~lIV d3G
01
!;0/0l/90
!;0-€-9 flWS :}~l!mA uOluAog-slU:}WWO:) p:}S~M~ A\:}~A:}~ lS{
-4,
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
11
DEPARTMENTS
Comment noted
74. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Comment noted
75. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
Comment noted
76. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area
within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total
area of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and,
where applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and
storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and
identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of
unit will be on each floor and within the building.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at T ART meeting.
77. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building.
Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown
shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the
applicable floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
b. Covered stairways;
c. Common area balconies;
d. Entrance area outside of a unit;
e. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
f. Garages (not part of a unit);
g. Elevator room;
h. Electrical room;
1. Mechanical room;
J. Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
1. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
78. Building "H" meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7)
and shall comply with the requirements ofF.s. 553.79 and the CBBA to the
2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through 105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit
INCLUDE REJECT
J
J
/
J
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
12
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
application:
a. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing
agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
construction of a threshold building.
b. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be
submitted. L/
c. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and
sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a
statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's
knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the
applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local
authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633.
Information to be provided at time of permitting
79. According to 2001 FBC, Table 500, Building "D" exceeds the
allowable building area permitted by the code. /
Allowable building area for Type IV unprotected - mercantile - one story is
27,000 SF. The building area can be increased well above the 28,000 SF
shown as allowed by the formula in Section 503.3.2 in the 2001 FBC
80. Identify Building "L" on the site plan and architectural plans. 2001
FBC, Section 104.2. (Clearly identify all buildings on site and architectural ~
plans.)
All buildings identified on site plan. Building "M" changed to building "L".
There will be no building "M"
81. A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 2001 J
FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b).
Comment noted, will be included in parking structure design
82. Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per ~
the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
Comment noted, will be included in parking structure design
83. Sheet C 13 shows the apartment building that is located northeast of
Building "H" as a one-story building with 16 units, yet the architectural V
sheets A1.6 & A1.7 show the building as multi-story with more than 16
units. Clarify.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
84. Indicate what amenities will be in the amenities building. Submit a floor /
plan and clearly label the building on the plans. See Sheet A 1.6.
Preliminary Floor Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed floor plans to be
provided and discussed at TART meeting.
85. The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted /
as "area not included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under
this site plan. Indicate the parcel numbers being developed on the site data.
Phase I not included, see plan
86. Sheet A1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the
~
'"
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE J REJECT
building is labeled as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section V
104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
Sheet A 1.6 will be corrected
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
87. Royal Palms have large fronds that they can drop on a vehicle or pedestrian
and cause substantial damage and injury. They need a minimum of 20'
diameter underneath them, that contains no roads or walks. In those
locations where there is enough clearance, suggest moving to a location
where there is or replacing with less hazardous plant material.
Adjustments have been made to the location of Royal Palms as requested.
88. Change cypress mulch to eucalyptus or melaleuca
Mulch specification has been changed to eucalyptus.
89. Need to provide note on each landscaping sheet that doesn't contain plant
list noting where the plant list that applies to that sheet is located.
Note has been added.
90. Do not recommend using Tabebuia because of low wind tolerance.
Noted.
91. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine
Road plan.
Noted.
92. Irrigation coverage should be 110%.
Percentages have been added to Sheet LA-2.
93. Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656.00 each = $52,480.00
Comment noted
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
94. Map of Boundarv and Topoeraphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1
Existine Trees Manaeement Plan
The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The
tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in
place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All
desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the
trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the
landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p.
2.].
An existing trees management plan will be prepared and submitted to the eity
once it is complete
95. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing
desirable trees that are located within the proposed landscape buffers.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
15
DEPARTMENTS
'7 104. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, also provide a full
set of reduced drawings, sized 8 ~ inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save
each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted
J......
taff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review. As
such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the
Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. Any information not
shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required to be shown at
the time of permitting.
ent noted
No survey was included within this packet of plans. Submit a survey of the
subject property. The survey shall include natural features such as lakes,
trees, and other vegetation and soils and topography. Indicate existing
utility lines and all easements (Chapter 4, Section 7.A.). Since the subject
parcel is 20.13 acres, it would be pre(erable to submit a survey that matches
said acreage. {\'\ \.4..,c;,f k.e <3l~ + A.ett1e~ '
Survey submitted. Survey will include areas outside the limits of the subject
parcel.
107. Update the project's site plan application if it changed because of the
submittals of Boynton Village Parcels 4 & 5 (NWSP 05-019) and (NWSP
05-020).
Weare not familiar with the above referenced submittals. We ask the City to
clarify the question so that we may answer.
ubmit a scaled drawing (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) that clearly
illustrates all proposed building elevations (of all sides - north, south, east,
and west, including the parking garage and out-lots). The elevations shall
indicate the height, exterior dimensions, exterior color, and materials used
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.1.). The ledger sized pages of the colored
elevations that you submitted are great supplements, but the packet still
requires the full sized elevation drawings. ~o e\e.~oY1.S
chitect to provide larger format drawin s at meeting
All proposed buildings within the out-lots shall be at minimum 35 feet in
height per Chapter 2, Section 5.H.4.. Conditional use approval would be
required for each if less than 35 feet in height.
Site architect will comply
rovide floor plans (sized 24 inches by 36 inches) of all buildings proposed
on the out-lots (Chapter 4, Section 7.). This includes the parking garage and
the second floor office space.
Out lots will be a se arate submittal- not art of this submittal
Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) meeting. If concurrency does exist, please provide this office
with a copy of a letter from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division
indicatin com liance with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm
?f
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
16
DEPARTMENTS
Beach County.
This has been previously submitted, any deficiencies to be addressed by traffic
consultant
1
112. At the technical advisory review team meeting, provide written responses to
all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each
set should be folded and stapled.
Comment noted
I'
1....
113. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed
residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space,
vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and
ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies,
building height for the SMU parcels only (Chapter 4, Section 7.E. and
Chapter 2, Section II.H.a.7.). gec.h-c.ct-
Master site plan data sheet prepared showing required information
1
114. The Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district requires 20% usable open space
for Multi-family dwelling units (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.4.). On the master
site plan (sheet C3) or on a separate plan, show the "usable open space" so
that staff can determine code compliance. If shown on the master site plan
(sheet C3), do not include the 24.4 acres of the Boynton Town Center
(NWSP 05-003) project because this property is zoned C-3. Please note
that Single-family attached developments require 30% usable open space.
This information must be consistent with the usable open space derived
from the master plan (LUAR 04-006).
Usable open space plan submitted separately
I U'The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) is incorrect (regarding the
/\. landscape requirement for interior parking areas). The plan indicates the
requirement is based on 20 square feet; however the code requires that each
separate landscape area shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet (Chapter
7.5, Section 5.G.). Revise the sheet to correctly indicate the requirement.
Sheet has been revised to indicate 25 square feet as the minimum requirement
1~ Indicate the number of proposed dwelling. u~its on the master site plan
/'\ (sheet C3) tabular data under the heading "Residential".
The number of proposed dwelling units under the heading of 'residential' has
been indicated on the master data sheet (MDS)
~ The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate
l'\." pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Village) and the other
two (2) projects (Cortina and Town Center). Revise the plan (show signage,
striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are
maintained throughout the entire 106.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
9.T.).
~estrian connections are shown on sheet C3 and C4 across the Spine Road
\118. The ledger sized colored renderings show that many of the buildings would
~
INCLUDE REJECT
v
/
J
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
17
DEPARTMENTS
have awnings but the site plans (sheets C4 and C5) do not show their extent
beyond the building line. Please revise the plans and show the extent of the
awnings. Staff recommends utilizing a dashed line to depict their extent.
Preliminary Exterior Plans not developed to extent necessary to answer these
comments at time of initial submittal. Further developed exterior plans to be
rovided and discussed at a later date.
J",
The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their
dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section
7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions,
exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Site plan have not developed to extent necessary to answer these comments at
time of initial submittal.
O. On the site plan (sheet C4), show the location(s) of the mailbox kiosk(s).
No a licable for commercial buildings
The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
County regarding school concurrency. Provide a copy of the District's
letter.
Concurrency already obtained
2. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to
issuance of a building permit for the project.
Comment noted
The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and
rights-of-way are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works'
review and approval.
Comment noted
V.' The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3
,tf). and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master
plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and
dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either an
unmarked or marked bicycle lanes.
Bic cle lanes are included in the desi of the Spine Road
On the site plan tabular data, indicate the proposed floor-area-ratio
(excluding the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.
This statistic is based on the entire SMU parcel and should include the
other developments proposed within the SMU zoning district. Don't just
provide data for just this portion of the entire project.
er site Ian data sheet rovided in Ian set
Staff notes that the site plan now proposes a one-story apartment building
with 16 dwelling units at the easternmost rotary intersection where staff had
previously commented that a public plaza / outdoor seating area should be
located to make better use of the lake. Please label the residential buildin
INCLUDE REJECT
~
l/'
/
/
1 st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
18
DEPARTMENTS
J.....
as Building "?" and indicate the number of units on the site plan tabular
data. Also, indicate the number of bedrooms per unit. This is required in
order to determine parking requirements. Staff recommends adding a
building or outdoor plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating
facing the small lake (north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast
side of this rotary intersection and provide for trolley drop-off at this area.
This segment could also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both
sides of the street, east of the rotary intersection
Public spaces to be further developed with potential trolley stop on the Spine
oa adjacent to the lake at the Eastern entrance to main street.
Question: Where will its parking be located? Within the parking garage?
Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating the floor plans for all buildings,
including each floor of the parking garage (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The
plans that were prepared by Pieper O'Brien Herr do not match the site plan
in terms of their configuration, labeling, and square footage.
ite rchitect will provide this information
. Question: Will the parking for the 16 dwelling units be identified on the
floor plan of the parking garage?
Parking for all the residential units is within the parking garage
'1
130. Parking requirements for the SMU zoning district shall be set forth by
Chapter 2, Section 11.H. of the Land Development Regulations. Parking
for mixed-use developments may utilize shared parking ratios, consistent
with those prepared by the Urban Land Institute.
To be provided by site architect
The following calculations will be used to determine the project's required
parking:
Efficiency and One-bedroom units: 1.5 spaces per unit
Two-bedroom and three-bedroom unit: 2 space per unit
Retail: 1 space per 200 square feet
Medical Office: 1 space per 200 square feet
General Office: 1 space per 300 square feet
Restaurant: 1 space per 100 square feet or 1 per 2.5 seats, whichever
reqUIres more spaces.
Shopping center: 1 space per 200 square feet
Comment noted
'M2. The site plan tabular data (sheet C-5) indicates that 80 dwelling units are
/S proposed, however, graphically, it only shows 16 dwelling units. This
discrepancy impacts the parking requirements in the tabular data and the
parking methodology in the tabular data is confusing. The site plan tabular
data should accurately indicate the number of required and provided parking
spaces.
The correct number of units is 80. Parkin tabular date u dated as re uested
INCLUDE REJECT
J
v
/
v
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
19
I
DEPARTMENTS
located east of Building "I". Break up the row with an interior parking
island.
Additional parking landscape islands have been added to the site plan to reduce
the number of arkin spaces in a row.
"...-"
On all elevations, indicate the dimension of the mean height level and the
peak of the roof for every building. Also, label each building with its
respective identification, orientation, and direction. For example, the
elevation sheet for Building "F" should indicate the following: Building
"F" front (north).
Site architect to change building labels
135. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review
Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Site architect will provide larger prints of elevations for the meeting
Q All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint
D manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color
schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Also, provide color swatches and
awning samples.
architect to add materials legend and materials boards
The intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap
the garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to
disguise the garage and create continuity in street-level activity by
maintaining interest for pedestrians and passing automobile traffic.
Principal structures that include parking garages shall be designed to blend
the architecture of the garage with the remainder of the structure or adjacent
buildings. Portions of freestanding parking garages that are not screened
with habitable space and are in view from the general public shall utilize
design measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall landscaping, etc. to
soften their impact (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.b.).
Site architect believes the design of the parking garage in combination with the
landsca ing design will com ly with the intent of the SMU zoning district
The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive
aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape
buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers
of plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful
groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in
a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or
decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum
of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip
spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four
(4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at
maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.D.). The landscape buffer along Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road
shall have the same quantity, type, and layout of the plant material proposed
within the Renaissance Commons ro'ect (Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section
INCLUDE REJECT
/
v
/
/
,t/
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
20
DEPARTMENTS
5.Q.). Staff will be recommending this as a project condition of approval if
the plans are not revised.
Noted.
J"'''
139. Show the landscape material proposed within the interior of the out-lots.
Show the proposed buildings on the landscape plan (sheet LA-I).
e out-lots are not being permitted at this time. Landscape plans will be
rov' ed with site Ian permit submittal.
140. Question: Are no trees or shrubs proposed within the interior of the out-
lots?
e out-lots are not being permitted at this time. Landscape plans will be
rovided with site Ian ermit submittal
No shrubs are proposed in front of any of the buildings. Staff recommends
installing ground cover and or / hedges in front of the buildings to help
soften the hardscape. Why is there no landscape material proposed around
the residential building?
Noted.
On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant
material for all five (5) projects combined.
Due to the fact it is very difficult to coordinate between several design
professionals to keep this data current, we will not provide this information in
tabular format for the entire project, but will provide it for individual parcels and
will combine the information for presentation to the City.
On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between
the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall
provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade
trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover.
Plant quantities have been reviewed and plans rectified.
Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. According to the landscape plan
(sheet LA-I), only 46% of the palm trees would be native. Please revise to
include more native trees so that the plans comply with this requirement.
Revi . ons have been made accordingly.
The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
ent noted
11 freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed
at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). Re-evaluate the project
entrances along Congress Avenue and plan for the location of anticipated
freestanding monument signs.
Comment noted
INCLUDE REJECT
V'
t/
v
v
~
v
-/
.~
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
21
DEPARTMENTS
Q All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3)
U caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.C.2.). This would impact the Ligustrum trees.
Comment noted
Q All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
V 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.).
Comment noted
1""
The Washingtonia palm trees proposed along the sides of the principal
building shall be installed at Y2 the building height of the building (Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5.M.).
Comment noted
INCLUDE REJECT
/
v
'v
All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and
City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a
master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior /
finish, and color(s) of all signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). The sign
program would address all types of signs, including commercial wall signs,
identification signs, residential subdivision signs, freestanding monument
signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs, directional signs, and all other signs
as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land Development Regulations. Provide
a detail of any proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate
their setback from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign
area, dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section
7.D.). The property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-
way line for the Spine Road.
