REVIEW COMMENTS
7.C.l
BOYNTON VILLAGE SMU, BLDG M
(NWSP 06-028)
NEW SITE PLAN
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NO:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-189
STAFF REPORT
Chair and Members of the Planning and Development Board
and City Commission
Michael RU~
Planning and Zoning Director
Ed Breese ~
Principal Planner
October 10, 2006
Boynton Village SMU - Building "M" / NWSP 06-028
New Site Plan
Property Owner:
Agent/ Applicant:
Location:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1950 Congress Avenue, LLC
Kimberly Glas-Castro, Ruden McClosky
Approximately 1,800 feet north of northeast corner of Old
Boynton Road and Congress Avenue (see Exhibit "A" - Location
Map)
Existing Land Use/Zoning:
Mixed Use Suburban (MXS)/Suburban Mixed Use (SMU)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning:
No change
Proposed Use:
Acreage:
Adjacent Uses:
North:
South:
East:
Request new site plan approval to construct a 12,120 square foot
retail building (Building "M'') on Outlot #5 of the approved
Boynton Village project
68,967.90 square feet (1.583-acres)
Ingress/Egress drive off of Congress Avenue, then further north undeveloped Outlot
#6 of Boynton Village with a Mixed Use Suburban (MXS) land use designation, zoned
Suburban Mixed Use (SMU);
Undeveloped Buildings "J" & "K" of Boynton Village with a Mixed Use Suburban
(MXS) land use designation, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU);
Undeveloped residential (Boynton Village Condominiums) with a Mixed Use
Suburban (MXS) land use designation, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU); and
Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028)
Memorandum No PZ 06-189
Page 2
West: Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, farther west is developed commercial (Wachovia
Bank Professional Building) with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use
designation, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
Site Characteristic: According to the site plan, the subject site is currently vacant, and approximately
210 feet deep and 335 feet wide. The subject parcel is one of the Outlots
associated with the approved Boynton Village project (Outlot #5). It is the first
Outlot north of the Mainstreet, between the Boynton Village and Town Center
projects, fronting the proposed Boynton Village Condominiums.
Proposal:
Concurrency:
Traffic:
Utilities:
BACKGROUND
Kimberly Glas-Castro of Ruden McCloskey, representing 1950 Congress Avenue,
LLC, is requesting site plan approval for the construction of a 12,120 square foot
retail building on the 1.583-acre parcel. Outlot #5 is one of the parcels fronting on
Congress Avenue that were not completely designed when the overall site plan for
Boynton Village and Town Center was approved by the City Commission on
September 20, 2005. While the approved plans depicted the Outlots, the in-depth
detail for each of the parcels was to be provided in the submittal of separate site
plan applications for each.
ANALYSIS
A traffic statement for the entire Boynton Village and Town Center project was sent
to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure
an adequate level of service. In a response dated February 1, 2005 , Palm Beach
County Traffic Division determined that the project meets the Traffic Performance
Standards, with conditions limiting the number of new PM peak hour external trips
that could be generated by any new construction and linking them to required
roadway improvements. Therefore, a monitoring matrix has been created between
the City and the master developer's traffic engineer to assist in the issuance of
building permits for the various phases, to ensure compliance with the overall
development order. Additionally, a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level
of Service) designation for various roadway linkages was adopted by Palm Beach
County which recognized the difficulty of certain intersection improvements (i.e.
additional turn lanes for certain turning movements at Old Boynton Road and
Congress Avenue). As stated earlier, construction of this component of the project
may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements noted in
the Boynton Village & Town Center development order(see Exhibit "C" - Conditions
of Approval).
The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million
gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the
projected potable water for this project. Local piping and infrastructure
improvements may be required, especially on the water delivery system for the
project, depending on the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These
Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028)
Memorandum No PZ 06-189
Page 3
local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be
reviewed at the time of permitting. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater
treatment capacity is also currently available to serve the project. The applicant
has already paid the capacity reservation fee for the entire master development.
Police / Fire: Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be
sufficient to meet the expected demand for services.
Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The
Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is
recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time
of permit review (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
School: School concurrency is not required for this type of project.
Driveways: The site plan (Sheet C5) shows that three (3) points of ingress/egress are proposed
for the retail building. One driveway opening would occur at the northeast corner
of the parcel, and another at the southeast corner, both of which would connect
with the westernmost north/south drive directly to the east of all of the Outlots. A
third point of ingress/egress is proposed at the southwest corner of the parcel, and
serves as a cross-access drive with Buildings "J" & "K" to the south.
Parking Facility: In the review of the master development plan for Boynton Town Center, parking
was calculated on the basis of a shopping center, due to the nature of the mixture
of uses proposed. According to the Land Development Regulations, shopping
centers require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. The
site plan (Sheet C5) proposes a 12,120 square foot retail building, which would
require 61 parking spaces. The site plan depicts 64 parking spaces, including three
(3) designated for handicap use. Therefore, there would be three (3) excess
parking spaces provided. All spaces, excluding the handicap spaces, would be
dimensioned 9 feet - six (6) inches in width and 18 feet - six (6) inches in length.
All proposed parking stalls, including the size and location of the handicap spaces
were reviewed and approved by both the Engineering Division and Building
Division. The master developer also entered into cross-access and cross-parking
agreements, which provides for overflow parking in times of need. The dumpster
and trash compactor have been sited to provide maximum accessibility and
maneuverability for waste removal equipment. Traffic circulation is maintained
completely around the building in order to allow optimum emergency response
capabilities.
Landscaping: The proposed open space or "pervious" area would be 18,074 square feet or
26.21 % of the total outlot. The master plan for the entire Boynton Town Center
was approved with a 25 foot landscape buffer along the west (Congress Avenue)
side of the project and included Live Oak and Mahogany trees, Royal Palm trees,
Cocoplum and Plumbago shrubs, among others. This 25 foot landscape buffer is
Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028)
Memorandum No PZ 06-189
Page 4
the master developer's responsibility for installation and maintenance, along with
various other site improvements, such as sidewalks and roadways. As such, no
Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) will be issued for this building without the
installation and final inspection of these common improvements (see Exhibit "C" -
Conditions of Approval). The other three (3) buffers are also scheduled to be part
of the master planting for the site and include Live Oak, Tibouchina, Pink Trumpet
and Royal Palm trees, along with Viburnum, Cocoplum and Podocarpus shrubs.
According to the landscape plan (LA-l), the applicant proposes to landscape
around the parking areas and building utilizing Live Oak, Royal and Sabal Palms,
and Cocoplum, Podocarpus and Indian Hawthorne shrubs/groundcovers. Staff
recommends the height and density of plant material along the building facades be
increased to provide specimens at varying heights (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval). A non-potable water source will be required for irrigation purposes.
Building and Site: The building and site design as proposed would generally meet code requirements
when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. Architectural style,
building materials and colors for all buildings proposed within Boynton Village and
Town Center were submitted and approved as part of the overall master plan. This
retail building is designed as a two (2)-story structure to provide the required
height along Congress Avenue, however, functionally it would operate as a one (1)-
floor retail space. The elevations indicate the ridge of the hip roof portions of the
building at 39 feet - two (2) inches in height and the top of the rounded parapet
feature in the center of the structure at a height of 40 feet. The remainder of the
roofline varies with different parapets ranging between 30 feet - six (6) inches to
33 feet - six (6) inches in height.
