REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-016
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and City Commission
Michael RumPf'r1(,.;~
Planning and Zoning Director
THRU:
FROM:
Kathleen Zeitler ~
Planner
DATE:
February 15, 2006
PROJECT NAME/NO:
Healing Heart Veterinary Clinic / White Elk LLC (MSPM 06-001)
REQUEST:
Major Site Plan Modification
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: White Elk Enterprises, LLC
Applicant: White Elk Enterprises, LLC, Nancy Keller, Managing Member
Agent: Ms. Merrill Romanik / Synalovski Gutierrez Romanik Architects, Inc.
Location: 226 SE 23rd Avenue (see Location Map - Exhibit "A'')
Existing Land Use: Office Commercial (OC)
Proposed Land Use: No change proposed
Existing Zoning: Office and Professional Commercial District (C-l)
Proposed Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use: Veterinary Clinic
Acreage: 8,541.22 square feet (0.196 acre)
Adjacent Uses:
North:
SE 23rd Avenue right-of-way, and farther north, medical offices zoned C-l;
South:
Single-family residence zoned R-1AA;
East:
Medical office zoned C-l; and,
West:
Medical office zoned C-1.
Staff Report - Healing Heart / White Elk LLC (MSPM 06-001)
Memorandum No PZ 06-016
Page 2
BACKGROUND
Site Features:
The subject property is located on the south side of SE 23rd Avenue between South
Seacrest Boulevard and the Florida East Coast Railroad. SE 23rd Avenue serves as
an urban collector roadway between Congress Avenue to the west and South
Federal Highway to the east, and is the only means of access to this property. The
subject property is a parcel containing 8,541 square feet, with 60 feet of road
frontage and 142 feet of lot depth. In 1952 the subject property was platted as Lot
8, of High Point, a single-family residential subdivision. Due to their proximity to
Bethesda Hospital, the lots which front SE 23rd Avenue in this area were rezoned to
the C-l zoning district years ago. The majority of these lots which front on SE 23rd
Avenue have since converted from single-family residential to medical and
professional office uses. When rezoned to C-l, the subject property continued to
be used as single-family residential, which is a nonconforming use the C-l district.
Proposal:
The applicant is proposing a major site plan modification to convert the existing
residential use of the subject property to a commercial site for a veterinary clinic.
The proposed use of veterinary office and clinic is a permitted use in the C-l zoning
district. However, the C-l zoning district specifically excludes the following
accessory uses to a veterinary clinic: (1) outdoor kennels or the keeping of animals
for purposes other than treatment; and, (2) on-site disposal of animals. The
applicant has noted on the site plan that the proposed veterinary clinic will not
conduct any of the above excluded accessory uses.
The property owner is a holistic veterinarian who specializes in homeopathy,
acupuncture, and chiropractic care of animals. Currently, the veterinarian has a
local practice (Healing Heart) on NE 3rd Street and is seeking to relocate the
business to the subject property. Conversion of the subject property for the
proposed veterinary clinic will result in the use of the property changing from a
nonconforming use (residential) to a conforming use (commercial) in the C-l
zoning district.
ANALYSIS
Concurrency:
Traffic:
A traffic statement was prepared by the applicant and sent to the Palm Beach
County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level
of service. Based on their review, the Traffic Division determined that the
proposed project meets the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) of Palm Beach
County, however, no building permits are to be issued by the City after the build-
out date of 2007. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project
Aggregation Rules as set forth in the TPS Ordinance.
Utilities:
Potable water and sanitary sewer / wastewater capacity is currently available to
serve this project, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity,
and obtaining water/sewer plan approval from the Utilities Department prior to
permitting (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
Staff Report - Healing Heart / White Elk LLC (MSPM 06-001)
Memorandum No PZ 06-016
Page 3
Drainage:
Fire I Police:
Driveways:
Parking:
Landscaping:
Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The
Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is
recommending that the full review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until
time of permit review (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
Staff from the Fire and Police departments have reviewed the site plan and
determined that emergency services are available to the proposed project with an
appropriate response time. Emergency service providers expect to be able to
utilize their current or anticipated resources to maintain an adequate level of
service for the proposed project.
Site access is proposed via one (1) full access driveway connection to SE 23rd
Avenue. On site vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including drive aisle width,
have been reviewed and approved by the Engineering Division staff. The existing
sidewalk along SE 23rd Avenue will remain.
The proposed veterinary clinic use requires one (1) parking space per 300 square
feet of gross floor area. The 1600 square foot vet clinic will require a total of six
(6) parking spaces, including one space designated for handicapped use. The site
plan indicates a total of eight (8) parking spaces, which complies with the minimum
parking requirements.
Typical parking stalls, excluding handicap spaces, are dimensioned 9 feet 6 inches
in width and 18 feet 6 inches in length. All proposed parking stalls, including the
size and location of the spaces designated for handicap use, were reviewed and
approved by both the Engineering Division and Building Division. All necessary
traffic control signage and pavement markings will be provided on site to clearly
delineate areas on site and direction of circulation.
Staff has reviewed the landscape plan and determined that it complies with the
landscaping requirements of the Land Development Regulations. The proposed
project will have a pervious area of 2,674 square feet (31% of the site).
Landscaping will include buffers along the south, east, and west property lines, and
plantings along SE 23rd Avenue, around the front and sides of the building
foundation, and within the landscape island in the parking lot. The existing six (6)
foot high wood fence along the south, east, and west property lines will be included
in the buffers. In addition, a trash enclosure for roll-out curb service will be located
to the rear of the building and screened on all sides with matching wooden fencing.
The landscape plan indicates fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials will be
native species as required. Native species will include Southern Magnolia, Sabal
Palmetto, Lysiloma Sabicu, Cocoplum, and Dwarf Florida Gamma Grass. The City
signature trees (Tibouchina Granulosa) will be located on each side of the access
drive as required. All above ground mechanical equipment will be visually screened
with a Cocoplum hedge, and all planted areas on site will be irrigated in accordance
with the landscape code requirements.
Staff Report - Healing Heart / White Elk LLC (MSPM 06-001)
Memorandum No PZ 06-016
Page 4
Building and Site
Design:
The existing one-story residence on site is a concrete block / stucco structure built
in 1957 and consists of 1,694 square feet, including a carport and rear porch. The
applicant is proposing to remove the carport and rear porch, and add 400 square
feet to the rear of the building, resulting in a total building of 1,600 square feet.
Currently, the building is set back 7 feet 6 inches from the east property line, which
is adjacent to a medical office. The side setback of 7 feet 6 inches was conforming
when the subject property was zoned residential, however, the C-1 zoning district
requires a minimum side setback of ten (10) feet from adjacent nonresidential
properties. The building addition is proposed with a continuation of the same
nonconforming side setback, pursuant to Chapter 2, Section l1.1.E. of the Land
Development Regulations, which states "a nonconforming structure or building may
be added or altered if such alteration or addition does not in itself constitute a
further violation of existing regulations". Therefore a variance is not required,
provided that the addition continues with the existing nonconforming setback of 7
feet 6 inches as indicated on the site plan. The site will have a lot coverage of
19% which complies with the maximum lot coverage of 40% in the C-1 zoning
district.
The proposed conversion of a residence to commercial office space is consistent
with the majority of surrounding properties which have previously converted. The
exterior building design is compatible with the surrounding natural and built
environment in compliance with the Community Design Plan guidelines. The
handicapped parking space will be located in front of the building, with all other
parking in the rear. A ramp for handicapped accessibility is located at the building
entrance. The building will maintain most of its residential look by keeping the
existing grid windows, decorative panel front door, and pitched, concrete tile roof.
Building colors are neutral and include Benjamin Moore colors named Pale Sea Mist
(walls), White Dove (window trim and doors), and Harbor Gray (tile roof). The
neutral color palette proposed will be harmonious with surrounding developments.
Building Height: The proposed one-story building is 14 feet in height, which complies with the
maximum building height of 30 feet allowed in the C-1 zoning district.
Site Lighting: A photometric plan has been reviewed by staff and found to require revisions in
some locations on site. Staff has recommended as a condition of approval that a
revised photometric plan be submitted at time of permitting (see Exhibit "C" -
Conditions of Approval). Freestanding light poles include one light located in front
of the handicapped space in front of the building, and two lights in the rear parking
lot. The freestanding lights will have concrete poles a maximum of 15 feet in
height, and be shielded to direct the light downward to avoid glare onto adjacent
properties and passing motorists. Wall mounted sconces will be located on the
west side of the building. Wall mounted light fixtures in antique bronze will be
located at the front and rear door.
Signage: Signs, in general, shall be designed and treated as part of the architecture of the
building and are formally evaluated during the site plan review process. All project
signage is indicated on the elevation drawings and has been reviewed and
Staff Report - Healing Heart / White Elk LLC (MSPM 06-001)
Memorandum No PZ 06-016
Page 5
approved by staff in accordance with the Land Development Regulations. The
proposed wall signage is limited to the front building elevation and consists of
bronze channel letters and business logo. Based on the building frontage of 30
feet, the cumulative maximum wall sign area allowed on the building is 45 square
feet. The proposed wall signage indicated on the elevation is only 29 square feet.
The sign colors will be complementary to the building colors in accordance with the
community design plan guidelines. No monument sign is proposed on the site.
The applicant has been informed that all project signage must be approved
concurrent with the site plan submittal, and an additional full site plan review
would be required solely for signage review and approval if additional signage is
proposed for this site in the future.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) has reviewed this request for a major site plan modification.
Staff recommends approval of the site plan, subject to satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" -
Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be
documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECfS\Healing Heart\MSPM 06-001 \Staff Report.doc
...
1 in. = 297.2 feet
((7'\
..~.
EXHIBIT "A" - Location Map of 226 SE 23rd Ave
@
~
j
....
~
'"
C)
!
!S
Sl
~
C)
/f .~
~
III
'"
r-
a
'-i
~
+
III
C)
:::! ~ ~ C)
C) gj
~ 3! ~
.:tl :::!
:::!' I'll -<: :u
~ :::! & (9
r:i r-'
:i: I'll ~ P
C/) '"
~ ~
):> ()
~ :0
0
~
.C)
~
,~
<:
-<
~ ~
!Xl., ~;;j
~~~; ~~ ~
.'J ~ _ ;;; -...
s!"-' ;;:;.... ~
\J1~8 01~~ tri
<CiS Ul ~:i!,. ~
. "> :>1 e; &1 .:""-
~ffi~~r-t^
...."''tIN:l>.'''}
",r-!11",;<::~
~ il;=<i;:;j c::;--=
~"'Iil0)~
'" ~ ill s:: ['1i
~ .'< If! ~ =G :::0
I "'S;!~~
f::l t'lil\Q'-(
;lj~f!l~O~
'<"'''''Bl
~ ~~ ~ a
~~~';'!> ~
~ ~"' ~ ;:0
.!.,~~t:: Ei1
~ ~ ~~: ~
is t;"
" ....::.:
er;;
5i
I
i\\
<>:
....
II
~
;J
EXHIBIT B
-f-Sg. 1ST SIREET
LOT ~
7 q 25.0'
D<lSTN; EU..aN:; I ~;~
Fl.OOR+T7.4J
+5.85 ~ ~ ~~
+ ~~~
~ ~li[~
+5.9 ri=')
CAFIP(RT CONC, DRI'VE I~
r- ~
15A' (~
a
'-i ~~ ~
+;:!l J5.2' ~ 61~
Co ~~ 'C' 1~li~
/8
q
J:J.r
.J:).J'
q~AD '" +1Ii4 ~~~I
'"
142.33' '1 1- I
~
+5.4
D<lSTN; 9.LlJ'IG 1-
Fl.OOR+T7.OJ el
a;
LOT 9
ii~
~"I
~'~
!i~
~~iii
~ ~
!~~
~~
~
o
U~i
~~~~ ~
~~~"'f;l :h:
1ii :;I'" lJ
<> ",~
~~j~ a
~r- E.... ..".,
~~s~ ttJ
~~:t~ a
cHil ~ 1ii r-'
~"'",... ~
<>~i!i! ~
~~~~ ~
~~~lil'
r-;",:>.~ ::0
~~l.t)
:-< >! ~ '-C:::
~~f~ V)
~Sl:r!; ~
~~~~ ::0
~~ii1~ ;:s;
eJ. ;:l"' . ' I
, ;:lig -c:::
~~~
\fl~iR5 ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ 1j
~~~ ~
~~.~
.~~~
~.t:;~
~~
~~d
~~
';:ll
\fl:l>.
~j
~~
~
~ ~~~
~ fiiii'5~
~ -<f!;:1I
~ ~~~
C) ;:::t~
~~;;! II
~~~ Cl ~
cxr!O~ ~ ~
~~~ ~ t:J
q~~ ~ ~
'.~ ~
~~ ~
~~ ffi
~~
B~
Q
r-
j~~~6K)~
~ f.i II ?"; ~ @.~
~ II ~ II ~ ~
~~ .~C)~
~ c: ~ ~
~ ~ ~
Gl :t
~ :t!
~ ~
<: ~
-I, ~
~
~ Ejlro
7L
4li'MLQI,IIOl~~"'~M_'It1'-l""'Hlo"I'N,.~
~
EXHIBIT B
~.
~:II
~o
~=
"...
m
o
...
c:
:II
.
...
en
=4
m
"tI
...
.
z
<~~~ [:->
( "''''
(~~,-)
,
mo"
;IIl';i.
. .
ill (m~~)
\ ,j ~ ~g!'4;!; u}
:r~: ~ i?~~ l"\
(."1. ; (~o~2 mj'
, ) (.~ l
(l", (~ III '" L....
/''/ ~.z _~~F./
LOT
( i2. t
( :h
(,m)
-- ( ~j;j~ )
11 \~: ill~ b>
(a I( ttl )
~>~~J(~'~'i~~
-J
~'.---
~ /
(
t;; ; f J
E; t ~ J
~ t i ~
~ I"!
it
~[,:>
~>
)It)".;fr
"""
~
~
$:p
7L
--,...........-..-'-
! 56'.& ~~"
,.....r-~......\
~~-~ r-,
)
)
)
')
)
)
')
)
-~
~, - .- - - -.......- .-~ ~~--..........,~~------......,..............
)
~~!Ui ~~8i(;!t"~~(5t1: Gl CIl )
m n III ~ I~ ,I! "i ";111 ~
~i~~H~DC8F Z )
lIl{'l nz~ ~ ~~Q::~ml~ m )
~~Qi~E ~3"~6ifi~f101~ ~ - ~i ~'i I )
~~,Iji~j~ ~~m~1J ~ .c"~ ,.... )( . . ~ L. i -~~ Ii i 0
~~~8~ ~~~T~';~ z II ! !t; )
~2 ~~ ;t~~ ~)~~~ 0 II ~ ! Ii' I" ~q ~
jaDO ~ IU ~ o~ ~~ ;;1 )( )
,--- --~---- ~l-~pB .~I:~"~~~~~ CIl Iii -I i ~n )
( P~( I(
~01 ~~ ~iI~~i;~t:~!;l I.. ~g ~
~',J~ ~2~;~~~ii!~~o . J~r. ~~ ~i ! )
o. .
\l~l>t; .~~~~,~~o,~
5 ~~~j~ h'i~U~~~ H U. - 8p
" ~~LH~~~l' ~~ le ~ I ~~ ~
~ goh~ ;i ~~" ~ .. 0
, ~ ~~~~~ ~h~~~~~Q~~ .. It lilt ~ '.' I j
~ ~ "',t~'"!!I "22,;.~h. )( Ii ~q ~ -
. ~ ~~'" ~~glJr ~ ~f2-t
i ~ I 2~~~~ ( ~~~~~)I~~~
i:1~~~_~~~g~ ~ !
~~~~ ~
. 22 . Q2~~jh~ i I
. .- 1:1 i'~~ ~
~ ----~"-~-
[, ~ , - - [,
,) :>
V) ~ ({~ ., ~~
. <m
-l. ; ~:;; . 71~ l;~
0 ;
. c
-l.
~ HEALING HEART WHITE ELK. llC i
",Q VETERINARY CLINIC Ii
~~ ~
~~ c
z'" 226 SOUTHEAST 23rd AVENUE
~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~ !
I
l
i
"-~~
~"
i \
~l
~ 1
; ;
/
(
\
"
l
\
\
"m~~\
\ ~~~""
~j;jS '
*fu ~im !
~~)) ( h~l
~ t ~i ~
~ \ ~~ \
C__'ij
[>
III Illl! l_
Ie U ~i I
* ** '* *
" 0 " Q " ~ ~ ~ ~ E s S &
Q
. II H ~ ~I ~lln ~~ '~> ul iU II ~"
I i g~ ~5! u II
II h ;"
~~ ~~ E a p
~ '! h n ~! I~
~ s~ . ~ ~~ 'i
~ ! ~ ! I; ~
i
Q ~~ I~ . liil'i P ~Q Me ~ .. ~ ::;
~~ ~: S; Fli; 5 ~~ .~
;~ -s I. ~ ". ~
, ~8 ~i , ~ I~ 5: ~, ~ , ~
. f, a ~ , ~ ~
P i' a , i~ " ;
~ U ; "l~ i 5 ~ .
. P" .
: " " . . . - . ; ~ : -
.*
n
~ ~
~ i
~ ~
is ~
~ ~
a ~
!i! ~
'"
~
l'i
~
'"
c
~
'"
ill
iji
hi
Ji:
.Ii
1
~
;;
~~
~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ a ..
"'~s ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~
'!!~ Oi;O; ~~ ~iii F :;:
F~ ~~ i~ ~~ '"
ffl~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ g
Q iJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i;;; a
~5 =-c:~)> ~8 0
8~ ;~ ~m ~~ ~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g
n :sF ~;; ~ ;'
ai ~~ '~ ':'
.." ~ n Z N J!
~i! ~ ~ :
"' ~ >~ ~
i~ '
~i ~
rE~ J: ...
~; ~
~~ ~
~
~
~
N
o
A
o
E)tHIBIT B
o
~
uu!!
Q~E~i;
!~~m
- .
Nn
w~
~~ o~
en
t'l
'"
w
"
o
~
t'l
Z
c:
t'l
*
8
6
~
o
~
;;1
;~I
~i~ ~ ~
l, I:!
~ ~J
o
c
~
-<
~>
.
"
Ii
;! !!
I !!
!
,
~
i!j~!!
'~i!'~
b.':i,
;1:" lilh
f ~"
~
~
z
>
~
u
~~
"6
h
.'1
~".
",N
.~
~
~
~
c
:<i
~
~
~
~
~ ~~i~ ~
~i$o2 ;
~ C:o"~
.. ~i~~ ~
~ o~~ i
~ ~'"
~ ~~"
~ ;~
~~
r
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
6
.
~
i
.
gg!!i~E~
S~S~i~
'"r-S;C>O
~~~~~:..
8~n ~
~~~ e:
ii~:; ~
go" l!
~~~ ~
~o:;: ~
;~~ ~
> . .
F ~ ~
~8
~.
