AGENDA DOCUMENTS
c,
o
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
0 August 2, 2005 July 18, 2005 (Noon.) 0 October 5, 2005 September 19,2005 (Noon)
D August 16, 2005 August I, 2005 (Noon) D October 18, 2005 October 3, 2005 (Noon)
D September 6, 2005 August 15, 2005 (Noon) D November I, 2005 October 17, 2005 (Noon)
~ September 20, 2005 September 6, 2005 (Noon) D November 15,2005 October 31, 2005 (Noon)
D Administrative 0 Development Plans
NATURE OF ~ Consent Agenda D New Business
AGENDA ITEM D Public Hearing D Legal
D Bids D UnfInished Business
0 Announcement D Presentation
D City Manager's Report
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the September 20,2005 City Commission Agenda under
Consent Agenda. The Planning and Development Board recommended that the subject request be approved on August 23,
200~, with the elimination of condition of approval #32 and #40 regarding size and location of the live/work units.. For
further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 05-155.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Cortina @ Boynton Village (NWSP 05-001)
Steve Liller, Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC
The Klatt Family Limited Partnership #1 and Klatt Enterprises, Inc.
NE Comer of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue
Request for new site plan approval in order to construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units in
the (SMU) Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
N/A
N/A
Devel
City Manager's Signature
~ -~~
", Planning and Zoning Direc66r City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton ViI\age-Boynton Town Center I \Boynton ViI\age Cortina NWSP 05-001 \Agenda Item Request Cortina @
Boynton ViI\age NWSP 05-001 9-20-05.dot
S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-155
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and
Mayor and City Commission
FROM:
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP
Planner
t
THROUGH:
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE:
August 18, 2005
PROJECT NAME /
NUMBER:
Cortina at Boynton Village / NWSP 05-001
REQUEST:
New site plan approval to construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units on a a
30.29-acre parcel in the SMU Suburban Mixed-Use zoning district.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: The Klatt Family Partnership & Klatt Enterprises, Inc.
Applicant: Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC AND 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC
Agent: Mr. Steve Liller with Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC
Location: Northeast corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue, just south of
the SFWMD C-16 canal (see Location Map - Exhibit "A")
Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Suburban (MX-S)
Existing Zoning: Suburban Mixed Use (SMU)
Proposed Use: 458 townhouse units
Acreage: 30.29-acre portion of the 106.5-acre parcel
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Right-of-way for the SFWMD C-16 Canal, then farther north is developed
property with town homes from Phase I of the Renaissance Commons
Master Plan with a Suburban Mixed Use (MX-S) land use classification,
zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU);
South:
Right-of-way for Old Boynton Road, then farther south is developed
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 2
commercial property (Oakwood Shopping Center), with a Local Retail
Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial
(C-3);
East:
Right-of-way of the LWDD E-4 Canal, then farther east is developed single
family residential (Sky Lake) with an Low Density Residential (LOR) land
use classification, zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA); and
West:
Immediately west is right-of-way for the proposed main north/south road
within the Boynton Village and Town Center Master Plan. Northwest is
undeveloped property proposed for condominium use within the Boynton
Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Suburban Mixed Use (MX-S)
land use classification, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU). Southwest is
undeveloped property proposed for commercial use within the Boynton
Village and Town Center Master Plan with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3), then farther
west is right-of-way for Congress Avenue, still farther west is developed
commercial property (Boynton Beach Mall).
Site Characteristic: The subject site is the location of pastureland commonly referred to as the
Winchester Property, named after one or more of its owners. On February 15,
2005, the City Commission approved the applicant's request for a land use
reclassification and rezoning (LUAR 04-006) of 81.814 acres of property from
Single-family Residential (R-1-AA) to Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU) and also
approximately 25 acres at the southwest corner of the parcel (LUAR 04-007) from
Single-family Residential (R-1-AA) to Community Commercial (C-3).
The SMU Master Plan shows that the subject property is comprised of two (2)
irregularly-shaped parcels, carved out of the original 106.5 acre parcel. This 30.29-
acre portion is located east of Congress Avenue and generally extends along the
eastern one-third of the greater Winchester property. It is bounded by the LWDD
C-16 Canal to the north, the LWDD E-4 Canal to the east, and Old Boynton Road to
the south. The survey submitted for this packet was a boundary survey, which
does not show the existing conditions. The SMU Master Plan depicts these parcels
as SMU Parcell (1.279 acres) and SMU Parcel 2 Phase II (29.02 acres).
BACKGROUND
Proposal:
Mr. Steve Liller with Hovstone Properties Florida, LLC, is requesting new site plan
approval to construct a large townhouse development within the 81.84-acre mixed-
use project. The project would consist of 458 fee-Simple townhouse units. All
units would have three (3) bedrooms. Out of the 458 units, the developer is
requesting that 127 of the units be designated as live / work units. The Building
Key & Open Space Plan (sheet A1.0) shows the location of the units would be
primarily along the Spine Road, north property line, and along the park.
Townhouses and live I work units are permitted uses in the SMU zoning district.
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 3
Concurrency:
ANALYSIS
Traffic: Generally, a project's anticipated traffic is generated by two factors, namely the
proposed use and its intensity. A letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
was received indicating that the entire Master Plan meets the traffic performance
standards, with a series of conditions which limit or time aspects of the
development with certain roadway improvements. Additionally, the City has
petitioned the County for a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of
Service) designation for Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and the respective
intersections. Palm Beach County has transmitted the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment associated with the CRALLS designation to the Department of
Community Affairs for review and comment prior to adoption. Formal adoption of
the CRALLS would remove the requirement for certain roadway improvements,
including the necessity to improve the entire segment of Old Boynton Road
between Congress Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard to a five (5) lane section.
However, even if the CRALLS is adopted by Palm Beach County, the following
roadway improvements would still be required for the project: 1) Intersection
improvements at Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, Congress Avenue and
Gateway Boulevard, and Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road; 2)
Improvement of Gateway Boulevard to six (6) lanes from Congress Avenue to High
Ridge Road; 3) Improvement of Old Boynton Road to five (5) lanes from Congress
Avenue to the Spine Road (the main north/south roadway within the proposed
Master Plan, connecting Old Boynton Road to Gateway Boulevard), transitioning to
three (3) lanes west of the E-4 Canal bridge, and continuing a three (3) lane
section east to Boynton Beach Boulevard. This would also include the construction
of a new three (3) lane bridge over the LWDD E-4 Canal; and 4) various access
point improvements to entrances/exits to the 106.S-acre parcel (see "Exhibit C" _
Conditions of Approval).
Utilities: The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million
gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the
projected potable water needs for this project. Local piping and infrastructure
improvements may be required for the project, dependent upon the final project
configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the
responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting
(see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Sufficient sanitary sewer and
wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve this project, subject to
the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site
plan.
