The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS 7.B.l ASPEN GLEN (NWSP 06-025) NEW SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-181 STAFF REPORT TO: THRU: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board and City Commission ~i.)~ Michael Rumpf \'-\.Y Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Kathleen Zeitler tl Planner DATE: October 17, 2006 PROJECT NAME/NO: Aspen Glen PUD / NWSP 06-025 REQUEST: New Site Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: Lawrence Development Group, LLC / Leonard Albanese, Managing Member Applicant: Lawrence Development Group, LLC / Leonard Albanese, Managing Member Agent: Mr. Bradley Miller, AICP / Miller Land Planning Consultants, Inc. Location: 7216 Lawrence Rd (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3050) (4.5 acres) 3904 71st Lane S (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3060) (4.8 acres) East side of Lawrence Road, approximately 1,000 feet south of Hypoluxo Road (see Location Map - Exhibit "A'') Existing Land Use: Low Density Residential (LDR) at 4.84 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed Use: 45 Single-family zero lot line homes Acreage: 9.34 acres Adjacent Uses: North: Single-family residential development (Jonathan's Grove) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned R1-A; South: Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound Phase I) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD); Staff Report - Aspen Glen (NWSP 06-025) Memorandum No PZ 06-181 Page 2 East: Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound Phase II) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD); and, West: Right-of-way for Lawrence Road, and farther west, single-family zero-lot line development (Palmyra Estates) within unincorporated Palm Beach County designated MR-5 and zoned PUD. To the southwest across Lawrence Road, single-family zero-lot line residential development (Anderson PUD) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned PUD. Site Features: The subject property has 334 feet of frontage on Lawrence Road, a depth of 1,220 feet, and currently consists of two (2) vacated residential parcels (7216 Lawrence Road, and 3904 71st Lane South), which had a total of (4) units according to County Property Appraiser records. BACKGROUND Proposal: Mr. Bradley Miller, Agent, is proposing a new site plan for development of 45 single-family detached (zero lot line) dwelling units to be known as Aspen Glen PUD. Requests to annex the subject property into the City Of Boynton Beach, amend the land use designation to Low Density Residential (LDR) and rezone to Planned Unit Development (PUD) were approved by the City Commission on June 20, 2006. Single-family homes are permitted uses in the PUD zoning district. The maximum density allowed by the Low Density Residential (LDR) land use classification is 4.84 units per acre, which would allow a maximum of 45 units. The 45 proposed homes at a density of 4.82 dwelling units per acre would be built in one (1) phase. The Land Development Regulations do not require that single and two-family dwelling units be reviewed for site plan approval. Therefore, the information herein unrelated to common areas, landscaping, signage, etc. is provided for informational purposes only. ANALYSIS Concurrency: Traffic: A traffic study prepared by Simmons and White was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. The traffic study stated that the proposed project would generate a total of 450 trips per day. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has determined in a letter dated May 11, 2006 that the project build-out year is 2008 and will meet the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other Staff Report - Aspen Glen (NWSP 06-025) Memorandum No PZ 06-181 Page 3 drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: The School District of Palm Beach County has reviewed the application and has determined that adequate capacity exists in area public schools to accommodate the projected resident population. Right of way: The project proposes one (1) point of ingress / egress centrally located within the site's frontage on Lawrence Road. The ingress lane and egress lane would each be approximately 22 feet in width and separated by a landscaped median 10 feet in width. No gated entry is proposed. According to the Typical Road Section shown on the paving and drainage details (sheet 4 of 11), the single right-of-way internal to the development would be 50 feet in width. Each 25 foot side (or half) of this right-of-way from the centerline would consist of 11 feet of asphalt, a two (2)-foot of valley gutter (for drainage purposes), a seven (7)-foot swale (grassy area), a four (4)-foot wide pedestrian sidewalk, and a one (l)-foot sod area. All proposed lots would front and have direct access to the proposed internal right-of-way (Snowmass Drive). No proposed lots will front or have direct access to Lawrence Road. Parking: Two, three, four, and five bedroom dwelling units require two (2) parking spaces per unit. The project proposes 45 residential units and therefore, would require 90 parking spaces. Each unit would have a two (2)-car garage. According to the floor plans, the garages would be dimensioned approximately 20 feet in length by 20 feet in depth, large enough to accommodate two (2) vehicles. This provision equals the required parking. Also, the "Typical Lot Detail" on the site plan indicates that the driveways in front of each unit would also accommodate two (2) additional parked cars. The detail shows the paver brick driveways would be dimensioned approximately 16 to 18 feet in width by 20 feet in depth. Landscaping: According to the site plan tabular data (sheet SP-1), the proposed pervious area for the development would total 3.03 acres (132,083 square feet) or 32.6% of the site. Landscaped areas will consist mainly of perimeter landscape buffers, street trees, and the perimeter of the dry detention areas. These areas will be platted as separate tracts to be maintained by the homeowner's association. The landscape code requires that 50% or more of the plant material be native species. The Landscape Quantities table (sheet L-2) indicates that 85% of the shade trees and 98% of the palm trees would be native. The landscape data also indicates that 87% of the shrubs would be native. The site plan shows perimeter landscape buffers, 5-feet in width, are proposed along the north, south, and east property lines of the subject property. These buffers are adjacent to existing landscape buffers and would include a mix of Areca Palms, Sabal Palms, Live Oak, Green Buttonwood, Mahogany, Slash Pine, and Firebush. The "Typical Lot Detail" (as shown on sheet SP-1) shows that each house would be located at least ten (10) feet away from rear lot line. Screened Staff Report - Aspen Glen (NWSP 06-025) Memorandum No PZ 06-181 Page 4 enclosures are proposed only within the rear yard and would be setback at least five (5) feet from the rear property line of each lot, resulting in an additional pervious area. The five (5) feet of pervious area coupled with the 5-foot wide landscape buffer easement equates to a 10-foot wide landscape strip behind each home. The right of way buffer along Lawrence Road varies from 10 to 15 feet in width and would include a mix of Sabal Palms, Live Oak, Slash Pine, Indian Hawthorne, Green Buttonwood hedge, and signature Purple Glory trees on each side of the entrance. Royal Palms will line the ingress / egress lanes, with Montgomery Palms and annuals planted in the median. Live Oaks will be planted within the right-of-way in front of each lot. The dry detention areas buffers include Bald Cypress, Glaucous Cassia, Pink Trumpet Tree, Sabal Palm, and Fakahatchee Grass. An open space area at the end of the cul-de-sac will be landscaped and include a fountain or sculpture. No lift-station for sanitary sewer service is proposed with this project. In all, the plans would provide for a total of 181 shade trees, 181 palm trees, and 1,785 shrubs and groundcover plants. Building and Site: The applicant is proposing a total of 45 zero lot line homes, as permitted in a PUD zoning district. Zero lot line development on this site is consistent with the development pattern found in the Nautica Sound PUD to the east and south, and the Palmyra PUD and Anderson PUD to the west across Lawrence Road. The PUD regulations require that setbacks within PUD's mirror those in abutting development to ensure adequate separation between buildings. As per the setbacks specified on the PUD Master Plan for Aspen Glen, the building setbacks proposed are as follows: front - 15 feet for building, 20 feet for garage; rear - 10 feet; non-zero lot line side - 10 feet; and zero-lot line side - zero (0) feet. The "Typical Lot Detail" of the proposed project as shown on the site plan (SP-1) illustrates the placement of each model type (A-C) within the typical 45 foot by 110 foot lot. The houses would be setback at least 15 feet from the front property line and the garage would be setback at least 20 feet. A portion of this front setback would consist of a 10-foot wide utility easement. The detail also shows that the zero-lot line homes would be setback 10 feet from the side lot line and 10 feet from the rear lot line. The applicant is proposing screened-roof enclosures and pools in the rear yard. The Details show that the screen enclosures would be setback five (5) feet from the rear lot line. Solid-roof enclosures would be restricted within the confines of the "building envelope". Staff has no objection to these allowances provided that the landscape buffers would remain intact. The elevations show that the mean height of the two (2) story homes would be approximately 27 to 28 feet, as measured from the midpoint of the roof. The development will comply with the maximum height of 30 feet for all single-family residential zoning districts. Staff Report - Aspen Glen (NWSP 06-025) Memorandum No PZ 06-181 Page 5 Design: There are a wide variety of possible building designs (i.e. contemporary, traditional, Spanish-Mediterranean, etc. associated with the proposed type of single-family residential development. This project would be considered as more of a mixture of "contemporary and Mediterranean" architectural styles, similar to many other zero- lot line communities throughout South Florida. The homes would be two (2) stories tall. The proposed roofing material would be Spanish S-tiles. The elevations show that the exterior finish of the walls would be textured stucco. The applicant is proposing a variety of neutral colors schemes which are compatible with the proposed architecture and surrounding developments. The project proposes three (3) models (A-C) with similar house style types, each with four (4) bedrooms, and either two (2) and one-half bathrooms or three (3) and one-half bathrooms, and a two (2) car garage. The size of each home would range from 3,345 square feet to 3,806 square feet of total area under roof. Air- conditioned living areas would range from 2,722 square feet to 3,088 square feet of each unit. Staff has no objections to the proposed building colors, architectural styles, or roof types. Signage: No freestanding signage for the development is proposed. RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff recommends approval of the site plan, subject to satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\NWSP 06-025\Staff Report.doc L-- < - I - ~ XI III U t/J;:;= ..~ ~ i - '-+ r 11--,-,.lJ ,. ~ . r-- I L '-+- r- ! J-- 1 -f-,~ I. I I i r---- -, ) ~ --r'- ~_;=: -..-- I I l' _ r---- I I I - t------ If - ____ I ~ r I I ~ I ~I Ii'u.. utii' '----i:- '1- - - ~ /7/ I 1 r 1 - 1-- 1_ ... I J~ r-~ ~ 1 in. = 264 6 feet -..,.- - I - ...,- .- - - I - -II I - -/ I : -l / r- \1 LL r-- I I I I L - - r - ~ I 1 - "'1". ~... OJ -- 9 d I~ ~ l i r---_-J I I~~ - h- l~~ ~ ~ ~ J' -'- ~ I I f-- r--I 1 I I J ~ ~ I I~ :"--_ "_I / l ), TT I I I I : I I I iI' I' I ~ I I , I I I I 1C:;1!i; A-j _ I I ~~p~n IGlen l1J 1\llTI, ~-plR I ~J ~ / ~ ~ ~ .../ IalAV - Ir-l~ r I - I I" I I _J ~ ~~ . " '" g; ~ I " U> " - J> g M ~ ~~~~7~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ p ~ zg~ '-"~IIIIII", n'~ ~~i!!~ ! ~f! 5~~ ' '~'~i~~~~~~~~i~~~~.~l !~;~ 1- ~ ~~I'"~~8~~"P~.~~~" !~l is' II -- J' ~8.- ~ . . .1 ., ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~~ ..un,.. ..n~ OO~.. ~.~~ ~: ~,~ ~~;:1~~~~'1 f~ ~ ~~ ~F ~~ I F ~ ~~~i2~~.~imW~~~~:ii~~I~~ ~ SiiSo: ~if~~!l~ilil~ ~ Q~~~~;~F;i~ ~~ 'i~~8ri~ ~ ~ i ~i~~~ I ~ o~ l - . ~ ~!~~~ . n -~ ~. gO ~l I g ! '; ~ 51 , , ~.: , , ,. , . . . : ~ ~P~IPI1, : -'I 1,ldi ~ i P I I II . ~ ! , ~ i , IOnnil 1; 'I ~ q ~ I ~ - ~ I , H - ; ~ I HHh'$ ~ J P, i dl , I I . ~ & ~ ~ 8 l~lil~l:I~~ I I ! I · . . ~ , 'I' ~ ~~~~ "~~~ ~~6~'~ ~.~ ~~. ~i ~ ~~. ~~~ ""0 ~.~- 'o~'.' -~. "g ~. . , ~ '~. 8&~~ p~~~ ~-.,~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ 2~ ~ ~;~ ~~~ ><~_":~ alilil ~~g~~!E iL!i ~~~ ~!il Ii ~~'5 ~P@ ~~~~ ~~~ ~2~~ ;f ~';;r~ :<~~ ~~ ~ :<....lil . ~.. ~::n g~S! ~:\:llil: 'tfil~ ~~ e~ ~~ 9~ ~&, ~~~ ~.~~~ ~:~ .' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~:~:~ ~~~ 2~ ~~ ~: ~~ 5~B "~~~ ~~~ ~~~. ~~ ~~ ~2:';' ~~;~ ~.> ~. ~~ 2' .~. ~2~ _~~~ ~~6 ~~ ~c n~ g ~~~ .~.~ ~"Q ~. ~~ ~~ <g ..<. . . .~~ ~"Fo .', 0." ~~~ .~~~ >.."~ ~~ 5~ ~i ~~~ i~~~ ~~8 ~~ ~ ~; ~~ ~ ~~~'i! :-..~ --~ ~ ~lil ~to ~ ~~t~ ~~. :~ i E' ~~ ;> ~.~. '.il F ~ _<~.. lilJ!~~ ~i~ Cl~'" lil~'~ . ~.~: ~.'/ S~ .~. a z6~~ ~~~ ~~. ~: t. ~ ~'2~ <~~ ~> S ! ~~2~ ~~ ~~ :. lil ; ~~ "SOl ~ ~ ~~~ ~<7io ~~:o ;na~ ~~~ ~ .~ ~~ I;~~;~:~;~~:~~i~~ !l~. ~ ~~ ~ S"~'/ 8~""~~~"~~~~.~~~ ;2'" .! ~<:< ~ ~ F~ c~i~"'S~~ ~~'-<:ui~ ~iil~"'lil ~~ ~ ~o Pei ~::jJ!! ri;~~ ~",~61(l~ ~ ~~~~..o~~~~.~i ~a ~~~S ~~~ S~~!~~ } ~~~~i ~~~;~<~,~ 8a~ ~~~ ~~g~ . "ed. ~~~i1~~~ ~~ I ~~ ~~2. ~~~: ~ m'~ ~.. ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~ i;;:~ I:~ .~; e~ 1:9 !!2 .:~~ ; .~.", ~~~ ~O"~ ;0 I' ~~~ ~"~~ " ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~5 ~~ ~~: ~8 F~'~ ~ .,~~~> ",!:!i ,.;8~ ~5! ~~!: a' ~~~~:;: 0.....0 !I !2"'/l1 t;>:u "'0 OIl ~Q ~ lil",r;l:!l G .I~~~ ~~~ 5~~ ~~ i ~~. ~~~~; ~~~.~~ ;i~~ ~~~~! ~ ~~ ~ ~~!~ '" ",,,,, :t:>- gib~ ego ~:!: 2 "" - 5 !2 ~ '~ .~ ~~~ ~;; ~~ ~~ ~ ~.~, tJ i~ ~~ ;~~ ~I~ ~i ~~ ~ t~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ :~!! ~~ ~ .~~ ~ ~~8~ ~ ~~ i:i~ ~~ ~.~~~, ! ~. ~ ~m ~ \3 iii Ill'" 6 g ~~ :; :i!c:;J f;1 ~ ~ ~~~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 " UD~;"';;;'>. ~ .< 0 r.. :.,~. !,.;.j 'It W >q iZ"' ~ p- ,...;'~b! ~~~ ~~U~ , , i II, ~ . , gli ,. g ~ ~ 5 d ~ ~ ~ ~ . p " II ~ :;J 0' ~ ~ EXHIBIT "B" .... no'Ht\lI:....... 1nJ1"/'2IVV:. ".U::,tr7 DU A........... DnC ~~ ~~ 1~ ro ~2~7.M1' ~il ~~ f' t \.:. :::;::;::t;- 2~ --=- ""'" ~ '" '" '" Il I~ " ~ '" 0 ;;; ;; " = z > c: =' ,~ I o~ ~\ I ~ I .... ~ \~ Ii \i I ~ ; '" ~ """', "'" i ~ I( I( CHESAPE:AI<f ORQ.E It -~-:I( I( 1=- ~Tr . ASPEN GLEN BOUNDARY SURVEY M:\M L P C\DRAWlN~ Glen (A1bonese)\IInalsite pi.., '6.dwg, 10/13/2006 11:31:05 AM, Adobe PDf ~ l \1 l' :l~ I' ~ it Ii ~J .t:1,1t -:.- ---lilT -,Ill" - - ---'tj . II i -':- ----1J1~. . .~ J'" --~- if" III :. f1~:"i . - II, ~ - - ---;f. I' ,- "- -11"~ ;; II" ---B-. = H!:' --~l, I . - I~E 1\ ;;; I" -,,-:-4 t--t-- ' II; l~.- .-.;: : - '." -- ---jl, ' · -=nf" -- 1:_ u \1 ~ -- -r,'~, " 1:\ -: ~~; - ----tl " !.~l";' -::~ - (I ~ l~ -: ill! . - --fI 1\ ~ I' ." "'! ~ i ~ t I ;r i ~ " ~ g. g JJJ g, NAUTlCA SOUND P u.O -PLAT TWO (l'\.A,l~77,PAatsl5J-'58) CHESAPEAKE: CIRCLE '~il EXHIBIT "B" ~~ n Q. [ 9: i l? c Of 1rT'~ 11'1;('=;;;;;;1 m I :.~1~.11 - I~ ~ ~.J~ L' ~~ I:' .t1 L , -=j~. ~~ 8. 9: c' -' l 61 -::;< .... 1 C i g- O or tl jl 111m mll!!1 ;ll! jlll!:: m!! I!I ~I~ ~ i.1 ill m IIII! '!'Illfo !! m l!l!'!' mil ill;~ ~ !II!! ii mil II! 'I! ~!I !II l!l!l! mil ill !! 0 !'IIIIIIIII!I!,..t r !lmllflll!!i.U r !lmllllll!!~'il ij m I!! iim!~ Ii, Q ijll! i~ !il!! ,Iii Ii, ~!j m i!! lim !li Ii, ~ im:441~\l~! '~!!!:~il~\~~! '.m:iql~\\~li ,III \ q I~ '111 \ 4!! IIII ' \ ~ : Ii! ! I :III! I : Iii ! i Ii: I 5 i;: I ~ Ii: I a t \ i i'\ i i \ i 0 1~~~i!!~!fllfl!!I!!%~lillil~Ji I -1....~~..~"-"-gf.g:~ afi~,PF:ll.~,,"g :~t[ilf~;~JJ~~.lfIJjil~ =~i;;w dg~~i:-.g.g[5.fg~a~~:i'i3':'g-~'jtg.~ ll~~~:t[ a~~iijg[~~~~~~~!~~~~~' i ~~ga~~ i....~ng:..~o.. <>~g?S~~.~~;;r~ "'.~l'"o~s ~~~i~. [l~E~~~~;~~9.~.g ~ f~ .g;;:~ .l!~i ~iiljjijit;!!ii i !! 1 ~ g,~~~ ~~~~i'~g.3-i!g'l~:~"' 8: [j' a. ~a~.~ ial!lls~~-~II~~ . ~~ 1 ~ "..~. Ii -0:;:' g~~.5a':-'8.c0J3~. ~ g, ~ ~'< :i :~ :-~~q~~~~ r~ l~ ~ ~ii ~ ~ ir~ ~ g, I Q ~. l': if ~ ~ D: ~~:t ~~ [l~l a~ ~ a%~ .E' h .. ~ r ~3 H~3. ~ fi~ s.-g c 0" ~q~ ~ g. .- '< "- '0 o~ ~ ~ o 6' " s: o .., ~ ~ Q? [~ ~:t ~~ c: f g.~ ~ ~Zi~;J ?:;gi5H~~~H ~~.e~~~t';~i}i 9:lS I II. en it ~~~~ g,V>:::: ~ !l?,Q2 J I ?; ~ J Aspen Glen ." . Q :J ~ 8 ~ ~ Boynton Beach, R. f u~i J~ :1 ,..2 rHlf w -rl lIiHH. ' 8\ . lfi .~ if '.' I .", r ; !hl H. Jl~ Fif . . r ?' t . ~, ;, . iif ~;. 'r ' > Cl ~i ~ L ~I ~[ ~ I I~ ~ 8 ~ f 'I !jilIU till Jl!UIi I!H I II [~! i~il ll~J i!~;fll ,I I I !! 1'1 Iii lill lllijij II ! tJ~ 'I i I Jill In!!i. ! i ~r ! r .1 HI , 8~ Ii rqqr~lr II J "iiil' Ifr-P!EE~~ .:.. 1 i 8~ II' IJI .. I ~ ---- ---------- - -------- . "--- ~"_...._.._....m_ ==~~============================= EXHIBIT "B" ~~- ~:-:-:~[" I ., .ot .ot \ \, . I I I ." "-" ~ 0' " :t c "C ~ CD Ilijl~ t'UI,' I lid lit i~li ~~ ~~ S2 1\)' C6' rn J ~ . I \ \ 1 \, ~ ~ I - ~-- \~ i I \ \ ~._j. \ I .0< I." I! I" . \ \..... lmtm.-.-m_.~ ) . I"-__._~//\ I ~I ~ iii k fir !f L.I~ r ~t ~~ ~( ~.. H~~~' ~i.~ !.~ n t"; r ~ .! i( .. ii 'i 'i 'i. I :ij}~ ~ ~.~~~~ ~. iQs ~~ ~~ 'i , ; , i , i , i : [ , ' ~~G ~ ~O ~ ~ I' '" ~ ~ 19af-~ ;:: g ~ '" r C9~ lFQ ~ & . tll ~ () 7<; ~ "'U ~~ ~"T1 ~m EXHIBIT "B" !'~' " ji~i ~ e"i ~I! ! ~i . ~i ! t1 ! il h II . I ~~~5j~~uml 'ell~l~II~~e .~il i~ ~ F~~~. ~~i;lihh n~t ~ ~~~~ih~~!! 8r. ~ !!~~~ !h, ~~ ~~I ed~l ~ I~ ,j ~l' I I. I ;l ~~ I q FRONT AN) RCJiT S[)E ELEVATIONS ... """"""'" -,.."'",..'" I IBRENNER II )> ARCHITBCTURB G R 0 U P LLC IAWKBNCIl II ; I ASPEN GLEN :! la-tll.....-._ IIIlVI!l.OPWIlN 1- i C.J I MODEL A I AI.CHITBCTUI.B LAND lI.ANJU:NG INTBUOU GR01J>. LLC BOYNroN HBACII '51 PIIk ateam..o.nr.. ..L11 ........1'IaddI U4I'7 BOCA RATON, FL l PAUl BEACH COUNTY, PLOIUDA T.561.241-"" Pa561.241.D41 __~ '~ ~I ~~ .I~ Ir.~ tQ I Q, ~~, ~. ~, " i! .' m 1 ~ Q. ~i , , ~~G~ ~-n g2 ..!1Hf ;S::@~~ ;s:: o c r ~9~ lD :II ~ l> ;1 4' o ",a ~Q ~ ~i ~ "1l :II ~o sJ! ~r dB 11' 'i:..el.. , ~. : 'J r-:o. .' el '. j ~;Eml , . , , , ~ Ii ;1: ~~ ( ~~~ )ii Jl o I -i Cf) o m m r ~ !~'~ ..... ". y ~~ -i 5 z ~I". ! ~..~DDD ~ ~ ODDD ~ ODDD -i D~DD m DDDD ~ DDD ~ ~ ~: ODD ~O !: ~ 6- ~z s. '" , ,: I: :: ;: ~: gi II! il~ ~~ ~ ~~. "I ~. EXHIBIT "B" ~ft~' ~ 12d~ . !I~ ~ ~>> . el I ~~ . it I~ Ii II iUU.I. '11;iill;UUII ~~no" ih~ifdl~2 W~~~~ ~~ii;;;N~ ~,~~t ~ l!2,id'~~~ at l "iM: ~I,; ~l ~~ I ~!I i I ~ I~ ,~ ~~, ~ , ~. , .1 ~I 13> n~i I~ ~i~~ Q. Ie' t" ~F .. ' < Ii ~ ~ . Gii j. ~' , 1 .: ! , ~ . ~ 111 ~~: ii ~ Q ~ -a n I q FRONT AND RIGHT SIDE 8..EVAllONS Do IBRENNER '"""""-'" ......... .. .. ~ ~ ~ I , :t> ARCHITBCTURB GROUP LLC lAWIlIlNCB I , I ASPEN GLEN ~ .....M.:a.-.__ 0IlVIlL0PWllNT i (.J ! MODEL B I AJ.CHITBCTUI.B LAND PLANNING )NTBIUOlll OROIJP. u.c ! BOYNTON BRACH 751 PIIk at ~Dr.. ...111 ......... >>417 BOCA BAlUN, PI. l PAUr.t BEACH COVNTY, PLOlUDA T.561.24U7M ...,'U41.G41 www' . - ~ iij , e~ii ~ i~iml illillll~PgI ~~ G~ dd. ~~ ": ~ I "4" g; O.g i;i~U! !~2 ~ 0" .I~ , ~2l ! ~I ~ F~;~. ~~i I' Ni ( ~ Ilii~ ~ ~iti I*~ Bi n> I t1 , ~: 3:: e ': ," C~' 2 ; >' 3:: ' Ii j~ ~~I ~d~l ~ i~ 1: 0 h gg ~3' l i c r ~ " I 0 @~ 1FQ !i .& z II ~~ C) ~ . ~ g~ ~. () ~~ ;><; m u.l "U t- B> :D '~ ~ ~O "~ ~J! "'. ;~: I ! ~ Or ~i' ~m mCJ) ~Ii ' ' I I ( , I I i I I I " , i I I , ' ' 1 ,.... 1 , ' i ~~EEm ' ' , ' i' i: ; ,.~" I 4.'.&' 1 ~ , , 1" ~. 1 2'.6" 1 ~lmJ o~ ~ " ~ Jl 0 ( I --I j~! QJ )ii 0 m m r m < 11 )> Jl --I 0 0 Z Z --I m B r ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < )> ~I H ". --I ~. ~ . 0 Z EXHIBIT "B" I H AlONT AND RIGHT SIDE B..EV A ilONS ~ IBRENNER ........:I1<< - ~ ,. ,. ~ I , ARCHITECTURE o R 0 U P LLC I I )> ASPEN GLEN IA WIlIlNCIl i I ! ! .....w..~.__ DI!VllI.OP><IlN c.J MODEL C I AI.CBITBCTUI.B LAND PLANNING INT81.101.. ORO\J)'. u.c I 8llYNI"ON BBACII 7!11 Pm: at ~Dr.. ...111 ......1'IaIidJ 3)417 BOCA RATON, PI. l PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLOlUDA r.S4ll.24uncs P_5I1.24U241 .....!l.. I\... ~-. ~~ ~l ~~ ~ , ( ~~i J!i I~ en o m m r m ~ -I (5 Z Im1 ).J.....l-L.l...J c" c" c" c" c" Ia'_" ,J c" c" , c" fTiJ ~ ~ EXHIBIT "B" .~ ~s ~4 I '~. l' I; i i i i i i i 'ij. ~~' ~ i P .~ " ~~ ;f ~! !~, i' , ~. I~III~ II [ .." l I~II ~III [ ... l ~. , , , , Ii , , : : ~" , , Q ~: ~l "~ \ ~ ~. !~ > ; i ~ ~~ ~ . :0 ~ m ~ )> H ~ :0 ~i ~~ k. . m . r m < )> -I (5 Z I q REAR Af\O LEFT SIDE ELEVATIONS - ~ - ~ ~ ,.. ~ "..."'",. I IBRENNER AR.CHITBCTUR.B G I. 0 U P LLC UWKIlNCB . )> ASPEN GLEN ~ ....}(.~,.w._ IlIlVIlLONI!NT i I .j:::o. I MODEL C I AI.CHITBCTUI.B LAND PLANNINO INTBI.IOI.I OROUP, ILC BOYNTON BBACII I 751 PIIk fIl c....u.Dr.. ..-111 ......... 3)417 BOCA RATON, PI. I PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA TIl."1.241.f1M P_~.24U2"" _.b. . .,- .."". EXHIBIT "C" - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL New Site Plan Project name: Aspen Glen File number: NWSP 06-025 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a October 13, 2006 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry & Grounds Comments: 1. Relocate the sidewalk within the roadway tract two to three feet (or more) closer to the roadway and relocate Live Oak to a position between the sidewalk and property line. This will provide sufficient separation from the canopy trees and water and sewer lines as well as minimizing vertical clearance conflicts. A utility easement will need to be provided within the roadway (ingress-egress) tract in order to avoid the conflict of canopy trees within the utility easement. All easements and tracts will be described/dedicated via the plat. UTILITIES Comments: 2. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Preliminary Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities, especially in the proposed utility easement along Lawrence Rd. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 3. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 4. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). In order to achieve this, consideration should be given to tying the proposed CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ASPEN GLEN NWSP 06-025 PAGE 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT eastern terminus into the existing water main located m Nautica Sound Boulevard (along the south development line.) 5. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 6. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 7. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 8. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 9. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 10. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 11. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 12. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ASPEN GLEN NWSP 06-025 PAGE 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 13. The Drainage Plan (Civil Site Improvement Sheet 1 of 9) depicts the final outfall from the dry retention area in the northwest comer of the development into the storm sewer system in Lawrence Rd. Please provide written concurrence with this from Palm Beach County. 14. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 15. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: 16. Residential Security: . The inside garage door leading into the residence shall be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock. . When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. This would not apply to customized doors. . Entry doors to open outward versus inward. . If front door has zero visibility to front entryway area, equip it with a 180- degree peephole. . Equip all exterior doors with security hinges. . Run telephone lines underground with box hook-up on inside of garage versus the exterior of garage where telephone lines can be cut making alarm system inoperable. It is strongly suggested that the architects and engineers incorporate this into the site plans to insure that the site supervisor is aware of this condition. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ASPEN GLEN NWSP 06-025 PAGE 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 17. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 18. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 19. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 20. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: . The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." . From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. . Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 21. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 22. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 23. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: . The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. . The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. . The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ASPEN GLEN NWSP 06-025 PAGE 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 24. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 25. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: . A legal description of the land. . The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. . The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 26. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 27. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. . Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) . United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 28. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 29. Revise note 3 on site plan to clarify which existing easements on subject property are abandoned prior to development. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ASPEN GLEN NWSP 06-025 PAGE 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 30. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. 31. Revise Sheet 11 of 11 to delete front entry gates which are no longer proposed. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS Comments: To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS Comments: To be determined. MWR!kz S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\NWSP\COA.doc - l"RE~~~:;e~~~;T~ l' " ,rnl~;:: ~], ~,ml Project name: Aspen Glen ,," I f_______ File number: NWSP 06-025 . I Reference: 1 '(review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a July 19, 2006,Planning andZoning Department date stamn marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section )." 1 0-26 (a). Comment noted. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. A copy '. of the letter from Palm Beach County Traffic was attached with submittal packaqe. 3. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard ~< Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Traffic control devices are shown on plans. 4. The proposed project reflects one long, single roadway exceeding 660 feet for a cul-de-sac street (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1.A.1.) This, in general, in not acceptable either without a waiver of the maximum length of a dead-end roadway, or the greater length approved by the City Engineer. This comment has been deleted per Laurinda Logan memorandum No. 06-093. She has added the following comments: Relocate the terminus of the roadway (cul-de-sac) approximately 1 DO-ft. west to provide a buffer between the roadway and Nautica Sound PUO (Plat 2.) The cud-de-sac has been ". relocated and we are providing landscaped open space in its place. Per the LDR, Chapter 4, Section a,C.2. and Ordinance 02- 033 (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1.A.4..) evaluate placing a secondary access point to the subdivision at the east end of the dead-end roadway (cul-de-sac.) The applicant will need to contact Nautica Sound regarding a cross-access agreement (this would be to their benefit too since emergency vehicles would be able to get i into Nautica via Aspen Glen if their entrance were blocked for some reason.) The secondary access point need not be paved and/or available for regular use by residents/trucks, etc. The secondary access may be constructed of stabilized sod and should a minimum of 15-ft. in width with appropriate turning radii off the cul-de-sac and onto Nautica Sound Blvd. A 15' emergency access has been nnrlo,.-j tn the tllfln ! 5. --.--- .- ...- 1-'-." 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc O~!25/06 2 DEPARTMENTS 6. It does not appear that an adequate turning radius has been provided at the entrance for vehicles (specifically trucks) that may be refused entry at the gate. Please correct. Gates have been removed so this should not be an issue. PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry & Grounds Comments: 6. Provide the Landscape plan at the same scale as the Site plan and Civil drawings (l-in=50-ft.)(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.l.) This may be provided as a Master Landscape plan, while still providing sheets using the l-in=20-ft scale for detail. Landscape Plan has been provided at the some scale os the Site Plan and Civil drawings (1-in=50-ft.) 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section 5.H.) Use Palm Beach County standards for the entrance onto Lawrence Road. Both 25' and extended sight line as required by Palm Beach County have been indicated on the Landscape Plan, 8. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section 5.H.) A note has been added to the Landscape Plan regarding the required unobstructed cross-visibility. 9. Staff recommends placing canopy trees a minimum of 1 O-ft off the property lines to avoid future conflicts with neighboring trees and hedges. We have a 5' buffer thus we can not plant the conopy trees 10' away from the property line. The trees have been located so that they are not in the center of the hedge. The hedge favors the 5' line of the buffer so that it can be maintained without having to trespass on adjacent property. .. Live Oaks are proposed within the road right-of-way/utility easement. Canopy trees are not permitted within utility easements. Additionally, the use of canopy trees in close proximity to the roadway may create a vertical conflict for high-profile vehicles such as solid waste trucks. Please remove canopy trees or replace with a non-canopy species. The water and sewer lines are located in the center of the road right-of-way under the pavement. There are no utility easements indicated on the engineering plan where we located the street trees. The street trees are proposed to be planted T from the water line along the south side of the road one! 16' rro':! the se\^.'er !i,,"?olong th"? :!'or+h sid"? of th"? ro:;o. , We will provide 0 root barrier at each tree aio:iQ the south side l.~ o. INCLUDE REJECT ~ '", " y \.' Page 1 of 1 _ Logan, Laurinda From: Logan, Laurinda Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 2:34 PM To: Breese, Ed; Zeitler, Kathleen Cc: Hall, Glenda; Quinn, Larry; Kelley, David; Livergood, Jeffrey; Mazzella, Pete Subject: Aspen Glen PUD Ed and Kathy, Please replace Comment #10 of the 1 st Review Comments for this project with the following: Relocate the sidewalk within the roadway tract two to three feet (or more) closer to the roadway and relocate Live Oak to a position between the sidewalk and property line. This will provide sufficient separation from the canopy trees and water and sewer lines as well as minimizing vertical clearance conflicts. A utility easement will need to be provided within the roadway (ingress-egress) tract In order to avoid the conflict of canopy trees within the utility easement. All easements and tracts will be described/dedicated via the plat. Please let me know if this meets your needs. Feel free to give me a call if you have questions or need additional information. L~ uyLVl-o( ~ 9/26/2006 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc OQ/25/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT of the rood, if required. If we con not plant canopy trees we will not hove enough room on site to plant the required number of canopy trees os required by City Code. This is 0 firsT, o request not to plant canopy street trees? 11. There are overhead lines along the north property line. Landscaping shall be designed and installed in accordance with FPL's "Plant the Rjght Tree in the Rjght Place". The existing meco palms and additional trees selected to be planted under the power iines aiong the north property line comply with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". 12. Symbols for various trees specified along the south property line do not match the legend or the symbols shown on other areas of the plans. Please correct. Different symbols hove been purposely indicated along the south property line to indicate where exiting trees on site are to be relocated. In addition, these trees/palms are labeled os relocated. All new plantings are labeled with 0 hexagonal tog. Triangles in the center of the symbol indicate sobol palms to be planted to mitigate for trees to be cleared from the site. UTILITIES Comments: 13. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. Weare in the process of working on a timeline.' - ,l . . , . 14. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Preliminary Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities, especially in the proposed utility easement along Lawrence Rd. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so I that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility servIces, either ill utility easements or public rights-of-way. Utility easements :md lines are shovm on both landscape and site ::>i00. hJo seporate utility e(JSerr,enTS ore Indic('1fed on th.s enaineerinq pian. utilities are located in streeT right-of-wev, ", " " 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 15. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). "- Comment noted. 16. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by , ", insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-l6(b)). In order to achieve this, consideration should be given to tying the proposed eastern terminus into the existing water main located in Nautica Sound Boulevard (along the south development line.) Comment noted. 17. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs fIrst. This fee will be determined based upon fmal meter size, or expected demand, Comment noted. 18. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed '\.. for irrigation. An on site well will be provided for irriqation. 19. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The , easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). Comment noted. 20. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that I " setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Comment noted. 21. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to servIce this project, ill accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. , Comment noted. 22. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach I , separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. Comment noted. 23. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by ail other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Comment added to plans. 24. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design -.:. I I Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. I Conlnlent noted. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 02/25/06 5 , II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 25. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation " (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." Comment added. 26. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be ., reflected on all appropriate sheets. Comment noted. 27. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments , may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 28. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A '~" preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance ofthe Land Development Permit. Comment noted. 29. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. The engineer's cortication on the ., drainaqe plan is attached. 30. The Drainage Plan (Civil Site Improvement Sheet 1 of 9) depicts the fmal outfall from the dry retention area ill the northwest comer of the development into the storm sewer system in Lawrence Rd. Please provide written concurrence with this from Palm Beach County. We are in the process of getting written concurrency from Palm Beach County for outfall. 31. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of ." permitting. Comment noted. 32. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction I acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in " accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" I and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. I FIRE 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08l006.doc 09/25/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE ~ Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 33. All lighting shall be metal halide. Comment noted. 34. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). Street trees and lights have been located to avoid driveways. street trees have been separated from street lights on the Landscape Plan. I 35. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and all pedestrian sidewalks. A note has been added to the light location plan indicating that a timer will be provided on the landscape iighting and a photocell sensor on street liqhts. 36. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. It is suggested that 14 foot-16 foot light poles be used for the street lighting. street Lighting to be provided: FPL 175 watt I\I\H mounted on 0 16' pole. See detail and locations on Light location plan, Site Pion and Plantinq Plan. 37. Provide lighting for entrance sign. There will be no entrance sign. 38. Landscaping should not obstruct view of windows, building address numbers, and walkways. A note has been added to the Landscaoe Plans 39. Sales center, clubhouse and recreational facilities should be pre-wired for alarm systems. Comment noted. 40. Restrict access to recreation buildings and pools through the use of key card or key. There ore no recreation building or public pools. 41. Residential Security: . The inside garage door leading into the residence shall be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock. . When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. This would not apply to customized doors. . Entry doors to open outward versus inward. . If front door has zero visibility to front entryway area, equip it with a 180- degree peephole. . Equip all exterior doors with security hinges. . Run telephone lines underground with box hook-up on inside of garage versus the exterior of garage where telephone lines can be cut making alllill1 system inoperable. It is strongly suggested that the architects and I I I engineers incorporate this into the site plans to insure that the site supervisor is aware of this condition. Comment noted, 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08l006.doc 09/25/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 42. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 43. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defmed in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. Site dato has been t-evised to include type of construction. 44. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defmed in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. Site data has been revised to include occupancy type of each building. 45. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Note has been odded to elevations. 46. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time ofpennit application. Comment noted. 47. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Comment noted. 48. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of each building. The number of stories has been added to the plan olano with the heioht of the buildino. 49. IdentifY within the site data the fmish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. VerifY that the proposed elevation IS m compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: 1) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD' s surface water management construction development regulations." 2) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specifY the base flood elevation. Ifthere is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 3) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). Site data has been revised to reflect above comments. 50. As required by the CBBCO, Part ill titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. The site plan has been revised to show 011 three model details with I I setback dimensions on each. 51. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Comment noted. 52. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the , permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. A water use permit will be applied fOI" from SFWtv'1O for well source irrigation system and a copy of the permit will be submitted at the time of permit application. 53. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: I 4) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. I 5) The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. 6) The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article IT, Sections 26-34) Comment noted. 54. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Comment noted. 55. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property, The following information I shall be provided: 7) A legal description of the land. 8) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 9) The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(:1)) C:urrifYierjl ['iL)leu. I 56. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting I ! 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. Note added to plan. 57. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted. 58. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. 10) Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) 11) United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) Comment noted. 59. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. The location of site lighting has been shown on the Landscape Plans and Site Plan. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 60. Parks Impact Fee - 45 single family detacted units $ 1,418.00 each = $63,810.00 to be paid prior to issuance offrrst permit. Comment noted. 61. Landscape plan needs to indicate overall percentage native plants. Percentage of native plants hos been added to the Landscape Plans. 62. Irrigation needs to have 110% coverage, use bubblers on all trees, have separate zones for bedding and sod areas, be low flow and have a non- potable water source. A note has been added to the Landscape Plan. 63. Cypress mulch is not permitted. A note hos been added to the Landscape Plan that cypress - mulch is not permitted. . FORESTERfENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 64. There are several eXlstmg Areca Palm trees on the site that can be successfully relocated along the North and / or East perimeter of the I property. This should be included in the TMP document. Developer has decided not TO relocClte any of the areca palms 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 10 DEPARTMENTS on site. 65. There are several Live Oak and Mahogany trees with diameters between 4"-8" that are noted on the tree survey which should be relocated to the North and / or East perimeter of the property. 'The Tree Movers' have reviewed the trees on site and have determined that three (3) live oak trees and twelve (12) sabal palms are worth relocating. ['-lone of the mahogany trees are worth relocating because of poor canopy structure and branching pattem. Our Tlv\P document has been revised accordingly to reflect 'The Tree Mover's recommendation. Trees and palms are to be relocated at the south-west corner of the site because the source of temporary water to water the transplants will be from the existing water meter the provided service to the demolished house. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 66. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff's comments and Questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. Comment noted. 67. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Vz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Comment noted. 68. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. Comment noted. 69. Revise / complete New Site Plan Application as follows: 1.10. add to Intended Use: "Single-Family residential (detached)"; ITA. Land Use Acreage Breakdown: a. provide total of residential lot areas in acreage and % of total acreage; ITA.g. provide total ofR/W area in acreage and % of total acreage; ITA.h. provide total of common landscaped areas (including dry detention areas) in acreage and % of total acreage; II. 5 . Surface Cover: a. provide a total of maximum building footprints (areas under roof) for all lots in acreage and % of total acreage; IT.5.b. 0 ac, 0%; c. provide a total of all impervious surfaces (areas not under roof) for alllots, including R/W, driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. in acreage and % of total acreage; IT.5.d. add a + c for acreage and % of total acreage; IT.5.e. 0 ac, 0%; IT.5.f. provide a total of common landscaped areas and % of total acreage; IT.5.g. provide a total of dry detention areas in acreage and % of total acreage; IT.5.h. add f + g for acreage and % of total acreage; IT.5.i. should equal d + h~;~- IT.6. Floor Area. a. Residential: provide total square footage under roof (1 51 floor INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 11 DEPARTMENTS + 2nd floor) of typical residential unit, and same total for h.; II. 7.a. provide number of units proposed (delete sf, add units); II.8. gross density is 45 /9.338 = 4.819 or 4.82 du/ac; II.9. 2 stories; II. 1 O. 2 spaces required per unit = 90 spaces required, 90+ spaces provided (with garages and driveways); II.10.b. add N/A.; N. Owner's signature authorizing Agent is missing from form. Applications has been revised to include the above comments. 70. Revise justification statement as follows: Land use classification is LDR (not MDR); code Chapter is 2.5 (not 25); typo on last sentence of A. "these" regulations (not there regulations); revise side-zero setback for pool to 3' (not 0'); B. Master Landscape should also indicate that all common areas will be platted as separate tracts and will be maintained by the HOA; C. Typo Fence, "Wall", etc. (not Well) should provide detail regarding existing masonry wall and any proposed perimeter walls or fences, areca pahn screen, note that no fences for individual lots are allowed through common areas including landscaped areas. Justification statement has been revised. 71. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover Sheet, Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans/ Elevations of Models A-C, Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans, Photometric Plan, and Civil Drawings. Drawinqs have been reorqanized as mentioned above. 72. Revise site plan as follows: Note that the symbol on west property line of each lot indicates the zero lot line side of each lot. Revise location of the symbol on each lot to the east property line to match typical ZLL detail (it is preferable that the zero-side be the east property line of each lot). Revise "3' maint." on typical ZLL detail to 3' overhang easement. Label length of home and length of privacy wall along zero lot line side on typical ZLL detail. Provide a scale for the typical ZLL detail. Revise ZLL detail to include typical layout of pool and screen enclosure. Dimension width of Lawrence Road right-of-way. ClarifY if 25' comer clip is right-of-way to be dedicated, or if it is a 25' safe sight comer. Site plan has been revised to address the above comments. 73. Revise site data as follows: Proposed Density: 4.82 Dwelling Units per Acre (du/ac); Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR); Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (PUD); Total Impervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Total Pervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Proposed Use: Single-Family Residential (Detached) Zero Lot Line Typical Lot Size: 45' x 110' Minimum Building Setbacks: Front 15' (building), 20' (garage), Side 0' on zero INCLUDE 1<........, ! DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT side, 10' on non-zero side, Rear 10' Minimum Pool Setbacks: Side 3' on zero side, 8' on non-zero side, Rear 8' Minimum Screen Enclosure (with screen roof) Setbacks: Side 0' on zero side, 5' on non-zero side, Rear 5' Proposed Model "A": 3,345 total sf (under roof), 2,722 sf AlC Proposed Model "B": 3,539 total sf (under roof), 2,867 sf AlC Proposed Model "C": 3,806 total sf (under roof), 3,088 sf AlC Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% oflot area Building Height: 35 feet Site data has been revised to address the above comments. 74. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan set. Comment noted. 75. Label width of all proposed easements and buffers on site and landscape plan. Width ot easements and butters ore labeled on plans. 76. Indicate 5' DE along north property line, dry detention areas, and all buffers as tracts to be platted separately from the proposed residential lots. Add a note that separate tracts are common space that will be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. Proposed buffer widths have been indicated on the site and landscape plans. 77. Revise note 3 to clarifY which existing easements on subject property are to be abandoned prior to development. Why is the existing 6' FPL easement in the vicinity of Lots 13 and 34 not indicated? The 6' FPL easement is now shown on the plan but we ore working with FP &L to abandon both the 6' and 14' easements prior to development. 78. Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate sufficient area for stacking ofvehic1es on site and out of Lawrence Road, Gates hove been removed. 79. Note on site plan if the street interior to the project is a public right-of-way, or a private street (tract) to be maintgained by the homeowners association. Note has been added. 80. Indicate location of required continuous sidewalks within Lawrence Road right-of-way. Sidewalk has been added along Lawrence Road within the Right-ot- Way. 81. Label location and width of any required maintenance easements around perimeter of dry detention areas. Maintenance easements have been added. 82. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site. Also provide a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. A reduced landscape plan has been provided for entire site and a reduced key has been provided indicating landscape sheet coverage. 83. rl r " indicate and lat-pl J ratlons t"np <In t-p;o-nt f <In 1 n rim ter w J <: 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 12 ~.ead..l / fences. --, .0_ ..~u , ..I r-' _d "-'0""" o~ -) re ,e . a.L I l.ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08l006.doc 09/25/06 13 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT No new walls or fences proposed. North property line has on existing 5' wall that is on the adiacent property to the north. 84. Indicate location of proposed subdivision identification sign at the entrance to the development (subject to Engineering review and approval for safe sight distance). At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. Also, indicate sign dimensions, height, and total proposed sign face area on sign detail. No identification sign proposed, 85. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). Feature lighting to emphasize plants, trees, entrance and art feature has been indicated on the Liaht Location Plan. 86. Provide lighting details for street lights including locations, typical height, material, and color. See Light Location Plan and Landscape Plan. 87. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. See Landscape Plan and Site Plan for location and Landscape Plans for art feature details. 88. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notifY the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Planning and Development Board meeting. Comment noted. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\NWSP\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc .... 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Aspen Glen File number: NWSP 06-025 Reference: I slreview plans identified as a New Site Plan with a July 19. 2006 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 3. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 4. The proposed project reflects one long, single roadway exceeding 660 feet for a cul-de-sac street (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section I.A.I.) This, in general, in not acceptable either without a waiver of the maximum length of a dead-end roadway, or the greater length approved by the City Engineer. 5. It does not appear that an adequate turning radius has been provided at the entrance for vehicles (specifically trucks) that may be refused entry at the gate. Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry & Grounds Comments: 6. Provide the Landscape plan at the same scale as the Site plan and Civil drawings (l-in=50-ft.)(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.I.) This may be provided as a Master Landscape plan, while still providing sheets using the l-in=20-ft scale for detail. 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Use Palm Beach County standards for the entrance onto Lawrence Road. 8. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 9. Staff recommends placing canopy trees a minimum of 10-ft off the property lines to avoid future conflicts with neighboring trees and hedges. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 10. Live Oaks are proposed within the road right-of-way/utility easement. Canopy trees are not permitted within utility easements. Additionally, the use of canopy trees in close proximity to the roadway may create a vertical conflict for high-profile vehicles such as solid waste trucks. Please remove canopy trees or replace with a non-canopy species. 11. There are overhead lines along the north property line. Landscaping shall be designed and installed in accordance with FPL' s "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". 12. Symbols for various trees specified along the south property line do not match the legend or the symbols shown on other areas of the plans. Please correct. UTILITIES Comments: 13. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 14. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Preliminary Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities, especially in the proposed utility easement along Lawrence Rd. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 15. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 16. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). In order to achieve this, consideration should be given to tying the proposed eastern terminus into the existing water main located in Nautica Sound Boulevard (along the south development line.) 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 17. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 18. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. 19. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 20. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 21. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 22. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. 23. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 24. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 25. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." 26. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 27. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 28. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 29. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 30. The Drainage Plan (Civil Site Improvement Sheet I of 9) depicts the final outfall from the dry retention area in the northwest comer of the development into the storm sewer system in Lawrence Rd. Please provide written concurrence with this from Palm Beach County. 31. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 32. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 33. All lighting shall be metal halide. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10106 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 34. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 35. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entrvways to residences and all pedestrian sidewalks. 36. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. It is suggested that 14 foot-16 foot light poles be used for the street lighting. 37. Provide lighting for entrance sign. 38. Landscaping should not obstruct VIew of windows, building address numbers, and walkways. 39. Sales center, clubhouse and recreational facilities should be pre-wired for alarm systems. 40. Restrict access to recreation buildings and pools through the use of key card or key. 41. Residential Security: . The inside garage door leading into the residence shall be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock. . When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. This would not apply to customized doors. . Entry doors to open outward versus inward. . If front door has zero visibility to front entryway area, equip it with a 180- degree peephole. . Equip all exterior doors with security hinges. . Run telephone lines underground with box hook-up on inside of garage versus the exterior of garage where telephone lines can be cut making alarm system inoperable. It is strongly suggested that the architects and engineers incorporate this into the site plans to insure that the site supervisor is aware of this condition. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 42. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 43. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 44. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. 45. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 46. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 47. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 48. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of each building. 49. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: 1) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." 2) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. 3) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 50. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 51. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 52. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 53. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: 4) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 5) The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. 6) The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 54. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 55. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: 7) A legal description of the land. 8) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 9) The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t)) 56. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 57. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 58. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. 10) Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) 11) United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) 59. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10106 8 ~~ q .~~ .0 h DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 60. Parks Impact Fee - 45 single family detacted units $ 1,418.00 each = $63,810.00 to be paid prior to issuance of first permit. 61. Landscape plan needs to indicate overall percentage native plants. 62. Irrigation needs to have 110% coverage, use bubblers on all trees, have separate zones for bedding and sod areas, be low flow and have a non- potable water source. 63. Cypress mulch is not permitted. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 64. There are several existing Areca Palm trees on the site that can be successfully relocated along the North and / or East perimeter of the V-- property. This should be included in the TMP document. 65. There are several Live Oak and Mahogany trees with diameters between 4"-8" that are noted on the tree survey which should be relocated to the L--- North and / or East perimeter of the property. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 66. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. 67. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 812 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 68. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 69. Revise / complete New Site Plan Application as follows: 1.10. add to Intended Use: "Single-Family residential (detached)"; II.4. Land Use Acreage Breakdown: a. provide total of residential lot areas in acreage and % of total acreage; II.4.g. provide total ofR/W area in acreage and % of total acreage; II.4.h. provide total of common landscaped areas (including dry detention areas) 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5. Surface Cover: a. provide a total of maximum building footprints (areas under roof) for all lots in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.b. 0 ac, 0%; c. provide a total of all impervious surfaces (areas not under roof) for all lots, including R1W, driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.d. add a + c for acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.e. 0 ac, 0%; II.5.f. provide a total of common landscaped areas and % of total acreage; II.5.g. provide a total of dry detention areas in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.h. add f + g for acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.i. should equal d + h.; 11.6. Floor Area. a. Residential: provide total square footage under roof (151 floor + 2nd floor) of typical residential unit, and same total for h.; II.7.a. provide number of units proposed (delete sf, add units); II.8. gross density is 45 / 9.338 = 4.819 or 4.82 du/ac; II.9. 2 stories; II.10. 2 spaces required per unit = 90 spaces required, 90+ spaces provided (with garages and driveways); II.IO.b. add N/A.; IV. Owner's signature authorizing Agent is missing from form. 70. Revise justification statement as follows: Land use classification is LDR (not MDR); code Chapter is 2.5 (not 25); typo on last sentence of A. "these" regulations (not there regulations); revise side-zero setback for pool to 3' (not 0 '); B. Master Landscape should also indicate that all common areas will be platted as separate tracts and will be maintained by the HOA; C. Typo Fence, "Wall", etc. (not Well) should provide detail regarding existing masonry wall and any proposed perimeter walls or fences, areca palm screen, note that no fences for individual lots are allowed through common areas including landscaped areas. 71. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover Sheet, Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans/ Elevations of Models A-C, Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans, Photometric Plan, and Civil Drawings. 72. Revise site plan as follows: Note that the symbol on west property line of each lot indicates the zero lot line side of each lot. Revise location of the symbol on each lot to the east property line to match typical ZLL detail (it is preferable that the zero-side be the east property line of each lot). Revise "3' maint." on typical ZLL detail to 3' overhang easement. Label length of home and length of privacy wall along zero lot line side on typical ZLL detail. Provide a scale for the typical ZLL detail. Revise ZLL detail to include typical layout of pool and screen enclosure. Dimension width of Lawrence Road right-of-way. Clarify if 25' corner clip is right-of-way to be dedicated, or if it is a 25' safe sight 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 10 . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT corner. 73. Revise site data as follows: Proposed Density: 4.82 Dwelling Units per Acre (du/ac); Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR); Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (PUD); Total Impervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Total Pervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Proposed Use: Single-Family Residential (Detached) Zero Lot Line Typical Lot Size: 45' x 110' Minimum Building Setbacks: Front 15' (building), 20' (garage), Side 0' on zero side, 10' on non-zero side, Rear 10' Minimum Pool Setbacks: Side 3' on zero side, 8' on non-zero side, Rear 8' Minimum Screen Enclosure (with screen roof) Setbacks: Side 0' on zero side, 5' on non-zero side, Rear 5' Proposed Model "A": 3,345 total sf (under roof), 2,722 sf A1C Proposed Model "B": 3,539 total sf (under roof), 2,867 sf A1C Proposed Model "C": 3,806 total sf (under roof), 3,088 sf A1C Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% of lot area Building Height: 35 feet 74. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan set. 75. Label width of all proposed easements and buffers on site and landscape plan. 76. Indicate 5' UE along north property line, dry detention areas, and all buffers as tracts to be platted separately from the proposed residential lots. Add a note that separate tracts are common space that will be owned and maintained bv the Home Owners' Association. 77. Revise note 3 to clarify which existing easements on subject property are to be abandoned prior to development. Why is the existing 6' FPL easement in the vicinity of Lots 13 and 34 not indicated? 78. Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate sufficient area for stacking of vehicles on site and out of Lawrence Road. 79. Note on site plan if the street interior to the project is a public right-of-way, or a private street (tract) to be maintained by the homeowners association. 