Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS 8.D.I FOREST HILL LOT 3, BLOCK 2, (ZNCV 06-007) ZONING CODE VARIANCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-094 STAFF REPORT FROM: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board and City Commission Michael W. Rum~~ Planning and Zoning Director Maxime Ducoste-A. ~ . Planner TO: THRU: PROJECT NAME/NO: May 4, 2006 Forest Hill Lot 3 (Main)/ ZNCV 0&007 DATE: REQUEST: Request for relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5.C.2.a, requiring a minimum lot frontage of seventy five (75) feet to allow a thirty-four (34) foot variance, resulting in a forty-one (41) foot frontage for a proposed single- family residence within the R-1-AA single family zoning district; Request for relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5.C.2.a, requiring a minimum 20 foot rear yard setback to allow a five (5) foot variance, resulting in a fifteen (15) foot rear yard setback for a proposed single-family residence within the R-1-AA single family zoning district. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: City of Boynton Beach Applicant/Agent: Octavia Sherrod Location: S.W. 23rd Terrace Existing Land Use/Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR)/R-1-AA Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No changes are proposed Proposed Use: Single-family house Acreage: 0.17 acre (7,509 square feet) Adjacent Uses: North: Right-of-way for SW 23rd Avenue, and farther north the right-of-way for Interstate 95; A single-family residence, zoned R-1-AA, single family residential district; South: Staff Report Memorandum No PZ-06-094 Page 2 East: A single-family house zoned R-1-AA, single family residential district; and West: Buffer wall and the right-of-way for Interstate 95. BACKGROUND The subject property is located within the Forest Hill subdivision. It is currently vacant and zoned R-1-AA, single-family residential dwelling district (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map). Currently, the subject neighborhood is mostly developed with the exception of the subject lot, which has remained vacant due to the physical configuration and the city's minimum lot restrictions. The Forest Hill subdivision was platted in 1957 with lot frontages ranging between 80 to 85 feet. Within the subdivision, the subject block (#2) was originally composed of twelve (12) uniform lots (see Exhibit"B"- Plat Map). When Interstate 95 was created in the early sixeties and late seventies land was expropriated, which included lots 1, 2, 12 and roughly half of lots 3 and l1.The original lot lines were altered by the I-95 construction resulting in the subject parcel having less than seventy-five feet of frontage. The subject parcel (Lot 3) has a frontage of 41 feet and a total area of 7,509 square feet. The parcel is also the westernmost lot on the block, and therefore abutting the buffer wall for Interstate 95. It is a non- conforming lot because it does not meet the minimum lot frontage required by the R-1-AA district regulations. In this case, the provisions within Section 11. 1. c., Non-conforming Lots are not applicable since the parcel is no longer "a whole platted lot" and the frontage is less than 60 feet. Mrs. Octavia Sherrod, applicant, and Manager of the city's Community Improvement Division is requesting the above-referenced variances needed for a single-family residence on this substandard lot (see Exhibit "C" - Proposed Building and Site Plan). It should be noted that the R-1-AA zoning district allows development of a single-family residence. The minimum lot regulations for a single-family dwelling in the R-1-AA zoning district are as follows (Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5. D.2.a.): . Lot area: 7,500 square feet in areas developed and/or platted prior to June 13, 1975 . Lot frontage: 75 feet . Front setback: 25 feet; . Rear setback: 20 feet; . Side setbacks: 7.5 feet. The applicant is proposing the following lot characteristics and setbacks: . Lot area: 7,509 square feet; . Lot frontage: 41 feet; . Front setback: 25 feet; . Rear setback: 15 feet; . Side setbacks: 7.5 feet. ANALYSIS The code states that the zoning code variance cannot be approved unless the board finds the following: a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building Staff Report Memorandum No PZ-06-094 Page 3 involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning district. b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant. e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. f. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter [ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Staff reviewed the requested variance emphasizing the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit "D". Staff concurs with the applicant's response to criteria "b" above that there exists special conditions peculiar to the subject parcel, namely lot frontage and configuration. Staff acknowledges that the previous expropriation action for the construction of the Interstate 95 caused the non-conformity by extracting a portion of the original conforming lot, therefore meeting criterion '~"above. Also, regardless of what allowable use is proposed for Lot 3, unless assembled with adjacent properties, which are not available, the subject variance for the lot frontage would be required, as the minimum variance needed to make possible the reasonable use of the land. Staff concurs with the applicant that special conditions and circumstances exist, related to lot configuration and size, and the placement of a utility easement, that are not the result of actions by the applicant, therefore satisfying criteria ''a''and "b"above. It should be noted that the construction of a house on the subject lot, within the required minimum setbacks would not likely be pOSSible without lowering the living area below the minimum standard of 1,500 square feet. Further, staff also concurs with the applicant that the approval of the variances will not confer any special privileges. The restrictions and physical conditions of the subject property, makes developing this lot impossible without the subject variances. Accordingly, denial of the subject variance requests would deprive the applicant of development rights enjoyed by those who have successfully developed other lots in the same subdivision and block. Therefore, criteria "c"and "d"are satisfied. With respect to criterion "e", which considers if the request is the minimum necessary to make pOSSible the reasonable use of the property, a unit design has been selected which just meets the city's minimum living area requirement, which design is a factor of the setback restrictions as well as a required utility easement. Along the western boundary of the subject