The URL can be used to link to this page

TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE (DEC 2004) BOYNTON BEACH MALL TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE Prepared for Simon Property Group Prepared by URS Corporation December 2004 Introduction: URS has prepared a traffic study update consistent with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards. It should be noted that the proposed change consists of adding a movie the ather while eliminating approximately 150,000 square feet of retail. The result of the analysis indicates that the proposed change will result in less PM peak hour trips than either the existing or the approved project. Trip Generation Table 1 summarizes the trip generation for the project. Land Use Size PM Peak Trip Rate PM Total Trips Shopping Center, 1,032,125 Sq. Ft. Ln(T) = 0.66 Ln(X) + 3.40 2,921 ITE Code 820 GLA X = 1000 Sq. Feet GLA Movie Theater, 3,800 seats (79,500 0.08 304 lTE Code 445 Sq. Ft.) Total 3,225 The PM Peak Hour Trip generation for the approved, existing and proposed project can be summarized as follows: Approved Project - 1,244,449 Sq. Ft. GLA 3,306 trips less 14% pass by = 2,843 trips Existing Project - 1,184,045 Sq. Ft. GLA 3200 trips less 14% pass by trips = 2,752 trips Proposed Project Less Exist. Macy's Add Retail "A" Net Retail 1,184,045 Sq. Ft. GLA -169,510 17,590 1,032,125 Sq. Ft. GLA Muvico Theater 79.500 Sq. Ft. TOTAL 1,111,625 Sq. Ft. · Retail Trips (ITE Code 820, P. 1453) · Theater Trips (ITE Code 445, P. 797) TOTAL PROPOSED PROJECT TRIPS 2921 304 3225 Less internal trips (10% ) Less pass-by traffic (14%) for a total of 2,748 pm peak hour trips In other words, the proposed change will result in a net decrease of four (4) peak hour trips from the existing development, and ninety five (95) trips compared to the approved development. Given that the proposed change results in less traffic than either the traffic already approved or the existing mall, the standard tests of the Traffic Performance Standards are not applicable. For purposes of updating the study, an analysis of future conditions after the proposed change is included here. Future Traffic Conditions Roadway Segments The existing PM peak hour counts were taken from the Palm Beach County website information. The year 2006 projected traffic volumes (for background traffic) were calculated using the growth rates taken also from the website for each one of the links analyzed in the 1998 study. The net difference in project traffic was calculated for the PM peak hour using the proposed project minus the approved project. As previously stated, this difference is minus 95 trips. This difference was distributed in the roadways around the project using the trip distribution used in the 1998 study and subtracted from the 2006 PM peak hour traffic and compared to the capacity of the segment. Figure 1 illustrates the traffic volumes for 2006. As seen in this figure, most roadways will be working under acceptable levels of service. Two of the segments operate over LOS D capacity: Gateway Blvd east of Congress Avenue and Woolbright Road west of 1-95, however, the proposed change does not worsen the level of service on these links. Intersection analysis In the 1998 study, three intersections were analyzed because those intersections were improved but with different laneage than identified in the Development Order. So, those intersections were evaluated to determine that those intersections were operating at HYPOLUXO RD I I I 3,289 I 3,532 I (-4) .J... 3,528 . 