REVIEW COMMENTS
NEW BUSINESS
7.A.l
BRU'S ROOM (COUS 05-009)
CONDITIONAL USE
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-184
TO:
Chair and Members
Planning & Development Board
Michael Rum~fW
Director of Planning and Zoning
THRU:
FROM:
Kathleen Zeitler ~
Planner
DATE:
October 17, 2006
PROJECT:
Bru's Room / CGUS 05-009, MSPM 06-004
REQUEST:
Conditional Use for Nightclub (Amplified Music)
Major Site Plan Modification (Building Addition)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: Bru's Wings, Inc.
Applicant: Mr. Bob Brudzinski
Agent: Mr. Charles Putman, Putman & Associates, Inc.
Location: 1333 North Congress Avenue (see Location Map - Exhibit "A")
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) / Community Commercial (C-3)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use:
Restaurant / Nightclub (Amplified Music)
Acreage:
1.68-acre
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Right-of-way for the C-16 Canal, and farther north a hotel (The Holiday Inn
at Catalina Centre) zoned C-3; to the northwest, multi-family residential
(Savannah Lakes) zoned PUD;
South:
Developed commercial parcel (bank / offices) zoned C-3;
East:
Right-of-way for North Congress Avenue, and farther east, approved multi-
family residential (forthcoming Boynton Village Cortina project) zoned SMU;
to the northeast, mixed use development of commercial and multi-family
residential (Renaissance Commons) zoned SMU; and
Bru's Room - COUS 05-009
Page 2
Memorandum No, PZ 06-184
West:
A retention pond, and farther west, developed commercial (Boynton Beach
Mall) zoned C-3.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Charles Putman, agent for the property owner, is seeking conditional use approval for a nightclub
and major site plan modification approval of a 775 square foot building addition at Bru's Room Sports
Grill located on the west side of North Congress Avenue about one-half mile north of Old Boynton Road.
Bru's Room is located on a 1.68-acre parcel in the C-3 (Community Commercial) zoning district.
Mr. Bob Brudzinski, owner of Bru's Room Sports Grill has indicated that his business is a combination bar
and grill, with the majority of sales from food (restaurant 55%) and the remainder of sales from
alcoholic beverages (bar 45%). The property owner proposes to have live musical entertainment
(bands, disc jockey, single musician, etc.) with amplified music within an interior lounge at Bru's Room.
Per Chapter 1, Article II. Definitions, of the Land Development Regulations, a Nightclub is defined as
follows: "A restaurant, bar, lounge or similar establishment serving alcoholic beverages, that features
dancing, theatrical, cabaret, or similar entertainment and/or electronically amplified music". A nightclub
is a conditional use in the C-3 zoning district. A conditional use requires greater scrutiny in reviewing
site design, operational characteristics and potential impacts on surrounding properties.
The additional request for a major site plan modification is to allow construction of a proposed building
addition of 775 square feet to the southwest corner of the existing restaurant building. The proposed
addition would consist of the same building materials and colors of the existing building, and include
handicap-accessible restrooms and storage space for relocated freezers and coolers. The existing
freezer and cooler storage area would be renovated to include a stage for musical performances in a
new lounge area within the existing enclosed building.
The outdoor bar area located at the southeast corner of the building is also proposed to be converted
from an awning-covered seating area to a solid roof. The outdoor bar would remain open-sided, and
utilize the existing roll-up plastic shades for weather protection when needed. The proposed solid roof
would match the existing roofing materials of the restaurant. Site plan modification will require the
property to be brought into compliance with current code requirements, such as landscaping. Relative
to traffic generation, Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering in a letter dated September 5, 2006,
indicated the proposed addition would meet the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
However, no building permits may be issued after the build-out date (2007).
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND ANALYSIS
Section 11.2.D of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which
conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Division's evaluation of the application as it pertains to each of the standards.
Per Section 11.2.D., the Planning & Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such
conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection
therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the faithful adherence to and
fulfillment of such restrictions and conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for
streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of
the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony
with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional use approval, the
Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and
Bru's Room - COUS 05-009
Page 3
Memorandum No. PZ 06-184
welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provisions have been
made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access
in case of fire or catastrophe.
According to a current survey of the subject property, there are two (2) existing points of
ingress/egress. The first existing access point is located at the southeast corner of the property, and
provides direct vehicular access from Congress Avenue. This drive is shared with the bank parcel to
the south, and runs in an east/west direction. The second existing access point is located at the
southwest corner of the subject property, and provides inter-parcel access from the bank parcel to
the south. This drive runs in a north/south direction and connects to the east/west drive off of
Congress Avenue. Both driveway widths appear to meet code requirements. These access points
adequately address the needs of typical vehicular circulation, as well as that of emergency vehicles
and sanitation equipment. No revisions are proposed to the subject property that would affect or
alter the two (2) existing points of ingress/egress to the site.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in
subsection above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on
adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
According to Chapter 2, Section 11.H.16.d.(1), restaurants, bars, cocktail lounges, dance halls, and
all other eating or drinking establishments require one (1) parking space per two and one-half (2.5)
seats, but not less than one (1) parking space per 100 square feet of gross floor area. The site plan
tabular data (sheet A1.01) indicates the restaurant has 296 existing seats, including indoor and
outdoor dining, as well as indoor and outdoor bar seats. A total of 33 seats are proposed in the new
lounge area, which includes dining and bar seats. A total of 329 seats would be located on site, as
further depicted on the new floor plan and seating plan (sheet Ext.1). Based on total number of
seats (329), required parking would be 132 spaces. The site plan tabular data (sheet A1.01)
indicates an existing restaurant area of 8,178 square feet, and a proposed addition of 775 square
feet, for a total building area of 8,953 square feet. Based on gross floor area (8,953 sf), required
parking would be 90 spaces. The more restrictive calculation applies, therefore parking is based on
number of seats and 132 spaces would be required. The site plan depicts 129 regular parking
spaces and 5 handicap parking spaces, for a total of 134 parking spaces on site. Therefore, the
existing parking spaces on site comply with the requirements and provide two (2) excess parking
spaces. Per the owner, additional parking spaces for overflow parking are available nights and
weekends on the office/bank site to the south if needed, through an agreement between the two (2)
property owners.
The parking area is landscaped along the north, east, and west property lines which will minimize
noise and also glare from the headlights of patron's cars. Additional foundation plantings at varying
heights around the building and dumpster, and large potted palms around the outdoor bar area
would be provided and act as a vegetative sound barrier. The parking lot lighting fixtures are
existing, and required to be designed to prevent glare and light spillage onto adjacent properties.
The site plan meets the intent of the Code relative to compatibility and buffering, based on the
landscaping, distance separation, and design characteristics. The multi-family residential
development to the northwest is separated from the subject property by a canal. Additionally, staff
has requested a professional sound study be performed to ensure sound levels leaving the site will
be within tolerances defined within the Code of Ordinances (60 decibels between the hours of 7 AM
Bru's Room - COUS 05-009
Page 4
Memorandum No. PZ 06-184
& 10 PM and 55 decibels from 10 PM to 7 AM for exterior sound levels for receiving residential
properties). Should ultimate sound measurements detect excessive levels, further mitigation will be
required such as volume adjustments (see Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval).
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The site plan (Sheet A1.01) shows that the existing dumpster location is situated near the southeast
corner of the building, near the outdoor bar area, and oriented in an east-northeast direction. The
dumpster is screened with enclosure walls and landscaped, in accordance with Chapter 9, Section
10.C.3 of the Land Development Regulations. The dumpster location is positioned in such a way as
to facilitate the efficient removal of trash. The existing dumpster location is farthest away from the
adjacent multi-family residential to the northwest, and will remain as is.
4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility.
Consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations, all utilities, including potable water
and sanitary sewer are already available and currently in use for this location.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character.
The Site Plan (Sheet A1.01) states the proposed pervious area of the parcel equals 10,666 square
feet or 15% of the total site. The Landscape Plan (Sheet L-1) indicates that a total of 670 trees,
shrubs, and groundcovers are either existing or provided on site. A minimum of 50% of plant
materials must be native species. A total of 340 of the 670 (approximately 51 %) of the existing and
proposed plantings would be native species.
The existing landscape buffers along the north and west property lines contain Live Oak trees from
18 to 30 feet in height, with a row of either Viburnum or Cocoplum hedges three (3) feet in height.
The applicant proposes to increase landscaping in areas around the building foundation, including
the proposed addition, and on landscape islands where needed.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and
compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
The existing monument sign is located on a landscape island adjacent to Congress Avenue and will
remain with required landscaping. The wall signage exists on the front of the building (east
elevation) and faces Congress Avenue. All existing signage will remain, and no new signage is
proposed on site.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
The existing building and the proposed addition would meet all minimum setback requirements of
the C-3 zoning district. The code requires a minimum 20-foot front setback, and the site plan
indicates a 75-foot setback is provided. A minimum side setback of 15 feet is required on one side
and zero on the other. The site plan depicts approximate building setbacks of 82 feet to the north
and 45 feet to the south. The code requires a minimum 20-foot rear setback, and the site plan
indicates a setback of approximately 116 feet is being provided. The proposed building addition of
775 square feet would be located on the northwest corner of the building and would be set back 74
feet from the north property line and 116 feet from the west property line.
Bru's Room - COUS 05-009
Page 5
Memorandum No, PZ 06-184
As noted earlier, the Site Plan (Sheet A1.01) states the proposed pervious area of the parcel equals
10,666 square feet or 15% of the total site. The majority of the green space on the site is located in
the seven (7) foot landscape buffers along the east and west property lines, and the eight (8) foot
landscape buffer along the north property line, and the plantings along the foundation of the
restaurant. Other green areas jopen spaces occur within landscape islands in the parking lot.
8. General compatibility with adjacent property and other property in the zoning district.
In general, the proposed building addition would be visually compatible with other existing buildings
in the C-3 zoning district within the Congress Avenue corridor. The general design of the building
addition utilizes the same type of building elements as the existing restaurant building (roof
materials, brick, and color and paint selection for the trim of the building). A standing seam metal
roof over the outdoor bar area would replace an existing canopy. The proposed roof would be the
same Hunter Green as the existing roof on the restaurant.
The maximum allowable building height in the C-3 zoning district is 45 feet. The building was
designed as a one (l)-story structure, approximately 18 feet - 4 inches in height to the top of flat
roof, and 21 feet to the top of the parapet wall which screens rooftop equipment. The mean height
of the pitched roof is approximately 24 feet. The building would not exceed the district's maximum
height limitations and would be compatible in comparison with the neighboring commercial
properties.
The traffic approval letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Division indicates that the proposed
building addition would generate 84 new daily trips to the existing high turnover restaurant, with the
peak hour trips being 7 PM during the busiest (rush hour) traffic times on Congress Avenue. The
remaining compatibility issues pertain to the request for amplified music and involve compliance with
the noise ordinance.
In general, the proposed use of a nightclub with amplified music appears to be compatible with other
uses in the C-3 zoning district within the Congress Avenue corridor. However, due to the late hours
(10:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.) of the estimated performance times, the amplified music could negatively
impact existing multi-family residential to the northwest (Savannah Lakes), as well as guests staying
at the Holiday Inn to the north. Also, to the northeast across Congress Avenue, is mixed-use
development of commercial and multi-family residential (Renaissance Commons), and proposed
multi-family residential units have been approved to the east across Congress Avenue (Cortina at
Boynton Village). Therefore, staff has requested detailed sound information, prepared by a
professional in the field, to demonstrate compliance with City code relative to noise (see Exhibit "C'l.
The applicant indicates the amplified music will be restricted to the interior of the enclosed building,
and located on the south side of the building in the new lounge area. Per Sheet A2.01, the new
lounge area is located between the proposed addition and the existing outdoor bar area, and
includes a stage approximately six (6) feet in width by 14 feet in length, limiting the size of any
performances.
Per Section 11.2.D.13. of the Land Development Regulations, a conditional use request for a
nightclub (amplified music) requires a detailed sound study as part of the evaluation of the request.
An Ambient Sound Level Study prepared by REP Associates, Inc. was conducted to analyze the
sound levels of the amplified music and determine its compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
Sound tolerances defined within the Noise Ordinance are 60 dBA (decibels) between the hours of 7
AM & 10 PM and 55 dBA from 10 PM to 7 AM for exterior sound levels for receiving residential
properties. Per the Code, the maximum sound tolerance level from any applicable sound sources
Bru's Room - COUS 05-009
Page 6
Memorandum No. PZ 06-184
shall not exceed the sound level limits by more than 5 dBA from 10 PM to 7 AM. A combination of
sound levels were recorded simultaneously, both peak sound levels and frequency weighted noise
exposures, specifically LlO readings. The LlO is the sound level exceeded for more than ten (10)
percent of a measurement period that shall not be less than 10 minutes.
The closest sensitive receiving land uses are to the north, northeast, and northwest of the subject
property. REP recorded and evaluated sound levels with and without amplified music at three (3)
receiving land uses (RLU's) as well as the perimeter of the site. RLU 1 was the multi-family
apartment complex (Savannah Lakes) located to the northwest (across the C-16 canal),
approximately 650 feet from the perimeter property line of the subject property. RLU 2 was the
mixed-use development (Renaissance Commons) located to the northeast (across Congress Avenue),
approximately 300 feet from the perimeter property line of the subject property. RLU 3 was the
hotel (Holiday Inn) located to the north (across the C-16 canal), approximately 250 feet from the
perimeter property line of the subject property.
The results of the professional sound study conducted between the hours of 10 PM and 1 AM
indicate measurements of amplified music which varied from 50 decibels to 77 decibels, depending
on location (off-site sensitivity zones, perimeter property lines, and outside main entrance to building
and at outdoor patio area).
The sound study results (see Table A of Exhibit "C") indicate compliance with the acceptable noise
levels at the north, south, and west property lines. The LlD readings collected at the west and south
property line during the playing of amplified music, with the west delivery door and the patio doors
open, were below the LlO exterior sound level limit of 65 dBA, even though the L10 reading at the
patio speaker (southeast side) was 77 dBA and the LlO reading at the main entrance (east side) was
73 dBA. The sound study determined these readings to be from a combination of sources
(noticeable banging of front door when closing), and amplified music (from speakers in the outdoor
patio area).
The sound study results (see Table B of Exhibit "C") indicate the LlD readings at all RLU locations,
Savannah Lakes, and Holiday Inn, with and without amplified music, and the LlO reading at
Renaissance Commons, with amplified music, were below the maximum of 60 dBA (for the exterior
of residential structures). The LlO reading of the background sound (no amplified music, commuter
traffic, and community noise) at Renaissance Commons was 61.5 dBA, slightly above the maximum
LlO of 60 dBA, with commercial traffic in the vicinity of the residential property.
Out of a total of 20 readings at various locations, 12 readings were taken when amplified music was
playing and 8 readings were of just background noise levels. Of the 12 amplified music readings,
only two (2) readings (6-A, 6-B) exceeded the maximum acceptable noise levels. These readings
were taken at the patio area from outside speakers and at the main entrance to the restaurant.
Some of the higher decibel readings (Table A Sample 4-A and Table B Samples 2-A, 3-A, 4-A)
exceeded acceptable sound levels during times of no amplified music. The sound study determined
these readings to be from background noise due to excessive vehicular traffic and the site's close
proximity to North Congress Avenue, an 88-foot, six-lane right-of-way.
The professional sound study recommends soundproofing measures to ensure that the live music is
kept at an acceptable low level when heard off-site. The applicant proposes to minimize noise
through the use of the following measures: (1) limited access (emergencies only) through the
delivery door located on the south side of the building next to the stage area (deliveries will be
received earlier in the day prior to live music); (2) utilizing the following construction materials for
the proposed addition: block wall, acoustical ceiling tiles, metal deck and roof insulation, new ceiling
Bru's Room - COUS 05-009
Page 7
Memorandum No, PZ 06-184
height of 12 feet, drywall with R-19 insulation, carpeting, and brick building exterior; (3) replacing
doors which lead from the new stage / lounge area to the outdoor bar area with more soundproof
doors which will be kept closed during performances as much as possible; (4) no speakers in the
outdoor bar area; (5) placing speakers in the live music area at least 3 feet away from the wall; and
(6) additional landscaping around building to provide a dense vegetative sound buffer (see
Conditions of Approval).
The sound study concludes that proposed site operations should not have an adverse effect on
adjacent properties, and would be in compliance with the sound standards set forth in the Noise
Ordinance. Should it be determined that additional mitigation measures are necessary, more
restrictive measures can be implemented through additional conditions of approval.
9. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
Based on its distance to nearby residential properties, site buffering and landscaping, staff opines
that there would be no negative effect on nearby properties, as specified by the professional sound
study submitted.
10. Conformance to the standards and requirements, which apply to site, plans, as set forth in Chapter
19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan Review).
With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project would comply with all requirements of
applicable sections of city code.
11. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance
standards within Section 4.N. of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2; also, conformance to
the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance.
With incorporation of all conditions and staff recommendations contained herein, the proposed
project should operate in a manner that is in compliance with the above-referenced codes and
ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. In many instances, a typical project may receive City
approvals and if complaints were generated regarding the operational aspects of the business, Code
Compliance would be asked to inspect the premises to determine if violations of the code exist, such
as a noise complaint. When the City reviews a project not allowed by right, but a project listed as a
Conditional Use, extra caution is exercised in the review to determine its compatibility with
neighboring property and its operational characteristics are scrutinized. If additional information is
required to help staff determine this compatibility and compliance with City codes, a request for the
necessary data is made. In this particular case, staff has requested detailed sound information,
prepared by a professional in the field, to demonstrate compliance with City code relative to noise
and nuisances. The applicant has provided this information, which indicates the proposal will comply
with the noise control ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the information contained herein and the sound data required by staff and provided by the
applicant and their consultants, staff recommends that this request for conditional use / major site plan
modification be approved subject to satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "D" - Conditions of
Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be
documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
5: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room \COUS\Staff Report.doc
SITE
Exhibit A - Site Location Map
Bru's Room
A
(J)
w
Cl!
t?
z
o
C:)
sMU - Suburban Mixed Use
C3 - Community, Commercial
!!'"
~
o 230 460
~--
0l!D B0:r.NJ.0N
III I
>;:
w
~. "' I \ I .
~ VEl!AIREU 'l.'!llIS~E'~
.c. TI I .$
!JJ
IL }1 I ;;::;.