~;
~~
~z
"~
ii>
~Q
z
~
~
~
i ;
~
~
~
~
~
~
i
~
~
dJ
~ PROJECT: "!j;:'2 ~
,. !j;:Z~
" ~
~ Z~~
HEALING HEARTS WHITE ELK llC. n ..
)>
I VETERINARY CLINIC "
~ m
. 226 SE 23RD AVENUE BOYNTON BCH,. FL.
l:
M;
L.
A.
M"et..r
Lan d 5 Clip e
Architn:tll'f"''''.
/lII\59I.QI,OOl~IlMrtNlM~IQI""""l'1:111OO11."".I'Iol,.,.
-"
~'Tl
~r-
:0
'0
~:u
"11
r-
:a.
z
"
~
~
~
~
r r=- ~ ~=~ ~ --=c:
II /
II ..
I
o
,. n
I ,...,..
t .,.
J
I.:J
I ~. I
. G)
( , : ~ )
I ~ ;E)
. '" n '
(~ !'l)
( j;; .1
I . )
-T
~ if, - ~H
,) ~,
....l. (1:1"") ~~
I,
0 f,~;;; .-
CO ....l.
HEALlNC HEART WHITE ELK. llC ,
~ VETERINARY CLINIC ;. in
: <~
, .
~ 226 SOUTHEAST 231d AVENUE
z BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ~ "
EXHIBIT B
~~
~i
~~
,6
.~
a
~.
-.
~o
"~
1,1t U !h '.
gfti u!\~ J
~~11......~_~.a..sI!ll/lClOtI"'16""",
....
.
o
z
J~>
;r:T
:~~~'
--rl.l. \
1 -
I, ,'0:)) -
__I""'"
~;-
( I
( ~;)(
( ~~ )
(~i)
(. ~~)
l.h)
( -)
l
I I)
',;)~[O:,
?' 3.
, 1'-.'
.;:.>
~t
l!
N
z
I,.,)
~'l{~ -
'[
[
!.T' .1
I "j
:: [C" ----
I,.,'>
I l)
I ~_
!f:1
mJ
f'
I ~~ I.,:
, O'
~;
. m,l.
~ 11; ":~ ~~ ,~,t
N
0 ..
., -l.
"~
~~
~~
Js
t '~i 1
, J-~ I
- I It I
'1.
U
H
',,--
I
~~
le
~~
:!
..
~.
~l
.-
..
~~
n
I ~
Sl:
'-
~t:
il
J" , ~'
1 'y'.'
I 1
'I
, :, '~' 1~1~1 ~ll
P ~I () I
~ I. ~li ~,
- :1 ' /'
~ " ~ ~)
'. i~
If'
~m
~t
'-4
'm
",..
m
<
.
-4
o
Z
EXHIBIT B
(,.)
~CI)
~o
~c
'-4
;%
"m
,..
m
~
-4
o
Z
"'-0' -----t
~'.&' -t~t-
~ I n
,
-----~
H
j ~ !
T
'1)11 '
II
~~p;: ~
I ,till I
I r)
"")""-........
110) )
T'
- [e
----
i ~~~~ )
I 2~>~)
I I~iij)
i L
'\-;)) ~>
1 (,
I 'f-~
(I.' )[)-
T .'
~:-
(I;')
.,.
:!~,~
)
II';))
ILL"
~il
~t
I ~
I!~' 1
.-l
-[
S'
'.
'e
2,
~8
r~
'i'
[c.
"
T
--
HEALING HEART WHITE ELK. LLC " ~
i VETERINARY CLINIC ~
~ ~ "
';'" ~
3i 226 SOUTHEAST 23rd AVENUE
BOYNTON BEACH, flORIDA ~ .
IiI l! III I_
i! n iii J
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name:
File number:
Reference:
Healing Heart Veterinary Clinic / White Elk LLC
MSPM 06-001
2nd review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a January 24, 2006 Planning &
Zoning date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
2. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway
onto SE 23rd Ave.
3. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
4. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
5. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
6. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
HEALING HEART VET CLINIC
PAGE 2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
7. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
9. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table
704.8. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected
and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
10. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
11. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
HEALING HEART VET CLINIC
PAGE 3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
12, If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order
and the Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and
how much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
13. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
14. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
15. Master Plant List, Sheet L2: All shade and palm trees must be listed in the
description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground)
not caliper, and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). The
height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter
requirement; or any clear trunk (c.t.) specifications. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.]
16. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina
granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site, These trees must meet the
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
HEALING HEART VET CLINIC
PAGE 4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter
7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.]
17. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the
diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection.
18. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk
and height of all of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection.
19. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and
spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
20. Irrigation Plan: Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be
designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation.
21. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.
C.2,l
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
22. Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a minimum of two (2) colorful
shrub species on both sides of the entrance and a signature tree. Note that
signature trees do not contribute toward the total number of required
perimeter trees or parking area interior landscaping. (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as Yellow Elder, Tibouchina
granulosa, or Bougainvilla at each side of the project entrance. These
signature trees shall have a minimum of six (6) feet of clear trunk to
preserve the clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N).
23. All lights shall be shielded and direct light down to avoid glare on streets
and adjacent properties (Ch.2., SecA.N.7).
24. The illumination levels appear high at certain locations on site. At time of
permitting, submit a photometric plan which reduces hot spots depicted on
plan.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
HEALING HEART VET CLINIC
PAGE 5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
MWR/kz
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk LLC\MSPM 06-001\COA,doc
1St REVIEW COMMENTS', /
Maior Site Plan Modification
----~.---=--::-,-..r:-:-'~".-- -
\ r:'\ ;c; (", " \,
I \1 \\0,
; \ 0 ; \~'--- ,~~
\ ~~ \ Me 2 , 2006
L
Project name: Healing Heart / White Elk
File number: MSPM 06-001
Reference: 1 sl review lans identified as a Ma'or Site Plan Modification with a Dece
Zoninl! date stamo markinl!.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section
10-26 (a). RESPONSE: Will comply.
2. Indicate where roll-out cart is to be stored. This should be in a screened
area. RESPONSE: Type of construction information has been added to
revised Sheet AS-I 01.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter provided by
Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated January 9,
2006, Please see attached copy.
4. Engineering and Public Works staff strongly recommends that the driveway
be configured for two (2) eight (8) feet lanes with adjacent landscaping
material designed such that they will not grow into travel lanes when they
reach maturity. If it is the desire of the City to allow this development with
a driveway of a width that will only accommodate one travel lane then Staff
recommends that the engineer/developer utilize traffic calming measures
that will ensure a low rate of speed along the driveway. If a one-lane
configuration is allowed Staff insists that no plant materials be placed in the
sight triangles on the northwest and southwest comers of the building.
RESPONSE: Proposed shrub materials that may grow above 30" in height
have been removed on the northwest and southwest corners of the building,
5. Staff recommends deleting one or both of the parking stalls adjacent to the
drainage swale in the southeast comer of the project to reduce backing
conflicts at this location. RESPONSE: Eliminating spaces will not allow for
adequate parking to be provided for a professional office space.
Add double yellow lane separators at the stop bar exiting to SE 23rd Ave.
RESPONSE: Yellow lane separator has been added to revised Sheet C-1 .
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencIes such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
RESPONSE: General Note has been added to revised Sheet AS-101.
7. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets. RESPONSE: Will comply in revised
sheets.
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
RESPONSE: Understood.
9. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. RESPONSE: Written and
graphic scales have been provided on all sheets,
10. The Site Plan (Sheet AS-IOI) does not match the Paving, Grading &
Drainage Plan (No Sheet Number.) The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan
does not depict the house addition or sidewalk shown on the Site Plan. The
Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan depicts a drainage swale (Swale Area
"B") where the house addition and sidewalk are located. This will seriously
impact the overall drainage calculations as Swale Area "B" contained the
largest volume of the three depicted swale areas. Correct discrepancies.
RESPONSE: Discrepancies have been corrected in revised plans provided.
11. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter
4, Section 7.BA.) It appears that the overall lighting levels could be
lowered to an average of 3 ft-candles by reducing light intensity .
RESPONSE: All proposed site lighting has been shown on the revised
landscape plan.
12. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway
onto SE 23rd Ave. RESPONSE: Palm Beach County Standards have been
added to revised Sheet C-I.
13. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft.
above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.)
RESPONSE: The note has been added to sheet 1,-1.
14. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive
aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile
vehicles. RESPONSE: The canopy trees have been moved further back
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
from the edge of parking area,
15. Corkscrew and Cocoplum Hedges are depicted as being located in the 5-ft.
sidewalk on the south and west sides of the existing house and proposed
addition. Correct plans accordingly. RESPONSE: All hedges have been
removed from paved areas.
16. Provide tree legend on Sheet L-1 RESPONSE: Tree legend has been
provided on sheet L-I .
17. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P). RESPONSE: Sidewalk has been added to revised Sheet C-I,
18. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in DR,
Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-1.
19. Explain the "200% Credit" used in the drainage calculations on the Paving,
Grading & Drainage Plan. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C -I.
20.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
22. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
UTILITIES
Comments:
Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services
will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. RESPONSE:
The water and sewer loads anticipated for this project will be no different
that the existing loads. Two restrooms and one kitchend sink will remain at
the end of the day.
23. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is
incomplete as submitted. The proposed Site Plan reflects an existing single
family residential dwelling site located within the Utilities' service area
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
where utility support is available. We are providing a cursory review of the
proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be
provided after a utility plan has been submitted. RESPONSE: Provided on
the revised Sheet C-] .
24. Depict location of water and sewer mains and service(s) for the site and
indicate whether any alteration will be required to accommodate the new
use and proposed addition. Palm Beach County permits will be required if
any utility work is to be performed within the SE 23rd Ave. right-of-way.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-] .
25. F ire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). RESPONSE: Please find
the attached fire flow test results,
26. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet AS-I and C-I,
27. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand. RESPONSE: Will comply.
28. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation. RESPONSE: Will comply,
29. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for any water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, In accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
RESPONSE: Understood.
30. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. RESPONSE: Provided on the
revised Sheet C- ] .
31. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must
therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed
off-site utilities construction needed In order to service this project.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-] .
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
5
DEPARTMENTS
32. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Understood,
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUIWING DIVISION
Comments: .~ )Jc7U~ (ft riP!
34. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. RESPONSE:
Understood,
35. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. RESPONSE: Type of construction
information has been added to revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
36. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3. RESPONSE: Occupancy type information has been
added to revised Sheet AS-I 0 I ,
37. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table
704.8. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected
and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
38. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every buildinf.?; or
INCLUDE REJECT
~
~
~
~
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
6
DEPARTMENTS
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
INCLUDE REJECT
~
39. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the ~
proposed construction. RESPONSE: Will comply.
40. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible
entrance doors to the building. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3. RESPONSE: Handicap accessible entrance door has been identified
on revised floor plan.
41. On the drawing titled site plan identifY the property line. RESPONSE:
Property lines have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-I 01,
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) RESPONSE: Understood,
43. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
RESPONSE: Will comply.
44. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application. RESPONSE: Note added.
45. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission. RESPONSE: Understood.
/
,/
/'
v
l/
/
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJhCT
46. Both toilet rooms shall be fully accessible for use by handicapped persons.
Doors shall not swing into the required clear floor space of accessible
fixtures. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.3(11 ); 11-4.22.2. RESPONSE: V
Bathroom layouts have been modified to provide two fully accessible toilet
rooms,
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
47. No irrigation plan. RESPONSE: Irrigation by others to be provided at a
later date.
48. Add 2 City signature trees. RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have
been added.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existin~ Trees Mana~ement Plan Sheet Ll
49. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of
existing trees on the site. proposed to be removed and replaced on site. The
replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape
plan sheet Lt. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec.
7.D.p. 2.] RESPONSE: The total diameter of trees removed has been
calculated. Mitigation trees have been noted symbol on the landscape plan,
Master Plant List, Sheet L2
50. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of
12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground) not caliper, and Florida #1
(Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be
larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any clear trunk
(c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. 5.C. 2.] RESPONSE: All canopy tree spec's have been changed. The
FL No. I requirement is noted in the planting notes on sheet L-2.
51. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina
granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the
minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] RESPONSE: Two City signature
trees have been added.
52. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the
diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of
planting; and inspection. RESPONSE: Tree planting details have been
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
revised to show measurements.
53. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk
and height of all of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown,
54. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and
spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
55. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedge plants on three sides. RESPONSE: Note has been added.
Irrie:ation Plan
56. Turfand landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation. RESPONSE: Irrigation to
be provided at a later date.
57. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.
C.2.] RESPONSE: Irrigation to be provided at a later date.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
58. Property Appraiser records indicate property owner as White Elk
Enterprises, LLC. Applications state property owner /Trustee as Nancy
Keller - White Elk LLC. Please submit the latest recorded warranty deed
for the subject property, and authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of
LLC. RESPONSE: See attached latest recorded warranty deed and
authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of the LLC.
59. Correct the site plan application to include the following: 1.8. (PCN # is 08-
43-45-33-04-000-0080); 1.13. name and company of site planner; 1.16.
name and company of traffic engineer; 1.17. no previously approved site
plan; 11.1. land use category is Office Commercial (OC); II.5.c. paved area
s.f. and % of site; II.5.h. total pervious area in s.f. and % of site (same as e. 1
h. is total of e. f. and g.); II.6.h. same as b. I h. is total of a.-g.; II.7.e. is 0 I
total of a.-d. which are all NI A or 0; 11.8. is 0; 11.1 O.a. provide formula I per
300 sf of GFA (1600/300 = 5.3 or 6 spaces; II.IO.b. provide formula I per
25 spaces = I H/C space; IV. Authorization of Agent: Agent's signature
required and date. RESPONSE: Site Plan Application has been updated to
reflect commentary.
60. Provide a copy of the traffic impact statement submitted to Palm Beach
County Traffic Engineering for their review and approval. (Chapter 4.
Section 8.F.). RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006. Please see attached copy.
61. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency approval (Traffic
Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering. RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006, Please see attached copy.
62. In addition to a drainage plan, a drainage statement (engineer's certification
in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc.
including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land
Development Regulations) is required prior to the TART meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.F.2.). RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
63.
64. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the site plan modification is
publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. RESPONSE:
Will comply.
65. Provide written and graphic scales for all drawings. RESPONSE: Written
and graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
66. On all plans indicate on the building footprint, the proposed use, number of
stories, and total building square feet (proposed veterinary clinic, one story
building, 1600 sf). RESPONSE: Building footprint, proposed use, number
of stories and total building square feet have been identified on the revised
plans.
67. Provide building dimensions for building footprint on site plan. The
building dimensions shown on the site plan must match the building
dimensions on the floor plan. RESPONSE: Dimensions for the building
footprint have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-I 0 I .
68. Per Chapter 2, Section 6 of the Land Development Regulations, veterinary
offices and clinics are a permitted use in the C-I zoning district, however
outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other than treatment,
and on-site disposal of animals is prohibited. Add notes to AS-lO I site plan
data that clarifY the proposed clinic will not include the above prohibited
uses. RESPONSE: General Note added to revised Sheet A S-IO J
identifYing that outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other
than treatment, and on-site disposal of animals are prohibited,
69. Swale area along the south side of the building, as depicted on the Paving,
Grading, and Drainage Plan, does not appear to take into consideration the
proposed building addition. RESPONSE: Civil plans have been updated
to indicate the proposed +/-400 SF addition.
70. Correct building setback information on site plan data (AS-101). Provide
minimum setbacks for C-I (rear is minimum of 30 feet when abutting a
residential district), and actual buildinJ!; setback distance provided (to front,
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
0] /23/06
]0
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
each side, and rear). RESPONSE: Rear setback dimension has been
corrected on the revised Sheet AS-1O 1.
71. Side setback is a minimum of 10 feet, note encroachment of building on
east side of site. Note existing side setback of 7.5 feet approved per
requested variance (ZNCV06-003). Of course, approval of the site plan as
shown is contingent upon prIor or concurrent variance approval.
RESPONSE: Pending variance approval.
72. Revise site plan tabular data (AS-lO 1) to include the following: Zoning
district Office Professional (C-I), Future Land Use Classification Office
Commercial (OC), Proposed Use (noting no boarding, no kennel, etc),
maximum lot coverage (building) 40%, maximum structure height 30 feet,
not to exceed 2 stories, and actual building height 14 feet, one story.
RESPONSE: Site Plan Tabular Data has been updated to include the above
information on the revised Sheet AS- 10 I.
73. Provide existing use, zoning district, and future land use for each abutting
property (C-l and OC to east and west, Single-Family Residential R1AA
and Low Density Residential LDR to south). RESPONSE: Site Plan
Tabular Data has been updated to include the above information on the
revised Sheet AS-I 0] ,
74. The proposed two-way drive is only 12 feet on the side ofthe building. The
vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisle widths
are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and
approval. RESPONSE: Understood,
75. Provide details on solid waste/garbage pickup on plans (indicating it will be
rolled out to curbside for pickup, no dumpster). RESPONSE: Indicated.
76. Will there be outdoor storage of trash containers? If so, a trash enclosure
shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the
principal building and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter
9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a note indicating this
requirement. Provide a detail of trash enclosure with required screening.
RESPONSE: Trash enclosure has been indicated.
77. Indicate with arrows two-way vehicular traffic circulation within 12 foot
drive area. RESPONSE: Two way areas have been provided.
78. Indicate locations and widths of nearest driveway approaches on adjacent
properties. RESPONSE: Provided.
79. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval ofthe City Forester I Environmentalist. RESPONSE: OK.
80. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper
inches at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.).
RESPONSE: Planting spec's indicate the height and spread required at
installation..
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
] ]
DEPARTMENTS
8] . Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening
of equipment. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior
utility boxes, meters, and transformers shall be visually screened with
appropriate landscaping! hedge material. RESPONSE: All utility boxes
shown are screened with landscape material.
82. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the
tabular data and the graphic illustration. RESPONSE: Plant quantities
match plan.
83. It appears as though landscape plantings are proposed within the swale
areas. These plantings should be located at natural grade around the swale
areas, not on the slope or depressed areas. RESPONSE: The swale has been
removed.
84. The area between SE 23rd Avenue pavement and the subject property line
should be sodded with St. Augustine sod and irrigated RESPONSE: Sod
has been noted to the edge of road.
85. Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a minimum of two (2)
colorful shrub species on both sides of the entrance and a signature tree.
Note that signature trees do not contribute toward the total number of
required perimeter trees or parking area interior landscaping. (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as Yellow Elder,
Tibouchina granulose, or Bougainvilla at each side of the project entrance.
These signature trees shall have a minimum of six (6) feet of clear trunk to
preserve the clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N).
RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have been added.
86. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 i.nches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). RESPONSE: Provided in revised
Sheet L-I .
87. Provide a typical drawing that includes the height and color / material of
proposed freestanding outdoor lights and poles. The design, style, and
illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and
shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section
1 O.F.1.). A pole detail is provided, but no detail of light. All lights
(including lighting for monument sign) shall be shielded and direct light
down to avoid glare on streets and adjacent properties (Ch.2., SecA.N.7).
