AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
D August I, 2006 July 17,2006 (Noon,) D October 3, 2006 September 18, 2006 (Noon)
~ August 15, 2006 July 31, 2006 (Noon) D October 17, 2006 October 2,2006 (Noon)
D September 6, 2006 August 14,2006 (Noon) D November 8, 2006 October 16,2006 (Noon)
D September 19, 2006 September 5, 2006 (Noon) D November 21, 2006 November 6, 2006 (Noon)
D AnnoWlcements/Presentations D City Manager's Report
NATURE OF D Administrative 0 New Business
AGENDA ITEM D Consent Agenda 0 Legal
D Code Compliance & Legal Settlements 0 UnfInished Business
~ Public Hearing 0
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the August 15,2006 City Commission Agenda Wlder
Public Hearing. The Planning and Development Board recommended that the subject request be approved, on July 25, 2006.
For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department Memorandum No. 06-129.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Steven L. Cohen & Associates, P.A.
Boynton Meadows, LLC
100 Meadows Circle
Request for New Site Plan approval for 34 townhomes and related site improvements on a
7.966 acre tract within the Meadows Planned Unit Development (PUD),
PROGRAM IMP ACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
City Manager's Signature
~ - ~fltfL
/' Planning and Zoning ector City Attorney / Finance
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Meadows 300\Meadows Townhomes\NWSP 05-032 Townhomes\Agenda Item Request Meadows Townhomes
NWSP 05-032 8-15-06.dot
Assistant to City Manager
S:\BULLET1N\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM,DOC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-129
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and City Commission
Michael Rum~
Planning and Zoning Director
Ed Breese ~
Principal Planner
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NO:
REQUEST:
June 16, 2006
Meadows Townhomes / NWSP 05-032
New Site Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner:
Boynton Meadows LLC
Applicant:
Mr. Jonathan Agus
Agent:
Location:
..
Mr. Steven Cohen - Steven L. Cohen & Associates, P.A.
existing Land Use/Zoning:
100 Meadows Circle, north of Meadows Boulevard,
approximately 2,500 feet west of Congress Avenue (see
exhibit "A" - location Map)
Low Density Residential (lOR) (4.84 du/ac) / Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning:
Proposed Use:
Acreage:
Adjacent Uses:
North: Freedom Shores Elementary School, with a land use designation of Moderate
Density Residential (MOOR) and zoned Single-Family Residential (R-l);
No Change
Request site plan approval for 34 townhouse units
7.966 acres (346,978 square feet)
South: Immediately south are developed condominiums In Tracts G & H of the Meadows
PUD (Meadows on the Green, fl<a Oub Meadows), and farther south are the rights-
Of-ways of Meadows Boulevard and Springfield Boulevard;
staff Report - Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Memorandum No PZ 06-129
Page 2
East: To the northeast Is Freedom Shores Elementary School, with a land use designation
of Moderate Density Residential (MOOR) and zoned Single-Family Residential (R-1)
and to the southeast are developed condominiums In Tracts G & H of the Meadows
PUD (Meadows on the Green, fka Club Meadows); and
West: Developed single-family residential (Nautlca Sound PUD), with a land use
designation of low Density Residential (lOR) and zoned PUD.
Site Characteristic: According to the survey, the subject site Is currently developed with only a 3.12-
acre lake and a portion of the pathway that borders the lake and continues onto
Tract G (Meadows on the Green Condominiums). Also, a bermed buffer easement
runs along the west side of the parcel abuttfng Nautlca Sound PUD, along with a
10-foot wide FPl easement. The highest elevation Is a point 17.79 feet above sea
level, located near the northeast comer of the property.
Proposal:
Concurrency:
Traffic:
Drainage:
School:
Driveways:
BACKGROUND
Mr. Steven Cohen, agent for Boynton Meadows llC, proposes to develop the
subject property with 34 townhouse dwelling units. Approval of this project Is
contingent upon the approval of the corresponding request for Master Plan
Modification of the Meadows PUD (see Exhibit "Cft - Conditions of Approval). The
project also involves the slight reconfiguration of the lake and pathway amenities
and would be built in one (1) phase.
ANALYSIS
A traffic statement was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for
concurrency review In order to ensure an adequate level of service. The City
received a letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Division, dated June 7, 2006,
Indicating that the project Is part of a pre 1990 approved PUO, and therefore meets
the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
Conceptual drainage Information was provided for the City's review. The
Engineering Division has found the conceptual Information to be adequate and Is
recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time
of permit review. All South Ronda Water Management DIstrict permits and other
drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see exhibit
"Cft - Conditions of Approval).
No confirmation of school concurrency has yet been received from the School
District of Palm Beach County. Therefore, no building permIts may be Issued until
the School DIstrict of Palm Beach County conflnns that adequate capacity exists to
accommodate the proposed 34 dwelling units (see exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval).
The site plan (Sheet Al.2) shows that one (1) poInt of Ingress I egress Is proposed
at the southwest comer of the property, running south through the Meadows on
Staff Report - Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Memorandum No PZ 06-129
Page 3
the Green CondomInIums and connectIng to a short drIve runnIng west off of
Meadows Boulevard. ThIs entrance / exIt, when scaled from the plans, appears to
be approxImately 44 feet In width, wIth four (4) 10 foot lanes and a landscape
Island/medIan between. ThIs drive Is proposed to be gated from the condominIum
complex ImmedIately to the south.
Parking Facility: The project consists of three (3) bedroom dwelling units, which require two (2)
parking spaces per unit. The project proposes 34 residential units and therefore,
would require 68 parkfng spaces. The applicant has provfded 85 parking spaces, or
an excess of 17 spaces. The parkfng Is proposed along the drive aisle In front of
each building. Parkfng spaces are dimensioned 9.5' X 18.5', with a drive aisle
dimension of 25 '.
Landscaping: According to the site plan tabular data (Sheet A1.2),the proposed pervious area
would total 37.11% of the site. Additionally, 3.12 acres of the subject property
would be set aside for the existing lake centrally located on the parcel. The
landscape data (Sheet lP-2) Indicates that 73% of the shade and palm trees would
be native. The landscape data Indicates that 51% of the shrubs would also be
native. The plan shows that a bennedlandscape buffer 18-feet In width exists on
the west perimeter of the property, abutting Nautlca Sound PUD. This benn Is
planted with areca palms In an effort to form a solid landscape buffer. Staff
recommends that any gaps within the existing buffer, due to missing or damaged
landscape material, be planted with areca palms similar In size, to re-establish the
landscape buffer (see exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). A five (5) foot
landscape buffer Is proposed along the north property line abuWng Freedom
Shores Elementary School. The landscape plan Indicates that the north buffer
would also contain areca palms to be planted at a height between 5 and 6 feet,
and the east buffer along the school Is designed to vary In wIdth to follow the
walking path around the lake and would contain Uve Oak, Gumbo Umbo and
Orange Geiger, trees, as well as Sabal palms. The south buffer abutting the
Meadow on the Green condominium complex Is proposed to be planted with
Gumbo Umbo and Yellow Elder trees.
The typical landscape design around the townhome buildings consists of sliver
buttonwood, flrebush, and myrslne material/foundation plantlngs, thryallls,
fakahatchee grass and arblcola accent shrubs, along with Orange Geiger and Sliver
Buttonwood trees and Alexander and Sabal palm trees.
