The URL can be used to link to this page

APPLICATION - -. ~ROJECT NAME: Casa uel Mar . LOCATION: 2632 N. Federal Highway PCN: 08-43-45-15-01-000-001 0; 08-43-45-15-02-000-0080;0120;0140;0160;0200;0220 I FILE NO.: NWSP 06-015 II TYPE OF APPLICATION: I AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: Ocean Boulevard Properties, LLC Ruden McClosky ADDRESS: 2000 S. Ocean Blvd. Kim Glas-Castro / Bonnie Miskel Manalapan, FL 33462 ADDRESS: 222 Lakeview Avenue #800 FAX: West Palm Beach, FL 33401 PHONE: FAX: - 561-514-3442 PHONE: 561-838-4542 E-Mail: On file in contacts SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITT AL 4/5/06 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 4/24/06 PUBLIC /IP ARC NOTICE: T ART MEETING: 5/9/06 LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED (SITE PLANS): LEGAL AD: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD MEETING: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 6/13/06 AGENCY BOARD CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 7/5/06 COMMENTS: S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Casa del Lago\2006 PROJECT TRACKING INFO. doc T....,City of Boynton Beach Arts Commission 129 East Ocean Avenue -Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 561.742.6784 PUBLIC ART INFORMATION FORM THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION ;' flY \ __,i ~I ),_ I" \. _ .'__ , '~''''i~:;~_~ :p/?:; Project Name Casa Del Lago Project location 2632 N. Federal Company Name Lancore Nurser Company Address 399 W. Palmetto Company Phone 561-367-9933 Web site N/ A Contact Person Merv McDonald - Doug Hutchinson Phone 561-367-9933 Email mmcdonald@lancorerealty.com Project contact name Casa Del Lago Phone Email Project description (include the projects design/image intent, special features/amenities, special construction materials) . The project is a waterfronted townhome and condo proJect. It features doors on the pu IC streets an ense an scape area e ween In e 10 to have amenrtles at e wa er w IC inc u es poo an Highway LLC Park Rd. #102, Boca Raton, F 33432 units with front IS proposed Project markets to The mid to upper end townhome and condo buyer. Art Location/s 2632 N. Federal Highway Is the Art Location accessible to the public? Yes x No Developer/Architect/designers concept for art Thematic sculpture interpreting the Boynton Beach lifestyle with a paver viewing area and landscaping elements. Will artist be hired by developer Yes (yes or no) If yes, artist resume must be submitted to Arts Commission for approval Call to Artists required through the Arts Commission No (yes or no) *Construction (preliminary) value for the project $11,500,000 1% Public Art Fee 1%= $115,000 . % budget for the Art element/s of the project 70% = $80,500 Elect to pay public Art Fee in lieu of Public Art in Project No Site plan date 4/5/06 Estimated completion date 2008-2009 Arts Commission meet date Date received ordinance with recommendations and guidelines 4/5/06 *Official construction valuation to be submitted with permit application. S:\PJanning\planning Templates\Public Art Infonnation\blankartform2.doc ... 1 in. = 164.8 feet -'. ..-..-..-..-..-..-........-..-. ~ ~ 0050 1 0070 0010 ...... SITE Q <0 IV 0220 0250 0010 0080 01200140 0160 0200 0280 0310 0550 0400 0331 0520 0480 0460 0440 0380 0350 062 0900 0920 0700 0720 0760 0780 0810 0840 0860 0950 1090 1250 1180 116011401120 0990 0060 EXHIBIT "A" - CASA DEL MAR LOCATION MAP 1060 1030 'It'H::>V3Q NmNAOQ J\.1BS1l.0N 3l1IOJlNVl '::lN1 'lJ.:)U.lH:nv AV_tlb iO.aq5HOO I'fU..lRM nn.xa IH.J..lnOKlJM. 'lIlLUOl.J I AHV HI OIloIlXI'IO QI:)fl(JOUn .1",," .NOlRa. 'll0 "NYl' "wv;JQl 1.iDU.'O ~-.v. ON "OLU:IR-. UHDI1I nv ":II ~ NNDlJVA "oa1L\ll~ 'n'fVJ1'IIM. 'UOA)'j 'nwol 'NOI'NUo.l A::lN1.tJb _c 0 ~I~~~,",'~~,~ . ~~~~~~~~~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ I~~~!!!'I I~'~~';'" i~ ~ ~ ! I ! '~III ......... .........~ a ; ; i ; ; ;: ~.HJi... ~.u~..' ~ . ~ ~ . . '. i ~~~~~~~~~i ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ · ~1~~3l..!. ~1~~3l..! ~~!! ~ ~ l . ! ........! ........~ i . . . . . .. 9 ~~~ I i9 ~~~ I ! ! I I I ~~~~ 0, ~~~~ i ~~ '~B i n 9 ~~ I h ~ . . W Un Ii ul ~~ H," ~ H" "".~ ""~ t ~5n t 551 ~~ n!! h I h i. ~~i~ i. ~~~ ~ ~ h i .~ H ~ ~~ ~~~: ~ ~g~ 9 ::.. i :~. e ~ii1;;;:;;: ~ii1:;;: 2: ~~r ! ~n91 ~::::l~ h ~~ s~.~ ~~;:: ols~I~. ~~gg _~;; I*!~ 'il ~~ ~ 'S1u _".~"! ~z ..18';;~ Ih~!! !a~~E Q. 1~ 'H::>V3Q NOlNAOQ ODVll3l0 VSV'J -~ r::x::1 >-- z :-1'-' t:Wl~>1 d L l~ >1 l- ~ :~ )1 :J <( f.._ ',j W ~C'"', i ~ i iHi :..~ : i~' i L~__j f!"~ Ir-\,I Ilk'lk'."j ,,;:!~ I I * I I 'I L I L -' F ."'" to . . . ---tl ~~5~ ~..~ ~ u " " ~. ~~~~ ~ H ~hs ~ a~ ~gH a ~~ (.-IYM oilO-J.HIJIIl ,Of) 3AIHa 3)[1'7 II' 'II l i ~llil ;::- '" .... ~~~ c ~ ~ l,:!t;"" C,J~8 $Jiil'" ..... ... ~~~ {J!1'i: nif 1,,,' ~ Inif JlJ, lilt mll.Jl . (,{~J/-.!/O-J./{tJIII HJ.!llJi S"lflYIllyA) Ii ([JTON :il.L JT.LS r "S"J1 aJTO<l7IJTN .LSJTO.J .LSJT:il JT([INOU z ~ ~ ~ ...... < :li:i~::i~:;i~::i::j .~!Cl~Cl;&Cf H ~~ i~ :~~~~~L ~' ~~~~~~~~~~~~9 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ i ~ Umi I~ mm !~ mw :e ~ H H ~ I: mm ~ nm~ i~ ~ "I! r ~~ . Ii = J . ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~~~, r i~ .1 "~ .i. ~: , ~~ .. HI i . -~ i~ ~ ; ~d . ~ i~ r H Ii w H~ i ~ ~ . ~ q . " g ~ ~ H g , . t ~ ~ I w ~ ~ ~ I ~ h~ Hr' . . . I ~ ~~ i ; I! illt ." ~~ I t:t::li:li: i ..1ll1 ~ ~I~ i Ih~1 'lie._ >< Q Ri ~~ ~ un; I ~I ~ ~i hhsH9 ~~ Uu. i ~.' ~ I J =ii .;; J~!i il~~ ~ ~i I~~ I~~ illE ~~~I II ;~I !Ii !i~ '~Ii i~l~ -~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~f ~~ I ~I' !~ ~~il i;~ i~~ II~ ~ i ~I ~. ~~;~ II~~ III illl- I!!il II il~~ . ;i . ; . d It I. L ~ ~Iil ~ l~ t~ ;- li~1 l~II';;lllllli,1 il!~il;f z li~~i~I~I~I~I~11 !~!I~~~I~ <( ~~-. i IIi ~ ~i' ~. i -g, -' .. Q.. ~ l;i~fil_~R~~~I.1 111;i!!;1 ~ ~~i!!ltli~r;~jlil !i~lj~!111 UJ ffi f- '" .