RESPONSE: Site lighting fixture specifications have been provided, see
revised Sheet E-l 0 I. Color Selection: White,
88. All plans should clearly indicate the locations of proposed freestanding
lights. RESPONSE: Light poles have been shown.
89. The illumination levels appear very high, with numerous "hot spots" and
levels at property lines exceeding 1.0. Please correct. RESPONSE:
INCLUDE REJECT
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
12
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Illumination levels have been corrected, see revised sheet E-I 01.
90. On the elevations indicate the material and color(s) of any proposed wall
mounted lighting fixtures. RESPONSE: Provided. Site lighting fixture
specifications have been provided, see revised Sheet E-I 0 1. Color
Selection: White.
91. Indicate the proposed height of any roof top equipment. Note on plans (if
applicable) that rooftop equipment will be screened from view at a distance
of 600 feet. (LDR, Chapter 9, Section 11.E.). RESPONSE: No roof top
equipment is provided.
92. All elevations must indicate the proposed colors, including the paint
manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In addition,
provide paint swatches that directly correspond to the elevations.
RESPONSE: Provided,
93. The use of sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises, or benches are
recommended to be included in the site design (Chapter 9, Sec. 10.H.).
RESPONSE: Size of the site does not allow for sculptures, fountains,
gardens, pools, trellises or benches to be provided.
94. All project signage must be approved concurrent with the site plan submittal
or an additional full site plan review would be required solely for signage
review and approval. All project signage is subject to review and approval
of the Planning & Development Board. On the elevations, indicate the
cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it complies with Chapter
21, Article 4, Section C. In addition, indicate the letter colors and sign
material. Will it be a back-lit sign? RESPONSE: Cumulative area of wall
signage, letter colors and sign material have been provided on revised
elevations. Signage will not be backlit.
95. Indicate location of proposed freestanding slgnage on site plan and
striping/signage plan. Provide signage details on plan. All proposed project
(site) signs such as the monument sign shall clearly indicate the project
street address. RESPONSE: No freestanding or monument signs are to be
provided.
96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. RESPONSE: Provided.
97. Provide colored elevations and / or rendering of four (4) building sides at
the Technical Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
RESPONSE: Provided.
98. Provide a colored elevation drawing (full-sized 24 inches by 36 inches,
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
clipped not glued to foamboard) at the TART meeting. The color rendering
shall include all existing and proposed buildings on site. Staff recommends
using a color schedule. Provide paint swatches that will represent the colors
as depicted on the elevation pages (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). RESPONSE:
Provided.
99. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by II inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and
submit that to staff as well. RESPONSE: Provided.
100. Staff considers these plans to be near the final stage of site plan review, the
last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be
addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. Any
information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required
to be shown at the time of permitting. RESPONSE: Understood.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk llC\MSPM 06-001\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
...
ist REVIEW COMMENT~"
Maior Site Plan Modification
r:\ ~ ([g <<:-[1 \1'1 rs n,'
li~ uD ~ J r-;- In l!'__._J~_.~'i.__~ I ! r! I :
I&U 2 4 I'\:;(ir" i 1 U I '
U . -n1 {, ': fa I' . ...:
1...-./ l
; ;
l__~~-;_,_,_:,_____ !
.J
Project name: Healing Heart / White Elk
File number: MSPM 06-001
Reference: 1st review lans identified as a Ma'or Site Plan Modification with a Dece
Zonin!! date stamo markin!!.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section
10-26 (a). RESPONSE: Will comply,
2. Indicate where roll-out cart is to be stored. This should be in a screened
area. RESPONSE: Type of construction information has been added to
revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter provided by
Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated January 9,
2006. Please see attached copy,
4. Engineering and Public Works staff strongly recommends that the driveway
be configured for two (2) eight (8) feet lanes with adjacent landscaping
material designed such that they will not grow into travel lanes when they
reach maturity. If it is the desire of the City to allow this development with
a driveway of a width that will only accommodate one travel lane then Staff
recommends that the engineer/developer utilize traffic calming measures
that will ensure a low rate of speed along the driveway. If a one-lane
configuration is allowed Staff insists that no plant materials be placed in the
sight triangles on the northwest and southwest comers of the building.
RESPONSE: Proposed shrub materials that may grow above 30" in height
have been removed on the northwest and southwest corners of the building,
5. Staff recommends deleting one or both of the parking stalls adjacent to the
drainage swale in the southeast comer of the project to reduce backing
conflicts at this location. RESPONSE: Eliminating spaces will not allow for
adequate parking to be provided for a professional office space.
Add double yellow lane separators at the stop bar exiting to SE 23rd Ave.
RESPONSE: Yellow lane separator has been added to revised Sheet C-I .
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
RESPONSE: General Note has been added to revised Sheet AS-l 0 I.
7. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets. RESPONSE: Will comply in revised
sheets.
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
RESPONSE: Understood.
9. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. RESPONSE: Written and
graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
10. The Site Plan (Sheet AS-101) does not match the Paving, Grading &
Drainage Plan (No Sheet Number.) The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan
does not depict the house addition or sidewalk shown on the Site Plan. The
Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan depicts a drainage swale (Swale Area
"B") where the house addition and sidewalk are located. This will seriously
impact the overall drainage calculations as Swale Area "B" contained the
largest volume of the three depicted swale areas. Correct discrepancies.
RESPONSE: Discrepancies have been corrected in revised plans provided.
]1. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter
4, Section 7.B.4.) It appears that the overall lighting levels could be
lowered to an average of 3 ft-candles by reducing light intensity.
RESPONSE: All proposed site lighting has been shown on the revised
landscape plan,
12. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway
onto SE 23rd Ave. RESPONSE: Palm Beach County Standards have been
added to revised Sheet C-I.
13. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft.
above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.)
RESPONSE: The note has been added to sheet L-I.
14. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive
aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile
vehicles. RESPONSE: The canopy trees have been moved further back
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
from the edge of parking area.
15. Corkscrew and Cocoplum Hedges are depicted as being located in the 5-ft.
sidewalk on the south and west sides of the existing house and proposed
addition. Correct plans accordingly. RESPONSE: All hedges have been
removed from paved areas.
16. Provide tree legend on Sheet L-I RESPONSE: Tree legend has been
provided on sheet L-I .
17. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P). RESPONSE: Sidewalk has been added to revised Sheet C-I.
18. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in DR,
Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I,
19. Explain the "200% Credit" used in the drainage calculations on the Paving,
Grading & Drainage Plan. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-],
20.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-l,
22. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-1.
UTILITIES
Comments:
Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services
will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. RESPONSE:
The water and sewer loads anticipated for this project will be no different
that the existing loads. Two restrooms and one kitchend sink will remain at
the end ofthe day.
23. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is
incomplete as submitted. The proposed Site Plan reflects an existing single
family residential dwelling site located within the Utilities' service area
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
where utility support is available. We are providing a cursory review of the
proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be
provided after a utility plan has been submitted. RESPONSE: Provided on
the revised Sheet C-I .
24. Depict location of water and sewer mains and service(s) for the site and
indicate whether any alteration will be required to accommodate the new
use and proposed addition. Palm Beach County permits will be required if
any utility work is to be performed within the SE 23rd Ave. right-of-way.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). RESPONSE: Please find
the attached fire flow test results,
26. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet AS-I and C -I.
27. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand. RESPONSE: Will comply.
28. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation. RESPONSE: Will comply.
29. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for any water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
RESPONSE: Understood,
30. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. RESPONSE: Provided on the
revised Sheet C-I.
31. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must
therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed
off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
32. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I,
33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Understood.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
34. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. RESPONSE:
Understood.
35. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. RESPONSE: Type of construction
information has been added to revised Sheet A S- 10 I .
36. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type ofthe building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3. RESPONSE: Occupancy type information has been
added to revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
37. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table
704.8. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected
and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
38. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 moho Wind forces on every building or
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
6
DEPARTMENTS
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
39. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings ofthe
proposed construction. RESPONSE: Will comply.
40. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible
entrance doors to the building. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3. RESPONSE: Handicap accessible entrance door has been identified
on revised floor plan,
41. On the drawing titled site plan identifY the property line. RESPONSE:
Property I ines have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-l 01 .
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) RESPONSE: Understood,
43. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
RESPONSE: Will comply.
44. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application. RESPONSE: Note added.
45. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission. RESPONSE: Understood.
INCLUDE REJECT
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
7
'{ty I} 1\ .010
\ ,1
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
46. Both toilet rooms shall be fully accessible for use by handicapped persons.
Doors shall not swing into the required clear floor space of accessible
fixtures. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.3(11 ); 11-4.22.2. RESPONSE:
Bathroom layouts have been modified to provide two fully accessible toilet
rooms.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
47. No irrigation plan. RESPONSE: Irrigation by others to be provided at a
later date.
48. Add 2 City signature trees. RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have
been added.
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existin~ Trees Mana~ement Plan Sheet Ll
49. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of
existing trees on the site. proposed to be removed and replaced on site. The V
replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape
plan sheet Lt. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec.
7.D.p. 2.] RESPONSE: The total diameter of trees removed has been
calculated. Mitigation trees have been noted symbol on the landscape plan,
Master Plant List, Sheet L2
50. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of
12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground) ,!-ot calipeli and Florida #1 / .---
(Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be
larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any clear trunk
(c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. 5.C. 2.] RESPONSE: All canopy tree spec's have been changed. The
FL No, 1 requirement is noted in the planting notes on sheet L-2.
51. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina \ /
granulosa) at the ingress I egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the V \
minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations, ,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] RESPONSE: Two City signature l
trees have been addcd.
/
52. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the /
diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of
plantinJ!; and inspection. RESPONSE: Tree planting details have been
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE 1
revised to show measurements.
53. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk /
and height of all of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
54. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and
spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection. /
RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
55. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not ~
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedg;e plants8n three sides. RESPONSE: Note has been added,
Irrieation Plan
56. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate L-/'
zones and time duration for water conservation. RESPONSE: Irrigation to
be provided at a later date.
57. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. ~
C.2.] RESPONSE: Irrigation to be provided at a later date,
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
58. Property Appraiser records indicate property owner as White Elk
Enterprises, LLC. Applications state property owner ffrustee as Nancy
Keller - White Elk LLC. Please submit the latest recorded warranty deed
for the subject property, and authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of
LLC. RESPONSE: See attached latest recorded warranty deed and
authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of the LLe,
59. Correct the site plan application to include the following: 1.8. (PCN # is 08-
43-45-33-04-000-0080); 1.13. name and company of site planner; 1.16.
name and company of traffic engineer; 1.17. no previously approved site
plan; 11.1. land use category is Office Commercial (OC); 1I.5.c. paved area
s.f. and % of site; 1I.5.h. total pervious area in s.f. and % of site (same as e. 1
h. is total ofe. f. and g.); 1I.6.h. same as b. 1 h. is total of a.-g.; 1I.7.e. is 0 1
total of a.-d. which are all N/A or 0; 11.8. is 0; 1I.10.a. provide formula I per
300 sf of GF A (1600/300 = 5.3 or 6 spaces; 11.1 O.b. provide formula 1 per
25 spaces = I H/C space; IV. Authorization of Agent: Agent's signature
required and date. RESPONSE: Site Plan Application has been updated to
reflect commentary.
60. Provide a copy of the traffic impact statement submitted to Palm Beach
County Traffic Engineering for their review and approval. (Chapter 4.
Section 8.F.). RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006. Please see attached copy.
61. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency approval (Traffic
Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering. RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006. Please see attached copy.
62. In addition to a drainage plan, a drainage statement (engineer's certification
in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc.
including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 5 of the Land
Development Regulations) is required prior to the TART meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.F.2.). RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
63.
64. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the site plan modification is
publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. RESPONSE:
Will comply,
65. Provide written and graphic scales for all drawings. RESPONSE: Written
and graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
66. On all plans indicate on the building footprint, the proposed use, number of
stories, and total building square feet (proposed veterinary clinic, one story
building, 1600 sf). RESPONSE: Building footprint, proposed use, number
of stories and total building square feet have been identified on the revised
plans.
67. Provide building dimensions for building footprint on site plan. The
building dimensions shown on the site plan must match the building
dimensions on the floor plan. RESPONSE: Dimensions for the building
footprint have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-I 01.
68. Per Chapter 2, Section 6 of the Land Development Regulations, veterinary
offices and clinics are a permitted use in the C-I zoning district, however
outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other than treatment,
and on-site disposal of animals is prohibited. Add notes to AS-I 0 I site plan
data that clarity the proposed clinic will not include the above prohibited
uses. RESPONSE: General Note added to revised Sheet AS-IOl
identifying that outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other
than treatment, and on-site disposal of animals are prohibited.
69. Swale area along the south side of the building, as depicted on the Paving,
Grading, and Drainage Plan, does not appear to take into consideration the
proposed building addition. RESPONSE: Civil plans have been updated
to indicate the proposed +/-400 SF addition.
70. Correct building setback information on site plan data (AS-1 01). Provide
minimum setbacks for C- I (rear is minimum of 30 feet when abutting a
residential district), and actual building setback distance provided (to front,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
each side, and rear). RESPONSE: Rear setback dimension has been
corrected on the revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
71. Side setback is a minimum of 10 feet, note encroachment of building on
east side of site. Note existing side setback of 7.5 feet approved per
requested variance (ZNCV06-003). Of course, approval of the site plan as
shown IS contingent upon pnor or concurrent vanance approval.
RESPONSE: Pending variance approval.
72. Revise site plan tabular data (AS-lOI) to include the following: Zoning
district Office Professional (C-1), Future Land Use Classification Office
Commercial (OC), Proposed Use (noting no boarding, no kennel, etc),
maximum lot coverage (building) 40%, maximum structure height 30 feet,
not to exceed 2 stories, and actual building height 14 feet, one story.
RESPONSE: Site Plan Tabular Data has been updated to include the above
information on the revised Sheet AS-I 01 .
73. Provide existing use, zoning district, and future land use for each abutting
property (C-1 and OC to east and west, Single-Family Residential RIAA
and Low Density Residential LDR to south). RESPONSE: Site Plan
Tabular Data has been updated to include the above information on the
revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
74. The proposed two-way drive is only 12 feet on the side of the building. The
vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisle widths
are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and
approval. RESPONSE: Understood.
75. Provide details on solid waste/garbage pickup on plans (indicating it will be
rolled out to curbside for pickup, no dumpster). RESPONSE: Indicated.
76. Will there be outdoor storage of trash containers? If so, a trash enclosure
shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the
principal building and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter
9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a note indicating this
requirement. Provide a detail of trash enclosure with required screening.
RESPONSE: Trash enclosure has been indicated.
77. Indicate with arrows two-way vehicular traffic circulation within 12 foot
drive area. RESPONSE: Two way areas have been provided.
78. Indicate locations and widths of nearest driveway approaches on adjacent
properties. RESPONSE: Provided.
79. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. RESPONSE: OK.
80. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper
inches at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.).
RESPONSE: Planting spec's indicate the height and spread required at
installation..
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
11
DEPARTMENTS
81. Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening
of equipment. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior
utility boxes, meters, and transformers shall be visually screened with
appropriate landscaping! hedge material. RESPONSE: All utility boxes
shown are screened with landscape material.
82. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the
tabular data and the graphic illustration. RESPONSE: Plant quantities
match plan.
83. It appears as though landscape plantings are proposed within the swale
areas. These plantings should be located at natural grade around the swale
areas, not on the slope or depressed areas. RESPONSE: The swale has been
removed.
84. The area between SE 23rd Avenue pavement and the subject property line
should be sodded with St. Augustine sod and irrigated RESPONSE: Sod
has been noted to the edge of road,
85. Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a minimum of two (2)
colorful shrub species on both sides of the entrance and a signature tree.
Note that signature trees do not contribute toward the total number of
required perimeter trees or parking area interior landscaping. (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as Yellow Elder,
Tibouchina granulose, or Bougainvilla at each side of the project entrance.
These signature trees shall have a minimum of six (6) feet of clear trunk to
preserve the clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N).
RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have been added.
86. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). RESPONSE: Provided in revised
Sheet L-I ,
87. Provide a typical drawing that includes the height and color / material of
proposed freestanding outdoor lights and poles. The design, style, and
illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and
shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section
10.F.1.). A pole detail is provided, but no detail of light. All lights
(including lighting for monument sign) shall be shielded and direct light
down to avoid glare on streets and adjacent properties (Ch.2., SecA.N.7).
RESPONSE: Site lighting fixture specifications have been provided, see
revised Sheet E-I 01. Color Selection: White,
88. All plans should clearly indicate the locations of proposed freestanding
lights. RESPONSE: Light poles have been shown.
89. The illumination levels appear very high, with numerous "hot spots" and
levels at property lines exceeding 1.0. Please correct. RESPONSE:h
INCLUDE REJECT
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
12
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Illumination levels have been corrected, see revised sheet E-I 0 I.
90. On the elevations indicate the material and color(s) of any proposed wall
mounted lighting fixtures. RESPONSE: Provided. Site lighting fixture
specifications have been provided, see revised Sheet E- I 0 1. Color
Selection: White.
91. Indicate the proposed height of any roof top equipment. Note on plans (if
applicable) that rooftop equipment will be screened from view at a distance
of 600 feet. (LDR, Chapter 9, Section 11.E.). RESPONSE: No roof top
equipment is provided.
92. All elevations must indicate the proposed colors, including the paint
manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In addition,
provide paint swatches that directly correspond to the elevations.
RESPONSE: Provided.
93. The use of sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises, or benches are
recommended to be included in the site design (Chapter 9, Sec. 10.H.).
RESPONSE: Size of the site does not allow for sculptures, fountains,
gardens, pools, trellises or benches to be provided.
94. All project signage must be approved concurrent with the site plan submittal
or an additional full site plan review would be required solely for signage
review and approval. All project signage is subject to review and approval
of the Planning & Development Board. On the elevations, indicate the
cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it complies with Chapter
21, Article 4, Section C. In addition, indicate the letter colors and sign
material. Will it be a back-lit sign? RESPONSE: Cumulative area of wall
signage, letter colors and sign material have been provided on revised
elevations. Signage will not be backlit.
95. Indicate location of proposed freestanding signage on site plan and
stripinglsignage plan. Provide signage details on plan. All proposed project
(site) signs such as the monument sign shall clearly indicate the project
street address. RESPONSE: No freestanding or monument signs are to be
provided.
96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. RESPONSE: Provided.
97. Provide colored elevations and I or rendering of four (4) building sides at
the Technical Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
RESPONSE: Provided.
98. Provide a colored elevation drawing (full-sized 24 inches bv 36 inches,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE ,1
clipped not glued to foamboard) at the TART meeting. The color rendering
shall include all existing and proposed buildings on site. Staff recommends
using a color schedule. Provide paint swatches that will represent the colors
as depicted on the elevation pages (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). RESPONSE:
Provided.
99. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and
submit that to staff as well. RESPONSE: Provided.