Building and Site:
The PUD regulations require that perimeter buffers and setbacks within PUDs must
mirror those in abutting development to ensure adequate separation between
buildIngs. The buildIng setbacks In the Nautlca Sound Planned UnIt Development
to the west were approved wIth rear setbacks of 15 feet abutting the proposed
Meadows Townhomes parcel. As mentioned earlIer, there Is an existing 18 foot
benned landscape buffer on the proposed townhome parcel adjacent to Nautlca
Sound. The dosest any of the townhome unIts are proposed to Nautlca Sound's
east property line Is 20' - 5", at the northwest comer of the townhouse property,
with the aforementioned landscape benn In between. At the northeast comer, the
townhomes would be setback 28' - 8" from the Freedom Shores Elementary School
staff Report - Meadows Townhdlnes (NWSP 05-032)
Memorandum No PZ 06-129
Page 4
Design:
Slgnage:
property line. Finally, at the south end of the property, the town homes are
proposed to be In excess of 110 feet from the first condomInium building In the
Meadows on the Green complex.
The seven (7) townhome buildings, totaling 34 units, are arranged around the lake
In clusters of four (4) and six (6) units. The elevations show that the mean height
of the two (2) story homes measures to 25 feet tall and the peak of the roof would
be 31 feet - two (2) Inches tall, well below the maximum height allowed In the PUD
zoning district of 45 feet. The project proposes the townhouse unIts as three (3)
bedroom/2.5 bath, with air-conditioned living areas ranging between 1.638 and
1,665 square feet.
Architecturally, the design of the buildings would probably be considered
"contemporary", with a blend of "colonlal-style" features. The townhomes would be
two (2) stories tall, with a hip/gable roof combination. The proposed roofing
material would be a Certalnteed shingle roof tile called "Fieldstone", which has the
appearance of a variety of umber earthtones. The elevations show that the
exterior finish of the walls would be textured stucco. The applicant Is proposing
the following colors: The lower portion of the exterior waif area would be paInted a
medium tan (Benjamin Moore - Beeswax #2157-40). The body of the waif area,
which contains the greatest portion of mass, would be painted a light tan color
(Benjamin Moore - Crisp Straw #2157-50). The accent moldings and fasda would
be a cream color (Benjamin Moore - Tudor Cream #2157-60). The columns and
decorative moldings at each doorway and decorative louvers would be painted an
Ivory white color (Benjamin Moore - Ivory Tower#2157-70). Lastly, the doors,
shutters and decorative ral/ings would be a muted green color (Benjamin Moore ....
Aegean Teal #2136-40).
The applicant Is proposing a monument sign, approximately four (4) foot talf by
eight foot In width, painted to match the townhouse wall colors, and black lettering.
The sign Is proposed In the landscape Island at the gated entrance to the sIte.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Technical Review Committee (TRe) has reviewed this request for new sIte plan approval. Staff
recommends approval of the site plan, subject to approval of the associated master plan modification
(MPMD 05-013) and satisfying all comments Indicated In exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any
addItional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly In
the Conditions of Approval.
S:\Plannlng\Shared\Wp\Project:s\Meadows 300\Meadows Townhomes\NWSP OS-Q32\Staff Report.doc
...
110. .. 362.1 feet
Meadows Townhomes
.. ~. ---.-.....------- .-
. .....i i.. . .__...._. MINF"'qOAD _~.;~ .. - h... .....-.........- ....-V.,
:.:./ i;-..:.~~~~:.:;::~j;;W.T.. ..~.:~~:j~.-.-:;~.~~~::;::.~~~~~~.-:.::=:~:::~=:,:= H- :::., .::.:=:..~_:;;.."~:~:~ :~: :':':-._..
I~~t iii \ ii~m ! in 0 ! .~
11~ e~~)> \ 'a)m I 'a)m I. <'
~~03 .\,:!J I,:!JZ , \
'I ..... 8:I:J .---j----... 0 /;-1 <
.! 13 ~ \ 45::"--'~l' ;~!'-' '- -.,~ ////...... }
)./)'/ ~~ \,./ C') J )
\
}
<
II, Inz ~--J O~~~ IL ij I ~
I ( ~;!m(r~: --- i~ 'I ~~ !r~----7 )
fi 1 \~~-~~ )) /; 12~m !)
~o I (! jj // ~i I ! )
I 4'1t.:.=:..=~.-'LWb=~.-:~=_. '~::::::::>/ / ! I .
I 'J~:~-=-=r=,-~_._~~-=-.--;=: .-.::it--- ..~. -- ~-=J,..~=~._ .--- -.i. .
I i,: -;;._~-.~ I [' ~ ~H --i--'~-"
! .'If : - / /- /1 :I: 'IS r I
"j> 0: ~ / I /( . m I~ '
il,! ::J i / / { ~ ,5. (" ." '.. :
i 'i' ~! e 1 .' ,\ i -. r ( . . "
j Iii e~ i .i~cn^ .</~ \<... =jcnffir- If,' C"" i~
. I., P):i' P j :I: . . ... . 1;" :!J . . )0"..
: tl/I :D ;1 Offl // . ~ ,... / ~ /',' '( l;:!J i j
II ~ \ . P ./. .' . . i ,>" I \
I ,I, \ \ ;/./' /,/ \ I) .--- ---- _'__ _ _'u__,_
t ::: ! , \ /,/ , / ~'" i} I I
; '11' I ':1 / / '.~ '_'" -,,/ .
/' ;'r-'--; 'i i ' / - ..It>'~ - '-/ ;
( :1,,__ --.---~ / ,I I / . " /' ~.-......;..........,..,............... i ........... i
,... :ji '. --..., .~.~'o..... / / // /.~.., j ...................... '.i I
. l' I,,' ." i l"~:.":. '" : " .' / ~/ / ......'1 ,... "
1(.-:- " Hi ~ ~i. ~ (-;:~~-~,~1~ii-: ---.-/ :.:.~./; ~ i G) '. ! R .
If: ~ ~ u,.... -----1- i ~ i '--_: ~
\ I'~/I j~~ I f ~~~-7') ~
~~ 8:e:c1 I I
I /' \::::_- "i I ~ ~ I " ~ /
I, '~1 /.!! ~ i I ~ ~ I
'i~ ~ m I ~
I ~I I I I rTimj1l ~ m -
-'1 I :OLUXOROAD . ---.-. J!:! J I I
I I ~.L ! I U !~ ~! r fi eI
ill. f _II
'- -_::.J
/""v'" ..~ .,'--- '/'" ....v....,.,.. ..", .- ........,.... . ...."....w_, ".
~
I
~---
lO'fMlllN II:AllOWS 1Ol'INH0MES u.c
J.4 UNIT DE\{lOPM~NT
lOll l/[AOOIS O!lCl.[
~,<<* llAUi. Fl.CiIlOA
^ ... ,--'
.8TEVlt:N L. CDHlt:N .
AND AaaaalATl:8, P.A. -..
-.--
.."" w. _c.. ..Ull .... .Ulft I..
pain' ",",.c.~ .u.alDo\ .....
-.... .".,.,.
-
EXHIBIT B
~~
[0.~
J ·
\ .. , " wJ x'
~. ,../' \, i \ \.~.. " ~~~~~)f
\/ /I,l' '/ / \ II", '~~-:"---"\~<:, ~, .J...; -' r
./ /, ! \, \ '. ...... '. ,........
/-:/' I .' / ,Ill 'Of .,13~?~8 . \ " . \,.,'d ;' _.__ ~
..-.....--::.../ 0/ IlSt'1 JJ \\. """"ll'31N3'1,QN'
- -- . 0018 3::>NVN iN ,I'i , \; . ," ...._. ...__.
