Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-205 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members Planning and Development Board and City Commission Michael Rum~ IfJG Planning and Zoning Director THRU: FROM: Kathleen Zeitler Planner DATE: November 2, 2005 PROJECT NAME/NO: Southeast Neighborhood Park! NWSP 05-029 REQUEST: New Site Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: City of Boynton Beach Applicant: City of Boynton Beach Agent: Wally Majors, City of Boynton Beach Recreation & Parks Department Location: 2882 Southeast Second Street (see Location Map - Exhibit "A") Existing Land Use: Medium Density Residential (MEDR) Existing Zoning: Single and Two-Family Residential (R-2) Proposed Use: Recreation Acreage: 2.34 Acres Adjacent Uses: North: Orchard Estates Subdivision zoned Single and Two-Family Residential (R-2); South: Josephino S. Latino Subdivision zoned Single and Two-Family Residential (R-2); West: Right-of-way of S.E. 2nd Street, and father west Seacrest Estates zoned Single and Two-Family Residential (R-2) and Single-Family Residential (R-l- AA; and, East: Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way, and farther east multi-family development zoned Multiple-Family Dwelling (R-3). Staff Report - SE Neighborhood Park (NWSP 05-029) Memorandum No PZ 05-205 Page 2 PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION All property owners within 400 feet of the subject property were mailed a notice of this request for a major site plan modification and its respective hearing dates per the Applicant who has certified that the required signage was posted and notices mailed in accordance with Ordinance No. 04-007. Site Location: Proposal: Concurrency: Traffic: Utilities: Fire I Police: Drainage: Driveways: The subject property is generally located south of S. E. 23rd Avenue, between South Sea crest Boulevard and South Federal Highway, near the southeast city limits. The parcel is approximately 150 feet in width by 700 feet in length and lies west of and parallel to the Florida East Coast Railway. The subject property is a parcel of 2.34 acres located at 2882 Southeast Second Street near the Sea crest Estates, Orchard Estates, and Josephine S. Latino subdivisions. The site was a former mango grove obtained by the City in 2001, and is zoned Single and Two-Family Residential (R-2). BACKGROUND Mr. Wally Majors, Director of the City Recreation and Parks Department, and Agent for the City, is requesting new site plan approval for the proposed Southeast Neighborhood Park. A city-owned and operated recreational park is a permitted use in the current R-2 zoning district. The passive park will be used primarily by the neighborhood residents and have the following amenities: two (2) basketballs courts, an open play field, traditional playgrounds, picnic shelters including a handicap accessible picnic area, a picnic pavilion, paved walking paths, and parking. ANALYSIS Typically, a traffic statement which indicates a daily vehicle trip generation for the proposed project is sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review to ensure an adequate level of service. Based on their review of the proposed passive neighborhood park, the Traffic Division determined that the proposed project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Potable water and sanitary sewer / wastewater capacity is currently available to serve this project. An existing lift station is located near the proposed park entrance. Drinking fountains which will be handicap accessible will be located near the basketball courts and picnic shelter. These departments have reviewed the site plan and determined that emergency services are available to the proposed project with an appropriate response time. Emergency service providers expect to be able to utilize their current or anticipated resources to maintain an adequate level of service for the proposed project. Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Southeast Neighborhood Park will have a two-way access drive from SE 2nd Street Staff Report - SE Neighborhood Park (NWSP 05-029) Memorandum No PZ 05-205 Page 3 Parking: Landscaping: to the parking lot. Access will be gated at night in observance of park hours, which have not yet been established. There are no additional points of ingress/egress proposed for this request. The proposed pedestrian path will be paved asphalt eight (8) feet in width and extend the length of the park. Path construction will allow fire rescue vehicles to access activity areas in an emergency. A concrete sidewalk five (5) feet in width and 691 feet in length is proposed along S.E. 2nd Street adjacent to the park. The sidewalk will connect with sidewalks required on adjacent properties, and will connect with the proposed pedestrian path in the park. The park will be enclosed by a five (5) foot black chain link fence with gates. The proposed park is not intended to be a destination park, but rather a park for the use of the immediate neighborhood, therefore most park users will be pedestrians who live nearby. There are a total of six (6) parking spaces proposed, including a space designated for handicapped use. The proposed