The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS ENGINEERING DIVISION .5M~ () J11 0-& /~ ~G'V/tJ l' uti ''R-. TO: TART MEMBERS: (Hand delivered) C. Ed Breese, Senior Planner / Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist John Huntington, Sergeant, Police Department H. David Kelley Jr., City Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Plans Reviewer Timothy K. Large, Building Code Administrator Lourinda Logan, Senior Engineer (including stormwater management plan). Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Date: September 13, 2005 FROM: Ken Hall, Engineering Plans AnalYStllnSpecto@ RE: Plat Review - Knollwood PUD Here is your copies of the plat, survey and construction plans for the subject development. Please send me your comments (or lack thereof) by September 28. As always, we appreciate your timely response. c: Jeffrey Livergood. Public Works Director. (memo only) DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-194 TO: Ken Hall Engineering Technician Michael W. Rumpfi' 0 V' Planning and Zoning Director Ed Breese ~ Principal Planner THROUGH: FROM: DATE: September 28, 2005 SUBJECT: Knollwood PUD - Plat Comments I have reviewed the above referenced plat and have the following comment: 1. Plat (Sheet 4) - Remove the roadway terminus between Lots 30 & 31 to avoid encroachment into the 10 foot Landscape Buffer Easement (L.B.E.) along the east plat line against Nautica PUD, consistent with the approved site plan. 2. Plat (Sheet 4) - Remove the roadway terminus between Lots 42 & 43 to avoid encroachment into the 10 foot Landscape Buffer Easement (L.B.E.) along the south plat line against Sunup Grove Subdivision, consistent with the approved site plan. 3. The existing 20 foot ingress/egress easement between Lots 33 & 34 of Sunup Grove Subdivision that provided access to the five (5) acre tract that was added to Knollwood Groves to create the Knollwood PUD, would now terminate at the rear of Lot 38 of the Knollwood PUD Plat. Is there some mechanism to abandon this easement? 4. Condition of Approval (COA) # 40 for the Knollwood PUD requires conversion of the landscape "easements" to "tracts" to ensure appropriate maintenance by the HOA. On Sheet 1 of the Plat, Item 10 listed under "Description, Dedication and Reservation", there is language discussing HOA responsibility with regard to this issue. Is this sufficient? ~ Development Department Memorandum To: Ken Hall Engineering Technician \<~* From: Kevin John Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subj ect: Knollwood PUD-Plat comments Lake Management Plan (Upland and Littoral plantings) Incorporation into HOA documents Date: October 11, 2005 Tracts L-l and L-2 Narrative comment #2 The applicant should provide a copy of the Lake Maintenance Plan document. This document should be referenced in the HOA documents in the section pertaining to proper maintenance of the lake. This document is referenced in the plat narrative in the tract pertaining to maintenance ofthe lake. xc: Kjh G file / Eng. xc: kjh 7.E.l KNOLL WOOD II (NWSP 05-017) NEW SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-110 STAFF REPORT FROM: Chair and Members Planning and Development Board and Mayor and City Commission Eric Lee Johnson, AICP y Y Planner 1J Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning TO: THROUGH: DATE: June 23, 2005 PROJECT NAME / NUMBER: Knollwood PUD / NWSP 05-017 REQUEST: New site plan approval to construct 148 single-family homes on a 36.17- acre parcel in the PUD Planned Unit Development zoning district PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: Multiple owners Applicant! Agent: DRHI, Inc. / Julian Bryan & Associates, Inc. Location: Southwest corner of the intersection of Lawrence Road and the LWDD L-20 Canal (Approximately 1 mile south of Hypoluxo Road) (Exhibit "A'') Parcel Size: 36.17 acres Existing Land Use: Low Density Residential (LDR) Existing Zoning: PUD Planned Unit Development Proposed Use: 148 single-family homes Adjacent Uses: North: Right-of-way of the LWDD L-20 Canal then single family residential development (Lawrence Oaks) designated Low Density Residential and zoned PUD Planned Unit Development; South: To the southwest, developed residential property lying in unincorporated Palm Beach County designated LR-3 (3 du/ac with PUD zoning) and zoned AR Agricultural Residential. To the southeast, developed single family residential (Nautica) designated Low Density Residential and zoned PUD Planned Unit Development; Staff Report - Knollwood PUD (NWSP 05-017) Memorandum No PZ 05-110 Page 2 East: Right-of-way of Lawrence Road then single family residential development (Citrus Glen) designated Low Density Residential and zoned PUD Planned Unit Development; and West: To the northwest, vacant land in unincorporated Palm Beach County designated MR-5 Single Family Residential (5 dujac) and zoned AR- Agricultural Residential. To the southwest, single family residential development (Sunset Cay) also located in unincorporated Palm Beach County, designated RTU Residential Transitional Urban district. BACKGROUND Site Characteristic: According to the survey, the subject property is comprised of two (2) lots and is the site of the Knollwood Groves orange grove. The parcel contains several buildings and respective parking areas. Currently, Miner Road terminates at Lawrence Road; however, the County's Long-Range Transportation Improvement Plan calls for a right-of-way of 110 feet along the north boundary of the subject property. In deference to that plan, the developers have set aside a 110-foot wide strip of property along the north boundary of the parcel. The survey shows a large pond is located at the northeast corner of the property. The highest elevation is 18.4 feet above sea level, located at the center of the property. A four (4)-foot tall chain link fence runs along the east property line. Proposal: Mr. Julian Bryan, agent for the property owners, proposes to develop the subject property with 148 (Zero Lot Line) single-family dwelling units on 36.17 acres. A large portion of the property (+j- 30 acres) had already been approved for Low Density Residential (LDR) land use and PUD Planned Unit Development zoning. The developer is proposing to annex (ANEX 05-002) an additional 5 acres of land and rezone (LUAR 05-006) it to PUD to accommodate additional units. Single- family homes are permitted uses in the PUD zoning district. The maximum density allowed by the Low Density Residential (LDR) land use classification is 4.84 dujac, which would provide the developer a maximum of 175 units. The project would be built in one (1) phase. ANALYSIS Concurrency: Traffic: A traffic impact analysis was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. On April 12, 2005, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the proposed residential development meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, upon provision of an exclusive left-turn northbound lane on Lawrence Road. The County approved the site for 146 units but the site plan proposes 148 units. Therefore, no building permits would be issued until the applicant submits a revised analysis and the County reviews and approves the additional two (2) units (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Utilities: The City/s water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million Staff Report - Knollwood PUD (NWSP 05-017) Memorandum No PZ 05-110 Page 3 gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water needs for this project. Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required for the project, dependent upon the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve this project, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site plan. Police/Fire: Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: The School District of Palm Beach County must approve the project for school concurrency prior to the issuance of any building permits (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Driveways: The plans show that one (1) point of ingress I egress is proposed at the southeast corner of the property, connecting with Lawrence Road. The County is requiring a deceleration lane on southbound Lawrence Road. The entrance lane into the development would be 22 feet in width. The exit lane would be 15 feet in width and they would be separated by a 10-foot wide landscaped median. The exit lane would only allow for right-turn only traffic movements onto Lawrence Road. According to the Typical Road Section shown on sheet 2 of 4, the private rights-of- way, internal to the development would be 40 feet in width. Each side (or half) of this right-of-way would consist of 11 feet of asphalt, two (2) feet of valley gutter (for drainage purposes), a three (3)-foot wide swale (grassy area), and a four (4)- foot wide pedestrian sidewalk. The plans proposed a gated entrance. Further details of the gate would be required at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The plans show a 20-foot wide stabilized emergency access point is also proposed along Lawrence Road. This access point would be used for emergency purposes only, and only if the main entrance is obstructed. Parking Facility: Two, three, four, and five bedroom dwelling units require two (2) parking spaces per unit. The project proposes 148 residential units and therefore, would require 296 parking spaces. Each unit would have a two (2)-car garage. According to the floor plan (sheet A-l), the garages would be dimensioned a minimum 19 feet in width by 19 feet in depth, large enough to accommodate two (2) vehicles. This provision equals the required parking. Also, the "Typical Lot Detail" (sheet 1 of 1) indicates that the driveways in front of each unit would also accommodate two (2) parked cars. The detail shows the driveways would be dimensioned 18 feet in width by 22.5 feet in depth. The plan would provide a total of 612 parking spaces. Staff Report - Knollwood PUD (NWSP 05-017) Memorandum No PZ 05-110 Page 4 Landscaping: Nearly two (2) acres of the subject property would be set aside for buffer and open spaces. The landscape data on sheet 7 of 10 indicates that the project would have a total of 1,234 trees and 15,360 shrubs I groundcover. Over 50% or 8,056 of the 15,360 shrubs I groundcover would be native. The landscape plan indicates that 62% or 767 of the trees would be native (see Exhibit"C" - Conditions of Approval). A total of 60 existing trees would be relocated elsewhere on-site. They include the following species: Gumbo Limbo, Sausage Tree, Live Oak, Laurel Oak, African Trumpet tree, and Cabbage palm trees. The plans proposed landscape buffers around the entire development. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from landscape "easements" to "tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The east (front) landscape buffer along Lawrence Road would be 30 feet in width. A decorative wall is proposed within the center of this landscape buffer. It would be comprised of three (3) different parts, namely, a concrete-block-steel portion, a decorative stone finish portion, and a black picket fence portion. An assortment of trees and shrubs are proposed along both sides of the wall. They include the following: Ligustrum Tree, Live Oak, Royal palm, Bismark palm, Cabbage palm, Dwarf Yaupon Holly, Snow Bush, Redtip Cocoplum, Dwarf Podocarpus, Crinum Lily, and annuals. The north (side) landscape buffer proposed along the 110-foot set aside for the planned Miner Road extension would be 20 feet in width. The landscape plan (sheets 2, 3 of 10) shows a chain link fence and a row of Redtip Cocoplum are proposed along the northern edge of this buffer. The species of trees would include the following: Sweet Mahogany, Dahoon Holly, Cabbage palm, Gumbo Limbo, and Live Oak. Staff recommends that where possible, the shade tree spacing shall be no more than one (1) tree per 25 lineal feet. The area set aside for the Miner Road extension would be sodded and irrigated until the time the County makes the necessary improvements (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The west (rear) and south (side) landscape buffers would be 10 feet in width. A row of trees is proposed within these buffers. They include the following: Gumbo Limbo, Sweet Mahogany, and Cabbage palm. Likewise, a row of Redtip Cocoplum is proposed along the west and south property lines. To provide immediate buffering, staff recommends that these perimeter landscaped buffers utilize taller, more mature canopy trees behind all two story models, to soften the height against abutting single story residences. For example, the trees should be installed at 16 feet in height where two (2) story buildings are constructed (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The City's PUD regulations require that "peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone". The southwest edge of the subject project abuts an existing, older residential neighborhood built under the County's AR zoning district regulations. These existing properties are larger than the proposed yards, with rear yard setbacks that vary between approximately 26 feet to 40 feet (estimated). Therefore, increased Staff Report - Knollwood PUD (NWSP 05-017) Memorandum No PZ 05-110 Page 5 compatibility with the adjacent properties (where abutting AR zoning district) is required. This can be accomplished by either increasing the building setbacks of the abutting lots (Lots 31 through 42), increase the size of the buffer width (from 20 feet to 25 feet), and I or significantly increase the plant material proposed within the 10-foot wide landscape buffer (i.e. variety of canopy trees spaced no greater than 20 feet apart combined with lower vegetation to buffer heights from (four) 4 feet to six (6) feet (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Varying planting schemes are proposed and the scheme is dependent upon the style of the house proposed on each lot. The Typical Unit Landscape Plan (sheet 8 of 10) indicates that each unit would have a Live Oak planted within the front yard. A row of Viburnum hedges would screen the air conditioner units, which are proposed along the sides of the houses. The Landscape Quantities Table indicates the following species: Live Oak, Queen palm, Alexander palm, Pygmy Date palm, Florida Royal palm, Montgomery palm, Foxtail palm, Silver Buttonwood, Redtip Cocoplum, Red Crinum Lily, Japanese Fern, Pink Ixora Jatropha, and Ligustrum. Building and Site: As previously mentioned, the maximum density allowed by the Low Density Residential (LDR) land use classification is 4.84 dwelling units per acre, which translates to a maximum of 175 units. The site plan proposes a total of 148 zero- lot line units. The site plan tabular data (sheet 1 of 4) indicates that the lots would account for 49% of the entire property. The private roads would account for 14% of the site. Nearly five and one-half (5112) acres are set aside for potential future right-of-way purposes. The development's recreation area would account for 2% of the site. This 0.75-acre recreation area would accommodate swimming pool, a 1,797 square foot cabana I veranda facility, and a tot-lot. Two (2) large lake I water management tracts are proposed, in part, for storm water retention areas. These tracts would account for 14% or 4.93 acres of the entire site. The Typical Lot Details indicate that the proposed lots would be 45 feet in width. The interior lots would be 105 feet deep and perimeter lots would be 115 feet deep. The proposed building setbacks are as follows: Front - 22.5 feet minimum, 25 feet maximum, Side - 10 feet and zero (0) feet on the other side. The rear building