Design: As noted above, architectural style, building materials and colors for all buildings
proposed within Boynton Village and Town Center were submitted and approved as
part of the overall master plan. The applicant proposes to incorporate design
elements from the approved materials and color palette. The elevations show that
the standing seam metal hip roofs would reflect the terra-cotta color approved for
Retail Building "L" immediately to the north and Red Lobster and Smokey Bones to
the south. The architectural design of this building reflects the style of Building "L"
to the north and the various facades along Mainstreet to the south. The retail
building has a number of windows facing west towards Congress Avenue and both
north and south, with some groupings displaying an arched molding at the top and
others displaying the typical Mainstreet storefront look. The building contains the
smooth stucco finish, masonry and precast moldings, which are of the type
approved in the materials and color palette for the entire center. According to the
elevations and materials board, the main body colors of the various retail building
storefronts would be "Pure Cream", "Honey Beige", "Sandelwood Beige", and
"Manor White". The trim/accent colors are proposed as "China White" and
"Allspice". The masonry and precast elements at the base of the building would be:
"Wire Cut Red", "Crystal White", "Dark Pink" and "Sandstone".
Signage: The master developer has prepared a Sign Program for the entire development.
The review of all signage for this project will be based upon the regulations
contained within this final document.
Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028)
Memorandum No PZ 06-189
Page 5
RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Application Review Team (TART) has reviewed this request for new site plan approval and
recommends approval contingent upon satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented
accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\Shared\Wp\Projects\Boynton Village & Town Center\Boynton Village SMU - Bldg M\Staff Report.doc
Exhhsit A -Site Locatiow Map
Boynton Village SMU - Building M
SITE
\ x j
SMU - Suburban Mixed Use
~
~
o 160 320
r-\...-_
640
1,280
I Feet
N
w.'
960
s
EXHIBIT B
0r0WI, ftOI'lIlJ: H:\04714aOO7-Iol"'WfI Wotor\471.eoo7\CAOO\2000 eo~TON ..... , DATA\SU8Mll. XOOA-PlN 9ilS II; PlOT FILES WJR M MOO 0lI-0I2~\psX06A-SWU-"'sm Sll( PI..AN.dlf9 -,,_.;ct 02, zooe ~'7pm
rau
(~~
~Uh
rai~
~U~j
.~~~9
~il1~~
"m
II~i
1;1 II i!i III li:~ li:1 1;11 I I I j I
. I ii~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~
I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ i · j
~ ~d! j ;;~
~~~ Q E r
~;~ " "I m
~~ ih j~ ! Iu
~~ ~; i~ ~= ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~.Ii ille ~
~r i . ~
~ .
~ ~e@@@@
~t~;; ~ g ~ ~ ~
~.~~ ~ ... ~ ~
1ll1ll1A1Cl I ~ 0 I ~
^ .
_ I
m~
I~:~
.
~ ~J Ii: BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU
() : .~ tJ~ DEVELOPER:
U1i~~ ~ C
~ ~~:;: 1950 ONGRESS AVE., LLC.
P"-lM BEACH COUNTY FlORIOA
SITE PLAN
""''''''1[1)--- lIII""'1_n~
-.mSTCOR ..-~.:==- III.J_U IndAllociUll,"-
1IltA-.!'TAY 60742 44.l1P~-d>.-..n::...:-=-~rwn
ocoo .... f'MON[ (51\1 M$-0I85 rid (!IlIl)lU--lln
RQ.I _1lM.CT__.QllII tA_
R~SlONS
DATE BY
Ora""", _ H:\47148007\CAOO\2OOll M UOD IJ - XOfA\CAOO\LM05CN'E\SWl. IkI1dln9 M." LA-1 Oet 02. 200e ~~ ~ .....enlc.dutT
EXHIBIT B
__t.",,- _ _~_............._...._I.._ ..~..._~,... ...._____.... _11_ ~_.,,_-..-_.. ___ ___ _-...._..,.-,...-_-... _ _... _1_,,,.-,...-..___
~ Iii I ..
I IiI I
nd i i 'II
H': I f
. ~~; l i I
U!I J
p;:
! u,
I ~,
. I~
~~
3'
jl
I
8 : : r
r · ·
i ·
1 i t
I
: :1::1 tl
II II
I f
J~
f
f
" ~ i
f f r.
f f t
if
Ii
~
j ilgj
. . ~
f 1 !
~ ~
t .
X .'!
i: ~
· f
f x
x .
~ ~
~!~ii'!liml!~I!ii~i !!
qlr i lii~! ~1 m!lq r.
r
i
4
f
, - il"!II
'r ~ll~i
If.
I
~
~ . ..... .1
U :lIm II !I!I' UIB!
'll:t'~ I III !jl!!
I ~~ I ii~ ,I'
!~!Hi:!im 'i ~!Ir:I.!~: HiIi!ll! !!!iI!i1U1!!:jiiilffi!!Ji
t~. "!',q' I. ,I !f ""'I!I;;r l'lf~!I'"", ...!/I' [
I!! IIliU;! I : ' II d "~l:h J'~! hHil~'J 'il l<II'! i
"I' .1 '.1, J II 'I "'\:1, 'I' 111 I'!',' "'.I,
!"ll~J!"1 f ! "~\I;,S !l'1 ;I, J'I~';'I!I !il~ [
('," ",j!: J I I '~!I'1 'ill I~ :!I" ;1l'~11
1,1,' ","Il! .. ,', , I!>! .~. ,l' 1'",101 !I,.(,
r ~ r -ill;"'1 r
f {i I
i .
H H jn: I
~E .' ~JH
fi H J if
., Ii fl!
f~ J Jil
I J
: J
:' ,"mIl (!l f jf W Il l HI
,f ;j It t If It ullll J
ft ,:w.! i} ~ I "i . 1 f
If tijHi jlll~ 'If !Ii ~
11 JI,t" L.f ill If I f~ { ~
lllift1 It I ,11"1 ~ \ fi
Hili' l' II ~ It dl 't I II
f I P ~ f IJ \lr I (
; \lll1 II ! 111 I" " f"
I ,-' f h I j I
! HiH It! n 1) i : R
i !hu II li'l! t j!
f !Ii' r d f f t 1
if II if ~
I
l~~
~~~
r ; ~~ lil BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU
1" i i ~ ~ ~ DEVELOPER:
...... i ~~ 8 .~~~C~~:RESS AVENUE, L~~~~A
7~' ~~"I!
~i~ii'!li illl! m~qll!i!J. II
q1r ' !.hllll:l, ~l i~l II.
. 1'1 Iii- I,ll'
i
j
i
J
l
I
I
111111 I~ m J n1f.J ~ ~'l!lj ~ u !1!1I~ O! ~
Ihllld I~ I~!!!ll, F! P 'II/,ll ~I\l
'I. I l' I I' . i -II" I
l~:~
LANDSCAPE PLAN
BUILDING M (SMU)
""'AS NOlED ~ -- JII"'1_n KmIey-Ibn
......" 1M'" 1.0000"" a...J_U IIId AIMlCIIIII, h:.
--.. :: IU*M~: -- _~::':;,-:--. -:.0 ~"'n. ~
CMEOCO rr fIl<<M (rnl 112-'IWI ,All (m:) 1ft..- ~ STAfT COMMOlTS
OTW _lllIIIl.EY~ tAllllOOOIIl ~
-22-060f'0
DATE BY
a.
.. .. . .
. . . .