~ h ~.L i . I._.r; V"I ..... UJ f- V"I ol UJ f- V"I <( ~ r:-- dty Codes Accessed Via Website www.bovnton-beach.ore. ,^,'ww.amlegal.comlbovnton beach t1 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE PLAN j ! I I ','i 3 0 2000 Has applicant attended a pre.application meeting? Date This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and Zoning Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED sets of plans including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of the Site Plan Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information. I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project Name: Cas? del Mar 2. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name: Ocean Boulevard Properties, LLC Address: 2000 S. Ocean Blvd, Manalapan, FL 33462 (Zip Code) Phone: Fax: 3. Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made): Lancore Nursery, LLC Address: 1qq l.iI' Palmetto Park Road Sui tl'! 102 Ro~a Raton. FT. 11412 (Zip Code) Phone: 561-367-9933 Fax: 561-367-9992 If contract purchaser, please attach contract for sale and purchase. 4. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant): Ruden McClosky Bonnie Miskel, Esq./Kim Glas-Castro, AICP Address: 222 Lakeview Avenue /t800, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 838-4542 Fax: C~ir4~~22~ Phone: 5. Correspondence to be mailed to agent only; if no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute is specified below:* *This is the one address to which all agendas; letters and other materials will be mailed. 6. What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, developer. contract purchaser, etc.) C h ontact Purc aser 7. Street address of location of site: 2632 N. Federal Hwy & adjoining parcels on Dimick Road 8. Property Control #(PCN) See attached 9. Legal description of site: See attached 10. Intended use(s) of site: 82 units (42 townhomes and 40 condominiums) 11. Architect: Quincy Johnson Jones Myott Williams 12. Landscape Architect: Land Design South 13. Site Planner: Quincy Johnson Jones Myott Williams 14. Engineer: Keith & Schnars 15. Surveyor: Keith & Schnars 16. Traffic Engineer: Keith & Schnars 17. Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property? no II. SITE PLAN The following information must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable. on all copies of the site plan. 1. Land Use Category shown in the Comprehensive Plan: SpHDR 2. Zoning District: IPUD 3. Area of Site _~.1l ac + 0.12 ac E of seawaaeres-1J9,130 sf + 5.318 sf sq. ft. 4. Land Use - Acreage Breakdown: a. Residential, including 1. 50 surrounding lot area of grounds acres65,455 ~ 36.5.% of site b. Recreation Areas · -.Q..03 (excluding water area) acres ~ludL !:If o 8 % of site . 4 % of site c. Water Area__ .02 acres 718 SF d. e. f. g. h. j. Commercial % of site acres Industrial % of site acres public/Institutional -------------- acres % of site i. Public, Private and Canal rights-of-way Vehicular use areas/paving Other (specify) 64.829 sf Open Space Other (specify) .04,829 sf site ----------- % of site acres 36..5-% ofsite l..i...acres 75..8. _% of 1 . 0 facres Total area of site 1791:n SF 4. 11 acres 100% % of site *including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft. by 50 ft. 5. Surface Cover Ground floor building 1. 5 3 area ("building footprint") a. b. c. courts. site d. e. acres --2.2., 903_.1>f 3 7 . 3 % of site Water area .02a acres 718SF . 4 % % of site Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios. decks, and athletic 1.5 _ a acres .]4,829 uf 16. ') % of Total impervious area _ 3.02 a 7.4- % of site acres -1112.12 s f Landscaped area 1.09 a acres '. 47.399 sf 26 Yo of site inside of parking lots (20 sq.ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of LandscapeCod.e).. '_Mu ... f. Other landscaped areas, ---------- acres ------------------ % of site g. Other pervious areas, including golf course, natural areas, yards, and swales, but excluding water areas ------------------ acres ---==.::--------------- % of site h. Total pervious areas 1009 .q acreS~39-g ..,f 26' % of site i. Total area of site 179131SF 4 . 11a .acres 100% % of site 6. Floor Area Residential , . 65,455 sq. ft. sq. ft. a. b. CommerciaVOffice c. IndustriallWarehouse sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. d. Recreational 1448sF e. Public/Institutional f. Other (speCify) sq. ft. .- g. Other (specify) ----------------- sq. ft. sq. ft. h. Total floor area 66. 9W1 7. Number of Residential Dwellina Units Single-family detached sq. ft. a. b. c. (1) (2) (3) (4) d. Duplex Multi-Family (3 + attached dwelling units) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom _ 3+ Bedroom _' ~ Total multi-family 82 sq. ft. dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units e. Total number of dwelling units 82 8. Gross Density 20 dwelling units per acre 9. Maximum height of structures on site 45 t feet 4 stories 10. Reauired off-street oarkina a. Calculation of required # of off-street parking spaces. Off-street parking spaces provided on site plan l,sF./unit x 82 uni~ = ~~9L.s_paces ** This accounts for the requested 5 add'l . rec. spaces = = - ---"..- ~ b. Calculation of required # of handicap parking spaces 4 Number of handicap spaces provided on site plan 4 = REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT. --I Ruden ~I McClosky 200 EAST BROWARD BOULEVARD FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301 POST OFFICE BOX 1900 FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33302 (954) 527-2476 FAX: (954) 333-4076 BON N IE. MISKEL@RUDEN.COM May 22, 2006 ." 