4,550 I I I NW 22ND AVE I I I 3,688 I 3,799 I ~. 3,790 I 4,550 I I OLD BOYNTON RD I 2,226 2,435 (-10) 2,425 4,550 ...----- 1,694 1,769 (-16) 1,753 3,020 I 3,090 I 3,368 I (-3) I 3,365 BOYNTON I 4,550 BEACH BLVD - -1- - --- - -- I I I . I WOOLBRIGHT RD I I -II ~I f=1 fel ~I ::iI ~I GOLF RD I I I xx - 2004 Existing Peak Hour Two-way XX - 2006 Background Peak Hour (XX) - Mall Expansion Only XXX - Total 2006 Traffic XXX - LOS 0 Service Volume 3,412 3,562 (-4) 3,558 4,550 I I I ~ I ___________1 I I I I I I I I I I 3,239 I 3,485 (-10) + 3,475 2,905 I 4,550 3,166 I (-10) I 3,156 I 4,550 I ----=----- I I 3,765 I 4,217 . (-38) liT 4,179 I 4,550 I I 1,928 2,069 (-20) 2,049 3,020 I I I I 4,550 I ---~-.--- I I 2,581 2,896 3,385 I (-14) 3,568 .1. 2,882 (-11) . 4550 -I ' 3,557 I 4,550 I I wi ~I ~I ~I ~I ~I UI I D c:r:: w U Z w c:r:: ~ -I . Boynton Beach Mall - 2 Lane - 4 Lane - - 6 Lane FIGURE 1 3,314 3,367 (-1) 3,366 3,020 1,210 1,312 (-4) 1,308 1,390 --e- 3,680 3,967 (-13) 3,954 4,550 I I I I " I I I I N i Not to Scale GATEWAY BLVD BOYNTON BEACH MALL City of Boynton Beach, Florida PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AND LOS D SERVICE VOLUMES acceptable LOS. These intersections are Hypoluxo Road at Congress Avenue, Old Boynton Road at Congress Avenue, and Boynton Beach Boulevard at 1-95. When those intersections were analyzed with 2006 conditions, the LOS are: Intersection LOS Hypoluxo Road at Congress A venue F (84.3) Old Boynton Road at Congress A venue F (102.3) Boynton Beach Boulevard at 1-95 C (29.3) The intersections of Hypoluxo Road at Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road at Congress A venue were evaluated with the improvement recommended in the Development Order and mentioned in the 1998 study and the results are shown below: Intersection LOS Hypoluxo Road at Congress Avenue E (64.2) Old Boynton Road at Congress Avenue E (76.1) The HCS analysis are appended. :1 - ~ c:: .0 .t: e CD c:: CD C, .s. .: ~ c:: ~ o o .c:: u CIS CD QJ .5 ~ ... '" lO lO ci ci + + g X COC:::COCN 0) -J N ...J co ci ~ c:i g ci ci ci " " E E c: c: ...J ...J CD lO ~ Si ~ '" '" '" ci + g 510 ~ci ci " E c: ...J ~~~d~~~~~~ ......"to Q) (J) ~ N d~ ~~~d ~~ ~ ~ + + gg g .5.5~5 ;!~ci~ dO ci "n " E~ E .5..J .5 o ... ..; + :;~~~~:;~. Na;~~g~C'i~ ~~~~(J)(J)~~ .(J)~CDMM~CDMN"""MMM~N~OOM(J)CDO(J) ~~~~~~Q-~~~~~~~~~lO~~~~e~~~_~~~~~~~ ~~CD~GG~~~M~.~~.. .~M~"""~Z~~~~~~~~~ g ~ .5 10 ci t: ci ci " E c: ...J ~ ~ + CD '" ~ ~ c: ~ ~ X 'C"~ C:-.: CDO ci " ~~ ... ... ci d " " I- I- E c: ...J ~8:!t;o ci ci ci ci ~~~.g~~~~~~ _dcicicicid~....._ci lO III ~ ;;; I~ c: ...J o CD ci . I~ ...J ~~~:g~~Cii~_t5B Nci_N(")Nci::~~~ NCD.