Signage plan to be provided to City by signage consultant
"' ~~ OY\ The ?w~M.*ic- ~ I' ~ _ . L
151' freestanding outdoor lighting poles. L U h.e. lCtCL
~leasc pluv~J~ this iHfel'fllfttioh ell the next lcdmil,;<11 Advi:'Uly Review
'Fellffi meetiNg. (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.). V
The ro osed color will be black
~
Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property
(Chapter 9, Section IO.F.2.). The photometric plan fail to show the
proposed footcandle levels on the out-lots. Revise photometric plan (sheet
SLl-A).
Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.)
Comment noted
/
/
1st Review Revised Conunents-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
22
DEPARTMENTS
~, Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety
^ purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be
subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.4.).
Comment noted
1.....
Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws
more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (Chapter
9, Section 10.F.5.).
Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be
encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 10.H.). Provide
details of said amenities.
Site amenities such as benches, arbors, trash receptacles, directories and other
architectural features will be further developed and provided for staff review
Question: On the landscape plan (sheet LA-2), what is the "architectural
feature"?
exact configuration of this feature has not been com leted at this point.
Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the
commercial/public spaces. Show their location on the architectural plans.
Bike racks both covered and uncovered shall be included at various locations and
be inco orated into the pedestrian / bikeway network
~ The Renaissance Commons project did not propose bike lanes within the
~ Spine Road right-of-way, however, it contained wide sidewalks throughout
its design. This project is neither proposing bike lanes within the Spine
Road right-of-way nor is the sidewalk (east of the right-of-way) wide
enough to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians. Revise the plans to
either include bike lanes into the right-of-way (which is the preferred
scenario) or widen the sidewalk to not less six (6) feet in width. Staff
recommends an eight (8) foot wide sidewalk running adjacent to the spine
road.
INCLUDE REJECT
J
j
An 8' wide sidewalk has been added to the lans per staff comments
Ensure that all buildings maintain a front yard build-to line (along Congress /
Avenue) at no more than 90 feet, inclusive of the 25-foot wide landscape V
buffer.
Comment noted
160. The buildin ro osed within the out-lot located at the northwest corner of
v
/
)
1st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
23
DEPARTMENTS
the SMU project should contain a more "substantial" building than the other
out-lots immediately to its south. The surrounding condominium and
townhouse buildings should not dwarf this proposed commercial building.
This building should anchor and be similar (in size) to the building
proposed within the southwest out-lot, proposed in the C-3 parcel. Stand-
alone buildings were not envisioned when creating the SMU zoning district.
}''''
The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature
feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path
on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village
projects.
ature feature will be further explored for review by staff
Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the
main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast corner of
the greater project (at Old Boynton Road).
Signage structures at entrances are under development for staff review. POH
believes the tower structures at building H and I do provide a signature feature for
the project along Congress A venue. The building design on the NEC of the
project will be submitted for se arate review.
Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between
the Congress Avenue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in
front of the main street buildings (note next comment).
Pedestrian access will be added to comply
Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance
(both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along
main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same
pedestrian system in front of these buildings.
Not feasible. Sembler com any to discuss design constraints with City staff
Locate (by either aligning with the main rotary intersection (focal point)
within the park at the lake or on a short peninsula into the lake) a stage
feature with columns or colonnade similar to that at Bryant Park in Lake
Worth, Florida to accommodate public and private activities and events.
The Spine Road looks to point toward this feature (at both directions) before
bending toward the crossing between the main street and the open park. A
colonnade in the park will help connect Main Street and the park. An
expansion of this park area, the public activity stage, and surrounding
improvements (whether passive or active) begins to create what staff may
endorse as the public contributions amenity as mentioned and expected by
other early in this process. Sample pictures of Bryant Park in Lake Worth,
Florida can be provided to you by staff to help in your redesign.
Minimal architectural features are bein ex lored
INCLUDE REJECT
J
j
,/
j
t/
1 st Review Revised Comments-Boynton Village SMU 6-3-05
06/20/05
24
DEPARTMENTS
If possible, staff recommends preserving specimen trees that are currently
located within the proposed landscape buffer along Congress Avenue.
All trees that can be reserved will be.
Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the
retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that
additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's
design.
Number of excess parking spaces may be reduced at time of City concurrence for
the site plan parking calculations. Until we have City approval, the required
number of arking s aces is not yet determined.
Staff recommends installing a fountain into the design of all lakes.
ent noted
MWR/elj
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village NWSP 05-004\1st Review Revised
Comments.doc
'KtV(0~ S~ L-A--3> ~ ~Cab 80 AA
Exhibit 'A'
BOYNTON VILLAGE / TOWN CENTER
SCHEDULE FOR PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION
Site Plan Approval
C-3 Tract
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 16'\ 2005
August 16'\ 2005
August 16'\ 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
Site Development Permitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 17'\ 2005
December 15th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
August 17th, 2005
August 17'\ 2005
Obtain Site Dev. Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November 1''' 2005
March 1 st, 2006
March 1st, 2006
March 1st, 2006
November 1'" 2005
November 1 Sf, 2005
Building (Vertical) Construction Permitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
January 1'\ 2006 - May 1",2006
March 1'" 2006 - March 1'" 2007
March 1 ", 2006
March 1'" 2006 - April 1 ", 2006
January 1'\ 2006 - May 1",2006
Obtain Building Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
April 1", 2006 - August 1"" 2006
June 1 ", 2006 - June 1 ", 2007
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
June 1 st, 2006
June 1st, 2006 - July 1st, 2006
April1S\ 2006 - August r\ 2006
Si/ework Cons/me/ion
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November ls', 2005 - April 1st, 2006
March 1 s', 2006 - March 1 S\ 2008
March 1 st, 2006 - September 1 s" 2007
March 1 s., 2006 - September 1 st, 2007
November 1 st, 2005 - April 1 st, 2006
November 1st, 2005 - April 1st, 2006
Building (Vertical) Cons/me/ion
C-3 April 1 st, 2006 - June 1st, 2007
(Water Meters needed November ls', 2007 -April 1st, 2007)
SMU - Parcell and 2 June 1 st, 2006 - August 1 st, 2008
(Water Meters needed January 1 st, 2007 thro March 1 st, 2008)
SMU - Parcel 3 June 1 s', 2006 - October 1 st, 2007
(Water Meters needed May 1 st, 2007)
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5 June 1 st, 2006 - November 151,2007
(Water Meters needed May 1 st, 2007 - June 1", 2007)
SMU - Parcel 6 April 1st, 2006 -June 1st, 2007
(Water Meters needed November 1 st, 2007 - April 1 st, 2007)
11/22/2004 15:29
561364~ "2
BOYNTON BEACH r ~
PAGE Ell
0Hl0lT r P.Jl
(-'(.
, \ (
,-\
. \.
. V.
'. I, ."
2i~ ~~ 7bte ~e4e<<e
FLOW TEST
Request Date; 11/8/04
Company: Kimley-Horn & Associates
601 21st Street, Suite 400
Requested From: Chris Ralph
Telephone Number: 772-794-4088
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Facsimile Number: 772-562-9689
Location: Boynton Town Center I Boynton Village
· DIAGRAM *
(Include direction, street names, hydrant locations. intersections and main sizes)
i ~ C
H#@ 0
N
N G
R
E
S
s
H#<D
A
V
E OLD BOYNTON ROAD
I r
Hydrant 1:
Hydrant 2:
Static Reading: 56 psi
Flow Reading: 46 psi = 1141 gpm
Residual Reading: 52 psi
Assign Date: 11/8/04
Tested By: FF II Aaron
Test Date: 11/18/04
Time Tested: 10:30 hrs
AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL: 3,747 gpm
11/22/04 BON 16:55 ITX/RX NO 6708)
~-A~ ~ ~ ~ ~vyfh ~1~
. ~ ~r+' ~~Q~-o
~~ .l:; ~ ~ .h 'J:'r~ ,)'s ri ~
11;'31 / ~tJ (fi~l 0 (~-vcrr ~"'r f~'J l~ ~. c:l.
liu~pgOI :)lg~dOlddg os JI l:)wP s~qllg :)ligU~glP PUg liU~pRlli ':au~Agd :)ql op
Oll:)doPA:)P :)qlJO UOpu:)lU~ :)ql H sl l:)wP s~qllg p:)dopA:)p :)q sI:)~lgdlnO
:)S:)ql m.M 'p:)p~d:)p u:):)q :)Agq s:)uoz liu~pgOI ou l:)A:)MoH 'Igmwqns s~ql
JO :J,md :)lg 19q1 sp~lg(4no :)qllOJ UM.oqs :)lg Sg:)lg liuppgd PUg SAgMpgOll 'L
01 J 1S' 6J '8J sp:)qs :):)s 'SUgld 01 p:)ppg sugld liU~)[lgW PUg :)limili~s
'SHgl:)P liu~d~lS lOJ s:)~:)S ")I,, SliU~MglG PlgpUglS AHJ :):)S
',,:)uoZ liu~pgo'1 -liU~)[lgd ON" liupg~~pU~ MOIPA u~ :)ligss:)w lu:)w:)Agd g
:)pnpu~ :(['11 uop~:)S 'z l:)ldgqJ 'lIG'1- :)Iqg~Hddg :)l:)qM) "g:)lV liu~pgo'1"
:)ql :)d~lS PUg :)W:)uH:)G '~l:) ':)limui~s "l:)lUa lON oG" PUg SMOllg IgUOP~:)l~P
'liu~d~lS SlOlglgd:)s :)UgI MOlpA :)Iqnop 'suli~s dOls 'Slgq dOlS Sg q~ns s:)~!A:)P
IO.ijuO~ ~YJgll A.mss:)~:)u ng AJPU:)P~ PUg MOqS 'SUgld HA~:::> PUg :)l~S :)ql uo '9
s:)~~u:)~~!PP
AUB SS:)lppB Ol lUgHnsuo~ ~YJgj1 'p:)mwqns Alsno!A;lld SBM S!SAIBUg ~YJBll
'Ugld :)HS S!ql JO IgAolddg
Ollo~d P:)SS:)lPpg :)q 1snw Wql S~SAIgUg s~ql u~ lS~x:) s:)~~u:)P!PG 'Igmwqns
Ugld :)HS l:)lSgW :)ql qHM uop~unfuo~ u~ p:)p~Aold SgM S~SAIgUg ~YJg.ij V .~
:Slu:)wwo:::>
3UJ1U.L - S)llIOM. :JI'l8Jld
'lU:)wdOI:)A:)P :)JnlnJ lOJ 1no qnls Al~Ipn
:)p~Aold PUg ;lHs ;lpg,m qlinOl Ol l:)doPA;lG ';lWP 19q1 19 p;lmwqns ;lq IPM UBld
:)lSgM PH os qHM Ign!wqns Ugld Ilnd ':)lBP l:)lBI B lB p;ldOI;lA;lP ;lq Ol SI;lJlBd lno
'p:)l~nb:)l :)q mM :)lSgM PHoS lOJ Sg:)lg :)lB~dOlddg
os JI l:)wP s~ql 19 :)ligU~glP PUg liu~pg,m 'liu~Agd :)ql op Ol l:)dOI:)A:)P
:)ql JO UOPU:)lu~ :)ql H SI l:)wP s~ql 19 p:)dopA:)p :)q sp~lgd1no :)S:)ql
m.M 'p:)p~d:)p U:);lq :)Agq S;lJnSOPU:) l:)lsdwnp ou l:)A:)MoH 'Ign~wqns s~ql
JO :j.,md :)lB 19q1 sl:)JlBdlnO :)ql lOJ UMOqS :)lg Sg:)lg liu~)[lgd PUg SAgMpgOll 'v
Sl;llsdwnp liU!MOqs
;llB sliu!PIIllq l;lq10 ;lql 'f liu!PHnq PU!4:)q p;lPPB ;lq 01 ;lJnsOIJU;l 19lsdwnG
lPglpUgq :)q glSg.M PHOS mM MOH 'I:)~lgd'
s~ql JO l:)WOJ lSBgq:j.IOU :)ql u~ liu~PHnq Hg1:)l A.I01S-glliu~s l~un-91 :)4ll0 "0,,
pUB "d" '")I,, PUg "f" sliu~PHnH lOJ UM.oqs s~ lopgdwOJ lO l:)lsdwnp ON '(
;l~!Al;lS l;ldOld lOJ p;llsnfpB ;lq IPM uOPBJOIlglSdwnG
'Alliu~ploJ~g l;llsdwnp glg~OPlI ',.1" PUg ,.3:" sliu~PHnH
liu~Al:)s l:)lsdwnp gqllOJ pgl~nb;ll s~ 'U-OO 1 JO ss:)~x:) u~ :)~UBlS~P dn)[~Bq V 'z
P;llOU 1U;lWWOJ
'(g) gz-OI Uon~:)s 'II
gp~:j.IV 'aGo:::> gq1l:)d :)snJ:)l JO liUHPUgq PUg :)liglOlS gqlliu~Plgli:)l (00Z9
-ZvL-19~) lUgw:j.Igd:)G S)[lO.M ~Hqnd gql pglUOJ UOpg~Hddg HUIlgd OllO~d '1
:SlU;lWWO:::>
11U;}U;}~ - S)llIOM. :JI'l8fld
l:::>3:fmI aGfl'1:::>NI S.LN3W.LlIV d3G
I
'aU~)[lgW dwglS glgp lU:)W:j.IM:)G
3u~uoZ PUg 3u~UUgld ~OOZ .~ Agw g qHM Ugld :)HS M:)N g Sg p:)ypu:)p~ SUgld pgS~A;ll Mg!A:)ljS 1 :g~u:)l:)J:)lI
VOO-~O dS.MN :l:)qwnu :)Hd
gligmA UOluAOH :gWgU p:)fOld
UBld ans MaN
S~N3WW03 03SIAIDI A\3IAIDI}s [
~J
~
ue p::ldOI::lA::lP seq Ieqslew ::ll~d ::lql 'd~:-6 ::l:lUeU~plO AH;) Ol luenslfid 'Lf,
h 0SJ't: p::l10U lU::lllilUO;)
~ 'Z' f,'Z-1 V UOn:l::ls ~ 'y ddN l::ld :>{lOM UOn:ln.llsUO:l Ollo!ld ::l:l~A.l::lS
U} pue 'P::ll::lldwo:l 'p::lnelSU} ::lq IHM A::lqlleql ::llellSUOW::lP lsnw 'SlU::lWn:lOp
uii~s::lp 'p::lp~Aold ::lq Ol ::lle SlUelpAq pue su~ew l::lleM puno.I2l::lpUn ::ll::l1{A\ '9f,
'SlU::lW::ll~nb::ll AH;) l::l::lW pue
r;:;p vO/8/11 uo p::llUlOJl::ld U::l::lq ::lAeq SlS::ll MOll ::ll~d '::lnU::lA Y sS::lliluo;) JJo Wi\\. ,,91
::lqlJJo ::ll::lM P::l1Sgl SlUelpAq glg OM.1 'lgq10 lpeg JO ,00f, U~ql~M g:leld Uggq ::lAeq
s'Bu~PI~nq ::lql punOle sluelpAq 'uo}HPpe UI 'luelpAq ::lql JO sn~pel ,OOZ e U~qHM
's'Bu~ppnq ne JO ::l'Bel::lAO:l MOne leql SUOne:lolltl P::l:lUld U::l::lq ::lAUq SluUlpAq ::ll!d
" '\I~fJ '::llnu~w
~*~"f.,) l::ld suonu'B 00~1 lse::lI le JO MO[J ::llg e u~elU~ew lsnw pue ~sd OZ ueql
~?7"-nP SS::lI ::lq lOU neqs ::llnss::lld IenU::lp}S::ll :lnS::lWoG 'l::ll::lwe}p u~ S::lq:lU~ 9 ueql
~rl SS::lI lOU ::lle leql su~ew l::lleM Ol ::lq neqs SUOn:l::lUUO;) 'luelpAq e WOlJ l::l::lJ
~~ OOZ ueql ::llOW ::lq lOU neqs ::lllll:lOllS Aue JO ped lS::llOW::ll ::lql pue pede l::l::lJ
'vft? 00f, ueql ::llOW ::lq lOU neqs Suone:lndde le}:ll::lllilUo:l U} sluelpAH 'SlUelPAq
lOJ SlU::lw::ll}nb::ll S::lP}AOld q:l}qM '91 UOn:l::ls '9 l::lldeq;) suoneln'B::l"M
rrlr~ lU::lwdopA::lG pue1 qHM ::l:luendwo:l ::llellSUOW::lP neqs SlU::lWn:lOp uii}s::lG '~f,
p::l10U lU::lWwo.)
