REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-285
FROM:
Chair and Members
Planning & Development Board
Michael W. Rum~LJC
Director of Planning & Zoning
Ed Breese ~
Principal Planner
TO:
THROUGH:
DATE:
December 10, 2004
SUBJECT:
Serrano Beach PUD - File No. MPMD 05-002
Master Plan Modification (Amending setbacks)
PROJECT NAME:
Serrano Beach PUD - MPMD 05-002
LOCATION:
South of Golf Road, one-quarter (V4) mile west of Congress Avenue
APPLICANT:
Julian Bryan & Associates, Inc., on behalf of D.R. Horton Homes
LAND USE/ZONING:
Low Density Residential (LDR)/ Planned Unit Development (PUD)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Mr, Julian Bryan, of Julian Bryan & Associates, Inc., on behalf of D.R, Horton Homes, is requesting to modify
the Master Plan for the Serrano Beach PUD. This development is located south of Golf Road, one-quarter (V4)
mile west of Congress Avenue (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map). The specific request is to amend the front
yard setbacks of the individual lots from the previously approved twenty-five (25) feet to twenty-two and one-
half (22.5) feet, in order to accommodate the proposed single-story models.
BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS
On August 5, 2003, the City Commission granted master plan/site plan approval for the Serrano Beach PUD
project, a development consisting of 47 single-family homes on a 9.74-acre parcel (see Exhibit "B" - Site Plan).
The plan proposed one and two-story zero-lot line homes around a small lake.
According to the applicant, the proposed amendment would reduce the front yard setbacks by 2.5 feet (from
25 feet to 22.5 feet) in order to accommodate the single-story models. Based upon South Florida Water
Management District review and comment on the proposed design and configuration of the lake during
permitting, modifications had to be made. The original concept of utilizing a retaining wall on the north side of
the lake had to be changed to allow a gently sloping lake bank. Associated with this change was a
requirement for a 20 foot wide Lake Maintenance Easement, which reduced the depth of the lots along the
north side of lake. Additionally, the Conditions of Approval associated with the City's approval of the plans (
requiring 25 foot rear setbacks for those lots along the north property line abutting Silver Lake Estates and for
those lots along the west property line abutting the Village of Golf), have further restricted the building
Memorandum No. PZ 04-285
Serrano Beach PUD MPMD 05-002
Page 2
footprint. As currently approved, a one-story model could only be constructed on four (4) lots. If the request
of the applicant were to be approved, a one-story model could be constructed on anyone of 26 lots. However
with the developer placing a limit on themselves for a maximum of 20% of all lots being eligible for a one-
story model, nine (9) one-story houses could conceivably be constructed.
As noted above, the applicant has indicated on the revised master plan that the reduced front yard setback
will only be utilized for the construction of the single story models, which of course have a larger base
footprint, and would be limited to a maximum of 20% of the lots within the development. All front yard
setbacks are internal to the site and abut the internal circulation road, thereby limiting any external impacts
associated with the request.
This modification to the Master Plan also reflects changes as a result of the Conditions of Approval from its
initial review and approval in 2003. Some of these modifications include the shifting of the lift station farther
south away from Silver Lake Estates, the amended rear setbacks (25 feet) abutting Silver Lake Estates and the
Village of Golf and notes on the plans reflecting that homeowners may not remove landscape material from
the required landscape buffers and that any proposed fence along the south property line will be placed so
that the landscape buffer is between the fence and the LWDD canal. Additionally, staff has met with the
design team for the developer to ensure that the rectified site and landscape plans to be submitted for
permitting address all of the conditions of approval, including the doubling of the number of trees along the
north buffer, increase in the number of trees along the west buffer as mitigation for trees removed from the
site, as well as placement of trees along the width of the property frontage, along Palmland Drive.
Staff does not believe the modification would lower the quality of the development, but would allow for a
greater mix of one and two-story homes while providing a greater diversity along the streetscape. The
modification of the front setback would not bring the entire front fac;:ade forward 2.5 feet, but only about one-
half of the front fac;:ade (garage or bedroom) depending upon the model. This step back or alcove
arrangement would add interest to the street. Additionally, the parking in front of the garage is not affected
by this modification, as there is adequate parking dimension so as not to create any obstruction to the
sidewalk network within the community.
Based upon the above information, it would appear as though the requested amendment to the Master Plan
has little to no affect on the adjacent properties.
RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this Master Plan Modification request, and recommends
approval, based upon the lack of negative impacts upon adjacent properties. Staff also finds the subject
modification of the master plan to be non-substantial. This staff recommendation is contingent upon the
comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval and the original 48 Conditions of Approval. Any
additional conditions recommended by the Planning & Development Board or City Commission shall be
documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
MRjeb
Xc: Central File
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSI Serrano PUDMPMD 05,0021SIall Reporl.doc
zs
72.~
12.(,
Z5
.zo
10
.<< ONUj f40 L4>~ ~
AeCbMl!lOAtt, ,- S11l4Y.
5 - 10S
'1-- 110
3D - /15
I - 12.2-
1- 1'2.3
I - Ib8
2 - ODD
4-7
~ l!.A1uAWf ~.
t - ~ fl4!~,O,
(J1oJ tJ &Q.. W
P/l.o'P. I.-l~€. ~J
Wtl"U 2.5' rzo,e.
~,
Location Ma
Serrano at Boynt P
on Beach
~ '
" '
~
PU
( )
~
800
, 0
800 Feet
N
w~,
s
EXHI BIT A
I UN-5UBL _ .0 UN-5UBOMOEO VILLAGE OF GOLF
1 VILLAGE Or' <lOLl' VILLAGE OF GOLF Zonl!)p: R
.' I Zoning. P , Public Use Zoning: R.. Resldentiel Slngl&-Faml1y and Golf Coo.. ,,_R!'!I~tl!ia! ~'~I'amlly, --
~ i .-J. r--UlSl. CHAIH lU'" FENCE r-EXIST. 10' IHCRUS & EMESS nY'T. and Co COU....
..II ~.) 11 rlU/.JINDSCN'! 8IJFFER ESlI'r,fTfPJ _1 ITa RE/lN/II J $27,>>' I fTOBCNJNiOO/tEDI
ih ~:~:L. w..,. " .. _1., ' "1.. .~~'" w.....' ...._.. ... _ - 'PI"--:,l;" - ,
~~~ ':::: -t'i - f - _1"'0:. --:l1o - ~Ii'r<<'-- r.;;::.'.~, - -,- , .,,-' .----:I' - ' ,--fT.
L~::: ,1'\1 -11r----1~1 _1,-- -Ir--I 1.--L1 I I I I I ~
.~ f I ~ I : : : : I \ I I _ I I I 111 t ..1
~ ~ ; 1 : I ~: N ~ W ~ .. I 01 I at : ~ : at : ID : 10 I :: ~ N : ~ II !I
i; ~I \ \ .: i ; : : : -1:: : : : ~: L- : lL : ~ : L- : L- :i ~
~ (i)S " - )_~lJ= :~~~' -u~~j~~ ~=_~~:~~:~ :~_~.:J?,,~~. 1~.:~~:~~3~-:.~ :.~~, .:::' u t.
""""",,\ME""" ._. -. .-. 'T .-. .-. ~~
'~r-'*.~:,--~~~-- ~::~~-~,:~_~~""':"';:"':'~'-P-u-P -~'=';~~~'_'~ ~~ ~ &r;:;,~:~ ~~- f~
!.- ~-: -;"';;",-,,x, - -, \t l,~ ~ / _~~0~_-,~ - ! \\ 1 ~, : ~ I~
iI. i ' ~ - 1 1 4' I / 1: I ~ : i:::11'.lu ~ - 1 h' ~~
"," _, I , / I I~ I I I P '1~ ~ I ;:
R 11, \ :. ii i R / 1 ~ ,; i 'i' I '-~ i-
t. 1 I t= j! ",I .. ... "'I ' 1 I! I ': 1 _ C:;:' -
i : : ~ ~ ! II~! ; ~ ~ - - H '1 ~ \~\:~ :~
I ~ - - - \ I> f'i ! ~ 1 \ it, I!' : I I ~ ;111 ~li
