Loading...
TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE (FEB 2005) BOYNTON BEACH MALL TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE Prepared for Simon Property Group Prepared by URS Corporation l " I l- -- -< k , " February 2005 ~~p~ Do ngo Noriega ' Florida P .E. License No. 42019 0;4s- Introduction URS has prepared a traffic study update for Boynton Beach Mall consistent with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. It should be noted that the proposed change consists of adding a movie theater (79,500 sq. ft) while eliminating 169,510 square feet of retail (demolishing existing Macy' s). The result of the analysis indicates that the proposed change will result in less AM and PM peak hour trips than the approved project. The proposed project build-out date is 2006. Trip Generation Table 1 summarizes the pm peak hour trip generation for the project. Land Use Size PM Peak Trip Rate PM Total Trips Shopping 1,074,939 Sq. Ft. Ln(T) = 0.66 Ln(X) + 3.40 3,001 Center, ITE GLA X = 1000 Sq. Feet GLA Code 820 Movie Theater, 3,650 seats 0.08 292 ITE Code 445 (79,500 Sq. Ft.) Total 3,293 The PM Peak Hour Trip generation for the approved and proposed project can be summarized as follows: Approved Project -1,244,449 Sq. Ft. GLA 3,306 trips less 19.1% pass by = 2,675 trips Proposed Project Less Exist. Macy's Net Retail Muvico Theater 1,244,449 Sq. Ft. GLA -169,510 1,074,939 Sq. Ft. GLA 79.500 Sq. Ft. 1 TOTAL 1,154,439 Sq. Ft. . Retail Trips (ITE Code 820, P. 1453) . Theater Trips (ITE Code 445, P. 797) TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECT TRIPS 3001 292 3293 Less pass-by traffic (19.1 %) for a total of 2,664 PM peak hour trips Table 2 summarizes the am peak hour trip generation for the project. Land Use Size AM Peak Trip Rate AM Total Trips Shopping 1,074,939 Sq. Ft. Ln(T) = 0.6 Ln(X) + 2.29 651 Center,ITE GLA X = 1000 Sq. Feet GLA Code 820 Movie Theater, 3,650 seats 0 0 ITE Code 445 (79,500 Sq. Ft.) Total 651 The AM Peak Hour Trip generation for the approved and proposed project can be summarized as follows: I Approved Project -1,244,449 Sq.!"t. GLA 71 0 trips less 19.1% pass by = 574 trips Proposed Project 1,244,449 Sq. Ft. GLA Less Exist. Macy's -169,510 Net Retail 1,074,939 Sq. Ft. GLA Muvico Theater 79.500 Sq. Ft. TOTAL 1,154,439 Sq. Ft. . Retail Trips (ITE Code 820, P. 1452) . Theater Trips (No A.M. Peak Hour Trips) TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECT TRIPS 651 o 651 2 Less pass-by traffic (19.1 %) for a total of 527 AM peak hour trips The proposed change will result a net decrease of forty seven (47) trips in the am peak hour. Table 3 summarizes the daily trip generation for the project. Land Use Size Daily Trip Rate Daily Total Trips Shopping 1,074,939 Sq. Ft. Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(X) + 5.83 31,793 Center, ITE GLA X = 1000 Sq. Feet GLA Code 820 Movie Theater, 16 screens 292.50 4,680 ITE Code 445 (79,500 Sq. Ft.) Total 36,473 The Daily Trip generation for the approved and proposed project can be summarized as follows: Approved Project - 1,244,449 Sq. Ft. GLA 34,968 trips less 19.1% pass by = 28,829 trips Proposed Project 1,244,449 Sq. Ft. GLA Less Exist. Macy's -169,510 Net Retail 1,074,939 Sq. Ft. GLA Muvico Theater 79.500 Sq. Ft. TOTAL 1,154,439 Sq. Ft. · Retail Trips (ITE Code 820, P. 1451) · Theater Trips (ITE Code 445, P. 792) TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECT TRIPS 31,793 4,680 36,473 3 TABLE 6: PERFORMANCE STANDARD (Test 1) Link 2006 Background Project Total Traffic Significant Volume Traffic (Background (Yes or No) PM Peak Two-Way + Project} Congress Ave between Old 4,217 -4 4,213 No Boynton and Gatewav Blvd Old Boynton Rd between 2,069 -2 2,068 No Lawrence Road and Congress Ave Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd 1,769 -2 1,767 No and Military Trail Boynton Beach Blvd between 2,896 -2 2,894 No Congress A venue and Boynton Beach Blvd Gateway Blvd between Congress 3,135 -2 3,133 No Avenue and 1-95 For purposes of updating the study, an analysis of future conditions after the proposed change is included here. Future Traffic Conditions Roadway Segments The existing PM peak hour counts were taken from the Palm Beach County website information. The year 2006 projected traffic volumes (for background traffic) were calculated using the growth rates taken also from the website for each one of the links analyzed in the 1998 study. The net difference in project traffic was calculated for the AM and PM peak hour using the proposed project minus the approved project. As previously stated, this difference is minus 47 and 11 trips in the am and pm peak, respectively. This difference was distributed in the roadways around the project using the trip distribution used in the 1998 study and subtracted from the 2006 PM peak hour traffic and compared to the capacity of the segment. Figure 1 illustrates the traffic volumes for 2006. As seen in this figure, most roadways will be working above acceptable levels of service. Two of the segments operate over LOS D capacity: Gateway Blvd east of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road west of 1-95, however, the proposed change does not worsen the level of service on these links. Intersection analysis In the 1998 study, three intersections were analyzed because those intersections were improved but with different laneage than identified in the Development Order. So, those intersections were evaluated to determine that those intersections were operating at acceptable LOS. These intersections are Hypoluxo Road at Congress Avenue, Old Boynton Road at Congress Avenue, and Boynton Beach Boulevard at 1-95. In addition to 5 HYPOLUXO RD I I I 3,289 I 3,532 I (-1) .L. 3,531 . 4,550 I I I NW 22ND AVE I I I 3,688 I 3,799 I ~. 3,798 I 4,550 I I OLD BOYNTON RD I 2,226 2,435 (-1 ) 2,434 4,550 .----- 1,694 1,769 (-2) 1,767 3,020 I 3,090 I 3,368 I (-1) I 3,367 BOYNTON I 4,550 BEACH BLVD - -1- - -- - -- I I 3,412 I 3,562 . (-1) I 3,561 WOOLBRIGHT RD I 4,550 I ...JI <(I ~I fel ~I :JI ~I GOLF RD I I I xx - 2004 Existing Peak Hour Two-way XX - 2006 Background Peak Hour (XX) - Mall Expansion Only (decrease in volume) XXX - Total 2006 Traffic XXX - LOS D Service Volume I I I 3,239 I 3,485 (-1) . 