~.~~~~ 't7f~hOO(; ~::
/ /661 ';WO) <W7 '161 V dJN pHP. 'uomp~ J.~~ 1 'ape;) liB.
~J1 T '1 Y J.:IN- sldope ::l:lUeU}plO S}q.1 '"UOnU::lA::lld pue UO}P::llOld
..:J.
::ll~d" P::lH!lU::l q:le::lg U01uAOg JO AH;) ::lql JO s::l:lueu}plO JO ::lpO;) ::lql JO 6
l::lldeq;) Ol ::ll::lqpe neqs SlU::lwn:lop uii}s::lp ueld l::llSew lO / pue ueld ::lHS ::lq.1 'vf,
:SlU::lllilUO;)
~I.fI
'splUpUUlS
lU::lwpud::lp Al}l~ln 01 ::ll::lqpU luql SUUld u~ p::lpnI:lu~ ::llU Sl!e1::lp UO~P0l1SUO:l AlHnn
'uone:lndde HlUl::ld UOn:lOllSUO:l JO ::lWn ::lqlle p::lM::l}A::ll ::lq IHM A::lql
:(S::llepdn Aue 'Bu~pn{:lU}) Ienuew "SP.lBPUB1S uO!lJn.llsuo:) pUB '1ooqpUBH
u~!sa<I ~U!.IaaU!~U:tI sa!lml[}" sJu::lwped::lG S::l}lHnn ::lql qHM ::l:lUeplO:l:le
U} ::lq neqs Sl!Ul::lP UO}POllSUO:l AlHnn ny '::lWn s~ql le Almqeld::l:l:le
UO~POllSUO:l lOJ p::lM::l~A::ll ::lq lOU IHM Spel::lp UOn:ltUlSUO:l AlHnn 'f,f,
L;) l::l;)qs UO Z 1# ;)lOU ;)::lS 'P;)lOU lU::lWWO;)
'sueld p::llHwqns ::lql uo 'Bu}:>{:leI S} lU::lW::llelS S}q.1 'S::l~:lu::l'Be ::llU!ldOldde
::lq1 Aq P;)p}Aold ::lq IHM pue ;)lqel~eAe ::lle S::lHnnn l::lqlo leql p::lpn{:lu~
::lq lU::lW::llelS e s::ll~nb::ll (d)f, UOn:l;)S 'AI ::l{:l~PY 'f, l::lldeq;) '"Mal ::lq.1 'Zf,
P;)lOU 1U;)wwo.)
. LOz-n UOn:l::ls '3:GO;) ::lql qHM ::l:lUeplO:l:le
u~ 'Aue ::lle ::ll::lql J} ::lUn l::ll:>{u!lds ::llg ::lql pue '(s)'Bu~Pl!nq ::lql Ol ::l:l}A.l::lS
l::lleM :lnS::lWOp ::lql uo p::ll}nb::ll ::lq IHM (S)l::llU::lA::lld MO[J:>{:leq ::lle!ldOlddy '1 f,
P;)lOU 1U::lllilUO.)
'~I-n UO}P::lS '3:GO;) ::lql qHM ::l:lUeplO:l:le u~ 'l:l;)fold s~ql ::l:l}A.l::lS
Ol p::ll~nb::ll SlU::lW::lAoldw~ l::lM::lS lO/pUU l::lleM ::lqllOJ sueld ::lql p::lAoldde seq
lU::lWped::la s~ql mun p::lnss~ ::lq lOU neqs P::lfOld S~qllOJ HlUl::ld 'Bu~pnnq y 'Of,
.1;)3:ftnI 3:Gn1;)NI S.LN:tIW.LlIV d:tl<I
I
~
~O/0l/90
~0-t-9 [lWS ;)gemA uOluAOg-slU;)UlUIO;) P;)S~A;)~ M.;)!A;)~ lSl
/'
./
~
/'
/'
/\
l')3:ftrn
,
/\
H001.)NI
100Z ;)ql JO OOS ;)lqul U! qllOJ l;)S Sl!Wn ;)ql P;);):lX;) lOu nuqs pUU '3u!Punq
;)ql JO A:luudn:l:lO 10 ;)sn P;)PU;)lU! ;)ql Aq p;)w;)A03 ;)q nuqs UOH:lnllSUO:l
JO S;)dAl lU;)l;)JJ!P gql JO SglnpnllS 10 s3u!Punq 10J U;)lU pUU lq3!;)q gql '9v
uUld
;)PS uo pglU:l!PU! Uggq suq 'kmedm:lO gHlUU:llgW se pgg!SSUI:l S! 3u!Punq q:lU3
. ( 19lduq.) '')8d I OOZ U!
P;)ug;)P su 3u!Punq q:lUg JO ;)dAl A:luudn:l:lo gql elep ;)PS gql U!qpM gle:l!puI 'SV
ueld gpS uo pgle:l!pu! Uggq seq pglgl){u!ldS pgpglOlduO AI gdAl
'9 19ldeq.) '')8d 1 OOZ U! P;)ug;)P
se 3u!Punq q:le;) JO UOH:ltUlSUO:l JO ;)dAl gql elep gpS ;)ql U!qpM ;)le:l!puI 'vv
pglOu lUgwwo.)
'Mg!A;)ll!Wl;)d le pue
UO!SS!WWO:l gql Aq pglelgUg3 gq lOU Aew SlUgWWO:l leuop!ppe leql glllSUg
lOU SgOP Ssg:lOld ')"Ml gql 3u!lnp sueld ;)Sgql JO g:lUeld;):l:lV 'SlUgWWO:l
leuop!ppe ;)lelgUg3 Aew sueld ;)Sgql Ol SUO!S!MllO s;)3ueq:l leql ;)lOU gsegld . (v
:SlUgWWO.)
NOISIAIG ~NIG'1I[}H
01,) 78 '6;) '8;) Slg;)qs ;)gS 'sueld Ol p;)ppe S;):lIAgp 101lUO:l :lmell
'sueld gpS uo ;)3eu3!s 1;)lU3l0N 00
pue s3u!s dOlS 'sleq dOlS se q:lns Sg:l!Agp 101lUO:l :lmell A.1eSsg:lgu ne MOqS 'Zv
:SlUgWWO;)
/f
'9:31'10.1 r'" .~ j1 ~ v
A J~ J..J,,-1
-I ,,!--=:y, Y7Pr7~';r'" J?V~ ~v 'P!2: "Jf '(jll/
pg1;)I){u!lds ;)le 3u!PHnq nv
'WglSAS 19l){u!lds ;)lg e ;)l!nbgl mM lq3!;)q U! l;);)J O( l;)AO 3u!Punq AUV '1 V
UO!PnllSUO:) JO gsmo:) ;)l{l 3u!lnp sguel glg gp!A01d Ol10pmlUO:) 'P;)lOU lU;)WWO;)
'uO!lgldwo:l mun pgu!elu!ew pue pgfOld gl{ljO llelS ;)l{l
le P;)P!A01d ;)q neqs 's 19ldul{.) 'I VZ V ddN l;)d SAeMpeOl SS;):l:le ;)mSg1-g1H . Ov
UOH:lnllSUO:l JO ;)smo:) ;)l{l 3u!lnp sguel ;)lg ;)P!A01d Ol10pmlUO:) 'pglOU lUgWWO.)
. I 'Z- I v UOH:lgS 'I V ddN 19d ssg:l:le 10J UOH:lnllsuO:llnoq3n01l{l
p;)U!elu!ew gq pue P;)fOld e JO llelS ;)ql le pgp!A01d gq neqs S;)uel gl!d '6(
'pgUruuglgp ;)q Oll;)A S! lnoAelleug
;)l{l pel ;)l{l Ol ;)np slollno gl{l uo gWH S!l{lle u3!sgp lel{l gp!A01d Ol ;:llqeun ;)le ;:l M
'jjelS lU;:lWlled~a ~l!d lpe~8 UOluA08 ]0 Al!.) Aq P;:lA01dde llu!PHnq lunp!A!pu!
lpeg lOJ S;)UUI ;:)lg MOqS mM slollno pUU S;:)lOlS 10q:)UU lOJ SlU;:lWn:lOp u3!S;:)P IUU!d
'Z'8 UOH:lgS
'(Z l;:)ldel{') suoHeln3g"M lUgwdopA;:)O PUUl U! p;:)q!l:lS;:)P glU 3U!){lUW pue
3u!u3!S 'Sg:lUUU!P10 Al!.) gql JO Z I -6 UOH:lgS U! P;:)P!AOld gle lel{l sguel ;:)lg
10J lUgw;:)l!nbgl ;:)l{l l{pM g:lUUndwo:l ;:)le1lsuow;:)p lsnw Slugwmop u3!sgO '8(
P;:)lOU lU;:)wWO;)
'lgUUOSlgd A:lug31gWg 3u!puodsg110J uOHeWloJU!
JO g3e10lS x08 XOU)l SgSSglppe IOOZ 'SI AeW pglep l;:)p10 gAHellS!U!WPV
19l{lOUV 'ssg:l:le A:lug31gWg pue Sgle3 Al!ln:lgs ne 10J g:lUUWlOJlgd
wnw!u!w gql Sgp!A01d lBl{l IOOZ '6 AeW p;:)lep 19p10 gA!lellS!U!WPV
S.LN3W.LlIV d3G
9
SO/Ol/90
SO-(-9 IlWS ;}llemA UOluAOg-slU;}wwo:) P;}S!A;)~ M;)!A;)~ is l
j
'""
/
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 05-065
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer
DATE:
May 23,2005
I
Review Comments ~
New Site Plan (Revised) - 1 st Revi~
Boynton Village -,-
File No. NWSP 05-004
-"
RE:
The above referenced Site Plans, received on May 12, 2005, was reviewed for Public Works,
Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the
storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a).
2. A backup distance in excess of 100-ft. is required for the dumpster serving Buildings "E" and "I".
Relocate dumpster accordingly.
3. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Buildings "J" and "K", "F" and "G" or the 16-unit single-story
retail building in the northeast corner of this parcel. How will Solid Waste be handled?
4. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of this submittal. However
no dumpster enclosures have been depicted. Will these outparcels be developed at this time? Is it
the intention of the developer to do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so appropriate
areas for solid waste will be required.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
5. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan submittal. Deficiencies exist
in this analysis that must be addressed prior to approval of this Site plan.
6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars,
stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc.
Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings
"K" Series for striping details.
..
Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-065
Re: Boynton Village, New Site Plan (Revised) - 1 sl Review
May 24,2005
Page 2
7. Roadways and parking areas are shown for the outparcels that are part of this submittal. However
no loading zones have been depicted. Will these outparcels be developed at this time? Is it the
intention of the developer to do the paving, grading and drainage at this time? If so appropriate
loading areas, and striping will be required.
8. Provide off-site improvement plans for Congress Ave.
9. With respect to the plans for Old Boynton Rd., the engineer for Kimley-Horn, Marwan Mufleh, was
advised to carry the five-lane section through VelAire Rd. with appropriate taper lengths east of the
intersection. Correct accordingly.
10. Extend concrete medians on Old Boynton Rd. from VelAire Rd. west to tie into the median at
Hoadley Rd. This median should block both the east and west entrances to the apartment complex
on the south side of the road, allowing westbound access to this development from the middle
driveway.
11. Show all existing utilities on the off-site improvement plans.
ENGINEERING
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may
not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
14. This plan depicts primarily building construction and associated parking. The plan appears to depict
infrastructure construction and off-site improvements without identifying how or when they will be
constructed. Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be planned and
phased so that all improvements are in-place to support building construction.
15. The provided Photometrics plan provided with this submittal does not meet the minimum standards
required by our LOR. There are areas of the parking lot that provide less than 0.5 ft-candles. Please
correct.
16. The Pink Trumpet trees specified between Outparcels 5 and 6, on the north side of the driveway, are
too close to the edge of the roadway, posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as Solid
Waste or delivery trucks. Additionally three of these canopy trees are in close proximity to proposed
storm sewer and water lines. Canopy trees are not allowed within a drainage easement.
17, Be consistent with the use of symbols for the various trees and shrubs. For instance, on Sheet LA-2
the same symbol is used for both TH and SM. Also two different symbols are used for TH. Please
provide a legend for the planting symbols.
18. The Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of roadway - posing a vertical
conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is
"-
Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-065
Re: Boynton Village, New Site Plan (Revised) - 1st Review
May 24, 2005
Page 3
required. Additionally use of a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the
sidewalk, curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature.
19. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed
cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H.)
20. The medians on Congress Avenue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of
Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the
contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved
by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above
stated information.
21. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about the ultimate drainage
outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of Record is not guessing about how his drainage
design will work. Remove this note if not applicable.
22. Full Drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article
IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting.
23. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All
engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach
Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
24. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems
serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500
g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter
6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater
(CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
26. The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200
feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. While this proposed plan reflect this coverage in general,
it does not cover Building "I" completely in this phase. Please rectify this undercoverage.
In addition, Master Plan Sheet reflects the following note:
"Construction Type: IV
Unprotected - Sprinklered
Occupancy: Merchantile"
""
Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-065
Re: Boynton Village, New Site Plan (Revised) - 151 Review
May 24, 2005
Page 4
What this note means is unclear; no specific note appears on the proposed plan indicating that the
(all) mercantile buildings (or out lots) shall be sprinklered in accordance with the NFPC. Therefore,
sufficient coverage must be provided to meet the 1,500 gpm fire flow requirement for a four (4) hour
duration. The applicant shall demonstrate that this condition is being complied with.
27. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either
upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
28. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the
systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent
meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
29. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for
the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE,
Section 26-15.
30. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building(s),
and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207.
31. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that other utilities are
available and will be provided by the appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the
submitted plans.
32. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility
construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering
Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.I P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Boynton Village, New Site Plan (revised) - 1st review. doc
/
Coale, Sherie
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rivers, Jody
Wednesday, May 25, 20058:22 AM
Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
FW: Site Plan Review - Boynton Village
Please add the following:
Impact fee: 80 multi family units @$656.00 each = $52,480.00
-----Original Message-----
From: Rivers, Jody
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 5:26 PM
To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
Subject: FW: Site Plan Review - Boynton Village
-----Original Message-----
From: Rivers, Jody
Sent: Monday, May 23,20055:16 PM
To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
Subject: Site Plan Review - Boynton Village
Project No.:
NWSP 05-004
Recreation and Parks has the following comments:
1 . Royal Palms have large fronds that they can drop on a vehicle or pedestrian and cause substantial damage and
injury. They need a minimum of 20' diameter underneath them, that contains no roads or walks. In those locations
where there is enough clearance, suggest moving to a location where there is or replacing with less hazardous plant
material.
2. Change cypress mulch to eucalyptus or melaleuca
3. Need to provide note on each landscaping sheet that doesn't contain plant list noting where the plant list that
applies to that sheet is located.
4. Do not recommend using Tabebuia because of low wind tolerance.
5. Need to add the percentage of native plants on the L2 sheet of the Spine Road plan.
6. Irrigation coverage should be 110%.
NOTE: In reviewing the 1 st review comments, it was noted on the new plan that some of Forestry's comments from the
1 st review were not changed on the new plan.
JOc{kj RLvev-s
Parks Superintendent
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
(561) 742-6226
(561) 742-6233 (fax)
1
,/"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Ed Breese,
Principal Planner
DATE:
May 23, 2005
FILE: NWSP 05-004
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Boynton Village (revised)
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
1. Show all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs and Do Not Enter signage on site
plans.
TRC Memorandum
-..
Page 1 of2
/
Coale, Sherie
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, May 25,20052:21 PM
To: Breese, Ed
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: Boynton Village (revised) -TRC Review comments
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Ed Breese, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Boynton Village - (Revised)
New Site Plan - 1st Review
NWSP 05-004
Date:
May 24, 2005
Map of Boundary and Topographic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1 (previously submitted, not in this
current packet)
Existing Trees Management Plan
1. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. The tabular data
should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the
site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather
than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on
the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
2. I recommend that the applicant preserve, where possible, all existing desirable trees that are
located within the proposed landscape buffers. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I
Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
Landscape Plan
Sheets LA-l,2
3. All shade and palm trees on the Plant lists must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of
12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and
Standards manual). This includes the multi-trunk species. The height ofthe trees may be larger than
12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. 5.C. 2.p.l0]
4. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height and spread at time of
planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10]
Landscape Plan
Sheet LA-3
5/25/2005
TRC Memorandum
Page 2 of2
5. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should include a line indicating
where the height and spread of the plant will be measured at time planting and inspection.
Landscape Plan
Sheet LA-3 (con't)
6. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how the height of the
proposed landscape material will visually buffer the proposed buildings and parking lot facilities
from the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road rights-of-way.
Irrigation Plan-No Irrigation plan included in the submittal
7. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation
using non-portable water.
8. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration
for water conservation.
9. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.]
Kjh
5/25/2005
/
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 05-105
L~f Acronvms/Abbreviations:
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F .S. - Florida Statutes
LDR - Land Development Regulations
NEC - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code
TO: Ed Breese
Principal Planner
FROM: Timothy K. Large M/l)J
TRC Member/Buildi~ion
DATE: May 27,2005
SUBJECT: Project - Boynton Village
File No. - NWSP 05-004 - 2nd review
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings submitted for permits.
Buildino Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Laroe (561) 742-6352
1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional
comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001
FBC, Chapter 6.
3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC,
Chapter 3.
4 The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be
governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits
set forth in Table 500 of the 2001 FBC.
5 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and
exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that
clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per
2001 FBC, Table 600.
./6 Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with approved
opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
L- 7 General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2001 FBC, Sections
503.3, 503.3.2, and 503.3.3. Provide calculations verifying compliance with the above code
sections and 2001 FBC, Table 500.
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2005\Boynton Village ~d review
Page 1 of 6
~ 8 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind
loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the
provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind
Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the
state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
9 Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces
encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load
(pst) on the plans for the building design.
-=y 10 Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per
<" F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the
building plans at the time of permit application.
11 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and
perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request.
12 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction.
13 On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building
including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of each building.
14 Add to each building space that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a
labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to
each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
15 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of
travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and
the accessible entrance doors to each building. The installed symbol, required along the
path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance
doors to each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the
location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the
accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located
behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The
minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that
are part of a required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the
drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is
designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3 (Accessible Route) and 11-4.6
(Parking and Passenger Loading Zones). Please note that at time of permit review, the
applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the
accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along
the path of travel.
c
18 A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units covered under
the Fair Housing Act shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of the act.
Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed for each type of parking provided,
e.g. surface parking, parking structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205.
S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Village ~d review
Page 2 of 6
19 Vertical accessibility to the second floor/mezzanine area shall be required per the 2001
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-4.1.6 (Alterations).
20 Add to the residential buildings that are depicted on the site plan drawing a labeled symbol
that identifies the location of the proposed handicap accessible units. Add to the drawing
the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required units. Also,
state the code section that is applicable to the computations. Show and label the same
unitls on the applicable floor plan drawings. Compliance with regulations specified in the
Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and Construction
Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205).
21 At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the future
installation of grab bars as required by the Federal Fair Housing Act Title 24 CFR, Part
100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within the covered dwelling unit shall
comply.
22 Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the Federal Fair
Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which design specification ("A" or "B")
of the Fair Housing Act is being used. The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and
turning diameters shall be clearly shown on the plans.
23 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of
travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible units and the
recreational amenities that are provided for the project and other common area elements
located at the site. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the
location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed
along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a
drivellane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the
accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the Code is 36 inches). Add text
that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is
designed in compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act. Please note that
at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans
that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the
2001 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
24 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site
plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge
of the building/s. The leading edge of the building/s begins at the closest point of the
overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the
buildings on all sides.
25 Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the primary use of the
building. If the building is an expansion of an existing building, indicate with the footprint of
the new and existing building the primary use of the building.
26 Add to the floor plan drawing of the recreation building a breakdown of the floor area. The
area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, covered area outside, covered
area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated for the recreation building and other uses
S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Village 'f1d review
Page 3 of 6
located within the building. Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use
of all rooms and floor spaces.
27 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore,
be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available.
28 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from
a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of
permit application, F.S. 373.216.
29 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach
Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building
permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The
building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for
sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
30 At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of Title form. The
form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded
deed with legal descriptions, of each property that is being unified, is required to be
submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall
match.
31 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes
of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded
deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit
review.
32 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach
Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or
conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The
building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
33 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for
this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit
application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in
the development order and approved by the City Commission.
S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Village 'Z'd review Page 4 of 6
34 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the
time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the
particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the
Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of
application submittal.
35 Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area within the unit.
The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area of the unit, area of the balcony,
total area that is air-conditioned and, where applicable, total area of storage and garage space.
If the garage and storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and
identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be on each
floor and within the building.
36 Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building. Provide tabular area
data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall include the following areas and each
area shall be labeled on the applicable floor plan drawing:
a. Common area covered walkways;
b. Covered stairways;
c. Common area balconies;
d. Entrance area outside of a unit;
e. Storage areas (not part of a unit);
f. Garages (not part of a unit);
g. Elevator room;
h. Electrical room;
i. Mechanical room;
j. Trash room;
k. Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and
I. Any other area under roof.
(Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3)
37 Building "H" meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71 (7) and shall comply
with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2001 FBC, Sections 105.3.1 through
105.3.6.
The following information must be submitted at the time of permit application:
m. The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency prior to the
issuance of a building permit for the construction of a threshold building.
n. All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be submitted.
o. All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the architect or
engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best of the architect's or
engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the applicable fire safety
standards as determined by the local authority in accordance with this section and F.S.
Section 633.
38 According to 2001 FBC, Table 500, Building "0" exceeds the allowable building area
permitted by the code.
39 Identify Building "l" on the site plan and architectural plans. 2001 FBC, Section 104.2.
(Clearly identify all buildings on site and architectural plans.)
S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Village 2"d review
Page 5 of 6
40 A van accessible parking space is required in the parking structure per 2001 FBC, Section 11-
4.1.2(5)(b).
41 Accessible parking spaces shall be provided within the parking structure per the 2001 FBC,
Section 11-4.1.2(5)(a).
42 Sheet C13 shows the apartment building that is located northeast of Building "H" as a one-story
building with 16 units, yet the architectural sheets A 1.6 & A 1.7 show the building as multi-story
with more than 16 units. Clarify.
43 Indicate what amenities will be in the amenities building. Submit a floor plan and clearly label
the building on the plans. See Sheet A 1.6.
44 The site plan (Sheet C3) refers to Phase I of this parcel, yet Phase I is noted as "area not
included". Clearly show the parameters of construction under this site plan. Indicate the parcel
numbers being developed on the site data.
45 Sheet A 1.6 - Floor plan schematic reflects buildings as "H" and "L" yet the building is labeled
as "G". Label building correctly. 2001 FBC, Section 104.2. Also correct the key plan for same.
bf
S:\Deve/opment\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Boynton Village 2'd review
Page 6 of 6
.
'-" f)~-~~
1st REVIEWCOMMEN~ ~ /~
New Site Plan' "" A j /
CRrt1A/%t&, ~ --
Project name: Boynton Village ~ - J ,./
File number: NWSP 05-004 7 ,- 5j';J..l;i"';o S~
Reference: 1 slreview lans identified as a New Site Plan with an October 13 2004 and ZonIll
d k
......
Denartment ate stamn mar inQ'.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article
II, Section 10-26 (a).
Noted
2. Provide a dumpster enclosure per the LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J.2.b.
Dumpster enclosure added to plan
3. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster.
Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front
edge of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section Il.J.2.b.)
Dumpsters have been located in manner to allow for 60 foot turning radius.
Radius will at some locations will not meet the front of the pad exactly, though
will allow for perpendicular approach to dumpster.
4. Inadequate backing clearance is provided at the dumpsters for Building "F"
and "G". Reorient to provide a minimum of 60 ft. backing clearance.
Building 'F' and 'G' dumpsters have been relocated to the median islands on the
southeast and southwest comers of the buildings respectively and allow for
60 foot backing clearance.
5. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Building "L". How will Solid
Waste be handled?
There is no longer a Building 'L' on the most recent site plan. Dumpster
locations have been provided at all buildings.
6. Excessive backup is required for the dumpster serving Buildings "E", "H",
and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster location remains the same as previously submitted. Please clarify
'excessive backing' criteria
7. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Outparcel 7. How will Solid Waste
be handled?
Outlots are not 'site planned' at this time, illustration is for parking only. At time
of official submittal for site plan for out lots, dumpster locations will be
determined.
I PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic I I I
Comments:
8. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this site plan.
Traffic analysis was previously submitted
9. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
'"
"
t,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
2
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details.
Signing and marking plan added to site plan, including stop signs, stop bars, and
pavement markings
10. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These
improvements will be required as part of this project's construction.
Provide off-site improvement plans.
Off site improvement plans included, see attached roadway plans
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
11. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
General note added to plan
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Noted
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
Noted
14. This plan depicts primarily building construction and associated parking.
The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site
improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed.
Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be
planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support
building construction.
Noted
15. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter
4, Section 7.B.4.) No lighting is depicted for Outparcel 7. Provide
photometrics as part of your TRC plan.
Photometrics provided (On-Site Lighting) and site lighting is shown on the
landscape plans.
16. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light
....c "
'"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
3
DEPARTMENTS
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR,
Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b). Further coordination will occur
between consultants to analyze light pole locations due to landscape island
location requirements and possibly relocate the pole to be out of the
required landscape islands
17. The Pink Trumpet trees specified between Outparcels 5 and 6, on the north
side of the driveway, are too close to the edge of the roadway, posing a
vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as Solid Waste or delivery
trucks. Additionally three of these canopy trees are on top of proposed
storm sewer. Generally no trees are allowed within a drainage easement.
Further coordination between consultants will occur to adjust storm drainage lines
to allow adequate streetscape of drives.
18. Staff recommends the use of the cultivars High Rise or Cathedral for the
Live Oaks specified in the landscape islands in Outparcel 7. The landscape
plan has been revised to incorporate High Rise Live Oaks into the plan
palette.
19. Be consistent with the use of symbols for the various trees and shrubs. For
instance, on Sheet LA-2 the same symbol is used for both TH and SM.
Also two different symbols are used for TH. Please provide a legend for the
planting symbols. The plant callouts designate the landscape material vs. the
actual plant symbol.
20. Live Oaks are specified within small landscape squares in the larger parking
areas. Staff recommends not planting large canopy trees in areas too small
to support their future health and growth. The large canopy trees in the
diamond shaped landscape islands have been replaced with Washington
Palms.
21. The Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of
roadway - posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum
height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is required. Additionally use
of a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the
sidewalk, curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature. The proposed
spine road has a 4' bike lane on the outside of the roadway so the trees are
setback from the vehicles. A tree with 14' of clear trunk is cost prohibitive.
We will consider the use of root barriers within the landscape verge wherc
the trees occur.
22. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not
permitted. The Green Island Ficus has been removed from the plant list.
23. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) This notc will be
INCLUDE REJECT
"
jiI'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
4
I II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
revised.
24. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about
the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of
Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work.
Orainagc calculations have been performed that have been submitted to and meet
SFWMO criteria
25. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in
LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.