1_~:_~~~.~:::~ A~OlS 310NIS / 11S/Xl.,. \~ . , . . ~
1'43J.SAS 3J.VO 01
1'43J.SAS ~JOl XON~
015 ~31N3 J.ON CO
-NOIS 1HOI~ d33>f
{"IV/I: 01 ~3.:/3!:1 NOIS
OJ.S . NOIS
--..... dAl. ~V8 d01S
--. ('dAJ.) dl!llS
, ~01V~3d3S 3NYl
, ('dAl.) 310d J.HOIl
NOU.:)I1lI!SNO~
JO II""
~
.' ~---...- ~::>Sd
'{' I L Od '996t
'S'!I'O) 1N3l'iSV3
'1 I\"d'J ,01
-('dAJ.) 310d 1HOll
9gt9 81
~I .s/c; ON.:!
('dAJ.) 310d J.HOIl
r
f
,~~ s
,m I
J,.
..1
e-
i ~
~ I\)
e ~
CO
~'
<0
~~
~
!l'l
~ ~
I:IJ8d '9tfl
!)d '.IS6 'S'l/'O)
lN3t'fS\'3 1:13.:/.:/08
\,----- 31:1nS01::>N3
1:131Sdl'tnO ION
(' dAJ.) 310d J.H!:>n
~ )
I -:
II
I<nNTOH IoI:ADOIIS 1\llItlOIl[S LtC
34 UNIT DEmOPMENT
lGO IlEADOIlS ClRQ[
IOl1CTOH IEAaf. ROlIOA
EXHIBIT B
, ,
~,JI " I I II f :
i I II ~ ...
. . P , I
I " . :
r :
--,
~
-II I ~ , ID
J;..
I ,~ "'~\
;fi~ t if
~ i
r: :::: .~i 1'I'f"Uf" U," I
I 8! !la- ':, I 'I .,
~ ~ i~ 'q,9 I~' ,
i .~ .1"'1 f
p ~ Nil'" ,
."Il.J 'I
I:' d
,~
llCMIlllH It:AIlOIlS 1lJlItlOIIES I1C
J4 UNIT OGa.<RfENT
100 IUlOIlS ClIlQ.[
IOIIIIllN I[ACIf, flClMlA
I
I
J
, I
, <<
: ,
/'
'I'
i
I
A'
I
. I ,
Trflj
8 i ~
Ii Ii Ii Ihhi !
! 'I :1 'I :111 ,
. 8TEVltN L.. CDHEN .. ..........""
AND A..aalATE. P..... -":"!'!_- ..-
_.._~
a_I w. -"I~~O.:J.ulft I.
....,. LAIIO_J;;&, lIA'~r."'rI
EXHIBIT B
c: :~:; ':i III"I"IJI~ Itl~'
; ee !!,o ':tl I' <<I "
: ~ ~1 b: ilb;,t 'i I ~.
- ~ i :l .JI!3~ 11
. 'It;:,' u
e>
!..
~
f.'.
"
'en
~i
g
I ii,
.' l !
,1.._._./' .
,e, fi ii Ii ii if I
1111111111"1
I, III I
t
~
80WltW MEADOWs lOIHIOMES u.c
34 UNIT OEVELlfMENT
'100 l/EADOWS ClRQ.(
lIO'/IITCN 1l[AClf, flCRDA
illl:1I III'
J .JIll"
. ,,"!!
/:..1 I
. I
i
:':_:~;.:!.-::-.'"':. .
e>
.. ..-.
~"~T~f :rlJ
/
. I Ii ,
f'~-rJ~r~
.BTEVENL.COHEN ._.....;.......
AND A..aa....TI:., PeA. 1IWo" . .. ..
-..--
"41 .. 1I\'lftI1.. -.11e lUIo __ ,.
-tIT u.U..";:"~,\ ~:~~=
EXHI BIT B
Conditions of Approval
New Site Plan
Project name: Meadows PUD
File number: NWSP 05.032
Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a May 26. 2006 Planning &
d ki
Zonine ate stamn mar ne.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Conflict between Gumbo Limbo (BS) and dumpster enclosures. Relocate X
BS or replace with non-canopy trees, based on necessary revisions to
Landscape plans.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
2. Add signage identifying resident and visitor lanes, X
3. Identify call box location on plans, X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be X
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
5. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
6. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the Site Plan, the applicant shall X
enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A
preliminary plat application may be initiated during the Site Plan review to
expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit.
7. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. (Landscape Plans) X
8. Photometric plans does not agree with Landscape, Site and Civil plans for X
light pole locations - please correct. Staff recommends increasing the
number of poles and reducing lighting intensity to provide overall lighting
levels closer to I-foot candle average, Most of the site is well in excess of
the 1 foot candle required, with ''hot spots" of 10 foot candles plus in the
immediate vicinity of proposed 1i2l1t pole locations,
9. Revise Landscape plan to reflect site plan changes (Le, dumpster enclosure X
orientation. liJdlt pole locations. etc.),
10. Full Drainage Plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the X
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
COA
06/23/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
11. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction X
acceptability at this time, All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
12. Please provide a detailed timeline that clearly illustrates when water and X
sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting
date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter, This timeline will be used to determine
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. Need
dates prior to Planning & Development Board meeting,
13. All utility easements shall be shown on the Landscape Plans (as well as the X
Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances,
trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. ill general, palm trees will be
the only tree species allowed within utility easements, Canopy trees may be
planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact
those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR,
Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to
remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility
easements or public rights-of-way. Relocate light poles and canopy trees
out of utility easements,
14. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the X
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12),
15, Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)), at the time of permitting,
16. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be X
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application fonns or within seven (7) days of Site
Plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
17. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable X
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation.
18. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be X
COA
06/23/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on
the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The
easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
CODE Sec. 26-33(a), Easement shall be centered on the sanitary sewer
main and width shall be determined by using two (2) times the depth of the
sewer line. Easement widths will be finalized at the time of platting and
permitting.
19. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer X
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
20. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department X
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
21. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction X
acceptability at this time, All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE X
POLICE
Comments: NONE X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
22, Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the conunission and at permit review.
23, Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the X
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
COA
06/23/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
24, Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the X
loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table
1607,1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design,
25, Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents X
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
26. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X
proposed construction.
27, CBBCPP 3.C,3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may X
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are
readily available.
28. A water-use permit from SF\VMD is required for an irrigation system that X
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216,
29. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan,
. If the project is a multi-family project, the building numberls
must be provided, The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans,
. The number of dwelling units in each building.
. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water
and how much is for sewer,
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article IT, Sections 26-34)
30. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or X
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review,
31. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
. A legal description of the land,
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan.
. If the project is a multi-family project, the building numbers must
be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on
the Commission-approved site plans.
. The number of dwellim~ units in each building.
COA
06/23/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
32, Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
33. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
34. All shade trees must be a minimum of 12' feet to 14 feet in height and have X
a three (3) inch caliper at DBH (4.5 feet off of ground).
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
35. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. X
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan sheets Ll- L5. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7,D.p, 2,J
Plant Material Sheets LP-l.2 X
36, All shade and palm trees listed must be shown in the description as a
minimum of 3" DBH (4,5' off the ground) [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article IT Sec. 5.C. 2.]
37. A Lake Maintenance Plan document must be provided for the proper X
maintenance of the lake plantings. A time zero and quarterly monitoring
report for two years is required of the developer.
38. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not X
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedae Dlants on three sides.
39. There is no irrigation system design included with the site Dlans. The X
COA
06/23/06 '
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
irrigation design should be low-flow for water conservation, All shade and
palm trees should receive irrigation from a bubbler source, [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. SA.]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
40. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly .X
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
41. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval of the accompanying X
request for Master Plan Modification.