80. Indicate location of required continuous sidewalks within Lawrence Road right-of-way. 81. Label location and width of any required maintenance easements around perimeter of dry detention areas. 82. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site. Also provide a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 08/10/06 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 83. Clearly indicate and label locations, type, and height of any perimeter walls / fences. 84. Indicate location of proposed subdivision identification sign at the entrance to the development (subject to Engineering review and approval for safe sight distance). At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. Also, indicate sign dimensions, height, and total proposed sign face area on sign detail. 85. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). 86. Provide lighting details for street lights including locations, typical height, material, and color. 87. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation 88. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Planning and Development Board meeting. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\NWSP\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc . , m(;;~~l~1 PLAWWxG txc File number: NWSP 06-025 lONlr\0 DCP! Reference: 1 sr review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a July 19,2006 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking je O'i R \',J ef2-s. 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Aspen Glen DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. A copy of the letter from Palm Beach County Traffic was attached with submittal packaqe. 3. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identifY all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details, Traffic control devices are shown on plans. 4. The proposed project reflects one long, single roadway exceeding 660 feet for a cul-de-sac street (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section l.A.I.) This, in general, in not acceptable either without a waiver of the maximum length of a dead-end roadway, or the greater length approved by the City Engineer. This comment has been deleted per Laurinda Logan memorandum No. 06-093. She has added the following comments: Relocate the terminus of the roadway (cul-de-sac) approximately 100-ft. west to provide a buffer between the roadway and Nautica Sound PUD (Plat 2.) The cud-de-sac has been relocated and we are providing landscaped open space in its place. Per the LOR, Chapter 4, Section a.C.2. and Ordinance 02- 033 (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1.A.4..) evaluate placing a secondary access point to the subdivision at the east end of the dead-end roadway (cul-de-sac.) The applicant will need to contact Nautica Sound regarding a cross-access agreement (this would be to their benefit too since emergency vehicles would be able to get into Nautica via Aspen Glen if their entrance were blocked for some reason.) The secondary access point need not be paved and/or available for regular use by residents/trucks, etc. The secondary access may be constructed of stabilized sod and should a minimum of 15-ft. in width with appropriate turning radii off the cul-de-sac and onto Nautica Sound Blvd. A 15' emergency access has been added to the plan. 5. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 2 DEPARTMENTS 6. It does not appear that an adequate turning radius has been provided at the entrance for vehicles (specifically trucks) that may be refused entry at the gate. Please correct. Gates have been removed so this should not be an issue. PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry & Grounds Comments: 6. Provide the Landscape plan at the same scale as the Site plan and Civil drawings (l-in=50-ft.)(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.i.) This may be provided as a Master Landscape plan, while still providing sheets using the I -in=20-ft scale for detail. Landscape Plan has been provided at the same scale as the Site Plan and Civil drawings (1-in=50-ft.) 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Use Palm Beach County standards for the entrance onto Lawrence Road. Both 25' and extended sight line as required by Palm Beach County have been indicated on the Landscape Plan. 8. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) A note has been added to the Landscape Plan regarding the required unobstructed cross-visibility. 9. Staff recommends placing canopy trees a minimum of IO-ft off the property lines to avoid future conflicts with neighboring trees and hedges. We have a 5' buffer thus we can not plant the conopy trees 10' away from the property line. The trees have been located so that they are not in the center of the hedge. The hedge favors the 5' line of the buffer so that it can be maintained without having to trespass on adjacent property, 10. Live Oaks are proposed within the road right-of-way/utility easement. Canopy trees are not permitted within utility easements. Additionally, the use of canopy trees in close proximity to the roadway may create a vertical conflict for high-profile vehicles such as solid waste trucks. Please remove canopy trees or replace with a non-canopy species. The water and sewer lines are located in the center of the road right-oF-way under the pavement. There are no utility easements indicated on the engineering plan where we locoted the street trees. The street trees are proposed to be planted 7' from the water line along the south side of the road and 16' from the sewer line along the north side of the road. We will providE? a root barrier at each tree alona the south side INCLUDE REJECT 1 S1' REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 3 DEPARTMENTS of the road, if required. If we can not plant canopy trees we will not have enough room on site to plant the required number of canopy trees as required by City Code. This is a first, a request not to plant canopy street trees? 11. There are overhead lines along the north property line. Landscaping shall be designed and installed in accordance with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". The existing areca palms and additional trees selected to be planted under the power lines along the north property line comply with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". 12. Symbols for various trees specified along the south property line do not match the legend or the symbols shown on other areas of the plans. Please correct. Different symbols have been purposely indicated along the south property line to indicate where exiting trees on site are to be relocated. In addition, these trees/palms are labeled as relocated. All new plantings are labeled with a hexagonal tag. Triangles in the center of the symbol indicate sabal palms to be planted to mitigate for trees to be cleared from the site. UTILITIES Comments: 13. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. We are in the process of workina on a timeline. 14. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Preliminary Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities, especially in the proposed utility easement along Lawrence Rd. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility serVIces, either In utility easements or public rights-of-way. Utility easements and lines are shown on both landscape and site plan. ~'-lo separate utility easements are indicated on the enqineerinq pion. Utilities are located in street riqht-of-way. INCLUDE REJECT 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 15. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Comment noted. 16. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). In order to achieve this, consideration should be given to tying the proposed eastern terminus into the existing water main located in Nautica Sound Boulevard (along the south development line.) Comment noted. 17. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Comment noted. 18. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. An on site well will be provided for irriqation. 19. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). Comment noted. 20. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Comment noted. 21. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted. 22. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. Comment noted. 23. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Comment added to plans. 24. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 25. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." Comment added. 26. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Comment noted. 27. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 28. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance ofthe Land Development Permit. Comment noted. 29. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. The engineer's cortication on the drainaqe plan is attached. 30. The Drainage Plan (Civil Site Improvement Sheet 1 of 9) depicts the final outfall from the dry retention area In the northwest corner of the development into the storm sewer system in Lawrence Rd. Please provide written concurrence with this from Palm Beach County. We are in the process of getting written concurrency from Palm Beach County for outfall. 31. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Comment noted. 32. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. FIRE 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: NONE -- POLICE Comments: 33. All lighting shall be metal halide. Comment noted. 34. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). street trees and lights have been located to avoid driveways. street trees have been separated from street lights on the Landscape Plan. 35. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and all pedestrian sidewalks. A note has been added to the light location plan indicating that a tinier will be provided on the landscape lighting and a photocell sensor on street liqhts. 36. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. It is suggested that 14 foot -16 foot light poles be used for the street lighting. street Lighting to be provided: FPL 175 watt MH mounted on a 16' pole. See detail and locations on Light location plan, Site Plan and Plantinq Plan. 37. Provide lighting for entrance sign. There will be no entrance sign. 38. Landscaping should not obstruct view of windows, building address numbers, and walkways. A note has been added to the Landscape Plans 39. Sales center, clubhouse and recreational facilities should be pre-wired for alarm systems. Comment noted. 40. Restrict access to recreation buildings and pools through the use of key card or key. There are no recreation building or public pools. 41. Residential Security: . The inside garage door leading into the residence shall be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock. . When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. This would not apply to customized doors. . Entry doors to open outward versus inward. . If front door has zero visibility to front entryway area, equip it with a 180- degree peephole. . Equip all exterior doors with security hinges. . Run telephone lines underground with box hook-up on inside of garage versus the exterior of garage where telephone lines can be cut making alarm system inoperable. It is strongly suggested that the architects and engineers incorporate this into the site plans to insure that the site supervisor is aware of this condition. Comment noted. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 42. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 43. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. Site data has been revised to include type of construction. 44. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3, Site data has been revised to include occupancy type of each building, 45. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Note has been added to elevations. 46. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Comment noted. 47. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Comment noted. 48. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of each building. The number of stories has been added to the plan alonq with the heiqht of the buildinq. 49. IdentifY within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation IS In compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: 1) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the huilding site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." 2) From the FIRM map, identifY in the site data the title ofthe flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specifY the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 3) IdentifY the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). Site data has been revised to reflect above comments. 50. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. The site plan has been revised to show 011 three model details with setback dimensions on each. 51. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Comment noted. 52. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. A water use permit will be applied for from SFWMD for well source irrigation system and a copy of the permit will be submitted at the time of permit application. 53. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: 4) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 5) The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. 6) The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Comment noted. 54. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Comment noted. 55. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: 7) A legal description of the land. 8) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 9) The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter], Article V, Section 3(1)) Comment noted. 56. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25106 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. Note added to plan. 57. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted. 58. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 91 I. 10) Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) 11 ) United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) Comment noted. 59. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. The location of site lighting has been shown on the Landscape Plans and Site Plan. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 60. Parks Impact Fee - 45 single family detacted units $ 1,418.00 each = ../ $63,810.00 to be paid prior to issuance oftirst permit. Comment noted. 61. Landscape plan needs to indicate overall percentage native plants. Percentage of native plants has been added to the V Landscape Plans. 62. Irrigation needs to have 110% coverage, use bubblers on all trees, have separate zones for bedding and sod areas, be low flow and have a non- V potable water source. A note has been added to the Landscape Plan. 63. Cypress mulch is not permitted. A note has been added to the Landscape Plan that cypress V mulch is not permitted. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 64. There are several existing Areca Palm trees on the site that can be successfully relocated along the North and / or East perimeter of the property. This should be included in the TMP document. Developer has decided not to relocate any of the areca palms 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 10 DEPARTMENTS on site. 65. There are several Live Oak and Mahogany trees with diameters between 4"-8" that are noted on the tree survey which should be relocated to the North and / or East perimeter of the property. 'The Tree Movers' have reviewed the trees on site and have determined that three (3) live oak trees and twelve (12) sabal palms are worth relocating. None of the mahogany trees are worth relocating because of poor canopy structure and branching pattern. Our TMP document has been revised accordingly to reflect 'The Tree Mover's recommendation. Trees and palms are to be relocated at the south-west corner of the site because the source of temporary water to water the transplants will be from the existing water meter the provided service to the demolished house. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 66. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. Comment noted. 67. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Comment noted. 68. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. Comment noted. 69. Revise / complete New Site Plan Application as follows: 1.10. add to Intended Use: "Single-Family residential (detached)"; 11.4. Land Use Acreage Breakdown: a. provide total of residential lot areas in acreage and % oftotal acreage; H.4.g. provide total of R/W area in acreage and % of total acreage; H.4.h. provide total of common landscaped areas (including dry detention areas) in acreage and % of total acreage; H.5. Surface Cover: a. provide a total of maximum building footprints (areas under roof) for all lots in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.b. 0 ac, 0%; c. provide a total of all impervious surfaces (areas not under root) for all lots, including R/W, driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. in acreage and % of total acreage; n.5.d. add a + c for acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.e. 0 ac, 0%; 1I.5.t: provide a total of common landscaped areas and % oftotal acreage; 1I.5.g. provide a total of dry detention areas in acreage and % of total acreage; n.5.h. add f + g for acreage and % of total acreage; 11.5.i. should equal d + h.; II.6. Floor Area. a. Residential: provide total square footage under roof (I sl floor INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 11 DEPARTMENTS + 2nd floor) of typical residential unit, and same total for h.; II.7.a. provide number of units proposed (delete sf, add units); II.8. gross density is 45 /9.338 = 4.819 or 4.82 du/ac; II.9.2 stories; II. I O. 2 spaces required per unit = 90 spaces required, 90+ spaces provided (with garages and driveways); II.IO.b. add N/A.; IV. Owner's signature authorizing Agent is missing from form. Applications has been revised to include the above comments. 70. Revise justification statement as follows: Land use classification is LDR (not MDR); code Chapter is 2.5 (not 25); typo on last sentence of A. "these" regulations (not there regulations); revise side-zero setback for pool to 3' (not 0'); B. Master Landscape should also indicate that all common areas will be platted as separate tracts and will be maintained by the HOA; C. Typo Fence, "Wall", etc. (not Well) should provide detail regarding existing masonry wall and any proposed perimeter walls or fences, areca palm screen, note that no fences for individual lots are allowed through common areas including landscaped areas. Justification statement has been revised. 71. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover Sheet, Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans/ Elevations of Models A-C, Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans, Photometric Plan, and Civil Drawings. Drawings have been reorganized as mentioned above. 72. Revise site plan as follows: Note that the symbol on west property line of each lot indicates the zero lot line side of each lot. Revise location of the symbol on each lot to the east property line to match typical ZLL detail (it is preferable that the zero-side be the east property line of each lot). Revise "3' maint." on typical ZLL detail to 3' overhang easement. Label length of home and length of privacy wall along zero lot line side on typical ZLL detail. Provide a scale for the typical ZLL detail. Revise ZLL detail to include typical layout of pool and screen enclosure. Dimension width of Lawrence Road right-of-way. Clarify if 25' corner clip is right-of-way to be dedicated, or if it is a 25' safe sight corner. Site plan has been revised to address the above comments. 73. Revise site data as follows: Proposed Density: 4.82 Dwelling Units per Acre (du/ac); Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR); Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (PUD); Total Impervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Total Pervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Proposed Use: Single-Family Residential (Detached) Zero Lot Line Typical Lot Size: 45' x 110' Minimum Building Setbacks: Front 15' (building), 20' (garage), Side 0' on zero INCLUDE REJECT 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT side, 10' on non-zero side, Rear 10' Minimum Pool Setbacks: Side 3' on zero side, 8' on non-zero side, Rear 8' Minimum Screen Enclosure (with screen roof) Setbacks: Side 0' on zero side, 5' on non-zero side, Rear 5' Proposed Model "A": 3,345 total sf (under root), 2,722 sf AIC Proposed Model "B": 3,539 total sf (under root), 2,867 sf AIC Proposed Model "C": 3,806 total sf (under root), 3,088 sf AlC Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% of lot area Building Height: 35 feet Site data has been revised to address the above comments. 74. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the p Ian set. Comment noted. 75. Label width of all proposed easements and buffers on site and landscape plan. Width ot easements and buffers are labeled on plans, 76. Indicate 5' VE along north property line, dry detention areas, and all buffers as tracts to be platted separately from the proposed residential lots. Add a note that separate tracts are common space that will be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. Proposed buffer widths have been indicated on the site and landscape plans. 77. Revise note 3 to clarifY which existing easements on subject property are to be abandoned prior to development. Why is the existing 6' FPL easement in the vicinity of Lots 13 and 34 not indicated? The 6' FPL easement is now shown on the plan but we are working with FP&L to abandon both the 6' and 14' easements prior to development. 78. Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate sufficient area for stacking of vehicles on site and out of Lawrence Road. Gates have been removed. 