1 , \ 1 ~ ~I j: ~ ' '--. ' ,~I, \ ~i i I \ ~~.:i,
II !d I;I!:I~I 11 lI!.r -- I~
1 1 1 1 _ _ II!: J 1 1 ~... '~ ~l!I: - r - - ~ l ~ : 1 : lo "
~~ _j=-1--~~) ~ '~R' : 8~ : \.. 1\t ~ W, li )~: :: 1
..:: · T K ~ ~ ;--~, ~ : :: - - ~. -~ i:. - - r 1 ..;, --,--
~ . 1"1' i " ,,,- 1 \ 1 1 i-...' - '~
I 1 _ _ tt'f \' IS \ ~ J J I ~ ~ aD 1 ~ 'I
I 1 ~" ' 1 I ~ i,i 1 ,Ii - I t I \ . \... ~ _ ':f' g
i~: n- - I<< ":~~ \i ~~~: ,,/; ~ ':r - - : ~ np';; \~nl ~~
~ - - - Ill! II t!I 1 I 1 - I - I \ \; \ ~Ei~. tl am
I 1 \~ ~ I ~ 1 I I I 1 ':t \" \ - ~. -~'~I b I 0
1 1 1 ~ "~ ' I, ' '" 1 I'~! 1 1 ~ Ol~ \~11 ~~-<
~ 1 1 , ',. I: " ' '!, 1 ~ & '~ &~! , 1 '1' i. II ~~ ,~~ ~ ~~
, - - - 1 I~ \ I' " !" !:; 1 ,~~ 1 il"~ 'J' ~ t~
I : ~ it 1 ~ \ ! \ \ \, ,I ,,1 1 I II I I ~'ld-r I :~m
1 1 1 ~ 1:1 : \ I \ \ " _ '_'~ _ _ ' - / ~: f-- : &. : / @; ~.".; U!g :!~
1 , 1 ,-, , ~'f"N",J , __..~jLJJ~' - -;.A: ... >' . ~: -<~
;~'~ \\~.~~ .::.-.;-, ~;-; -;.---~~_~_ _ _ _ __ ~..... ~"'_:L ~'--~~-- - - ---I~ J ~
\ I il:i ~ "," ~~ - - - - ~t(,'(J<<,VJUErwrrl,.m"J I I ,i
, 1 i / / , /, , _ ._ _ _' _ _ ~- _ -1i' J ~ - ,;" - ,- - - ,- -I : ""
1 1 ~ '" '" I' '/'- -- _ tt\- _ -_ 1- _ _ _ _IT,!! - - - - 1:jq"J ~ ~ I- - - - ~'\ - - 1- - - - I- - - - ~ '
I\~ '" ~ 1 I I' 1r----1-f---1r----1r---1 I'
[ r-\ '" '" LoJ 1'1'.--- \ -l-- I ~ 1'-- 1'--- I I l.i 1 I I, 1 !
lJ. 1 \ rtI'" ... I' :.i 1 I I I I I I I I . I E
'Ii '" :-r ;l;I I' I 1 1 1 I I I I I I 't 1 -~
~ " ~ 'l!l '~1Il ~ II N' III 1 III ' ~ '~l:l r:l'!:!' ~, lil,
rtI11?l ,," ~i 1 1....1 I~\ I~ \ 1 I~\ ~i
~ I\~ 'I l~ 1 I I 1 1 I I \ I 1 t:c
"l I 1 ... I' L- I 1 I '--- I L-- I \ L--- I L-.- I L-- I L--. \ -~
II 1 / ""'_-;r., ___'____ ___ I____L~-- --- I----r--~ 0
1 l _ - - - - _1- - - - ~c 'r: IOJ~. _ .- -- .- - ..,
'-U--'~.:~u-L_.;~~;,;.,";'a;,:,;;<;;,;,;~u~- '~-'~i';'\;ft~~i~,':;;'-: u5"",;, 'U__U,\U- ._u_u__:
,
~ 1 :
~ ~
~ ~ \
, ,
~~ k=;i .
/(,
, 'I
: ~R '
\i~ :
i
'~'i
.1
.1
~i
I
g
5'
'!!
Cllll
U
fl~
to[
:;-
c'
a.
~ :
~:
r
:\ : ,
'\ \ \ \
:,: ! l
, ,
! :
, '
, ,
\ \
: \ I'
:: ; :
:(
\ J, \
!\f\
,
,
"I"
'.ir-
ji.21
rlg~
.;fo
nlil-rn
i!t~
~~!~ I
i~.::! ; 0
~~i~ ~ ~
;t~ i::l
r'~ ! 0
3:"~ I Z
m i ~
.~i . 'tI
lr-
.~~ ~,
!~ ....J
c;
r
~onln'/iill property _n_lyele rn_~t "'._Iblllty gove",rnantal prooe..lng _
\
1
1
f-
1
\\
I
m T'.
\1
\
~ 1
UN-5UBOIVlOEO
BOYNTON BEACH
Zoning: AR ' (Elementary SchooQ
I I Iii lUll;
; ~!Jhl
; Ii IlIli~
PIIJl1il
I~" ! & !
