Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS c, o CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office 0 August 2, 2005 July 18, 2005 (Noon.) 0 October 5, 2005 September 19,2005 (Noon) D August 16, 2005 August I, 2005 (Noon) D October 18, 2005 October 3, 2005 (Noon) D September 6, 2005 August 15, 2005 (Noon) D November I, 2005 October 17, 2005 (Noon) ~ September 20, 2005 September 6, 2005 (Noon) D November 15,2005 October 31, 2005 (Noon) D Administrative 0 Development Plans NATURE OF ~ Consent Agenda D New Business AGENDA ITEM D Public Hearing D Legal D Bids D UnfInished Business 0 Announcement D Presentation D City Manager's Report RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the September 20,2005 City Commission Agenda under Consent Agenda. The Planning and Development Board recommended that the subject request be approved on August 23, 200~, with the elimination of condition of approval #32 and #40 regarding size and location of the live/work units.. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 05-155. EXPLANATION: PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Cortina @ Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001) Steve Liller, Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC The Klatt Family Limited Partnership #1 and Klatt Enterprises, Inc. NE Comer of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue Request for new site plan approval in order to construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units in the (SMU) Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district. PROGRAM IMPACT: FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: N/A N/A N/A Devel City Manager's Signature ~ -~~ ", Planning and Zoning Direc66r City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton ViI\age-Boynton Town Center I \Boynton ViI\age Cortina NWSP 05-001 \Agenda Item Request Cortina @ Boynton ViI\age NWSP 05-001 9-20-05.dot S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-155 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members Planning and Development Board and Mayor and City Commission FROM: Eric Lee Johnson, AICP Planner t THROUGH: Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: August 18, 2005 PROJECT NAME / NUMBER: Cortina at Boynton Village / NWSP 05-001 REQUEST: New site plan approval to construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units on a a 30.29-acre parcel in the SMU Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: The Klatt Family Partnership & Klatt Enterprises, Inc. Applicant: Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC AND 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC Agent: Mr. Steve Liller with Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC Location: Northeast corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue, just south of the SFWMD C-16 canal (see Location Map - Exhibit "A") Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Suburban (MX-S) Existing Zoning: Suburban Mixed Use (SMU) Proposed Use: 458 townhouse units Acreage: 30.29-acre portion of the 106.5-acre parcel Adjacent Uses: North: Right-of-way for the SFWMD C-16 Canal, then farther north is developed property with town homes from Phase I of the Renaissance Commons Master Plan with a Suburban Mixed Use (MX-S) land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU); South: Right-of-way for Old Boynton Road, then farther south is developed Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 2 commercial property (Oakwood Shopping Center), with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3); East: Right-of-way of the LWDD E-4 Canal, then farther east is developed single family residential (Sky Lake) with an Low Density Residential (LOR) land use classification, zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA); and West: Immediately west is right-of-way for the proposed main north/south road within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan. Northwest is undeveloped property proposed for condominium use within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Suburban Mixed Use (MX-S) land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU). Southwest is undeveloped property proposed for commercial use within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3), then farther west is right-of-way for Congress Avenue, still farther west is developed commercial property (Boynton Beach Mall). Site Characteristic: The subject site is the location of pastureland commonly referred to as the Winchester Property, named after one or more of its owners. On February 15, 2005, the City Commission approved the applicant's request for a land use reclassification and rezoning (LUAR 04-006) of 81.814 acres of property from Single-family Residential (R-1-AA) to Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU) and also approximately 25 acres at the southwest corner of the parcel (LUAR 04-007) from Single-family Residential (R-1-AA) to Community Commercial (C-3). The SMU Master Plan shows that the subject property is comprised of two (2) irregularly-shaped parcels, carved out of the original 106.5 acre parcel. This 30.29- acre portion is located east of Congress Avenue and generally extends along the eastern one-third of the greater Winchester property. It is bounded by the LWDD C-16 Canal to the north, the LWDD E-4 Canal to the east, and Old Boynton Road to the south. The survey submitted for this packet was a boundary survey, which does not show the existing conditions. The SMU Master Plan depicts these parcels as SMU Parcell (1.279 acres) and SMU Parcel 2 Phase II (29.02 acres). BACKGROUND Proposal: Mr. Steve Liller with Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC, is requesting new site plan approval to construct a large townhouse development within the 81.84-acre mixed- use project. The project would consist of 458 fee-Simple townhouse units. All units would have three (3) bedrooms. Out of the 458 units, the developer is requesting that 127 of the units be designated as live / work units. The Building Key & Open Space Plan (sheet A1.0) shows the location of the units would be primarily along the Spine Road, north property line, and along the park. Townhouses and live I work units are permitted uses in the SMU zoning district. Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 3 Concurrency: ANALYSIS Traffic: Generally, a project's anticipated traffic is generated by two factors, namely the proposed use and its intensity. A letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering was received indicating that the entire Master Plan meets the traffic performance standards, with a series of conditions which limit or time aspects of the development with certain roadway improvements. Additionally, the City has petitioned the County for a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service) designation for Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and the respective intersections. Palm Beach County has transmitted the Comprehensive Plan Amendment associated with the CRALLS designation to the Department of Community Affairs for review and comment prior to adoption. Formal adoption of the CRALLS would remove the requirement for certain roadway improvements, including the necessity to improve the entire segment of Old Boynton Road between Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard to a five (5) lane section. However, even if the CRALLS is adopted by Palm Beach County, the following roadway improvements would still be required for the project: 1) Intersection improvements at Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and Gateway Boulevard, and Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road; 2) Improvement of Gateway Boulevard to six (6) lanes from Congress Avenue to High Ridge Road; 3) Improvement of Old Boynton Road to five (5) lanes from Congress Avenue to the Spine Road (the main north/south roadway within the proposed Master Plan, connecting Old Boynton Road to Gateway Boulevard), transitioning to three (3) lanes west of the E-4 Canal bridge, and continuing a three (3) lane section east to Boynton Beach Boulevard. This would also include the construction of a new three (3) lane bridge over the LWDD E-4 Canal; and 4) various access point improvements to entrances/exits to the 106.S-acre parcel (see "Exhibit C" _ Conditions of Approval). Utilities: The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water needs for this project. Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required for the project, dependent upon the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve this project, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site plan. Police! Fire: The Police Department reviewed the subject request relative to the Master Plan as a whole and how it would impact their level of service. The Department reports, "With the projected growth for this area, additional officers for this zone will be needed to handle the increase of calls for service. Service requirements for the Police Department will be impacted greatly and the demand for more police personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and projected traffic. If Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 4 The Fire Department expects to be able to maintain an adequate level of service for the subject project with current or anticipated staffing. Infrastructure requirements such as hydrants and roadway would be addressed during plan reviews and the permitting process. It must be noted however, that this project is located in an area that has experienced significant growth this past year. Fire supports the project with the understanding that Fire Station NO.5 would be available when the buildings receive their certificates of occupancy. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: The School District of Palm Beach County has approved the project for school concurrency. Driveways: The site plan proposes two (2) points of ingress / egress. A third point (egress only), is proposed at the north end of the subject property. All driveway openings are proposed along the Spine Road, which is intended to link Old Boynton Road with Gateway Boulevard. The southernmost driveway would be located approximately 60 feet from the north end of the proposed park. When scaled, the opening would be over 55 feet at its widest point and 25 feet at its narrowest point. The egress lane would allow for straight-left-right turn traffic movements onto the spine road. The second point of ingress / egress is proposed just south of SMU Parcel 3. This driveway opening would be similar to the southernmost opening in terms of dimensions and function. A point of egress only, is proposed north of the SMU Parcel 3. This opening would allow for right-turn (north) traffic movement onto the spine road. It is narrow and curved (to the north) to only allow for egress. This characteristic is one of the main reasons why staff is recommending against live / work units for these townhouse buildings proposed at the northeast corner of the subject property (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Throughout the entire project, the internal circulation system would consist of two (2) travel lanes, each 11 feet in width for a total of 22 feet of pavement. These private rights-of- way would be maintained by the property owner or property owners' association. The Section "A" drawing (of the internal roadways) illustrate that the roadway would be 22 feet in width and that each side would have a 21-foot long driveway. The Section "C" drawing (of the internal roadways) illustrates the dimensions of the right-Of-way where parallel on-street parking spaces are proposed. The Section shows the parallel spaces would be nine and one-half (9-112) feet in width, followed by a five (5)-foot wide sidewalk. Parking Facility: The project proposes 458 townhouse units with two (2) recreation areas. As previously mentioned, all units would have three (3) bedrooms. Three (3) bedroom units require two (2) parking spaces each and the recreation areas require five (5) parking spaces each. Therefore, a total of 926 parking spaces would be required. Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 5 Landscaping: The site plan provides for 998 parking spaces, or in excess of 72 spaces. The project proposes parking in the following scenarios: Garage spaces (852 spaces), driveway spaces (64 spaces), off-street parking spaces (12 spaces), on-street parking spaces (70 spaces). The City encourages that one (1) parking space per two (2) live / work units be provided to meet business activity needs. Parking provided to meet this requirement shall be located on the lot, built into or under the structure, or within 300 feet of the live / work units. Parking provided to accommodate said space, including driveways of adequate depth in front of the unit's garagel shall not serve as meeting required parking for the unit's residential use (Chapter 2, Section 6.H.5.c.(4). The site plan meets the intent of the code with respect to customer parking for the live / work units. The Typical Parking Space Detail (as shown on sheet 10 of 10) indicates parallel parking spaces would be dimensioned nine and one-half (9-112) feet in width by 25 feet in length. The 90-degree parking spaces would be dimensioned nine and one- half (9- V2) feet in width by 16 feet - six (6) inches in length with two (2) feet of vehicular overhang. The handicap spaces would be 12 feet in width with five (5) feet of striping by 16 feet - six (6) inches in length with seven (7) feet of vehicular overhang. The master site data plan indicates that 10.59 acres (26.7%) of the subject property would be pervious surface. Much of this pervious surface would be in the form of the 25-foot wide greenway proposed along the north property line and the 40-foot wide greenway proposed along the east property line. The tree survey (sheet 2 of 2) indicates the site currently contains 5,449 caliper inches of native trees and 80 caliper inches of non-native trees. The list of existing trees indicates the site contains a majority of Cabbage palm trees with a few Strangler Fig, Brazilian pepper, and citrus trees. A note on the survey