79. Note on site plan if the street interior to the project is a public right-of-way, or a private street (tract) to be maintgained by the homeowners association. Note has been added. 80. Indicate location of required continuous sidewalks within Lawrence Road right-of-way. Sidewalk has been added along LClwrence Road within the Right-ot- Way. 81. Label location and width of any required maintenance easements around perimeter of dry detention areas. Maintenance easements have been added. 82. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site. Also provide a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. A reduced landscape plan has been provided for entire site and a reduced key has been provided indicating landscape sheet coverage. 83. Clearly indicate and label locations, type, and height of any perimeter walls / fences, 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 13 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT No new walls or fences proposed, North property line has an existinq 5' wall that is on the adiacent property to the north. 84. Indicate location of proposed subdivision identification sign at the entrance to the development (subject to Engineering review and approval for safe sight distance). At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. Also, indicate sign dimensions, height, and total proposed sign face area on sign detail. No identification sign proposed. 85. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). Feature lighting to emphasize plants, trees, entrance and art feature has been indicated on the Liqht Location Plan. 86. Provide lighting details for street lights including locations, typical height, material, and color. See Light Location Plan and Landscape Plan. 87. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. See Landscape Plan and Site Plan for location and Landscape Plans for art feature details. 88. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notifY the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Planning and Development Board meeting. Comment noted. MWR/sc S:\PlanningISHARED\WPIPROJECTS\Aspen GlenINWSP\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS doc l:(t/[~t>ld ~ pt'2t%~ \V IAlJrg;: , I , ql%It'~ l'tREVIEWCOMMENTS } .~. La New Site Plan SEP 2 62Uu ,6 Project name: Aspen Glen ~ PLANN'NG ANr --1 . File number: NWSP 06-025 ZONlr~G DEPT J Reference: 1 sl review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a July 19. 2006 Planning and Zoning Department date stanm marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. A copy of the letter from Palm Beach County Traffic was attached with submittal packaqe. 3. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identifY all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Traffic control devices are shown on plans. 4. The proposed project reflects one long, single roadway exceeding 660 feet for a cul-de-sac street (LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 1.A.I.) This, in general, in not acceptable either without a waiver of the maximum length of a dead-end roadway, or the greater length approved by the City Engineer. This comment has been deleted per Laurinda Logan memorandum No. 06-093. She has added the following comments: Relocate the terminus of the roadway (cul-de-sac) approximately 100-ft. west to provide a buffer between the roadway and Nautica Sound PUO (Plat 2.) The cud-de-sac has been relocated and we are providing landscaped open space in its place. Per the LOR, Chapter 4, Section 8,C.2. and Ordinance 02- 033 (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1.A.4..) evaluate placing a secondary access point to the subdivision at the east end of the dead-end roadway (cul-de-sac.) The applicant will need to contact Nautica Sound regarding a cross-access agreement (this would be to their benefit too since emergency vehicles would be able to get into Nautica via Aspen Glen if their entrance were blocked for some reason.) The secondary access point need not be paved and/or available for regular use by residents/trucks, etc. The secondary access may be constructed of stabilized sod and should a minimum of 15-ft. in width with appropriate turning radii off the cul-de-sac and onto Nautica Sound Blvd. A 15' emergency access has been r'lrlrlc:.rl t,., t c. ......lr'I'"" I 5. """"-"-4'-"1'-"'\",.A:~ ,h__ I--'l~ll. , 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 2 DEPARTMENTS 6. It does not appear that an adequate turning radius has been provided at the entrance for vehicles (specifically trucks) that may be refused entry at the gate. Please correct. Gates have been removed so this should not be an issue. PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry & Grounds Comments: 6. Provide the Landscape plan at the same scale as the Site plan and Civil drawings (l-in=50-ft.)(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.1.) This may be provided as a Master Landscape plan, while still providing sheets using the l-in=20-ft scale for detail. Landscape Plan has been provided at the same scale as the Site Plan and Civil drawings (1-in=50-ft.) 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section 5.H.) Use Palm Beach County standards for the entrance onto Lawrence Road. Both 25' and extended sight line as required by Palm Beach County have been indicated on the Landscape Pion. 8. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section 5.H.) A note has been added to the Landscape Plan regarding the required unobstructed cross-visibility. 9. Staff recommends placing canopy trees a minimum of lO-ft off the property lines to avoid future conflicts with neighboring trees and hedges. We have a 5' buffer thus we can not plant the conopy trees 10' away from the property line. The trees have been located so that they are not in the center of the hedge. The hedge favors the 5' line of the buffer so that it can be maintained without having to trespass on adjacent property. 10. Live Oaks are proposed within the road right-of-way/utility easement. Canopy trees are not permitted within utility easements. Additionally, the use of canopy trees in close proximity to the roadway may create a vertical conflict for high-profile vehicles such as solid waste trucks. Please remove canopy trees or replace with a non-canopy species. The water and sewer lines are located in the center of the road right-of-way under the pavement. There are no utility easements indicated on the engineering plan where we located the street trees. The street trees are proposed to be planted 7' from the water line along the south side of the road and 16' from the sev./er line along the north side of the road. We will provide 0 root barrier at each tree alona the south side INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 3 DEPARTMENTS of the road, if required. If \A/e can not plant canopy trees we will not have enough room on site to plant the required number of canopy trees as required by City Code. This is a first, a request not to plant canopy street trees? 11. There are overhead lines along the north property line. Landscaping shall be designed and installed in accordance with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". The existing areca palms and additional trees selected to be planted under the power lines along the north property line comply with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". 12. Symbols for various trees specified along the south property line do not match the legend or the symbols shown on other areas of the plans. Please correct. Different symbols have been purposely indicated along the south property line to indicate where exiting trees on site are to be relocated. In addition, these trees/palms are labeled as relocated. All new plantings are labeled with a hexagonal tag. Triangles in the center of the symbol indicate sabol palms to be planted to mitigate for trees to be cleared from the site. UTILITIES Comments: 13. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approvaL Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the fIrst water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. We are in the process of workinq on a timeline. 14. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Preliminary Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities, especially in the proposed utility easement along Lawrence Rd. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility servIces, either ill utility easements or public rights-of-way. Utility easements and lines are shown on both landscape and site ;,Irm ~'!o separate utility easements ore indicated on the enqineerinq plan. Utilities are located in street riaht-oT-wav. INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09125/06 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 15. Pahn Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Comment noted. 16. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). In order to achieve this, consideration should be given to tying the proposed eastern terminus into the existing water main located in Nautica Sound Boulevard (along the south development line.) Comment noted. 17. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs fIrst. This fee will be determined based upon [mal meter size, or expected demand. Comment noted. 18. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. An on site well will be provided for irriqation. 19. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). Comment noted. 20. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the fIrst permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the CertifIcate of Occupancy. Comment noted. 21. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, m accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted. 22. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. Comment noted. 23. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Comment added to plans. 24. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. I I I Comment noted. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE J. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 25. Add a note to the Site Plan stating" All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (pBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." Comment added. 26. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Comment noted. 27. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 28. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. Comment noted. 29. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. The engineer's cortication on the drainaqe plan is attached. 30. The Drainage Plan (Civil Site Improvement Sheet I of 9) depicts the fmal outfall from the dry retention area in the northwest corner of the development into the storm sewer system in Lawrence Rd. Please provide written concurrence with this from Palm Beach County. We are in the process of getting written concurrency from Palm Beach County for outfall. 3l. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Comment noted. 32. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. FIRE 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 6 , II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 33. All lighting shall be metal halide. Comment noted. 34. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). Street trees and lights have been located to avoid driveways. Street trees have been separated from street lights on the Landscape Plan. 35. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and all pedestrian sidewalks. A note has been added to the light location plan indicating that a timer will be provided on the landscape lighting and a photocell sensor on street liahts. 36. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. It is suggested that 14 foot-16 foot light poles be used for the street lighting. street Lighting to be provided: FPL 175 watt MH mounted on a 16' pole. See detail and locations on Light location plan, Site Plan and Plantinq Plan. 37. Provide lighting for entrance sign. There will be no entrance sign, 38. Landscaping should not obstruct view of windows, building address numbers, and walkways. A note has been added to the Landscape Plans 39. Sales center, clubhouse and recreational facilities should be pre-wired for alarm systems. Comment noted. 40. Restrict access to recreation buildings and pools through the use of key card or key. There ore no recreation building or public pools. 41. Residential Security: . The inside garage door leading into the residence shall be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock. . When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. This would not apply to customized doors. . Entry doors to open outward versus inward. . If front door has zero visibility to front entryway area, equip it with a 180- degree peephole. . Equip all exterior doors with security hinges. . Run telephone lines underground with box hook-up on inside of garage versus the exterior of garage where telephone lines can be cut making alarm system inoperable. It is strongly suggested that the architects and I I I engineers incorporate this into the site plans to insure that the site supervisor is aware of this condition. Comment noted. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 42. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments ,V may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 43. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defmed in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. Site data has been revised to V include type of construction. 44. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defmed ~ in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. Site data has been revised to include occupancy type of each building. 45. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that ~ clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Note has been added to elevations. 46. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be ~ determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Comment noted. 47. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of t/ the proposed construction. Comment noted. 48. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall V height of each building. The number of stories has been added to the plan along with the height of the building. 49. Identify within the site data the fmish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation IS m compliance with regulations of the code by adding /' specifications to the site data that address the following issues: /' 1) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." 2) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that I the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. Ifthere is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 3) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). Site data has been revised to reflect above comments. 50. As required by the CBBCO, Part ill titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the V property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. The site plan has been revised to show 011 three model details with setback dimensions on each. 51. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may ,~ not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Comment noted. 52. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the / permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. A water use permit will be applied for from SFWrJID for well source irrigation system and a copy of the permit will be submitted at the time of permit application. 53. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be I provided at the time of building permit application: 4) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 5) The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. 6) The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article IT, Sections 26-34) Comment noted. / 54. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. .J For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Comment noted. 55. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been J satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: 7) A legal description of the land. 8) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 9) The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t)) Cor~(-I(n8n.l noted. 56. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT / shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the V time of permit application. Note added to plan. 57. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the ./ time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted. 58. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton / Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. 10) Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) 11) United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) Comment noted. 59. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans, (LDR., Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan / submittals. The location of site lighting has been shown on the Landscape Plans and Site Plan. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 60. Parks Impact Fee - 45 single family detacted units $ 1,418.00 each = $63,810.00 to be paid prior to issuance of first permit. Comment noted. 61. Landscape plan needs to indicate overall percentage native plants, Percentage of native plants has been added to the Landscape Plans. 62. Irrigation needs to have 110% coverage, use bubblers on all trees, have separate zones for bedding and sod areas, be low flow and have a non- potable water source. A note has been added to the Landscape Plan. 63. Cypress mulch is not permitted. ,A, note has been added to the Landscape Plan that cypress mulch is not permitted. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 64. There are several existing Areca Palm trees on the site that can be successfully relocated along the North and / or East perimeter of the property. This should be included in the TMP document. Developer has decided not to relocate any of the areca palms 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 10 DEPARTMENTS on site. 65. There are several Live Oak and Mahogany trees with diameters between 4"-8" that are noted on the tree survey which should be relocated to the North and I or East perimeter of the property. 'The Tree !v\overs' hove reviewed the trees on site and hove determined that three (3) live oak trees and twelve (12) sobol palms ore worth relocating. None of the mahogany trees ore worth relocating because of poor canopy structure and branching pattern. Our TMP document has been revised accordingly to reflect 'The Tree Mover's recommendation. Trees and palms ore to be relocated at the south-west corner of the site because the source of temporary water to water the transplants will be from the existing water meter the provided service to the demolished house, PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 66. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. Comment noted. 67. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Comment noted. 68. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. Comment noted. 69. Revise / complete New Site Plan Application as follows: I.1 O. add to Intended Use: "Single-Family residential (detached)"; IIA. Land Use Acreage Breakdown: a. provide total of residential lot areas in acreage and % of total acreage; IIA.g. provide total ofR/W area in acreage and % of total acreage; IIA.h. provide total of common landscaped areas (including dry detention areas) in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5. Surface Cover: a. provide a total of maximum building footprints (areas under root) for all lots in acreage and % of total acreage; IISb. 0 ac, 0%; c. provide a total of all impervious surfaces (areas not under root) for all lots, including R/W, driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.d. add a + c for acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.e. 0 ac, 0%; II.5.f provide a total of common landscaped areas and % of total acreage; II.5.g. provide a total of dry detention areas in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.h. add f + g for acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.i. should equal d + h.; II.6. Floor Area. a. Residential: provide total square footage under roof (1 st floor INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 11 DEPARTMENTS + 2nd floor) of typical residential unit, and same total for h.; II.7.a. provide number of units proposed (delete sf, add units); II.8. gross density is 45/9.338 = 4.819 or 4.82 dulac; II.9. 2 stories; II.10. 2 spaces required per unit = 90 spaces required, 90+ spaces provided (with garages and driveways); II.IO.b. add N/A.; IV. Owner's signature authorizing Agent is missing from form. Applications has been revised to include the above comments. 70. Revise justification statement as follows: Land use classification is LDR (not MDR); code Chapter is 2.5 (not 25); typo on last sentence of A. "these" regulations (not there regulations); revise side-zero setback for pool to 3' (not 0'); B. Master Landscape should also indicate that all common areas will be platted as separate tracts and will be maintained by the HOA; C. Typo Fence, "Wall", etc. (not Well) should provide detail regarding existing masonry wall and any proposed perimeter walls or fences, areca palm screen, note that no fences for individual lots are allowed through common areas including landscaped areas. Justification statement has been revised. 71. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover Sheet, Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans/ Elevations of Models A-C, Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans, Photometric Plan, and Civil Drawings. Drawinqs have been reorqanized as mentioned above. 