Police! Fire: The Police Department reviewed the subject request relative to the Master Plan as
a whole and how it would impact their level of service. The Department reports,
"With the projected growth for this area, additional officers for this zone will be
needed to handle the increase of calls for service. Service requirements for the
Police Department will be impacted greatly and the demand for more police
personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and
projected traffic. If
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 4
The Fire Department expects to be able to maintain an adequate level of service for
the subject project with current or anticipated staffing. Infrastructure requirements
such as hydrants and roadway would be addressed during plan reviews and the
permitting process. It must be noted however, that this project is located in an
area that has experienced significant growth this past year. Fire supports the
project with the understanding that Fire Station NO.5 would be available when the
buildings receive their certificates of occupancy.
Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The
Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is
recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time
of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other
drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit
"C" - Conditions of Approval).
School: The School District of Palm Beach County has approved the project for school
concurrency.
Driveways: The site plan proposes two (2) points of ingress / egress. A third point (egress
only), is proposed at the north end of the subject property. All driveway openings
are proposed along the Spine Road, which is intended to link Old Boynton Road
with Gateway Boulevard. The southernmost driveway would be located
approximately 60 feet from the north end of the proposed park. When scaled, the
opening would be over 55 feet at its widest point and 25 feet at its narrowest point.
The egress lane would allow for straight-left-right turn traffic movements onto the
spine road. The second point of ingress / egress is proposed just south of SMU
Parcel 3. This driveway opening would be similar to the southernmost opening in
terms of dimensions and function. A point of egress only, is proposed north of the
SMU Parcel 3. This opening would allow for right-turn (north) traffic movement
onto the spine road. It is narrow and curved (to the north) to only allow for egress.
This characteristic is one of the main reasons why staff is recommending against
live / work units for these townhouse buildings proposed at the northeast corner of
the subject property (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Throughout the
entire project, the internal circulation system would consist of two (2) travel lanes,
each 11 feet in width for a total of 22 feet of pavement. These private rights-of-
way would be maintained by the property owner or property owners' association.
The Section "A" drawing (of the internal roadways) illustrate that the roadway
would be 22 feet in width and that each side would have a 21-foot long driveway.
The Section "C" drawing (of the internal roadways) illustrates the dimensions of the
right-Of-way where parallel on-street parking spaces are proposed. The Section
shows the parallel spaces would be nine and one-half (9-112) feet in width, followed
by a five (5)-foot wide sidewalk.
Parking Facility: The project proposes 458 townhouse units with two (2) recreation areas. As
previously mentioned, all units would have three (3) bedrooms. Three (3) bedroom
units require two (2) parking spaces each and the recreation areas require five (5)
parking spaces each. Therefore, a total of 926 parking spaces would be required.
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 5
Landscaping:
The site plan provides for 998 parking spaces, or in excess of 72 spaces. The
project proposes parking in the following scenarios: Garage spaces (852 spaces),
driveway spaces (64 spaces), off-street parking spaces (12 spaces), on-street
parking spaces (70 spaces). The City encourages that one (1) parking space per
two (2) live / work units be provided to meet business activity needs. Parking
provided to meet this requirement shall be located on the lot, built into or under the
structure, or within 300 feet of the live / work units. Parking provided to
accommodate said space, including driveways of adequate depth in front of the
unit's garagel shall not serve as meeting required parking for the unit's residential
use (Chapter 2, Section 6.H.5.c.(4). The site plan meets the intent of the code with
respect to customer parking for the live / work units.
The Typical Parking Space Detail (as shown on sheet 10 of 10) indicates parallel
parking spaces would be dimensioned nine and one-half (9-112) feet in width by 25
feet in length. The 90-degree parking spaces would be dimensioned nine and one-
half (9- V2) feet in width by 16 feet - six (6) inches in length with two (2) feet of
vehicular overhang. The handicap spaces would be 12 feet in width with five (5)
feet of striping by 16 feet - six (6) inches in length with seven (7) feet of vehicular
overhang.
The master site data plan indicates that 10.59 acres (26.7%) of the subject
property would be pervious surface. Much of this pervious surface would be in the
form of the 25-foot wide greenway proposed along the north property line and the
40-foot wide greenway proposed along the east property line. The tree survey
(sheet 2 of 2) indicates the site currently contains 5,449 caliper inches of native
trees and 80 caliper inches of non-native trees. The list of existing trees indicates
the site contains a majority of Cabbage palm trees with a few Strangler Fig,
Brazilian pepper, and citrus trees. A note on the survey indicates that the status of
the native trees remains to be determined until the health and quality can be
evaluated. Native trees would either be removed and mitigated for, or relocated
elsewhere on-site. The Overall plant list indicates that 87% of the 241 canopy
trees would be native, 53% of the 408 palm trees would be native, and 52% of the
7/716 shrubs / groundcover would be native. The plant list includes the following
species: Gumbo Limbol Seagrape, Royal Poinciana, Live Oakl High Rise Live Oak,
Coconut palm, Alexander palm, Medjool Date palm, Florida Royal palm, Cabbage
palmI and Teddy Bear palm.
As described above, the project proposes a "greenway" along the north and east
property line. Proposed within its design, an eight (8)-foot wide multi-purpose,
meandering trail with benches, would eventually link up to Renaissance Commons
and Quantum Park (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The site plan shows
that the landscape buffers would contain Live Oak, Royal Poinciana, and Coconut
palm trees. Despite being under private ownership, both greenway segments
would be set aside for perpetual use by the public with the inclusion of the multi-
use path and benches. The plant material proposed within this buffer would be
consistent with the Greenways Elevation. The path would also link to the five (5)-
acre park, proposed along the south property line.
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001 )
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 6
The SMU zoning district requires a 25-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer around
the entire project. The south landscape buffer, adjacent to the park, is depicted to
be only 13 feet - four (4) inches wide. However, the developers of the five (5)
projects are dedicating approximately five (5) acres of the entire Master Plan for
park use; therefore, the plans meet the intent of the code. The landscape plan
shows that 10 Silver Buttonwood trees are proposed within this buffer. It should
be noted that the Typical Unit Landscape Plan includes plant material (installed
around each building) that is not shown within said buffers. The landscape buffer
adjacent to the Spine Road would be approximately nine (9) feet in width. It does
not show any landscape material proposed within this area. A note on the
landscape plan indicates that "Spine Road Landscape by Others" would provide for
trees proposed along the Spine Road.
The landscape plan (sheet 7 of 9) proposes five (5) typical unit landscape plans, of
which, three (3) apply to alley or "rear" loaded units. A majority of the townhouse
units proposed along the Spine Road would be the rear-loaded model. The 4-Unit,
5-Unit, and 6-Unit Detail shows that the landscape material proposed at the front
of each rear-loaded unit (along the spine road) would consist of Alexander palm,
Brazilian Beauty Leaf, Cabbage palm, and Pink Tabebuia. The townhouse models
proposed north of the park would be front-loaded units. The 4-Unit and 6-Unit
Details illustrates the plant material proposed adjacent to the park, which would
include Gumbo Limbo and Brazilian Beauty Leaf trees into the design.