42, Provide copy of the recorded ingress/egress easements that provide access to X
this project at time of plat.
43. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach X
County regarding school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
44. Provide response from the school regarding potential access for school X
children in the neighborhood via a gate in the fence and improved walkwC!}',
X
45. Landscape drawings indicate an existing 18 foot tall Areca Palm buffer
along the west perimeter. Any gaps in the landscaping shall be filled in with
like-size Areca Palms and this buffer shall be dense, so as not to allow
headlights to show through,
46. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) X
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.C.2.).
47. Staff recommends screening the at-grade AlC units proposed behind each X
unit with native hedge material.
48. Provide information on the parking for the project to the south to ensure that X
the loss of two (2) parking spaces to create the entry drive to this project
does not adversely affect the required parking for the previously approved
project.
49. The project appears to lack the customary recreational amenities. If you X
intend to utilize facilities located elsewhere within the PUD, please submit
letter of authorization,
50. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the X
"Art in Public Places" Program and must demonstrate their participation.
COA
06/23/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
AD])ITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
MWRlsc
S:\Plannlng\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Meadows 300lMeadows Townhomes\NWSP 05-032 Townhomes\COA.doc
DEVELOPMf""'T ORDER OF THE CITY COMMIS~'ON OF THE
~. I Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORllJ""
PROJECT NAME: Meadows Townhomes
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Steven L. Cohen & Associates, P.A.
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 2941 W. Cypress Creek Rd. Suite 102 Ft. Lauderdale, FL.33309
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: August 15, 2006
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: New Site Plan approval for the construction of 34 townhouse
dwelling units.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 100 Meadows Circle, north of Meadows Boulevard, approximately 2,500
feet west of Congress Avenue.
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above, The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1, Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations,
2, The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof,
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order,
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Meadows 300\Meadows Townhomes\NWSP 05-032 Townhomes\DO.doc
Meeting Minutes
Planning Ii Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
July 25, 2006
Motion
Mr. Cwynar moved to approve the request for Master Plan Modification for the addition of 34
townhomes to the Meadows Planned Unit Development (PUD). Ms. Jaskiewicz seconded the
motion.
Chair Wische asked for a roll call vote.
Vote
The motion passed 4-2, Mr. Casaine and Wee Chair Hay dissenting.
B. New Site Plan
1.
Project:
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Steven L. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
Boynton Meadows, LLC
100 Meadows Circle
Request for New Site Plan approval for 34
townhomes and related site improvements
on a 7.966-acre tract within the Meadows
Planning Unit Development (PUD).
Ed Breese presented the request. Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's
review and the information was deemed to be adequate at this time with further review at the
time of permitting. The egress to the site is through the condominium project running north to
a cui de sac returning the same way. The PUD regulations require the buffers and setbacks to
mirror those of surrounding properties. The Nautica Sound development to the west was
approved with rear setbacks of 15 feet abutting the proposed Meadows Townhome parcel. The
closest any of the townhouse units are to Nautica's east property line would be 20 feet 5 inches
at the northwest corner of the townhouse property. Most typical buildings were 40-60 feet away
from the Nautica Sound property. At the south end of the property, the townhomes are
proposed to be in excess of 110 feet from the first condominium building in the Meadows on
the Green complex. The seven town home buildings are arranged around the lake in clusters of
four and six units ranging from 1,638 and 1,665 square feet under air. Staff recommended
approval of the plan since it was in compliance with PUD regulations.
Chair Wische asked Mr. Cohen whether the applicant agreed with all conditions of approval, and
the response from Mr. Cohen was in the affirmative. Mr. Cohen thought the project would
enhance the neighborhood and secure the safety of the residents. They were all two stories,
but when standing on the second floor, the neighbors behind would not be affected, because
there was 11 feet from floor to floor and an average height would be six feet tall. There were
only two units that looked over the Nautica Sound property; the rest faced the opposite
direction, east towards the lake.
Ms. Jaskiewicz noted some of the comments heard from the residents at this meeting were
included in the conditions of approval, so they could feel some comfort that a shovel could not
be put in the ground until those conditions were met.
Chair Wische opened the floor for public comment.
6
Meeting Minutes
Planning Be. Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
July 25, 2006
David Core, Attorney with St. John, Core Be. Lemme, Centurion Tower, Suite 701,
1601 Forum Place, West Palm Beach, FI 33401, stated that one of the findings and
determinations this board had to make in order to pass this on to the Commission was that the
site plan would not generate, among other things, excessive traffic and noise. Staff and the
agent represented the closest unit would be 20 plus feet from the Nautica Sound homes, and
most would be 40-60 feet away. He believed a road width in Boynton Beach should be 20 feet
on center. That would mean a 40-foot road from end to end on the roadway that runs through
the north end of the cui de sac and then returns back. If most of the units are 40-60 feet from
the Nautica property lines, when any unit owner in the townhomes would be returning to the
public thoroughfare from that roadway, they would be as close to the property line as could
conceivably be possible under human circumstances, not Code circumstances. He submitted to
the board that the traffic generated from 85 parking places, when at full capacity, would create
a substantial increase in noise and traffic. This board had to make a finding that this site plan
would not create that effect, among others. He could not see how the board could make a
finding that this project would not generate excessive noise and traffic, as currently planned.
This project impacts Nautica Sound and Nautica Sound needs to be considered.
Brenda Sansaricq, 7080 Chesapeake Circle, Boynton Beach, spoke as a resident directly
affected by the proposed project. She directed her remarks to the agent, Steven Cohen. Ms.
Sansaricq declared Nautica Sound was a zero lot line community. Ms. Sansaricq is a real estate
agent who sells homes and she did not believe she would be able to sell any more homes in
Nautica Sound if this project went through. Having someone 20 feet behind you was like having
no space at all. She believed the proposed project would destroy the beauty of Nautica Sound
as well as the property values. She felt some kind of nature should be kept in the
neighborhood.
David Katz, 67 Midwood Lane, The Meadows, Boynton Beach, had lived in the area for
30 years. He had not come before this board to complain when Nautica Sound was developed
and that was 400 homes. The proposed project was only 34 homes. Abutting recreational land
was available in two sections and put together, comprised a 7-acre parcel. There was a vacant
piece of land in The Meadows and to the west of it, there was a recreational piece of land for
Nautica Sound. That would never be developed. He had seen egrets on the two vacant pieces
of land, so they would not be displaced by this project. The Meadows did not have a problem
with this project, and it was their PUD. The number of traffic in trips would not affect Nautica
Sound. If anybody, they would affect The Meadows, and The Meadows had no problem with
this project.
Jacqueline Peterson, 7204 Chesapeake Circle, Boynton Beach, expressed concern for
noise pollution. Their house was exposed to loud music at all hours of the day and night, often
until 1 or 2 a.m. in the morning. She was concerned about the amount of noise the proposed
project might create. She expressed total disapproval and asked the developer to find another
place to build the units.
Diane Schrader, 7164 Chesapeake Circle, Boynton Beach, used one of the elevation
drawings for the proposed project to point out the berm and their houses, saying they would
look out over a roadway with a gate. She realized the proposed units would be sold for
approximately $300K; however, the units that had been converted from apartments to
condominiums were still occupied by people who were not homeowners of $200K units. If
investors bought them, they would eventually have to be rented. Anyone looking out his or her
7
Meeting Minutes
Planning &. Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
July 25, 2006
back door would be able to look into her master bedroom. She thought it was wrong. She
understood they were entitled to build these units back in 1978. But once they built a lake in
1986, they all assumed they would not be doing any more building. There were other places
the units could be placed. She asked why they did not block the condos in The Meadows
instead of blocking their properties. She strongly believed her property values would go down if
this project was approved, possibly by $150K to $200K. She thought that was unfair. If the
project was going to go through regardless of their concerns, she hoped the developer would
consider modifying the placement of the units to preserve the character of the Nautica Sound
neighborhood. She asked the developers to reconsider the project and/or its location.