. . . . .
~~
_0
"...
!~
'1Z
"'
!I:
~
n
on
..
o
o
"
,.
~
is.
~ /
i:
I
':"~
f---- .....
t---
':"~
f----
t---
~
':"
I
t---
0'" OJ 3 Ii' -l"'1J all
~~ ali~~
cai ~[g~!
;... "'-Q'l1t
..... ~~-l'T1!:
~ ~ii ~~
~ ~~ijj ~
~ . ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ i
~, H!
~ ~~ i
if f~ Ci)
I>> c.S'-=
I ~[
!
t---
t---
':"~
~
-
-
-
, jl\'
J
1\
~, .
}I -
J\ ·
-,,~
':"~
-' 'J
EXHIBIT/B
~:.:.:~><~,
"'~:""I':"<:'"
::.~.:-~ I\h--~';"
. . . :-- 0 --.:s ,',/
..~'/
II II II I:::::.. . .-:::::
.... . . . . . . . . . .
"1J~
~~
"1J =_
mOJO
-f(")zOJ
Iome
mzcn.
-cn-fO
~-f07
~c=<G)
<(").s:
~ )>-fs:'
:::0 0 m.......
-<z:::oJ'.>
"TI'Q~
-ri I'n ~ ........
O"1J~cn
s::::Or="T1
wZm
o^_
-.
d~
~m
Qo
6N'
I rY30~
. . ~
.
\2 ~
. . . . ~~~
. . .
~
T
'.~ ::J
/ . .
: 'I' f--"
_\'*
:~
--L--.J'r---------- ..
~::J
L-
..-
r-
~::J IL
':.51' I
~~.
75';- .
~
r"--
r--
L-
r-
"'--
or-
I'--
{~Jtll,uG:- ::J
" ,
'T'C' 'JQ ~
,...- . . . .
~ \.
~
.--
~~
F
r., r................
I I I I
.. .. .. .. .. ..
'EJ"
. . .
. --I ..
. . .
. . .
. . .
--=
- . i!!1II >
-- -_!. g '" ~-a
H 11!IIl li~()::I::~-
Boynton Town Center I "'1 a .. " : rt-1 :::c rt-1
~2 Mixed Use Development iI III!!. fl'! ~ :::c - -a
^=-oz:~ ~
~ ~i I Illil 1m rt-1
.. ~~ I i () :::c :::z rt-1
. !:;:Cj -n-f. :~
.. li8 11I:1
;11'
Q
o
.~
@;t
~
~.~
~' ,
,0
('1
" h,"!', __,'
.~..
...
~..~
~
.,. .,.
~ ~
.,.
~ '1 c I ~
~
;;.
,2 t ' ; I
"
6
-i L.J
-,
o!'
~
~
.,. ,
~~
E t
i~
f' .
...
;1
H
f;
i:l
. c
=..
a'l
. ..
: .
i !
.. .
: ;.
EXHIBIT B
.,.
~
~
:~ ~~
:El
it]
~ iLi U ~ ~ H H i! ~ ~ ~ all~& ~ & ~ ~ . "" 'SS ~.!! ~ ;;,n u m na,~ I! D D ~ 0 ~ t J
:iiiiHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i ii iiiiHiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiHi'Hi f
HIUHenenn~u . _ . .' . l
innii;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;--- ulur - -lfff HHiHHi~iiUjijji
iij~i.HjjHiijini.iijiiiH i i--i-ii:iiii~ir.lt...rIHjiiii
I Ill! ~HHII E ~I ~ :~ I nIl II ... ~iPiii
I fl'! i .' 1 , .
---,..--- ----1------------- --:-----.-.--.------.-'--- ---,---
UUUI iln~ 1IIIIiIIIlUII!1 .,
I ;UIUluli;un un;
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Boynton Village SMU
File number: NWSP 06-028
nd
hOb 3 2006 P & Z d
ki
Reference: 2 review plans identified as a New Site P an wit an cto er , ate stamp mar ng.
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
2. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
3. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
4. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
5. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order
and the Commission-approved site plan.
B. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
6. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
7. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
8. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The U S Post Office,
the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City GIS Division, and the
P B County Emergency 911 shall approve the addressing plan.
A. Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561
233-5013)
B. United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
9. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant olant soecies (oer the South Florida Water Manae:ement District
'-
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
10. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of clusters of specimens in the 4-6 feet high range along the
foundation planting beds.
11. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall
where attached.
12. No Building permits shall be issued until the necessary road improvements
triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the
Boynton Village & Town Center development order have been initiated.
13. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
project.
14. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior
finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the
Master Developer for a typical monument sign on outlots.
15. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as
well as all depicted sidewalks.
16. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
17. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
18. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit
door on the east elevation.
19. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
building, like depicted on the south side.
20. All non-vision glass on the elevations shall appear identical to areas of
vision glass relative to color and appearance. The only arched areas on the
second story of the west elevation shall also be fitted for non-vision glass.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\COA,doc
Project name: Boynton Village SMU
File number: NWSP 06-028
Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16,2006 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
(MfVJ .u.~(':'-C?-~_
revl 1 ~ i I:" .,' , ' ,-.----
~! Li, 1----. ,
1st REVIEW COMMENTS !}jj ------..-
N S. PI U L.c! OCr - 3
ew de an L~rc-. .
. f
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster V'
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster V'
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the /
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No /
Parking - Loading Zone."
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section B.2 and Section M. V
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are ~
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.R) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. V
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue ~
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. \/'"
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of /
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
UTILITIES
Comments:
11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the /
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, /
Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, /
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. yI
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature /
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to V
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide V'
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the
main line.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design /
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be ~
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments ~
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of ~
permitting.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings /
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site Approval:
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
4
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
25. Lil!htinl!: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments ~
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or /
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
/
/
v
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of v'
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the /
proposed construction.
29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. v'
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that V
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application: V-
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, /'
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for V'
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton ~
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval. vi
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting V"
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
toppling problem during a wind event.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District V
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. V'
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material V'
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff ~
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the V
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak ,/
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter v'
4, Section 7.D.).
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall V'
where attached.
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color V'
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. v"
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the ~
Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
7
"--
48.
49.
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour tri s noted in the Bo ton Villa e & Town Center develo ment order
uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
iden 1 roposed throughout the Boynton Village and To
roo ect.
Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed
to standard wall acks.
All signage IS subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following
the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument
SI on ou arcels.
The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful oundcover and a minimum of two 2) colorful shrub s ecies.
No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and finaled, as
well as all de icted sidewalks.
Staff recommends one of the three HIC parking spaces located on the south
end of the buildin be relocated to the north end of the buildin .
At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
lans. Each set should be folded and sta led
At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8h inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
Ian to a com act disk and submit that to staff as well.
It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the roO ect, such as one of the roundabouts.
The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form
and submit at time of TART meetin .
The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at
time of TART meetin .
The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of
TART meetin .
The Cover Sheet (Cl) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
a es included.
As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
INCLUDE
v""
€- ~ tlJI
~
V'
v
v
v
v
v
V'
V"
~
/
v'
v'
V'
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
8
DEPARTMENTS
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in hei ht, with no ortion lower that 30 feet in hei ht.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look
for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the
buildin an 0 mimic windows.
68. St ecommends the inclusion of a ings over each tenant entrance / exit
oor IJ,J ~ W 1r11&"J .