Building and Site: The project proposes a mix of buildings with a minimum of four (4) units to a
maximum of six (6) units per building. The site plan shows that 90 townhouse
buildings are proposed on the 30.29-acre portion at a density of 15.12 dwelling
units per acre. The Suburban Mixed Use (MX-S) land use classification allows up to
20 dwelling units per acre. Cortina at Boynton Village is just one (1) component of
the Boynton Village Master Plan. The entire Master Plan is proposed at a project
density of 13.69 dwelling units per acre. The Master Site Data Plan indicates that
the recreation areas would account for 2.1 acres of the subject site. The SMU
zoning district requires 30% usable open space for townhouse uses, or in this case,
11.602 acres of usable open space. The Usable Open Space plan (sheet MOS)
indicates the plan would provide for a total of 13.304 acres of usable open space.
It should be noted that the pervious surface around the 8.3-acre lake is included in
the usable open space tabulations. This acreage amount is accurate and sufficient
because the impervious surface area of the lake was used to determine the total
required usable open space but only the pervious surface around the banks of the
lake were counted towards usable open space. The Master Plan would provide a
total of 23.8 acres of usable open space.
The project proposes four (4) different types of floor plans, namely Units "A", "B",
"C", and "D". All model types have (3) bedrooms for each unit. The Building Key &
Open Space Plan (sheet A1.0) indicates that the project proposes a total of 134 "A"
models, 198 "B" models, 80 "C" models, and 46 "D" models. These buildings
would be either front or rear-loaded. Unit sizes proposed are as follows: Unit "A"
models would be 1/943 square feet under air; Unit "B" models would be 1/887
square feet under air; Unit "C" models would be 1,973 square feet under air;
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 7
Lastly, Unit "D" models, would be 2,898 square feet under air.
The project also proposes that 127 units or 27.7% of the total units would be
designated as "live / work" units. The SMU zoning district limits the work space of
the live / work unit to no more than 30% or 400 square feet, whichever is greater.
The floor plan of the live / work unit (sheet A-4.8) shows that the work area of
each unit would comprise no more than 17% of the total living area. However, the
Unit "D" model proposes a work space of 449 square feet. Although the work area
is 15.49% of the unit, at the time of permittingl it shall be reduced to no more than
400 square feet in order to comply with code (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval). As previously mentioned, the Building Key & Open Space Plan (sheet
A1.0) illustrates that the live / work units would be primarily located along the
spine roadl along the north property line, and along the five (5)-acre park.
Howeverl staff opposes placement of such units along the north property line (of
Parcel 2) where direct access is not provided from the spine road. This is
problematic since customers would have to travel through residential-only areas of
the townhouse community in order to access these live / work units. Likewise,
since these units are more commercial in nature, it is staff's intent to preserve the
residential integrity of the community and therefore, staff recommends eliminating
them from the plans in this particular location (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of
Approval). Regardless of the location of the live / work unitsl the buildings shall
provide universal accessibility to the front and to the interior space of the non-
residential area of the live-work unit from the public sidewalk adjacent to the street
(Chapter 2, Section 6.H.5.c.(1).(c).). At the time of permitting, the developer will
be required to update the plan to indicate available parking and the distance from
the live / work unit to verify compliance with code. It should be noted that the
applicant provided preliminary drawings showing compliance. However, these
drawings were not included within this packet but can be considered during the
permitting process. The drawings also include additional sidewalks between the
live / work buildings proposed along the spine road.
The maximum building height in the SMU zoning district for townhouses is 45 feet.
The project proposes two (2) types of buildings, namely front-loaded and rear-
loaded buildings, both of which would be 36 feet - four (4) inches in height (at
mid-point of the roof) and 42 feet - four (4) inches at the peak of the roof. All
buildings would be three (3) stories tall and comply with code.
The site details (sheet A-1.6) shows the detail of the 15-foot tall gazebos that are
proposed throughout the development. These are the same types of gazebos and
pocket parks that were proposed throughout the townhouse community of
Renaissance Commons. The two (2) recreation areas would have an 875-square
foot clubhouse building and swimming pool. The clubhouse elevations show that
the one (l)-story structure would be 19 feet - seven (7) inches at the peak of the
roof.
Design:
The Boynton Village Master Plan is essentially divided in half by the proposed spine
road. For this particular projectl a vast majority of the townhouse buildings are
proposed east of the spine road. The project is enhanced with easily accessible
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 8
spaces (i.e. greenways to be available in perpetuity to the public). Internal private
spaces in the form of small parks are sprinkled throughout the development while a
large five (5)-acre public park is proposed on the southern portion, east of the
spine road and adjacent to Old Boynton Road. The townhouse buildings are
proposed in a Spanish-Mediterranean architectural style. The building facades are
enhanced with balconies, trim, banding, columns, shutters, medallions, decorative
garage doors, and Spanish S-tile roof. The buildings would come in a variety of
colors schemes, all of which would use Benjamin Moore paints. The six (6)
schemes are as follows:
Elev A Body 1 (Lower) Restrained Gold - SW 6129
Scheme 1 Body 2 (Upper) Ivoire - SW 6127
Trim Creamy - SW 7012
Doors Toile Red - SW 0006
Shutters, Medallions, Railings Oak Moss - SW 6180
Garaqe Doors Ivoire - SW 6127
Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Humble Gold - SW 6380
Scheme 2 Body 2 (Upper) Jersey Cream - SW 6379
Trim Crisp Linen - SW 6378
Doors Sheraton Sage - SW 0014
Shutters, Medallions, Railings Red Cent - SW 6341
Garaqe Doors Jersey Cream - SW 6379
Elev A Body 1 (Lower) Caen Stone - SW 0028
Scheme 3 Body 2 (Upper) White Hyancinth - SW 0046
Trim Alabaster - SW 7008
Doors Tuscan Black - SW 6258
Shutters, Medallions, Railings Toile Red - SW 0006
Garaae Doors White Hyancinth - SW 0046
Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Restrained Gold - SW 6129
Scheme 1 Body 2 (Upper) Ivoire - SW 6127
Trim Creamy - SW 7012
Doors Toile Red - SW 0006
Shutters, Medallions, Railings Oak Moss - SW 6180
Garaae Doors Ivoire - SW 6127
Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Humble Gold - SW 6380
Scheme 2 Body 2 (Upper) Jersey Cream - SW 6379
Trim Crisp Linen - SW 6378
Doors Sheraton Sage - SW 0014
Shutters, Medallions, Railings Red Cent - SW 6341
Garaae Doors Jersey Cream - SW 6370
Elev B Body 1 (Lower) Caen Stone - SW 0028
Scheme 6 Body 2 (Upper) White Hyancinth - SW 0046
Trim Alabaster - SW 7008
Doors Tuscan Black - SW 6258
Shuttersl Medallions, Railings Toile Red - SW 0006
Garage Doors White Hyancinth - SW 0046
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 9
Regarding the townhouse buildings proposed along the spine road; staff originally
recommended that these buildings be oriented as such so that the front doors (of
each unit) "face" the spine road, in order to maintain a consistent development
pattern and design theme along the roadway. Staff is opposed to live / work
models located at the northeast corner of the parcel where there is a lack of direct
access from the spine road. Alternatively, staff felt that it was more logical for all
the townhouse buildings proposed along the spine road, to be the "rear-loaded"
models (so that the front doors face the spine road) and be of the live / work
variety. This recommendation (for the buildings to "face" the spine road) is
applicable to those units proposed south of the lake, currently designed with their
building sides oriented towards the spine road. However, the developer is opposed
to staff's recommendations and maintains the plans as proposed, due to their
desire to prevent the units from facing the back of the commercial buildings and
additionally, to open up some east views to the lake. As a compromise, staff
recommends that the applicant enhance the west fa~ades of the townhouse
buildings (proposed along the spine road with their sides facing the spine road)
with shutters, plaster banding, and / or archways (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval).