Motion
Mr. Saberson moved to approve staff's recommendation (of approval). Ms. Jaskiewicz seconded
the motion.
Ms. Jaskiewicz confirmed the staff conditions of approval were included in that
recommendation.
Following an inconclusive vote, Chair Wise he asked for a roll call vote.
Vote
The motion passed 4-2, Vice Chair Hay and Mr. Casaine dissenting.
7. New Business
A. Development of Regional Impact Amendment
Master Plan Modification
1.
Project:
Quantum Park Nope #16 (DRIA 06-
001) (MPMD 06-003)
Eugene A. Gerlica, Quantum Group of
Companies
MFT Development, Inc.
West side of 1-95 between Miner Road and
the Boynton (C-16) Canal
Request for Development of Regional
Impact Amendment (DRIA)/Master Plan
Modification (MPMD) to allow an increase in
the maximum allowable dwelling units from
1,105 to 1,905 units and change in
designation of lots 17, 52, 58, 102 and 103
to Mixed Use (MU).
Agent:
Owner:
location:
Description:
Eugene Gerlica, agent for applicant, 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive, Boynton Beach,
responded they had received the complete staff report on the previous Friday, but were only
able to look at it on the day before this meeting. It was their intention to reject all staff
conditions of approval and they would present their case in support of that. They were willing
to discuss all of the conditions and answer questions.
8
o
o
o
o
NA'
AG
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
_ _.... ..1 ~~......._ /'I___~~~;__
~--b, e(l/l~ ~
k~~p
Cy,) ~ i1> P)- JO (Y\
0- ~
~l~5- ~
o-L ~ ~~
./(Y"-
o City Manager's Report
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
May 15,2006 (Noon)
June 5, 2006 (Noon)
June 19,2006 (Noon)
July 3, 2006 (Noon)
opment Plans
3usiness
ished Business
ltation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the July 18, 2006 City Commission Agenda under Public
Hearing, to be removed from the agenda for re-advertisement. Subsequent to the Planning and Development Board meeting
errors were identified in the 400 foot boundary used for notification purposes, warranting correction and re-mailing of notices
for subsequent board, and City Commission hearings. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department
Memorandum No. 06-129.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Steven L. Cohen & Associates, P.A.
Boynton Meadows, LLC
100 Meadows Circle
Request for New Site Plan approval for 34 townhomes and related site improvements on a
7.966 acre tract within the Meadows Planned Unit Development (PUD).
PROGRAM IMPACT: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
Develo~f
City Manager's Signature
Planning and Zon' irector City Attorney I Finance I Human Resources
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS eadows 300\Meadows Townhomes\NWSP 05-032 Townhornes\Agenda Item Request Meadows Townhomes
NWSP 05-032 7-18-06.dot
S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM ,DOC
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NO:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-129
STAFF REPORT
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and City Commission
Michael Rum~
Planning and Zoning Director
Ed Breese ~
Principal Planner
June 16, 2006
Meadows Townhomes / NWSP 05-032
New Site Plan
Property Owner:
Applicant:
Agent:
Location:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Boynton Meadows llC
Mr. Jonathan Agus
Mr. Steven Cohen - Steven l. Cohen & Associates, P.A.
100 Meadows Circle, north of Meadows Boulevard,
approximately 2,500 feet west of Congress Avenue (see
Exhibit "A" - location Map)
Existing Land Use/Zoning:
low Density Residential (LDR) (4.84 du/ac) / Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning:
Proposed Use:
Acreage:
Adjacent Uses:
North:
South:
No Change
Request site plan approval for 34 townhouse units
7.966 acres (346,978 square feet)
Freedom Shores Elementary School, with a land use designation of Moderate
Density Residential (MODR) and zoned Single-Family Residential (R-1);
Immediately south are developed condominiums in Tracts G & H of the Meadows
PUD (Meadows on the Green, fka Club Meadows), and farther south are the rlghts-
of-ways of Meadows Boulevard and Springfield Boulevard;
Staff Report - Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Memorandum No PZ 06-129
Page 2
East: To the northeast is Freedom Shores Elementary School, with a land use designation
of Moderate Density Residential (MODR) and zoned Single-Family Residential (R-l)
and to the southeast are developed condominiums in Tracts G & H of the Meadows
PUD (Meadows on the Green, fka Club Meadows); and
West: Developed single-family residential (Nautica Sound PUD), with a land use
designation of Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned PUD.
Site Characteristic: According to the survey, the subject site is currently developed with only a 3.12-
acre lake and a portion of the pathway that borders the lake and continues onto
Tract G (Meadows on the Green Condominiums). Also, a bermed buffer easement
runs along the west side of the parcel abutting Nautica Sound PUD, along with a
10-foot wide FPL easement. The highest elevation is a point 17.79 feet above sea
level, located near the northeast corner of the property.
Proposal:
Concurrency:
Traffic:
Drainage:
School:
Driveways:
BACKGROUND
Mr. Steven Cohen, agent for Boynton Meadows LLC, proposes to develop the
subject property with 34 townhouse dwelling units. Approval of this project is
contingent upon the approval of the corresponding request for Master Plan
Modification of the Meadows PUD (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The
project also involves the slight reconfiguration of the lake and pathway amenities
and would be built in one (1) phase.
ANALYSIS
A traffic statement was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for
concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. The City
received a letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Division, dated June 7, 2006,
indicating that the project is part of a pre 1990 approved PUD, and therefore meets
the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
Conceptual drainage information was proVided for the City's review. The
Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is
recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time
of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other
drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit
"c" - Conditions of Approval).
No confirmation of school concurrency has yet been received from the School
District of Palm Beach County. Therefore, no building permits may be issued until
the School District of Palm Beach County confirms that adequate capacity exists to
accommodate the proposed 34 dwelling units (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval).
The site plan (Sheet A1.2) shows that one (1) point of ingress / egress is proposed
at the southwest corner of the property, running south through the Meadows on
Staff Report - Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Memorandum No PZ 06-129
Page 3
the Green Condominiums and connecting to a short drive running west off of
Meadows Boulevard. This entrance / exit, when scaled from the plans, appears to
be approximately 44 feet in width, with four (4) 10 foot lanes and a landscape
island/median between. This drive is proposed to be gated from the condominium
complex immediately to the south.
Parking Facility: The project consists of three (3) bedroom dwelling units, which require two (2)
parking spaces per unit. The project proposes 34 residential units and therefore,
would require 68 parking spaces. The applicant has provided 85 parking spaces, or
an excess of 17 spaces. The parking is proposed along the drive aisle in front of
each building. Parking spaces are dimensioned 9.5' X 18.5', with a drive aisle
dimension of 25 '.
