AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
0 August 2, 2005 July 18,2005 (Noon.) D October 5, 2005 September 19, 2005 (Noon)
0 August 16, 2005 August I, 2005 (Noon) D October 18,2005 October 3,2005 (Noon)
0 September 6, 2005 August 15,2005 (Noon) D November 1,2005 October 17, 2005 (Noon)
~ September 20, 2005 September 6, 2005 (Noon) D November 15,2005 October 31,2005 (Noon)
D Administrative 0 Development Plans
NATURE OF ~ Consent Agenda 0 New Business
AGENDA ITEM 0 Public Hearing 0 Legal
0 Bids 0 Unfinished Business
0 Announcement 0 Presentation
0 City Manager's Report
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the September 20,2005 City Commission Agenda under
Consent Agenda. The Planning and Development Board recommended that the subject request be approved on August 23,
2005. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 05-153.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
High Ridge New Urban Communities (NWSP 05-016)
Tim Hernandez, New Urban Communities
New Urban High Ridge, LLC, George Kechriotis and Kosta Kechriotis
Northwest comer of High Ridge Road and Miner Road
Request for new site plan approval in order to construet 48 single-family homes and 126
townhouse units and related site improvements on an 18.44 acre parcel in a (PUD) zoning
district.
PROGRAM IMP ACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
N/A
N/A
Develo
City Manager's Signature
~ r 1" JtlL
,/ .anning and Zoning Di6ttor City Attorney / Finance / Human Resourees
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\High Ridge- New Urban Communities\NWSP 05-OI6\Agenda Item Request High Ridge New Urban Comm NWSP
05-0169-20-05.dot
S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-153
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and
Mayor and City commiSS.ioni,
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP
Planner
--IV1/J<1
Michael W. Rumpf r \U 4..-
Director of Planning and Zoning
THROUGH:
DATE:
August 18, 2005
PROJECT NAME j
NUMBER:
New Urban High Ridge PUD j NWSP 05-016
REQUEST:
New site plan approval to construct 48 single-family detached homes and
126 fee-simple townhomes on an 18.44-acre parcel in the PUD Planned
Unit Development zoning district.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: New Urban High Ridge, LLC, Mr. George Kechriotis, and Mr. Kosta
Kechriotis
Applicant! Agent: Mr. Tim Hernandez with New Urban High Ridge, LLC
Location: Northwest corner of High Ridge Road and Miner Road (Exhibit "Aft)
Parcel Size: 18.44 acres
Existing Land Use: High Density Residential (10.8 dujacre)
Existing Zoning: PUD Planned Unit Development
Proposed Use: 48 single-family detached homes
126 fee-simple townhomes
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Single family homes in unincorporated Palm Beach County, designated LR-
2 Low Density Residential (2 dujacre) and zoned RS Single Family
Residential.
South:
The right-of-way of Miner Road, then developed property (flex space
warehouse) designated Industrial (I) and zoned M1 Light Industrial;
further south a townhome development (Canterbury, currently under
construction), with a density of approximately 9.9 dujacre, designated
Staff Report - New Urban High Ridge PUD (NWSP 05-016)
Memorandum No PZ 05-153
Page 2
Industrial (I) and zoned Planned Industrial Development (PI D); to the
southwest, undeveloped property within unincorporated Palm Beach
County designated Industrial (IND) and zoned Single Family Residential
(RS).
East: The right-of-way of High Ridge Road, then, to the northeast, Cedar Ridge
Estates, with single family homes and town homes (townhomes built at
8.04 du/acre), designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned
Planned Unit Development (PUD). To the southeast, High Ridge
Commerce Park, developed properties designated Industrial (I) and zoned
Planned Industrial Development (PID).
West: To the west, undeveloped property (High Ridge Country Club) designated
Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned RIM Single Family Residential.
BACKGROUND
Site Characteristic: On May 17, 2005, the City Commission annexed (ANEX 05-001) the subject site
per Ordinance 05-008 and rezoned the property to PUD (LUAR 05-002) per
Ordinance OS-OlD. According to the survey, the subject property is comprised of
several lots that contain horse stables, wood fencing, and a single-family home.
The property was previously used as an equestrian center. The subject site also
contains may different types of trees, both native and exotics. The species include
but are not limited to the following: Slash pine, Royal Poinciana, Magnolia, Orange,
Mango, Black Olive, Oak, Cabbage palm, Queen palm, and Areca palm. The
highest ground elevation is 23 feet above sea level, located near the halfway point
of the property along High Ridge Road. A four (4)-foot tall wooden fence exists
along the east property line and an eight (8)-foot tall chain link fence extends along
the west property line.
Proposal:
Mr. Tim Hernandez of New Urban Communities proposes to develop the subject
property with 48 single-family detached homes and 126 fee-simple townhomes.
Both single-family homes and town homes are permitted uses in the PUD zoning
district. The maximum density allowed by the High Density Residential (HDR) land
use classification is 10.8 dulac, which would provide the developer a maximum of
199 units. The project proposes 174 units (9.43 du I ac) and would be built in one
(1) phase. The project is a compact, high density, new urban development as
promoted by policy 1.13.4. and by policies under Objective 1.22. of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Concurrency:
ANALYSIS
Traffic:
On April 14, 2005, a traffic impact analysis was sent to the Palm Beach County
Traffic Division for concurrency review, in order to ensure an adequate level of
service. Trip generation would result in 1,363 new daily trips, 105 a.m. peak-hour
trips, and 128 p.m. peak-hour trips. The analysis concluded that the radius of
development influence was two (2) miles, which was based on the peak hour trips
Staff Report - New Urban High Ridge PUD (NWSP 05-016)
Memorandum No PZ 05-153
Page 3
that would be generated. On April 27, 2005, the Palm Beach County Traffic
Division determined that the proposed residential development meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. According to the analysis, the Palm
Beach County and Florida Department of Transportation Five (5)-Year Road
Program do not include any widening projects in the vicinity of the site. According
to the land use amendment staff report (PZ Memo 05-024), High Ridge Road is
currently operating at a "B" level of service and would continue to do so after
project build-out.
Utilities: The project is expected to require 75,000 gallons of water per day. The City's
water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of
potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected
potable water needs for this project. Local piping and infrastructure improvements
may be required for the project, dependent upon the final project configuration and
fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the
site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "C" -
Conditions of Approval). The expected demand for sanitary sewer would be 34,000
gallons per day. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is
currently available to serve this project, subject to the applicant making a firm
reservation of capacity, following approval of the site plan.
Policel Fire: Police staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would
be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. The Fire Department
expects to be able to maintain an adequate level of service for the subject project
with current or anticipated staffing. Infrastructure requirements such as hydrants
and roadway would be addressed during plan reviews and the permitting process.
It must be noted however, that this project is located in an area that has
experienced significant growth this past year. Fire supports the project with the
understanding that Fire Station No.5 would be available when the buildings receive
their certificates of occupancy.
Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The
Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is
recommending that the review of speCific drainage solutions be deferred until time
of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other
drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit
"C" - Conditions of Approval).
School: Regarding school concurrency, the proposed project lies within Concurrency Service
Areas (CSA) 17 and SAC 239. On January 7, 2005, the Palm Beach County School
District approved the project for school concurrency purposes.
Driveways: The plans show that three (3) points of ingress / egress are proposed along High
Ridge Road. All openings are Identical to each other In terms of width and function
and no driveway opening would be gated. This is a basic characteristic of new
urbanism type of developments.
The southernmost opening would be located approximately 650 feet from the
Staff Report - New Urban High Ridge PUD (NWSP 05-016)
Memorandum No PZ 05-153
Page 4
intersection of High Ridge Road and Miner Road. The entrance would directly align
with the recreation area. Parallel, on-street parking spaces are proposed on each
side of this entrance drive. The second of the three driveway openings, would be
located approximately 450 feet north of the southernmost opening. This opening
would align with the single-family detached homes proposed at the rear of the
development of the subject development and also with the entrance to Cedar Ridge
PUD on the opposite side of High Ridge Road. The northernmost driveway opening
is proposed approximately 170 feet south of the north property line. Similar to the
middle opening, this third driveway would align with the single-family homes
propose at the rear of the development. The presence of these three (3) driveway
openings allow for ample availability of emergency / service vehicle ingress and
egress.
The Typical section of High Ridge Road shows that the right-of-way is 65 feet in
width. It presently contains a northbound and southbound travel lane but as
required, would be improved to include a 12-foot wide center-turn lane. The east
side of High Ridge Road would have a four (4) foot wide paved shoulder, six (6)
feet of sod, and the existing six (6)-foot wide sidewalk. The west side however,
would have a two (2)-foot wide "F" curb / gutter and 11 feet of sod.
The Typical 50-foot wide section of the internal rights-of-way indicates that the
development would have two (2) travel lanes that are each 11 feet in width. The
development's parallel parking spaces would be nine (9) feet in width, followed by
an eight (B)-inch wide "D" curb and a four (4)-foot wide sidewalk.
The Typical 40-foot wide section of the internal rights-of-way indicates that the
development would have two (2) travel lanes that are each 11 feet in width.
However, in this scenario, the only difference between this section and the 50-foot
wide section is that parallel parking spaces have been omitted on one of the sides.
An important component to a new urban community is the employment of alleys
(subordinate street systems) throughout a development. The Typical 20-foot wide
section of the alleys show that the alleys, proposed within the single-family
detached area would have two (2) travel lanes, each being 10 feet in width.
However, the language in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5 Planned
Unit Developments, Section 9. Internal PUD standards. F. RIGHTS OF WAY, reads
as follows:
"F". RIGHT -OF-WAYS. The minimum width of a right-of-way in a
PUD is forty (40) feet. In the event of a conflict with this section
and any other provisions of the City's Land Development
Regulations regulating the width of the right-of-ways, this section
shall prevail."