\ G0I'\1DO~
~1.T71
IIr I II R---I
920
1,380
p,~~R\lDGE
....
J:
Ol
::J
""
~
W
III
'\ T I II III
13Jil;l
-~
-I--
f---
f--=-
I--
::E I- "" _0>
F: -I--r :-:\_l--
0_, BI--I--:I;_~
~ r--~ l--:
al_
-
'- 1dH:1
9TM "l-- I
'II" L
R1AA- Single Family ResUfel
I l'(il r-
ZLI
Ig D ~J T\ I-
""--i=:~ ~ ,_
.... 0- IT I / ~~
"'" 6TH.J::.(/ ~J:-
/1 I l-
~ F _ sr!i!J
J ''\- ~ ~m~~~
v--
I I I I
~ &~JL.6[
I--
I--
1,840
,Feet
N
w.'
s
/7F',;
~
f ~
~
~
I ~
I; ,
t · 1
hj! II.
~ .~ \
~i " .
10;,
'<I II.,/J
i ~[
! I,
ij .il~' m~ ij .~im~~= ~m~ i .ii~ m
il 'Ujif .~~~ il.h .~~.S ~~iS~ ~~.~z ~h
~ i.=J ii~m i il~I~~!ih. s~~~~ ~ ~~~m~ lii!J
~ n~i~ ~~i~ ~ I~i~i~ll~: I:!S~! ~fli~ 1.;1
jl !iii!.l!ii 11 ill!!II!1 m!, jl !ililllP
~ .1 ~.~m lib ~I ~'e~..mi"' Imi"' h;!j mM
I U ~1~iU ~~a. ~I"' i;!~~:!:~1 i~~!1 I~ !!~j~ !~~i
~~ oU~~i i.: ~ i aWiit~IBi~' ~~~~~~! .2~i; i21a
~ i~ 1~I!i~ .;:i I - li;di;m lihm ~~ ';UI dn
dim:; im I!! !i~ih!m h!ml if b~!i !m
~I ~.2ll~1 ~li.' l! -: il~i!'.iin~~ .- h ~. .~fllo ll~'li
~~ <~~i~ii ..~~I ~ ~i ~~.Uall~lli i~!lf~ h ;iall~ i!~!i
~~ i~@i~l!l ;"3~i :I ~o !i1~~liB*IIl!i lE~ I~! ~~ iitil~ ~:~i
i Ii Iin;lliU~ ; ~i mdnlil j Him ~i lihl im
'2
~
.~,.j~-l~~ .
~ gf '
, r ,~o': '
. ~
I
'./"'-<
!
. ..J .
(
,{-
.~
,
, ...
~
,i ~~
~~ j ~ ~~Nml
y.< .
~~ ~ ~
i~ -, ""'""~"'_,'~ .
\ v ...... i "" .'. ''''',,;;' .,.
~~",'. '.~' .' '.---~' :-'. -.......... .::.9f!f":t#...Il?,S:"i'.;','.." ",,"
....., 4 ~ l....':>I1Wi'dlS"tll'lf/.7,S
, .J ,'. l, ' ~ .' . . '.In
1 !-5,~- --c'-'-~'r-'~-'-'-' 'u-
'. I -ffilI .. I'
'- v' ....
1'~1 .
'''I'
t .z.I' .. '
I
. .
Jf .
~:; ,
. ,~. .
~.' .~~
I . *= '\
~ \
.. .~ ~
.., "
~.
, I .
iI. ~~ .
~~ .v..
)
.;;;(
,
~>//
(,
~
l
~
..
.
. ~~
~~ .
.t~
~5 .
. .i.9'l!J:iI.&&.OO,'J.
?'
/
'-.
.IUBtL41...fF&.t/IJN
.wru
/GiSt
!
~
=
.., ..-
~~~-
-I '--~
~;;-
~$ \
~t
",
0,
gi
.,:: J
./!. ~~ I
;,' ~
!--~ J
-, /I
I I
,.
~~
~~
o~
~!
-~
\
I
~
it
i'l
;,
~
i~1
~i!
d~
~I~
~.i
>;j~
U~I'
;;I~
-sial;!
ill~
i~~~
i~;*
ii!d
~ ~~
~ uil
~ uE'.
JfiHr&.4f &.<<ljIJ
"".
I
~)
, \",,-
." EXHIBIT "B"-I
,
Iii
~~}
" '
!!
I!
H;:9 '
:-- 1'< 6 r'
l!'-~-
,~ ~
J"l !! .. 1 I
'11 Hi
m'lii
l~g ~!
d~ ,~ I
m'
'f'
;i!\
'II hi; .
t I .i'
~ .~
,Jill im "
Z I i ~. I
~~, ~;
i
~ mu~
-. !i~~~eEI
p." ~~
~ ~t !
~ ~~ U I'
~ hlH!
~~~,:~c:,;..l:i~~~'~ ~
~ e;i! ~ 'I:
~ ~ I li3t Ii"
1ClKlAl...fE&JJlN...... \ O-~III.t ....~ -i
~I- !-:>7 m ....:'. IJlfj1!;;.. ,..
it ~. ~~.~z~~
: ~ ,i' 1 J ,~
:t. t!'. ""': ~
\ ~ i!.,,! ,'. m" L
I !lJd!!l
~ ,,:till;,
~ 'llhllil
11i""I'
~-is;~~~ ~ I
rti III
lHii!1fi,
l'I<~tml
. I
mm!fl!
i1!:ii:m
dfth,Hj
mhHJh
~~~~~H~~~
! II '! Ii
i II h f'
, I' .
I, illil!l;iI
II'!I II "
l~ II! In Iii
~...~J3J;IIlOllV
~"U~, '_n - n~
o 0
C6f:o;;::OO'lJ'i t
31MOJ. O'lOllYE ~.''.''-.l
,..'..,' ,
vaI~O~3 'H~Vaa NO~N^08
TII~:J S~~OdS
WOO~ s.Q~a O~ NOI~IaaV
~! Ui~ ~
il ~ ~ Illl ill ::!.... ~. "'.. Ih!~
~H . !
i I. ~ ~. i il~mlm !I: I ; :~ri
~ ;l; !iI~n -- ~I ! ! i~1
P ~E ~I i! Ii =h ~q ~~j
~ I ~ g ~ ~ . , 11!!!I!1 ll~p !~"
. ~ I i.;~ ~n~~IIiU = ~ t - .:,~
~ ~ i ~ II HI I~UII ~. I~ II II h~ 611 i.~v
lnid In i ~I ~i~ ~~h ..-
~ ~ ~ ~ .~E
in 01 < qU
----------- ---l---
(L08 AMAH 3.LV.LS) :mN'3:AV SS:n!~NO:::l ..3:0 . 'I';)
I, -=.~I
"'" '..........
.
'-
I
i I
~n
M
II
~
:~r~g
>---~----< -
8~ ~ii
~ 1 U.i!
,
.
r
" J
: t
~~
.~
L
,-- ~ I
s~ ~~~t
~:~ ~~::
~~~
e
~
1 1 ~
,y'!!)
; .1 1 'ii
{ II; II
I
! !
,
I !~.
"1'
, .
I
!
1
Iii
s.,
U'~~' 1
EXH lBlT "B"
..-< =
~ ~ ~
~ rl ""
"~ ,
~ ~
iiir- .
,i 0
~llj' ~
0, j L1j
:II ~
,,<:,~::<::,,~~J~}.~ ~ ~
','J~'...~>,":,'.:';Y-._ '~lJ:; z
, - ... .' ,.",~;-~'!i". "
,.><::,,:..' ~.'~-\'"./l/~~~" II ~
'--.J /'~ L~~oCY- %-T I' ~ 'oy i ~
i;.o/:J \ J~ Ii \~' ~
\ ~l ~ \ i~ \\ \ ".~ ~
" f \ ~ ii \\\ S 0
\ !! i I ')'- \ I!, 1,'0 -'{[' ~
\ 8 ! \ I I l:.d~' j; ~
\ ~ \..1 \-__.:"~ . I ~
\ \ ~---- 'j ~~li
\ __-..........:3 f~ -~'
I \ ~o--- ~l SF l,:
\/ RO " j-
- - -- -- ~-- - - - - - - 1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
\
I
,--------.....\
,/
/ 1
I
I
,
II
-' Ii--
'I
r
,~ J
-"I
I.
1i~t1
,IE
w
~
~
U
7
./~-
~
o
z
,
_/
___J
I!
!j
,
~;:'''ii jm:.~, >1
. . :' I'
EXtllBIT "B"
d . oj
~ . ,~ ~
l!dlld:
VOI<llOl::1 H:lV3'i1 NOJ.NAO'iI
111<11V 5J.<IIOd5I"iOO<ll5,fl<ll'il OJ. NOUlOOV
i~
~.
~.
Ii
S ,,1
~! . ~
~~ :i ~
; !~!
~~
(0--------
@------ - - --
0=--
. I
~ ~
~ ~
~
EXHIBIT "B"
.. \, ~ T
~ S~jiU~ ii'
~ d'. dj!!lU, rr'
dfuHI;r.:' "~lll
..J
~~
-~~
i i fu
.~
8 0 I~
..J~~ -: I
IlSN~LL l":'Z 'faN!
.0 '~ Z :;( v .g <
3~ u [U ~ W ~ - <0 i
~d z zr en zr 8~;;:; I
~Ii
8l~ i
~u I
'.-
.-:
'ii]
~ Z
~
~ ~;
,}l C
~~ ~~ z i
.=: ;j~ n ~ ~ un
frl~~~~~~ a; ~uq
~daH~ ~~i ~Ia~ ~
~~~I
in.l
~ I H ;
~~~~~~
~~~
~ ~ ~i'~ ~
~
~~t
~;!. z
9.
."
m ~
o
"'101
~...13
'"
~
~ ~~
>=
1~8
kL:J :::i
~
;,~ \ l:~ 1;;
w~-! ~~~ r\,!::~ [[] ~-=l~~OD 0, 0
In~ "\ "- '=Bo --V
'2'11'-- ~~ C:::=:J 0
- ~,
'g[~P
to - ! D~ :'. I ~8LIIT~ "~~;:! '-1
(/ , Z I_.~
r---I~~---------~G_--------~~-----1
~C:-=C-
'OIqDEj4-J&-~~ ~ ,_-
~c;O - L------n-t~----- ~~o ~i5fJ"':;_ F:J
w IL . ~ ! g ~ ~ ~~
f ~ -
o,~ --
[7' l~
.\ ii f~ ~~
I V 1_, --1<1
i/\l 1--'\ E~~
U I \0=
--
~~
5- ~ 2EB
S> ~
~~
~
w
-'
!gr;;]
goo ~V1~
Di !~ ~~
::>
- --,
/
z
o
>=
~~
~l:J
...
;;:
\=~ I '"
- ,- 'r-ill
Jt'
t~
\,
1....-...'
~~
~! ~'Q
i~r;l
..UI3
~~
u
~
lii
~
ti
w
~
~
~
'"
w
" N!91
! lj~
~ e:
i~r;.l
!gl3
m ~
~ ~.
"- "
00 0
w SW S ffi
..J ~~ iI1!:! ~ ~'"
5~~"lg" ~~~
w\j~gQi \j~~
o ~duH i ~~~5
en ~n~h8 2~~;w"i
!z al~~xHE \l2al~0
w ~g~~:i~~hil~U
Ii; ~~.;~~~~l:l:~~~<I.<I.
::> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
53 ....:NCf"i-.t~~ru)cri~~~~
:..::
a:
~
lL
o
~
o
o
en
~~1iOI
a8l::J
u
i~o
...
~~GiI
0[3
...
In
'= .::::..."
/1\
n ( (~ I I
II" 1,- _.J )
1'-- -- ----/
'"
~~~
!~G
...
!~o
we
0><6,
"03.11; ~ S' ':l"U dl~:iNll!r.Ve! :i~'~ ll!l1i1iOO! ~ N01~I~3oI Nilllerr, ih. lro~lm 'J.~...rr:JOa ~'-;1 :lQ ;lo;n llj:,lHH... J:JO ~t~-;",::Qoi.oI:llioI ':c-.....~VOd .I.Nv ::!h.V a~i'Oil!I ii'j\" 'il,"':;ji!i'-~ -:;INI a!HSOeIiNJ.'=''\I'''' 3ll!iWO 'l)..1IIftOilI:!IC _~;w~ ;HI il 1~-c. 'i1HJ.
t.jl'i!~D5\S!M11.lIl\ual~....ft"'~OIO\.,{,
"3111" . II I. a _ .I 1 . ;) _ t'
'""""""'..
;!1llfll"""'"
==~~ I~
~
'li<>..~ )
",
YClI~Ol~ HJY3Q NOlNAOQ
111~E) 9.J.~Od5 ~OO~ 5,n~Q OJ. NOllJQQV
~~
il
~~ ii
~~ i~
Ie ~>
~~I ~!h
~~~. .~~'...
~s @ ~
W ~ 1-' ·
! I ~~ ~p U
III 'I ~i ~i ! ~;
8 Ie i I
nil ~
i hlll~ II II
9 8~ .! i~. ~e
8 Ii Ie Ii
EXHIBIT "B"
iLa QI
It<).
~J.iJJ~J<.
z
o
l=
~
-'
UJ
~
o
z
"L(~ll!ilDl __Lt~(11I.l
1IDlCl:""",,,,"'Jllidnr
......, --...o8llll
~.~ ~"MIWS
-
lVI~31V~ INVld ::lOA~OlN3^NI "
Val~Ol:l 'HOV38 NOINA08
WOOM S,fllIH
toIVo~ -
"""1'
"" ~.
..- "
........~ I"'''' teIH1Ch..
..1IIlI'll:l....."'-'l'll
lICl:..............,...~~
~....dIn8.JllU~
........
OlR'at(l.I'illllll _l~,(18I)
mG!PI"lIII'......_
-.....~_(lIiIi!:
'OU1'8J~Tl
".,,,,,'"
(L08 ..TJUH 3J.'lJ.S) 3nN3AV ss:.;n:I~NO:) .aO 0'1';)
1.-.....: ...1
.,. 'V<l"'"
i i j
I \ \
"i'I' II
.". "
~-~
I~
l~
---
///---
/
e
I.
e
~
~
z
,
1//--
('
I
L......."- ' '" "'-"'-'- _ _ ~
I ~ II
~ ~i
i i'
--- -
;;I
ii1
~ III ~lll llll . lP . ! I I . . I I ~ : I I : : : I
: l l - . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~
:::! ~: ~n; ;~ ~: j II ~ ~ ~ , ~ " " " " ; ~ ; " , ~ ~ ~ ~
.... -. - ~ . , - - . . k
5z
a.~
Ow i
zO:: I J
~o I i ~ I I " i
!Qt:- , I
~ I .! '! ) I ! ! I } I I ! I '1 i I I I
I ! I i I I I I I i f !
0 ! ! ! I i f I I i ~ .
t-
)( ,10 ro r;;;- G~o
w 0 0 . " ... @C$ I ~ I 0(;] O@ @ @ 0 ~ .
0 0
~
I ~ ;!: - <'> N ~ - N <'> <'> - (!! :;! 18 iij '" - ~ N '" ~ M ~ ~ -
- ..
~I ~ ! I~
ii
intHfi8lMJsnj "tfrl66/t.f/G
~''" fIPIJOI:/'Iqf1HE1Ofl
IlOt:JEJff'JS'1JlB1I9/fIOf1IJU1l'l1l1OO8'MNa.Lr
EJNJ.1J..JJ"RB I ONINOZ I DNlNNV7d
'OUI 'saj8poSStll? U8Wfl1d S8jJ81/:J
:XH'f'T "B"
~
!I
1111
. .
" ",-._r-
I ~h
": c i~3
il1 ,,1:!~ i"~
h 0 li~
n H ol!i
~! H ~li ~
.~ H ~ ~
&c; "-a. . III "#-
~U5.h!.~:a
iti!i~ nthl
-pl~ i'~i!~
hi~1 ;h:~~i
}~ !ft~ ~ i !ji!i
s. ~6ES:3 ~
-a~j ~:H' :o~
., HHpul ~f
~ it! ili~i~rh
i Hihf~Holl;~
C) ~ N ..;.ldci
5 J . I J :
~ . ~ .
~ I : ~ , . ~ : . ,
. . - b
I-
0:: ~
w
a. I
en
z I I .
01 ; I.
~I ! I 'j" II .
i I !
(.1 I ! I
u: I ~ !
13
0 , I@ I
::!; , E €I co E~ I@
I ! ., ~ ., - I
I- I - ~ ..
i
Iii
. ~ 0
III
. <.
.
AMBIENT SOUND LEVEL STUDY
Bru's Room Sports Grill
1333 North Congress Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida
Prepared for
Mr. Robert Brudzinski
c/o .
Charles Putman & Associates
4722 NW Boca Raton Boulevard
Boca Raton, Florida 3:3432
Contact: Ms. Toni Ash
Phone: (561) 994-6411
j
Prepared by
REP Associates, Inc.
11825 NW 1001h Road
Medley, Florida 33178 .
Contact: Teresa A. Thomas
Telephone: (305) 279-5255
REP Project Number 2396.01.02
October 13, 2006
.
1. INTRODUCTION
The subject facility is the Bru's Room Sports Grill located at 1333 North Congress Avenue,
Boynton Beach, Florida (Site). The proposed project consists of a 775 square foot (sf) building
addition to the northwest comer of the existing structure. The new addition will be utilized for
storage purposes.
The musical entertainment room will be relocated to the interior of the existing building. See
Figure 1. The musical entertainment could be a disc jockey (DJ), a single musician, or a full band
with string and percussion instruments. Currently, the Brq's Room Boynton Beach location has
amplified music with a jukebox. The purpose of REP's study was to determine compliance with
the required analysis of conditional use application for bars, nightclubs, etc.
Multi-family dwellings are located to the northwest and to the northeast. A Holiday Inn is north
of the Site. A Wachovia Bank is south of the Site. A lake and the Boynton Beach Mall are
southwest of the Site. The Site is in a busy, highly traveled area with multiple restaurants and
bars.
REP evaluated sound levels at three receiving land uses (RLU) as well as the perimeter of the
Site.