setback would be 10 feet for interior lots and 20 feet for lots proposed along the perimeter. The proposed building setbacks are consistent and comparable with the building setbacks in the adjacent Planned Unit Development (PUD) residential communities. The Typical Lot Details illustrate the proposed placement of the house within each respective lot. The applicant informed staff that the "building envelope" as illustrated on the detail would not represent the walls of each home. Rather, the "building envelope" only depicts each lot's minimum setback requirements. Therefore, the proposed houses, which would be smaller than the "building envelope", would be placed further away from the property lines, such as long as its placement would meet all other minimum setbacks. For the perimeter lots, the detail shows that the 20-foot wide rear building setback would consist of a 10-foot wide landscape easement (where the buffer trees are proposed). Staff Report - Knollwood PUD (NWSP 05-017) Memorandum No PZ 05-110 Page 6 The applicant is requesting provisions for swimming pools and screened-roof enclosures within the rear yard. No solid-roof enclosures are proposed outside the building envelope. Staff has no objection the allowance of pools and screened rooms provided that the landscape buffer would remain intact. Staff would object to solid-roof screened enclosures that encroach into the minimum rear setback. Staff recommends that the height of the screen enclosures be limited to the mean height of the house on which the structure is proposed (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The elevations show that the mean height of the two (2) story homes would be 25 feet - seven (7) inches tall and the peak of the roof would be 29 feet - two (2) inches tall. The maximum height in all residential zoning districts except R-3 Multi-family Residential is 30 feet. On interior lots, screened enclosures would have a five (5) foot rear setback and swimming pools would have a seven (7) foot rear setback. On perimeter lots, screened-enclosures would have the same rear setbacks (from each individual rear lot line) but would be further separated from the perimeter (of the entire PUD) by a 10-foot wide landscape buffer. Design: The City has reviewed and approved many different residential projects over the past several years (i.e. Anderson PUD, Serrano PUD, The Harbors, Villas at Quantum Lakes, Arbolata, Jefferson at Boynton Beach, Kensington Place). With the exception of Anderson and Serrano, most of the newer projects have been townhouse developments. Associated with the proposed type of single-family residential development are a wide variety of possible building designs (i.e. contemporary, traditional, Spanish-Mediterranean, etc.). This project would be considered as more of a mixture of "contemporary and Mediterranean" architectural style, similar to many zero-lot line communities throughout South Florida. The homes would be either one (1) or two (2) stories tall. The proposed roofing material would be Spanish S-tile roof. The elevations show that the exterior finish of the walls would be textured stucco. The applicant is proposing a variety of colors schemes. The colors are as follows: Scheme Body Color Trim Color Front Door Color 1 Restorative CW025W Spicenut 8755A Winestain 8386N lR Spicenut 8755N Restorative CW025W Winestain 8386N 2 Tequilla 8672W Wood let 8685D Mansard Stone 8635D 2R Wooldet 8685D Tequilla 8672W Mansard Stone 8635D 3 Stucco Greige 8693M Floral White CW033W Black Metal 8796N 3R Floral White CW033W Stucco Greige 8693M Black Metal 8796N 4 Desert Tumbleweed Moose Paint 8715D Wayfarer Grey 8535D 8723M 4R Moose Paint 8715D Desert Tumbleweed Wayfarer Grey 8535D 8723M 5 Desert Fawn 8222W Beaver Creek 8765D Dark Colossus 8526A 5R Beaver Creek 8765D Desert Fawn 8222W Dark Colossus 8526A 6 Saltbush 8183M Weaverbird 7760W Manganese 8826N 6R Weaverbird 7760W Saltbush 8183M Manganese 8826N Staff Report - Knollwood PUD (NWSP 05-017) Memorandum No PZ 05-110 Page 7 The project proposes a variety of house style types, ranging from three (3) to five (5) bedrooms with air-conditioned living areas ranging from 1,952 square feet to 3,054 square feet. Staff has no objections to the proposed building colors, architectural style, or roof types. Signage: Project development signs are proposed on each side of the main entrance. The ledger-sized page of the sign shows that it would be 20.25 square feet in area and multi-colored. Its colors would be consistent with the building colors proposed throughout the community. The sign face would be placed in between two (2) decorative columns on the C.B.S. wall proposed within the front (east) landscape buffer. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval and recommends approval, contingent upon the approval of the corresponding petitions for annexation (ANEX 05-002) and rezoning to PUD (LUAR 05- 006), and also subject to satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Knollwood Groves PUD\NWSP 05-017\Staff Report.doc ""',. '., ," ,...-c.t',.-.... ~ ~ "'~..- .,' ." .",...." ..N.:,~....; '. ~ =.., ,..~.!,..".._.. ,.. .,.;o,_.~...~=.."':...r,-,~....,.'-..e.- ...~_,"" .~,!'''7'' ~. 9'~ "~ Knollwood Grovect PUD Exhibit A n, -..L.W.Y ~ J= ... - ..., ..., ~~ 5 - ::J~ I- r --'I~__r-).( ~~ < ~ ~ ~ H ~ /111111 III It! ~ "\ /"'-. " co .M~I 1'-'...... t-"\. I 'I 'I . Z -""Ll i- ~ ~ ~ '.- IH_TaII .00UI&A --- A II 11111111 ~ r== - - ,:: L =1 ~ -:j ~ "'\..l l ~~~I~ TH A ~ .m I I -"ig m ~~ L~1 _, ~.~ "~~ ~ rrrn ~u ~q yo Ir- '-' ~ ~ .Im..... . I U-~ t-.. t- OTH II 11--1 II LjJ JE:!:4I. /Il Till II~R II 111111 7 KDlaKILL ~D "" -=, .....,.,.;,l~ + AA08 M'fIUCUlIC ....-.- .-.-.-.-. ~~- 1=1= ~.... ~ t:::~ ...& 1 - Jn~ ~tIt In )'f~! ..., 7 ~ \..... R I ~ llij = II I /1111111: II IUN TOP ~ ..... 11..1..1. I I 'f ~ '" Ie: :-'= - _n.. ......... .....: "'8'" , "'" ,II/lIT -S 1= II JIl{' I I I I 1/ 1 "lIl 1,100 650 o 1,100 Feet --.......- . .....&_........,...---...._....._......._....-.........~_.._-_.................. --....1.. ...... .....-......_____.0#_........ ............... ).. aull TIUI& IUN f I II N A --.. 41 40 39 Ul 38 C Z C 37 -u Co 36 Z::o ::00 35 "'< 8'" 34 ::oUl Oc 33 "'co ~o 32 :::; Ul 31 0 30 Z 29 EXHIBIT B SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) z ~ -z- ~ o \.fl ~ '-J lOo ()l 0"- ()l (J t'l \.fl ~ (Jl c.ii ~~ ~1O N 0- eN c;j -z-:>> -z- --t:::: ..->% <: vi-:=:'" <: I:>> ~~ I K-:::: ~K- f'Tl '-J -" '-J -" -" NOOO 34'2S"E 28 332.99' )>-4- -40? -i-l&; II - Ui"'I -U",S O)>C Z~Ul -4 -UZ " )>r::: -IZ '" o Z '" tf) (Xl -"to ~ 0 O()l !'JtO (J)- '-Jt.N -.j::. - -, II I ;3 II fi II -4 I :iE c:i II II II ~I TRACT "8" UNPLATTED OOOTOS"W 961.74' 628.00' "0-8" 101 II 100 ~ II 99 ! ~ 1198 i 111 97 : ~II 96 _;:: I 111 95 ~~ ~ : III 94 ~::o ~:1 III 93 ~b ~ ~ III 92 ~ ~ ~q 11191 ~~ ~~ 11190 ~~ ~ r1 III 89 ~ .j>. ,. I 88 q "I 87 . III N () II 86 ~ ~ 11185 :--J)> II' ~ '1 III , III : enlll 81 I ~1I1 80 : :;;:11-7-9 I :vII 78 : :11: 77 r ~II 76 , 0 I i :r.1I1 75 , ~1'174 II 73 11172 11171 11170 ,,169 11.68 II 67 1166 jl165 ~1164 ~1163 91162 111 TRACT "R-l" ACT "P 3" ~-z- O~ ..--\- --- :>> -z- 0% -z- ~ "->:>>..-7 ~t'\ K- 0':::: ~K- ~ ~-z- (J-':::::" .-\ t'l..-7 O~ -z-~ :>> ~~ I K-"-> 0'- IK- K- ~ Z , z '" Ul '" o -I o Z GJ , .j>. [Jl .j>. tv 40' .j::. o E.LiNE SECTION "13-45"-42 502003'29"W lAWRrnC~ROAD- -- JOB NO. 04174 c::o ., "'::;; "'1J""1J""TI-O"""U-OO$:rr . 0. . . . . o. . Vi- CDmOO::OZl/)CD ~ ;> OCDCD ';J C:::lJQ:I-o-o-o-o-o-oos::::rr -I.......... :::0)>)>100110-- -C1S::::00il>--IlZ0n rIl>"TlfTl$:--1ZZ-CfTlfT1 ---l-ofTl -l-lOS:::ZZ ----l1""TIf./) corn -[Tllf)(/) -<Orr1(/1 fTlOOOl>ZfTTrrl 11::0- :1>011",-100 fTll 0 ();::": l>::E Z :r: ()co::o ViCD lIi)>)> QrTlfTl CC fTl-< r () s::::c>o ::Olf) ;:: 0 ;::-0 <- fT1 l/) C fTlZ::O rrlZ Z C Z zzo -<ro1 --I ::0 --I n-Vl 0(1) < -< f'TlZ ::O(j) '" ;::C>CD -< ::0 fT1 0 o fTl Z 0 :::0 n -I ^ o ::0 o Vl E. L1NES(C"TION" 12-45:42 -" Proj ect Nome. KNOLL WOOD OVERALL PROPERTY JSH JS SCALE. 1"-400' DATE. 4/05/2005 no )> ~~ OJ . ;> OJ :::0 m < )> -i o noZ ~~ en zn "'::0 ::OfTl -4 '" SHEET 2 OF 2 g~ ~~~ m ~~~~~ i ~~~j ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~!~ ~ ~II~ ~ Ii ~! I ~h~ ~ ~~i~ rn L o !!I ~~~~ ill~~';; (") 8i ~fll ~~j~ ~..~~ ~ i~ Sill io~j ~~~ -i ;~ ~~ - ~~iz ~flll 0 ~i bo ~~~ ~~ z ~~ ~.~ !l j ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ E~~! s~si fll!lb 5~. - ~o ..~ ~~ m8 ~b~ ~b~ ~= ~~ ~~i~ ~~~ ~ S~ gO m gzj z ~~ ~~~ ~M "''l ~ ~ ~~ % - ~~ nn~ ~~ ~~~~. b ~ " ~ q .. .; ~~ ~ n ~ Z .. t "t..,... "l;;: ~t , I ~ ~ '4 ~ liS ~i .... ""..... 0" ~ '"' ~ ~ ~ ;::~ ~ il "~ ~~ ~~ ~i ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~I<: ~~ 1Ii~ ~~ r>j;;l ~~ Rl~ i~ ~g ~ ~~ 1Ii~ c~ ~~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~rll ~~ ~.. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~il ~~ ~: ~~ !ii! ~ -II: ii:.... ~,~ e M ~ ~~ S ~~ ; ~~ r: ~ ~ ~ \1 ~ ~ ~ I II ,p ~ ~~I ~~ ~ ~I ~~ I ~, ~q <l' ~ ~~ ~~ S~ S ~' ...... 0 ~ ~. ; ~! :.:~ ." ii' . ~ EXHIBIT B ac!:B>~~:IIb!!! ~~!6?;t"T1~~~nl Pi~!l!~~~ m~i;lOn~~ U" ~ ~ ~i'i!Jl ~U~q~1 Ii 0 !l! . .. ~ g ~ g .. ~ ~ .. ~ .m ~ - ~ !:1 ~ J! !:1::i " ~i~~~~i@~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ :"II>>> ~~~ 'IIQ~ "'0" ij10m c: II. =J " '" " 3~ lJlill~:' ~;;;~~ ~m!l!_:S 2i: " l! ~; "" i ~ o S o .. iii " '" ~ .... :JI o:u tlLu~P is~il~ ~~~_il ::ti: " l! ;~ ~~ ~j ~n~~ ~~~~n ~ ~ 2l1~ ,,~ :!;" mO r <z_C 6m:tm" z 'l! ~ Ii ~ ::l~ ~~ ~~ :Ii ~~~"a~ Q r- I!l 2J (;) ~E ~! g51 ~~~ g~1;~m i 15 0 0 a~ ~: ~g ~j!!m ill~~~"~ ~ ;;j ~ ~m ~% 3m 0: mz~ g:S i g m ~ "6 3~ 1aiil ~f~ ~~5;!~!i1 !!l !!l ~~ fR~ ii ~~m oljOm"n ~ i ~ :S ~ ~~6 ~~;!;!;8 ill z z lilm ~ gz-g ii m-8 5>:~:U" CO) Q :u ~8z iil5m~ ~ ~ ~~ 8~" "~~~~ :if Jit i~ o!~ Q8:::1 (') ~ 51! ~ ~ ~ ,.. :"'" ~ pi ~ i'; o c em ~~~ Q.!!:!i~!D ... l!S E ti t 8 f: 01 8 ~ :u ~ ~ ~~ >m~ ~~~~. i ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ l; ~ ~ ~ Dl nt iit 0 ~~"' G ~ a m ~ ~ i~ ~.~ ~~~~ ~ N~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~8! ~~ m () gO ?iffi ~ ~~m m ~ ~~ ::10 i ~"" s ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~J~jj~ ~ Q J B A Julian Bryan & Associates u<t>_n d_.'"n .._ "'_nnln.. ..-zon'n.. "~,,.._ _n_'"",_ m_""_< "-_.'blll", "o_~~_n_' ..~~_In" MASTER PLAN I SITE PLAN fTTT111ITiiiI BOYNTONBEACH,FLORIDA KNOLLWOOD GROVES P.U.D. D.R HORTON HOME ~ - . . --' ,...,...;;,'f" a ~! en ~s ~~ ~ z nt ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ E )> li ,..-I ~ )> ~ ~~ U o 0 ~ ~ ji!llzz 21 M ~ Q N ~ !i1 ~ ~o~c ~ ~ ,. ~ '" l~: ~ ii J ~6~i!ij;l~~!Si o:U-=a~8:~~ ~ !II j:D r-z E r; : () C'l ~~l5 ~ ~ g g!:"TI fit liB~~ < S~~ _gt ~~~ ~ "os ~ ;1 r- ~~ ~ ~ ~l:l ~ ~ ~. " s:~ 11 ~~ ~ ~~ z ~~ ~: ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~~, ~. ~ t!l ~ z ~~~ aJ"'F ~ .. ~ ~ pl II I~ !!li!I!!i i ~ I i~ ;llulm~i ~ ! ~ ~ Qe ~Q'Q~~i~~ I ~ 0 I, ;~ 111111;11 i ; ~ ~ ~~~~15j~i i I i Ilhll!l . ! ~ Id~U~iii i ~ I~ud~ i i Jdl~M I I ~~Idin II~nl~ iB" iB" .~~~: ROAD , -- '''''"'''',: \ ~;, j I: ~ i' II! Ii -I; Iii !; :j EXHIBIT B ~ o r, ,OJ: I." .'1 ~ :J ;,c" I I ___________J CIVTe SITE ,: ',I. n ;':: ,;: ~11 -J r;, .:1; o ~ ~n ~~~~ ,:.~~~ ~~l~ ~ ~ > n I ,..;, Ii ; ~; 'Ii "I' .:.'~! " :~ t j; ;:;~;( , , ~ << ~ ""l@' :;I 0.<'(/$~~ .: ~h'Y.X. ~ ;;: !!I ),)f~>i(h:0 a ~~~~'\'7~ :!j ~ .. ell !;; l~:~ . ~ J B A Julian Bry-an & Associates urban d__lgn _tte planning .--zoning property _n_I~I_ rn_rtc-t; .......lblll'ty go....--rnrn_nt.l proce.aalnQ I>) ;h.:~ 0 ~~. A "T1 ~,., .j>. SITE PLAN BOYNTON BEACH FlORJDA KNOLLWOOD GROVES P.U.D. O.R HORTON HOME Ii ~ I I ~ i I . gg l!Il 4 I ~ ~ ~. 4 I ~ @ J \ \ 011 P Il.. t @Il.. 't ~ , , I I I ' I II~ ~ ~ :1 ;U ~ ttt ~ ~ ,!I@ 'Il.. liP ~ ~ I sllll ~ I II ; ,Id ~ ;, ,~ ~ ~ ~ , " I 1 't I' J ~ l ~! irrrr'lr!ll I". 'I r 1D<lIIlI~ ILIWoTICNI ~Ii I II!! In!!1 · > !ij~ n.. P t '. '& EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B ..- It I I~ I 'I I III;;; I II ~ .... N' I' ~ I'd I ~~ 5~ B I I @)i I .... ~< ~~ n> I !.~ -f I ~ I , I ' : DE[j II ~ I ! I' ~~ U , I "i H ~II j\ H t !tt t ' " I~ ,I II~ II II :1 ,I , " I~ , I I H '~ i ~ i I I I " : ~ !1 ~l> 1 .... ~ ICID~ ~ ... j 'm ~ i ~ l a : N ~ I Z rn I I@ , .... , .... I~~ .... " il ,~ II @ . ~! irrrr'!!'! II IIUIl.DtO UVATICINI ~nl I~ ~g I ~i) , I I ~ II u ~ I , : , 0 I1IIII , , , , 1-----::-----1 :' . II ; EE , r I ~ ~ ~~ I 'I ~ < I ' 011I I' d 0 gEE )>, ~ ~ -f' o I OEm gEE z' i {1 o. ~@ 01:0 , ' r--u- ; ~I D_ O I CD OEm I ~, ~ I~I , I;~ < I )>, Ii ! -f I ,0 , CD ~ Z I I , I, , Ii '~ ! '. ~ )> ~ ~ ~CID < ,~ )> !::::! I II I l~ ~ 1 ~c&J I oEm .~~ fI I l~ 1110. ' " I II , ~ I tl imrll!'!l! I". 'I r I~ In!!1 · > !ii~ nil P J> EXHIBIT B ___ ___--J l$ ~--t~~~i ^ m -< ;: l> "0 ~~: ~ ~ 1: ~ ~,;~ ~ .~ ~&\i~ ~WJ ~ I HH~ ~ tiW~ -1 HH~w 'i;!~ ~ hH~~ ,l! 0 jg ~~i~~~ ~! i t! ~ iciJ; I 1"'101 , I, !~!;!~~:i!j f.;:: l! ~ :j'l II:; ~~-'-----'! ,.;.; '.:~;~'~'==i...'.c~.~.'.jllll r :II~~.. . ~~ll ~'" I 1 01 I l t ~ I ~==-=-" . :'~111' I,: ' 1 ~ co ______J::--~-~u ..::;;-. :~;-._~-----=-..___ - -~~ ~--;;:~:.~l~ [f-~~.r-=~=T I[ ~ .1:11 Ii'. ~li i','. ~ - f"-Hli li~~:~:=~~~ ---=--- - ~:ti IiI" i I I", }1 i'"., : I ~1'1 IL\-- '~l:1 ~..';.'\111; t~.. '. "" I I:Hi Ir"~---l ~+~jl r t, II i'-~r~ill!~o\'r' _~ i ..1.;1 -'~'i~1 ,'.'1 ill LUI ; t' -~---.. -,~ I-IC~ -----liJ =----r!;.t I ~~ I : d .< ~I - 'I} '-,~:,o''l ~y ,_11. ! I' .;: I .......... ' :... I ~-~ -------------------- ;: : ':rJ I ',:-': /. -~) !~ (3 ~~ ~ ;: ~ ;~ ,p @ --=~ J3!'~~ :. :;:t~~~ t: I .. '-'lif: " J!=:: I , " I, " " " " " :' , " " , " , , , " " " " " " , " I , , I I I , ) l I ) , , , , i , , I , , , , I -'. _ _ ~ J. lAWRENCE ROAD , .'-~!':_!:;; -'~,~;''' Kno//wood Groves P. U. D. ~i~r ~~ ~ m :to 0 j2~ CD 0 I !l~ D.R. HORTON HOMES Boyton Beach Florida ~ @ EXHlBl 1 ~ J ~ r~ - -- )(~" I~ I ;~:; 1...-: I' @ . I 1"-- J( -- o. It: · ..--~- }--li f-----~ ~':"- ............- . - -f--M- Ci ~~'Ir"" ~ --:-)-T.T >C ~~@ -j. ~~! T--~ ~ '-, JI ,> >, ~~ n ' J io IL Il ):~-! ~~ ;-:1 I;:: ~~~ r j ~;' ljl"~ n: ' ! It:: @;' iii'! __..J, I ~ \ ~r;t;,Q :;- };~'., - In ~rt !j~<-- j It ~ ~r ~-~'i ! Ic \-, .', i' )2 g ", I?; -t ' I~): 1~~Lm ,II;: ~ I::'~ E ~r>~ r' Leu; I ,~ ~ ~ft ~ ~ " 'f y 111 ~ J ~ ~, IllrT--! 1~~ ~: ,- -----~ "- ~- ftt I P I[?~, ~ ;~I: It:. L_~ ,",--v i I 'y ! - ji, ! ; ~) r$ ~ ,~~:- ,~. \~-;j h " ~ I ~\""n- -j=L}~ @ ; , . ~ i ~ ~j9~ - - " . ,.....,----- ,-.,,.... "IC' ( , i~ 0 " ' ~ ", ' . '- un' u} un "-- ':T ,< _ ! : I :: D ~,~ ( i ,rD-- i r$l.."-:; .:" -- ~~:\\ :c ;:V( ~ , '- "",:Dc , "'D > ~~ ~ ~ l! SHEE;' . i ( ____________________ :1 I --1--;H;e;;- 111 ~ i;: ~D " , p ;D@ ".c'~ p ~<I , / ~:~ @~ ~ i 01\ I Y ~ ~ /'-,,);~. Jr ~ L ~ ~I ~'I-'-.~ r' -i'- =-'7'-\;: T T ~:rr- _",', _ I,''',' I ) ~:i I:fJ -" i~~ ~ I ) lit~ _~J :f)':_~- ~~+_~.i .;i~::..~ .:"~:n_~ ",Z.__.1.. ~.;:::..::' ~:-_~ -1;,._;~,- (~j ~~G ~ ',-^-- " I Q , ~I --8 '--"-./__ A, ~ i , '\ '\ "",,' ,""" I ".h ~ ~"- ! , ~ I i., 11 r.1-- i.------ i .:L:..l.)L ...,.~..~.,' ''''''' " .. .".j, . "--J~,"-~'-.../ , i ! I 1 I'-;j - . ' : ;~ . -- . ~ p-'{~~~ r~~;='~-'f~~~.-, '-jc-~-'"'1'~ ~:~~~'~-r-;~ ~ -~1'''a~J~ , , ) j , : !I " I' ~ I ':1," ~. i,1 - ------.f~tll!F I I I~ ~ .~ i. I I I __ r11 be : i ~f ;:-Lt ", 1 J 1 l____ -~:,l! L t-I~ 1-:1 j I I "ti, ~--~ -1 I! I .----- I~l ~ I -- --~-- I - ii" -,-' 1;'1 .. ~I ,.', l - ~ 1.1,' 1- ;__._~..~ "/".. ' '. f, : ,}" ~ I I ~~ I :-'1 ' ~ - ,._-:. - --- ~ - - ~~ ~! j: J t~ Ittt-"c,; " .- ""'- . 1 . ;~e ! --: r ft<,:-J,-J - ",--:!,' j ',;,~ i di ~ i~ -- -- _Y-2i ~ i j ,~! ~-~~ l~ ..-1-' 'rJ ,_ _ ~ ~ ~ tj I~~ J,W Wit ---"-i- :< ~; :{ -~.J"=-~'-"11 T' : ti-+~,L__~ \ i IOUI i : ~l ). ; .l.~. ~'_I- - f ~____{ t~j L ____.J:.{ H: I ; "~ '. I t 'JoJ J! ! "; [f~+~, I. ._,;.:;. - - - -. -~,~ : C ~I ,I ; .,,~ l,~.' "'I~C:-_' '. t~ r-----t,'_ ",J ;L_; -:i~l I'~" ~- - r\4Xj : or I: /~ ~.. -_--~ I ; ,,~~ ~! )i J) ; ( ~' : i~ I 0,..0 ': ~-- f,.,.