Landscaping: According to the site plan tabular data (Sheet A1.2), the proposed pervious area
would total 37.11% of the site. Additionally, 3.12 acres of the subject property
would be set aside for the existing lake centrally located on the parcel. The
landscape data (Sheet LP-2) indicates that 73% of the shade and palm trees would
be native. The landscape data indicates that 51% of the shrubs would also be
native. The plan shows that a bermed landscape buffer 18-feet in width exists on
the west perimeter of the property, abutting Nautica Sound PUD. This berm is
planted with areca palms in an effort to form a solid landscape buffer. Staff
recommends that any gaps within the existing buffer, due to missing or damaged
landscape material, be planted with areca palms similar in size, to re-establish the
landscape buffer (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). A five (5) foot
landscape buffer is proposed along the north property line abutting Freedom
Shores Elementary School. The landscape plan indicates that the north buffer
would also contain areca palms to be planted at a height between 5 and 6 feet,
and the east buffer along the school is designed to vary in width to follow the
walking path around the lake and would contain Live Oak, Gumbo Limbo and
Orange Geiger trees, as well as Sabal palms. The south buffer abutting the
Meadow on the Green condominium complex is proposed to be planted with
Gumbo Limbo and Yellow Elder trees.
The typical landscape design around the townhome buildings consists of silver
buttonwood, firebush, and myrsine material/foundation plantings, thryallis,
fakahatchee grass and arbicola accent shrubs, along with Orange Geiger and Silver
Buttonwood trees and Alexander and Sabal palm trees.
Building and Site: The PUD regulations require that perimeter buffers and setbacks within PUDs must
mirror those in abutting development to ensure adequate separation between
buildings. The building setbacks in the Nautica Sound Planned Unit Development
to the west were approved with rear setbacks of 15 feet abutting the proposed
Meadows Townhomes parcel. As mentioned earlier, there is an existing 18 foot
bermed landscape buffer on the proposed townhome parcel adjacent to Nautica
Sound. The closest any of the townhome units are proposed to Nautica Sound's
east property line is 20' - 5", at the northwest corner of the townhouse property,
with the aforementioned landscape berm In between. At the northeast corner, the
townhomes would be setback 28' - 8" from the Freedom Shores Elementary School
Staff Report - Meadows Townhomes (NWSP 05-032)
Memorandum No PZ 06-129
Page 4
Design:
Signage:
property line. Finally, at the south end of the property, the townhomes are
proposed to be in excess of 110 feet from the first condominium building in the
Meadows on the Green complex.
The seven (7) townhome buildings, totaling 34 units, are arranged around the lake
in clusters of four (4) and six (6) units. The elevations show that the mean height
of the two (2) story homes measures to 25 feet tall and the peak of the roof would
be 31 feet - two (2) inches tall, well below the maximum height allowed in the PUD
zoning district of 45 feet. The project proposes the townhouse units as three (3)
bedroom/2.5 bath, with air-conditioned living areas ranging between 1.638 and
1,665 square feet.
Architecturally, the design of the buildings would probably be considered
"contemporary", with a blend of "colonial-style" features. The townhomes would be
two (2) stories tall, with a hip/gable roof combination. The proposed roofing
material would be a Certainteed shingle roof tile called "Fieldstone", which has the
appearance of a variety of umber earthtones. The elevations show that the
exterior finish of the walls would be textured stucco. The applicant is proposing
the following colors: The lower portion of the exterior wall area would be painted a
medium tan (Benjamin Moore - Beeswax #2157-40). The body of the wall area,
which contains the greatest portion of mass, would be painted a light tan color
(Benjamin Moore - Crisp Straw #2157-50). The accent moldings and fascia would
be a cream color (Benjamin Moore - Tudor Cream #2157-60). The columns and
decorative moldings at each doorway and decorative louvers would be painted an
ivory white color (Benjamin Moore - Ivory Tower#2157-70). Lastly, the doors,
shutters and decorative railings would be a muted green color (Benjamin Moore -
Aegean Teal #2136-40).
The applicant is proposing a monument sign, approximately four (4) foot tall by
eight foot in width, painted to match the townhouse wall colors, and black lettering.
The sign is proposed in the landscape island at the gated entrance to the site.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff
recommends approval of the site plan, subject to approval of the associated master plan modification
(MPMD 05-013) and satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval. Any
additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in
the Conditions of Approval.
S:\Plannlng\Shared\Wp\Project5\Meadows 300\Meadows Townhomes\NWSP 05-032\Staff Report.doc
+
1 in, = 362,1 feet
r(~
~(-'
~, -
(
Meadows Townhomes
./
..../... ..../
'./
FUTURE '08 fWI
--...-i....:
,_..MINE:.. . ~QAR ....
I ~! _:~~~~~-~t;.W.~ji..
: !!i \
/ijq- ii: 00 <0 0
:1; \ 0') ~ ..... r-
I i:i .... <: cC:_z <'"" c: 0 I
II ii, _ ~ ~ r; ~ j \N ~ ~ ~ C1 i
I ~I l: z ~ )> en _ lJ:J I
~III ~~~ \ ~ /'-~--~~ /<
~m' fli c ~ \ 4~~~/--r; ~ 'j'-' , ~~"" // // -- !
~;I /;,/:f/ I r; ~ ; \ '\// (,) ~ I
I I ___/ // /--_._.--~ .... \ ~ 0 !
, /, -------- / /~ \ \ \ c: < i
i Ilr-~----/ ( ( J) 18 ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~O I
/' Iii I\) :E i \ II _ c: 6 I ~ en I'
fll Q) ~ ) I I I P Z 0 :::::=-- J en ~
I 1;1 00 . . -! 1/ t =i :E;;::::" ! ' ..:!l):l'
I III !~ Z /;:~~.>___- // II r; ~ /' L--.!iL i
;1 ~!~ ~~ ~ rF'C:~~_ --~. ". ~~ )\ \ ~ ~ II /--~~;-~--------7
{ill I ~ \ ~:=::<"'-<=::~\ ) j // e ~ ~ m !
J : 1;/ I , ~z m I
I '1/ '/ i / / / p =i 3: '
" /,/ I / I enm
;to. 1'1; , / ( I / - :II
~j ;i j ! / ) J / / ~ m
. ! II: {, l..._ .//// / i
/ )f:::~~::;:,:oC~L~!-=:::=:::;.it:;--:~:<.~. -'-=i~~~~-~=~=~==- .. _~___h_=_~!
! JI' /F//i:z: /'8/1' '/. - ~
! i.'! Q ~ .il / ( . ~ J (' I.. '
jif ~~ i~-~!l en ~"T' '.' ~," -aI ~ ! I: (;~
! fit r;"'tl! r; ":z:0'r .' Cicnml I! t'"C ; (
I :if ~' O"'::J>! ~ r;j 'T1 :II i! '> r;>" : ;
Iii ^ I - ~(: r;~/j . ~ ! / \ ~ I <
,I I '\, \.!, /.'/' ,./ j' \ I (~--- ----.. -.- -
iii I ;' " ! ~.',~ i ( :
\ I '/~~ \\_\ ~ ~ So?:r: ,.1
( I .~~=:-~;~}I.! g ~ (jj I
( ! i nl r;z ~ !
I .il i~ I tl j ~ i
i/I ~I i~1 -I;
J k_~.\J~
-, 1- HYPOLUXOROAD
i
L:!I. -,. ,,~:~"-c=~~
_ n _~__..__ ___
..~_._~
z
o
=i
:z:
3:
~-I
-~j
[,---'i ;!! -r---j
'.' ilSIII/1 i :~~p~'
I I ~I ~ i II i I ~
i j .' i: I i ~
~ Ii' ~
f ! I ; '~I
r- ____'_____ilij__i: ~ I
:!! ~ ~ t:;1 ~ ;~ ]'~-i~ ~
L~~~~~i::: L~~I tfii
: j ~ ~ti ~ !,
--- _.___.._ ...1
(
I
\
'1
":-.'"