72. Revise site plan as follows: Note that the symbol on west property line of each lot indicates the zero lot line side of each lot. Revise location of the symbol on each lot to the east property line to match typical ZLL detail (it is preferable that the zero-side be the east property line of each lot). Revise "3' maint." on typical ZLL detail to 3' overhang easement. Labe1length of home and length of privacy wall along zero lot line side on typical ZLL detail. Provide a scale for the typical ZLL detail. Revise ZLL detail to include typical layout of pool and screen enclosure. Dimension width of Lawrence Road right-of-way. ClarifY if 25' corner clip is right -of-way to be dedicated, or if it is a 25' safe sight corner. Site pion has been revised to address the above comments. 73. Revise site data as follows: Proposed Density: 4.82 Dwelling Units per Acre (dulac); Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR); Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (PUD); Total Impervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Total Pervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Proposed Use: Single-Family Residential (Detached) Zero Lot Line Typical Lot Size: 45' x 110' Minimum Building Setbacks: Front 15' (building), 20' (garage), Side 0' on zero INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT side, 10' on non-zero side, Rear 10' Minimum Pool Setbacks: Side 3' on zero side, 8' on non-zero side, Rear 8' Minimum Screen Enclosure (with screen roof) Setbacks: Side 0' on zero side, 5' on non-zero side, Rear 5' Proposed Model "A": 3,345 total sf (under roof), 2,722 sf AlC Proposed Model "B": 3,539 total sf (under roof), 2,867 sf AlC Proposed Model "C": 3,806 total sf (under roof), 3,088 sf AlC Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% of lot area Building Height: 35 feet Site data has been revised to address the above comments. 74. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan set. Comment noted. 75. Label width of all proposed easements and buffers on site and landscape plan. Width of easements and buffers ore labeled on plans. 76. lndicate 5' UE along north property line, dry detention areas, and all buffers as tracts to be platted separately from the proposed residential lots. Add a note that separate tracts are common space that will be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. Proposed buffer widths hove been indicated on the site and landscape plans. 77. Revise note 3 to clarifY which existing easements on subject property are to be abandoned prior to development. Why is the existing 6' FPL easement in the vicinity of Lots 13 and 34 not indicated? The 6' FPL easement is now shown on the plan but we ore working with FP &L to abandon both the 6' and 14' easements prior to development. 78. Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate sufficient area for stacking ofvehic1es on site and out of Lawrence Road. Gates hove been removed. 79. Note on site plan if the street interior to the project is a public right-of-way, or a private street (tract) to be maintgained by the homeowners association. t--.Jote has been added. 80. Indicate location of required continuous sidewalks within Lawrence Road right-of-way. Sidewalk has been added along Lawrence Rood within the Right-of- Way. 81. Label location and width of any required maintenance easements around perimeter of dry detention areas. Maintenance easements have been added. 82. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site. Also provide a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. A reduced landscape plan has been provided for entire site and a reduced key has been provided indicating landscape sheet coverage. 81 (;1 . v' die t a Ii hf':1 o~ n" tvnp nli hf':i (Y t of nv n .n .f':rw 1" i -- _earl... ill / fences. 3_e _1L la___ L_a1Jo._~, ~r _, aJ:__ ____gh. __ aJ:_~ re__TJ1eL aJ_ I 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 13 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT No new walls or fences proposed. North property line has an existinq 5' wall that is on the adjacent property to the north, 84. Indicate location of proposed subdivision identification sign at the entrance to the development (subject to Engineering review and approval for safe sight distance). At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. Also, indicate sign dimensions, height, and total proposed sign face area on sign detail. No identification sign proposed. 85. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). Feature lighting to emphasize plants, trees, entrance and art feature has been indicated on the Liqht Location Plan. 86. Provide lighting details for street lights including locations, typical height, material, and color. See Light Location Plan and Landscape Plan. 87. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. See Landscape Plan and Site Plan for location and Landscape Plans for art feature details. 88. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notifY the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Planning and Development Board meeting. Comment noted, MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\NWSP\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Aspen Glen File number: NWSP 06-025 Reference: 1 sj review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a July 19. 2006 Planning and Zoning Department d t tam k' aes 10 mar mg. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). Comment noted. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. A copy of the letter from Palm Beach County Traffic was attached with submittal packaqe. 3. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identifY all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Traffic control devices are shown on plans. 4. The proposed project reflects one long, single roadway exceeding 660 feet for a cul-de-sac street (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section I.A.I.) This, in general, in not acceptable either without a waiver of the maximum length of a dead-end roadway, or the greater length approved by the City Engineer. This comment has been deleted per Laurinda Logan memorandum No. 06-093. She has added the following comments: Relocate the terminus of the roadway (cul-de-sac) approximately 100-ft. west to provide a buffer between the roadway and Nautica Sound PUO (Plat 2.) The cud-de-sac has been relocated and we are providing landscaped open space in its place. Per the LOR, Chapter 4, Section a.C.2. and Ordinance 02- 033 (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1.A.4..) evaluate placing a secondary access point to the subdivision at the east end of the dead-end roadway (cul-de-sac.) The applicant will need to contact Nautica Sound regarding a cross-access agreement (this would be to their benefit too since emergency vehicles would be able to get into Nautica via Aspen Glen if their entrance were blocked for some reason.) The secondary access point need not be paved and/or available for regular use by residentsltrucks, etc. The secondary access may be constructed of stabilized sod and should a minimum of 15-ft. in width with appropriate turning radii off the cul-de-sac and onto Nautica Sound Blvd. A 15' emergency access has been added to the plan. S. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 6. It does not appear that an adequate turning radius has been provided at the entrance for vehicles (specifically trucks) that may be refused entry at the gate. Please correct. Gates have been removed so this should not be an issue. PUBLIC WORKS - Forestrv & Grounds Comments: 6. Provide the Landscape plan at the same scale as the Site plan and Civil drawings (l-in=50-ft.)(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.1.) This may be provided as a Master Landscape plan, while still providing sheets using the l-in=20-ft scale for detail. Landscape Plan has been provided at the same scale as the Site Plan and Civil drawings (1-in=50-ft.) 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Use Palm Beach County standards for the entrance onto Lawrence Road. Both 25' and extended sight line as required by Palm Beach County have been indicated on the Landscape Plan. 8. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) A note has been added to the Landscape Plan regarding the required unobstructed cross-visibility. 9. Staff recommends placing canopy trees a minimum of 10-ft off the property lines to avoid future conflicts with neighboring trees and hedges. We have a 5' buffer thus we can not plant the conopy trees 10' away from the property line. The trees have been located so that they are not in the center of the hedge. The hedge favors the 5' line of the buffer so that it can be maintained without having to trespass on adjacent property. 10. Live Oaks are proposed within the road right-of-way/utility easement. Canopy trees are not permitted within utility easements. Additionally, the use of canopy trees in close proximity to the roadway may create a vertical conflict for high-profile vehicles such as solid waste trucks. Please remove canopy trees or replace with a non-canopy species. The water and sewer lines are located in the center of the road right-of-way under the pavement. There are no utility easements indicated on the engineering plan where we located the street trees. The street trees are proposed to be planted 7' from the water line along the south side of the road and 16' from the sewer line along the north side of the road. We will provide a root barrier at each tree alono the south side 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 3 DEPARTMENTS of the road, if required. If we can not plant canopy trees we will not have enough room on site to plant the required number of canopy trees as required by City Code. This is a first, a request not to plant canopy street trees? 11. There are overhead lines along the north property line. Landscaping shall be designed and installed in accordance with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". The existing areca palms and additional trees selected to be planted under the power lines along the north property line comply with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". 12. Symbols for various trees specified along the south property line do not match the legend or the symbols shown on other areas of the plans. Please correct. Different symbols have been purposely indicated along the south property line to indicate where exiting trees on site are to be relocated. In addition, these trees/palms are labeled as relocated. All new plantings are labeled with a hexagonal tag. Triangles in the center of the symbol indicate sabal palms to be planted to mitigate for trees to be cleared from the site. UTILITIES Comments: 13. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. We are in the process of working on a timeline. 14. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Preliminary Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities, especially in the proposed utility easement along Lawrence Rd. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either In utility easements or public rights-of-way. utility easements and lines are shown on both landscape and site plan. No separate utility easements are indicated on the enqineerinq plan. Utilities are located in street riqht-of-wav. INCLUDE REJECT 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25106 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 15. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Comment noted. 16. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). In order to achieve this, consideration should be given to tying the proposed eastern terminus into the existing water main located in Nautica Sound Boulevard (along the south development line.) Comment noted. 17. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Comment noted. 18. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. An on site well will be provided for irriaation. 19. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). Comment noted. 20. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Comment noted. 21. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, ill accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted. 22. Provide a minimum of lO-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. Comment noted. 23. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Comment added to plans. 24. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25106 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 25. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." Comment added. 26. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Comment noted. 27. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 28. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. Comment noted. 29. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. The engineer's cortication on the drainaqe plan is attached. 30. The Drainage Plan (Civil Site Improvement Sheet 1 of 9) depicts the final outfall from the dry retention area in the northwest comer of the development into the storm sewer system in Lawrence Rd. Please provide written concurrence with this from Palm Beach County. We are in the process of getting written concurrency from Palm Beach County for outfall. 31. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Comment noted. 32. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. FIRE 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 33. All lighting shall be metal halide. Comment noted. 34. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). Street trees and lights have been located to avoid driveways. Street trees have been separated from street lights on the Landscape Plan. 35. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and all pedestrian sidewalks. A note has been added to the light location plan indicating that a timer will be provided on the landscape lighting and a photocell sensor on street liqhts. 36. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. It is suggested that 14 foot-16 foot light poles be used for the street lighting. street Lighting to be provided: FPL 175 watt MH mounted on a 16' pole. See detail and locations on Light location plan, Site Plan and Plantinq Plan. 37. Provide lighting for entrance sign. There will be no entrance sign. 38. Landscaping should not obstruct view of windows, building address numbers, and walkways. A note has been added to the Landscape Plans 39. Sales center, clubhouse and recreational facilities should be pre-wired for alarm systems. Comment noted. 40. Restrict access to recreation buildings and pools through the use of key card or key. There are no recreation building or public pools. 41. Residential Security: . The inside garage door leading into the residence shall be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock. . When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. This would not apply to customized doors. . Entry doors to open outward versus inward. . If front door has zero visibility to front entryway area, equip it with a 180- degree peephole. . Equip all exterior doors with security hinges. . Run telephone lines underground with box hook-up on inside of garage versus the exterior of garage where telephone lines can be cut making alarm system inoperable. It is strongly suggested that the architects and engineers incorporate this into the site plans to insure that the site supervisor is aware of this condition. Comment noted. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 42. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 43. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defmed in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. Site data has been revised to include type of construction, 44. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. Site data has been revised to include occupancy type of each building. 45. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Note has been added to elevations. 46. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Comment noted. 47. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Comment noted. 48. On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of each building. The number of stories has been added to the plan alonq with the heiqht of the buildinq. 49. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation IS in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: 1) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." 2) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title ofthe flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25106 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 3) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). Site data has been revised to reflect above comments. 50. As required by the CBBCO, Part ill titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. The site plan has been revised to show all three model details with setback dimensions on each. 51. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Comment noted. 52. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. A water use permit will be applied for from SFWMD for well source irrigation system and a copy of the permit will be submitted at the time of permit application. 53. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: 4) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 5) The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. 6) The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Comment noted. 54. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Comment noted. 55. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: 7) A legal description of the land. 8) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. 9) The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(t)) Comment noted. 56. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. Note added to plan. 57. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted, 58. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. 10) Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) 11) United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) Comment noted, 59. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. The location of site lighting has been shown on the Landscape Plans and Site Plan. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 60. Parks Impact Fee - 45 single family detacted units $ 1,418.00 each = $63,810.00 to be paid prior to issuance offrrst permit. Comment noted. 61. Landscape plan needs to indicate overall percentage native plants. Percentage of native plants has been added to the Landscape Plans. 62. Irrigation needs to have 110% coverage, use bubblers on all trees, have separate zones for bedding and sod areas, be low flow and have a non- potable water source. A note has been added to the Landscape Plan. 63. Cypress mulch is not permitted. A note has been added to the Landscape Plan that cypress mulch is not permitted. FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 64. There are several existing Areca Palm trees on the site that can be successfully relocated along the North and / or East perimeter of the property. This should be included in the TMP document. Developer has decided not to relocate any of the areca palms 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 10 * DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT on site. 65. There are several Live Oak and Mahogany trees with diameters between 4"-8" that are noted on the tree survey which should be relocated to the North and / or East perimeter of the property. 'The Tree Movers' have reviewed the trees on site and have determined that three (3) live oak trees and twelve (12) sabal palms are worth relocating. None of the mahogany trees are worth relocating because of poor canopy structure and branching pattern. Our TMP document has been revised accordingly to reflect 'The Tree Mover's recommendation. Trees and palms are to be relocated at the south-west corner of the site because the source of temporary water to water the transplants will be from the existing water meter the provided service to the demolished house. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 66. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised J..--' plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. Comment noted. 67. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and V submit that to staff as well. Comment noted. 68. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. V Comment noted. 69. Revise / complete New Site Plan Application as follows: 1.10. add to Intended Use: "Single-Family residential (detached)"; ':-- ITA. Land Use Acreage Breakdown: a. provide total of residential lot areas in acreage and % of total acreage; IT.4.g. provide total ofR/W area in acreage and % oftotal acreage; J ITA.h. provide total of common landscaped areas (including dry detention areas) in acreage and % of total acreage; ((2( V 11.5. Surface Cover: a. provide a total of maximum building footprints (areas under roof) for all lots in acreage and % of total acreage; 1I.5.b. 0 ac, 0%; c. provide a total of all impervious surfaces (areas not under roof) for all lots, including R/W, driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.d. add a + c for acreage and % of total acreage; 1I.5.e. 0 ac, 0%; , IT.5.f. provide a total of common landscaped areas and % oftotal acreage; . 1I.5.g. provide a total of dry detention areas in acreage and % oftotal acreage; 1I.5.h. add f + g for acreage and % of total acreage; 1l.5.i. should equal d + h.; "-- 11.6. Floor Area. a. Residential: provide total square foota~e under roof (1 sl floor 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT + 2nd floor) of typical residential unit, and same total for h.; II.7.a. provide number of units proposed (delete sf, add units); 11.8. gross density is 45/9.338 = 4.819 or 4.82 du/ac; 11.9. 2 stories; C!r 11.10. 2 spaces required per unit = 90 spaces required, 90+ spaces provided (with v\U) r V garages and driveways); II.IO.b. add N/A.; IV. Owner's signature authorizing Agent is missing from form. Applications has been revised to include the above comments. 