I ~~ hlij~
I !! IlilU
111/11'111
I il IIQgJ!
I I ~JI)h
I i till
i IIUb
~ '1Ii,l;
! Q; I)
q~
H~
8 8 ~
· . z
110
8 I iil
q!'!
I' ~R'
'1.-
~ ~ I
~~~
~ ~
~ ~
l!:
r-
~~~ ~
:>~~ ~,j ~
~ . l~,~~ '~~~ >!81
~ ~l:~~ rfI' ~ m
I-----t--~~~~ ~",~ ~Q
,r:-" i-- t:J '" ~ ' ~ n
<l~ I ~~
~~ I05'TrP h
!
i
~
j
J
I
I
r
i~
~ pi
l . ·
S'~
~~~ ~
~~a
~~
,hR
..
~, III
~~ i.(
~~ i~
Ii d
.~ ,
h
I.
~-
il,lli ~
J i! '
~li1'
~~~ ~
~ ~ ~ 1 ~ij I )
~..~ ,.. - t - Y- "'ill ~~~~~~~
~ I ~<l ~~!;-- :> ~s "N. ~
~~ ~~:: il; 15 ~~i 25'ftP.
~~ ~~ ~~:: ~ ~~~a ~'
I; '-< ~--... ~1:H\!I ~",~
. ~ r :~ t-----...~--...J "'~'t>>
; ~j 'C-,YYTrP. I
:-
f-
I, I',
r-u
~
J n A Julian Bryan & AssocIates u"'.n d_...n ._ p..nn.n..
w
J~J JJJ JJJJ IIIIJJJ
11;1111111 1IIIIp ~
m iB HH Pil~U;;j
111 ." .... fij' ~
B. iiG S~H i-"
~~~ ~~~ ~~H ,~
i
II
l~: ~
IS~ Sh lh~
-
~
i
o
.
~
-
.'ETR
~
n
i
o
."
....
i~l. ;1~1'~!~!1
'8Ia's !6
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MASTER SITE PLAN
SERRANO
D.R HORTON HOMES
II I' n r r I
I I I I I I ~
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with a November 23,2004 Planning &
Z d ki
omng ate stamp mar ng.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less than 6
inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less than 20
psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
13. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD' s surface water management
construction development regulations."
a. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b. Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the
drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans).
I DEPARTMENTS l INCLUDE I REJECT I
14. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
16. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
17. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
18. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
19. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
C. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
20. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Conditions of Approval
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
21. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
22. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents
considering the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
23. Existine: Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species QuantitvDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 10" each 10" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
24. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A.]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
25. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
26. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
27. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
, .. - " ' ..
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\COA.doc
1
Julian Bryan & Associates, Inc.
Land Development Consultants
November 29, 2004
Eric Johnson
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Serrano Beach Site Plan Major Modification
Dear Mr. Johnson,
Please accept the following amended request for a major site plan
modification on the above project. The specific modification requested
consists of the reduction in the proposed front setback from 25' shown to
22.5'.. This is being requested in order to allow more single story models
to fit on the lots without necessitating a reduction in the square footage
of the unit.
Two situations have arisen since the original approval which have led to
this request, they are as follows:
1. The internal lake originally proposed a bulkhead arrangement which
was rejected by South Florida Water Management District. As a
result the design was modified to alter the cross section of lots
adjacent to the lake.
2. Ongoing discussions with adjacent residents of neighboring
communities. The increased emphasis on one story units is as a
result of commitments made to residents of adjoining communities
regarding the use of single story homes along portions of the
Serrano Beach perimeter. Because of this, D.R. Horton would be
required to restrict certain lots to 1-story units, which are smaller
square footage, yet with a larger footprint.
C:\Documents and Settings\randal1.schnarseng\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK17F\majorspmod 101304 (2).doc
1700 Arcadia Way - Boca Raton, Florida 33432 - 561.391.7871- Fax.561.391.3805
Julian Bryan & Associates, Inc.
Land Development Consultants
The above issues have created a situation where the builder would not be
able to offer the originally anticipated range of models without reducing
the setbacks slightly. The requested change will not impact any other
aspects of the previous PUD approval, and we feel will not be detrimental
to the overall design or function of the community.
The reduction of the front setback to 22.5" will not result in any additional
changes to the design, and will allow the offering of all of the home
models originally anticipated for this community based on recent market
experiences by my client in other Boynton Beach communities.