The detail of the outdoor freestanding lighting fixture (sheet EP-1 and sheet A-1.6)
shows that the height of the poles would vary between 12 feet and 18 feet tall,
depending where the location where each is proposed. The poles and decorative
lamp would be painted black.
Signage:
The project is proposing three (3) monument-style residential subdivision entrance
signs, which would be permitted under Chapter 21, Article IV, Section l.D. All
monument signs are proposed west of the spine road at the project's main
entrances.
The elevation drawing (sheet A1.6) shows the dimensions of the wall in which the
sign would be affixed. The wall and sign would have to comply with the above-
reference code. Staff recommends the applicant submit an overall master sign
program that shows the number, location, dimensions, exterior finish, and color(s)
of all freestanding monument and directional signs (Chapter 2, Section 5.H.9.).
This would include signage for the live / work units. All freestanding monument
signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at the base. This requirement can
be met during the permitting process (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
According to the Signage Detail for the live / work units, signs would be affixed to
the front fa~ade, over the each entranceway. These signs would be perpendicular
to the wall. According to the detail, the bottom of the sign would be nine (9) feet
from the ground. The sign would be two (2) feet in width by one foot and one-
half (1- V2) inches tall. Again, these types of signs would be a component of the
overall Master Sign Program.
Staff Report - Cortina at Boynton Village NWSP 05-001)
Memorandum No PZ 05-155
Page 10
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff recommends approval, contingent upon
successfully satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional
conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the
Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJEcrS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village Cortina NWSP OS-OOl\Staff Report.doc
EXHIBIT A
BOYNTON VILLlbSE AND BOYNTON TOWN CENTER I
LOCATION MAP
Local Retail Commercial
o
Industrial
BOYNTON CANAL
..........11.......................................,
i
I
i
I
I
BOYNTON VILLAGE
LUAR 04-006
Suburban Mixed Use
81.814 acres
.e
~
E
lj
::::
J!
&
...
~
o
....
LUAR 04-007
Loea' Ret." Com ere'.'
25.00 acres
Commercial
i
I
i
u................u.J
- -
W+E
S
...
"6
"""
l
ul~
rf
,:[
~~
II
n
o
o
~
-t
Z
lD)>
0)>
i-t
~ OJ
::tI 0
-< -<
en Z
c:-t
~o
m Z
-< <
F
!;
G)
m
." U\ ... ..... '" _ ~
o
. .
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ Ii
. ~
r
? ~
.~
~
~
~
~
,
~
~ ~ ~ g
! (ll 111 ~
(l._fttL'!ll.UllL&H~_.1~
~}^~ .S~3~J
.
eO"
'~iM
!~'l
:Ih
t,
-- - -I.l"j\"I_~lif"-\.
i
1
~
2p~ ~i
..,"~ ~!i
~ij !~
~~~I I
<j
i
I[
1
r '
eee ~~
~~~~"I
n~ S~
a;,~... ..~
md~
J~
1 1 "
.w"or' .-
~O''ii.to~:.,
:~~
I .
I
:<1
.,!
~,
~
11.__.___
,4i~
r
1
i
>
~. .,
~ti:
j~~
t..: 0'-'" \ *~t~l'
~~t m~~g
~ ~ ~~~"<I
' ~
I
"
~.o
( o;ot-1o
~{~
()1-",
J'
~ ,.".
0.'".
~ ~~'
.enll
J.fOolt.OOS
;)''-:~
i~:~
.6;'t06:MOH.OOS
11/"1-('1"1 S:W'l(' '8<1
~JA.llS.:If)IJt'1.I
EXHIBIT B
IJ
!
i~: ~
; ~i~~
i p.!~i
i ;!~i
;1. i
it
~
r
i
i
c ~" '~"eSCCCcce088c~n~c
/T\ZVlOO' Glo:tIXl:l::lf....Ol"'''',.., "'z.....O ..,
. . . ., .......... . n. r
'1:'-'''' n aI 0 n . "
;~!!!~~i~m~:mg!m~1
.~~n~ , . ,.~.~, '.0
~~~~~ i ~~~; ~i ~~
.../T\Xln_ V' :ro......, ZI> /T\
"" "'2 po :o~, ....z
"',;." n n
O:Z '" :;,
.. .
~.g
at:g
~~~
;,mil
~~ i~;?~
~... 2n 2.
o~:J.::f: "0
~~ i~E j
C'I-....~~ 1;1
~~ ~~01 ~
~~~e
Z"
~~
!
c.~ ~g~2~- ~ ~~ ~11~~11i
~~~ ;;~~~%~ ~ . :.,,1' . 0
;;~8 ::::........~!:s: c; ~g m' ~
::c:.,,~!.. ~ j~ ~~:~
~~~ ~~~~~e ~ ~
B~;~S ~ 11: ~.
Z< 0 ;:~~~;~~~E; i
0 "'0::.::.... .., ~ ~~e:~J:~~
O....;q~::t _ ~
eg ..,..-".. n
~2~~' . ~~i'~;a~~~~~
:~ "~~i: ~ ~
~ ~.""O F~~5:~~~~~ ~
g;~~~~ ",,,,. .. ............,.,0
~.... ~~~H~'.~~~
,. . .. .....f..............
~~~~i ....~.%~ .. ,......
~O8~~ ~~:~i~~~~~~
~~~~~ :::::~~:Z:~:::,.,..~~
..~i:? 0 ...~~ .:;;:~;t~~...~
~~~~: ;~S~~~i~~;:
~;;32~ ".~ "~g."~~
~...o;i ~iij~~~~~~~~
;~E~~ ;g~C:'::~;
~~~i5 ~~ ~ ;-
o
EXHIBIT B
"'.... .., 'Of ... . h '"..<.., ... ~"'I'" ......,.... \totblCOtX'......,.. ....... ... '" 'h "..f<, ><'o......d "n, '''' _.".,. .......0 n..:.:.~~_.,,,...op.. ....^'.~.J!'~Mwm _, ~... .1j..,..~\~. .......r''"'\''..~ ............ I.. ...... ~......., 110Io"', ,. ......,.~...... __......
----- ~r~.!:.._"'!.'!!.~~u__=_=~-..:~_ ---- -~;::-==:h;~""=-"'---"'-.-:-~-=--: ;,~~~~~U~~~~ P:::'~I'~ 0 ~o~
I I' I '-=-===-== -F==-=':::'~f-:::--"--~'~~-:-"it' ." uH[u .- - ~~;,~;,;,= ..~- U~ ~ I ~I~ ~.