3,484 2,905 I 4,550 3,166 I (-1) I 3,165 I 4,550 I ----=----- I I 3,765 I 4,217 . (-4) jT 4,213 I 4,550 I I N ~ ~t. I I I I I I I I I GATEWAY BLVD 1,928 2,069 (-2) 2,067 3,020 3,146 I 3,203 I (-1) I 3,202 I 4,550 I ___-L_.___ -e- II 2,581 3,680 2,896 3,967 3,385 I (-2) (-1) 3,568 ..J.. 2,894 3,966 (-1)" 4,550 4,550 3,567 I 4,550 I I I wi ~I ~I ~I 1.91 ~I UI I o a:: w U Z w a:: ~ ...J 11II Boynton Beach Mall - 2 Lane - 4 Lane -- 6Lane 3,314 3,367 (-0) 3,367 3,020 I I I I I , I I I I BOYNTON BEACH MALL City of Boynton Beach. Florida FIGURE 1 PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AND LOS D SERVICE VOLUMES those three~ the intersection of NW 22nd Avenue at Congress Avenue was evaluated because this is one of the most impacted intersections with the project trip distribution. When those intersections were analyzed with 2006 conditions, the LOS are: Intersection LOS NW 22fld Avenue (Gateway Blvd) at Congress Avenue F (111.9) Old Boynton Road at Congress Avenue F (109.2) Boynton Beach Boulevard at 1-95 C (23.9) Hypoluxo Road at Congress Avenue F (100.3) These two intersections will operate at LOS F on 2006; however the proposed change does not affect the peak hour volume at those intersections because the pm peak volume generated by this change is less than the pm peak volume approved for the project. The intersections of Hypoluxo Road at Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road at Congress Avenue were evaluated with the improvement recommended in the Development Order and mentioned in the 1998 study and the results are shown below: Intersection LOS Hypoluxo Road at Congress Avenue F (94.6) Old Boynton Road at Congress Avenue F (91.2) The HCS analyses are appended. 7 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX Palm Beach County Trip Generation Rates Growth Rates Intersection volumes for 2006 HCS analysis 1998 study excerpts PAGE I 2 3-6 7-12 13-15 ~ ci + '" lO ci + N '" ci + g g g lS.5~.5~5U; ci~cilici:;:lci ci d ci . . . E: E: E: ..s .5 .5 ~~~t-881oU'):!CD t::~ ~~~~ ciociOo-.:cicioci od ~r-:_ci ~~ ..:~ + + gg 55~ t!~ci cio . . E:E: 55 o .... ..; + X 5~ ~ N ci " E: C -' N ...,. Q) N ...... r-- ...... Qt ui'!j....:g ~ ~ . ;t~~ ~lO~~~"'~~~~~~~lO~"''''~~~N~''''''''' N~OO"'~~o~ ~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ - ca a:: c: ,0 ..;:: e CD c: CD (!) ,s. .: c 5 <3 .c: (,) ca CD CXl .s ~ ~ ~ - ('L') (W) ci g ::& ~.s U') KS(.5~~~;!:fDo cir:::ci~f~Ociodd ci ciciO n H' U E: I-I-E: C C -' -' "!~~.li~~~~~O~~~ "'" d ci ci ci d d ~ .-..-- g N ci . f= 'c -' :l\ + ~ ~ 8 ci _ N lil ;1; M ~ a;~_SS ci~f3~ti ,i~~~I~ii~~i~~~~~~~!~E~~i~~~~~i~~~~~ ... ~~~lO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~G~~~~~~~~ U')~ QbOboOOU')PU')OOOObO(W)_U')U')~U')b~U')~~U')U')~2~ S III :5 c) .. N o ~CONfD~o)<'I _,........COCD coQ)""':c.J<'!C!: NNai-C")-- :!:! :!:! .:t:!::t:: =- U;U;U;:5:5:5:55 ., iiiffffi!!!! ~ ~ ~ ~ lillilin:tl~~~~ NNNNNNC')~ I :i' ~~ ~ D.'O"g"=n 1il G Gl 'E~.fi.fi~.f li~~~G:BIIl:!