69. taff recommends awnings over e windows on the north side of the
bu.' like de icted 0 uth side.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a
minimum distance of 600 feet.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being
treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
MWR/sc
INCLUDE REJECT
v
V'
V'
V'
v
v'
~
V'
S;\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST
REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
- tru- fVtTIJ... V 1$,(&111 ~ 8'N n+e. EZEVkrl~ ,:,1f1rU, ~ 11>evn~ ro
~ or IItf.l(}6\) ~ fU:l.A1Jl/ft 7lJ ~~ MfJ~. If/€. t/7UL-'f
~~~1!J(J.Y t7'f 17M. fJol.J- VISIoN
~ trIlOfc.!> ~ 7)11:.11 W1:!::Jr ~M7&AJ.$~ ~~P/~ ~~.
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
, ,I
,
.j
Project name: Boynton Village SMU -
"',
File number: NWSP 06-028 , . ,/
Reference: 1 8t review plans identified as aNew Site Plan with an August 16. 2006Planniiig"and-ZomIUL
Deoartment date stamo markinS!.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast corner of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast corner of the
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone."
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section B.2 and Section M.
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways.
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement.
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
UTILITIES
Comments:
11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE,
Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the
main line.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site ADDroval:
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
4
DEPARTMENTS
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doorslbays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads), Calculations that
INCLUDE REJECT
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
29. On the drawinJl: titled site plan identifY the property line.
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of Permit application, F.S. 373.216
31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
6
./
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
toppling problem during a wind event.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District V'
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. ~
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight ,/
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the V
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak V
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter V'
4, Section 7.D.).
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall /'
where attached.
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color V
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. ~
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the a/'
Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
,..-
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
7
~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
( 48. I Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the /
J necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order.
49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, ~
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
proj ecl.
50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building ::Is. n1'\M"oA /
to standard wallpacks. ,
51. All signage is subject hi (~ ,I
Development Board and Cil . ,
or proposed location has bel ,
area, including the dimensio V'
the sign program prepared b:
sign on outparcels.
52. The base of the monument si ~ /
with colorful groundcover ani
53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occu
until all required landscapin~ v'
well as all depicted sidewalks.
54. Staff recommends one of the' ~
end of the building be relocate
55. At the technical advisory re" ~
responses to all staff s comme
plans. Each set should be fold.
56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of ~
reduced drawings, sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly ~
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. v"
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form V
and submit at time of TART meeting.
60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at V"
time of TART meeting.
61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of V"
TART meeting.
62. The Cover Sheet (Cl) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to V'
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
pages included.
63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. a/'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
8
/'
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent v"
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an ~
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look y/'
for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the V"
buildin~ and those areas designed to mimic windows.
68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit ~
door, ",., ~ i:.~1' QEV k11e.N
69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
buildin~, like depicted on the south side.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a ~
minimum distance of 600 feet.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being /
treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST
REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1"",,".,
1...-1" REVIEW COMMENT~'; \~~=~~~~J\
New Site Plan \, j\< I ,rT _ 3 -;I"' \\! \i I
", I c. )\_,0 L
Project name: Boynton Village SMU t~\ ---.--
File number: NWSP 06-028 " \ i -- ' , . ';:{'
Reference: 2nd Submittal for New Site Plan NWSP 06-028. ~sponses to 151 review comments.
\
\
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster .,,~
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
This application is solely for Building "M", however, we have made the revisions
to those areas as requested.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast corner of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster ,.
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-l
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast corner of the
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste ,.
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm
We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-l
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone." ~
Loading area for building "M" has been incorporated in site plans as requested.
Please refer to sheets C-5 and C-9 for revised site plan.
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section B.2 and Section M. '"
Fire lane has been added to Signage and Stripping plan on sheet C-9 as required
by LDR.
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend "
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
Pedestrian crossing signs have been added at cross-walks to Congress Ave. at
Buildings "L" and "M". Since scope of this submittal has been narrowed to only
items affecting building "M", only revised sheet C-9 has been included in this set.
The revised sheet C-8 will be included on the next Rectified Site Plan submittal.
,"'"..'~
-,
"",...
2nd submittal - Response to I st review comments
10/02/06
Page 2
. II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestrv
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways.
Sight triangles have been incorporated to Landscaping plan sheet LA-l as ,-
requested.
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards. ,
Sight triangles have been corrected for driveway from Congress A venue into the
Development (between Buildings "L" and "M"). Please, refer to revised sheet
LA-I.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. '>
We will provide root barriers around the trees that will be affecting those areas.
Please, refer to sheet LA-l
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of .....
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
Note has been added to sheet LA-l as requested.
UTILITIES
Comments:
11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the "-
setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
Revised time line is being submitted as part of this response package.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE,
Section 26-12).
Comment noted. We will contact Palm Beach County Health Department
,,",J
2nd submittal- Response to 15t review comments
10/02/06
Page 3
"
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
regarding the proposed changes to the system.
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters, ",
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire Flow Calculations have already been performed. Please, see copy attached to
this submittal.
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
"'
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
We have added a new fire hydrant next to the proposed compactor on the SE side
of the building. Please, refer to revised utility plan sheet C-13.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site "
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
Capacity reservation fee has been paid.
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. '.
Comment noted.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the ,
main line.
Separate service line for Building "M" has been removed as requested. Service
line for building "K" now has been upsized to 10" from 8" in order to serve both
buildings "M" and "K". Please, refer revised utility sheet C13 for details.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) '.,
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Comment noted
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
"~.J
"-
~
2nd submittal- Response to 1 sl review comments
10/02/06
DEPARTMENTS
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Comment noted.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
Comment noted
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
Drainage plans pertaining to Building "M" have been included with this
submittal. Drainage calculations have been already been submitted to SFWMD
and a permit has been granted by SFWMD.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Please, refer to sheets C-16 and C-18 for PGD plans. Please, refer to sheets C-30
and C-31 for PGD details.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site Approval:
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
Developer will work with Police Staff to create and administer a Construction
Phase Security Plan for this Building.
Page 4
INCLUDE REJECT
"
"
\;
\.
.,.'
'" ,/
......,.
2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments
10/02/06
Page 5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
Comments noted
25. Li2htin2: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
Comments noted. Site lighting plans have been coordinated with Landscaping,
Irrigation and underground utilities plans in order to avoid conflicts.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
Comment noted.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
Comment noted.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Comment noted.
29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
Property line identified on site plan. Please, refer to sheet C-5
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
Please, refer to attached water-use permit by SFWMD issued February 6,2006
II'" .
, /
'-'
2nd submittal- Response to 151 review comments
10/02/06
Page 6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3l. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
The above information will be provided at the time of building permit.
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
This comment will be addressed by the Developer at the time of building permit.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Comment noted.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
Comment noted.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval.
Comment noted. Weare not aware of any comments that have not been
addressed.
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
toppling problem during a wind event.
We will add root barrier around trees in those areas. It should be noted that these
trees were located at the request ofP&Z.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
J'
-..
2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments
10/02/06
Page 7
. II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
All trees, palms and shrubs are classified as drought tolerant.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List.