]. The multifamily apartment complex located to the northwest, approximately 650 feet (ft)
from the Site's property perimeter
2. A property with mixed use of commercial/retail and multifamily apartment complex
located to the northeast, approximately 300 ft from the Site's property perimeter
3. The Holiday Inn property perimeter 250 feet ft north of the Site property line
North Congress Avenue, a six (6) lane thoroughfare (approximately 88 ft wide), separates the Site
from RLU 2. Two buildings (approximately 15 ft tall), trees (approximately 30 ft tall) and
general hedge row landscape buffers (approximately 4.5 ft tall) as w~ll as a 130 ft wide canal
separate the Site from RLU 1 and 3. Additionally, there are a total of 18 potted palms
(approximately 6.5 ft tall) located along the south patio perimeter and a ]0 ft tall dumpster
enclosure southwest of the patio that offer a noise barrier to the south and southwest.
There are three doorways into the building. The main entrance is located on the east side of the
building; the patio entrance is on the south side, and the delivery entrance is on the west side. The
west delivery door is utilized during the day. Nighttime access is strictly limited to emergency
use only. The delivery door is secured from the outside and controlled from the inside with an
emergency push bar apparatus. ' '
Vehicular access to the Site is from North Congress Avenue. Appendix A, Figures 1, presents a
Site Plan with sample locations and surrounding land uses. Appendix B presents Photographic
Documentation.
Ambient Sound Level Study
Bre's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02
Date of Study: September 28, 2006
Page I
.
2. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES
Sections 15-8 through 1 5-8.8 shall be cited by the short title of "The City of Boynton Beach
Noise Control Ordinance."
(Ord. No. 85-16 JJ 2, 3-19-85). Ord No. 85-1Q J1, 2, adopted Mar. 19, 1985, providedfor the
repeal of J 15-8, noise, and enacted in lieu thereof new provisions relative to the same subject
matter, designated as J 15-8 -15-8.8 to read as herein set out. Formerly, J 15-8 was derived
from the 1958 Code, J 17-22.2, and Ord No. 82-12, J adopted May 18,1982.
3. SOUND TERMINOLOGY AND CHARACTERISTICS
Sound level means the weighted sound pressure level obtained by the use of a metering
characteristic and weighting A, B, or C as specified for sound level meters. For the purposes of
this assessment, sound levels are A-weighted. A-weighted sound level means the sound pressure
level in decibels (dB) as measured on a sound level meter using an A-weighting network and
designated as dBA. Decibels describe the ampJitude of sound and are logarithmic rather than
linear. For example. 70 dB plus 70 dB equals 73 dB and not 140 dB.
The human ear does not "hear" all sounds identically and people respond more readily to sounds
in the middle to high frequencies. The A-weighted scale most closely mimics the human ear's
response to sound. One decibel has been determined to be the lowest sound level perceived by
the human ear in laboratory conditions.
Increases of less than three (3) - dBA are generally not noticed in a typical community since 3
dBA is the smallest increment at which the human ear perceives any change. The sound level
meter/dosimeter was set at a 3dB exchange rate.
j
Without any barriers (buildings, vehicles, landscape, and walls) between the source and the
human ear, the sound detected by the human ear is decreased by six (6) dB as the distance from
the source doubles.
Because sound levels fluctuate considerably, REP uses various statistical descriptors for
measuring and calculating sound levels. The Ll 0 is the sound level exceeded for more than ten
(] 0) percent of a measurement period that shall not be less than lO minutes. Peak measurement
(L peak) is the peak sound)evel detected in any ]/16-second interval and is equivalent to an
impulsive sound and the Lmax is the maximum sound level from any applicable sound source.
Ambient Sound Level Study
Bru's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02
Datc of Study: Septcmber 28, 2006
Page 2
.
4. METHODOLOGY
Section 15-8.8 establishes that no person shall operate or cause to be operated any source of
sound as enumerated in section 15-8.6 in such a manner as to create an exterior or interior sound
level of any origin which exceeds the limits set forth for the receiving land use category in
question for more than ten (10) percent of any measurement period. That period shall not be less
than ten (10) minutes when measured at or within the boundaries of a property or within the
confines of a building within the receiving land use and as a result of a source of sound being
located on some other property. REP used accepted Industrial Hygiene practices and ASTM
Standard E1780-96 (measurement and evaluation of community noise) for this study.
The closest sensitive receiving land uses are to the north, northeast, and northwest. Figure 1
included as Appendix A denotes sample locations at the Boynton Beach Site.
Noise dosimetric testing was conducted using a CEL Model 360 Noise Dosimeter. The CEL-360
Noise Dosimeter measures frequency weighted noise exposures and peak sound levels
simultaneously. LJ 0 readings were collected over a 100minute sample period. The instrument was
programmed with the following settings:
Measurement range:
Frequency:
Time Weighting:
Amplitude Weighting:
50-120 dB
A
Fast
3
Peak Frequency Weighting:
Frequency Weighting:
LN%A:
LN%B:
LN%C: ,i
Profile Interval:
Profile I:
Profile 2:
Profile 3:
Linear
A
LJO
L50
L90
1 minute
Lavg
Leq
Lrnx
The calibration of each CEL-360 was verified prior to-and-following the test periods using a CEL
Model 282 Acoustic Calibrator. The CEL-282 acoustic calibrator is a single frequency calibrator
that generates 114 dB SPL at 1000 Hz.
REP representatives, Teresa Thomas and Cristina Abboud, collected data at the Site on
September 28, 2006 between the hours of 10:00 PM and 1 :00 AM. Simultaneous L1 0 readings
were collected with and without the amplified music (background) at the south and west property
perimeters with the south patio doors and the west delivery door left open, and outside the sound
source at the south patio and at the main entrance.
Ambient Sound Level Study
8ru's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02
Date of Study; September 28, 2006
Page 3
.
The sample locations were the property perimeter to the north, south, east, and west and at the
property perimeter closest to RLU 1 to the northwest, RLU 2 to the northeast, RLU 3 to the
north, and east across Congress Avenue. REP selected these locations based on the potential
impact of the existing bar/nightclub to the nearest receiving land uses or sensitive zones.
REP also sampled at the Bru's Room Sports Grill location in Delray Beach to evaluate the sound
generated by a band in a setting similar to the Boynton Beach site. A band plays on Friday and
Saturday nights between the hours of 10:00PM to 1 :00 AM. The band had a vocalist and
percussion/string instruments. TheLI0 readings were collected on August 12,2006.
5. SOUND EMITTING DEviCES
The data on the sound emitting devices/equipment to be utilized by the respective musical
entertainment is dependent on the entertainer(s). Installed and in use at the Site during this study
are two types of speakers - the JBL Control 28 and the JBL Control SB2. The JBL Control 28
offers high power perfonnance band width and sensitivity in a compact, full range speaker with
an 8" low-frequency woofer and I" titanium-coated tweeter. The SB2 features hybrid load
bafflelband pass design. This single speaker functions as the subwoofer section of left/right
music systems. Currently there are 8 speakers and 4 woofers located at the south patio. The
speakers on the south patio will broadcast music from the jukebox. The new musical
entertainment room specifies 6 speakers. The speakers at the south patio will not broadcast music
from the inside musical entertainment area.
6. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
J
The intended use for the proposed addition is storage and an existing food preparation/storage
area within the interior of the site will be renovated for the musical entertainment. The proposed
entertainment room is constructed of block wans on all sides. The renovation of the room will
incorporate existing building materials (acoustical ceiling tiles, metal deck, and roof insulation).
The new ceiling height will be raised from 8 ft to 12 ft. The existing wall construction consists of
sheetrock on both sides of 6-inch metal studs, 2-inch airspace, and R-19 insulation. There is a 4-
inch brick veneer on the exterior of the building.
Ambient Sound Level Study
Bm's Room Sports Gri)~ North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02
Date of Study: September 28, 2006
Page 4
.
7. SUMMARY OF SAMPLE RESULTS
The L10 readings from the Ambient Sound Level Study are tabulated in Table A and Table B.
Table A presents the Site commercial property line data and applicable code. Table B presents
the exterior residential property line data and the applicable code. REP selected the time frame of
10:00 PM to 1 :00 AM as these are the proposed hours of the live entertainment at the Site.
Section 15-8.8 (b) Boynton Beach Code, lists exterior sound level limits for LlO Sound Levels as
follows for the receiving land uses:
Exterior Residential
Exterior Commercial (Site)
55 dBAfrom 10:00PMto 7:00AM
65 dBA At all times
c) Maximum sound level limits. The Maximum sound level from any applicable sound sources
shall not exceed the Ll 0 sound level limits by more than the values listed below:
5 dBAjrom 10:00 PM to 7:00AM
The LI0 readings collected at the west and south property perimeter with the west delivery door
and the patio doors open and with amplified music were below the Ll 0 exterior sound level limit
of 65 dBA (53 dBA and 61.5 dBA respectively); even though the Ll 0 reading at the Patio speaker
was 77dBA and the Ll 0 reading at the main entrance (east side) was 73 dBA.
The LlO readings at RLU 1 (multi-family apartments) and RLU 3 (Holiday Inn) with and
without amplified music and the LIO reading at RLU 2 with amplified music were below the
maximum L10 of 60 dBA for the exterior of residential structures. The LI0 reading at the.
Sensitive RLU 2 during the background (no amplified music, commuter traffic, and community
noise) sampling event was 61.5 dBA, slightly above the maximum Ll 0 of 60 dBA, with
commercial traffic in the vicinity of the residential property.
The LIO reading recorded at the DeIray Beach location before the band began was 66 dBA at the
source. The LIO reading increased from 66 dBA to 67 dBA adjacent to the open door once the
band (vocalist and percussion/string instruments) began to play, and decreased to 58 dBA at the
property line 240 ft away from the source.
Ambient Sound Level Study
Bm's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach. FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02
Date of Study: September 28, 2006
Page 5
.
TABLE A
SUMMARY OF LIO DATA
EXTERIOR COMMERCIAL SAMPLE POINTS
The weather was wanD, clear, with little to no wind.
I-A Exterior Commercial-Site Background 56.5 dBA 65 dBA
south ro erimeter Maximum 70 dBA
1-B Exterior Commercial-Site Amplified music 61.0 dBA 65 dBA
south . eter la 'n Maximum 70 dBA
2-A Exterior Commercial-Site Background 50.5 dBA 65dBA
west ro e erimeter Maximum 70 dBA
2-B Exterior Commercial-Site Amplified music 51.5 dBA 65 dBA
west ro e erimeter la 'n Maximum 70 dBA
3-A Exterior Commercial-Site Background 51.5 dBA 65 dBA
north ro rimeter Maximum 70 dBA
3-B Exterior Commercial-Site Amplified music 50.5 dBA 65 dBA
north erimeter Is .n Maximum 70 dBA
Exte~or Commercial-Site 65 dBA
4-A east property perimeter at Background 77.0dBA Maximum 70 dBA
Con ess Avenue
Exterior Commercial-Site Amplified music 65 dBA
4-B east property perimeter at playing 63.5 dBA Maximum 70 dBA
Con Avenue
Exterior Commercial-Site Amplified music 65 dBA
5-A South property perimeter 61.5dBA
with atio doors 0 en playing Maximum 70 dBA
Exterior Commercial-Site Amplified music 65 dBA
5-B west property perimeter with 53.0 dBA
delive door 0 en playing Maximum 70 dBA
6-A Patio area Noise source - 77.0 dBA
speaker Note 1
6-B Main entrance (east) Amplified music 73.0 dBA
la in Note I and 2
Note:
I) For reference of noise with amplified music
2) Noticeable "banging" of the door when closing.
Ambient Sound Level Study
8ru's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No, 2396.01.02
Date of Study: September 28, 2006
Page 6
.
TABLE B
SUMMARY OF L10 DATA
EXTERIOR RESIDENTIAL SAMPLE POINTS
The weather was wann, clear. with little to no wind.
I-A
Exterior Residential RLU I
northwest of canal 650 ft
from the Site perimeter.
1-8
Exterior Residential RLU I
northwest of canal 650 ft
from the Site rimeter
Exterior Residential RLU 2
northeast of canal 300 ft
from Site rimeter.
Exterior Residential RLU 2
northeast of canal 300 ft
from Site erimeter.
Exterior Residential RLU 3
north of canal 250 from Site
erimeter
Exterior Residential RLU 3
north of canal 250 ft from
Site erimeter
Exterior Residential Vacant
lot directly east across
Congress A venue and south
ofRLU 2-200 ft from Site
erimeter
Exterior Residential Vacant
lot directly east across
Congress A venue and south
ofRLU 2-200 ft from Site
erimeter
2-A
2-B
3-A
3-B
4-A
4-B
Less than
equipment 55 dBA
Background measurement Maximum 60 dBA
range
50 dBA)
Amplified 54.0 dBA '55 dBA
music playing Note I Maximum 60 dBA
Background 61.5 dBA 55 dBA
Note 2 Maximum 60 dBA
Amplified 53.5 dBA 55 dBA
music playing Maximum 60 dBA
BackgrOlmd 57.0 dBA 55 dBA
Note 3 Maximum 60 dBA
Amplified 57.0 dBA 55 dBA
music playing Note 3 Maximum 60 dBA
Background 69.0dBA 55 dBA
Note 4 Maximum 60 dBA
Amplified
music playing
55 dBA
Maximum 60 dBA
54.5 dBA
Notes:
J) RLU 1 a tractor trailer pulled onto the Residential Property and a small motor boat passed
on the canal during tbe second sample period.
2) RLU 2. vebicular traffic associated with tbe adjacent retail shops moved in and out of the
parking lot area primarily during the first sample period.
3) RLU 3. several loud vebicles with music moved in and out ofthe parking lot area during both
sample periods.
4) The noise level recorded during tbe 4A sample period can be contributed to excessive
vehicular traffic aloog Congress Avenue.
Date of Study: September 28,2006
Ambient Sound Level Study
8ru's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02
Page 7
.
8. RECOMMENDATIONS
REP recommends using only the patio doors on the south side of the building for access to the
entertainment area (administrative control) and adjusting the main entrance door to eliminate the
"banging" when closing.
In addition to the above recommendations, the sound heard at the receiving land uses and outside
the building from the live indoor entertainment can be controlled and/or modulated by not
propping doors open; by using sound absorbing doors; by incorporating engineering controls into
the entertainment area such as interior acoustical ceiling panels for broad-band Daise and other
sound absorbing building materials (carpet, drywall, and wall coverings) and by placing the band,
speakers and amplifiers at least 3 feet away from walls.
Therefore a combination of the administrative controls and building finishes and other sound
treatment products inside the entertainment area will either keep the sound or absorb the sound
inside the building reducing the reflection of sound and subsequent "noise" heard outside the
building.
J
Ambient SOWld Level Study
Bru's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02
Date of Study: September 28,2006
Page 8
.
9. CONCLUSIONS
The addition and the proposed entertainment at the Site will not have an adverse effect on humans
nor will it unnecessarily disturb enjoyment of life or property based on distance separating the
Site from residential sensitive zones. Bru's Room Sports Grill will be in compliance with the
sound standards set forth in the City of Boynton Beach Noise Ordinance between the hours of
I 0:00PM to 7:00AM. As it appears the conditional use permit should be approved.
AIl LIO readings recorded at the Site property lines did not exceed the LIO sound criteria of 65
dBA with or without amplified music except for the LI 0 background reading at the east property
perimeter along Congress Avenue was 77 dBA with no amplified music. This is a heavy traffic
area.
A band may increase the LI 0 at the entrances to the Site by ] to 2 dBA. This I to 2 dBA
increase will not be noticeable 250 to 650 ft. away at the receiving residential land uses because
as the distance doubles between the noise source and the receiving land uses, the sound detected
by the human ear will decrease by 6 dB. This was confirmed by a decrease in Ll 0 from 67 dBA
at the Delray Beach location outside the door while the band was playing to 58 dBA at the
property line 240 feet away.
The numerous trees and some structures between the Site and the canal will absorb or reflect
sound. The sound will travel over the trees and structures, losing the ground effect from the canal
or lake. The data collected during the sampling event supports this conclusion.
Incorporating our recommendations for a combination of administrative controls and building
finishes into the construction of the entertainment area will minimize "noise" heard outside the
entertainment area. The nonnal opening of doors for people to enter and leave the establishment
during these hours wiIJ not create sound disturbances or unnecessary noise.
J
10. CLOSING
REP Associates, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide industrial hygiene services and assist
you in obtaining your conditional land use approval. Contact our offices at 305/279-5255 or
561/627-18]0 with any questions.
Prepared by,
REP Associates, IDe.
Approved For Release:
REP Associates, IDe.
~~~
~
Teresa A. Thomas
Project Manager
/<~-~)ut-^--
Karen M. Meyer, CIH
Vice President
Ambient Sound Level Study
Bru's Room Sports Grill, North Congress Ave. Boynton Beach, FL
REP Project No. 2396.01.02 '
Date of Study: September 28, 2006
Page 9
.
APPENDIX A
FIGURE
.
~~r
;;:;-
::l
~
5
z
~
~
::J
o
:I:
~
~
5
::l
::Ii
/S
@
~II
m
s
@
-;:-
3
5
~
w
::Ii
~
!i
~ ~ ll!
5 ::I! g tl
~ !i Q ~
III ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ e
~ Q.. Q.. Q.O 5: I!:
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~ ::I! ~o ...
iil <'l iillE 10 g
~[t]
!~ ~!~ c..
,. <(
is! ~
~ 0 Isl ~
(/)
I~' ~I!
z ~
@ 181 <I *_
~
~~
@Sg
~
~
_ CONGRESS AVENUE
MEDIAN
CONGRESS AVENUE----
~~
G
::Ii::!
CIS;;:
aE",C>
!ii",~
~~~
S'"
I!lI
~
~~l
~~l
l~
w
3
ll~
~~
W
::l ....
~c5~
~Q:C!
cnO~
~cnlt,..,
OW ....
o~~ .
O:zUO
cnoLSz
. UlD....
::l U
O::Z:zw
lDli:06
01'-0::
Z~Q.
,..,OQ.
,..,lDw
,.., 0:
-
.--
~
~
'"
~~
:I:~
~
,..-
~
~
13
(.)
~
o
'---
~~
.