~co -6.c.c~~!!:-~C(oi~ ~ i ~"i &:I:lJslJdl-':I: coS~LL~'a++2'"i ~ co!! "C1t)V)~1) :ii~ 61OlO~1 u; (.) 8~ ,RI4Snpu. ~ & IRRU.PI"~ ~~i~~ 2~ " "c "g "g cs ~ ~ ~ ,a 1/)1/)1/)1/) NON ~ N N .... lO lO ~ .g 10 I-.c G .. ~ III ::E! Jl l!! N ~ 5 ; > "t: n. G :!) Iv", co ..; + X ~::~8~~5~ NcD~;t..;..;:::~ ci " E: 5 su.;u;u;u.;u;u;u: il/)I/)Ull/)I/)I/)u) !~~~~~~~ &l&'i~~51~ 88 'fi 'fi 1/)1/) ~.2 J!l 5 i ~ E .!! .!!:g W:ii a;-C\I o~~ 08- S'fi 8 .c I/) S ~jj cr ;r ,RUOlpqJlSU, lD ..; + X :55 .t~ . E: C -' o 0 N It) ~ IClNvjQ)ci ~~~g~ ~:g~ 8$::; ....~~ u:u.:u:u.:u.:u.:u:: ~u)u)u)u)u)u)u) 1Il~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ GJ'1i 8' ~88i'~:l ! i III i ~ ~ l ~ ~ 1!c-':I:e~'6~~~ ::> :f~~~iz .c ::> Cl (.) Z pew .:110 co ~ M ~ co CD CD CD ~i~ b ~ ~ + ~ ~ (;' C G GI I' a::: ~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ct!b + S 'E ~ l!! c ::> ... B u; .. ~ ct! I 8 ~ LL .c ~ co III J: LL I!lq8H S.~jAI.S ..: ~c6 .r ~ .. Jl I! ~ .c "ri 8- ~ I .0 .2 ! G :; " i ~ I ~ 1) ..!! C 2 <( .t, N I! ~ i ~ i Il _"" ~ <- e ~i-6 ~ w 'ii1iiLL. S I- _ C " E 81'i~ ci .g :a.~~ ;j "2 . Ill" i" .... $:"i'15:5G n "t:'fi~C5-'" ~ ~1Il61b" 1!~.cIll'15 ~ ~i:il ~ i"C ~';i~ ; 'fi!';2Jl III ~~iiCS-;15~ ~2l=~:;EE E~~"G"~ cae III o..coW LLcaGl<O::J.c .!!u.~~...r.ow-iii QlI) ....e Ii .5Q~.s;!!:::~ (I).E G)O~D ohl/)15!c:i~,g ~:M!~;CG .e~G)i!-c.QCD "'l;;~2!cljJ!l .!! ti a ii ::J ::J 5i ~~~~J~~ a~g~~5~ .r. s:.41Cl).J::..c. "'" ""'""'l"""',J, : = 6 = ., f;l. n. LLn.~ "il :ii"(;"'O"ilc ..: .. 8. ~ - ~ o ..; lO ! ct! ~ .e -g III iri G '0 z I! o C iil .2 8 ! i .. c .. G Cl > C o (.) 8~ ~= ~t:. >-., III G ::Eiij a: 15 '" l!! G C G Cl Q. "t: !:; C ~ G ~ III I! .. G :c III .. .. .!! .. .. e co '15 Q. 'C 1 "5 ct! C G E g. l 9 (.) ~ !:; z ..: .. a "t> J!! ~ .. .. ! ~ r: ,g :fl ~ I ~ r: ,g l! i Cl ~ ~ ~ r: : ~ 2006 Daily and PM Background Traffic Volume Daily Daily Peak Peak Growth Background Station 2004 Rate 2006 5601 38835 0.9 39534 5203 47590 3.9 51302 5613 39277 4.5 42812 5615 35294 6.1 39600 4610 36796 3.8 39592 5610 39648 2.7 41789 5206 45021 6.0 50424 4625 33092 4.5 36070 4667 33813 4.8 37059 4649 25368 4.7 27753 5202 42135 1.5 43399 4636 39646 3.7 42580 5608 40776 2.2 42570 5629 13703 4.2 14854 5639 19095 3.8 20546 5627* 22301 3.8 24843 5205 42125 0.8 42799 PM Peak PM Peak Growth Background Station 2004 Rate 2006 5601 3146 0.9 3203 5203 3680 3.9 3967 5613 3090 4.5 3368 5615 2581 6.1 2896 4610 3239 3.8 3485 5610 3385 2.7 3568 5206 3765 6.0 4217 4625 2905 4.5 3166 4667 2860 4.8 3135 4649 2226 4.7 2435 5202 3688 1.5 3799 4636 3289 3.7 3532 5608 3412 2.2 3562 5629 1210 4.2 1312 5639 1644 3.8 1769 5627* 1857 3.8 2069 5205 3314 0.8 3367 *2003 AADT was used for this location and growth rate assumed was 3.8%~ same as Station 5639 *2003 AADT was used for this location and growth rate assumed was 3.8%, same as Station 5639 For 2004 I 5627 I 22301 I 3.8 23148 For 2004 I 5627 I 1857 I 3.8 1928 o ld ~~n '\2-J_ ~~,O~~~rDS Av-.t.. V H ? ~L r+cr-ww' \ -:t... OD - \~. 0"0 05\ '2 '0 I Ul'O 4- } <D- ~ ~ ~ .L- 285 -- Cb 4- ~~IJ ~t.!,~ r~8 ~~ itt~ \":tC1 ~ ~ ~ ;t ('()~ C')- (:) \J ~~ 2,DOIl '{~~~ ~ ~. 