Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: PROJECT: REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 05-146 Chair and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Board and City Commission Michael Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning Eric Lee Johnson, AICP r Planner August 4/ 2005 . The Arches / HTEX 05-006 Height Exception Property Owner: Applicant: Agent: Location: Existing Land Use: Existing Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Proposed Zoning: Proposed Uses: Acreage: Adjacent Uses: North: South: East: Boynton Ventures 1/ LLC Boynton Ventures 1/ LLC Ms. Bonnie Miskel and Ms. Kim Glas-Castro with Ruden McClosky Southwest corner of Ocean Avenue and Federal Highway(Exhibit "A") Mixed Use (MX) Mixed Use Core (MX-C) Central Business District (CBD) Mixed Use High (MU-H) Mixed Use Core (MX-C) Mixed Use High (MU-H) Retail: 40/596 square feet Residential: 1 bedroom (240 units) 2 bedroom (138 units) 4.688 acres (204/208 square feet) Right-of-way for Ocean Avenue and farther north are developed propertie~ zoned Central Business District (CBD); Right-of-way for Southeast 2nd Avenue and farther south is a developec commercial plaza zoned Community Commercial (C-3); Right-of-way for Federal Highway and father east is developed commercia properties zoned CBD; and Page 2 Memorandum No, PZ 05-146 West: Right-of-way for Southeast 4th Street and still farther west is developec commercial properties zoned CBO. BACKGROUND Boynton Ventures I, LLC has assembled many lots within two city blocks in order to develop a large scale mixed use project. The subject property is located within Study Area III of the Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan and a portion was previously rezoned (LUAR 03-003) from Central Business Oistrict (CBO) to Mixed-Use High (MU-H). In addition, the property was also approved for a site plan (NWSP 03-002) consisting of three (3) buildings ranging from three (3) stories to 10 stories in height. The previously approved site plan contained 276 dwelling units, 24,296 square feet of retail, 18,169 square feet of office, and 12,699 square feet of restaurant. It should be noted that a portion of an alley on Block 7 (ABAN 03-002) was also approved to accommodate the aforementioned uses. The project represented the second "mixed-use" type of development within the MU-H zoning district at the time of its approval. Since then, Boynton Ventures I, LLC acquired additional property on Block 7 on the Original Town of Boynton plat. As such, the applicant is now requesting a major site plan modification in order to construct a total of 378 dwelling units and 40,596 square feet of retail space (combining retail, office, and restaurant space). The total "commercial" area has been reduced by 14,568 square feet. Approval of the site plan will be contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 05-008). The modifications now propose two (2) residential towers that are 15 stories tall. Although the buildings comply with the maximum height as permitted under the MU-H zoning district, there a certain elements of the building that exceed the 150-foot threshold. Those elements are the subject of this request for height exception. The height exception would only be required for the two (2) identical, 15-story buildings (see Exhibit "B"). ANALYSIS The objective of the CBO and mixed use zoning districts, in part, is to support and stimulate revitalization efforts in the city's traditional downtown core area. Staff recognizes that a viable downtown will have a mix of uses with higher residential densities and reasonable building heights. Land Oevelopment Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 4.F.3, Height Limitations and Exceptions, states that in considering an application for exception to the district height regulation, the City Commission shall make findings indicating the proposed exception has been studied and considered in relation to minimum standards, where applicable. The applicant has responded affirmatively to all standards for evaluating height exceptions (see Exhibit "0" - Applicant Letter). The premise for the height exception was predicated on the fact that the maximum allowable height for all zoning districts in the City would be 45 feet, excluding