~E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a~N~~~~;~<~~~~ i~m~~~~~~~~Z~~~m~~~~~~~i~z~~m~Z~~~~ ..... ~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~II~~~~~~~;~~ ... (l) 0 '" '" lO cD .. N ~""""""CD<<)~~~~~?4~~ NNc:O...-M-__ ., ! '" ~ CD (l) 0 CD '" ,S......-Nq"":...... !2Ng;~~(l)..; "C ll. ., .. :> ~~~~~~~~ ~.E~~~~~S~en~~en: c6enen"'''''''''''''tl" -c6iiiii ~~811111~~&!8~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en "il Ie ij ~ ~ .s 0 .,g .5 e e ~ ~ ~ ::; c: ~ leJ.lJsnpul ~rJ~~~~~ !!?: NON 0 j:mNNM ...... 10 IOIC) 'i E ., 'E o ., i i .. a. "- <( ., c. c: en .., Ci." E .. 00'6 ., .. ., li !!::.O x"- 'i5~ "lO l5 lO (.) 2:- ,,'2i 88 GLLIIJ ~ .c'5 tie"- j.g,jlen ~i~I~~i~ ~~i ~~~~ 1O~"ii tti:g <3 ~ ~ lellu8p!saH '" u ~ ~ '10 <0 ..; + ~ CD on + OONIC)~N:gm ~~.o~cicDcOr-: {;m~CD~~~~ E c: ...J LLLLLLU.u.: u..:u:u:u.:u.:u.:u.: u.: ~~~~oo !uiooct.iootrioocriD.uj =008gf;lgggg8go~0 ~8800 oo~~~~~ll.~ ~ <0 g lO l3 lO x ~ 5~~~ I::~~~ ci ~ " n E c: ...J ~~~~~~~~j me::; -~~ 88::::- ~ ti ~ .c en ~ r~.!! ~ ~ ll. ll. ., ~ "'; - [(.) ~i~ 1e~,g8 1!o...Jx " ~ (.) leUOlP1J!JsUI G>a; ~88=1!:l o88~~~ g.e5~8~ ~~i~~i ZC>~l!I)Z " Cl Z paw ':110 I m ~ m s ~ i :g 'E 6 ~ ~ + ~ Ga ~ c: ; .. J; 0: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ o i b 0: + I; 'E !; l! o " ... .. (jj ~ ~ "5! E IS " "- I- ;; ~8!. x l!eJa}J sa:J!l\.Ias .. ., ! ~ " o ~ .>< ., ., a. ., = ".; .; 8 q ~ - g on lO I .Q o '" l! .. = " c: .. II li 0: ,g " c: .. ".; .; l ~. I -.!! o g <( ~ d ~ m ,g E 8 i :l ~=8 $ ! ~~6 ~ UJ 1;i"iiLL N ~ ~t~ ~ ,g ~~~ on '2..; .. ~ i ... ~ ~ D!!2 CJ · ~~~~= .,. e~~"~ ~ l-g-:j: ~ i: e-.: ~ ; ~~;~i 1& ::ls:cgl!!c:1! ......G).!!~C)OCJ ~';,J~=~E E=CUD.:UJe ~ECU(D:J.c8 .!!:~~....fiOe 01) 0"" II')W G) .5c.z I 8t:: 16 (/).5 GJoEa J;U)~!OeL- &0'2-1--_.2 Stl;s.,s& ii&~5~~ ~2oml1~~ I-:JL-Q.;:::L-I) ~2~it~i ok: ~ii"C~.\ = :.!smcn ll. Il.S"-Il.~ ., :Cu=C'G)'c in ., '5 z e o l5 en ]i g en ., .. c .. ., Cl > c: o (.) .. e .. ., :c .. .. .. .!! .. .. 2 '" " ...~ 8~ "'~ ;:~ .. ., ::Oiii 0: c: ~ I!! .. c: ., Cl a. "C !;:: c: .!2 i! ., c: ., Cl a. "C 1 "5 ., 0: ".; .; 8 o. 1:: ., E 8- ~ ~ G ii: ~ !;:: z .., ~ g .. .. ~ !l ., c: ,g ~ s ..... ~ c: ~ c: .2 e ., c: ., ~ ~ ~ E: .g c: ~ ~ Daily Daily Peak Peak Growth Background Station 2004 Rate 2006 5601 38835 0.9 39534 5203 47590 3.9 51302 5613 39277 4.5 42812 5615 35294 6.1 39600 4610 36796 3.8 39592 5610 39648 2.7 41789 5206 45021 6.0 50424 4625 33092 4.5 36070 4667 33813 4.8 37059 4649 25368 4.7 27753 5202 42135 1.5 43399 4636 39646 3.7 42580 5608 40776 2.2 42570 5629 13703 4.2 14854 5639 19095 3.8 20546 5627* 22301 3.8 24843 5205 42125 0.8 42799 *2003 MDT was used for this location and growth rate assumed was 3.8%, same as Station 5639 For 2004 I 5627 I 22301 I 3.8 23148 C/ ..,.. ~PM Peak PM Peak Growth Background Station 2004 Rate 2006 5601 3146 0.9 3203 5203 3680 3.9 3967 5613 3090 4.5 3368 5615 2581 6.1 2896 4610 3239 3.8 3485 5610 3385 2.7 3568 5206 3765 6.0 4217 4625 2905 4.5 3166 4667 2860 4.8 3135 4649 2226 4.7 2435 5202 3688 1.5 3799 4636 3289 3.7 3532 5608 3412 2.2 3562 5629 1210 4,2 1312 5639 1644 3.8 1769 5627* 1857 3.8 2069 5205 3314 0.8 3367 I *2003 MDT was used for this location and growth IRk. assumed was 3.8%, same as Station 5639 For 2004 I 5627 I 1857 I 3.8 1928 G-- \ J. \-::.A:n...tfr\"C)f"\ .l~~c>- (~-?0----t";l-c.,~7_~ ( (>~) \:JJr'(lJ.. AJ Jk.U--C^V,~~,-t.,{ ~_~_._~..