Based upon discussions with your department, we will restrict this setback
reduction to single story homes only and allow it on a maximum of 200/0
of the total lots.
Additionally, this revised plan reflects the specific language of approval
regarding increased setbacks along the west property line and portions of
the north property line. It also corrects an acreage discrepancy for the
lake area, and adds 2 general notes regarding landscaping.
Please contact me with any questions concerning this request.
Cc: Karl Albertson, D.R. Horton
C:\Documents and Settings\randall.schnarseng\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK17F\majorspmod 101304 (2).doc
1700 Arcadia Way. Boca Raton, Florida 33432 . 561.391.7871. Fax.561.391.3805
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 04-171
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
DATE:
October 22, 2004
(
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer
RE: Review Comments
Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review
Serrano PUD
File No. MPMD 05-002
The above referenced Site Plans, received on October 15, 2004, was reviewed for Public Works,
Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. The proposed modification is to allow for reduced front yard setbacks.
We have no comments regarding the proposed modification.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.I P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Serrano PUD, Major Site Plan Mod. 1st Review.doc
-
PLANNING AND ZONING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sherie Coale, Senior Office Assistant
FROM: Ed Breese, Principal Planner
DATE: November 12,2004
SUBJECT: Serrano PUD (MPMD 05-002)
Please include the following comments in the TRC reVIew of the above-mentioned
proj ect:
1. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the request
is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's review is isolated
to those requested modifications, all the other sheets should be removed.
2. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks have
been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend the drawings
to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
3. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback along
the west boundary ofthe project, as approved by the City Commission
4. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are still in
force.
5. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that the
perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that individual
homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their property.
6. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of the
subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on this plan.
If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the north side of the
10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape material on the outside
of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland Drive. A note to this effect shall
be placed on the Master Plan.
7. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the redesigned
lake.
f
8. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those lots on
which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
9. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure setbacks for
the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of your request.
10. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they match
those depicted on the plat.
MA ~ Cef?'(
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13, 2004 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamp marking
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE V
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE /
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE /
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE V
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire V
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. !f:ydranl __u~~-,ial frl'pl~_..CuJ 3l-1aJl lit b@ merE! lfltHl JQQ /
feet apaR aRa 1:I.w.. .~mv[c;1>1 Y~Jf ~-J '-l'llctJlr... C'h., 11 nnt be mere tfiaR 208
.fe0t fwm A Rj'a..t. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design ~
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an ~
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
, 11
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing ~
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained V
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at V
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not V
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as ~
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined V
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. v/
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents ~
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the v'
proposed construction.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 1 OO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management
construction development regulations." ~
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that ./
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that ~
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be ./
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, V
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan. vi
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter I, Article V, Section 3(f))
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the V
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for V
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180 ~
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project. ~
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents vi'
considering the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existine Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species OuantityDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total V
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 1 0" each 10" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade ~
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A.]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets V
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend V
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
30. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City vi'
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are ./
still in force.
.
32. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that vi
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
6
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their /
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the ~
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
34. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the - ~
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those vi
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
36. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure V
setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they V
match those depicted on the plat.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13, 2004 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP A 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for respondin~ emer~ency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throu~hout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management
construction development regulations."
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
..
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t))
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project.
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents
considering the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existinl! Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species OuantitvDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak I single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak I single 10" each 10" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A.]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's ~
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend /
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
~
(l:J The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are /
still in force.
/
32. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that V
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on /
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
t;) The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the /
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those /
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
9 A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure
setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they /
match those depicted on the plat.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
lOP' ')J 3/ - II
D ~U I . REVIEW COMMENTS d w.
l:~~'~t:t J'hester Plan MOdifiC~ l..
"-I -U. IJMftn+'- II. ' L PLANNING AND
'" ...... (;IVL 'Q ~./l.I..M.-. t ZONING D~PT
Project name: Serrano ach UD '. ~'
File number: MPMD 05-002 ~(!~
Reference: 1 5t review plans identifie ~s a Master ptJn Modification with an October 13, 2004 Planning and
-'- -___,', :', J
: 'I
I! U J
j~
Zoninl! De t date stamn 1 .
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional J
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as J
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined J
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall J
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents J
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the .J
proposed construction.
~.,
I I
I
D ~
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building V
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management
construction development regulations."
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of /
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that J
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan. J
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article n, Sections 26-34)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. vi
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information J
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(0)
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting I
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, .J
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project.