6 010 -;;r 0- lb c1o~L '" ::: ~ ~Q+ j ~ l. r ;t, 4. ----------,-,-----------.-..--~---.--.-- 3:t9 ~ ~ r-'" ~=t-S -+ \ t I I~.~~:;? i v ~ [ w f ~ ~\~(}Jw 0~~gT-~ V\--\ ':?wJ(. ~ .. \1.-:00 - \E.GD 02:>\ \0\,;)001- o ~ ro L 2\ 'i- c--t cJ U1 ~ ct - ~ 4- \\ ~'2.. hJlD2.1nG. ~ U l..~ F ~61- c:'o.~0 e,\~ 21-q -:1 11 tttl s ~lp ~ --r ('l) <i) ~4e -~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ,jDOCQ v~ ~ 4. ~qo c<) ~ :; ~ ~ L .2.35 .J ~ L. · -- ~I~ _,~_......~._......b..._~.......___.,="_......~___ w~ 1 1 t r (0 ')...0' ". .:)::1.2, -1 ~ ~ r+ '-I 't -==:r \D ~ Uu.o~ ~d- ~---~- -~ 'V H :P .If)..,~(... ->r \ ~. I, c/D ... \ ~: tS'D ~tw-i- ~ -L-..-.."'iI~~.lfilf~~~ 04 \.:1 '=l- \~4 , 1-- z \~ cJ (D 0 #- 4-- "ai) N ~ ~ c.-- ,~ ~ ~.J..w... f e~ '-K~ ~ , t t ~ ~Ol ---... ~ ~ 2: W-o- , i 4 ~ _,~ - ~h\lO g ~ ~ c1rolv vdu~ ~~ ~.~O!o ri ~ ~ L ~231 c) 0- ~ )2.00 J+~ ;-~4 ~~ ~ '1 tr l~q.~ ~~ ~ :::rOC'-J - I - q5 &> ~~ ~LCAW ~\ u--cL ~~?~\t...." O~)O'2-\~'C1)~ \~;45- \+'.45 \ ~~~ 3C12- ~ L 2..52.. 4--- ~ \\3\ - cf) c<) lft C'l ~ It J-ODu ~ ~ 3. Q"1b t+ c-1 U} ~ .J l 5~L-J l~\ )?"~ )- .. \uo9 r \~ 1-\ t,~-\on ~c..cl: Y?:l.udv /' L ~-=r\ ~ ...-.. \ 2..\9 <f-- i1r c<\ ~ 0~ HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/22/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project 10: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Old Boynton Rd Inter.: Congress Ave at Old Boynton Rd Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: Congress Avenue No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 Eastbound I L T R I I 1 2 0 1 L TR 1379 275 193 112.0 12.0 I 0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound 1 L T R I L T R 1 I 11201130 I L TR I L TR 184 426 307 1359 1821 75 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 0 1 0 I Southbound 1 L T R I 1 1 3 0 I L TR 1218 1109 224 112.0 12.0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 341 I NB I I 1 I SB I I I I EB I WB Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red A 12.0 4.0 2.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 2 A A A A A g/C Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Right Right 5 A 7 A 6 A A A 8 A A A A 10.0 40.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Length: 140.0 secs 18.0 4.0 2.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) A A 4.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 4.0 2.0 Delay LOS Approach Delay LOS Eastbound L 284 TR 871 1805 3387 Westbound L 155 TR 773 1805 3383 Northbound L 438 TR 1841 1805 5156 Southbound L 232 TR 1445 1805 5056 v/c 1. 48 0.60 0.60 1. 05 0.91 1.14 1. 04 1.02 0.16 0.26 0.09 0.23 0.24 0.36 0.13 0.29 294.1 F 46.8 D 68.0 E 101. 2 F 74.5 E 116.8 F 131. 8 F 80.2 F Intersection Delay = 109.2 (sec/veh) 157.4 F 97.8 F 110.1 F 87.5 F Intersection LOS F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Inter.: Congress Ave @ Gateway Blvd Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 02/17/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Gateway Blvd SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I 2 2 1 I 2 2 1 I 2 3 1 I 2 3 0 I L T R I L T R I L T R I L TR 1306 620 272 1610 1285 235 1432 1592 527 1283 1373 241 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 0 I 0 j 0 I 0 N/S St: Congress Avenue No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol A A A A A A A 7.0 36.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 Eastbound L 475 T 928 R 761 Westbound L 800 T 1109 R 623 Northbound L 600 T 1593 R 854 Southbound L 300 TR 1340 3502 0.70 0.14 62.4 E 3610 0.73 0.26 50.4 D 1615 0.39 0.47 24.3 C 3502 0.83 0.23 58.7 E 3610 1.26 0.31 172.8 F 1615 0.41 0.39 31. 8 C 3502 0.78 0.17 62.2 E 5187 1.09 0.31 98.3 F 1615 0.67 0.53 26.2 C 3502 1.03 0.09 123.0 F 5071 1.31 0.26 196.0 F 47.5 D 124.6 F 77.3 E 185.1 F Intersection Delay = 111.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/19/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Hypoluxo Road Inter.: Congress Ave at Hypoluxo Road Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: Congress Avenue I Eastbound 1 L T R 1 I 1 L 1481 112.0 1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound 1 Northbound 1 L T R I L T R I 1 1 I 230 I 221 R I L TR I L T R 187 1304 1280 229 1490 1099 202 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 o I 0 1 0 I Southbound I L T R 1 I 231 I L T R 1264 977 217 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 2 3 T 860 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right Green 15.0 45.0 15.0 39.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 140.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 375 T 1667 R 761 Westbound L 375 TR 1629 3502 5187 1615 3502 5069 1. 39 0.56 0.27 0.88 1. 01 Northbound L 375 T 1006 R 692 Southbound L 375 3502 T 1445 5187 R 692 1615 Intersection Delay 3502 3610 1615 1.42 1.19 0.32 0.77 0.73 0.34 = 100.3 0.11 0.32 0.47 255.7 F 39.8 D 22.6 C 105.6 F 0.11 0.32 82.3 F 71.4 E 73.3 E 0.11 0.28 0.43 267 . 1 F 145.1 F 26.7 C F 165.1 0.11 69.9 0.28 47.8 0.43 27.1 (sec/veh) E D 48.7 C Intersection D LOS F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/19/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Boynton Beach Blvd SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R 1 1 I 0 3 1 I 1 2 0 I 0 0 0 I 2 0 1 T R 1 L T I I L R 1888 392 1184 1609 I 1282 571 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 0 I I I 0 No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: 1-95 West @ Boynton Beach Blvd Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: 1-95 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 I NB Left A I Thru A I Right I Peds A I SB Left A A A I Thru I Right A I Peds I EB Right A A I WB Right 43.0 85.0 17.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 160.