~, J!'I' L-------l: ~: 1 -i ._y_ < ; I ~~ / ~ L~+J~cS:_)c~':,,2~7~~ ~t;;::(( ~\ ,-+J I I'ltj! I .. .....~ ... D~~~~r)\ ;--------i<.i:1 I _____(:) '~.-::- :r----."'.-"~,._" I'.""'~"~'''''''.':'"~,,, '\.' \ ,,~ ,~" : f"Tjl tf.;~,;~l~:~:-~1-i(;:=-l.:'''.~~}) 11~~~JI ~~---------I" + 1,. ~ Iff Iii: i r~~~",' ~,': .i.JII"1 [.1l(8 ! ; U ;~ 1~-(!1 JI I .;. I' I '" ~ ;,. lV'; , ~I ." 'T,' ~1..J I :J:i: 1 i- Ii I. L.R-~-~ ~: J ~ r L- :,.....,' I ~~ i I:~ t: I ~ ~'.I IT" ~ ~ I ~ ' ~. , ;..I"il i!):f-~ ---., -ill _~. --- ----1- /: I ~ +~ : -~L t~ t ~~~ i I :! ~ E~ / ~@ ~ : J, .1'; ;Tl ~t'd" i ~ ~ ";'1 ~~. 1\ VI ie.'.!j !,., .. tC "."1 : ~ I f)i ! ': II ~i.:, ',- . ~----.J ,- J/:~ I \ - , . '.' '. - - . - ~ '~<,4 I I ./ @j ,: If,: ;r! '''"cc_c;"",:,''''''--'-+:'''T :",-,0:-5... en .~ ~! ['!ll.:cl.- -.-- € iii -"'--'--+1.. ' " ~~--..~ .-.,--j-- -.+--_.. ~ ~-~ j ~r-~:,,,-~=ldl (~/ -=~-~~t ,. - ' '" ,,-- :tI<;' I 'rP' ~I. t,(-~"r! L., . '. I "', " , ! ., ,,'I iri ,,'ll 1'0 L" .' j",,; ---~.~:." I : q ~ I ~-~' ';, ' '71' ,,>, I; I, I .~' ' ,.r If , ;' ''il I~' L...... c ,--' ;L. ,---- ---0-t I ~'--;'[l. I; ~ ~ - / i I i{ Th1 : c~~ ~ f:' -r--I / .r;- ~ : ' l + "'~ .~. :I!' jl .'er ~-~~-- - .:...~( .r 5 - -u-~I'.~Ai! ,~, ,(r ' , : . /! ! ; n li'Lr~~~ ---7-;-~ "\:i;i i.. ,-:11 f~ .: " ,I ( I ;: _~~ - 'r; It- I' 'r~~-----~- ctj :~'i . , . : ~I 1)';"1' : -- .~. i-<- .. --";, n! '" !1: , ' SHEET 2: ~; i )f _____J:.:tH~) ~~-~-_-~---;z--...., - --;;;-E~T-3~2~1 j--- i --~, n : I(~+_'-j--=-=-=-~~ ------:--:1 \1 .., ~i.~~l 11 ~'I ., i '! ( : : ~l i'i~'--' l T~! :t==---~ i:~l--1 : I' "I-----r\.,:;l 1i-1 : , ! I: 1,---, ! ---------M--~-~-- / I........ i I__~ ~~_ 1 ~:~E ~ - - --<:'fI~- I -:N I ;>; m -< 3: )> " II Hi' X' ~. ill CD ~ ~ ~" @ 1i ~" I I ~ j' ~-' ~ ~ - - II ~ C) z&\ ~WJ (" E'~l' 2: ~ I 1B -~ ..... . - lL_:.u . !-'-. .-.- ..-.. !: I ~:;.-~,.I Kno//wood Groves P.U.O. 11!1!~ Hi 0 ii: ~~~m .~! ~~~i I I "I i I III ill i.I,I.! ! I. \~i~i~~ljlf , j o' D.R. HORTON HOMES Boyton Beach Florida !~ Wf ~~ ~ H~ ::r:CJ 0 F- (1) 0 ~ j OJ ....... Ii: ~ ~- ~ · 5,(1) !. ~ C J · (rQ "'"' -:..~,<,,~~,!: ~~ i h;'I ',I] I t Ii i i ~' ~. .ll-~~ -; -7.J'~-~~1~~\~~~~:._ , 'Ii ~~. 0 _.- .;'- .-, ~L_.,~ - cb-~", - .-. - --" r~1 l '" _ _ ~ _ _ =~:.Tl_ _ _..: _ _ _~~~.._ __ ___~ _=-~_-=-_ ~ _-=_ ~__ _ =- _ _ _ _ _.., I ~- ;:t:~~': ~ . __.:t?,~:..- ". .-."""""l( - ~) :_- ""- LAWRENCE ROAD )) - '" -;'-. t-!HL ;~> 7 ;>; m -< :s: :>> '0 (j) .,:; ~ r. OJ iD ~I - w ~ q @ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~= ~ !f ~f~ ~ IHH~ t"' l~ ~ .,.,! - lii~l ~ ,II 0 iH 'HiP ~!W~ i ! tj i i Ii II i i I; 1 i i! 15:ii51 ! !~ 1~lfl~~ljij Kno//wood Groves P. U. D. ;; ;~ D.R. HORTON HOMES Boyton Beach, Florida ~~ Ul -;-'ii :;;"l<t if ;'~ ~~ I ::cn 0 ('DO ~,;; :JC 00..... EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Knollwood File number: NWSP 05-016 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an May 24, 2005 Planning; and Zoning; Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 1. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the proposed project meets the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) of Palm Beach County, upon provision of an exclusive north-bound lane along Lawrence Road onto the project main access driveway. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 2. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not permitted. 3. Live Oaks are proposed within the utility easement on the east side of the recreation area. Canopy trees are not allowed within utility easements. Please replace with a different species. 4. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 5. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 6. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 7. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code COA.doc 06/23/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 8. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 9. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 10. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 11. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. 12. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 13. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 14. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily COA.doc 06/23/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT available. 15. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 16. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 17. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 18. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: a. A legal description of the land. b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. d. The number of dwelling units in each building. e. The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 19. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. PARKS AND RECREATION COA.doc 06/23/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 20. The recreation impact fee will be: 148 single-family, detached homes @ 940.00 each = $139,120.00 The impact fee is due prior to issuance of the "first application permit". FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 21. The applicant should amend the note indicating that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. 22. At the time of permitting, the applicant must submit an updated Lake Management Plan document for the lakes. 23. Irrigation Plan-No Irrigation plan included in the submittal The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 24. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball (Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.). PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 25. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon the accompanying request for annexation (ANEX 05-002) and corresponding land use / rezonmg applications (LUAR 05-001 and LUAR 05-006). This includes the proposed project density. 26. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division approved the project for 146 single- family dwelling units. The site plan proposes 148 dwelling units. At the time of permitting, revise the site plan by deleting two (2) units or provide an updated Traffic Performance Standards Review letter from the County that approves the project for the additional two (2) units. 27. A unity of title will be required at the time ofoermitting. 28. The School District of Palm Beach County must approve the project for school concurrency purposes prior to the issuance of a building permit. 29. Increased compatibility with the adjacent properties (where abutting AR zoning district) is required. This can be accomplished by either increasing the building setbacks of the abutting lots (Lots 31 through 42), increase the size COA.doc 06/23/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJbCT of the buffer width (from 20 feet to 25 feet), and / or significantly increase the plant material proposed within the 10-foot wide landscape buffer (i.e. variety of canopy trees spaced no greater than 20 feet apart combined with lower vegetation to buffer heights from four (4) feet to six (6) feet 30. At the time of permitting, provide a detail of the front entry gates, including its dimensions, material, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 31. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). On the landscape plan plant list (sheet 7 of 10), indicate by asterisk, the native species to ensure that at least 50% of landscape material is native. Separate and indicate the proposed plant material into the following categories: Shade Trees, Palm Trees, Shrubs / Hedges, and Groundcover. Please tabulate the amount of native material in each plant category. 32. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities must match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. 33. The landscape plan (sheet 9 of 10) shows a Unit 2110 but there is no corresponding floor plan. At the time of permitting, revise this sheet to exclude this unit or provide all corresponding information for the unit. 34. At the time of permitting, revise the landscape plan to include the following: The 110 foot strip along the north side of the property between the 20 foot landscape buffer and the LWDD canal R-O-W should be sodded, irrigated, and maintained by the developer / HOA like all other common areas within the site. 35. The master plan / site plan will dictate the applicable setbacks for amenities such as swimming pools and screened-roof enclosures. There IS a discrepancy between a note that references city regulations for pool setbacks and the minimum dimension shown on the typical lot drawing. Therefore, at time of permitting, on the site plan (sheet 1 of 4), eliminate the note that reads "Pools and Jacuzzi's may be permitted provided they meet City of Boynton Beach code requirements", or change the dimension on the typical lot drawing to be consistent with city setback regulations. 36. At the time of permitting, provide Home Owners' Association documents to verify necessary maintenance of common areas and landscape buffers. 37. On the Typical Lot Details as shown on the site plan, indicate "Minimum" rear and side building setbacks rather than "TYP" rear and side building setbacks. 38. Building heights proposed on the subject property (Lots 31 through 60) are partially defined and impacted by the ground elevation of the adjacent properties (if they are lower ground elevation). Therefore, two (2) story houses built along the perimeter of the subi ect property may be in jeopardy of COA.doc 06/23/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT exceeding the maximum building height (proposed as per this site plan). Therefore, at the time of permitting, provide updated ground elevations of the adjacent property to ensure compliance and consistency. 39. On the site plan, correct the label "Nautica Sound PUD" to read "Nautica PUD". 40. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from landscape "easements" to "tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. 41. Staff recommends that the height of the screen enclosures be limited to the mean height of the house on which the structure is proposed. 42. Staff recommends that where possible, the shade tree spacing within the north landscape buffer shall be no more than one (1) tree per 25 lineal feet 43. Staff recommends the perimeter landscaped buffers utilize taller, more mature canopy trees behind all two story models, to soften the height against abutting single story residences. For example, the trees should be installed at 16 feet in height where two (2) story buildings are constructed. 44. A six (6) foot tall black vinyl coated chain link fence is proposed along the southern property line of Lots 1 through 3 and half-way through Lot 4. Staff recommends extending the fence westward so that it terminates along the west property line of Lot 4. ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS: Comments: 45. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: Comments: 46. To be determined. MWR/elj S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Knollwood Groves PUD\NWSP 05-017\COA.doc Johnson, Eric From: Sent: To: Subject: Johnson, Eric Thursday, June 23, 2005 11 :59 AM Rumpf, Michael; Breese, Ed Proposed setbacks Knollwood Mike, Do you want me to make a recommendation to increase the rear setback for the units proposed along the south property line, adjacent to the County AR parcels? If so, by how much? From 20 to 25 feet? Thanks, Eric 1 Johnson, Eric From: Sent: To: Subject: Rumpf, Michael Thursday, June 23,20054:18 PM Johnson, Eric RE: Proposed setbacks Knollwood I think the optional comment is best which calls out the issue, and gives them options for addressing the potential incompatibility of the existing and proposed neighborhoods. To read as follows (clean up as desired): The City's PUD regulations require that "peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone". The southwest edge of the project abuts an older neighborhood built under the County's AR zoning district. These lots are larger than the proposed yards, with rear yard setbacks that vary between approximately 26 feet to 40 feet (estimated). Increase compatibility with adjacent properties (where abutting AR zoning district) by 1) increasing setbacks of abutting lots; 2) increasing adjacent buffer width; and/or 3) by significantly increasing the buffer vegetation (i.e. variety of canapy trees spaces no greater than 20 feet combined with lower vegation to buffer heights from 4 feet to 6 feet. -----Original Messagemn From: Johnson, Eric Sent: Thursday, June 23,200511:59 AM To: Rumpf, Michael; Breese, Ed Subject: Proposed setbacks Knollwood Mike, Do you want me to make a recommendation to increase the rear setback for the units proposed along the south property line, adjacent to the County AR parcels? If so, by how much? From 20 to 25 feet? Thanks, Eric 1 Johnson, Eric Page 1 of 1 From: Main, Karen Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 1 :38 PM To: Johnson, Eric; Rumpf, Michael Subject: Nautica Rear setback for bldgs along the community's 25' buffer easement is 25 Rear setback for lots on the 5' buffer easements (lakes, parks & preserves) is 10' 6/2312005 o '" "-/) ~) .---\ 5' 3 > Johnson, Eric From: Sent: To: Subject: Rumpf, Michael Thursday, June 23, 2005 12:26 PM Johnson, Eric RE: Your comments -----Original Message----- From: Johnson, Eric Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:06 AM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: Your comments Mike, These are your comments that were written down on the little sheets. Let me know what you think. I didn't make a condition regarding the park. Make changes as you see fit. Thanks, The landscape plan (sheet 9 of 10) shows a Unit 2110 but there is no corresponding floor plan. At the time of permitting, revise this sheet to exclude this unit or provide all corresponding information for the unit. The master plan/site plan will dicate the applicable setbacks for amenities such as swimming pools and screened-roof enclosures. There is a descrepancy between a note that references city regulations for pool setbacks and the minimum dimension shown on the typical lot drawing. Therefore, at time of permitting, on the site plan (sheet 1 of 4), eliminate the note that reads "Pools and Jacuzzi's may be permitted provided they meet City of Boynton Beach code requirements", or change the dimension on the typical lot drawing to be consistent with city setback regulations. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from landscape easements" to "tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. At the time of permitting, provide Home Owners' Association documents to verify necessary maintenance of common areas and landscape buffers. Builidng heights proposed on the subject property (Lots 31 through 60) are partially defmed and impacted by the ground elevation of the adjacent properties (if they are lower ground elevation). Therefore, two (2) story houses built along the perimeter of the subject property may be in jeopardy of exceeding the maximum building height (proposed as per this site plan). Therefore, at the time of permitting, provide updated ground elevations of the adjacent propety to ensure compliance and consistency. On the Typical Lot Details as shown on the site plan, indicate "Minimum" rear and side building setbacks rather than "TYP" rear and side building setbacks. On the site plan, correct the label "Nautica Sound PUD" to read "Nautica PUD". 