3 0, Casa del Mar Height Exception Lancore Nursery, LLC (the "Petitioner"), in conjunction with a townhome and condominium project within the City of Boynton Beach community redevelopment area IS requesting an exception from Chapter 2, Section 6.F.5 pertaining to building height. The property is located at the northeast comer of Dimick Road and Federal Highway, and comprises 4.12 acres, within Planning Area 1. The general use and zoning pattern in the area can be described as follows: Casa del Mar North: West: IPUD(proposed) IPUD C3 and PUD Multi-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Commercial and Multi- Family Residential Single Family Residential Water and Single Family Residential South: East: R1AA ICWW and RIAA Section 4.F of the City's Zoning Code ("Code") provides for height limitations and exceptions. Electrical and mechanical support systems, as well as parapets and similar structures may be erected on top of a structure, above the district height limitations with City Commission approval. The Infill Planned Unit Development ("IPUD") zoning district limits heights to 45 feet. The Petitioner is seeking a height exception that would allow a proposed four-story condominium to exceed the aforementioned provisions. The Petitioner is proposing one four- story building with a pitched, mansard roof that measures 53'6" at the mid-point of stair and elevator roof and mid-pont of balcony roof. The proposed project is within the CRA. The City's Code provides for a height of 45' for projects zoned with the IPUD to provide residential uses in proximity to the downtown area that will provide synergy between downtown uses and enhance economic viability of downtown businesses. Height exceptions for rooftop mechanical equipment, parapets and similar structures are permissible, subject to City Commission approval. The Petitioner is requesting an exception of (up to) 8'6" for a total of 53'6" height (at midpoint of peaked roof) to accommodate rooftop mechanical equipment, elevator shafts, stairwells and roof profiles on the proposed condominium building. The 3-story townhome buildings are consistent with height limitations and do not require an exception. WPB:242218:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, PA CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE' TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH Page 2 As discussed below, approval of the height exception will adhere to the standards set forth in Section 4.F of the Code. The Petitioner will demonstrate that the height exception: . Will not have adverse effect on surrounding land uses; Is necessary; Will not severely reduce light and air in adjacent areas; Will not be a deterrent to the redevelopment of adjacent properties; Will not adversely affect property values; Will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Will not constitute a grant of special privilege; and Is needed for the proposed redevelopment project. . . . . . . . (1) land uses. Whether the height exception will have an adverse effect on the existing and proposed The proposed Casa del Mar project is located within the City's CRA. A general objective of the CRA is to create a transition in intensity from the downtown to single-family neighborhoods. The proposed condominium building fulfills these objectives and represents the logical progression of uses that are less intense than the central business district but greater than surrounding properties. The proposed building will blend well with existing and proposed uses. Special care has been given to encompass function, style and urban appeal, which makes for a more harmonious elevation. The requested exception is not applicable to the entire building. Roof-mounted equipment located within the central portions of the flat roof will be screened by the parapet. Roof profiles over the balconies provide shelter and architectural interest on what would otherwise be a flat fa<;ade. The centralized stairs and elevators on the front and rear of the building extend above the parapet and the gabled roof provides the necessary height to protect these from the elements. Balcony roofs provide shelter and roofline variation. The requested 8'6" exception will not have an adverse effect on existing or proposed land uses. (2) Whether the height exception is necessary. . Conformance with the height provisions would limit the aesthetic quality of the condominium building. The proposed roof heights are necessary provisions to grant access to the roof and room to the building's stairwells and elevator shafts, as well as provide cover for the proposed balcony towers, all of which are important elements of the building elevation in terms of functionality and aesthetics. A minimal parapet could be provided to screen roof-mounted equipment, however, the result would be a flat, uninteresting elevation. The proposed gabled- WPB:242218:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS' FT, LAUDERDALE' MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO' PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH Page 3 roof profiles have aesthetic purpose and increase the compatibility of the four-story building with the surrounding three-story townhomes and nearby two-story single family homes. (3) Whether the height exception will severely reduce light and air in adjacent areas. The proposed exception of 8'6" will not affect adjacent properties. The highest points over the elevator shafts and stairwells are centralized on the rooftop, and not immediately adjacent to abutting properties. The balcony roofs which are lower in height, similarly, will not pose a barrier to reduce light or air - they represent subtle changes in the elevation which only enhance the geometry and spatial appeal of the project. The parapet screens roof-mounted equipment from view, but will not affect other properties. The requested building height exception will not create shadows or affect air circulation in a manner that negatively impacts adjacent properties. (4) Whether the height exception will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accord