: ,:.- ~~_ J_ _:-'''~~1J~-~:=- ~ =:f'~7"~~-;-~ ~~~--~=-::~-~un~ ~~~ ~~~ 8 m~~~! 8~
I I I"" - ~ r :cc -.-"",- '7 -=- -::- ===- - - -.. , " '" ....... ~ < 'i1f ~ i i ! = ~ ~ ~ ~F
, .. '''V.PARCEll \ ~ Ii!! i!l [!J
, ~ RESIDENTIAL \ ~ 1" ~ ~ --
I I !Il,.27' ACRE' . , .52" +'t-- j . f; f;
~ 1.1 \ ~
I i I I ,\ i;l S1 ~ Ii
\ II Ii ~H
b t,h l
~.\i ,!\
~ \ \11
\ I,
'\ I
: \" W{US ~fmii~ ~f~ml~
'; \\ '\ n!!IJ~ hi iUi~ hiuli
" \\' ~~ ~~ ~i i~! ~~ U
' \\ \ ~I ~I~ ~ ~~
\\\ ~~
\ \ "'~\/. \\>/. .
\\ }~K/o/\\'\:':,
" \~\':~,~,/. :)~;:< , "
xv~~.~\, ,/ \ ~\ .
';;\\\ ~ \ '/A\ \ \
\0 \;'" '\ \.,. \ \ \
\"'~ \\ ~>\\
,\. \\. .'\
\, \ \\ /' \
\\ \ \\.' .
\\ '\\/
'\ \ \\~~
\\ \ '\
\\ 1 '"
" " \ \,
;., 'I I'
f ~ \ I 'I I ~I
Hi II II
1'1 ,I I II
f! i: I :J
.~ illl! I"
~ ~ 'I' Ii'
I ~ II
I, II
'I I Ii
II /I,
! Ii fl ii!
, I ~! Ii
I, i i I I
~ nhlJ J l
!i Ii ~ ~ I I:
I' ~'I I'
,i/ II I
,.: 'I ,I!
~ I: :,1 \. ,i
'I It I
I :11 I
--; ~; 1\ I I \!
I III IJ I ,M~
--- u _ u_ _ _ -- ~- cc=c ~ ; -L~1'~'~:~~~~;:~;~::,:: __~.-,)LLL
~-.-~.~ ii i:r~------~:,~:~-----~l'~I~'r-~-~-L_---------~11 r;=';I/-~-+\I' ~~:~'~J_~~~~:i-'~l' ~1)!~!1 [~ 0_
!Ii! II i il ...::;:'::::':~ I ~ OONOO""""'~"", : 1,- no __L__1~~~__.J._u --/1 i' t _ 'A.
'I~ Ii., \1 '\ -""";::~~~,=",~.,,, I 'III _ -- ~__.vwt ,). . n ---~------I ,I q -$
. I I I-----r-f"'i>.~""~ U /~ I I 'I I
~~.f i.: : I, '\' \ ' " ~ . I ' 1" -"'0 I I'; I! --=4' - :=<:-
~ \i _. _.1-.-1---....1.-- - I ,I
"
IJi
~
~~~"D
;~U~
ili:tJ!!=
W~N
~
~ ~~
~ mt;;
r ..m
~-
~
"
':
\
'\
/....\ ,
I ./><~\
,/ </<;~>/<> \
/ 'lfr ..' .' . , '/ 'I
..~..::r~t:'/.'>::>:l
z /~~>////I
()/ '/'/:;"//1 I
r '1
a .\
m..- .\
o.
~
~i
1~
i
~ .
s ~j 1.!
d~\i
S ~i:
! ~' ,:
. i; f
~ i,l,
'Ii
,,~,Jj
3: ~8 f BOYNTON VILLAGE
CIl ;: ~ ~ ~ DEVELOPER:
"tl @~~' 1950 CONGRESS AVENUE, LLC.
'"
.,
c
ill
~I~
~~a~!
~U~~
0~~
~
'"~
~~~~
"'~..m
rn~=
~
_ ::jf:l
'lIS
". ".".
;~
~~
OJ
o
-<
Z
-l
~ Ii
~ d
G)
m
SMU
MASTER PLAN
~~^' f 1lI"~~CI> rNG".rrR' .
A~ NOIFrl CI1," [) Roluh?[ ~-n Kimley~Hom
O,Sl:.;M(OBY' ,
~HAfi.Ci;(.~ ~rr,l5.RAno., ~LJ~(.R~ _ - and AssOCIates. me.
D~.~ BY ~u~ ~9~ ':, f,.'~,3~1;:,t~;~~1~~:~~:::S~:;.~::~2~n
1-3-05 COR
'2-7-0~ CQ~
11-5-0. eDI<
[JOYNh).'4 nrACI
rl QRIDA
PH. C:1Y or eO~,TON BEACH
1>~1l C'f'--(lf OOY~ I()I, lJlAC11
PH, (~'IY ,)( IlOYNTON n[ACIl
':(O,,;,,~ ''''''O~' '1' '.1;( r 4/j~'C7-'JlJyr"~'\ ViI ,,~~\ ~ /' ~K:;(, 7\C ~IJCI\lI~fN ~p,l.c:r C~l.. S'
e- ~il~ F'l,,~ -l:< 01'"\1
.n" n'. lO{l~\ . ',g,,,p "y. l;~:.'" le,,,.
EXH IBIT B
'I'"'' .0" '" "~,..,, 0" ..",...., .""""" ,...'" ..... ."........., "' ".~.. ., h'
.'"'....,<1."..'.0..."......,'.....,...,.".."."." ......O.O"J...O........-""".'.l.,...........',.".,~,..."".".."""'..,,..". """',.".'.".........."."......,...,....., .........,.........IlI"rl.M.....)_Iol............_..'..,,"<
.RliH-~,.. v
--~p.::o/-:--
sJ ~
i~: ~F
I
. i
\~~~,
'~
f
i
,
I
; ~~ : r
~,i ~ i
(: 1'1
'!.ili1f : / :;:':"";;',"
'.'t irf ~,r~" "
.il !fJ
"l !i
_ f ::
: I
i.'I.,.'! '1'1'
::!
: ,I
.'.,. jl
JJ.,.,
",ll';~ :
:1 iH
>" 1~I7.:r."'"
~I' ill' ;. r ",.,~^"",....~.A,~,.~"",",""y, ^""^"
~!! : I I~~~~~;_:~~;<,~;
~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ii! ~
fiHI ~ ~~ ,.!!
V!P~li ~~
~~u~ ~\.
ni~~ ~
~~~!~ ~
IIH~ ::
~<;l~ ~
<;lri!<;l Ei
ri!'~ li
~s~ I
H~;~ ~
~~Sl,!!J!J!J!J!J!
~~2fiJ~~~~~
~i!<;l~;<!,;<~~
>~~n~u
hmnLr
~'" "''''''U
~i U
~hl
~
;J!
~
e
~
~
!il
II!
..
~
~
~
*
~
I"
.._""....._~
~~~E~iI!~~~.5
..
!!
~
i!i
i ~i'
l :~: r
I,~;"~:~~
~
I"
1;
Ii
I"
~
i~iii; e
~
~
i~1i1i~~ ~
~
. J'.lf
..:;'t~.'<'i....,l7.;(".J.404_':.