1 1 s. REVIEW' RESPONSES, 5-~-i~05 New Site Plan jI,\ . ~ t 0JY'Y " Project name: Knollwood File number: NWSP 05-016 Reference: 1 Sl review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an April 6, 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- / 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). No resoonse required. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance / Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. A traffic analysis has been submitted. 3. Staff strongly recommends moving the main entrance to the north property line, by extending Miner Rd. from Lawrence Rd. west to the easterly north- south roadway. The proposed location of the main entry off Lawrence Rd. will conflict with the planned park entry to the Civic Site south of Knollwood Groves PUD. Additionally the proposed main entry has only one egress lane that will not efficiently allow both northbound and southbound t/ turning movements. The entry location has been the topic of meetings with both Palm Beach County and City professionals. For reasons too numerous to list in this response the entry will remain in it's general location. County staffwill require extending the existing median in front of the entrance thereby only allowing for a rif!ht in and rif!ht out of the community. 4. Retain a secondary emergency access on the east property line onto Lawrence Rd. V- A second means of emergency access onto Lawrence Road has been added to the site plan. 5. Show all required off-site improvements. Extend Miner Rd. west from Lawrence Rd. approximately 600-ft. The typical section should provide a V minimum of two 12-ft. lanes, widening to three 12- ft. lanes at the intersection of Miner and Lawrence to allow for left turn movements. Please see response #3 above. 6. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering to upgrade the V signals at Miner Rd. and Lawrence Rd. The aoolicant has met with Palm Beach County traffic and roadwav comment response.052405 OS/24/05 2 I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT production. Warrants necessary for upgrading the signal do not exist at this time. 7. Extend the center median on Lawrence Rd. south of Miner Rd. {// approximately 70-ft. north. The center median has been extended north as requested. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be / reflected on all appropriate sheets. All corrections have been shown on all sheets 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional / comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Acknowled(!ed 10. Show proposed site and street lighting on the Site and Landscape plans ~ (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) Lighting will be required for the parking area adjacent to the recreation area. Lif!htinf! has been added to all aoolicable plans. II. The two Live Oaks located in Lots 96 and 97 (either side of the drainage easement) are placed too close together for their mature size. Staff recommends that the cultivars "Highrise" or "Cathedral" be used for Live V Oaks, particularly where called out along rear property lines. Response: One of the proposed Live Oaks has been removed from the landscape plan, as requested. "Highrise" species have been designated throughout the project. Please see revised landscape plan included herein. 12. All trees and palms should be placed a minimum of five feet off the property lines and away from driveways, sidewalks and curbs to allow for future growth and prevent heaving of the aforementioned structures. ~ ~ Response: All street trees have been placed at least 5 feet from drives, sidewalks and curbs. Please see landscape plans, prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., and included herein. 13. Wild Date Palm/Sylvester specified within the entryway median does not have adequate clear trunk specified for vehicle clearance due to the large size (length) of the fronds which will hang into traffic. ~ -- Response: The Wild Date Palm/Sylvester has been replaced with Royal Palms. Please see revised plans prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. 14. The Shrub/Groundcover Planting Detail on Typical Unit Landscape Plan Sheet 2 of 2 depicts planting for a tree. Please correct. ~ Response: The Planting Detail, referred to above, identifies a shrub. Please refer to landscape plans, included herein. comment response.052405 OS/24/05 3 DEPARTMENTS 15. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.l.b). Response: This has been noted in the General Notes on the landscape plan. The proposed trees have been adjusted per the lighting plan. Please see revised plans, included herein. 16. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FOOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Lawrence Road. Use a minimum 25-f1. site triangle for interior development intersections (revise the note on Landscape Plan Sheet I of 5.) Response: The required safe sight triangles have been included on the landscape plans. 17. Per the LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not permitted. Response: The ficus shrub located in the green island has been replaced with a Carissa "Green island". Please refer to revised landscape plans. 18. Provide a legend for the plant symbols. Response: All plants are denoted and tagged on the landscape plans with letter symbols, which correlate to the comprehensive plant list included within the landscape plan package. Please refer to landscape plans, included herein, for further clarification. 19. Live Oaks are proposed within the utility easement on the east side of the recreation area. Canopy trees are not allowed within utility easements. Please replace with a different species. Response: All canopy trees have been pulled to a location behind the easement. Royals have been identified around the perimeter of the recreation area. INCLUOE REJECT / /' 20. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of ./ permitting. V Acknowledged. See Site Grading Note #8 on Sheet 2 of the Preliminary Enflineerinf! Plans. 21. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction pemlit application. Acknowledged. 22. Upon Commission approval of the site plan schedule a pre-application meeting with the Engineering Division to begin the plat process. v t/ ~ ~ /' comment response.052405 OS/24/05 4 DEPARTMENTS Acknowled~ed. UTILITIES Comments: .~ ' Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. We expect water and sewer service will be required 12 months after the City Commission approval. City Commission Approval - Month 0 Permit Application - Month 2 Start of Construction - Month 7 FustWarerMerer-Monffl12 24. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the Site plan and Landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. Most all water and sewer has been shown in the road R/W which will also be a utility easement to the City. A 10 foot general utility easement has been shown adjacent to the road RJW. Utility easements outside the road R/W have been shown. All easements will be dedicated bv olat. 25. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Acknowledged. 26. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b )). Fire Flow calculations will be provided at the time of permit application. 27. The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. INCLUDE REJECT / v/ v ~ / t/ comment response.052405 OS/24/05 5 DEPARTMENTS Numerous lots are not covered by this requirement; lots not covered are: 9, 10 partially, 31 partially, 40 partially, 51 partially, 52, 53, 54, 65, 66, 67, 79 partially, 80, 81, 82 partially, 87, 88, 89, 90 partially, Ill, 112, 113, 120 partially, 127 partially, 128, 135, 136, 137, 147 partially, 148, and 149. Reconfigure fire hydrant locations to meet this code requirement. This code section also provides for an exception to the above requirement for one and two story residential project with a density of less than 10 units per acre which this project qualifies. We believe the plan meets the exception reauirements. 28. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be detemlined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Acknowled~ed. 29. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). See response to item 24. 30. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Acknowled~ed. 31. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Acknowledged. See Fire and Life Safety notes on Sheet 2 of the Preliminary En~ineerin~ Plans. 32. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the dwellings as well as the recreational building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26- 207. Acknowled~ed. 33. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that support utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. INCLUDE / ,/ REJECT / / / / / comment response.052405 OS/24/05 6 I ~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT See General Note Ion Sheet 2 of the Preliminary EnKineerillJ! Plans. 34. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in / accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Acknowled1!ed. FIRE Comments: 35. All entrance gates to construction area shall have a Knox lock system that will also open in case of electrical power failure. All gates shall be a t/' minimum of 20' wide. Fire Department apparatus shall be able to turn into the construction site in one turn. Acknowledged, a knox box will be provided to activate the entrance gates. All Kates will ooen to provide a 20' clear open inK. 36. The construction site access roads shall be maintained free of obstructions / at all times. A cknowledJ!ed 37. All required fire hydrants, standpipes or sprinkler systems shall be in place before going vertical. Vertical construction shall be protected by standpipes V and the sprinkler system to one level below the highest level of V construction throughout the building. AcknowledKed. No fire sorinkler systems are allticioated in this oro;ect. 38. Any cost of damage to Fire Department vehicles because of improperly stabilized roads or any towing fees if a vehicle becomes stuck will be the responsibility of the contractor. A minimum of 32 tons is required for ~ /" ground stabilization. AcknowledKed. 39. Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around space shall be provided in c./ v/ the construction area. AcknowledJ!ed. POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: comment response.052405 OS/24/05 -., / DEPARTMENTS 40. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. No reSDonse required. 41. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 200 I FBC, Chapter 6. A note has been added to the site plan regarding the use of CBS Masonry construction 43. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Acknowledeed 44 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Yerify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: a. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation ~. ~ NGYD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined k;.by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." b. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. c. Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). See Site Grading Notes on Sheet 2 of the Preliminary Engineering Plans. Notes have also been added to the site plans. 45. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code. Wall and fence details will be provided with the next resubmittal for staff review. 46. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. INCLUDE REJECT /v / L7 / / ~ / comment response.052405 OS/24/05 8 I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT It is anticipated that the source of irrigation water shall be groundwater from the lake. 47. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system / that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. Acknowledged. 48. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. / b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Acknowledged. 49. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City / computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Acknowledged 50. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: / a. A legal description of the land. b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building numberls must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. d. The number of dwelling units in each building. e. The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t)) Acknowledged 51. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting / shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. A note has been added to the site vlan comment response.052405 OS/24/05 9 I II I DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 52. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building v Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans / must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed 10 the development order and approved by the City Commission. Acknowledged 53. Sheet 2 of 4. Indicate on the plans that light poles comply withy 200 I FBC, Section 1606 for compliance with 140mph windload. Design ~ calculations by a design professional registered in the State of Florida shall be submitted at time of permit application. Acknowledged P ARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 54. Landscaping notes should indicate a 110% irrigation coverage. / Response: A note has been added to the landscape plan. Please see revised plan included herein. 55. A six (6) foot black, vinyl coated chain link fence should be installed / between the development and the civic area to the south. Response: A note has been added to the landscape plan for reference. Please see revised plans, included herein. 56. The recreation impact fee will be : / 152 single-family, detached homes @ 940.00 each = $142,880.00 The impact fee is due prior to issuance of the "first application permit". Acknowledged FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 57. The Landscape Architect should indicate and tabulate the total number 1/ of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet LP5. fEnvironmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. comment response.052405 OS/24/05 10 I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 7.D.p.2.] Response: The total number of on-site trees have been tabulated for the site. A Mitigation, Relocation and Preservation Chart has been added to the landscape plan package which identifies all trees to be mitigated, to be re- located off site and to be re-located on site. All high quality, native trees have been saved or re-located to the greatest extent possible, including approximately 60 sabal palms. 58. Landscape Plan Sheet 5 of 5. 1 of 1 ( Lakes) / All shade and palm trees on the Plant list must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), 12'-14' height minimum and Florida #1. The height of the trees will be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.] Response: The plant list has been revised as requested. Please see revised plant list included in the revised landscape plan package. 59. The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include -:/ a line indicating where the height of the tree will be measured at time of planting and inspection. Response: The detail has been revised accordingly. Please see revised plan included herein. 60. All groundcover / vine plantings should have a height and spread / measurement. Response: The plant list has been revised to reflect this information. Please see revised plans prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. 61. The applicant should amend the note indicating that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be / screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. Response: The Applicant has amended the platz accordingly. Please see updated note on revised landscape plans. 