park will have sufficient paved parking on site to accommodate all of the proposed uses. All parking spaces will comply with applicable regulations. The subject property consists of a former mango grove. Due to the age and untidy nature of the existing mango trees, only two (2) trees will be retained for landscaping. Staff has reviewed the Landscape Plan and determined that it is in compliance with the Landscape Code requirements. A total of 67% of the site will consist of pervious landscaped areas. The north and south ends of the park will have a landscape buffer to reduce any impacts on adjacent residential subdivisions. At least fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species. The landscape plan indicates a total of 97% of the trees and 100% of the shrubs are native species. Typical native species to be used include sabal palmetto, live oak, paradise tree, wax myrtle, wild coffee, fishtail fern, and coontie. Building Design: The depicted restroom facility will not be placed as part of the initial phase, but will be evaluated in the future for placement, per a variance approved in May, 2005 by the City's Building Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Floor plans and details for the 575 square foot picnic shelter will be provided at the time of permitting, and shall comply with all applicable regulations. Setbacks: Lighting: Proposed park structures are required to comply with the minimum building setbacks which are 25 feet for front and rear, and 10 feet on each side. The most intensive uses within the park are centrally located away from abutting residential, and all proposed structures comply with the setback requirements. Freestanding outdoor lighting poles are proposed at the park entrance, on each end of the parking lot, and around the basketball courts. Lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent residential properties and comply with all City requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for approval of a new site plan and recommends approval, contingent upon all comments indicated in Exhibit "CIf - Conditions of Approval. Staff recommends that any deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. Also, any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. Staff Report - SE Neighborhood Park (NWSP 05-029) Memorandum No PZ 05-205 Page 4 MR/kz S:\Planning\Shared\Wp\Projects\SE Neighborhood Park\NWSP 05-029\Staff Report.doc ... j rl ! / 'IIWOJ~ I/lVI= C::l= 77TI-I AVF QJ ~~ 1 in. = 234.1 feet Il ~ {BEBEE f 1-0 / ~ -_/ ! ~-r ___ ~rnCIl~ Sol" ~/ - ~ --- ~(~ ! rnmQ)CI ~~ C::l= ? 7TI-I PI ~ f ======--~ ! k It >- 7 I~ ~! / lJ.J \A1AV a.. 1:1/ i / I !; f- / ) &3 / ~T J - -J1i CO - .:::> C/) ---" ! /' ",,-- / ~. 1/ //# ~~~ ,,~ .,OTU AU'" ! / I / ~ 1/ - / J I I--- I r V ! / f-- ':u: ?QTI-I AVI= H I i=tb9// I J f---- l/~ I--- I I 1 I--- AVE r ! f--- /1 / f----- J~ I I J I I j C::l= '>1 C::T /lVF J I Location of SE Neighborhood Park - Exhibit "A" ~. vJ~~ e-s}l II ,I w ~ -' ... u U'l u k r "- ... 1'5 0 !l k i S~ I~ S~ ~ II I~ t ~I l ~ ~ ~ lo~i M III !ii 111 ~. 1 ~ ~i ~~~ ~IlN ~~ :i!~ ~o ~j::: ~v lIU eGl . I ~... III III III III 8!ii8 ~ lri:i"': Sl I);Nt::!. _ Pilll ~ II u- :n ii ~~ o ">CD !i!il( <I: o~11l (7) do""; N ~~ J I .~ ":!!"R ~ ~ I ~iJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~!!!!!! ~~ ~ ]f~ ~~~! ~ I~~ m]~ C\! .... '!. . ~ ~!i!rn Z a i j ~ p.. eJ E-< !rl i 5 d ~ ~ ~~ r:.:l d t: i~3 rFl H ; I ~ t3 ~h ~I!!~ ~!I :~s o~~ ~ u ~ I:l:: -< Po. ~ o o := I:l:: o jJ:l := o - rz:l Z Eo< [J) -< rz:l := ~ o [J) t I ! II t I ! ~ II ~ {Jii) 51!! 5C1ll % I ~... j !~ ll. c ~h ~ j j ~ ~ ll. d ~ ~ s B ; I ~ = t) ~8 . I'li~ ~I!l! ~~I I'li!i~ I>.~ o Ii!~ ~ t) lo: Q:; < ll. ~ o o i:I: Q:; o lJ:l i:I: C [;l Z E-< rn ~ i:I: E-< ~ o rn t i ! g i! I ! g EXHIBIT "C" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Project name: SE Neighborhood Park File number: NWSP 05-029 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a November 14,2005 Planning & Zoning; date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: NONE PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 2. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 3. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 4. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 5. At time of permit review, submit a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 6. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 7. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 8. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 9. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 10. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 11. The drinking fountains shall be handicapped accessible and shall be on an accessible route per the 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.1.3(10)(a) and 11-4.15. 12. Submit floor plans and details for the picnic shelter and the restroom building. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 13. The design professional may want to review the publication "Recommendations for Accessibility Guidelines: Recreational Facilities and Outdoor Developed Areas," published by the Federal Access Board. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: NONE ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS: Comments: To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: Comments: To be determined. MWR/kz S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\SE Neighborhood Park\COA.doc 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Q, n d-rA T2-f re l/ ~ I 0 { d-( f oS- Ii Project name: SE Neighborhood Park File number: NWSP 05-029 Reference: 1st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a September 21.2005 Plannina & Zonina date stamp markina. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: NONE PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 1. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. No Traffic Statement required for this site per Masoud Atefi, PSC Traffic EnQineerinQ, 10/14/05. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 2. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Acknowledged _ 3. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Acknowledged. 4. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Acknowledged. UTILITIES Page 1 of 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 5. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Acknowledged _ 6. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Acknowledged. FIRE Comments: 7. Provide Emergency Vehicle access to this site so that no Rescue vehicle will be more than 15 feet from any activity area. The park pedestrian path is constructed to allow it to be used by vehicular traffic in an emergency_ In discussion with Rick Lee, Fire Plan Reviewer, 10/10/05, this is acceptable. POLICE Comments: FORTHCOMING BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Same as comment #3_ Acknowledged. 9. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the restroom building and picnic shelter as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. The depicted restroom facility will not be placed as part of this project, but will be evaluated in the future for placement. Building type will be identified at that time. Type of construction for the picnic shelter will be provided at the time of Page 2 of 12 DEPARTMENTS permitting. 10. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Acknowledged. 11. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. Corrected. 12. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Acknowledged. 13. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible parking space/so The quantity of the spaces shall be consistent with the regulations specified in the 2004 FBC. The accessible parking space/s that serve a use shall be located on the shortest safety accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. The 2004 FBC states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrance. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2(5),4.3, and 4.6. The handicap accessible parking space is labeled "He" and will be constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing K-3_ 14. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: . The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." . From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. · Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the Page 3 of 12 , INCLUDE REJECT DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). This information will be provided if a restroom is installed in the future. Also see response to Comment #9. 15. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter walllfence. Identify the type of walllfence material and the type of material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the walllfence that includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code. The perimeter fence is a 6-ft coated chain link as noted on Sheet 4 of 12. Fence details, including embedment depths, will be provided with the permit application. Fencing will comply with all applicable rules and regulations of the City of Boynton Beach_ 16. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Corrected _ 17. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. The Irrigation Plan, Sheet 12 of 12, specifies and shows the location for a welL 18. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. Acknowledged. 19. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. This is a single property. There will not be any lots, parcels or tracts. A copy of the recorded deed will be submitted with the permit application. 20. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. Acknowledged. Page 4 of 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 21. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Acknowledged. 22. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. Acknowledged _ 23. The drinking fountains shall be handicapped accessible and shall be on an accessible route per the 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.1.3(10)(a) and 11-4.15. Acknowledged. Drinking fountains are on an accessible route. Additional details will be provided at the time of permitting addressing accessibility. 24. Are there any parking spaces to be provided? If so, comply with 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5). Six parking spaces, one of which is handicap accessible, are depicted on Sheets 3 and 4 of 12. These parking spaces will comply with all applicable rules and regulations. 