____".++____. ......__..~:/ (,,/'j)o(;L::::...~_..... ~,.::::.:~""-' ~--l \ .~ "-'. ., . . ''-'' ~\-..l ~\oJl Heu),' \'::t 00 - \0 :Do 012.512;~4 t ID c<) 0'1 +-. 2- B5 ~ t'- ~ ~..'?R (p yt t-j. ~ :=- % 352- ~ "ltt't* 2-5L1 ....;.. ~ 11-.1 7 ~ ~ g jJJP;L) ~6~~ .~. f. I \.' " r,.... . ,. y"r '1 (\ , ',,0'..' ~l!..J..'...M.'Il..j '(..x '.\.-4 '-' :{ I i nCf'P. ,~I..\ I / 'L ,f '0 J .il (.."G'I\, ,. '~'''' , ,... ( ~. ' d OOLP 1.M<-3,3. 5 iJ1v t ~ ~ L ~1- .J ~ ~ <Ie- ~ ;(r . -.4 - ~~1-:- \--~~~--------_._.~ ,9.3 ~ 0;;, ~ ~ .3 H-rj 'fa l<1.J-1--u f4j., ~ ;\.JJl{:j'{(S~ ~JJJ.- 'f' IV ~ "'7 041 ';)-=+)';004 (=tot> - lis' tJO · 2./~ ~ ~ ~ -4- II Cf2. cr :t 4- ~ ~+~ th- F-Jf3 lK€ -4 1~ tt r ~I ~ ~ 0" - 11-4 ~ ~ t; ~ ~f'1>\u..{ D ILA ~ ~o 0"", f cJfYD U VQ1~ >;) ~--O^"~S 3 1- vr 0 r+ it $ ~\r01 J+~ 4?\ --1 8(00 ~ J g 1- --~-:J L 2.2.'1 +-- \ 2.80 ..r- 304 -~------_.~_.__._-----._....-------- ~ 1f J::. 0 ~ ..!) -P t-.:> O...D /1 -r \.-1 1" eU.A.... ?,~9 \ & ~g.. ')\}.. v vlvt....l~v ( Hp:<\6 - \+' 45 6} W fiI ~ 14'13 .J ~~ EJ~L___ \"+51 ~ ---. oLP+ ~ ~ ~ ~ "r .J~ )-- .:5i2.- ~ ~ ~ .4l ItQ09 '--\'04 5 (~~_ " ~ ,r\ r~Y-., ~,_ n ,'.', j ~ '"$'1 i i--' /), ,,' i' \ " ,_~ j',/ '._______: I_/,' (:..-:::1 __ 1 ; , cy ~ ?~ O--L \\-t';.l'~ .. n 00 -'\'60 () $ ; /;/\ It i) .r ~I i 0\ -'7"', i""' L.4 "'=- I \C:r--....} ~_,.J \ I 1~ \ I I I () \<) It, 2-\4- ~ lJ) W 14- \\ 1-2- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t ~L>\F 66+- J:V-i ~ h~ tH f1" 5lt~:-t \~ ~ ~ IlKItJ. ~ i ~ V ::j- :J,!iV I b cQ~~j .t ro 0 \0 't-~--Z G~ BlwG -~~ ~ ~ ~ L~35 \ \ I 4;-ldBS ~ ~ lp ~ (PID :!JJ(p ~j' ~"'\ t . ' \"'"7 o J o--<-~ ) :J1J- --"J ~ \J;, t; ~ ;::-+,' ....Ii ''i...) T \... {p HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/19/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project 10: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Boynton Beach Blvd Inter.: 1-95 West @ Boynton Beach Blvd Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: 1-95 No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I 1 0 3 1 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 I 2 0 1 T R 1 L T 1 I L R 1888 392 1184 1609 I 1282 571 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 I 112.0 12.0 0 1 I I 0 Duration 0.25 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 I NB Left A I Thru A 1 Right 1 Peds A 1 SB Left A A A 1 Thru 1 Right A 1 Peds I EB Right A A 1 WB Right 20.0 50.0 35.