62. The applicant must submit a Lake Management Plan document for the lakes. t/ A management plan will be submitted to the City prior to request for lake excavation oermits. 63. Irri2ation Plan-No Irri2ation plan included in the submittal The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low /- volume water conservation using non-portable water. Response: An irrigation plan has been included within this re-submittal. The irrigation is drawing from the on-site lake. 64. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on ./ separate zones and time duration for water conservation. Resoonse: The Aoolicant acknowledKes this comment but would like to note comment response.052405 OS/24/05 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT that this is not a costs effective option, and is not being proposed for this site. Separate zoned for turf and landscape areas would require a complicated zone layout that would not be most effective for this plan and would increase irrigation costs by at least 40%. 65. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] Response: Separate irrigation bubblers are typically not required for every tree. The Applicant is not proposing separate irrigation bubblers at this time, because it is not cost-effective and is unnecessary. The developer will use water trucks on site until the trees are established, approximately 30 days. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 66. At the technical advisory reVIeW team meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. At the technical advisory review team meeting, provide a full set of drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. E"\.eIAWC; Approval of this site plan is contingent upon the accompanying request for land use / rezoning application (LUAR 05-00 I). This includes the proposed project density. Include a note regarding LUAR 05-001 on the site plan / master plan (sheet I of 4). owled ed, a note has also been added to the site Ian. According to Chapter 2.5, Section 9.B., when rezoning a property, no minimum lot size or minimum yard shall be required; provided however, that PUD frontage on dedicated public roads shall observe front yard requirements in accordance with the zoning district the PUD use most closely resembles and that peripheral yards abutting other zoning districts shall be the same as required in the abutting zone. The abutting properties to the west are zoned County Agricultural Residential (AR) and County Residential Transitional Urban District (RTU). The RTU zoning district requires a 20-foot rear setback. The Typical Perimeter Lot Detail indicates a 20-foot rear dimension. This is acceptable. of title will be re uired. / t./ J L/ v comment response.052405 OS/24/05 12 DEPARTMENTS Acknowledged On the site plan (sheet I of 4), name this sheet as both the "Master Plan" and "Site Plan" since it will serve as both according to Chapter 2.5, Section 10.A.3.d. Revised as requested on the site plan ,~....."~<,, 2. e Palm Beach County Traffic Division shall approve the Traffic Impact Statement / Study. (Chapter 4. Section 8.F.). ck owled ed 73. The School District of Palm Beach County must approve the project for school concurrency purposes. Please provide evidence of their approval prior to the technical advisory review team meeting. School Board will be provided prior to the Development Include a color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Color renderings will be provided by the developer at the meeting. >( The ledger-sized color rendering of Model 2510 does not match its respective elevations with regard to house style, window openings, and architectural enhancements. Also, no color renderings were submitted for Model 1952 and 3054. Renderings were submitted for Model 3080 and 3135, but no elevations were provided. Correct renderings of each model will be provided at the TRC meeting. Provide paint swatches for the elevations (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). rovided at the meetin . The elevations shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule that corresponds with the graphic illustration (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Color swatches will reflect the exact colors proposed. Architectural renderings rely on commercially available art markers for renderings. On some occasions they are not exactly the same a paint manufacturers swatches. /( INCLUDE ~ / ~ REJECT v t/ v/ v comment response.052405 OS/24/05 13 DEPARTMENTS (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Building heights are shown on the elevations and in a table on the site plan. t( Provide a floor plan and elevation of the cabana building (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Staff recommends constructing a clubhouse building (w A/C) rather than a small cabana building in order to provide a place where owner association meetings home can occur. Plans of the cabana building are included in this resubmittal. The applicant does not feel that a clubhouse with meeting facilities is necessary. 8 All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. Is there an entrance sign proposed for the project? If so, on the site plan (sheet I of 4), indicate its location and provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Entry sign details will bf5s~mi~~r~r;,.~Xhe next TAC meeting. r\ I~ Are screened roofs or solid-roof enclosures proposed at the rear of each house? According to Chapter 16 of the 200 I Florida Building Code, a concrete slab is required at the base of screen enclosures. Indicate the impervious area should all homeowners choose to build a screen or solid-roof enclosure at the rear of their unit. A note has been added to the site plan reflecting the maximum impervious area with tMe largest home footprint and deck area. y A note on the site plan (sheet I of 4) indicates that swimming pools are permitted such as long as they meet City of Boynton Beach Code requirements. Indicate their proposed location, configuration, and setback within the Typical Lot Details. Also, indicate the impervious area should all homeowners choose to improve their lots with swimming pools. Please note that setbacks for swimming pools should be greater than setbacks for screened-roof enclosures. INCLUDE Notes have been added to the typical lot details reflecting pool and screen I enclosure setbacks. 83. On the site plan (sheet 1 of 4), revise the note that currently reads, "Covered patios (including roofed screened enclosures) shall be restricted to within building envelope" to read as follows: Covered patios (including solid-roof screened enclosures) shall be restricted to within building envelope. REJECT comment response.052405 OS/24/05 14 DEPARTMENTS The width of the roadway (pavement) is subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval. 4? Acknowledged, this width is exactly the same as the developers last six communities in the Ci . 85. The site plan / master plan tabular data (sheet 1 of 4) should indicate the square footage and percentage distribution of the total project site, including area proposed for landscaped open space, vehicular use areas, other paved areas, and building coverage and total lot coverage (Chapter 4, Section 7.EA.). R ~~ 'he site tabular data table re ects a breakdown 0 all re uired in ormation. The site plan / master plan tabular data (sheet I of 4) should indicate the number and ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.5). 1; re uirements are shown in the site data table on the site Ian. The site plan / master plan tabular data (sheet 1 of 4) should indicate the height of buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.E.7.). ildin hei hts table has been added to the site Ian. Provide a detail of the fence proposed around the pool/clubhouse area, including its dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). tail will be resubmitted with the next series 0 revisions. Provide a detail of the proposed buffer wall, including its dimensions, materi~l, ~d color (Chapter 4, S~ction 7.0.). . t L j.... ~~ ~R.-f.A ~4' ~~~ (~ L 6/ 4- a~~t, f IfU-- etail will be resubmitted with the next series 0 revisions. Provide a detail of the entry gates proposed at the development's front entrance, as well as proposed entry features denoted on the plans. nclude its di nsions, material, and color(s) (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). ail will be resubm ed with the next series 0 revisions. Will a lift station be required? If so, where would it be located? The removal/relocation of landscape material is subject to review and approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantitIes must match between the tabular data and the ra hic illustration. INCLUDE v v ./ REJECT L/ ~ v v v ~ comment response.052405 OS/24/05 15 DEP ARTMENTS Response: All quantities have been thorough(v reviewed to ensure consistency between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. All plant material shown on the landscape plan (sheet 3 of 5), in particular within the landscape buffer, must be identified with a symbol and its corresponding quantity. Response: All plant material is identified and tagged with a symbol and label. Please see attached landscape plan. ~5. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or <' '\ Bouganvillea) is required at both s;des of each project entrance I exit The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. Response: Tibouchina Granulsola has been proposed on both sides of the project entrance, as recommended by the City of Boynton Beach. lIe on s eet 0 i q\4aHtltIes OR sh0€t t1 gf51 --tfriOl, provide an overalI plant list that accurately identifies all (total) plant material provided. Response: An overall plant list has been provided. Please refer to revised landscape plans prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. ~ All trees are required to be at least 12 feet overall height and three (3) ./\ caliper inches at the time of installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). This would apply to the Bougainvillea, Silver Buttonwood, Hibiscus, and Ligustrum. Response: No Silver Buttonwood are proposed on-site. All Bougainvillea, Hibiscus and Ligustrums, due to the fact they are omamental trees and are not available in the minimum size identified above, have been moved to the large shrub category. INCLUDE J REJ ECT /' / / comment response.052405 OS/24/05 16 DEPARTMENTS {' . Indicate the ten (10) foot wide landscape buffers on the landscape plan (sheets 2,3 of 5). Also, indicate any other proposed easements or land dedications on the landscape plans. Response: All landscape buffers, easements and land dedications have been indicated on the revised landscape plan. Please see revised plans, included herein. ~ On the landscape plan (sheet 3 of 5), indicate the type of trees proposed /\ at the northeast comer of the property. Response: The trees at the northeast corner of the property have been appropriately labeled. Please see landscape plan included herein, as prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. (j i 100. All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in eight, 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the site (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.CA.). Response: The Applicant acknowledges this comment and has provided the appropriate shrubs and hedges on the site. ~ Place a note on the landscape plan that all above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, and back- flow preventers shall be visually screened (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Response: A note has been added to the landscape plan identifying that all above ground mechanical equipment will be visually screened from view to the greatest extent possible an in conformance with Chapter 9, Section lO.C.4. ~ ! ( 1 02~ Was the landscape material proposed on the Typical Unit plans Onciuded within the overall landscape plan plant list? Response: Only trees proposed at each of the units were included in the overall landscape plan plant list, as these are easily identifiable as one (1) street tree per unit. Shrubs and groundcover shown on the typical unit plans are not included in the overall plant list. ~ .MM ~-\~ib\ ~~/ ~ ~,J) ~. / ~-( INCLUDE / ct REJECT v/ v ~ l comment response.052405 OS/24/05 17 DEP ARTMENTS . ~aff recommends installing a hedge on the outside of the fence that is /S- .req~ired around the pool area. Response: A hedge has been added along the outside perimeter of the required fence. Please see revised landscape plans, included herein. 104. With nO parks in the immediate vicinity, consider elimination of lots 138-140 to create a cohesive, unified park/open space area. The proposed open space around the entry gates is disjointed from the other recreational facilities proposed with the development and not safe for kids running back and forth across the road. 105. The fence along the north side of 20 foot landscape buffer should be moved further south to provide a dense/lush landscape theme on the outside of the fence, visible from outside the development. Response: The Applicant is not proposing to move the fence further south, as there is ample existing vegetation on the north side of the fence, which has been enhanced by additional cluster plantings proposed by the Applicant. Together, these create a dense/lush landscape theme on the outside (north side) of the fence. r o~ ) The 110 foot strip along the north side of the property between the 20 000t landscape buffer and the LWDD canal R-O-W, should be sodded, irrigated and maintained by the developer/HOA like all other common areas within the site. Noted ~taff recommends utilizing larger, Canary Island Date Palms in the .~ entry drive median. Response: Royal Palms have been used in lieu of Canary Island Date Palms in the entry drive median. Please see revised plan, included herein. ~~ (~~lt ktaff recommends the perimeter landscaped buffers utilize taller, more I Vature canopy trees behind all two story models, to soften the height against abutting single story residences. Response: Oaks have been proposed behind all two story models to soften the height. Please see landscape plans, prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., and included herein. wt '-Sf ,'I +r~~0 C),~Q t~ 'R~ ttf {b~ INCLUDE REJECT ~ v 1..-/ / comment response.052405 OS/24/05 18 "? I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ~taff recommends the use of a decorative opaque gate at the fire emergency access. Response: A note has been added on the landscape plan, identifying the location of a decorative opaque gate at the fire emergency access. Please see revised landscape plan, included herein. tJeeiA~. 110. The site data does not agree between the site plan (sheet I of 4) and the landscape plan (sheet 5 of 5). Please correct. Response: The site data has been revised to ensure consistency among all plans. Please see revised plans, included herein. K~~ MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Knollwood Groves PUD\NWSP 05-017\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc . '3y YV-\tJA.\.f - ~\{2/ '( It 0-0 .~<; -~~ ~ Str toc~ I ~ '1J S1~ __ ~ 1~0cJj ~ cll-{~h~ , - R-e ~dJ Z{~ 7 ( ) , ,-M-! aP fJfr ?; to iF ~r~ ~ /Vl~(J/ v:[1 - . ~ 5t~ 2-?J 4- ~20c ~ .vAX;, ~__ ~ O~VHVJ 0'. I w~ ~ ~e~ D\M at Cd;&~<< 1+( '. ~~ 1?ic[ I 7Lf:l- Ce'33~ ~ li q I'- \ j.l \'.. e f\~ ( ~\,cJJ7 tJuf~ tIt\ '?W7"'j [0 ~54 ~~.;t 1+ lOb. .- 't>~ 1 '(:;:;el.O(-rh~ offA'fr'L JoJe {rl>'wt tIt~Tl&1 ~ 1~ l ~ ~ ilf' 1\Jcf& ~ S{~ cjf?