100. Staff considers these plans to be near the final stage of site plan review, the
last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be
addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. Any
information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required
to be shown at the time of permitting. RESPONSE: Understood.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk llC\MSPM 06-Q01\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS,doc
~c>O'-\. ~,"~
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
Maior Site Plan Modification
..-_ ..,._ ,~._,__ n
Project name: Healing Heart / White Elk
File number: MSPM 06-001
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Decembe
Zoninl!: date stamD markinl!:.
JAM 2. 4 2006
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section
10-26 (a). RESPONSE: Will comply,
2. Indicate where roll-out cart is to be stored. This should be in a screened
area. RESPONSE: Type of construction information has been added to
revised Sheet AS-I 0 I ,
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter provided by
Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated January 9,
2006. Please see attached copy.
4. Engineering and Public Works staff strongly recommends that the driveway
be configured for two (2) eight (8) feet lanes with adjacent landscaping
material designed such that they will not grow into travel lanes when they
reach maturity. If it is the desire of the City to allow this development with
a driveway of a width that will only accommodate one travel lane then Staff
recommends that the engineer/developer utilize traffic calming measures
that will ensure a low rate of speed along the driveway. If a one-lane
configuration is allowed Staff insists that no plant materials be placed in the
sight triangles on the northwest and southwest comers of the building.
RESPONSE: Proposed shrub materials that may grow above 30" in height
have been removed on the northwest and southwest comers of the building.
5. Staff recommends deleting one or both of the parking stalls adjacent to the
drainage swale in the southeast comer of the project to reduce backing
conflicts at this location. RESPONSE: Eliminating spaces will not allow for
adequate parking to be provided for a professional office space.
Add double yellow lane separators at the stop bar exiting to SE 23Tl1 Ave.
RESPONSE: Yellow lane separator has been added to revised Sheet C-I .
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
RESPONSE: General Note has been added to revised Sheet AS-l 0 I.
7. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets. RESPONSE: Will comply in revised
sheets,
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit revIew.
RESPONSE: Understood,
9. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. RESPONSE: Written and
graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
10. The Site Plan (Sheet AS-I 01) does not match the Paving, Grading &
Drainage Plan (No Sheet Number.) The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan
does not depict the house addition or sidewalk shown on the Site Plan. The
Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan depicts a drainage swale (Swale Area
"B") where the house addition and sidewalk are located. This will seriously
impact the overall drainage calculations as Swale Area "B" contained the
largest volume of the three depicted swale areas. Correct discrepancies.
RESPONSE: Discrepancies have been corrected in revised plans provided.
II. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter
4, Section 7.BA.) It appears that the overall lighting levels could be
lowered to an average of 3 ft-candles by reducing light intensity.
RESPONSE: All proposed site lighting has been shown on the revised
landscape plan.
12. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway
onto SE 23rd Ave. RESPONSE: Palm Beach County Standards have been
added to revised Sheet C -I ,
13. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft.
above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.)
RESPONSE: The note has been added to sheet L-l.
14. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive
aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile
vehicles. RESPONSE: The canopy trees have been moved further back
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
from the edge of parking area,
15. Corkscrew and Cocoplum Hedges are depicted as being located in the 5-ft.
sidewalk on the south and west sides of the existing house and proposed
addition. Correct plans accordingly. RESPONSE: All hedges have been
removed from paved areas.
]6. Provide tree legend on Sheet L-1 RESPONSE: Tree legend has been
provided on sheet L-I.
17. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P). RESPONSE: Sidewalk has been added to revised Sheet C-] .
18. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in DR,
Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-1.
19. Explain the "200% Credit" used in the drainage calculations on the Paving,
Grading & Drainage Plan. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C -I.
20.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I,
22. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-] ,
UTILITIES
Comments:
Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services
will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. RESPONSE:
The water and sewer loads anticipated for this project will be no different
that the existing loads. Two restrooms and one kitchend sink will remain at
the end of the day.
23. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is
incomplete as submitted. The proposed Site Plan reflects an existing single
family residential dwelling site located within the Utilities' service area
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
0] /23/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJ he J
where utility support is available. We are providing a cursory review of the
proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be
provided after a utility plan has been submitted. RESPONSE: Provided on
the revised Sheet C-] .
24. Depict location of water and sewer mains and service(s) for the site and
indicate whether any alteration will be required to accommodate the new
use and proposed addition. Palm Beach County permits will be required if
any utility work is to be performed within the SE 23rd Ave. right-of-way.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by IOsurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). RESPONSE: Please find
the attached fire flow test results,
26. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet AS- I and C -1,
27. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand. RESPONSE: Will comply,
28. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation. RESPONSE: Will comply.
29. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for any water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, 10 accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
RESPONSE: Understood,
30. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. RESPONSE: Provided on the
revised Sheet C- I ,
31. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must
therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed
off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-l,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
32. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Understood.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
34. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. RESPONSE:
Understood,
35. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. RESPONSE: Type of construction
information has been added to revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
36. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3. RESPONSE: Occupancy type information has been
added to revised Sheet AS-IOI.
37. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table
704.8. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected
and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
38. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every buildin~ or
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
6
DEPARTMENTS
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
39. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction. RESPONSE: Will comply,
40. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible
entrance doors to the building. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3. RESPONSE: Handicap accessible entrance door has been identified
on revised floor plan,
41. On the drawing titled site plan identifY the property line. RESPONSE:
Property lines have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) RESPONSE: Understood.
43. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
RESPONSE: Will comply.
44. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application. RESPONSE: Note added.
45. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission. RESPONSE: Understood.
INCLUDE REJECT
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
46. Both toilet rooms shall be fully accessible for use by handicapped persons.
Doors shall not swing into the required clear floor space of accessible
fixtures. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.3(11 ); 11-4.22.2. RESPONSE:
Bathroom layouts have been modified to provide two fully accessible toilet
rooms,
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
47. No irrigation plan. RESPONSE: Irrigation by others to be provided at a V
later date.
48. Add 2 City signature trees. RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have ~
been added.
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existin2 Trees Mana2ement Plan Sheet Ll
49. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of
existing trees on the site. proposed to be removed and replaced on site. The
replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape
plan sheet Lt. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec.
7.D.p. 2.] RESPONSE: The total diameter of trees removed has been
calculated. Mitigation trees have been noted symbol on the landscape plan,
Master Plant List, Sheet L2
50. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of
12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground) not caliper, and Florida #1
(Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be
larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any clear trunk
(c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. 5.C. 2.] RESPONSE: All canopy tree spec's have been changed. The
FL No. I requirement is noted in the planting notes on sheet L-2.
51. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina
granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the
minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] RESPONSE: Two City signature
trees have been added.
52. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the
diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Tree planting details have been
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
revised to show measurements.
53. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk
and height of all of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown,
54. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and
spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
55. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedge plants on three sides. RESPONSE: Note has been added.
Irrie:ation Plan
56. Turfand landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation. RESPONSE: Irrigation to
be provided at a later date.
57. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.
C.2.] RESPONSE: Irrigation to be provided at a later date,
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
58. Property Appraiser records indicate property owner as White Elk
Enterprises, LLC. Applications state property owner /Trustee as Nancy
Keller - White Elk LLC. Please submit the latest recorded warranty deed
for the subject property, and authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of
LLC. RESPONSE: See attached latest recorded warranty deed and
authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf ofthe LLC,
59. Correct the site plan application to include the following: 1.8. (PCN # is 08-
43-45-33-04-000-0080); 1.13. name and company of site planner; 1.16.
name and company of traffic engineer; 1.17. no previously approved site
plan; 11.1. land use category is Office Commercial (OC); II.5.c. paved area
s.f. and % of site; 1I.5.h. total pervious area in s.f. and % of site (same as e. 1
h. is total of e. f. and g.); 1I.6.h. same as b. 1 h. is total of a.-g.; 11.7 .e. is 0 1
total of a.-d. which are all NI A or 0; II.8. is 0; II.1 O.a. provide formula 1 per
300 sfofGFA (1600/300 = 5.3 or 6 spaces; II.lO.b. provide formula 1 per
25 spaces = 1 H1C space; IV. Authorization of Agent: Agent's signature
required and date. RESPONSE: Site Plan Application has been updated to
reflect commentary,
60. Provide a copy of the traffic impact statement submitted to Palm Beach
County Traffic Engineering for their review and approval. (Chapter 4.
Section 8.F.). RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006. Please see attached copy.
61. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency approval (Traffic
Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering. RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006, Please see attached copy.
62. In addition to a drainage plan, a drainage statement (engineer's certification
in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc.
including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land
Development Regulations) is required prior to the TART meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.F.2.). RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
63.
64. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the site plan modification is
publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. RESPONSE:
Will comply.
65. Provide written and graphic scales for all drawings. RESPONSE: Written
and graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
66. On all plans indicate on the building footprint, the proposed use, number of
stories, and total building square feet (proposed veterinary clinic, one story
building, 1600 sf). RESPONSE: Building footprint, proposed use, number
of stories and total building square feet have been identified on the revised
plans,
67. Provide building dimensions for building footprint on site plan. The
building dimensions shown on the site plan must match the building
dimensions on the floor plan. RESPONSE: Dimensions for the building
footprint have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
68. Per Chapter 2, Section 6 of the Land Development Regulations, veterinary
offices and clinics are a permitted use in the C-1 zoning district, however
outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other than treatment,
and on-site disposal of animals is prohibited. Add notes to AS-lO 1 site plan
data that clarifY the proposed clinic will not include the above prohibited
uses. RESPONSE: General Note added to revised Sheet AS-lOl
identifYing that outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other
than treatment, and on-site disposal of animals are prohibited.
69. Swale area along the south side of the building, as depicted on the Paving,
Grading, and Drainage Plan, does not appear to take into consideration the
proposed building addition. RESPONSE: Civil plans have been updated
to indicate the proposed +/-400 SF addition.
70. Correct building setback information on site plan data (AS-l 01). Provide
minimum setbacks for C-1 (rear is minimum of 30 feet when abutting a
residential district), and actual building setback distance provided (to front,
I S1' REVIEW COMMEN1'S- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
IO
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
each side, and rear). RESPONSE: Rear setback dimension has been
corrected on the revised Sheet AS-I 0 I,
71. Side setback is a minimum of IO feet, note encroachment of building on
east side of site. Note existing side setback of 7.5 feet approved per
requested variance (ZNCV06-003). Of course, approval of the site plan as
shown is contingent upon pnor or concurrent variance approval.
RESPONSE: Pending variance approval.
72. Revise site plan tabular data (AS-IOI) to include the following: Zoning
district Office Professional (C-I), Future Land Use Classification Office
Commercial (OC), Proposed Use (noting no boarding, no kennel, etc),
maximum lot coverage (building) 40%, maximum structure height 30 feet,
not to exceed 2 stories, and actual building height 14 feet, one story.
RESPONSE: Site Plan Tabular Data has been updated to include the above
infonnation on the revised Sheet AS-I 01 .
73. Provide existing use, zoning district, and future land use for each abutting
property (C-1 and OC to east and west, Single-Family Residential R1 AA
and Low Density Residential LDR to south). RESPONSE: Site Plan
Tabular Data has been updated to include the above infonnation on the
revised Sheet AS-I 01.
74. The proposed two-way drive is only 12 feet on the side of the building. The
vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisle widths
are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and
approval. RESPONSE: Understood.
75. Provide details on solid waste/garbage pickup on plans (indicating it will be
rolled out to curbside for pickup, no dumpster). RESPONSE: Indicated.
76. Will there be outdoor storage of trash containers? If so, a trash enclosure
shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the
principal building and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter
9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a note indicating this
requirement. Provide a detail of trash enclosure with required screening.
RESPONSE: Trash enclosure has been indicated.
77. Indicate with arrows two-way vehicular traffic circulation within 12 foot
drive area. RESPONSE: Two way areas have been provided,
78. Indicate locations and widths of nearest driveway approaches on adjacent
properties. RESPONSE: Provided,
79. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval ofthe City Forester I Environmentalist. RESPONSE: OK.
80. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper
inches at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.).
RESPONSE: Planting spec's indicate the height and spread required at
installation..
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
11
DEPARTMENTS
81. Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening
of equipment. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior
utility boxes, meters, and transformers shall be visually screened with
appropriate landscaping! hedge material. RESPONSE: All utility boxes
shown are screened with landscape material.
82. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the
tabular data and the graphic illustration. RESPONSE: Plant quantities
match plan.
83. It appears as though landscape plantings are proposed within the swale
areas. These plantings should be located at natural grade around the swale
areas, not on the slope or depressed areas. RESPONSE: The swale has been
removed.
84. The area between SE 23rd A venue pavement and the subject property line
should be sodded with St. Augustine sod and irrigated RESPONSE: Sod
has been noted to the edge of road.
85. Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a minimum of two (2)
colorful shrub species on both sides of the entrance and a signature tree.
Note that signature trees do not contribute toward the total number of
required perimeter trees or parking area interior landscaping. (Chapter 7.5,
Article 11, Section 5.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as Yellow Elder,
Tibouchina granulose, or Bougainvilla at each side of the project entrance.
These signature trees shall have a minimum of six (6) feet of clear trunk to
preserve the clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N).
RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have been added.
86. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). RESPONSE: Provided in revised
Sheet L- I.
87. Provide a typical drawing that includes the height and color / material of
proposed freestanding outdoor lights and poles. The design, style, and
illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and
shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section
IO.F.1.). A pole detail is provided, but no detail of light. All lights
(including lighting for monument sign) shall be shielded and direct light
down to avoid glare on streets and adjacent properties (Ch.2., SecA.N.7).
RESPONSE: Site lighting fixture specifications have been provided, see
revised Sheet E-I 0 I. Color Selection: White.
88. All plans should clearly indicate the locations of proposed freestanding
lights. RESPONSE: Light poles have been shown.
89. The illumination levels appear very high, with numerous "hot spots" and
levels at property lines exceeding 1.0. Please correct. RESPONSE:
INCLUDE REJECT
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
]2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Illumination levels have been corrected, see revised sheet E-I 0 I.
90. On the elevations indicate the material and color(s) of any proposed wall
mounted lighting fixtures. RESPONSE: Provided. Site lighting fixture
specifications have been provided, see revised Sheet E- I 01. Color
Selection: White,
91. Indicate the proposed height of any roof top equipment. Note on plans (if
applicable) that rooftop equipment will be screened from view at a distance
of 600 feet. (LOR, Chapter 9, Section] I.E.). RESPONSE: No roof top
equipment is provided.
92. All elevations must indicate the proposed colors, including the paint
manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In addition,
provide paint swatches that directly correspond to the elevations.
RESPONSE: Provided,
93. The use of sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises, or benches are
recommended to be included in the site design (Chapter 9, Sec. 10.H.).
RESPONSE: Size of the site does not allow for sculptures, fountains,
gardens, pools, trellises or benches to be provided.
94. All project signage must be approved concurrent with the site plan submittal
or an additional full site plan review would be required solely for signage
review and approval. All project signage is subject to review and approval
of the Planning & Development Board. On the elevations, indicate the
cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it complies with Chapter
2], Article 4, Section C. In addition, indicate the letter colors and sign
material. Will it be a back-lit sign? RESPONSE: Cumulative area of wall
signage, letter colors and sign material have been provided on revised
elevations, Signage will not be backlit.
95. Indicate location of proposed freestanding signage on site plan and
striping/signage plan. Provide signage details on plan. All proposed project
(site) signs such as the monument sign shall clearly indicate the project
street address. RESPONSE: No freestanding or monument signs are to be
provided.
96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. RESPONSE: Provided.
97. Provide colored elevations and I or rendering of four (4) building sides at
the Technical Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
RESPONSE: Provided.
98. Provide a colored elevation drawing (full-sized 24 inches by 36 inches,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
clipped not glued to foamboard) at the TART meeting. The color rendering
shall include all existing and proposed buildings on site. Staff recommends
using a color schedule. Provide paint swatches that will represent the colors
as depicted on the elevation pages (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). RESPONSE:
Provided.
99. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and
submit that to staff as well. RESPONSE: Provided.
toO. Staff considers these plans to be near the final stage of site plan review, the
last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be
addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. Any
information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required
to be shown at the time of permitting. RESPONSE: Understood,
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk llC\MSPM 06-001\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS,doc
...
1st REVIEW COMMENT8 ,..
Maior Site Plan Modification
Project name: Healing Heart / White Elk
File number: MSPM 06-00]
Reference: ] sf review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a December 14. 2005 Planning &
Zoninl! date stamo markinl!.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (56] -742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section
10-26 (a). RESPONSE: Will complv,
2. Indicate where roll-out cart is to be stored. This should be in a screened
area. RESPONSE: Type of construction information has been added to
revised Sheet AS-lOI.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter provided by
Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated January 9,
2006. Please see attached copy.
4. Engineering and Public Works staff strongly recommends that the driveway
be configured for two (2) eight (8) feet lanes with adjacent landscaping
material designed such that they will not grow into travel lanes when they
reach maturity. If it is the desire of the City to allow this development with
a driveway of a width that will only accommodate one travel lane then Staff
recommends that the engineer/developer utilize traffic calming measures
that will ensure a low rate of speed along the driveway. If a one-lane
configuration is allowed Staff insists that no plant materials be placed in the
sight triangles on the northwest and southwest comers of the building.
RESPONSE: Proposed shrub materials that may grow above 30" in height
have been removed on the northwest and southwest corners of the building,
5. Staff recommends deleting one or both of the parking stalls adjacent to the
drainage swale in the southeast comer of the project to reduce backing
conflicts at this location. RESPONSE: Eliminating spaces will not allow for
adequate parking to be provided for a professional office space.
Add double yellow lane separators at the stop bar exiting to SE 23m Ave.
RESPONSE: Yellow lane separator has been added to revised Sheet C-I .
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
RESPONSE: General Note has been added to revised Sheet AS-I 01,
7. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets. RESPONSE: Will comply in revised
sheets.
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
RESPONSE: Understood.
9. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. RESPONSE: Written and
graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
10. The Site Plan (Sheet AS-1 0 I) does not match the Paving, Grading &
Drainage Plan (No Sheet Number.) The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan
does not depict the house addition or sidewalk shown on the Site Plan. The
Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan depicts a drainage swale (Swale Area
"B") where the house addition and sidewalk are located. This will seriously
impact the overall drainage calculations as Swale Area "B" contained the
largest volume of the three depicted swale areas. Correct discrepancies.
RESPONSE: Discrepancies have been corrected in revised plans provided.
11. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter
4, Section 7.BA.) It appears that the overall lighting levels could be
lowered to an average of 3 ft-candles by reducing light intensity.
RESPONSE: All proposed site lighting has been shown on the revised
landscape plan.
12. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway
onto SE 23rd Ave. RESPONSE: Palm Beach County Standards have been
added to revised Sheet C-I ,
13. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft.
above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.)
RESPONSE: The note has been added to sheet L-I.
14. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive
aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile
vehicles. RESPONSE: The canopy trees have been moved further back
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
from the edge of parking area,
15. Corkscrew and Cocoplum Hedges are depicted as being located in the 5-ft.
sidewalk on the south and west sides of the existing house and proposed
addition. Correct plans accordingly. RESPONSE: All hedges have been
removed from paved areas.
16. Provide tree legend on Sheet L-1 RESPONSE: Tree legend has been
provided on sheet L-I.
17. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P). RESPONSE: Sidewalk has been added to revised Sheet C-I.
18. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in DR,
Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I,
19. Explain the "200% Credit" used in the drainage calculations on the Paving,
Grading & Drainage Plan. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I,
20.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
22. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C -I.
UTILITIES
Comments:
Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services
will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. RESPONSE:
The water and sewer loads anticipated for this project will be no different
that the existing loads. Two restrooms and one kitchend sink will remain at
the end of the day,
23. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is
incomplete as submitted. The proposed Site Plan reflects an existing single
family residential dwelling site located within the Utilities' service area
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
where utility support is available. We are providing a cursory review of the
proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be
provided after a utility plan has been submitted. RESPONSE: Provided on
the revised Sheet C-I,
24. Depict location of water and sewer mains and service(s) for the site and
indicate whether any alteration will be required to accommodate the new
use and proposed addition. Palm Beach County permits will be required if
any utility work is to be performed within the SE 23rd Ave. right-of-way.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C -I.
25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). RESPONSE: Please find
the attached fire flow test results.
26. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet AS-I and C-1.
27. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand. RESPONSE: Will comply,
28. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation. RESPONSE: Will comply.
29. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for any water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, 10 accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
RESPONSE: Understood.
30. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. RESPONSE: Provided on the
revised Sheet C -I ,
31. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must
therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed
off-site utilities construction needed 10 order to service this project.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
32. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Understood.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
34. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. RESPONSE:
Understood.
35. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. RESPONSE: Type of construction
information has been added to revised Sheet AS- 10] .
36. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3. RESPONSE: Occupancy type information has been
added to revised Sheet AS-I 0 I .
37. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table
704.8. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected
and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
38. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every buildinl]; or
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
6
DEPARTMENTS
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
39. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction. RESPONSE: Will comply,
40. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible
entrance doors to the building. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3. RESPONSE: Handicap accessible entrance door has been identified
on revised floor plan,
41. On the drawing titled site plan identifY the property line. RESPONSE:
Property lines have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) RESPONSE: Understood.
43. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
RESPONSE: Will comply,
44. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application. RESPONSE: Note added.
45. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission. RESPONSE: Understood.
INCLUDE REJECT
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJhCl.
46. Both toilet rooms shall be fully accessible for use by handicapped persons.
Doors shall not swing into the required clear floor space of accessible
fixtures. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.3(11 ); 11-4.22.2. RESPONSE:
Bathroom layouts have been modified to provide two fully accessible toilet
rooms.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
47. No irrigation plan. RESPONSE: Irrigation by others to be provided at a
later date.
48. Add 2 City signature trees. RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have
been added.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existin2 Trees Mana2ement Plan Sheet Ll
49. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of
existing trees on the site. proposed to be removed and replaced on site. The
replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape
plan sheet LI. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec.
7.D.p. 2.] RESPONSE: The total diameter of trees removed has been
calculated. Mitigation trees have been noted symbol on the landscape plan,
Master Plant List, Sheet L2
50. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of
12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground) not caliper, and Florida #1
(Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be
larger than ] 2'-] 4' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any clear trunk
(c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. 5.C. 2.] RESPONSE: All canopy tree spec's have been changed, The
FL No. ] requirement is noted in the planting notes on sheet L-2,
51. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina
granulosa) at the ingress I egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the
minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] RESPONSE: Two City signature
trees have been added.
52. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the
diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Tree planting details have been
] ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
0]/23/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
revised to show measurements.
53. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk
and height of all of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
54. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and
spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
55. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedge plants on three sides. RESPONSE: Note has been added,
Irrie:ation Plan
56. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation. RESPONSE: Irrigation to
be provided at a later date.
57. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.
Co2.] RESPONSE: Irrigation to be provided at a later date.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
58. Property Appraiser records indicate property owner as White Elk
Enterprises, LLC. Applications state property owner ITrustee as Nancy
Keller - White Elk LLC. Please submit the latest recorded warranty deed
for the subject property, and authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of V"
LLC. RESPONSE: See attached latest recorded warranty deed and
authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of the LLC.
59. Correct the site plan application to include the following: 1.8. (PCN # is 08-
43-45-33-04-000-0080); 1.13. name and company of site planner; 1.16.
name and company of traffic engineer; 1.17. no previously approved site
plan; II.]. land use category is Office Commercial (OC); I1.5.c. paved area
s.f. and % of site; II.S.h. total pervious area in s.t: and % of site (same as e. 1
h. is total of e. f. and g.); II.6.h. same as b. 1 h. is total of a.-g.; II.7.e. is 0 1 V
total of a.-d. which are all NI A or 0; 11.8. is 0; 11.1 O.a. provide formula 1 per
300 sfofGFA (1600/300 = 5.3 or 6 spaces; 1I.10.b. provide formula 1 per
25 spaces = 1 H/C space; IV. Authorization of Agent: Agent's signature
required and date. RESPONSE: Site Plan Application has been updated to
reflect commentary.
60. Provide a copy of the traffic impact statement submitted to Palm Beach V
County Traffic Engineering for their review and approval. (Chapter 4.
Section 8.F.). RESPONSE: Traffic Perfonnance Standards Review letter
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006. Please see attached copy,
61. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency approval (Traffic
Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering. RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter V
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9, 2006. Please see attached copy.
62. In addition to a drainage plan, a drainage statement (engineer's certification
in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc.
including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land V
Development Regulations) is required prior to the TART meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.F.2.). RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
63.
64. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the site plan modification is
publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. RESPONSE: V
Will comply.
65. Provide written and graphic scales for all drawings. RESPONSE: Written V
and graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
66. On all plans indicate on the building footprint, the proposed use, number of
stories, and total building square feet (proposed veterinary clinic, one story
building, 1600 sf). RESPONSE: Building footprint, proposed use, number
of stories and total building square feet have been identified on the revised V
plans.
67. Provide building dimensions for building footprint on site plan. The
building dimensions shown on the site plan must match the building
dimensions on the floor plan. RESPONSE: Dimensions for the building V-
footprint have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-1O I.
68. Per Chapter 2, Section 6 of the Land Development Regulations, veterinary
offices and clinics are a permitted use in the C-1 zoning district, however
outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other than treatment,
and on-site disposal of animals is prohibited. Add notes to AS-lO 1 site plan V
data that clarify the proposed clinic will not include the above prohibited
uses. RESPONSE: General Note added to revised Sheet AS-IOI
identitying that outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other
than treatment, and on-site disposal of animals are prohibited.
69. Swale area along the south side of the building, as depicted on the Paving,
Grading, and Drainage Plan, does not appear to take into consideration the V
proposed building addition. RESPONSE: Civil plans have been updated
to indicate the proposed +/-400 SF addition.
70. Correct building setback information on site plan data (AS-lOl). Provide
minimum setbacks for C-l (rear is minimum of 30 feet when abutting a
residential district), and actual building setback distance provided (to front,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES. doc
01/23/06
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
each side, and rear). RESPONSE: Rear setback dimension has been V
corrected on the revised Sheet AS- 101,
71. Side setback is a minimum of 10 feet, note encroachment of building on
east side of site. Note existing side setback of 7.5 feet approved per
requested variance (ZNCV06-003). Of course, approval of the site plan as V
shown IS contingent upon prior or concurrent variance approval.
RESPONSE: Pending variance approval.
72. Revise site plan tabular data (AS-l 0 I) to include the following: Zoning
district Office Professional (C-l), Future Land Use Classification Office
Commercial (OC), Proposed Use (noting no boarding, no kennel, etc),
maximum lot coverage (building) 40%, maximum structure height 30 feet, V
not to exceed 2 stories, and actual building height 14 feet, one story.
RESPONSE: Site Plan Tabular Data has been updated to include the above
information on the revised Sheet AS-l 0 I.
73. Provide existing use, zoning district, and future land use for each abutting
property (C-I and OC to east and west, Single-Family Residential R1AA
and Low Density Residential LDR to south). RESPONSE: Site Plan
Tabular Data has been updated to include the above information on the V
revised Sheet AS- I 0 I,
74. The proposed two-way drive is only 12 feet on the side of the building. The
vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisle widths
are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and V
approval. RESPONSE: Understood,
75. Provide details on solid waste/garbage pickup on plans (indicating it will be V
rolled out to curbside for pickup, no dumpster). RESPONSE: Indicated.
76. Will there be outdoor storage of trash containers? If so, a trash enclosure
shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the
principal building and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter
9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a note indicating this V
requirement. Provide a detail of trash enclosure with required screening.
RESPONSE: Trash enclosure has been indicated,
77. Indicate with arrows two-way vehicular traffic circulation within 12 foot V
drive area. RESPONSE: Two way areas have been provided.
78. Indicate locations and widths of nearest driveway approaches on adjacent V
properties. RESPONSE: Provided.
79. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and V
approval ofthe City Forester / Environmentalist. RESPONSE: OK.
80. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper
inches at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). V
RESPONSE: Planting spec's indicate the height and spread required at
installation..
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
11
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
81. Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening
of equipment. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior
utility boxes, meters, and transformers shall be visually screened with
appropriate landscaping! hedge material. RESPONSE: All utility boxes
shown are screened with landsca e material.
v-
82. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the
tabular data and the graphic illustration. RESPONSE: Plant quantities
match Ian.
\....--
83. It appears as though landscape plantings are proposed within the swale
areas. These plantings should be located at natural grade around the swale
areas, not on the slope or depressed areas. RESPONSE: The swale has been
removed.
v
84. The area between SE 23rd A venue pavement and the subject property line
should be sodded with ~. Augustine sod and irrigated RESPONSE: Sod
has been noted to the edge of road.
~
~
85. Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a mInimum of two (2)
colorful shrub species on both sides of the entrance and a signature tree.
Note that signature trees do not contribute toward the total number of
required perimeter trees or parking area interior landscaping. (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section 5.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as Yellow Elder,
Tibouchina granulose, or Bougainvilla at each side of the roject entrance. V
These signature trees shall have a minimum of six eet 0 c ear n 0
preserve the clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N).
RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have been added. /).J.J + -f.' IJ
86. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). RESPONSE: Provided in revised
Sheet L-I .
87. ro . al drawing that includes the height and color / materia f
proposed freestanding r lights and poles. The desi e, and
illumination level shall be compatib e WI eSlgn (height) and
shall consider safety, function, ettc value apter 9, S n /;J(!/ Lft
IS provided, but no detail of li 11 lights
(including lighting for monument sign s a e s Ie ed and direct light
down to avoid glare on streets and adjacent properties (Ch.2., SecA.N.7). V
RESPONSE: Site lighting fixture specifications have been provided, see
revised Sheet E-I 0 I. Color Selection: White,
88. All plans should clearly indicate the locations of proposed freestanding
li ts. RESPONSE: Light oles have been sh dtiN &:Jc...
89. The illumination levels appear ~high, wtfft-fUUllGJOnS "hat sf9tg" and
e . . Please correct. RESPONSE:
~
v
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
12
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Illumination levels have been corrected, see revised sheet E-I 01.
90. On the elevations indicate the material and color(s) of any proposed wall
mounted lighting fixtures. RESPONSE: Provided. Site lighting fixture V
specifications have been provided, see revised Sheet E- I 0 1. Color
Selection: White.
91. Indicate the proposed height of any roof top equipment. Note on plans (if
applicable) that rooftop equipment will be screened from view at a distance V
of 600 feet. (LOR, Chapter 9, Section 1 I.E.). RESPONSE: No roof top
equipment is provided.
92. All elevations must indicate the proposed colors, including the paint
manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). In addition,
provide paint swatches that directly correspond to the elevations.
RESPONSE: Provided. 1--
93. The use of sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises, or benches are
recommended to be included in the site design (Chapter 9, Sec. 10.H.). V-
RESPONSE: Size of the site does not allow for sculptures, fountains,
gardens, pools, trellises or benches to be provided.
94. All project signage must be approved concurrent with the site plan submittal
or an additional full site plan review would be required solely for signage
review and approval. All project signage is subject to review and approval
of the Planning & Development Board. On the elevations, indicate the
cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it complies with Chapter V
21, Article 4, Section C. In addition, indicate the letter colors and sign
material. Will it be a back-lit sign? RESPONSE: Cumulative area of wall
signage, letter colors and sign material have been provided on revised
elevations. Signage will not be backlit.
95. Indicate location of proposed freestanding slgnage on site plan and
striping/signage plan. Provide signage details on plan. All proposed project
(site) signs such as the monument sign shall clearly indicate the project V
street address. RESPONSE: No freestanding or monument signs are to be
provided.
96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised V
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. RESPONSE: Provided.
97. Provide colored elevations and / or rendering of four (4) building sides at
the Technical Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). V
RESPONSE: Provided.
98. Provide a colored elevation drawing (full-sized 24 inches by 36 inches, V
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
clipped not glued to foamboard) at the TART meeting. The color rendering
shall include all existing and proposed buildings on site. Staff recommends
using a color schedule. Provide paint swatches that will represent the colors V-
as depicted on the elevation pages (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). RESPONSE:
Provided.
99. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and ~
submit that to staffas well. RESPONSE: Provided.
100. Staff considers these plans to be near the final stage of site plan review, the
last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be V
addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. Any
information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required
to be shown at the time of permitting. RESPONSE: Understood.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk LLC\MSPM 06-001\1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
~
1st REVIEW COMMENTS'" '[OJ ~ ~ ~ n ~1JL ~
Major Site Plan Modification lrll \ .M 2 A 2006 \ l!!J
Project name: Healing Heart / White Elk I .._ . .._..:_._._1
File number: MSPM 06-001 I I" ., , . J
Reference: 151 review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Debemher 14. 2005 Planning'oc
Zoning date stamo marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section . ,
10-26 (a). RESPONSE: Will comply.
2. Indicate where roll-out cart is to be stored. This should be in a screened
area. RESPONSE: Type of construction information has been added to
revised Sheet AS-I 01. io ~"( ... ~ 'J'lI / .::.. '~'"::1 'f'
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter provided by
Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated January 9,
2006. Please see attached copy.
4. Engineering and Public Works staff strongly recommends that the driveway
be configured for two (2) eight (8) feet lanes with adjacent landscaping
material designed such that they will not grow into travel lanes when they
reach maturity. If it is the desire of the City to allow this development with
a driveway of a width that will only accommodate one travel lane then Staff
recommends that the engineer/developer utilize traffic calming measures . ,
"
that will ensure a low rate of speed along the driveway. If a one-lane
configuration is allowed Staff insists that no plant materials be placed in the
sight triangles on the northwest and southwest corners of the building.
RESPONSE: Proposed shrub materials that may grow above 30" in height
have been removed on the northwest and southwest corners of the building.
5. Staff recommends deleting one or both of the parking stalls adjacent to the
drainage swale in the southeast corner of the project to reduce backing
conflicts at this location. RESPONSE: Eliminating spaces will not allow for /,
adequate parking to be provided for a professional office space.
Add double yellow lane separators at the stop bar exiting to SE 23fd Ave.
RESPONSE: Yellow lane separator has been added to revised Sheet C-I .
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific .
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
RESPONSE: General Note has been added to revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
7. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets. RESPONSE: Will comply in revised ,
sheets.
8. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
RESPONSE: Understood.
9. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. RESPONSE: Written and
graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
10. The Site Plan (Sheet AS-l 01) does not match the Paving, Grading &
Drainage Plan (No Sheet Number.) The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan
does not depict the house addition or sidewalk shown on the Site Plan. The
Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan depicts a drainage swale (Swale Area
"B") where the house addition and sidewalk are located. This will seriously
impact the overall drainage calculations as Swale Area "B" contained the
largest volume of the three depicted swale areas. Correct discrepancies.
RESPONSE: Discrepancies have been corrected in revised plans provided.
11. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter
4, Section 7.B.4.) It appears that the overall lighting levels could be
lowered to an average of 3 ft-candles by reducing light intensity. ,
RESPONSE: All proposed site lighting has been shown on the revised
landscape plan.
12. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway
onto SE 23fd Ave. RESPONSE: Palm Beach County Standards have been , ,
added to revised Sheet C-I .
13. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.S-ft. and 8-ft. :
above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.H.)
RESPONSE: The note has been added to sheet L-I.
14. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive
aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile . ,
vehicles. RESPONSE: The canopy trees have been moved further back
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
from the edge of parking area.
15. Corkscrew and Cocoplum Hedges are depicted as being located in the S-ft.
sidewalk on the south and west sides of the existing house and proposed
addition. Correct plans accordingly. RESPONSE: All hedges have been . ..
removed from paved areas.
16. Provide tree legend on Sheet L-l RESPONSE: Tree legend has been
provided on sheet L-I.
17. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, "
Section P). RESPONSE: Sidewalk has been added to revised Sheet C-I.
18. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in DR,
Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
19. Explain the "200% Credit" used in the drainage calculations on the Paving,
Grading & Drainage Plan. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I. " ,
. .
20.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of ' ,
permitting. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
22. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
UTILITIES
Comments:
Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services
will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the ,-
setting ofthe first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. RESPONSE:
The water and sewer loads anticipated for this project will be no different
that the existing loads. Two restrooms and one kitchend sink will remain at
the end of the day.
23. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is
incomplete as submitted. The proposed Site Plan reflects an existing single
family residential dwelling site located within the Utilities' service area
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
where utility support is available. We are providing a cursory review of the
proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be
provided after a utility plan has been submitted. RESPONSE: Provided on
the revised Sheet C-I .
24. Depict location of water and sewer mains and service(s) for the site and
indicate whether any alteration will be required to accommodate the new
use and proposed addition. Palm Beach County permits will be required if '..
any utility work is to be performed within the SE 23rd Ave. right-of-way.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, ,~;, "
Section 16, the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, ""
or .,. .~
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). RESPONSE: Please find
the attached fire flow test results.
26. The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants. RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet AS- I and C-1.
27. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site ,
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand. RESPONSE: Will comply.
28. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation. RESPONSE: Will comply.
29. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for any water and/or sewer improvements required to
servIce this project, III accordance with the CODE, Section 26-1 S. ,\.; , '.
RESPONSE: Understood.
30. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in , ..
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. RESPONSE: Provided on the
revised Sheet C-I .
31. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must
therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed
off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project.
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
32. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. ".
RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design ,
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
RESPONSE: Understood.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
34. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. RESPONSE:
Understood.
35. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. RESPONSE: Type of construction
information has been added to revised Sheet AS- 10 I.
36. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3. RESPONSE: Occupancy type information has been
added to revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
37. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table
704.8. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected
and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
38. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
6
DEPARTMENTS
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
RESPONSE: Calculations for windows and doors have been added to the
plans, will comply with product approvals at submission to Building
Department.
39. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings ofthe
proposed construction. RESPONSE: Will comply.
40. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible
entrance doors to the building. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3. RESPONSE: Handicap accessible entrance door has been identified
on revised floor plan.
41. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. RESPONSE:
Property lines have been identified on the revised Sheet AS- 10 I.
42. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
o The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) RESPONSE: Understood.
43. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
RESPONSE: Will comply.
44. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application. RESPONSE: Note added.
45. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission. RESPONSE: Understood.
INCLUDE REJECT
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
46. Both toilet rooms shall be fully accessible for use by handicapped persons.
Doors shall not swing into the required clear floor space of accessible
fixtures. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.3(11 ); 11-4.22.2. RESPONSE:
Bathroom layouts have been modified to provide two fully accessible toilet
rooms.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
47. No irrigation plan. RESPONSE: Irrigation by others to be provided at a
later date.
48. Add 2 City signature trees. RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have
been added.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existin~ Trees Mana~ement Plan Sheet Ll
49. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of
existing trees on the site. proposed to be removed and replaced on site. The
replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape
plan sheet L 1. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec.
7.D.p. 2.] RESPONSE: The total diameter oftrees removed has been
calculated. Mitigation trees have been noted symbol on the landscape plan.
Master Plant List, Sheet L2
50. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of
12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground) not caliper, and Florida #1
(Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be
larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any clear trunk
(c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. S.C. 2.] RESPONSE: All canopy tree spec's have been changed. The
FL No. I requirement is noted in the planting notes on sheet L-2,
51. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina
granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the
minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C.3.N.] RESPONSE: Two City signature
trees have been added.
52. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the
diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Tree planting details have been
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJ t',L I
revised to show measurements.
53. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk
and height of all of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection. RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
54. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and
spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
RESPONSE: Measurements have been shown.
55. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedge plants on three sides. RESPONSE: Note has been added.
Irrie:ation Plan
56. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation. RESPONSE: Irrigation to
be provided at a later date,
57. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.
C.2.] RESPONSE: Irrigation to be provided at a later date.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
58. Property Appraiser records indicate property owner as White Elk
Enterprises, LLC. Applications state property owner /Trustee as Nancy
Keller - White Elk LLC. Please submit the latest recorded warranty deed
for the subject property, and authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of
LLC. RESPONSE: See attached latest recorded warranty deed and
authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of the LLC.
59. Correct the site plan application to include the following: 1.8. (PCN # is 08-
43-45-33-04-000-0080); 1.13. name and company of site planner; 1.16.
name and company of traffic engineer; 1.17. no previously approved site
plan; II.l. land use category is Office Commercial (OC); II.S.c. paved area
s.f. and % of site; II.5.h. total pervious area in s.t: and % of site (same as e. /
h. is total ofe. f. and g.); II.6.h. same as b. / h. is total of a.-g.; II.7.e. is 0 /
total of a.-d. which are all N/A or 0; II.8. is 0; II.IO.a. provide formula 1 per
300 sf of GF A (1600/300 = 5.3 or 6 spaces; II. 1 O.b. provide formula 1 per
25 spaces = 1 H/C space; IV. Authorization of Agent: Agent's signature
required and date. RESPONSE: Site Plan Application has been updated to
reflect commentary.
60. Provide a copy of the traffic impact statement submitted to Palm Beach
County Traffic Engineering for their review and approval. (Chapter 4.
Section 8.F.). RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9,2006. Please see attached copy.
61. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency approval (Traffic
Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering. RESPONSE: Traffic Performance Standards Review letter
provided by Palm Beach County Department of Traffic Engineering dated
January 9,2006. Please see attached copy.
62. In addition to a drainage plan, a drainage statement (engineer's certification
in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc.
including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land
Development Regulations) is required prior to the TART meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.F.2.). RESPONSE: Provided on the revised Sheet C-I.
63.
64. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the site plan modification is
publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. RESPONSE:
Will comply.
65. Provide written and graphic scales for all drawings. RESPONSE: Written
and graphic scales have been provided on all sheets.
66. On all plans indicate on the building footprint, the proposed use, number of
stories, and total building square feet (proposed veterinary clinic, one story
building, 1600 sf). RESPONSE: Building footprint, proposed use, number
of stories and total building square feet have been identified on the revised
plans.
67. Provide building dimensions for building footprint on site plan. The
building dimensions shown on the site plan must match the building
dimensions on the floor plan. RESPONSE: Dimensions for the building
footprint have been identified on the revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
68. Per Chapter 2, Section 6 of the Land Development Regulations, veterinary
offices and clinics are a permitted use in the C-l zoning district, however
outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other than treatment,
and on-site disposal of animals is prohibited. Add notes to AS-tO 1 site plan
data that clarify the proposed clinic will not include the above prohibited
uses. RESPONSE: General Note added to revised Sheet AS-IOI
identifying that outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other
than treatment, and on-site disposal of animals are prohibited.
69. Swale area along the south side of the building, as depicted on the Paving,
Grading, and Drainage Plan, does not appear to take into consideration the
proposed building addition. RESPONSE: Civil plans have been updated
to indicate the proposed +/-400 SF addition.
70. Correct building setback information on site plan data (AS-IO 1). Provide
minimum setbacks for C-l (rear is minimum of 30 feet when abutting a
residential district), and actual building setback distance provided (to front,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
each side, and rear). RESPONSE: Rear setback dimension has been
corrected on the revised Sheet A S-IO 1.
71. Side setback is a minimum of 10 feet, note encroachment of building on
east side of site. Note existing side setback of 7.5 feet approved per
requested variance (ZNCV06-003). Of course, approval of the site plan as
shown IS contingent upon prior or concurrent varIance approval.
RESPONSE: Pending variance approval.
72. Revise site plan tabular data (AS-101) to include the following: Zoning
district Office Professional (C-l), Future Land Use Classification Office
Commercial (OC), Proposed Use (noting no boarding, no kennel, etc),
maximum lot coverage (building) 40%, maximum structure height 30 feet,
not to exceed 2 stories, and actual building height 14 feet, one story.
RESPONSE: Site Plan Tabular Data has been updated to include the above
information on the revised Sheet AS- 10 I.
73. Provide existing use, zoning district, and future land use for each abutting
property (C-l and OC to east and west, Single-Family Residential Rl AA
and Low Density Residential LOR to south). RESPONSE: Site Plan
Tabular Data has been updated to include the above information on the
revised Sheet AS-I 0 I.
74. The proposed two-way drive is only 12 feet on the side of the building. The
vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisle widths
are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and
approval. RESPONSE: Understood.
75. Provide details on solid waste/garbage pickup on plans (indicating it will be
rolled out to curbside for pickup, no dumoster). RESPONSE: Indicated.
76. Will there be outdoor storage of trash containers? If so, a trash enclosure
shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the
principal building and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter
9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place a note indicating this
requirement. Provide a detail of trash enclosure with required screening.
RESPONSE: Trash enclosure has been indicated.
77. Indicate with arrows two-way vehicular traffic circulation within 12 foot
drive area. RESPONSE: Two way areas have been provided.
78. Indicate locations and widths of nearest driveway approaches on adjacent
properties. RESPONSE: Provided.
79. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. RESPONSE: OK.
80. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper
inches at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.).
RESPONSE: Planting spec's indicate the height and spread required at
installation. .
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
11
DEPARTMENTS
81 . Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening
of equipment. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior
utility boxes, meters, and transformers shall be visually screened with
appropriate landscaping/ hedge material. RESPONSE: All utility boxes
shown are screened with landscape material.
82. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the
tabular data and the graphic illustration. RESPONSE: Plant quantities
match plan.
83. It appears as though landscape plantings are proposed within the swale
areas. These plantings should be located at natural grade around the swale
areas, not on the slope or depressed areas. RESPONSE: The swale has been
removed.
84. The area between SE 23rd A venue pavement and the subject property line
should be sodded with St. Augustine sod and irrigated RESPONSE: Sod
has been noted to the edge of road.
85. Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a minimum of two (2)
colorful shrub species on both sides of the entrance and a signature tree.
Note that signature trees do not contribute toward the total number of
required perimeter trees or parking area interior landscaping. (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section S.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as Yellow Elder,
Tibouchina granulose, or Bougainvilla at each side of the project entrance.
These signature trees shall have a minimum of six (6) feet of clear trunk to
preserve the clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.N).
RESPONSE: Two City signature trees have been added.
86. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.C.4.). RESPONSE: Provided in revised
Sheet L-1.
87. Provide a typical drawing that includes the height and color / material of
proposed freestanding outdoor lights and poles. The design, style, and
illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and
shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section
10.F.1.). A pole detail is provided, but no detail of light. All lights
(including lighting for monument sign) shall be shielded and direct light
down to avoid glare on streets and adjacent properties (Ch.2., Sec.4.N.7).
RESPONSE: Site lighting fixture specifications have been provided, see
revised Sheet E-I 0 I. Color Selection: White.
88. All plans should clearly indicate the locations of proposed freestanding
lights. RESPONSE: Light poles have been shown.
89. The illumination levels appear very high, with numerous "hot spots" and
levels at property lines exceeding 1.0. Please correct. RESPONSE:
INCLUDE REJECT
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
12
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
11Iumination levels have been corrected, see revised sheet E-I 0 I.
90. On the elevations indicate the material and color(s) of any proposed wall
mounted lighting fixtures. RESPONSE: Provided. Site lighting fixture
specifications have been provided, see revised Sheet E- I 0 1. Color
Selection: White.
91. Indicate the proposed height of any roof top equipment. Note on plans (if
applicable) that rooftop equipment will be screened from view at a distance
of 600 feet. (LOR, Chapter 9, Section 1 I.E.). RESPONSE: No roof top
equipment is provided.
92. All elevations must indicate the proposed colors, including the paint
manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). In addition,
provide paint swatches that directly correspond to the elevations.
RESPONSE: Provided.
93. The use of sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises, or benches are
recommended to be included in the site design (Chapter 9, Sec. to.H.).
RESPONSE: Size of the site does not allow for sculptures, fountains,
gardens, pools, trellises or benches to be provided,
94. All project signage must be approved concurrent with the site plan submittal
or an additional full site plan review would be required solely for signage
review and approval. All project signage is subject to review and approval
of the Planning & Development Board. On the elevations, indicate the
cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it complies with Chapter
21, Article 4, Section C. In addition, indicate the letter colors and sign
material. Will it be a back-lit sign? RESPONSE: Cumulative area of wall
signage, letter colors and sign material have been provided on revised
elevations. Signage will not be backlit.
95. Indicate location of proposed freestanding slgnage on site plan and
striping/signage plan. Provide signage details on plan. All proposed project
(site) signs such as the monument sign shall clearly indicate the project
street address. RESPONSE: No freestanding or monument signs are to be
provided.
96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. RESPONSE: Provided.
97. Provide colored elevations and / or rendering of four (4) building sides at
the Technical Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.).
RESPONSE: Provided.
98. Provide a colored elevation drawing (full-sized 24 inches by 36 inches,
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS- RESPONSES.doc
01/23/06
13
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
clipped not glued to foamboard) at the TART meeting. The color rendering
shall include all existing and proposed buildings on site. Staff recommends
using a color schedule. Provide paint swatches that will represent the colors
as depicted on the elevation pages (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). RESPONSE:
Provided.
99. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and
submit that to staff as well. RESPONSE: Provided.
100. Staff considers these plans to be near the final stage of site plan review, the
last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be
addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. Any
information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required
to be shown at the time of permitting. RESPONSE: Understood.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk LLC\MSPM 06-001\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
Department of Engineering
and Public WOrks
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000 .
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Tony Masilotti, Chairman
Addie L. Greene, Vice Chairperson
Karen T. Marcus
Jeff Koons
Warren H, Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
"An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
~ orlnt6d on f9CVC16d papar
R tC E J V E 0
JAl..i 1 ~ "''''~,,,
nl'f I L.J.Uo
Synalovski Gutierrez
Romanik Architects
January 9,2006
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O, Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE:
Healing Heart I White Elk LLC Veterinary Clinic
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
proposed change in land use entitled; Healing Heart I White Elk LLC Veterinary Clinic,
pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County
Land Development Code. This project is summarized as follows:
Location:
South side of SE 23rd Avenue, between South Seacrest Boulevard
and South Federal Highway, .
Boynton Beach
1 SF Residential Unit (1,600 SF floor area) - to be remodeled
1,600 SF Veterinary Clinic.
43
5
2007
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Use:
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed change in
land use project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, No
building permits are to be issued by the town, after the build-out date, specified above,
The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set
forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance,
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OF~ICE OF THE CQ~N
:.:?:Jtefi:
Project Review
cc: Synalovski Gutierrez Romanik Architects, Inc.
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
F:\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\060112.doc
~ROM :PRRRDISE DEVELOPMENT,LLC
FRX NO. :561 736 9821
~. 16 2006 12:05PM P2
r;;y,
\U
....,11
'\\
, t~~
~ 8't4tA ~ :&M-
FLOW TEST
Company: SGR Architects, Inc.
3950 North 46th Avenue
Request Date: 1/10106
Requested From: Merrill Romanik
Telephone Number: 954-961-6806
Hollywood, FL 33021
Facsimile Number: 954-961-6807
I h-J.)o ~ R. Ii,..
Location: Healing Heart I White Elk LLC
i N s
S E
E 1ST
A
C S
R T
E R
S H#G) E H#@
T E
SE 23RD AVENUE T
8
L
V I
0
* DIAGRAM *
(Include direction, street names, hydrant locations, intersections and main sizes)
Hydrant 1:
Hydrant 2:
Static Reading: 56 psi
Flow Reading: 36 psi = 1010 gpm
Residual Reading: 46 psi
Assign Date: 1/11/06
Tested By: FF III Aaron
Test Date: 1/12/06
Time Tested: 09:30 hrs
AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL: 2,017 gpm
FROM :PARADISE DEVELOPMENT,Ll
FAX NO. :561 736 9821
J
17 2006 11:48AM P3
@002/006
01!16/~O~6 MON 1~:20 f\X 305S93i666 Christopher P. Kelley
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION
FOR FLO~IDA LIMITEO LIABILITY COMfiANY
Of
WHITE SeAVeR ENTeRPltISES, LLC
I, the undersIgned. being the Managing Member of WHIT! BCAVER
ENTERPRISES. LLC, whose Articles of Organization were flied on or about the 17th day
of FebruarY. 2005, under-the name WHITE eEA VER ENTERPRISIi$, Ll..C, do now submit
this Amendment to th8 original Articles of Organiz8tion in the following partlculars:
I
I
I !
AMENDMENT TO A~CLE! I
, ,
I
!
Artlcle I of the original Articles of Organizatron shall be amended to
~~~ . fft
read .1 follows: . '. ~.
: r. 'T-!
I
,::1;/
"The name of the Llmitecl Liability Company Is:
WHITe ELK ENTERPRISES. LLC"
~
'-2
..~
. "
~
"r" N
:v'
WITNESS my hand and seal this ./JA. day of ::r~. 2005.
NAN1~/.ffi--
STATE OF FLORIDA )
)65:
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
PERSONALLY APPEARED before me NANCY KELLER, as Managing Member of
WHITE BEAVeR ENTERPRISES, LLC. to me Known as the person whO subscribed and
who executed the for&golng Amendmentto the Articles of Organization, and caused the
FROM :PARADISE DEUELOPMENT,LLC FAX NO. :561 736 9821
, Ulilb!lUU6 MUN 15:20 FAX ~937666 Christopber p, Kelley
~n. 17 2006 11:48AM P4
seal of said limited liability company to be attached hereto, and that she exeC\ited and
subscribed to the same for the purpO$es therein 6X(jressed.
'./If""r...I....~n ,..I:"'..-.~..J ____.J...............I.LL~.- ~..,.i,._,c ~
VVI I '''II=~... my IldllU QIII.J :.~~n 111I0 ~ I.II;1Y VI J' (orA.<..
"'^^',..
, ""\1\1..,.
My commission expires:
ARY PUBLIC.
1>~" KlII8~
· . My <lGmmiIIlcn DD2~
~ EIqN_fMy at 3001
~RtlfJ~TE
I, NANCY KELLER; the undersigned, being the Managing Member of WHITE
. BEAVER ENTERPRISES, LLC, do hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment to the
Articles of OrganiZation of WHITE SEAVER ENTERPRISES, LLC, was unanimously
app.w..ved by the Managil'lg Members and Members at the speciaJ meeting held on
i!!!!....~ z. z. , 2005, at Hypoluxo, Palm aeaeh County, Florida, aU of the stock
entltlec to vote being represented at said meeting.
WHITE BEAVER ENTERPRISES. LLC
BY:
STATE OF FLORIDA )
)SS:
COUN1Y OF PALM BEACH )
BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority. personally appeared NANCY K;ELLER as
Managing Member of WHITt: BEAVER ENTERPRISE5, LLC, and $he acknowledged
befol'e me that the foregoi~9 Amendment to the Articles of O~an~at(on of sal~ limited
liability company is a true and correct copy of the Amendment whIch was. unanimously
approved by the Managing Member~ Cind Members of said limited liability company. She
further acknOWledged before me that she executed the foregoing Certificate for thO
purpOses therein contained on behalf of said limited lIability company.
WITNESS my hand and seal this Cds of ~ - ,2005
My commission expires:
ORIOA at Large
~a\. Owl-'*''' ICtlIIy
. ~ 'My~~
\7',J ~-r;Cl :l1lW
~003/006
FROM :PARADISE DEVELOPMENT,LLC FAX NO. :561 736 9821
, Ul11BJ2UU6 IUN lb: 21 Hi 3frJ'BY~7~~\) Christopher P. lelley
'n. 17 2006 11:49AM P5
IIJUU~iUUb
ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION FOR FLORIDA
LIMITeD LIABILITY COMPANy
ARTICLE I
NAM~
The name oHhe Llmrted Liability Company is;
WHITE SSAVER ENTERPRiSeS, 'tf.t
ARTICLE II
AO'ORE3~
The mailing address and street address of the principaLofflce of the limited
liability Company is:
180 Neptune Drive
Hypoluxo, Fl 33462
ARTICLE III
REGISTERED AGENT, REGISTERED OFFICE,
& l1~fil~TERED A~ENT'S SJGN~ TURE
The name and the Florida address of the registered agent Bre:
CHRISTOPHER p, KELLEY ._
(name)
11QS~ Biscayne BOl~I~lrd.. Suite 205
(Florida street address)
MIim!. FL 33161
(CIty/State/Zip)
~c,-;. :;;I
~~ ""'"
......
).1Il:;;~ ~
~l"'1 ~n
;1>-'
en~~'. r.....
Vi.". -.! .
1""\-': r~'
!1lc: ' !