This requirement leaves no opportunities for one-way streets, service roads, or
common driveways of any lesser widths. The site plan proposes alleys that would
be 20 feet in width, which Is less than the above-referenced 40-foot requirement.
These circulation elements are not permitted because of the restrictive language in
Staff Report - New Urban High Ridge PUD (NWSP 05-016)
Memorandum No PZ 05-153
Page 5
the PUD regulations. There is no similar problem with the Infill PUD regulations,
since language in those development standards permits narrower rights-of-way at
the discretion of the City Engineer. Staff is currently proposing changes to the Land
Development Regulations (CDRV 05-014) that would allow a right-of-way width of
less than 40 feet. Therefore, approval of this project is contingent upon the
approval of the revisions proposed to the above-referenced section of the Land
Development Regulations (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
Parking Facility: Two, three, four, and five bedroom dwelling units require two (2) parking spaces
per unit. The project proposes 174 residential units and recreation area, therefore,
353 parking spaces would be required. The plans provide 432 parking spaces with
the potential of providing an additional 48 spaces for a total of 480 parking spaces.
These additional spaces can be achieved because an undetermined number of
single-family homes have the 3-car garage model, as opposed to strictly just 2-car
garage models. The Typical Townhouse Detail shows that the townhouses would
have 1-car garages. However, it should be noted that the number of 3-car garage
models has not been finalized at this time and will not be finalized until the site plan
is approved. Therefore, staff utilized a more conservative approach at reporting the
parking statistics. The site plan tabular data indicates that 84 on-street parking
spaces are proposed throughout the development. The graphic shows that these
spaces would be dimensioned nine (9) feet in width by 25 feet in length.
Landscaping: The site plan tabular data indicates that 10.59 acres (57..43%) of the subject
property would be pervious. This figure includes the 2.11-acre lake tract. More
importantly, over 5.36 acres (29.08%) of the subject property would be set aside
for buffer and open space area. As previously mentioned, the subject site contains
a mix of native and non-native trees. The mitigation plan (sheet 18 of 18)
indicates that the property contains 220 trees, of which, 13 would be preserved.
The preserved tress would include 12 pines and one (1) oak. The developer would
have to mitigate up to 2,214 caliper inches. The Overall Landscape Quantities
plant list indicates that 186 or 92% of the canopy trees would be native and 65 or
58.56% of the palm trees would be native. Likewise, a total of 74.13% of the
shrubs I groundcover would be native. The plant list includes the following
species: Red Maple, Bougainvillea, Gumbo Limbo, Silver Buttonwood, Seagrape,
Dahoon Holly, Ligustrum Tree form, Live Oak, Bald Cypress, Bald Cypress Glory
Bush, European Fan palm, Coconut palm, Alexander palm, Medjool palm, Florida
Royal palm, and Cabbage palm trees.
The plans proposed landscape buffers around the entire development. A note on
the site plan indicates all exotic and nuisance vegetation shall be removed from the
site and from within native buffer areas. Native vegetation within the buffer shall
be preserved to the maximum extent possible. The east (front) landscape buffer
along High Ridge Road would be eight (8) feet at its narrowest point but a majority
of It would be 10 feet in width. The plant species proposed within this green space
would include the following: the relocated Oaks, Coconut palms, Bougainvillea,
Seagrape, Ligustrum, Dwarf Yaupon Holly, Dwarf Variegated Schefflera, Redtip
Cocoplum, Crown of Thorns, and Croton. The length of this perimeter buffer Is
1,731 feet in length and would require 58 trees. The plan proposes 59 trees.
Staff Report - New Urban High Ridge PUD (NWSP 05-016)
Memorandum No PZ 05-153
Page 6
However, within the east and south perimeter buffers, staff recommends reducing
the spacing between each tree to one (1) tree per 20 linear feet (see Exhibit "CIf-
Conditions of Approval). The south landscaped "common" area adjacent to Miner
Road would be 15 feet in width. This perimeter would be 459 linear feet. It would
have similar plant material as proposed within the east landscaped area. The west
landscape buffer would be five (5) feet in width. This is the buffer where a
majority of the existing trees would be preserved. The west perimeter buffer
would be 1,745 linear feet and would require 56 trees. The landscape plan
proposes 79 trees. The plant material within this buffer would also include the
following species: Relocated and additional Coconut palms, Silver Buttonwood,
Gumbo Limbo, and Crepe Jasmine. The north landscape buffer would be 398 linear
feet and seven (7) feet in width. It would require 13 trees and 13 trees are
provided. It would contain similar plant material as the other perimeter buffers.
Varying planting schemes are proposed for the individual lots. The scheme would
be dependent upon the style of the single-family house proposed on each lot or the
style of the townhouse building. Each Typical Unit Landscape Plan indicates that
each lot would have a multitude of plant material. A note on the site plan indicates
that all air conditioner units and similar mechanical equipment shall be screened
with landscaping which will achieve a height of 36 inches. When adequate room
for landscaping does not exist, a 36-inch high masonry screen wall will be provided.
Also, on the Typical Landscape Plan for the single-family homes, a note indicates
that no landscaping would be planted within three (3) feet of the rear alley. The
Engineering Division is requiring five (5) feet (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval). Regardless, the plant material proposed adjacent to the alley shall be
clear (vertically) as to not interfere with service vehicles (garbage trucks) traversing
the alleys.
The landscape plan shows that there are trees proposed outside the property line,
along High Ridge Road and Miner Road. The trees would require the Engineering
Division review and approval. Regardless, they cannot be used within the
landscape plan as counting towards meeting the minimum required number of
trees (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
Building and Site: As previously mentioned, the maximum density allowed by the High Density
Residential (HDR) land use classification is 10.8 dwelling units per acre, which
translates to a maximum of 199 units. The site plan proposes a total of 174 units,
which is a density of 9.43 dwelling units per acre. The site plan tabular data
indicates that collectively, the lots would account for 9.72 acres or 52.72% of the
entire property. The private rights-of-way would account for 5.50 acres or 29.82%
of the site. The developmenfs recreation area would account for 1.73% of the
site. This 0.32-acre recreation area would accommodate a swimming pool, a 1,409
square foot cabana / veranda facility, and a tot-lot. The recreation area would be
located adjacent to the site's lake / water management area. The project,
designed with new urban design characteristics, proposes homeowner accessibility
to the lake by all, so that It functions as a public amenity rather than a private
amenity enjoyed by few residents.
Staff Report - New Urban High Ridge PUD (NWSP 05-016)
Memorandum No PZ 05-153
Page 7
The Typical Lot Details of the single-family homes shows two (2) different types of
lots are proposed, namely a 40-foot wide and a 50-foot wide lot. The Detail
indicates that screen enclosures and pools would be permitted within the building
setbacks of the house. Solid roof enclosures are prohibited. The Detail shows that
all single-family detached lots would be 110 feet in depth. On both Details, the
houses would be setback 15 feet from the front property line and the 2nd-story
front balconies would be setback seven and one-half (7- V2) feet from the front
property line. The Detail also shows the house would be setback five (5) feet from
the rear and side lot lines. The smaller building setbacks, as proposed, are
generally smaller than conventional PUD type of projects but they are common
among New Urban type of developments. The Typical Townhouse Detail shows
that the buildings would be setback five (5) feet from the edge of pavement (along
the sides), 10 feet from the front lot line at ground level. The 2nd-story balcony
would be setback four (4) feet from the front property line. A 2nd-story balcony is
also proposed at the rear of each unit; it would be setback five (5) feet from the
rear lot line. The plans propose a 20-foot wide building separation (at the sides)
and 14 feet between 2nd story balconies.
The size of the townhouse units varies between 1,615 square for the smallest unit
to 1,940 square feet for the largest unit. They would come in either two (2) or
three (3) bedroom model options. The single-family detached homes would come
in numerous varieties. The smallest unit would be 2,097 square feet while the
largest would be 3,964 square feet in area. It should be noted that a number of
units have habitable space above the detached garage. These spaces are not
considered individual units and do not count toward density.
Design:
The City has reviewed and approved many different residential projects over the
past several years (i.e. Anderson PUD, Serrano PUD, Knollwood PUD, and Boynton
Dixie) and most have been developed as conventional, suburban-style types of
subdivisions. With the exception of Anderson and Serrano, most of the newer
projects have been townhouse developments. Associated with the proposed type
of single-family residential development are a wide variety of possible building
designs (i.e. contemporary, traditional, Spanish-Mediterranean, etc.). This is a
New Urbanism type of project with hints of the aforementioned architectural styles.
All townhouse buildings would be three (3) stories. The elevations show that the
buildings would be 35 feet - three (3) inches tall (mean roof height) and 40 feet-
three (3) inches at the peak of the roof. The single-family detached homes would
be two (2) stories tall and have varying roof styles. The tallest single-family
detached home would be 27 feet - six (6) inches tall at the mean roof height and
32 feet - three (3) inches tall at peak of roof.
The elevations of the townhouses show that the exterior finish of the walls would
be medium textured cementltous finish. All trim would be painted bright white and
all front doors would be painted mahogany. The applicant Is proposing a variety of
colors schemes. The Benjamin Moore paints are as follows:
Staff Report - New Urban High Ridge PUD (NWSP 05-016)
Memorandum No PZ 05-153
Page 8
Scheme Color Paint
1 Tan Crisp Straw #2157-50
2 Yellow Mellow Yellow #2020-50
3 Orange Peach Sorbet #2015-40
4 Blue Clearest Ocean Blue #2064-40
5 Green Eccentric Lime: #2027-30
The single-family homes would come in numerous varieties of wall and accent
colors. There are eight (8) different color schemes and each scheme has two (2)
or three (3) varying options. The color palette proposed contains a combination of
light or white pastels, and dark, unmuted primary/secondary colors. Staff supports
use of the soft color palette, particular as they are light earth tones to match
existing natural vegetation in the corridor. However, staff opposes use of highly
saturated and primary colors for this project. Such colors are inconsistent with
both existing improvements in the corridor as well as incompatible with the existing
natural environment in this area which consists of many mature trees and natural
scrub areas and preserves. The bold colors are more typical of the Caribbean
settings or other waterfront environments, and should be changed to soft earth
tones to compliment the general area rather than just the project (see Exhibit "C"-
Conditions of Approval).