Engineer's certification on Sheet C16
26. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
Noted
27. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate
grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures.
Storm sewer diameters, inlet types, elevations, etc., have been added to PGO
plans
28. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Noted
UTILITIES
Comments:
29. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer
services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date
for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
See attached Exhibit' A'
30. No utility plan was included with this submittal; therefore the Utilities
Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However, the
proposed Site Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service
area, and is located where utility support is available. Weare providing
only a cursory review of the proposed site plan as submitted at this time.
Additional comments will be generated after a utility plan has been
submitted.
Utility plan submitted with pipe tvpe/lengthllocation/etc.
31. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and
landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may
'"
....
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIlage-SMU
05/04/05
5
DEPARTMENTS
determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with
utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within
utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so
that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in
the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives
public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
Utility easements shown on plan and landscape plan
32. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
Noted
33. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Illsurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire flow calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on I 1/8/04
and meet the eity requirements, See attached Exhibit 'B'
34. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants.
Fire hydrants are placed at locations to be within 200 feet of all points in a
building, with the exception of a small portion of Building' A', in the center.
35. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
Noted
36. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be
included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on
the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The
easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
the CODE, Section 26-33(a).
Utility easements shown on plan and landscape plan and will be dedicated at a
later date.
37. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Noted
38. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
INCLUDE REJECT
'"
, .,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIlage-SMU
05/04/05
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Noted
39. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be
DIP.
All water lines are DIP
40. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207.
Noted
41. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show
the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities
construction needed in order to service this project.
All offsite connections to existing utilities are indicated on the plan
42. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
Statement added to plan that dry utilities are provided by local provider (Sheet
ell)
43. Utili ty construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates);
they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Utility construction details are included in plans that adhere to Utility Department
standards.
FIRE
Comments:
44. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
Noted
45. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all buildings,
with a 200' radius of the hydrant. In addition, hydrants around the buildings have
been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the 16"
...,
",""
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS _Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
WM off Congress A venue. Fire flow tests have been performed on I 1/8/04 and
meet City requirements
46. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
Noted
47. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
Administrative Order dated May 15,2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
Noted
48. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
Noted
49. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
Noted
50. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
Noted
51. Any building over 30 feet in height will require a fire sprinkler system.
Noted
POLICE
Comments:
52. Provide direction of traffic and signage around rotaries.
Arrows have been added to plan to indicate traffic direction
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
53. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not /
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
Noted
54. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as V
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
Type of construction has been indicated on the site olan
55. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined 1/
"
,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3. V
Type of construction has been indicated on the site plan.
56. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of
construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the vi
building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001
FBC.
Noted
57. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. V
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Please see architectural plans
58. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with V
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
Noted
59. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand
the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and V
the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
Noted
60. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
Noted
61. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the ~
subject request.
So as not to clutter the site plan, this request will bc fulfilled at time of submission
of construction plans
62. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Noted
63. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in
each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall ,1/
height of each building.
Height and number of stories added to plan, all buildings with the exception of
building 'H', '1', and 'K' are one story. Building 'H' is 4 stories, 'J' and
'K' are 2 stories. Height varies on all buildings and is indicatcd on the
architect's elevation.
64. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and /
floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap
accessible entrance doors to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2,
11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
Accessible entrance location symbol placed on all buildings on site plan
",",c
,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
9
DEPARTMENTS
65. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The
building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable
building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual"
below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s
However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the
location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to each building. The
location of the doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance
door/ that are depicted on the site plan drawing.
Floor plan provided by the architect
66. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each
building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the
accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to
each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel,
not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The
location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a
drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan
the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an
accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a
required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the
drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route
and the route is designed in compliance with 200 I FBC, Section 11-4.3
(Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones).
Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified III the 200 I FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
Accessible routes added to site plan at all HIe locations.
67. Vertical accessibility to the second floor area shall be required per the 2001
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2,11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-
4.1.6 (Alterations).
Noted
68. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
Property line has been identified on site plan
69. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations",
submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each
property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the
buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the
property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all
sides.
Front, rear, and side setback line has been indicated on site plan. Distance
between buildings has been indicated.
70. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are
INCLUDE REJECT
tI
/
vi
'L-- ---
/
, .'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
10
DEPARTMENTS
readily available.
Noted
71. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
Noted
72. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City
of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Noted
73. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
Noted
74. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
Note has been added to Master Site Plan
75. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Noted
76. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
Noted
77. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LRD,
Chapter 4, Section 7 .BA) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your
TRC plan submittals.
Photometric Ian has been submitted. At this time, hotometrics have not been
INCLUDE
/
REJECT
...
;
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
11
I II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
performed considering proposed landscaping. This plan will be produced at
time when landscaping plan has been completed and accepted by the City.
78. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC, V
Section 11-4.29.2.
Noted
79. The parking garage shall comply with the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b) /
for handicap accessibility.
Noted
80. The parking garage shall be sprinklered or comply with F.S. 553.895(2). V
Noted
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
81. 128 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $83,968
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
N/A
82. Furthermore, the Department assumes that the developer is providing no
recreation amenities for this project. We recommend some type of outdoor
recreation amenity such as a playground, or open playfield that would
contribute to a better quality of life for the residents. Additionally,
considering the density of this and adjacent projects, the Department
recommends that the developer provide bikeways and bike racks as part of
the project.
Noted
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALlST
Comments:
83. Map of Boundary and Topoe:raphic Survey-Sheet 1 of 1
Existine: Trees Manae:ement Plan
The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site.
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] An Existing Trees Management Plan
will be prepared and submitted to the City once it is completc.
84. Landscape Plan
Sheet LA-2
All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the
"
. .,;'
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS _Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
12
I II
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off
the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This
includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than
12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.lO] So Noted
85. The landscape design should include installation of City signature trees
(Tibochina granulosa) at all of the project ingress/egress locations.
[Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.2 p. 10]
Tibouchina trees have been added to the project entries.
86. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height
and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5,
Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10] So noted
87. The note" All existing vegetation to be removed" should be taken off of this
sheet. Note has been removed
88. Landscape Plan
Sheet LA-3
The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a
line indicating where the height of the tree and the caliper @ dbh (4.5' off
the ground) will be measured at time of planting and inspection. So Noted
89. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should
include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be
measured at time planting and inspection. To be provided ay next
submittal.
90. Revise the note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or
shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on
three sides. Note has been rcvised accordingly.
91. The mulch note should be changed to say 3" Pine Bark Nuggets mulch to be
used on the Large and Small Tree planting detail. Mulch note has been
revised to be 3" Pine Bark Nuggets.
92. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how
the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the
proposed parking lot facility from the Congress A venue and Old Boynton
Road rights-of-way. Cross-Sections have been provided on the eivil
Engineering Plans.
93. Irrie:ation Plan-No Irrie:ation plan included in the submittal
The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low
volume water conservation using non-portable water. So Noted, an
,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
13
I II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
irrigation plan will be submitted to the eity at a future date.
94. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation. . So Noted, an irrigation
plan will be submitted to the City at a future date
Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root
ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] So Noted,
an irrigation plan will be submitted to the eity at a future date
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
95. The Boynton Village / Town Center site will be treated as one (1) master
planned project. Therefore, the master site plan (sheet C3) should include
graphics and data for all three projects (Cortina at Boynton Viliage, Town
Center, and Boynton Village) because all three projects are linked together
on the 106.6-acre parcel known as the "Winchester" property. Please revise
the master site plan to show graphical and tabular data for all three (3)
projects.
See 'Key Plan' on cover page to delineate parcel lines and zoning
96. Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department regarding the size,
type, and placement ofthe open-space / park space.
Noted
""
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
14
DEP ARTMENTS
INCLUDE
REJECT
97. The site plan tabular data (sheet C4) should accurately indicate the number of required parking spaces.
Please note that parking for mixed-use developments may utilize shared parking ratios, consistent with
those prepared by the Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering or land planning and
design organization. Supporting documentation form this standard book shall be presented with a
shared parking analysis (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.a.). Nonetheless, the required parking methodology
will be as follows:
Proposed Uses
Required
Parkin
102
120
561
50
833
Please com lete
Provided
Parkin
Net Difference
Please com lete
Please com lete
Please com lete
Please com lete
Please com lete
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicablc to this
particular project.
'"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton VilIage-SMU
05/04/05
15
DEP ARTMENTS
,
INCLUDE REJECT
98. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) should accurately indicate the number of required parking
spaces. The required parking for all three (3) projects is as follows:
Proposed Uses
Required
Parldn
117
120
944
10
1686
50
2,927
Please com lete
aces
Net Difference
Provided
Parkin
Please complete
Please com lete
Please complete
Please com lete
Please com lete
Please com lete
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this
particular project.
99. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Review Committee
meeting. The analysis must include all uses and intensities for the entire
106.6-acre property because this site plan is liked to the Boynton Town
Center (NWSP 05-003) and Cortina at Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001)
projects. The analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic
Division for concurrency purposes (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). The proposed
uses and intensities on the traffic study must be consistent with the proposed
uses and intensities itemized on the master plan (sheet C3).
Previously submitted
100. The master site plan (sheet C3) should indicate the total gross project
acreage and net buildable land area in acres and square feet (Chapter 4,
Section 7.E.1.). Staffrecommends itemizing each of the three (3) site plans
as an individual phase, regardless of zoning district. For example, Cortina
at Boynton Village could be labeled Phase One, Boynton Town Center
could be labeled as Phase Two, and Boynton Village could be labeled as
Phase Three. Please note that project phasing can easily be changed during
the permitting process so this staff recommendation should not be viewed as
an impediment to project build-out.
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is
not applicable to this particular project.
"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIlage-SMU
05/04/05
16
DEP ARTMENTS
101. The master site plan (sheet C3) shall clearly indicate the separate of the
SMU and C-3 zoning districts.
See 'Key Plan' on cover sheet and sheet C-3
102. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed
residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space,
vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and
ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies,
building height based on both 106.6 acres and on 38.14acres (Chapter 4,
Section 7.E. and Chapter 2, Section I1.H.a.7.).
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is
not applicable to this particular project.
103. The Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district requires 20% usable open space
for Multi-famliy dwelling units (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.4.). On the master
site plan (sheet C3) or on a separate plan, show the "usable open space" so
that staff can determine code compliance. If shown on the master site plan
(sheet C3), do not include the 24.4 acres of the Boynton Town Center
(NWSP 05-003) project because this property is zoned C-3. Please note
that Single-family attached developments require 30% usable open space.
This information must be consistent with the usable open space derived
from the master plan (LUAR 04-006). How will this relate to the single-
family attached development of Cortina at Boynton Village?
The developer respectfully disagrees that this request is required for the
submittal. It is not applicable to this particular project.
104. On the master site plan (sheet C3), the line thickness of the perimeter of the
property should be greater than the line thickness of the project phase line,
which in turn, should be a different line thickness than the edge of the
pavement for the Spine Road or the line thickness for the outparcels. All
outparcels are a component of the master site plan and therefore, their
information should be included as such. Please revise the master site plan
to show more order and varying line thickness to easily distinguish between
each graphical element.
Master site plan has been modified accordingly
105. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) is incorrect (regarding the
landscape requirement for interior parking areas). The plan indicates the
requirement is based on 20 square feet, however the code requires that each
separate landscape area shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet (Chapter
7.5, Section 5.G.).
Master site plan has been modified accordingly
106. On the master site plan (sheet C3), the tabular data and the graphic do not
match regarding the proposed amount of "retail" space. The tabular data
indicates 120,250 square feet whereas, when counted, the graphic data
shows 112,075 square feet. This discrepancy between the two (2) must be
rectified.
INCLUDE
REJ~C~
'...,
,.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton VilIage-SMU
05/04/05
17
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Master site plan has been modified to correct the discrepancy
107. The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate
pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Village) and the other
two (2) projects (Cortina and Town Center). Revise the plan (show signage,
striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are
maintained throughout the entire 106.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
9.T.).
Plan has been revised to show pedestrian connections throughout the specific
zoning district.
108. Once a master plan has been approved in a SMU district, the designated
parcels may be platted as a boundary plat for the purposes of a sale to a 3rd
party purchaser. Each parcel that is platted will be subject to technical site
plan approval as provided in the City's code. This boundary plat may be
processed simultaneously with the SMU master plan or a SMU master plan
modification (Chapter 2, Section I1.H.15.).
Noted
109. The site plan (sheet C4) requires more detail (i.e. setback lines, colonnades
and their supporting columns, sidewalk locations, traffic control markings)
pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B.
Additional information has been added, including setback lines, sidewalk
locations, and traffic control markings
110. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their
dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section
7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions,
exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
At the time of this submittal, this detail has not been determined. This
information will be provided prior to final site plan approval.
111. On the site plan (sheet C4), show the location(s) of the mailbox kiosk(s).
At the time of this submittal, this detail has not been determined. This
information will be provided prior to final site plan approval.
112. Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so,
show its location on the site plan (sheet C4).
Lift station is indicated on plan
113. Is a pool/recreation area proposed for the residential component of this
project?
Yes, please see site plan
114. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
County regarding school concurrency.
Previously submitted
115. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to
issuance of a building permit for the project.
Noted
116. The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and
rights-of-way are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works'
"
;#
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIlage-SMU
05/04/05
18
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
review and approval.
Noted
117. The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3
and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master
plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and
dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either an
unmarked or marked bicycle lanes.
Noted
118. On the site plan tabular data, indicate the proposed floor-area-ratio
(excluding the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.
Floor to area ratio has been modified
119. Condominium buildings, such as these, must be at least 100 feet in length
on all building sides (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.). This requirement would
apply to the east and north building sides.
Noted
120. On all elevations, indicate the dimension of the mean height level and the
peak of the roof for every building. Also, label each building with its
respective identification, orientation, and direction. For example, the
elevation sheet for Building "F" should indicate the following: Building
"F" front (north).
Please see architectural plans
121. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plan
for all building including each floor of the parking garage (Chapter 4,
Section 7.0.). Gross building area does not include balconies.
Please see architectural plans
122. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review
Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.).
Noted
123. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint
manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color
schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Also, provide color swatches and
awning samples.
Please see architectural plans
124. The intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap
the garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to
disguise the garage and create continuity III street-level activity by
maintaining interest for pedestrians and passIllg automobile traffic.
Principal structures that include parking garages shall be designed to blend
the architecture of the garage with the remainder of the structure or adjacent
buildings. Portions of freestanding parking garages that are not screened
with habitable space and are in view from the general public shall utilize
design measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall landscaping, etc. to
soften their impact (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.b.).