the CBO and Mixed-Use zoning districts. The citywide maximum height of 45 feet would generally limit a typical building to four (4) stories. Similarly, the CBO zoning district allows for a maximum building height by right at 45 feet. However, building heights in the CBO may be increased to 100 feet, but only as a conditional use. As a conditional use, it would be evaluated against a different set of standards and require public notice. The Mixed-Use Low (MU-L) zoning district allows for a maximum building height of 75 feet by right. Only the MU-H zoning district allows for a maximum building height of 150 feet by right. In 2002, the Marina project (MSPM 02-005) was proposed with buildings that were nine (9) stories in height. The City Commission approved a new method for measuring building height based on roof type. Ordinance 02-010, adopted on March 19, 2002 defined the building height for mansard roofs as measured (in feet) from the finished grade to the top of the deck line. The goal of the new definition was to be consistent with current standards and to allow more flexibility in building design. Pursuant to Ordinance 02-010, the nine (9)-story project complied with both the CBO and MU-H zoning district height Page 3 Memorandum No, PZ 05-146 limitations. In 2003, the project known as "The Residences at Marina Village", the project's most recent site plan modification (MSPM 03-001), proposed building elevations with the deck line dimensioned at 144 feet in height. In this particular project, the deck line was considered to be the top of the roof deck, or in other words, the point of the building at which height was measured. The deck line was actually six (6) feet below the maximum allowable height of 150 feet and therefore, the building met the height restriction of the MU-H zoning district. However, portions of the mansard roof exceeded 150 feet. Many portions of the Boynton Beach Marina's roofline reached as high as 168 feet in height, which in turn, necessitated the need for a height exception. Staff reviewed the Boynton Beach Marina request in accordance with standards prescribed by Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 4.F.3, Height Limitations, and Exceptions. Staff argued that the origin of the height exception was predicated on the fact that 45 feet was the maximum allowable height for all zoning districts, excluding the CBD and Mixed-Use zoning districts, and that the intent of the height exception process was to allow for mechanical equipment, elevator towers, and other minor rooftop appurtenances that would incidentally (due to Building Code related issues) exceed the 45-foot maximum height limitation. Staff felt that the Boynton Beach Marina project's request for an 18-foot height exception did not meet the intent of the height exception standards. Staff recommended denial of their request. The CRA Board reviewed the request but failed to reach consensus on a motion to deny (with a 3 to 3 vote), resulting in a non-recommendation to the City Commission. The City Commission, however, approved the applicant's 18-foot height exception request on April 15, 2003. In June of 2004, a similar mixed-use project known as The Promenade (NWSP 04-009) was proposed in another area of the MU-H zoning district. The site plan for The Promenade proposed 318 dwelling units, 68 hotel units, 19,200 square feet of retail, and 3,000 square feet of restaurant. All were proposed within three (3) separate buildings ranging from two (2) stories to 14 stories tall. The Promenade project requested a 17-foot height exception. Staff reviewed The Promenade height exception request the Boynton Beach Marina project (HTEX 03-002). Both projects represented similar mixed-use developments that were recently approved by the City Commission for height exceptions. The Promenade's request for height exception was similar in many respects to the Boynton Beach Marina. The elevations showed that the deck line of the Promenade project was 142 feet in height, placing it eight (8) feet below the maximum allowed by the MU-H zoning district. The applicant affirmatively addressed all standards for evaluating height exceptions. In the letter, the applicant indicated that the portions of the buildings (that exceeded the 142 foot roofline) were necessary