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Eastbound T 2119 R 1187 Westbound L 295 T 2212 5085 1583 0.97 0.36 0.42 0.75 47.2 5.3 D A 40.0 o 1770 3539 0.68 0.79 0.17 0.63 53.1 18.7 o B 22.2 C Northbound Southbound L 1001 3433 0.31 0.29 33.2 C 15.4 B R 1187 1583 0.52 Intersection Delay = 29.3 0.75 6.6 A (sec/veh) Intersection LOS C '/ HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/19/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project 10: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Hypoluxo Road Inter.: Congress Ave at Hypoluxo Road Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: Congress Avenue No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol I Eastbound I L T R I I I L 1481 112.0 I SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Westbound I Northbound 1 L T R I L T R I I 1 I 230 1221 R I L TR I L T R 187 1304 1280 229 1490 1099 202 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 o I 0 I 0 I Southbound I L T R I I 2 3 1 I L T R 1264 977 217 112.0 12.0 12.0 1 0 2 3 T 860 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds I Peds NB Right A I EB Right A SB Right A I WB Right Green 20.0 45.0 20.0 45.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 150.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 467 T 1556 R 754 Westbound L 467 TR 1521 3502 5187 1615 1.12 0.60 0.27 3502 5069 0.71 1. 08 Northbound L 467 T 1083 R 754 Southbound L 467 3502 T 1556 5187 R 754 1615 Intersection Delay 3502 3610 1615 1.14 1.10 0.29 0.61 0.68 0.31 = 84.3 0.13 0.30 0.47 143.7 F 45.5 0 24.6 C 73.8 E 0.13 0.30 67.0 E 99.8 F 94.3 F 0.13 0.30 0.47 151. 5 F 112.7 F 24.9 C 113.4 F 0.13 63.8 0.30 47.5 0.47 25.2 (sec/veh) E o 47.1 C Intersection o LOS F 'Y HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/19/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Boynton Beach Mall (WBR) E/w St: Hypoluxo Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 I 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 I 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 L T R 1 L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1481 860 187 1304 1280 229 1490 1099 202 1264 977 217 /12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 / 0 I 0 1 0 I 0 No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Inter.: Congress Ave at Hypoluxo Road Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: Congress Avenue Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 341 I NB I I I I SB I 1 1 / EB 1 WB Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red 16.0 4.0 1.0 Cycle Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Flow Rate (s) A A A 14.0 4.0 1.0 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity 2 A A A A vlc g/C Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Right Right 5 A 8 A A A 10.0 39.0 4.0 1.0 6 A A 7 A A A A A A A 15.0 36.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 Length: 150.0 secs Approach Delay LOS 62.9 E 41.9 D 18.8 B 120.1 F 88.4 F 50.8 D 52.7 D 68.5 E 35.2 D Delay LOS Eastbound L 677 T 1694 R 861 Westbound L 327 T 1349 R 420 Northbound L 840 T 1227 R 592 Southbound L 374 3502 T 1245 5187 R 754 1615 Intersection Delay 3502 5187 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3610 1615 0.77 0.55 0.24 1.01 1. 