Signage:
Project development signs are proposed on small posts labeled "ID columns".
These posts would be located on each side of the entrance drives. The sign detail
shows that the column would be four (4) feet - two (2) inches in height. The base
of the post and its decorative caps would be a smooth textured cementitious stucco
base, painted white. The greater surface of the post would be a medium textured
stucco finish over CBS and painted yellow (Mellow Yellow BM 2020-50). Its colors
would be consistent with the building colors proposed throughout the community.
The sign face would be located in the center of the post.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval and recommends approval, contingent upon the
adoption of the changes proposed to the Land Development Regulations (CDRV 05-014) related to widths
of rights-of-way in Planned Unit Developments (PUD), and also subject to satisfying all comments
indicated in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or
City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJEcrS\High Ridge- New Urban Communities\NWSP 05-016\Staff Report.doc
Exh\Jit 'A' - Location I\.Itt9p
.
275
I
137.5
o
275
550
825
I
1,100
I Feet
..'
R
EXH IBIT B
f'~ ( .
II~~ II ! 1/ II UilW I! I! Ir Ii I !!') d~ IW II jii I rsx Ii ~l: "", ._.n ___n' n--n ---- -' n -. -1___ - ---- .-' ----
illllllll Hllll illlilll i ilnl'I!111 ~~lt I:,:. . ~ . _
1!!lllli 111111' I I'll I! ! Ii!! I! in ill,l!ll1'111 " : ,-~1:::,;:;,,:I.;L~,;.:.;,~:I;ii:~ I
I. / nl~i! i i .~ I'I!. i ~ !Ii. ! i' ' . i . i!: i!: i!l ili ill il! i,i i I :
I 5 -;- i I ~ :il ~ :ila :11 t" :1: 111\ Ill:' :1:' : tl
tz: . I l:: 1=1 ji; Ii! Ii! !Ii lil : i
filE' L___),._JIL__J,.____':"uJ,.__:_""_:Ji._u_' ,
, .- -=' .. ..' --. i
I " ,Ill .' .~, .
~i ~ IJ 1 r---.1r-.",----.lr-.,l,----, .~
~ I ~ I :1: :1: :I: \ll J ,it
. '~ ,I ':' ':1 :=: I:: I I F.
......:.. ~ I :.. 11: ~ :11 ~ .11 a 1~;a : 'd9
,...!.. ,....!..., ,. E I .. ::: 1:\ ::,1 1,', 1 II'fi
. . .;::1\ :1: :,: ',' . ; I:J
::l t j \ 'n .J:L _J:L_ __~'L _J'~_ -' . ,f
-- __J' .~.. · I!i
t1
j" I
! i1irl j!llllli;I'JPII!lmll~ Ihll!~!lIlU ~ mm i
"Ie In.~ ! I i llli IIi f j I nili' ·
~I H~ il p~!
I I I I r-h-r
~ i , .
-t'_..n--n.
,.!I@ --N '--.1 fill: limB
; I
""1 ---,1 11m 15ml
i
ij
i
f ~ ~;;; i I
:;t;i}
_ flU~1
~ . I
I .
iiliHi
~!~N'I ~~";;nl il~Ii~I~ il~ill ~
I~~~ l;g' I~ g iii' i:l
t~8~1 i~lil l~i;1 ~~~~ [
i~ I~ ~&~~I~ ~I~~ s~!~ ~
;.~ i: ~ aB& g I ~
: ~ ~ I~~ ~
s~
~
i
!
liJ
i !
i ....1/
-"-"-"---,
-..----------.
./"
// I
/ ,
/ II:
J--
Ul
@
~
_"n.._.._.._
~~
~
.~
1~
~O ~
~
II
~
"
II
~
\1i
~
...,//
,
,
,
,
,
j I
k
""'"
. ( : ---1~:- -1:r~-11r~ ::r- -- 1
. t: :,: :I! III !!1 !
f i Ill; III Z III ~ III · I
: __uHt____HLJ!LJIl----J
i1
~!
: .
Ill&: 'r- ~
! I ..1, = . .~:.c . iI
" ' !' OJ?, ~\,,"
u! ' ;r.." .. i , r;;n r ~ ) i
r ~~I~.~.~._.~I~G ~ IJi
i ","... ,)flll~~ if "
I ". ~ : - I r j ; ~ il" Ii
!\ ~ril f-i i *' i
i Vi:lff ~ Ii f-4- Ii :1
I -.:..... ' I
...!... I! I ;; if
,'I I II' ~ :
~ I' --- . . :1
~,~ ' \. I
..!... /"i l I I ./
. I I \ ,
: ,; i., I _. .~.', ~-'
- i' J 0 --l"^'""-~.-;;:..;.._._._
! I + iii : . ---...:r-u.,:r-__~'1.r____-;~- \
1 ~ ;i/""";- jI: :r: :1: Ii: :1'1--~1
, \' I. .' ~' .:' '" ,., ,.1 '"
. . 'j. ~ I 1!i I!] ii ifi i ii,: Ii :jl; ! t
I . i Hi iil llJ !l! i t'
I II I I . ~: J- !..._~_Ju.__J:t__ _J:L -~:L...._J 1/ :
~ : '=--i-- -i "
J ..e= r---~-nn_, ,---__nn_: I t
" :"" Ln__.n__." ~ ., j
" i H. I Ii; ~:;~:;::~ ~::::~::l w
Lu_'_m__".: i: id
c~~r~i~~ .II
: lH!i1 HI lil I .f"\
: :1: ::1 l:\ ::1 : . ~i
I a \1\'" 'II ... '11. III;; . ' I;
j!i!.lil.lI11,\~:!:jl.
-IOL. ...l'~ .I'~____J:~____J :.1
_u_ . n . ---- . I"
'Y 'I
0=. . . ......:., u~ ~- 'I
I . ! . . ! l,...u'.r____' I
i f---1ir--lir--ltr~-lifu:f--lir--l!: :I: ;I~:
i I: :'1 :'1 I:: :'i i'l 1'1 :.: :'1: :
II-T ,I t 11\, .tl . It I . II. I :1: . I!: . :111 :.: . . r :
rr-- i: I:: I:: 1:: ::1 .ll 101 .'. 1'\ :!,
· ': :1\ :1: II: l11 :11 :!: * :I: 1/,
3 , ':'jiL .:1 *f....tIt h' 1.1 I.........!J ,
: ..~!. .: .~~:.:~:.~,;.~~;.~;.-::_.~ ",:_J ~~_:~:-=:.~
: I: II, i
I ,
i i
___h'
'I.....;j -;11
, .. I ._1t1
i j.....Ll!l.
>-!- I. i 11I1r-1I
\ ~ II i bllV
: t I EiJ
1:li'I'i'~
JI
'-.
r i
II
i
i
I~I W~~~ High Ridge 0'11111 j~ ~
:IN J1
'I" ~ !~ New Urban Communities il i J I .~
III Ii Boynton Beach, Florida
i m: [Iilli-.. 7 ~ .. .:' .
___.: ; n '1-011 1I{,l~f" O'Il'TTr \r~ \,. '3 (1'.11 Ill'. I) t~ }II \J' IJ -'x x
~ !~ 1+_ . ,f- I~I _ u-Il-h -+<- II Irt--'~I
/" :.., ::: I ~'\- - - - - - - - "'_ 11 ... ... '" '" ... ... '" - ,
6 .. ChU'l.WN....O
il F j 0: ,
I'~ _ _ ,_ _ '---' --'-- - _ --.~ ""-:i:.- _
'" - - .. - - -;t- .. ~~.
i ;;;!p ~ ,i r--'lr-i1r-i1r---.,lr-,lr---.,!r-i1r---l'
I I I I d i ill ill III I I d i I
I ~ I I I: I I: I I: I I: 1 I: I I: I I: I I
I' ~ I TI I ~ 1\: ~ 1\: ffi il: ~ II: m II: m :1: ~ II: m : '
tl 'T-Ir I 1'1 Iii Iii Iii 1,1 1,1 1,1 I ~
'E ~'/ !;I !.:I 1'1 1'1 T :\! \j~ 1
1\: .~{~~;":~;~ ~ LTf~~: L:jl,D
I I : ~", ... -:lr~ilr--;TF-i r-- ::., ;. x
1\ If ~ ~!:l : I ::\ :l: I:: I:: lll~'
/; \\ ~ ~ 11. ~I III ~ i -! ;j : \: ;j : I \ ~ : I \ ~ : I \ m : ,-/ 3
; I ;Ii l!l 1"/:1 g: ~d::I.~~1 -: Ill::: l{:: 1:\:: :::p: .: I' ~
I I 1 L__.J L_.J L__.J L_.J L__.J 6
\ I I 1 ~ I,' ~ I ~I ~
,\ I L. -!III!!I.J IL..L~ I (ilLo L..-~ . _ - .. I-
! I 'I ~ I! I ~;-: ~ I i ~ ~ "j I i - -; \ i i l i - i \ i ,," ~ . ~ I ~ .
i ;, tl III L ~ Fill;) t"': I I : I I : I I : I I : I I I ~ ~
/ , 1 J It ;, I ; I, ~ ~ _ ! ;: : I: ~ : I: ~ : I: :j : I : ~ : -, ~ Ll);
I I I ... I. il! '-"T I I 1,1 1'1 Iii III I
. '" ;,I:I/4,!!l - ~ I III III 1'1 1II1 I ~
Ii J; ~ /,/1/', t J:filci... ~,__.JIL__.JjL_-.J L_.J L__.J "
i I~ ~ ill: It,;::: I __ ~ I 3
I ~ I l;l 'LI~I ~ " .:...." --;..~ - ~
I ~ Eli '!i' ".' , .' ~ <; .J ,'i
! @ -f~F- '-. ~ ~ ~~' ,~~
~ ;~~rJJ.~ ~ " 0 r h '. ~
f' I ~TTI-'II; {ilhr.h,,,/J!t . .J i I
: ~ ~rabll IfV I ~ I ~ -- '= ~ II
L
~
~ ~ 'f II, ~Ii. ~ltlJ:l' : ~ kl-'~ ,..? ( -;~
, ~ r;: 1-, -,_ _~~!;j j ~.