APPENDIX B
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
Bru's Room-east entrance
Hotel located to the north- existing
trees and general landscaping
. ASSOCIATES. INC:
. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, ENGINEERS &. PLANNERS
Northwest corner of Site- existing
structures, trees and general
landscaping
South patio area
Client: Bru'sRoom
Location: 1333 North Congress Ave
FlEP Ref: 2396.01.02
Date of pic. : 09/2812006
Southwest corner of the building
West property perimeter
Bru's Room property from the northwest sensitive
zone
- ASSOCIATES. INC~
. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
Client: . Bru's Room
Location: 1333N()rth Congress Ave
R.EP Ref: 2396.01.02
Date of pic.: 09/2812006
View of the secured delivery located
on the west of the building.
~ ASSOCIATES. INC:
. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS, ENGINEERS & PLANNERS
View of the kitchen area that will be
converted to the Entertainment area.
Client: Bru'sRoom
L()ciltion: 1333 North Congress Ave
REPRef: 2396.01.02
Date of pic.: 09/2812006
...
EXHIBIT "D" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use / Maior Site Plan Modification
Project name: Bru's Room
File number: COUS 05-009 / MSPM 06-004
Reference: 3rdtreview plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with an October 10. 2006 Planning
and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the Commission and at permit review.
2. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
Conditions of Approval
Bru's Room
CaDS 05-009 / MSPM 06-004
Page 2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory
Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the commission and at permit review.
4. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
5. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
6. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
7. The owner shall include the following measures to maintain the noise level of
the amplified music at an acceptable level:
. limited access (emergencies only) through the delivery door located on the
south side of the building next to the stage area (deliveries will be received
earlier in the day prior to live music);
. utilizing the following construction materials for the proposed addition:
block wall, acoustical ceiling tiles, metal deck and roof insulation, new
ceiling height of 12 feet, drywall with R-19 insulation, carpeting, and brick
building exterior;
. replacing doors which lead from the new stage / lounge area to the outdoor
bar area with more soundproof doors which will be kept closed during
Conditions of Approval
Bru's Room
CaDS 05-009 / MSPM 06-004
Page 3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
performances as much as possible;
. no speakers in the outdoor bar area;
. placing speakers in the live music area at least 3 feet away from the wall; and
. providing additional landscaping around building to provide a dense
vegetative sound buffer (large potted palms to line the exterior of the outdoor
bar area, and additional foundation landscaping of varying heights as
proposed on the landscape plan presented).
8. If sound levels of the amplified music are ultimately measured to exceed
sound limitations of the code, the owner or operator will either reduce the
amplification level to comply with city sound limits, or apply additional
sound mitigation measures to accomplish same. Sound readings would be
taken by city personnel certified in using a sound level meter.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
To be determined.
MWRIkz
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\COUS\COA.doc
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Project name: Bru's Room
Pile number: COUS 05-009
Reference: 1 '(review plans identified as a Conditional Use with an August 17.2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments: NONE
I Comments: NONE POLICE I I I
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
1. This application is for conditional use for live music yet Sheet A1.00 and
A1.01 notes a proposed addition and a proposed outside bar. Please clarify.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
2. Existing Site: Sheet A1.00 (Landscaping)
The applicant is indicating on this sheet the existing parking lot and
landscape areas throughout the site. The existing landscape trees, bushes,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
02/10/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
plants and sod for these areas should be shown accurately on the plans in
accordance with the original City approved landscape plans on file in the
Planning Department as NWSP 97-007, Cooker Bar & Grill, Sheet L-l,
3-10-97. This landscape plan will replace the old landscape plan and
become part of the site.
Any existing landscape trees, bushes, plants and sod throughout the site
that are dead, missing or in poor health, must be replaced in conjunction
with the use of the parking lot for the conditional use. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
3. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
4. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8 Yz
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and
submit that to staff as well.
5. Submit two (2) copies of the following as required per page 3 of the
Conditional Use Application:
Last recorded Warranty Deed for the subject property, and a certificate from
an attorney-at-law or a title insurance company certifying who the current
fee simple title holders of record of the subject property are, and the nature
and extent of their interest therein.
Legal survey, prepared by a surveyor registered in the State of Florida,
showing an accurate legal description of the subject property, and the total
acreage computed to the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of an acre (these
two surveys are in addition to the surveys required on page 6 of the
application).
5, The application submitted simply describes the project as "outdoor music".
Submit a justification letter to supplement the inadequate project description
and provide the following additional details:
Clarify request IS for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail lounge" which IS
conditional use in the C-3 zoning district when located within 600 feet of
residential property.
Hours of operation for Bru's room,
Type and frequency of special events,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
02/1 0/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Details of proposed outdoor music (hours, live bands, amplified)
Type of sound barriers proposed, and,
Justify reason why music has to be located outdoors.
6. It is recommended that the site plan be revised to enclose the outdoor
bar/dining area to reduce the negative impact that amplified music will have
on adjacent residential property.
7. Plans submitted are dated 2003 and indicate "proposed future addition", and
"proposed future take-out window", along with "proposed outside bar".
Please update plans by clarifying all existing use areas and only refer to the
use proposed for this application request (conditional use to allow a
nightclub within 600 feet of residential). The additional proposals of
outside bar, future take-out window, and future addition will require a
separate application and plans to be submitted (for major site plan
modification). It is recommended that both applications (for conditional
use and site plan modification) be reviewed concurrently. If concurrent
review is desired, submit completed site plan modification application,
required application documents and plans, and fee.
8. Applications for conditional use approval and/or major site plan
modifications are subject to the City's Concurrency Management
Ordinance. Submit a traffic study to Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering for their review and approval, and a copy to the City for the
file.
9. Provide applicant responses to the standards for evaluating conditional uses
(Ch.2. Sec. I1.2.D.1.-B. of the Land Development Regulations).
10, Submit all of the following for the sound analysis required for all
conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs:
Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment and the methods and
materials to be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will
be met.
The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the
acoustic level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent
and sound reflecting materials to be used, coasting of the surfaces of
ceilings, walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
02/10/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
II. Provide a floor plan of building which identifies all use areas (kitchen,
restaurant seating, bar, etc.), including any stage area for open mike night.
12. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional
use is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\COUS 05-009\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS,doc
....
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-165
TO:
Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
John Huntington, Police Department
H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department
Timothy K. Large, Building Division
Jody Rivers, Parks Division
Laurinda Logan, Engineering Division
Eric Johnson, Planning Department
Kathleen Zeitler, Planning Department
FROM:
Ed Breese
Principal Planner
DATE:
September 1, 2005
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
15T Review - Conditional Use
Project Bru's Room
Location - 1333 N. Congress Avenue
Agent Bob Brudzinski
File No.
COUS 05-009
( Conditional Use for Live Music)
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should be made available
via e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on Fridav. September 9. 2005. When
preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code
sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to sufficiently revise plans to forward for Board recommendation:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the
reviewer by contacting Eric Johnson, or myself.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Code deficiencies outside of review responsibility, may be included in review comments. The
comment and the specific code section should be cited.
5. If a reviewing member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the
time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that
...
Page 2
they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the
project be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution
to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-
mail. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of reviewing staff
members.
EB:sc
Attachment
xc: Marshall Gage, Police Department
Pete Mazzella, Assistant Dir. Of Utilities
Jeffrey Livergood, Public Works Director
Don Johnson, Building Division
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\COUS 05-009\Memo for 1 st Plans Review ,doc
Revised 1/14/02
-
BRU'S ROOM - MSPM 06-004
RESPONSE TO 2nd STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
PREPARED BY CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
October 10, 2006
2nd REVIEW COMMENTS
Maior Site Plan Modification/Conditional Use
Project name: Bru's Room
File number: MSPM 06-004/COUS 05-009
Reference: 2ndt review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a September 26. 2006 Planning
and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments; None
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PLANNERS lLANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (5611 994-6411
"
"
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS - 2nd Review
Page 2 of 9
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for October lOth TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the Commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
2. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Comment Noted.
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
3. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory
Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
4. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Comment Noted.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVElOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561l 994-6411
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS - 2nd Review
Page 3 of 9
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for October lOth TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
BUILDING DIVISION (con't.)
5. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Comments Noted.
6. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
Comment Noted.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
7. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
Note has been added.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
),
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS - 2nd Review
Page 4 of 9
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for October 10th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
8. At the next TART meeting provide a full set of reduced / revised drawings,
sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk
(PDP) and submit that to staff as well.
Comment Noted. Material to be provided.
9. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional use
is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Comment Noted.
10. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan
set.
Comment Noted.
11. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art
in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation if
applicable.
Comment Noted.
12. The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following
criteria required for all conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and is
therefore not considered valid for purposes of determining the true impact on
adjacent properties. Please submit a revised sound study which more clearly
details, addresses, and specifies the following code requirements:
. Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment the methods and materials to
be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
See Page 4 of the Ambient Sound Level Study dated
October 3, 2006.
. The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the
acoustic level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
See revised Ambient Sound Level Study dated October 3,
2006.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Floridal (561) 994-6411
."
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS - 2nd Review
Page 5 of 9
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for October I Oth TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
· The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent and
sound reflecting materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings,
walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
See Page 5 of the Ambient Sound Level Study dated
October 3, 2006.
· It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
This has been addressed in the revised Ambient Sound
Level Study dated October 3, 2006
13. Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a
regular basis, why was the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound
sampling of a band? What was the band that night (single band member or
full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the sound
study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid
August)? Why was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not how
sound travels over the waterbody between Bru's Room and the adjacent noise
sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the sound analysis
recommends soundproofing and limiting door access during band play to
emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be incorporated
into the design of the addition, yet the applicant has not indicated such. What
exactly is the conclusion "it appears as if Bru's Room will be in conformance
with the City's Ordinance" based on? Revise plans to include proposed
soundproofing measures and door access restrictions (delivery door next to
stage as well as to outdoor bar area) that will be included in the daily
operations. Revise sound study to address all of the above and detail
recommendations and provide a more conclusive verification that Bru's
Room will be able to comply.
See analysis and recommendations of the revised Ambient
Sound Level Study dated October 3, 2006.
14. There are discrepancies between the current survey and the site plan. Please
have surveyor correct the survey to indicate front dining area is under roof.
The Survey has been modified to show area as being
enclosed. Also, two utility easements have been added.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
It
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS - 2nd Review
Page 6 of 9
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for October lOth T ART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
15. Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new
standing seam metal roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will be
open (no walls or windows), or partially enclosed.
Elevations have been modified to add the information
requested. This area will be partially enclosed with a low
rail fence and the roll-up weather shades. Also, there is a
jasmine hedge along the exterior of the open bar area and a
row of potted areca palms.
16. Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from Congress
Avenue. Revise building elevations to indicate canopies, potted plants, etc.
Elevations for both existing and new construction have
been modified to show existing canopy and lighting
features. Additional Photo Exhibits are included showing
lighting and canopies on existing elevations.
17. Revise building elevations of existing and proposed buildings to include
building colors, including the paint manufacturer's name and color code, and
type / color of brick to match existing (Chapter 4, Section 7.D).
The information requested above is provided in this
submission.
18. Submit paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building
walls, trim, doors, etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the
existing buildings, and proposed building addition, and include paint
manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
A color and material board has been provided with this
submission.
19. Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the
TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not
glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at the public meetings. Revise
renderings to include foundation landscaping.
A colored elevation of that portion of the north and west
portion of the building where the new construction is
proposed is herein provided. Colored Photos of the
remaining existing elevations are also provided.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Floridal (561) 994-6411
~
"
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS - 2nd Review
Page 7 of 8
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for October 1 Oth TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
20. Label landscape buffers on site plan and landscape plan.
INCLUDE REJECT
The landscape buffers have been identified and labeled.
21. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). Revise plans to indicate up lighting
in landscaped areas on site.
The Architect has updated the elevations to show existing
building lighting. As shown on these elevations and the
various photos contained herein, both the east and north
elevations currently contain accent lighting that illuminates
the respective frontage access as well as the landscaping.
22. Revise site plan and landscape plan to indicate type, purpose, and width of
existing and proposed easements on and adjacent to subject property.
We have confirmed that there are two additional FPL
easements on the property and both have been added to
the Site Plan. There is a 10 foot easement on the north side
of the site and a 20 foot easement along the Congress
A venue frontage.
23. Revise plans to indicate proposed shrubs instead of just sod on the landscape
island next to the northernmost handicap space.
We have reviewed this area and are proposing to add a
ligustrum tree in the area.
24. The required foundation landscaping should include trees as well as shrubs
and groundcovers. Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on
north and south sides of building with Green Malayan Coconut palms and
Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will add to the
ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier.
Revise plans to indicate existing potted palms in this area and any proposed
landscaping.
The following modifications and additions have been made
on the Landscape Plan:
. On the north elevation we have modified
the proposed landscaping at the entrance
ways to provide for variegated
pittosporum with a front laver of crotons.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
, '
'II,
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS - 2nd Review
Page 8 of 8
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for October 10th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
. As noted above, we have added a new
ligustrum tree in the landscape island.
. We have amended the plan to show the
locations of the existing potted areca
palms along the outdoor bar area.
. In addition to the above our previous
submission had provided for the
installation of a jasmine hedge and
clusters of alexander palms to be
installed along the new building addition.
. We have a note on the plan that all
damaged material or material that is not in
good condition will be replaced.
INCLUDE REJECT
25. Bring landscaping up to code on site and replace missing or damaged trees
and shrubs. Additional landscaping, including colorful perennials, is
recommended around building foundation to maximize project appearance.
See response to item #24 above.
26. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24
inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately
after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.CA.).
All existing and proposed plant materials are or will be a
minimum of 24 inches.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
...
2nd REVIEW COMMENTS
Maior Site Plan Modification/Conditional Use
Project name: Bru's Room
File number: MSPM 06-004/COUS 05-009
Reference: 2ndtreview plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a September 26. 2006 Planning
and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the Commission and at permit review.
2. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
2nd Review Comments
Bru's Room MSPM 06-004
2
TAeT
lC ~ If l.LVU
10' J 0 I 0(0
~
..
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory
Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the commission and at permit review.
4. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
5. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
6. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
7. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the eXlstmg
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition V
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
8. At the next TART meeting provide a full set of reduced / revised drawings,
sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk V-
(PDF) and submit that to staff as well.
9. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional use
is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. V
2nd Review Comments
Bru's Room MSPM 06-004
3
DEPARTMENTS
10. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan
set.
11. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art
in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation if
applicable.
12. The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following
criteria required for all conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and is
therefore not considered valid for purposes of determining the true impact on
adjacent properties. Please submit a revised sound study which more clearly
details, addresses, and specifies the following code requirements:
· Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment the methods and materials to
be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
· The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the
acoustic level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
· The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent and
sound reflecting materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings,
walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
· It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
13. Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a
regular basis, why was the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound
sampling of a band? What was the band that night (single band member or
full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the sound
study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid
August)? Why was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not how
sound travels over the waterbody between Bru's Room and the adjacent noise
sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the sound analysis
recommends soundproofing and limiting door access during band play to
emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be incorporated
into the design of the addition, yet the applicant has not indicated such. What
exactly is the conclusion "it appears as if Bru' s Room will be in conformance
with the City's Ordinance" based on? Revise plans to include proposed
soundproofing measures and door access restrictions (delivery door next to
stage as well as to outdoor bar area) that will be included in the daily
operations. Revise sound study to address all of the above and detail
recommendations and provide a more conclusive verification that Bru's
Room will be able to comply.
14. There are discrepancies between the current survey and the site plan. Please
have surveyor correct the survey to indicate front dining area is under roof.
INCLUDE REJECT
v
v/
(!k~rY<~fJ f
<..;)5( () 00
v
2nd Review Comments
Bru's Room MSPM 06-004
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
15. Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new
standing seam metal roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will be V
open (no walls or windows), or partially enclosed.
16. Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from Congress
A venue. Revise building elevations to indicate canopies, potted plants, etc. \./""
1 7. Revise building elevations of existing and proposed buildings to include
building colors, including the paint manufacturer's name and color code, and V
type / color of brick to match existing (Chapter 4, Section 7.D).
18. Submit paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building
walls, trim, doors, etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the V
existing buildings, and proposed building addition, and include paint
manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
19. Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the
TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not V
glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at the public meetings. Revise
renderings to include foundation landscaping.
20. Label landscape buffers on site plan and landscape plan. \/"
21. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 1O.F.3.). Revise plans to indicate up lighting V
in landscaped areas on site.
22. Revise site plan and landscape plan to indicate type, purpose, and width of
existing and proposed easements on and adjacent to subject property. V
23. Revise plans to indicate proposed shrubs instead of just sod on the landscape V'
island next to the northernmost handicap space.
24. The required foundation landscaping should include trees as well as shrubs
and groundcovers. Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on
north and south sides of building with Green Malayan Coconut palms and
Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will add to the
ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier. V
Revise plans to indicate existing potted palms in this area and any proposed
landscaping.
25. Bring landscaping up to code on site and replace missing or damaged trees
and shrubs. Additional landscaping, including colorful perennials, IS V
recommended around building foundation to maximize project appearance.
2nd Review Comments
Bru's Room MSPM 06-004
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
26. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24
inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately V
after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section S.C.4.).
MWRIkz
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\MSPM 06-004\2nd REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
BRU'S ROOM - MSPM 06-004
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
PREPARED BY CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
For September 26th .TART MEETING
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Maior Site Plan Modification/Conditional Use
Project name: Bru's Room
File number: MSPM 06-004
Reference: 151 review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Planning and Zoning Department
date stamp marking. .
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. Show location of the loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.)
Location of loading area is now shown on Site Plan.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved any plans for water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Comment Noted.
3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the ,
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by
insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Comment Noted.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 2 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
UTILITIES (con't)
4. Any increase in demand will require an upgrade in the supply lateral and
meter size. Coordinate with the Deputy Director, Utilities, for any service
changes to the existing account.
The increase in building size per this plan is minor and no
increase in lateral size or meter size is anticipated.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
5. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "An plans submitted for specific permits
shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage,
curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from
other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth
Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD),
Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM)
and any others, shall be included with the permit request."
Note has been added but modified per discussions with
Lorenda Logan.
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Comment Noted.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
8. Show existing and proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans
(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.4.)
Site lighting has been added to Sheets A-1.01 (Site Plan)
and L-1 (Landscape Exhibit.)
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 3 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ENGINEERING DIVISION (con't)
9. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Comment Noted.
FIRE
Comments: . FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
10. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
11. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defmed in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6.
Construction type is IIIB Unprotected. 100% sprinklered.
12. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3.