"
ell
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
19
DEPARTMENTS
Noted
125. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive
aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape
buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers
of plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful
groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in
a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or
decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum
of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip
spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four
(4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at
maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.D.). So Noted.
On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant material for
all three (3) projects combined. The three projects are separate submittals and
will be permitted and built separately so there shouldn't be a need to combine the
tabular data.
126. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between
the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall
provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade
trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover. Landscape quantities have been
checked and the plant list has been revised to separate the material into the
categories requiested.
127. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover.
Noted
128. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
Noted. An Existing Trees Management Plan will be submitted to the City once it
is completed.
129. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed
at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0).
Noted
INCLUDE
REJECT
....
"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
20
DEPARTMENTS
130. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of the project entrances (along U.S. 1
and Old Dixie Highway). The signature trees must have eight (8) feet of
clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2,
Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above
referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of
plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City
Forester / Environmentalist review and approval.
Signature Trees have been provided at the project entries.
13 1. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3)
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.C.2.).
Noted
132. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches III spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacIllg measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). So Noted
133. The landscape material and design proposed within the landscape buffer
along Congress Avenue should resemble the same buffer (along Congress
Avenue) approved in the Renaissance Commons project. In addition,
provide a cross-section of the Congress Avenue landscape buffer. We will
review the Renaissance Commons landscape plans once they arc made
available. The cross section of the Congress A venue buffer is in the eivil
Engineering drawings.
134. All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and
City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a
master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior
finish, and color(s) of all freestanding monument signs (Chapter 2, Section
5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, which would
include commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision
signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs,
directional signs, and all other signs as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land
Development Regulations.
Noted
135. All SIgn age IS subject to reVIew and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. Provide a detail of any
proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback
from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area,
dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In
this case, the property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-
INCLUDE REJECT
" "
'"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
21
DEPARTMENTS
I
INCLUDE REJECT
way line for the Spine Road.
Noted
136. Provide a detail of a typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The detail
of the typical freestanding outdoor lighting fixture should include the
overall height, exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum)
and color(s). The lighting fixture height, style, design, and illumination
level shall be compatible with the building design and height and shall
consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.).
To be submitted at a later date
137. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property
(Chapter 9, Section 10.F.2.).
Noted
138. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.)
Noted
139. Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety
purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be
subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.FA.). Please submit a photometric plan so
that staff can review the photometric levels (footcandles).
Photometric plan has been submitted
140. Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws
more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (Chapter
9, Section 10.F.5.).
Noted
141. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be
encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section 10.H.). Provide
details of said amenities.
To be provided at later date
142. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the
commercial/public spaces.
Bike rack locations to be determined at a later date
..
./'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
22
DEP ARTMENTS
r INCLUDE \ REJECT l
143. The Renaissance Commons project did not propose bike lanes within the
Spine Road right-of-way, however, it contained wide sidewalks throughout
its design. This project is neither proposing bike lanes within the Spine
Road right-of-way nor is the sidewalk (east of the right-of-way) wide
enough to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians. Revise the plans to
either include bike lanes into the right-of-way (which is the preferred
scenario) or widen the sidewalk to not less six (6) feet in width. Staff
recommends an eight (8) foot wide sidewalk running adjacent to the spine
road.
Spine Road plan has been modified per discussions with City staff.
144. Ensure that the front yard build-to line along Congress Avenue is no more
than 90 feet away, inclusive of the 25-foot wide landscape buffer.
Buildings along Congress A venue are placed at 90 feet from the edge of the
eongress Avenue ROW. The distance indicated is required to allow for two
rows of parking along the lot frontage, also with the minimum landscape buffer.
145. The building proposed within the outparcellocated at the northwest corner
of the SMU project should contain a more "substantial" building than the
other outparcels immediately to its south. The surrounding condominium
and townhouse buildings should not dwarf this building. This building
should anchor and be similar (in size) to the building proposed within the
southwest outparcel.
Noted
146. Staff recommends creating roundabouts or other traffic calming devices into
the design of each intersections of the Spine Road.
The spine roadway alignment does not allow for roundabouts
147. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature
feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path
on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village
projects.
8 foot wide multiuse path has been discussed with eity planners and engineer.
See revised roadway plan to note changes.
148. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the
main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast corner of
the greater project (at Old Boynton Road).
Noted
149. Improve the pedestrian link at the main street entrance between
the Congress A venue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in
front of the main street buildings (note next comment).
Additional sidewalks have been added along main street. Please see site plan
',", ,
,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
23
DEPARTMENTS
I
INCLUDE REJECT
150. Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance
(both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along
main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same
pedestrian system in front of these buildings.
Per conversations with the City, the buildings have been modified but not aligned
with the buildings to the east
151. The second rotary intersection (eastern one) should be the main focal point:
adjust what is needed to align the north-south links, bring the south side
building closer to align with the remainder of main street buildings (parking
distributed to front, side (west) and rear (south), add a building or outdoor
plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small lake
(north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary
intersection, and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could
also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east
of the rotary intersection.
Please see revised site plan for implemented changes
155. Locate aligned with the main rotary intersection (focal point) within the park
at the lake, or on a short peninsula into the lake, a stage feature with columns
or colonnade similar to that at Bryant Park in Lake Worth (sample pictures
can be provided) to accommodate public and private activities and events.
The Spine Road looks to point toward this feature (at both directions) before
bending toward the crossing between the main street and the open park.
Colonade in park will help connect Main Street and park. An expansion of
this park area, the public activity stage, and surrounding improvements
(whether passive or active) begins to create what staff may endorse as the
public contributions amenity as mentioned and expected by other early in this
process.
A park has been added at the end of the main entry street that allows for a view of
the lake.
156. If possible, staff recommends preserving specimen trees that are currently
located within the proposed landscape buffer along Congress Avenue.
Noted. An Existing Tress Management Plan will be preparcd and submitted to
the eity when complcte.
157. Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the
retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that
additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's
design.
Noted
158. Staff recommends installing a fountain into the design of the lake.
Noted, see landscape plans.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village NWSP 05-004\1ST REVIEW
.#
Exhibit 'A'
BOYNTON VILLAGE / TOWN CENTER
SCHEDULE FOR PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION
Site Plan Approval
C-3 Tract
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 16th, 2005
August 16t\ 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
Site Development Permitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 17th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
August 17th, 2005
August 17th, 2005
Obtain Site Dev. Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November 15\ 2005
March 15\ 2006
March 15\ 2006
March 15\ 2006
November 15\ 2005
Novernber 15\ 2005
Building (Vertical) Construction Permitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
January 15\ 2006 - May 15\ 2006
March 15\ 2006 - March 15\ 2007
March 15\ 2006
March 15\ 2006 - April 1 5\ 2006
January 15\ 2006 - May 15\ 2006
Obtain Building Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
April 15\ 2006 - August 15\ 2006
June 15\ 2006 - June 15\ 2007
'"',
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
June 15\ 2006
June 15\ 2006 - July 15\ 2006
April 15\ 2006 - August 15\ 2006
Sitework Construction
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November 15\ 2005 _ April 1 5\ 2006
March 15\ 2006 - March 15\ 2008
March 15\ 2006 _ September 15\ 2007
March 15\ 2006 _ September 15\ 2007
November 15\ 2005 - April 1 5\ 2006
November 15\ 2005 _ April 1 5\ 2006
Building (Vertical) Construction
C-3 April 1 5\ 2006 - June 15\ 2007
CW ater Meters needed November 151, 2007 - April 151, 2007)
SMU _ Parcell and 2 June 15\ 2006 - August 15\ 2008
CWater Meters needed January 15\ 2007 thro March 15\ 2008)
SMU _ Parcel 3 June 15\ 2006 - October 15\ 2007
CW ater Meters needed May 15\ 2007)
SMU _ Parcel 4 and 5 June 15\ 2006 - November 15\ 2007
CWater Meters needed May 15\ 2007 - June 15\ 2007)
SMU _ Parcel 6 April 1 5\ 2006 - June 15\ 2007
CW ater Meters needed November 151, 2007 - April 151, 2007)
11/22/2004 15:29
5613647382
BOYNTON BEACH FIRE
PAGE 01
0Hl0tT (t?Jl
~~ ~ead 'JUte ~~
FLOW TEST
Request Date: 11/8/04
Requested From: Chris Ralph
Company: Kimley-Horn & Associates
601 21st Street, Suite 400
Telephone Number: 772-794-4088
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Facsimile Number: 772-562-9689
Location: Boynton Town Center I Boynton Village
* DIAGRAM *
(Include direction, street names, hydrant locations, intersections and main sizes)
i ~ C
H#@ 0
N
N G
R
E
5
5
H#CD
A
V
E OLD BOYNTON ROAD
I r
Hydrant 1:
Hydrant 2:
Static Reading: 56 psi
Flow Reading: 46 psi ~ 1141 gpm
Residual Reading: 52 psi
Assign Date: 11/8/04
Tested By: FF II Aaron
Test Date: 11/18/04
Time Tested: 10:30 hrs
AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL: 3,747 gpm
11/22/04 MON 16:55 [TX/RX NO 67081
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner
FROM:
Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal
MAY 2 3 2005
DATE:
May 20,2005
SUBJECT: NWSP 05-003
NWSP 05-004
NWSP 05-020
NWSP 05-019
Boynton Town Center
Boynton Village
Boynton Village Parcel 3 Condos
Parcel 4&5
Traffic Congestion and population density is a concern in this area with the
mall and the Renaissance Commons project in close proximity. During the
holidays Congress Avenue is already difficult to travel for responding
emergency apparatus due to blocked lanes of traffic. This situation will get
worse as the density increases. Pursuit of traffic light pre-emption is essential
as a remedy. To meet the increased demand additional resources are
required such as personnel, apparatus, and equipment. It is imperative that
Fire Station #5 be expedited to insure adequate service delivery levels and
effective response times in the NE section of the City and as a back-up in the
NW section of the City. This situation also increases the potential for mass
causality events when large numbers of people occupy confined areas. This
is becoming more prevalent in many areas of the city.
Every added new commercial and multi-family occupancy increases the
annual fire prevention inspection workload as required by ordinance.
Although there have been a large number of these occupancies added in the
past several years, our inspection staff has decreased. This situation has
reached a point that may soon require changes in our inspection schedules
that may negatively affect our future success. The past and current service
level has prevented any significant fires in these occupancies for several
years.
New development projects involving multi-family or high-density commercial
projects should be approved contingent upon consideration of future
upgrades in emergency dispatch capability. These enhancements include
new technology related to CAD, GIS, and AVL capability, as well as adequate
staffing. All other factors (personnel, training, technology, fire station
placement, building design features, etc) depend on a reliable and efficient
method of getting the resources provided where they are needed in time to
mitigate the consequences of an emergency, regardless of the type of
response.
....
1 sf REVIEW COMMEN1~
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-004
Reference: 1 slreview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an October 13,2004 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article
II, Section 10-26 (a).
Noted
2. Provide a dumpster enclosure per the LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.2.b.
Dumpster enclosure added to plan
3. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster.
Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front
edge of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.2.b.)
Dumpsters have been located in manner to allow for 60 foot turning radius.
Radius will at somc locations will not meet the front of the pad exactly, though
will allow for perpendicular approach to dumpster.
4. Inadequate backing clearance is provided at the dumpsters for Building "F"
and "G". Reorient to provide a minimum of 60 ft. backing clearance.
Building 'F' and 'G' dumpsters have been relocated to the median islands on the
southeast and southwest corners of the buildings respectively and allow for
60 foot backing clearance.
5. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Building "L". How will Solid
Waste be handled?
There is no longer a Building 'L' on the most recent site plan. Dumpster
locations have been provided at all buildings.
6. Excessive backup is required for the dumpster serving Buildings "E", "H",
and "I". Relocate dumpster accordingly.
Dumpster location remains the same as previously submitted. Please clarify
'excessive backing' criteria
7. No dumpster or compactor is shown for Outparcel 7. How will Solid Waste
be handled?
Outlots are not 'site planned' at this time, illustration is for parking only. At time
of official submittal for site plan for outlots, dumpster locations will be
determined.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
8. A traffic analysis was provided in conjunction with the Master Site Plan
submittal. Deficiencies exist in this analysis that must be addressed prior to
approval of this site plan.
Traffic analysis was previously submitted
9. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the
"
\.,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton VilIage-SMU
05/04/05
2
I II
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
"Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include
a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone".
See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details.
Signing and marking plan added to site plan, including stop signs, stop bars, and
pavement markings
10. Off-site improvements are indicated on the plans as "By Others." These
improvements will be required as part of this project's construction.
Provide off-site improvement plans.
Off site improvement plans included, see attached roadway plans
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
11. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
General note added to plan
12. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Noted
13. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
Noted
14. This plan depicts primarily building construction and associated parking.
The plan appears to depict infrastructure construction and off-site
improvements without identifying how or when they will be constructed.
Major driveways, drainage, utilities and off-site improvements shall be
planned and phased so that all improvements are in-place to support
building construction.
Noted
15. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter
4, Section 7.BA.) No lighting is depicted for Outparcel 7. Provide
photometrics as part of your TRC plan.
Photometrics provided (On-Site Lighting) and site lighting is shown on the
landscape plans.
16. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light
"
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
3
DEPARTMENTS
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR,
Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b). Further coordination will occur
between consultants to analyze light pole locations due to landscape island
location requirements and possibly relocate the pole to be out of the
required landscape islands
17. The Pink Trumpet trees specified between Outparcels 5 and 6, on the north
side of the driveway, are too close to the edge of the roadway, posing a
vertical conflict with high profile vehicles such as Solid Waste or delivery
trucks. Additionally three of these canopy trees are on top of proposed
storm sewer. Generally no trees are allowed within a drainage easement.
Further coordination between consultants will occur to adjust storm drainage lines
to allow adequate streetscape of drives.
18. Staff recommends the use of the cultivars High Rise or Cathedral for the
Live Oaks specified in the landscape islands in Outparcel 7. The landscape
plan has been revised to incorporate High Rise Live Oaks into the plan
palette.
19. Be consistent with the use of symbols for the various trees and shrubs. For
instance, on Sheet LA-2 the same symbol is used for both TH and SM.
Also two different symbols are used for TH. Please provide a legend for the
planting symbols. The plant callouts designate the landscape material vs. the
actual plant symbol.
20. Live Oaks are specified within small landscape squares in the larger parking
areas. Staff recommends not planting large canopy trees in areas too small
to support their future health and growth. The large canopy trees in the
diamond shaped landscape islands have been replaced with Washington
Palms.