with existing regulations. The requested height exception does not affect or impact the redevelopment potential of adjacent properties. The requested exception (up to 8'6") will not be injurious to the surrounding properties or public welfare. The proposed height is compatible with the building heights envisioned for the Special High Density Residential land use category. (5) Whether the height exception will adversely affect property values in adjacent areas, The requested height of the elevator/stairwell areas, parapet, and balcony roof profiles will not adversely affect property values. Rather, the Casa del Mar redevelopment project will have a positive impact on property values in the area. This project along with other redevelopment efforts in the immediate area may spur other property owners to redevelop their parcels with structures and uses that are more consistent with the vision the City has established for this portion of the Federal Highway corridor. (6) Whether the height exception will constitute a grant of a special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The requested building height does not establish a substantial mass increase and is not applicable to the entire building. The maximum height is located at the elevator/stairwell areas in the central portions of the building. The balcony roof profiles are only 51' in height and only located over the balcony elements. The gabled roof elements provide a better, more WPB:242218:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO' PORT ST.LUCIE . SARASOTA' ST. PETERSBURG' TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH Page 4 aesthetically-pleasing architectural solution to screening elevator/stairwell areas and providing protection from weather. The exception (up to 8'6") will not impact other properties and is consistent with the public welfare. (7) Whether sufficient evidence has been presented to justifY the need for a height exception. The requested height exception is in keeping with the spirit of the height provisions for infill redevelopment projects in the eRA, and is permissible pursuant to Section 4.F. The requested building height will accommodate the elevator/stairwell areas, screen mechanical equipment, and provide shelter for ten (10) fourth-story balconies. The result is an aesthetic, varied roofline that provides interest to each building fac;ade. The requested height exception will promote function, style and urban appeal, and increase the four-story building's compatibility and harmonious relationship to abutting buildings. Therefore, the requested Height Exception is consistent with the criteria contained in Section 4.F. WPB:242218:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS' FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI' NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA' ST. PETERSBURG. TAllAHASSEE' TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH 1 'C, City of Boynton Beach Arts Commission 129 East Ocean Avenue Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 561.742.6784 PUBLIC ART INFORMATION FORJ(~. ,'__d_-"~---- THIS APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION ~" i ~ \\\ '. I,!".-~ flY \ ~Ii_ 'I; d }- .~!;; ';~ . Ii", \9;' t\PR - 5 '2.Uu6 Project Name Casa Del Lago Project location 2632 N. Federal Highway Company Name Lancore Nurser LLC Company Address 399 W. Palmetto Park Rd. #102, Boca Raton, F 33432 Company Phone 561-367-9933 Web site N / A Contact Person Merv McDonald - Doug Hutchinson Phone 561-367-9933 Email mmcdonald@lancorerealty.com Project contact name Casa Del Lago Phone Email Project description (include the projects design/image intent, special features/amenities, special construction materials) The project is a waterfronted townhome and condo project. It features doors on the pu IC streets an ense an scape area e ween In e 10 to have amenities at e wa er w IC inc u es poo an units with front IS proposed Project markets to The mid to upper end townhome and condo buyer. Art Location/s 2632 N. Federal Highway Is the Art Location accessible to the public? Yes x No Developer/Architect/designers concept for art Thematic sculpture interpreting the Boynton Beach lifestyle with a paver viewing area and landscaping elements. Will artist be hired by developer Yes (yes or no) If yes, artist resume must be submitted to Arts Commission for approval Call to Artists required through the Arts Commission No (yes or no) *Construction (preliminary) value for the project $11,500,000 1 % Public Art Fee 1 % = $115,000 % budget for the Art element/s of the project 70% = $80,500 Elect to pay public Art Fee in lieu of Public Art in Project No Site plan date 4/5/06 Estimated completion date 2008-2009 Arts Commission meet date Date received ordinance with recommendations and guidelines 4/5/06 *Official construction valuation to be submitted with permit application. S:\Planning\planning TemplateslPublic Art Infonnation\blankartform2,doc . City' Codes Accessed Via Website ,-,>:W"\I., boy ntQ.!]._:hs:.ash.oI;g www.amlegal.com/bovnton beach 11 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR I NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING-5ITEPLAN APR-5r, " 1...J,jj Has applicant attended a pre-application meeting? Date This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and Zoning Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED sets of plans including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of the Site Plan Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information. I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project Name: Cas a del Lago 2. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name: Ocean Boulevard Properties, LLC Address: 2000 S. Ocean Blvd, Manalapan, FL 33462 (Zip Code) Phone: Fax: 3. Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made): Lancore Nursery, LLC Address: 199 W Palmetto Park Road Suite 102 Boca Raton, FT. 11412 (Zip Code) Phone: 561-367-9933 Fax: 561-367-9992 If contract purchaser, please attach contract for sale and purchase. 4. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant): Ruden McClosky Bonnie Miskel, Esq./Kim Glas-Castro, AICP Address: 222 Lakeview Avenue #800, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 838-4542 Fax: (~if4~~~2~ Phone: 5, Correspondence to be mailed to agent only; if no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute is specified below:* *This is the one address to which all agendas; letters and other materials will be mailed. 6. What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, developer, contract purchaser, etc.) Contact Purchaser 7. Street address of location of site: 2632 N. Federal Hwy & adjoining parcels on Dimick Road 8. Property Control #(PCN) See attached 9. Legal description of site: See attached 10. Intended use(s) of site: 82 units (42 townhomes and 40 condominiums) 11. Architect: Quincy Johnson Jones Myott Williams 12. Landscape Architect: Land Design South 13. Site Planner: Quincy Johnson Jones Myott Williams 14. Engineer: Keith & Schnars 15. Surveyor: Keith & Schnars 16. Traffic Engineer: Keith & Schnars 17. Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property? no II. SITE PLAN The following information must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of the site plan, 1. Land Use Category shown in the Comprehensive Plan: SpHDR 2. Zoning District: IPUD 3. Area of Site 4. l~ 4. Land Use -- Acreage Breakdown: acres 179,131 sq. ft. a. Residential, including 1. 53 surrounding lot area of grounds acres 66, 742SF % of site 3 7 % b. Recreation Areas * . 0 3 (excluding water area) Water Area . 02 acres 144 8SF % of site. 8 % c. acres 718sF % of site. 4 % 02-03~200~ ,10:09am From-Ruden McClo 5618323036 T-266 P,002!002 F-445 OCEAN BOULEVARD PROPER.TIES Property Control Numbers 08-43-45-15-01-0000-010 08-43-45-15-02-0000-080 08-43-45-15-02-0000-120 08~3-45-1S-02-0000-140 08~3-45-15-02-0000-160 08-4 3 ~5-15-02-0000-200 08~3-45.15.02-0000-220 CAS A DEL LAGO LEGAL DESRIPTION LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, LAKESIDE GARDENS PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 57, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, AND LOT 1, HULLS SUBDIVISION, PLAT BOOK 2, PAGE 17, LESS AND ACCEPT THE WEST 94 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT - OF - WAY OF STATE ROAD 5, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH RIPARIAN RIGHTS THERUNTO APPERTAINING. WPB:240519:1 d. Commercial % of site acres e. Industrial % of site acres f. Public/Institutional -------------- acres % of site g. h. Public, Private and Canal rights-of-way % of site acres Other (specify) % of site acres I. Other (specify) site a~es ---------------- % of j. Total area of site 1791. 31SF 4. 11 acres 100% % of site *including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft. by 50 ft. 5. Surface Cover a. b. c, courts. site d. e. Ground floor building 1 . 57 area ("building footprint") acres 68,190 SF 3 8 % % of site Water area .02a acres 718SF . 4 % % of site Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic 1. 46a acres 63433SF % od5. 4% Total impervious area 3. 0 3 a 131623SF 7 3 % % of site acres Landscaped area 1 . 0 9 a acres 4 7 5 0 8 SF 2 7 % % of site inside of parking lots (20 sq.ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of Landscape Code). f. Other landscaped areas, ---------- acres ------------------ % of site g. Other pervious areas. including golf course, natural areas, yards, and swales, but excluding water areas ------------------ acres ----------------- % of site h. Total pervious areas 1. 09a acres 47508SF 27% % of site i. Total area of site 179131SF 4. lla acres 100% % of site 6. Floor Area a. Residential 66,742SF sq. ft. b. Commercial/Office ----------- sq. ft. c. IndustriallWarehouse ------------- sq. ft. d. Recreational 1448sF sq. ft. e, Public/I nstitutional --------------- sq. ft. f, Other (specify) sq. ft, g. Other (specify)-=--------------- sq. ft. h. Total floor area 68, 1905F sq. ft. 7. Number of Residential Dwellina Units Single-family detached sq. ft. a. b. sq. ft. Duplex c. (1 ) (2) (3) (4) Multi-Family (3 + attached dwelling units) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3+ Bedroom dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units d. Total multi-family 82 dwelling units e, Total number of dwelling units 82 8. Gross Density 20 dwelling units per acre 9. Maximum height of structures on site 45 ' feet 4 stories 10. Reauired oft-street oarkina a. Calculation of required # of oft-street parking spaces. ';t sp/llnit x 82 units -= J bLl = ~ I~(P , Off-street parking spaces provided on site plan ~ = Jt ~W""\~ ^--~ ;;}.~ J~ = b. Calculation of required # of handicap parking spaces 4 Number of handicap spaces provided on site plan 4 = REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT. Statement of Interest in Property and Authorization to File Petitions OCEAN BOULEVARD PROPERTIES, LLC certifies that it is the Owner of the subject property and authorizes LANCORE NURSERY, LLC, as contract purchaser, and/or RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A to act as applicant/agent and submit petitions for land use amendment, rezoning, and site plan approval to the City of Boynton Beach. This authorization includes all related site plan and permitting considerations, including necessary variances or technical deviations, concurrency applications and platting requirements. OCEAN BOULEV ARD PROPERTIES, LLC understands how the proposed land use amendment and rezoning may affect the subject property. S,LLC Signature: Printed N Address: 200lE. Ocean Boulevard Manalapan, FL 33462 Phone: State of Florida County of Palm Beach The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this~',::>').' day of \1t,~l \-' , 2006, by Paul Stafford, as Managing Member of Ocean Boulevard Properties, LLC and is personally kn,;>wn to me or who has produced as identification and who did take an oath. IlARYILIALI. ... ..,...... ... 11_.... 1o.I11M1B11t ...... II ...... ,,--.... My CornmInIon _ APd~t" NOTARY PUBLIC: Si~: 0 11 1<11) Pnnt: l"'"V"<:L'1 t J ,{, 'fi. , '- My Commission Expires: (~61.' L-- \ I 7_oD'1 / Property: 08-43-45-15-01-000-0010, 08-43-45-15-02-000-0080, 08-43-45-15-02-000-0120, 08-43-45-15-02-000-0140, 08-43-45-15-02-000-0160, 08-43-45-15-02-000-0200, 08-43-45-15-02-000-0220 WPB:230497:2 RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge, represent and agree that all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering, and other data submitted with this application for review by the City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by the various boards. commissions, staff personnel and other parties designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall rely upon the accuracy thereof, and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and substantial. The undersigned hereby agrees that all plans, specifications, drawings. engineering and other data which may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, staff or designees shall be constructed in strict compliance with the form in which they are approved, and any change to the same shall be deemed material and shall place the applicant in violation of this application and all approvals and permits which may be granted. The applicant agrees to allow the City of Boynton Beach all rights and remedies as provided for by the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to bring any violation into compliance, and the applicant shall indemnify, reimburse and save the City of Boynton Beach harmless from any cost, expense, claim, liability or any action which may arise due to their enforcement of the same. tf-EAD. ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO this ;;r-j~day of ;vLClACh.. ~h.') ~<~~ ~ Appllca t , '. ~f /0 Lancore Nursery, LLC Witness ,200~ III. CERTIFICATION (I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (We) hereby certify that the above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be accepted unless signed according to the instructions below. Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee, of Authorized Principal if property is owned by a corporation or other business entity. Date '3-~l.() 0 Date IV. ~-d:~-O~ Date (I) (We) hereby designate the above-signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this application. Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee, _or Authorized Principal if property is owned _by a corporation or other business entity. Date OR La~r~ ~ by: r.I c. ~ Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant) ~-~l-a() Date A REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT. The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org April 6, 2006 Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re: Traffic Statement: Casa del Lago Dear Mr. Atefi: The enclosed traffic statement, prepared by Keith and Schnars, P.A., dated March 31, 2006 was received by Planning and Zoning for the above- referenced application. Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and me with your written response. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742- 6260. Sincerely, Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWR/sc Attachments S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Casa del Lago\Traffic #2.doc KEITH and SCHNARS, P.A. ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS ,----., -..-- ! ...,......, March 31, 2006 t, ) 1 r------..-------__.__ i ,(! IUUI ~ - 52006 I I . I , City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Division Department of Development P,Q. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 ';'Ar@NG MW lUNING DfF7 I I' , 1'/ " ' -". J RE: Traffic Statement Lancore Nursery a.k.a. Casa del Lago Keith and Schnars Proiect No. 17557.CP-09001 Dear Sirs: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Keith and Schnars, P,A. was retained by Ruden McClosky to prepare a traffic statement with respect to a traffic related land use impact comparison for a 4,13 acre parcel known as Lancore Nursery a,k,a Casa del Lago located within the City of Boynton Beach, The subject site is located on the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Federal Highway (US 1, SR 5) and Dimick Road (see Figure 1), 6500 North Andrews Avenue · Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-2132 (954) 776-1616. (800) 488-1255. Fax (954) 771-7690 .." "",,,; City of Boynton Beach Traffic Statement Lancore Nursery a.k.a, Casa del Lago Keith and Schnars Proiect No, 17557,CP,09001 March 31,2006 - Page 2 The current land uses corresponding to the subject parcel include local retail commercial, low density residential and high density residential. The owner/developer has proposed a change in land use to special high density residential. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY In order to determine the level of general traffic impact resulting from the proposed change in land use, the methodology employed consists of the comparison of the trips generated by the existing potential maximum uses and the proposed use, This is accomplished through the application of the trip formula and/or rates as found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation 7th Edition. The comparison evaluation is based upon daily and PM peak hour trips, The potential maximum development for the existing land uses on the subject parcel, as developed by Ruden McClosky, are as follows: . Commercial retail: 5,946 square feet · Single-family unit residential: 6 units · Multi-family residential: 25 apartments The proposed use, special high density residential, consists of 82 residential units (townhouses and/or condos). Pass-by trips were determined only for the commercial retail use. Pass-by trips are trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary destination. These trips are attracted from the adjacent streets with a direct driveway connector to the subject site. For purposes of analysis, the percentage of pass-by for the subject parcel for the PM peak period is based on the average percentage of 34 percent as presented in ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, Chapter 5. For the daily trips, a factor of 24 percent was applied. The basis for this is that according to Florida Department of Transportation's Site Impact Handbook, April 1997, the PM peak hour trip percentages are usually 10 percent greater than in other times during the day, The trip generation tables and corresponding internalization matrices for the daily and PM peak hour conditions for both land use scenarios are presented in the attachment to this letter. A summary of the findings is presented in the following section, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Table 1 presents a summary of the findings of the trip generation analysis for the subject parcel. The supporting tables and figures are found in the attachment to this Traffic Statement. The daily internalization factor of 17.4 percent and the PM Peak hour factor of 20.4% were determined based on the procedures and parameters presented in ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998, '.(",j ,",/ City of Boynton Beach Traffic Statement Lancore Nursery a,k,a, Casa del Lago Keith and Schnars Proiect No, 17557,CP,09001 March 31,2006 - Page 3 Table 1 land Use Trips Analysis Summary land Use Net Daily Trips Net PM Peak Hour Trips Existing Potential 979 92 Proposed Use 542 51 Net Change -437 -41 Percent Change 45% 45% Based upon the findings of the trip generation comparisons between the existing and proposed uses for the subject parcel, it is our conclusion that proposed land use will represent a significant reduction of 437 daily trips and 41 PM peak hour trips with respect to the existing potential use, These reductions represent reductions of about 45 percent in comparison to the existing uses. Sincerely, =I~~: and :: ....~=ENG\NEERS"PLANNEfl ,""...., ""'" City of Boynton Beach Traffic Statement Lancore Nursery a,k,a, Casa del Lago Keith and Schnars Proiect No, 17557,CP,09001 March 31,2006 - Page 4 TABLE A.l Daily Trip Generation: Existing Use vs. Proposed Use Lancore Nursery Land Use Plan Amendment 30.Mar.06 EXISTING LAND USE LAND ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP INBOUND OUTBOUND DESCRIPTION DENSITIES UNITS USE GENERATION RATE OR FORMUL~ TRIPS CODE % TRIPS % TRIPS COMMERCIAURETAIL 5,946 SQ FT 820 LN(T) = 0,65 LN(X) + 5,83 1,084 50% 542 50% 542 SINGLE FAMILY 6 D.U, 210 LN(T) = 0,92 LN(X) + 2,71 78 50% 39 50% 39 MULTI -FAMILY (APARTMENTS) 25 DU, 220 T = 6,01 (X) + 150,35 301 50% 151 50% 150 GROSS DAILY TRIPS = 1,463 50% 732 50% 731 INTERNALIZATION RATE (See Table 4) = 17.4% 254 50% 127 50% 127 PASS-BY TRIP REDUCTION COMMERCIAL [1] 24.0% OF NET EXTERNAL COMMERCIAL TRIPS 230 50% 115 50% 115 TOTAL NET DAILY EXTERNAL TRIPS = 979 50% 490 50% 489 PROPOSED LAND USE LAND ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP INBOUND OUTBOUND DESCRIPTION DENSITIES UNITS USE GENERATION RATE OR FORMUL~ TRIPS CODE % TRIPS % TRIPS CONDOMINIUMI TOWNHOUSE 82 D,U 230 LN(T) = 0,85 LN(X) + 2,55 542 50% 271 50% 271 GROSS DAILY TRIPS = 542 50% 271 50% 271 TOTAL NET DAILY EXTERNAL TRIPS = 542 50% 271 50% 271 NOTES: [1] BASED ON AVERAGE PASS-BY TRIP PERCENTAGE FOR ITE CODE 820, ITE TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 2nd EDITION, CHAPTER 5 DAILY PASS-BY ASSUMED APPROXIMATELY 10% LESS THAN THE PEAK HOUR VALUE, TABLE 2 (FDOT SITE IMPACT HANDBOOK) ,iii City of Boynton Beach Traffic Statement Lancore Nursery a,k,a, Casa del Lago Keith and Schnars Proiect No, 17557,CP,09001 March 31,2006 - Page 5 FIGURE A-1 Daily Trip Internalization: Existing Use Versus Proposed Use lancore Nursery land use Plan Amendment Analyst EMAN Date 03/30/06 Project Name Time Period Lancore Nursery LUPA Daily LAND USE A COMMERCIAL LAND USE B SINGLE FAMILY ITE LU Code 820 Size 5,946 sa, FT, EXlflcEx/ema! Total Internal External Enter 542 64 478 Exit 542 63 479 Total 1,084 127 957 Enter From External % 100% 11.7% 88.3% ITE LU Code 210 Size 6 D,U, 0%1 01 Demand 11%1 Demand c::JQ] Balanced I 33%1 Demand Demand Balanced Demand 9%1 491 ~ 38%1 151 tl%1 601 c::::TII 33%1 131 Demand Balanced Demand 0%1 Demand Enter Exit Total % Total 39 39 78 100% Internal 13 15 28 35.9% External Enter From External 26~ 24 50 64.1% Exit /0 Exlemal 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand c:::::::::QI Balanced c:::::::::QI Balanced c:::::::::QI Balanced c:::::::::QI Balanced 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand 491 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand 1 0%1 01 57 Demand o USE C c:::::::::QI LAND USE 0 MUL TI-FAMI Y Balanced 0%1 01 ITE LU Code Demand ITE LU Code 220 Size Size 25 D,U, Demand Balanced Demand Exit to External Total Internal External 0%1 01 c:::::::::QI 0%1 01 Total Internal External Enter From External Enter 0 0 0 Enter 151 50 101 +-----CJQj] Exit 0 0 0 Exit 150 49 101 Total 0 0 0 0%1 01 c:::::::::QI 0%1 01 Total 301 99 202 Enter From External % 100% Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 32.9% 671% Exilto Extemal NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT Notes: Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE) Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998. Cammer Single Multi cia I Family Family TOTAL Enter 478 26 0 101 605 Exit 479 24 0 101 604 Total 957 50 0 202 1209 Sinale-Use Trip Gen. Est. 1,084 78 0 301 1.463 INTERNAL CAPTURE 17.4% ..tf City of Boynton Beach Traffic Statement Lancore Nursery a,k,a, Casa del Lago Keith and Schnars Proiect No, 17557,CP,09001 March 31,2006 - Page 6 TABLE A-2 PM Peak Trip Generation: Existing Use vs. Proposed Use Lancore Nursery Land Use Plan Amendment 30-Mar-06 EXISTING LAND USE LAND ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP GENERATION INBOUND OUTBOUND DESCRIPTION DENSITIES UNITS USE TRIPS CODE RATE OR FORMULA % TRIPS % TRIPS COMMERCIAL 5,946 SQ. FT 820 LN(T) = 0,66 LN(X) + 3.40 97 48%> 47 52% 50 SINGLE FAMILY 6 D.U 210 LN(T) = 0,90 LN(X) +0,53 9 63% 6 37% 3 MULTI -FAMILY (APARTMENTS) 25 D,U, 220 T = 0.55 (X) + 17,65 31 65% 20 35% 11 GROSS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS = 137 53% 72 47% 65 INTERNALIZATION RATE (See Table 51 = 20.4% 28 53% 15 47% 13 PASS-BY TRIP REDUCTION COMMERCIAL [1] 34,0% OF NET EXTERNAL COMMERCIAL TRIPS 17 48% 8 52% 9 TOTAL VEH PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS = 92 53% 49 47% 43 TOTAL NET PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS = 92 53% 49 47% 43 PROPOSED LAND USE LAND ITE 7TH EDITION TRIP INBOUND OUTBOUND DESCRIPTION DENSITIES UNITS USE GENERATION RATE OR TRIPS CODE FORMULA % TRIPS % TRIPS CONDOMINIUM/ TOWNHOUSE 82 D.U 230 LN(T) = 0,82 LN(X) +0,32 51 67% 34 33% 17 GROSS PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS = 51 67% 34 33% 17 TOTAL NET PM PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS = 51 67% 34 33% 17 [IJ BASED ON AVERAGE PASS-BY TRIP PERCENTAGE FOR ITE CODE 820, ITE TRIP GENERATION HANDBOOK, 2nd EDITION, CHAPTER 5 ~ ~ City of Boynton Beach Traffic Statement Lancore Nursery a,k,a, Casa del Lago Keith and Schnars Proiect No, 17557,CP,09001 March 31, 2006 - Page 7 Figure A-2 PM Peak Trip Internalization: Existing Use Versus Proposed Use Lancore Nursery Land use Plan Amendment Analyst EMAN Date 03/30/06 Project Name Time Period Lancore Nursery LUPA PM Peak Hour LAND USE A RETAIL LAND USE B SINGLE FAMILY ITE LU Code 820 Size 5946 SQ. FT. ITE LU Code 210 Size 6 D.U, 0%1 01 Demand 12%1 Demand c:::::::::J] Balanced I 31%1 Demand Demand Balanced Demand 9%1 41 c:::J] 53%1 21 12%1 61 c:JI 31%1 21 Demand Balanced Demand 0%1 Demand Enter Exit Total % Total 6 3 9 100% Internal 2 2 4 44.4% External EnrerFromExternal 4 +----e::::::] 1 5 55.6% Exit to External Enter From Extemal Enter Exit Total % Total 47 50 97 100% Internal 6 8 14 14.4% External 41 42 83 85.6% EXit to Extemal 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand C:JI Balanced C:JI Balanced C:JI Balanced C:JI Balanced 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand 41 0%1 01 Demand 0%1 01 Demand Enter From External Enter Exit Total % Total o o o 100% Internal Ex1ernal o 0 o 0 o 0 #DIV/O' #DIV/O' 01 C:JI LAND USE D MUL TI-FAMI Y Balanced 0%1 01 Demand ITE LU Code 220 Size 25 D,U. Demand Balanced Demand 0%1 01 c:::3 0%1 01 Total Internal External Enter From External Enter 20 6 14 -c:==EI Exit 11 4 7 0%1 01 C:JI 0%1 01 Total 31 10 21 Demand Balanced Demand % 100% 32.3% 67.7% Exit to ExtemaJ D USE C ITE LU Code Size Exit to External NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI-USE DEVELOPMENT Notes: Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook, October 1998, Single Multi Retail Familv Office Famil TOTAL Enter 41 4 0 14 58 Ed 42 1 0 7 51 Total 83 5 0 21 109 Single-Use Trip Gen, Est. 97 9 0 31 137 INTERNAL CAPTURE 20.4% . . PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE REVmW FORM Date ~ - 5 - 07 Time Started 3: 00 Time Finished Attending as Applicant ~ #itrCHIN~~ :; MB2.1/ McJ~ Phone Fax Applicant Must Initial for Receipt of Art in Public Places Ordinance 05-060_ and Art Program Info Sheet: Proposed Project Information ProposedProjectNameand ~ MiL- k,t,e (E~t'tmJ 6F E)<I$71~~) Type/Use Site Location (Address if Available) Site PCN Existing Zoning Existing Land Use.Density Anticipated Submittal Date Proposed Zoning Proposed Land Use/Density / Vacant Lot Area Lot Frontage Lot Depth Setback Height Parking Requirements or Improvements LandscapinglBuffering Non-confonning Use or Change in Use Other Zoning Changes Required Hazardous Material Notes and Comments Notes/Comments/Recommendations 7Jia An:fW ~ ~vlIIU:J uP/' me s,~ W/~ ~~_ ~ n-I€ I~~~ ~ 7P€. ~ ~.ff" f.ku~ ~ ~~ ~ "'f2hl. C--r!1 J7) ~ ~ 17; ~ &.ItLc- hCI ~ ~ A7rlJ U4wr-r rv AJllLJ ~ S cS Tnff ~ ~U.I=::Z.."tJ(;.... tiP 1/7 ~ .......<1 #'I>t,,,"- / ...,~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ sft ~/~A{ ahFF ~ I-'V 6? T}H:S-E. -~;,I/S~ ~.J~~~ 3~~~. 7N€. JWjf)u~r ~B/~ fIE ~ AcqVtd.eS 7JIi: /l.owAr ~ """Y 'F- :;;;MAJ~/:: ~~~ ~<<. 6l:;"14l>t~ 17' JJz .s A- Me :GM 7D ~7' 1() ~ a..e. WI ZFt:TVr ~.AlG- ~ ~ ~~ 71IE.L}n:t. NOTICE: The purpose of this conference sbaD be for staff and applicant to discuss overall community goals, objectives, policies and codes as related to the proposed development and to discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions expressed at the pre-application conference are not binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be fortbcoming based on actual plans submitted for review. S:\Planning\Planning\Pre-App Form pp 1-3\Pre-application Form p2.doc .':~ PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SIGN IN 'SHEET PLEASE PRINT MEETING DATE: TIME: ATl'ENDING FOR APPLICANT: NOTICE: The purpose oftbfs conference shall be for the staft' and appUcant to cUsCUSl overall community goals, objectives, poUcles and codes u related to the proposed development and to disCUBS site pJan review procedures. OpiDJODJ expressed at the pr..appUcation conference are not binding for fOrma) review purposes. AddJtionaJ staff comments may be forthcoming based on actual lans submitted for review. City of Boynton Beach Attending for Applicant Attendin Staff I v'IYTrI ~~ S:\Plannlng\Plannlng\Pre-App Form pp 1-3\Pre-applleatlon Form p3.doe