The occupancy type is A-2 small assembly.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Comment Noted. ,
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 4 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
BUILDING DIVISION (con't)
14. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project,
identify on the site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn
over, or fast food with drive-through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the
site plan the number of existing seats, number of new seats and the total
number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all
seats including those seats that are around the bar.
The restaurant is an eat-in, high turnover. The restaurant
currently has 296 seats and we are proposing to add 33
additional seats.
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Comments Noted.
16. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
Note has been added to Site Plan.
17. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Comment Noted.
18. The handicapped toilet stall cannot be used as an access route to the other
toilet stall. Privacy must be maintained per the 2004 FBC, Section
426.3.2.2.
Toilet room has been modified to single use only.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 5 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existinf! Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
19. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees,. shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
Note has been added to Sheet L-1.
20. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
Note has been added to Sheet L-1.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existinf! Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
21. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
See Comment #19.
22. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
See Comment #20.
,
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 6 of 15
PR n & Associates
(or September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
23. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk (PDF)
and submit that to staff as well.
v
Comment noted.
24. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional
use is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. V
Comment noted.
25. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the
plan set.
Plan revisions have been reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
26. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation if
applicable.
The application was submitted. However, participation is
not required as construction cost is less than $250,000.
27. Revise Conditional Use application submitted (page 2, Project Description
to include more details or submit a justification letter to supplement the
application, and provide the following additional details: (A modified
Application package is herein enclosed.)
. Clarify conditional use request is for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail
lounge" which is a conditional use in the C-3 zoning district
when located within 600 feet of residential property.
This conditional use request is to allow live music
to be provided in the BruJs Room Spotts Grill on
Congress A venue. The following generally
summarizes the petition. Bru's Room is a
bar/restaurant that. is proposing to have live
indoor music.
v
v
i&
~
t/
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 7 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
. Hours of operation for Bru's Room,
Operating Hours for the facility are from 11 :00 AM
to 2:00 AM.
. Type and frequency of special musical events,
Music will be indoors and it is estimated that the
frequency will be around 8 to 10 times per month.
It will consist of small live bands and individual
entertainers.
· Details of proposed music (hours, live bands, typical instruments
and amplification).
The proposed location for the live music is shown
on the Site Plan and is in the interior of the
building. As noted above, the music will be
provided by small bands or individual
entertainers approximately 8 to 10 times per
month.
. Type of sound barriers proposed, and ,
The area where live entertainment is proposed
already contains sufficient sound buffers and no
additional barriers are required (see Noise Study).
In addition to the building construction, there is a
massing of large canopy trees on the site
perimeter that will further act as a sound barrier
for the project
. Measures to be taken to ensure that music remains indoors and
does not include outdoor bar area (how will door between new
lounge area and outdoor bar stay closed.
There are no plans to provide music in the
outdoor seating area. The door between the new
lounge and the outdoor area will remain closed
(primarily for air conditioning purposes.)
However, it will be used by service personnel and
customers who need to access both areas.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 8 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
28. It was previously recommended that the site plan be revised to enclose the
outdoor bar/dining area to reduce the negative impact that amplified music
will have on adjacent residential property. A solid roof is now proposed to
replace the existing canopy. It is not clear if outdoor bar area will be open,
screened in, or partially enclosed. Include details on plans that indicate the
type of materials for walls and windows for the outdoor bar area.
Live music will only be played in the new proposed bar
area. The existing outdoor bar area will remain the same,
however, it should be noted that the area is partially
enclosed by existing landscaping, an aluminum fence and
clear plastic rollup shades for weather protection.
. 29. For purposes of determining if correct use classification was utilized for
traffic statement (high turnover restaurant vs. bar), please provide the
following breakdown of gross proceeds: % from sale of food, and % from
sale of alcoholic beverages.
55% from sale of food.
45% from sale of alcohol.
30. The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following
criteria required for all conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and
is therefore not considered valid for purposes of determining the true impact
on adjacent properties:
a.
Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment the methods and materials to
be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
b.
The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the
acoustic level ofthe sound emitting devices/equipment.
c.
The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent
and sound reflecting materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings,
walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
d.
It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
INCLUDE REJECT
v
v
SOVVJcL';)r-uGF-,' ~~~ ~
{(X;f d'D () f
Jv~a..% a~Cr-->r:J ~1 r~?
/vo f QA C UO__,/--...., ?
durs/'-, 'f )'Y-I7f
7
See the Ambient Sound Level Addendum provided with
this submission for specific response to the above
comments. ~ 8 /UV 'f- .e )L~ e e d {j 6 t,D-' P L
rrts~1t'Yl if- s~ ~I\JV ~{ co-bv.-tLvL re V ~ ~~d D
v
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 9 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
31. Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a
regular basis, why was the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound
sampling of a band? What was the band that night (single band member or
full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the sound
study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid
August)? Why was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not
how sound travels over the waterbody between Bru's Room and the
adjacent noise sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the ~. '
analysis recommends soundproofmg and limiting door access during band
play to emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be
incorporated into the design of the addition, yet the applicant has not \L.--
indicated such. What exactly is the conclusion "it appears as if Bru's Room .~
will be in conformance with the City's Ordinance" based on?
-
See the Ambient Sound Level Addendum provided with
this submission for specific responses to the above
comments.
32. There are discrepancies between previously approved plans and this request
regarding the number of seats. Include within the plan set a floor plan of
the existing building and proposed addition which graphically shows the
number of seats and seating arrangement, and label all use areas/rooms.
Exhibits &t.1 and Ext.2 have been added to the plan
package showing the current seating arrangement in the
restaurant.
33. Note on floor plans where amplified music is to be played.
Plans have been modified to note where music will be
played.
34. Include in tabular data the number of existing seats (restaurant and bar areas
including outdoor bar area), and the number of proposed seats (for new
lounge area), and a total number of seats. Revise parking information if
needed.
This information has been added to the Site Plan and the
Parking Data has been revised.
35. Indicate dimensions of addition on site plan.
Dimensions have been added to plan.
INCLUDE REJECT
StJ{Jv'-f. VJ ( S
~lLrre~ lo'i~+
riP- ~ I'! (I:-, yY1 tdJU'\v
"$ tiQ () L rvJ
V~
v
~
v
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 10 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
36. Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new
standing seam metal roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will
be open (no walls or windows), or partially enclosed.
A wall section detail has been added to the plan package
showing proposed support. As noted above, this area is
partially enclosed with landscaping, a fence and plastic
roll up shades.
37. Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from
Congress Avenue.
The proposed addition is located in the rear of the
building and will match the existing building height,
materials and color. The plan does not propose any
changes to that portion of the building facing Congress
Avenue.
38. Revise building elevations of existing and proposed buildings to include
materials, colors, including the paint manufacturer's name and color code
(Chapter 4~Section 7.D.) and building height at roof midpoint.
N'tl/n<-t. O"p h Il ~k.
Elevations have been modified to show height and
materials.
39. Submit a paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building
walls, trim, doors, etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the
existing buildings, and proposed building addition, and include paint
manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
The proposed addition will be consistent with the existing
building in the use of the brick veneer finish. Enclosed is
a photo showing the character of the existing restaurant.
40. Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the
TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not
glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at the public meetings.
A colored elevation of the proposed addition will be
provided at the TART Meeting. . ,Enclosed herein is a photo
of the existing building showing the texture of the
material to be used on the new addition.
INCLUDE REJECT
k>e
v.
V /S~
-e~
v
\,,/
v
v
"e4 .C'
e ~i?
~~b~~
~ ("~ '1~
(? 4~1 0
0,1
o "t)
. -f
it)
~S
IOU'
S"'t! : $;c ~
C . 04)Q
IS
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 11 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
41. Provide building setbacks for all structures in tabular data (minimum
required and provided setback for front, rear, and sides).
Tabular data for building setbacks has been added to the V
Site Plan.
42. Revise site plan information regarding adjacent property to north to include
the canal which directly abuts the subject property.
V
Location of canal has been more clearly identified.
43. Revise site plan to include right-of-way width of Congress Ave or distance
from centerline.
A dimension has been added from centerline of Congress V
Avenue.
44. Label buffer widths on site plan and landscape plan. - I L (J..N 01
---=====---- \/'"'
Buffer widths have been added to Sheets A 1.01 and L-1. lo[). ff~
45. Provide site lighting locations (freestanding light poles in parking area) on
site and landscape plans and label as existing.
Site lighting has been added and labeled as existing on V
Sheets A1.01 and L-1.
46. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 1O.F.3.).
No lighting changes are proposed by this Site Plan 'V
change.
47. Revise site plan and landscape plan to indicate type, purpose, and width of
existing and proposed easements on and adjacent to subject property.
Easements have been added and labeled on Sheets A1.01 V
and L-1.
48. On landscape plan label the tree/shrub shown on the south side of dumpster.
,
The tree has been labeled (Oak). J
'&e a.{fJ--
./('
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENl s -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 12 of 15
PREP ARc..... by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
49.
PLANNING AND ZONING (can't)
A tree is required o~ the landscape island next to the northernmost .han<}icap
space. pl~-f- L/~ ,'N ti~ /\Jof ~d
There is currently an existing Oak tree adjacent to the
sidewalk in this same Landscape Island. Thus, there will
not be room for an additional canopy tree.
v
50. Landscape plan legend indicates 56 proposed jasmine are * indicated by
cloud, yet only 18 jasmine are actually indicated with a cloud on the plan.
Please correct.
v
This error has been corrected.
51. Clarify on landscape plan all new material to be added and its location on
site, and label remaining landscaping as existing.
New material to be added has been clarified on plan and
tables. All other material shown is existing and is
identified on the table.
v
52. Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that is
pervious and impervious.
v
Note has been added.
53. Add note to landscape plan regarding existing water source for the irrigation
system.
v
Note has been added. Source for irrigation is well.
54. Add note to landscape plan that the use of mulch other than cypress is
required.
v
Note has been added.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 13 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
55. The required foundation landscaping should include.trees as well as shrubs
and groundcovers. Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on
north and south sides of building with Green Malayan Coconut palms and
Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will add to the
ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier.
Alexander palms have been added to the North side of the
new addition. The applicant currently utilizes portable
areca palms in pots to provide addition~1 screening and
ambiance for the outdoor bar area. The remainder of the
plan is existing and unchanged and is consistent with
previously approved plans.
56. Bring landscaping up to code on site and replace missing or damaged trees
and shrubs. Additional landscaping may be recommended where necessary
to minimize offsite impacts and/or maximize project appearance where site
includes large parking lots, truck circulation or loading area, drive through
lanes, etc..
IS 1/ dou r,N L~-
Missing and damaged material will be replaced as noted.
57. Indicate on landscape plan how the plant material to be removed for the
addition will be mitigated by planting additional material in another location
to replace removed material. Is it possible that the removed material can be
relocated elsewhere on site.
Plant materials to be mitigated are shown on Sheet L-1.
The material to be removed for the new construction
consists of nine (9) crotons and one (1) dracaena, none of
which are in good condition. They will be removed from
the site and new landscaping will be installed for the
building addition.
58. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
Comment noted.
59. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height at the time of
installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.C.2
Comment noted.
INCLUDE REJECT
v
_ ;f1o
V I'(~. ""e
e~
y\, ~.~
Ov
v
v
1/'
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 14 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
60. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches m spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site I /'
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). V
Comment noted.
i (t~( .;}'I
k) r--rl.,ol1C ? /:l
,
.61.
Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species.
Indicate the amount of native material in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.P): On the landscape plan plant list,
separate the trees from the groundcover / shrubs. Furthermore, separate
shade trees from palm trees. Indicate by asterisk, the native species and
ensure that at least 50% of landscape material is native. On plant list
indicate which species are native, and percentage of each plant category
(trees, palms, shrubs, groundcovers, etc.) that are native species (minimum
of 50% native).
v
This information has been added to the inventory of plant
material.
62. Revise plans to include a detail of dumpster and the type and height of
screening.
L/
Site Plan has been modified to include this information.
63. The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and
materials, the design of the principal buildings and shall be integrated with
other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a
note indicating this requirement. Provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure.
The existing dumpster has the same outer material and
appearance as the main building.
v
64. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the
building color (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the elevations
indicating this requirement.
v
Note has been added.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 15 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
65. Rooftops will be treated as part of the building elevation. All rooftop
equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance
of 600 feet (Chapter 9, Section 1I.E.).
All rooftop equipment is screened. Note has been added
to Sheet A3.01.
66. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for
presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning
and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the
scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at
the Board meetings.
Comment noted.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\8ru's Room\MSPM 06-004\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
INCLUDE REJECT
v
I-
'V
"
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
To:
Fax#:
Date:
From:
Re:
Toni at Charles Putman & Associates
561-994-0447
September 28, 2006
Kathleen Zeitler, Planner
Your Meeting Notes for 9/26 TART
For Bru's Room MSPM 06-004
Pages to Follow: 15
Attached are your notes that were left with us after the TART meeting. The revised (2nd
Review 9/26 TART) comments will be e-mailed to you later today if all goes as planned.
Thank you.
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
BRU'S ROOM - MSPM 06-004
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
PREPARED BY CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
~-.....-.
~!'I~~ j
;r;r.[r..,lit.'(:i~
...-.._~Nf:\'C1\ fif [.of4
---.-.::.~;
"',-..--...
For September 26th TART MEETING
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
Major Site Plan Modification/Conditional Use
Project name: Bru's Room
File number: MSPM 06-004
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Planning and Zoning Department
date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. Show location of the loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.)
Location of loading area is now shown on Site Plan.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved any plans for water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Comment Noted.
3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by
insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Comment Noted.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 2 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
UTILITIES (con't)
4. Any increase in demand will require an upgrade in the supply lateral and
meter size. Coordinate with the Deputy Director, Utilities, for any service
changes to the existing account.
The increase in building size per this plan is minor and no
increase in lateral size or meter size is anticipated.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
5. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits
shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage,
curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from
other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth
Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD),
Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM)
and any others, shall be included with the permit request."
Note has been added but modified per discussions with
Lorenda Logan.
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Comment Noted.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
8. Show existing and proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans
(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.4.)
Site lighting has been added to Sheets A-1.01 (Site Plan)
and L-1 (Landscape Exhibit.)
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 3 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ENGINEERING DIVISION (con't)
9. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Comment Noted.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
10. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
11. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defmed in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6.
Construction type is IIIB Unprotected. 100% sprinklered.
12. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defmed in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3.
The occupancy type is A-2 small assembly.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Comment Noted.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 4 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
BUILDING DIVISION (con't)
14. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project,
identify on the site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn
over, or fast food with drive-through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the
site plan the number of existing seats, number of new seats and the total
number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all
seats including those seats that are around the bar.
The restaurant is an eat-in, high turnover. The restaurant
currently has 296 seats and we are proposing to add 33
additional seats.
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Comments Noted.
16. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
Note has been added to Site Plan.
17. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Comment Noted.
18. The handicapped toilet stall cannot be used as an access route to the other
toilet stall. Privacy must be maintained per the 2004 FBC, Section
426.3.2.2.
Toilet room has been modified to single use only. ,
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 5 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existine Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
19. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
Not~ has been added to Sheet L-1.
20. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
Note has been added to Sheet L-1.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existine Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
21. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
See Comment #19.
22. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
See Comment #20.
,
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 6 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
23. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk (PDF)
and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted.
24. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional j
use is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Comment noted.
25. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the
p Ian set.
Plan revisions have been reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
26. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation if
applicable.
The application was submitted. However, participation is
not required as construction cost is less than $250,000.
27. Revise Conditional Use application submitted (page 2, Project Description
to include more details or submit a justification letter to supplement the
application, and provide the following additional details: (A modified
Application package is herein enclosed.)
. Clarify conditional use request is for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail
lounge" which is a conditional use in the C-3 zoning district
when located within 600 feet of residential property.
This conditional use request is to allow live music
to be provided in the Bru's Room Sports Grill on
Congress A venue. The following generally
summarizes the petition. Bru's Room is a
bar/restaurant that is proposing to have live
indoor music.
INCLUDE REJECT
j/
,j
j
j
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 7 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
. Hours of operation for Bru' s Room,
Operating Hours for the facility are from 11 :00 AM
to 2:00 AM.
. Type and frequency of special musical events,
Music will be indoors and it is estimated that the
frequency will be around 8 to 10 times per month.
It will consist of small live bands and individual
entertainers.
. Details of proposed music (hours, live bands, typical instruments
and amplification).
The proposed location for the live music is shown
on the Site Plan and is in the interior of the
building. As noted above, the music will be
provided . by small bands or individual
entertainers approximately 8 to 10 times per
month.
. Type of sound barriers proposed, and ,
The area where live entertainment is proposed
already contains sufficient sound buffers and no
additional barriers are required (see Noise Study).
In addition to the building construction, there is a
massing of large canopy trees on the site
perimeter that will further act as a sound barrier
for the project
. Measures to be taken to ensure that music remains indoors and
does not include outdoor bar area (how will door between new
lounge area and outdoor bar stay closed.
There are no plans to provide music in the
outdoor seating area. The door between the new
lounge and the outdoor area will remain closed
(primarily for air conditioning purposes.)
., However, it will be used by service personnel and
customers who need to access both areas.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 8 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
28. It was previously reeommended that the site plan be revised to enclose the
outdoor bar/dining area to reduce the negative impact that amplified music
will have on adjacent residential property. A solid roof is now proposed to
replace the existing canopy. It is not clear if outdoor bar area will be open,
screened in, or partially enclosed. Include details on plans that indicate the
type of materials for walls and windows for the outdoor bar area
Live music will only be played in the new proposed bar
area. The existing outdoor bar area will remain the same,
however, it should be noted that the area is partially
enclosed by existing landscaping, an aluminum fence and
clear plastic rollup shades for weather protection.
29. For purposes of determining if correct use classification was utilized for
traffic statement (high turnover restaurant vs. bar), please provide the
following breakdown of gross proceeds: % from sale of food, and % from
sale of alcoholic beverages.
55% from sale of food.
45% from sale of alcohol.