-~ /VO o~/J-t}f t9~cf) ~. -- ?lAtve'1 ~ r-- ~ .:S-- ~ Johnson, Eric From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Logan, Laurinda Friday, June 17, 2005 10:01 AM Johnson, Eric Livergood, Jeffrey; Kelley, David RE: Knollwood Groves PUD #1. Yes #2. You'll have to ask him, but I think so. #3. Prior to issuance of final CO. #4. Developer p.s. PBC permits required for work on Lawrence. -----Original Message----- From: Johnson, Eric Sent: Friday, June 17, 20059:56 AM To: Logan, Laurinda Subject: Knollwood Groves PUD Laurinda, Masoud Atefi with Palm Beach County Traffic Division approved the Knollwood project for traffic concurrency purposes but had the following comment regarding Lawrence Road: "The Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the proposed project meets the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) of Palm Beach County, upon provision of an exclusive north-bound lane along Lawrence Road onto the project main access driveway" . In preparing the staff report and because my memory fails me, I wanted to confirm with you that... #1. Our city Engineering Division was aware of this County requirement; #2. The applicant (Julian Bryan) is aware of this County requirement; #3. When will this northbound lane be constructed? During the permitting process? Land development permit process? Platting process? #4 Who is paying for this? I am thinking it is the responsiblity of the developer, correct? Thanks for shedding some light on the situation. Eric 1 . # 1st REVIEW RESPONSES, 5-24-05 New Site Plan bJ1Lv/~ Ar~~ '-V/,j~ Project name: Knollwood C-:ot4.D fi7()JJ~l A J ~ File number: NWSP 05-016 S 1-"11 o~ -r:; ~ f? Reference: I slreview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an April 6. 2005 Planning a d Zoning (5 - Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). No response required. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. A traffic analvsis has been submitted. 3. Staff strongly recommends moving the main entrance to the north property line, by extending Miner Rd. from Lawrence Rd. west to the easterly north- south roadway. The proposed location of the main entry off Lawrence Rd. will conflict with the planned park entry to the Civic Site south of Knollwood Groves PUD. Additionally the proposed main entry has only one egress lane that will not efficiently allow both northbound and southbound turning movements. The entry location has been the topic of meetings with both Palm Beach County and City professionals. For reasons too numerous to list in this response the entry will remain in it's general location. County stajJwill require extending the existing median in front of the entrance thereby only allowing for a ri/[ht in and ri/[ht out of the communitv. 4. Retain a secondary emergency access on the east property line onto Lawrence Rd. A second means of emergency access onto Lawrence Road has been added to the site olano 5. Show all required off-site improvements. Extend Miner Rd. west from Lawrence Rd. approximately 600- ft. The typical section should provide a minimum of two 12-ft. lanes, widening to three 12- ft. lanes at the intersection of Miner and Lawrence to allow for left turn movements. Please see resoonse #3 above. 6. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering to upgrade the signals at Miner Rd. and Lawrence Rd. The aoplicant has met with Palm Beach Countv traffic and roadway cominent response.052405 OS/24/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT See General Note Ion Sheet 2 of the Preliminary Enf(ineerinf( Plans. 34. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Acknowledf(ed. FIRE Comments: 35. All entrance gates to construction area shall have a Knox lock system that will also open in case of electrical power failure. All gates shall be a minimum of20' wide. Fire Department apparatus shall be able to turn into the construction site in one turn. Acknowledged, a knox box will be provided to activate the entrance gates. All f(ates will open to provide a 20' clear ooeninf(. 36. The construction site access roads shall be maintained free of obstructions at all times. Acknowledf(ed 37. All required fire hydrants, standpipes or sprinkler systems shall be in place before going vertical. Vertical construction shall be protected by standpipes and the sprinkler system to one level below the highest level of construction throughout the building. Acknowledf(ed. No fire sprinkler svstems are anticipated in this proiect. 38. Any cost of damage to Fire Department vehicles because of improperly stabilized roads or any towing fees if a vehicle becomes stuck will be the responsibility of the contractor. A minimum of 32 tons is required for ground stabilization. Acknowledf(ed. 39. Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around space shall be provided in the construction area. Acknowledf(ed. POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: comment response.052405 OS/24/05 7 DEPARTMENTS 40. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. No response required. 41. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6.- A note has been added to the site plan regarding the use of CBS Masonry construction 43. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Acknowledged 44 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: a. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined k;.by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." b. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. c. Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). See Site Grading Notes on Sheet 2 of the Preliminary Engineering Plans. Notes have also been added to the site plans. 45. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code. Wall and fence details will be provided with the next resubmittal for staff review. 46. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. INCLUDE REJECT / v 11 v t:-//' .) . comment response.052405 OS/24/05 8 , II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT It is anticipated that the source of irrigation water shall be groundwater from the lake. 47. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system / that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of ~ the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. AcknowledJ!ed. 48. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and / the Commission-approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) AcknowledJ!ed. 49. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City / computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or ~/ tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. A cknowledlled 50. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: a. A legal description of the land. b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. ~ c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. d. The number of dwelling units in each building. e. The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) AcknowledJ!ed 1/ 5L Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting / shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. A note has been added to the site plan coriiment response.052405 OS/24/05 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE .1 52. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans / must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed In the V/ development order and approved by the City Commission. Acknowledl!ed 53. Sheet 2 of 4. Indicate on the plans that light poles comply withy 200 I FBC, Section 1606 for compliance with 140mph windload. Design / calculations by a design professional registered in the State of Florida shall be submitted at time of permit application. Acknowledged PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 54. Landscaping notes should indicate a 110% irrigation coverage. Response: A note has been added to the landscape plan. Please see revised plan included herein. 55. A six (6) foot black, vinyl coated chain link fence should be installed between the development and the civic area to the south. Response: A note has been added to the landscape plan for reference. Please see revised plans, included herein. 56. The recreation impact fee will be : 152 single-family, detached homes @ 940.00 each = $142,880.00 The impact fee is due prior to issuance of the "first application permit". AcknowledJ!ed FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 57. The Landscape Architect should indicate and tabulate the total number of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet LP5. rEnvironmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. -~ 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Knollwood File number: NWSP 05-016 Reference: 1 slreview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an April 6. 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 3. Staff strongly recommends moving the main entrance to the north property line, by extending Miner Rd. from Lawrence Rd. west to the easterly north- south roadway. The proposed location of the main entry off Lawrence Rd. will conflict with the planned park entry to the Civic Site south of Knollwood Groves PUD. Additionally the proposed main entry has only one egress lane that will not efficiently allow both northbound and southbound turning movements. 4. Retain a secondary emergency access on the east property line onto Lawrence Rd. 5. Show all required off-site improvements. Extend Miner Rd. west from Lawrence Rd. approximately 600-ft. The typical section should provide a minimum of two 12-ft. lanes, widening to three 12-ft. lanes at the intersection of Miner and Lawrence to allow for left turn movements. 6. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering to upgrade the signals at Miner Rd. and Lawrence Rd. 7. Extend the center median on Lawrence Rd. south of Miner Rd. approximately 70-ft. north. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional ... 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 04/28/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 29. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 30. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 31. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 32. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the dwellings as well as the recreational building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 33. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that support utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 34. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 35. All entrance gates to construction area shall have a Knox lock system that will also open in case of electrical power failure. All gates shall be a V minimum of 20' wide. Fire Department apparatus shall be able to turn into the construction site in one turn. 36. The construction site access roads shall be maintained free of obstructions at t/ all times. 37. All required fire hydrants, standpipes or sprinkler systems shall be in place V before going vertical. Vertical construction shall be protected by standpipes . 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 04/28/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT and the sprinkler system to one level below the highest level of construction V- throughout the building. 38. Any cost of damage to Fire Department vehicles because of improperly stabilized roads or any towing fees if a vehicle becomes stuck will be the V responsibility of the contractor. A minimum of 32 tons is required for ground stabilization. 39. Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around space shall be provided in the construction area. V--. POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 40. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 41. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. 42. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 43. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 44. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: a. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." b. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 04/28/05 7 * DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. d. The number of dwelling units in each building. e. The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t)) 51. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 52. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 53. Sheet 2 of 4. Indicate on the plans that light poles comply withy 2001 FBC, Section 1606 for compliance with 140mph windload. Design calculations by a design professional registered in the State of Florida shall be submitted at time of permit application. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 54. Landscaping notes should indicate a 110% irrigation coverage. / 55. A six (6) foot black, vinyl coated chain link fence should be installed ./ between the development and the civic area to the south. t~ -(0 140 uPrf$ - /tJ~ W ID ~ev( ~(; CA-lC. 56. The recreation impact fee will be : ~ 152 single-family, detached homes @ 940.00 each = $142,880.00 The impact fee is due prior to issuance of the "first application permit". FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 57. The Landscape Architect should indicate and tabulate the total number of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These 5!~\06 if!. r) V-~ ~ / ,-\_0) 5. ~ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 04/28/05 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet ~ LP5. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] 58. Landscape Plan Sheet 5 of 5.1 of 1 ( Lakes) All shade and palm trees on the Plant list must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), 12'.14' height 1.-----'" minimum and Florida # 1. The height of the trees will be larger than 12' -14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article IT Sec. 5.C. 2.] 59. The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height of the tree will be measured at time of ~ planting and inspection. 60. All groundcover / vine plantings should have a height and spread ~ measurement. 61. The applicant should amend the note indicating that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened / with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. 62. The applicant must submit a Lake Management Plan document for the V lakes. 63. Irrieation Plan-No Irrieation plan included in the submittal V The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 64. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate V zones and time duration for water conservation. 65. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article IT Sec. 5. ~ C.2.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 66. At the technical advisory review team meeting, provide written responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. 67. At the technical advisory review team meeting, provide a full set of drawings, sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. ...,. ""' 1 ~~REVIEW RESPONSES, 5-24-05 New Site Plan l _ ! .I.V' i'- .1 Project name: Knollwood File number: NWSP 05-016 Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an April 6, 2005 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). "'I-, No response required. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic - Comments: . 2. Provide a .trttffie-tmalysisand notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. ").:" A traffic ana(ysis has been submitted. 3. Staff strongly recommends moving the main entrance to the north property line, by extending Miner Rd. from Lawrence Rd. west to the easterly north- south roadway. The proposed location of the main entry off Lawrence Rd. will conflict with the planned park entry to the Civic Site south of Knollwood Groves PUD. Additionally the proposed main entry has only one egress lane that will not efficiently allow both northbound and southbound turning movements. ~"" ' The entry location has been the topic of meetings with both Palm Beach County and City professionals. For reasons too numerous to list in this response the entry will remain in it's general location. County staffwill require extending the existing median in front of the entrance thereby only allowing for a right in and right out of the community. 