70. Revise justification statement as follows: Land use classification is LDR (not MDR); code Chapter is 2.5 (not 25); typo on last sentence of A. "these" regulations (not there regulations); revise side-zero setback for pool to 3' (not 0'); B. Master Landscape should also indicate that all common areas will be platted as separate tracts and will be maintained by the HOA; C. Typo Fence, "Wall", etc. (not Well) should provide detail regarding existing V masonry wall and any proposed perimeter walls or fences, areca palm screen, note that no fences for individual lots are allowed through common areas including landscaped areas. Justification statement has been revised. 71. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover Sheet, Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans/ Elevations of Models A-C, Reduced Landscape Plan of V Entire Site, Landscape Plans, Photometric Plan, and Civil Drawings. . Drawinos have been reoroanized as mentioned above, 72. Revise site plan as follows: Note that the symbol o~perty line of each lot indicates the zero 10.!i!.iPe side of each lot. ~ - ~' Revise location of the symbol on each lot to the east property line to match typical ZLL detail (it is preferable that the zero-side be the east property line of each lot). Revise "3' maint." on typical ZLL detail to 3' overhang easement. V Label length of home and length of privacy wall along zero lot line side on typical ZLL detail. Provide a scale for the typical ZLL detail. Revise ZLL detail to include typical layout of pool and screen enclosure. ~, Dimension width of Lawrence Road right-of-way. Clarify if25' corner clip is right-of-way to be dedicated, or if it is a 25' safe sight corner. Site plan has been revised to address the above comments. 73. Revise site data as follows: Proposed Density: 4.82 Dwelling Units per Acre (du/ac); Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR); Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (PUD); V Total Impervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Total Pervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Proposed Use: Single-Family Residential (Detached) Zero Lot Line Typical Lot Size: 45' x 110' Minimum Building Setbacks: Front 15' (building), 20' (garage), Side 0' on zero 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081006.doc 09/25/06 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT side, 10' on non-zero side, Rear 10' Minimum Pool Setbacks: Side 3' on zero side, 8' on non-zero side, Rear 8' Minimum Screen Enclosure (with screen roof) Setbacks: Side 0' on zero side, 5' on non-zero side, Rear 5' Proposed Model "A": 3,345 total sf (under roof), 2,722 sf NC Proposed Model "B": 3,539 total sf (under roof), 2,867 sf NC Proposed Model "C": 3,806 total sf (under roof), 3,088 sf AIC Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% of lot area Building Height: 35 feet Site data has been revised to address the above comments. 74. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the V plan set. Comment noted. 75. Label width of all proposed easements and buffers on site and landscape '1.--' plan. Width of easements and buffers are labeled on plans. 76. Indicate 5' VE along north property line, dry detention areas, and all buffers as tracts to be platted separately from the proposed residential lots. Add a note that separate tracts are common space that will be owned and ~ maintained by the Home Owners' Association. Proposed buffer widths have been indicated on the site and landscape plans. 77. Revise note 3 to clarify which existing easements on subject property are to be abandoned prior to development. Why is the existing 6' FPL easement ~ in the vicinity of Lots 13 and 34 not indicated? The 6' FPL easement is now shown on the plan but we are working with FP &L to abandon both the 6' and 14' easements prior to development. 78. Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate V sufficient area for stacking of vehicles on site and out of Lawrence Road. Gates have been removed. 79. Note on site plan if the street interior to the project is a public right-of-way, V Mtlv; ~ or a private street (tract) to be maintgained by the homeowners association. ~. Note has been added. P rt"v c'L 80. Indicate location of required continuous sidewalks within Lawrence Road Cldd(J right-of-way. V h ,'\"'. ~ Sidewalk has been added along Lawrence Road within the Right-of- ~/>r Way. Cl.A : ~ !)( 81. Label location and width of any required maintenance easements around .,. t. perimeter of dry detention areas. Maintenance easements have been V /VJ~ added. dr- cr;: !. J. ~. 82. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site. Also provide v ~r a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. A reduced landscape plan has been provided for entire site V and a reduced key has been provided indicating landscape sheet coverage. 83. Clearly indicate and label locations, type, and height of any perimeter walls I fences. 11{1// C N" ~ J" ~)(~ / () / ~7>e ~ } 0 ~terl I O......~4' 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 081 006.doc 09/25/06 13 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT No new walls or fences proposed. North property line has an V existina 5' wall that is on the adjacent property to the north. 84. Indicate location of proposed subdivision identification sign at the entrance to the development (subject to Engineering review and approval for safe sight distance). At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line V and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. Also, indicate sign dimensions, height, and total proposed sign face area on sign detail. No identification sign proposed. 85. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 1O.F.3.). V Feature lighting to emphasize plants, trees, entrance and art feature has been indicated on the Liqht Location Plan. 86. Provide lighting details for street lights including locations, typical height, , \//' material, and color. See Liqht Location Plan and Landscape Plan. 87. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. V I See Landscape Plan and Site Plan for location and Landscape Plans for art feature details. 88. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for V presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Planning and Development Board meeting. Comment noted. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\NWSP\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc Wednesday. September 27, 2006 11 :03 AM MLPC 561-736-8079 p,01 MILLER LAND PLANNING CONSULTANTS, INC. 420 W. Boynton Beach Blvd. #201 Boynton Beach, FL 3~{435 Phone 561/7:36.8838 Fo!'; 561/736.8079 Ernail dlfisti@mlpc,net Date: 9/2712006 Time: 11 :03:03 AM Recipient: Laurlnda Logan Fax Number: 742-6265 Company: Voice Number: Sent By: Christie Tuttle Pages: 19 Subject: Aspen Glen Message: Please see the attached traffic study. Thanks. Christi Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11 :03 AM MLPC 561-736-8079 p.02 ., ~: .::( ':":,~"::~' . .:. <:':~~: j.'~:{ - .. ,,'~ =~ \_Y.w~';:fi''''- .. SIMM()NSI\..\!WllfTE LN(;IN(L:.IUNIIi I VL..A.NNINl.i I t:IIN'AIlI.T1Nr.. I ~INr.r: HI":t Pebmary J.4, 2006 J oh No, 06-006 TRAfFIC IMP A<;T ST A TEMEN'"( Aspen Glen City ()fBoynton Btlach, ll'lori.da. SUp; DATA The subject parcel is located on the cast side of Lawrcn(:~ Road, approximately 1000 feet SOUtll ofHypoluxo R<md in tlle City ofHoynton Beach, Flon.da and COllliliD.IS appnJxirnarely 9.3 acres. Proposed site developrnent on the currently unimproved parl.:el consists of 45 single- family dwelling units with a project build-out of 200X. Site access is proposed vja a Lull access driveway connection to Lawrence Road. For additjotlal information concerning ::;itt:: location and layout, please refer to the site plan prepared by Miller I ,and Planning Consultants, .Tn~:, P..l.! R.pOSR OF STUD Y This :'itudy will cmalyze the proposed development's impact onl.he surrounding thoroughfares wilhinllu:: project's radius of'development influence in accordance wittl Palm. .Beach County Land Development. Code Article 12 Traffic .Pcr.lcmnance Standards. The Traffic Performam:e Standard" require that. a propo.sed development. I.neei two Ittests" with regard to traffic. Test 1, or the Link/Buildout 'fest, requires that no site specific development order be issued wh.ich would, during the build-out period onhe project, add prqject traffic at any point on any major thoroughfare link wilhin the project's radius of development in tluencc if the total traffic on that link would result in an average annual daily tra11ic or peak hO'lr t.ratlic voh.lrtll.:: that exceed::; I.he adopted threshold level or ~(;tvicc dlld.ng the bui1d~out pt;riocl of lht: proj ed.. Test 2, or the Model Test, requires that TlO ::;ile spe<:i.fic development order be issued which would add projcct trafl1c to HUy link within the project's m.odel ra.<.liu:s of devclopment inJ1ut:m:l;: if lhe total model traffic on that I ink would te~ml t jn an average annual d.:-lily .jrame volume, a~ determined by the rnodd, t.hat exceeds the adopted level of service. lior the purpOi)~.S of this analysis, (he construction contemplated in the. ModiJ:ied 2025 Plan shall be llsed. Simmons & WhitE!, 11Il:. bl5(ll Corpl)t"atr: Wny Suito 200 West Palm Beach Florida 33407 T: 561.4/8,/848 17: !;61.~7fl.373R www.simmonsalldwhitc.com C~rliri(;Cll~ ur Al.lthori~(ltinll Number 3452 Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11 :03 AM MLPC 561-736-8079 p.03 Traffic Impact Statement Joh No. 06-006 February 14, 2006 - Page 2 PURPOSE OF STUDY.(G9NTINUEPJ This study will verify that the proposed development's traffic impact will meet the above Performance Standanis. TRAFFIC GE~.!~R^ nON The daily trame to be generated by the proposed developm.ent has heen calculated in accordance with the (.ranic genera.tion ra(.es listed in Tablet) 10.8-1 Fair Share Road Impact Fcc Schedule. The net c'Xtemal A.M. peak hOUT and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes to he generated by thc proposed development were calculated in accordance with the peak hour traff.ic generation rates provided by the ITE Trip Generation Manual, th .Edition. TubJe1:l1, 2, and 3 show lhc dtlily,A.M. peak llvur, emu P.M. pcal< hourtrafflc generation forthc proposed development. respectively. Based on the proposed plan of development consisting of 45 single~family dweJJing units, the traffic generation may b~ summari7.ed as follows: Daily Tra11ic Generation A.M. .Pcak Hour Traffic Generation P.M. Pcak Hour Traffic Generation = 450 tpd 41 pl1t 52 pht = RADiUS OF DF.VELOPMEN.T.INFJ,UENCE Based on Table 3A of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance St;mdards, for a net trip generation of 52 peak hour trips, the radius of development influence shall be one milt: fur Test 1. Dased on TablcJH ofthePahn Deach County T:r(l.ffi(,,: Performance Stfmdanls, for a net trip generation of 450 daily trips, the radius of inlluence shall he t.he directly accessed link Jor Test 2. EXISl2J;NG..TRAFFl C Existing A.M. cmd P.M. peak hour tralljc volumes for the Jinks within the project's radiuc; of devcloJ'lmeTlt inD uence were available from the Palm Beach County Erlgi1)eerin~ Tratlie Division. Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11 :03 AM MLPC 561-736-8079 p.04 Trame.; Impact Statement Job No. 06-006 February 14,2006 - Page 3 RXlSTJNG TR.A.FFlC (CONTINunn) Hackground traffie~';~sting of historiclllp,gtowlh allowancc~ ~hed by Palm Hcach County, rn~jor prq;~fi.~~, and anticipat~~~evelopmcnt in lhe a~was also considered. ';~3!i.I1i<mable 4 a'. -, .... .'i ~. . ' '., year historicah~tatcs for each of the . . · '; iin.ks within the '~ius of~lop ".in1luencc. The calCn-ated !,7fowth rates were based on 2001",105 pCllik:s.e>~' ",: traffic volumes1~;:.7.~~k., ,i~"1:\'7~:Tf. ~ ..~... "j ~ Th~ project is expected to be hujll.-out in 2008 eJnd background traffic was project.ed to that time. Please refer to Tables 5 mld 6 attached with this report. IRAFFlC ASSIGNMENT/DISTR1HUTIO~ Thc distrib\Jtioll of project trips was based upon existing and propo~ed geometry of the roadway network, <l review of the existing and historical travel patterns, and a review of t11C proposed/existing development and improvemcnts in. the area. TIle distributed traffic for the project was assigned to the links within the projcct's radius of development influence and can be seen inl'ahles 5 cmd 6. Based on the projected total ^..M. and P.M. peak hour traffic volumes and threshold volumes for the links within the project's radius of development influence a<3 ~hown in Tables 5 and 6, thi~ project meets the applicable Peak Hour Traffic V oJume Link Performance Standards listed under ''Test One - Paft Two" of the Palm Bcao'rCounty Traffic Performance Standards on all I iuks within the project's radius of development influence. . ~'" j .J~,j!~. INTF.RSECTION REVIEW The developmcnt of the subject parcel is not anticipated to result in an excess oftt:n percent oftotal traffic on all average aTlnual daily traffic basis leading to any signali:l.ed int.ersection. However, as a requirement. of Part 1 of Test I of the Palm Bea.ch County Tra1.1ic Performance Standard~, the 1ollowing intersection has been anaIY:lA;.'ld: 1. Hypoluxo Road and J ,awrence Road Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:03 AM MLPC 561-736-8079 p.D5 Traffic Impact Statement Job No. 06-006 .,.' l"ebruary 14, 20061. ;~~~.~,;. (,. '~;, :"'" ",', ' , ~: INTERSD..(;'.[I0N RF:VIRW (CO;NTINUED) Tho ahove intersection has been analY'7.ed using the adju~tcd turning movement volumes ,;;:t;.,. a~tached with ~~;1,. ln~ccor~ce with~~ methodology set fort,h in the Transportation uttiJtc~carch Bon:' >. rt 209~ 'P1a:rln~:Analysi!;, As thetesults in the l:ntersectjnn Analy~is ~how, the sum of the critical move.ments during the peak-season, peak-hours at .~ect bui1~1. , ~~ crvice volumt;~ . lions of 1400 vph the subject. ,~'" ,. . j;l;i, ' ' rNT~I,{SECTrON CRITICAL SUlYI: A.M. ~ 1. rIypoluxo Road and Lawrence Road 1247 1336 SlTE~J;"A TED TMPROVEMENl:S The A.M. and P.M. peak hour tuming movement volumes and directional distributions at the projcct cl1tl'anCCS with no reduction for pass hy credit or ex.isting use crcditR arc shuwn in T~lblc:s 2 and 3 attached with this report. The: 1<.,l1uwing summary applies: .1>1 RECTIONAL DISTRffiUnON (TRIPSmJ.oUT) 'c' , 'ji,' t;~ '; ""~.M. Peak HoUrr.: P.M.. Peak. Hour = 10/31 33/19 As meu(jon~d in !.be SITE DATA portion of the report, site access i~ propos~d via a full access driveway connection to Lawrence Road. Based on the turning movement worksheet attached with this report and the Palm Beach County Engineering guideline used in dctcnnining lhe need for turn lane~ of75 right turns or 30 left turns in the peak hour, no lum lanes appear warranted. - .."{ . l; t Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11 :03 AM MLPC 561-736-8079 p.06 Trame Impact Statemmt Job No. 06-006 February 14, 2()~ . -] , . !.,..J}.,:!:',,k';" . ;' ';;:;~:;i;~ },i;f. . '," TIle proposed dcvcl~Il1ent is anticipated to .;.. tc450 newu'lps per day, 41 A.M. peak hour trips. and 52 P.M. ~bGW'trips at project h.out in 2008. Rased on an analysis of ex.i::;ting and project traffic characteristics and dh;trib~, as WCll11S the cxi~ttng aud thture roadway network geometry. .~dtr;4D........~. yo..Iumes,.th.l.lS is. <? 0._, :'>1111 pT<Jject meets ~h. .~....1ink1.~. . Buildout Test and Model Test as ~'tIIm~Chr~ffic Perfo~'stlndards. ~~'.\, : . ert '. cnnehaum., P.R Reg. No. 41168 fEB 1 fi 20U6 JP tis.06006 ~ j ~:': ~ -:-r-~;.r.-;:rrs::~'-" ----;---;:--,.,---.- . '''''r''; Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11 :03 AM MLPC 561.736-8079 (0 o ~ :':'" ('oJ l;';. ;1 '1 p.07 o :i lii Ql C3 <: o C, c: .r;; c: ~ -- <.0 o 9 w 9 -III di Ul .c VI .U III ell .... a. !9 .~~ t;. 4J E ::3 U o 9 >< MLPC 561.136-8079 Wednesday, September 27,200611:03 AM @ ---l ~@) I-- r a::: ~@ -..::: -c=... l..EGEND @ PROJECT DISfRIBUTION T - T S~MMONS BtWHITE, INC. ENGINELHS * PlANN!Rs * CONSULTANTS ',il.:'~::;. ~b!~:, I f(poLUXO (~ ROAD. @ MINER ROAD @ LJ.J ~ - Q@~ .... - ~ (/) (/) u..J a::: {~ z: t2%' o ~o; u 5601 CORPORATF: WAY, SUITE 200, WEST PALM E3EACII, FLORIDA 3340"/ TELEPHONF (561) 478.. 78-18 o@ <:( o n-:: 1...&..1 ~@ a::: ~ :5. @ PR~ DISTRIBUTION . :~~., .J @ ASPEN GlE.~ 06-006 K.D. 2-14-06 p.08 N . " ""~Ffflf"":;~' Wednesday, September 27, 2006 '11:00 Mi' 1" "....' "-.-".- <f':- !':' '. '!' . ~ ~. MLPC 5 ~36-8079 p.09 I>.. _. SIMMONS & WHITF.9 ~NC. ENCINFmS * PLANNmS * CONSlJllANTS 20(12) ----- L.W U 7" W 0:::: ~ 14561 SITE _...~ 3 (12) -- 11 (1) . r , , f '~:' ',: JYBNING M.~eNT WORKSHEET. ILGENQ 3 A.M. Pt.AK I~OUR TURNING MOVEMENT (13) P.M. P~.AK HOUR 'TURNING MOVCMENT [SM] MDT DRlVCWAY VOUJME ASPEN GUEN 06-006 K.D, '). 14 Of) 5601 CQRp:oRAtE~ WAY, SUIH:: 2 · .1':'" !., _.-: H ILl[Rlro !',,;\ J:. PALM BEACH, fL~,33407 , 478-7848 ,..:J".;,. . ;~F~~;~"~l~ ~~~t ~,~ " ~:: l > . ;1 . '';;;iri.lIf'': :. ..' Wednesday, September 27, tD o .;r ~ p.10 .....~~ .J 0--' (:j r' .....0)\l')'V :z~~~ It)lt)~ 1l i=- #. ;l;~' ~ g "'::.'1($ cO 9 rj ~ ;1:.~ vO ~C"! ,'. N M <lO (l)v 0)(") 0;<<> ('11('1) z 0 !;t (I) ...I .111;. ::1 E U ~ ...J i ...J <C -;; 0 U 0 > w a:: ~ ~ J- ~ u.. <C u.. tLl IX Cl w Cl .:( -J ~ ....J ~ 0:: :I: B I- m ~ oc ~o 1;":1 <( aJ 0 0 0< (;) t- o >< >- xO ~ ::;:l <( ::;:la:: 0 0:: ...J s: ....a: ;l!!: C) 0 lLI OlLl <( ...J Q. ~. o..z .... < ~.< ;>-- 0 :ct> r~ 0.'. (.) j;:::i3~'::. i2 o. ,~\t~r' J- U) . '. ;j; .. c '...I'~ 0 . 011 , .;:) .. i:~7.~ LL1::J... a a::<(w . 0::...10 c ~t-O::C) <0;:0- 0 t;) :2~~8 (f)>() c- ";;; wo- r -LI. ~ :1:'."""11.. ;:),I.L;.< jg ...Jd:a:: 0,:: t- 9 tD > Z 9 UJlLI (.)Zo ", -Oen q; 0 0 ::J:"l LLrnq: l! 000 Cl ~ ~ zz ~<W (I) ~C3~ <;( ...J ..:I ww Wen 't:l 0 ~~ m ~~ I-(f)~ n> a:: a.:: a:: a:: a:: 0::: ... N~< u. WW cncn ,Il 000 0 1-1- O;SIU .." U U en{/) ", XXX X ~~ i-' :J:J:J :J Z Z lLIUJ ~D.D. 011 ...J...J-l ...J ~~ W W oc oc :::.:::....~ F 000 0 a:: 0::: (!)(!) <00 ;"l ~ ~ 2:% u 0..0..0.. 0.. WON 9 >-->-->->- .1...1 00 l).. N.. :r:::tII ::!::'2: ()() ~ << , >< ~ ~ 1 'l~f.\ ! ! tt~';s..:; . . 1'. '\"~ .~1.~. ;1,' I j' . " ., Q, ill .. :0 . .. ~ .. t. t ~~~ ol:iS I~" ..~~ .10 ,,~.. nllll coon ., -. ... ~o(.c:1( ~~ gg ~~~~ "'''' ....W&&llU .. vI ,.,. u~u~ "'fl) !! hh r,lm "..,. -" '. ~;r, !~ ~~B sR iiiklirlt. ~r;.. . ig~1fl< ;&'--- p.11 .,. .. ~ " ~ .r a ~ ~ ! i . 'r. e ~ ~ .~ ....'.-r'~~J{~, r . "\"f;~' ~'.~.~~' .~- -11 ~ ',. p.12 i! 'f ..LEQ~ND 824 2005 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 1121 ~^CKG~OUND TRAf . :c~" .,',. I'M PEAK HQ \. .',"~"~! . , " . ". . '.' . . . , '.', ' " .r ~;~-~~.'~'- '_ .... :, :" . .' .";i~ai TOTAL PtAK ';5110 PEAK HOUR (1.$) INSIGNIFICANT ~~MFt{r .d~/'i::'.' . i << :> ~i " .. :il '~i ~. ~;. t;~\:;" ~ ~ J " ! ., ~ '* ~ .' j . ! .. \:. i".: .t~~(l }f;; .' , . . o o Wedn~day.c Septem~r 27, ~~ '~~:~~llc~W ,"'~~tJd:~~l~~' t ~_~_ ., l' p.14 ,."', N (10) ( 13) (9) >- V'> Vl ~ W <( 0::: ~ (1) ~ (1) ~ 0 C> y MINLR ROAD (5) ,(;13) ~'h';\. ....'~..f...,... '2' . ,. , ,. .'.!I . ,,' PM OUR TABt~ 6) ._.~..",...-.-~..,-"'-..,..,-- r ~'''I.'',__, Wednesday, September 27, 2006 11:03 AM MLPC 561-736-8079 p.15 ! ..i;:jit~"tJ;~;. '. .A(1'~~~jj<-,:,,:. / ~.~. . 53 52 25 120 63 39 300 7 8 0 346 217 1611 2,042 1 214 60 152 2 , ,.211([ ., .: 800 1,336 NEAR "r.~ L ,HL. } . f~;:' -- ~);,. 1: ">:"':~~,;~r~~t ; , .. ~--"'-'~1~-- , .~ ,T'>'/ ," +Jl~"- p.16 ",~ ..c, ..,. :.;. ~ i.~ C"'t " o!J CD '" "' '" "'0.. " n ;:, W N ;"'. ,~~~~ ',', ~~ 1':~' ; .,U:\~: '. kk~) r,;.~": "~" . ....'II'..'t.,"''' .itt.~':x',:;;'O'~"'; I:" ~ltlf' , lI) CI) E: :=3 ~ (,.) :e ~ .:: :g ~ E t; ~ ~ ~ )"(g ~'#'g' ..~ *8 ~ ~ .~ ~ 0" Qjo(Y')'<to 0 - N CI:: ,-,. .- - .... ~ ~ g ~ ^ "0 _ ~'\I '<t '<t '" a:> 00 \l) l'? \l) vi ~ 'g 1~::J88g88gg8g~Z~ ilXlO,('\/NNNNNNNN = VI :l ~ Gl Oa Ja g; !~ 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: a:: ,0: 0: (,) N C 1-' ZZZZ tieD ::J ~.. ~ ~ ~ '& ~;;.=;~:; 1; <( 1 <II :0- or: ":;a; ~.i$ ~'. ,.;:;p. ';j: ';fl ;-j2 ~ $ :tJ a JIl ~ ~ g ,., gg g :g r;.> 8 J! ~ ;:; J! .... ....'........ ,.~{:.g~ N","","MCOOO<Ol"-M<ClIli~-g ggggggggj'=lO~ 0::: C"fNNNNNN""~~ "E ::J o 0:;; GlID :0:': g,s,:"m O"1f *' '=I o N"'<"l'<tOOOO((ll"-M<D 8888888$88 ..., '" N N N N ('\/ ... ('\/ ('\/ cr c:: 0::: 0:::' cr 0:: 0:: a:: a:: c:: , ",. I Z Z Z Z Z (Y.l'I':o::c::a::~~~~~ ". d';, : '" ~.' ,;. < ;il~l~~{ :t. ......, ..~ t- ~ ~ ~ ::i ~ I ~ N !, u ~ .. ~ a:a:~ 11(1) 13 g'P5- ~ ~ n' .8ffi1'J ii! ~ Ii ~;j~~ lc!o~ .. II >- ....I l..~ ~~i fa ~ l1) "'0 <>> .&..: tY.... .. 1:::sTtl .sp'" ~ ~~!-J 24i-E ;s:o.Gl .. .. t: .. ... " E E g ~~'?- ..: ..: )( r, -ci E ,~ 0 :{; .. LI. Gl .> .1Il J: '0 '0;1 0 .. a:: '0 e )( - :.> rn '0 c. ~ "~ I. ~ ~ ~ ,.,~ ... () c: !I> >.i ill ..J .-.(; : ,""_ '_ _, " _"," - -'" ',~,~j''''':::.'l-,,: 'i Wed~. September 27..2OOe:11:w..ilrt ,.1 . ':-1 ,..;i~;;,t, "",-;]/'T , !\~'~'i~~~f(3B.8079 " "r! Qt !''\'Z' , ~ . ;"~;:l.~;'~~:~~ ,CD , ..'L<'t aW 'l~:~ Q. ffi :i,1- iil >0: Z ,;.c mlD,",-~ VI:.: C'Illt~!:..~ ~Q. ~ ~ ::t~...U1 ...I::Z:"'" O:.::al(m \DN~\D > 0.. iil flCHO ('\I t"l C) G5 ~.... i:i: z ..... < ~>"IO-." '0: 0.. '< I/) ....~,Ift, ~ ~ ....N_f"t r; :!i!~ ,2 a. N w ,", It 2:-fIl;e~:;-~ .- 0.. I/) q:, ~ 10 ~~ .N-~ ,I 'ti Q) .~ e D. ~ ~ 2 Q. Q. oct ,:11 !.h HI ... u- CII ! ~ o I- :g e.!!!.!!g.r o ~ Q) ::1 :J :c ... , ~,N 0: ~ .2",3, , ^" ,~ ~r:c; I .. 'i. :c! % .U:')" 'O~o, 'E $ ::I ::J CII 0.... fIl I ON 'E~' .!!!, ::J .Q 8 c 5 S ; Q ~ III O,rn ... -<- ; )0, L U ; 5 o ... CII .. CII .s: .. m :>. <II 01 c: '" 'L U E o ~ ...' CII' Q) .. o . ..." ,",~'- ~,. " p.17 - ,. "'., 0_ -.0 r~ ... ". il;!' ,,0.. Q. ;j . f' no ; ~ lI; N "5 ti:! a ,. I" r.: r.: ~. Ii II' tl ~ ::1'8- ~~u: 11~~ _ u ~ ~ g, ~-;; ~ jb~ to u. ). ;;i~ c!'Uj ~~~ .......... -s,~! :Ei~~ 1:1 . .. ~ C1 11 II = S i i,a 111 111- VI ~"..- 4(</;><: ..- """'-:.1\\r:~'\';~":~'" ~~~ 1!:~t1frl1/r~",;~r p,18 Wednesday, September 27, II) Q) E :::= - g 1)'1:1_ 1=211 '0::10 W,en v:> :I <II E :l · ;~~;@j';~e. ' ~'P!j;P ,~. , '. ;,;!!!i.:; <" I '., "" ,~:~~~ ~~. ',h.."\, .:;..: ~ j;'!1fl.. r~ '", ,",,' , ,;....'".;!!.'\~,"~/ ,',,;Jc:o' '...>:;'~'"'*r' ' CJ o ',;, ~ l\;..," E Q.;iL, 0 ,Q;/""','",,,, "":;" , .u .;:: .... e J.;;: ~lI;:i;,. ., :. ,.........:. J;$t~fl'~i " c: .. .J: o 1',; :>.VI(OOO _ g,. () 00 "cv.- (0 "I""" 0':: at .... <<::> ~\... ('?.... ,...'''!