We have revised the sheet and title block to reflect Building "M"
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
This issue has been addressed with prior site plan approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
Please note that using Pygmy Date Palms in a pedestrian area, especially with the
thoms, could pose a health safety and welfare problem. We propose to leave the
landscaping as shown and as submitted on a preliminary basis to P&Z.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
We have revised the species to Podocarpus and rearranged the plants in that area
so as to address the comment. Please, see revised sheet LA-l
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
Comment noted. We have revised the plans to provide additional plant material
in that area.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
Material information has been added.
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall
where attached.
Comment noted.
,r'
,
.....
2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments
10102/06
Page 8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
The materials board, previously submitted and currently in the possession of
P&Z, will be the same for Bldg M.
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development.
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
A note stating the same has been added.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the
Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Revised color elevations are included.
48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order.
Comment noted.
49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
project.
Please, refer to site lighting plan for pole detail. All poles will follow design
shown on this sheet.
50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed
to standard wallpacks.
Decorative lighting is illustrated.
51. All signage IS subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following
the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument
sign on outparcels.
Master signage program nearing final approval with Staff.
52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species.
Comment noted.
53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and finaled, as
well as all depicted sidewalks.
Comment noted.
54. Staff recommends one of the three HIC parking spaces located on the south
end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building.
HIC parking space has been relocated to the north side of building "M" as
requested. Please, refer to sheets C-5 and C-9.
55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled
Comment noted.
56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted
57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
,.
"
~,""
2nd submittal- Response to 151 review comments
10/02/06
Page 9
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Comment noted.
58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
Comment noted. In discussion with Staff.
59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form
and submit at time of TART meeting.
Completed form submitted as part of this package.
60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at
time of TART meeting.
Executed rider was submitted with first application.
61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of
TART meeting.
Completed application pages submitted as part of this package.
62. The Cover Sheet (C 1) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
pages included.
Cover has been revised to reflect "Building "M" Major Modifications". All
sheets that do not pertain to Building M have been removed from the submittal .
63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8.
Sheets have been removed as requested.
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
Sheet C-5 has been updated to include information for SMU Parcel 6 - Building
"M".
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height.
Parapet heights have been adjusted accordingly.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for
consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
Revised elevations, submitted as part of this package, maintain consistency and
compatibility while still offering variation from other buildings.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the
building and those areas designed to mimic windows.
Comment noted and addressed.
68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit
door.
Locations of awnings, as depicted on submitted elevations, have been located to
emphasize aesthetic appeal rather than over points of egress.
69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
building, like depicted on the south side.
. r
;""
""*""
" .;'
2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments
10/02/06
Page 10
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Awnings placed on the North elevation are not necessary due to it's northern sun
exposure. Additionally, as explained in comment response #68, awnings placed
on North elevation would not appear aesthetically correct.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a
minimum distance of 600 feet.
Comment noted.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being
treated as a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
All revision clouds have been removed from this submittal.
MWR/sc
h:\047148007-boynton village\47148007\permits\city of boynton beach\major mods - building m\9-28-06 - second submittal\2nd-submittal-
responses.doc
(? J D .A j Ail ~/)'Yff/Iil4~
. ~~ /()/3/0C IstREVIEWCOMMENTS
New Site Plan
, "(
(,
()
Project name: Boynton Village SMU
File number: NWSP 06-028
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16. 2006 Planiifng and Zbhing ,
Deoartment date stamo markinl!.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone."
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article IT,
Section B.2 and Section M.
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways.
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement.
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
UTILITIES
Comments:
11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE,
Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the
main line.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site Approval:
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
4
DEPARTMENTS
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doorslbays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
INCLUDE REJECT
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
toppling problem during a wind event.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List.
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall
where attached.
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development.
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the
Technical Review Committee meetin~ (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Villa~e & Town Center development order.
49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
project.
50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed
to standard wallpacks.
51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following
the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument
sign on outparcels.
52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species.
53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as
well as all depicted sidewalks.
54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south
end of the buildin~ be relocated to the north end of the buildin~.
55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled
56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form
and submit at time of TART meeting.
60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at
time of TART meeting.
61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of
T ART meetin~.
62. The Cover Sheet (CI) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
pages included.
63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look
for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the
building and those areas designed to mimic windows.
68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit
door.
69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
building, like depicted on the south side.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a
minimum distance of 600 feet.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being
treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST
REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
't
Jc('. \. ~0~
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
, ~
!
~
OCT
co
~, ~
Project name: Boynton Village SMU
File number: NWSP 06-028
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as aNew Site Plan with an August 16. 2006 Planni~ and Zoning .
Deoartment date stamo marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopv tree/palm
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone."
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article IT,
Section B.2 and Section M.
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.R) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways.
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement.
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
UTILITIES
Comments:
11. Provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE,
Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the
main line.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site Approval:
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
4
DEPARTMENTS
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doorslbays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
j. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
INCLUDE REJECT
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval. V
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting /
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
toppling problem during a wind event.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List.
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall
where attached.
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development.
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the
Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order.
49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
project.
50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed
to standard wallpacks.
51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following
the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument
sign on outparcels.
52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species.
53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as
well as all depicted sidewalks.
54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south
end ofthe building be relocated to the north end of the building.
55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled
56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8~ inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form
and submit at time of TART meeting.
60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at
time of TART meeting.
61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of
TART meeting.
62. The Cover Sheet (C1) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
pages included.
63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look
for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the
building and those areas designed to mimic windows.
68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit
door.
69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
building, like depicted on the south side.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a
minimum distance of 600 feet.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being
treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST
REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
..
~
~U~bl~ ~~t3P W/1J~ C,J.-lf)rrtaJs,-
~-
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS /.. ..-
New Site Plan . /&- 3~,. .
\ j
Project name: Boynton Village SMU
File number: NWSP 06-028 ' -
Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16.2006 Planning and Zoning'
Department date stamp markine:
. .----
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopv tree/palm
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone."
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section B.2 and Section M.
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways.
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") Thev are not
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement.
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
UTILITIES
Comments:
II. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE,
Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
,
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the
main line.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site Approval:
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
4
DEPARTMENTS
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
]. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of ~
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction. V
29. On the drawinJ1; titled site plan identify the property line. V
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that V
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application: /
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, 1/
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for V
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach /
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
topplim~ problem during a wind event.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List.
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall
where attached.
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development.
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the
Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order.
49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
project.
50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed
to standard wallpacks.
51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following
the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument
sign on outparcels.
52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species.
53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as
well as all depicted sidewalks.
54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south
end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building.
55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled
56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form
and submit at time of TART meeting.
60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at
time of TART meeting.
61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of
TART meeting.
62. The Cover Sheet (CI) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
pages included.
63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look
for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the
buildin12; and those areas desij2;lled to mimic windows.
68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit
door.
69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
building, like depicted on the south side.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a
minimum distance of 600 feet.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being
treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST
REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
Project name: Boynton Village SMU
File number: NWSP 06-028
Reference: 151 review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16. 2006 Planning and Zoning
D dat ki
'eoartment e stamn mar nl!.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone."
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section B.2 and Section M.
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestrv
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways.
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") Thev are not
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement.
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
UTILITIES
Comments:
11. Provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE,
Section 26-12).
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the
main line.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site Approval:
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
4
DEPARTMENTS
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
25. Li2htin2: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
INCLUDE REJECT
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
6
f<\~
to.3
00
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
toppling problem during a wind event.
FORESTERJENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List.
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall
where attached.
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development.
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the
Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
7
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order.
49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
proiect.
50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed
to standard wallpacks.