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Eastbound T 2701 R 1059 Westbound L 476 T 2942 Northbound Southbound L 365 5085 1583 0.76 0.40 27.6 0.53 0.67 30.8 12.3 C C B 1770 3539 0.42 0.59 0.27 0.83 48.8 4.8 D A 9.3 A 3433 0.84 0.11 86.2 F 38.8 D R 1059 1583 0.59 Intersection Delay = 22.9 C 0.67 15.3 B (sec/veh) Intersection LOS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/22/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Boynton Beach Mall (2 NBL E/W St: Old Boynton Rd Inter.: Congress Ave at Old Boynton Rd Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year : 2006 and 2 EBL) N/S St: Congress Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY / Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R I L T R / L T R I L T R I 1 / I No. Lanes 1 2 2 0 I 1 2 0 I 2 3 0 I 1 3 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR 1 L TR I L TR Volume /379 275 193 184 426 307 /359 1821 75 1218 1109 224 Lane Width /12.0 12.0 /12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 / 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A / NB Left A A Thru A A / Thru A A Right A A I Right A A Peds I Peds WB Left A / SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 12.0 4.0 32.0 18.0 10.0 40.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 140.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 550 3502 0.77 0.16 62.9 E TR 871 3387 0.60 0.26 46.8 D 54.0 D Westbound L 155 1805 0.60 0.09 68.0 E TR 773 3383 1. 05 0.23 101. 2 F 97.8 F Northbound L 850 3502 0.47 0.24 45.7 D TR 1841 5156 1.14 0.36 116.8 F 105.5 F Southbound L 232 1805 1. 04 0.13 131. 8 F TR 1445 5056 1.02 0.29 80.2 F 87.5 F Intersection Delay = 91.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = F HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/19/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Boynton Beach Mall (1 WBR) E/W St: Hypoluxo Road Inter.: Congress Ave at Hypoluxo Road Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: Congress Avenue No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol 1 Eastbound 1 L T R 1 I I L 1481 112.0 1 2 3 T 860 12.0 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 1 1 12311221 R 1 L T R 1 L T R 187 1304 1280 229 1490 1099 202 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 o I 0 I 0 I Southbound 1 L T R 1 I 2 3 1 I L T R 1264 977 217 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right A 1 EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right Green 15.0 45.0 15.0 39.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 140.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 375 3502 1. 39 T 1667 5187 0.56 R 761 1615 0.27 Westbound L 375 3502 0.88 T 1667 5187 0.83 R 519 1615 0.48 Northbound L 375 3502 1. 42 T 1006 3610 1.19 R 692 1615 0.32 Southbound L 375 3502 0.77 T 1445 5187 0.73 R 692 1615 0.34 Intersection Delay = 94.6 0.11 255.7 F 0.32 39.8 D 0.47 22.6 C 0.11 82.3 F 0.32 47.9 D 0.32 38.8 D 0.11 267.1 F 0.28 145.1 F 0.43 26.7 C 105.6 F 52.5 D 165.1 F 0.11 69.9 E 0.28 47.8 D 48.7 D 0.43 27.1 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS F I I I I I I I I I I I I . . . . . . . . It... I I I.......... 192 OLD BOfNTON RO. . ". ... . 16.7 '1 . i7.5 . . ~............ .. ... . 2.0 . . . H.2 . . . . . ...J ~ ~ g 5E . . . . . . . . LEGEND c:i ~ w o z w ~ I I . I I . . I . 0.6 ~ Not To Scale ... to- .................... ~ 9.21 : ~ . 10.31 :~ . .(!) . IZ . .0 . .0 . ...10.9~: : ................. : NW 22ND AVE. : : . ~ . . . I . . . . . . . . . . 13.3 $' 4.1 .. ... " ... ... ...... ..