(
Ii
I
"
o
I^
BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU
DEVELOPER:
1950 CONGRESS AVENUE, LLC.
80....\jlON BEACH ;-LOR,!)A
MASTER USABLE OPEN
SPACE PLAN
~c"lr
-.S/o,!IO'1
Q(S1~peT IlUSSElll.lOOR\SON
ClH'l f,CIlIC~lI(QS1RAflOtl_~
~l::'li/
llI"1_n K1mley.Hom
IIII..I_U and AssocIates, Inc.
!O,~S~~1f<<'7:.[~~OfI.NOO~N~:~~~Sf\"'~,~1l
Pi,W .t'<;./:::~[~!~;~,\CO/MC~l~;.HM
.-,,'-=~"'--'------==""=-="---==-<-'~
REV'.S:ONS OAIl. 'BY
CI<t.~Ml\l ~l
'"
...
,
....I
r~~
,-I
~m
q
""tl
r-
:>
z
o
~
EXHIBIT B ,
__...Kt!"_....
.-..---...-.-.IliI"'.-..-..-.--m-.----. . _.
~ --
~ ~~~
!
~ .i
h ~
a
~i
h
~
I I Ii Iii ill i I II Il!l
UiIIU
,~, ~ I~
I~ il ! !~ ~I !~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- hi
~I ~ ~ ..
.~ ~ - ~ i~ 1 1 II Qi ~~~
~I - I
i ' ~ ! ~= i! j
I I 1'1 ~~,
FF! ~ l ~I 'II
ili i g ~~ ~~ ~ r I
fH 1- Ih/
i II
f ! f . .. .
~. U.
N
P" ~ I!~i IIWWil ~~, I
~m
~-< I tld li!hllil ~II a
I '! .~ R - -!
""tl - jls, .~ l'li! ~~
r- i~ ~ -I; i';I~ i~! r
:> 2! II! illll!!ll M
z I
~~
f ~ R
0 - - -.-.- - --- --- -.- - - --
, '" -- -- ---
~
< uN>
. ~~!
-:-Ji...
I I
" \'
U II
I 1\
l
\
i
~- ~ U 8~U ~ ~ cc5i~TNi\ COI\TRNA 1~~SI lIun ~i~I"
~ ~; I ~~ ~~U : : · BOYNTON VIllAGE I~;I~ 1IIIn ~~.g
o ;;JS ~ e i I ~ ~TO\VN&C.OUNTRYHOl>mSfL()'''[)<.. ~~I~ ;U..~ J~~ ~
~ - ~ ~ t ~ ~ g i C BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~n~ E : ~ ~
C :NlO4 QUlHCl'IOHtUON, IOHU. M'rOtT. WtLl.lAU.I, ACIVlOO. WJ.H.1H.H IoACHITIC1"S,II'lC..Al..llU<:IHn J.llS.I.V1D. NO '.....TO'THUIIOIAS, .1.AN1,Ok OUIClHI WOVU IU.JODUClDOkOO'UD IN AXYfOlW, WMAnoMl.wtftlOUTTHI IXl'WI WNT1'Il'lOOHUNT01 Q,jIM.WAVAACHmcn.INc,
l.
~
f'
~po
-N
<",
'OJ
'0
~\l
r
po
Z
(f'
(f'
",
()
....
6
z
(f'
~
",
<
po
....
6
2
(f'
+
CJ
1"'1
....
po
F
(f'
Qo
~r-
~-
-<
~tTI
---
~
~ ~ 0
~ ~ ~
~ .~
:j ~
-l
-< . f
~I
'" ,I
n "
F: i:
iil
(j) ,
,
~ I
1
;P-
O
tTI
r- ~;:J
0
(j mo
~ fl
~ 0
Z
,
'I
/ //
/ /
/ /
!Ii 1
~1'
!.~
;~
'-"
~-~
~g
"<
.2 ~
-<
~
'"
,
'"
I
+--~
mUl
r;;s
<m
:>om
::Ip
~~
ill
t:I
::?:
0
z
C
::?:
",
Z
....
(f'
"
2
."
'"
0
z
....
+
'"
",
po
'"
",
", ~ ~
<
po
....
6
2
(f'
~l jlC' At:;" I/'~~ l
~~ f~ :l~~ ~'f "
~- . d i~~
}.. '8f
06 lOti
f ;~
R ~.
~ ~~
.J ,.L. m
~I~~
~.~~
'I~f
'e.
~~~
~ ~
~>J
<"
_0
c
'02
"0
b~
.~
6
z
."
!;
.. "'~oo,
;:~,
~~~~
~N
-~~~
EXHIBIT B
I
! f'..
10
id
, ,.,
PI 21U ~ c()I~tTN;\ CO~TKNA li~~~: uun ~i~t
:t ~ i h ~~n ~. BOYNTON VILlAGE ~i~ ii.'jl g~3
(j'. ~ . I I ~'IOWN61:(".ouNTRYHOMESHO;1JD!' ~UI ;'1',; I~I i
n ~ ~~ g ~ BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA n~~ I e ~: ~
,C JOOoI QUlHCVIOHH.tON.}Ot.lU MTOTT.WIW1.MJ.~MDO. VI<J,J(Jt(HAJ.t:;I(ITtCfS.lNC... N.l.IJOHTS WIr..Wo. NO'An O'THUIIDW, rtANl. Ol.DUIOHIIMV.1 ~'JDDUCtDo"'corIID IN IoHYfOa.MWKATSOm..WlTHOIJ1'TH.W..... WlJ'TTlNCOHlIINTOfQUM.WAVAlaimcT1IHC;:.
L
.J
r~
EXHIBIT B
-1
,
iEE i tE i tE
! ~B@2I0G~~B '., F F
"i 1 ~i I Ii II ai ! ~ Iii
Ii a ~< ~ ~~ a 3 ~.i i ! ! \ G
ii~ ~~: i !~ U l~ ~( !~ b . I I I )B3
. d. i 'S .~ ~g ,il 'S ., !
~.". , . 'u
!m ,:tlE3:3B 1tTI
.~ I ! I "I I 1t"n\ .u::o
II a ~ dHn~ I ; ~! : ~
i, ~1. i ~~ Il ~( <( h Ii ~ ! . u,
i; -F i ~~ P ~H~ ~q' ~! ! u
~
ii a ~ HHlli I ; ~
i, d: ~ !I ~I ~I i; !, ~I ~
;i/II G~IR:
"'~ lO
~~ ..
:>> r- .
--10
OE;
Z'"
:>>0 "
w...