~~ ~ I--!-~- ~ . :;;:11" _ ,w,' '",,__n ::~----_._.
~
if
r-;
"
w
q
11"1 ~ ! ~~ ~Url
I~" !. I.
m ~ If I. m~.,
~;;
x-
-e1
EXH IBIT B
-""
f ..I~ .
High Ridge
New Urban Communities
Boynton Beach, Florida
U!f2 JI'I ~~ ~
II. J f ~'g ~
!l
~
~
rVI HOlT 0
I r--T-1't - ,~=~ JI (-"7~r~ ~~ ~---- ::~~ _______J+_ 0~
, , L · "f ,-Jf i ~ . j '* [.~ I
I I I ~ =Ii! ~ 1, h~ ~ '( I
" I I g: '1'/:'- ~ I' f I ~ )
/... ll! II r ~ ~ . }.'f\C i .
i (t ~-~~~H~~--~f1lt'i :;; .~ "- \/i I~
: \ "~-;,,_~II'I'~~_ '.:., :::~.." I {: '} (.) ~ ../
I I 3-.:'--kJ l=I- i$ I"" ." It- . r L~, .-' .
~: f,i :~-~--1:I'I' ~~-p ~ '~;k - Ji~-~-- --,.. ~
~"-I I, r-. 'I -- ..... ~ 1 I
~.~ ~llj4- ~ J= .
i t:~ ~~=tJ- '1" t'5 -if!==<..... (! ~--ll~-r r--rTr----,l~-- .
n b In ----'-1~.., 1,1 I' II I!
, ,.d, -, lli I I is p. I I' I I : , I' I I, I I .J
, ~ " .. L - ' '" --1 E. I t:i 'I' ~ I II ~ II' I ;:; : )' : ;:; I I t ~
, 4 I I - -, I I' I 1 I I" '" I - ~ "J
i\ ~;I I frr-T-fn, ~r i Ii: iii Ii: ii! .: t ~
'\ ~ I : !!l : ill , 18 '8 ,g : ~ L - - -.l LL - -.J I L - - -.J I L _ _ --1.1 L ...J (~')
1 ;\~I I rn-l i ; ; i ~I\'" .. ~ I, lY
i \::: . T .'1 11.1. r .. - _ ---," .. '-t! i\
~ '1- I I I .......~ I '" ; i ---I~ t 1/
~Ih .. ~ ~__~__ -.J i ~ I n ~ B
1;~i~I~":"': '.w';.: ~. ~-c~;-_-c=t ~':-=;:=':~:' ( ~
i~, ~ . ~I ,. I I I ,,,, \' L--____-1 'I ;:; I ,
i; I . l': ~:!:l : ls1 : ii\ : ~ I ~ ,-':-'::'-=~:::':=-=j I ~.:-_~--_-.J - ~ ,~
I ~ ' ~ I 1_ I -1-1 , I\' L _ _ ~ I I' r - - - - -=:.... -=J Q~ t' ~
. ::t:.:Hl.=.iJt:l- _ --__-.J ~t I ~ I ~ ~ '7
; ~--. -~ Jj ,(, r-':-'::'-=-=--::~ I ~ I' Il
! '. . l! ~-, '. I ~ I I L - - -.J i 'J
: * T l:rIT iB It L-:::--=__-:_-.J I r=-=:""-==::::-:::T I t ~
~ ... '1':/11 i T r-' ~.. , - - :: - -::::-- I I :: I -! (
! 'I ':Ii!w, g ::; ~ r:. I kl i ~~~--=.:--.J /1,
I 1 .: I illfT '" q::j ~ L-_____..J j ,-------, , ( ,
~ I : '" I,I Li.. ... J I t -r:-=-=-'::'-=--=--':--_1 I I ~
, t; 1:+,':' ill ~I~.: E i.,: &i : I~.(
! I: t II, g: ~i/ L ____-.J/ I L ___JA~ t
i, ~ ::1: ,I ~ (ijl '- --: -----'-----~-~ -o~
14 1 :b ~ I! ~' ,---,rr-r1r--, r--rlr-':--1~1I' .1
,. I; I I II i ili I , i I i I I ,I .
I '" _, -=-_ ~ _ /.. I I: I I : I , : I I: I I, /' ~
~\~ i. ~r1D-=-T-fJ.: a II: ~ i\l ~ :1: &i :\: ~ : I ( ~
I ,~ T I II. I 1,1 1'1 1,1 1,1 I'
~ .~~I'. s ::; : is : ~ : ia I, ! \' I I' I IJ' : I I,' II I'll I
; . ~ I. I I" I . ~ __J L_-.J L__.J L__.J L__.J ,
~_ " --II T1TI1--t-n.., ~ ~ ''';
i&;;; ~~ I J ..' ~ ~_ 'l;371 I~/ ~
. ~ :~~~ri~l~ :~~~~-,Tr~~r-~;-:t~~, ' 'l
:; " , to r-.::rf--~-~ I 1 I I :!I d\ I!: -I!l 1,1 1,1 "I!~ 1\
-...l I <i ~~_.;:j I' I I I: , II I 1'1 I' , 1'1 1'1 1'1 1'1 1/
· ~ ~ p ~- -;1/1 I 'I' II' ~ III ~ III ~ II' ~ 'II ~ III ~ III g / ~
~ ; 1 ...J---~ 1 ~ 'I ~ I I 8l I I g: I' f " ~ I I ~ I , ~ I,' " ~
~ ~ It. ';; ~-~~' ill :1\ :1: l\\ ::1: ::\: ::1: Il: Ii: ~j ~
~ 15' . __c;l_ I ~ L__JIL_.JIL_.JIL_-.J L_-.J L_-1 L_.JIL__IIL~
~ If:' ~ \ ''----~. - ~.. ~--. .. -=- /
~ /'. _"'_. ~-~ .r ~..... ~_-.-r"':"- l"'....~~..~
~Oii ~ I I =''''t,:,;,\I,~"n..:,..r- ~ ~(d)".~_~'\.,:,.J'~ ~
=r ~,! ~ ~~ I I I
-...l , Eli i
~
II
w
q
flU' I Il~~[~ High Ridge r R!lll'l if~ 0
trl ~ J!
Il~!. i! New Urban Communities II i j I!. g
II to :
, II Boynton Beach, Florida ~
TI-lI~ DOCl.MeNT Ie TIoE ~RTY Ol< ELIOFOULOfl 4 A&5OCIATE& INC. ALL I'tlGl-lTll AI'I:E fI<E$ERVl!:D AND ,U>j'r ~eIIlfER. Lle.E OF n.lltl ~T WlTl-lOUT n-E ~TTEN 1"E1IlN1e610N Cf' I!LIOl'"QJLOSo 4 A&6OCIATES !NC. 1& ~eITED
!~~ JII~ ~
gU ~ II' III
~ ;; fD. ~ ~
* ~~ &51i!~ a
1Ill!::: ~.. '"
-5
f'
5iD~
~ II
~ D
EXHIBIT B
::I:l
~.
O'l:l
::T
~
~.
c..
O'l:l
('t)
::
t:::j
('t)
-<
to ('t)
......
0 0
~ 'i:::1
~ S
~
0 ('t)
~ ~
~
to ""I:l
('t) 0
~ '1
('j
t:r' Z
('t)
~ ~
-
0 c:::
'1 '1
~.
c.. f:i'
~ ~
~
::I:l
~.
O'l:l
t:r'
~
~.
c..
O'l:l
('t)
b
<J
'II
~I
I
Iq .~
'II
1!1 III 11(11
II )'1 ~I
~~
5
;
EXH IBIT B
PI
~ lti II III ".1 IP HI'
",i 8m '011, II
~:!J ~ ~ III
h .~
~
III "" 5 I III
i'l :l- I"
i'l ."
fr ~ ; IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1!1
I /
_Iq
1'1
ill -/
'I
I
I
, H m
- - I 1,1
C COl'Y'UGHT 1HI$ ilOCUlQff IS THE ~MPEflTY or IM"I to ELIOI"Du..OS oIlRCHITtcTS. ,...... AlL IUOHTS AM: Ilt$[ltVCD ilINll Notl I"OUCUlQN, REPRODUtTJOoI [M OTHEII UK lit' THIS IOCVHtNT ....ltfOlT THE 'If1lIITTEN CONSENT IF KuPl .. ElIlIl'O.A.OS o\fICHlTECTS. ,...... IS '""OHt.ITt:D.
)> @ I
:~
19 · .'
CD t'.1 I
"i I~I i I 'High RIdge' Develbpment for I!i I: D~
I..~ U NEW URBAN HIGH RIOQE, LLC. -;:-:; II
I ;:::i
~ ;:F! ,yo D
BOYNTON BEACH, FLOII:lA ~ ~ ~ ,..
~.- ~
I
!~ ~
~I jJ!
.fi ~
II
I~
..
i~
.jlI
~
I
,
I
,
!~
I~
'::IE
I~
,
I
i
EXH IBIT B
!~
*~
!!
.:.1
ifi
II
1,\
..
,- - - --- - -- --- --- -- - - - -- ----- --- - - - --- - -- --I
I ,'1 I
- - ,
I
,
,
I
,
I
i i
L-- ----- - - --- -- ---~~ - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- -- j
ill
i
.
i
.
i
~
I
,
I
,
!~
I
,
I
i
C carYl'tIGHT '"IS DQCUENT IS TK ~EItTY or _I .. D.1QPlM..D5 IIRCHlltCTS, PA. ........L IUlIHTS ME MSERVED NG lIoN' POU(SSlllH, M:~TION IIIl DTHEIl Un: oj THIt IIClCVMt.HT YlJlolllUT TI1[ wtIIlTTEN CllNSEHT or ,",uP'1 .. ELlOf'OULDS AACKl1t:(lS, p"" n: ~.ltEI.
.)>
~8
~
.@~
lzJ
'8
i~
!! ~
.:.1
ifi
II
1,\
..
,- - - u _ u _u_ _ _ -- _ -- _ -- _ -- _ _ _ -- _ _ _ u_ -- ---I
i i
i I
,
,
I
i i
, ,
, ,
L- - -- --- - - - - - - - - u_ -- - - - -_ _____ - - - u - - -- - -----l
III
Ih
p
I
.
I
i
i!! ~
I. I
I 1 ...
ii!
! Ii ill
... 1i
I ~~
I I I
J nn In ~
hi i!1 ~
I u' I m g
n~n m ~
! I i' III ;: = == ~c. 1!IIIlD~
I~ I ~Pi
~~ BOYNTONBEACH,R.<KlA ~~I ~ D
~.- ~
I
P'!J1:'-'~!"J:-" n '"
I I I I I , l2 m
~mn'V;::n m
0 j!!
<fl~~~~ "
'" m
~~ !to'll n <
~~rn",~~ J: ~
m
-to-<~ ;:: <5
ng~ill~~ m Z
~~~~~61 ~ '"
"
0
I~ ~15=:J "
~oCD""'N' 8
~~~~~gj
f:l ~. gj ~
J }ijJ ! ~
'"
!
'"
i5
~ ~
,.. m
'" <
co~
~iii<5
o ",c",fj"SS
ril-t~~~m~i
;!; ~ '" '" II ::!I 'v
Z J:~t"
&l :;;~zo;6~
g:;; 8 f:il!lp:J
::dj ~ ';l::!l iri
iii 0 ...' c
~ ;-:~~
"'Om
II II II ~ s: ~
<t8~
"'3:,..
w.....cn==:-
~~g;:-n~~
:-n~:-n~o!f
xxxf-"o
~~",O)>Z
:l:1il'"
II II II II ~ ~ ~
mmm
Wq:)co~
~~~~~ae
~~:-n:-n~~~
-tm-t
~~Sl
cc?!-
OZ:l:
~rn~
~ ~
&l 'll
fj
m
'"
i5
~ ~
~ ~
Co-t
~rli~
o-t"'c",fj"",
~~~~~mc;~
~ ~!2~~::!I;E
&l,,:l:"'zo;60
. z ~ 8 . N rrf
8~~~o~
~8"'~~l!J
~ ;;:;~~
II " fl ~ ~ ~
~~~
"'~,..
cofdc~~~
~YJ!'Jl' Z}!
:n:n:n~!6;:j
~~~o~~
:l:",'"
II II II II ! ~ ~
~ "'3lcl!J~
~:~cn~;gae
":-n:-n:-n~~~
iri~d
S=<!-t
cc?!-
Om Z:l:
'fl' ?!-
~ ~
Z C
&l 'll
?;
m
~~~~~
~~~~!6
~CS;::o'"
m~d~~
8~~~9
"T1(1)mmo
fl2~~pj
~::j:!it:
~!B~~
m~iil~
~~. 8
=1m "
!"~ !"
~
c
~
~
:<
~ m
,.. ,..
~ ~
'l:~~
fj!B~
(J)N(i)~~~
!!2~.::!I'fi
~~Gl&;6~
~:;;m .",-t
zzo~o~
888J:;liri
~~ill~~~
"'0 'V
IllllIc;;:~
c~gz
~o;::Gl
q:)~x~~~
~~~~zi!
, ' ':l:: 0 '"'
XXXf-"O
",~",o~Z
:l:"''''
II II i'ii ~ ~
"'mm
m~o<!)
cnz;H?ft
"''VOo
:-n~~~
~~Sl
rric?!-
cZ:l:
o!"?!-
ril ,..
Z '"
Z ~
&l )>
n
m
::XHIBIT B
I
!
~ijJ
!~
.(')
2 ~ if q~ ~~
l~ ! C/l
7z a
~ ~ ! m
m i m ~m
Iii r- r-
I ~ ~
~ j
~ D H '-l '-l
0 1>> 0 5
z z z
a '"Oi ~j i HIGH RIDGE IUl'f j~f
13 mid > i BERMlJOA TOWNHOME BUILDINGS II
m )E ~ 0 ~ UNITS 103-110/118-125/133-140'141-1<18/149-158,
m It ~t~ 8 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 'f I
~ '-l PALM BEACH COUNTY, flORIDA nil II
5 I
z I [ If
C/l I Ii
by: NEW URBAN HIGH RIDGE, LlC
c
z
:::j
OJ
1;0
c
z
~G') :::j
s ;0
! g I~
q Z
o
"T1
r
o C
o Z
;0 :::j
-U ?'
!; ;0
z
Il. '"0.
:pI
OJ
m
;0
~
5 ~J.
o g ,rr f .
~ 15 II III I. t
~ I [
11Sl118!11Si11Sl1 - [_n-l--l
c
z
:::j
)>
,
..J I~
c
z
:::j ~
()
. ------~
,
..J Ij
c
z
:::j
OJ
ll~
_m_j
c
z
:::j
o
uJ
c
z
:::j
m
,
I
nmJ
,
ll~
__nJ
....1 Il
l~
-----,
~
j
,
nJ I~
11Si118!11Si11Si1 _ Ln__j_...!
r~i~
1 HIGH RIDGE
I BERMUD'" TOWNHOME BUILDINGS
UNITS lQ3.110/118-125/133-140/ 1(1.148/149-156,
CITY Of BOYNTON B~CH
PAlM BE.6.CH COUNTY, FLORID'"
by: NEW URBAN HIGH RIDGE, LLC
s s
~ ~
!
~
I I
~ ~
~
f(!
s s
~ ~
~
f(!
I I
~ ~
~
~
-:XHIBIT 8
I I
~ ~
UI~11i11
~ I d I ill
UQil ~jil!U ~ ~
f(!!(I!(I!(I !(I !(I !(I !(I t
B~ ~ Il<<i ; ~
g~II~I~I~
~. L ~ ~
&I~I ~il~~ '"
f(!f(!!(I!(I !(If(! !(I !(I i
B~ ~ jfl!i ; ~
gml ~ ~ h I ~
~ i g ~
~. L ~ ~
&I~I l:l!&~ <>
f(!!(IlI!f(! lI!!(I!(IlI! ~
~
lI!
I I
~ ~
UU ; II ~ ; ~
" m~g~!i!~>
~ 2 g ~ is
~ ~ ~
linh ~~H~ !i
lI!!(If(!f(!!(I lI! lI!!(I f(! c
UU I ! Ii i ~
" ~i~U~~
~ . ~~ ~:z'
.tl~1 ~li!~~ =l
lI!!(I!(I!(IlI! !(Ill! lCl!(l m
IlIi III iI
i ~Sh~;:"k"~~>
~ lI! lI!f(!lI! S L'G
. !II !(Ill! f(!
Ii aJ!l~i Iii ~ ~~ J ~ q! ~
IPI!llilll ~ Ii I i II I Ii
!' j;h:. 'ii i!" 1I!l II
1IIIIillll ;! ill! II
I~ .~d. III
II lilll III
If
f
Ir
IUlrl
. ~ I
I '
I
I
is
nl'''
I
.'
"'-..
~?':""~r-->;-l' () en
I . . . I' 0 m
~~(')"t1~~ 5 ~
;;lrilii~p; :<I In
:<IZ~:i:o"tl ~ <
~~~gj~~ ill ~
oOoillm~ ~ Z
~~@!!I5:;E fI! ~
Ir;nZ~~~ ~
~l!!o ...
~"'ffi~~~ ~
~~! ~ ~
02?:j!:0
~~r-~
0000
:<100:<1
!!lOr-en
m~~pl
:<I~enm
80~~
~en032
_:i:men
In ~ C'
dm~
ffl~~
~d8
iijlll.i:l
, ~j!:
~~
02:1
~;:
~~
-<2:1
'Gl
=i
~
=l
.m
;>J
G5
:!i
m
hi
);
-i I
0
, z ,
, II II I , II
I~ IP !~
,~ il fJJ pi ,~ U
J II e 1
I .1
II. :Bt ~J i HIGH RIDGE
m mN H~i~ POOl & MAll CABANA
C/l ~
. 1-1
),> '-I CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
~ 0 PAlM BEACH COUNTY, FlORlD^
Z
C/l
by: NEW URBAN HIGH RIDGE, lLC,
EXH IBIT 8
~
ccco
cccc
e~
111111 I ~
IIIIIII
I ~
II
IIIBIIIIIIIDIII
CCCC
;>J cccc
~ ~
m
r-
~
-t
0
Z
,
b I
,< l!! ,.
