REVIEW COMMENTS
~f, Michael
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Gage, Marshall
Wednesday, August 25, 2004 7:50 AM
Rumpf, Michael
RE: service impact review - Edward Medical Office Building
I think that will suffice.
-Po t lC-e.-
-----Original Message-----
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 12:43 PM
To: Gage, Marshall; Bingham, William; Gomez, Nem
Cc: Immler, Matt; Ness, Jim; Mazzella, Pete; Johnson, Eric
Subject: service impact review - Edward Medical Office Building
Gents, this is another project initiated prior to our process modification to incorporate your reviews into our site
plan or rezoning process. The following are the simple facts for this project:
Location: West side of S.Federal Hwy. appx 350 south of the intersection with Old Dixie Hwy.
Proposed Annexation, and Land Use Amendment/Rezoning from CH/5 and CG in Palm Beach County to Local
Retail Commercial and Community Commercial in City
Proposed use: An 11,957 square foot office building as an infill project.
The site is neglected in terms of maintenance, and a couple of old buildings and a ramp exist. The billboard has
been removed except for the remaining support posts.
I assume that you can easily accommodate this project with existing services; however, I do not want to speak for
you. To assist with your quick review, please confirm that the following text is true and acceptable for the report
under the appropriate heading to represent your departments:
This project has been reviewed for potential service impacts and availablity, and based on the planned office use,
it has been determined that services allocated to, or existing within the area are adequate to provide the project
with a necessary level of service.
If not acceptable, please provide direct revisions or text to replace this suggested narrative. As for utility
improvements, I will try to get a description of needed utility extensions to be provided by the project (if applicable).
If I don't hear from you or a representative by say next Monday, I will use this text.
Thanks in advance for your assistance, Mike
1
Johnson, Eric
,From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Logan, Laurinda
Tuesday, August 24,20042:17 PM
Johnson, Eric
Kelley, David
RE: service review for Haney - utility text
Edwards is tieing into an existing 4" force main for sanitary sewer. The existing 8" water main currently terminates 20'
south of his north property line. He will be extending this main to his south property line and providing a new fire hydrant
approximately mid-point of his east boundary.
If you need additional information please feel free to give me a call.
LCll.{vLV'vclCl
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, August 24,2004 1:25 PM
To: Kelley, David
Cc: Logan, Laurinda
Subject: FW: service review for Haney - ulitity text
Importance: High
Dave,
I am working on the project known as the Edward Medical Office Building. As you know, the site plan came through
TRC on August 3, 2004. As you can recall, the project was for a 12,000 square foot office building located on the west
side of South Federal Highway, approximately 350 south of the intersection of Old Dixie Highway and Federal
Highway. The property is located outside the city limits but they're requesting to annex into the City. I was unaware
that this project needed the utility lines extended to the property.
Below is a special request to you from Mike Rumpf. Thank you for responding. Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 12:48 PM
To: Johnson, Eric
Cc: Breese, Ed
Subject: service review for Haney - ulitity text
Importance: High
Eric, can you get a sentnce or two, unless you are aware and can write it, on the needed utility lines that need to be
extended to the project, if any (water and sewer?). You will see that I have contacted others for the needed input.
Perhaps Dave or Laurinda can provide this description to you for write up. This is info that may be collected from their
comments as well, or from discussion at TRC. Thanks, MR.
1
~f, Michael
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mazzella, Pete
Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:48 PM
Rumpf, Michael
RE: service impact review - Edward Medical Office Building
Mike
A water main currently exists across the frontage of this parcel, and should be sufficient to provide domestic and fire-flow
needs for a low-rise facility. They will probably need a private lift station to connect to the sewer.
Peter Mazzella
-----Original Message-----
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 12:43 PM
To: Gage, Marshall; Bingham, William; Gomez, Nem
ee: Immler, Matt; Ness, Jim; Mazzella, Pete; Johnson, Eric
Subject: service impact review - Edward Medical Office Building
Gents, this is another project initiated prior to our process modification to incorporate your reviews into our site plan or
rezoning process. The following are the simple facts for this project:
Location: West side of S.Federal Hwy. appx 350 south of the intersection with Old Dixie Hwy.
Proposed Annexation, and Land Use AmendmenURezoning from CHIS and CG in Palm Beach County to Local Retail
Commercial and Community Commercial in City
Proposed use: An 11,957 square foot office building as an infill project.
The site is neglected in terms of maintenance, and a couple of old buildings and a ramp exist. The billboard has been
removed except for the remaining support posts.
I assume that you can easily accommodate this project with existing services; however, I do not want to speak for you.
To assist with your quick review, please confirm that the following text is true and acceptable for the report under the
appropriate heading to represent your departments:
This project has been reviewed for potential service impacts and availablity, and based on the planned office use, it
has been determined that services allocated to, or existing within the area are adequate to provide the project with a
necessary level of service.
If not acceptable, please provide direct revisions or text to replace this suggested narrative. As for utility
improvements, I will try to get a description of needed utility extensions to be provided by the project (if applicable).
If I don't hear from you or a representative by say next Monday, I will use this text.
Thanks in advance for your assistance, Mike
1