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents
considerin~ the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
OIL-
Pdf:
11J I
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existinl! Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species QuantitvDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 10" each 1 0" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
30. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
32. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
34. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
36. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure
setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they
match those depicted on the plat.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
"
Joo-..l 'R\'-l~
.,.
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13,2004 Planning and
Z . D d kin
omnl! enartment ate stamn mar 19.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site pIan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the protect and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subj ect request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professiona1-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management
construction development regulations."
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180 ""
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project. /
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents v'
considering the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existinl! Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species OuantitvDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 10" each 10" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master PIan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
30. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
32. Applicant shall aj1;fee to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
6
. .
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
34. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
36. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure
. setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they
match those depicted on the plat.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13,2004 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamp marking.
. II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
2
..
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management
construction development regulations."
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
4
. II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project.
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents
considering the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
5
~~~ 3.0'J
/1.1-
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existinl! Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species OuantityDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter ~
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 1 0" each 1 0" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental. V
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
30. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
32. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/29/04
6
I II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
34. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
36. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure
setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they
match those depicted on the plat.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Anderson PUD
File number: MPMD 05-001
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13, 2004 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamo marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP A 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A I 0 1, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throu~out construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
11. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
12. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
a. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following
text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction
development regulations."
b. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
13. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
14. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
16. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
17. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t))
18. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
19. The Recreation & Parks Facilities Impact for this phase is calculated as
follows:
85 single-family units @ 940ea = $79,900
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
20. The developer provides no recreation amenities for this project. We
recommend some type of outdoor recreation amenity such as a playground,
or open p1ayfteld that would contribute to a better quality of life for the
residents.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existine Trees Manaeement Plan
21. The Landscape Architect should identify by species and indicate the
diameter inches of all of the existing trees on the site. Show all existing
trees on the site to be preserved in place, relocated on site, or removed /
replaced on site. All existing trees must be preserved in place or relocated
rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be
shown as a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet. Please comment on
the removal of all of the existing citrus trees when the site was a citrus
grove.
22. Irrieation Plan-No Irrieation plan included in the submittal
There is no irrigation system design included with the plans. The irrigation
design should be low-flow for water conservation.
23. In the design, all shade and palm trees should receive irrigation from a
bubbler source. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec.
5A.]
24. Turf areas should be limited in size. Landscape (bedding plants) areas
should be designed on separate low-flow zones with proper time duration
for water conservation. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. 5. C.2.]
25. City water cannot be used for landscape improvements.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
26. Only the Rectified Master Plan (Sheets 1-3) should be submitted for review.
a. Since the request is specific to items contained on only these
sheets and the City's review is isolated to those requested
modifications, all the other sheets should be removed.
27. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
28. I understand the Phase I Palmyra Recreation Area has been proposed to be
upgraded from what is shown on Sheet 2 of this Master Plan Modification.
Please reflect these changes on this drawing.
29. All 39 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Anderson PUD\MPMD 05-001\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
3 W04
J,Jj
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 1 streview lans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an Octobe
Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the proiect and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _. _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD' s surface water management
construction development regulations."
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project.
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents
considering the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existinl! Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species OuantitvDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 10" each 1 0" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
30. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
32. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
34. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
36. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure
setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they
match those depicted on the plat.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Anderson PUD
File number: MPMD 05-001
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13, 2004 Planning and
Zoning Deoartment date stamp marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP A 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for respondin~ emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFPA 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the proiect and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
11. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
12. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
a. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following
text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction
development regulations."
b. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
13. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
14. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
16. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
17. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
18. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
, \ ^
, -, v '.
DEPARTMENTS , INCLUDE REJECT
~-" .. ----...." /, J "
.. -
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
19. The Recreation & Parks Facilities Impact for this phase is calculated as
follows:
85 single-family units @ 940ea = $79,900
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
20. The developer provides no recreation amenities for this project. We
recommend some type of outdoor recreation amenity such as a playground,
or open playfield that would contribute to a better quality of life for the
residents.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existinl! Trees Manal!ement Plan
21. The Landscape Architect should identify by species and indicate the
diameter inches of all of the existing trees on the site. Show all existing
trees on the site to be preserved in place, relocated on site, or removed /
replaced on site. All existing trees must be preserved in place or relocated
rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be
shown as a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet. Please comment on
the removal of all of the existing citrus trees when the site was a citrus
grove.
22. Irril!ation Plan-No Irril!ation plan included in the submittal
There is no irrigation system design included with the plans. The irrigation
design should be low-flow for water conservation.