ItDUffOfM:rcMOf1t<<mctlCif'llClO<<
~
w
o
q ~ IIU I CO[~i~;\ 8:~~t~L~~ IU~U unp, ~_I~t
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~~ 5 P ~ I! ::::j
, a r I ~ ~TOWN&:COI.)NTRYHOMES!I'\R'rJ' ~d~ UIJJR J~~;
E i ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 80YNTON 8EACH, FLORIDA :UG E _. ~ _
C JOHCI,/IHCY JOHHlIOH. 'ONU. "'YOn. Wll.Ll.l.MS. N::MDO. VAlJOIiH UCHITICn,IHC.. AU IJOH'N W.r..VIO. "'0'AA:f 0' nt,SI lOW. ru.tU. OaOUIQHf MAY'I ....fODUClD OI.OOPl.D IN AHt 101M WHA.l'SOI\III. W'lTHOUTTHIIXI'UfI wt.In1H cotaun or QUMWAV AJ.CHmC11, IHe.
L
.J
V1
@
?if
..... ~,
Ci ~
~
~ ~,
~
~
fJ
~
~
~
<Ii
'P" m ~I[(t:t
' He
lUll" I;
'..1
illl~ ~ !~
III <.0
II l"
II
Cortina
Boynton Village
Boynton Beach, Florida
EJ.~q..lmn ::r: () 0
w~ I · CD 0
,d i' f~'~
.~ lie
g .a .....
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Cortina at Boynton Village
File number: NWSP 05-001
Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 9, 2005 Planning & Zoning date
ki
stamn mar n\!.
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None X
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water X
and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
2. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.rn. some residential developments) with
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in t}1e LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
3. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid X
for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the
Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site plan
approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
4. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has X
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
5. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability X
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments:
6. A new flow test shall be conducted when all water feeder rnams are X
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
connected.
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
7. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction X
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic X
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
9. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the X
loads and forces encountered per the 200 I FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table
1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
10. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic X
sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic
calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit
application.
11. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X
proposed construction.
12. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may X
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily
available.
13. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
14. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the proiect as it appears on the Development Order and
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
IS. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. X
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
16. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s
must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter I, Article V, Section 3(f))
17. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
18. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
19. The design of the "greenway", proposed along the east property line shall be X
in conformance with the Greenways Standards. The "greenway" proposed
along the north property line shall resemble the "greenway" proposed along
the south property line of the Renaissance Commons master plan.
20. Impact fee: 458 Single family, attached units (a} $771.00 per unit = X
Conditions of Approval
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
$353,118.00
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
21. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. X
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan (Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.).
22. Staff recommends preserving, where possible, all existing desirable trees that X
are located within the proposed landscape buffers (Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec.
7.D.p. 2.).
23. The applicant must provide a lake littoral and transitional planting plans for X
50% of the lake perimeter (20 feet in width).
24. A Lake Maintenance Plan document must be provided for the proper X
maintenance of the lake plantings. A time zero and quarterly monitoring
report for two years is required of the developer.
25. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume X
water conservation using non-portable water.
26. Turf and larrdscape (bedding plarrts) areas should be designed on separate X
zones and time duration for water conservation.
27. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the X
root ball (Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.).
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. The project is subject to the limitations and timing at which development may X
proceed as outlined in the Palm Beach County Traffic approval letter or the
conditions contained within the CRALLS amendment upon its adoption.
29. The SMU Master Plan does not match the proposed site plan in terms of the X
number off ingress points proposed along the spine road. Therefore, the
SMU Master Plan shall be modified to be consistent with all other plarrs.
30. At the time of permitting, the site statistics in the cover sheet (sheet A-OI) X
shall match the same in the master site data plan (sheet MSD).
31. At the time of permitting, the plant material proposed within the Typical Unit X
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Landscape Plans shall be incorporated into the overall plant quantities in the
Overall Landscape Plan plant list.
32. Regarding the live / work units: Unit "D" proposes a work space of 449 X
square feet. Although the work area is 15.49% of the unit, at the time of
permitting, the work area shall be reduced to no more than 400 square feet in
order to comply with code.
33. Buildings designed as live / work units shall provide universal accessibility to X
the front and to the interior space of the non-residential area of the live-work
unit from the public sidewalk adjacent to the street (Chapter 2, Section
6.H.5.c.(1 ).( c).). At the time of permitting, provide a drawing that indicates
parking available for these types of units and distance for determination of
compliance with the Code.
34. The City encourages that one (1) parking space per two (2) live / work units X
be provided to meet business activity needs. Parking provided to meet this
requirement shall be located on the lot, built into or under the structure, or
within 300 feet of the unit in which the use is located. Parking provided to
accommodate said space, including driveways of adequate depth in front of
the unit's garage, shall not serve as meeting required parking for the unit's
residential use (Chapter 2, Section 6.H.5.c.(4).
35. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the X
tabular data and the graphic illustration. Staff recommends adding more trees
along the south property line adjacent to the park.
36. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends X
that they be maintained by the Home Owners' Association so that no
individual property owner removes any of the required plant material along
the perimeter or interior of the development.
37. All freestanding monument signs shall have colorful groundcover installed at X
the base (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.0).
38. Submit a master sign program that shows the number, location, dimensions, X
exterior finish, and color(s) of all freestanding monument signs (Chapter 2,
Section 5.H.9.). This would include signage for the live / work units.
39. Staff recommends orienting the townhouse buildings so that all units X
(proposed along the spine road) are "facing" the spine road. This would
apply to those units proposed south of the lake. Also, it would make sense for
them to be "rear loaded units" or live-work units. However, if the developer
elects to not re-orient the buildings, then staff recommends that the west
fa<;:ade of the townhouse building (proposed along the spine road) shall be
enhanced with shutters, plaster banding, and / or archways to resemble the
front facades.
40. Staff recommends eliminating the "Live / Work" component of the X
townhouse buildings proposed at the northeast corner of the subject property.
41. The bridge over the C-16 Canal offers the opportunity for a signature feature X
Conditions of Approval
6
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
to be coordinated with the developers of the Renaissance Commons project;
please consider. Also, please include pedestrian path on this bridge to
connect the green way paths of the Renaissance Commons and Boynton
Village projects.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
43. Remove conditions #32 and #40. X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
44. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village Cortina NWSP 05-001\COA.doc
4~
Meeting Minutes
Planning & Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
August 23, 2005
Motion
Mr. Cwynar moved to approve the request for new site plan approval to construct 82 fee-
simple town houses on an 8.6-acre parcel in the Planned Unit Development Zoning District,
subject to all staff conditions. Mr. Casaine seconded the motion that passed 6-11 Mr. Saberson
dissenting.
Ms. Jasciewicz voted in favor of it with the understanding that the applicant would consider
her comments and suggestions. Mr. Casaine reiterated that Condition #36 would be worked
out between the applicant and staff.
B. New Site Plan
1.
Project:
Cortina @ Boynton Village (NWSP 05-
001)
Steve Lillerl Hovstone Propertiesl Floridal LLC
The Klatt Family Limited Partnership # 1 and Klatt
Enterprisesl Inc.
NE corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress
Avenue
Request for new site plan approval in order to
construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units in the
Suburban Mixed-Use (SMU) zoning district.
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Steve Liller, Town &. Country Homes, appeared to answer questions. James Williams,
Architect for the project appeared also.
Chair Wische asked the applicant's position on the 41 staff comments.
Attorney To!ces swore in the latecomers before proceeding.