to hide mechanical equipment, elevator shafts, and stair shafts. In addition, the roof treatment was necessary to provide articulation to give the buildings a more desirable aesthetic appearance. Staff concurred that those building elements were eligible to be considered for height exceptions. The peak of the tallest portion of the roof was 167 feet in height. This was 17 feet over the maximum allowed by the MU-H zoning district. No existing buildings in the CBD or citywide were 100 feet tall. The Promenade's request for height exception was one (1) foot less than what was already approved for the Boynton Beach Marina. Staff reviewed the Promenade request against the criteria listed in the Land Development Regulations and determined that it would not have had an adverse effect on existing and proposed land uses and that it would not have reduced light and air in adjacent areas. Staff recommended approval of the Promenade's request for height exception. The height exception was subsequently approved by the City Commission on July 20, 2004. The approval of the Boynton Beach Marina height exception request (HTEX 03-002) set the precedence upon which subsequent height exception requests have been reviewed. Prior to 2003, the subject property was zoned Central Business District (CBD). The CBD zoning district allows for a maximum building height of 45 feet, except for mixed-use type of developments (buildings), which as a conditional use, may not exceed 100 feet. In June of 2003, the subject property was Page 4 Memorandum No, PZ 05-146 successfully rezoned from CBD to Mixed Use High (MU-H) pursuant to Ordinance 03-020. The MU-H zoning district allows for a maximum building height of 150 feet. Part of the justification to rezone to MU- H was to provide developers with greater options for development and redevelopment projects in the downtown area. The elevations show the building would be 150 feet in height and that the top of the parapet wall would be 154 feet - eight (B) inches in height. This complies with the maximum allowable building height of the MU-H zoning district. However, certain rooftop elements reach as high as 167 feet, or 17 feet above the maximum height threshold. According to the applicant, the portion of the roof that would require the height exception consists of rooftop mechanical equipment, elevator shafts, stairwells, and roof profiles, all of which are uninhabitable space. The elevations show the top of the roof profiles are proposed at 161 feet - eight (B) inches in height. According to the applicant, these architectural enhancements proposed above the main roof area are decorative in nature and are considered non-habitable space. Roof profiles are eligible for height exceptions and would provide for better roof articulation that is encouraged by the Urban Design Guidelines. The applicant also states that roof-mounted equipment would be located within the central portions of the tower elements (at 167 feet in height). The centralized location of the equipment, as well as the shielding that would be provided by the roof profiles would prevent them from being obvious from adjacent properties. The top of elevator shafts and stairwells are the types of roof appurtenances that should be hidden from public view. Furthermore, the applicant states that the height exception is necessary to accommodate the units to allow an economically feasible and well-balance redevelopment project. According to the applicant, the elements that require the height exception would comprise 2,600 square feet in area and would account for approximately one percent (1%) of the total site. The equipment would be setback 40 feet from East Ocean Avenue and Southeast 2nd Avenue, and 31 feet - six (6) inches from Federal Highway, and 44 feet from Southeast 4th Street. The proposed height would be compatible with the building heights envisioned for the MU-H zoning district. As evidenced by previous approvals, this request for height exception would not constitute a grant of special privilege. RECOMMENDATION As previously mentioned, staff generally supports the redevelopment efforts proposed in the accompanying request for major site plan modification (MSPM 05-00B). The applicant meets the criteria as set forth in the Land Development Regulations. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the request for a 17-foot height exception contingent upon satisfying all comments noted in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval. Should the Board or City Commission have any additional comments, they will be placed accordingly within Exhibit "C". S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIARCHES @ BBIHTEX 05-0061Staff Report.doc Exmdit 'A' - Location I'vtap . 100 200 400 600 800 I Feet w.' . f- 3:0 ---I i~ :J! =3 CD CD"'D )> ~~ erg .., m~ 0 1Il-' =:T r>>m r+- CD CD- en (;)5 a' c p 5" p " CD i ~ z m ~~ ~m I · iD (0" ~i =:T =, ~ III m ~'< ~ m E" _ !!!. CD < ~ m t:!:. o :J i ~ OJ o '< :J 0 r+ - o q ::J: :J ~' OJ ::r CD '" ~ m q ~. g. lD - ~" 5 r- 0 . . q - iZ i1~ 1i~ ~~ S.. F!;l 8~ ~o ~~ l!~ it ~!' i!!iiiii!iii!i'~ ,1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DDDDD ;~;WN~o.-~n_~ - ~.~~N- ~;lil~~lill~IIIElillll~ ~! Is~I~~II~~i~&~~~~~~~ e'ill i !~~e~~~!i~~m!:z -&~'" ; i Iaia!!h: II ~ i "'il!!!lj~ ~'" i ! u '" ~~" '" EXHIBIT B fri1 3::0 -I Ii ffi CD \J )> ~a !!?,:~ ~ ~a ::r i>>m -- CD CD - ,,, (;)5 VI a' c: :!oJ 5" p ! ~ r-+ z ::r 0 CJ) lD ~m r-+ )lj5" .., mDi CD tt CD 0 r-+ :::I iii' m (') 0 CD :::I S < "0 e- O) !!!. ~ ~ 0 ::J i. ~ OJ o '< ::J '" r-+ - o ~ J: ::J iii' OJ g. (COg: 0)- o 0)' ::r i - -;--n 5 1- , . & ... EXHIBI ~. f- - ~ I, ODD o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~EBEE EBEBEB EB EEl EEHE EB EH J :g: E!3EBEE ~ ~J 0 I J r BEBEE! I ~1 - EEBEE! f J ~ g EBEE I I I EBEE J '. 0 EElEBEE Q EEl EBIEE [ 11 0 E EBIEE I I J I g f131!1311EE I 11 II - 11131m: g [ 11\ I~\ g ElliE! I tmtll g I3lIIBIl I I J II I J i - EE1IEB l g e [ 11 II g mlEE EBEBEB EBEBEBEE EBEB noD 0 ODD 000 L 1 Ui!!i!iU!!!! ;i;1; ~ \\.~ 6 \\.~ \\." \\.~ Q~ ,I ~ -+ TB ~ t- ~!' -I l~ ffi CD" )> ifo l\l-a 0"" -CD JI'C!: ::T s-m -- CD CD - ,^ G>5 VI a' c: :!=' :; p I'\) ::l 0- ~ CD ::l ~ C CD z m 0 lD CD ~m < Ill- -(I) m ~~ ~ <;- 0 ::I Iii ::l (') -- 0 ::I () S "S ~ c: ~ I () 0 3 "'C -. m :J 0 .. CD J. ~ OJ o '< ::l 0 ...... - 0"\ J: ::l g. OJ i m ~ g. g. lD .. ~" 5 r_ . . q ... EXHIBIT B mmm w cu. DESIGtI GUIDUHES - MHDS or COIlPOSmOH BASE t.tOSECTIOM ~-!"~I"!'j if~i~i~!. ~i. "!;i~!~i;!ii~ii!;;! I"~I"~. ~P'~ . Q.. t ~~ i~ & *~ li~ ~~ S ~~ ~~ ~ fi . ~ . , i ~ 6 q \\: ~~ q~ - ~ Ii~ \\:~ 1; q~ \\:~ I.~ . t- s:n -i i~ ffi lf3 ~~ )> eta! a !I'd: -- [lilll - -- CD CD - ,^ G)5 VI a' c y 5' P 0 i 0 CD q Q) z ::J 0 c..~ ~ ~m Ill- - CD ~~ CD 6' ::J ~ C iii' 0 CD 0 ~ m fiJ "'C 2" CD et < ~ Q) ~ 0 :::J i 'I" ;;; tD o '< ::J 0 r+ - o o_ J: ::J ~. tD ::T CD uo ~ Q) q o 0 ~. :T CD .. ~" ~ ;0- ~ flHfJ - ~ 1== I- ~ == EEEEEE IBIBEBIB IBIBEB EEIBIB I- ?= f== 133 EE EE EBIBEBE131 IBEBEB EBEBEB '- i~ ilih == ~EE EE ~ ~ EI3IEBEBE131 EBEBEB EBIBIB ~ i i~ h E EEEEEE EBEBEBEB EBIBEB EBEBEB r:: 1= ~E B~ ~ l;; ~ ~- ~ oD EEEEEE IBEBIBEBEBIBEBEB EBEBEB m ::fj ~~ ~G == ;; EB EB IBEB EBEBEBEB EaEBEB ~ r:: II II ~ t: ~ f:: [ r- - r- _ fW 7 JI L 'Ip!i p : iiiU!iiUiii!il~l~ 6~ ~ ~ tUn ~~ ~nnH 6 h ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ;I~ 6 ~H EXHIBIT B f' io EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: File number: Reference: The Promenade HTEX 05-006 Elevations dated August 2, 2005 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: None FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: None PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 1. At the time of permitting, the elevations shall be revised to indicate by note that the roof profiles (proposed at 161 feet - 8 inches in height) are non- habitable spaces and are decorative elements, ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMENTS: Comments: 2, To be determined, Page 2 The Promenade File No,: HTEX 05-006 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: Comments: 3, To be determined. S:IPlanninglSHAREDI WPIPROJECTS\ARCHES @ BBIHTEX 05-0061COAdoc FVHIBIT 0 ~ Ruden ~b McClosky 200 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD FORT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA 33301 POST OFFICE BOX 1900 FORT LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA 33302 (954) 527-2476 FAX: (954) 333-4076 BONN IE. MISKEL@RUDEN.COM June 20, 2005 The Arches at Boynton Beach Height Exception Boynton Ventures I, LLC (the "Petitioner"), in conjunction with a proposed mixed-use (retail and condominium) project within the City of Boynton Beach downtown area is requesting an exception from Chapter 2, Section 6.F.5 pertaining to building height. The property is located at the northwest comer of Ocean Avenue and Federal Highway, and comprises two city blocks (Block 7 and 12 of the original Town of Boynton Florida plat) between Ocean Avenue and SE 2nd Avenue (the "Property"), within the Community Redevelopment Area. The general use and zoning pattern in the area can be described as follows: The Arches at Boynton Beach North: East: South: West: MU-H (proposed) CBD MU-H CBD CBD CommerciallRetail CommerciallRetail Mixed Use CommerciallRetail City public parking lot Section 4.F of the City's Zoning Code ("Code") provides for height limitations and exceptions. Electrical and mechanical support systems, as well as parapets and similar structures may be erected on top of a structure, above the district height limitations with City Commission approval. The Mixed Use-High ("MU-H") zoning district limits heights along arterial roadways, such as Federal Highway, to 150 feet. The Petitioner is seeking a height exception that would allow a proposed mixed-use project to exceed the aforementioned provisions. The Petitioner is proposing fourteen residential floors, above a floor of ground level retail/commercial uses, for a total of fifteen (15) stories or 150' roofline. The proposed project is within the CRA, The City's Code provides for a height of 150' for mixed use projects zoned with the MU-H district to provide intensities within the downtown area that will provide synergy between uses and enhance economic viability of downtown businesses. Height exceptions for rooftop mechanical equipment, parapets and similar structures are permissible, subject to City Commission approval. The Petitioner is requesting an exception of (up to) 17' for a total of 167' maximum height to accommodate WPB:206268:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS' FT,LAUDERDALE . MIAMI' NAPLES' ORLANDO' PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA' ST. PETERSBURG' TALLAHASSEE' TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH EXHIBIT 0 Page 2 rooftop mechanical equipment, elevator shafts, stailWells and roof profiles on the proposed tower buildings. As discussed below, approval of the height exception will adhere to the standards set forth in Section 4.F of the Code. The Petitioner will demonstrate that the height exception: . Will not have adverse effect on surrounding land uses; Is necessary; Will not severely reduce light and air in adjacent areas; Will not be a deterrent to the redevelopment of adjacent properties; Will not adversely affect property values; Will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Will not constitute a grant of special privilege; and Is needed for the proposed redevelopment project. . . . . . . . (1) [and uses. Whether the height exception will have an adverse effect on the existing and proposed The proposed Arches at Boynton Beach project is located within the City's downtown and CRA. A general objective of the CRA is to create a critical mass of upscale development that establishes a pedestrian environment and promotes the local economy. The MU-H zoning district is applicable only within the downtown area. This district provides for buildings to attain 150' in height. The requested exception is not applicable to the entire building. Roof-mounted equipment located within the central portions of the tower elements extend approximately 17' above the roofline. Roofprofiles on the glass tower elements extend approximately 5'8" above the roofline. The centralized location of the equipment, as well as the shielding that will be provided by the roof profiles, will prevent it from being obvious from adjacent properties, which are lower in height than The Arches. The requested 17' exception will not have an adverse effect on existing or proposed land uses. (2) Whether the height exception is necessary. . Conformance with the height provisions would limit the size of the mixed-use project, require the ground floor of retail to be lowered from just under 15' to 9', and would require a floor of condominium units to be eliminated from the redevelopment plans. The downtown area allows high-rise structures