25. Submit floor plans and details for the picnic shelter and the restroom building. Floor plans and details for the picnic shelter and restroom will be submitted at the time of permitting. 26. The design professional may want to review the publication "Recommendations for Accessibility Guidelines: Recreational Facilities and Outdoor Developed Areas," published by the Federal Access Board. Acknowledged. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 27. The Landscape Architect must indicate on the landscape plan Page 5 of 12 DEPARTMENTS existing Mango trees that will be removed and mitigated on the site. Tabulate and create a table for mitigation of the total caliper inches of existing Mango trees proposed to be removed and show all caliper inches of replacement native shad and palm trees on the landscape plan. A separate symbol should be used on the landscape plan to identify the mitigation trees. This is a mango orchard_ All but three trees will be removed. These trees are considered the mitigation trees. 28. The City Signature trees (sheet 10 of 12) must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" caliper at DBH (4.5' off the ground) [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.2.] Acknowledged. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 29. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Same as comment #3. Acknowledged. 30. At the TART meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Acknowledged. 31. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8~ inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Acknowledaed _ 32. Clarify on application (Section 1.17.) previous site plan approval for this property (?) This is a new site plan_ Application has been corrected_ 33. Clarify/correct on application (Section 11.3.) area of site (acreage and sf). Survey and property records indicate 2.34 acres. Correct all land use acreage breakdowns accordingly (Section 1I.4.b. and 4.j., Section 11.5.) Correct on application (Section 11.6.d.) total sf under roof (Picnic paviliqn), (6.f.) sf of future restrooms; and (6.h.) total of d and f. Corrected. Page 6 of 12 INCLUDE REJECT ~ <&' v v y v v DEPARTMENTS 34. Correct on application (Section 11.10.a-b) parking required and parking provided. If outdoor athletic courts require 1 space per 1,500 sf, then 8 spaces are required (including 1 H/C space), however, only 6 are provided. Courts and adjoining pavement measure 10,905 sf (96.5' x 113') divided by 1,500 = 7.269, round up to 8 spaces (per Sec. H.14. of the LDR). Revise plans (sheets 3 and 4) to add parking accordingly. Only 1 H/C space is required (must be van accessible, with diagonal striping to left of driver's side). Through previous meetings with Mike Rumpf it was decided to provide six parking spaces. This park is not intended to be a "destination" park, but rather a park for the use of the immediate neighborhood. Additional spaces are not desired. 35. Survey submitted is not current as required (dated 2001). Since the property is vacant, undeveloped land a current survey is not required (waived) for purposes of site plan review. However, the Building Division may require a current survey prior to issuance of permits. Acknowledged. 36. Revise sheet 2 to include both written and graphic scales, and a north arrow. This is the survey that Staff has previously acknowledged will be acceptable. We will not be sending it back to the Surveyor for additional changes_ 37. Update details of property to north (Orchard Estates, Plat Book 102/ Page 25) on applicable sheets. As this is a neighborhood park there are residential subdivisions to the north, south and west of the project North and south ends of the park will have a landscape buffer. The most intensive uses within the park are centrally located away from abutting residential. To the east of the park is the FECRR and has a landscape buffer to shield park users from trains_ 38. Revise site plan (sheet 3) to delete matchline and sidewalk extension north from park. Property abutting the sidewalk extension is now platted as Orchard Estates and the developer, property owner(s) are responsible for sidewalk construction there per platting requirements for undeveloped land. Include a note on plan that sidewalk extension will be coordinated between City and adjacent property owner(s) per platting requirements. Corrected. 39. Revise site plan to include the following information as tabular site data (sheets 3 and 4): total acreage, zoning district (R-2), all proposed l,Ises and corresponding square footages for each use, minimum setbacks for R-2 zoning district (25' front and rear, 10' Page 7 of 12 ,01" INCLUDE REJECT ~j7 d ~&,p ~ V~{ V @f v v v v v DEPARTMENTS each side), and parking calculations including formula, number of spaces required and number of spaces provided, including number of handicapped spaces (outdoor athletic courts require one (1) parking space per 1,500 square feet of court area and adjoining paved area). Corrected. 40. The vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisles are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval. Acknowledged _ 41. Provide required loading/unloading area immediately north of H/C space, diagonally striped per ADA requirements, and label the H/C space as van accessible H/C space. As noted on Sheet 5 of 12, these requirements are detailed in the "Handicap Parking, Stalls and Details" detail. 42. Relocate bike rack further away from sidewalk intersection (to west) so it does not interfere with H/C accessibility near H/C space basketball courts. After consideration, it has been decided to leave the bike rack in its proposed location. 43. Provide an additional bike rack across sidewalk from the water fountain near the basketball courts. One bike rack should be sufficient. 44. Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening of equipment. Note lift station as future. Why is it to be located in RIW and at an intersection, not screened, and close to large picnic pavilion? This is an existing lift station (see note identifying it as LS 410.) It is screened_ It is in riQht-of-wav because that's where Utilities wanted it. 45. Can a fitness/heart trail be located around the perimeter path to provide for more activity? It has been our experience that these types of exercise units are not well used and become maintenance issues. Page 8 of 12 INCLUDE REJECT v v- v v- /Jx/oft I'- ~ I,( /' v DEPARTMENTS 46. Indicate any existing and all proposed easements (utility). Clarify what the 5' limited access easement at SE comer of park is for, and will fence interfere with that access? All existing easements have been shown. There are no proposed easements on the property to show. The 5-ft. LAE you are asking about is on another property, not this project. However it is likely placed there for the FECRR. 47. Provide dimensions, phasingltiming for future restrooms. Design of the future restroom will not be done until it is determined if a restroom will be needed/required. I 48. Note on plans per 5/12/2005 Order of the Building Board of Adjustment and Appeals: One park can be developed without required restrooms so long as necessary infrastructure is installed to allow for future installation of handicapped accessible bathrooms, and (2) the need for proposed future restrooms will be further assessed by May 12, 2007. A memo has been sent to Planning & Zoning, at their request, indicating the ruling of the Building Board of Adjustment & Appeals. Adding the same statement to the plans will increase the cost of the consultant's services. It is requested that the memo be sufficient. 49. Label future restrooms as H/C accessible (1 mens, 1 womens). Design of the future restroom will not be done until it is determined if a restroom will be needed/required_ 50. It appears that a gate will be needed at the SW comer of the park where the sidewalk, asphalt path, and the 6' fence intersect. A gate has been added to the plans at the southwest and northwest intersections of the internal path and the sidewalk within the public right- of-way. 51. Will six (6) foot fence along west property line remain? Gated access to park? Yes. 52. Will gated access to FEC railroad be locked? What is the purpose Page 9 of 12 " INCLUDE REJECT v v v v v v ; OEPARTMENTS of having a gate there? Yes the gated access to the FECRR right-of-way will be locked. The gate is placed there to allow access to the FECR right-of-way for landscaping maintenance on the east side of the proposed 6-ft coated chain link fence. 53. If garbage cans are to be placed right next to benches they should have attached lids. How is garbage removal done? Solid waste removal will be performed by Parks & Recreation emplovees. 54. Indicate picnic tables as they will actually be oriented on slabs. Label as slabs, provide dimensions on site plan or provide typical detail and reference detail. Picnic tables are to be oriented as shown on the plans. 55. H/C picnic table should include a covered shelter and a sign designating for H/C use. The shelter will include wheelchair seating. An additional shelter is not necessary. 56. Provide an elevation detail of all structures (picnic pavilions, future restrooms) and details on type of materials to be used. See revised plans for picnic shelter elevation. Full plans and details will submitted at permitting. No elevations or details are available for the future restroom. 57. Are any grills proposed in picnic area? No Qrills are proposed for the park. 58. On sheet 8, is some kind of soft nettingllow divider needed between courts to protect younger players on smaller court when both courts are in use? Staff is not proposinQ use of a divider between the two basketball courts. 59. It appears that more player benches are needed in and around basketball courts. Staff believes sufficient benches have been provided. 60. It appears that more benches are needed around open play field and playground areas. Staff believes sufficient benches have been provided. Page 10 of 12 INCLUDE REJECT ~ v v w; II t/..x p/~ v v v v ~ v " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 61. Revise sheet 4 (above impervious data) to delete floating number 6,167. V-- Corrected. 62. Correct impervious data on sheet 4 (basketball courts 10,905 sf not 11,074 sf). ~ Corrected. 