J JJ
Ir TUlff i~t
'f Pi"- a
Ir I
I If
rrf f ~
I~l!i Ji~
B ~; p'
i [
~ en
~ -
h:; -I
~m
~ "'U
1-
~ m
;0
~ ;:-
l'f
~
:> tJ:'
~ I g~(f)
n r>> (f) n
-~~:r: 0
~ m(J)~
~ to~~
m
4'-2"
B'-6"
~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~
:n jl~'i! m:<l~ m'i ~U
~ ;~i ~U ~! ~~s
~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ u~
u ~~~ U ~~
s~~
~
EXH IBIT B
!~IHr~
.. h ~ III <.11 ~
~!:!!"_~ m-l
%~~~~~ f
~ ~
~
Q
)>0
1iIil~
lM----f
W
0(")
~s;:
~~
-"
2-
G)(")
)>
-I
-
o
z
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: High Ridge New Urban Communities
File number: NWSP 05-016
Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 9.2005 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. Staff strongly discourages on-street parking along High Ridge Road and X
Miner Rd. due to their functional classification (Urban Collector) and the
volumes and types of traffic they carry. The applicant may petition the
County for permission to utilize on-street parking. If allowed by the County,
provide written concurrence of this decision.
2. At the time of permitting, improve High Ridge Road to a minimum of three X
12-foot lanes from Miner Road to the northern boundary of the proposed
development. Provide plans, including typical sections, for off-site
improvements, including curb and gutter along High Ridge Road. Palm
Beach County permits will be required for work within the Palm Beach
County right-of-way. Staff recognizes that improvements required by the city
may not be required and / or supported by the County. The developer shall
provide a letter of credit in the amount of 110% of the engineer's estimate for
public roadway improvements prior to issuance of any building permits for
this project. The letter of credit shall be held until such time as the
improvements are complete.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
3. The minimum right-of-way width for a PUD is 40-feet. (LDR, Chapter 2.5, X
Section 9.F.) The applicant is proposing a traditional neighborhood design
and is desirous of utilizing a proposed Code Change, currently in process, to
allow for lesser right-of-way widths for portions of the project. Internal
roadways will be categorized as "Primary" and "Secondary" based on their
functions. Primary roadways will handle internal flow, guests, deliveries and
Fire/Rescue access. Secondary roadways will be utilized for homeowner
access to the rear loaded parking and will additionally be used for Solid
Waste Access.
Primary internal roadways shall have no less than 40-ft. right-of-way widths,
but may use II-ft. lanes widths. Secondary internal roadways shall have no
less than 20-ft. right-of-way widths and may use 10-ft. lane widths. The
COA
08/23/05
2
DEPARTMENTS
applicant shall provide, through homeowners documents, an additional buffer
area of no less than 5-ft., adjacent to both sides of the proposed right-of-way
to allow for Solid Waste storage and pickup. The buffer area shall be kept
free of all obstructions, including fencing and landscaping, for this purpose.
Primary access roadways connecting to High Ridge Road will conform with
all Land Development Regulations and City Standards.
The above Condition of Approval is contingent upon Connnission approval
of the proposed changes to Chapter 2.5 of the LDR. In the event Commission
does not approve the Developer shall be required to provide roadways and
rights-of-way in accordance with the LDR and City Standards or may seek a
variance, in accordance with the procedure established in the LDR.
INCLUDE REJECT
4. In order to accommodate a roadway typical section within the proposed 20-ft. X
secondary roadway (if approved) the engineer shall construct two - 9 1/2-ft.
lanes with 6-in. concrete header curb on each side of the roadway. Asphalt
paving, lime/shellrock and stabilized sub grade in accordance with City
Standards shall be completely contained within the header curb.
5. Upon Connnission approval of the site plan schedule a pre-application X
meeting with the Engineering Division to begin the plat process.
6. Show proposed site lighting on the landscape plans (Chapter 4, Section X
7.BA.) The lighting design shall provide a minimum average light level of
one foot-candle. On the Lighting Plan, specify that the light poles shall
withstand a 140 MPH wind load (Chapter 23, Article II, Section A1.a and
Florida Building Code). Provide a note that the fixtures shall be operated by
photo-electrical control and are to remain on until 2:00 a.Ill. (LDR, Chapter
23, Article II, Section A1.a.) Include pole wind loading, and pole details in
conformance with Chapter 6, Article N, Section 11, Chapter 23, Article I,
Section 5.B.7 and Chapter 23, Article II, Section A on the Lighting Plan.
7. It will be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light X
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter
23, Article II, Section A1. b).
8. At the time of permitting, show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, X
Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.).
9. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not X
permitted. See Sheet 13 of 17.
10. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the X
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
11. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction X
COA
08/23/05
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water X
and sewer systems serving this proiect (CODE, Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
~eater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid X
for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the
Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan
approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
15. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer X
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has X
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
17. The City of Boynton Beach does not wish to have another lift station X
constructed for this project. If the applicant desires, there is a lift station
approximately Y2 mile north of this project (south terminus of NW 7th Ct. -
Lift Station 717) or another approximately Y4 mile east of the intersection of
High Ridge Rd. and Miner Rd. (Lift Station 718.) Also available are gravity
systems in the Commerce Rd. right-of-way and within the Cedar Ridge
subdivision. The invert elevation at Lift Sta. 717 is 1.19. By upsizing to a
to-in. main and using a 0.3% slope it is possible to tie into Lift Sta. 717.
Credit for oversizing the main may be available. A copy of the as-builts for
Lift Sta. 717 has been given to the applicant. Should the developer propose
to build their own lift station for this project, they would have to submit an
analysis indicating that the life cycle cost (capital and O&M) would be
cheaper for the system with a new lift station than it would be for connecting
to the existing stations. This analysis can be conducted based upon "present-
COA
08/23/05
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
worth" of the two alternatives, with an expected 40-year life on the stations.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability X
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments:
19. Appropriate fire department access will be required at the pool/recreation X
area. At the time of permitting, an access road (14 feet in width) will be
required to the pool area so that medical/emergency victims can be quickly
and safely loaded. Revise the plans to show compliance with this
requirement.
POLICE
Comments: None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
20. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X
proposed construction.
21. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates X
the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the
accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the
project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol shall
represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable
warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path.
The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a
drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify on the plan
the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the
Code is 36 inches). Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant
shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the
accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2001
FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish
grade elevations along the path of travel.
22. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", X
submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each
property line to the leading edge of the building/so The leading edge of the
building/s begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the
COA
08/23/05
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all
Xsides.
23. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
24. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Connnission-approved site plan.
b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
c. The number of dwelling units in each building.
d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
25. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. X
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
26. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
f. A legal description of the land.
g. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Connnission-approved site plan.
h. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Connnission-approved site plans.
1. The number of dwelling units in each building.
J. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
27. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Connnission.
COA
08/23/05
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
28. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
29. The impact fee will be: X
Single family, detached 48 units @ $940.00 each = $45,120.00
Single family, detached 126 units @ $771.00 each = $97,146.00
TOTAL $142,266.00
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
30. All ornamental trees on the Plant list must be listed in the specifications as a X
minimum of 3" diameter (not Cal) at DBH (4.5' off the ground), 12'-14'
height, and Florida #1. The height of the trees will be larger than 12'-14'
to meet the 3" diameter requirement (Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.).
31. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume X
water conservation using non-portable water.
32. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate X
zones and time duration for water conservation.
33. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the X
root ball (Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.).
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
34. According to the Land Development Regulations, alleys and other secondary X
roadways are considered to be rights-of-way. In a Planned Unit
Development, the minimum width of a right-of-way is 40 feet. Approval of a
variance or an amendment to the Land Development Regulations would be
required in order to allow the alleys to be less than 40 feet in width.
35. A unity of title may be required. The Building Division of the Department of X
COA
08/23/05
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Development will determine its applicability.
36. On the master plan (sheet 1 of 6), with a dashed line, show the limits of the X
2nd story porches proposed on the sides of the townhouse buildings; or is this
already shown in the typical Multi-family Setback matrix?
37. At the time of permitting, the elevation pages of the clubhouse should include X
the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. (Chapter 4,
Section 7.D.).
38. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between X
the tabular data and the graphic illustration.
39. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) X
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.C.2.). This applies to the Ligustrum, Bald Cypress and Live Oak trees.
40. The trees proposed around the townhouse and single-family detached X
buildings must be installed at ~ the building height of the building (Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section S.M.).
41. The landscape plan shows that there are trees proposed outside the property X
line, along High Ridge Road and Miner Road. The trees would require the
Engineering Division review and approval. Regardless, they cannot be used
within the landscape plan as counting towards meeting the minimum required
number of trees.
42. Staff recommends that where possible, the trees proposed within the east and X
south landscaped "common" areas be spaced no further than one (1) tree per
20 linear feet.
43. Regarding the subdivision wall sign, place a note on the site plan indicating X
that the sign will be located 10 feet from the property line (Chapter 21,
Article IV, Section I.D.).
44. The ends of those townhouse buildings directly visible from High Ridge Road X
and Miner Road should be enhanced with features similar to the front facades
using elements such as balconies, individual roof features, porches, varying
surface materials and colors, etc.). Those units would include #1, #17, #40,
#84, #96, #139, #147, #169, and #174.
45. Indicate on the plans the proposed locations of the townhouse buildings by X
type (not unit type). Two building designs are proposed but not located on the
site. Placement of the two building design types should maintain
compatibility in the project.