property, parallel to the I-95 right-of-way a twenty-four (24) foot utility easement is required by the Utilities Department for a gravity sewer line and water line. Regardless of building layout, any single-family dwelling providing a minimum living area comparable to the existing residences in the neighborhood would still encroach into the rear setback, and therefore, this proposed application represents the minimum variance required in achieving the reasonable use of the land. It should be noted that the lot located to the east of the subject property is developed, thereby preventing further land assemblage to create a lot sufficient in size to comply with the minimum lot frontage. Further, it should also be noted that the lot complies with the minimum width requirement along the rear; only the front dimension Staff Report Memorandum No PZ-06-094 Page 4 Staff finds that granting the variances will not be injurious to the area or detrimental to the public welfare. On the contrary, the proposed improvement will be consistent with existing characteristics of the neighborhood including house sizes. RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis contained herein, staff finds that a "hardship" exists. This request will not be injurious to the area or detrimental to the public welfare, and the variances requested are the minimum necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land. Staff also concludes that the approval of the requested variances will enhance the community by supporting new infill housing development in the neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends that the requested variances be approved, which grant relief from the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2-Zoning to allow: 1) A thirty (34)-foot reduction from the seventy-five (75) foot frontage required by code to allow a 41-foot frontage; and 2) A 5-foot reduction from the 20-foot rear yard setback required by code to allow a 15-foot side yard setback. No conditions of approval are recommended; however, any conditions of approval added by the Planning and Development Board or the City Commission will be placed in the Exhibit "E'~ Conditions of Approval. MWR/MD S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Forest Hill Lot 3 (Main)\Staff Report.doc .. 1 in. = 100.0 feet 1- 5 R 1- ( I \ '-- ------------ Location Map Forest Hills Lot 3 EXHIBIT "A" <> .~ ;g. 85 ?-::::s- ?/~ 4.", '- ~ <> N Vl '" u;,j,':.'" ' . ,," I 85:. r " 1'., \lb'f' '- ..... -- -0 <> ..... C> \It J"", >.....v_ ?'i "" 85' . '" S.~ 24 rH AVE. Q ~-" 80' :> ~:s- ~ t,J , ,. (,f. "1':-- '~n1IT.-: ,. 80: 85' H t '- <> '" - ...... ..... l'\) ..... C) .:>/ ", :> :// /.r-- - (..)) >-'>,,> ~ 6'S' s.w Z5 rH Ave. ':>/s,. ':>/d ~ \)) ~'I .'" .~.'1'I~n; . ..go 6'0' ...... ?c(oo< ~ N .-;,; ; (.)0) ~' EXHIBIT B ~ ,E 14 Cor: v. 8,' 0'<> >Ot;; \1\ i' o 8(..3,' ..~, ..... ?Q...z~~.~ ~ .' '" '" G' ~ .. 6'~' , 8>'. 91H' t./i",; ~",('~t'I7/~J ~ ~. <> '" Cl ();) C; ~ \Jl :;. ~o .::>-..:'5<9 90' ,,'-.' ?~:? 85 ~. J'5' "-c 85" ~ ~ c , G"- o '" ." 90' ~: ": .) ~~~1~' Q-<. "\0 ....... -t" ~ ~ , I'. ~ ..., o ....., ~ " '" J'5' 8$.' 1 . 8~r.S~ . I 87"'" 8(..37" UI,/: 'I '"-QJ/:;'n('''....--i r.... C; VJ ':" ~ ...0 <> \1\, :>~; '&'~ '50;,- . 6>. I 8.5 " :.> "',7' -{'o '" 0, ~: 80' '" :> ~,i ~ o&.'~ :: ~ .:>~-<:~~ G' "-t~;... VI " ~: ~~~i;~.~.~+;:, " p'C Jf..,. . ,~ ,; c- '2~ \B :Cb ,;; Cb :}'" Z5' , \PI ;5c-.,:> >2,;. ~.