51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following
the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument
si~ on outparcels.
52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species.
53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and finaled, as
well as all depicted sidewalks.
54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south
end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building.
55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled
56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8\12 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form
and submit at time of TART meeting.
60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at
time of TART meeting.
61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of
TART meetinj2;.
62. The Cover Sheet (Cl) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
pages included.
63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/02/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look
for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the
building and those areas designed to mimic windows.
68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit
door.
69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
building, like depicted on the south side.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a
minimum distance of 600 feet.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being
treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST
REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
'"""
'-'" 'wII
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
New Site Plan
~,..., t;:;\...-, f' \
". II" I ~ ,! '
O ' I?' ,tr" ! , j, I
, ...--- .-- I ,.,
I l I I II I
<:, I 6 I; I:
c~cil ~~_~3 :OO~[J
Project name: Boynton Village SMU t," :'.,".)0
File number: NWSP 06-028 , i"::,, Dr;!
Reference: 2nd Submittal for New Site Plan NWSP 06-028. Responses to 151 review corriiheirtS.------'
J
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed
dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
This application is solely for Building "M", however, we have made the revisions
to those areas as requested.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at
the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with
Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster
enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-l
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the
proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the
Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste
pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure
or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm
We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-I
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.) Delineate and stripe
the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone."
Loading area for building "M" has been incorporated in site plans as requested.
Please refer to sheets C-5 and C-9 for revised site plan.
5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section B.2 and Section M.
Fire lane has been added to Signage and Stripping plan on sheet C-9 as required
by LDR.
6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and
"M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are
indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend
on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
Pedestrian crossing signs have been added at cross-walks to Congress Ave. at
Buildings "L" and "M". Since scope of this submittal has been narrowed to only
items affecting building "M", only revised sheet C-9 has been included in this set.
The revised sheet C-8 will be included on the next Rectified Site Plan submittal.
"
"-'
" ....,
,"""""
2nd submittaI- Response to 1 st review comments
10/02/06
Page 2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry
Comments:
7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways.
Sight triangles have been incorporated to Landscaping plan sheet LA-l as
requested.
8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue
into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not
oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County
Standards.
Sight triangles have been corrected for driveway from Congress A venue into the
Development (between Buildings "L" and "M"). Please, refer to revised sheet
LA-I.
9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for
growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement.
We will provide root barriers around the trees that will be affecting those areas.
Please, refer to sheet LA-l
10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the
irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's
operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as
approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility
of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of
Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum
of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the
appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.)
Note has been added to sheet LA-l as requested.
UTILITIES
Comments:
11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will
be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the
time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
Revised timeline is being submitted as part of this response package.
12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for
revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE,
Section 26-12).
Comment noted. We will contact Palm Beach County Health Department
"..
.......
-;...
"""'"
2nd submittal - Response to 1 sl review comments
10/02/06
Page 3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
regarding the proposed changes to the system.
13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments)
with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by msurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Fire Flow Calculations have already been performed. Please, see copy attached to
this submittal.
14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each
building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please
demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
We have added a new fire hydrant next to the proposed compactor on the SE side
of the building. Please, refer to revised utility plan sheet C-13.
15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand.
Capacity reservation fee has been paid.
16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department
has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
Comment noted.
17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire
service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for
Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide
meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the
main line.
Separate service line for Building "M" has been removed as requested. Service
line for building "K" now has been upsized to 10" from 8" in order to serve both
buildings "M" and "K". Please, refer revised utility sheet C13 for details.
18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in
accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design
Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates)
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Comment noted
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
r'
""'....
'<~
""
2nd submittal ~ Response to I sl review comments
10/02/06
Page 4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
Comment noted.
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
Comment noted
21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
Drainage plans pertaining to Building "M" have been included with this
submittal. Drainage calculations have been already been submitted to SFWMD
and a permit has been granted by SFWMD.
22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards"
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
Please, refer to sheets C-16 and C-18 for PGD plans. Please, refer to sheets C-30
and C-31 for PGD details.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments:
23. Construction Site Approval:
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for
approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be
limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers,
construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub
contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other
measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout
the construction phase of the project.
Developer will work with Police Staffto create and administer a Construction
Phase Security Plan for this Building.
"'-""-
.......,
"
..-'
2nd submittal - Response to 1 st review comments
10/02/06
Page 5
II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened
strike plate.
d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place
directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at
vehicle driver slight level.
g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
Comments noted
25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree
canopy growth).
1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near
entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian
sidewalks.
Comments noted. Site lighting plans have been coordinated with Landscaping,
Irrigation and underground utilities plans in order to avoid conflicts.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical
Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the commission and at permit review.
Comment noted.
27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and
the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
Comment noted.
28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
Comment noted.
29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
Property line identified on site plan. Please, refer to sheet C-5
30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216
Please, refer to attached water-use permit by SFWMD issued February 6, 2006
r""
~
..,
'..J
2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments
10/02/06
Page 6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3l. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
The above information will be provided at the time of building permit.
32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
This comment will be addressed by the Developer at the time of building permit.
33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must
incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order
and approved by the City Commission.
Comment noted.
34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach
County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100
Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-
233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
Comment noted.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to
approval.
Comment noted. Weare not aware of any comments that have not been
addressed.
36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting
areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a
toppling problem during a wind event.
We will add root barrier around trees in those areas. It should be noted that these
trees were located at the request ofP&Z.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
P""-
.........
" -#
2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments
10/02/06
Page 7
II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
All trees, palms and shrubs are classified as drought tolerant.
38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List.
We have revised the sheet and title block to reflect Building "M"
39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
This issue has been addressed with prior site plan approval.
40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff
suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along
the foundation planting beds.
Please note that using Pygmy Date Palms in a pedestrian area, especially with the
thorns, could pose a health safety and welfare problem. We propose to leave the
landscaping as shown and as submitted on a preliminary basis to P&Z.
41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the
compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure.
We have revised the species to Podocarpus and rearranged the plants in that area
so as to address the comment. Please, see revised sheet LA-l
42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak
trees within the parking lot and around the building.
Comment noted. We have revised the plans to provide additional plant material
in that area.
43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
Material information has been added.
44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall
where attached.
Comment noted.
,
....
-",
"""'"
2nd submittal - Response to 1 51 review comments
10102/06
Page 8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
The materials board, previously submitted and currently in the possession of
P&Z, will be the same for Bldg M.
46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development.
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
A note stating the same has been added.
47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the
Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
Revised color elevations are included.
48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order.
Comment noted.
49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
project.
Please, refer to site lighting plan for pole detail. All poles will follow design
shown on this sheet.
50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed
to standard wallpacks.
Decorative lighting is illustrated.
51. All slgnage IS subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following
the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument
sign on outparcels.
Master signage program nearing final approval with Staff.
52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species.
Comment noted.
53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel
until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as
well as all depicted sidewalks.
Comment noted.
54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south
end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building.
HIC parking space has been relocated to the north side of building "M" as
requested. Please, refer to sheets C-5 and C-9.
55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled
Comment noted.
56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8 Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
Comment noted
57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
,'.,
.........
""
'.","",
2nd submittal- Response to 151 review comments
/ /
P 9
10 02 06 age
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
Comment noted.
58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.
Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and
the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible
location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts.
Comment noted. In discussion with Staff.
59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form
and submit at time of TART meeting.