COA.doc
08/24/05
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
46. Color swatches are to be provided for all proposed colors. Those unmuted X
colors proposed, typical of the Caribbean or other islands, or waterfront
environments, are inconsistent with established colors throughout the High
Ridge Road corridor, and should be replaced with muted earth tones to
increase compatibility with existing buildings and the natural characteristics
of the area (i.e. existence of scrub and other preserve areas, and mature trees
and other existing vegetation). Modify the proposed colors as follows and
provide color renderings to match.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS:
Comments:
47. None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Comments:
48. To be determined.
MWR/elj
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\High Ridge- New Urban Communities\NWSP 05-016\COAdoc
DEVELOPMV ORDER OF THE CITY COMMIS '?N OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA'
PROJECT NAME: New Urban High Ridge PUD
APPLICANT: Mr. Tim Hernandez with New Urban Communities
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 398 Northeast 6th Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33483
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION:
September 20, 2005
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: New site plan approval to construct 48 single-family detached homes
and 126 fee-simple townhomes on an 18.44-acre parcel in the PUD
Planned Unit Development zoning district.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Northwest corner of High Ridge Road and Miner Road (Exhibit "A")
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
X THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
S: IPlanninglSHAREDI WPIPROJECTSIHigh Ridge- New Urban CommunitieslNWSP 05-016\00 .doc
~
Meeting Minutes
Planning & Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
August 23,2005
Location:
The Klatt Family Limited Partnership and Klatt
Enterprises, Inc.
NE corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress
Avenue
Request for Conditional Use/New Site Plan
approval for two 5-story buildings with 206
condominium units on a 4.384-acre portion of the
106.5-acre Boynton Village and Town Center site.
Owner:
Description:
Chair Wische described the project, asking the applicant's position on the 44 staff conditions.
James Comparato, representing Anthony Comparato from WRI, LLC, 980 North
Federal Highway, Boynton Beach, stated the applicant reviewed the conditions and
agreed to all of them.
Ed Breese, Principal Planner, stated this was a Conditional Use due to the height associated
with the stair towers and elevator shafts that far exceeded the requirements of the height
setback envelope.
Chair Wische opened the floor to the publi~ and closed it when no one wished to speak.
Motion
Mr. Cwynar moved to approve the request for Conditional Use/New Site Plan approval for
Boynton Village Parcel 3 Condos for 2 five-story buildings with 206 condominium units on a
4.384-acre portion of the 106.5-acre Boynton Village and Town Center site, subject to all staff
conditions. Mr. Baldwin seconded the motion that passed 7-0.
G. New Site Plan
1.
Project:
High Ridge New Urban Communities
(NWSP 05-016)
TIm Hernandez, New Urban Communities
New Urban High Ridge, LLC, George Kechriotis
and Kosta Kechriotis
Northwest corner of High Ridge Road and
Miner Road
Request for new site plan approval in order to
construct 48 single-family homes and 126
townhouse units and related site improvements
on an 18.44-acre parcel in a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) zoning district.
Agent:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Assistant City Attorney To/ces swore in the latecomers.
Chair Wische described the project, and asked the applicant's position on the 46 staff
conditions.
12
"
Meeting Minutes
Planning &. Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
August 23, 2005
Mr. Casaine reiterated his understanding that the conditions would be handled in the same
manner for this project as the Boynton Town Center project heard previously.
Motion
Vice Chair Hay moved to approve the Boynton Village request for new site p, n approval in
order to construct a large scale, mixed-use project consisting of 80 dwelli g units, 14,541
square feet of restaurant, 10,000 square feet of office, and 135,641 square et of retail, all of
which proposed on a 20.33-acre parcel in the Suburban Mixed Use Zing District (SMU),
subject t all Staff Conditions of Approval with the modifications agr; ed to by staff. Mr.
Casaine se nded the motion that passed 7-0.
Description:
Boynton Village Pa
(COUS 05-07)
Anthony Com para I Kim Glas-Castro
The Klatt Family imited Partnership #1 and Klatt
Enterprises, Inc
NE corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress
Avenue
Request f; r Conditional Use/New Site Plan
approval for 4 five-story buildings with 376
condo . ium units on an 8.8l5-acre portion of
the 1 .5-acre Boynton Village and Town Center
le.
E.
1.
nditional Use New Site Plan
Chair Wische asked the applicant's position 0 th 47 staff conditions of approval.
James Comparato, representing An ony Co arato from WRI, LLC, 980 North
Federal Highway, Boynton Beach, ated the apph nt agreed to all of the conditions of
approval and thanked staff for its coo ration.
Mr. Breese commented on the eight setback envelope i the SMU district, saying the
applicant's project far exceeded e requirements in relationship single family residential.
Chair Wische opened the flo r to the public, and closed it when no 0
Motion
Mr. Casaine moved to prove request for Conditional Use/New Site Plan ap oval for Boynton
Village Parcels 4 & 5 ondos for 4 five-story buildings with 376 condominium nits on 8.815-
acre portion of 106.5-acre Boynton Village and Town Center site, subje to all staff
Conditions of Ap oval. Vice Chair Hay seconded the motion that passed 7-0.
F.
1.
Project:
Boynton Village Parcel 3 Condos
(COUS 05-008)
Anthony Comparato, Kim Glas-Castro
11
Agent:
Meeting Minutes
Planning & Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
August 23, 2005
Tim Hernandez and Jeff Costello of New Urban Communities, 398 N.E. 6th Avenue,
Delray Beach, 33483, offered to answer questions. Mr. Costello declared that the applicant
agreed with all Conditions of Approval, but wanted to discuss Condition #46 regarding the
color of the buildings.
Eric Johnson, Planner, displayed the building colors for the benefit of the board and the public.
He read Condition #46 for the record as follows: Color swatches are to be provided for all
proposed colors. Those unmated (corrected by Mr. Johnson to read unmuted) colors
proposed, typical of the Caribbean or other islands, or waterfront environments, are
inconsistent with established colors throughout the High Ridge Road Corridor, and should be
replaced with muted earth tones to increase compatibility with existing buildings and the
natural characteristics of the area (i.e. existence of scrub and other preserve areas, and
mature trees and other existing vegetation). Modify the proposed colors as follows and
provide color renderings to match.
Mr. Hernandez gave a PowerPoint presentation showing photographs of houses they had
erected in Jupiter using the same color scheme as proposed for this project. He acknowledged
the proposed colors were more colorful than staff wanted to see, but did not agree the colors
were inappropriate for the High Ridge/Miner Road area.
After a very lengthy discussion on this topic, the net result was that staff and the applicant
would work together to come to a mutually acceptable color scheme. The colors shown in the
artist's rendering were considerably darker and brighter than the colors shown in the
photographs of the homes in Jupiter. Most of the board members did not feel they could
approve the colors as shown in the rendering. Mr. Johnson opined that the heavy chroma
colors shown in the rendering would be inappropriate in the proposed setting. The applicant
noted that the color chips they presented more closely matched the colors shown in the
photographs of the homes in Jupiter. The applicant tried to be true to the Bermuda style of
architecture.' Staff expressed a desire to have the colors muted and used as accents and not
as the entire building color, as proposed. Some board members felt the colors were
acceptable as presented, and others preferred that they be more pastel or muted in
appearance. There was some feeling on the board that government should not dictate colors
to the commercial sector. l
.
Ms. Jasciewicz asked the price range of the homes in the proposed project. Mr. Hernandez
responded that they projected the single-family home prices to be $500K to $700K and the
town homes in the mid-$300K's to $400K.
Chair Wische opened the floor to the public.
Timothy Lamb, 1860 Tom-a-toe Road, stated the proposed colors might look all right in
downtown Delray Beach, but not on a horse pasture in the country. Also, the traffic was
already intense and would increase even more with this project. He referred to Mayor Taylor's
offer at a previous meeting to talk to the County about getting the timing changed on the light
at High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. This was still a problem and only ,he first five
cars can make the light.
13
.-
Meeting Minutes
Planning & Development Board
Boynton Beach, Florida
August 23, 2005
Jane Forrester, 7648 High Ridge Road, felt color was less a problem than the extra traffic
generated by this project.
Ron Vanderwey, 14 Redwood Court, had no problem with the project, but wanted to
know the long range plan on traffic. Mr. Cwynar responded that High Ridge was a County
road. Mr. Vandewey expressed concern that water would be diverted to this project and away
from his community in Cedar Ridge across the road. He thought a stop sign on Miner road
would be a good thing, but especially wanted to see a traffic-calming device in that area.
Tamara Pilosi, 109 Spruce Street, a resident of Cedar Ridge, was concerned about traffic.
She also felt that pastel colors would be more in keeping with the rural environment in which
the project would be built.
Chair Wische closed the floor to the public.
om Hernandez stated that High Ridge Road was now at service level "B" which meant it was
almost free-flowing traffic. According to the County's projections, when the entire area is
developed, it would never need more than two lanes and would never drop much below its
current level of service. A level of service of "D" is allowable in Palm Beach County before a
road is considered to be over capacity. He commented that the applicant and the City had
been working with County Commissioner Newell and the County Engineering Department to
time the signals to give people enough time to make turns onto Hypoluxo and Gateway. At the
request of the City and the expense of the developer, High Ridge Road will be three-Ianed
along the entire project frontage, which will allow the project to create turn lanes in and out
of their development, and this should help the free flow of traffic.
Laurinda Logan, Senior Engineer, pointed out the City is working cooperatively with people
from Quantum Park to improve both Gateway and High Ridge Road to increase the number of
turn lanes from southbound High Ridge Road to eastbound Gateway Boulevard to get to the
Interstate. This is in progress and will happen as the separate developments are constructed.
Ms. Jasciewicz asked for and received confirmation that the applicant would meet with staff to
discuss the color issues.