30. The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following
criteria required for all conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and j
is therefore not considered valid for purposes of determining the true impact
on adjacent properties:
a. Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment the methods and materials to
be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
b. The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination ofthe
acoustic level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
c. The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent
and sound reflecting materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings,
walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
d. It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
See the Ambient Sound Level Addendum provided, with
this submission for specific response to the above
comments. 0 Il
.~ 8fL/J<-- SOv~ flP:pt-J"fP ~
.~ c~r). '_N1/ .....-"- - ..,L' ~i~.S
: ~r!:/~"::~l~~-:h rr;:- lJ)pt};.~!:~/_(~J's-SJ.. :~10J-AV
J
)
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 9 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
31. Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a
regular basis, why was the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound
sampling of a band? What was the band that night (single band member or
full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the sound
study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid
August)? Why was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not
how sound travels over the waterbody between Bru's Room and the
adjacent noise sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the sound
analysis recommends soundproofmg and limiting door access during band
play to emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be
incorporated into the design of the addition, yet the applicant has not
indicated such. What exactly is the conclusion "it appears as if Bru's Room
will be in conformance with the City's Ordinance" based on?
See the Ambient Sound Level Addendum provided with
this submission for specific responses to the above
comments.
32. There are discrepancies between previously approved plans and this request
regarding the number of seats. Include within the plan set a floor plan of
the existing building and proposed addition which graphically shows the
number of seats and seating arrangement, and label all use areas/rooms.
Exhibits Ext.1 and Ext.2 have been added to the plan
package showing the current seating arrangement in the
restaurant c;vru-*-Y flff/>{Jj S/:/
33. Note on floor plans where amplified music is to be played.
J
Plans have been modified to note where music will be
played.
)
34. Include in tabular data the number of existing seats (restaurant and bar areas
including outdoor bar area), and the number of proposed seats (for new
lounge area), and a total number of seats. Revise parking information if
needed.
J
This information has been added to the Site Plan and the
Parking Data has been revised.
35. Indicate dimensions of addition on site plan.
Dimensions have been added to plan.
,
J
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 10 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
36. Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new
standing seam metal roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will
be open (no walls or windows), or partially enclosed.
A wall section detail has been added to the plan package
showing proposed support. As noted above, this area is
partially enclosed with land.scaping, a fence and plastic
roll up shades. ~ vJ /~f ~ ~ D 1;
37. Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from
Congress Avenue. ~~ 1lLV I f;(l {( \.~V M-i tJf'I
The proposer:ddition is located in the rear of the
building and will match the existing building height,
materials and color. The plan does not propose any
changes to that portion of the building facing Congress
Avenue.
L
38. Revise building el vat ions of existing and proposed buildings to include
materials, colors, including the paint manufacturer's name and color code
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.) and building height at roof midpoint.
Elevations have been modified to show height and
maffJ.rials~,", ., {I ~ 11/. ~ I (l/l C/1 ,,/t
1't)W- ~f- b7Z.lcp((i pJG l)..\- J1Ifrre{L) 11" ,/ to /()~ /Y1141'1 v+tf
39. Submit a paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building
walls, trim, doors, etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the
existing buildings, and proposed building addition, and include paint
manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
The proposed addition will be consistent with the existing
building in the use of the brick veneer finish. Enclosed is
a photo showing the character of the existing restaurant.
40. Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the
TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not
glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at the public meetings.
INCLUDE REJECT
J
J
J
J
A colored elevation of the proposed addition will be /
provided at the TART Meeting. Enclosed herein is a phQto .
of the existing building showing the texture of the
material to be used on the new addition.
D1f~L
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 11 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
INCLUDE REJECT
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
41. Provide building setbacks for all structures in tabular data (minimum
required and provided setback for front, rear, and sides).
Tabular data for building setbacks has been added to the
Site Plan.
42. Revise site plan information regarding adjacent property to north to include
the canal which directly abuts the subject property.
Location of canal has been more clearly identified.
43. Revise site plan to include right-of-way width of Congress Ave or distance
from centerline.
A dimension has been added from centerline of Congress
Avenue.
44. Label buffer widths on site plan and landscape plan.
45.
Site lighting has been added and labeled as existing on
Sheets A1.01 and L-1.
46. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.).
No lighting changes are
change.
this Site Plan
47.
Easements have been added and labeled on Sheets A1.01
and L-1.
vi; ; e
48. On landscape plan label the tree/shrub shown on the south side of dumpster.
The tree has been labeled (Oak).
/
~/
/
J
j
J
/'
j
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMEN1::, -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 12 of 15
PREP ARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (can't)
49. A tree is required on the landscape island next to the northernmost handicap
space. . l ~~ L 01+ 1L ~~
There is currently an AJiYs6ng gak tree adjacent to the
sidewalk in this same Landscape Island. Thus, there will J
not be room for an additional canopy tree.
50. Landscape plan legend indicates 56 proposed jasmine are * indicated by
cloud, yet only 18 jasmine are actually indicated with a cloud on the plan.
Please correct.
/
This error has been corrected.
51. Clarify on landscape plan all new material to be added and its location on
site, and label remaining landscaping as existing.
New material to be added has been clarified on plan and
tables. All other material shown is existing and is
identified on the table.
~.
52. Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that IS
pervious and impervious.
Note has been added.
I
53. Add note to landscape plan regarding existing water source for the irrigation
system.
Note has been added. Source for irrigation is well.
I
54. Add note to landscape plan that the use of mulch other than cypress is
required.
Note has been added.
I
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 13 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
55. The required foundation landscaping should include trees as well as shrubs
and groundcovers. Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on
north and south sides of building with Green Malayan Coconut palms and
Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will add to the
ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier.
INCLUDE REJECT
Alexander palms have been added to the North side of the /
new addition. The applicant currently utilizes portable
areca palms in pots to provide additional screening and
ambiance for the outdoor bar area. The remainder of the
plan is. existing and unchanged and is consistent with
previously approved plans. 0 \'v vJ ~ ~Q..~ 0 \A~ '7
56. Bring landscaping up to code on site ari'd replace missing or ddmaged trees
and shrubs. Ad@ionallandscaping may be recommended where necessM'Y
to minimize 61fsite impacts andfor maximize project appearance where site j
includes large parking lots, truck circulation or loading area, drive through
lanes, etc.. ,lLe.. f01J W ~ I}t; t> eJ (A N& ~ c. hlf i 111 9
Missing ,m~ damaged material will be replaZed-6s noted.
57. Indicate on landscape plan how the plant material to be removed for the
addition will be mitigated by planting additional material in another location
to replace removed material. Is it possible that the removed material can be
relocated elsewhere on site.
Plant materials to be mitigated are shown on Sheet L-1.
The material to be removed for the new construction
consists of nine (9) crotons and one (1) dracaena, none of
which are in good condition. They will be removed from
the site and new landscaping will be installed for the
building addition.
J
58. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
Comment noted.
J
59. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height at the time of
installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.C.2
Comment noted.
J
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 14 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
60. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches III spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacmg measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). ~
Comment noted. '
61. Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species.
Indicate the amount of native material in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). On the landscape plan plant list,
separate the trees from the groundcover / shrubs. Furthermore, separate
shade trees from palm trees. Indicate by asterisk, the native species and
ensure that at least 50% of landscape material is native. On plant list
indicate which species are native, and percentage of each plant category
(trees, palms, shrubs, groundcovers, etc.) that are native species (minimum
of 50% native).
/
This information has been added to the inventory of plant
material.
62. Revise plans to include a detail of dumpster and the type and height of
screening.
Site Plan has been modified to include this information.
I
63. The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and
materials, the design of the principal buildings and shall be integrated with
other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a
note indicating this requirement. Provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure.
/
The existing dumpster has the same outer material and
appearance as the main building.
64. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the
building color (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the elevations
indicating this requirement.
Note has been added.
/
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 15 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th T ART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (can't)
65. Rooftops will be treated as part of the building elevation. All rooftop
equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimtim distance
o~et (~~apter 9, Section 1l.E.). /
All rooftop equipment is screened. Note has been added
to Sheet A3.01.
66. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for
presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning
and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the
scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at /
the Board meetings.
Comment noted.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\MSPM 06-004\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
Project name: Bru's Room
File number: MSPM 06-004 "
Reference: I st review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Planning andZonltHt Department
date stamp marking
-\
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS n ___'.____.____.,
. .
, ,
Major Site Plan Modification/Conditional Use,' I
! i.. I ,(;:-O? n ')
. '
i
~
,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. Show location of the loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.)
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved any plans for water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by
insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
4. Any increase in demand will require an upgrade in the supply lateral and
meter size. Coordinate with the Deputy Director, Utilities, for any service
changes to the existing account.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
S. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits
shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage,
curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from
other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth
Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD),
Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM)
and any others, shall be included with the permit request."
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
8. Show existing and proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans
(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.4.)
9. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
10. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
11. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6.
12. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
14. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project,
identify on the site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
over, or fast food with drive-through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the
site plan the number of existing seats, number of new seats and the total
number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all
seats including those seats that are around the bar.
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
16. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
17. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
18. The handicapped toilet stall cannot be used as an access route to the other
toilet stall. Privacy must be maintained per the 2004 FBC, Section
426.3.2.2.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existinl! Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
19. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade V ----
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
20. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition .
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11106
4
~
~ ~J' 0 ~
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Index to Plant Material Existine Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
21. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade V /
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
22. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition V
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
23. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk (PDF)
and submit that to staff as well.
24. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional
use is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
25. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the
plan set.
26. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation if
applicable.
27. Revise Conditional Use application submitted (page 2, Project Description
to include more details or submit a justification letter to supplement the
application, and provide the following additional details:
. Clarify conditional use request is for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail
lounge" which is a conditional use in the C-3 zoning district
when located within 600 feet of residential property.
. Hours of operation for Bru' s Room,
. Type and frequency of special musical events,
. Details of proposed music (hours, live bands, typical instruments
and amplification).
. Type of sound barriers proposed, and ,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
5
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
· Measures to be taken to ensure that music remains indoors and
does not include outdoor bar area (how will door between new
lounge area and outdoor bar stay closed.
28. It was previously recommended that the site plan be revised to enclose the
outdoor bar/dining area to reduce the negative impact that amplified music
will have on adjacent residential property. A solid roof is now proposed to
replace the existing canopy. It is not clear if outdoor bar area will be open,
screened in, or partially enclosed. Include details on plans that indicate the
type of materials for walls and windows for the outdoor bar area.
29. For purposes of determining if correct use classification was utilized for
traffic statement (high turnover restaurant vs. bar), please provide the
following breakdown of gross proceeds: % from sale of food, and % from
sale of alcoholic beverages.
30. The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following
criteria required for all conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and
is therefore not considered valid for purposes of determining the true impact
on adjacent properties:
a. Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment the methods and materials to
be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
b. The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the
acoustic level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
c. The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent
and sound reflecting materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings,
walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
d. It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
31. Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a
regular basis, why was the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound
sampling of a band? What was the band that night (single band member or
full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the sound
study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid
August)? Why was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not
how sound travels over the waterbody between Bru's Room and the
adjacent noise sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the sound
analysis recommends soundproofing and limiting door access during band
play to emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be
incorporated into the design of the addition, yet the applicant has not
indicated such. What exactly is the conclusion "it appears as if Bru' s Room
will be in conformance with the City's Ordinance" based on?
32. There are discrepancies between previously approved plans and this request
regarding the number of seats. Include within the plan set a floor plan of
the existing building and proposed addition which graphically shows the
number of seats and seating arrangement, and label all use areas/rooms.
33. Note on floor plans where amplified music is to be played.
34. Include in tabular data the number of existing seats (restaurant and bar areas
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
including outdoor bar area), and the number of proposed seats (for new
lounge area), and a total number of seats. Revise parking information if
needed.
35. Indicate dimensions of addition on site plan.
36. Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new
standing seam metal roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will
be open (no walls or windows), or partially enclosed.
37. Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from
Congress Avenue.
38. Revise building elevations of existing and proposed buildings to include
materials, colors, including the paint manufacturer's name and color code
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.) and building height at roof midpoint.
39. Submit a paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building
walls, trim, doors, etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the
existing buildings, and proposed building addition, and include paint
manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
40. Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the
TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not
glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at the public meetings.
41. Provide building setbacks for all structures in tabular data (minimum
required and provided setback for front, rear, and sides).
42. Revise site plan information regarding adjacent property to north to include
the canal which directly abuts the subject property.
43. Revise site plan to include right-of-way width of Congress Ave or distance
from centerline.
44. Label buffer widths on site plan and landscape plan.
45. Provide site lighting locations (freestanding light poles in parking area) on
site and landscape plans and label as existing.
46. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.).
47. Revise site plan and landscape plan to indicate type, purpose, and width of
existing and proposed easements on and adjacent to subject property.
48. On landscape plan label the tree/shrub shown on the south side of dumpster.
49. A tree is required on the landscape island next to the northernmost handicap
space.
50. Landscape plan legend indicates 56 proposed jasmine are * indicated by
cloud, yet only 18 jasmine are actually indicated with a cloud on the plan.
Please correct.
51. Clarify on landscape plan all new material to be added and its location on
site, and label remaining landscaping as existing.
52. Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that is
pervious and impervious.
53. Add note to landscape plan regarding existing water source for the irrigation
system.
54. Add note to landscape plan that the use of mulch other than cypress is
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
required.
55. The required foundation landscaping should include trees as well as shrubs
and groundcovers. Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on
north and south sides of building with Green Malayan Coconut palms and
Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will add to the
ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier.
56. Bring landscaping up to code on site and replace missing or damaged trees
and shrubs. Additional landscaping may be recommended where necessary
to minimize offsite impacts and/or maximize project appearance where site
includes large parking lots, truck circulation or loading area, drive through
lanes, etc..
57. Indicate on landscape plan how the plant material to be removed for the
addition will be mitigated by planting additional material in another location
to replace removed material. Is it possible that the removed material can be
relocated elsewhere on site.
58. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
59. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height at the time of
installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.C.2
60. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches m spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacmg measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.CA.).
61. Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species.
Indicate the amount of native material in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.P). On the landscape plan plant list,
separate the trees from the groundcover / shrubs. Furthermore, separate
shade trees from palm trees. Indicate by asterisk, the native species and
ensure that at least 50% of landscape material is native. On plant list
indicate which species are native, and percentage of each plant category
(trees, palms, shrubs, groundcovers, etc.) that are native species (minimum
of 50% native).
62. Revise plans to include a detail of dumpster and the type and height of
screening.
63. The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and
materials, the design of the principal buildings and shall be integrated with
other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a
note indicating this requirement. Provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure.
64. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the
building color (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the elevations
indicating this requirement.
65. Rooftops will be treated as part of the building elevation. All rooftop
equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance
of 600 feet (Chapter 9, Section ll.E.).
66. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for
presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning
and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the
scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11106
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the Board meetings.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\MSPM 06-004\1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
.
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Major Site Plan Modification/Conditional Use --
Project name: Bro's Room /JLII L D i ^,-'(" ~~!/If L":.-r:nn6A-S
File number: MSPM 06-004 LAV/v.lj I , -
Reference: 1 streview nlans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Planning and Z()nina llPn<>rtment
date stamp marking. L.:JNj~-':L; il~ r-.~
-_.-.~,._.. --~.-
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. Show location of the loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J.)
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved any plans for water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by
insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-l6(b)).
4. Any increase in demand will require an upgrade in the supply lateral and
meter size. Coordinate with the Deputy Director, Utilities, for any service
changes to the existing account.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
S. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits
shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage,
curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from
other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth
Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD),
Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
2
,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM)
and any others, shall be included with the permit request."
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
8. Show existing and proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans
(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.)
9. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
10. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional V
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical /
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
11. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as vi
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6.
12. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in /V
2004 FBC, Chapter 3.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the V
proposed construction.
14. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project,
identify on the site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09111/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
over, or fast food with drive-through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the 1/
site plan the number of existing seats, number of new seats and the total
number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all
seats including those seats that are around the bar.
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan. t/
b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
16. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting v/
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
17. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for V
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
18. The handicapped toilet stall cannot be used as an access route to the other V
toilet stall. Privacy must be maintained per the 2004 FBC, Section
426.3.2.2.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existine Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
19. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
20. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
i Comments:
r
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Index to Plant Material Existine Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
21. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
22. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
23. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk (PDF)
and submit that to staff as well.
24. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional
use is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
25. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the
plan set.
26. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation if
applicable.
27. Revise Conditional Use application submitted (page 2, Project Description
to include more details or submit a justification letter to supplement the
application, and provide the following additional details:
. Clarify conditional use request is for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail
lounge" which is a conditional use in the C-3 zoning district
when located within 600 feet of residential property.
. Hours of operation for Bru's Room,
. Type and frequency of special musical events,
. Details of proposed music (hours, live bands, typical instruments
and amplification).
. Type of sound barriers proposed, and,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
5
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
· Measures to be taken to ensure that music remains indoors and
does not include outdoor bar area (how will door between new
lounge area and outdoor bar stay closed.
28. It was previously recommended that the site plan be revised to enclose the
outdoor bar/dining area to reduce the negative impact that amplified music
will have on adjacent residential property. A solid roof is now proposed to
replace the existing canopy. It is not clear if outdoor bar area will be open,
screened in, or partially enclosed. Include details on plans that indicate the
type of materials for walls and windows for the outdoor bar area.
29. For purposes of determining if correct use classification was utilized for
traffic statement (high turnover restaurant vs. bar), please provide the
following breakdown of gross proceeds: % from sale of food, and % from
sale of alcoholic beverages.
30. The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following
criteria required for all conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and
is therefore not considered valid for purposes of determining the true impact
on adjacent properties:
a. Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment the methods and materials to
be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
b. The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the
acoustic level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
c. The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent
and sound reflecting materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings,
walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
d. It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
31. Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a
regular basis, why was the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound
sampling of a band? What was the band that night (single band member or
full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the sound
study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid
August)? Why was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not
how sound travels over the waterbody between Bru's Room and the
adjacent noise sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the sound
analysis recommends soundproofing and limiting door access during band
play to emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be
incorporated into the design of the addition, yet the applicant has not
indicated such. What exactly is the conclusion "it appears as ifBru's Room
will be in conformance with the City's Ordinance" based on?
32. There are discrepancies between previously approved plans and this request
regarding the number of seats. Include within the plan set a floor plan of
the existing building and proposed addition which graphically shows the
number of seats and seating arrangement, and label all use areas/rooms.
33. Note on floor plans where amplified music is to be played.
34. Include in tabular data the number of existing seats (restaurant and bar areas
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
including outdoor bar area), and the number of proposed seats (for new
lounge area), and a total number of seats. Revise parking information if
needed.