23. In the design, all shade and palm trees should receive irrigation from a
bubbler source. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec.
SA.]
24. Turf areas should be limited in size. Landscape (bedding plants) areas
should be designed on separate low-flow zones with proper time duration
for water conservation. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. 5. C.2.]
25. City water cannot be used for landscape improvements.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
26. Only the Rectified Master Plan (Sheets 1-3) should be submitted for review.
a. Since the request is specific to items contained on only these
sheets and the City's review is isolated to those requested
modifications, all the other sheets should be removed.
27. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
28. I understand the Phase I Palmyra Recreation Area has been proposed to be
upgraded from what is shown on Sheet 2 of this Master Plan Modification.
Please reflect these changes on this drawing.
29. All 39 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Anderson PUD\MPMD 05-001\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13, 2004 Planning and
Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFPA, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15,2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until comoletion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest toO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD' s surface water management
construction development regulations."
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project.
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents
considering the proximity to an e1ementarv school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existinl! Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species Quantity Diameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 1 0" each 1 0" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
30. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
32. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved; and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
34. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
36. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure
setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they
match those depicted on the plat.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Serrano Beach PUD
File number: MPMD 05-002
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with an October 13, 2004 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments:
1. The site plan and / or master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention". This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 1997 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safety Code, 1997
edition.
2. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development
Regulations Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for
hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall not be more than 300
feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall not be more than 200
feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to water mains that are not less
than 6 inches in diameter. Domestic residential pressure shall not be less
than 20 psi and must maintain a fire flow of at least 1500\ gallons per
minute.
3. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, design
documents, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per NFP A, (1997) Section 41-2.3.2.
4. Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9,2001 that provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. Another
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Administrative Order dated May 15, 2001 addresses Knox Box storage of
information for responding emergency personnel.
5. Design documents must demonstrate compliance with the requirement for
fire lanes that are provided in Section 9-12 of the City Ordinances. Signing
and marking are described in Land Development Regulations Chapter 23,
Section B.2.
6. Fire lanes shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction for access per NFP AI, Section 41-2.1.
7. Fire-rescue access roadways per NFP A 241, Chapter 5, shall be provided at
the start of the project and maintained until completion.
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission
and at permit review.
9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as
defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.
10. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined
in 2001 FBC, Chapter 3.
11. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
12. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation)
that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in
compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site
data that address the following issues:
The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text
to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is
above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building
site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management
construction development regulations."
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
plans.
b) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established
for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on
the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil
plans).
16. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of
material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between
supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that
includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and
the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height
of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
17. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
18. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
20. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
21. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
22. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
23. 47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
24. The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project.
Consequently, this will impact our current inventory of facilities.
25. Recommendation that the developer include bike lanes for residents
considering the proximity to an elementary school.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
26. Existinl! Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site:
Tree Species QuantitvDiameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single to" each 10" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrigation System
27. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade
trees should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnementa1.
Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
28. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the
request is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's
review is isolated to those requested modifications, all the other sheets
should be removed.
29. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks
have been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend
the drawings to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
30. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback
along the west boundary of the project, as approved by the City
Commission
31. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are
still in force.
32. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
11/15/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
the perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that
individual homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their
property.
33. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of
the subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on
this plan. If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the
north side of the 10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape
material on the outside of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland
Drive. A note to this effect shall be placed on the Master Plan.
34. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the
redesigned lake.
35. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those
lots on which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
36. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure
setbacks for the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of
your request.
37. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they
match those depicted on the plat.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\MPMD 05-002\1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
It
~
PLANNING AND ZONING
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sherie Coale, Senior Office Assistant
Ed Breese, Principal Planner ~
FROM:
DATE: November 12,2004
SUBJECT: Serrano PUD (MPMD 05-002)
Please include the following comments in the TRC reVIew of the above-mentioned
project:
1. Only the Rectified Master Plan should be submitted for review. Since the request
is specific to items contained on only this sheet and the City's review is isolated
to those requested modifications, all the other sheets should be removed.
2. It would appear as though only the written dimension of the front setbacks have
been amended, as the scaled dimension still reflects 25 feet. Amend the drawings
to reflect a scaled dimension of 22.5 feet as well.
3. The Master Plan Modification does not reflect the required 25 foot setback along
the west boundary ofthe project, as approved by the City Commission
4. All 48 Conditions of Approval from the original Development Order are still in
force.