Mr. Williams declared that the applicant agreed with all staff conditions except clarification was
needed on Conditions #19 and #40. Condition #19 refers to a greenway to be consistent
with the greenway proposed along the Renaissance Commons project. They would prefer
green area or green space to the term greenway.
Eric Johnsonl Planner, said the word greenway was used to be consistent with the greenway
proposed for the Renaissance Commons project. For this project,. the greenway would occur
along the east and north property lines and would be 40 feet wide on the east and 25 feet
wide on the north. Mr. Williams asked for and received confirmation they were talking about
an area with walkways and benchesl not a wildl nature-type preserve. Mr. Johnson also stated
that Parks & Recreation had come up with a definition of what a greenway would look like and
it typically included a meandering path with some trees, park benchesl and trash receptacles.
Mr. Williams felt they could agree to this condition.
Mr. Williams declared that Condition #40 referred to the location of the live/work units. Staff
suggested eliminating live work units at the northeast comer of the subject property. The
ordinance states that live/work units should be located along perimeter roads, and shouldl
therefore, be allowed.
6
'-
Meeting Minutes
Planning & Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
August 23, 2005
Mr. Johnson expressed staff's opinion that the live/work units would negatively impact the
adjacent residential property owners due to the traffic destined for the live/work units having
no choice but to pass through the residential area to get to the live/work areas.
Mr. Williams stated there was no parking on the spine roads and there was parallel parking
next to the live/work units. Alsol the types of businesses allowed in the live/work units were
not the kinds that generate much traffic.
Mr. Johnson stated the wording of Condition #32 was proposed to be 449 sq. ft. for the work
component of the live/work units. This would be the maximum, but it was also "or 30% of the
unit." In these large unitsl the work component could exceed the 449 square feet and still be
under 30%. Therefore, Condition #32 should be eliminated.
Chair Wische opened the floor to the public and closed it when no one came forward.
Kathy Cook, 1074 N.W. 11th Street, Boynton Beach, a resident of Sky Lake just east of
the proposed projectl asked if the 40-foot "greenway" were measured from the center of the
canal or just the land. f
Mr. Johnson responded that it was measured from Cortina's property line westward and did
not include the canal. The canal is 180 feet wide and combined with the setback on the east
side, considerable separation between the project and the residential area would be provided.
Kim Glas-Castro appeared on behalf of the developer of Boynton Village SMU Master Plan,
to speak on Condition #33. They resisted USi~ the term greenway since staff has a specific
definition for a greenway. They would prefer to refer to it as an expanded buffer area with
pedestrian walkways and bicycle paths. Greenways have a specific development standard that
was not an expectation for this project.
Mr. Johnson believed the Parks & Recreation Department would prefer the term greenway,
and that the difference was one of semantics.
James Comparato, developer for Renaissance Commons, appeared to say that during the
approval process of Renaissance Commonsl considerable discussion took place about whether
the greenway was "Forever Wild" or a green area with space for pedestrians and bikes.
Ms. Jasciewicz referred to Condition #39 where there were two options. If one were not
usedl the remaining one should be requiredl and not just recommendedl in her view. Mr.
Williams responded they were choosing option 2 and had supplied staff with drawings showing
they would comply with the request. Mr. Johnson confirmed this.
The discussion on the live/work units resumed. There was much give and take between the
developer, the board, and staff, including the Engineering Department. Laurinda Logan,
Senior Engineer for Boynton Beach, did not believe there was enough room to make a
dedicated turn lane or to move the median to provide access to the live/work units without
going through the residential section. A representative of Kimley Horn confirmed thisl giving
the technical explanation of why it would not be possible.
7
-
Meeting Minutes
Planning & Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
August 23, 2005
Mr. Williams did not believe that the live/work units would generate excess traffic. The types
of businesses that were allowed were: a mailing service, arbitrator/mediator service,
housemaid service, commercial artist, design studio, commercial photography, computer
programming, computer software, data processing, direct mail, editing, proofreading,
paralegal, and similar businesses. Mr. Liller added that the ordinance prohibited more than
two employees in the work component of the live/work units at a given time.
Motion
Mr. Cwynar moved to approve the request for new site plan approval for Cortina at Boynton
Village in order to construct 458 fee-simple townhouse units in the Suburban Mixed-Use
Zoning District (SMU), subject to all staff comments and conditions except deleting Conditions
#32 and #40. Ms. Jasciewicz seconded the motion for discussion.
Mr. Johnson declared that staff was in favor of eliminating Condition #32, but wanted to keep
Condition #40 (elimination of live/work units on the perimeter of the property). The motion
was not changed to that effect.
The motion passed 6-1, Mr. Casaine dissenting.
C. New Site Plan
Location:
Boynton Town Center (NWSP 05-003)
Russell C. Morrison, P .E., Kimley-Horn &
Associates
The Klatt Family Limited Partnership # 1 and Klatt
Enterprises, Inc.
NE corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress
Avenue
Request for new site plan approval in order to
construct 247,812 square feet of commercial on a
24.65-acre parcel in the (C-3) Community
Commercial zoning district
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Description:
Chair Wische asked for the applicant's position on the 50 staff conditions and whether they
wished clarification on any item(s).
Kim Glas-Castro, Ruden McCloskey, appeared on behalf of the applicant, stating they
wanted to discuss four of the 50 conditions. They asked for confirmation that Boynton Town
Center was being parked at 1 space per 200 square feet for the entire C-3 area, regardless of
specific uses that might come in like a bank or restaurant. There were some cross parking and
cross access agreements with Boynton Village and Boynton Village was to be parked at 1 per
200 also.
Eric Johnson, Planner, agreed the 1 to 200 parking rate would apply across the board, without
regard to the types of businesses that might come in when the out parcels were developed.
Ms. Glas-Castro objected to Conditions of Approval #35 and #37 that called for mirroring the
landscaping used in Renaissance Commons. They wanted to have their own identity.
8
("\ ,-
"-. '1' \.l/'f'.'" . .
(..:" V'--_f, / '., 1
,.
',! i l_i';l t'
\
t) UJ ~ r , t i
AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Hovstone Properties, agent for The Klatt Family Partnership and Klatt Enterprises, Inc., property owner, has
requested the following project to be considered for site plan approval:
Legal Description: On file in the Planning & Zoning Department. Generally, the northeast comer
of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road
Proposed Use: Requests new site plan approval for the construction of 458 townhomes on a
.:t36 acre portion of the 82.06-acre site known as Boynton Village.
PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIQER THE REQUEST ARE SCHEDULED BEFORE THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT BOARD ON AUGUST 23. 2005 AT 6:30 P.M. AND THE CITY COMMISSION ON
SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 AT 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE AGENDA PERMITS, IN THE
CITY HALL COMMISSION CHAMBERS, LOCATED AT 100 EAST BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD.
All interested parties are notified to appear at said hearings in person or by attorney and be heard or file any
written comments prior to the hearing dates. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the
Planning and Development Board and City Commission with respect to any matter considered at these
meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim
record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based.
The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a
disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity
conducted by the City. Please contact Patricia Tucker (561) 742-6268, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to
the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING AND ZONING
(561 742-6260)
DIVISION
WPB:21 0096:5