indicates that the status of the native trees remains to be determined until the health and quality can be evaluated. Native trees would either be removed and mitigated for, or relocated elsewhere on-site. The Overall plant list indicates that 87% of the 241 canopy trees would be native, 53% of the 408 palm trees would be native, and 52% of the 7/716 shrubs / groundcover would be native. The plant list includes the following species: Gumbo Limbol Seagrape, Royal Poinciana, Live Oakl High Rise Live Oak, Coconut palm, Alexander palm, Medjool Date palm, Florida Royal palm, Cabbage palmI and Teddy Bear palm. As described above, the project proposes a "greenway" along the north and east property line. Proposed within its design, an eight (8)-foot wide multi-purpose, meandering trail with benches, would eventually link up to Renaissance Commons and Quantum Park (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The site plan shows that the landscape buffers would contain Live Oak, Royal Poinciana, and Coconut palm trees. Despite being under private ownership, both greenway segments would be set aside for perpetual use by the public with the inclusion of the multi- use path and benches. The plant material proposed within this buffer would be consistent with the Greenways Elevation. The path would also link to the five (5)- acre park, proposed along the south property line. Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001 ) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 6 The SMU zoning district requires a 25-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer around the entire project. The south landscape buffer, adjacent to the park, is depicted to be only 13 feet - four (4) inches wide. However, the developers of the five (5) projects are dedicating approximately five (5) acres of the entire Master Plan for park use; therefore, the plans meet the intent of the code. The landscape plan shows that 10 Silver Buttonwood trees are proposed within this buffer. It should be noted that the Typical Unit Landscape Plan includes plant material (installed around each building) that is not shown within said buffers. The landscape buffer adjacent to the Spine Road would be approximately nine (9) feet in width. It does not show any landscape material proposed within this area. A note on the landscape plan indicates that "Spine Road Landscape by Others" would provide for trees proposed along the Spine Road. The landscape plan (sheet 7 of 9) proposes five (5) typical unit landscape plans, of which, three (3) apply to alley or "rear" loaded units. A majority of the townhouse units proposed along the Spine Road would be the rear-loaded model. The 4-Unit, 5-Unit, and 6-Unit Detail shows that the landscape material proposed at the front of each rear-loaded unit (along the spine road) would consist of Alexander palm, Brazilian Beauty Leaf, Cabbage palm, and Pink Tabebuia. The townhouse models proposed north of the park would be front-loaded units. The 4-Unit and 6-Unit Details illustrates the plant material proposed adjacent to the park, which would include Gumbo Limbo and Brazilian Beauty Leaf trees into the design. Building and Site: The project proposes a mix of buildings with a minimum of four (4) units to a maximum of six (6) units per building. The site plan shows that 90 townhouse buildings are proposed on the 30.29-acre portion at a density of 15.12 dwelling units per acre. The Suburban Mixed Use (MX-S) land use classification allows up to 20 dwelling units per acre. Cortina at Boynton Village is just one (1) component of the Boynton Village Master Plan. The entire Master Plan is proposed at a project density of 13.69 dwelling units per acre. The Master Site Data Plan indicates that the recreation areas would account for 2.1 acres of the subject site. The SMU zoning district requires 30% usable open space for townhouse uses, or in this case, 11.602 acres of usable open space. The Usable Open Space plan (sheet MOS) indicates the plan would provide for a total of 13.304 acres of usable open space. It should be noted that the pervious surface around the 8.3-acre lake is included in the usable open space tabulations. This acreage amount is accurate and sufficient because the impervious surface area of the lake was used to determine the total required usable open space but only the pervious surface around the banks of the lake were counted towards usable open space. The Master Plan would provide a total of 23.8 acres of usable open space. The project proposes four (4) different types of floor plans, namely Units "A", "B", "C", and "D". All model types have (3) bedrooms for each unit. The Building Key & Open Space Plan (sheet A1.0) indicates that the project proposes a total of 134 "A" models, 198 "B" models, 80 "C" models, and 46 "D" models. These buildings would be either front or rear-loaded. Unit sizes proposed are as follows: Unit "A" models would be 1/943 square feet under air; Unit "B" models would be 1/887 square feet under air; Unit "C" models would be 1,973 square feet under air; Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 7 Lastly, Unit "D" models, would be 2,898 square feet under air. The project also proposes that 127 units or 27.7% of the total units would be designated as "live / work" units. The SMU zoning district limits the work space of the live / work unit to no more than 30% or 400 square feet, whichever is greater. The floor plan of the live / work unit (sheet A-4.8) shows that the work area of each unit would comprise no more than 17% of the total living area. However, the Unit "D" model proposes a work space of 449 square feet. Although the work area is 15.49% of the unit, at the time of permittingl it shall be reduced to no more than 400 square feet in order to comply with code (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). As previously mentioned, the Building Key & Open Space Plan (sheet A1.0) illustrates that the live / work units would be primarily located along the spine roadl along the north property line, and along the five (5)-acre park. Howeverl staff opposes placement of such units along the north property line (of Parcel 2) where direct access is not provided from the spine road. This is problematic since customers would have to travel through residential-only areas of the townhouse community in order to access these live / work units. Likewise, since these units are more commercial in nature, it is staff's intent to preserve the residential integrity of the community and therefore, staff recommends eliminating them from the plans in this particular location (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Regardless of the location of the live / work unitsl the buildings shall provide universal accessibility to the front and to the interior space of the non- residential area of the live-work unit from the public sidewalk adjacent to the street (Chapter 2, Section 6.H.5.c.(1).