~-"l ;g 0
r"'(," '-
~~
-~ ""
~l""\ -.I
lI"
Having been named as registered agent and to accept service of process for the above
stated Ilmlted liability company at the place designated in this certificate, I hereby accept
the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this capacity. I.further agree to
comply with the provisions of all statutes relating to the proper and complete performance
of my dutie$. and I am famMier with and accept the obligations of my position as registered
agent a. provided forin Chapler ij06. F.S, ~. .~
. . ~egl~ um
. '
2
FROM :PARADISE DEVELOPMENT,LLC FAX NO. :561 736 9821
, 01/1~/20~6 MON 1~:22 FAX 3~937666 Christopher p, Kelley
In. 17 2006 11:49AM P6
~OO~i006
ARTICLE IV
bt1ANAGEME;tfi
L) The Limited Liability Company is to 'be managed by a manager or
lTiore managers and is, therefore, a manager.. managed company.
Managing Mem~r NANCY KELLER. 1 SO NeptUne Drive
Hypoluxo, FL 33462
d fgpresentativ;---
(In aooord8nce with Section 608.408(3), Flori~a
Statutes, the execution 01 this document constItUtes an
affinnation uni1er.l!1e: penalties of perjury that th$facts
stated ,are true.) '. : '
CkJfI,"-- l.&~
. Typ.CI or prln~(I name s'"nee
3
FROM :PARADISE DEVELOPMENT,LLC FAX NO. :561 736 9821
. . . Uli HI ~UUb !U~ l~: ~2 FAl 3~3'{ij6o Christopher P, Kelley
'no 17 2006 11:50AM P7
~~~~/006
1111111118111111111111
~Im'.d bv lIIII!I Ntum IQ'
Empire TkIe.. ~e..P-1
4IDO N. '.tl1ll HfI'nI'.f hitI: 3CNJ)
Boca Baton, n.:>>4)I
CPR 20f)~05"Q3"7
OR BK ~Q~66 PC ~a.4
~ED te/311al11S "IIM.$6
Pal. lie. Ccnuat,p Florida
MlT 321, III. Ie
l)M st... 2. MI, II
sw,t'OD R. 1adI:, CLII:J[ , CIlIPT~
Pg8 1144 - 11451 C~PI81
PIle NumOcr. ~O!00t9
W'\U CaD 'No,: I) .
~
\~~)> 0 Warranty Deed
./......
TIlit Warrani)' @\d. tbi$:lPtIl day of Au...., zoos 1NIlWeII1 A,,1ta ApostoJlIldt,. Iblp Wil", t" EdwI'"
P. Sell......., a . .. w~ post Om" addiwu i5 226 SE '3r'd A....... 8oJlllOA &.ch, F.t.. anmor, ad \VUe
Elk bterprUa. LJ.C. a I/Jo~~ ~1iCy COIJIIIUY whoso post o1!ice -'11 180 ,..... DrIY..1I)'paI1ll'8,
FL >>4&1.~ ,;;:%: .
(WlJaMr lUllS lInIII _ telIII ~ tIllS "JtllllI!lI!' ,Mlwle aIi lIIc pMia bt t'it i~ IUd the heino, IepI ~ 1M __ 01
mdividwlb,1l!I4l11cl.~_~~;;.,;,~WAt.tnlll.!lllll4~) .
WitAclRlh, that Q$d pDt<<, :..., ill ellJi.aiclmlion 01 rh.1Um ofTEN AND N'O/lOO DOIJ",U,S (5Jo.oO) aM GChor
pK _ valulJblc ~ in bad paid b)' hid ..lee. 1bc l'tICCipt wJacaof is hereby GDuw~
"' gnm~cS. barplaM. -.1 aold to ~ lIDIIM. and puteo'$ b,elrs aIId iii..... fQNVu. Ihe fQJlowiq clescrtW laDcI.
aitlallC, lyUls _<I boine ill PabD ".' orldlllOowit
~
Lot S, Hum l'OlNrl ~~o thereot, .-.oord.d In pfIIj Book 23, ..1' aaf, 0(* ".Bc
R..o... oIPabR ..,II Coullt)', I
... ;,;-'
t.s;
I'arcd Idntif"atiOll N1I1Dhr: G8oo4J'" 0080
/")\
J$Pf11!41 Ab.J'bll Une rOl JMe,.". oa.1
nil <ony.... ., abJect 10: (I)
DOW IJ:~ hut.., At' Ill'tensU tIIat ,lit 1M.. twaIJul1lld .... DOt _by ....t.poud; (11)
eoIl'"h..... IIDd use pla-.1IDIDg r ~ I"OblbklMl,.... 0'" rwpd....... ."_ ..,.
pocII'mDlIdIIl uthorlt)'; (II) nmi..a~pe...a: .. b ,lilt or ot..'....lK ':"IIIIIHIII to
IlalllllldlVlIkIlII; ..II (Lv) cales aCCl'UiDt; . ~ lllba' 31. 2004.
o
Topda.r Wllb all 0IiI t8n..-nt&, ~~Dts iUlel. ". I*oap., or in mywillll ~inj!;o
1'0 Hal'o,1CI to Hold. th_o m ~ lIilnpJe fumoer. ~:~..)
I^\l
And 1IIe 8IQtcC' hereb)- Q)vaumu wi1b safd ~ that the ~. :rei.zed of Mld I8I1CllD IU -pie;; tha 1be
~ ... aGClCt rl&h~ ..liw&l8l6ody 10 sell awl tlODVry 5I1d n.cby 1\111)' Waft'lltts tho tiUe 10 Mid
1IIId IIDd wII dmnd tJle same ~ the lawful claims of all ODJ.1joewt: liIld tJ.t aid Iatul is Cru m III
encIImbran"" IlK. aCMut1llltd ht2wiubo~, . ,)
.~~
III Wibaa.Wb.reor; II'ID_ Us heretmlo WI ,gnDor'IIhln:lllld.. d1~~ tint.bow WICL
7()J~
~"J/.....~
~~~
~~
DIIIu...TtMt
Book19166/Page1144
Page 1 of 2
City Codes Accessed Via Website
www.3ovnton-beach.org
._ w<<'W.am1egal.comlboyntoD_beach_fl.u8
. CIT'T' OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOrdDA
PLANNING & 'ZONING DIVISION
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR
NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE PLAN
. Has, applicant attended a pre-appllcatlon meeting? j~~ ,Date 1 Q . OJ? O?
This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an origin~1 to the Planning and
Zoning Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND. S1'APLED sets of plans
including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of
the Site Plan Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED.
Please print legibly (in 'ink) or type all information.
GENERAL INFORM,t(fION
Project Name: ~AL. \ ~ ~ / lJJ \-t lTE e l-~ L~C
Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:~L:-{ ~LL-\-=R'" U.H-\ rt~ EL ~ l,LC
le;o wmu~E: ~lVE. - t\-'(f.bLJ..{XD 1Ft. 3~~~
I ',(-7 17 (~e)
~~. 6q I . ~'2 Fax: ~l.- · O~ \.:L
"
I.
1.
2.
Address:
Phone:
3. . Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made):
NUiC,'( ~C:t..~~ - Wt\-rfE EL.~ L~G
Address: \~ kl~~ ~\\jE- \:t(ftJLUXO~\9~ ~Q.
r:::/.-.l ,--:=.A1 ( ip CodeL
Phone: "'JlV. ~ .6217 Fax: ~\ .1~. O~\4.
4.
5.
*This is the one address to which 'all agendas; letters and other materials will be mailed.
6.' What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, developer,
contract purchaser, etc.) 10
CAN \-J'Er-
7. Street address of location of site:
'2 2G ~ 2 ~ AVE ~U E- '\ti:J(.s1V"-l E:E~k* 11-
\ .
8. Property Control #(PCN) 0'3-4~~4t? "'* ~:?...~.... OOO...ooBO
9.
Legal description of site: ~ ~ I ~1::L}b1 ~ 1 ,ACCc:f(<D~
, I'
-tP % ~~ Pb f2t:=~~~ \~ ~~
/l?J ?P6e 2.26) Of * ~I~ ~ of ~V\ e:FA6H(
Intended use(s) of site: tJ \c -
10.
11.
12.
Architect: 01~oV~t ~Ul1~~Z ~IK ~t1:rfEq5.
Landscape Architect: M LA. ~U P
SitePlanner:~~l btmG~ ~~\~ ~r;
Engineer: FI.,l'W~ t:~b\We~\~6. ~\Gc5 I~C-
Surveyor: O\e;f2I1:S~) ~L.\rll::~~ +O\~ ,) \\JG.4
Traffic Engineer: TL~~ ~I "-J~ ~ ~laf5l-.Nc '
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
'I SITE PLAN
The following information must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of
the site plan.
1. Land Use Category shown in the Comprehensive Plan: c?ff==\c.t: CCN\M~tAt, ( OC )
2. Zoning District: C _. I
3. Area of Site I 1 qiL:> acres e CS4\ .2 '.:) , sq. ft.
4. Land Use - Acreage Breakdown:
a.
e.
f.
g.
h.
Residential, including
surrounding lot area of grounds
% of site
acres
b.
Recreation Areas *
(excluding water area)
% of site
acres
c.
Water Area
d.
,l~
acres
% of site
\00 % of site
acres
Commercial
Industrial
% of site
acres
Public/Institutional
% of site
acres
Public, Private and Canal rights-of-way
% of site
acres
Other (specify)
acres
% of site
2
i.
Other (specify)_
% of site
acres
j. Total area of site ' , \ qG7 acres ". \ 00 % of site
*including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft.
~OOft .
0. Surface Cover
Ground floor building { I 000 0.~ aere&
area ("building footprinf')
a.
l~,,~%
% of site
--
% of site
b.
Water area
acres
---
c.
Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking
lots & driveways excluding landscape areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic courts.
.::::::=-, . -acres 31. Q % % of site
Total impervious area ~-aeFee .f.q , 1 % % of site
Landscaped area '2., "'11-. '21. ~ .~ 3 t. 3 J;, % of site
inside of parking lots (20 sq.ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of
Landscape Code).
d.
e.
f.
Other landscaped areas,
-
% of site
acres
g.
h.
Other pervious areas. including golf course. natural areas. yards, and swales, but excluding
water areas - ~s % of site
Total perviOUS areas_4-274 . "2'2... s 50 9"0 % of site
8154-\.'22 ~ (06%
i.
Total area of site
% of site
6. .Floor Area
a. Residential
b. Commercial/Office
c. IndustriallW arehouse
d. Recreational
e. Public/Institutional
f. Other (specify)
g. Other (specify)
h. Total floor area
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
\ 0CX)
\00~
7. Number of Residential Dwellina Units
a.
Single-family detached
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
b.
Duplex
c. Multi-Family (3 + attached dwelling units)
3
(1 ) t:TT1clency UVYCIfIII\:I UIIIL~
(2) 1 Bedroom dwelling units
(3) 2 Bedroom dwelling units
(4) 3+ Bedroom dwelling units
d. Total multi-family 0 dwelling units
8.
e. Total number of dwelling units ~
Gross Density 0 dwelling units per acre
Maximum height of structures on site ~ feet J
stories
9.
10. Reauired off-street oarkina
a.
Calculation of required # of
off-street parking spaces.
Off-street parking spaces
provided on site plan
o
=
<2>
=
=
~. \/~ot-G~ -:= '~ez:J/~? S,~ OV"b SpPc~
b.
Calculation of required #
of handicap parking spaces
l
Number of handicap
spaces provided on site plan
I
=
l/:Z0~~~~ \% ~
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY
COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT.
4
III. CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand-lffat this application and all papers and _s submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (We) hereby certify that the
above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith
are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be accepted
unless signed according to the instructions below.
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee, of
Authorized Principal if property is owned by
a corporation or other business entity.
Date
OR
IV.
ct purchaser (if applicant)
Date
~1.24.C0
Date
(I) (We) hereby designate the above-signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to
this application.
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee,
or Authorized Principal if property is owned
by a corporation or other business entity.
Date
OR
Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant)
Date
A REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO
REVIEW THIS PROJECT.
5
..
ri it' \,
lli ["';~~=006_1 }\st ~~~~~~~:;;:~~o~s
Proj t name: He~~i~g->>#h / White
File u "-001
Reference: 1 51 review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a December 14. 2005 Planning &
Zoninll date stamp marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section
10-26 (a).
2. Indicate where roll-out cart is to be stored. This should be in a screened
area.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
4. Engineering and Public Works staff strongly recommends that the driveway
be configured for two (2) eight (8) feet lanes with adjacent landscaping
material designed such that they will not grow into travel lanes when they
reach maturity. If it is the desire of the City to allow this development with
a driveway of a width that will only accommodate one travel lane then Staff
recommends that the engineer/developer utilize traffic calming measures
that will ensure a low rate of speed along the driveway. If a one-lane
configuration is allowed Staff insists that no plant materials be placed in the
sillht triangles on the northwest and southwest corners of the building.
S. Staff recommends deleting one or both of the parking stalls adjacent to the
drainage swale in the southeast comer of the project to reduce backing
conflicts at this location.
6. Add double yellow lane separators at the stop bar exiting to SE 23fd Ave.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
7. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving,
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
10. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets.
11. The Site Plan (Sheet AS-IO 1) does not match the Paving, Grading &
Drainage Plan (No Sheet Number.) The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan
does not depict the house addition or sidewalk shown on the Site Plan. The
Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan depicts a drainage swale (Swale Area
"B") where the house addition and sidewalk are located. This will seriously
impact the overall drainage calculations as Swale Area "B" contained the
largest volume of the three depicted swale areas. Correct discrepancies.
12. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter
4, Section 7.B.4.) It appears that the overall lighting levels could be
lowered to an average of 3 ft-candles by reducing light intensity.
13. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway
onto SE 23rd Ave.
14. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft.
above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.H.)
15. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive
aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile
vehicles.
16. Corkscrew and Cocoplum Hedges are depicted as being located in the S-ft.
sidewalk on the south and west sides of the existing house and proposed
addition. Correct plans accordingly.
17. Provide tree legend on Sheet L-1
18. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P).
19. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in
LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.
20. Explain the "200% Credit" used in the drainage calculations on the Paving,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Gradin~ & Draina~e Plan.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
22. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
23. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer
services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date
for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
24. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is
incomplete as submitted. The proposed Site Plan reflects an existing single
family residential dwelling site located within the Utilities' service area
where utility support is available. Weare providing a cursory review of the
proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be
provided after a utility plan has been submitted.
25. Depict location of water and sewer mains and service(s) for the site and
indicate whether any alteration will be required to accommodate the new
use and proposed addition. Palm Beach County permits will be required if
any utility work is to be performed within the SE 23rd Ave. right-of-way.
26. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
27. The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all
hydrants.
28. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
29. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable
water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed
for irrigation.
30. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for any water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
31. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water
service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in
accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207.
32. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to
show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must
therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed
off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project.
33. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3(P) requires a statement be
included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other
appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans.
34. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: FORTHCOMING
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
35. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as
defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6.
37. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in
2004 FBC, Chapter 3.
38. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table
704.8. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected
and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
39. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
40. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
41. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor
plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible
entrance doors to the building. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and
11-4.3.
42. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
43. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
44. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
45. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting
shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the
time of permit application.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
46. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
47. Both toilet rooms shall be fully accessible for use by handicapped persons.
Doors shall not swing into the required clear floor space of accessible
fixtures. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.3(11); 11-4.22.2.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
48. No irrigation plan.
49. Add 2 City signature trees.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
Existin~ Trees Management Plan Sheet Ll
50. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of
existing trees on the site. proposed to be removed and replaced on site. The
replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape
plan sheet L 1. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec.
7.D.p. 2.]
Master Plant List, Sheet L2
51. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of
12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground) not caliper, and Florida #1
(Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees maybe
larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any clear trunk
(c. t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II
Sec. S.C. 2.]
52. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina
granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the
minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C.3.N.]
53. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection.
54. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk
and height of all of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of
planting and inspection.
55. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and
spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
56. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not
currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum
hedge plants on three sides.
Irrieation Plan
57. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate
zones and time duration for water conservation.
58. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to
the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.
C.2.]
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
59. Property Appraiser records indicate property owner as White Elk
Enterprises, LLC. Applications state property owner /Trustee as Nancy
Keller - White Elk LLC. Please submit the latest recorded warranty deed
for the subject property, and authorization for Trustee to sign on behalf of
LLC.
60. Correct the site plan application to include the following: 1.8. (PCN # is 08-
43-45-33-04-000-0080); 1.13. name and company of site planner; 1.16.
name and company of traffic engineer; 1.17. no previously approved site
plan; 11.1. land use category is Office Commercial (OC); II.S.c. paved area
s.f. and % of site; II.S.h. total pervious area in s.f. and % of site (same as e. /
h. is total of e. f. and g.); II.6.h. same as b. / h. is total of a.-g.; II.7.e. is 0 /
total of a.-d. which are all N/ A or 0; 11.8. is 0; II.lO.a. provide formula 1 per
300 sf of GF A (1600/300 = 5.3 or 6 spaces; II.10.b. provide formula 1 per
25 spaces = 1 HlC space; IV. Authorization of Agent: Agent's signature
required and date.
61. Provide a copy of the traffic impact statement submitted to Palm Beach
County Traffic Engineering for their review and approval. (Chapter 4.
Section 8.F.).
62. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency approval (Traffic
Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Engineering.
63. In addition to a drainage plan, a drainage statement (engineer's certification
in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc.
including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land
Development Regulations) is required prior to the TART meeting (Chapter
4, Section 7.F.2.).
64. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the site plan modification is
publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
65. Provide written and graphic scales for all drawings.
66. On all plans indicate on the building footprint, the proposed use, number of
stories, and total building square feet (proposed veterinary clinic, one story
building, 1600 sf).
67. Provide building dimensions for building footprint on site plan. The
building dimensions shown on the site plan must match the building
dimensions on the floor plan.
68. Per Chapter 2, Section 6 of the Land Development Regulations, veterinary
offices and clinics are a permitted use in the C-l zoning district, however
outdoor kennels, the keeping of animals for purposes other than treatment,
and on-site disposal of animals is prohibited. Add notes to AS-IO 1 site plan
data that clarify the proposed clinic will not include the above prohibited
uses.
69. Swale area along the south side of the building, as depicted on the Paving,
Grading, and Drainage Plan, does not appear to take into consideration the
proposed building addition.
70. Correct building setback information on site plan data (AS-lOI). Provide
minimum setbacks for C-l (rear is minimum of 30 feet when abutting a
residential district), and actual building setback distance provided (to front,
each side, and rear).
71. Side setback is a minimum of 10 feet, note encroachment of building on
east side of site. Note existing side setback of 7.5 feet approved per
requested variance (ZNCV06-003). Of course, approval of the site plan as
shown is contingent upon prior or concurrent variance approval.
72. Revise site plan tabular data (AS-IO 1) to include the following: Zoning
district Office Professional (C-l), Future Land Use Classification Office
Commercial (OC), Proposed Use (noting no boarding, no kennel, etc),
maximum lot coverage (building) 40%, maximum structure height 30 feet,
not to exceed 2 stories, and actual building height 14 feet, one story.
73. Provide existing use, zoning district, and future land use for each abutting
property (C-l and OC to east and west, Single-Family Residential RlAA
and Low Density Residential LOR to south).