Completed form submitted as part of this package.
60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at
time of TART meeting.
Executed rider was submitted with first application.
61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of
TART meeting.
Completed application pages submitted as part of this package.
62. The Cover Sheet (C1) should be changed to reflect the project as Building
M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to
Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be
removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those
pages included.
Cover has been revised to reflect "Building "M" Major Modifications". All
sheets that do not pertain to Building M have been removed from the submittal.
63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8.
Sheets have been removed as requested.
64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent
data for Building M (Outlot 5).
Sheet C-5 has been updated to include information for SMU Parcel 6 - Building
"M" .
65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an
average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an
average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of
35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height.
Parapet heights have been adjusted accordingly.
66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for
consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff
recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades.
Revised elevations, submitted as part of this package, maintain consistency and
compatibility while still offering variation from other buildings.
67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the
building and those areas designed to mimic windows.
Comment noted and addressed.
68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit
door.
Locations of awnings, as depicted on submitted elevations, have been located to
emphasize aesthetic appeal rather than over points of egress.
69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the
building, like depicted on the south side.
"........
-'-
,.,,",,,
"'-'
2nd submittal - Response to 1 51 review comments
1 0/02/06
INCLUDE
DEPARTMENTS
REJ
Awnings placed on the North elevation are not necessary due to it's northern sun
exposure. Additionally, as explained in comment response #68, awnings placed
on North elevation would not appear aesthetically correct.
70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a
minimum distance of 600 feet.
Comment noted.
71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being
treated as a New Site Plan for Outlot 5.
All revision clouds have been removed from this submittal.
MWR/sc
h:\047148007-boynton village\47148007\permits\city of boynton beach\major mods - building m\9-28-06 - second submittal\2nd-submittal-
responses.doc
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/13/06
6
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJ
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
Include 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the
Technical Review Committee meetin (Cha ter 4, Section 7.D.).
Y Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color
number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
(li>J(~p
y
The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's
name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter
4, Section 7.D.).
All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height,
24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured
immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the s' e
(Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.4.).
Landscape detail information should be depicted on Sheet LA-l regarding
the (3) landscape islands in the west parking area, as they are not within the
landscape buffer easement "to be done by others". These islands should
have a minimum of one tree, shrubs and oundcover.
Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and
north elevations, to include a greater number oftaller~ specimens.MMl
~1'HltlH8 gf }1alRl!!. Staff suggests the use of c lmt<>..~ ef taBu }1RIHls<<t
t~P i...rl~~+~n "rp;lS m.Rl'I-~ tUI ~ !,1B)l.aet6 ~a<hns an~ proposed aHa tke liBel ef
the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet il!HI.. kllle along the
foundation lantin beds.
Staff recommends the planting beds be continued closer to the front door
and that some type of signature planting (tall, narrow and stately) be
inserted on either side of the entry (not plants that could conceal any
wron doin , but followin CPTED idelines.
~.
l.
A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or
Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The
signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight
triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material
may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or
undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree
requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist
review and approval.
Staff recommends increasing the amount and density of plant material along
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/13/06
7
)(
)(
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
the east landscape buffer to help shield/screen the drive-thru teller
o eration.
A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels,
identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center
ro . ect.
A Photometric Plan should be submitted, depicting compliance with City
Codes and ensurin no li ht s illover onto ad. acent ro erties.
All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning &
Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign
or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign
area, including the dimensions, exterior finis~d letter color(s) (CRIi~tBr,
~ ~ I '7 T"\ .~.the Master Developer RIl~ 8 Q1 typical monument sign
.tG be ~flarefl v:it.R t.R~ JW'lttiug Qwt parsel. f~ sign Cll3emel'lt fer tflc 3halcd
The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced
with colorful oundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub s ecies.
Please provide, in tabular form, a breakdown of sign calculations for all
signage for the entire site, depicting the code requirement and that being
ro osed, indicatin com liance with all code re uirements.
All monument signs shall clearly indicate the project street address at the
to of the si
Non-word depictions on signs shall be limited to 20% of the area of the
sign. Please provide calculation indicating compliance with this
re uirement.
If any other on-site directional signage is proposed, please provide proposed
location, detail includin size, materials and color, and ro osed wording.
~.
~.
~
7':
Staff recommends the use of decorative~gting on the building as
o osed to standard wall acks.
A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development.
Please note this on all architectural sheets.
The metes and bounds description and associated drawings on Sheet 1 of 1
by ACTAlASCM Land Title depicts the 25 foot landscape buffer easement
along Congress Avenue within this parcel. Why is the landscape buffer
depicted within this parcel, when installation and maintenance thereof rests
with the master develo er?
No e.o. (Certificate of occupanc~.ll be issued for t~i icular parcel
until all required landscaping has e(i stalled, inspecte a fi led, as well
as all de icted sidewalks.
r;V
~
't1'f
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/13/06
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
~ On the Site Plan (Sheet C-3), lot coverage indicates the inclusion of a
retention pond. Obviously this would be a common area pond. Please
provide some analysis as to how this part of the pond was allocated to this
project.
~ On the Site Plan (Sheet C-3), under total site area, please explain the
calculation of site area for this particular outparcel, and correct it to indicate
outlot 2 instead of 1.
~ On the Site Plan (Sheet C-3), what is the square item immediately east of
the H/C ramp leading to the front door, a decorative design in the concrete?
~. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written
responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised
plans. Each set should be folded and stapled
~. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of
reduced drawings, sized 8YS. inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each
plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well.
~. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly
advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007.
~. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the
"Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.",
MWR/sc ~~11IM
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\RCB Centura\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
~~ftSYJ..
MtArSli, ~
~ A4'I> ~ fJ11Id. ~ ~ lit
IrW ~ ~~._~ /fJ A
_ ~ L-J ~ /)I>I'--.,J AJ ;"e
~ ~",v->.- rrrl ~ 111h
~ VIS'~ wCA"f1 * nJl
~Ir~ ~
~
~.
~ :><,j' J
v~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
X The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the X
"Art in Public Places" program and has demonstrated their participation
through the submittal of the Public Art Information Form. Associated Art
fpp," are due at time of permitting.
,:yr: All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall X
/ where attached.
~. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought X
V tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible.
~ Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the X
necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak
hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. J
---
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
'"
',,"
\
.
'"
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Red Lobster\NWSP 06-018\COA,doc
V /#e 14POJ.. 17; nI€ ~7Z fJltM/ ~~ /QI14 Nvr ~/~. ~ ~/r K71~
6F 7Ntr 1ka;T)A)(;.
.7 111& ~e /kr ~ ~ tor I~" p~ ~ ~ 711€ ~.u.ri!J
~ I r Ar 771U1# 4= 71J1Z.r fklJllAJ a,"
v' ~ /hItJuU7l~ IS /)t(,uINt; ~ J + '1 41r PuH€ ~/rA7' 11M6 ~ 71f1'/..r /lUa:TtfM,.