~ '-T ... -;:j.~' .-85' . , " '" -. f'\) ~$> 8>' ..... C5 '-0 ..... ~ .:> v'. ?// 0.... 85 /00 -{,.' o -... ~ ~- )~ }; <- I 0 l-.,. ~ r" ~ t' VI 0, s.~ 25 .,.H PL. ~ 130.4'1' ~ I ?~.;.;' I ,-~..<"""" ~ ..~~ ~ ~. " 113.4-3' " 'I~ 110.01' ~ 7.....p IJO (;i '\~ ~ "N ~~ '" ~,; ~.. ~"'j- ~"h~ lO'. ,c. ~" C\) .3 ~ '" ~ U>, G\ ~ 110_' .Ll_ . "f".- ~- .' . "-........ "'v C);) f\) ~ () v, . I\)~ '" .. <> 24.n' ... /10 . --fj~ y ~ VJ C' :- <> " -. -. .... " ~ "' 108 80' .5L...... (i\ t'\ Q\o ~VJ ""0 '> VJ "','~ :1 ~ ~ . -< ~ t; , ~/089/. ~ , . ~ ~,\ '" ~ 'l'>1 1~ 1 . ) '" .~ ~'8 '\}- ' ". ,O'/090(!' -i:':.. 50' " ~~-J ~ ~ - \J\ ~~: . ~ 1!~'-- .f':' 11/ ct' ",' "" "" '" ~ Cl ~ .> l -. ." C) ":. ~ ~ v ~i~. '" '" ~e " '" -0 ~ , .. \,o-,~ /Oe. 58' (f) <l<l ~l<> L :'i ~O:l "'I\) . Cl :; c. '" . .~" '- <> ~ -.). 70' ~~ \., ">~ ~ ~ ,of I . ..,. ~ ~ f11 ';;:;';,s, ~ 50' ~. 110 o,,~ "- . /lg;.,o; ,1' ~ s'S;', ?......p " - '- ~ ..... , '" !'O~'&_ , ... ~ r~ ~ Cl":: -t' ", <-: ., .. , -.j Ji /J o- Il o' 1.1 ~ -r~ I \. T~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ..... >;. I\) , <\) ~ '" to " .... ....'" , '" ""- ~ , '" tJ,) :... ..... <<'- f\) '" , - ---- . ~ ~ ,. '" , "':, :~ ~ ..... o. ;J ...... - ,1.- ~ ~ ':; '" ~ \h .. ...... -> '" C- , 9 ~ : .' -, ., -~-_.- ." c' .... .> " ~ ... ~ -;; (1\ , <\) '-0 :.. ~ '" ;.~, 11,10' I ;...,,/:' ; "'0';,,0" . . '" '" I ~ '" "" 'It .... l'~ '" ~ ..., ~ '" -J '" CO~.;~'" Ul 0" ~ to ,;l.. " - " j I/O. oz' i I/O.OZ ~ ~ rH AVE. 25'0, '77' 80.0r' '" Q ~1o,0f' ~~~~;)-o .~::t <5 -, ~ . _ 90,75' ~ :> ,l"''' ~'0" c<; ~ .c:: <; 2i o ..t-----C~~ ,".' ~~ ~. ~ Rn'" ~11 9", 7/.' ;~: ,Ii,,' -,<>~ ";r 'b .j t' C,\ \ , -", ^.J \II " ~ \i, !tl r>, ~ o '\ ....Q 3::;; '\:.-: '\ I.l I.n~ l\l r>,n-. ~~ ~~ ~~ !' ~ ~" \,../ :t: ! "PR.M Z5'I I I I Z~ Z~'I I 1(;) 111 :t. I; ~I '~I ~:l-J 0" I I I Z5 ZJ ~ " "-~ ~ ('I),,, . n-.O Z~ I ~ <> I t" \ \ 1) f, \lJ ~" , ' , (I) () ~ Q ~ ~~ " <:::> -.K It: c::::J ..... a~ o ~ f'-,. ~ ~ - ""i ~ <> o ~~ ~~~ r(l)O ~ ~~ z~q ~~~zco -...; )>Z(/) (f) () rn ~:I:6~~" ~ ()ZO ~r 1;::) 0 z l> ~~(J]~ ~ )j -t m" ~,"-<~--1~ 0 ~,,~ ." ac():U EXHIBIT C III rr 00 ,,-< '" ... '" -~ ~-l~ _u , ",sf' /i-- ," I, I' II I' i! i' I r1: i"'~ i! 2~ j' i~'1 ... /' ii I. It I' il -'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'~l ~ I ~ : ! , i 1 I I / I I .~.:x, I;, .!<~--- --- ----- - - ----- --.- L -- _ --- --i- :1 I a~. I I ~...- -- -- u -- -- -- -In 1/: I / ------------\7-t-------7-, , .. I / , 0, I '4~--l I I -<>" I I Ie I " -LI r / I I I: I I I / __. I I I I ~ I I / SET lACK I I I! II,' I ' I ) ~---IJ: / I Ii,' / >,' ,I / / I / " n I ,~. l; ~.,.. .>r I~I '.1:- 't-". '0. "l',:T. I '" ~~ ~ "~4' I > ~5 R::: ",0 ~~i \. -------\ ~ '\ !!lit ~ , ll'l / / --.I o .- 'I ~ct" 4'~ ..."gfi ~,i' ~cs ~ s, W, 23rd, ~--<t.- ;Ii ~ \. I / I /1 I " . ~: / I . i!l~ / I ;Ii I // ~ II/~"'... / " TER~~_ I,' (I . I, " /'; I , I ' // I I : i I i j I i 1111111 iiD;!:~ i iii ; m I i I 1 iV' ! f I : : I I . i I 1 i i ~ ~ ! ~ I ~~: '" -; 0 . o o I ~ i II S ~tm"' N I' ~ II II?: .. \l~~;I-i'~i~ I ' .. SITE PLAN 1__PIANS 3, JJIOCIl: ;t, i:>-;W. ;z"ra Tar.. Boynton Beacb. F10rida 33425 B~ Engineering Cousultants, PA 2840 NE 14th Stn:et, No, A-309 Pompano Beach. FL 33062 Phone (9S4)781-6700/FBPE CA NnQn,l;,.c;: ~ '" 0 _ ,-(J' f ~~ ,;, i 35'-'" 1 'W> 0 ell- o i_..J1m1'L_i .