- <'1M O"lt <"i NaD 0:' C) 1.1:3 (Y) to, , QQ ~ '<t '<1'_ Cl'!. .... .... It:I . :~ .,p. 'd'< i:ft,'..;p. o .EoOot?o O~ lI)O N<'1;, N a:: .....q: -<0 -:I' '<%' ,...., ~~~~! ~'#'#.!!l 008,S , ,10 ' 'o.,~ ' ; V'~ .- ~ j,~' :.~'~: ,n'," , '." ,',""" ~,'t?,U); ~. J.~. :*g,g. ,:,,1; t~,ic:", N,t ,;'f'# 'U" , ,~ ~', ,I"~ .,,~, 'it~:,~,,~ ~\'N' ,Z..Z.Z 1'1> ," " I .~" ' ,7"_ ::-~~f\~ii,: L,~~~.:, "'::~"~l~i:' : .1'<fi~~t ,.,<;:;' , I'~ ~ 0 a ~ ::> :R >- ,:I: 't:l '0 IV IV 0 0 0:: oa:: e .CIl 0 0 x .. <:' .2 Il. 1Il :"C ~ ....I otJ ~ N "fi ,~ ,; i ~....- a:~ iv)~ ~~ ,~ ~~d: t;:;."'O ~~~ "':c: tl. ~~S 11.1 (;: U.I ju.~ ~ bi u~il a:.uit r"J .sp"a. ~ ~.~ :~ ~ ~ .. .. c CD CD .::I E f. g ;;r a 1:1 ~<~ ;io-~~~" .. III '41 ~ In , \, ~ lV_ ~", t .~.'::l" 'I'C""".,. " .,-U?JI'~.'" ;,~'"~'~.~d.'~,."~:'''':, .; ',"!;. ~ ~~es - YI"September '),7, 2 I ;: I" ,!:i . ,~! ii1 iii 1):1, irl ii, i 1 ~ J .,~, eo gu ~ N- to :t:ern ~~Q.ItI""~f'-.~RlO~O""~~~ <... Ie! .... .... ~~ ~ rh.O to wX ~ :eQ. a:l ", '1" .~:::l,f~~ - '" ',,";;;1, l :!"; ',k. . a:l"ot ''':i~~ ~;}".a.. w . '<i_\~ CD " . '.,,~: ':.1:1: z \';';~' :.: ~ ~ ~.("). ,~~ :a..~,1 ;"~~' ,,' l~ l ;';i", 1.1'; ~ :q, ;e ~ '~ ~ VI ';"1;; ,... W (\l (0), Q) 0.... ~ - ~ u is e t.;;: .... u .~ & a: "tl ~ ~ Q,: 'c:( ,';.,,'. ;;:7..Z b E u:.i:: - ~t) &l 'e: '[ S Q. U Iii! <> o ~ 1-0 c. .t' " ,a:. e aj o .t:: .. <0 LI. ;: '1Il '...J ''Q rr: Ql :8 Gl t:: ~ :~ ,. <0 LJ ;r~~t.i'l-t~ , p.19 "'''' ~o ..1'\1 ... .. .!!~ ~ 'L a. -' " (\I 0 0 III "., ....("')10 . . .., III l'? N <? a;iHib<,~.::::-~ ,. N ~ ~'f..IT;;tttO ~'" '; 'l '. \ :,\ I ~ ~~ zzz'z ~~ :::I .. o.ll! 0U1 ii' ~'. '#. o o Lri ON <II ~<Q..,..O:: r. :-'Ct1~fJ);;':(Z) Zl:i.!lloo~ .- D. X c: ~ ...J!\!~m~ 0~~ 0:: l: III <\I ;;:>lIl-",N O '"'z '" 9 - .r [J.. ~ l\l ~ 1Il 0 .. .lO: (1 o (5 '" ~ ~ . .. ~ 1i ... ",.. i s; ... I- lllfl.l- 1!!i'i :J:"'C: s.;1!aJ ..Ci ~ '. ~PiIi!! ft !: n. 1!:~ .:Hi~ ."lILJ. ~ 'J! i'! Ii . Il ~.8'5j ~&l '" !! . r:: =- ~~ ~ .~ ::tf~ ... ... l: .. .. , E F U ~iii8 en (fJ ":-. .at <x ~~:" ,., _ ' ~~:~" .::- -f ~ ;" .:,' :'1,;""~' ;~~ :t, ,~ "~t\L;{ ;i',:ffi1lirlliillt~t2 :' ~ :-1 . ,;' ;/'}"j~,i~-,~,i;::f~~(~_~y;_ , .. "i~.;;t!ii;"i'!~~i"( , 'j,~, . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-088 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer\~\. ,." .,.--- DATE: August 9,2006 RE: Review Comments New Site Plan - 1 st Review Aspen Glen File No. NWSP 06-025 ,) The above referenced Site Plans, received on July 25, 2006, was reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LOR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY & GROUNDS 2. Provide the Landscape plan at the same scale as the Site plan and Civil drawings (1-in=50-ft.)(LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.1.) This may be provided as a Master Landscape plan, while still providing sheets using the 1-in=20-ft scale for detail. 3. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Use Palm Beach County standards for the entrance onto Lawrence Road. 4. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 5. Staff recommends placing canopy trees a minimum of 10-ft off the property lines to avoid future conflicts with neighboring trees and hedges. 6. Live Oaks are proposed within the road right-of-way/utility easement. Canopy trees are not permitted within utility easements. Additionally, the use of canopy trees in close proximity to the roadway may create a vertical conflict for high-profile vehicles such as solid waste trucks. Please remove canopy trees or replace with a non-canopy species. 7. There are overhead lines along the north property line. Landscaping shall be designed and installed in accordance with FPL's "Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place". Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-088 RE: Aspen Glen, New Site Plan - 1 st Review, NWSP 06-025 August 9,2006 Page 2 8. Symbols for various trees specified along the south property line do not match the legend or the symbols shown on other areas of the plans. Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 9. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 10. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and liDo Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings ilK" Series for striping details. 11. The proposed project reflects one long, single roadway exceeding 660 feet for a cul-de-sac street (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1.A.1.) This, in general, in not acceptable either without a waiver of the maximum length of a dead-end roadway, or the greater length approved by the City Engineer. 12. It does not appear that an adequate turning radius has been provided at the entrance for vehicles (specifically trucks) that may be refused entry at the gate. Please correct. ENGINEERING 13. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "AII plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." 14. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 15. Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 16. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 17. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 18. The Drainage Plan (Civil Site Improvement Sheet 1 of 9) depicts the final outfall from the dry retention area in the northwest corner of the development into the storm sewer system in Lawrence Rd. Please provide written concurrence with this from Palm Beach County. 19. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Dept. of Public Works, Engineeririg Division Memo No. 06-088 RE: Aspen Glen, New Site Plan - 1 st Review, NWSP 06-025 August 9,2006 Page 3 20. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTI L1TI ES 21. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 22. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Preliminary Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities, especially in the proposed utility easement along Lawrence Rd. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 23. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 24. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 500 g.p.m. with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). In order to achieve this, consideration should be given to tying the proposed eastern terminus into the existing water main located in Nautica Sound Boulevard (along the south development line.) 25. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 26. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. 27. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 28. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-088 RE: Aspen Glen, New Site Plan -1st Review, NWSP 06-025 August 9,2006 Page 4 29. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 30. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. 31. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 32. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities (via e-mail) H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.I P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Forestry & Grounds Manager, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division (via e-mail) Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Logan\TRC\Aspen Glen 080706.doc Page 1 of 1 Coale, Sherie From: Lee, Rick Sent: Monday, August 07,20062:28 PM To: Coale, Sherie Subject: RE: Aspen Glen Comments No comments. From: Coale, Sherie Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:57 AM To: Lee, Rick; Hallahan, Kevin Subject: Aspen Glen Comments Do either of you have anything for this one? Its single family.... we already did the Land Use. 8/7/2006 www.bbfrd.org FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal DATE: August 1, 2006 SUBJECT: Aspen Glen Boynton Retail Plaza The Fire Rescue Department expects to be able to provide an adequate level of service for these projects with current or expected infrastructure and/or staffing levels. ~ i DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-112 List of Acronvms/Abbreviations: ANSI - American National Standards Institute ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO . City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBC - Florida Building Code FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F.S. - Florida Statutes LOR - Land Development Regulations NEC - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District TO: Ed Breese Principal Planner FROM: Timothy K. Larg~ TART Member/Jn;~sion DATE: August 2,2006 SUBJECT: Project - Aspen Glen File No. - NWSP 06-025 - 1 st review Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. 4 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 5 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 6 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 7 On the site plan and floor plan, indicate the number of stories that are in each building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Indicate the overall height of each building. S\Development\Building\ TARn TART 2006\ Aspen Glen Page 1 of 3 8 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 9 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 10 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 11 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 12 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. C The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 13 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 14 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: A A legal description of the land. B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. C The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) S\Development\Building\ T ART\ TART 2006\ Aspen Glen Page 2 of 3 # 15 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 16 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 17 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-0872) 18 Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. bf S\Development\Bui/ding\ T ART\ TART 2006\ Aspen Glen Page 3 of 3 ch~ OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: July 31, 2006 FILE: NWSP 06-025 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Aspen Glen REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: 1. All lighting shall be metal halide. 2. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 3. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and all pedestrian sidewalks. 4. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. It is suggested that 14'- 16' light poles be used for the street lighting. 5. Provide lighting for entrance sign. 6. Landscaping should not obstruct view of windows, building address numbers, and walkways. 7. Sales center, clubhouse and recreational facilities should be pre-wired for alarm systems. 8. Restrict access to recreation buildings and pools through the use of key card or key. Residential Security ~ The inside garage door leading into the residence shall be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock. ~ When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. This would not apply to customized doors. ~ Entry doors to open outward versus inward. ~ If front door has zero visibility to front entryway area, equip it with a 180-degree peephole. ~ Equip all exterior doors with security hinges. ~ Run telephone lines underground with box hook-up on inside of garage versus the exterior of garage where telephone lines can be cut making alarm system inoperable. It is strongly suggested that the architects and engineers incorporate this into the site plans to insure that the site supervisor is aware of this condition. Cm OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: July 31, 2006 FILE: FROM: John Huntington, Officer Crime Prevention Unit SUBJECT: REFERENCES: Aspen Glen Impacts of Proposed Site Plan Upon City Services ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the impact for services for the proposed development on Lawrence Road. For the purpose of this study, a statistical analysis was completed to show the percentage of increase of police calls for service for the selected project area. A crime analysis for 2005 shows that there have been 6,169 calls for service for zone 10 and represents 9.5% of all calls for service. This is an increase of 4% over last year's figures. A similar community located on Lawrence Road, used as a comparison for this project, had 468 calls for service. Twenty-two percent of these calls were responses to residential alarms. A new development already under way, Palmyra II located just north of Knollwood PUD, with 85 single family homes will also add to the projected increase in calls for service to Zone 10. It must be noted that the development of Palmyra I which is located on the south west corner of Lawrence and Hypoluxo will be annexed into the city upon the completion of Palmyra II development. In addition, Knollwood PUD, a planned single family community of 152 homes will also add to the impact of services for this zone. Based on this comparison, a projected increase of 8% in calls for service in Zone 10 can be expected. With the projected development throughout the city, an increase of 35% in population can be expected. Total police calls for service have increased 66.8 % over the past 10 years. The need for additional officers in Zone 10 is evident by the high percentage of calls for service that one officer is currently handling. Due to new development throughout the city, all city services will be affected. Service requirements for the police department will be impacted greatly and the demand for more police personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and projected traffic. Planning Memorandum: Forestf'r / Environmentalist Page I of 1 / Coale, Sherie From: Hallahan, Kevin Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 3:59 PM To: Coale, Sherie Cc: Breese, Ed Subject: Aspen Glen-TART comments Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Ed Breese, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Aspen Glen New Site Plan - 18t Review NWSP 06-025 Date: July 26, 2006 Existing Trees Management Plan (TMP) -Sheet TS-l 1. There are several existing Areca Palm trees on the site that can be successfully relocated along the North and / or East perimeter of the property. This should be included in the TMP document. 2. There are several Live Oak and Mahogany trees with diameters between 4"-8" that are noted on the tree survey which should be relocated to the North and / or East perimeter of the property. Kjh File 8/7/2006 """,,, The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities Matthew Immler, Police Chief Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Wally Majors, Parks Director Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst John Huntington, Police Officer Ed Breese, Principal Planner I!tf?J From: Date: Re: 7/25/06 Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services Project: Aspen Glen MEMORANDUM As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development. Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6260. 5: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\NWSP\Impact Analysis.doc Page 1 of /'. Rivers, Jody To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie Subject: Site Plan Review - Aspen Glen Project: Aspen Glen File No,: NWSP 06-025 1 Parks Impact Fee - 45 single family detacted units $1,418.00 each = $63,810,00 to be paid prior to issuance of first permit 2, Landscape plan needs to indicate overall percentage native plants. 3, Irrigation needs to have 110% coverage, use bubblers on all trees, have separate zones for bedding and sod areas, be low flow and have a non-potable water source, 4, Cypress mulch is not permitted, JoDltj Rivers Parks of Beach Bead1 Blvd. Beach FL 33425 1: :' 4~'6n6 \fa,..) A sense of COMMUNITY. It Starts in Parks What transforms a crowd into a community? Parks provide that chance Boynton Beach's parks are where lifetime friendships are formed, where generations can come together, where people discover what they have in common. It starts in parks 7/25/2006 iI' Planning 1 st Review Comments ASPEN GLEN NWSP 06-025 At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 812 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. Revise / complete New Site Plan Application as follows: 1.10. add to Intended Use: "Single-Family residential (detached)"; IIA. Land Use Acreage Breakdown: a. provide total of residential lot areas in acreage and % of total acreage; II.4.g. provide total ofR/W area in acreage and % of total acreage; IL4.h. provide total of common landscaped areas (including dry detention areas) in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5. Surface Cover: a. provide a total of maximum building footprints (areas under roof) for all lots in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.b. 0 ac, 0%; c. provide a total of all impervious surfaces (areas not under roof) for all lots, including R/W, driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. in acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.d. add a + c for acreage and % of total acreage; IL5.e. 0 ac, 0%; II.5.f. provide a total of common landscaped areas and % oftotal acreage; II.5.g. provide a total of dry detention areas in acreage and % oftotal acreage; IISh. add f + g for acreage and % of total acreage; II.5.i. should equal d + h.; 11.6. Floor Area. a. Residential: provide total square footage under roof (1 st floor + 2nd floor) of typical residential unit, and same total for h.; IL7.a. provide number of units proposed (delete sf, add units); II.8. gross density is 45/9.338 = 4.819 or 4.82 du/ac; II.9. 2 stories; 11.10. 2 spaces required per unit = 90 spaces required, 90+ spaces provided (with garages and driveways); II.IO.b. add N/A.; IV. Owner's signature authorizing Agent is missing from form. Revise justification statement as follows: Land use classification is LDR (not MDR); code Chapter is 2.5 (not 25); typo on last sentence of A. "these" regulations (not there regulations); revise side-zero setback for pool to 3' (not 0'); B. Master Landscape should also indicate that all common areas will be platted as separate tracts and will be maintained by the HOA; C. Typo Fence, "Wall", etc. (not Well) should provide detail regarding existing masonry wall and any proposed perimeter walls or fences, areca palm screen, note that no fences for individual lots are allowed through common areas including landscaped areas. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover Sheet, Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans/ Elevations of Models A-C, Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans, Photometric Plan, and Civil Drawings. Revise site plan as follows: Note that the symbol on west property line of each lot indicates the zero lot line side of each lot. Revise location of the symbol on each lot to the east property line to match typical ZLL detail (it is preferable that the zero-side be the east property line of each lot). Revise "3' maint." on typical ZLL detail to 3' overhang easement. Label length of home and length of privacy wall along zero lot line side on typical ZLL detail. Provide a scale for the typical ZLL detail. Revise ZLL detail to include typical layout of pool and screen enclosure. Dimension width of Lawrence Road right-of-way. Clarify if25' comer clip is right-of-way to be dedicated, or ifit is a 25' safe sight comer. Revise site data as follows: Proposed Density: 4.82 Dwelling Units per Acre (du/ac); Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR); Zoning District: Planned Unit Development (PUD); Total Impervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Total Pervious Area (for entire site, not per lot) sf, ac., % Proposed Use: Single-Family Residential (Detached) Zero Lot Line Typical Lot Size: 45' x 110' Minimum Building Setbacks: Front 15' (building), 20' (garage), Side 0' on zero side, 10' on non-zero side, Rear 10' Minimum Pool Setbacks: Side 3' on zero side, 8' on non-zero side, Rear 8' Minimum Screen Enclosure (with screen roof) Setbacks: Side 0' on zero side, 5' on non-zero side, Rear 5' Proposed Model "A": 3,345 total sf (under roof), 2,722 sf AlC Proposed Model "B": 3,539 total sf (under roof), 2,867 sf AlC Proposed Model "C": 3,806 total sf (under roof), 3,088 sf AlC Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% of lot area Building Height: 35 feet Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan set. Label width of all proposed easements and buffers on site and landscape plan. Indicate 5' VE along north property line, dry detention areas, and all buffers as tracts to be platted separately from the proposed residential lots. Add a note that separate tracts are common space that will be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. Revise note 3 to clarify which existing easements on subject property are to be abandoned prior to development. Why is the existing 6' FPL easement in the vicinity of Lots 13 and 34 not indicated? Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate sufficient area for stacking of vehicles on site and out of Lawrence Road. Note on site plan if the street interior to the project is a public right-of-way, or a private street (tract) to be maintained by the homeowners association. Indicate location of required continuous sidewalks within Lawrence Road right-of-way. Label location and width of any required maintenance easements around perimeter of dry detention areas. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site. Also provide a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. Clearly indicate and label locations, type, and height of any perimeter walls / fences. Indicate location of proposed subdivision identification sign at the entrance to the development (subject to Engineering review and approval for safe sight distance). At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. Also, indicate sign dimensions, height, and total proposed sign face area on sign detail. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section lO.F.3.). Provide lighting details for street lights including locations, typical height, material, and color. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting.