The URL can be used to link to this page

AGENDA DOCUMENTS CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Requested City Commission Meeting Dates Date Final Form Must be Turned in to City Clerk's Office D December 6, 2005 D December 20, 2005 ~ January 3, 2006 D January 17, 2006 November 14, 2005 (Noon.) D February 7, 2006 D February 21, 2006 D March 7, 2006 D March 21, 2006 January 17,2006 (Noon) December 5, 2005 (Noon) February 6,2006 (Noon) December 19,2005 (Noon) February 21,2006 (Noon) January 3, 2006 (Noon) March 6, 2006 (Noon) NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM D D ~ D D Announcement D Administrative Consent Agenda Public Hearing Bids D Development Plans D New Business D Legal D UnfInished Business D Presentation City Manager's Report RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the January 3,2006 City Commission Agenda under Public Hearing to coincide with the corresponding land use amendment and rezoning requests. This item was tabled at the City Commission meeting on December 6, 2005, to allow adoption of the corresponding items for land use and rezoning, prior to approving the site plan request. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department Memorandwn No. PZ 05-208. EXPLANATION: PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: Estancia @ Boynton Beach (NWSP 05-026) Carlos Ballbe, Keith & Ballbe, Inc. HHC Boynton, LLC 3010 South Federal Highway (East side of Federal Highway, approximately 300 feet south of intersection of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway Request for new site plan approval to construct 30 townhouse units and related site improvements on 2.65-acres to be rezoned InfIll Planned Unit Development (IPUD). DESCRIPTION: PROGRAM IMP ACT: FISCAL IMP ACT: ALTERNATIVES: N/A N/A N/A City Manager's Signature ~-'~ /~ Planning and Zoning4irector City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Estancia @ Boynton Beach\NWSP 05-026\Agenda Item Request Estancia@ BB NWSP 05-026 1-3-05.dot S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-208 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Board and City Commission THRU: Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Eric Lee Johnson, AICP Planner 1 DATE: November 2, 2005 PROJECT NAME/NO: Estancia at Boynton / NWSP 05-026 REQUEST: New Site Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: HHC Boynton, LlC Applicant: HHC Boynton, LLC Agent: Mr. Carlos J. Ballbe / Keith & Ballbe, Incorporated Location: East side of South Federal HighwaYr approximately 400 feet south of Old Dixie Highway (3010 South Federal Highway / see Location Map - Exhibit "A IT) Existing Land Use: Low Density Residential (LDR)r Moderate Density Residential (MoDR) and High Density Residential (HDR) Existing Zoning: R-1-AA Single Family Residential and PUD Planned Unit Development Proposed Land Use: Special High Density Residential (SHDR - 20 du/ac) Proposed Zoning: Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) Proposed Use: 30 townhouse units Acreage: :1:2.643 acres Adjacent Uses: North: To the northeastr a developed single-family residence designated Moderate Density Residential (MoDR) and zoned R-l-AA Single Family Residential. To the northwestr a condominium development (Heritage Staff Report - Estancia (NWSP 05-026) Memorandum No PZ 05-208 Page 2 Club) designated High Density Residential (HDR) and zoned R-3 Multi- family Residential; South: To the southeast, two developed single family residences, the westernmost designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned R-1-AA Single Family Residential, the easternmost lying in unincorporated Palm Beach County, designated MR-5 Medium Density Residential and zoned RS Single Family Residential. To the southwest, the right-of-way of Bamboo Lane, then vacant property lying in Palm Beach County, designated CHIS Commercial High and zoned CG General Commercial; East: Developed single family residences designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned R-1-AA Single Family Residential then the Intracoastal Waterway; and West: Right-of-way of Federal Highway, then developed property designated Local Retail Commercial (lRC) and zoned C-3 Community Commercial. PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION Owners of properties within 400 feet of the subject site plan were mailed a notice of this request and its respective hearing dates. The applicant certifies that they posted signage and mailed notices in accordance with Ordinance No. 04-007. Site Characteristic: The subject property is comprised of three (3) irregular-shaped parcels all under the same ownership totaling approximately 2.65 acres. Parcels 1 and 2 are undeveloped and the easternmost portion, "Parcel 3", is primarily a finger canal of the Intracoastal Waterway. The developer intends to leave the canal intact and to utilize its square footage as a means to increase the allowable density. The subject property lies within Study Area V of the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Plan. The survey shows that multiple easements have been dedicated throughout the site. The survey also shows the location of existing single-family detached homes (that once fronted on Virginia Gardens Drive) and new lot lines of previously platted lots of the "Dakota Lofts PUD". The project intent is to raze all buildings in order to construct townhouse buildings. However, one (1) existing single-family dwelling was not acquired by the developer and therefore, will not be within the scope of this project. However, access to the existing home would be preserved thereto via an easement through the subject project. Originally, the houses on Virginia Gardens Drive had direct access to Federal Highway. However, the developer acqUired this private right-of-way and has it integrated into the design of the site plan. As a consequence, ingress I egress for the remaining single-family dwelling (located directly east of the subject property) will occur through the proposed site to Bamboo Lane. Additionally, it was learned that a water well previously served the single family dwellings at 2 Virginia Gardens Drive and 821 Bamboo lane. This water well was considered a community well and unless there were underlying conditions or requirements such as deed restrictions granting water rights to the existing users, it was incumbent upon the Staff Report - Estancia (NWSP 05-026) Memorandum No PZ 05-208 Page 3 applicant to either install a new well to serve those residential dwellings or to connect the aforementioned dwellings to City water. Staff understands that 821 Bamboo Lane is in fact, connected to potable water and sanitary sewer. However, from a cursory review, it appears as though 2 Virginia Gardens Drive is still on well and septic tank. BACKGROUND Proposal: Mr. Carlos Ballbe, agent for HHC Boynton, LlC is proposing a new site plan for 30 townhouse units. The subject site was previously developed with the SunWah Chinese restaurant. On January 15, 2002 the City Commission approved the site for a residential townhouse project known as "Dakota Lofts". On February 28, 2002, the original owner applied for building permits but failed to submit actual permit drawings. Subsequently, the property was sold to a different developer who likewise, was unsuccessful in obtaining a building permit. The new developer proposed various changes to the floor plan and elevations drawings, necessitating a major site plan modification (MSPM 02-006). On January 21, 2003, the City Commission approved the developer's request for major site plan modification and accompanying Dakota Lofts Record Plat. Site plan approval is valid for one (1) year and it subsequently expired on January 21, 2004. No request for site plan time extension was ever submitted. It should be noted that any site improvements other than a single-family or duplex home on the subject property requires site plan approval. Now, the new property owner, HHC Boynton, LLC desires to develop the former "Dakota Lofts" project with additional units because they (as contract purchaser) were able to assemble additional lots along the former Virginia Gardens Drive. However, the newly assembled lots are classified and zoned for single family homes; not townhomes. Additionally, subsequent to when the "Dakota Lofts" site plan was approved, the City created a more appropriate zoning district (the Infill Planned Unit Development - IPUD) in order to better accommodate infill development. The subject property is eligible for the IPUD zoning district because it is located within Study Area V of the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Plan. Therefore, the developer is now requesting to rezone the entire property to IPUD. Therefore, approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the corresponding request for land use change and rezoning (LUAR 05-009). Fee-simple townhouses are permitted uses in the IPUD zoning district. Under the Special High Density Residential land use category, the maximum allowable project density would consist of 52 dwelling units (density at 20 dwelling units per acre). The project proposes a total of 30 dwelling units, which equals a density of 11.35 dwelling units per acre. The entire project would be built in one (1) phase. ANALYSIS Concurrency: Traffic: A traffic statement was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has determined that the proposed residential project is located within the designated Coastal Residential Exception Areas of the county, Staff Report - Estancia (NWSP 05-026) Memorandum No PZ 05-208 Page 4 and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. However, no building permits are to be issued by the City, after the 2007 build-out date (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Utilities: The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water for this project (project estimated to require a total of 13,560 gallons per day). Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required, especially on the water delivery system for the project, depending upon the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve the projected total of 6,090 gallons per day, subject ~'r' the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the Site plan (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Police I Fire: Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: An application for school concurrency has been submitted to the School District of Palm Beach County. No confirmation has yet been received. Therefore, no building permits may be issued until the School District of Palm Beach County confirms that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the proposed 30 dwelling units (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Driveways: The project proposes one main (1) point of ingress / egress to the subject site. This point would be located on Bamboo Lane. According to the survey, Bamboo Lane was previously dedicated as an ingress / egress easement (O.R.B. 14728, Page 512) for the surrounding neighborhood. The developer intends to improve the portion of Bamboo Lane that directly abuts the subject property. The site plan (sheet SP1 of 2) shows that the project entrance on Bamboo Lane would be located approximately 90 feet east from the paved portion of Federal Highway. Vehicles leaving the subject property would be allowed to make right (west) and left (east) traffic movements. However, Bamboo Lane is a dead end road and therefore, vehicles traveling east from the subject property would be minimal. The site plan proposes 22 to 24 foot wide drive aisles. The Typical Roadway sections show that the width of the travel lanes would vary between 11 feet to 12 feet, depending on their location. All internal roadways would accommodate two Staff Report - Estancia (NWSP 05-026) Memorandum No PZ 05-208 Page 5 (2) -way traffic movements. The site plan shows an emergency vehicle "T" Turn- around area, proposed north of the finger canal. This would allow fire trucks and service vehicles to successfully turn around at the project's dead-end street. These private streets, internal to the development, would conform to current engineering standards. Parking Facility: Two (2) and three (3) bedroom dwelling units require two (2) parking spaces per unit. The project proposes 30 three (3) bedroom units and a recreation facility. Therefore, based upon the above referenced number of units and the amenity, the project requires a total of 65 parking spaces. The site plan shows that each unit would have a two (2)-car garage, which would thus equate to providing 60 parking spaces. The first floor plan (sheet A6) shows that each garage would be dimensioned 22 feet - eight (8) inches in width and 21 feet in depth. The plan also proposes eight (8) off-street parking spaces. According to the Typical Parking Stall Detail, the 90-degree parking stalls would be dimensioned nine (9) feet in width by 18-feet in length. The handicap parking spaces would be dimensioned 12 feet in width (with extra 5-feet of striping) and 18 feet in length. Combining the garage spaces and the 90-degree spaces, the site plan would provide for a total of 68 parking spaces or an excess of three (3) parking spaces. The applicant informed staff that it is their intent to provide an additional eight (8) parking spaces along Federal Highway. That proposition would be subject to Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) review and approval. Landscaping: The site plan tabular data (sheet SPl of 2) indicates that 0.77 acres or 29.06% of the site would be pervious surface. According to the Land Development Regulations, the IPUD zoning district requires 200 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit. The plans propose 30 dwelling units and therefore, 6,000 square feet of usable open space would be required. The land earmarked for the recreation area in conjunction with eligible portions of the pervious surfaces brings the plans into compliance with this usable open space requirement. The recreation area alone constitutes over 87% of usable open space. The landscape plan would provide a total of 81 canopy trees, 127 palm trees, and 1,065 shrubs, 2,312 groundcover plants, and 147 accent plants. The Plant List (sheet l-2 of 3) indicates that 97% of the canopy trees, 60% of the palm trees, and 50% of the shrubs would be native species. The site plan (sheet SPl of 3) shows that the western landscape buffer would be at least 20 feet in width at its narrowest point. This landscape buffer would be adjacent to Federal Highway. The landscape plan shows that this buffer would consist of Live Oak, Foxtail palm, Silver Buttonwood hedge, Evergreen Giant, Wax Jasmine, Crinum Lily, Simpson Stopper, Indian Hawthorne, and Dwarf Crown of Thorns. The landscape plan also shows that a six (6) foot high perimeter fence (with 6-foot high decorative columns) is proposed within this buffer, which would be installed close to and running parallel with the west property line. Each unit would have pedestrian access directly to Federal Highway. All pedestrians would pass through an entry gate. The gates would be iron and the decorative columns with their precast caps would have a smooth stucco finish. The Elevation Cross Section of Federal Highway Buffer (sheet L-3 of 3) illustrates a street level view of Staff Report - Estancia (NWSP 05-026) Memorandum No PZ 05-208 Page 6 Federal