03 0.59 0.63 0.97 0.37 0.77 0.85 0.31 = 64.2 0.11 74.5 E 0.24 60.4 E 57.7 0.47 25.2 C {sec/veh} Intersection 0.19 0.33 0.53 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.24 0.34 0.37 45.7 D 88.9 F 60.4 E E LOS E '] HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/22/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project ID: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Old Boynton Rd Inter.: Congress Ave at Old Boynton Rd Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: Congress Avenue No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I 1 2 0 I 1 2 0 I 1 3 0 I 1 3 0 I L TR 1 L TR I L TR I L TR 1379 275 193 184 426 307 1359 1821 75 1218 1109 224 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 A A 1 NB Left A A A A 1 Thru A A A A 1 Right A A I Peds A 1 SB Left A A I Thru A A I Right A I Peds 1 EB Right I WB Right 10.0 16.0 31. 0 10.0 16.0 42.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Cycle Length: 145.0 sees Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1805 1. 09 0.21 129.4 F 3387 0.47 0.32 39.4 D 79.7 E 1805 0.75 0.07 88.5 F 3383 1.13 0.21 130.7 F 126.4 F 1805 1. 03 0.21 111. 8 F 5156 1.02 0.40 68.9 E 75.7 E 1805 1. 95 0.07 523.7 F 5056 1. 01 0.29 77.9 E 140.5 F Phase Combination EB Left Thru Right Peds WB Left Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red Eastbound L 386 TR 1098 Westbound L 124 TR 723 Northbound L 386 TR 2062 Southbound L 124 TR 1464 Intersection Delay = 102.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS F )D HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: Agency: URS Date: 11/22/2004 Period: PM Peak Hour Project 10: Boynton Beach Mall E/W St: Gateway Blvd Inter.: Congress Ave @ Gateway Blvd Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: Palm Beach County Year 2006 N/S St: Congress Avenue No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol I Eastbound 1 L T R 1 I 1 L 1306 112.0 I SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Westbound I Northbound 1 L T R I L T R 1 1 1 1 221 1 231 R I L T R I L T R 272 1610 1285 235 1432 1592 527 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 o 1 0 1 0 I Southbound I L T R 1 123 0 I L TR 1283 1373 241 112.0 12.0 1 0 2 2 T 620 12.0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A A SB Left A Thru A A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right A A EB Right A A SB Right WB Right A Green 11.0 29.0 41.0 10.0 10.0 39.0 Yellow 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 4.0#~- All Red 1. 0 O. 0 1. 0 1. 0 O. 0 1/()' Cycle Length: 160.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 241 T 925 R 717 Westbound L 985 T 1579 R 565 Northbound L 547 T 1589 R 898 Southbound L 219 TR 1236 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 5071 1. 41 0.74 0.42 0.69 0.90 0.46 0.88 1.11 0.65 1. 43 1. 45 0.07 0.26 0.44 0.28 0.44 0.35 0.16 0.31 0.56 0.06 0.24 282.2 F 58.0 E 30.8 C 109.1 F 53.3 0 49.7 0 40.9 0 49.7 D 81. 0 F 115.9 F 26.4 C 91.5 F 294.4 F 268.2 F 272.1 F Intersection Delay = 126.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS F /} . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , !t4. . . I,......... 19~ OLD BOYNTON RD. 04 .. 16.7 .. . 2.0 . . it 7' . . ~ ............ 14.2 . -l ~ I- ~ ~ :J ~ . . . . . . . . . 0.6 ~ 04 ~ .................... 1 · . . ~ 9.2 . ~ . 