5. Applicant shall agree to, and place within the Homeowner Documents, that the
perimeter buffer landscape shall be maintained as approved, and that individual
homeowner may not remove it for improvements on their property.
6. There does not appear to be a fence proposed along the south perimeter of the
subdivision. If one is currently contemplated, it should be indicated on this plan.
If one should be considered in the future, it shall be placed on the north side of the
10 foot landscape buffer. This would place the landscape material on the outside
of the fence, screening the fence from Palmland Drive. A note to this effect shall
be placed on the Master Plan.
7. The Site Data needs to be updated to reflect the revised acreage for the redesigned
lake.
."
8. The request for a front setback of 22.5 feet should be limited to only those lots on
which a single story residence could theoretically be constructed.
9. A change has also been made to the rear, pool, and screen enclosure setbacks for
the typical lake lot. If this is intended, it should be made part of your request.
10. The street names have changed from the original Master Plan. Ensure they match
those depicted on the plat.
~
,/
Coale, Sherie
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Majors, Wally
Monday, October 25, 2004 10:35 AM
Coale, Sherie
Serrano Beach PUD
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the plans for Serrano Beach PUD. The Recreation Facilities Impact
for this phase is calculated as follows:
47 single-family units @ 940ea = $44,180
Comments: The developer provides no recreation amenities as part of this project. Consequently, this will impact our
current inventory of facilities. Additionally, considering the proximity to an Elementary School, recommend the developer
include bike lanes for residents.
The fee is due at the time of the first building permit for this phase.
Wally
1
/'
Coale, Sherie
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lee, Rick
Monday, November 01, 2004 3:48 PM
Coale, Sherie
SERRANO BEACH PUD
PLEASE ENTER THE STANDARD FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1
.----
-----
U". .JIf Acronyms/Abbreviations:
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F.S. - Florida Statutes
LDR - Land Development Regulations
NEC - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 04-242
TO:
Ed Breese
Principal Planner
-- !
FROM: Timothy K. Large L~I!./
TRC Member/Building Division
DATE: October 28. 2004
SUBJECT: Project - Serrano Beach PUD
File No. - MPMD 05-002 - 1st review
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings submitted for permits.
Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352
1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may
not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC,
Chapter 6.
3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter
3.
4 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior
wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the
percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
5 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter
of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request.
6 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction.
7 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the
building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding
specifications to the site data that address the following issues:
a. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data.
"The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood
elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water
management construction development regulations."
b. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located
within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation,
indicate that on the plans.
S:\Development\Building\TRC\TRC 2005\Serrano Beach PUD Page 1 of 2
..
c. Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the
footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and
paving/drainage (civil plans).
8 Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall/fence. Identify
the type of wall/fence material and the type of material that supports the wall/fence, including the
typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence
that includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the
wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall/fence shall comply with the
wall/fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code.
9 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well
or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit
application, F.S. 373.216.
10 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities
Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-
approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building
numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
11 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting
up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot,
parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
12 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and
Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property.
The following information shall be provided:
a. A legal description of the land.
b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-
approved site plan.
c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building
numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
d. The number of dwelling units in each building.
e. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
13 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes
and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application.
14 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this
project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application
submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development
order and approved by the City Commission.
bf
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2005\Serrano Beach PUD
Page 2 of 2
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Plannin2: Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
Ed Breese, Principal Planner
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Serrano Beach PUD
Master Plan Modification - 15t Review
MPMD 05-002
October 27, 2004
./
~~
kjh
File
Existin2: Trees removal and Landscape Plan
The applicant must submit a tree replacement (mitigation) plan for the 498
diameter inches of trees removed from the site;
Tree Species Quantitv Diameter inches (each) Total Diameter
Slash Pine 36 trees 10" each 360" total
Live Oak 1 double 12" each 24" total
Live Oak 1 single 30" each 30" total
Live Oak 1 single 12" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 double 6" each 12" total
Live Oak 1 single 1 0" each 1 0" total
Acacia 5 trees 8" each 40" total
46 trees total 498" total
Total diameter of trees removed from the site is 498 diameter inches.
Irrhmtion System
There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans. All shade trees
should receive water from an irrigation bubbler. [Environnemental. Regulations,
Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A.]
Cfry OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
~'
TO:
FILE: MPMD 05-002
FROM:
Ed Breese
Principal Planner
DATE:
10/26/04
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Serrano Beach PUD
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comments.