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
74. The proposed two-way drive is only 12 feet on the side of the building. The
vehicular back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisle widths
are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and
approval.
75. Provide details on solid waste/garbage pickup on plans (indicating it will be
rolled out to curbside for pickup, no dumpster).
76. Will there be outdoor storage of trash containers? If so, a trash enclosure
shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the
principal building and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter
9, Section lO.E.3.). On the site plan, place a note indicating this
requirement. Provide a detail of trash enclosure with required screening.
77. Indicate with arrows two-way vehicular traffic circulation within 12 foot
drive area.
78. Indicate locations and widths of nearest driveway approaches on adjacent
properties.
79. The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
80. All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper
inches at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section S.C.2.).
81. Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening
of equipment. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior
utility boxes, meters, and transformers shall be visually screened with
appropriate landscaping/ hedge material.
82. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the
tabular data and the graphic illustration.
83. It appears as though landscape plantings are proposed within the swale
areas. These plantings should be located at natural grade around the swale
areas, not on the slope or depressed areas.
84. The area between SE 23rd Avenue pavement and the subject property line
should be sodded with St. Augustine sod and irrigated.
85. Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a minimum of two (2)
colorful shrub species on both sides of the entrance and a signature tree.
Note that signature trees do not contribute toward the total number of
required perimeter trees or parking area interior landscaping. (Chapter 7.5,
Article II, Section S.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as Yellow Elder,
Tibouchina granulose, or Bougainvilla at each side of the project entrance.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
These signature trees shall have a minimum of six (6) feet of clear trunk to
preserve the clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.N).
86. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches m spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacmg measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.C.4.).
87. Provide a typical drawing that includes the height and color / material of
proposed freestanding outdoor lights and poles. The design, style, and
illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and
shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section
1O.F.I.). A pole detail is provided, but no detail of light. All lights
(including lighting for monument sign) shall be shielded and direct light
down to avoid glare on streets and adiacent properties (Ch.2., Sec.4.N.7).
88. All plans should clearly indicate the locations of proposed freestanding
lights.
89. The illumination levels appear very high, with numerous "hot spots" and
levels at property lines exceeding 1.0. Please correct.
90. On the elevations indicate the material and colorCs) of any proposed wall
mounted lighting fixtures.
91. Indicate the proposed height of any roof top equipment. Note on plans (if
applicable) that rooftop equipment will be screened from view at a distance
of 600 feet. (LOR, Chapter 9, Section 1 I.E.).
92. All elevations must indicate the proposed colors, including the paint
manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). In addition,
provide paint swatches that directly correspond to the elevations.
93. The use of sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises, or benches are
recommended to be included in the site design (Chapter 9, Sec. 10.H.).
94. All project signage must be approved concurrent with the site plan submittal
or an additional full site plan review would be required solely for signage
review and approval. All project signage is subject to review and approval
of the Planning & Development Board. On the elevations, indicate the
cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it complies with Chapter
21, Article 4, Section C. In addition, indicate the letter colors and sign
material. Will it be a back-lit sign?
95. Indicate location of proposed freestanding signage on site plan and
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
01/05/06
11
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
striping/signage plan. Provide signage details on plan. All proposed project
(site) signs such as the monument sign shall clearly indicate the project
street address.
96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled.
97. Provide colored elevations and / or rendering of four (4) building sides at
the Technical Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
98. Provide a colored elevation drawing (full-sized 24 inches by 36 inches,
clipped not glued to foamboard) at the TART meeting. The color rendering
shall include all existing and proposed buildings on site. Staff recommends
using a color schedule. Provide paint swatches that will represent the colors
as depicted on the elevation pages (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.).
99. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8'i'2
inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and
submit that to staff as well.
100. Staff considers these plans to be near the final stage of site plan review, the
last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be
addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. Any
information not shown on the plans at the TART meeting would be required
to be shown at the time of permitting.
MWR/sc
S:\PJanning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk LLC\MSPM 06-001\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
HEALING HEART VET OFFICE
MSPM 06-001
1st Review
December 29,2005
Property Appraiser records indicate property owner as White Elk Enterprises, LLC.
Applications state property owner /Trustee as Nancy Keller - White Elk LLC. Please
submit the latest recorded warranty deed for the subject property, and authorization for
Trustee to sign on behalf of LLC.
Correct the site plan application to include the following: 1.8. (PCN # is 08-43-45-33-04-
000-0080); 1.13. name and company of site planner; 1.16. name and company of traffic
engineer; 1.17. no previously approved site plan; ILL land use category is Office
Commercial (OC); IISc. paved area s.f. and % of site; II.5.h. total pervious area in s.f.
and % of site (same as e. I h. is total of e. f. and g.); 1I.6.h. same as b. I h. is total of a.-g.;
II.7.e. is 0/ total of a.-d. which are all N/A or 0; 11.8. is 0; II.IO.a. provide formula 1 per
300 sfofGFA (1600/300 = 5.3 or 6 spaces; II.IO.b. provide formula 1 per 25 spaces = 1
HIC space; IV. Authorization of Agent: Agent's signature required and date.
Provide a copy of the traffic impact statement submitted to Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering for their review and approval. (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.).
Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency approval (Traffic Performance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
In addition to a drainage plan, a drainage statement (engineer's certification in writing
that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations, codes, etc. including, but not
limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of the Land Development Regulations) is
required prior to the TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.).
It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the site plan modification is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Provide written and graphic scales for all drawings.
On all plans indicate on the building footprint, the proposed use, number of stories, and
total building square feet (proposed veterinary clinic, one story building, 1600 sf).
Provide building dimensions for building footprint on site plan. The building dimensions
shown on the site plan must match the building dimensions on the floor plan.
Per Chapter 2, Section 6 of the Land Development Regulations, veterinary offices and
clinics are a permitted use in the C-I zoning district, however outdoor kennels, the
keeping of animals for purposes other than treatment, and on-site disposal of animals is
prohibited. Add notes to AS-lOI site plan data that clarify the proposed clinic will not
include the above prohibited uses.
Swale area along the south side of the building, as depicted on the Paving, Grading, and
Drainage Plan, does not appear to take into consideration the proposed building addition.
Correct building setback information on site plan data (AS-lOl). Provide minimum
setbacks for C-l (rear is minimum of 30 feet when abutting a residential district), and
actual building setback distance provided (to front, each side, and rear).
Side setback is a minimum of 10 feet, note encroachment of building on east side of site.
Note existing side setback of 7.5 feet approved per requested variance (ZNCV06-003).
Of course, approval of the site plan as shown is contingent upon prior or concurrent
variance approval.
Revise site plan tabular data (AS-lOl) to include the following: Zoning district Office
Professional (C-l), Future Land Use Classification Office Commercial (DC), Proposed
Use (noting no boarding, no kennel, etc), maximum lot coverage (building) 40%,
maximum structure height 30 feet, not to exceed 2 stories, and actual building height 14
feet, one story.
Provide existing use, zoning district, and future land use for each abutting property (C-l
and OC to east and west, Single-Family Residential RlAA and Low Density Residential
LDR to south).
The proposed two-way drive is only 12 feet on the side of the building. The vehicular
back-up distance, parking stall dimensions, and drive aisle widths are subject to the
Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval.
Provide details on solid waste/garbage pickup on plans (indicating it will be rolled out to
curbside for pickup, no dumpster).
Will there be outdoor storage of trash containers? If so, a trash enclosure shall resemble
with respect to the color and materials, the design of the principal building and shall be
integrated with other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3.). On the site plan, place
a note indicating this requirement. Provide a detail of trash enclosure with required
screenmg.
Indicate with arrows two-way vehicular traffic circulation within 12 foot drive area.
Indicate locations and widths of nearest driveway approaches on adjacent properties.
Indicate on site plan and landscape plan the locations and dimensions of all existing or
proposed easements and their purpose.
The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and approval of the
City Forester I Environmentalist.
All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper inches at the time
of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.).
Indicate any outdoor mechanical equipment and type of required screening of equipment.
All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior utility boxes, meters, and
transformers shall be visually screened with appropriate landscaping! hedge material.
On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the tabular data and
the graphic illustration.
It appears as though landscape plantings are proposed within the swale areas. These
plantings should be located at natural grade around the swale areas, not on the slope or
depressed areas.
The area between SE 23rd Avenue pavement and the subject property line should be
sodded with St. Augustine sod and irrigated.
Landscaping at project entrances shall contain a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub
species on both sides ofthe entrance and a signature tree. Note that signature trees do not
contribute toward the total number of required perimeter trees or parking area interior
landscaping. (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.G.) Provide a signature tree, such as
Yellow Elder, Tibouchina granulose, or Bougainvilla at each side of the project entrance.
These signature trees shall have a minimum of six (6) feet of clear trunk to preserve the
clear sight area (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N).
All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in
spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to
adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.).
Provide a typical drawing that includes the height and color I material of proposed
freestanding outdoor lights and poles. The design, style, and illumination level shall be
compatible with the building design (height) and shall consider safety, function, and
aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.). A pole detail is provided, but no detail of
light. All lights (including lighting for monument sign) shall be shielded and direct light
down to avoid glare on streets and adjacent properties (Ch.2., SecA.N.7).
All plans should clearly indicate the locations of proposed freestanding lights.
The illumination levels appear very high, with numerous "hot spots" and levels at
property lines exceeding 1.0. Please correct.
On the elevations indicate the material and color(s) of any proposed wall mounted
lighting fixtures.
Indicate the proposed height of any rooftop equipment. Note on plans (if applicable) that
roof top equipment will be screened from view at a distance of 600 feet. (LDR, Chapter
9, Section 11.E.).
All elevations must indicate the proposed colors, including the paint manufacturer's name
and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). In addition, provide paint swatches that
directly correspond to the elevations.
The use of sculptures, fountains, gardens, pools, trellises, or benches are recommended to
be included in the site design (Chapter 9, Sec. 10.H.).
All project signage must be approved concurrent with the site plan submittal or an
additional full site plan review would be required solely for signage review and approval.
All project signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development
Board. On the elevations, indicate the cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it
complies with Chapter 21, Article 4, Section C. In addition, indicate the letter colors and
sign material. Will it be a back-lit sign?
Indicate location of proposed freestanding signage on site plan and striping/signage plan.
Provide signage details on plan. All proposed project (site) signs such as the monument
sign shall clearly indicate the project street address.
At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all
staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be
folded and stapled.
Provide colored elevations and / or rendering of four (4) building sides at the Technical
Advisory Review Team meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Provide a colored elevation drawing (full-sized 24 inches by 36 inches, clipped not glued
to foamboard) at the TART meeting. The color rendering shall include all existing and
proposed buildings on site. Staff recommends using a color schedule. Provide paint
swatches that will represent the colors as depicted on the elevation pages (Chapter 4,
Section 7.D.).
At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11
inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
Staff considers these plans to be near the final stage of site plan review, the last stage
prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the
plans prior to the TART meeting. Any information not shown on the plans at the TART
meeting would be required to be shown at the time of permitting.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Healing Heart White Elk LLC\MSPM 06-00 I \Planning 1st review.doc
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 06-001
TO:
Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning
RE:
Review Comments
Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Revie
Healing HeartlWhite Elk
File No. MSPM 06-001
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer
DATE:
January 4, 2006
The above referenced Site Plans, received on December 20, 2005, was reviewed for Public Works,
Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the
storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a).
2. Indicate where roll-out cart is to be stored. This should be in a screened area.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from
Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering.
4. Engineering and Public Works staff strongly recommends that the driveway be configured for 2-8-f1.
lanes with adjacent landscaping material designed such that they will not grow into travel lanes when
they reach maturity. If it is the desire of the City to allow this development with a driveway of a width
that will only accommodate one travel lane then Staff recommends that the engineer/developer utilize
traffic calming measures that will ensure a low rate of speed along the driveway. If a one-lane
configuration is allowed Staff insists that no plant materials be placed in the sight triangles on the
northwest and southwest corners of the building.
5. Staff recommends deleting one or both of the parking stalls adjacent to the drainage swale in the
southeast corner of the project to reduce backing conflicts at this location.
6. Add double yellow lane separators at the stop bar exiting to SE 23rd Ave.
ENGINEERING
7. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's
Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following:
Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 06-001
Re: Healing Heart/White Elk, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 sl Review
January 4, 2006
Page 2
paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other
permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water
Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach
County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental
Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
9. Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
10. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets.
11. The Site Plan (Sheet AS-1 01) does not match the Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan (No Sheet
Number.) The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan does not depict the house addition or sidewalk
shown on the Site Plan. The Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan depicts a drainage swale (Swale Area
"B") where the house addition and sidewalk are located. This will seriously impact the overall
drainage calculations as Swale Area "B" contained the largest volume of the three depicted swale
areas. Correct discrepancies.
12. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) It
appears that the overall lighting levels could be lowered to an average of 3 ft-candles by reducing
light intensity.
13. Use Palm Beach County Standards for the sight triangles at the driveway onto SE 23fd Ave.
14. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed
cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H.)
15. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive aisles to minimize the
potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles.
16. Corkscrew and Cocoplum Hedges are depicted as being located in the 5-ft. sidewalk on the south
and west sides of the existing house and proposed addition. Correct plans accordingly.
17. Provide tree legend on Sheet L-1
18. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 in. thick
within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P).
19. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section
7.F.2.
20. Explain the "200% Credit" used in the drainage calculations on the Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan.
Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 06-001
Re: Healing Heart/White Elk, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review
January 4, 2006
Page 3
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article
IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting.
22. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All
engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach
Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
23. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to
serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission
approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting
of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and
wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as
accurate as possible.
24, No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore this plan is incomplete as submitted. The
proposed Site Plan reflects an existing single family residential dwelling site located within the
Utilities' service area where utility support is available. We are providing a cursory review of the
proposed site plans as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be provided after a utility
plan has been submitted.
25. Depict location of water and sewer mains and service(s) for the site and indicate whether any
alteration will be required to accommodate the new use and proposed addition. Palm Beach County
permits will be required if any utility work is to be performed within the SE 23rd Ave. right-of-way.
26. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500
g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter
6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater
(CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
27. The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200
feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition,
by showing all hydrants.
28. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either
upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
29. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources
are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation.
30. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for
any water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE,
Section 26-15.
Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 06-001
Re: Healing Heart/White Elk, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 sl Review
January 4, 2006
Page 4
31. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP.
32. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and
the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207.
33. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent
to the proposed tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and
the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project.
34. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are
available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the
submitted plans.
35. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility
construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering
Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.! P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Healing Heart-White Elk Major Site Plan Mod, 1st Review.doc
...
,/
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIlfA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Ed Breese,
Principal Planner
DATE:
December 29, 2005
FILE: MSPM 06-00 I
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Healing Heart/White Elk
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comments.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIlJA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Ed Breese,
Principal Planner
DATE:
December 29,2005
FILE: MSPM 06-001
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Healing Heart/White Elk
REFERENCES: Impacts of Proposed Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have reviewed the impact for services for the proposed project, Healing heartlWhite Elk Veterinary Clinic.
This project in itself will not have a direct impact on department service requirements.
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner
FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal
DATE: December 21, 2005
SUBJECT: Healing Heart! White Elk
Commerce Bank @ Winchester Shops
The Fire Department expects to be able to maintain an adequate level of service
for the subject projects, with current or anticipated staffing. Infrastructure
requirements such as hydrants and roadways will be addressed during plan
reviews and the permitting process.
CC: Chief Bingham
F&LS Staff
File
..
/'
SUBJECT:
Project - Healing HeartlWhite Elk
File No. - MSPM 06-001 - 1st review
List of Acronvms/Abbreviations:
ANSI - American National Standards Institute
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act
FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F.S, - Florida Statutes
LOR - Land Development Regulations
NEC - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 05- 2Li ~
TO:
FROM:
Ed Breese
Principal Planner
Timothy K. Larg ~
TART Member/~on
DATE:
December 20,2005
Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352
1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process
does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as defined in 2004 FBC,
Chapter 6.
3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the building as defined in 2004 FBC,
Chapter 3.
4 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and
exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8. Submit calculations that
clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per
2004 FBC, Table 704.8.
5 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind
loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the
provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind
Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the
state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
6 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction.
7 Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor plan a labeled
symbol that identifies the location of the handicap-accessible entrance doors to the
building. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3.
8 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
S\Development\Building\ T ART\ TART 2006\Healing Heart/White Elk
Page 1 of 2
..
9 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach
Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building
permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The
building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans.
C The number of dwelling units in each building.
D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
E The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for
sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
10 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes
of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded
deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit
review.
11 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the
City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application.
12 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for
this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit
application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in
the development order and approved by the City Commission.
13 Both toilet rooms shall be fully accessible for use by handicapped persons. Doors shall not
swing into the required clear floor space of accessible fixtures. 2004 FBC, Sections 11-
4.1.3(11); 11-4.22.2.
bf
S\Development\Building\ TARn TART 2006\Healing Heart/White Elk
Page 20f2
Page 1 of 1
/'
Rivers, Jody
To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
Subject: Site Plan Review - Healing Heart/White Elk
Project: Healing Heart/White Elk
File No,: MSPM 06-001
1, No irrigation plan,
2, Add 2 City signature trees
)ooltj RLveY's
Parks Superintendent
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd,
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
(561) 742-6226
(561) 742-6233 (fax)
12/16/2005
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 Of/
Coale, Sherie
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, December 29,20051 :30 PM
To: Coale, Sherie
Cc: Breese, Ed
Subject: Healing HearUWhite Elk-TART comments
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Ed Breese, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Healing Heart/White Elk
Major Site Plan Modification - 1st Review
MSPM 06-001
Date:
December 29,2005
Existing Trees Management Plan Sheet Ll
The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of existing trees on the site. proposed
to be removed and replaced on site. The replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the
landscape plan sheet Ll. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]
Master Plant List. Sheet L2
1. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the
ground) not caliper, and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual), The height of the trees may be larger
than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any clear trunk (c.t.) specifications, [Environmental Regulations,
Chapter 7,5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.]
2, The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at the
ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the minimum size specifications for trees.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.]
3. The tree planting details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the diameter and height,
of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
4. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the clear trunk and height of all of the
shade and palm trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
5. The details sheet L2 should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the shrubs
will be measured at time of planting and inspection.
6. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should
be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides.
.Irrigation Plan
7. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration
for water conservation.
8. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.]
12/29/2005
Page 1 of 1
Breese, Ed
From: Immler, Matt
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 3:19 PM
To: Breese, Ed
Subject: Commerce Bank; Healing Heart/White Elk
Approval of the above captioned projects will not negatively impact police operations,
o
G. Matthew ImmIer
Chief of Police
City of Boynton Beach
561-742-6101
immlerm@ci,boynton-beach.fl.us
1212012005
TRC COMMENTS
PROJECT: HEALING HEARTIWHITE ELK
LOCATION: 226 S.E. 23 Avenue
FILE# MSPM 06-001
TYPE OF PROJECT: TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING
CAPACITY: 50,000 Square Feet.
COMMENTS
The Fire Department has no comments.