21. The Live Oaks specified along the spine road are too close to the edge of
roadway - posing a vertical conflict with high profile vehicles. A minimum
height of 14 feet to the bottom of the canopy is required. Additionally use
of a root barrier is strongly recommended to prevent heaving of the
sidewalk, curb & gutter, and roadway as the trees mature. The proposed
spine road has a 4' bike lane on the outside of the roadway so the trees are
setback from the vehicles. A tree with 14' of clear trunk is cost prohibitive.
We will consider the use of root barriers within the landscape verge where
the trees occur.
22. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not
permitted. The Green Island Ficus has been removed from the plant list.
23. Correct the note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) This note will be
INCLUDE REJECT
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
revised.
24. Note 11, Sheet C-4, states that Kimley-Horn is making assumptions about
the ultimate drainage outfall. The City sincerely hopes that the Engineer of
Record is not guessing about how his drainage design will work.
Drainage calculations have been performed that have been submitted to and meet
SFWMD criteria
25. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in
LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.
Engineer's certification on Sheet Cl6
26. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
Noted
27. Specify storm sewer diameters, inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate
grate, rim and invert elevations for all structures.
Storm sewer diameters, inlet types, elevations, etc., have been added to PGD
plans
28. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Noted
UTILITIES
Comments:
29. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer
services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date
for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
See attached Exhibit' A'
30. No utility plan was included with this submittal; therefore the Utilities
Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However, the
proposed Site Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service
area, and is located where utility support is available. Weare providing
only a cursory review of the proposed site plan as submitted at this time.
Additional comments will be generated after a utility plan has been
submitted.
Utility plan submitted with pipe type/length/location/etc.
31. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and
landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may
'"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIlage-SMU
05/04/05
5
DEPARTMENTS
determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with
utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within
utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so
that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in
the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives
public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
Utility easements shown on plan and landscape plan
32. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
Noted
33. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Illsurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire now calculations were performed by Boynton Beach Fire Rescue on 11/8/04
and meet the City requirements, See attached Exhibit 'B'
34. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants.
Fire hydrants are placed at locations to be within 200 feet of all points in a
building, with the exception of a small portion of Building' A', in the center.
35. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
Noted
36. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be
included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on
the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The
easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
the CODE, Section 26-33(a).
Utility easements shown on plan and landscape plan and will be dedicated at a
later date.
37. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Noted
38. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
INCLUDE
REJECT
"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton VilIage-SMU
05/04/05
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Noted
39. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be
DIP.
All water lines are DIP
40. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building(s), and the fire sprinkler line if there are any, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207.
Noted
41. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show
the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities
construction needed in order to service this project.
All offsite connections to existing utilities are indicated on the plan
42. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that other utilities are available and will be provided by the
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
Statement added to plan that dry utilities are provided by local provider (Sheet
e I I)
43. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates);
they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Utility construction details are included in plans that adhere to Utility Department
standards.
FIRE
Comments:
44. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
Noted
45. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
Fire hydrants have been placed at locations that allow coverage of all buildings,
with a 200' radius of the hydrant. In addition, hydrants around the buildings have
been placed within 300' of each other. Two fire hydrants tested were off the 16"
....
" '"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIIage-SMU
05/04/05
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
WM off Congress A venue. Fire flow tests have been performed on 11/8/04 and
meet City requirements
46. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
Noted
47. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
Administrative Order dated May 15,2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
Noted
48. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
Noted
49. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
Noted
50. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
Noted
51. Any building over 30 feet in height will require a fire sprinkler system.
Noted
POLICE
Comments:
52. Provide direction of traffic and signage around rotaries.
Arrows have been added to plan to indicate traffic direction
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
53. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
Noted
54. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
Type of construction has been indicated on the site plan
55. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
"",,
./
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIlage-SMU
05/04/05
8
. II
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
Type of construction has been indicated on the site plan.
56. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of
construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the
building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 500 of the 2001
FBC.
Noted
57. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Please see architectural plans
58. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with
approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2.
Noted
59. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand
the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
Noted
60. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the
loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
Noted
61. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
So as not to clutter the site plan, this request will be fulfilled at time of submission
of construction plans
62. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Noted
63. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in
each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall
height of each building.
Height and number of stories added to plan, all buildings with the exception of
building 'H', 'J', and 'K' are one story. Building 'H' is 4 stories, 'J' and
'K' are 2 stories. Height varies on all buildings and is indicated on the
architect's elevation.
64. Add to each building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and
floor plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap
accessible entrance doors to each building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2,
11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
Accessible entrance location symbol placed on all buildings on site plan
...
, ;'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton VilIage-SMU
05/04/05
9
DEPARTMENTS
65. As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The
building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable
building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual"
below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet/s
However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the
location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to each building. The
location of the doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance
door/ that are depicted on the site plan drawing.
Floor plan provided by the architect
66. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each
building. The installed symbol, required along the path, shall start at the
accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to
each building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel,
not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings. The
location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a
drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan
the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum clear width of an
accessible route shall be 36 inches, except at curb ramps that are part of a
required means of egress shall not be less than 44 inches). Add text to the
drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route
and the route is designed in compliance with 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.3
(Accessible Route) and 11-4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones).
Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed
documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in
compliance with the regulations specified III the 2001 FBC. This
documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade
elevations along the path of travel.
Accessible routes added to site plan at all H/e locations.
67. Vertical accessibility to the second floor area shall be required per the 200 I
FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4-1.3(5) (New Construction) and Section 11-
4.1.6 (Alterations).
Noted
68. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
Property line has been identified on site plan
69. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations",
submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each
property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the
buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the
property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all
sides.
Front, rear, and side setback line has been indicated on site plan. Distance
between buildings has been indicated.
70. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are
INCLUDE REJECT
...
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
readily available.
Noted
71. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
Noted
72. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City
of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Noted
73. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
Noted
74. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
Note has been added to Master Site Plan
75. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Noted
76. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
Noted
77. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LRD,
Chapter 4, Section 7 .B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your
TRC plan submittals.
Photometric plan has been submitted. At this time, ohotometrics have not been
..
,F
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
11
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
performed considering proposed landscaping. This plan will be produced at
time when landscaping plan has been completed and accepted by the City.
78. Detectable warnings on walking surfaces shall comply with 2001 FBC,
Section 11-4.29.2.
Noted
79. The parking garage shall comply with the 2001 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5)(b)
for handicap accessibility.
Noted
80. The parking garage shall be sprinklered or comply with F.S. 553.895(2).
Noted
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
81. 128 multi-family units @ 656 ea = $83,968
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
N/A
82. Furthermore, the Department assumes that the developer is providing no
recreation amenities for this project. We recommend some type of outdoor
recreation amenity such as a playground, or open playfield that would
contribute to a better quality of life for the residents. Additionally,
considering the density of this and adjacent projects, the Department
recommends that the developer provide bikeways and bike racks as part of
the project.
Noted
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
83. Map of Boundarv and Topoeraphic Survev-Sheet 1 of 1
Existine Trees Manaeement Plan
The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site.
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] An Existing Trees Management Plan
will be prepared and submitted to the eity once it is complete.
84. Landscape Plan
Sheet LA-2
All shade and palm trees on the Plant list (C-3) must be listed in the
....
\", ,Jf
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton VilIage-SMU
05/04/05
12
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
specifications as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off
the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). This
includes the multi-trunk species. The height of the trees may be larger than
12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.p.l0] So Noted
85. The landscape design should include installation of City signature trees
(Tibochina granulosa) at all ofthe project ingress/egress locations.
[Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.2 p. 10]
Tibouchina trees have been added to the project entries.
86. All of the shrubs, hedges and groundcover plants should include the height
and spread at time of planting. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5,
Article II Sec. 5.CA p. 10] So noted
87. The note "All existing vegetation to be removed" should be taken off of this
sheet. Note has been removed
88. Landscape Plan
Sheet LA-3
The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a
line indicating where the height of the tree and the caliper @ dbh (4.5' off
the ground) will be measured at time of planting and inspection. So Noted
89. The details section for the Shrub and Groundcover Planting Detail should
include a line indicating where the height and spread of the plant will be
measured at time planting and inspection. To be provided ay next
submittal.
90. Revise the note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or
shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on
three sides. Note has been revised accordingly.
91. The mulch note should be changed to say 3" Pine Bark Nuggets mulch to be
used on the Large and Small Tree planting detail. Mulch note has been
revised to be 3" Pine Bark Nuggets.
92. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail indicating how
the height of the proposed landscape material will visually buffer the
proposed parking lot facility from the Congress A venue and Old Boynton
Road rights-of-way. eross-Sections have been provided on the eivil
Engineering Plans.
93. Irrieation Plan-No Irrieation plan included in the submittal
The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low
volume water conservation using non-portable water. So Noted, an
"
,",
J"-
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
irrigation plan will be submitted to the City at a future date.
94. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation. . So Noted, an irrigation
plan will be submitted to the eity at a future date
Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root
ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] So Noted,
an irrigation plan will be submitted to the eity at a future date
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
95. The Boynton Village / Town Center site will be treated as one (1) master
planned project. Therefore, the master site plan (sheet C3) should include
graphics and data for all three projects (Cortina at Boynton Village, Town
Center, and Boynton Village) because all three projects are linked together
on the 1 06.6-acre parcel known as the "Winchester" property. Please revise
the master site plan to show graphical and tabular data for all three (3)
projects.
See' Key Plan' on cover page to delineate parcel lines and zoning
96. Coordinate with the Parks and Recreation Department regarding the size,
type, and placement of the open-space / park space.
Noted
...
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
14
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
97. The site plan tabular data (sheet C4) should accurately indicate the number ofrequired parking spaces.
Please note that parking for mixed-use developments may utilize shared parking ratios, consistent with
those prepared by the Urban Land Institute or an equivalent traffic engineering or land planning and
design organization. Supporting documentation form this standard book shall be presented with a
shared parking analysis (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.a.). Nonetheless, the required parking methodology
will be as follows:
Proposed Uses
Required
Parkin
102
120
561
50
833
Please com lete
Provided
Parkin
Net Difference
Please com lete
Please com lete
Please complete
Please com lete
Please com lete
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this
particular project.
"",,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS _Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
15
DEP ARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
98. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) should accurately indicate the number of required parking
spaces. The required parking for all three (3) projects is as follows:
Proposed Uses
Required
Parkin
117
120
944
10
1686
50
2,927
Please com lete
Provided
Parkin
78 One-bedroom units
Net Difference
Please complete
Please com lete
Please complete
Please complete
Please com lete
Please com lete
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is not applicable to this
particular project.
99. Submit a traffic impact analysis prior to the Technical Review Committee
meeting. The analysis must include all uses and intensities for the entire
106.6-acre property because this site plan is liked to the Boynton Town
Center (NWSP 05-003) and Cortina at Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001)
projects. The analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic
Division for concurrency purposes (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). The proposed
uses and intensities on the traffic study must be consistent with the proposed
uses and intensities itemized on the master plan (sheet C3).
Previously submitted
100. The master site plan (sheet C3) should indicate the total gross project
acreage and net buildable land area in acres and square feet (Chapter 4,
Section 7.E.1.). Staff recommends itemizing each of the three (3) site plans
as an individual phase, regardless of zoning district. For example, Cortina
at Boynton Village could be labeled Phase One, Boynton Town Center
could be labeled as Phase Two, and Boynton Village could be labeled as
Phase Three. Please note that project phasing can easily be changed during
the permitting process so this staff recommendation should not be viewed as
an impediment to project build-out.
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is
not applicable to this particular project.
"'"
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS _Boynton ViIIage-SMU
05/04/05
16
INCLUDE REJECT
DEPARTMENTS
101. The master site plan (sheet C3) shall clearly indicate the separate of the
SMU and C-3 zoning districts.
See' Key Plan' on cover sheet and sheet C-3
102. The master site plan (sheet C3) should itemize the total number of proposed
residential units, non-residential floor area, landscaped open space,
vehicular use areas, other paved areas, building (lot) coverage, number and
ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces, water bodies,
building height based on both 106.6 acres and on 38.14acres (Chapter 4,
Section 7.E. and Chapter 2, Section II.H.a.7.).
The developer respectfully disagrees with this requirement for the submittal. It is
not applicable to this particular project.
103. The Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district requires 20% usable open space
for Multi-famliy dwelling units (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.4.). On the master
site plan (sheet C3) or on a separate plan, show the "usable open space" so
that staff can determine code compliance. If shown on the master site plan
(sheet C3), do not include the 24.4 acres of the Boynton Town Center
(NWSP 05-003) project because this property is zoned C-3. Please note
that Single-family attached developments require 30% usable open space.
This information must be consistent with the usable open space derived
from the master plan (LUAR 04-006). How will this relate to the single-
family attached development of Cortina at Boynton Village?
The developer respectfully disagrees that this request is required for the
submittal. It is not applicable to this particular project.
104. On the master site plan (sheet C3), the line thickness of the perimeter of the
property should be greater than the line thickness of the project phase line,
which in turn, should be a different line thickness than the edge of the
pavement for the Spine Road or the line thickness for the outparcels. All
outparceIs are a component of the master site plan and therefore, their
information should be included as such. Please revise the master site plan
to show more order and varying line thickness to easily distinguish between
each graphical element.
Master site plan has been modified accordingly
105. The master site plan tabular data (sheet C3) is incorrect (regarding the
landscape requirement for interior parking areas). The plan indicates the
requirement is based on 20 square feet, however the code requires that each
separate landscape area shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet (Chapter
7.5, Section 5.G.).
Master site plan has been modified accordingly
106. On the master site plan (sheet C3), the tabular data and the graphic do not
match regarding the proposed amount of "retail" space. The tabular data
indicates 120,250 square feet whereas, when counted, the graphic data
shows 112,075 square feet. This discrepancy between the two (2) must be
rectified.
~
/
~
/
/
/
"
-< .J
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
17
I II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Master site plan has been modified to correct the discrepancy
107. The master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 and C4) fail to show adequate
pedestrian connections between this project (Boynton Village) and the other /
two (2) projects (Cortina and Town Center). Revise the plan (show signage,
striping, pedestrian refuge islands) to ensure pedestrian connections are
maintained throughout the entire 106.6 acres (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
9.T.).
Plan has been revised to show pedestrian connections throughout the specific
zoning district.
108. Once a master plan has been approved in a SMU district, the designated /
parcels may be platted as a boundary plat for the purposes of a sale to a 3rd
party purchaser. Each parcel that is platted will be subject to technical site
plan approval as provided in the City's code. This boundary plat may be
processed simultaneously with the SMU master plan or a SMU master plan
modification (Chapter 2, Section 11.H.15.).
Noted
109. The site plan (sheet C4) requires more detail (i.e. setback lines, colonnades
and their supporting columns, sidewalk locations, traffic control markings) \ /
pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 7.B.