in order allow densities and intensities designed to create synergy between permitted uses. In order to promote quality redevelopment, The Arches at Boynton Beach proposes a 15th floor, containing 26 condominium units. The requested height is necessary to accommodate the units necessary to allow an economically feasible and well- balanced redevelopment project, while providing pedestrian-oriented amenities (plaza) on the ground level. WPB:206268:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT,LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST, PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH EXHIBIT 0 Page 3 (3) Whether the height exception will severely reduce light and air in adjacent areas. The proposed exception of 17' will not affect adjacent properties. The mechanical equipment, elevator shafts and stairwells ("equipment areas") are centralized on the rooftop. The subject equipment areas comprise approximately 2,600 s.f. of the roof area, which is just over 1 % of the total site. The equipment areas are setback 40' from Ocean Avenue and SE 2nd Avenue, 31 '6" from Federal Highway, and 44' from SE 4th Street. In addition to the location of the equipment areas, the roof profiles on the glass tower elements (parapet), which extend 5'8" above the top of roof, will also shield the equipment areas from viewpoints. The requested building height exception will not create shadows or affect air circulation in a manner that negatively impacts adjacent properties. (4) Whether the height exception will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations, The requested height exception does not affect or impact the redevelopment potential of adjacent properties. The requested exception (up to 17') will not be injurious to the surrounding properties or public welfare. The proposed height is compatible with the building heights envisioned for the downtown redevelopment area. (5) Whether the height exception will adversely affect property values in adjacent areas. The requested height of the equipment areas and roof profiles will not adversely affect property values. Rather, The Arches at Boynton Beach redevelopment project will have a positive impact on property values in the area. This project along with other redevelopment efforts in the immediate area may spur other property owners to redevelop their parcels with structures and uses that are more consistent with the downtown vision the City has established for this portion of the Federal Highway corridor. (6) Whether the height exception will constitute a grant of a special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The requested building height is not applicable to lands outside the downtown redevelopment area, and therefore is peculiar to the Property. The proposed IS-story structure is consistent with another mixed-use project in the downtown area that is currently under construction (which has been granted a similar exception greater than 17'in height). The exception (up to 17') will not impact other properties and is consistent with the public welfare. WPB:206268:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS' FT, LAUDERDALE' MIAMI' NAPLES' ORLANDO' PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA' ST. PETERSBURG' TALLAHASSEE' TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH ExHiBIT 0 Page 4 (7) Whether sufficient evidence has been presented to justify the need for a height exception. The requested height exception is in keeping with the spirit of the height provisions for mixed use, high density projects in the downtown area, and is permissible pursuant to Section 4.F. The requested building height will accommodate 378 residential units, and commercial/retail uses, in the City's Downtown area. The Property is conveniently located in proximity to Downtown businesses and employers; and the proposed project introduces new residents into the City's Downtown to foster patronage of its businesses and additional economic support for the redevelopment area. Therefore, the requested Height Exception is consistent with the criteria contained in Section 4.F. WPB:206268:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST, LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST, PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH