Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-116 STAFF REPORT FROM: Chair and Members communi~ent Agency Board and City Commission Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director Kathleen Zeitler ~Z Planner TO: THRU: DATE: June 6, 2006 PROJECT NAME/NO: Casa del Mar / NWSP 06-015 REQUEST: New Site Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: Ocean Boulevard Properties, LLC (Dirk Ziff, Managing Member) Applicant: Lancore Nursery, LLC (Merv McDonald, Managing Member) Agent: Bonnie Miskel, Esq., and Kim Glas-Castro, AICP of Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. Location: 2632 North Federal Highway (see Location Map - Exhibit "A") Existing Land Use: Local Retail Commercial (LRC), High Density Residential (HDR), and Low Density Residential (LOR) Existing Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3), Multi-Family Residential (R-3), and Single- Family Residential (R-1AA) Proposed Land Use: Special High Density Residential (SHDR - max. 20 du/ac) Proposed Zoning: Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) Proposed Use: 42 fee-simple townhouse units and 40 condominiums (19.95 dwelling units/acre) Acreage: 4.11 acres (179,130 sf) Adjacent Uses: North: To the north, property designated Special High Density Residential (SHDR) and zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD), approved for Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 2 South: East: West: 30 town homes and 40 condominiums at a density of 19.94 dwelling units per acre (forthcoming Peninsula at Boynton Beach project); Right-of-way for Dimick Road, and farther south at the intersection with Federal Highway, a vacant parcel designated Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned Community Commercial (C-3), and several single-family residences on the south side of Dimick Road that are designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Single-Family Residential (R-1AA); The Intracoastal Waterway (ICWW) to the northeast, and to the southeast right-of-way for Lake Drive, and single-family residences on the east side of Lake Drive that are designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Single-Family Residential (R-1AA); and, Right-of-way for Federal Highway, and farther west across Federal Highway, the Crossings PUD designated High Density Residential (HDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION Owners of properties within 400 feet of the subject site plan were mailed a notice of this request and its respective hearing dates. The applicant has certified that they posted signage and mailed notices in accordance with Ordinance No. 04-007. Site Features: Proposal: The subject property, which is part of Study Area I of the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Plan, is located on the east side of North Federal Highway, north of Dimick Road. The property has approximately 161 feet of frontage on North Federal Highway, approximately 425 feet of frontage on Dimick Road, and the northern portion of the site extends to the Intracoastal Waterway. The property is comprised of Lots 8 - 24, Lakeside Gardens (Plat Book 8, Page 57) and Lot 1, Hulls Subdivision (Plat Book 2, Page 17). The previous use of the subject property was a plant nursery. The only structure remaining on site from the previous use is a shadehouse, which will be removed. An existing seawall located on the east property line of Lot 1, Hulls Subdivision will be removed, and a new seawall is planned near the mean high water line. Existing ground elevations indicated on the survey vary from 4 to 8 feet. BACKGROUND The Land Development Regulations require approval of a master plan concurrent with approval of a rezoning to the Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) district. If the project is to be constructed in one (1) phase, a site plan may take the place of the master plan, as is requested in this case. The agent, on behalf of the applicant, is proposing a new Site Plan for 42 fee- simple townhouse units and 40 condominium units. The applicant is simultaneously requesting a land use plan amendment to Special High Density Residential (SHDR) and rezoning to Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD). The property is located within Study Area I of the Federal Highway Corridor Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 3 Concurrency: Traffic: Utilities: Police/Fire: Drainage: Redevelopment Plan and, as such, would be eligible for the Special High Density Residential (SHDR) land use classification, which allows a maximum of 20 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Site Plan includes or consists of a multi-family development of 82 units (42 fee-simple townhouses and 40 condominiums) at a gross density of 19.95 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). Fee-simple townhouses and condominiums are permitted uses in the IPUD zoning district. Under the Special High Density Residential land use category, the allowable project density, based on the acreage of the subject property, would be a maximum of 82 dwelling units (20 units per acre). The project proposes a total of 82 dwelling units, which equals the maximum density allowed. Recreation amenities for the proposed development would include a community swimming pool and one-story clubhouse located on the Intracoastal Waterway, various usable open space areas on site, a central fountain, and public artwork visible from Federal Highway. Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the corresponding requests for a land use amendment and rezoning (LUAR 06-018). ANALYSIS A traffic study was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the proposed redevelopment project is located within the County-designated Coastal Residential Exception Area, and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards. However, the approval stipulates that no building permits for the project are to be issued by the City after the project's build- out date of 2008. The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water for this project (projected water demand is estimated to be 35,260 gallons per day). Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required, especially on the water delivery system for the project, depending upon the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve the projected total of 15,867 gallons per day, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site plan (see Exhibit "CIf - Conditions of Approval). Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 4 recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: The applicant has obtained school concurrency approval from the School District of Palm Beach County confirming that adequate capacity exists to accommodate student residents of the proposed 82 dwelling units. Vehicular Access: Principal ingress/egress for the gated project is from North Federal Highway located on the west side of the project. A secondary ingress/egress is located on Dimick Road on the south side of the project approximately 150 feet east of Federal Highway. Circulation: The two-way streets internal to the development will be privately-owned streets which provide primary vehicular circulation internal to the development. The internal circulation streets form a grid-like pattern with garage access for the townhouse residents opening onto these private roadways. Pedestrian circulation is separated from the roadways, reducing potential conflicts with vehicular circulation. Street Width: Per the IPUD zoning district regulations, privately-owned streets providing secondary vehicular circulation internal to the IPUD may be considered for approval with right-of-way and pavement widths less than the minimum PUD requirement of 40 feet, however in no case shall health, safety, and / or welfare be jeopardized. These roads are for the use by residents and service providers alike. Solid waste pickup for the townhouse units would be roll-out curbside service for each unit, rather than a centralized trash dumpster, therefore large garbage trucks will be required to maneuver and circulate throughout the proposed development. The proposed plans have been reviewed by the Engineering Division for compliance with City standards for IPUD zoning, including internal street width, utilities within those streets, and safe sight distances. The Engineering Division has determined that the 36 foot street width is acceptable and the plan is in compliance with the City's requirements. Setbacks: The IPUD zoning district has no specific minimum building setback requirements, except that "perimeter setbacks shall mirror setbacks of adjacent zoning district(s) but with a minimum of the setback required for a single-family residence, as determined by the orientation of structures in the IPUD". The proposed perimeter setbacks of between 10 to 20 feet are consistent with other similar developments along the Federal Highway Corridor. A 20 foot building setback is provided from Federal Highway and Dimick Road. A 10 foot side setback is provided along the north property line adjacent to the Peninsula project. A 10 foot side setback is also provided for two (2) townhouse buildings adjacent to Lake Drive. The condominium building has a 28 foot setback from the south property line, and an additional building step-back of 17 feet from the second floor upward. These building setbacks have been provided for compatibility purposes, as this project Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 5 Parking: Landscaping: represents a transition from the detached single-family residences to the south and east. These setbacks around the perimeter of the development are intended to accommodate privacy fencing, landscape buffers, and outdoor air conditioning equipment, as well as to provide some common area for the enjoyment of the respective residents. The 11 proposed townhouse buildings are three (3) stories and consist of three (3) to four (4) units within each building, each unit having a two-car garage. The condominium building, located east of the townhouse buildings, consists of four (4) floors with a total of ten (10) units on each floor, and an under-story parking garage with 63 parking spaces, including (2) spaces designated for handicap use. A recreational amenity area consisting of a community pool and clubhouse on the Intracoastal will require a total of five (5) parking spaces. Two (2) parking spaces are required for each of the 82 units, plus five (5) parking spaces are required for the amenity area, for a total of 169 required parking spaces on site. Each of the 42 townhouse units will have a two-car garage (approximately 22' by 23') which will provide the required 84 townhouse parking spaces. The under-story parking garage for the 40-unit condominium building will provide 63 parking spaces, including two (2) handicap spaces. The remaining 22 spaces required for the condo units and the amenity area will be proVided immediately adjacent to and west of the condo building. Additionally, a total of ten (10) visitor spaces are planned throughout the townhouse areas, bringing the total parking spaces proVided on site to 179 spaces, an excess of ten (10) spaces. The plan also indicates a total of nine (9) off-site (on-street) parking spaces will be provided on the north side of Dimick Road adjacent to the townhouse units. The 90-degree parking stalls, excluding the handicap spaces, would be dimensioned nine (9) feet 8-inches in width and 18 feet in length and include wheelstops. All proposed parking stalls, including the size and location of the handicap space, were reviewed and approved by both the Engineering Division and Building Division. In addition, all necessary traffic control signage and pavement markings will be provided on site to clearly delineate areas on site and direction of circulation. The landscape plan (sheet LP-1) indicates that 1.13 acre or 27% of the site would be pervious surface. The landscape code requires that 50% or more of the plant material be native species. The plant list (sheet LP-9) indicates the landscape plan would provide a total of 162 canopy trees, of which 99 (or 61 %) would be native species. The plant list indicates that 168 (or 61%) of the 275 palm trees would be native species. Also, the landscape plan indicates a total of 4,223 shrubs, of which 2,128 (or 50%) would be native. The landscape plan notes indicate that non- potable water will be used as the source of irrigation for the project. However, if the non-potable water source proves to be too brackish, and potable water has to be used for irrigation purposes, then the use of drought-tolerant species shall be utilized, and water conserving irrigation techniques be applied such as a drip system (see Exhibit "e" - conditions of approval). The proposed landscaping exceeds minimum code requirements and provides a Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 6 complimentary mix of canopy and palm trees such as Pigeon Plum, Geiger Tree, Live Oak, Laurel Oak, Royal Palm, Coconut Palm, and Sabal Palm. All trees would be the required minimum of 12 feet in height at time of planting. However, trees proposed around the proposed buildings must be installed at one-half the height of the building per the Land Development Regulations (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). All areas located outside the individual fee-simple townhouse lots (building footprint only) and the condominium building would be under the control of the Homeowners' and Condominium Associations to ensure proper maintenance of the common landscaped areas. The landscape plan shows that the ten (10) foot perimeter buffer would consist of a six (6) foot masonry privacy wall along the north property line. The adjacent Peninsula IPUD to the north is also required to have a privacy wall, and the applicant will take measures to share their wall, rather than duplicate it. The 10 foot perimeter buffer along the north property line will have Geiger Tree, Yellow Elder, and Thatch Palm trees, with Wild Coffer, Myrsine, and Silver Saw Palmetto shrubs located on the interior of the wall. The trees would be installed approximately every 10 to 20 feet. Also, a privacy wall is proposed along the common property lines adjacent to the commercial parcel at the corner. Plantings along the wall in this area will include Thatch Palm, Silver Saw Palmetto and Wild Coffee installed approximately every ten (10) feet. In addition, a masonry privacy wall is proposed along the property line south of the condo building adjacent to lots on Lake Drive. This ten (10) foot perimeter buffer will include Sabal Palm, Thatch Palm, and Wax Myrtle planted installed approximately every ten (10) feet. Other areas such as between townhouse buildings fronting rights-of-way, will include a white aluminum rail picket fence five (5) feet in height with decorative masonry columns, similar to the entry gate and pool fence enclosure. Pedestrian circulation is proposed by connecting sidewalks which loop along the front elevation of each townhouse building, the rights-of-way, and lead to the public artwork on North Federal Highway, a central open space area, and along the north and south sides of the condominium building to the clubhouse and pool area. Each unit adjacent to Federal Highway and Dimick Road would have pedestrian access from the front door of each unit to sidewalks along the right-of-way, to allow for pedestrians to engage the street. Building and Site: As previously mentioned, the applicant is requesting to rezone the property to the IPUD zoning district and develop at a density of 19.95 dwelling units per acre. The maximum density allowed by the requested Special High Density Residential land use classification is 20 dwelling units per acre. Proposed are a total of 82 units consisting of 42 townhouse units and 40 condominium units on 4.11 acres Townhouses: The 42 townhouse units are proposed within 11 separate buildings consisting of three (3) to four (4) units each. All proposed townhouse buildings are three (3) stories, and each unit includes three (3) bedrooms, three and one-half (3.5) bathrooms, and a two-car garage. The floor plans propose several townhouse models of various sizes as follows: Model "A" consists of 2,438 square feet under air and a total of 2,984 square feet. Model "s" consists of 2,370 square feet under Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 7 air, and a total of 2,902 square feet. Model "C" consists of 2,288 square feet under air, and a total of 2,837 square feet. Model "0" consists of 2,223 square feet under air, and a total of 2,758 square feet. Residents of each townhouse unit would receive their mail at a mailbox kiosk located at the east side of townhouse building 5 where parking spaces are available. Trash collection for the townhouse units would be individual roll-out curbside service. No individual swimming pools or screened enclosures of patios or balconies are proposed (or allowed) and would be noted as such on final plans and within the Home Owners Association documents (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The IPUO zoning district allows buildings to reach a maximum height of 45 feet. The elevations show the townhouse buildings would be three (3) stories in height, and 41 feet 3-inches at the highest point. Condominium: A four-story 40 unit condominium building with an under-story parking garage is proposed on the east portion of the subject property. Each floor would have a total of ten (10) condo units, and each unit would consist of two (2) bedrooms, two (2) baths, plus a den. Condominium models "A" - "0" range from 1,521 square feet under air to 1,738 square feet under air. Although the architecture of the condo building is more modern in appearance than the townhouse buildings, the building materials and colors will be complimentary to each other. The condo building would be at the maximum height of 45 feet at the top of the fourth floor, and a height exception has been requested for the additional height needed to screen stairwells, elevator shafts, and other mechanical equipment (see HTEX 06-007). Amenity: The IPUO zoning district requires a minimum of 200 square feet per dwelling unit to be provided for usable open space areas. The site plan indicates a total of 16,400 square feet (82 x 200) is required, and 46,060 square feet (or 562 square feet per dwelling unit) of usable open space is provided. The recreation amenity area would include a swimming pool and a clubhouse building with restrooms, a kitchen, multi-use space, and lanai for the use of the residents and their guests. The one-story pool clubhouse building of 1,348 square feet is designed to match the architecture and building materials of the townhouse buildings. A covered entry from the condo building will connect to the clubhouse with a trellis. Sidewalks from the north and south of the condo building will lead from the townhouses and the parking areas to the clubhouse. Bike racks would be located on the south side of the clubhouse. The kidney-shaped pool and spa front the Intracoastal Waterway and would have a decorative paver deck around it as well as large planter areas. The fencing around the pool is consistent with the white aluminum rail picket fencing proposed throughout the project. Design: The proposed townhouse buildings will resemble Spanish style architecture with slate roof tiles, wooden outlookers, balconies, trellises, and arched doorways and windows. Many of the same features are also proposed for the condo building. Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 8 The project proposes a total of 11 townhouse buildings, with colors consisting of the following Sherwin Williams paints: Color code Paint Name Color Location TH Bldg 1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11 # SW 6344 Peach Fuzz Peach main body, body (relief) #SW7119 Venetian Lace Cream upper body # SW 7006 Extra White White trim banding, columns, mullions, roof brackets # SW 6345 Sumptuous Peach Peach doors # SW 6379 Jersey Cream Yellow TH Bldg 2, 5, 6, 9, 10 main body, body (relief) #SW 7119 Venetian Lace Cream upper body #SW 7006 Extra White White trim banding, columns, mullions, roof brackets #SW 6365 Cachet Cream Yellow doors #SW 6379 Jersey Cream Yellow Condo Bldg main body #SW 6344 Peach Fuzz Peach Condo Bldg body (relief) #SW 7119 Venetian Lace Cream Condo Bldg column base accents, pilasters #SW 7006 Extra White White Condo Bldg trim banding, columns, mullions, roof brackets #SW 6344 Peach Fuzz Peach Clubhouse main body #SW 6379 Jersey Cream Yellow Clubhouse main and upper body #SW 7006 Extra White White Clubhouse trim banding, columns, mullions, roof brackets, and Bahama shutters Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 9 White Aluminum railing on all balconies and fences Monier Life Tile Saxony Slate Brown, Gray Roofs of all buildings 1 LSCS3903 Florida Blend Lighting: The photometric plan (sheet A-1.2) proposes freestanding lighting fixtures, as well as wall mounted lighting fixtures. The freestanding pole fixtures would be 12 to 18 feet in height and would be located throughout the development at access points, in parking areas, and around the amenity area. Other smaller freestanding fixtures would light walkways, common areas and landscaped areas throughout the development. All proposed lighting will be shielded to direct light down / away from adjacent properties and rights-of-way. Signage: Per the landscape plan, one (1) project entry sign is proposed at the main entrance on Federal Highway. The monument sign would be located in a landscaped median which would separate the ingress / egress traffic at the main entrance drive. The sign elevation indicates that the sign face area is 11 square feet which complies with the maximum sign face area of 32 square feet. The sign face will have a marble tile and border with arched design. The structure would be raised smooth stucco base painted to match the nearest building. Art: An open space is proposed to exhibit public art along Federal Highway in compliance with the newly adopted requirement for developments to provide public art work. The artwork is proposed near a usable open space area and has sidewalks leading to it. This artwork will enhance the ambiance of the proposed development. Ultimate review and approval of the artist and sculpture is still pending by the Arts Commission. SUMMARY: The Infill Planned Unit Development district standards and regulations were created for the purpose of allowing flexibility to accommodate infill and redevelopment on parcels less than five (5) acres in size. The IPUD zoning district regulations state the following: "It is a basic public expectation that landowners requesting the use of the IPUD district will develop design standards that exceed the standards of the basic development standards in terms of site design, building architecture and construction materials, amenities and landscape design. The extent of variance or exception to basic design standards, including but not limited to requirements for parking spaces, parking lot and circulation design, and setbacks, will be dependent on how well the above stated planning expectations are expressed in the proposed development plan. If The site/master plan design standards exceed the basic development standards for conventional residential zoning districts in terms of site design, building architecture, amenities, and landscape design. Staff Report - Casa del Mar (NWSP 06-015) Memorandum No PZ 06-116 Page 10 RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for New Site Plan and is recommending approval of the plans presented. If this request is approved, it is contingent upon the approval of the request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06-018), request for height exception (HTEX 06-007), and subject to satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Casa del Mar\NWSP\Staff Report.doc ... 1 in. = 164.8 feet ~ ~ 0050 0060 .. -.. -.. -"-" -.......... _u -. " _.. .. _.. _.. _. ._.. _.. _.._.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _" _.. _.. _.. _ n _. 0_.. _.. _.._.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _. '_.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.._ ';("W, G, L. _2)~,,; \'>l'~\o,,-, " tOf'. 1 0070 50 0010 SITE 0220 0250 0010 0080 01200140 0160 0200 0280 0310 0550 0400 0331 0520 0480 0460 0440 0380 0350 062 0900 0920 0700 0720 0760 0780 0810 0840 0860 0950 1090 0990 1250 1180 116011401120 1060 1030 EXHIBIT "A" - CASA DEL MAR LOCATION MAP ,- ~ - ~~ -> &Vl 1,-1 rn '" Vl - -I rn -- Vl - -I rn ""Cl r- > Z ~ I i ~ . $I (. ..,11.1IlfF 1/ ~ ~j;-' i;:-, ~ ~a~ ~ : 1~~ ,~~ 1 J .r.:i / ;:k !~:. ~ 1~~ ~ !~" ~ ~._ rn' .., ~! ,;. l~ ~i. I F; m' H ~ I t I ~::lo *~(.1 H I I ~ :~. *. " H-- :, I J~ - , \:, 4 ,:" ~ : -- "...-- '"... : I __ ~ ---4 I _._ A~f :F==I"" =m= ~ I II I . ~ 0' ~~~ :~_ +-ItI-+ ~a' ~ 8~~ N -:;:::::m::::::~, ~~Ill ti-- HH --+ ! ~~~ E: IIN i i . II !:.~ f--+--~ --4 -iI -0 :i &,~._-~~!_~ f--.. ~ lhR fl:]ItJll ~~"Tj' ID Iii ~ I 1~~\j~ ~l1 I IS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..t'e 11-> If'o~rq I, .I l ill '! III ~ ~HHi ~B I!'II;I"II~I ~ ~~~S ~ ."" ~ """""" e ii~~. ii~~ ~ i~~ ~ HHH ~~ -u~; BH'. i~~ 'i tili!! ~I "U I nil i iii ~ ~~~!~! 2 II~~ II~~ I I~~ I ! ;r- ~ nil ~ !U i nil w~~ppp~ ~~ ! II ! i ~ H -.~~~.~~~~~~~ IIi ~ i i i i i i ::~~li~8i! ~'~Ii~i~. '~~~Ii~ii! ~~~~Ii~!i! ~~ · ~ii~ ~ ~ii~ ~. ~ii~ ~. ~~i~ I I I I I I ~5 ~ ~~~ . ~ ~~~ .5 ~ ~~~ .5 ~ ~~~ . .~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ I g........ ~........ ~........ ~.,...... ~ ~ ~ ~ l ! i i..~$iil~ :;..~~ii.~ ~...~~ii.~ ~i..~.iil~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~. ~~~~~~~~~n ~~~~~~~~~n ~~~~;~~~~. ~ "l l l i i l ~'..liiil~ ...~illf~ ".Ig~e~~ ,:.Iiiil~ ~ ~ ~ II: !l: II: ~1~'='=~~!I:~~!f:" ~!I:~Il:!l:!I:!::!l:<J !l:!(;;;!C:n:~O !l::"~O;!C!l:!l:~'" ~;w~~H;HH !! ~ ~ ~ ~ ih. ~HH;U ~.~HHHI ,.~ rm~; ~~mH;;1 . ~ i . i . . ~ ~ ~ ! ~ I ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ! ~ - ~ ~ ~ i . . i . 1 i ~ ! ! ~ l : (J' . (') :r . f"1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ::!: f"1 " : - ~ ~ ! ~ J!1I11 Ii I illH FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD ~ n YT. -W~~ ;<2 - ~N _r_ - ~ ,. Wll L.,.- ~ ~~ 1 ~... ~I ~ ~ i:; 0 l> :;; ~ ~ ~ ill u-- ~ l> _ _ i <, ('l i ~ . ijj ~ ii ap: i! ~ .,.... ~ i ~ i · - i ~c ~ ~~ . ~. . ';;~ 2l ~~ ~ EXHIBIT B ) ------.... J ~ i~ ~~ II TI:l~ ~ ~ ;~ ~I I I . " 11111 ~ !! ii, I , ! = I~m nun ~~€li!I ~~:~~ liWI ~~ Q ~~~~~ ~~i~!. S~:!fi ~ ~nu ~~ ~ i!lS~~ ~ CASA DEL MAR BOYNTON BEACH. FL LANCORE NURSERY BOYNTON BEACH. FL C 2006QUINC'l JDMNION. JONII. MYOTT. WlUIAMI. N:.IVlDO. VAlIOHN AACHf1'WCt'lI.INc.. ALL ...OKTI UJI"-YJD. NO 'Al..T O'THIII 10""'. '!.ANI. Oa.OIlIONS MAY I. UPWOUCID O..COP.IO IN ANY I'OIlM WHAT10IVlkWITHOUl'THIIJaQII ~ lDNJINTO. QlJMWAY AM:.HITlcn. [He. m:m~i! W~~~~U~~i~, m~ ~ ~~Sa~:i>~~ "'m;~~~li~I~JI'~~ ~ ii;mm~ lil~i'~hmil!m ~ 'i'~'5i~' ~i' ~>~ai@ .~~I iill~lil~l i;lllli;I!!I!I~!i ". lili!! ;1' ~~ ~'i I~~II !~II !I lii~i !i!li II~ ~~~~ ~i;a I~ -;i~~ ~I~I~ .~; ~Ijl ~ .~ 60 ~i~~ ~~. ~ ..~ '~ ~;ii!i il~~ .I!~ i!~ ~i; II; I~ ;:!I i~l~ !I! Ji! ~~ ~~ i=~~ .ig~ ~~. ~~. ~ ~ il~. · ~ ~ H I P~l, i "~ U~Ha" i~ j,IL, ~ Ihh ~ .~ ! ~ Hi; I ~Ur ~.F ;~ a _b I ~ q hi ~I · ; i ~ i ~ ~ i ! I -~~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~. ~! I ! hi .! iI ~ ~ .~ i~ ~ ~ i ~ - 'II ~"i m U; ~ ' , ~! ; f ~ i ~ ~ p. il ~ ,~ I - h~ .~. ; I: i2.~> ,! ~ .. !i ~!" c - ~ Ii ; I~ i HI;; I' ! _~n'~~ J!lIlll Ii I - , ' iill' J!lIi~ II P ;i;;1 ~~~ "''''Ii: "'ill..... g"~ - .. ~ v . 1;;0 ~~~ :.::: " - 1I1!~ illl I,i IJ - LAKE DRIVE (40. RIGHT-OF WAY) t ~lilll~I~I~~~~i'&i~1 ~'~'i';'~'~ ~; I i ~ ~ i i ~~ -H~e ~ _ il il il i rf !o: ii ). ........ ~'" ~;i ~~ "z >- z ~ 3 n a .. z ~~U ~ oPQ ~ ;.. ; ~ 1~~! I W2 m~ ~ ~~c I1U o L .J ~~ :; ~ ~ r 0 r f' Q ~ > . ~ 0 ": ": ~ n ~ ~ < < < ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ w ~'" " ~> '" 0 ~'" z " rn -l ~r- rn "< r- rn ~ ~ 5 z 5 z IV '" C') J: -l rn r- ~ 5 z ~~~ ~~~ ~ r" 000 0 ~~0 Q ~~~ ~.", - .. :;z ZUl Z2V' ~ 000 aa~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ 'co 0 ~ ppp ~5~ < ~~n > <<< ..> .~> ~ ;:1-1-1 :j:;:L.... i; ~~~ ~~~ > > i'l~ I ~~ W ;i~ 0 :Eo ~2 ~ -l> EXHIBIT B . ~ ~He ~ II ~ I r ~ ~~ - ~ ~i ~ ~~: +'.1 ~ ~~ il'" '" ~~ : ~ ~ ~I .; . .. ~_. .~. .~. '~..,J Ii' ir ;1' if" S i ... ~ ............~ ! .;..;..;,.,,~ I ! ! ! ~ . . . .. .. " ~ ............ ~ .;'.;..;....! ~ I I I g3 ~H ~Otl.. i~~S! Hn~~ = .~:5 CASA D JE l LAGO ~~@I. u in 8H- t:~~ li i I 0 i n;;o:;= o .~ BOYNTON BEACH. FL "'csQ o .. ~;~~ ~:~g~ "i'!' ;:j::::jes z ~ In=S ~ ~t n ! lANCORJE NURSERY li~~~~,~ ~ . ~~~ ~~ ~~~8 BOYNTON BEACH. FL ~S ~ t r- :q rn r- rn < ~ 5 z ~ t: ~~ ~= i~ o( ~~ ~~ ~' :~ Cl _ QUINCY 10"1'110101. /01'11'. MYO'tT. WlLLlAMJ. N::.IVlDO. VALIOHN AaCHITBCT$.INC- ALL alOHTJ US'kVlD. NO PAAT O' THUIIOKAl. PlANI. OIlDUIClN' MAY II U''-ODUClD Olleo'IID 11'1 AHY PO"'"' WHATlOlVIllWlTHOlITTHllXf'gJI WUITlN CONIINTO. QUMWAV AAC:HITICTJ. [He. ~~ 00 QQ ~2 .0 ~~ <~ .< ~. ~~ 2 ~ > Q 8 Q 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ r OIClCllCilOlOlCllOl ""or" C1Cl'OClClClCJO 00000000 Q>.....61\J1.1>oVN..... (foZZIf'(f'zz::t: g~~gg~~~ :!:!:i':t:t:i':t~ ~g~~~g~~ >>>:1'>>>>::1 -1::l:::!-1-l:j::lQ ~~~~~~~2 ~ 8 ~ ~ i . i BElI'"II'IBElB C~~~!!!!() i~n u n ~ 5 i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;; ~ .... ,.. i1 J: ~ m ~~qz~~ Gl ~~~n1~ ~ ~ ~!;l 0 II I ~ (j'I I"T1 () o z o ..." . o o !7O Sll '. ~~ t ~ .. > t ~ .. . . ~ ~ ! ! t ~ ~ > ~ ",... - l r ., " ~ ~ o ~ ~ C C ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ Z (fI "'" =l =l ..." C 01 J> (") r z 0 0 =l J> J> Z 0 70 70 01 I"T1 I"T1 (") 70 C J> J> t"'1 \J F \J 0 () () -l r " , Z ~ ~ C! * ~ ~ J> ~ * ~ J> l> ;jl t: i ~ ~ u-C! C , Cl . . . . VI\", VI . Z ",!"", VI"'!" () () l> ~ '-l.., ..., ., ..,..., , ' , ':; ...,,,,., , , , r !J' !J' EXHIBIT B 1----------- I I i ~ I ~ ~ > 1'--- I i ~ I ~ ~ .. i . I I L,.. i------------ ~ I i ~ .. I ~ . a : ~ L______n ~ i i ~ . I ~ > a ! ~ l___________ ~ ~ c g~~~ iS~S$ C5 > CASA D lElLAGO un~i ~~~I" ). ~~ ~U SR" i ~~~ 8..; po "'!i'" ("J ;3:::; :z:; I "'" o~5i BOYNTON BlEACH, FL IHIII ~~;;; N ~~ ~ H ~ 9 .~ ~ f6 0 ~~ ~ o ~ 1~'= .JIJ ~ r~SE " ~~ ~~~8 LANCORE NURSERY hh J~ ~~ :;~ 0 H BOYNTON BlEACH. FL ~ .. ~ =: o _ QUINa 10HNSON. laNlS. MYOTT. W1LLlAMl1. N:.IVJDO. VAUGHN AN:.HtTICTJ.1NC-ALL JJOHTJ USn:v:lD. NO ..u.TO'TKUIIDIAS. PtANs. akDISIONI MAYI. QrKOOUC1D oa.conm IN ANY roaM. WHAT:!OIVla. W1TltOUT1'lflIXPUIJw.rTnN CONftNT O. Q1JtttWAV AN:.HI1'IC'T1INC EXHIBIT B 42"'~'. 70 o o r'1 ~;Jl ~l> ~z II II II II II II II II II II ~-----_..J-.J --I ::r 70 o ""l\ r o o ~ ~;Jl ~?Z " ~ ~ ). " II II II II II II II II II II :: ~ .. . :: ~ .. . n ~: U'" ()r 00 zO ()70 t'11-o -or -4J> ~z r g 3 i~~B~ C5 > ~i ~ CASA DEll JLAGO nml ~;~t 3 is Q 1 ~~~ I 8~ z z BOYNTON BEACH. FL Ij~lj~ ~~ ~ N :;;~ ~ Y.' .~ ~ 0 p >~ z ~~~I~ .~i~ ~ r~ ~ ...... ~ LANCORE NURSERY ~o ~~~~ ~m~ ~~ ~~ ~I=~ BOYNTON BEACH. FL " ~~= Cl JOO6 Ql,/INCX /OHMION, ]OHU. MYOTT. W'IU-1.'M1. N:.W1oDO. VALIOHN AJ.CHrncn.'toIc..1<U a1attTJ IlURVlD. NO.AIl.T O. THUIID~. PIN\lJ. O&DIIIGNJ MAY.. U'aDDUCWDOIlCO'IHJ IN AH'fKJIlM WHAT101Vlk W1THOOTTHIIICPUSJ WJ.l1TIN CONnMT O' QUMWAV AJlCHITICTlI. (He. N '" C'i J: -l rn r- m ~ o z '" rn )> '" rn r- ~ o z "'" r- rn ::q EXHIBIT B !( ! m II~ g ~i i ~ ,-, :t ~-o ~~~ ~~~ :~~ ~ g U ;1 g ~I ; i ~ ~ ~I ' . " V' ~~"~"'~.'~>'"; ~ iriririr..l I ~ ~ : ~ : ~r ~r ~I;:: ~ i ! i . . t $ ~ , , , ~ 0........... . i~' i~' i~' "I I I i o > ~~" !U, u ~ CASA DJElLAGO ~o~~~,; !I!, Hi! ~:=~I. I ;:ic: ;~.. p ~ BOYNTONBEACH,FL!iu E ~il~~. :;==10 UJ ~~ ~ ~i~g~ .~~~~i' Jm:$ ~ ...... ~~ t~ ~~~! ~~yCZfoEN~Wc~fLRY ~i~h i~B g s~ ~ o 20N QUlNCY JOHNSON. JONII, MYOTT. WlLUAMJ./II::.IVlDO. V!l1JOHN AN:HtTlICTJ.INC-. AlL a1QHTI US.kYlD. NO'AIlT O' TKUIIDUJI. PlANI. OJ.DUIONJ MAY I' U'IlODUClD OI.CO'IID IN J.NY POlM WHATlOIVII. wtTHot1'I' THIIUDSI WUTTlN CONIINT O'01lMWAV AacHrncn. IN~ r L rn r- rn < ~ o z ;~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~,~ ~- ~'" 0-. ~~ ~~ ~, r w r .." '" o Z --l rn r- rn < ~ o z r L m~ -,~~~~~~~ 0 i"~.-m 1;;50 ::!: ~ :!' ::!' :! ::;: 0 -H ~". , , - > . , r o~. i~" · · ~ . ! " 0 ~.~ ~ q is ~ . ~ ;0 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~~~ . j 0 ~ z ~ ~ lR !ii"'O ~ l:,: !;; ~!; IJ: m pg .' ~ · < Z .~ ~! 0 > I tv tv ~~ fl81~ 8"""" "'~'" "'~s ;:~t""' ~U "-#' rr.)1I:l" ~ ; .. . n~ CASA DJElLAGO BOYNTON BEACH, FL LANCORE NURSERY BOYNTON BEACH, FL EXHIBIT B ~ H I i I H ~ I L, i . ; ~ ~ ! o I~~~~ um~ ~:~I. i~;:; Ij~li~ ~~ ~ nm iH~~~ .131 ~ Cl _ QUINCY JOHNSON. lONllI. MYUTT. Wll.llAMJ. N:.IVlDO. VAl.IOHN .-..cHITICTS,INc.. AU. aiOHn una.vlD. NO 'MY O.THUIID...... PLANI. OI.DUIONS MAYI. UrJ.CDOCID OI.CO'lln IN ANY JOaM WKATlOIIVII. WlTt1OU1" nil IXPUII W1I'1"nN CONJRon" O' CWMWAV ~HITK:n. IHe:. ~ ~ ~ iU ~ ~~ ~~ g~~5 SH" o .q ~~~~ o i ~h8 ~: 0, ., U'..." (I' 00 zO (170 f"11\J \J, -IJ> ~z , :> I tv \.;J "'~~ 8b~ ~,,"' ~~~ z~~ 70 o o ""'1 h S' ,:t> ~z :t> rr--=--=--=--=- I Iv,,:1,~ " r)',f"''' ~ -=--=--=--=--=----=--,-, II II II II II II II II II II --t :r 7ii C) ""'1 , o o !711 ~;J1 ':t> i;z EXHIBIT B n H~ ~ ~ , ~ ! o ~~@I" n~= :qQ ....:::j = Im;:s= ~~6 II ~~= Cl :1006 QUINCY 10HNION. JOHU, MVOTT. WlLLIAMlI. N::IVlDO. VAlJQHN AN:.HlT1CTS.INC- /lI.L AlOf{TS a.u.a.Yl:D. I'fO ,.....YO, THUIIOSA1 'U<HJ.Oa. DUlONJ MAY" ura.oDUCH> OJ.corlID IN ANYI'OIlM WHAT:!OIVl" W1THOUTTHI DPI..UJ WUl"nN CONJ~ O' Q,UMWAV AN:.ttITlCn. IN<:. II II II II II II II II II II 'C.-'C.-'C.-'C.-'C.-'C.-'C.-~~ "~~ no . ~ ~~~.H~~ ~~ o~ i ~ ~ ~.. ~.. p ~ - . . ~ tC n: ~ ii ~~n e CASA DElLAGO BOYNTON BEACH. Fl iS~i: HUn ~ ~:~; Ij~ll~i ~l"'l"'i!!~ t=J: ~~.,. ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~m~ ~ LANCORE NURSERY BOYNTON BEACH. Fl ~z W c"" ,-l ~:I: ~m r- rn < ~ o z f " -t ~~:;~ ~~ ~ . r 1 1 i - iI. "'. 3'~ 5~ ~~, "' g " g ~: tTl'T1~ > t;;~~ I ~~~ W 6~~ tv ;jl~~ " ~~5 Q~ S ~n ~! ~ ~~ Ii ~. ~ .~ . t;: ~ P: ~~ ~~~il EXHIBIT "B" N ::E rn VI ..... rn r- rn < >- ..... o z t ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ .L >>co ""Z_ ~, ~o, "~ ~ ~H~I" ~I ~ ~; r ~ I~ ~ - ~ ~~ i ~ i~' 'li".~ 2 ~r ;1"'"' ~~ i i ~ ~I ' , .. ~_.!l~"~~.~~.p' -r;rT~r.d I . . . i i ~ : ~ .'l'.'l'.!l'""~ ~ .;~.;..;....~ I ! ! ! f ~ : ~ ~ .!l'.!l'.!l'",,~ ~ .tt;I'''~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ () '~cm "s~ ' , , , , , 0 o~~ ~~~ n n n 5 ~;;l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;u ~~~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ r ~~~ ~ ~ g ~ . , 0 m Gi~ ~ i i '" ~ fj ~ ~ i~~ "! 0 "'~ ~ CASA DlEL LAGO BOYNTON BEACH, FL o t~~~; Hm~ ~;;~t i~;:~ li~li~ ~8;;; ~m= ;h~~; I~~ ~ ~m~~ .~~= C> ~ ClIl1NC'(JOKNJON, JONU. ....YOn. WlLUAMJ, N::.1Vl00, VALIOHN ~lTlCJ'S.lNc. AU. '-lONTI ~1J.VlD. 1010 "~T OrTl1UI IDIoU. PloANI. OJ.DUIONJ MAY" gPWDUClD O..CO'IID IN JtNY roaM WKATIOIVIIl WlTHOUTTlII Ea'1UJ1 WUTnlN CONIDIT O' Q1IMWAV JoN;KITICTJ. I"'Co LANCORE NURSERY BOYNTON BEACH, FL - ~ :;vi "0 ~c ~-l ;:I: 6rn .~ ~ o z j1' 9 ij II II/I m lm3J [m;s( ~ - ,~~ ~ 7 w r-- ~~ ~rn VI ;;-; ~5 Cl> Cl> -< ..... VI > ;;;; -l o ~ rn "" VI rn (") -; o z EXHIBIT B II 11111111 11111111 /~, I -/", I ---/--";:-';:-1 ~ IIIIII11 ~~~~ /, , /1 S2I S2I S2I S21) (~VVV i " ~ H i~ q ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ - 12: ~ n ~ f f. !~ P I I II" ~~~ I, '\- 'l-------; ':\1>< iilt "'d Ii \IX ..dil:- 111 <;"!. ?!. ~ . ~ ~ ~; ~ ~ 9 ~~ "', ~ ~~ ~ - ~ II~ ~f IJIJIJI]~ ~~ ~,~ 1 .$ ,$.$ , F~ T .$J$J$J ~ ;';~~. I~~ f IJ IJ IJ I] ~ I~,e .-, ~ I~ ~-- )( "T, t ,~ 1" Ii - TI---1'~ I v ..--- I'" --li/ e, I 'iiiii "" I I I B b II t-T .~ ~I IJlJit N -IJ. i ~ ~II~I~ ~~- ,[III ~ \IJ lemJ I~ ~~~I; I( ~~I~I~ r IJIJI]~ IJIJI]: ~ ~ EiIl1 \1'mIi'1 \1'mIi'1 rmtil;;J 1m ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ g::gJ ~ ~ ~ B Ii ~ ~ mi ~ WD ~ ram ~ ~ .~; - i. ~ ~ ~ ~ h: ~i~=~d ;;!; ~~! ---r' ~i . , , ~~ . . ;: --'- ~, ' ., , r:m ~~.~~"~h~~.."~ .,.,." ~flTl.d ~ I , , , ~ ~ ..L.L.t..~ I . i" i" i'."~ i- u. I ; ; ~ ~ . <z, _. ". ". ". . . ~ ~~ ~~" ~ 'ii'ii'ir"! N - ~r;:' :::(i; :-t 'rn ., r- -rn "< ~ o z :::: .-- :::: ~ 0 -J IIIIIY . " ~ _ N " . ~.:. :=. + a ~ a. '" 5'.. ,l~1\ ~ tl ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ B~[;;]GBBG ; ~.~~ 06< ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ! 0 ~ ~o~ ~.~ i ii' i · i2 ~ ~h ~~g ~ . ~ ~ . : ~ ~ g~~ ~~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~~~ q n ~ q ~ ~p ~ ~ ~ < Z o.~ ~ 0 g EH 2C~' 6 ~S~S! = ~ I H~lil ~~@I. > ,"",-< ~ ~U 8~~~ ~ CASA DJElLAGO i ~~~ ~~~ ~ "f'l"'Sl"l'" n3:;:Z: c..Q ~i li~~il ~~ ~ I <",", f~~ ~ BOYNTON BEACH, FL UJ ~~tIl 0 "~~~8 oa~ . ~ ~ 1i I'~i~ i' Jm=s = UJ ~m~ ~ t;:t n i 3 LANCORE NURSERY ~~~~= ~~ ~g n~~ ~hil c ~~m I :~~ " H ~ ~ BOYNTON BEACH, FL II:> 1006 QUlN~lOHHSON. IONU. ....YOTT. W1LI.lAMlI. N:;IVIDO. VNJOHN .u.cHITIC'n.INc.. AU "'OHTJ -.s.LVlIP. NO ......T OrTHI., IDIAJ. '!,ANI. O"DUIO"'I MAY.l kI'WDUClD OLCO'IID IN ANY roaM WK.\TIOIVIL WITHOUT TH. KXPIlIJI WlUTTIN OON'Dn O' CUlM.WAV.uJ::tltTtCTl. IN<:. EXHIBIT B i ~ ~ i i ~ J, i J, i ~ i ! ~ ~ ! ----- I ~ ~ I i ~ ~ I i ~ ~ i ----, - ------- i ~ ~ . ~ i -, 1 I I ! ~ I ~ ~ ~ i -----~ ------- i ~ I ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ -, ~, .. i ~ J, l' ~ ~ J, i ~ i ------ ----- : ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ------ ------ r i ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ i 0, ~ . I ~ ~ I ----- ------- U"." ! ~ ~ ! (lr 00 zO i ~ ~ I (170 r>1\l \lr -l)> i ~ ~ I ~z r o > do~ n I n ~ I CASA DEL LAGO I~~I; um! ~;!I. I "'" ~~" ;" ~ BOYNTONBEACH,FL ~U5l ea~ll; -:::1- tv ;>i;;~ ~ ~ 2!i;.~ .~I~ l' I;;:""" ~ '" ~::c "I::" n. ~ LANCORE Nun <'En'y ~""~ ~~ ~~ n= = - :;;~ i~ ~~d ~ BOYNTONBEAC~FL"- m~~ ~E . ~~ ~ C _ QUlNet JOHNSON. JONU. ""'YOn. wtLI.lAMS. N::.IV1DO. VAlJOHN ~HITICTJ.INc.. ALL kl.OHTS kUlkVlD. NO PAAT or THU. [DUS. PlANS. OIlD.IIONS MAY IllUPIlODUO!D Oa.C:O'IID IN llI<l'( 1'0_ WHATSOlVlk WlTHOlITTHI IXP1UISI WAlTnN eoNIINT O' OVMWAV Aal::HITICn. [Ne. EXHIBIT B r 0, (j'l , f"T1 0- (JI." 0 Z (I' a 00 ""'1 zO r 0 (I/O 0 r'1IJ 70 IJ, -lJ> -u j;z ,r l> I Z ~ ~' I" ... . l[tr "811 '!(~ :;y~j,':,',-- :i ~n~:F I~I ====JPI" ~; .~/' ~ ::--v "I Fm_'" Jill 1 ,,~ rF~~~~'" (, '/ 'frl~-'<" ~ ,J(~l~J) , ," / ,,) " <'>~ I ~1jj~ ~ <<~~ ~,"'- / ! ~3~x / ~ / ~I-~~~ 'CJ ---~:~ I ~ S'\.-ILii]- [) ~17"- '~ Y'>-.'Xy~/ I~~, _),{ ~)h-! ~__. ~jl " "x/){~x lj' - ,"'t-- - - , K~h~ , ~11f1i[J ,ro Jlld1ll~ / , ( ~ ii!~ . ~'X ~r--: ~ ;( : \~ ~~~~: · -- : :~x:~k---I; -~ _!!, - . ---Ig---~ ~~xx - -- / Gfx ~ 'I J /^ ", ~~~ x I , ~~~,y:'~ i"I" ^ ,- r" '",", '" , i ~' Ii '\ ~~:o;^./: x~ I 0~"" ! ~ii x~{> I Xx > ! I ' {;j,., I r", :"X';< x xx> -f-------;. =i t= T,:,,~ ~'X: I <xx/~<> .., L. ~ ~ i . J J "I < >( >(x v I " E> A v ,: / x ~r\~:<:iS:,~--- 'i- ,- ,./r' , 1 1 -,<~~,~, ,j~'l TS' ,? ]X/~ "/' ,.^/x,~<X"". ~S;,," I ~~ UI .,,();< ~ Y I [ '~( ";"1 L" I ,~' ii ,.A/ (X~'~ I )7.~)Z~?<~ ~--I~-- I -~-~- I --'U---; ~> X'< I >x I ~ 1/ I~IX X I ~'x.x / 'il I, I ~ D ,^-.,../ I ;y:->>< ~ ~ ~ JI ~x~ /', x,^,x, X,> < ! I, ,- II I'" x x ><' <;,!I~' on --b- ,XX>! ' ~. I I / :/y~ i~' ~ I !JV?M, ~ ' J=v J ,/,-/\ / ~~ x~ X)V:) H/r~",', : ~I _,'" - /, , Xx >-" )9<~x~XJ< ' J x.'> ~ ), l> ~>t</)<!!:i ' - !!: ~Kx><~ ~~ f-- I ~~y,8{~ ~--18-- - Zl ~ - ! --1:--7 ~~ ~ /x :,(-x V \:: I I ~~" '-~ liT tb..L JI:: ~~ x: :<,.':/x / <I 7" I I r9 '<. X'<.,/' I 'I 0__ iL_J'--L Jg~~lirf> ^ v', - x~: ~ ':;'H ..J2~ ~~L_-r>: ~<~<~<~ k~~ ~~ ,l5i,v'~~::S~I[' Kill I ~i/, ~ ~~ f<:Xx'< x, ~8 0 ~s ;/ ~l >(x~: __ )- <4;::/ - - - ---" ___ _ Ile''--- xXX: AX I f<~y~'>.v ~,J" ~..k _ >(x ~~ ' LV, /" /\)/'. jF9rfi r: lFr;;l y'~X I ~/<:</:(' L~ii i i i f'. i lit ii ~~ ">Xx ~.?~ / E IT :: L,== :: ~'7- ~" Yy ~$.>< y~ ~ ~< >( , ..il - ~ I ~ ~ ~ '>'),.x:/>, ~,/\" I' '/,:j/ ~x>$(S~x ..x~ /' LJ 'I ::SI r 1. I' \J" ,,//<~'<' ~X)< v'"', /..)<p<j ")(Y J. ~ y /'<:;..XJ xX, I /')" ; '''1'x;[>8<~ \:'<.,' ~'>~-<VY"''<J<Y .. "x 1-" X ,~/, / h ,F= . ../;'/',<x>(> ~'>( 0'.)< ffl 11 " /:X)/ x >( ':trL ! ~)'?," !': "'" "i! / <9 ! I~, I ""'>: I I ~ ! ) it ":1 I 1 II opC . n' Z r ~ r _ < ~ -I l> 70 f"T1 l> " w- ('l ~ ~~ l> ... ..,'" r , ('l ~ l> 70 f"T1 l> ~ ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ r , '('l ~ H~ ~ ~~ -If-- CD '- >-" ~I-- f"T1 l> ~ ;~ ~ , '('l ~ ( - .. " < . < C ~ ~ ~ Z ~ g~ - ~ ~ -I ('l f"T1 l> r Or ('l ~ ; ~ ~ , '('l ~ ~ -~ cs N;; ~ ~ ~~ ~ g~E~ ~ CASA DEL LAGO !m~~~ UU~i ~~@I. > ~~ ~.6 ~~ ~ BH~ ~ ~~ ioi~oi ~=~ ~ I 8 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 5 z ~ BOYNTON BEACH. FL U ~ S ~ j ~ I ~ ; :: =I"::: ~ ~~ .:~" ~ n~; I lANCORE NURSERY ~~~i~ ;t~~ I~:!fi ~ z ~ u ~ ~ ~ g t BOYNTON BmACH. FL ~~U~ I ~ . :: ~ ~ C> JOO6 QUII'IC't JOHI'lSON.IONU. MYOTf. WlLLIAMI. NCIVaDO. VAlKIHN AM:.HrTICTS,INc:... AU.1LI0ttTJ QJla.v:ID. NO 'AJ.TO'THUIIDIAI. ,tANs. aLDlSlONI MAYJ. U'WDVCID OLeCJP1ID IN ANY PONol WHATSOIVI.. WlT110l1t THIIlU'UII waJTTIIoi CONIINT 0' QlJMWAV ~HITWCTlI. INC. I rF~"/111 c C h~ Z ~~ Z ~~ =i =i 0 :t> ,..., ,..., :t> 70 l"l\ :t> () ." :t> ,- r () / ~ ;~ C z =i Ii -- U " OJ " " il ,..., " :t> I: " 70 i~ l"l\ :t> ---4 ~~ () IY :t> '~ r I ii () " ~ ': i I: / " " C " ~~ ~========== ~ ~ ;6 () ,..., :t> 70 l"l\ :t> ~'" () :t> , ~ r () ~ -oj ----- ::r r 75 if"-"-""-'::::'::::'::c",--:=,,- " 0 " " " :t> " " 0, Z " " 0 " i: " ""T1 " " . 0 :' C--- " 70 " U' " .." -oj " " () r ::r :i " 0 " 0 ""T1 " "- 0 r " Z 0 :i () 70 " 0 " rt1 :1 " -u 70 " , -u ': -; r " , l> '1l :i/ c r l> Z ':t> ~_..:-=--- - -~ r z EXHIBIT B ----------~I " " " " -.L___ :: " " " ~i +i--- " i Ii " " " " ii I: " __________J: / i " " " " " " Ii " ii __________JI =======-==~ " " " " " " " " " " " " :1 ': " " " " i: Ii ,,/ :: I: " " / I: , " :' '" Ii " " /_- - --.JJ ~ 3 pc U ~ I~~~~ Umi 0 ~:;; CASA DEL LAGO ~~@I. ~..., IU > . 0 3 ~ ~ !~;:i H;W n~= ,,,is.?:l "'c:s Q I ~~-< :!:Y.' ~~ ~ BOYNTON BEACH. FL N "'" 0 " :j;:::jo "'~ z ~ I~;:S~ 0'\ 8'" ~t ~~~I LANCORE NURSERY !~~~ ~~ ~~ . ~~~ ~* gg BOYNTON BEACH. FL ~~n~ ~ Cl _ Cll1II'IC'( IOHNION. JONIS. MYOTT. MWAMJ. N:.IV1DO. VAJ.1OHN Il.N:Hrnc;rs,INc::.. ALL &lOHTI UJIIlVlD. NO 'A1TO' TKISIIDLU. PlANS. Oil CISION' MAY II U'aDDUC1D OkCOnlD IN ANY roaM. WHAT!OIVlIlWlTHOUTTHIIXPUSJ WlU'TTIN c::oHIINT D' CWMWAV AJU:HI-r.c"n. (He. r 0, . (f\ ()70 00 zO ()""Tl ~ l"'1IJ IJr 1\ -lJ> Cz J> r > ",'" 8~ I ",-< N ~~ -.....l 2 ~, EXHIBIT B - ~ ~ H l!li!' o Z C5 II~~~: UHli ~5'i€I" ~~~ ioilo~ ~~ Q u E ~ i ~ ~ i - ::::1- !;~h .~~~g~ I;;:~~ ~~~~ ~~B ~y ~E:5 ~~h ~ " ~ ~ = 6~ ~ U ~ ~ h~ p ~ : ~ . ~ ~c n l ~ u 1~n t CASA DJElLAGO BOYNTON BEACH. FL lANCORE NURSERY BOYNTON BEACH. FL Cl _ QI1INCYJOHNKlN. JON.$. M'tO'TT. Wll.l.lAMS. AClVlDO. VAUOHN AM:HIl'ICTJ.II'fc., oUt lUOHTJ US.......D. NO PAllT 0' T1'IUIIDIAS. ru.NJ. OJ..DU1(]NS MAY II g,NJDUCID OJ..CO,nD IH JoNYI'OJ.M 'WHATJOIVI" wtTHotn' THlIXP'USJ WIUTTIN CONfIMT O' QDMWAV AACHITICTI. 1Me. EXHIBIT B !( I l!lll~ ~i i l> ~h ~i~ :~~ ~ ~~ II ~~ . . > ~; ~ ~ ~ ~.. .~. .~. .~..,; or ir ;1' ;1' . d i . . . i ~ ~ g I : ~r ~r ~r:: ~ ~ . . . I · · . ~ , " ~ . H. ". ..... ~ 'i~';~';~'''~ ~ I I I , n , ~~ , , '. .~ .' ~~ ih Z~ ~ ,. ~i "~ z '~ '~ . 0 , :;>;l ...., ::r:: I tI'J I l' tI'J < I > I ...., (3 I Z I I , I ., I > . ~ .~ I I i ' ~ r.n o c ...., ::r:: tI'J l' tI'J < > ...., (3 Z tI'J > r.n ...., E:l '" tI'J < ~ > ...., '" (3 Z OJ = t ~! ;I III !! i C~~~T~NEB~C~~O I~!;; unll ~~~I. ~~ z ~, Ii ~~~i~ .~8~~~ 1:::;$ ~ ..... -.", ~t a LANCORE NURSERY ii" ~~ ~Ee · nE 0 u ~~~~: BOYNTON BEACH. Fl ~~n~ ~ . ~~ = o _ QU'INCV lOHNJON. IDNU. MYOTT. WlLLIAMlI. N:.w.oo. VAlIOHN AacHrnCTS,INl:., ALL alaHTS UJilllvaD. NO.AIlT 0' THIIIIDLU. PIANI. OLDIS(ONI iIolAY I. ....tiJDUC'lD Ollc;onlO IN NfY I'OtI.IIoI. WKATSOIVIIl wtTHOUTTHllXPIJSS WlUTTI.N CONIINT O' OD""WAV AaCHrTlCI'S. 1He. ~.~: . . ~: 0, ~~~~ BElE'lGB8G ~~=; &;;!!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 6~~ ih i i ~ ~ i ~ 5 ~.~ i::~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ;u ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fl ~ r ~~~ n n , ~ ~ ffi ~p ~ < ~ ~ < z .~i ~ ~ 0 m~ .Tt n l' c:::: to ::r: o c:::: (/J trJ '" o o 'Tl '" l' >- Z n l' c:::: to ::r: o c:::: (/J trJ 'Tl l' o o '" '" l' ~ ~J "'~~~~-~/' I \-____-( I I!~ I I I I ~ I I I I '1 I I I I ~ I I I I 1: I I I I I I I I I I : ~~-~~~ : ~- ~-'" "'------/' I \-____ I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I ~ ~ I I 1: ' I I I I I I I I I I I ~---- I ~-------'" ~ [8 i ~ p~ n r;; a t" c: 'Tl '" n l' , ~ :I: ~ 0 0 c: 0 ~ ~ '" '" n '" i ~ trJ '" '" ~ ...., l' ;. ~ ~ n ~ : ~ ::.; F: l' . ~ ~ " fA ~ ';i ~ ~ ~ ';i ';i ';i r EXHIBIT B o /- ~ " 0 ( 0 ~ \ \ ~ ~/ 0 " ,/ ~ C5 ~~n ~~ C U ~ CASA DJElL JLAGO i~~B! unl~ ~~~I" ~ ~~~ iU p ~ BOYNTONBEACH,FL t:~! jii1ii ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ LANCORE NURSIERY ~~~15 ;W~~ I~~ ~ ~~ ~<~g; BOYNTONBEACH,FL ~Uh I .. ~~ = o :1006 CIUINCY}OHNJON. '010111. M.YOTT. WllUAMI. N:.~DO. VM.fOHN ~HITICTI.INC., ALL IUOHTS kUlJ..VlD. NO '~TO' THUI IDIAI. .tANl. O..OUIONI MAY" "'aDDUC'lD OIlCOPIID IN ANY PO.... W\iAnolVlJ.. wtTHOUT THI EXPIUIIS WIlI'T'nN CONI.NT O'QUJ.tWAV AJ.CH1TIC1'1. (He. EXHIBIT B f-- - - f-- ~ N W .I> r-- - - f-- ~z VI ~~ "V\ W rn ~rn Ii EO ~Ii ~'" -l c-l d-l ",0 ~o ?O ,,'J: qP::! ,Z ~z ~z rn Ii Cl> > < Ct ~ ~ OJ l"1 c<. ~ m~ 0 .~ ~~ Z . ~ S f-- ~ ~ " .- m~ ao~ t~ii ,- :::: ~ o ""~ ~ ~'.F I 5i~~ 0, , ~~-<~I , f----'"-<---+ , 41'-'" 0, ,~ 1)'.." '. , " ~ - ~" ].6'_1. ~.~ . , ,~'.... m;~ - o~. lP~O , ~~~ c ~. ~ -< z ~ ~ w i;~ ~..~ . 6~~ ! gio -, - 0, ffi~~ j ~ .. ~ N , ., .."_T ~ , ~ ~T . ~ ~..~~ , ", ~~~~ , I ) )4'). )2".'. ~ . ~ w ~wc ~ ~~~ ! :r;V~ " ,~ u,.';"", [ ~-<"" ~..~~ ~ ",,'.," ~~~~ I, ~ . ~ '. ~ ~, ,.'-. " ..t-T ~ [ I n u; ~ ~w ,c ~~ .".J" U... '1"-' r=t1 , ,.'-.. I / ~ ~l . ~ w ~ ..~~ . ~~~~ , . ~ . j .- H'.,," 0 ~. ~ " ~~. )4'.,' 60-1 8~ t~t5 ~~ ~ ~ ~-< " ~ , 0 ..r-T ~.~ ~ . ,C~ 0, ozo c:.::j;u ;~:] ffi -< , . - ~ ,(T )6....- ,~~ ,. ~~ ~. ~>' o~ = ~~~ .~ V'. r o~ ;0 @~ . ~~ f ~~ ;;>\~ ,; ~~ g~ ~z or 6~ ~-< ~o Zg ~~ (jiG: . --.L ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ UU i 6 I~~S$ Hm~ = " CASA DlEl LAGO ~~€I" > " U ~n ~ ~ ~~2 n;;o:;z ~" ~ ~~~ li~li~ "'::::SQ I ~~ ~ ~ ; c~~~ ~ BOYNTON BEACH, Fl 0'\ ;;1'1 (5 .. ~ .' Ii %~~g~ ;:j;:::jC5 Z ~ ~ 1i~1~ l' I;:;:;!f;~ 0 ~'" n ~ ~ m~= ~ ~ t;:C ~ LANCORE NURSERY ~m~ ~~ ~~ .. ~~ ~ ~~ ~~n g ~ BOYNTON BEACH, Fl ~ Cl _QUlNCV JOHNSON. JONIS. MYOTT. WlLI.UIMI. AClVloo, VAUGHN AX:HlTICJ'J.INC- AU. '-IOHTI W.a.V10. NO MilT O'THUI1DIAI, PtANl, O..OUIONI MAYI. UPWDUClD O..COP1ID IN ANY fOaM WKATIOIVla. W1THotn THI IXPUJS WJ.ITTIN CONSINT 0' Q1lMWAV JlJI:HITIC'TS. lHe. USS n ~~~~ ..it ~~ un II ~ nn i~ ilim -=---:- 'I I jl , , I -c i I. Il 'II' ~~ i I ~ ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !U x I W ~ l!i I ~ ;~I Ill' Ii ~ J r- III n ~" ( "tJ -l II J ;,1 ~..I-~ -11 ~Jf4 I ~~ !i!~ ~r m~ ~~ ===- 1 61 1 i i i -- --- Cas a del Mar PREPARED FOR LANCORE NURSERY CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FL - ~ XHIBIT B - LAND. DESIGN SOUTH lftapoAld1_Pln~_c:a.utq EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Casa del Mar File number: NWSP 06-015 Reference: 3rd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a May 30,2006 Planning & Zoning date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 1. The minimum right-of-way width for a PUD is 40-ft. (LDR, Chapter 2.5, Section 9.F.) Please provide appropriate right-of-way widths for all internal roadways and/or make a written request for reduced width, including justification for the request. Justification for any proposed reduction in right-of-way width shall address the adequacy of the right-of- way to handle solid waste storage and truck movement, utility maintenance, and an evaluation of sight distance for backing out of garages. The evaluation of sight distance for backing shall include an opinion, from the Engineer-of-Record regarding the relative safety of this movement within the reduced right-of-way. 2. The developer has proposed gating this community, providing only 95-feet from Federal Hwy. to the gate. The minimum standard for stacking per County standards is 150-feet. Please revise plans to provide this minimum stacking distance. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 3. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 4. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 5. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 6. The City already has a proposed subdivision in review at the present with a similar name to Casa del Lago. The new name (Casa del Mar) is pending CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT verification and will be further reviewed during the platting process. 7. Show proposed site lighting on the Site, Civil and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.BA.) 8. The medians on Federal Highway have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry and Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. 9. Site lighting has been provided in excess (number of lights and intensity) of what is strictly required by Code. The City's standards are primarily set up for parking lots, not residential developments. Site lighting does need to be provided for the various parking spaces for guests, etc., however simple coach lights should be sufficient for lighting along the roadways. Staff recommends that the lighting design be re-evaluated with these factors in mind. 10. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting 11. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 12. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 13. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 14. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 16. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33 (a). 17. This office will not require securety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 18. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 19. PVC material is generally not permitted on the City's water system. However, since this project is located east of Federal Highway, we may consider the use of PVC C900 pipe for water mains if it is shown that corrosivity will be a problem. This determination will be made during the detailed utility construction plan review. 20. The Utilities Department staff is requiring that each townhouse block (of three or four units) have a master meter, which will become the point of service for the department. Each townhouse will then be submetered. CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 21. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 22. All buildings require an NFPH 13R (townhouses) and an NFPH 13 (condominium). 23. All entry gates require a Knox override system. 24. All entry gates and streets shall be 12 feet wide if one-way and 20 feet wide if two-way traffic. 25. Provide a turn around for the Fire Department engines at the Clubhouse. 26. Hydrant locations: no part of any building can be more than 200 feet from a hydrant. 27. Flow test required is 1500 GPM (ii), 20 PSI. 28. All hydrants must be activated up to the point of any vertical construction. POLICE Comments: 29. All lighting shall be metal halide following IESNA Lighting standards. 30. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 31. Timer clock or photocell lighting for nighttime use shall be above or near entryways. 32. Numerical address: . Shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility (dusk to dawn). . Shall not be obstructed. . Shall also be placed on the rear of the building if buildings are adjoined by a common area. CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Residential Security: . The door leading into a residential unit should be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock (including garage door). . When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. . If front door has zero visibility to front entryway are, it should be equipped with a l80-degree peephole. . Entry door should open outward versus inward. . All exterior doors should be equipped with security hinges. . Anti-lifting auxiliary locks should be installed on sliding doors and windows. . Should be pre-wired for alarm system. There should be strategically placed directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver sight level. The directories should be placed at the ingress points. 33. If benches in a park area are intended for nighttime use, adequate lighting should be provided for the area in which they are located. They should also be in open view to eliminate concealment areas. 34. Stairways and balconies should provide open views. 35. Building architecture should allow for enhanced natural surveillance of all parking lots and provide a sense of security. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 36. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 37. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 38. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS 39. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units covered under the FFHA shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. 40. Compliance with regulations specified m the FFHA, Design and Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, is required. 41. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the future installation of grab bars as required by the FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within the covered dwelling unit shall comply. 42. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which design specification ("A" or "B") of the FFHA is being used. The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be clearly shown on the plans. 43. The applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the letter that is sent to the County impact fee coordinator. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story clubhouse, the letter shall answer the following: Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the clubhouse? Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? . . . . To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse building. 44. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. A permit from PBC Health will be required for a well. 45. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 46. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: INCLUDE REJECT CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. · The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 47. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 48. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: · A legal description of the land. · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 49. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 50. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. INCLUDE REJECT CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 51. The condo building structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7) and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 through 109.3.6.6. . The following information must be submitted at the time of permit application: . The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a threshold building. . All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be submitted. . All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 52. Park Impact Fee: 42 single family attached @ $771.00 each = $32,382.00 plus 40 multi family @ $656.00 ea = $26,240.00 = TOTAL $58,622.00 to be paid at the time of building permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 53. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation on the Irrigation Plan. 54. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 55. Approval of this project IS contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06-018) and height exception (HTEX 06-007). 56. lt is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 57. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program. 58. The existing 10 foot sewer easement where the condo building is planned will be required to be abandoned and relocated prior to approval of the application requests. 59. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from private property to "buffer tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. 60. The dimension of the parking stalls, and vehicular back-up areas are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval. 61. Removal of the existing seawall along the eastern property line adjacent to the ICWW will require permits from additional agencies such as the Army Corp of Engineers and Dept. of Environmental Protection. 62. If an IPUD is located with frontage on the Intracoastal Waterway, conditions of approval shall include a deed restriction requiring that any marina or dockage build will not exceed in width the boundaries of the project's actual frontage on the water, regardless of what any other governing or permitting entity may allow or permit per Ch 2. Sec. 5.L.4.g.(3). 63. At time of permitting, identify / label on the plan where all the required usable open space is located and the boundaries and square footage provided for each location. In addition, provide total usable open space area required (200 square feet per unit) and total provided in the tabular site data. 64. Staff recommends sodding and irrigating those areas between existing / proposed pavement on both Dimick Road and Lake Drive and the south and east property lines of the subject property. 65. Staff recommends working with your neighbor to the north (Peninsula) to utilize their perimeter wall rather than building one immediately adjacent to it. 66. The trees proposed around the townhouse and condominium buildings must be installed at Yz the building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5 .M.). CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS 67. If potable water is used for irrigation purposes, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized, and the irrigation system should have water conserving designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 68. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.2.). 69. Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section IO.F.3.). 70. The location of the proposed monument sign in the entrance median is subject to Engineering review (for safe sight distance) and approval. At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. 71. Approval is conditioned on the applicant establishing ownership of the easternmost triangular portion of the property, which applicant claims by application of the doctrine of accretion. The applicant shall establish ownership by accretion of the triangular parcel by submitting historic aerials of the area, soil tests to eliminate the possibility that the triangular area was created as the result of artificial improvements, affidavits of former or adjacent property owners, or such other proof as may be appropriate. Additionally, applicant shall submit a waiver letter from the State of Florida indicating that the State does not assert claim to the triangular area. The determination of ownership based on the proof submitted shall be by the Development Director, subject to review (in the event of denial) by the City Commission. Issuance of building permits (except clearing and grubbing) will be conditioned on satisfactory proof of ownership of the easternmost triangular section of the land by accretion. Failure to establish proof of ownership of the easternmost triangular section of land within 90 days of approval of the site plan will result in automatic revocation of this development order. 72. The subject property to be developed lies within a hurricane evacuation zone. The developer shall be required to apprise each purchaser within the development of the fact that they are buying property in a hurricane evacuation zone, and the developer shall provide a mechanism to disseminate continuing information to residents concerning hurricane evacuation and shelters, through the established homeowners' and condominium associations. 73. Make the following corrections to plans submitted for permitting: (Sheets A-O.l and A1.0: Site Data, Parking, TH 42 x 2 = 84 required, 94 provided (42 2-car garages and 10 visitor spaces), Condo 40 x 2 = 80 (63 in parking INCLUDE REJECT CASA DEL MAR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NWSP 06-015 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT garage, 17 outside garage), Clubhouse = 5 spaces west of garage, Total spaces required 169, Total spaces provided on site 179 (plus 9 on-street spaces on north side of Dimick Road). Total Std Spaces = 93, Total HC = 2 74. Make the following corrections to plans submitted for permitting: (Sheet A1.0) Area Calculations: Buildings 6-9 = 16 units (not 6), Building 1 = 4 units (not 16). Condo Floor Plans indicate a total of 30 units, revise to include remaining 10 units (make 3rd/4th floor plans read 3-5 floor) and revise condo data on sheet A1.0. to delete reference to units E-F. Sheet A- 1.1: Note entry gate to be white (to match aluminum rail fence). Sheet A- 1.3: Revise parking across from Building 1 to standard (not HIe) spaces to match site plan. Delete striped area between spaces on all plans. Sheet LP- 3: provide continuous landscaping around 3 sides of dumpster. CRA STAFF Comments: None ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: 1. To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: 1. To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Casa del Mar\NWSP\COA.doc Kathleen Zeitler June 2, 2006 Page 5 ~ DEPARTMENTS ~ ~,.<, ~ ~,if' "r" oC! (g' EJECT 14. Palm Beach County Health Department the water and sewer systems serving thi: 12). Comment noted. 15. Fire flow calculations will be required requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pJ Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or lOt: ft:4U1ft:IIlt:1lL III1PU:st;;U uy insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26- 16(b )). Comment noted. 16. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Please provide the number and size(s) for all proposed meters at the TART meeting so the reservation fee may be calculated. The meter number and sizes have been added to the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 17. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). All of the common areas on the site shall be usedfor roadway, ingress/egress, drainage and utilities. As such, the City shall have the right to maintain it's utilities located within the common areas. This use shall be dedicated to the City via plat recordation.. The separation on the utilities has been revised to 8 ' as agreed upon by the City. 18. This office will not require securety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler June 2, 2006 Page 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment noted. 19. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted. 20. PVC material is generally not permitted on the City's water system. However, since this project is located east of Federal Highway, we may consider the use of PVC C900 pipe for water mains if it is shown that corrosivity will be a problem. This determination will be made during the detailed utility construction plan review. Comment noted. Civil plans have been revised to specify PVC C900. Soils tests shall be conducted with results provided to the City to justify the use of pvc C900 otherwise, DIP shall be used .Please see revised civil plans. 21. Per City Standard W -9 fire hydrants are installed on 6-in. laterals; change all 8-in. x 8-in. tees to reflect 8-in. x 6-in. tees. Civil plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 22. Per City Standard W-14A, Note 6, meters shall not be placed in sidewalks or driveways. The townhouses as shown on the drawings do not appear to provide suitable areas for meter placement for individually metering each residence. Additionally due to the property line layout for the townhouses the meter would not be able to be set on private property (City Standard W-lO.) The Utilities Dept. Staffis therefore requiring that each townhouse block (of three of four units) have a master meter, which will become the point of service for the department. Each townhouse will then be sub- metered. The water meters have been relocated to the green areas.. 23. Provide water meter supply characteristics to the four-story condominium building located adjacent to the Lake Worth Maron. A chart illustration the water meter supply characteristics has been added accordingly. Please see the chart provided on the revised civil plans for the number of meters, meter sizes, anticipated demand, and totals for this project. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH I. r J 0:__. ~. Ruden ~II McClosky . , i : I MAY 2 3 - , I...... l_.~ b<:Nt[L~ 222 LAKEVIEW AVENUE SUITE 800 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 (561) 838-4542 FAX (561) 514-3442 KIM.GLASCASTRO@RUDEN.COM May 22, 2006 Kathleen Zeitler City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Division 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Casa del Lago, LUAR 06-018 and NWSP 06-015 Dear Kathleen: Responding to your letter dated April 24th regarding the above referenced small-scale land use amendment/rezoning petition, we offer the following information: l. Provide proof of ownership pf triangular-shaped area where recreation is located. This land does not show as a parcel in the tax map, and is not included with the adjacent parcel (Lot 1, Hull's). Please submit the latest recorded warranty deed for this property, including legal description. If proof of ownership cannot be provided, this land may not be included in the application, and may not be included in the total acreage used for calculating density. Sam Navon, Esq. has provided ownership information to Jim Cherof as documentation of ownership rights. 2. Legal description on survey does not include acreage of subject property to the nearest 1/1 Goth of an acre as required (see ILd.(2) on page 3 of application). The survey has been revised to include the acreage. 3. Provide official recorded document for Ocean Boulevard Properties, LLC, which authorizes Paul Stafford to represent and sign on behalf of the LLC (sunbiz.org's Corporations Online notes name of manager/member for this LLC as Dirk Ziff). This is an application submittal requirements (see II.c.(5) on page 3 0 f application). Evidence of Paul Stafford's authority to execute the application form is enclosed. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 2 4. Revise attachment Property Control Numbers to correct PCN's (last 7 numbers should be separated by a dash as follows 000-0010,000-0120,000-0140,000-160, etc.) The peN sheet has been revised. 5. Please provide information detailing the form of ownership and form of organization to maintain common spaces and recreation facilities (see h.(1 0)( d) on page 6 of application). The ownership shall be condominium, in part, and fee simple townhome, in part. There will be a declaration of covenants, conditions and restriction as the master PDA with all of the fee simple owners and the condominium association(s) being the members of the association. The condominium(s} with have their own declaration of condominium governing its constituency. The master association will be responsible to maintain common areas and recreation facilities. 6. Please provide written commitment to the provision of all necessary facilities for the proposed development (see h.(10)(e) on page 6 of application). IPUD's are required to be under common ownership or unified control. The property is currently under unified ownership and control and the IPUD will be under common ownership and unified control. All required facilities will be installed, improved or paid for at the time of construction, as a condition of permit approvals, and will be completed prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 3 Additionally, TART comments have been addressed with revised plans, clarifying details and supporting documentation. More specifically, the City's comments have been addressed as outlined below: 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Casa del Lago File number: NWSP 06-015 Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an April 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561- 742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a),. We met with Larry Quinn from the Public Works Department. He reviewed and approved the waste management plan for Casa del Lago. 2. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 feet to approach dumpsters. Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 feet. (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J.2.b.) Turning radiuses and clearance distances have been met. See Site Plan sheet A-J.O. 3. Provide a minimum outside turning radius of 55 feet to allow turning movements for Solid Waste (and Fire/Rescue) inside the proposed community. Using AutoTurn (or similar), show on the plans that the required turning movements are provided. Particular attention should be given to the entryways/gates, and the associated callboxes, etc., allow ingress and egress for Solid Waste and Fire/Rescue. Turning radiuses and clearance distances have been met. See Site Plan sheet A-J.O. 4. There appears to be a potential vertical conflict between the proposed dumpster enclosure and the porte cochere at the four (4) story condominium building. Relocate the dumpster enclosure to resolve the conflict. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 4 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT The condominium building does not have a Porte Cochere. Instead, it is a covered entry that does not project over the driveway. Consequently, there is no "vertical conflict" between the dumpster and the covered entry. rendering dumpster relocation unnecessary. 5. There is a potential vertical conflict between a Live Oak and the proposed dumpster enclosure (southeast corner of enclosure.) Please resolve this conflict by moving the Live Oak or using a non-canopy tree. Live Oak will be replaced by a Royal Palm. See Landscape plan. The Live Oak tree was replaced with a Royal Palm and place back further away from the dumpsters front edge. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 6. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. Per our initial discussions with Mr. Atefi of the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division, this site lies within the Palm Beach Coun~v Residential Coastal Exclusion Area, and as such, a notice of concurrency is not required. We are currently working on the required driveway analysis. 7. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Comment noted and civil plans revised per comment. Please see revised civil plans. 8. The minimum right-of-way width for a PUD is 40-ft. (LDR, Chapter 2.5, Section 9.F.) Please provide appropriate right-of-way widths for all internal roadways and/or make a written request for reduced width, including justification for the request. Justification for any proposed reduction in right-of-way width shall address the adequacy of the right- of-way to handle solid waste storage and truck movement, utility WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 5 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT maintenance, and an evaluation of sight distance for backing out of garages. The evaluation of sight distance for backing shall include an opinion, from the Engineer-of-Record regarding the relative safety of this movement within the reduced right-of-way. The turning radii has been evaluated through out the site for both emergency vehicles and garbage pickup. In addition, we have verified the turning movements into the garages along the allies. In all cases, roadway width and radii prove to be sufficient. Please see revised site plan for illustration of turning movements. 9. The developer has proposed gating this community, providing only 95- feet from Federal Hwy. to the gate. The minimum standard for stacking per County standards is ISO-feet. Please revise plans to provide this minimum stacking distance. The minimum stacking distance issue has been resolved by modifying the main entrance layout to have a 22 ft. wide two-lane entrance and an 11 ft. wide one-lane exit. Thus, allowing for a total of 190 ft. stacking distance from the edge of Federal Highway (the single lane strength is currently 95 ft.) There is also a supplementary stacking distance created at the secondary entrance on Dimmick Road of 33 ft. in length. See sheet A-1.0. We are currently analyzing the proposed configuration and requirements at the entrance off of Federal Highway. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 10. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." Parking spaces in front of the main entrance have been eliminated or relocated. See sheet A-J.O. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Note added to civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 11. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. These two parking spaces have been eliminated. See sheet A-I.O Comment noted. Please see revised civil plans. 12. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit reVIew. Comment noted. 13. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. Comment noted. 14. The City already has a proposed subdivision in review at the present with a similar name (Vista Lago.) Please rename this subdivision. The name is not that similar - the Applicant desires to maintain the Casa del Lago name. 15. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. Written and graphic scales are provided on all civil plan sheets. Please see revised civil plan sheets. 16. The scale for the Site, Civil and Landscape plans shall be provided at the same scale for each (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 7.) The Civil and Landscape plans may be provided as a "master" plan with subsequent sheets drawn at a scale that provides the needed level of detail. Graphic scales included in all plans. The landscape plans were updated to include a master plan sheet at the WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. fT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT same scale of the site and civil plans. A key sheet has been added to the civil plans to match the site plan scale. Please see civil key sheet. 17. Show proposed site lighting on the Site, Civil and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.BA.) The lighting plan will be shown on Site, Civil, and Landscape plans. Site lighting has been added to the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 18. Site lighting has been provided in excess (number of lights and intensity) of what is strictly required by Code. The City's standards are primarily set up for parking lots, not residential developments. Site lighting does need to be provided for the various parking spaces for guests, etc., however simple coach lights should be sufficient for lighting along the roadways. Staff recommends that the lighting design be re-evaluated with these factors in mind. Comment noted. 19. lt may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.l.b.) The necessary adjustments will be done. All landscape material will be placed at a safe distance away from the light poles so not to create shadowing of the parking surface. 20. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Federal Highway. Internal roadway intersections shall be no less than 15 feet. Safe sight triangles have been added to the landscape plans based on FDOT index 546. 21. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5 feet and 8 feet. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 8 DEP ARTMENTS A note exists on the landscape details sheet under plant schedule. INCLUDE REJECT 22. Please check spelling and grammar on the Landscape Notes on Sheet LP-7. All spelling and grammar was checked on LP-7. 23. The medians on Federal Highway have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets (including any plans sheets involving underground work) with the above stated information. The appropriate note was added to the landscape plans in reference to the irrigation design. 24. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. The appropriate note has been added to the revised civil plans to serve as the engineers certification as required by the City of Boynton Beach LDR. 25. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). Appropriate note has been added to civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 26. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. All storm pipe have been labeled on the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 27. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WESl PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 9 DEPARTMENTS Comment noted. 28. An existing 15-ft. drainage easement is shown running east to west through the middle of the project. No structures or surfacing shall be placed within drainage easements. Will that easement continued to be used for that purpose or is abandonment being considered? If the easement is to be retained the gazebos and sidewalk need to be removed and/or relocated. The site plan now shows notes indicating the gazebos are removable structures referred to the details and the sidewalks use removable pavers. See sheet A-I.O 29. The Site Data table on Sheet A1.0 incorrectly states the number of townhouses as 11. There are 42 townhouses and 11 townhouse buildings/blocks. Also the number of condominium units appears to be incorrect. There are 10 units per floor. Only the top three floors of the condo building are habitable, the ground (or 1st floor) is understory parking. Therefore the correct number of condominium units should be 30, not the 40 stated in the table. Further, the number of parking spaces for the townhouses would then be 84, not 82 (based on 2 parking spaces per townhouse unit) and the number of parking spaces for the condominiums would be 60, not the 80 stated (also based on 2 parking spaces per unit.) The number of town homes has been corrected. The condo building has four stories with la-Dwelling Units each, for a total of 40. thus requiring 80 parking spaces. This is reflected in the Site Data chart. See sheet A-I.O 30. Monitoring wells are shown at various locations throughout the site, a number of which will be covered over by paving, sidewalk or buildings. Please indicate their purpose and what their disposition will be. Water Spigots were incorrectly labeled on the civil plans as monitoring wells. The spigots are to be removed from the site. Please see revised civil plans. 31. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. The appropriate details will be included in the plans when WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE ""~ CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 10 DEPARTMENTS appZvingfor the construction permit. At this time, the detail sheets have been removed from the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. UTILITIES Comments: 32. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. City Commission approval: July 5 Permit Application: 9 Months - March 2006 Commencement of Construction: July 2006 Project Completion: January 2008 33. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. All easements are now shown on Site (sheet A-l.O), civil and landscape plans. All easements have been added to the landscape plans. Palms are the only large plant material in the easements. All of the common areas on the site shall be used for roadway, ingress/egress, drainage and utilities. As such, the City shall have the right to maintain it's utilities located within the common areas. This use shall be dedicated to the City via plat recordation. 34. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment noted. 35. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Comment noted. 36. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. Plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 37. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Please provide the number and size(s) for all proposed meters at the TART meeting so the reservation fee may be calculated. The meter number and sizes have been added to the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 38. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). All of the common areas on the site shall be used for roadway, ingress/egress, drainage and utilities. As such, the City shall have the right to maintain it's utilities located within the common areas. This use shall be dedicated to the City via plat recordation. 39. This office will not require securety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page l2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment noted. 40. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted. 41. PVC material is generally not permitted on the City's water system. However, since this project is located east of Federal Highway, we may consider the use of PVC C900 pipe for water mains if it is shown that corrosivity will be a problem. This determination will be made during the detailed utility construction plan review. Comment noted. Civil plans have been revised to specify PVC C900. Please see revised civil plans. 42. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. Comment noted. 43. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. Comment noted and civil plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 44. Three story buildings and higher are required to be sprinklered per the Florida Building Code. Comment noted. Town homes and condo building are to be sprinklered. 45. Per City Standard W -9 fire hydrants are installed on 6-in. laterals; change all 8-in. x 8-in. tees to reflect 8-in. x 6-in. tees. Civil plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 46. Per City Standard W-14A, Note 6, meters shall not be placed in sidewalks or driveways. The townhouses as shown on the drawings do not appear to provide suitable areas for meter placement for individually WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 13 DEPARTMENTS metering each residence. Additionally due to the property line layout for the townhouses the meter would not be able to be set on private property (City Standard W -10.) The Utilities Dept. Staff is therefore requiring that each townhouse block (of three of four units) have a master meter, which will become the point of service for the department. Each townhouse will then be sub-metered. INCLUDE REJECT So noted. Respectfitlly we request that the proposed location of the water meters be allowed. This layout leaves the islands open for landscaping which serves to soften the appearance of the allies. Additionally, we propose to place the meters in traffic rated boxes with traffic rated lids. 47. Provide water meter supply characteristics to the four-story condominium building located adjacent to the Lake Worth Lagoon. A chart illustration the water meter supply characteristics has been added accordingly. Please see the chart provided on the revised civil plans for the number of meters, meter sizes, anticipated demand, and totals for this project. 48. Clarify sanitary sewer main material call-out to reflect pressure-rated pipe (C900.) Comment noted and plans revised accordingly. 49. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. Comment noted. Please see civil key sheet. 50. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Letters of commitment shall be obtained. We do not anticipate any problems in this regard. 51. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering WPB:244393: 1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE' TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 14 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. The appropriate details will be included in the plans when applying for the construction permit. At this time, the detail sheets have been removed from the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. FIRE Comments: FORTHCOMING POLICE Comments: 52. All lighting shall be metal halide following IESNA Lighting standards. So noted. A note has been included on the Photometric Plan. See sheet A-l.2 53. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). Placement of lighting poles has been done taking into account the location of landscape of landscape items. See landscape drawings. See sheets A-l.O and A-l.2. The landscaping will not be a conflict for the lighting plans. 54. Timer clock or photocell lighting for nighttime use shall be above or near entryways. So noted. Note on Photometric Plan. 55. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. lt is suggested that interactive or lighting on demand be used in sensitive areas. So noted. Pedestrian walkways are noted for lighting with photocells. Note on Photometric Plan. Sheet A-l.2. 1. Numerical address: a Shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility( dusk to WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 15 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT da wn). b Shall not be obstructed. c Shall also be placed on the rear of the building if buildings are adjoined by a common area. Comment noted. 2. Residential Security: a The door leading into a residential unit should be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock (including garage door). b When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. c If front door has zero visibility to front entryway are, it should be equipped with a 180-degree peephole. d Entry door should open outward versus inward. e All exterior doors should be equipped with security hinges. f Anti lifting auxiliary locks should be installed on sliding doors and windows. g Should be pre-wired for alarm system. Items under "Numerical Address" and "Residential Security" are noted in sheet A-I.a and A-I.2. 56. There should be strategically placed directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver sight level. The directories should be placed at the ingress points. So noted. Directories have been placed at or near entry gates in architectural Site Plan. See sheet A-I.O. 57. Ifbenches in a park area are intended for nighttime use, adequate lighting should be provided for the area in which they are located. They should also be in open view to eliminate concealment areas. Photometric study is provided so no areas are left "concealed" or without WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 16 DEP ARTMENTS proper lighting. See Sheet A-I.2. 58. Stairways and balconies should provide open views. INCLUDE REJECT Stairways in condo building are fire-rated. therefore they are not open stairwells. They have windows to the exterior, which provide sufficient views of the surrounding areas. Balconies and terraces offer wide open views of the complex and its surroundings, allowingfor an efficient register of site activities at all times. 59. Building architecture should allow for enhanced natural surveillance of all parking lots and provide a sense of security. Every step has been taken to ensure a proper interaction of uses and a safe environment for end users. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 60. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. So noted. It is understood that there will be additional comments which will be addressed on time. 61. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. Heights and areas are in compliance with construction types and uses and do not exceed height limits imposed by the Florida Building Code. Refer to project information table on sheet A-O.I 62. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. So noted. See added tahle sheetsA-3.0 through A-3.3 and A5.I. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 17 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 63. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2004 FBC, Section 506. Provide calculations verifying compliance with the above code sections and the 2004 FBC, Table 503. See sheet A-O.I 64. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provIsIOns of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. All stntctural calculations and provisions are taken to comply with current code standards and are reflected on sheet A-I.a. 65. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. The three-story town homes and the condo building are to be sprinklered to comply with the code requirements. See sheet A-O.I project information table of construction "Type 3B" sprinklered. 66. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. A note has been added to the site plan indicating limits of constntction, which are the same as the property line. See sheet A-I.a. 67. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction All project related documentation will be submitted in accordance to current and city requirements. 68. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units covered under the FFHA shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. All accessible parking is in compliance with the prescribed percentages and WPB:244393:1 -- .--.- RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG' TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 18 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT is convenient(v located throughout the site. 69. Compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA, Design and Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, is required. Noted. Design is in compliance with the FFHA. Design and Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR. Part 100.205. See sheet A-1.0. 70. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the future installation of grab bars as required by the FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within the covered dwelling unit shall comply. Noted. The FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. Section 3, Requirements #6 will be included in permit drawings. 71. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which design specification ("A" or "B") of the FFHA is being used. The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be clearly shown on the plans. Noted. The FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205 is been used and us noted on plans. Construction documents will comply with design requirements. See adds clear floor space on all unit plans. Bathroom types shall be clarified on construction documents. 72. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the Code is 36 inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS designed III compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2004 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 19 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment noted. See Sheet A-l.O. 73. If an accessible route has less than 60 inches clear width, then passing spaces at least 60 inches by 60 inches shall be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet. A "T" -intersection of two corridors or walks is an acceptable passing place. 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.3.4. Noted. All sidewalks and corridors are at least 60" wide. See sidewalk dimensions in sheet A-l.O and civil drawings. 74. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." B Prom the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). The requested information has been added to the plans. Please see the revised plans. 75. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Noted. Property line shows identification notes on every section. See Sheet A-l.O. 76. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. Setback dimension lines have been added to the Site Plan, as well as In between buildings. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 20 DEPARTMENTS 77. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one- story clubhouse, provide the following: A Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? Yes B Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the clubhouse? C Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? D Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse building. In response to the above questions: A - Yes B-No C-No D-No A draft of the letter to the County Impact Fee Coordinator is enclosed. 78. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. At the time of irrigation work to bring all irrigation comments will be adhered to. 79. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. At the time of irrigation work to bring a water use permit will be obtained. 80. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. WPB:244393: 1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 21 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT C The number of dwelling units in each building. D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. E The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) So noted. 81. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. So noted. 82. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: A A legal description of the land. B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. D The number of dwelling units in each building. E The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) So noted. 83. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Yes, plans submitted for the permit will incorporate all conditions of approval. 84. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 22 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT application submittal. Yes. the full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. 85. The condo building structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7) and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 through 109.3.6.6. The following information must be submitted at the time of permit application: A The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a threshold building. B All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be submitted. C All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633. So noted. The project will comply with the requirements of FS. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 throuf{h 109.3.6.6. 86. Sheet A-O.l references Table 500 in the Project Information legend. There is no such table in the 2004 FBC. Insert the correct table. So noted. Table in sheet A-0.1 has been corrected to read and comply with Table 503. 87. Sheet A-0.1 indicates the parking garage as Type V sprinklered. Parking garages are not permitted to be of Type V construction. Comply with Table 406.3.5 of the 2004 FBC. Garage will be type IV and the use will be S2. See A-O.1/ 88. Sheet A-O.l Project Information legend indicates the building construction types as V(B) and Sheet Al.O notes Type VI. Clarify. So noted. See sheet A-0.1 project information. 89. Sheet A2.4 shows the stairs labeled as an elevator and the elevator is labeled as stairs. Correct the labeling. So noted. Sheet A-2.4 has been corrected. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 90. Park Impact Fee 42 single family attached @ $771.00 each = $32,382.00 40 multi family @ $656.00 ea = $26,240.00 TOTAL $58,622.00 The Park Impact Fees due are acknowledged and will be paid at time of buildinK permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 91. The Existinl! Trees and Landscape Plan Show on Sheet LP-7 Landscape Architect should review the existing trees on the site and indicate the trees to be preserved in place, relocated on site and removed / replaced in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. This information should be shown on the landscape plan by a separate symbol for each existing tree. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] The environmental work will be forthcoming. Plant Schedule Sheet LP-7 92. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12' -14' height, 3" DBH [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.] All shade and palm trees will be listed to meet this spec. 93. All shrubs and groundcover plants should have a height and spread dimension. All shrubs and groundcovers have a height and spread dimension. 94. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 24 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT planting to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings and parking lot from the Federal Highway and Dimick Road rights-of-ways. Both requested elevations have been provided. Irri2ation Plan 95. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. The in'igation will address recommended conservation needs. 96. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] The irrigation plans shall address bubblers for each tree. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 97. Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06- 018) and height exception (HTEX 06-007). So noted. It is understood that approval of this project is contingent with the 'V'" above mentioned amendment and exception. 98. Clarify area of site (II.3. on application) 179,131/43560 = 4.11 acres. This area should correspond with area to be stated on survey. Please see revised application and revised survey for correct site area. V 99. Revise II.4.j. on application to match area stated in II.3. Provide additional calculations for vehicular use areas, open space, etc. under other (II.h. and i.). In addition, 4.a.-i. should add up to 100% (j.) and it adds up to only 38.2%. V-- Please see revised application. 100. Acreages on application (II.3 and 5.i.) do not match. Please see revised application. \/ WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 25 DEPARTMENTS 101. Complete application (7.c.) regarding number of bedrooms for each unit proposed. So noted. Application # 7 c has been completed with the bedroom mix. 102. Provide a notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. The traffic impact analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes prior to the issuance of any building permits. Per our initial discussions with Mr. Atefi of the Palm Beach Counzv Traffic Engineering Division, this site lies within the Palm Beach County Residential Coastal Exclusion Area, and as such, a notice of concurrency is not required. 103. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. So noted. 12 sets of revised plans are being submitted. 104. At the T ART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8~ inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. So noted. Reduced copy of plans set and electronic files are being submitted. 105. lt is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. Acknowledged. 106. A height exception request has been received for the portions of the condo building that exceed the maximum height of 45 feet. Revise }?age 1 of the height exception letter submj_tte~_~ri119z..lQQiUQ.~ ~tatement that "mansard roof measures 53 '6" at its highest point" (should be re-worded to "53 '6" at mid-point of stair and elevatoTroof, and midpoint of balcony roof'). So noted. 107. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art In Public Places" program and must demonstrate their WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT v v-- v v-- V^' & v c v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 26 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT participation. So noted. 108. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan set. V So noted. All provisions have been taken to reflect revisions on plans. 109. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover sheet (A-0.1), Survey, Master Plan/Site Plan (A1.0), Townhouse Elevations (A-3.0 thruA-3.1), Townhouse Floor and Roof Plans (A-2.0 thru A-2.3), ~ Townhouse Unit Floor Plans (A-4.0 thru A-4.3), Condo Elevations (A- 3.2 thnl A-3.3), Condo Floor Plans (A-2.4 thru A-2.6), Condo Roof ~V Plan (A-2.7), Condo Unit Floor Plans (A-4.4 thru A-4.1O), Clubhouse I~ Elevations (A-5.l), Clubhouse Floor Plan and Elevations (A-5.0), Site I Details (A-l.l), Photometric Plan (A-1.2), Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans (LP-l thru LP-8), and Civils (PLl-16). So noted. Drawin~s order will comply with the above mentioned f!:Uidelines. 110. Revise project location on location map (A-O.l). lt appears that half the property is located south of Dimick Road. V- On the location map. the lettering of Dimick Road is shown above the actual road. Dimick Road is south of the site and not included in this project. 111. Correct fax # under Civil (extra digit) on sheet A-O.l. V Fax # has been corrected. Please see revised sheet A-O.I. 112. Provide fax # for Landscape Architect instead of xxx.xxxx on sheet A- 0.1. V Please see revisedfax #, sheet A-O.I 113. Correct spelling of Lakeview under Lawyer address and reVIse to Agent/Lawyer on sheet A-O.1. V Svellinf! has been corrected. Please see revised sheet A-O.I. 114. Provide complete Index of Drawings including survey, landscape plans, and civil plans on sheet A-O.l. ~ V Civil, landscape and survey drawings have been added to the sheet index. Please see revised sheet A-D.I. 115. Correct spelling of roof under Project Information, Height of Building for townhomes on sheet A-0.1. '\..-- Spelling has been corrected. See revised sheet A-Dol. 116. Revise site data on sheet A-O.l (cover sheet) and A1.0 (site plan) as WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 27 DEP ARTMENTS follows: Move address of property closer to Address (delete 52 spaces between) v-" Add zoning district Infill Planned Unit Develop~t (IPUD) V Delete proposed land use category existing R3; Revise from "proposed: Special High Density Residential" to "Future Land Use Designation: Special High Density Residential (SHDR) V Revise "units/acre" to "proposed density 20 units/acre (82 units)" and "maximum density allowed in SHDR 20 units/acre" V Revise "total impervious: paving, walks, patios, pool/spa, future pool/patios, roads, etc." to "total impervIOUS: roads, sidewalks, paved area, pool, etc." V Total pervious and impervious add up to 4.12 acres, site area is 4.11 acres V Delete "required setbacks front (west) 40 feet, rear (east) 0 feet, side (south) 20 feet, SIde (north) 0 feet V Scaled setbacks are 46-50 front (west), rear (east) 0 feet (from property line), SIde (north) 15 feet and side east 11 feet Revise proposed setbacks (and building locations on plans) to be more in keeping with the standard setbacks for previously approved IPUD's and setbacks of adjacent property (prop9se west 10-20 feet, east 10-20 feet, north 10-20 feet and south 20-25 feet). ~ /' Delete setbacks for private pools (future), screen enclosures, and patios V Correct community pool setbacks to correspond with revised location (if no ownership obtained) or if not relocated, clarify why patio has a rear setback of 0 feet and 5 feet. V Correct parking proposed from 11 townhouses to 42 townhouses with 2 spa~es provided in each 2 car garage ~, Correct parking to include an additional 5 spaces for recreation area per Section l1.H.16.e. (12). V Clarify trash collection for townhouses to note roll-out curbside service V Clarify open air parking garage to note location under 4 story condo building and hbte#-ofspaces " ."" " ""9-' . _ _ ..__.-...-....u..--..----. Usable open space 200 square feet per unit required (provide total OS required and total,OS provided on site. 1f..... See revised site data, sheet A-O.l and sheet A-l.O. 117. When the IPUD is to be developed in a single phase, the site plan may also represent the master plan. Since there is not a separate master plan submitted, label site plan as M \ -+t +'[Q b L a t2~k-.. --f:r~ (5 Sheet A-l. 0 has been relabled. '---- 118. Per master plan requirements, indicate pedestrian circulation which should be planned to prevent pedestrian use of vehicular ways and parking spaces. Note on plans the sidewalks interior to the development, continuous perimeter sidewalks, and widths of sidewalks. So noted. See Sheet A-l.O. 119. Add bearings and distances (which match survey) to perimeter property WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT v v v v- CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 28 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT lines on site plan. So noted. See sheet A-1.0. 120. The existing 10 foot sewer easement where the condo building is planned will be required to be abandoned and relocated prior to approval of the application requests. V Acknowled!{ed. An abandonment application will be filed by June tho 121. Several monitoring wells are depicted on the survey. What happens to them in the development of the site? Water Spigots were incorrectZv labeled on the civil plans as monitoring wells. The spigots are to be removed from the site. Please see revised civil plans. \f/ 122. Consider overhead utility placement underground. This proposed development only has (+/-)161 feet offrontage along Federal Highway and burying that small amount of overhead utilities would not make much of a difference since our site frontage is so small relative to the total length of overhead wires along Federal Highway. Secondly, FPL would have to be amendable to the idea of burying their lines along the frontage of our proposed site, and they typically do not like to run their line above ground, below ground, above ground...etc...in short runs v 123. The existing pumphouse located near the northwest corner of the site will remain (according to civils), but is not indicated on site or landscape plans. Provide an elevation and indicate how it will be screened, or confirm that it will be removed. v The pump-house will be removed. Please see revised civil plans. 124. Two gazebos are located within the existing 15 foot drainage easement and will require Engineering approval. @f v So noted. 125. Artwork in front of Building 1 cannot be located in the right-of-way of Federal Highway. The portion located in the right-of-way may be grassed, but not landscaped. Provide details on site and landscape plans of proposed materials, width of walkway, etc. for art area. So noted. Once the art work piece dimensions and characteristics have been determined, appropriate documentation will be added to the drawings. v WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TAlLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH " L /j tr"" (, 'L L€ fJ {rj-t'L d-e~c ~v ( t0~ ~L~'E-LAJ " B (a '+- II -+~ tJ(l tk.! N ~ 6 ItL+ ~ ~()..rlL-~ ~". 126. Will townhomes be sold as fee simple? If so, indicate all townhouse lot lines ~m plans. IVO-T- OUzeL,", ~ Yes, lot lines are shown. See sheet A-l.O. ck.!2t..-<5}kP9.Ff:f/),{:., I ~ 127. Dimension and label typical building setbaCks 1lncr lancfscapF1mffer widths along perimeter property lines. )/)/10 t. ~ B ?? if <I-! I btA.ek-.+fOM d('~~,,; (:1:. Yes, dimensions. setbacks and landscape btifJer widths are reflected on plans. . See sheet A-loa and landscape plans. yYt 0 ~.,<-- I?:> I./! ~- c;...o / -Pro ~t +::li(~ t~ 128. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from private property to "buffer tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 29 v DEPARTMENTS The area in question is called out to have sod only installed in both the R.o. W section and the landscape tract section. Refer to comment #5 on letter dated April 24th. The buffer areas will be platted as btifJer tracts, dedicated to the POA for their perpetual maintenance responsibility. See also response to #5. April 2lh letter, above. 129. The IPUD is required to minimize adverse impacts on surrounding property. The IPUD project must be compatible with and preserve the character of adjacent residential neighborhoods. The ingress/egress proposed on Dimick Road is located too far into the residential neighborhood, and should be relocated as close to the existing commercial outparcel as possible. Although this is considered a secondary ingress/egress, it will be used frequently by those heading south on Federal Highway (no median at Dimick and Federal allows left turns from Dimick Rd, but median in front of main entrance does not allow left turns). We have relocated this secondary drive as close to Federal Highway as possible. 130. Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate sufficient area for stacking of vehicles on site and out of Federal Highway. T71e dimension from the west property line to the gated entrance has been added to the revised civil plans and the stacking analysis is pending. Please see revised civil plans for requested dimension. 131. The dimension of the parking stalls, and vehicular back-up areas are WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT rJ!J\/ y '( v -- v ~ ,1/ , v -- ...-- -- CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 30 DEP ARTMENTS subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' reVIew and approval So noted. 132. Provide typical dimensions for parking space and H/C space in parking garage (floor plan A-2.4), aisle width dimension, and arrows indic~.. ing traffic circulation. a (JJJ-' I +, ,~ ci ( ? ' So noted. These have been added to the plans. ~ 133. Provide typical dimension for distance between townhouse buildings. So noted. These dimensions have been added. See sheet A-l.O. 134. Revise title for drawings A-2.0 thru A-2.3 and A-3.0 thru A-3.1 to delete reference to front loaded (garage shown on rear elevation). Terminology 'front loaded" has been removed from drawings. Please see revised sheets A-2.0 throuKh A-2.3 and A-3.0 throuKh A-3.1. 135. Clarify if streets interior to the project are public rights-of-way or private streets to be maintained by the homeowners and condo associations. Streets, regardless if public or private, are required to be 40 feet in PUD' s ~--"'~"-"'""--_.'-- , Internal streets are private and maintained by the Homeowners Association. See response to item #8 136. The width of interior streets is minimal and includes only 2 lanes of 11- feet each for a total right-of-way width of 22 feet (no sidewalks indicated). Per the IPUD zoning district regulations, privately-owned streets providing secondary vehicular circulation internal to the IPUD may be considered for approval with right-of-way and pavement widths less than the minimum PUD requirement of 40 feet, however in no case shall health, safety, and / or welfare be jeopardized. However, these roads are primary circulation roadways for use by residents and service providers alike. Solid waste pickup would be roll-out curbside service for each unit, rather than a centralized trash dumpster, therefore large garbage trucks will be required to maneuver and circulate throughout the proposed development. See response to items #3 and #8. A sufficient amount of sidewalks have been designed on the site to provide for pedestrian traffic so that the use of the ally ways for pedestrian traffic is not needed. The size of the proposed roadways in the allies is 22' and has been analyzed for movements of vehicular traffic (fire, garbage, and entrance/exit from town homes). Please see revised site plan. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE ~ 1-' 11-'( v ~ ~ till v \,- ,./ v V ~-c-b. J T(t XL C '( -...., p~/ v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 31 DEPARTMENTS 137. Due to the minimal street width, there is limited area for utilities within those streets. There are required distances that underground utilities must be separated from other utilities and from structures. In addition, the reduced internal street width poses a potential sight distance hazard. All proposed buildings are oriented toward the interior of the site, and residents would access their garages from the private streets internal to the development. Due to the limited street width (currently shown as 22 feet), sight distance may be compromised, leading to a safety issue for residents backing out of the garages. See response to items #8 and Auto study in site plan. Sheet A-l.O. Comment noted. We do not be/zeve backing out of the garages creates a safety issue. It is similar to and less hazardous than cars backing out of parking spaces in a typical parking lot with a view that is obscured by other vehicles (Vans, Pick-up Trucks, SUVs, etc.). The only differences are that the proposed garages are set back from the drive isle in these plans, and the parking spaces in a typical parking lot are not set back from the drive isle. 138. Add note to plans that solid waste disposal for townhouses will be curbside garbage pickup in front of each unit, instead of a centralized trash container or dumpster So noted. Note has been added and issue has been discussed with Larry Quinn at the Public Works Department. 139. Revise Area Calculations for residential units on Al.O to correct 2nd and 3rd floor sf for all TH buildings Unit A (does not correspond with sf on .floor plan A-2.0 and A-2.2); correct total AlC and total covered if unit A sf changed; provide building height of townhomes instead of xx' -xx"; ----?>provide note that clarifies that #'s for unit A and unit B sf are totals within buildings (not size of 1 unit). Yes, revisions and amendments to sheets have been done. 140. Relocate parking space designated for handicapped so it is not next to dumpster. This H/C space (and all other H/C spaces for condo residents) should be located in the condo parking garage close to an elevator. Condo building is provided with 2 handicapped parking spaces, one onside the garage and one in the parking are adjacent to the building. Current location for exterior parkin!? space is due to proximity to the pedestrian !?rid. 141. The parking garage only provides 62 spaces plus 1 H/C space. 40 du x 2 = 80 spaces required. These 80 spaces should be located in the parking garage, or immediately outside of it, not throughout the townhome development. A total of 5 spaces is required at the WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT ~ @ ~ ffl v/ v v v v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 32 DEP ARTMENTS recreation area, but no parking is provided there. There appear to be no spaces for guests to park (no driveways). Number of parking units has been increased near the condo building. See sheet A-l.a 142. Provide a note on plans that the established homeowner's association and condo association will not allow individual pools or additions, and will not allow the patios, porches, or balconies to be modified (i.e. increased in size, enclosed, or screened). See general notes on sheet A-l.O. 143. Relocate townhouse grouped mailboxes away from entrance and to a more centralized location. See new location between the south of the circle and the center parkway runnin over the utility easement, as noted in sheet A-l.O. 144. Revise entry wall elevation (A-l.l) to delete color conflict on aluminum fence (white or black not both, white is preferred) and to reduce wall height from 8 feet to 6 feet per Art. II. Sec. 5.E. Also, submit color schedule for proposed entry wall (Chestertown Buff, Hawthorne Yellow). So noted. See sheet A-l.l. 145. Revise dumpster details (A-I.l) to provide a six (6) foot wall (not eight (8) foot wall) per Ch 9. Sec. 1O.C.3. ~ --=> So noted. See sheet A-l.l. 146. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the building color (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the elevations indicating this requirement. So noted. See sheet A-loa. 147. Provide additional architectural treatments (wooden shutters, trellises, faux windows, etc.) to the side elevations visible from Federal Highway, to alleviate large areas of blank wall. So noted. See elevations sheets. A-3.0 and A-3.l 148. To enhance the rear building elevations consider providing white light fixtures on each side of garage doors, rather than one large light centered above doors. So noted. See elevations sheets A-3.0 and A-3.l 149. To enhance the rear building elevations and provide required foundation landscaping, consider providing pergolas above garage doors and large WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT ~ L---- v "v v ~ t/ v- v v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 33 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT potted bougainvillea or other climbing and/or flowering vines on each side of garage door. So noted. See elevations sheets A-3.0 and A-3.1 150. The colored elevations provided indicate various building colors on each building unit which promote a multi-family look for the development. To minimize the multi-family appearance, and to be more compatible with adjacent single-family residences to the south and east, staff recommends the buildings have one main color (with each building having a complementary color, not necessarily the all the same color buildings). Staff recommends the following revisions: TH Buildings 1,3,4,7,8 and 11 Body I (Main): Floors 1-2 Peach Fuzz, floor 3 Venetian Lace Body II (Relief): Peach Fuzz Front doors: Sumptuous Peach (SW 6345) Aluminum Railing: White TH Building 2,5,6,9, and 10 Body I (Main): Floors 1-2 Jersey Cream, floor 3 Venetian Lace, Body II (Relief): Jersey Cream Front Doors: Cachet Cream (SW 6365) Aluminum Railing: White Condo Building Roof: Florida Blend (to tie in condo with TH buildings) So noted. 151. Please submit revised colored elevations accordingly. Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These will be on display at the public meetings. Comment noted, color elevations have been submitted. 152. Label elevations North, South, East, and West. ( ^" Comment noted. 153. Revise Gazebo Elevation (A-1.1) to include proposed color of gazebos (staff recommends a pale sage green called Sea Salt SW 6204 with Extra White trim). Comment noted. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. ~ ~ v L/ v v v CARACAS. fT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 34 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 154. Provide pamt swatches for the revised elevations. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Comment noted. v 155. Provide details on plans which indicate location and type of pavers in streets and driveways, and type of pool deck material. v Comment noted. 156. Project compatibility will be judged on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting properties. For this purpose, elevations and cross-sections showing adjacent structures shall be included with the site plan application. Submit project elevations which include properties to south and east so i~taff can determine compatibility, setbacks, buildin~_~~~~~! (Chapter 2, Section, 5.L.4.g. (1). {j v So noted. See cross-section studies on sheet A-6.0. 157. Provide a cross-section that illustrates the relationship between the buildings within the subject project and the single-family homes to the south and east. The cross-section should show the following: height of the proposed buildings, the setback of the proposed townhouse and condo buildings from the south and east property lines, the general height of the existing single-family homes, the maximum allowable height of a single-family home in the R-I-AA zoning district, and the setback of said homes to the subject property. t/ So noted. See cross-section studies on sheet A-6.0 158. In the past, the CRA Board has been very diligent in requesting that developers provide a drawing that shows what the project would look like when viewing the subject property from public rights-of-way. Therefore, staff recommends providing a supplemental drawing that shows the west elevations (along Federal Highway) and south least elevations (along Dimick Road and Lake Drive) that depicts the buildings with the plant material at time of planting. v See Landscape plans for elevations with planting. 159. Townhouse buildings 8, 9, and 11 which front on Dimick Road are directly across the street from a single-family residential neighborhood. To minimize impacts of 3 story TH buildings on these SF properties, similar building setbacks should be mirrored (20 to 25 feet minimum from south property line). The IPUD zoning dIStrict perimeter setbaCKS shall mirror setbacks of adjacent zoning district(s) but with a minimum WPB:244393:1 -0-- -f) ~. r- c..//" V<1 ".r:. RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. .X; ( CARACAS' FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACstJ -,' Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 35 DEPARTMENTS of the setback required for a single-family residence as determined by the orientation of the structures in the IPUD (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.3.). The properties to the south and east have been developed with single- family detached homes and the IPUD regulations specifically addresses compatibility requirements with these types of developments. The site plan proposes a 12 foot front setback from Dimick Road and a 9 foot setback from Lake Drive. This is unacceptable, given the proposed building heights / massing and proximity to the adjacent single-family homes. Staff recommends increasing the setbacks for compatibility. From a design and planning point of view, minimal setbacks along the perimeter of Dimick Road and Lake Drive allow the residents the ability to engage and utilize the street. This not only gives residents the options of on- street parking but. is also contributes an important element to a walkable community. In addition, the surrounding residential neighborhoods are very likely to be redeveloped in the near future to mirror the subject in density. 160. Demonstrate how the design submitted provides pedestrian walks/access gates to the individual units which provide more opportunity for residents in the buildings along Federal Highway and Dimick Road to engage the street as denoted in the CRA design guidelines. The site plan depicts a continuous and unbroken pedestrian network throughout the project. The walkway provides eacll resident the ability to walk from their unit to all amenities within the community as well as safely connecting them to Federal Highway and Dimick Road. Please see civil plans for a more detailed pedestrian traffic pattern. 161. lt is a basic public expectation that landowners requesting the use of the IPUD district will develop design standards that exceed the standards of the basic development standards in terms of site design, building architecture, and construction materials, amenities and landscape design (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.l.b.). The city is not obligated to automatically approve the level of development intensity requested for the IPUD. Instead, it is expected to approve only such level of intensity that is appropriate for a particular location in terms of land use compatibilities (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.1.c.). The proposed project contains no provision for guest parking. There is no recreation area parking that often times provides for guest or overflow parking. In addition, no tandem parking (driveway parking) has been provided for these large- size dwelling units that may very well possess two (2), three (3), four (4) car households, not to mention storage within the garage that can compromise necessary parking spaces. Therefore, staff recommends providing surplus parking and the creation of a pedestrian walkway system, including a connection to the public walkway (Chapter 2, Section 5.LA.c.). WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT (Cfr i9 v v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 36 A) / ~ " ~.<<J _ :V>L(j LA{, . ~r +6 Sere.___ ;/ ~ jO YJ Q.Ai ~isJ ~. u ~ p' (jiJ I I'c . /77 ' rJI A ~ ' { (. \..-N ((, co ~-w .IL ot;! . \ r I I I DEPARTMENTS We have provided for more parking spaces. A majority of the townhouse and condominium units are two-bedroom units ~ there are no four-bedroom units. There are two parking spaces per unit provided. The Applicant desires to offer a marketable residential community - one consideration of such is adequate parkingfor residents and guests. The Applicant feels that the number of parking spaces is sufficient to meet the needs of the residents and their f!Uests. 162. The proposed recreation area is not centrally located and appears to be very small for the use of 82 units (approximately 188 residents plus their guests). The location of the clubhouse was chosen due to its proximity to the water. It' e feel that this location, although riot located at the center of the community. would be enjoyed by all residents. In addition, we feel that open green space located at the center will better balance the site 163. If a fence is required around the pool/clubhouse area, provIde a detail of the fence including the dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Staff recommends matching white rail fence used elsewhere on site. So noted. See detail #7 on sheet A-I.i. 164. Removal of the existing seawall along the eastern property line adjacent to the ICWW will require permits from additional agencies such as the Army Corp of Engineers and Dept. of Environmental Protection. Comment noted. 165. Are there any existing mangroves located on the property east of the seawall? There are no existing mangroves located on the property east of the seawall. INCLUDE REJECT @-/ v jt)~ S<"'\ k '/v \J /La C?t?t' 5 /Lf?~~~ ~ ~ -1~- q~ _7V --~ OJ ~ t/ ~ v v t--/ 166. If an IPUD is located with frontage on the Intracoastal Waterway, conditions of approval shall include a deed restriction requiring that any marina or dockage build will not exceed in width the boundaries of the project's actual frontage on the water, regardless of what any other governing or permitting entity may allow or permit per Ch 2. Sec. V 5.L.4.g.(3). Comment noted. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 37 DEP ARTMENTS 167. Include bike racks near the swimming pool area. Staff recommends that they be covered or sheltered. So l'oted, Bike racks have been added on the south side of the Club House. 168. The subject site is located along Palm Tran Bus Route 1. A bus stop should be shown on the site plan, along Federal Highway. Staff recommends installing an upgraded shelter. Coordinate with Palm Tran and provide a written response at the TART meeting. While the Applicant has no objection to providing a bus easement, if it is provided. there will not be sufficient room for public art. The site plan proposes public art in front of the project, but if the City Commission desires a bus stop in lieu of on-site art, the plan could be modified. The Applicant feels that public art will enhance the Federal Highway corridor and the CRA 's objectives to redevelop it as the gateway into the City's downtown. 169. Increase landscaping (trees and shrubs) along property line south of main entrance to screen adjacent commercial building located on property line). This area is within an existing 15' drainage easement. The main entrance may need to shift north. The landscape has been increased with the use of Palm trees 11l the Landscape tract/ Drainage easement. (j v ~ 170. Identify / label on plan where all the required usable open space IS located and the boundaries and~provided for each location. V See sheet A-l.O to locate open space areas and. revi~w chart for areas. :') 171. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site as L-l. Also provide a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. A reduced landscape plan was provided as LP-l. Also a key was added to each sheet. 172. Revise plant list (LP-7) to include spacing of perimeter trees (min. 40 feet). {:.QcY' ,') t F.'J'< c:.) -i lJ Joe S. () N ~t) Spacing of perimeter trees and palms was added to the details sheet. 173. Add landscaping (tree, shrubs) to terminal landscape islands located WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. v ~ v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 38 DEP ARTMENTS I rJ INCLUDE REJECT south of roundabout. IV, Jd lQ. ~.:; ( tl-^--\ 0' yr-U . Palm trees and shrubs have been added to the islands ~ the area south of the ~ roundabout. Palm trees were usea because of this 1!.'ea lJeing a draj-nage easement. <: I elf ^-. 174. Staff recommends - , s~~_irrig~1!~ those areas between existing/proposed pavemcn~bvttf15ImIck Road and Lake II / Drive and your property line. V ~ The landscaped area is forthcoming. 175. What will be located inside.. roundab9ut? DeC?rative fountain? Landscaping? I{ OltNddl:nuf 10 L'/!,Jr1J?/H. 'cd I-c} _ l)ro IJ /de, hit a47/ I TiON 1// tJlfI d-';J. R The intersection of these two internal streets wtll have a Pfver design ~ covering the corner's entire circular area. l'f.p foundation or lanJscaped area is located at its center. 176. Clearly indicate locations of perimeter wall / fence. lt appears to be located only along the west and south property lines. See Sheet A-l.O for locations and line es chart. 177. Staff recommends working with your neighbor to the north (Peninsula) to utilize their perimeter wall rather than building one immediately adjacent to it. So noted. 178. Increase native species of palms to provide a minimum of 50% native. Replace Washington Palms with another palm species that tend to receive less storm damage Native palm species have been increased to meet the 50% that is required. Washington Palms were switched to Sabal Palms. 179. Label monument sign on landscape plan. Confirm that only one (1) sign is proposed on site (at main entrance), and no other signage is pr.oposed. So noted. Only one monument is planned for this site, at the main entrance on Federal Highway. gv.1...k d (Jr 1f'~O [,0 -r~-r"" r-'t I a~ ~ I ._MonU1nf!.!!.~~ign was labe{ed on the landscape plan. +.v _ r .' -------- G '& l /'..J 180. The trees proposed around the townhouse and condominium buildings must be installed at Yz the building hei ht of the building (Chapter 7.5, WPB:244393: 1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. V'6 r @j v v v fL- v 4)/ 1J~/ -7, C1- ? v v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 39 DEPARTMENTS Article II, Section 5.M.). All trees and palms are installed at a height that is ~ the building height. ? 181. Staff recommends placement of more canopy trees in frolD yards along Dimick Road. froNl- A canopy tree was added to the overall planting scheme along Dimick Road. Since this is an FPL easem nt canopy trees are limited. 'fl' YJ' . e 'It e.- Ndt-e oAJ L P ~q $tU1S .L/~' ufo tv td:- ~.~ CL{uv'f-b~ rL'~"'f- INCLUDE /2-' I Lf / (?;;/ , I A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have six (6) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe- sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Forester / Environmentalist review and approval. <;,fi I ( A,,! \.1 +- 0 A.,.) e {J. el'( :s l' elL A signature tree was added to the other entrance. 182. Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that is pervious and impervious, and how quantities of trees and shrubs were calculated along perimeter property lines. Notes added to landscape plans. 183. If potable water is used for lITIgation purposes, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized, and the irrigation system should have water conserving designs (such as a drip system), where possible. Drought tolerant plans were used in this design. The irrigation plans will address the remaining recommendations as well. 184. Delete incomplete sign detail on sheet LP-6 (details provided on sheet A-1.1). Condo detail was deleted for now. 185. Revise Photometric Plan (A-1.2) to indicate at a larger scale so it is more legible. So noted. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. ~ .~ R d-Q/ &3/' v- v v q C/c;/ p ~Y-a.. /V urQ i.JtZ( ,4: it '. FI 7 . ?'" . ~O! I r . V'I 0- fi' G"\-- .J t /t:: ~ v v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. Sf. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 40 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 186. No photometrics have been provided for pool and clubhouse area, or along paths on either side of condominium building, or in the parking V garage W- So noted. Adequate lighting is proposed for all these areas and they are to be equipped with proper fixtures. 187. Provide an elevation drawing of a typical freestanding outdoor lighting pole (indicating height from grade to top). The typical drawing of the freestanding outdoor lighting poles must include the color and material (staff recommends Sea Salt green for a verdigris look, rather than black). The design, style, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.). A minimum average light level of one (1) foot candle shall be provided, with no more than 10% of the spot readings below one (1) foot candle and none below Y2 foot candle (Chapter 23, Article II.A.l.a). So noted. See detail on sheet A-I.2 188. Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.2.). So noted. See photometric plan, sheet A-I.2. 189 . Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). Site lighting levels will comply with Chapter 9. Section IO.F3. 190. The location of the proposed monument sign in the entrance median is subject to Engineering review (for safe sight distance) and approval. At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. ()y v v- The monument has been moved in towards the east and more than ten feet V from Federal Highway. Landscape design will be created per recommendation. 191. Indicate total proposed sign face area (for one side) of Casa del Lago monument sign on Sign Elevation (A-l.1). S 1 Uti. ,re 0 f {2 L/O~t- . r So noted. See Sheet A -1.1 for signage area. V (! (l.l t it/At- .(. 192. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior WPB:244393: 1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. ~ tit l/" v v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 41 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. Yes, we will have a power-point presentation. CRA STAFF COMMENTS CRA staff recommends that additional architectural details be included at the north and south elevations and the rear elevation at the second floor of the town home buildings. Recommended details include but are not limited to: Columns with minimum 4' separation from wall. Plinth at base of wall with minimum 6" separation from wall. Belt courses with different colors and materials. Horizontal banding at story breaks with minimum of 4" separation from wall. Projecting cornice and canopy Trellis Medallions Translucent glass Artwork Lighting fixtures Arcade Awnings Comment noted. Provide detail of fencing design and materials to be used at North Federal and Dimick frontage, if any. Several architectural details have been added to the elevations to comply with theses requirements, in tune with the architectural style. See elevations. Correct parking calculations. Noted. We look forward to discussing the proposed project at the May 23rd TART meeting. Sincerely, RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. Kim Glas-Castro, AICP WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH 1. at! ~~.A4 .~ A.-..~ IV FfJ1 13/~ . t!OW/'(/VS (;5) .j- ~ A/r-JP/! /3 A)~ ~ ~ fGo~ ~.-~~~~A~~~~~. . 1. at-f\~/n,7~~~/:l~~";; ~7ft20(~y L J.oz ~'''''7~' (STRti:e/.5 Iluo) I. ~A>.~~~F/)~.a/.zz-~..~ s. ~~. n.:~i~~~-,,~/Z,,;r;O'./>-4~ c. ~~~ IS{)OG~@~ops' " 7 ~~.~~k~~7~ rg'.~4L/~k 3.7~, ~~~ q. g"P~~~~$.-4~ " Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 41 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. Yes, we will have a power-point presentation. eRA STAFF COMMENTS CRA staff recommends that additional architectural details be included at the north and south elevations and the rear elevation at the second floor of the town home buildings. Recommended details include but are not limited to: Columns with minimum 4' separation from wall. Plinth at base of wall with minimum 6" separation from wall. Belt courses with different colors and materials. Horizontal banding at story breaks with minimum of 4" separation from wall. Projecting cornice and canopy Trellis Medallions Translucent glass Artwork Lighting fixtures Arcade Awnings Comment noted. Provide detail offencing design and materials to be used at North Federal and Dimick frontage, if any. Several architectural details have been added to the elevations to comply with theses requirements, in tune with the architectural style. See elevations. Correct parking calculations. Noted. We look forward to discussing the proposed project at the May 23rd TART meeting. Sincerely, RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. Kim Glas-Castro, AICP WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH 1 it Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 16 INCLUDE REJECT DEP ARTMENTS proper lighting. See Sheet A-i.2. 58. Stairways and balconies should provide open views. Stairways in condo building are fire-rated, therefore they are not open stairwells. They have windows to the exterior, which provide sufficient views of the surrounding areas. Balconies and terraces offer wide open views of the complex and its surroundings, allowing for an efficient register of site activities at all times. 59. Building architecture should allow for enhanced natural surveillance of all parking lots and provide a sense of security. Every step has been taken to ensure a proper interaction of uses and a safe environment for end users. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 60. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. So noted. It is understood that there will be additional comments which will be addressed on time. 61. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. Heights and areas are in compliance with construction types and uses and do not exceed height limits imposed by the Florida Building Code. Refer to project information table on sheet A-O.I 62. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. So noted. See added table sheetsA-3.0 through A-3.3 and A5.I. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. /v Li v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 17 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 63. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2004 FBC, Section 506. Provide calculations verifying compliance with the above code sections and the 2004 FBC, Table 503. See sheet A-O.l 64. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. All structural calculations and provisions are taken to comply with current code standards and are reflected on sheet A-l.O. '1 65. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. The three-story town homes and the condo building are to be sprinklered to comply with the c '.g!!}!!:ements. See sheet A-O.l project information table of constructio "Type 3B " sprinklered. 66. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. A note has been added to the site plan indicating limits of construction, which are the same as the property line. See sheet A-l.O. 67. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction All project related documentation will be submitted in accordance to current and cit re uirements. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units__covered under the FFHA shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. All accessible RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. v / t--/ ~ CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 18 DEPARTMENTS ~ .~; is conveniently located throughout the site. 69. Compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA, Design and Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, is required. Noted. Design is in compliance with the FFHA, Design and Construction Re uirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. See sheet A-1.0. 70. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the future installation of grab bars as required by the FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within the covered dwelling unit shall comply. Noted. The FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirements #6 will be included in permit drawings. 71. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which design specification ("A" or "B") of the FFHA is being used. The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be clearly shown on the plans. Noted. The FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205 is been used and us noted on plans. Construction documents will comply with design requirements. See adds clear floor space on all unit plans. Bathroom types shall be clarified on construction documents. 72. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the Code is 36 inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2004 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE t/ v CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE' SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH K~hleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 19 DEP ARTMENTS Comment noted. See Sheet A-l.O. 73. If an accessible route has less than 60 inches clear width, then passing spaces at least 60 inches by 60 inches shall be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet. A "T" -intersection of two corridors or walks is an acceptable passing place. 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.3 A. Noted. All sidewalks and corridors are at least 60" wide. See sidewalk dimensions in sheet A-l.O and civil drawings. i1J\ 74. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). The requested information has been added to the plans. Please see the revised plans. 75. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Noted. Property line shows identification notes on every section. See Sheet A-l.O. 76. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. Setback dimension lines have been added to the Site Plan, as well as in between buildings. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT ~ J v/ ./ L,// J CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH \f; .~ K!lthleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 20 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 77. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one- story clubhouse, provide the following: A Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? Yes B Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the clubhouse? C Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? D Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit V review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse building. .~) j(\~: In response to the above questions: 1 "~) '\ (." l.e. ~rt:f'vv A - Yes ~ Q ~ / ,j( \ ~U '~ ( B- No Lf5vYf6J\j\JV ~Q.;;.C tA-f' C-No .. ''W' "\ 0 D-No ~ co~\ A draft of the letter to the County Impact Fee Coordinator is enclosed. 78. CBBCPP 3.C.3A requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where otlJe;.':JIL are readily available. - lJee1J-.e~">t(r~rjl!.tJvt-.... rec... - f" -' '" T?-:i! F b- (,t-Lt'ef "V At the time of irrigation w rk to bring all irrigation comments will be adhered to. 79. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of V the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. At the time of irrigation work to bring a water use permit will be obtained. 80. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH K:rthleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 21 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT C The number of dwelling units in each building. D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. E The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and vi how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) So noted. 81. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or ,/ tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. So noted. 82. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: j A A legal description of the land. B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. D The number of dwelling units in each building. E The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) So noted. 83. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The -J plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Yes, plans submitted for the permit will incorporate all conditions of approval. : 84. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction / documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH . K<tthleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 22 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE RE~~~ ~ application submittal. Yes, the full address oj the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. 85. The condo building structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7) and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 through 109.3.6.6. The following information must be submitted at the time of permit application: A The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a threshold building. B All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be submitted. C All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633. So noted. The project will comply with the requirements of F.s. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 throuf{h 109.3.6.6. 86. Sheet A-O.l references Table 500 in the Project Information legend. There is no such table in the 2004 FBC. Insert the correct table. So noted. Table in sheet A-0.1 has been corrected to read and comply with Table 503. 87. Sheet A-O.l indicates the parking garage as Type V sprinklered. Parking garages are not permitted to be of Type V construction. Comply with Table 406.3.5 of the 2004 FBC. Garage will be type IV and the use will be S2. See A-O.1/ 88. Sheet A-O.l Project Information legend indicates the building construction types as V(B) and Sheet A1.0 notes Type VI. Clarify. So noted. See sheet A-0.1 project information. 89. Sheet A2A shows the stairs labeled as an elevator and the elevator is labeled as stairs. Correct the labeling. So noted. Sheet A-2.4 has been corrected. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSElL, P.A. tl / 1-/ L/ l-/ CARACAS. fT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 23 I<~ rt 5" 2-'S -0 {; DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 90. Park Impact Fee 42 single family attached @ $771.00 each = $32,382.00 40 multi family @ $656.00 ea = $26,240.00 TOTAL $58,622.00 The Park Impact Fees due are acknowledged and will be paid at time of buildin~ permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 91. The Existin2 Trees and Landscape Plan Show on Sheet LP-7 Landscape Architect should review the existing trees on the site and indicate / /' the trees to be preserved in place, relocated on site and removed / replaced in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. This information should be shown on the landscape plan by a separate symbol for each existing tree. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] The environmental work will be forthcoming. Plant Schedule Sheet LP-7 92. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, V Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.] / All shade and palm trees will be listed to meet this spec. 93. All shrubs and groundcover plants should have a height and spread V dimension. / All shrubs and groundcovers have a height and spread dimension. / 94. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual ,,/' heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 24 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT planting to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings and ~~ parking lot from the Federal Highway and Dimick Road rights-of-ways. Both requested elevations have been provided. Irri2ation Plan V 95. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on / separate zones and time duration for water conservation. The irrigation will address recommended conservation needs. 96. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. / 5. C.2.] The irrigation plans shall address bubblers for each tree. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 97. Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06- 018) and height exception (HTEX 06-007). So noted. It is understood that approval of this project is contingent with the above mentioned amendment and exception. 98. Clarify area of site (I1.3. on application) 179,131/43560 = 4.11 acres. This area should correspond with area to be stated on survey. Please see revised application and revised survey for correct site area. 99. Revise IIA.j. on application to match area stated in II.3. Provide additional calculations for vehicular use areas, open space, etc. under other (I1.h. and i.). In addition, 4.a.-i. should add up to 100% (j.) and it adds up to only 38.2%. Please see revised application. 100. Acreages on application (II.3 and 5.i.) do not match. Please see revised application. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 41 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. Yes, we will have a power-point presentation. CRA STAFF COMMENTS CRA staff recommends that additional architectural details be included at the north and south elevations and the rear elevation at the second floor of the town home buildings. Recommended details include but are not limited to: Columns with minimum 4' separation from wall. Plinth at base of wall with minimum 6" separation from wall. Belt courses with different colors and materials. Horizontal banding at story breaks with minimum of 4" separation from wall. Projecting cornice and canopy Trellis Medallions Translucent glass Artwork Lighting fixtures Arcade Awnings Comment noted. Provide detail of fencing design and materials to be used at North Federal and Dimick frontage, if any. / , 'J Several architectural details have been added to the elevations to comply with theses requirements, in tune with the architectural style. See elevations. Correct parking calculations. . , / Noted. We look forward to discussing the proposed project at the May 23rd TART meeting. Sincerely, RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. Kim Glas-Castro, AICP WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 90. Park Impact Fee I 42 single family attached @ $771.00 each = $32,382.00 40 multi family @ $656.00 ea = $26,240.00 TOTAL $58,622.00 The Park Impact Fees due are acknowledged and will be paid at time of buildin~ permit. FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 91. The Existinl! Trees and Landscape Plan Show on Sheet LP-7 Landscape Architect should review the existing trees on the site and indicate the trees to be preserved in place, relocated on site and removed / replaced in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. This information should be shown on the landscape plan by a separate symbol for each existing tree. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] The environmental work will be forthcoming. Plant Schedule Sheet LP-7 92. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.] All shade and palm trees will be listed to meet this spec. 93. All shrubs and groundcover plants should have a height and spread dimension. All shrubs and groundcovers have a height and spread dimension. 94. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH .. ~I Ruden ~I McClosky ~":::.3!i . '-#1 ; .' , 222 LAKEVIEW AVENUE SUITE 800 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 (561) 838-4542 FAX: (561) 514-3442 .----_ ~IM.GLASCASTRO@RUDEN.COM .------::-.-,::------... \ r:\ ~ \R !L ~ , . TI r-'-'---".'" May 23,2006 ~!"'" 3 0 Kathleen Zeitler City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Division 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Re: Casa del Mar, LUAR 06-018 and NWSP 06-015 Dear Kathleen: In response to the TART's continuing comments, we have revised the plans and details to address the remaining concerns, more specifically, the plans were adjusted by shifting buildings to accommodate 20' setback and provide 36' separation between buildings. We have modified the T ART Comments by eliminating those that were satisfied and "rejected" at today's meeting - only the continuing comments or conditions are shown below: 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Casa del Mar File number: NWSP 06-015 Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an April 5. 2006 Planning & Zoning date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: l.The minimum right-of-way width for a PUD is 40-ft. (LDR, Chapter 2.5, Section 9.F.) Please provide appropriate right-of-way widths for all internal roadways and/or make a written request for reduced width, including justification for the request. Justification for any proposed reduction in right- of-way width shall address the adequacy of the right-of-way to handle solid waste storage and truck movement, utility maintenance, and an evaluation of WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH . Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 2 DEPARTMENTS sight distance for backing out of garages. The evaluation of sight distance for backing shall include an opinion, from the Engineer-of-Record regarding the relative safety of this movement within the reduced right-of-way. The turning radii has been evaluated through out the site for both emergency vehicles and garbage pickup. In addition, we have verified the turning movements into the garages along the allies. In all cases, roadway width and radii prove to be sufficient. Please see revised site plan for illustration of turning movements. 2. The developer has proposed gating this community, providing only 95-feet from Federal Hwy. to the gate. The minimum standard for stacking per County standards is 150-feet. Please revise plans to provide this minimum stacking distance. The minimum stacking distance issue has been resolved by modifying the main entrance layout to have a 22 ft. wide two-lane entrance and an 11 ft. wide one-lane exit. Thus, allowing for a total of 190 ft. stacking distance from the edge of Federal Highway (the single lane strength is currently 95ft.) There is also a supplementary stacking distance created at the secondary entrance on Dimmick Road of 33 ft. in length. See sheet A-I. O. We are currently analyzing the proposed configuration and requirements at the entrance off of Federal Highway. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 3. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." Note added to civilians. Please see revised civilians. 4. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT "- '(\ : ) . jG / C\.) 1(\. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 3 DEPARTMENTS be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Acknowledged. Please see revised civil plans. 5. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Acknowled ed. 6. Upon satisfactory Commission approval ofthe site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. Comment noted. 7. The City already has a proposed subdivision in review at the present with a similar name (~Ti~tll 1-1(1[.) fllt:i:m:; I~Il(1Il1~ this ~nbdi. i~i6fl. A "'LW MVY'v<.. wtlA be.. ~kd Glu.nt''''' pla!l~ . The applicant has changed the project name to Casa del tJar. L"'3 8. Show proposed site lighting on the Site, Civil and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.BA.) Site lighting has been added to the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 9. Site lighting has been provided in excess (number of lights and intensity) of what is strictly required by Code. The City's standards are primarily set up for parking lots, not residential developments. Site lighting does need to be provided for the various parking spaces for guests, etc., however simple coach lights should be sufficient for lighting along the roadways. Staff recommends that the lighting design be re-evaluated with these factors in mind. Comment noted. INCLUDE REJECT ~c/\ >J \ \ '\V I' t- . . tCf . , , t 1'/' \ ~ cf\!' 10. The medians on Federal Highway have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's \ l \ operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better 1"4 grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the .__-- sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notifY and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH qq Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 4 DEPARTMENTS any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets (including any plans sheets involving underground work) with the above stated information. The appropriate note was added to the landscape and civil plans in reference to the irrigation design. 11. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting Comment noted. 12. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. The appropriate details will be included in the plans when applyingfor the construction permit. At this time, the detail sheets have been removedfrom the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. UTILITIES Comments: 13. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. All of the common areas on the site shall be usedfor roadway, ingress/egress, drainage and utilities. As such, the City shall have the right to maintain it's utilities located within the common areas. This use shall be dedicated to the City via plat recordation. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT ~ X. ,~ ~ 1~ ., '. i~ (/ . \,~ 't ' tCfr CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 5 DEPARTMENTS 14. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26- 12). Comment noted. 15. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26- l6(b )). Comment noted. 16. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Please provide the number and size(s) for all proposed meters at the TART meeting so the reservation fee may be calculated. The meter number and sizes have been added to the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 17. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). All of the common areas on the site shall be usedfor roadway, ingress/egress, drainage and utilities. As such, the City shall have the right to maintain it's utilities located within the common areas. This use shall be dedicated to the City via plat recordation. 18. This office will not require securety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE R .'0v \ \N I. W\ , ! , l~ <" "<~ ~{- ~tf CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment noted. 19. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted. 20. PVC material is generally not permitted on the City's water system. However, since this project is located east of Federal Highway, we may consider the use of PVC C900 pipe for water mains if it is shown that corrosivity will be a problem. This determination will be made during the detailed utility construction plan review. Comment noted. Civil plans have been revised to specify PVC C900. Please see revised civil plans. 21. Per City Standard W -9 fire hydrants are installed on 6-in. laterals; change all 8-in. x 8-in. tees to reflect 8-in. x 6-in. tees. Civil plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 22. P&I- City Standaid W-~ Not(:-~, w~ter3 shalt not be sldewalks or driveways. he townh~n on the drawin d~ not appear to provide ita.ble-- areas for meter placement fI r iqdividually meterin re . ence. Additionally due to t pI\operty line ut for the to~I!hQ._ } W to~~on..~(City an ar . The Utilities Dept. Staff is ~ t;; requiring that each townhouse block (of three of four units) have a master meter, which will become the point of service for the department. Each townhouse will then be sub- metered. The water meters have been relocated to the green areas.. 23. Provide water meter supply characteristics to the four-story condominium building located adjacent to the Lake Worth Maron. A chart illustration the water meter supply characteristics has been added accordingly. Please see the chart provided on the revised civil plans for the number of meters, meter sizes, anticipated demand, and totals for this project. 24. Utili construction details will not be reviewed for construction WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. tN \, ilJ ~-,.....C.',' -'. e- . '-- - c. " ~ V& c. \. e; ~~~ ,,' ' i 0:;. . CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE \REJECT acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in \ accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering 11\ Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit A~ application. Comment noted. The appropriate details will be included in the plans when applyingfor the construction permit. At this time, the detail sheets have been removedfrom the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. FIRE Comments: 25. All buildings require an NFPH 13R (townhouses) and an NFPH 13 ( condominium). Noted 26. All entry gates require a Knox override system. Noted. See site plan sheet A-1.0 27. All entry gates and streets shall be 12' wide if one way and 20' wide if two-way traffic. Noted. 28. Provide a turn around for Fire Department engines at the Club House. A Fire Hose box will be provided from the Condominium Building to the Club House and access to fire hydrant on Lake Drive is granted through an exit door from the walkway running to the club house. See Site Data sheet for walkway layout, sheet A -1.3 28. Hydrant locations: no part of any building can be more than 200' from a hydrant. Noted. All hydrants comply with required distances. See civil plans. 29. Flow test required is 1500 GPM @ 20 PSI. Noted. 30. All hydrants must be activated up to the point of any vertical construction. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Noted 31. Stabilize all roads to 32 tons, even during construction. Noted. 32. Engines shall have easy access to all areas. Noted. POLICE Comments: 33. All lighting shall be metal halide following IESNA Lighting standards. So noted. A note has been included on the Photometric Plan. See sheet A-I.2 34. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). Placement of lighting poles has been done taking into account the location of landscape of landscape items. See landscape drawings. See sheets A-I.O and A-I.2. The landscaping will not be a conflict for the lighting plans. 35. Timer clock or photocell lighting for nighttime use shall be above or near entryways. So noted. Note on Photometric Plan. 36. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. lt is suggested that interactive or lighting on demand be used in sensitive areas. So noted. Pedestrian walkways are notedfor lighting with photocells. Note on Photometric Plan. Sheet A-I.2. 29. Numerical address: a Shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility( dusk to dawn). WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 9 DEPARTMENTS b Shall not be obstructed. c Shall also be placed on the rear ofthe building if buildings are adjoined by a common area. Comment noted. 30. Residential Security: d The door leading into a residential unit should be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock (including garage door). e When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side of the door handle and lock making them unreachable. f If front door has zero visibility to front entryway are, it should be equipped with a 180-degree peephole. g Entry door should open outward versus inward. h All exterior doors should be equipped with security hinges. Anti lifting auxiliary locks should be installed on sliding doors and windows. J Should be pre-wired for alarm system. Items under "Numerical Address" and "Residential Security" are noted in sheet A-i.O and A-i.2. 31. There should be strategically placed directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver sight level. The directories should be placed at the ingress points. So noted. Directories have been placed at or near entry gates in architectural Site Plan. See sheet A-i.O. 32. If benches in a park area are intended for nighttime use, adequate lighting should be provided for the area in which they are located. They should also be in open view to eliminate concealment areas. Photometric study is provided so no areas are left "concealed" or without proper lighting. See Sheet A-i.2. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 33. Stairways and balconies should provide open views. Stairways in condo building are fire-rated, therefore they are not open stairwells. They have windows to the exterior, which provide sufficient views of the surrounding areas. Balconies and terraces offer wide open views of the complex and its surroundings, allowing for an efficient register of site activities at all times. 34. Building architecture should allow for enhanced natural surveillance of all parking lots and provide a sense of security. Every step has been taken to ensure a proper interaction of uses and a safe environment for end users. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 35. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. So noted. It is understood that there will be additional comments which will be addressed on time. 36. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. Heights and areas are in compliance with construction types and uses and do not exceed height limits imposed by the Florida Building Code. Refer to project information table on sheet A-O.l 37. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. So noted. See added table sheetsA-3. 0 through A-3.3 and A5.l. 38. General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 11 DEPARTMENTS 2004 FBC, Section 506. Provide calculations verifying compliance with the above code sections and the 2004 FBC, Table 503. INCLUDE REJECT See sheet A-O.I Calculations applying the equation shown in Section 506 were performed. Data reflects the results. 39. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. All structural calculations and provisions are taken to comply with current code standards and are reflected on sheet A-I.O. 40. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. The three-story town homes and the condo building are to be sprinklered to comply with the code requirements. See sheet A-O.I project information table of construction "Type 3B" sprinklered. 41. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. A note has been added to the site plan indicating limits of construction, which are the same as the property line. See sheet A-I.a. 42. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction All project related documentation will be submitted in accordance to current and city requirements. 43. A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units covered under the FFHA shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page l2 DEPARTMENTS All accessible parking is in compliance with the prescribed percentages and is conveniently located throughout the site. INCLUDE REJECT 44. Compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA, Design and Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, is required. Noted. Design is in compliance with the FFHA, Design and Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. See sheet A-1.0. 45. At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the future installation of grab bars as required by the FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within the covered dwelling unit shall comply. Noted. The FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirements #6 will be included in permit drawings. 46. Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which design specification ("A" or "B") of the FFHA is being used. The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be clearly shown on the plans. 47. Noted. The FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205 is been used and us noted on plans. Construction documents will comply with design requirements. See adds clear floor space on all unit plans. See condo unit plan for bathroom designations. 48. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the Code is 36 inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS designed In compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2004 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 13 DEPARTMENTS grade elevations along the path of travel. INCLUDE REJECT Comment noted. See Sheet A-l.O. 49. If an accessible route has less than 60 inches clear width, then passing spaces at least 60 inches by 60 inches shall be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet. A "T" -intersection of two corridors or walks is an acceptable passing place. 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.3.4. Noted. All sidewalks and corridors are at least 60" wide. See sidewalk dimensions in sheet A-l.O and civil drawings. 50. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGYD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). The requested information has been added to the plans. Please see the revised plans. 51. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Noted. Property line shows identification notes on every section. See Sheet A-l.O. 52. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. Setback dimension lines have been added to the Site Plan, as well as In WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 14 DEPARTMENTS between buildings. 53. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story clubhouse, provide the following: A Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? Yes B Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the clubhouse? C Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? D Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse building. In response to the above questions: A - Yes B-No C-No D-No A draft of the letter to the County Impact Fee Coordinator is enclosed. 54. CBBCPP 3.C.3A requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Irrigation water source will be a tap into the city water supply of potable water. This is due to the other water sources would not be in the best interest to the landscape material. (i.e. Brackish water and lack of reuse water from surface water) 55. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. We will proceed with city water as our source and no permit will be obtained for using well water or water from other sources. 56. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of buildin ermit WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 15 DEPARTMENTS application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. C The number of dwelling units in each building. D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. E The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) So noted. 57. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. So noted. 58. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: A A legal description of the land. B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. D The number of dwelling units in each building. E The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) So noted. 59. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Yes, plans submitted for the permit will incorporate all conditions of approval. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 16 DEPARTMENTS 60. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. Yes, the full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. 61. The condo building structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7) and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 through 109.3.6.6. The following information must be submitted at the time of permit application: A The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a threshold building. B All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be submitted. C All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633. So noted. The project will comply with the requirements of F.s. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 throuf{h 109.3.6.6. 62. Sheet A-O.l references Table 500 in the Project Information legend. There is no such table in the 2004 FBC. Insert the correct table. So noted. Table in sheet A-0.1 has been corrected to read and comply with Table 503. 63. Sheet A-O.l indicates the parking garage as Type V sprinklered. Parking garages are not permitted to be of Type V construction. Comply with Table 406.3.5 of the 2004 FBC. Town houses are listed as type 5A, the condominium is listed as type 2B and the garage is listed as type S2. 64. Sheet A-O.l Project Information legend indicates the building construction types as V(B) and Sheet Al.O notes Type VI. Clarify. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES' ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 17 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT So noted. See sheet A-O.l project information. 65. Sheet A2.4 shows the stairs labeled as an elevator and the elevator is labeled as stairs. Correct the labeling. So noted. Sheet A-2.4 has been corrected. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: Previously Addressed FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 66. The Existine Trees and Landscape Plan Show on Sheet LP-7 Landscape Architect should review the existing trees on the site and indicate the trees to be preserved in place, relocated on site and removed / replaced in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. This information should be shown on the landscape plan by a separate symbol for each existing tree. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Any trees found on site to be in a condition that is favorable will be relocated to the area left open to the south of the club house. Plant Schedule Sheet LP-7 67. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12' -14' height, 3" DBH [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.] All shade and palm trees will be listed to meet this spec. 68. All shrubs and groundcover plants should have a height and spread dimension. All shrubs and ground covers have a height and spread dimension. 69. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 18 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT time of planting to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings and parking lot from the Federal Highway and Dimick Road rights-of-ways. Both requested elevations have been provided. Irrie:ation Plan 70. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. The irrigation will address recommended conservation needs. 71. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] The irrigation plans shall address bubblers for each tree. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 72. Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06- 018) and height exception (HTEX 06-007). So noted. It is understood that approval of this project is contingent with the above mentioned amendment and exception. 73. Revise II.4.j. on application to match area stated in 11.3. Provide additional calculations for vehicular use areas, open space, etc. under other (II.h. and L). In addition, 4.a.-i. should add up to 100% (j.) and it adds up to only 38.2%. Please see revised application. 74. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. On-site art is proposed..... the art form had been submitted with the original application and a copy is enclosed 75. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover sheet (A-O.l), Survey, Master Plan/Site Plan (A1.0), Townhouse Elevations (A-3.0 WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23,2006 Page 19 DEPARTMENTS thruA-3.l), Townhouse Floor and Roof Plans (A-2.0 thru A-2.3), Townhouse Unit Floor Plans (A-4.0 thru A-4.3), Condo Elevations (A-3.2 thru A-3.3), Condo Floor Plans (A-2.4 thru A-2.6), Condo Roof Plan (A-2.7), Condo Unit Floor Plans (A-4A thru A-4.10), Clubhouse Elevations (A-5.l), Clubhouse Floor Plan and Elevations (A-5.0), Site Details (A-I. 1), Photometric Plan (A-1.2), Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans (LP-I thru LP-8), and Civils (PL 1-16). INCLUDE REJECT Cover Pa~e has been modified. 76. Revise site data on sheet A-O.I (cover sheet) and A1.0 (site plan) as follows: Usable open space 200 square feet per unit required (provide total OS required and total OS provided on site). See revised site data, sheet A-O.I and sheet A-I.O. 77. Per master plan requirements, indicate pedestrian circulation which should be planned to prevent pedestrian use of vehicular ways and parking spaces. Note on plans the sidewalks interior to the development, continuous perimeter sidewalks, and widths of sidewalks. PEDESTRIAN PLAN - See Sheet A-I.3 78. Add bearings and distances (which match survey) to perimeter property lines on site plan. So noted. See sheet A-I.O. 79. The existing 10 foot sewer easement where the condo building is planned will be required to be abandoned and relocated prior to approval of the application requests. Acknowledged An abandonment application will be filed by June th. 80. Will townhomes be sold as fee simple? If so, indicate all townhouse lot lines on plans. Yes, lot lines are shown. See sheet A-I.3. 81. Clarify if streets interior to the project are public rights-of-way or private streets to be maintained by the homeowners and condo associations. Streets, regardless if public or private, are required to be 40 feet in PUD's Internal streets are private and maintained by the Homeowners Association. See response to item #8 WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23,2006 Page 20 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 82. The width of interior streets is minimal and includes only 2 lanes of 11-feet each for a total right-of-way width of 22 feet (no sidewalks indicated). Per the IPUD zoning district regulations, privately-owned streets providing secondary vehicular circulation internal to the IPUD may be considered for approval with right-of-way and pavement widths less than the minimum PUD requirement of 40 feet, however in no case shall health, safety, and / or welfare be jeopardized. However, these roads are primary circulation roadways for use by residents and service providers alike. Solid waste pickup would be roll-out curbside service for each unit, rather than a centralized trash dumpster, therefore large garbage trucks will be required to maneuver and circulate throughout the proposed development. See response to items #3 and #8. A sufficient amount of sidewalks have been designed on the site to provide for pedestrian traffic so that the use of the ally ways for pedestrian traffic is not needed. The size of the proposed roadways in the allies is 22' and has been analyzed for movements of vehicular traffic (fire, garbage, and entrance/exit from town homes). Additionally, the minimum distance between the Buildings across the ally way has been revised to at least 36 '. Please see revised site plan. 83. Due to the minimal street width, there is limited area for utilities within those streets. There are required distances that underground utilities must be separated from other utilities and from structures. In addition, the reduced internal street width poses a potential sight distance hazard. All proposed buildings are oriented toward the interior of the site, and residents would access their garages from the private streets internal to the development. Due to the limited street width (currently shown as 22 feet), sight distance may be compromised, leading to a safety issue for residents backing out of the garages. Comment noted. We do not believe backing out of the garages creates a safety issue. It is similar to and less hazardous than cars backing out of parking spaces in a typical parking lot with a view that is obscured by other vehicles (Vans, Pick-up Trucks, SUVs, etc.). The only differences are that the proposed garages are set back from the drive isle in these plans, and the parking spaces in a typical parking lot are not set back from the drive isle. Additionally, the distance between the Buildings has been revised to be at least 36" in the ally ways. 84. Relocate parking space designated for handicapped so it is not next to dumpster. This HlC space (and all other HlC spaces for condo residents) should be located in the condo parking garage close to an elevator. WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 21 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Condo building is provided with 2 handicapped parking spaces, one onside the garage and one in the parking are adjacent to the building. Current location for exterior parking space is due to proximity to the pedestrian wid. 85. The parking garage only provides 62 spaces plus I H/C space. 40 du x 2 = 80 spaces required. These 80 spaces should be located in the parking garage, or immediately outside of it, not throughout the townhome development. A total of 5 spaces is required at the recreation area, but no parking is provided there. There appear to be no spaces for guests to park (no driveways). Number of parking units has been increased near the condo building. See sheet A-J.O. 86. Townhouse buildings 8, 9, and II which front on Dimick Road are directly across the street from a single-family residential neighborhood. To minimize impacts of 3 story TH buildings on these SF properties, similar building setbacks should be mirrored (20 to 25 feet minimum from south property line). The IPUD zoning district perimeter setbacks shall mirror setbacks of adjacent zoning district(s) but with a minimum of the setback required for a single-family residence as determined by the orientation of the structures in the IPUD (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.3.). The properties to the south and east have been developed with single-family detached homes and the IPUD regulations specifically addresses compatibility requirements with these types of developments. The site plan proposes a 12 foot front setback from Dimick Road and a 9 foot setback from Lake Drive. This is unacceptable, given the proposed building heights / massing and proximity to the adjacent single-family homes. Staff recommends increasing the setbacks for compatibility. From a design and planning point of view, minimal setbacks along the perimeter of Dimick Road and Lake Drive allow the residents the ability to engage and utilize the street. This not only gives residents the options of on-street parking but, is also contributes an important element to a walkable community. In addition, the surrounding residential neighborhoods are very likely to be redeveloped in the near future to mirror the subject in density. 87. It is a basic public expectation that landowners requesting the use of the IPUD district will develop design standards that exceed the standards of the basic development standards in terms of site design, building architecture, and construction materials, amenities and landscape design (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.1.b.). The city is not obligated to automatically approve the level of development intensity requested for the IPUD. Instead, it is expected to approve only such WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 22 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT level of intensity that is appropriate for a particular location in terms of land use compatibilities (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.l.c.). The proposed project contains no provision for guest parking. There is no recreation area parking that often times provides for guest or overflow parking. In addition, no tandem parking (driveway parking) has been provided for these large-size dwelling units that may very well possess two (2), three (3), four (4) car households, not to mention storage within the garage that can compromise necessary parking spaces. Therefore, staff recommends providing surplus parking and the creation of a pedestrian walkway system, including a connection to the public walkway (Chapter 2, Section 5.LA.c.). We have provided for more parking spaces. A majority of the townhouse and condominium units are two-bedroom units - there are no four-bedroom units. There are two parking spaces per unit provided. The Applicant desires to offer a marketable residential community - one consideration of such is adequate parking for residents and guests. The Applicant feels that the number of parking spaces is sufficient to meet the needs of the residents and their guests. 88. Include bike racks near the swimming pool area. Staff recommends that they be covered or sheltered. So noted, Bike racks have been added on the south side of the Club House. 89. IdentifY / label on plan where all the required usable open space is located and the boundaries and sf provided for each location. See sheet A-i. 0 to locate open space areas and review chart for areas. 90. Staff recommends sodding and irrigating those areas between existing/proposed pavement on both Dimick Road and Lake Drive and your property line. The landscaping area outside of the property along Dimick Road and Lake Drive will be landscaped with only sod and new irrigation will be setup. 91. Clearly indicate locations of perimeter wall / fence. lt appears to be located only along the west and south property lines. See Sheet A -i. 0 for locations and line types chart. 92. Revise Photometric Plan (A-I.2) to indicate at a larger scale so it is more legible. So noted. 93. No photometrics have been provided for pool and clubhouse area, or WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH ~ · Kathleen Zeitler May 23, 2006 Page 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT along paths on either side of condominium building, or in the parking garage So noted. Adequate lighting is proposed for all these areas and they are to be e ui ed with ro er lxtures. 94. Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. Yes, we will have a ower- oint resentation. We look forward to discussing the proposed project at the May 30th TART meeting. Sincerely, RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. Kim Glas-Castro, AICP WPB:244393:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 3 Additionally, TART comments have been addressed with revised plans, clarifying details and supporting documentation. More specifically, the City's comments have been addressed as outlined below: 1st REVIEW COMMENTS ~~ New Site Plan,J;;;Z.~a, Project name: Casa del Lago File number: NWSP 06-015 Reference: 1st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an April 5, 2006 Planning & Zoning date stamQ marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561- 742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a),. /<- We met with Larry Quinn from the Public Works Department. He reviewed and approved the waste management plan for Casa del Lago. 2. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 feet to approach dumpsters. Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 feet. (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.2.b.) )< Turning radiuses and clearance distances have been met. See Site Plan sheet A-l.O. 3. Provide a minimum outside turning radius of 55 feet to allow turning movements for Solid Waste (and Fire/Rescue) inside the proposed community. Using AutoTurn (or similar), show on the plans that the required turning movements are provided. Particular attention should be X given to the entryways/gates, and the associated callboxes, etc., allow ingress and egress for Solid Waste and Fire/Rescue. Turning radiuses and clearance distances have been met. See Site Plan sheet A-l.O. H _ ------- -- -------- - - 4. There appears to be a potential vertical conflict between the proposed dumpster enclosure and the porte cochere at the four (4) story condominium building. Relocate the dumpster enclosure to resolve the conflict. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH . Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 4 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 171e condominium building does not have a Porte Cochere. Instead, it is a covered ent,y that does not project over the driveway. Consequently, there is no "vertical conflict" between the dumpster and the covered entry, rendering dumpster relocation unnecessary. '\./ /,/ 5. There is a potential vertical conflict between a Live Oak and the proposed dumpster enclosure (southeast corner of enclosure.) Please resolve this conflict by moving the Live Oak or using a non-canopy tree. )< Live Oak will be replaced by a Royal Palm. See Landscape plan. The Live Oak tree was replaced with a Royal Palm and place back further away from the dumpsters front edge. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 6. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. Per our initial discussions with Mr. Ateft of the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division, this site lies within the Palm Beach County Residential Coastal Exclusion Area, and as such, a notice of concurrency is not required. We are currently working on the required driveway analysis. )( 7. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. x Comment noted and civil plans revised per comment. Please see revised civil plans. 8. The minimum right-of-way width for a PUD is 40-ft. (LDR, Chapter 2.5, Section 9.F.) Please provide appropriate right-of-way widths for all internal roadways and/or make a written request for reduced width, X including justification for the request. Justification for any proposed reduction in right-of-way width shall address the adequacy of the right- of-way to handle solid waste storage and truck movement, utility WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH .. . Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 5 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT maintenance, and an evaluation of sight distance for backing out of garages. The evaluation of sight distance for backing shall include an opinion, from the Engineer-of-Record regarding the relative safety of this movement within the reduced right-of-way. The turning radii has been evaluated through out the site for both emergency vehicles and garbage pickup. In addition, we have verified the turning movements into the garages along the allies. In all cases, roadway width and radii prove to be sufficient. Please see revised site plan for illustration of turning movements. We are currently analyzing the proposed configuration and requirements at the entrance off of Federal Highway. 9.' The developer has proposed gating this community, providing only 95- feet from Federal Hwy. to the gate. The minimum standard for stacking per County standards is l50-feet. Please revise plans to provide this minimum stacking distance. The minimum stacking distance issue has been resolved by modifying the main entrance layout to have a 22 ft. wide two-lane entrance and an 11 ft. wide one-lane exit. Thus, allowing for a total of 190 ft. stacking distanc from the edge of Federal Highway (the single lane strength is currently 95 ft. There is also a supplementary stacking distance created at the seconda entrance on Dimmick Road of 33 ft. in length. See sheet A-1.0. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 10. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." \/, ,.....;, I '? Parking spaces in front of the main entrance have been eliminated or relocated. See sheet A-1.0. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH ~ "Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Note added to civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 11. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. )C Xhes~ t.,1u parking ~pac;I::') hu VI:: bu" e:imiflwed S-ee~'Jt::t=tT.- Comment noted. Please see revised civil plans. 12. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional X comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit reVIew. Comment noted. 13. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review )(] to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. Comment noted. 14. The City already has a proposed subdivision in review at the present with a similar name (Vista Lago.) Please rename this subdivision. The name is not that similar - the Applicant desires to maintain the Casa del Lago name. ~ 15. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. Written and graphic scales are provided on all civil plan sheets. Please see revised civil plan sheets. )<; 16. The scale for the Site, Civil and Landscape plans shall be provided at the same scale for each (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 7.) The Civil and Landscape plans may be provided as a "master" plan with subsequent sheets drawn at a scale that provides the needed level of detail. XI Graphic scales included in all plans. The landscape plans were updated to include a master plan sheet at the WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 7 INCLUDE REJECT DEPARTMENTS same scale of the site and civil plans. A key sheet has been added to the civil plans to match the site plan scale. Please see civil key sheet. 17. Show proposed site lighting on the Site, Civil and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.BA.) The lighting plan will be shown on Site, Civil, and Landscape plans. Site lighting has been added to the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 18. Site lighting has been provided in excess (number of lights and intensity) of what is strictly required by Code. The City's standards are primarily set up for parking lots, not residential developments. Site lighting does need to be provided for the various parking spaces for guests, etc., however simple coach lights should be sufficient for lighting along the roadways. Staff recommends that the lighting design be re-evaluated with these factors in mind. Comment noted. 19. lt may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.l.b.) The necessary adjustments will be done. All landscape material will be placed at a safe distance away from the light poles so not to create shadowing of the parking surface. 20. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Federal Highway. Internal roadway intersections shall be no less than 15 feet. Safe sight triangles have been added to the landscape plans based on FDOT index 546. 21. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5 feet and 8 feet. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. )( )( I - )< y x CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH . Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 8 DEP ARTMENTS A note exists on the landscape details sheet under plant schedule. INCLUDE REJECT 22. Please check spelling and grammar on the Landscape Notes on Sheet LP-7. All spelling and grammar was checked on LP-7. 23. The medians on Federal Highway have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and )< coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets (including any plans sheets involving underground work) with the above stated information. The appropriate note was added to the landscape plans in reference to the irrigation design. 24. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. The appropriate note has been added to the revised civil plans to serve as the engineers certification as required by the City of Boynton Beach LDR. 25. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). Appropriate note has been added to civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 26. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. All storm pipe have been labeled on the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans~ .. ... .. . \f> 27. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of )( permitting WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. >t x- x ~ CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE' MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH . Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 9 DEP ARTMENTS Comment noted. 28. An existing 15-ft. drainage easement is shown running east to west through the middle of the project. No structures or surfacing shall be placed within drainage easements. Will that easement continued to be used for that purpose or is abandonment being considered? If the easement is to be retained the gazebos and sidewalk need to be removed and/or relocated. The site plan now shows notes indicating the gazebos are removable structures referred to the details and the sidewalks use removable pavers. See sheet A-1.0 29. The Site Data table on Sheet Al.O incorrectly states the number of townhouses as 11. There are 42 townhouses and 11 townhouse buildingslblocks. Also the number of condominium units appears to be incorrect. There are 10 units per floor. Only the top three floors of the condo building are habitable, the ground (or 1 st floor) is understory parking. Therefore the correct number of condominium units should be 30, not the 40 stated in the table. Further, the number of parking spaces for the townhouses would then be 84, not 82 (based on 2 parking spaces per townhouse unit) and the number of parking spaces for the condominiums would be 60, not the 80 stated (also based on 2 parking spaces per unit.) The number of town homes has been corrected. The condo building has four stories with 10-Dwelling Units each, for a total of 40, thus requiring 80 parking spaces. This is reflected in the Site Data chart. See sheet A -1.0 30. Monitoring wells are shown at various locations throughout the site, a number of which will be covered over by paving, sidewalk or buildings. Please indicate their purpose and what their disposition will be. Water Spigots were incorrectly labeled on the civil plans as monitoring wells. The spigots are to be removed from the site. Please see revised civil plans. 31. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted. The appropriate details will be included in the plans when WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT ~ 'Y-. / >< \/ / , , x CARACAS. fT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH . Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT applying for the construction permit. At this time, the detail sheets have been removedfrom the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. UTILITIES Comments: 32. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. x City Commission approval: July 5 Permit Application: 9 Months - March 2006 Commencement of Construction: July 2006 Project Completion: January 2008 33. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. "y All easements are now shown on Site (sheet A-I.O), civil and landscape plans. All easements have been added to the landscape plans. Palms are the only large plant material in the easements. All oj the common areas on the site shall be used for roadway, ingress/egress, drainage and utilities. As such, the City shall have the right to maintain it's utilities located within the common areas. This use shall be dedicated to the City via plat recordation. 34. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). )C WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH 4 . Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 11 DEP ARTMENTS Comment noted. 35. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Comment noted. 36. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. Plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 37. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Please provide the number and size(s) for all proposed meters at the TART meeting so the reservation fee may be calculated. The meter number and sizes have been added to the civil plans. Please see revised civil plans. 38. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). All of the common areas on the site shall be used for roadway, ingress/egress, drainage and utilities. As such, the City shall have the right to maintain it's utilities located within the common areas. This use shall be dedicated to the City via plat recordation. 39. This office will not require securety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. INCLUDE REJECT y )( / )C "X 'Xl / CARACAS' FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH "Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment noted. 40. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. )< Comment noted. ."""'- '41.') PVC material is generally not permitted on the City's water system. ~ However, since this project is located east of Federal Highway, we ,,!llay consider the use of PVC C900 pipe for water mains if it is shown-mat'. corrosivity will be a problem. This determination will be made during X the detailed utility construction plan review. Comment noted. Civil plans have been revised to specify PVC C900. Please see revised civil plans. 42. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. x Comment noted. 43. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. x Comment noted and civil plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 44. Three story buildings and higher are required to be sprinklered per the Florida Building Code. Comment noted. Town homes and condo building are to be sprinklered. v 1\.. 45. Per City Standard W-9 fire hydrants are installed on 6-in. laterals; change all 8-in. x 8-in. tees to reflect 8-in. x 6-in. tees. \( Civil plans have been revised accordingly. Please see revised civil plans. 46. Per City Standard W-14A, Note 6, meters shall not be placed in sidewalks or driveways. The townhouses as shown on the drawings do ~ not appear to provide suitable areas for meter placement for individually WPB:244393:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH . Kathleen Zeitler May 22, 2006 Page 13 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT metering each residence. Additionally due to the property line layout for the townhouses the meter would not be able to be set on private property (City Standard W -10.) The Utilities Dept. Staff is therefore requiring that each townhouse block (of three of four units) have a master meter, which will become the point of service for the department. Each townhouse will then be sub-metered. So noted. Respectfully we request that the proposed location of the water meters be allowed. This layout leaves the islands open Jar landscaping which serves to soften the appearance of the allies. Additionally, we propose to place the meters in traffic rated boxes with traffic rated lids. ",,"""-, (47) Provide water meter supply characteristics to the four-story '1::::-/ condominium building located adjacent to the Lake Worth Lagoon. ..""" A chart illustration the water meter supply characteristics has been added r< accordingly. Please see the chart provided on the revised civil plans for the number of meters, meter sizes, anticipated demand, and totals for this project. 48. Clarify sanitary sewer main material call-out to reflect pressure-rated pipe (C900.) )q Comment noted and plans revised accordingly. 49. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. 'X Comment noted. Please see civil key sheet. 50. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. x Letters of commitment shall be obtained. We do not anticipate any problems in this regard. 51. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering WPB:244393:1 '/. I RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities Matthew Immler, Police Chief Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Wally Majors, Parks Director Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst John Huntington, Police Officer From: Ed Breese, Principal Planner ~ Date: 04-14-06 Re: Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services Project: Casa del Lago MEMORANDUM As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development. Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6260. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Casa del L.ago\Impact Analysis.doc ~ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-051 TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: May 5,2006 RE: Review Comments New Site Plan - 1 st Review Casa del Lago File No. NWSP 06-015 The above referenced Site Plans, received on April 17, 2006, was reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LOR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a),. 2. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach dumpsters. Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad.) (LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.2.b.) 3. Provide a minimum outside turning radius of 55 ft. to allow turning movements for Solid Waste (and Fire/Rescue) inside the proposed community. Using AutoTurn (or similar), show on the plans that the required turning movements are provided. Particular attention should be given to the entryways/gates, and the associated callboxes, etc., allow ingress and egress for Solid Waste and Fire/Rescue. 4. There appears to be a potential vertical conflict between the proposed dumpster enclosure and the porte cochere at the 4-story condominium building. Relocate the dumpster enclosure to resolve the conflict. 5. There is a potential vertical conflict between a Live Oak and the proposed dumpster enclosure (southeast corner of enclosure.) Please resolve this conflict by moving the Live Oak or using a non- canopy tree. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 6. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 7. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-051 RE: Casa del Lago, New Site Plan - 1st Review, NWSP 06-015 May 5,2006 Page 2 8. The minimum right-of-way width for a PUD is 40-ft. (LOR, Chapter 2.5, Section 9.F.) Please provide appropriate right-of-way widths for all internal roadways and/or make a written request for reduced width, including justification for the request. Justification for any proposed reduction in right-of-way width shall address the adequacy of the right-of-way to handle solid waste storage and truck movement, utility maintenance, and an evaluation of sight distance for backing out of garages. The evaluation of sight distance for backing shall include an opinion, from the Engineer-of-Record regarding the relative safety of this movement within the reduced right-of-way. 9. The developer has proposed gating this community, providing only 95-ft. from Federal Hwy. to the gate. The minimum standard for stacking per County standards is 150-ft. Please revise plans to provide this minimum stacking distance. 10. Engineering Design Handbook Standard K-8 does not permit parking across from a major driveway or ingress/egress point. Eliminate or relocate the designated parking spaces across from the primary driveway off Federal Hwy. 11. Pull the two parking spaces in the southwest corner of the property north approximately 20-ft. to line up with the back of curb. ENGINEERING 12. Add a note to the Site Plan stating "All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request." 13. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 14. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 15. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 16. The City already has a proposed subdivision in review at the present with a similar name (Vista Lago.) Please rename this subdivision. 17. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. 18. The scale for the Site, Civil and Landscape plans shall be provided at the same scale for each (LOR, Chapter 2, Section 7.) The Civil and Landscape plans may be provided as a "master" plan with subsequent sheets drawn at a scale that provides the needed level of detail. 19. Show proposed site lighting on the Site, Civil and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-051 RE: Casa del Lago, New Site Plan -1st Review, NWSP 06-015 May 5, 2006 Page 3 20. Site lighting has been provided in excess (number of lights and intensity) of what is strictly required by Code. The City's standards are primarily set up for parking lots, not residential developments. Site lighting does need to be provided for the various parking spaces for guests, etc., however simple coach lights should be sufficient for lighting along the roadways. Staff recommends that the lighting design be re-evaluated with these factors in mind. 21. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b.) 22. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Reference FOOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Federal Highway. Internal roadway intersections shall be no less than 15-ft. 23. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 24. Please check spelling and grammar on the Landscape Notes on Sheet LP-7. 25. The medians on Federal Highway have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets (including any plans sheets involving underground work) with the above stated information. 26. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 27. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). 28. Indicate material specifications for storm sewer. 29. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 30. An existing 15-ft. drainage easement is shown running east to west through the middle of the project. No structures or surfacing shall be placed within drainage easements. Will that easement continued to be used for that purpose or is abandonment being considered? If the easement is to be retained the gazebos and sidewalk need to be removed and/or relocated. 31. The Site Data table on Sheet A 1.0 incorrectly states the number of townhouses as 11. There are 42 townhouses and 11 townhouse buildings/blocks. Also the number of condominium units appears to be incorrect. There are 10 units per floor. Only the top three floors of the condo building are habitable, the ground (or 1st floor) is understory parking. Therefore the correct number of condominium units should be 30, not the 40 stated in the table. Further, the number of parking spaces for the townhouses would then be 84, not 82 (based on 2 parking spaces per townhouse unit) Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-051 RE: Casa del Lago, New Site Plan -1st Review, NWSP 06-015 May 5,2006 Page 4 and the number of parking spaces for the condominiums would be 60, not the 80 stated (also based on 2 parking spaces per unit.) 32. Monitoring wells are shown at various locations throughout the site, a number of which will be covered over by paving, sidewalk or buildings. Please indicate their purpose and what their disposition will be. 33. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES 34. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 35. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 36. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 37. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 38. The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 39. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Please provide the number and size(s) for all proposed meters at the TART meeting so the reservation fee may be calculated. 40. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-051 RE: Casa del Lago, New Site Plan - 1st Review, NWSP 06-015 May 5, 2006 Page 5 41. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 42. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 43. PVC material is generally not permitted on the City's water system. However, since this project is located east of Federal Highway, we may consider the use of PVC C900 pipe for water mains if it is shown that corrosivity will be a problem. This determination will be made during the detailed utility construction plan review. 44. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 45. Provide a minimum of 10-ft. separation between water main, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer lines. Please note that City of Boynton Beach separation standards are more stringent that FDEP standards. 46. Three story buildings and higher are required to be sprinklered per the Florida Building Code. 47. Per City Standard W-9 fire hydrants are installed on 6-in. laterals; change all 8-in. x 8-in. tees to reflect 8-in. x 6-in. tees. 48. Per City Standard W-14A, Note 6, meters shall not be placed in sidewalks or driveways. The townhouses as shown on the drawings do not appear to provide suitable areas for meter placement for individually metering each residence. Additionally due to the property line layout for the townhouses the meter would not be able to be set on private property (City Standard W-10.) The Utilities Dept. Staff is therefore requiring that each townhouse block (of three of four units) have a master meter, which will become the point of service for the department. Each townhouse will then be sub-metered. 49. Provide water meter supply characteristics to the four-story condominium building located adjacent to the Lake Worth Lagoon. 50. Clarify sanitary sewer main material call-out to reflect pressure-rated pipe (C900.) 51. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(0) requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the proposed tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. 52. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 53. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-051 RE: Casa del Lago, New Site Plan - 1st Review, NWSP 06-015 May 5,2006 Page 6 Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.! P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Forestry & Grounds Manager, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File Planning 1 st Review Comments CASA DEL LAGO NWSP 06-015: Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06-018) and height exception (HTEX 06-007). Clarify area of site (II.3. on application) 179,131/43560 = 4.11 acres. This area should correspond with area to be stated on survey. Revise 1I.4.j. on application to match area stated in 11.3. Provide additional calculations for vehicular use areas, open space, etc. under other (II.h. and i.). In addition, 4.a.-i. should add up to 100% (j.) and it adds up to only 38.2%. Acreages on application (II.3 and 5.i.) do not match. Complete application (7.c.) regarding number of bedrooms for each unit proposed. Provide a notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. The traffic impact analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes prior to the issuance of any building permits. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. At the TART meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application requests are publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. A height exception request has been received for the portions of the condo building that exceed the maximum height of 45 feet. Revise page 1 of the height exception letter submitted April 19, 2006 to correct statement that "mansard roof measures 53 '6" at its highest point" (should be re-worded to "53 '6" at mid-point of stair and elevator roof, and midpoint of balcony roof'). The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Plan revisions must be reflected on all appropriate sheets throughout the plan set. Revise order of drawings in plan set as follows: Cover sheet (A-O.l), Survey, Master Plan/Site Plan (A1.0), Townhouse Elevations (A-3.0 thruA-3.1), Townhouse Floor and Roof Plans (A-2.0 thru A-2.3), Townhouse Unit Floor Plans (A-4.0 thru A-4.3), Condo Elevations (A-3.2 thru A-3.3), Condo Floor Plans (A-2.4 thru A-2.6), Condo Roof Plan (A-2.7), Condo Unit Floor Plans (A-4.4 thru A-4.10), Clubhouse Elevations (A-5.l), Clubhouse Floor Plan and Elevations (A-5.0), Site Details (A-l.l), Photometric Plan (A-l.2), Reduced Landscape Plan of Entire Site, Landscape Plans (LP-l thru LP-8), and Civils (PLl-16). Revise project location on location map (A-O.I). It appears that half the property is located south of Dimick Road. Correct fax # under Civil (extra digit) on sheet A-O.I. Provide fax # for Landscape Architect instead of xxx.xxxx on sheet A-O.I. Correct spelling of Lakeview under Lawyer address and revise to Agent/Lawyer on sheet A -0.1. Provide complete Index of Drawings including survey, landscape plans, and civil plans on sheet A-O.I. Correct spelling of roof. under Proj ect Information, Height of Building for townhomes on sheet A -0.1. Revise site data on sheet A-O.I (cover sheet) and AI.O (site plan) as follows: move address of property closer to Address (delete 52 spaces between); add zoning district Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD); delete proposed land use category existing R3; revise from "proposed: Special High Density Residential" to "Future Land Use Designation: Special High Density Residential (SHDR)"; revise "units/acre" to "proposed density 20 units/acre (82 units)" and "maximum density allowed in SHDR 20 units/acre"; revise "total impervious: paving, walks, patios, pool/spa, future pool/patios, roads, etc." to "total impervious: roads, sidewalks, paved areas, pool, etc."; total pervious and impervious add up to 4.12 acres, site area is 4.11 acres; Delete "required setbacks front (west) 40 ft, rear (east) 0 ft, side (south) 20 ft, side (north) 0 ft"; Scaled setbacks are 46-50 ft front (west), rear (east) 0 ft (from property line), side (north) 15 ft, and side (east) 11 ft. Revise proposed setbacks (and building locations on plans) to be more in keeping with the standard setbacks for previously approved IPUD's and setbacks of adjacent property (propose west 10- 20', east 10-20', north 10-20', and south 20-25'); Delete setbacks for private pools (future), screen enclosures, and patios; Correct community pool setbacks to correspond with revised location (if no ownership obtained) or if not relocated, clarify why patio has a rear setback of 0 feet and 5 feet; Correct parking proposed from 11 townhouses to 42 townhouses with 2 spaces provided in each 2 car garage; Correct parking to include an additional 5 spaces forrecreation area per Sec. lI.H.16.e.(12); Clarify trash collection for townhomes to note roll-out curbside service; Clarify open air parking garage to note location under 4 story condo building, and note # of spaces; Usable open space 200 sf per unit required (provide total OS required and total OS provided on site). When the IPUD is to be developed in a single phase, the site plan may also represent the master plan. Since there is not a separate master plan submitted, label site plan as MASTER PLAN / SITE PLAN. Per master plan requirements, indicate pedestrian circulation which should be planned to prevent pedestrian use of vehicular ways and parking spaces. Note on plans the sidewalks interior to the development, continuous perimeter sidewalks, and widths of sidewalks. Add bearings and distances (which match survey) to perimeter property lines on site plan. The existing 10 foot sewer easement where the condo building is planned will be required to be abandoned and relocated prior to approval of the application requests. Several monitoring wells are depicted on the survey. What happens to them in the development of the site? Consider overhead utility placement underground. The existing pumphouse located near the northwest comer of the site will remain (according to civils), but is not indicated on site or landscape plans. Provide an elevation and indicate how it will be screened, or confirm that it will be removed. Two gazebos are located within the existing 15 foot drainage easement and will require Engineering approval. Artwork in front of Building 1 can not be located in the right-of-way of Federal Highway. The portion located in the right-of-way may be grassed, but not landscaped. Provide details on site and landscape plans of proposed materials, width of walkway, etc. for art area. Will townhomes be sold as fee simple? If so, indicate all townhouse lot lines on plans. Dimension and label typical building setbacks and landscape buffer widths along perimeter property lines. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from private property to "buffer tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. The IPUD is required to minimize adverse impacts on surrounding property. The IPUD project must be compatible with and preserve the character of adjacent residential neighborhoods. The ingress/egress proposed on Dimick Road is located too far into the residential neighborhood, and should be relocated as close to the existing commercial outparcel as possible. Although this is considered a secondary ingress/egress, it will be used frequently by those heading south on Federal Highway (no median at Dimick and Federal allows left turns from Dimick Rd, but median in front of main entrance does not allow left turns). Dimension distance from west property line to gated entrance and demonstrate sufficient area for stacking of vehicles on site and out of Federal Hwy. The dimension of the parking stalls, and vehicular back-up areas are subject to the Engineering Division of Public Works' review and approval. Provide typical dimensions for parking space and H/C space in parking garage (floor plan A-2.4), aisle width dimension, and arrows indicating traffic circulation. Provide typical dimension for distance between townhouse buildings. Revise title for drawings A-2.0 thru A-2.3 and A-3.0 thru A-3.I to delete reference to front loaded (garage shown on rear elevation). Clarify if streets interior to the project are public rights-of-way or private streets to be maintained by the homeowners and condo associations. Streets, regardless if public or private, are required to be 40 feet in PUD's. The width of interior streets is minimal and includes only 2 lanes of II-feet each for a total right-of-way width of 22 feet (no sidewalks indicated). Per the IPUD zoning district regulations, privately-owned streets providing secondary vehicular circulation internal to the IPUD may be considered for approval with right-of-way and pavement widths less than the minimum PUD requirement of 40 feet, however in no case shall health, safety, and I or welfare be jeopardized. However, these roads are primary circulation roadways for use by residents and service providers alike. Solid waste pickup would be roll-out curbside service for each unit, rather than a centralized trash dumpster, therefore large garbage trucks will be required to maneuver and circulate throughout the proposed development. Due to the minimal street width, there is limited area for utilities within those streets. There are required distances that underground utilities must be separated from other utilities and from structures. In addition, the reduced internal street width poses a potential sight distance hazard. All proposed buildings are oriented toward the interior of the site, and residents would access their garages from the private streets internal to the development. Due to the limited street width (currently shown as 22 feet), sight distance may be compromised, leading to a safety issue for residents backing out of the garages. Add note to plans that solid waste disposal for townhouses will be curbside garbage pickup in front of each unit, instead of a centralized trash container or dumpster. Revise Area Calculations for residential units on ALO to correct 2nd and 3rd floor sf for all TH buildings Unit A (does not correspond with sf on floor plan A-2.0 and A-2.2); correct total AlC and total covered if unit A sf changed; provide building height of townhomes instead of xx' -xx"; provide note that clarifies that #'s for unit A and unit B sf are totals within buildings (not size of 1 unit); Relocate parking space designated for handicapped so it is not next to dumpster. This H/C space (and all other H/C spaces for condo residents) should be located in the condo parking garage close to an elevator. The parking garage only provides 62 spaces plus 1 HlC space. 40 du x 2 = 80 spaces required. These 80 spaces should be located in the parking garage, or immediately outside of it, not throughout the townhome development. A total of 5 spaces is required at the recreation area, but no parking is provided there. There appear to be no spaces for guests to park (no driveways). Provide a note on plans that the established homeowner's association and condo association will not allow individual pools or additions, and will not allow the patios, porches, or balconies to be modified (i.e. increased in size, enclosed, or screened). Relocate townhouse grouped mailboxes away from entrance and to a more centralized location. Revise entry wall elevation (A-L1) to delete color conflict on aluminum fence (white or black not both, white is preferred) and to reduce wall height from 8 feet to 6 feet per Art. II. Sec. 5.E. Also, submit color schedule for proposed entry wall (Chestertown Buff, Hawthorne Yellow). Revise dumpster details (A-L1) to provide a 6 foot wall (not 8 foot wall) per Ch 9. Sec. 10.C.3. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the building color (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the elevations indicating this requirement. Provide additional architectural treatments (wooden shutters, trellises, faux windows, etc.) to the side elevations visible from Federal Highway, to alleviate large areas of blank wall. To enhance the rear building elevations consider providing white light fixtures on each side of garage doors, rather than one large light centered above doors. To enhance the rear building elevations and provide required foundation landscaping, consider providing pergolas above garage doors and large potted bougainvillea or other climbing and/or flowering vines on each side of garage door. The colored elevations provided indicate various building colors on each building unit which promote a multi-family look for the development. To minimize the multi-family appearance, and to be more compatible with adjacent single-family residences to the south and east, staff recommends the buildings have one main color (with each building having a complementary color, not necessarily the all the same color buildings). Staff recommends the following revisions: TH Buildings L 3,4, 7,8, and 11 Body I (Main): Floors 1-2 Peach Fuzz, floor 3 Venetian Lace Body II (Relief): Peach Fuzz Front doors: Sumptuous Peach (SW 6345) Aluminum Railing: White TH Buildings 2, 5, 6, 9, and 10 Body I (Main): Floors 1-2 Jersey Cream, floor 3 Venetian Lace, Body II (Relief): Jersey Cream Front doors: Cachet Cream (SW 6365) Aluminum Railing: White Condo Building Roof: Florida Blend (to tie in condo with TH buildings) Please submit revised colored elevations accordingly. Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These will be on display at the public meetings. Label elevations North, South, East, and West. Revise Gazebo Elevation (A-I.l) to include proposed color of gazebos (staff recommends a pale sage green called Sea Salt SW 6204 with Extra White trim). Provide paint swatches for the revised elevations. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Provide details on plans which indicate location and type of pavers in streets and driveways, and type of pool deck material. Project compatibility will be judged on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting properties. For this purpose, elevations and cross-sections showing adjacent structures shall be included with the site plan application. Submit project elevations which include properties to south and east so staff can determine compatibility, setbacks, building height (Chapter 2, Section, 5 .LA.g.( I). Provide a cross-section that illustrates the relationship between the buildings within the subject project and the single-family homes to the south and east. The cross-section should show the following: height of the proposed buildings, the setback of the proposed townhouse and condo buildings from the south and east property lines, the general height of the existing single-family homes, the maximum allowable height of a single-family home in the R-l-AA zoning district, and the setback of said homes to the subject property. In the past, the CRA Board has been very diligent in requesting that developers provide a drawing that shows what the project would look like when viewing the subject property from public rights-of-way. Therefore, staff recommends providing a supplemental drawing that shows the west elevations (along Federal Highway) and south least elevations (along Dimick Road and Lake Drive) that depicts the buildings with the plant material at time of planting. Townhouse buildings 8, 9, and 11 which front on Dimick Road are directly across the street from a single-family residential neighborhood. To minimize impacts of 3 story TH buildings on these SF properties, similar building setbacks should be mirrored (20 to 25 feet minimum from south property line). The IPUD zoning district perimeter setbacks shall mirror setbacks of adjacent zoning district(s) but with a minimum of the setback required for a single-family residence as determined by the orientation of the structures in the IPUD (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.3.). The properties to the south and east have been developed with single-family detached homes and the IPUD regulations specifically addresses compatibility requirements with these types of developments. The site plan proposes a 12 foot front setback from Dimick Road and a 9 foot setback from Lake Drive. This is unacceptable, given the proposed building heights / massing and proximity to the adjacent single-family homes. Staff recommends increasing the setbacks for compatibility. Demonstrate how the design submitted provides pedestrian walks/access gates to the individual units which provide more opportunity for residents in the buildings along Federal Highway and Dimick Road to engage the street as denoted in the CRA design guidelines. It is a basic public expectation that landowners requesting the use of the IPUD district will develop design standards that exceed the standards of the basic development standards in terms of site design, building architecture, and construction materials, amenities and landscape design (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.I.b.). The city is not obligated to automatically approve the level of development intensity requested for the IPUD. Instead, it is expected to approve only such level of intensity that is appropriate for a particular location in terms ofland use compatibilities (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.I.c.). The proposed project contains no provision for guest parking. There is no recreation area parking that often times provides for guest or overflow parking. In addition, no tandem parking (driveway parking) has been provided for these large- size dwelling units that may very well possess two (2), three (3), four (4) car households, not to mention storage within the garage that can compromise necessary parking spaces. Therefore, staff recommends providing surplus parking and the creation of a pedestrian walkway system, including a connection to the public walkway (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.c.). The proposed recreation area is not centrally located and appears to be very small for the use of 82 units (approximately 188 residents plus their guests). If a fence is required around the pool/clubhouse area, provide a detail of the fence including the dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Staff recommends matching white rail fence used elsewhere on site. Removal of the existing seawall along the eastern property line adjacent to the ICWW will require permits from additional agencies such as the Army Corp of Engineers and Dept. of Environmental Protection. Are there any existing mangroves located on the property east of the seawall? If an IPUD is located with frontage on the Intracoastal Waterway, conditions of approval shall include a deed restriction requiring that any marina or dockage build will not exceed in width the boundaries of the project's actual frontage on the water, regardless of what any other governing or permitting entity may allow or permit per Ch 2. Sec. S.L.4.g.(3). Include bike racks near the swimming pool area. Staff recommends that they be covered or sheltered. The subject site is located along Palm Tran Bus Route 1. A bus stop should be shown on the site plan, along Federal Highway. Staff recommends installing an upgraded shelter. Coordinate with Palm Tran and provide a written response at the TART meeting. Increase landscaping (trees and shrubs) along property line south of main entrance to screen adjacent commercial building located on property line). This area is within an existing 15' drainage easement. The main entrance may need to shift north. Identify / label on plan where all the required usable open space is located and the boundaries and sf provided for each location. Provide a reduced landscape plan which indicates entire site as L-l. Also provide a key (reduced landscape plan layout) to top right or bottom right of each page of landscape drawings which indicates location of applicable area on site. Revise plant list (LP-7) to include spacing of perimeter trees (min. 40 feet). Add landscaping (tree, shrubs) to terminal landscape islands located south of roundabout. Consider landscaping, sodding and irrigating those areas between existing/proposed pavement on both Dimick Road and Lake Drive and your property line. What will be located inside roundabout? Decorative fountain? Landscaping? Clearly indicate locations of perimeter wall / fence. It appears to be located only along the west and south property lines. Consider working with your neighbor to the north (Peninsula) to utilize their perimeter wall rather than building one immediately adjacent to it. Increase native species of palms to provide a minimum of 50% native. Replace Washington Palms with another palm species that tend to receive less storm damage. Label monument sign on landscape plan. Confirm that only one (1) sign is proposed on site (at main entrance), and no other signage is proposed. The trees proposed around the townhouse and condominium buildings must be installed at Y2 the building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.). Consider more canopy trees in from yards along Dimick Road. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have six (6) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section S.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant . . material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Forester / Environmentalist review and approval. Provide notes on landscape plan regarding sf / percent of site that is pervious and impervious, and how quantities of trees and shrubs were calculated along perimeter property lines. If potable water is used for irrigation purposes, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized, and the irrigation system should have water conserving designs (such as a drip system), where possible. Delete incomplete sign detail on sheet LP-6 (details provided on sheet A-I.I). Revise Photometric Plan (A-I.2) to indicate at a larger scale so it is more legible. No photometries have been provided for pool and clubhouse area, or along paths on either side of condominium building, or in the parking garage. Provide an elevation drawing of a typical freestanding outdoor lighting pole (indicating height from grade to top). The typical drawing of the freestanding outdoor lighting poles must include the color and material (staff recommends Sea Salt green for a verdigris look, rather than black). The design, style, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section IO.F.I.). A minimum average light level of one (1) foot candle shall be provided, with no more than 10% of the spot readings below one (1) foot candle and none below 12 foot candle (Chapter 23, Article II.A.I.a). Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section IO.F.2.). Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section IO.F.3.). The location of the proposed monument sign in the entrance median is subject to Engineering review (for safe sight distance) and approval. At a minimum, it must be 10 feet from any property line and surrounded by two colorful varieties of shrubs and two colorful varieties of groundcover. Indicate total proposed sign face area (for one side) of Casa del Lago monument sign on Sign Elevation (A-I. I) Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. Page 1 of 1 / Rivers, Jody To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie Subject: Site Plan Review - Casa del Lago Project: Casa del Lago File No.: NWSP 06-015 Park Impact Fee 42 single family attached @ $771.00 each = $32,382.00 40 multi family @ $656.00 ea = $26,240.00 TOTAL $58,622.00 )octtj Rtvers Parks Superintendent City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 (561) 742-6226 (561) 742-6233 (fax) A sense of COMMUNITY...lt Starts in Parks What transforms a crowd into a community? Parks provide that chance. Boynton Beach's parks are where lifetime friendships are formed, where generations can come together, where people discover what they have in common. It starts in parks. 4/25/2006 Date: Project No: Name: Location: Planning Area: Type of Project: Size of Site: Number of Units: Existing Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Annexation: Abandonment: Parking Required: Parking Provided: Height: Developer: Architect: CRA Comments: - # Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Agency Project Review / ,-' 4/27/06 Casa del Lago 2632 N. Federal Highway Federal Highway Corridor Planning Area I Residential- Town homes & Condos. 4.11 acres 82 - 42 Townhomes and 40 condos HDR SHDR C-3/R3 IPUD No No 164 + 3 HC 166 + 4 HC 45' Lancor Nursery Quincy Jones 1. CRA staff recommends that additional architectural details be included at the north and south elevations and the rear elevation at the second floor of the town home buildings. Recommended details include but are not limited to: a. Columns with minimum 4' separation from wall. b. Plinth at base of wall with minimum 6" separation from wall. c. Belt courses with different colors and materials. d. Horizontal banding at story breaks with minimum of 4" separation from wall e. Projecting cornice f. Projecting canopy g. Trellis h. Medallions i. Translucent glass j. Artwork k. Lighting fixtures I. Canopy m. Arcade n. Awnings 2. Provide detail of fencing design and materials to be used at N. Federal and Dimick frontage, if any. 3. Correct parking calculations. ,; ---,' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: April 24, 2006 FILE: NWSP 06-015 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Casa del Lago REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: 1. All lighting shall be metal halide following IESNA Lighting standards. 2. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 3. Timer clock or photocell lighting for nighttime use shall be above or near entryways. 4. Pedestrian scale lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. It is suggested that interactive or lighting on demand be used in sensitive areas. 5. Numerical address: a Shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility( dusk to dawn). b Shall not be obstructed. c Shall also be placed on the rear of the building if buildings are adjoined by a common area. 6. Residential Security: a The door leading into a residential unit should be a solid core door and equipped with a single cylinder dead bolt lock (including garage door). b When placing the order for a front door that will have a side pane window it should be placed on the opposite side ofthe door handle and lock making them unreachable. c If front door has zero visibility to front entryway are, it should be equipped with a l80-degree peephole. d Entry door should open outward versus inward. e All exterior doors should be equipped with security hinges. f Anti lifting auxiliary locks should be installed on sliding doors and windows. g Should be pre-wired for alarm system. 7. There should be strategically placed directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver sight level. The directories should be placed at the ingress points. J>o 8. If benches in a park area are intended for nighttime use, adequate lighting should be provided for the area in which they are located. They should also be in open view to eliminate concealment areas. 9. Stairways and balconies should provide open views. 10. Building architecture should allow for enhanced natural surveillance of all parking lots and provide a sense of security. TRC Memorandum Page 1 of 1 ~/ Coale, Sherie From: Hallahan, Kevin Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1 :43 PM To: Coale, Sherie Cc: Breese, Ed Subject: Casa del Lago-TART review comments Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Ed Breese, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Casa del Lago New Site Plan - 1st Review NWSP 06-015 Date: April 26, 2006 Existing Trees and Landscape Plan Show on Sheet LP-7 The Landscape Architect should review the existing trees on the site and indicate the trees to be preserved in place, relocated on site and removed / replaced in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. This information should be shown on the landscape plan by a separate symbol for each existing tree. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Plant Schedule Sheet LP-7 1. All shade and palm trees must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12' -14' height, 3" DBH [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.] 2. All shrubs and groundcover plants should have a height and spread dimension. 3. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of planting to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings and parking lot from the Federal Highway and Dimick Road rights-of-ways. .Irrigation Plan 4. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 5. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. Co2.] Kjh 4/26/2006 Page 1 of 1 Breese, Ed From: Lee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 3:05 PM To: Breese, Ed Subject: Casa del Lago Regarding the Casa del Lago project and its impact on City of Boynton Beach emergency services: This project will have approximately 160 new residence. Although the overall impact of all the new projects taxes the City of Boynton Beach's Fire Department services, this project by itself will not cause a major impact. However, the townhouses will require a fire sprinkler system, which will increase the water supply needs of the site. 4/26/2006 /' DATE: April 27, 2006 List of Acronvms/Abbreviations: ANSI - American National Standards Institute ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBC - Florida Building Code FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F.S. - Florida Statutes LOR - Land Development Regulations NEC - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-078 TO: Ed Breese Principal Planner FROM: Timothy K. Large ~ TART Member/Bui~ision SUBJECT: Project - Casa Del Lago File No. - NWSP 06-015 - 1st review Buildino Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Laroe (561) 742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 2 The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. 3 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 4 General area modifications to buildings shall be in accordance with 2004 FBC, Section 506. Provide calculations verifying compliance with the above code sections and the 2004 FBC, Table 503. 5 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 6 Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 7 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. S\Development\Building\TARnTART 2006\ Cas a Del Lago Page 1 of 4 8 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 9 A minimum of 2% of the total parking spaces provided for the dwelling units covered under the FFHA shall be accessible and comply with the requirements of the act. Accessible parking spaces shall be equally distributed for each type of parking provided, e.g. surface parking, parking structures, etc. per Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205. 10 Compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA, Design and Construction Requirements, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, is required. 11 At the time of permit review, submit details of reinforcement of walls for the future installation of grab bars as required by the FFHA, Title 24 CFR, Part 100.205, Section 3, Requirement #6. All bathrooms within the covered dwelling unit shall comply. 12 Bathrooms and kitchens in the covered dwelling units shall comply with the FFHA, Title 24 CFR 100.205. Indicate on the plans which design specification ("A" or "B") of the FFHA is being used. The clear floor space at fixtures and appliances and turning diameters shall be clearly shown on the plans. 13 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the project and other common area elements located at the site. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parking vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the Code is 36 inches). Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with regulations specified in the FFHA. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the 2004 FBC. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. 14 If an accessible route has less than 60 inches clear width, then passing spaces at least 60 inches by 60 inches shall be located at reasonable intervals not to exceed 200 feet. A "T"- intersection of two corridors or walks is an acceptable passing place. 2004 FBC, Section 11-4.3.4. 15 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. ''The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." S\Development\Building\TART\TART 2006\ Casa Del Lago Page 2 of 4 B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 16 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 17 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 18 To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story clubhouse, provide the following: A Will the clubhouse be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? B Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the clubhouse? C Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? D Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the clubhouse building. 19 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 20 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 21 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. C The number of dwelling units in each building. D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. E The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 22 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded S\Development\Building\TARnTART 2006\ Casa Del Lago Page 3 of 4 deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 23 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: A A legal description of the land. B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. D The number of dwelling units in each building. E The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 24 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 25 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 26 The condo building structure meets the definition of a threshold building per F.S. 553.71(7) and shall comply with the requirements of F.S. 553.79 and the CBBA to the 2004 FBC, Sections 109.3.6.1 through 109.3.6.6. The following information must be submitted at the time of permit application: A The structural inspection plan must be submitted to the enforcing agency prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a threshold building. B All shoring and re-shoring procedures, plans and details shall be submitted. C All plans for the building that are required to be signed and sealed by the architect or engineers of record shall contain a statement that, to the best of the architect's or engineer's knowledge, the plans and specifications comply with the applicable fire safety standards as determined by the local authority in accordance with this section and F.S. Section 633. 27 Sheet A-0.1 references Table 500 in the Project Information legend. There is no such table in the 2004 FBC. Insert the correct table. 28 Sheet A-0.1 indicates the parking garage as Type V sprinklered. Parking garages are not permitted to be of Type V construction. Comply with Table 406.3.5 of the 2004 FBC. 29 Sheet A-0.1 Project Information legend indicates the building construction types as V(B) and Sheet A 1.0 notes Type VI. Clarify. 30 Sheet A2.4 shows the stairs labeled as an elevator and the elevator is labeled as stairs. Correct the labeling. bf S\Development\Building\TARnTART 2006\ Casa Del Lago Page 4 of 4