CJ _~,._........I',
A
- - \,
.......-..^,. /......... .........,.- .,,~ .../\.... /"\, ,.,/'....._..../\..... ....^---....
BO'f1jTON MEADOWS TOWNHOMES LLC . STEVEN L. COHEN
34 UNIT DEVELOPMENT . AND ASSOCIATES, P.A.
AliIIIteT~ .,~ Dmt_NlaIl.
!('(t MEADOWS ()RCLE ..41 W. GYP"C.. a..EK liD. .UITE 1 aa
Bon ION Ilf.AtJ-i. flC~'DA ....IIT l.AuaItOll=~ ~::I":~ ~~~~:
___HI._-......_,..
EXHIBIT B
I~
fT1 ~. ~
f J ~w )
~
I
~I ) ~
I ~ ~
LI ~
" '"
". '"
"
~. ,/
^ ,
, "
"
.
...~
'old'" EJNIolSIX3
'~:. .. IN\>' I S,<l01ISI^
! 1'015A5 31\>'~ 01
I V015AS >lJ01 XON>I
: ~I5 <l31N3 lON 00
I - N~15 lH~I<I d33>1
,.. r'l\>'/z 01 <l3;J3<1 N~IS
01S NDIS
.. 'dAl <I\lS d015
" \ \
\\ \
\ \ \
/ ,~) , . \ />,:-,- ,....:.
,...-:.::/' ,I ;' ,BIor '13 t01S" "
" I, BBn,,J;J ,
II ~OlS 3JN\>'N3'lNIv~ " '
.~ ~ /~ / A<lOlS 31~NIS ~tllSIX3. "<\
-.' --~~..... .,"- ../' / ~\" ~,,' .
'-~3-13:o'r"-/ NOIlO~tlS~~I~""/~~~~~' ::~:::~\~,~.. '.'
"",t'. \ \,,\
/.~. ':':"-'" / L:t 3dOlS 30lS \\\\\'\' "
.../:::'~;~,:~,,' -"!<~:L;>i~3 J~01f~~ \, \~,\,\,' ~..'
.' / // ',,-:' l \\ 3>i'v'l; ,;, I
_/ .::;;:::':: / ..,y\ \\ {f1! '~!! j;:
I. ~, "3"35",.J, ','. I
I: \ .O-.oz N~/_ I
Al<l3dO<ld '. \\ \, /_" .j I/;' I
9""'9 8l '\ \ . "f.--lN3"3SY3 3"" /' 1/./1
::J If \\ \ :\ ~o-.OZ "HlI1 ,,1 IJ'/~!
~I "B/S ON.:! ,I \J, .
.\\ \ V J I
., ~ . I 1/ Il,
II \ ! / /
,\,\, \. . lNJttJS"J i I II' '
..o-.Ol . 3Jtt1r ft i
'\i j f Nly-pr1 .
. F J If, [
1/ / Iii
Ii ,l ,II
. (Uf' ;i r
~ .f r" i I I: ~
1\3 /1 :; ;s(l 3"':" Jt\",
s..; ./l \,' \_ ,I J.N?ri-""ot .tl1ft\ \ \ \. :
():j . ", "!
1\)' .! ; i
\() I ; ,"
~l ,/ /i!
E /,,/;/,'
~~ 'II( (, ~ )1 I: i
. ~ i ~~ \ J I (
() ~ :, 1., \ / l !
;; :< '\' \ \\ \ / //1
z ,... '" '\ \\ " . ,/ // j.
~~ '\.\:~~3~.~::.:>/ 0
~,.lr~'~,:~iE<~;> ,
n
'"
(f)
o
c
z
o
--lN31'13SV3 3015 <l3Hl13
.9 3^,tH 01 Nn<l
NIV<lO 1131\>'M 1"l<l015
, ::""-. (" dAl) 310d lH~1l
,_. ("dAl) dl<llS
I. <l01\>'<l3d3S 3NV1
.: (" dAl) 310d lH~1l
,
\---.. -q <lJ8d
'rtL ~d '996t
'8 <l'0) LN3~S\l3
'1 ""d'J ,01
-("dAl) 310d lH~1l
I:i 6
~;i I
- ("dAl) 310d lH~1l
~-_. lN31'13SV3 30lS
<l3HlJ3 ,9 3^VH 01
Nn<l <l3M3S A<lV1INVS
. . .. - ..... lN31"l3SV3
.' UI' 30lS <l3Hl13 ,9 3^VH
; '! fi !~ 01 Nn<l SNI\lt'j <l31VM
" ft'" ---3<lnS01JN3
'?,:' <l31Sdt'jna M3N
o!r
Ii.
;=
.Ii /~ - S31<lV^ lH~I3H
f - 11VM DNINIV13<l
{ mSOdO<ld
!t ,.- (" dAl) 310d lH~1l
:pc
'flJ) :-OJ!
:] [3 ~ 0
;, t.; ~ ~
f' '-!. -u ~
0; s;: 0
, -i
~' -u
-is;:
~-i
o
'I
Z
~
l-."
~I.~
e
e , i
-..:'~:-.!:..~1
310d lH~1l
("dAl) 310d lH~Il--
3JN3;J
>lNIl NI\>'HJ
~NllJX3 NI 31V~
lN31'13S\>'3
NOI1\l15 UIl
,orx,or O3S0dO<ld-..
l S3~03H.,'
"'*dlO"J ..~
--- <lJSd '9trl
~d 't1S6 'S'<l'O)
IN3~S\f3 <l3JJnS
\'---<l::1Sd 'rlL ~d '996t
'S'<l'O) IN3~S\>'3 '1 ""d'J ,0 I
-.--.-....... 3<lnS01JN3
<l31Sdt'jno M3N
'- (" dAl) 310d lH~1l
BO'1NTc.I MEADOWS TllllNHOWES LtC
34 UNIT DEvROPMENT
100 MEADOWS ClRa.r
BOYNTc.I BEACH, FtOflIOA
.....
'601 ~d 'zr9:'"
$l5ITEVEN'L. COHEN
AND ASSOCIATES, P.A.
~......,.......,...........
..41 w. ay...... a".el( 110. .UITE laa
.-aRT LA",D...aALa. n.a"IDA ...ae
~HDMa ....., ..,.'.1a,G
____..____1_
EXHIBIT B
VAlllE$ (1l[~(R
roSl1~.~)
j.,~_..._._,_.
.":'.!:l':
W-~: ..
J~
h
JJ
~
l
~~ '
l?
:~
.t.:~ .- ..~: .
tlW "',: ..i~ :
~ ~ ~--
." 'I'
- .., r.::.o.J'
;l
i 'r~
iF---
rf
~.::': "
I!
u
\~
r
..+-
i=.
It!.. !.'.:!:
.,
J
I~
. .
-a.
~ :::: .~i III.'I"I~~ I~~ ~
; ~ aeao'~ I II~ ~I~
~ .~ ~~~ .! ~llt~~ ~~
i ~ ~ : Ithll3 ,~
~ ~ ~ iU=I~1 d
'I~~ tl II
1:1 il
it IJ,
) .' ,/
r
, ,
. ..,,/.=. ~
'-fi
!im!.
tl~~
~,
~:
I
$
bi~'
.~ ~.:.
~V
~.
.--=:......-.L--t:J
~;. ~ jJ'~
. ~' ~
~ ._ f'l'
,
~
l?
~
~
~i
I"
.' '
,("
I
'__ ..11'-:9"
I .. . I
~.._~.~; H .~ ~-qth
: ~t W
,
~
7.:~
~.
in '
~ ~ )~ .J.