63. Clarify on sheets 3 and 4 that entire playground area is impervious and what type of hard surface is proposed there. Clarify detail on V sheet 8: is concrete the base layer only with a softer cushioning layer on top (preferred), or is concrete the only surface? NO pal r: Details are shown on Sheet 8 of 12 showing both a plan and profile view (! 0 Ntr 1f of the plavaround area surfacing. fa btl ,( 64. Clarify by labeling on sheet 3 what is indicated on the north side of the park entry. \/' Corrected. 65. Revise sheet 4: totals for impervious 33,059 sf and total impervious (under pervious section) is 35,000 sf (don' match). \,./ Corrected. 66. It appears that landscaping is in 3' swale along east property line. \/' Plantinqs will be field-adiusted so that they do not fall in the swale. 67. Landscape plan should match site plan layout indicating and labeling all use areas. Additional information requested will be provided at time of permitting. V 68. Considering relocating the northern picnic tables to be closer to parking area, away from adjacent residential lot, out of mango trees. V Northern picnic tables were specifically sited under the manqo trees_ :.(4 ~ '5eA J:\SHRDATA\Engineering\Logan\TRC\SENP 1st Review Comments Response.doc Page 11 of 12 PROJECT DATA Land Use Zoning Total Gross Site Area SITE COVERAGE Buildings Pavement Open Space/Landscaping Total PARKING DATA Parking Required Parking Provided SETBACKS Front & Rear SIDE Medium Density Residential R2 Duplex Residential . 2.34 AC 0.01 AC 0.74 AC 1.59 AC 2.34 AC 101,930.40 SF 575.00 SF 32,234.40 SF 69,121.00 SF 101,930.40 SF 6 (Includes 1 Handicap Space) 6 (Includes 1 Handicap Space) 25-FT. 1 O-FT. Page 12 of 12 , 1st REVIEW COMMENTS Major Site Plan Modification Project name: SE Neighborhood Park File number: NWSP 05-029 Reference: 1st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a September 21, 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. NOTE: This will be a city owned and operated facility to benefit the public. Staff review and permitting will be facilitated to reduce processing time as much as possible. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. At the TART meeting, provide written responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8V2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Clarify on application (Section 1.17.) previous site plan approval for this property (7) Clarify/correct on application (Section 11.3.) area of site (acreage and sf). Survey and property records indicate 2.34 acres. Correct all land use acreage breakdowns accordingly (Section IIA.b. and 4.j., Section 11.5.) Correct on application (Section 1I.6.d.) total sf under roof (Picnic pavilion), (6.f.) sf of future restrooms, and (6.h.) total of d and f. Correct on application (Section II.10.a-b) parking required and parking provided. If outdoor athletic courts require 1 space per 1,500 sf, then 8 spaces are required (including 1 H/C space), however, only 6 are provided. Courts and adjoining pavement measure 10,905 sf (96.5' x 113') divided by 1,500 = 7.269, round up to 8 spaces (per See. H.14. of the LOR). Revise plans (sheets 3 and 4) to add parking accordingly. Only 1 H/C space is required (must be van accessible, with diagonal striping to left of driver's side). Survey submitted is not current as required (dated 2001). Since the property is vacant,c,ry- ~ undeveloped land a current survey is not required (waived) for purposes of site plan , review. However, the Building Division may require a current survey prior to issuance of permits. Revise sheet 2 to include both written and graphic scales, and a north arrow. Update details of property to north (Orchard Estates, Plat Book 102/ Page 25) on applicable sheets. Revise site plan (sheet 3) to delete matchline and sidewalk extension north from park. Property abutting the sidewalk extension is now platted as Orchard Estates and the developer, property owner(s) are responsible for sidewalk construction there per platting requirements for undeveloped land. Include a note on plan that sidewalk extension will be coordinated between City and adjacent property owner(s) per platting requirements. Revise site plan to include the following information as tabular site data (sheets 3 and 4): total acreage, zoning district (R-2), all proposed uses and corresponding square footages for each use, minimum setbacks for R-2 zoning district (25' front and rear, 10' each side), and parking calculations including formula, number of spaces required and number of spaces provided, including number of handicapped spaces (outdoor athletic courts require one (1) parking space per 1,500 square feet of court area and adjoining paved area). The vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisles are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval. Provide required loading/unloading area immediately north of H/C space, diagonally striped per ADA requirements, and label the H/C space as van accessible H/C space. Relocate bike rack further away from sidewalk intersection (to west) so it does not interfere with H/C accessibility near H/C space basketball courts. Provide an additional bike rack across sidewalk from the water fountain near the basketball courts. Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening of equipment. Note lift station as future. Why is it to be located in R/W and at an intersection, not screened, and close to large picnic pavilion? Can a fitness/heart trail be located around the perimeter path to provide for more activity? Indicate any existing and all proposed easements (utility). Clarify what the 5' limited access easement at SE corner of park is for, and will fence interfere with that access? Provide dimensions, phasing/timing for future restrooms. Note on plans per 5/12/2005 Order of the Building Board of Adjustment and Appeals: (1) park can be developed without required restrooms so long as necessary infrastructure is installed to allow for future installation of handicapped accessible bathrooms, and (2) the need for proposed future restrooms will be further assessed by May 12, 2007. Label futur strooms as H/C accessible (1 mens, 1 womens . appears that a gate will be needed at the corner of the park where the sidewalk, asphalt path, and the 6' fence intersect. Will 6' fence along west property line remain? Gated access to park? Will gated access to FEC railroad be locked? What is the purpose of having a gate there? If garbage cans are to be placed right next to benches they should have attached lids. How is garbage removal done? Indicate picnic tables as they will actually be oriented on slabs. Label as slabs, provide dimensions or provide typical detail and reference detail. H/C picnic table should include a covered shelter and a sign designating for H/C use. Provide an elevation detail of all structures (picnic pavilions, future restrooms) and details on type of materials to be used. Are any grills proposed in picnic area? On sheet 8, is some kind of soft netting/low divider needed between courts to protect younger players on smaller court when both courts are in use? It appears that more player benches are needed in and around basketball courts. It appears that more benches are needed around open play field and playground areas. Revise sheet 4 (above impervious data) to delete floating number 6,167. Correct impervious data on sheet 4 (basketball courts 10,905 sf not 11,074 sf). Clarify on sheets 3 and 4 that entire playground area is impervious and what type of hard surface is proposed there. Clarify detail on sheet 8: is concrete the base layer only with a softer cushioning layer on top (preferred), or is concrete the only surface? Clarify by labeling on sheet 3 what is indicated on the north side of the park entry. Revise sheet 4: totals for impervious 33,059 sf and total impervious (under pervious section) is 35,000 sf (don' match). It appears that landscaping is in 3' swale along east property line. Landscape plan should match site plan and indicate/label all use areas. # ~ ~'~Relocat. the northern picnic table tQ thE! E:8uth 0 be closer to parking area, away from adjacent residential lot, out of mango rees. Page I of 1 Breese, Ed From: Immler, Matt Sent: Tuesday, September 27,20059:29 AM To: Breese, Ed Subject: SE Neighborhood Park; Ocean Breeze West Ed, The above captioned projects will not negatively impact police department operations. G. Matthew Immler Chief of Police City of Boynton Beach 9/27/2005 FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal DATE: September 29, 2005 SUBJECT: SE Neighborhood Park (No impact) Miller Road Project New development projects involving multi-family or high-density commercial projects should be approved contingent upon consideration of future upgrades in emergency dispatch capability. These enhancements include new technology related to CAD, GIS, and AVL capability, as well as adequate staffing. All other factors (personnel, training, technology, fire station placement, building design features, etc) depend on a reliable and efficient method of getting the resources provided where they are needed in time to mitigate the consequences of an emergency, regardless of the type of response. CiTY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: October 14, 2005 FILE: NWSP 05-029 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: SE Neighborhood Park REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the impact for services for the proposed S E Neighborhood Park. This project in itself will not have a direct impact on department service requirements. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIjj'A INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: October 14, 2005 FILE: NWSP 05-029 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: SE Neighborhood Park REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: No Comments DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-115 TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: October 3, 2005 RE: Review Comments New Site Plan- 1 st Review SE Neighborhood Park File No. NWSP 05-029 The above referenced Site Plans, received on September 21, 2005, was reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LOR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL No comments at this time. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 1. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. ENGINEERING 2. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 3. Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 4. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES 5. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Oeparts;nent of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-115 Re: SE Neighborhood Park, New Site Plan - 15t Review October 3, 2005 Page 2 6. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. LUck Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Csd\Projects\SE Neighborhood Park\New Site Plan - 1st Review.doc " The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities Matthew Immler, Police Chief Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Wally Majors, Parks Director Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst John Huntington, Police Officer Ed Breese, Principal Planner 46 From: Date: Re: 9/23/05 Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services Project: SE Neighborhood Park MEMORANDUM As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development. Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6260. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\SE Neighborhood Park\Impact Analysis.doc / .. DATE: September 29, 2005 List of Acronvms/Abbreviations: ANSI - American National Standards Institute ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBC - Florida Building Code FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F.S. - Florida Statutes LDR - Land Development Regulations NEC - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-190 TO: Ed Breese Principal Planner FROM: Timothy K. Large~ TART Member/B~ion SUBJECT: Project - SE Neighborhood Park File No. - NWSP 05-029 - 1st review Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the restroom building and picnic shelter as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 3 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 4 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 5 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 6 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible parking space/so The quantity of the spaces shall be consistent with the regulations specified in the 2004 FBC. The accessible parking space/s that serve a use shall be located on the shortest safety accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. The 2004 FBC states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrance. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2(5),4.3, and 4.6. 7 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." S\Development\Building\TARnTART 2005\ SE Neighborhood Park Page 1 of 2 B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 8 Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 9 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 10 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 11 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 12 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 13 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 14 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 15 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 16 The drinking fountains shall be handicapped accessible and shall be on an accessible route per the 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.1.3(10)(a) and 11-4.15. 17 Are there any parking spaces to be provided? If so, comply with 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.1.2(5). 18 Submit floor plans and details for the picnic shelter and the restroom building. 19 The design professional may want to review the publication "Recommendations for Accessibility Guidelines: Recreational Facilities and Outdoor Developed Areas," published by the Federal Access Board. bf S\Development\Building\TARnTART 2005\ SE Neighborhood Park Page 2 of 2 TRC Memorandum Page 1 of I / Coale, Sherie From: Hallahan, Kevin Sent: Friday, September 30,200512:02 PM To: Coale, Sherie Cc: Breese, Ed Subject: TART comments- S.E. Neighborhood Park Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Ed Breese, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: S. E. Neighborhood Park New Site Plan - 1st Review NWSP 05-029 Date: September 30, 2005 The Landscape Architect must indicate on the landscape plan existing Mango trees that will be removed and mitigated on the site. Tabulate and create a table for mitigation of the total caliper inches of existing Mango trees proposed to be removed and show all caliper inches of replacement native shad and palm trees on the landscape plan. A separate symbol should be used on the landscape plan to identify the mitigation trees. I. The City Signature trees (sheet 10 of 12) must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" caliper at DBH (4.5' off the ground) [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.] Kjh 9/30/2005 ~~ TRC COMMENTS PROJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD PARK LOCATION: S.E.2 Street and 28 Ave FILE# TYPE OF PROJECT: Small Park CAPACITY: 2.34 Acre Park COMMENTS Provide Emergency Vehicle access to this site so that no Rescue vehicle will be more than 15' from any activity area.