(c).). At the time of permitting, the developer will be required to update the plan to indicate available parking and the distance from the live / work unit to verify compliance with code. It should be noted that the applicant provided preliminary drawings showing compliance. However, these drawings were not included within this packet but can be considered during the permitting process. The drawings also include additional sidewalks between the live / work buildings proposed along the spine road. The maximum building height in the SMU zoning district for townhouses is 45 feet. The project proposes two (2) types of buildings, namely front-loaded and rear- loaded buildings, both of which would be 36 feet - four (4) inches in height (at mid-point of the roof) and 42 feet - four (4) inches at the peak of the roof. All buildings would be three (3) stories tall and comply with code. The site details (sheet A-1.6) shows the detail of the 15-foot tall gazebos that are proposed throughout the development. These are the same types of gazebos and pocket parks that were proposed throughout the townhouse community of Renaissance Commons. The two (2) recreation areas would have an 875-square foot clubhouse building and swimming pool. The clubhouse elevations show that the one (l)-story structure would be 19 feet - seven (7) inches at the peak of the roof. Design: The Boynton Village Master Plan is essentially divided in half by the proposed spine road. For this particular projectl a vast majority of the townhouse buildings are proposed east of the spine road. The project is enhanced with easily accessible Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 8 spaces (i.e. greenways to be available in perpetuity to the public). Internal private spaces in the form of small parks are sprinkled throughout the development while a large five (5)-acre public park is proposed on the southern portion, east of the spine road and adjacent to Old Boynton Road. The townhouse buildings are proposed in a Spanish-Mediterranean architectural style. The building facades are enhanced with balconies, trim, banding, columns, shutters, medallions, decorative garage doors, and Spanish S-tile roof. The buildings would come in a variety of colors schemes, all of which would use Benjamin Moore paints. The six (6) schemes are as follows: Elev A Body 1 (Lower) Restrained Gold - SW 6129 Scheme 1 Body 2 (Upper) Ivoire - SW 6127 Trim Creamy - SW 7012 Doors Toile Red - SW 0006 Shutters, Medallions, Railings Oak Moss - SW 6180 Garaqe Doors Ivoire - SW 6127 Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Humble Gold - SW 6380 Scheme 2 Body 2 (Upper) Jersey Cream - SW 6379 Trim Crisp Linen - SW 6378 Doors Sheraton Sage - SW 0014 Shutters, Medallions, Railings Red Cent - SW 6341 Garaqe Doors Jersey Cream - SW 6379 Elev A Body 1 (Lower) Caen Stone - SW 0028 Scheme 3 Body 2 (Upper) White Hyancinth - SW 0046 Trim Alabaster - SW 7008 Doors Tuscan Black - SW 6258 Shutters, Medallions, Railings Toile Red - SW 0006 Garaae Doors White Hyancinth - SW 0046 Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Restrained Gold - SW 6129 Scheme 1 Body 2 (Upper) Ivoire - SW 6127 Trim Creamy - SW 7012 Doors Toile Red - SW 0006 Shutters, Medallions, Railings Oak Moss - SW 6180 Garaae Doors Ivoire - SW 6127 Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Humble Gold - SW 6380 Scheme 2 Body 2 (Upper) Jersey Cream - SW 6379 Trim Crisp Linen - SW 6378 Doors Sheraton Sage - SW 0014 Shutters, Medallions, Railings Red Cent - SW 6341 Garaae Doors Jersey Cream - SW 6370 Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Caen Stone - SW 0028 Scheme 6 Body 2 (Upper) White Hyancinth - SW 0046 Trim Alabaster - SW 7008 Doors Tuscan Black - SW 6258 Shuttersl Medallions, Railings Toile Red - SW 0006 Garage Doors White Hyancinth - SW 0046 Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 9 Regarding the townhouse buildings proposed along the spine road; staff originally recommended that these buildings be oriented as such so that the front doors (of each unit) "face" the spine road, in order to maintain a consistent development pattern and design theme along the roadway. Staff is opposed to live / work models located at the northeast corner of the parcel where there is a lack of direct access from the spine road. Alternatively, staff felt that it was more logical for all the townhouse buildings proposed along the spine road, to be the "rear-loaded" models (so that the front doors face the spine road) and be of the live / work variety. This recommendation (for the buildings to "face" the spine road) is applicable to those units proposed south of the lake, currently designed with their building sides oriented towards the spine road. However, the developer is opposed to staff's recommendations and maintains the plans as proposed, due to their desire to prevent the units from facing the back of the commercial buildings and additionally, to open up some east views to the lake. As a compromise, staff recommends that the applicant enhance the west fa~ades of the townhouse buildings (proposed along the spine road with their sides facing the spine road) with shutters, plaster banding, and / or archways (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The detail of the outdoor freestanding lighting fixture (sheet EP-1 and sheet A-1.6) shows that the height of the poles would vary between 12 feet and 18 feet tall, depending where the location where each is proposed. The poles and decorative lamp would be painted black. Signage: The project is proposing three (3) monument-style residential subdivision entrance signs, which would be permitted under Chapter 21, Article IV, Section l.D. All monument signs are proposed west of the spine road at the project's main entrances. The elevation drawing (sheet A1.6) shows the dimensions of the wall in which the sign would be affixed. The wall and sign would have to comply with the above- reference code. Staff recommends the applicant submit an overall master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s) of all freestanding monument and directional signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). This would include signage for the live / work units. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at the base. This requirement can be met during the permitting process (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). According to the Signage Detail for the live / work units, signs would be affixed to the front fa~ade, over the each entranceway. These signs would be perpendicular to the wall. According to the detail, the bottom of the sign would be nine (9) feet from the ground. The sign would be two (2) feet in width by one foot and one- half (1- V2) inches tall. Again, these types of signs would be a component of the overall Master Sign Program. Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001) Memorandum No PZ 05-155 Page 10 RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff recommends approval, contingent upon successfully satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJEcrS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village Cortina NWSP OS-OOl\Staff Report.doc EXHIBIT A BOYNTON VILLlbSE AND BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I LOCATION MAP Local Retail Commercial o Industrial BOYNTON CANAL ..........11......................................., i I i I I BOYNTON VILLAGE LUAR 04-006 Suburban Mixed Use 81.814 acres .e ~ E lj :::: J! & ... ~ o .... LUAR 04-007 Loea' Ret." Com ere'.' 