Highway. The cross section shows that Live Oak trees and Foxtail palm trees would be installed at 16 feet in height, Royal palm trees at 26 feet in height, and Cabbage palms at 20 to 30 feet in height. The plant material (and their specifications) proposed on the cross section supersedes the same on the landscape plan and a revised landscape plan will be required at the time of permitting as a result of the discrepancy between the two (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The site plan (sheet SP1 of 3) shows that the south landscape buffer, adjacent to Bamboo Lane would be approximately seven (7) feet in width. This buffer would contain a solid, six (6) foot tall wall with decorative columns and the following plant material: Highrise Live Oak, Palatka Holly, Purple Glory tree, Foxtail palm, Simpson Stopper, Crinum Lilly, Indian Hawthorne, and Dwarf Crown of Thorns. As part of the improvement proposed to Bamboo Lane, the existing landscape median would be enhanced with 23 Dwarf Schefflera, 25 Crown of Thorns, and 25 Indian Hawthorne installed within. The site plan (sheet SP1 of 3) shows that the north landscape buffer would be approximately six (6) feet in width at its narrowest point. It should be noted that Areca palm trees and a la-foot tall Ficus hedge were previously installed along the south property line of the abutting property to the north. However, the following plant material is proposed within the north landscape buffer of the subject property: Royal palm, Buttonwood, Gumbo Limbo, Purple Glory tree, Cat palm, Red Ginger, Dwarf Schefflera, and Dwarf Firebush. A wall is proposed along the western half of the north property line. The site plan (sheet SP1 of 3) shows that the east landscape buffer would be 20 feet in width at its narrowest point. The landscape plan shows that Highrise Live Oak, Cabbage palm, Gumbo Limbo, Palatka Holly, Fahahatchee grass, Redtip Cocoplum, and Sword fern are proposed within this buffer. The main objective of this buffer is to serve as a barrier between the subject property and the adjacent single-family homes. Staff has concerns over the deciduous nature of the Gumbo Limbo and therefore recommends substituting them with another type of native, canopy tree such as a Paradise tree or Mahogany (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The Typical 4, 5, and 7 Unit Landscape Plans (sheet L2 of 3) depict the use of Indian Hawhthorne, Silver Buttonwood hedge, Wart Fern, Redtip Cocoplum, Crinum Lily, and Tibouchina. The pool area would have Coconut palms on each side. Building and Site: As previously mentioned, the applicant is requesting to rezone the property to the IPUD zoning district with a density of 11.32 dwelling units per acre. The maximum density allowed by the Special High Density Residential land use classification is 20 dwelling units per acre. The 30 dwelling units are proposed within six (6) separate buildings on the 2.65-acre site. Each building would contain a varying number of dwelling units, ranging from four (4) units to seven (7) units. The unit plans (sheet A.13.0 through sheet A.16.0) show the size of each unit, ranging from 1,931 square feet to 2,372 square feet of "under roof area". Staff Report - Estancia (NWSP 05-026) Memorandum No PZ 05-208 Page 7 The IPUD zoning district allows buildings to reach a maximum height of 45 feet, however, a lesser height could be imposed for better compatibility with adjacent properties. All buildings would be three (3) stories in height, the tallest of which, would be 36 feet - six (6) inches in height, measured at the mid-point of the pitched roof. The elevations do not indicate the height to the peak of the roof. The IPUD zoning district contains no specific minimum building setback requirements other than mirroring the setbacks of adjacent zoning districts. The required setbacks, most important to this project, would be those required along the east property line. The abutting property to the northeast is zoned R-l-AA and requires a side yard setback of 10 feet. The site plan is proposing a 20-foot building setback at the northeast corner of the property. The abutting property to the southeast is also zoned R-l-AA. Likewise, it has the same side setback requirement (10 feet). However, it appears as though the existing single-family detached home on the abutting property to the southeast is non-conforming because there is no side yard setback. This non-conforming status of the abutting neighbor to the east would not be an issue for the current developer because Building #3 would be setback 23 feet from the east property line; it needs to be setback only 10 feet from the east property line. The abutting multi-family development to the north is zoned R-3. The required setbacks along the north property line that are pertinent to the Estancia project would be as follows: Side- 20 feet and Rear - 40 feet. To comply, the site plan shows the buildings of the subject property would be setback between 20 feet at its narrowest point to nearly 40 feet at its widest point from the north property line. The site plan shows that the buildings would be setback 20 feet from the west property line (along Federal Highway). Buildings #1 and #3 would be setback 35 feet from the south property line (along Bamboo lane). On the site plan tabular data, the setback table indicates that the parcel setbacks would be 20 feet from the west property line, 15 feet from the north property line, 30 feet from the south property line, and 10 feet from the east property line. This does not coincide with the aforementioned setback information and as a consequence, must be rectified to match each other at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The unit setbacks within each parcel boundary are proposed as follows: Front, Rear, and Sides - five (5) feet. No individual swimming pools are proposed but a note on the site plan indicates that screen enclosures would be permitted, such as long as they do not go beyond the building envelop. The second story balconies would be approximately three (3) feet deep and extend into the front setback. This encroachment would only occur within the setback proposed along Federal Highway. The recreation area would be located at the eastern portion of the property abutting the finger canal and flanked by the townhouse buildings on the north and south sides. It would include a cabana and a swimming pool. The clubhouse elevation (sheet A-17) does not indicate the roof height but shows it as a one (i)-story structure. Staff Report - Estancia (NWSP 05-026) Memorandum No PZ 05-208 Page 8 Design: The proposed buildings and clubhouse resemble a modern Spanish-Mediterranean design with textured stucco finish, decorative shutters, outriggers, and S-tile roof. The elevations show that each building would have decorative garage doors, tile inlays, and wall mounted lighting fixtures. The project proposes multi-colored buildings consisting of the following Sherman Williams paint: Color code Color Location SW# 6686 Light yellow Main wall SW# 6339 Tan Main wall SW# 6673 Yellow Main wall SW# 6355 Light Brown Main wall SW# 6962 Purple Shutters The elevations of the clubhouse (sheet A17) show that it would have the same S- tile roof as the townhouse buildings. The clubhouse would be painted yellow and would have an aluminum gate with self closing and latching doors to meet requirements of the Florida Safe Pool Act. The plans propose one (1) type of outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The Type "A" Light Pole detail on the photometric plan detail (sheet PHl of 1) indicates it would be 18-feet in height and made of round aluminum. Each pole would be painted black and have a decorative lamp. The photometric plan demonstrates that lighting levels would be adequate and not "spillll over onto adjacent properties. Pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.g.(1) of the Land Development Regulations, project compatibility is judged on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting properties. Attached is a letter-sized sheet that illustrates building heights, setbacks, and plant material. Staff determined that the original Dakota Lofts site plan met the intent of the code, and this generation of plans (Estancia) surpasses the quality of the former. Signage: The Landscape Feature detail on sheet AO.l shows that an "Estanciall sign is proposed on the entry wall at the southwest corner of the property. The detail shows that it would be aluminum, black powder-coated lettering with uplighting. No dimensions or font types were indicated on the sign detail. The sign is limited to six (6) feet in height and 32 square feet in area pursuant to Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 1.D. of the Land Development Regulations (see Exhibit "CII - Conditions of Approval). RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval and is recommending approval, contingent upon the successful request for land use amendment / rezoning (lUAR 05-009) and subject to satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "CII - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJEcrS\Estancia @ Boynton Beach\NWSP OS-026\Staff Report.doc LOCATION MAP Estancia at Boynton Beach (f.k.a. Dakota Lofts) Exhibit A ! f } f / I / ( I i ! I ~--~- I ---~ I I I ! I ! ! { ) I City Limits 160 80 o N 160 Feet A EXHIBIT B @ I l I ~ . I ~ _u_u_u 7t -(I {: ! ~i i t~ ,m i~ 13 i~ i i i ....." -'s:!!~1~~'~ri i~~i ~ ~." \ i ! i ! i i i i i i i i ! i ~ ~ ~ ~ .-.---1" "l, ~m ~ {~ ,~ ~~~ !~ n ~~t'1 i~ -- p;t.... n U' ~=~~ '. ~n~:"~ ~ ~ .. . 0 I" o~ : ! i i i ! ~~o~ :tI ~m ~ il~~ f;~~i~ ..~ ~ ~~. a" ~ ;ll ,. ~ ~ 8 · b~ 0 m ~I I ~ i i,1 ~ ,I . IIUi~ , '~illl~ I; I I in'; .! ;I~ u ~ 'l ~ II" q~! ~ I~~ 1:J lll~ 0 ~ I I~q u " ~ I~~ ~ ~ ~ t I'i j;; e l:!1~~ ':' r;; III"" ~ I ~.' . " · · r;; . · j;; !<l ~ !l III ~ ~~~ · ~'~I' .I~ .1 ~~ q~U~:-Id~~ ~ { INTRAC PII~ :! till! ! ~ I ill !~. ~._<-::.:~...:~;.:::' 'Iill~ n ~ ! I I II 9\ - iil~ a ~ ~ ~ , JiOilo. Iz:- 7L "--., ."" .... 'lfl.""-" '1':.\;!:" ~lRArQt""....rtJ I I !q f ~I -I EXHIBIT B (.I~: ".,,,,. "",,,,,,. n ~ ~ m~ ~ I jli i I h ~ ill mill! ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ am ! S II . m ~~~ ~~! ~~~ "." .dd ~ ~ , ~~ ii I~ ~ IN i ~ I ~ z <( :z ~ f:? C/ ~o ~ o~ III dl~ ~ ~E " 0 z <("! <( <3 j c1 ~i I- IJ Vl I- "-' Iii .~ ! I~I j ~ or ~ J : ! 3 {. < 4t l l~ } J~ o < ~ 0.: g~ . ~~ ~~.~~,p CQ Q)J; ':/ ~.5ti(J1tl ..Jhll~g~ <cS~gl co bll~ ; '-;3~~j r.JJ ::s ;;li: ~ o~t1~'" ~oS:~ I:l::oc;o < ~~ u ~ i 111!lllllllilllll!ll!11 : [13 ;;] II 1< ~I ~I ! lllllllllllllllllllllll I I I 1IIIIIIIIlllllll!llll!l (),'VMHOIH l'VtJ 3Q3.:/ H J.nOSI rON-- ),'VM HO/H's'n ~I ~I ~I ! .!i .!i & ~ II 1/ ~111 .It .It .It I i l ~ II ! ~ t ~ " 0 EXHIBI' lj .!II II 1m ~r~6 i :3 tt ~ ~~ q In !ti(~c1\ 1111 ~ i h -1 ;: 15 ij) ~~ ~U Sf ~ III ~~ a ~ i . I> ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ :ri ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 8 il ~ ~ ~ N U ~ ~ i ~ w :;; ~ :J n :; Iii ~ m ~ oc ~ III ~ ci It' ~ G ~ 1M ~ ~ \ ... . ~ I ~ I 1100/200 'd ~ II .. ~ d 21 W I cI) 5 "'t"': o...:J: ..J& <( fC\ ' m_' ~~ EXHIBIT B '\ 5.-: w,.: oct:r ttt :r 0.: ~ I- 11) ..IN tu- ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ (j ~ ....I \, \\ ttf...: f- a:: ~ ~N '" C1 m i ~ ~ ~ ~ :i :I d) J11 ~aIM01~ JHH 20:51 (03m)5002-61-1JO .4'-,Gt .aI-,r ."'.,rl ,,4'-,4'1 i~ Ii I . "" . in . 900/200 'd 6620 02 195(X~d) S~Ja~14JJ~ ~~~o~S IIQPUQ~ 9E:ll (nHl)5002-02-1JO EXHIBIT B ~ ~ ~ , c:l - g II '" ~ ~a , I'f'\ tU ~< ...J ~ p~ (5 ~ @?)s i= ~ U 0" - I.U as i= 11DdJ~ (I) - u UJ llJ ~~ ~ (I) d5 ss ~ ~ d) 6~ P ~ ~ ~ $ t:C tI,) ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~u <~~ 00...... Z :r: -< ~ l:.) ~ ~oo< ~O\ "I; 0\ oS -I /:X.I('f") .d~ ~-. 0_ lXl\C !~ ~~ .... o .1:: 0'1 t?50\ ..f"'" 00 ~~ .1 ~ ~~ zd ~E= m l> (j) -I IIi r m ~\ ~J> [ m -I ~ j.\- ~ - ~ :Oi ~Z; ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 2. . ^ ~r ~~ ~ 6 \ 1m ~~~~ \ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~6~ .~. R,e ntITIE i [JJJDJD ~ i 0CImJ ~~ W I~ I 1 i :~ ..~, :} l! f? Ii r! i. ~ ~ li ~ I~ A RANDALL )11J ~J:9fE~I TI-IE E~TANCIA eOi:!nton e"SC:;h, F~ I-I,C.C. eO\lnton, ~LC .42 N. 5uJlnl.an AV4, Delr.!~ Be..'lch, FL 334.44 (5E71) 2"3~0''!l~ ~ple6, FL (23'3) 262.1611 EXHIBIT E '.llIUI_......._._..U. V I Y A r:XHIBIT B nn !a~ H:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~~p ~W ~~~~ L q ~8g n~ ~r ~oj ih E m (p -I '. m . . " r In ~\ ~ l> c L_p f- ~ ,'O~ I bZ~ !'~ [ ~ .' nil ,< . t' ; ~ ;~ ~ ~ RANDALL P ~J9fE~r THE E~TANCIA Bo!!nton Beach, ~1. H,C.C, Bo!!nton, I.I.C Swinton Ave, Delra~ 6edch, FL 33444 (!I61J 243~~'~~ Naplea, FL (23~) 262-161' ...1......._._.... 1 .,.. AT (p o m m r In < (PI> () ~-1 [ m-Z .\() ~ , ~ ~z~ HJh p . Q tl ! ? OCITID t--'-"-----1 ;1 i ~mmD i!~~ U -l !m .~ lO "-. EXHIBIT B I~ ~ ;; U p f' I m~ ~~~~ , ~ ~~~ W !"! l~~ Wi hl~ h , !e.~ i~h \ 1 Ill! II ~~~ i~~ ~~~ ~il' .U ~<. , , r~ I I~I~ .11.11 -p~ l I ...........-.-.... ~v I Y' A TI-+5 5~TANCIA 6oynton 6e.sC::h, pll. "' ,0,0, 6oynton, 1.1.0 42 N. SwInton Ave. DelrQ~ Bec!lch, FL 33444 (!b!) 243-~'~~ Naple6, FL (23SJ 2.62-1611 -L RANDALL ~ ~X2fE~I ~EXH'B'T B r \;J ~ ~I ~ II . il I I I ~' , I i IF' IJ Iii Iii IS III I! I I ~U I ul hi Ui Iii m n I ;h 1:1 il Ii ~ -. m " n m ~ ,. ~ ~ r z '" ~ ,. ~ "~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~ i 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1,i1 II I ~ ill 11'1 I I ) IJ, . I ~ t U q ~i n d! ~d ~ i I i h ~J.!> vq,.,:r :EB ~ di ~ I ~ 61 IllI II Iii EXHIBIT B )> ~ CD o 11 ~ CJ (p -I (Jill () ~r c mo~ f ~ .'O~ I'l ~IU; A RANDALL ~ ~JgfE~1: -...........-.-.... Sf Y AT T!-IE E~TANCIA 6oyt'llOt'l 6each, FL. H,C,C, 6oyt'ltot'l, L.L.C .42 N. Swrnlon Ave, Delra~ ee.sch, FL 3~444 (&bIJ 243~0'~~ N.!ph!!o, FL <13<;) 262.16" 0\11 o ~r (: mo~ \ ~ , I'O~ ~~; " (p m o o z o rr1 <'..., EXHIBIT B [] ~LLJ~ ; · ...... ..... []~ D (0 ~ ;"r"', ) ; ',..8,....,,,.,' i. ...... -=- -=- OJ ~=-- , ( :;.:,~':'....~:'( ) , '" ..... .............-..-.... r Y A ~ RANDALL ~ ~R19fE~I THE E~TANCIA 6oi:jnton 6eaC:h, FL. ~,c,c, 6ol:lnton, L.L.C 42 N. Swlnlan Ave, Oc!Ir.!~ ~c.h, FL 33444 (!l6U 243-0'~~ N.!Fle~, FI.. (23SJ 262-161' '=XHIBIT B rF 01.1'4' ==t -I I J{J o . ' :::: ",.". ('\ :t> ~) I(@), c:=Jc:=J ~ rl Bl~ L2!! ~ E ~ - " ~ ~ t) m I--- ~ I--- ~~-~~ C] I--- ~ li"~' ~ ~/II II II ~ II u___ 04l~,EiII:: T ?:J 0 - ~f7 ~ , ~\ ~ ~1 1J co I(g! c:=Jr OJ I(@), c:=Jc:=J ~ fll 8~ .' '-"" ~ -~ g I !.------ ~,,)! ~ 1- ;;1 . ~ - ~ rn ~ === p - 11 HGl ~ Cy::ii II ~ ::::: (:-::;;- ,. ~O~1 r'--',J m 0 \>( EJII ~ 0 - , Lfl ~ I;lJ U CO ~ [@1 ~, ~ ~'i .' (CO ~c:=J[ ~ n '--- .. 0 (!) "") C] Co.:: ~, ~~" ~ C::c \~i '1f\~I~ll~.. OJ ~ - u__.. . - C~ , - !=:JQ~' ... ~ t:J -r rj ~ - V E - t@1 " BI ~ ~! IQI! c:=Jc:=J 0 I(@), c:=Jc:=J ~ I I 81a .' '-"" 'to E " ~ - ~ ::.-- I--- 1) ~ I--- ---. I--- c:J I--- ,1"~' 11 ~ Y-ii ~ b..-.i,' , , -:=:: ===== ::::: r:-...;_ 0 r~ ~1 I rill Ji: \>( EJ II ~ ~ H- , I IU~ ~r f7 R I ~ t II [@1 e ~ u...u.u __..J ~ ~ 'i LJ CO I(@ c::::Jc:=J f'T1 $11 ~ ~r c mo~ ~~ -4 .'O~ ~~; -li1L- RANDALL ~ ~lRfE~I Tl-IE EeTANCIA 6oynton 6each, filL. ".0,0, 6oynton, L.L.O .41 N. $wInton Ave, Delr.,~ 8e4d1, FL 33.44..4 l!l6lJ 2"".3~~'~~ Ndple., FL (2;~) 262-1611 ~ H E ~ ~ a~r ...1_.........,...-.... VI Y EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Estancia at Boynton File number: NWSP 05-026 Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a September 27, 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None X PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: None X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall X enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 2. The existing Boundary Survey is an augmented version of the Dakota Lofts X record plat (recorded in P.B. 97, Pgs. 132-134, on 3/11/03); a new record plat will be required to reflect the new Site Plan and additional land to be incorporated into the development. 3. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the X LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 4. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction X acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 5. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the landscape plans X (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities COA 11/03/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 6. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water X and sewer systems serving this proiect (CODE, Section 26-12). 7. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-l6(b)). 8. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid X for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 9. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has X approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 10. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability X at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: None X POLICE Comments: None X BUILDING Comments: 11. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as X defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 12. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in X 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. COA 11/03/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE 13. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall X openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 14. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the X minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 15. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the X loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table 1607.1. Indicate the live load (psf) on the plans for the building design. 16. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic X sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 17. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X proposed construction. 18. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may X not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 19. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 20. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. C The number of dwelling units in each building. D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. E The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) REJbCT COA 11/03/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 21. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: A A legal description of the land. B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Cormnission-approved site plans. D The number of dwelling units in each building. E The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t)) P ARKS AND RECREATION Cormnents: 22. Recreation and Parks Impact Fee is $23,130 and should be paid prior to the X issuance of the first permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 23. The plant material (and their specifications) proposed on the Cross Section of X Federal Highway Buffer supersedes the same as shown on the landscape plan and therefore, a revised landscape plan will be required at the time of permitting. 24. Three (3) Gumbo Limbo trees are proposed at the northeast comer of the X property, adjacent to the single-family home. While Gumbo Limbo trees provide a large canopy, staff still has concerns over the deciduous nature of them and their ability to effectively buffer year-round. Therefore, recommends substituting these three (3) particular trees with another type of native, canopy tree, such as a Paradise, Red Cedar, Ilex, or Mahogany tree or a combination. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 25. Because there are multiple lots, a unity of title will be required to join the lots X together. This shall be executed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the accompanying X request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 05-009). Staff recommends that all sales information used to promote the development and COA 11/03/05 5 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT all homeowner documents should inform buyers that the units are located in the hurricane evacuation zone. 27. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach X County regarding school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building permit. It would be preferable to have this approval prior to the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. 28. On the site plan tabular data (sheet SPI of 2), indicate that the project X requires 65 parking spaces rather than 62 parking spaces. Also, correct the tabular data on the on the site plan prepared by Randall Stofft Architects (sheet AO.l) so that it matches sheet SPI of2. 