Additional information has been added, including setback lines, sidewalk
locations, and traffic control markings
110. The site plan should indicate proposed fences and walls, including their
dimensions, setbacks, material, and color(s) pursuant to Chapter 4, Section
7.B.3. Provide a detail of any walls or fences, including their dimensions,
exterior finish, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
At the time of this submittal, this detail has not been determined. This
information will be provided prior to final site plan approval.
111. On the site plan (sheet C4), show the location(s) of the mailbox kiosk(s).
At the time of this submittal, this detail has not been determined. This
information will be provided prior to final site plan approval.
112. Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so,
show its location on the site plan (sheet C4).
Lift station is indicated on plan
113. Is a pool/recreation area proposed for the residential component of this
project?
Yes, please see site plan
114. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach
County regarding school concurrency.
Previously submitted
115. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to
issuance of a building permit for the project.
Noted
116. The dimensions of the roadway (pavement), drive aisles, back-up areas, and
rights-of-way are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works'
'"
,..
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
18
..
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
review and approval.
Noted
117. The Spine Road, as shown on the master site plan and site plan (sheet C3 v/
and C5), should directly correspond to Spine Road shown on the master
plan (from LUAR 04-006), in terms of its configuration, location, and
dimensions. Please design the roadway so that it can accommodate either an
unmarked or marked bicycle lanes.
Noted /
118. On the site plan tabular data, indicate the proposed floor-area-ratio 7
(excluding the garages) to ensure compliance with Chapter 2, Section 5.HA.
Floor to area ratio has been modified
119. Condominium buildings, such as these, must be at least 100 feet in length /
on all building sides (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.). This requirement would
apply to the east and north building sides.
Noted
120. On all elevations, indicate the dimension of the mean height level and the
peak of the roof for every building. Also, label each building with its /
respective identification, orientation, and direction. For example, the
elevation sheet for Building "F" should indicate the following: Building
"F" front (north).
Please see architectural plans
121. Provide a scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plan
for all building including each floor of the parking garage (Chapter 4, I
Section 7.D.). Gross building area does not include balconies.
Please see architectural plans
122. Include a color rendering of all elevations at the Technical Review 1'/
Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.).
Noted
123. All elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finishes, roof material, paint /
manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color
schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Also, provide color swatches and
awning samples.
Please sec architectural plans
124. The intent of the SMU zoning district, where possible, is to border or wrap /
the garage in storefronts and other permitted habitable floor area so as to
disguise the garage and create continuity in street-level activity by
maintaining interest for pedestrians and passing automobile traffic.
Principal structures that include parking garages shall be designed to blend
the architecture of the garage with the remainder of the structure or adjacent
buildings. Portions of freestanding parking garages that are not screened
with habitable space and are in view from the general public shall utilize
design measures such as shutters, planter boxes, tall landscaping, etc. to
soften their impact (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.7.b.).
'"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
19
DEPARTMENTS
Noted
125. The intent of the landscape code is to screen vehicular use areas (drive
aisles and parking lots) from roadways and abutting properties. Landscape
buffers adjacent roadways (internal and external) should contain two layers
of plant material. The first layer shall be a combination of colorful
groundcover plants and a minimum of two colorful shrub species planted in
a continuous row. The next layer shall consist of a continuous hedge or
decorative site wall. The continuous hedge (2nd layer) shall be a minimum
of 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread and planted with tip-to-tip
spacing immediately after planting. This hedge shall be maintained at four
(4) feet. Also, within these buffers, the proposed trees shall be spaced at
maximum 30 feet apart from each other (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.D.). So Noted.
On a separate sheet, provide tabular data regarding the proposed plant material for
all three (3) projects combined. The three projects are separate submittals and
will be permitted and built separately so there shouldn't be a need to combine the
tabular data.
126. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between
the tabular data and the graphic illustration. The landscape plan shall
provide total plant material quantities for the following categories: Shade
trees, palm trees, Shrubs / Groundcover. Landscape quantities have been
checked and the plant list has been revised to separate the material into the
categories requiested.
127. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: Shade
trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover.
Noted
128. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
Noted. An Existing Trees Management Plan will be submitted to the City once it
is completed.
129. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed
at the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0).
Noted
INCLUDE REJECT
t/
v
/
/
/
""
.,1'
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS _Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
20
DEPARTMENTS
130. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of the project entrances (along U.S. 1
and Old Dixie Highway). The signature trees must have eight (8) feet of
clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2,
Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above
referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of
plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City
Forester / Environmentalist review and approval.
Signature Trees have been provided at the project entries.
13 I. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3)
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.C.2.).
Noted
132. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches III spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacIllg measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). So Noted
133. The landscape material and design proposed within the landscape buffer
along Congress Avenue should resemble the same buffer (along Congress
Avenue) approved in the Renaissance Commons project. In addition,
provide a cross-section of the Congress A venue landscape buffer. We will
review the Renaissance Commons landscape plans once they arc made
available. The cross section of the eongress Avenue buffer is in the eivil
Engineering drawings.
134. All proposed signage is subject to the Planning & Development Board and
City Commission review and approval. Staff recommends that you submit a
master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior
finish, and color(s) of all freestanding monument signs (Chapter 2, Section
5.H.9.). The sign program would address all types of signs, which would
include commercial wall signs, identification signs, residential subdivision
signs, freestanding monument signs, canopy signs, way-finding signs,
directional signs, and all other signs as regulated by Chapter 21 of the Land
Development Regulations.
Noted
135. All sIgnage IS subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. Provide a detail of any
proposed outdoor freestanding monument signs and indicate their setback
from the property line (minimum 10 feet), and include the sign area,
dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In
this case, the property line would be measured from the edge of the right-of-
INCLUDE REJECT
/
.
7
/
/
/
I
...
;f'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton Village-SMU
05/04/05
21
DEPARTMENTS
way line for the Spine Road.
Noted
136. Provide a detail of a typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The detail
of the typical freestanding outdoor lighting fixture should include the
overall height, exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum)
and color(s). The lighting fixture height, style, design, and illumination
level shall be compatible with the building design and height and shall
consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.).
INCLUDE REJECT
/
To be submitted at a later date
137. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property /
(Chapter 9, Section 10.F.2.).
Noted
138. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.)
Noted
139. Lighting may be used to illuminate a building and its grounds for safety
purposes and to enhance its beauty. However, the visual effect shall be
subtle (Chapter 9, Section 10.FA.). Please submit a photometric plan so
that staff can review the photometric levels (footcandles).
Photometric plan has been submitted
140. Lighting shall not be used as a form of advertising in a manner that draws
more attention to the building or grounds at night than in the day (Chapter
9, Section 10.F.5.).
Noted
141. Sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises an benches shall be
encouraged within the site design (Chapter 9, Section IO.H.). Provide
details of said amenities.
/
/
/'
/
To be provided at later date
142. Include covered bike racks at intermittent locations throughout the .j
commercial/public spaces.
Bike rack locations to be determined at a later date
"
, ,I'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton ViIIage-SMU
05/04/05
22
DEP ARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
143. The Renaissance Commons project did not propose bike lanes within the
Spine Road right-of-way, however, it contained wide sidewalks throughout
its design. This project is neither proposing bike lanes within the Spine
Road right-of-way nor is the sidewalk (east of the right-of-way) wide
enough to accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians. Revise the plans to /
either include bike lanes into the right-of-way (which is the preferred
scenario) or widen the sidewalk to not less six (6) feet in width. Staff
recommends an eight (8) foot wide sidewalk running adjacent to the spine
road.
Spine Road plan has been modified per discussions with City staff.
144. Ensure that the front yard build-to line along Congress Avenue is no more
than 90 feet away, inclusive of the 25-foot wide landscape buffer.
Buildings along Congress Avenue are placed at 90 feet from the edge of the
Congress Avenue ROW. The distance indicated is required to allow for two
rows of parking along the lot frontage, also with the minimum landscape buffer.
145. The building proposed within the outparcellocated at the northwest corner
of the SMU project should contain a more "substantial" building than the
other outparcels immediately to its south. The surrounding condominium
and townhouse buildings should not dwarf this building. This building
should anchor and be similar (in size) to the building proposed within the
southwest outparcel.
Noted
146. Staff recommends creating roundabouts or other traffic calming devices into
the design of each intersections of the Spine Road.
The spine roadway alignment does not allow for roundabouts
147. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature
feature; please consider. Also, please include an 8-foot wide multi-use path
on this bridge to connect the greenway paths of the Renaissance and Village
projects.
8 foot wide multiuse path has been discussed with eity planners and engineer.
See revised roadway plan to note changes.
148. Staff recommends adding / repeating signature features at both sides of the
main street entrance (along Congress Avenue) and at the northeast corner of
the greater project (at Old Boynton Road).
Noted
149. Improve the pedestrian link at the maIll street entrance between
the Congress A venue sidewalk and the pedestrian system that should be in
front of the main street buildings (note next comment).
Additional sidewalks have been added along main street. Please see site plan
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
."
"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS_Boynton VilIage-SMU
05/04/05
23
I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
150. Staff recommends moving the first buildings at the main street entrance /
(both south and north sides), to align with the next series of buildings along
main street, and also reduce parking to one row, and extend the same
pedestrian system in front of these buildings.
Per conversations with the City, the buildings have been modified but not aligned
with the buildings to the east
151. The second rotary intersection (eastern one) should be the main focal point:
adjust what is needed to align the north-south links, bring the south side /
building closer to align with the remainder of main street buildings (parking
distributed to front, side (west) and rear (south), add a building or outdoor
plaza (i.e. restaurant or space with outdoor seating facing the small lake
(north), and public space (east)) close to the northeast side of this rotary
intersection, and provide for trolley drop-off at this area. This segment could
also be enhanced with a colonnade repeated on both sides of the street, east
of the rotary intersection.
Please see revised site plan for implemented changes
155. Locate aligned with the main rotary intersection (focal point) within the park /
at the lake, or on a short peninsula into the lake, a stage feature with columns
or colonnade similar to that at Bryant Park in Lake Worth (sample pictures
can be provided) to accommodate public and private activities and events.
The Spine Road looks to point toward this feature (at both directions) before
bending toward the crossing between the main street and the open park.
Colonade in park will help connect Main Street and park. An expansion of
this park area, the public activity stage, and surrounding improvements
(whether passive or active) begins to create what staff may endorse as the
public contributions amenity as mentioned and expected by other early in this
process.
A park has been added at the end of the main entry street that allows for a view of
the lake.
156. If possible, staff recommends preserving specimen trees that are currently /
located within the proposed landscape buffer along Congress Avenue.
Noted. An Existing Tress Management Plan will be prepared and submitted to
the City when complete.
157. Staff recommends reducing the number of excess parking spaces (for the /
retail and restaurant calculations consistent with code requirements) so that
additional green / pervious space can be incorporated into the project's
design.
Noted ./
158. Staff recommends installing a fountain into the design of the lake. V
Noted, see landscape plans.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village NWSP 05-004\1ST REVIEW
,#
Exhibit 'A'
BOYNTON VILLAGE / TOWN CENTER
SCHEDULE FOR PERMITTING AND CONSTRUCTION
Site Plan Approval
C-3 Tract
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
August 16th, 2005
Site Development Permitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
August 17th, 2005
Decernber 15t\ 2005
December 15th, 2005
December 15th, 2005
August 17th, 2005
August 17t\ 2005
Obtain Site Dev. Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November 1 S\ 2005
March 1 S\ 2006
March 1 S\ 2006
March 1 S\ 2006
November lS\ 2005
November lS\ 2005
Building (Vertical) Construction Permitting
Application -
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
January 1 S\ 2006 - May 1 S\ 2006
March 1 S\ 2006 - March 1 S\ 2007
March 1 S\ 2006
March 1 S\ 2006 - April 1 S\ 2006
January 1 S\ 2006 - May 1 S\ 2006
Obtain Building Permits -
C-3
SMU - Parcel 1 and 2
April 1 S\ 2006 - August 1 S\ 2006
June 1 S\ 2006 - June 1 S\ 2007
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
June 1 sr, 2006
June 1 sr, 2006 - July 1 sr, 2006
April 1 sr, 2006 - August 1 sr, 2006
Sitework Construction
C-3
SMU - Parcell and 2
SMU - Parcel 3
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5
SMU - Parcel 6
Lake Parcel and Spine Road
November 1 sr, 2005 - April 1 sr, 2006
March 1 sr, 2006 - March 1 sr, 2008
March 1 sr, 2006 - September 1 sr, 2007
March 1 sr, 2006 - Septernber 1 sr, 2007
November 1 sr, 2005 - April 1 sr, 2006
N overnber 1 sr, 2005 - April 1 sr, 2006
Building (Vertical) Construction
C-3 April 1 sr, 2006 - June 1 sr, 2007
(Water Meters needed November 1 s\ 2007 - April 1 sr, 2007)
SMU - Parcell and 2 June 1 s\ 2006 - August 1 sr, 2008
(Water Meters needed January 1 sr, 2007 thru March 1 sr, 2008)
SMU - Parcel 3 June 1 sr, 2006 - October 1 sr, 2007
(Water Meters needed May 1 sr, 2007)
SMU - Parcel 4 and 5 June 1 s\ 2006 - November 1 sr, 2007
(Water Meters needed May 1 sr, 2007 - June 1 sr, 2007)
SMU - Parcel 6 April 1 sr, 2006 - June 1 sr, 2007
(Water Meters needed Novernber 1 sr, 2007 - April 1 sr, 2007)
11/22/2004 15:29
56136('-""'82
BOYNTON BEACH ~E
-",i/
PAGE 01
~HlGlT (P.JI
(( ;;:~
\ , I
'"" I
~,
, y'"
g'~ 2?ead 7l1te ~~
FLOW TEST
Request Date: 11/8/04
Requested From: Chris Ralph
Telephone Number: 772-794-4088
Facsimile Number: 772-562-9689
Company: Kimley-Horn & Associates
601 21st Street, Suite 400
Vero Beach. FL 32960
Location: Boynton Town Center I Boynton Village
· DIAGRAM *
(Include direction. street names, hydrant locations. intersections and main sizes)
i ~ C
H#(i) 0
N
N G
R
E
5
5
H#CD
A
V
E OLD BOYNTON ROAD
I r
Hydrant 1:
Hydrant 2:
Static Reading: 56 psi
Flow Reading: 46 psi::: 1141 gpm
Residual Reading: 52 psi
Assign Date: 11/8/04
Tested By: FF II Aaron
Test Date: 11/18/04
Time Tested: 10:30 hrs
AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL: 3.747 gpm
11/22/04 MON 16:55 (TX/RX NO 6708J