25.00 acres Commercial i I i u................u.J - - W+E S ... "6 """ l ul~ rf ,:[ ~~ II n o o ~ -t Z lD)> 0)> i-t ~ OJ ::tI 0 -< -< en Z c:-t ~o m Z -< < F !; G) m ." U\ ... ..... '" _ ~ o . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii . ~ r ? ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ g ! (ll 111 ~ (l._fttL'!ll.UllL&H~_.1~ ~}^~ .S~3~J . eO" '~iM !~'l :Ih t, -- - -I.l"j\"I_~lif"-\. i 1 ~ 2p~ ~i ..,"~ ~!i ~ij !~ ~~~I I <j i I[ 1 r ' eee ~~ ~~~~"I n~ S~ a;,~... ..~ md~ J~ 1 1 " .w"or' .- ~O''ii.to~:., :~~ I . I :<1 .,! ~, ~ 11.__.___ ,4i~ r 1 i > ~. ., ~ti: j~~ t..: 0'-'" \ *~t~l' ~~t m~~g ~ ~ ~~~"<I ' ~ I " ~.o ( o;ot-1o ~{~ ()1-", J' ~ ,.". 0.'". ~ ~~' .enll J.fOolt.OOS ;)''-:~ i~:~ .6;'t06:MOH.OOS 11/"1-('1"1 S:W'l(' '8<1 ~JA.llS.:If)IJt'1.I EXHIBIT B IJ ! i~: ~ ; ~i~~ i p.!~i i ;!~i ;1. i it ~ r i i c ~" '~"eSCCCcce088c~n~c /T\ZVlOO' Glo:tIXl:l::lf....Ol"'''',.., "'z.....O .., . . . ., .......... . n. r '1:'-'''' n aI 0 n . " ;~!!!~~i~m~:mg!m~1 .~~n~ , . ,.~.~, '.0 ~~~~~ i ~~~; ~i ~~ .../T\Xln_ V' :ro......, ZI> /T\ "" "'2 po :o~, ....z "',;." n n O:Z '" :;, .. . ~.g at:g ~~~ ;,mil ~~ i~;?~ ~... 2n 2. o~:J.::f: "0 ~~ i~E j C'I-....~~ 1;1 ~~ ~~01 ~ ~~~e Z" ~~ ! c.~ ~g~2~- ~ ~~ ~11~~11i ~~~ ;;~~~%~ ~ . :.,,1' . 0 ;;~8 ::::........~!:s: c; ~g m' ~ ::c:.,,~!.. ~ j~ ~~:~ ~~~ ~~~~~e ~ ~ B~;~S ~ 11: ~. Z< 0 ;:~~~;~~~E; i 0 "'0::.::.... .., ~ ~~e:~J:~~ O....;q~::t _ ~ eg ..,..-".. n ~2~~' . ~~i'~;a~~~~~ :~ "~~i: ~ ~ ~ ~.""O F~~5:~~~~~ ~ g;~~~~ ",,,,. .. ............,.,0 ~.... ~~~H~'.~~~ ,. . .. .....f.............. ~~~~i ....~.%~ .. ,...... ~O8~~ ~~:~i~~~~~~ ~~~~~ :::::~~:Z:~:::,.,..~~ ..~i:? 0 ...~~ .:;;:~;t~~...~ ~~~~: ;~S~~~i~~;: ~;;32~ ".~ "~g."~~ ~...o;i ~iij~~~~~~~~ ;~E~~ ;g~C:'::~; ~~~i5 ~~ ~ ;- o EXHIBIT B "'.... .., 'Of ... . h '"..<.., ... ~"'I'" ......,.... \totblCOtX'......,.. ....... ... '" 'h "..f<, ><'o......d "n, '''' _.".,. .......0 n..:.:.~~_.,,,...op.. ....^'.~.J!'~Mwm _, ~... .1j..,..~\~. .......r''"'\''..~ ............ I.. ...... ~......., 110Io"', ,. ......,.~...... __...... ----- ~r~.!:.._"'!.'!!.~~u__=_=~-..:~_ ---- -~;::-==:h;~""=-"'---"'-.-:-~-=--: ;,~~~~~U~~~~ P:::'~I'~ 0 ~o~ I I' I '-=-===-== -F==-=':::'~f-:::--"--~'~~-:-"it' ." uH[u .- - ~~;,~;,;,= ..~- U~ ~ I ~I~ ~. : ,:.- ~~_ J_ _:-'''~~1J~-~:=- ~ =:f'~7"~~-;-~ ~~~--~=-::~-~un~ ~~~ ~~~ 8 m~~~! 8~ I I I"" - ~ r :cc -.-"",- '7 -=- -::- ===- - - -.. , " '" ....... ~ < 'i1f ~ i i ! = ~ ~ ~ ~F , .. '''V.PARCEll \ ~ Ii!! i!l [!J , ~ RESIDENTIAL \ ~ 1" ~ ~ -- I I !Il,.27' ACRE' . , .52" +'t-- j . f; f; ~ 1.1 \ ~ I i I I ,\ i;l S1 ~ Ii \ II Ii ~H b t,h l ~.\i ,!\ ~ \ \11 \ I, '\ I : \" W{US ~fmii~ ~f~ml~ '; \\ '\ n!!IJ~ hi iUi~ hiuli " \\' ~~ ~~ ~i i~! ~~ U ' \\ \ ~I ~I~ ~ ~~ \\\ ~~ \ \ "'~\/. \\>/. . \\ }~K/o/\\'\:':, " \~\':~,~,/. :)~;:< , " xv~~.~\, ,/ \ ~\ . ';;\\\ ~ \ '/A\ \ \ \0 \;'" '\ \.,. \ \ \ \"'~ \\ ~>\\ ,\. \\. .'\ \, \ \\ /' \ \\ \ \\.' . \\ '\\/ '\ \ \\~~ \\ \ '\ \\ 1 '" " " \ \, ;., 'I I' f ~ \ I 'I I ~I Hi II II 1'1 ,I I II f! i: I :J .~ illl! I" ~ ~ 'I' Ii' I ~ II I, II 'I I Ii II /I, ! Ii fl ii! , I ~! Ii I, i i I I ~ nhlJ J l !i Ii ~ ~ I I: I' ~'I I' ,i/ II I ,.: 'I ,I! ~ I: :,1 \. ,i 'I It I I :11 I --; ~; 1\ I I \! I III IJ I ,M~ --- u _ u_ _ _ -- ~- cc=c ~ ; -L~1'~'~:~~~~;:~;~::,:: __~.-,)LLL ~-.-~.~ ii i:r~------~:,~:~-----~l'~I~'r-~-~-L_---------~11 r;=';I/-~-+\I' ~~:~'~J_~~~~:i-'~l' ~1)!~!1 [~ 0_ !Ii! II i il ...::;:'::::':~ I ~ OONOO""""'~"", : 1,- no __L__1~~~__.J._u --/1 i' t _ 'A. 'I~ Ii., \1 '\ -""";::~~~,=",~.,,, I 'III _ -- ~__.vwt ,). . n ---~------I ,I q -$ . I I I-----r-f"'i>.~""~ U /~ I I 'I I ~~.f i.: : I, '\' \ ' " ~ . I ' 1" -"'0 I I'; I! --=4' - :=<:- ~ \i _. _.1-.-1---....1.-- - I ,I " IJi ~ ~~~"D ;~U~ ili:tJ!!= W~N ~ ~ ~~ ~ mt;; r ..m ~- ~ " ': \ '\ /....\ , I ./><~\ ,/ </<;~>/<> \ / 'lfr ..' .' . , '/ 'I ..~..::r~t:'/.'>::>:l z /~~>////I ()/ '/'/:;"//1 I r '1 a .\ m..- .\ o. ~ ~i 1~ i ~ . s ~j 1.! d~\i S ~i: ! ~' ,: . i; f ~ i,l, 'Ii ,,~,Jj 3: ~8 f BOYNTON VILLAGE CIl ;: ~ ~ ~ DEVELOPER: "tl @~~' 1950 CONGRESS AVENUE, LLC. '" ., c ill ~I~ ~~a~! ~U~~ 0~~ ~ '"~ ~~~~ "'~..m rn~= ~ _ ::jf:l 'lIS ". ".". ;~ ~~ OJ o -< Z -l ~ Ii ~ d G) m SMU MASTER PLAN ~~^' f 1lI"~~CI> rNG".rrR' . A~ NOIFrl CI1," [) Roluh?[ ~-n Kimley~Hom O,Sl:.;M(OBY' , ~HAfi.Ci;(.~ ~rr,l5.RAno., ~LJ~(.R~ _ - and AssOCIates. me. D~.~ BY ~u~ ~9~ ':, f,.'~,3~1;:,t~;~~1~~:~~:::S~:;.~::~2~n 1-3-05 COR '2-7-0~ CQ~ 11-5-0. eDI< [JOYNh).'4 nrACI rl QRIDA PH. C:1Y or eO~,TON BEACH 1>~1l C'f'--(lf OOY~ I()I, lJlAC11 PH, (~'IY ,)( IlOYNTON n[ACIl ':(O,,;,,~ ''''''O~' '1' '.1;( r 4/j~'C7-'JlJyr"~'\ ViI ,,~~\ ~ /' ~K:;(, 7\C ~IJCI\lI~fN ~p,l.c:r C~l.. S' e- ~il~ F'l,,~ -l:< 01'"\1 .n" n'. lO{l~\ . ',g,,,p "y. l;~:.'" le,,,. EXH IBIT B 'I'"'' .0" '" "~,..,, 0" ..",...., .""""" ,...'" ..... ."........., "' ".~.. ., h' .'"'....,<1."..'.0..."......,'.....,...,.".."."." ......O.O"J...O........-""".'.l.,...........',.".,~,..."".".."""'..,,..". """',.".'.".........."."......,...,....., .........,.........IlI"rl.M.....)_Iol............_..'..,,"< .RliH-~,.. v --~p.::o/-:-- sJ ~ i~: ~F I . i \~~~, '~ f i , I ; ~~ : r ~,i ~ i (: 1'1 '!.ili1f : / :;:':"";;'," '.'t irf ~,r~" " .il !fJ "l !i _ f :: : I i.'I.,.'! '1'1' ::! : ,I .'.,. jl JJ.,., ",ll';~ : :1 iH >" 1~I7.:r."'" ~I' ill' ;. r ",.,~^"",....~.A,~,.~"",",""y, ^""^" ~!! : I I~~~~~;_:~~;<,~; ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ii! ~ fiHI ~ ~~ ,.!! V!P~li ~~ ~~u~ ~\. ni~~ ~ ~~~!~ ~ IIH~ :: ~<;l~ ~ <;lri!<;l Ei ri!'~ li ~s~ I H~;~ ~ ~~Sl,!!J!J!J!J!J! ~~2fiJ~~~~~ ~i!<;l~;<!,;<~~ >~~n~u hmnLr ~'" "''''''U ~i U ~hl ~ ;J! ~ e ~ ~ !il II! .. ~ ~ ~ * ~ I" .._""....._~ ~~~E~iI!~~~.5 .. !! ~ i!i i ~i' l :~: r I,~;"~:~~ ~ I" 1; Ii I" ~ i~iii; e ~ ~ i~1i1i~~ ~ ~ . J'.lf ..:;'t~.'<'i....,l7.;(".J.404_':. ( Ii I " o I^ BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU DEVELOPER: 1950 CONGRESS AVENUE, LLC. 80....\jlON BEACH ;-LOR,!)A MASTER USABLE OPEN SPACE PLAN ~c"lr -.S/o,!IO'1 Q(S1~peT IlUSSElll.lOOR\SON ClH'l f,CIlIC~lI(QS1RAflOtl_~ ~l::'li/ llI"1_n K1mley.Hom IIII..I_U and AssocIates, Inc. !O,~S~~1f<<'7:.[~~OfI.NOO~N~:~~~Sf\"'~,~1l Pi,W .t'<;./:::~[~!~;~,\CO/MC~l~;.HM .-,,'-=~"'--'------==""=-="---==-<-'~ REV'.S:ONS OAIl. 'BY CI<t.~Ml\l ~l '" ... , ....I r~~ ,-I ~m q ""tl r- :> z o ~ EXHIBIT B , __...Kt!"_.... .-..---...-.-.IliI"'.-..-..-.--m-.----. . _. ~ -- ~ ~~~ ! ~ .i h ~ a ~i h ~ I I Ii Iii ill i I II Il!l UiIIU ,~, ~ I~ I~ il ! !~ ~I !~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- hi ~I ~ ~ .. .~ ~ - ~ i~ 1 1 II Qi ~~~ ~I - I i ' ~ ! ~= i! j I I 1'1 ~~, FF! ~ l ~I 'II ili i g ~~ ~~ ~ r I fH 1- Ih/ i II f ! f . .. . ~. U. N P" ~ I!~i IIWWil ~~, I ~m ~-< I tld li!hllil ~II a I '! .~ R - -! ""tl - jls, .~ l'li! ~~ r- i~ ~ -I; i';I~ i~! r :> 2! II! illll!!ll M z I ~~ f ~ R 0 - - -.-.- - --- --- -.- - - -- , '" -- -- --- ~ < uN> . ~~! -:-Ji... I I " \' U II I 1\ l \ i ~- ~ U 8~U ~ ~ cc5i~TNi\ COI\TRNA 1~~SI lIun ~i~I" ~ ~; I ~~ ~~U : : · BOYNTON VIllAGE I~;I~ 1IIIn ~~.g o ;;JS ~ e i I ~ ~TO\VN&C.OUNTRYHOl>mSfL()'''[)<.. ~~I~ ;U..