4. Retain a secondary emergency access on the east property line onto Lawrence Rd. I A second means of emergency access onto Lawrence Road has been added to the site plan. 5. Show all required off-site improvements. Extend Miner Rd. west from Lawrence Rd. approximately 600-ft. The typical section should provide a mInImUm of two 12- ft. lanes, widening to three 12- ft. lanes at the intersection of Miner and Lawrence to allow for left turn movements. '. Please see response #3 above. 6. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering to upgrade the signals at Miner Rd. and Lawrence Rd. " The applicant has met with Palm Beach County traffic and roadway ... comment response.052405 OS/24/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT production. Warrants necessary for upgrading the signal do not exist at this time. 7. Extend the center median on Lawrence Rd. south of Miner Rd. approximately 70-ft. north. ,... The center median has been extended north as requested. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. All corrections have been shown on all sheets 9. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission . and at permit review. Acknowled!!ed 10. Show proposed site and street lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.BA.) Lighting will be required for the parking area adjacent to the recreation area. l Lif!htinf! has been added to all applicable plans. 11. The two Live Oaks located in Lots 96 and 97 (either side of the drainage easement) are placed too close together for their mature size. Staff recommends that the cultivars "Highrise" or "Cathedral" be used for Live Oaks, particularly where called out along rear property lines. '''.,,, Response: One of the proposed Live Oaks has been removed from the landscape plan, as requested. "Highrise" species have been designated throughout the project. Please see revised landscape plan included herein. 12. All trees and palms should be placed a minimum of five feet off the property lines and away from driveways, sidewalks and curbs to allow for future growth and prevent heaving of the aforementioned structures. Response: All street trees have been placed at least 5 feet from drives, sidewalks and curbs. Please see landscape plans, prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., and included herein. 13. Wild Date Palm/Sylvester specified within the entryway median does not have adequate clear trunk specified for vehicle clearance due to the large size (length) of the fronds which will hang into traffic. " Response: The Wild Date Palm/Sylvester has been replaced with Royal Palms. Please see revised plans prepared by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. 14. The Shrub/Groundcover Planting Detail on Typical Unit Landscape Plan Sheet 2 of 2 depicts planting for a tree. Please correct. Response: The Planting Detail, referred to above, identifies a shrub. Please refer to landscape plans, included herein. comment response.052405 OS/24/05 3 DEPARTMENTS 15. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b). Response: This has been noted in the General Notes on the landscape plan. The proposed trees have been adjusted per the lighting plan. Please see revised plans, included herein. 16. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Lawrence Road. Use a minimum 25-ft. site triangle for interior development intersections (revise the note on Landscape Plan Sheet 1 of 5.) Response: The required safe sight triangles have been included on the landscape plans. 17. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not permitted. Response: The ficus shrub located in the green island has been replaced with a Carissa "Green island". Please refer to revised landscape plans. 18. Provide a legend for the plant symbols. Response: All plants are denoted and tagged on the landscape plans with letter symbols, which correlate to the comprehensive plant list included within the landscape plan package. Please refer to landscape plans, included herein, for further clarification. 19. Live Oaks are proposed within the utility easement on the east side of the recreation area. Canopy trees are not allowed within utility easements. Please replace with a different species. Response: All canopy trees have been pulled to a location behind the easement. Royals have been identified around the perimeter of the recreation area. Acknowledged. See Site Grading Note #8 on Sheet 2 of the Preliminary En1!ineerinJ! Plans. 21. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Acknowledged. 22. Upon Commission approval of the site plan schedule a pre-application meeting with the Engineering Division to begin the plat process. INCLUDE REJECT '. comment response.052405 OS/24/05 4 DEPARTMENTS Acknowledged. UTILITIES Comments: :2.). Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. We expect water and sewer service will be required 12 months after the City Commission approval. City Commission Approval - Month 0 Permit Application - Month 2 Start of Construction - Month 7 First Water Meter-Month 12 24. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the Site plan and Landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. Most all water and sewer has been shown in the road R/W which will also be a utility easement to the City. A 10 foot general utility easement has been shown adjacent to the road RIW. Utility easements outside the road R/W have been shown. All easements will be dedicated by plat. 25. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). A cknowledf(ed. 26. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Fire Flow calculations will be provided at the time of permit application. 27. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. INCLUDE REJECT comment response.052405 OS/24/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Numerous lots are not covered by this requirement; lots not covered are: 9, 10 partially, 31 partially, 40 partially, 51 partially, 52, 53, 54, 65, 66, 67, 79 partially, 80, 81, 82 partially, 87, 88, 89, 90 partially, Ill, 112, 113, 120 partially, 127 partially, 128, 135, 136, 137, 147 partially, 148, and 149. Reconfigure fire hydrant locations to meet this code requirement. " This code section also provides for an exception to the above requirement for one and two story residential project with a density of less than 10 units per acre which this project qualifies. We believe the plan meets the exception requirements. 28. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Acknowledf(ed. 29. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). See response to item 24. 30. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Acknowledf(ed. 31. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. . Acknowledged. See Fire and Life Safety notes on Sheet 2 of the Preliminary Enf(ineerinf( Plans. 32. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the dwellings as well as the recreational building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26- 207. Acknowledf(ed. 33. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that support utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. comment response.052405 OS/24/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT See General Note 1 on Sheet 2 of the Preliminary Engineering Plans. 34. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including ; any , ;; updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Acknowledged. FIRE Comments: 35. All entrance gates to construction area shall have a Knox lock system that will also open in case of electrical power failure. All gates shall be a minimum of 20' wide. Fire Department apparatus shall be able to turn into the construction site in one turn. Acknowledged, a knox box will be provided to activate the entrance gates. All gates will open to provide a 20' clear opening. 36. The construction site access roads shall be maintained free of obstructions at all times. Acknowledged 37. All required fire hydrants, standpipes or sprinkler systems shall be in place before going vertical. Vertical construction shall be protected by standpipes and the sprinkler system to one level below the highest level of construction throughout the building. Acknowledged. No fire sprinkler systems are anticipated in this proJect. 38. Any cost of damage to Fire Department vehicles because of improperly stabilized roads or any towing fees if a vehicle becomes stuck will be the responsibility of the contractor. A minimum of 32 tons is required for ground stabilization. Acknowledged. 39. Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around space shall be provided in the construction area. Acknowledged. POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: .~ '01; r . <n;lO ;108 III 1 . . -;lOlm::c )> :~ ! ~ <:l < ~ -l '. ~ 1 ~ ,:C'l e I .:,~ i Cr ~ 1. f~a~m ~ , : ,(1) ~<n . :..... trim ] " j ~ . . ~i'~!~1! '".' ."'~'_tl':.:~~~l~" :",~ - .. ~~~:~~: I . ~;.ii:.=- .' .1~... .. I.~. !.I", ,,_:. ;e. I . .~::::. :.; ~~,:,:' 1.::.ii:.1 11 . . I....... '. . I::;,~~" :J :~'..::.::~, ..:~ii:c, -~..'.-.... . I~~ . . '. '. .' ',..... ..,;~ ,.... . t:.... ...-.:JI" I ~.:.::.::: ".::~;,r" --, : I . . . " _ ~."".4 ..... ....., ~::::~. ~:.:... ' ;.... '............................ ~.... ~':liil ','. .......... · .......... · ........ .. ".:.:., ~::'l!i :~.:............... .. .. . :::::' ..:::: l:':. ............. ....'~-'=H .. .i. . .... m~rl::~~m ~~Ii. .... ..... ..... ...... Je..iI...... :......, , '.:. O....i:t -. ."". ::.'.- '.-- '... .. "'0 to',." 'e:'::.:.' -~..." ! ::.:. ~.:.:: \M . ~ ....: . .' ':'. ITl -< '::.a :.::.~.,.::.:.):> I~..:~!I .:-....-,.;c.-.: ("') z ... ":.:..:.. ... """0' ;::~~ t;i ::m; ~ z :r-f.:...~.'~..,...:... :.! :'.:. ....:. ~ .::.:: .::.: ::~:..~ :..:., .:.:. ..... .::.: .:.: :.t:..~ :.... ..... '41"'*'_ · "..:' ":...-.-. i. ....ii,'. . ..... · · · · · · '. · .... .... 00;........ r. . '. . ... ............ ............ ......:.. ....:~.~.........'-. '.'~.. ' ,.......0... ...... .......... .......: ~. ............... . ~..!".!_.&.- ..... ,. , ~ - - '.., ,... F , I f ., ~, ~,.; to"~$V ,/ ~ .. ~\9 "il, 10/ "'0.> ~O / ~.> (/) ~'" '-~ v.. ~O .... 1\)\1' l\l ::u 00 2 .... o tIl . I... .,. . .... ....VI O~NN"""'" ~ CD ~(I) N f!'h T .1'11 + . )> ;e CD o -< Z .--1 o Z J, \:: " . ./ .. f1"1 )> (") :I: :1 ') '" .,:'1:!'! :=8' 'b I 't ~;c;i~ _t ,r-Il J I I I -~,:,~8 ) bo....1 ~~ :s ~-o ~ a7 ~ P ..n Ci) ".. <f ~ I Ie I ,-.,.... 0 I U) 0 -I -II I!I;' f t!~~~ ~ Cr - '~ ~ (n OJ · < c.nm _. ,~ . ~Ii .. .., I. I ii."' t .~ ,---- . " W, 'e,.:.,,:.'., ~ ~.; I . f!.~'.~~.j!t. _ ~ "'.'---'. ' -----r;:., · · I ~'~:;::~:: l:~:::" . ? -.to I ..,.., ~~.~~. I...., fIII'tiI 'r;-:.-~.. I.~. I I 1.:.:.: I::: ~ .~.:.:. j.:" ~il I I. :~~~~~~ \;:2 .J..L',.,:. . I: ,F.:::::., I::z~;ri · l.........~.'i.~.'.. C4_',__"_". ",,'"'' .......-. .::::.-: 1.-';-;"\ ..'.---.".'..1..... I' .... .'.'.: .; . .la, 'e~.:.,," ,.1'....1'.1, I, 1,..',..',',............',..: I: .:.:, ;.:.:fli .',..',',............'1. It..'..~... ........ 1:.:.:-\ }-. e,';,. . . . i .....; r..'~.'.i :::::."::::: ~:~z.~ .......:...... \e..,~:iI ............ '.:.,:~\ ::::: ~:::: ;:,;.:,::~..'.. :.:.'.'" ..:.... C...~~- . . . . ....,.' . . .", .. ..... ..'........'.:: .:.:-:'" .:.:.:. ~:.'~i1 ........~:,: IL..--...... ....~.~'..',;,'~ . . :' Ii . . ~'.H.!'~-',. .....,.." ~......; ,.., &:I :-.',:4J~(" . .....-'" "'....' t.N 0 E'..t~~~' . ..-- __.. ._ '. I ............ 111 . .... ..--Wl.ri ..... ...... ):)- -<..~-~, ~~~~~; ~.~~~; ~ O~. ~;:;~ .:...:,~ ..!..... ':::;I'~! ...:.:,:"'- "'..:.: ~ .. ' .....- '..... .:::Iii- :e:.:' I .....':,~ ..... .....1 . . ..."', .. r-.-. .....:,.. .... .. . -I .....::! ..... I......., .....' .... ...~ t...' ..... .... ....;-~ I. · · .....~~...................I.:.:.-:_ -.:.:_ . .:.-:~a .........0.""'..... .'. 1'1 ......-' .. '... i.. ....v.~ '_' . .. ......... 1'-',-, . . . .: > :.".',,:...,,:...,:,'.!__~;;"'.., .,' ,',~. ~""'''i'~i'!'" ~,..,. :~,,:~, r , I I. ... ~ ~~.~ A" 'V.... r.. .~ ,/ .. It.. ... ~\9 ~V.. .10 "'0 & 7/ >0 ~.> a~ ~I:"" &> 17 " &>0 I\l\ .... 0'" ""::0 00 0.... .01 ~ ow -.j.:a.~ . - NN ~ N CD ~cn N ~A .' --!~ . G)l;' .r Gl 1 ' ]:>> , ~ 1 ~' ~ 1 . 1 : L? . J . . , _ oJ m o -< Z '--I o Z L"" ".. . . ", . (D fF1 )> o ::I: i.....~.._.. -.'."'~- '.. .. ,_"e". :..:..:r......;'.....".. ~.!. ~.:~~ .,j: ~<,: .. Ie ... I....; , . . 1:.:., f. . . . '.:-.'.1 I- . ..-0' I....,.. I... ,.....':'.....).. ..... --c! I...', . L.~ !~.. . .~ :l ? v: 'r I: I I ! I :11 ! li~ III ! ~. i I !' ( J 'iI'flj , lrfl,., e '1 ~ flliil! 1-( 11111:j ~d i i J iiI/fir .~ ~ r ljllil I ~,.~ . ~,.:. >. . 'If \ .:~~' ' , ! ': Ii , . .. '1 ., M , ~ . 't . z.: i , . ~~~ I' ... I ,\ ..., ;~l~: I~' . ,I!' ~ I . . ,. 0. . ...~ 'I", 'I II . .~ r' --- "'" -.. -~\ 1;... \ ~ ,/-;-~t. . !.I....:il.i.i.'vdfL.,; I." 1',:11""'" ....~ \.' ~.I:"i~'!' ' I .'. l:lati ._' _I d:. 1"_''#''/1 if"'''', i . l, , , ~. , . 11'1,. -I if : , " '. I . . iii- '!'~~ i \.:! i : '0 , ' ,: ?'ii i : I!!~ JJL.:t>,., z.~ il ' "A, , ,Eil":Xl. 9i' , !t/,>"^r'r.(: f . I-~ 1 ",/ , ~ -1115: I 1: I~ : ~:Hi t "ijr , :' 'I ',',. , I;"!'" ".',1 . ~ : ~ J ': :il.. .:~.:: !ij~ .: rill ~~. ~r n~= ~ ! ~H~i , +., : I~'. F- Ui' ~M. I '. : U!~: p ,:\f' . . . I~~ ~ ~ , I i~i~ =~~ (f) fT1 Ii! .=' ~, :i Ij~!!lIi~ III T :,:!! Tlil'l~m.,,~ l:' I:~ ~ ~ !~.. I I!;h . 'l;';~:"i'!'" .' ,'. ~lL. . I" H:. i;;:!j , 1] ! l H;Q! "! m. "1~li: ,'" I -.. 10 II,~N :qq. ~:~I l~ '1m ' Inm.mg : : J< .! " i -.t.. :!j i !jl~ I , I I ~,~y .( ; ~_:.~i~ iii, =~J u!~ I:E:C ." H~~ jfT1 .., Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX: (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION to: Chip Bryan fax #: fIR/ 3C1/ ' 3~d~ date: April 28, 2005 from: Sherie Coale re: 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Knollwood Please find attached the first review comments for your project. To stay on the current review schedule, please do the following steps listed below, and bring all documents to the Technical Application Review Team who will meet on Tuesday, May 17,2005. 1. Revise your plans incorporating all comments listed herein, including the addition of notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bring 12 copies to the TART meeting (full sets including all pages originally submitted); 2. Submit the additional information as requested within the attached comments; ( i.e. traffic analysis, engineering certification, etc.) 3. Prepare a written response (7 copies) consisting of a list briefly summarizing how each comment has been addressed on the revised plans or with the supplemental information including location on the plans (this promotes an expeditious 2n review by staff and your project representatives during the TART meeting );and 4. Submit reductions (8 ~ X 11) and in digital format (JPEG) for the proposed site plans, elevations and landscaping plan (this is required for the final report and public presentation). Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 ~ The applicant should not attend a second review meeting until all documents have been revised and copied for staff review. Ifplans will not be fully revised and brought to the scheduled meeting, contact Ed Breese in this office by the Thursday prior to the scheduled meeting date. Projects deviating from the original schedule are eligible for review at subsequent meetings, which are held every Tuesday. To reschedule, contact Sherie Coale, by the Thursday prior to the Tuesday meeting that you desire to attend. The remainder of the review schedule will be adjusted accordingly. If you have questions on the attached comments, please contact the respective reviewer using the attached list of review representatives. If the plans are reasonably complete and all significant comments are addressed following 2nd review, the project is forwarded to the Planning and Development Board meeting that falls approximately 2 to 3 weeks following the TART meeting. An "*,, by any comment identifies a comment that must be addressed prior to moving forward to the Planning and Development board. Note: Items recognized by staff as typically outstanding at this point include a traffic report and/or confirmation ofthe traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County drainage certification by a licensed engineer, signed "Rider to Site Plan Application" form and colored elevations of the proposed project. This information is necessary for the project to proceed. If you have submitted this information, please disregard this note. DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENT A TIVES' PHONE FAX DESIGNEE Engineering Dave Kelley Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485 Building Don Johnson Timothy Large 742-6352 742-6352 Fire Department Rodger Kemmer Rick Lee 742-6753 742-6357 Police Department Marshall Gage John Huntington 737-6167 737-3136 Utilities Pete Mazzella H. David Kelley Jr. 742-6401 742-6485 Public Works-General Larry Quinn Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485 Public W orks- Traffic Jeffrey Livergood Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485 Parks & Recreation Jody Rivers 742-6227 742-6233 Forester/Environmentalist Kevin Hallahan Kevin Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259 Planning & Zoning Michael Rumpf, Ed Breese 742-6262 742-6259 CHAIRMAN REVISED 4/12/05 S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlKnollwood Groves PUDINWSP 05-01711s1 Review comments FAX COVERdoc TRC COMMENTS PROJECT: FILE # TYPE OF PROJECT: SIZE OF PROJECT: CAPACITY: KNOLLWOOD NWSP 05-017 RESIDENCES 36.17 ACRES 152 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITH CLUB HOUSE COMMENTS 1. All entrance gates to construction area shall have a Knox lock system that will also open in case of electrical power failure. All gates shall be a minimum of 20' wide. Fire Department apparatus shall be able to turn into the construction site in one turn. 2. The construction site access roads shall be maintained free of obstructions at all times. 3. All required fire hydrants, standpipes or sprinkler systems shall be in place before going vertical. Vertical construction shall be protected by standpipes and the sprinkler system to one level below the highest level of construction throughout the building. 4. Any cost of damage to Fire Department vehicles because of improperly stabilized roads or any towing fees if a vehicle becomes stuck will be the responsibility of the contractor. A minimum of 32 tons is required for ground stabilization. 5. Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around space shall be provided in the construction area. 6. The finished roof height is very close to the 30' mark. The height of the buildings will be measured and if they exceed 30' they will be required to install a fire sprinkler system. ../ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-050 TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: April 25, 2005 RE: Review Comments New Site Plan - 1 st Review Knollwood Groves PUD File No. NWSP 05-017 The above referenced Site Plans, received on April 18, 2005, were reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 3. Staff strongly recommends moving the main entrance to the north property line, by extending Miner Rd. from Lawrence Rd. west to the easterly north-south roadway. The proposed location of the main entry off Lawrence Rd. will conflict with the planned park entry to the Civic Site south of Knollwood Groves PUD. Additionally the proposed main entry has only one egress lane that will not efficiently allow both northbound and southbound turning movements. 4. Retain a secondary emergency access on the east property line onto Lawrence Rd. 5. Show all required off-site improvements. Extend Miner Rd. west from Lawrence Rd. approximately 600-ft. The typical section should provide a minimum of two 12-ft. lanes, widening to three 12-ft. lanes at the intersection of Miner and Lawrence to allow for left turn movements. 6. Coordinate with Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering to upgrade the signals at Miner Rd. and Lawrence Rd. 7. Extend the center median on Lawrence Rd. south of Miner Rd. approximately 70-ft. north '" "' Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-050 Knollwood Groves PUD, New Site Plan 1st Review April 25, 2005 Page 2 ENGINEERING 8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 9. Please note that changes or reVISions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 10. Show proposed site and street lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) Lighting will be required for the parking area adjacent to the recreation area. 11. The two Live Oaks located in Lots 96 and 97 (either side of the drainage easement) are placed too close together for their mature size. Staff recommends that the cultivars "Highrise" or "Cathedral" be used for Live Oaks, particularly where called out along rear property lines. 12. All trees and palms should be placed a minimum of five feet off the property lines and away from driveways, sidewalks and curbs to allow for future growth and prevent heaving of the aforementioned structures. 13. Wild Date Palm/Sylvester specified within the entryway median does not have adequate clear trunk specified for vehicle clearance due to the large size (length) of the fronds which will hang into traffic. 14. The Shrub/Groundcover Planting Detail on Typical Unit Landscape Plan Sheet 2 of 2 depicts planting for a tree. Please correct. 15. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b). 16. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Lawrence Road. Use a minimum 25-ft. site triangle for interior development intersections (revise the note on Landscape Plan Sheet 1 of 5.) 17. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. Ficus species are not permitted. 18. Provide a legend for the plant symbols. 19. Live Oaks are proposed within the utility easement on the east side of the recreation area. Canopy trees are not allowed within utility easements. Please replace with a different species. 20. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 21. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-050 Knollwood Groves PUD, New Site Plan 1st Review April 25, 2005 Page 3 UTILITIES 22. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 23. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the Site plan and Landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 24. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 25. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 26. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Numerous lots are not covered by this requirement; lots not covered are: 9, 10 partially, 31 partially, 40 partially, 51 partially, 52, 53, 54, 65, 66, 67, 79 partially, 80, 81, 82 partially, 87, 88, 89, 90 partially, 111, 112, 113, 120 partially, 127 partially, 128, 135, 136, 137, 147 partially, 148, and 149. Reconfigure fire hydrant locations to meet this code requirement. 27. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 28. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 29. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. . Department of Public Works/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-050 Knollwood Groves PUD, New Site Plan 1 sl Review April 25, 2005 Page 4 30. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 31. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the dwellings as well as the recreational building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 32. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that support utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 33. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. LUck Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Knollwood Groves PUD, New Site Plan 1st Review.doc /" Plannine Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Ed Breese, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Knollwood New Site Plan - 1 st Review NWSP 05-017 Date: April 25, 2005 Existine Trees Manaeement Plan The Landscape Architect should indicate and tabulate the total number of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to remain in place, be relocated throughout the site, or removed / replaced on site. All desirable species of existing trees must be relocated rather than removed if the trees are in good health. These trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet LP5. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Landscaoe Plan Sheet 5 of 5.1 of 1 (Lakes) 1. All shade and palm trees on the Plant list must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of3" diameter at DBH (4.5' off the ground), 12'-14' height minimum and Florida #1. The height of the trees will be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.] 2. The details section for the Tree and Palm Planting Detail should include a line indicating where the height of the tree will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 3. All groundcover / vine plantings should have a height and spread measurement. 4. The applicant should amend the note indicating that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. 5. The applicant must submit a Lake Management Plan document for the lakes. .. Irrieation Plan-No Irrieation plan included in the submittal 1. The irrigation system design (not included in the plans) should be low volume water conservation using non-portable water. 2. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 3. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] Kjh ------ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: April 22, 2005 FILE: NWSP 05-017 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Knollwood REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: No Comments. ./ Rivers, Jody To: Subject: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie Site Plan Review - Knollwood Project: File No.: Knollwood NWSP 05-017 1 . Landscaping notes should indicate a 110% irrigation coverage. 2. A 6' black, vinyl coated chain link fence should be installed between the development and the civic area to the south. 3. The recreation impact fee will be: 152 single-family, detacted homes @ $940.00 each = $142,880.00 The impact fee is due prior to issuance of the "fist application permit." J ovi.lj T.;;:Lve v:; Parks Superintendent City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 (561) 742-6226 (561) 742-6233 (fax) 1 ~ The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 ~~'~l' " \ ! ~ / , " / 'c"'''~ .-.- "'""" ~ I '>J' www.boynton-beach.org To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities Marshall Gage, Police Chief Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Wally Majors, Parks Director Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analysist John Huntington, Police Officer Ed Breese, Principal Planner 4t:7J From: Date: Re: 4/15/05 Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services Project: Knollwood PUD File Number: NWSP 05-016 MEMORANDUM As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current infrastructure and I or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development. Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent us something that indicates your current staff I infrastructure would either be able to support the proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6260. 5: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\AGENDAS\ TRC\correspondence\lmpact Analysis.doc ----- .' FROM: Timothy K. Larg TRC Member/Bu Ll1W"6f Acronvms/Abbreviations: ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBC - Florida Building Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F .S. - Florida Statutes LOR - Land Development Regulations NEC - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 _ SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-076 TO: Ed Breese Principal Planner DATE: April 26, 2005 SUBJECT: Project-~ ~(lwvo~ File No. - NWSP 05-017 - 1::;1 review We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits. Buildino Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Laroe (561) 742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2001 FBC, Chapter 6. 3 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 4 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 5 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: a. The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." b. From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. c. Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2005\Citrus Cay Page 1 of 2 6 Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall/fence. Identify the type of wall/fence material and the type of material that supports the wall/fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall/fence that includes the depth that the wall/fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall/fence shall comply with the wall/fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 7 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 8 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 9 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission- approved site plan. b. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. c. The number of dwelling units in each building. d. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. e. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 10 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 11 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: a. A legal description of the land. b. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission- approved site plan. c. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. d. The number of dwelling units in each building. e. The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 12 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 13 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 14 Sheet 2 of 4. Indicate on the plans that light poles comply withy 2001 FBC, Section 1606 for compliance with 140mph windload. Design calculations by a design professional registered in the State of Florida shall be submitted at time of permit application. bf S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2005\Citrus Cay Page 2 of 2 r' ~ FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal DATE: April 20, 2005 SUBJECT: NWSP 05-016 NWSP 05-017 Knollwood PUD High Ridge New Urban Community The Fire Department expects to be able to maintain an adequate level of service for the subject projects, with current or anticipated staffing. Infrastructure requirements such as hydrants and roadways will be addressed during plan reviews and the permitting process. It must be noted however, that the Multi- family units of High Ridge NUC is in an area with significant growth in the past year. We support this project with the understanding that Fire Station NO.5 will be available when these structures are ready for occupancy. Any additional commercial occupancies that require periodic fire inspections will require additional inspection staff. CC: Chief Bingham F&LS Staff File