35. Indicate dimensions of addition on site plan.
36. Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new
standing seam metal roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will
be open (no walls or windows), or partially enclosed.
37. Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from
Congress Avenue.
38. Revise building elevations of existing and proposed buildings to include
materials, colors, including the paint manufacturer's name and color code
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.) and building height at roof midpoint.
39. Submit a paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building
walls, trim, doors, etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the
existing buildings, and proposed building addition, and include paint
manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
40. Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the
TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not
glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at the public meetings.
41. Provide building setbacks for all structures in tabular data (minimum
required and provided setback for front, rear, and sides).
42. Revise site plan information regarding adjacent property to north to include
the canal which directly abuts the subiect property.
43. Revise site plan to include right-of-way width of Congress Ave or distance
from centerline.
44. Label buffer widths on site plan and landscape plan.
45. Provide site lighting locations (freestanding light poles in parking area) on
site and landscape plans and label as existing.
46. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 1O.F.3.).
47. Revise site plan and landscape plan to indicate type, purpose, and width of
existing and proposed easements on and adiacent to subiect property.
48. On landscape plan label the tree/shrub shown on the south side of dumpster.
49. A tree is required on the landscape island next to the northernmost handicap
space.
50. Landscape plan legend indicates 56 proposed jasmine are * indicated by
cloud, yet only 18 jasmine are actually indicated with a cloud on the plan.
Please correct.
51. Clarify on landscape plan all new material to be added and its location on
site, and label remaining landscaping as existing.
52. Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that is
pervious and impervious.
53. Add note to landscape plan regarding existing water source for the irrigation
system.
54. Add note to landscape plan that the use of mulch other than cypress is
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
required.
55. The required foundation landscaping should include trees as well as shrubs
and groundcovers. Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on
north and south sides of building with Green Malayan Coconut palms and
Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will add to the
ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier.
56. Bring landscaping up to code on site and replace missing or damaged trees
and shrubs. Additional landscaping may be recommended where necessary
to minimize offsite impacts and/or maximize project appearance where site
includes large parking lots, truck circulation or loading area, drive through
lanes, etc..
57. Indicate on landscape plan how the plant material to be removed for the
addition will be mitigated by planting additional material in another location
to replace removed material. Is it possible that the removed material can be
relocated elsewhere on site.
58. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
59. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height at the time of
installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.C.2
60. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches In spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.CA.).
61. Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species.
Indicate the amount of native material in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.P). On the landscape plan plant list,
separate the trees from the groundcover / shrubs. Furthermore, separate
shade trees from palm trees. Indicate by asterisk, the native species and
ensure that at least 50% of landscape material is native. On plant list
indicate which species are native, and percentage of each plant category
(trees, palms, shrubs, groundcovers, etc.) that are native species (minimum
of 50% native).
62. Revise plans to include a detail of dumpster and the type and height of
screening.
63. The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and
materials, the design of the principal buildings and shall be integrated with
other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a
note indicating this requirement. Provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure.
64. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the
building color (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the elevations
indicating this requirement.
65. Rooftops will be treated as part of the building elevation. All rooftop
equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance
of 600 feet (Chapter 9, Section l1.E.).
66. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for
presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning
and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the
scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/11/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the Board meetings.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\MSPM 06-004\1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
BRU'S ROOM PROJECT
'.'l r~ ,-11 [C'
: ~ \ Ii, \ I J
c' "J ;.,
ugust 16, 2006
Page 1
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
1 ST REVIEW
CONDITIONAL USE
BRU'S ROOM PROJECT - FILE NUMBER COUS 05-009
RECEIVED 9/16/05
BUILDING DIVISION:
1. This application is for Conditional Use for live music yet Sheet A1.00 and A1.0l notes a
proposed addition and a proposed outside bar. Please clarify.
Site Plan details have been added to the petition.
PARKS AND RECREATION:
No changes.
FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST:
2. The applicant is indicating on this sheet the existing parking lot and landscape areas
throughout the site. The existing landscape trees, bushes, plant and sod for these areas
should be shown accurately on the plans in Planning Department as NWSP 97-007, Cooker
Bar & Grill, Sheet L-l, 3-10-97. This landscape plan will replace the old landscape plan and
become part of the site.
The applicant understands that prior to the issuance 0/ a building permit, he will need to
update the 3/10/97 Landscaping Plan to reflect both current site conditions and any
modifications approved as part 0/ this petition. In that regard, there is only one minor
change in Landscaping associated with the proposed building addition. The enclosed
sketch describes the nature 0/ that change and the proposal/or new Landscaping.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS I lAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
BRU'S ROOM PROJECT
August 16,2006
Page 2
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST: (con't)
Any existing landscape trees, bushes, plants and sod throughout the site that are dead,
missing or in poor health, must be replaced in conjunction with the use of the parking lot for
the Conditional Use. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C]
Comment Noted.
PLANNING AND ZONING:
3. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all
Staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded
and stapled.
Written responses are provided herein along with twelve (12) sets of the revised plans.
4. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8.5 inches by 11
inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to Staff as well.
Comment noted.
5. Submit two (2) copies of the following as required per page 3 of the Conditional Use
application:
LllSt recorded Warranty Deed for the subject property, and a certificate from an
attorney-at-law or a title insurance company certifying who the current fee dimple
title holders of record of the subject property are, and the nature and extent of their
interest therein.
See enclosed Warranty Deed.
· Legal survey, prepared by a surveyor registered in the State of Florida, showing an
accurate legal description of the subject property, and the total acreage computed to
the nearest one-hundredth (1/100) of an acre (these two surveys are in addition to the
surveys required on page 6 of the application.)
A Site Survey with a legal description is enclosed with this Plan package.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS I lAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
BRU'S ROOM PROJECT
August 16,2006
Page 3
PLANNING AND ZONING: (con't)
6. The application submitted simply describes the project as "outdoor music". Submit a
Justification Letter to supplement the inadequate project description and provide the
following additional details:
· Clarify request is for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail lounge" which is a Conditional Use
in the C-3 zoning district when located within 600 feet of residential property.
Request is for Conditional Use approval for a bar that has indoor music.
· Hours of operation for Bm's Room.
Hours of operation will befrom 11:00AM to 2:00 AM
· Type and frequency of special events.
Eight (8) to ten (10) times per month.
· Details of proposed outdoor music (hours, live bands, amplified).
All entertainment will be indoors. Estimated pe1:formance times are 10:00 PM -
1 :00 AM
· Type of sound barriers proposed, and
No exterior sound barriers are required per attached Noise Study.
· Justify reason as to why music has to be located outdoors.
The application has been modified per Staff request to only have music inside the
restaurant.
7. It is recommended that the Site Plan be revised to enclose the outdoor bar/dining area to
reduce the negative impact that amplified music will have on adjacent residential property.
See above response. No entertainment in the outside bar area is proposed.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS I lAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
~
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
BRU'S ROOM PROJECT
August 16, 2006
Page 4
PLANNING AND ZONING: (con't)
8. Plans submitted are dated 2003 and indicate "proposed future addition", and "proposed
future take-out window", along with "proposed outside bar". Please update plans by
clarifying all Existing use areas and only refer to the use proposed for this application
request. (Conditional Use to allow a nightclub within 600 feet of residential.) The additional
proposals of outside bar, future take-out window, and future addition will require a separate
application and plans to be submitted (for major Site Plan Modification.) It is recommended
that both applications (for Conditional Use and Site Plan Modification) be reviewed
concurrently. If concurrent review is desire, submit completed Site Plan Modification
application, required application documents and plans, and fee.
See enclosed Site Plan which describes the improvements being proposed.
9. Application for Conditional Use approval and/or major Site Plan modifications are subject
to the City's Concurrency Management Ordinance. Submit a traffic Study to Palm Beach
County Traffic Engineering for their review and approval, and a coy to the City for the file.
A Traffic Analysis is herein provided.
10. Provide applicant responses to the standards for evaluating Conditional Uses (Ch.2.Sec.
11.2.D.I-13. Of the Land Development Regulations.
Responses are herein provided.
11. Submit all of the following for the sound analysis required for all Conditional Use
applications for bar, nightclubs:
· Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment and the methods and materials to be
used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
See Noise Study.
· The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the acoustic
level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida 1(561) 994-6411
"
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
BRU'S ROOM PROJECT
August 16, 2006
Page 5
See Noise Study.
PLANNING AND ZONING: (con't)
· The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include information
such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent and sound reflecting
materials to be used, coasting of the surfaces of ceilings, walls, windows, and floors
and insulation to be used.
See Noise Study.
· It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal opening of
doors for people entering and existing and exiting the establishment.
See Noise Study.
12. Provide a floor plan of building which identifies all use areas (kitchen, restaurant seating,
bar, etc.), including any stage area for open mike night.
No "open mike" nights are contemplated.
13. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested Conditional Use is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Comment Noted.
Attachments
CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIATES
PlANNERS llANO DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
Boca Raton, Florida I (561) 994-6411
www.bbfrd.org
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner
FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal
DATE: September 5, 2006
SUBJECT: Miraflor
Bru's Room
Boynton Village SMU - Building M
Although some of these projects will substantially increase commercial space
to be inspected and/or residents that require emergency services, we
anticipate that no impact to our ability to provide services will occur in
accordance with our staffing and operations plans.
Breese, Ed
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mazzella, Pete
Friday, September 01, 2006 10:47 AM
Breese, Ed
Logan, Laurinda
Proposed site plans/ concurrency review
Ed
Here are my comments in response to your memos of 8/21/06 regarding the following site plans now being proposed:
Bru's Room addition - Not a significant increase. Existing treatment capacity and infrastructure will meet adopted levels
of service for water and sewer.
Boynton Village SMU- Building M-Existing treatment capacity and infrastructure improvements proposed by the
developer will meet adopted levels of service for water and sewer.
Miraflor - Existing treatment capacity and infrastructure improvements proposed by the developer will meet adopted levels
of service for water and sewer.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment.
Peter Mazzella
1
BRU'S ROOM - MSPM 06-004
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
PREPARED BY CHARLES PUTMAN & ASSOCIAT ~,--l1VC~<,;""
/1',,,,-,,
,- j
! ,,'" i
I, '
l'.:; i.'
....t" !
For September 26th TART MEETING
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
Major Site Plan Modification/Conditional Use
Project name: Bru's Room
File number: MSPM 06-004
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Planning and Zoning Department
date stamp marking. '
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. Show location of the loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.)
, '
Location of loadina area is now shown on Site Plan. .'
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved any plans for water and/or sewer improvements required to l}lj
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Comment Noted.
3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by N
"
insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Comment Noted.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 2 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
UTILITIES (con't)
4. Any increase in demand will require an upgrade in the supply lateral and
meter size. Coordinate with the Deputy Director, Utilities, for any service
changes to the existing account.
"
The increase in building size per this plan is minor and no
increase in lateral size or meter size is anticipated.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
s. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits
shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage,
curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from
other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth
Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD),
Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM)
and any others, shall be included with the permit request."
Note has been added but modified per discussions with
Lorenda Logan.
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
":\':.
Comment Noted.
7. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
8. Show existing and proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans
(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.4.)
Site lighting has been added to Sheets A-1.01 (Site Plan)
and L-1 (Landscape Exhibit.)
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 3 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ENGINEERING DIVISION (con't)
9. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Comment Noted.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
10. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
Comment Noted.
11. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defmed in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6.
Construction type is IIIB Unprotected. 100% sprinklered.
12. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defmed in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3.
The occupancy type is A-2 small assembly.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Comment Noted. ,
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 4 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
BUILDING DIVISION (con't)
14. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project,
identify on the site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn
over, or fast food with drive-through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the
site plan the number of existing seats, number of new seats and the total
number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all
seats including those seats that are around the bar.
The restaurant is an eat-in, high turnover. The restaurant
currently has 296 seats and we are proposing to add 33
additional seats.
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application: .
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
Comments Noted.
16. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
Note has been added to Site Plan.
17. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Comment Noted.
18. The handicapped toilet stall cannot be used as an access route to the other
toilet stall. Privacy must be maintained per the 2004 FBC, Section
426.3.2.2.
Toilet room has been modified to single use only.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09125/06
Page 5 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existin2 Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
19. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by tpe City.
Note has been added to Sheet L-1.
20. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
Note has been added to Sheet L-1.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Index to Plant Material Existin2 Trees and Landscape Plan Sheet L-l
21. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any of the existing shade
trees, palm trees, shrubs, hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown
that is not in good condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
See Comment #19.
22. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing
irrigation system on the site as shown that is not in good working condition
must be replaced by the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
See Comment #20.
,
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 6 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
23. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk (PDF)
and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted.
24. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional
use is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Comment noted.
25. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the
p Ian set.
Plan revisions have been reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
26. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation if
applicable.
The application was submitted. However, participation is
not required as construction cost is less than $250,000.
27. Revise Conditional Use application submitted (page 2, Project Description
to include more details or submit a justification letter to supplement the
application, and provide the following additional details: (A modified
Application package is herein enclosed.)
.
Clarify conditional use request is for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail
lounge" which is a conditional use in the C-3 zoning district
when located within 600 feet of residential property.
This conditional use request is to allow live music
to be provided in the Bru's Room Sports Grill on
Congress A venue. The following generally
summarizes the petition. Bru's Room is a
bar/restaurant that is proposing to have live
indoor music.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 7 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
. Hours of operation for Bru' s Room,
Operating Hours for the facility are from 11 :00 AM
to 2:00 AM.
. Type and frequency of special musical events,
Music will be indoors and it is estimated that the
frequency will be around 8 to 10 times per month.
It will consist of small live bands and individual
entertainers.
. Details of proposed music (hours, live bands, typical instruments
and amplification).
The proposed location for the live. music is shown
on the Site Plan and is in the interior of the
building. As noted above, the music will be
provided by small bands or individual
entertainers approximately 8 to 10 times per
month.
· Type of sound barriers proposed, and ,
The area where live entertainment is proposed
already contains sufficient sOl.!nd buffers and no
additional barriers are required (see Noise Study).
In addition to the building construction, there is a
massing of large canopy trees on the site
perimeter that will further act as a sound barrier
for the project
. Measures to be taken to ensure that music remains indoors and
does not include outdoor bar area (how will door between new
lounge area and outdoor bar stay closed.
There are no plans to provide music in the
outdoor seating area. The door between the new
lounge and the outdoor area will remain closed
(primarily for air conditioning purposes.)
However, it will be used by service pers.onnel and
customers who need to access both areas.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 8 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
28. It was previously recommended that the site plan be revised to enclose the
outdoor bar/dining area to reduce the negative impact that amplified music
will have on adjacent residential property. A solid roof is now proposed to
replace the existing canopy. It is not clear if outdoor bar area will be open,
screened in, or partially enclosed. Include details on plans that indicate the
type of materials for walls and windows for the outdoor bar area.
Live music will only be played in the new proposed bar
area. The existing outdoor bar area will remain the same,'
however, it should be noted that the area is partially
enclosed by existing landscaping, an aluminum fence and
clear plastic rollup shades for weather protection.
29. For purposes of determining if correct use classification was utilized for.
traffic statement (high turnover restaurant vs. bar), please provide the
following breakdown of gross proceeds: % from sale of food, and % from
sale of alcoholic beverages.
55% from sale of food.
45% from sale of alcohol.
30. The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following
criteria required for all conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and
is therefore not considered valid for purposes of determining the true impact
on adjacent properties:
a. Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment the methods and materials to
be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
b. The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the
acoustic level ofthe sound emitting devices/equipment.
c. The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include
information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent
and sound reflecting materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings,
walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
d. It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal
opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
See the Ambient Sound Level Addendum provided with
this submission for specific response to the above
comments.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 9 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th T ART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
31. Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a
regular basis, why was the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound
sampling of a band? What was the band that night (single band member or
full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the sound
study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid
August)? Why was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not
how sound travels over the waterbody between Bru's Room and the
adjacent noise sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the sound
analysis recommends soundproofmg and limiting door access during band
play to emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be
incorporated into the design of the addition, yet the applicant has not
indicated such. What exactly is the conclusion "it appears as if Bru's Room
will be in conformance with the City's Ordinance" based on?
See the Ambient Sound Level Addendum provided with
this submission for specific responses to the above
comments.
32. There are discrepancies between previously approved plans and this request
regarding the number of seats. Include within the plan set a floor plan of
the existing building and proposed addition which graphically shows the
number of seats and seating arrangement, and label all use areas/rooms.
Exhibits Ext.1 and Ext.2 have been added to the plan
package showing the current seating arrangement in the
restaurant.
33. Note on floor plans where amplified music is to be played.
Plans have been modified to note where music will be
played.
34. Include in tabular data the number of existing seats (restaurant and bar areas
including outdoor bar area), and the number of proposed seats (for new
lounge area), and a total number of seats. Revise parking information if
needed.
This information has been added to the Site Plan and the
Parking Data has been revised.
35. Indicate dimensions of addition on site plan.
Dimensions have been added to plan.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 10 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
36. Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new
standing seam metal roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will
be open (no walls or windows), or partially enclosed.
A wall section detail has been added to the plan package
showing proposed support. As. noted above, this area is
partially enclosed with landscaping, a fence and plastic
roll up shades.
37. Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from
Congress A venue.
The proposed addition is located in the rear of the
building and will match the existing building height,
materials and color. The plan does not propose any
changes to that portion of the building facing Congress
Avenue.
38. Revise building elevations of existing and proposed buildings to include
materials, colors, including the paint manufacturer's name and color code
(Chapter 4, Section 7.0.) and building height at roof midpoint.
Elevations have been modified to show height and
materials.
39. Submit a paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building
walls, trim, doors, etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the
existing buildings, and proposed building addition, and include paint
manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
The proposed addition will be consistent with the existing
building in the use of the brick veneer finish. Enclosed is
a photo showing the character of the existing restaurant.
40. Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the
TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not
glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at the public meetings.
A colored elevation of the proposed addition will be
prqvided at the TART Meeting. Enclosed herein is a photo
of the existing building showing the texture of the
material to be used on the new addition.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 11 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
41. Provide building setbacks for all structures in tabular data (minimum
required and provided setback for front, rear, and sides).
Tabular data for building setbacks has been added to the
Site Plan.