~ J~~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ t ~ ~ g i C BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~n~ E : ~ ~ C :NlO4 QUlHCl'IOHtUON, IOHU. M'rOtT. WtLl.lAU.I, ACIVlOO. WJ.H.1H.H IoACHITIC1"S,II'lC..Al..llU<:IHn J.llS.I.V1D. NO '.....TO'THUIIOIAS, .1.AN1,Ok OUIClHI WOVU IU.JODUClDOkOO'UD IN AXYfOlW, WMAnoMl.wtftlOUTTHI IXl'WI WNT1'Il'lOOHUNT01 Q,jIM.WAVAACHmcn.INc, l. ~ f' ~po -N <", 'OJ '0 ~\l r po Z (f' (f' ", () .... 6 z (f' ~ ", < po .... 6 2 (f' + CJ 1"'1 .... po F (f' Qo ~r- ~- -< ~tTI --- ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ :j ~ -l -< . f ~I '" ,I n " F: i: iil (j) , , ~ I 1 ;P- O tTI r- ~;:J 0 (j mo ~ fl ~ 0 Z , 'I / // / / / / !Ii 1 ~1' !.~ ;~ '-" ~-~ ~g "< .2 ~ -< ~ '" , '" I +--~ mUl r;;s <m :>om ::Ip ~~ ill t:I ::?: 0 z C ::?: ", Z .... (f' " 2 ." '" 0 z .... + '" ", po '" ", ", ~ ~ < po .... 6 2 (f' ~l jlC' At:;" I/'~~ l ~~ f~ :l~~ ~'f " ~- . d i~~ }.. '8f 06 lOti f ;~ R ~. ~ ~~ .J ,.L. m ~I~~ ~.~~ 'I~f 'e. ~~~ ~ ~ ~>J <" _0 c '02 "0 b~ .~ 6 z ." !; .. "'~oo, ;:~, ~~~~ ~N -~~~ EXHIBIT B I ! f'.. 10 id , ,., PI 21U ~ c()I~tTN;\ CO~TKNA li~~~: uun ~i~t :t ~ i h ~~n ~. BOYNTON VILlAGE ~i~ ii.'jl g~3 (j'. ~ . I I ~'IOWN61:(".ouNTRYHOMESHO;1JD!' ~UI ;'1',; I~I i n ~ ~~ g ~ BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA n~~ I e ~: ~ ,C JOOoI QUlHCVIOHH.tON.}Ot.lU MTOTT.WIW1.MJ.~MDO. VI<J,J(Jt(HAJ.t:;I(ITtCfS.lNC... N.l.IJOHTS WIr..Wo. NO'An O'THUIIDW, rtANl. Ol.DUIOHIIMV.1 ~'JDDUCtDo"'corIID IN IoHYfOa.MWKATSOm..WlTHOIJ1'TH.W..... WlJ'TTlNCOHlIINTOfQUM.WAVAlaimcT1IHC;:. L .J r~ EXHIBIT B -1 , iEE i tE i tE ! ~B@2I0G~~B '., F F "i 1 ~i I Ii II ai ! ~ Iii Ii a ~< ~ ~~ a 3 ~.i i ! ! \ G ii~ ~~: i !~ U l~ ~( !~ b . I I I )B3 . d. i 'S .~ ~g ,il 'S ., ! ~.". , . 'u !m ,:tlE3:3B 1tTI .~ I ! I "I I 1t"n\ .u::o II a ~ dHn~ I ; ~! : ~ i, ~1. i ~~ Il ~( <( h Ii ~ ! . u, i; -F i ~~ P ~H~ ~q' ~! ! u ~ ii a ~ HHlli I ; ~ i, d: ~ !I ~I ~I i; !, ~I ~ ;i/II G~IR: "'~ lO ~~ .. :>> r- . --10 OE; Z'" :>>0 " w... ItDUffOfM:rcMOf1t<<mctlCif'llClO<< ~ w o q ~ IIU I CO[~i~;\ 8:~~t~L~~ IU~U unp, ~_I~t I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~~ 5 P ~ I! ::::j , a r I ~ ~TOWN&:COI.)NTRYHOMES!I'\R'rJ' ~d~ UIJJR J~~; E i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 80YNTON 8EACH, FLORIDA :UG E _. ~ _ C JOHCI,/IHCY JOHHlIOH. 'ONU. "'YOn. Wll.Ll.l.MS. N::MDO. VAlJOIiH UCHITICn,IHC.. AU IJOH'N W.r..VIO. "'0'AA:f 0' nt,SI lOW. ru.tU. OaOUIQHf MAY'I ....fODUClD OI.OOPl.D IN AHt 101M WHA.l'SOI\III. W'lTHOUTTHIIXI'UfI wt.In1H cotaun or QUMWAV AJ.CHmC11, IHe. L .J V1 @ ?if ..... ~, Ci ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ fJ ~ ~ ~ <Ii 'P" m ~I[(t:t ' He lUll" I; '..1 illl~ ~ !~ III <.0 II l" II Cortina Boynton Village Boynton Beach, Florida EJ.~q..lmn ::r: () 0 w~ I · CD 0 ,d i' f~'~ .~ lie g .a ..... EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Cortina at Boynton Village File number: NWSP 05-001 Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 9, 2005 Planning & Zoning date ki stamn mar n\!. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS- General Comments: None X PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic Comments: None X UTILITIES Comments: 1. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water X and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 2. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.rn. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in t}1e LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 3. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid X for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 4. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has X approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 5. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability X at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 6. A new flow test shall be conducted when all water feeder rnams are X Conditions of Approval 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT connected. POLICE Comments: None X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 7. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction X acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 8. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic X sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 9. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the X loads and forces encountered per the 200 I FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 10. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic X sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 11. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X proposed construction. 12. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may X not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 13. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 14. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the proiect as it appears on the Development Order and DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) IS. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. X For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 16. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: a. A legal description of the land. b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. d. The number of dwelling units in each building. e. The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter I, Article V, Section 3(f)) 17. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 18. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 19. The design of the "greenway", proposed along the east property line shall be X in conformance with the Greenways Standards. The "greenway" proposed along the north property line shall resemble the "greenway" proposed along the south property line of the Renaissance Commons master plan. 20. Impact fee: 458 Single family, attached units (a} $771.00 per unit = X Conditions of Approval 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT $353,118.00 FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 21. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. X The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan (Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.). 22. Staff recommends preserving, where possible, all existing desirable trees that X are located within the proposed landscape buffers (Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.). 23. The applicant must provide a lake littoral and transitional planting plans for X 50% of the lake perimeter (20 feet in width). 24. A Lake Maintenance Plan document must be provided for the proper X maintenance of the lake plantings. A time zero and quarterly monitoring report for two years is required of the developer. 25. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume X water conservation using non-portable water. 26. Turf and larrdscape (bedding plarrts) areas should be designed on separate X zones and time duration for water conservation. 27. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the X root ball (Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.). PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 28. The project is subject to the limitations and timing at which development may X proceed as outlined in the Palm Beach County Traffic approval letter or the conditions contained within the CRALLS amendment upon its adoption. 29. The SMU Master Plan does not match the proposed site plan in terms of the X number off ingress points proposed along the spine road. Therefore, the SMU Master Plan shall be modified to be consistent with all other plarrs. 30. At the time of permitting, the site statistics in the cover sheet (sheet A-OI) X shall match the same in the master site data plan (sheet MSD). 31. At the time of permitting, the plant material proposed within the Typical Unit X DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Landscape Plans shall be incorporated into the overall plant quantities in the Overall Landscape Plan plant list. 32. Regarding the live / work units: Unit "D" proposes a work space of 449 X square feet. Although the work area is 15.49% of the unit, at the time of permitting, the work area shall be reduced to no more than 400 square feet in order to comply with code. 33. Buildings designed as live / work units shall provide universal accessibility to X the front and to the interior space of the non-residential area of the live-work unit from the public sidewalk adjacent to the street (Chapter 2, Section 6.H.5.c.(1 ).( c).). At the time of permitting, provide a drawing that indicates parking available for these types of units and distance for determination of compliance with the Code. 34. The City encourages that one (1) parking space per two (2) live / work units X be provided to meet business activity needs. Parking provided to meet this requirement shall be located on the lot, built into or under the structure, or within 300 feet of the unit in which the use is located. Parking provided to accommodate said space, including driveways of adequate depth in front of the unit's garage, shall not serve as meeting required parking for the unit's residential use (Chapter 2, Section 6.H.5.c.(4). 35. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the X tabular data and the graphic illustration. Staff recommends adding more trees along the south property line adjacent to the park. 36. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends X that they be maintained by the Home Owners' Association so that no individual property owner removes any of the required plant material along the perimeter or interior of the development. 37. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at X the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0). 38. Submit a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, X exterior finish, and color(s) of all freestanding monument signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.). This would include signage for the live / work units. 39. Staff recommends orienting the townhouse buildings so that all units X (proposed along the spine road) are "facing" the spine road. This would apply to those units proposed south of the lake. Also, it would make sense for them to be "rear loaded units" or live-work units. However, if the developer elects to not re-orient the buildings, then staff recommends that the west fa<;:ade of the townhouse building (proposed along the spine road) shall be enhanced with shutters, plaster banding, and / or archways to resemble the front facades. 40. Staff recommends eliminating the "Live / Work" component of the X townhouse buildings proposed at the northeast corner of the subject property. 41. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature X Conditions of Approval 6 I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I to be coordinated with the developers of the Renaissance Commons project; please consider. Also, please include pedestrian path on this bridge to connect the green way paths of the Renaissance Commons and Boynton Village projects. ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: 43. Remove conditions #32 and #40. X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: 44. To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village Cortina NWSP 05-001\COA.doc 4~ Meeting Minutes Planning & Development Board Boynton Beach, Florida August 23, 2005 Motion Mr. Cwynar moved to approve the request for new site plan approval to construct 82 fee- simple town houses on an 8.6-acre parcel in the Planned Unit Development Zoning District, subject to all staff conditions. Mr. Casaine seconded the motion that passed 6-11 Mr. Saberson dissenting. Ms. Jasciewicz voted in favor of it with the understanding that the applicant would consider her comments and suggestions. Mr. Casaine reiterated that Condition #36 would be worked out between the applicant and staff. B. New Site Plan 1. Project: Cortina @ Boynton Village (NWSP 05- 001) Steve Lillerl Hovstone Propertiesl Floridal LLC The Klatt Family Limited Partnership # 1 and Klatt Enterprisesl Inc. NE corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue Request for new site plan approval in order to construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units in the Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU) zoning district. Agent: Owner: Location: Description: Steve Liller, Town &. Country Homes, appeared to answer questions. James Williams, Architect for the project appeared also. Chair Wische asked the applicant's position on the 41 staff comments. Attorney To!ces swore in the latecomers before proceeding. Mr. Williams declared that the applicant agreed with all staff conditions except clarification was needed on Conditions #19 and #40. Condition #19 refers to a greenway to be consistent with the greenway proposed along the Renaissance Commons project. They would prefer green area or green space to the term greenway. Eric Johnsonl Planner, said the word greenway was used to be consistent with the greenway proposed for the Renaissance Commons project. For this project,. the greenway would occur along the east and north property lines and would be 40 feet wide on the east and 25 feet wide on the north. Mr. Williams asked for and received confirmation they were talking about an area with walkways and benchesl not a wildl nature-type preserve. Mr. Johnson also stated that Parks & Recreation had come up with a definition of what a greenway would look like and it typically included a meandering path with some trees, park benchesl and trash receptacles. Mr. Williams felt they could agree to this condition. Mr. Williams declared that Condition #40 referred to the location of the live/work units. Staff suggested eliminating live work units at the northeast comer of the subject property. The ordinance states that live/work units should be located along perimeter roads, and shouldl therefore, be allowed. 