~ !.l~ I r-F=..... : fi,E~ .J.. 8(1 !I k-- 7-<' e 1(-0" , 1T11 1 ,-(J' I 5'-(]' Ii ., '" 5'-8' .... ~ I! <\ 7-<' e ~[/:e' ,./~ H !I. ,-,. ~ ~ KT-D' . €> G) I au <\ e I r~ ~ r@ ~v "~ e 1-0" ~ 'l-or ~ ~ I · ~rl I[~' .IP8 I rrr III =-: ~ ffi;QI/ 11LJ '90 li~[3 It!-D' .,'-4' i ~ OJ c.. 1- ----------1 I I I I I @ I I ~ ~ '-D' c.. I~ "'g ~~ ~ ~~Id;t i!' ~ g H ~ is ~ )0...... i ~ ~~in2 ~ i~~iKJa I l!l lil ~ ! W I ~ ;;t .. FLOOR PLAN, .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r;; . '" ~ ~ ~ !:.. I' ~ i ~ ~ SCHEDULES & :::t ~ ~ ~ ; AREA TABULATION EXHIBIT C 4'-(J' ~~ ~ OJ ~r Ni' /5 ~ f'-_ ,It!-D' _ ~~ H ~ e ~ ~Il 8 It!(J' [~( ~ '" ...... <\ ..~ )'f' .. -( ~ ~ .. f.c>< Il!~ ~~:;; _ !~ !~ ! "'-8' It!(J' K o <I'f, @ ~ ~( ~ ~ II< ~ I ~~ i~ ;.'" ;~ ! .. '" ~[ t ~ ~ GO ,. ~ ~-~015 <3 01 e/€elGeee V> -< ;:< ~ --< -< 0 ril 8 ;u ~ <Jl Cl --< :I: '" '" '" 0 ~ c !;; ~ tJI tJI tJI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lil ~ Ili Ili '" I I I ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ il!:f""" "d" '" ",. '" '" ~ ;~;:;~~:;r;; 2 " ~ '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ I'U Ii ~ ;ji ;ji ;ji . . ~ ~ ~ ~ --< 0 y ~ If ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ in n ~ i i I ~ ~ i II g ~ ~ ~!;; fH'! ~ ~ V> P" ~~ lt~ i ~ ~ I ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - - - ~ - - ~ . - ~ ~ :< II li ~ :I: 0 U I- << w ;:;: en w z Z 0 W f- m z >- ~~C, W 0 en I l.. ~"'~ I- 0 ~~~ 0:: 1= ~ \its~ 0 lL. U .....-:.,':.- J ~ t<) ~~ IX) r ~'I' - i:\~ ~~~ --:',.)J:S, -~ c6'.p N Cr- <) '\!' ,00 SOl . ~ ~~ ~\\>~ ~~\) ~~~ ;::....--<::.. ~..::::. C:, ------7 I- ~ I~' '1- ~ :z ~~ w", 'z';sw ww~w "'''' :z ~~5~ 3~S~ :::EUlVlU ~55~ ::si5i5o ::>ClCl~ g I I (:) t3wwl *ci:::i<T' L EXHIBIT C ~~g~ ~~~0b so ' '?:~. C::zo::1(;;> Ii! eJ ~ ~~) ~ :i<!6' ~~tr'"t .\Q\:' \;~"'r: ~E;8~ : o::lhz' )- "':'I,;~~-~~~Clw U> w:l;I!:i 0" i '/. \.p"~ _ ~ O'~bj:i:!:;;:,:;~.;j,'l -~re~~~ '-' ~- ~i~,Ea:r~:~t :'7!"~~ ~ z Vl ~ ~ ~ (:j lli;af~L~,;."\, G 0 c> C .....l ;t >,,::J~~~'i~i?;" . ~t . ~;;,9E ~:i ~ ~~w - ~.'I-"'":;_ y~ " w a:::: CIl 0:: W Ql ~J= ~- ~~hi.;:~' .t~t" ~:J: ei ~ ~ 9 ~ t- <( ..c{ V;;a ".' "~:,,<\:~ . ...$' ~~ ~ -(I) ~ ~ a......:. . <( l&- '--~I '-:,""': Y."O, t<CeJ 8 u...:( tJ o o~~::> -;~,\, .,' J~\H"JZ"""~L.. .ti: >- zO::J1:o...""")i(@i ~~~(I)ogg ~ ~~~~ )~ ~ug~~~~ n:: ~~~~ ~\\ Rg5 ~~b .Ulb~ :::> w~:J~ \' ~Vl .~:Z8El:zCl V1 ~~~:I: ~~ ~8 ~~~5~~~ 9 a... :r:Ow '\ n...f5 I n..~zO:=ofu W ~~t-~8 ".'" ~~ ~::1~~~~Ui G: ~0~~~ ",oS ~~ ~~;~~~~ ~m:~~ ~,: ~~g~~~~ oWz><C. /1... Z~OWlf)U u~<(~~ "~ @iwC)lf)~~~ ~ozlf)~ \' ~~z~o~~ <~~~- ~ ~~~ZZ~~ ~~~~~ - ~~~~~~~ ~~~~< ~b~~~~9 ~o~w9 If)lf)O~~o~ ~~~~9 ~~~~~~~ z~~~~ o5C)~w~8 8wb~~ ~~~o~e ~r or ~~~~w~ I~~~~ ~~8~~~ ~u~gm ~>~j~~ ~~~~~ z~o~~~ ~~~~0 ~z~~~~ ~~8g~ :5~~~~ ~~~~~ ~85~~lf) ~~5~t If)~e5ci~ r w <( ~ <00 ~ W ~~~~~ ~~8~~~ & ~~:Z:I:O 8<b~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~8~~~~ ~ ~~5~~ :z~~<~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ < ~~~lf)~ ~~~~8~ ~ ~~~~< ~~~~~~ ~ ~b~oe Wlf)lf)~ ~ o ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ m _O<(lf)~ ~~~lf)~<( .,., o "- '" '" "- <D '" .... "" 1-<.> 00 -'-, (0 t ii'll -1:: t \J ' .~ lol 1 ,( \. LO LO N I c:i<.O zo '" I "'LO ~o g;:z: <r: o 1'--0:::: LOO w~ .----.. c:> 3=~~>- ~--.J f- 0::::- :z: ILO:=> LOf-NO mc.n U Iw~ 0::::0 I c.nOOU c.nLL..m<r: w w --.J f-CO '----' <{ --.J:L D-- --.J <r: D-- ~ U o --.J m '" <'oJ o u- rn '" ..... ~ w :::>; :::>; o :I: --' 5E :C ;;.: en ro l.. '0 <'oJ .,., o "- rn <'oJ "- '" 1'0 re- O --.J .:J --' <( U VJ .:J f- <( '" '" "" U :J f- '" ~ ~ ~ ~ < .",,,,, .,...... ",,,,,,, ...",,, I I I o;~~ ",,,,, ;,oU;(D ~ee ii 6 ~ gtx tf: ~~~ ~ '" ... .... .... w <( :J 0 ~m(ij <~~ :E~:i ~~~ LJqlIl viQ.a m >- N ?: g .J ~ N m ~ '" no: << :I: U ii: 0'" ~"" 1-0 00 -,-' (0 <( Cl ~02 ~g >L... <( - I . "U 0 ~~ "'(0 Vi 3::z: III lIlo W I- et:: :z: Cl >- Cl 0 <( (0 --' l..U - I :I:'" ~g~ ~10l ",- zm _ 0-0 f- 0", ZN >- -no: o w co ':m 0:::>; l..ZW o f- --,u- u~~~ t: u~.. La.J.. 8 ;'51= I=!!! N z zGj o~~Ct:: g~~~ L.....UU~ EXHIBIT D Statement of Special Conditions, hardships or reasons justifying the requested exception or variance A. The subject property is a vacant lot, which was originally platted with 85 feet of frontage. At some point, when the Interstate 1-95 was enlarged, 44 feet was taken leaving 41 feet of frontage for the subject lot. Therefore, special conditions and circumstances are peculiar to the land. The majority of the other lots in this subdivision meet the standard frontage for the R1-AA zoning district. B. The sub-standard conditions of the lot existed prior to the applicant taking ownership of the property. Further, along the westernmost part of the lot, a buffer wall separates the property to 1-95. On the east side of the 1-95 wall, a water line and a gravity sewer line run north and south, which requires no less than a twenty (20) foot easement. This technical requirement makes this site difficult to develop without the requested variances. C. The applicant wishes to construct a single-family, approximately 1952 square feet. This home will be approximately the same size as the surrounding homes. The approval of these variances will not confer any special privilege, since no other land exhibits the same special conditions as the subject lot. And other lands which are sub-standards in the R1-AA zoning district have been developed with similar frontage. D. Denying the variance request would deprive the applicant of the development right of this property. Therefore this lot would remain vacant and would entice illegal dumpling. E. The variances requested is the minimum variance it requires to build a single family, which represents the minimum and reasonable use of the land. Further, the proposed single-family house would meet all other building and site regulations. F. The approval of the subject variances would meet the intent and purpose of the zoning code. n would be consistent with the existing fabric and characteristic of the neighborhood including house sizes. G. The applicant could not acquire property on either side of the subject parcel as the lot to the east is developed with a single family, while to the West is the Interstate 1-95 buffer wall. EXHIBIT "E" Conditions of Approval Project name: Forest Hill Lot 3 File number: ZNCV 06-007 Reference' DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS- General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: None FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: None ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Conditions of Approval 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 1. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: 1. To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Forest Hill Lot 3 (Main)\COA,doc S:\Planning\Planning Templates\Condition of Approval 2 page -P&D ORA 2003 form,doc