42. Revise site plan information regarding adjacent property to north to include
the canal which directly abuts the subject property.
Location of canal has been more clearly identified.
43. Revise site plan to include right-of-way width of Congress Ave or distance
from centerline.
A dimension has been added from centerline of Congress
Avenue.
44. Label buffer widths on site plan and landscape plan.
Buffer widths have been added to Sheets A 1.01 and L-1.
45. Provide site lighting locations (freestanding light poles in parking area) on
site and landscape plans and label as existing.
Site lighting has been added and labeled as existing on
Sheets A1.01 and L-1.
46. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is
encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.).
No lighting changes are proposed by this Site Plan
change.
47. Revise site plan and landscape plan to indicate type, purpose, and width of
existing and proposed easements on and adjacent to subject property.
Easements have been added and labeled on Sheets A1.01
and L-1.
48. On landscape plan label the tree/shrub shown on the south side of dumpster.
,
The tree has been labeled (Oak).
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMEN 1 ~ -] ST REVIE WCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 12 of 15
PREP ARciJ by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
49. A tree is required on the landscape island next to the northernmost handicap
space.
There is currently an existing Oak tree adjacent to the
sidewalk in this same Landscape Island. Thus, there will
not be room for an additional canopy tree.
50. Landscape plan legend indicates 56 proposed jasmine are * indicated by
cloud, yet only 18 jasmine are actually indicated with a cloud on the plan.
Please correct.
This error has been corrected.
51. Clarify on landscape plan all new material to be added and its location on
site, and label remaining landscaping as existing.
New material to be added has been clarified on plan and
tables. All other material shown is existing and is
identified on the table.
52. Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that is
pervious and impervious.
Note has been added.
53. Add note to landscape plan regarding existing water source for the irrigation
system.
Note has been added. Source for irrigation is well.
54. Add note to landscape plan that the use of mulch other than cypress is
required.
Note has been added.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 13 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
55. The required foundation landscaping should include trees as well as shrubs
and groundcovers. Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on
north and south sides of building with Green Malayan Coconut palms and
Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will add to the
ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier.
INCLUDE REJECT
Alexander palms have been added to the North side of the
new addition. The applicant currently utilizes portable
areca palms 'n pots to provide additional screening and
ambiance for the outdoor bar area. The remainder of the
plan is existing and unchanged and is consistent with
previously approved plans.
56. Bring landscaping up to code on site and replace missing or damaged trees
and shrubs. Additional landscaping may be recommended where necessary
to minimize offsite impacts and/or maximize project appearance where site
includes large parking lots, truck circulation or loading area, drive through
lanes, etc..
Missing and damaged material will be replaced as noted.
57. Indicate on landscape plan how the plant material to be removed for the
addition will be mitigated by planting additional material in another location
to replace removed material. Is it possible that the removed material can be
relocated elsewhere on site.
Plant materials to be mitigated are shown on Sheet L-1.
The material to be removed for the new construction
consists of nine (9) crotons and one (1) dracaena, none of
which are in good condition. They will be removed from
the site and new landscaping will be installed for the
building addition.
58. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
Comment noted.
59. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height at the time of
installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2
Comment noted.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 14 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
60. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacmg measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.CA.).
Comment noted.
61. Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species.
Indicate the amount of native material in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). On the landscape plan plant list,
separate the trees from the groundcover / shrubs. Furthermore, separate
shade trees from palm trees. Indicate by asterisk, the native species and
ensure that at least 50% of landscape material is native. On plant list
indicate which species are native, and percentage of each plant category
(trees, palms, shrubs, groundcovers, etc.) that are native species (minimum
of 50% native).
This information has been added to the inventory of plant
material.
62. Revise plans to include a detail of dumpster and the type and height of
screen mg.
Site Plan has been modified to include this information.
63. The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and
materials, the design of the principal buildings and shall be integrated with
other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a
note indicating this requirement. Provide a detail of the dumpster enclosure.
The existing dumpster has the same outer material and
appearance as the main building.
64. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the
building color (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the elevations
indicating this requirement.
Note has been added.
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS -1 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS
09/25/06
Page 15 of 15
PREPARED by Charles Putman & Associates
for September 26th TART Meeting
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING (con't)
65. Rooftops will be treated as part of the building elevation. All rooftop
equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance
of 600 feet (Chapter 9, Section 11.E.).
All rooftop equipment is screened. Note has been added
to Sheet A3.01.
66. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for
presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning
and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the
scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at
the Board meetings.
Comment noted.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Bru's Room\MSPM 06-004\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
.
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities
Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities
Matthew Immler, Police Chief
Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal
Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent
Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief
Wally Majors, Parks Director
Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer
Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst
John Huntington, Police Officer
From: Ed Breese, Principal Planner ~
Date: 08/21/06
Re: Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services
Project: Bru's Room
MEMORANDUM
As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning
Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current
infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development.
Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative
for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for
anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and
provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent
us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the
proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond
no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would
enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should
you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at
742-6260.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECfS\Bru's Room\MSPM 06-004\Impact Analysis.doc
/
SUBJECT: Project - Bru's Room
File No. - MSPM 06-004/COUS 05-009
1 st review
List of Acronvms/Abbreviations:
ANSI - American National Standards Institute
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act
FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F.S, - Florida Statutes
LDR - Land Development Regulations
NEC - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 06-124
TO: Ed Breese
Principal Planner
FROM: Timothy K. Large ~
TART Member/B~ion
DATE: September 5, 2006
Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352
1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process
does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as defined in 2004 FBC,
Chapter 6.
3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in 2004 FBC,
Chapter 3.
4 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction.
5 To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project, identify on the
site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn over, or fast food with drive-
through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the site plan the number of existing seats,
number of new seats and the total number of seats provided. On the floor plan,
chronologically number all seats including those seats that are around the bar.
6 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach
Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building
permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for
sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
7 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the
City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application.
S\Oevelopment\Building\ T ART\ TART 2006\ Bru '8 Room
Page 1 of 2
8 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for
this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit
application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in
the development order and approved by the City Commission.
9 The handicapped toilet staff cannot be used as an access route to the other toilet stall.
Privacy must be maintained per the 2004 FBC, Section 426.3.2.2.
bf
S\Development\Building\TARnTART 2006\ Bru's Room
Page 2 of 2
.
,
BRU'S ROOM
COUS 05-009
MSPM 06-004
1 st Review
At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs
comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches
of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk (PDF) and submit that to staff as well.
It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the requested conditional use is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan set.
The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places"
program and must demonstrate their participation if applicable.
Revise Conditional Use application submitted (page 2, Project Description) to include more
details or submit a justification letter to supplement the application, and provide the following
additional details:
Clarify conditional use request is for a "bar, nightclub, cocktail lounge" which is a
conditional use in the C-3 zoning district when located within 600 feet of residential
property.
Hours of operation for Bru's room,
Type and frequency of special musical events,
Details of proposed music (hours, live bands, typical instruments and amplification),
Type of sound barriers proposed, and,
Measures to be taken to ensure that music remains indoors and does not include outdoor
bar area (how will door between new lounge area and outdoor bar stay closed).
It was previously recommended that the site plan be revised to enclose the outdoor bar/dining
area to reduce the negative impact that amplified music will have on adjacent residential property.
A solid roof is now proposed to replace the existing canopy. It is not clear if outdoor bar area
will be open, screened in, or partially enclosed. Include details on plans that indicate the type of
materials for walls and windows for the outdoor bar area.
For purposes of determining if correct use classification was utilized for traffic statement (high
turnover restaurant vs. bar), please provide the following breakdown of gross proceeds: % from
sale of food, and % from sale of alcoholic beverages.
The Sound Analysis submitted does not adequately address the following criteria required for all
conditional use applications for bars, nightclubs and is therefore not considered valid for purposes
of determining the true impact on adjacent properties:
Data on the sound emitting devices/equipment and the methods and materials to be used
to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be met.
The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for determination of the acoustic
level of the sound emitting devices/equipment.
The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall include information
such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound absorbent and sound reflecting
materials to be used, coating of the surfaces of ceilings, walls, windows, and floors and
insulation to be used.
It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the normal opening of doors
for people entering and exiting the establishment.
Since the Bru's Room Boynton location already has amplified music on a regular basis, why was
the Delray location chosen for a 10 minute sound sampling of a band? What was the band that
night (single band member or full band, what instruments, amplification level, etc). Why was the
sound study done in only one night at the Boynton location in the off-season (mid August)? Why
was distance the only factor taken into consideration, not how sound travels over the waterbody
between Bru's Room and the adjacent noise sensitive zones? To minimize the noise impacts, the
sound analysis recommends soundproofing and limiting door access during band play to
emergencies only, and assumes their recommendations will be incorporated into the design of the
addition, yet the applicant has not indicated such. What exactly is the conclusion "it appears as if
Bru's Room will be in conformance with the City's Ordinance" based on?
There are discrepancies between previously approved plans and this request regarding the number
of seats. Include within the plan set a floor plan of the existing building and proposed addition
which graphically shows the number of seats and seating arrangement, and label all use
areas/rooms.
Note on floor plans where amplified music is to be played.
Include in tabular data the number of existing seats (restaurant and bar areas including outdoor
bar area), and the number of proposed seats (for new lounge area), and a total number of seats.
Revise parking information if needed.
Indicate dimensions of addition on site plan.
Revise elevations to include details of materials which will support the new standing seam metal
roof over outdoor bar area. Clarify that this area will be open (no walls or windows), or partially
enclosed.
Improve/enhance building elevations, especially those visible from Congress Avenue.
Revise building elevations of existing and proposed buildings to include materials, colors,
including the paint manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.) and building
height at roof midpoint.
Submit a paint chips/swatches of the materials and paint colors for building walls, trim, doors,
etc. that directly correspond to the elevations of the existing buildings, and proposed building
addition, and include paint manufacturer's name, paint name color and code.
Please submit large colored renderings of each building elevation at the TART meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.2.). These should be clipped (not glued) to foamboard, and will be on display at
the public meetings.
Provide building setbacks for all structures in tabular data (minimum required and provided
setback for front, rear, and sides).
Revise site plan information regarding adjacent property to north to include the canal which
directly abuts the subject property.
Revise site plan to include right-of-way width of Congress Ave or distance from centerline.
Label buffer widths on site plan and landscape plan.
Provide site lighting locations (freestanding light poles in parking area) on site and landscape
plans and label as existing.
Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9,
Section 10.F.3.).
Revise site plan and landscape plan to indicate type, purpose, and width of existing and proposed
easements on and adjacent to subject property.
On landscape plan label the tree/shrub shown on the south side of dumpster
A tree is required on the landscape island next to the northernmost handicap space.
Landscape plan legend indicates 56 proposed jasmine are * indicated by cloud, yet only 18
jasmine are actually indicated with a cloud on the plan. Please correct.
Clarify on landscape plan all new material to be added and its location on site, and label
remaining landscaping as existing.
Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that is pervious and impervious.
Add note to landscape plan regarding existing water source for the irrigation system.
Add note to landscape plan that the use of mulch other than cypress is required.
The required foundation landscaping should include trees as well as shrubs and groundcovers.
Staff recommends upgrading foundation landscaping on north and south sides of building with
Green Malayan Coconut palms and Alexander palms. Adding palms around outdoor bar area will
add to the ambiance, screen the dumpster, and provide an additional sound barrier.
..
Bring landscaping up to code on site and replace mlssmg or damaged trees and shrubs.
Additional landscaping may be recommended where necessary to minimize offsite impacts and/or
maximize project appearance where site includes large parking lots, truck circulation or loading
area, drive through lanes, etc.
Indicate on landscape plan how the plant material to be removed for the addition will be mitigated
by planting additional material in another location to replace removed material. Is it possible that
the removed material can be relocated elsewhere on site?
The removal/ relocation of landscape material is subject to review and approval of the City
Forester / Environmentalist.
All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section S.C.2.).
All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread, and
planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the
planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.CA.).
Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species. Indicate the amount of
native material in the plant list of the landscape plan (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.P). On the
landscape plan plant list, separate the trees from the groundcover / shrubs. Furthermore, separate
shade trees from palm trees. Indicate by asterisk, the native species and ensure that at least 50%
of landscape material is native. On plant list indicate which species are native, and percentage of
each plant category (trees, palms, shrubs, groundcovers, etc.) that are native species (minimum of
50% native).
Revise plans to include a detail of dumpster and the type and height of screening.
The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the
principal buildings and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3.).
On the site plan, place a note indicating this requirement. Provide a detail of the dumpster
enclosure.
Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the building color
(Chapter 9, Section 1O.CA.). Place a note on the elevations indicating this requirement.
Rooftops will be treated as part of the building elevation. All rooftop equipment must be
completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet (Chapter 9, Section II.E.).
Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City
Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at
least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint
presentation at the Board meetings.
/
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Ed Breese,
Principal Planner
DATE:
September 6, 2006
FILE: MSPM 06-004
CODS 05-009
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Bru's Room
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comment
Page 1 of 1
/
Rivers, Jody
To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
Subject: Site Plan Review - Bru's Room
Project: Bru's Room
File No.: MSPM 06-004/COUS 05-009
No comments
Jocttj Rivers
Parks Superintendent
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
(561) 742-6226
(561) 742-6233 (fax)
A sense of COMMUNITY",lt Starts in Parks
What transforms a crowd into a community? Parks provide that chance. Boynton Beach's parks are
where lifetime friendships are formed, where generations can come together, where people discover
what they have in common, It starts in parks
8/25/2006
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1
Coale, Sherie
~
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11 :28 AM
To: Coale, Sherie
Cc: Breese, Ed
Subject: Bru's Room- TART comments
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Ed Breese, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Bru's Room
Major Site Plan Modification / Conditional Use - 1st Review
MSPM 06-004 / caus 05-009
Date:
August 29,2006
Index to Plant Material
Existing Trees and Landscape Plan
Sheet L-l
1. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any ofthe existing shade trees, palm trees, shrubs,
hedges, and sod on the entire property as shown that is not in good condition must be replaced by
the applicant at the time of inspection by the City.
2. The Landscape Architect must add a note that any part of the existing irrigation system on the site
as shown that is not in good working condition must be replaced by the applicant at the time of
inspection by the City.
3. I have no comment on the conditional use request.
Kjh
9/11/2006
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 06-100
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
t 4 i.
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer I,i.-
DATE:
September 6, 2006
RE:
Review Comments
Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review
Bru's Room
File No. MSPM 06-004/COUS 05-009
The above referenced Site Plans, received on August 22, 2006, was reviewed for Public Works,
Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LOR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE
No comments at this time.
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY & GROUNDS
No comments at this time.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
1. Show location of the loading area (LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.)
ENGINEERING
2. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code
requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following:
paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other
permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach
County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental
Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request."
3. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
4. Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
5. Show existing and proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 4, Section
7.B.4.)
Dept. of Public Works, Engineediig Division Memo No. 06-100
RE: Bru's Room, Major Site Plan Mod.lConditional Use- 1 st Review, MSPM 06-004/COUS 05-009
September 6, 2006
Page 2
6. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All
engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach
Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
7. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved any plans for
water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE,
Section 26-15.
8. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. with
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement
imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
9. Any increase in demand will require an upgrade in the supply lateral and meter size. Coordinate with
the Deputy Director, Utilities, for any service changes to the existing account.
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.I P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Forestry & Grounds Manager, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
File
S:\Engineering\ Memorandums\Memorandums 2006\06-100 LOGAN - Bru's Room 090606.doc
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to: Charles Putman
fax #: 561-994-0447
date: 9/12/06
from: Sherie Coale
re: 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Bru's Room
Please find attached the first review comments for your project. After reviewing the attached
comments and appropriately revising the associated site plans and addressing each comment,
please call 561-742-6265 to schedule your TART meeting. TART meetings may be scheduled
any Tuesday morning.
1. Revise your plans incorporating all comments listed herein, including the addition of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bring 10 copies
to the TART review meeting (full sets including all pages originally submitted);
2. Submit the additional information as requested within the attached comments; ( i.e. traffic
analysis, engineering certification, etc.)
3. Prepare a written response (7 copies) consisting of a list briefly summarizing how each
comment has been addressed on the revised plans or with the supplemental information
including location on the plans ( this promotes an expeditious 2nd review by staff and
your project representatives during the TART meeting); and
4.
Submit reductions (8 Y2 X 11) for the proposed
site plans, elevations and landscaping plan (this
is required for the final report and public
presentation).
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
The applicant should not attend a TART (2nd review) until all documents have been revised and
copied for staff review. If plans will not be fully revised and brought to the scheduled T ART
meeting, contact Ed Breese in this office by the Thursday prior to the scheduled meeting date.
Projects deviating from the original schedule are eligible for review at subsequent meetings,
which are held every Tuesday. To reschedule, contact Sherie Coale, by the Thursday prior to the
Tuesday TART meeting that you desire to attend. The remainder of the review schedule will be
adjusted accordingly. If you have questions on the attached comments, please contact the
respective reviewer using the attached list of TART representatives.
If the plans are reasonably complete and all significant comments are addressed following TART
(2nd review), the project is forwarded to the Planning and Development Board Meeting that falls
approximately 2 to 3 weeks following the T ART meeting. An "*,, by any comment identifies a
comment that must be addressed prior to moving forward to the Planning and Development or
Community Redevelopment Agency board.
Note: Items recognized by staff as typically outstanding at this point include a traffic report
and/or confirmation of the traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
drainage certification by a licensed engineer, signed "Rider to Site Plan Application"
form and colored elevations of the proposed project. This information is necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submitted this information, please disregard this note.
DEPARTMENT REPRESENT A TIVE REPRESENT A TIVES' PHONE FAX
DESIGNEE
Engineering Dave Kelley Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
Building William Bucklew Timothy Large 742-6352 742-6352
Fire Department Rodger Kemmer Rick Lee 742-6753 742-6357
Police Department Matthew Immler John Huntington 737-6167 737-3136
Utilities Pete Mazzella H. David Kelley Jr. 742-6401 742-6485
Public Works-General Larry Quinn Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
Pub lic W orks- Traffic Jeffrey Livergood Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
Parks & Recreation Jody Rivers Jody Rivers 742-6227 742-6233
Forester/Environmentalist Kevin Hallahan Kevin Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Planning & Zoning Michael Rumpf, Ed Breese 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 9/5/06
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlBru's RoomlMSPM 06-00411st Review comments FAX COVER doc