Motion
Mr. Casaine moved to approve the request for new site plan approval for High Ridge New
Urban Communities in order to construct 48 single-family homes and 126 town house units
and related site improvements on an 18.44-acre parcel in a Planned Urban Development
zoning district, subject to the comments made by staff and a specific notation that the color
scheme will be worked out between the petitioner and staff. Vice Chair Hay seconded the
motion that passed 6-0. (Mr. Saberson left the meeting at 8:35 p.m. just before the motion.)
H. Master Plan Modification
1.
Project:
Agent:
Fosters Mill (MPMD 05-010)
Bernard Malatesta, Vice President{Treasurer
Foster Mill Homeowner's Association, Inc.
N/A
Owner:
14
"
To the City Clerk - City Of Boynton Beach
AFFIDA VIT
RE: Property A~d!ess: 0,'
Project Name: rt\ ~ t\- q\....A.D G-€--
I/We, the undersigned do certify that to the best of my knowledge, the
attached ownership list, 400' radius map and mailing labels are a complete
and accurate representation of the real estate property and property
owners within at least 400 feet of the above-referenced subject property.
This reflects the most current records on file in the Palm Beach County
Property Appraiser's Office.
The notifications were postmarked a minimum of 10 days in advance of
the public hearing.
Site signs were posted on the premises 10 days in advance of the public
hearing in accordance with City Ordinance 04-007. Attached are
photographs of the signs showing their placement on the property.
No t\ l>Q,o lw~ ~ t:..UJ ~ €.NT 1'0 ~ tJ e.to aU) ~ EA'li ~ ~ LE.
"'*- (AS. '\ So ~b t\.l TTl\t. p\ll CY1\ffJ~.s te. f-C.Li ueAJ f-.Jo\\' <...e:.S
S. ~5. co ell .
mcerely,
rpplicant/ Agent
Notary Public, State of Florida
'...l....J'...........................H......
: SUE A. CUCE i
I tI ColMII_t'III i
I ~ ....121F12OOI:
I ~\6J~ IondId ltWU (800)432~54i
: ~ICf~.. Florida Notary Assn., Inc ,=
a... .... ... I" .......... ........ ......1 ... ...
Cc: Planning & Zoning Department
S:IPlanninglPlallnillg TelllplateslP&Z letters and lIlellloslAFFIDA VIT.doc
To the City Clerk - City Of Boynton Beach
AFFIDAVIT
rf I(,./..f ~ r[)b6 jJ~Ut:L 0 f'1'/lt;f'J ( ,
RE: Property A~dress: ~ { C 1L n r tV Of<. R () It JJ j
Project Name: H T. (;. Ii R..L D lJ CT
Ai hJ Ie..
I/We, the undersigned do certify that to the best of my knowledge, the
attached ownership list, 400' radius map and mailing labels are a complete
and accurate representation of the real estate property and property
owners within at least 400 feet of the above-referenced subject property.
This reflects the most current records on file in the Palm Beach County
Property Appraiser's Office.
The notifications were postmarked a minimum of 1 0 days in advance of
the public hearing.
Site signs were posted on the premises 10 days in advance of the public
hearing in accordance with City Ordinance 04-007. Attached are
photographs of the signs showing their placement on the property.
Sincerely,
.....::rnu'.... SA~iril:l,,, ,l" LONGO I;
r~'J::'i:..\ MY COMMIS810~1 '! fjD ~4180S
~'~k:f J:i\PIPES June 10, 2009
"~jff;:n3.'" Bnnd~d Tr. :J NC,I~l"; '.)I,b:l;' I i"lrler\vri-,-.
Cc: Planning & Zoning Department
S:IPlanninglPlanning TemplateslP&Z letters and memoslAFFIDA VIT.doc
j......""\. 1(' ~ "'I~ -~-"--
, I I' I' II
; 11) I, i' I'
: U r~-'-'.-
:'(.
L,__,.. .
!'rr',\
',","""
:t
~
~~
~~
Ale:.
~c-
~"
~
--- -------- ----------
-- - --------- - --- --- --
-----------------------~-~--
~
t-\
~~
~i'l
Nf~
'tJ"
\\~
, '\ Cl\
~
~
\ ~
OJ
'1
~
~ ,-
.. ,. ,: :J
~ ~- ~~,~
'~l.
~ i"
"\ ( ,f
Ll
)2
...~
~n
1_~
!-~
i'~
.l:
~~
,...
c:.
(1\
"'t
.~~
~:
~
~~
~ :~
:::>-
l\j
'--.....
\:J
V'(
::t:
f-\
~t
~j14)
,'-'
O~
~~
~
~
:
I
~
"
..
" ~
, , ~ ~
~ :
, -l
I
Johnson. Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Gabrielle Ortner [gortner@newurbancommunities.com]
Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:35 AM
'Johnson, Eric'
'Coale, Sherie'
RE: Public Noticing requirements
Sherie sent the Hearing Notice and we mailed it yesterday. I am mailing it
today to the new 3 owners I mentioned.
Jim Knight should be posting the signs tomorrow, per my conversation with
him this morning.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric [mailto:JohnsonE@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:37 AM
To: 'gortner@newurbancommunities.com'
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: RE: Public Noticing requirements
Excellent. Yes, please send them to the 3 new owners and everyone else that
is on your list. The public noticing that was conducted during the
annexation and rezoning process is not covered under the public noticing
required by this request for new site plan approval. Please coordinate with
Sherie if you haven't already. Thanks, Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabrielle Ortner [mailto:gortner@newurbancommunities.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:02 AM
To: 'Johnson, Eric'
Cc: 'Coale, Sherie'
Subject: RE: Public Noticing requirements
I check every owner and there have been only 3 sales. I will send the
notices to the new 3 owners.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric [mailto:JohnsonE@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:04 AM
To: 'gortner@newurbancommunities.com'
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: RE: Public Noticing requirements
I assume the first time around was when you went through the Land Use
Amendment / Rezoning. You must understand that the subject request for site
plan approval is totally separate from the previous request for rezoning.
This is why my comments sometimes ask for the same things (i.e. traffic
statement). This public noticing is a city requirement, the previous was a
state requirement. The previous information may be used such as long as it
is current and accurate (i.e. the list of property owners are current) .
You'll have to confirm this information before you submit your affidavit.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabrielle Ortner [mailto:gortner@newurbancommunities.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:52 AM
To: 'Johnson, Eric'
Cc: 'Coale, Sherie'; jcostello@newurbancommunities.com; Jkncalco@aol.com
Subject: RE: Public Noticing requirements
Eric,
Am I missing something? We already submitted the map, list etc... the first
time around. We did two sets, as requested, we mailed out the first set and
1
this is the second set. That was my understanding.
I am not sure about Jim being able to do this before the weekend. I think he
was planning on doing it this weekend, 10 days prior to the 23rd.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric [mailto:JohnsonE@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:55 AM
To: 'gortner@newurbancommunities.com'; Johnson, Eric
Cc: Coale, Sherie; jcostello@newurbancommunities.com; Jkncalco@aol.com
Subject: RE: Public Noticing requirements
You mean to tell me that Jim Knight is working on this? Oh no; what are we
going to do?
Just kidding. Excellent. I'm glad that everything seems to be working out.
I would suggest that Jim do the sign thing sooner rather than later. I'm
working on the staff report today and I would like to have the affidavit
(with all the back up material) in the office by tomorrow so that I can
indicate in the staff report that you've complied with Ordinance 04-007.
Remember, you'll have to submit the affidavit, pix, map, list of property
owners, etc. to the City Clerk's office. They'll forward the info to us.
Thanks and have a nice vacation.
Eric Johnson
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabrielle Ortner [mailto:gortner@newurbancommunities.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:37 AM
To: 'Johnson, Eric'
Cc: 'Coale, Sherie'; jcostello@newurbancommunities.com; Jkncalco@aol.com
Subject: RE: Public Noticing requirements
We are on track, the notices were mailed out yesterday. The signs should be
installed this weekend. Jim Knight has graciously offered to handle the
signs for us since he is a Pro at this. I know you need pictures and an
affidavit to be delivered to you. I am waiting for Jim to call me back on
this.
I will be on vacation next week.
Gabrielle
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric [mailto:JohnsonE@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:39 AM
To: 'Gabrielle Ortner'
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: Public Noticing requirements
Gabrielle,
Good morning. As you know, the New Urban High Ridge project is all set for
August 23, 2005 Planning & Development Board meeting. As such, neighboring
property owners within a 400-foot radius will need notification per
Ordinance 04-007. The code requires 10 days notification prior to the
hearing. The responsibility of noticing is the applicant's. As a courtesy,
we can provide you with basic information, but nonetheless, the applicant is
required to comply with the ordinance.
How are you coming along with the noticing? Have you gone to the property
appraisers office? Have you gone to a sign company? Please say yes. If
you have any questions, you may contact Sherie Coale at 561-742-6260 and she
can help you.
Not trying to be nitpicky, just want to make sure your project goes
smoothly, that's all. Take care,
2
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Gabrielle Ortner [gortner@newurbancommunities,com]
Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:05 AM
'Johnson, Eric'
RE: Name
We now own 100% of the property we closed On August 1, 2005.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric [mailto:JohnsonE@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:06 AM
To: 'gortner@newurbancommunities.com'
Subject: RE: Name
I hope so, otherwise I'll be offending someone. He's listed as a property
owner. Please confirm. Thanks,
Eric Johnson
-----Original Message-----
From: Gabrielle Ortner [mailto:gortner@newurbancommunities.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:54 AM
To: 'Johnson, Eric'
Subject: RE: Name
I believe it is a "He".
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric [mailto:JohnsonE@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:59 AM
To: 'gortner@newurbancommunities.com'
Subject: Name
Is Kosta Kechriotis a name for a man or a woman? I want to indicate gender
in the staff report. Thanks,
Eric Johnson, AICP
Planner
City of Boynton Beach
1