J' ' i' +
~; +~\ ~~
. etJr--t'
: !
. ,
" i
~ ! ~
e : 4
S
/(
,
, , ,
-~~~.~7it
~. ~. ~ W
~ ~ . ~
eeeees5
IIUnU!llI ;
11111 U 1111 I
~,I'I i
8O'rNTON IolEADOWS TOllNHOIolES liC
34 UNIT DEVELOPMENT
100 MEADOWS CIRClE
aOYNTON BEACH, FlORIOA
4) STEVEN L. COHEN .=- =.=""........
ANO A..OCIATE., P.A. ....... ......_. ....-
.................. ....,.................... M'
..... t w. a~IIK.. GREEK "D. .Urnt ,a.
I'D"" LAUDE"DALE. .....a"IDA .a.ae
~.... t..41.",.'Q,a
---....--...--...
EXHIBIT B
j
f~
. .
(..)
If ip g ~
~ ~ ! ~
~(. , ~
) 5 ~ 5 !
,) I I I
U .I I
tj. I
i /
I !
-:=-::.---:-!:";:':'::".:=..
~f,~."_,~ '!'~~t.~~
c r' &>\5
"
Ii
'ra
~g.
m
f
g
~ "~
'I II!
,J-----/
,-,"
"r.
"il'
~'
f:
,-
'c,,,,,
(V-"
Ii:
:-:!
"1:"
'"
t';' :::: ':i ill~I'I~I" '~I" ~
.. H'" fr I II ~I
~ u~u ~f I .
~ ~~ b~ ~lllil~ ~
~ ~ ~ hi~n3 !~
~" ~ NU"3ii11 d
" ~f ~I:J J1
i~ I:' ii
eeeesElI
I;U!lUUU1
dPliliUI I
e~111 i
I?
~___~!!:-9~
~ Q'
!H lI~
.~~
;~
I'
.;a
~I!l
"
~I ~ ~ i
~ ~ I , ! ~
i .'. I; a
/ .> !S
+ ; I
f
I
I
1i'Jc",_;:-,r~.: J~~~{!J"' :,';,
t ~: ~' F
~ ,;
~ ~ ~
BOYNTON MEADOWS TOllNHOMES lie
34 UNIT DEVELOPMENT
'lOll IotrAOOWS aRCU
BOYNTal BEACH, FlORllA
. STEVEN L. COHEN
AND A..DDIATE., P.A.
~. . "'"'- 0-......
..41 W, CYJlRE.. CREEK RD. .urn: I C.
F'afIT LAUDE"DA~., n..a"IOA ...a.
"NDH. (....... .'11"1D1D
----,._---,..
EXHIBIT B
Conditions of Approval
New Site Plan
Project name: Meadows PUD
File number: NWSP 05-032
Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a May 26, 2006 Planning &
Zoning date stamp marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Conflict between Gumbo Limbo (BS) and dumpster enclosures. Relocate X
BS or replace with non-canopy trees, based on necessary revisions to
Landscape plans.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
2. Add signage identifving resident and visitor lanes. X
3. Identify call box location on plans. X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be X
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
5. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
6. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the Site Plan, the applicant shall X
enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A
preliminary plat application may be initiated during the Site Plan review to
expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit.
7, Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. (Landscape Plans) X
8. Photometric plans does not agree with Landscape, Site and Civil plans for X
light pole locations - please correct. Staff recommends increasing the
number of poles and reducing lighting intensity to provide overall lighting
levels closer to I-foot candle average. Most of the site is well in excess of
the 1 foot candle required, with "hot spots" of 10 foot candles plus in the
immediate vicinity of proposed light pole locations.
9. Revise Landscape plan to reflect site plan changes (i,e, dumpster enclosure X
orientation, light pole locations, etc,),
10, Full Drainage Plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the X
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
COA
06/23/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
11. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction X
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
12. Please provide a detailed time line that clearly illustrates when water and X
sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting
date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. Need
dates prior to Planning & Development Board meeting.
13. All utility easements shall be shown on the Landscape Plans (as well as the X
Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances,
trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be
the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be
planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact
those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR,
Chapter 7,5, Article I, Section 18,1 gives public utilities the authority to
remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility
easements or public rights-of-way. Relocate light poles and canopy trees
out of utility easements,
14. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the X
water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
15. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g,p.m, some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)), at the time of permitting.
16. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be X
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of Site
Plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
17. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3,C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable X
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation,
18. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be X
COA
06/23/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
included within utility easements, Please show all proposed easements on
the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The
easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
CODE Sec. 26-33(a), Easement shall be centered on the sanitary sewer
main and width shall be determined by using two (2) times the depth of the
sewer line. Easement widths will be finalized at the time of platting and
permitting.
19. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer X
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
20, A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department X
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15,
21. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction X
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE X
POLICE
Comments: NONE X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
22. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
23. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the X
minimum wind loads of 140 mph, Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application,
COA
06/23/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
24, Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the X
loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table
1607,1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design.
25. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents X
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
26, At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X
proposed construction.
27. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may X
not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are
readily available.
28, A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source, A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
29. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan.
. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s
must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as
noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
. The number of dwelling units in each building.
. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water
and how much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
30. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or X
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
31. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property, The following information
shall be provided:
. A legal description of the land.
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order and the Commission-approved site plan,
. If the project is a multi-family project, the building numbers must
be provided, The building numbers must be the same as noted on
I the Commission-approved site plans.
. The number of dwelling units in each building.
COA
06/23/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
32. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
33. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
34. All shade trees must be a minimum of 12' feet to 14 feet in height and have X
a three (3) inch caliper at DBH (4.5 feet off of ground).
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
35, The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total existing trees on the site. X
The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to
remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on
site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than
removed if the trees are in good health, These trees should be shown by a
separate symbol on the landscape plan sheets Ll- L5. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
Plant Material Sheets LP-l.2 X
36. All shade and palm trees listed must be shown in the description as a
minimum of 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground) [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,C, 2.1
37, A Lake Maintenance Plan document must be provided for the proper X
maintenance of the lake plantings, A time zero and quarterly monitoring
report for two years is required of the developer.
38, The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not X
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedj:!;e plants on three sides,
39. There is no irrij:!;ation system design included with the site plans, The X
COA
06/23/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
irrigation design should be low-flow for water conservation. All shade and
palm trees should receive irrigation from a bubbler source. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5A.]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
40. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly X
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
41. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval of the accompanying X
request for Master Plan Modification.
42, Provide copy of the recorded ingress/egress easements that provide access to X
this project at time of plat.
43. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach X
County regarding school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
44. Provide response from the school regarding potential access for school X
children in the neighborhood via a gate in the fence and improved walkway.
X
45, Landscape drawings indicate an existing 18 foot tall Areca Palm buffer
along the west perimeter. Any gaps in the landscaping shall be filled in with
like-size Areca Palms and this buffer shall be dense, so as not to allow
headlights to show through.
46. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) X
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5,C.2.).
47, Staff recommends screening the at-grade AlC units proposed behind each X
unit with native hedge material.
48. Provide information on the parking for the project to the south to ensure that X
the loss of two (2) parking spaces to create the entry drive to this project
does not adversely affect the required parking for the previously approved
project.
49, The project appears to lack the customary recreational amenities. If you X
intend to utilize facilities located elsewhere within the POO, please submit
letter of authorization.
50. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the X
"Art in Public Places" Program and must demonstrate their participation.
COA
06/23/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
I 1. To be determined. I I I
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Meadows 300\Meadows Townhomes\NWSP 05-032 Townhomes\COA.doc