10.31 :~ .e> .z .0 .u . . 1.5 04 . 4.71 HYPOLUXO RD. c:i 0:: w o z W 0:: ~ ~ 10.9 '04 . ................. t-m 22ND AVE. . . 143 4.4 ~ 1405 21.0 04 . . . U'83 . 3.5 11.1.' 14.7 04. ... ... .......... .........i............. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. . . . . 11.t: 115.8 1.0 04 . WOOLBRIGHT RD. 7+ GOLF RD. SW 23RD AVE. LEGEND III BOYNTON BEACH MALL 2 LANE - 4 LANE ... 6 LANE N W--$--E I S Not To Scale GATEWAY BLVD. ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..13.3. 1 .. 4.1 ~ .......'CI . . }. . . SW 15TH ST. . . . . . . ~ . , , , , , , , , . . . . URS Greiner. Inc. BOYNTON BEACH MALL City of Boynton Beach, Rorida DIRECTIONS OF APPROACH AND DEPARTURE EXHIBIT 2 Simon DeBartolo Group, Inc. . /) I~ 25.106 26,533 {95} 26.682 47,500 31,162 32,933 {SO} 33,023 47,500 . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , , . , , ~: . . . . . . . I ............ 29,418 31,090 - {197} 31,287 47,500 . OLD BOYNTON RD. . . . . . . . . . .. ............ ! I ~: 28,566 : 29,432 · {75} . - : 29,507 47,500 -' ~ I- ~ ~ :::i ~ LEGEND - lIilllliJ xx -1997 EXISTING DAILY XX - 2000 BACKGROUND DAILY {XX} - MALL EXPANSION DAILY XXX - TOTAL 2000 TRAFFIC XXX - LOS 0 SERVICE VOLUME HYPOLUXO RD. . . . . . . . . . ....................~ . . . . ci a:: w () z w ~ u.i 29,080 ~ 30,363 ~ - {219} w . a:: . (!) . Z . o . () . . . \ 27,038 28,264 {362} 28,627 31,100 22,163 23,168 {232} 23,400 47,500 I tN-/ 22ND AVE. / ..................... . . 15,478 17,693 {449} 18,092\ 31,100 ...... ~ 42,050 \ .: 43,324 ~ . {284} : - . 43,608 . 47,500 : 39,955 41,718 - {86S} 42,583 47,500 . 31.614 . 32,572 : / {237}' 41,718 32,809 : - {891} 47,500: 42,109 . 47,500 .......... ..........i............. BOYNTON BEACH BLVD. : \ . 30,319 30,771: 31.238 32,129 _: {314} {237} : 31,552 32,366: 47,500 47,500 . . . WOOLBRIGHT RD. . . I 30,848 27,842 {27} 27,539 31,100 GOLF RD. SW 23RD AVE. . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . , . . . . ~ W--$--E s Not To Scale GATEWAY BLVD. ~ URS Greiner. Inc. BOYNTON BEACH MALL City of Boynton Beach, Florida BOYNTON BEACH MALL 2 LANE PERFORMANCE STANDARD 4 LANE 6 LANE (TEST 1) - ... EXHIBIT 3 Simon DeBartolo Group, Inc. /3 PERFORMANCE STANDARD TEST 2 Palm Beach County's Performance Standard model test/test 2 analysis shows no roadways within the study area of the mall will exceed the Adopted Level of Service based on the construction contemplated in the plan. REVIEW DEVELOPMENT ORDER CONDITIONS Conditions 10 and llA through lIE of the amended Development Order for the Boynton Beach Mall Expansion, approved March 5, 1991, relate to roadway improvements required for the mall expansion. The following summarizes the development order conditions and existing conditions: · Condition 10 4-lane divided Old Boynton Road 5-lane undivided Old Boynton Road from Military Trail to Lawrence Road. from Military Trail to Lawrence Road. · Condition llA - Hypoluxo Road and Congress Avenue. 1 right 1 right 2 through 2 through 2 left 1 left Southbound 1 right 1 right 2 through 2 through 2 left I left MM\M:\BOYNTON\TRAFFIC\TRAFFlC.RPT If/