- . . i 18.6 .' . . 1.5 ... to- 4.71 N W--$--E I S HYPOlUXO RO. GATEWAY BLVD. 1'~ 1'Q~ 21.0 .... . 4.4 '. ~ . i!18.3 t . "'. 3.5 11.1'. 14.7 .... ... to-- ..... .......... .........i............. BOfNTON BEACH BLVD. . . . . 11J i l. . . . . 1,5.8, . 1.0 .... . . WOOLBRIGHT RD. I SW15THST. 721 . . . . . . ~ . . . I . . . . . . . . . URS Greiner, Ine. GOLF RO. . . . . . . . . . . . SW 23RD AVE. BOYNTON BEACH MALL City of Boynton Beach, Aorida BOYNTON BEACH MALL 2 lANE - 4lANE --. 6lANE DIRECTIONS OF APPROACH AND DEPARTURE EXHIBIT 2 Simon DeBartolo Group, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....................~ . . . . ~ W-.-E I S NotTo Scale HYPOlUXO RD. , , , , , , , ""'-.: . . . . . . . r .......,..... w 29,080 ~ 30,363 ~ - {219} w. n::: . C> . Z . o . o. . . d n::: w o z w ~ 22,163 23,168 {232} 23,400 47,500 1 tm 22ND AVE. ..................... GATEWAY BLVD. 25,106 26,533 {95} 26,682 47,5PO . . . . . . . . . 31,100 : ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ~ 42,050 \ ': 43,324 ~ : {284} . - . 43,608 . 47,500 : \27,038 28,264 . {362} 28,627 . . 29,418 31,090 - {197} 31,287 47,500 15,478 17,693 {449} . 18,092\ 31,100 39,955 41,718 - {865} 42,583 47,500 " . . < ,I i :\ ., : ~ . OLD BOYNTON RD. . 31,614 . 32,572 : {237}. 41,718 / 32.809 : - {891} 47,500: 42,109 , 47,500 .......... ..........i............. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. : \ . 30,319 30,n1: 31,238 32,129 _: {314} {237} : 31,552 32,366' 47,500 47,500 ~~ < .f 1 :'4 'j .~ .....r..... 31,162 32,933 ""'-. {90} 33.023 47,500 ;~ " " ; ,; ; ; 28,566 29,432 {75} 29,507 47,500 ;'.i :1 j : 1 .~ . j J 'r j f : I SW 15TH ST. . . 30,848 . . 27,842 . {27} . . 27,539 ~ 31,100 . . . . SW 23RD AVE. . . . . . . . . . URS Greiner. loe. WOOLBRIGHT RD. g ~ ~ ..J :E GOLF RD. LEGEND IlDl BOYNTON BEACH MALL City of Boynton Beach, Aorida xx - 1997 EXISTING DAILY XX - 2000 BACKGROUND DAILY {XX} - MALL EXPANSION DAILY XXX - TOTAL 2000 TRAFFIC XXX - LOS D SERVICE VOLUME BOYNTON BEACH MAlL 2 LANE PERFORMANCE STANDARD 4 LANE ) 6 LANE (TEST 1 - ... Simon DeBartolo Group. Inc. EXHIBIT 3 PERFORMANCE STANDARD TEST 2 palm Beach County's Performance Standard model test/test 2 analysis shows no roadways within the study area of the mall will exceed the Adopted Level of Service based on the construction contemplated in the plan. REVIEW DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS Conditions 10 and llA through lIE of the amended Development Order for the Boynton Beach Mall Expansion, approved March 5, 1991, relate to roadway improvements required for the mall expansion. The following summarizes the development order conditions and existing conditions: · Condition 10 4-1ane divided Old Boynton Road 5-lane undivided Old Boynton Road from Military Trail to Lawrence Road. from Military Trail to Lawrence Road. · Condition llA - Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue. Northbound 1 right 1 right 2 through 2 through 2 left 1 left Southbound 1 right 1 right 2 through 2 through 2 left 1 left MMIM,IBOYNrON\lRAFF1C\TRAFFlC.RPT 3