29. On the site plan tabular data, the setback table indicates that the parcel X setbacks lines would be setback 20 feet from the west property line, 15 feet from the north property line, 30 feet from the south property line, and 10 feet from the east property line. This does not coincide with the aforementioned setback information and as a consequence, must be rectified to match each other at the time of permitting. 30. All new docks would require approval from the U.S. Army Corps of X Engineers. If an IPUD is located with frontage on the Intracoastal Waterway, conditions of approval shall include a deed restriction requiring that any marina or dockage built will not exceed in width, the boundaries of the project's actual frontage on the water, regardless of what any other governing or permitting entity may allow or permit (Chapter 2, Section 5.LA.g.(3)). 31. The sign is limited to six (6) feet in height and 32 square feet in area pursuant X to Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 1.D. of the Land Development Regulations. 32. A condition of approval from the Community Redevelopment Agency Board X from the original site plan application stated the following: Provide formal agreements between the developer and the adjacent property owners regarding the current and proposed water service. This directly relates to those adjacent single family residences currently receiving water service from a well that is located on the subject property. 33. A condition of approval from the Community Redevelopment Agency Board X from the original site plan application stated the following: Provide formal agreements between the developer and the adjacent property owners regarding the continued use of existing docks located on the finger canal of the subject property. 34. All elevation pages shall indicate the paint color name and corresponding X color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 35. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends X converting them from private property to "buffer tracts" that would be owned COA 11/09/05 6 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. 36. Staff recommends enhancing the south fayade of the southernmost building X proposed along Federal Highway with additional elements, such as faux windows, faux balcony, score lines, decorative shutters, awnings, and / or inlays. ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD COMMENTS: Comments: 37. Omit condition #36 and require south elevation along Bamboo Lane to have X similar architectural features as the west elevation along Federal Highway. 38. Request from DOT approval for on-street parking. X 39. Consider placement of utilities underground. X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: Comments: 39. To be determined. MWRJelj S:IPlanningISHARED\WPIPROJECTSIEstancia @ Boynton BeachlNWSP 05-026ICOA.doc CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM ~A rb \ e d \~ \\~\o~ Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Requested City Commission Meeting Dates Date Final Form Must be Turned in to City Clerk's Office [gJ December 6, 2005 D December 20, 2005 D January 3, 2006 D January 17, 2006 December 5, 2005 (Noon) D February 7, 2006 D February 21, 2006 D March 7, 2006 D March 21, 2006 January 17,2006 (Noon) November 14,2005 (Noon.) February 6, 2006 (Noon) December 19, 2005 (Noon) February 21, 2006 (Noon) January 3,2006 (Noon) March 6, 2006 (Noon) NATURE OF AGENDA ITEM D Administrative D Consent Agenda [gJ Public Hearing D Bids D Announcement D City Manager's Report D Development Plans D New Business D Legal D UnfInished Business D Presentation RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the December 6, 2005 City Commission Agenda under Public Hearing to coincide with the corresponding land use amendment and rezoning requests. The Community Redevelopment Agency Board approved the subject request on November 8, 2005, subject to staff comments excluding condition #36, subject to additional CRA staff comments regarding underground utilities and on-street parking, and subject to an additional condition on architectural details. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department Memorandum No. PZ 05-208. EXPLANATION: PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: Estancia @ Boynton Beach (NWSP 05-026) Carlos Ballbe, Keith & Ballbe, Inc. HHC Boynton, LLC 3010 South Federal Highway (East side of Federal Highway, approximately 300 feet south of intersection of Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway Request for new site plan approval to construct 30 townhouse units and related site improvements on 2.65-acres to be rezoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD). DESCRIPTION: PROGRAM IMP ACT: FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: N/A N/A N/A ~ City Manager's Signature 7t-u Planning -an~~or City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Estancia @ Boynton Beach\NWSP 05-026\Agenda Item Request Estancia @ BB NWSP 05-026 12-5-05.dot S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM,DOC