6 '- Meeting Minutes Planning & Development Board Boynton Beach, Florida August 23, 2005 Mr. Johnson expressed staff's opinion that the live/work units would negatively impact the adjacent residential property owners due to the traffic destined for the live/work units having no choice but to pass through the residential area to get to the live/work areas. Mr. Williams stated there was no parking on the spine roads and there was parallel parking next to the live/work units. Alsol the types of businesses allowed in the live/work units were not the kinds that generate much traffic. Mr. Johnson stated the wording of Condition #32 was proposed to be 449 sq. ft. for the work component of the live/work units. This would be the maximum, but it was also "or 30% of the unit." In these large unitsl the work component could exceed the 449 square feet and still be under 30%. Therefore, Condition #32 should be eliminated. Chair Wische opened the floor to the public and closed it when no one came forward. Kathy Cook, 1074 N.W. 11th Street, Boynton Beach, a resident of Sky Lake just east of the proposed projectl asked if the 40-foot "greenway" were measured from the center of the canal or just the land. f Mr. Johnson responded that it was measured from Cortina's property line westward and did not include the canal. The canal is 180 feet wide and combined with the setback on the east side, considerable separation between the project and the residential area would be provided. Kim Glas-Castro appeared on behalf of the developer of Boynton Village SMU Master Plan, to speak on Condition #33. They resisted USi~ the term greenway since staff has a specific definition for a greenway. They would prefer to refer to it as an expanded buffer area with pedestrian walkways and bicycle paths. Greenways have a specific development standard that was not an expectation for this project. Mr. Johnson believed the Parks & Recreation Department would prefer the term greenway, and that the difference was one of semantics. James Comparato, developer for Renaissance Commons, appeared to say that during the approval process of Renaissance Commonsl considerable discussion took place about whether the greenway was "Forever Wild" or a green area with space for pedestrians and bikes. Ms. Jasciewicz referred to Condition #39 where there were two options. If one were not usedl the remaining one should be requiredl and not just recommendedl in her view. Mr. Williams responded they were choosing option 2 and had supplied staff with drawings showing they would comply with the request. Mr. Johnson confirmed this. The discussion on the live/work units resumed. There was much give and take between the developer, the board, and staff, including the Engineering Department. Laurinda Logan, Senior Engineer for Boynton Beach, did not believe there was enough room to make a dedicated turn lane or to move the median to provide access to the live/work units without going through the residential section. A representative of Kimley Horn confirmed thisl giving the technical explanation of why it would not be possible. 7 - Meeting Minutes Planning & Development Board Boynton Beach, Florida August 23, 2005 Mr. Williams did not believe that the live/work units would generate excess traffic. The types of businesses that were allowed were: a mailing service, arbitrator/mediator service, housemaid service, commercial artist, design studio, commercial photography, computer programming, computer software, data processing, direct mail, editing, proofreading, paralegal, and similar businesses. Mr. Liller added that the ordinance prohibited more than two employees in the work component of the live/work units at a given time. Motion Mr. Cwynar moved to approve the request for new site plan approval for Cortina at Boynton Village in order to construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units in the Suburban Mixed-Use Zoning District (SMU), subject to all staff comments and conditions except deleting Conditions #32 and #40. Ms. Jasciewicz seconded the motion for discussion. Mr. Johnson declared that staff was in favor of eliminating Condition #32, but wanted to keep Condition #40 (elimination of live/work units on the perimeter of the property). The motion was not changed to that effect. The motion passed 6-1, Mr. Casaine dissenting. C. New Site Plan Location: Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003) Russell C. Morrison, P .E., Kimley-Horn & Associates The Klatt Family Limited Partnership # 1 and Klatt Enterprises, Inc. NE corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue Request for new site plan approval in order to construct 247,812 square feet of commercial on a 24.65-acre parcel in the (C-3) Community Commercial zoning district 1. Project: Agent: Owner: Description: Chair Wische asked for the applicant's position on the 50 staff conditions and whether they wished clarification on any item(s). Kim Glas-Castro, Ruden McCloskey, appeared on behalf of the applicant, stating they wanted to discuss four of the 50 conditions. They asked for confirmation that Boynton Town Center was being parked at 1 space per 200 square feet for the entire C-3 area, regardless of specific uses that might come in like a bank or restaurant. There were some cross parking and cross access agreements with Boynton Village and Boynton Village was to be parked at 1 per 200 also. Eric Johnson, Planner, agreed the 1 to 200 parking rate would apply across the board, without regard to the types of businesses that might come in when the out parcels were developed. Ms. Glas-Castro objected to Conditions of Approval #35 and #37 that called for mirroring the landscaping used in Renaissance Commons. They wanted to have their own identity. 8 ("\ ,- "-. '1' \.l/'f'.'" . . (..:" V'--_f, / '., 1 ,. ',! i l_i';l t' \ t) UJ ~ r , t i AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Hovstone Properties, agent for The Klatt Family Partnership and Klatt Enterprises, Inc., property owner, has requested the following project to be considered for site plan approval: Legal Description: On file in the Planning & Zoning Department. Generally, the northeast comer of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road Proposed Use: Requests new site plan approval for the construction of 458 townhomes on a .:t36 acre portion of the 82.06-acre site known as Boynton Village. PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIQER THE REQUEST ARE SCHEDULED BEFORE THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ON AUGUST 23. 2005 AT 6:30 P.M. AND THE CITY COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 AT 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA PERMITS, IN THE CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS, LOCATED AT 100 EAST BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD. All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearings in person or by attorney and be heard or file any written comments prior to the hearing dates. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Planning and Development Board and City Commission with respect to any matter considered at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Patricia Tucker (561) 742-6268, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PLANNING AND ZONING (561 742-6260) DIVISION WPB:21 0096:5