, I ~ .
v'"' THe eWSl-.$tIa;r (CI) JI./4V~ ~ ~ 7!> tzeFteC:r ~ ~ ~ &I/{,/)IAJ..6-
M A1" l:vy,Q~ V;UMI~ e5'Ml(. IJIE. ~#a'r.s fAJ/7HtJJ 'f1IE; p~ 1Jhfl/"r.k>tfJ1rr ~ n
(Dvr&Jt1f 5 )
?;Jv/lJ>I~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ t()Hf(!JJ If' /~ ~^ 1J/(1h)~ 1#6 ~et:J ~
72IE ~/711f<, 1tiI/.b 7J.Ii, J~ ~~ (lJ ~ ~ ~ I'4U5 JQC-tU()Q)"
vY' ~ ~ JQ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1l1€ fJ.c.~. Pt.n: ~IhETS /-8.
/TJIId .$m PUftV (~e5) ~CONr1t'IJ) '.sI"TE. I>1t17r ~11saA<L PEl-7}~
~ Ph. fu~ M (ourturS).
~'1 y: ~ ~$ 71.fE. It.IJ€ dF 71KU1L, ~ ~ J#fLUJ;>~.u ~
~~J TJJ(;J I"A ,ttf! tJ1"f7I~En/~_U~~~71Ie~~~
~. ~ 1If~1"fi(]/€. t<.IL oF d~ ~ 40 ()~jJen-1f/~ 4-U.... ~
1JIe !',VB OJ1&, ~ 1h/7l#J) fi.Ie ~MJ4lcy ~ ~ ~ l>v/~~.
.. ~ ~ ~B ~ 711€. 77-HU:E. Hie hbu4~ ~ ~
kp nIe ~ 191/1) ~ 7J.IE /XJIUI'~ eE ecu~ 7lJ me A.f!mn.t ~
OF ~ ~/~K~.
v /;cJ1t1;, 1))6 M 10$ IZ6!pVI/1.e:IJ 1f; ~ ~5 t:a:r /,() ~/~ ~ IS bUov~
'TO .IN ~ lleltlll-r ~ 35 IToer Bur 1Jh.s lAIl~/il-(, ~.s IVO 7 ~Dt)
J
~ ~ w~ ~ #O~ ~.3S 16d. p~ M..tU$r
~ ~/lbAH; 7;0 A10 I;f)~ c1;: .JS n:c:r JA) ~ IC;/ff tOJ T14' AJt; f2wLn iH1J
)
t-~ ~ 3v~ I'" ~~.
/ lilt. P1r~.I!rIZe (lrt) ~/l-14-IZ- 7b ~ 6F ~I U~ t-. Wu-,U' ~71IFF
/}Cfi6 ~ faz.- ~/.$r~ ~ ~".-nl;xta!:J UlZoBDV Itil~
~, ~ ~~ k tJ7TU ~ ~~7t(M) ~
/~}If) -rn ~.
/ ~ ~/Cbw..A& a&vffl~ c$~ ~J ~$C8e1J ~
~ ~ lht) 771€ bJ/~'~ A?v() ~ ~ ~/~f2iJ 'to tulAke-
/)#~~.
/ ~1"IrFF ~~ 7lJ€ /,fJ ~(~ "'" IJ('(.h()-I~ 6tkn- 6~ Tbv.vr
~M. /6:..~"" ~.
vY .J,..q..'fP-- ~ AtVPfJ.J.4S ~TU€ WI~ fwtJ ~ ~
Slt>e OJ: 7l/{; /bOIUJ~~ u~ bd>1~ tnU 1716 ~7#JI&Xi...
I
o /Jtl ~ ~u'fllLevr ~r the ~~~ ~ ~ 1/1fC1f) Ar
A- fH,{ All M.uM. ht6 ~ U ".. Ca; Fe?cr:
~. ~ ~/~~~~~/~M7Hd'~/.s
II ,,1
tE:.J~ ~ lIS .4 tfllj)() $/~,PtMJ f?#L ()vrtbr 6.
.J
(/:'" ','
fY'
\ I ;,.l
, \ I
"\
... ....-.
(
J ]--!
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 06-102
TO:
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer~
September 14, 2006 '\
--,~
DATE:
RE:
Review Comments ''-.~
Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review
Boynton Town Center &, Village. SMU
File No. MSPM 06-005
The above referenced Major Site Plan Modification, received on August 22, 2006. These plans address
revisions to the site in Outparcel 5, Building "M." The changes include an increase in building area and
changes to associated site details caused by the enlarged building.
The plans were reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in
the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code
and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE
~,
1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building
"L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away
from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast corner of
Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak
away from the dumpster enclosure' or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor
enclosure located in the southeast corner of the Buildir;1g "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict
with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or
replace with a non-canopy tree/palm.
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY & GROUNDS
4. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15-ft.
sight triangles for interior driveways.
5. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Ave. into the development
(between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not oriented correctly and should be constructed using
Palm Beach County Standards.
/.~6. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize
heaving of curb and adjacent pavement.
7. The medians on Congress Ave. have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of
Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the
Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-102
RE: Boynton Town Center & Village - SMU, Major Site Plan Mod -1st Review, MSPM 06-005
September 14, 2006
~ Page 2
contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved
by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor
shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public
Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge
this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above
stated information (verbatim.)
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
8. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area",
include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone."
9. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M.
10. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to
Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they
are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct.
ENGINEERING
11. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
"-""'12. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
13. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article
IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting.
14. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All
engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach
Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit appljcation.
UTILITIES
15. Provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the
proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval.
Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the
first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater
treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as
possible.
16. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer
systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
~7. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500
g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter
6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater
(CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-102
RE: Boynton Town Center & Village - SMU, Major Site Plan Mod -1st Review, MSPM 06-005
September 14, 2006
- Page 3
18. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200
feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently
covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
19. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either
upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand.
20. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for
the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE,
Section 26-15.
21. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that
is approximately 24-ft. from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and
provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line.
22. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility
construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering
Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
~
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Forestry & Grounds Manager, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
R~ .
S:\Engineering\ Memorandums\Memorandums 2006\06-102 LOGAN 1 st Review Ellipse.doc
~
Page 1 of 1
//
Rivers, Jody
To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
Subject: Site Plan Review - Boynton Village SMU
Project: Boynton Village SMU
File No.: MSPM 06-005
1. All previous comments that have not been adressed must be prior to approval.
2. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system
is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event.
JO~!:j Rivers.
Parks Superintendent
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
(561) 742-6226
(561) 742-6233 (fax)
A sense of COMMUNITY...lt Starts in Parks
What transforms a crowd into a community? Parks provide that chance. Boynton Beach's parks are
where lifetime friendships are formed, where generations can come together, where people discover
what they have in common. It starts in parks.
/25/2006
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
~
TO:
Ed Breese,
Principal Planner
DATE:
August 31, 2006
FILE: MSPM 06-005
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Boynton Village SMU - Building M
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
All previous conditions must be met. In addition, the department staff recommends the following
conditions of approval:
Construction Site Approval:
The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a
construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department
CPTED Official.
a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction
trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft.
The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security
personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit
points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or
any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working
environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the
construction phase of the project.
Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
a) Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways.
b) All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate.
c) Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window.
d) Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system.
e) Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories
with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight
level.
f) Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close
proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots.
...
Liahtina: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval:
a) Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth).
b) Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on
pedestrian sidewalk.
c) Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways
to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks.
y/
SUBJECT:
Project - Boynton Village SMU
File No. - MSPM 06-005 - 1 st review
List of Acronvms/Abbreviations:
ANSI - American National Standards Institute
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act
FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F.S. - Florida Statutes
LDR - Land Development Regulations
NEC - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 06-125
FROM:
Ed Breese
Principal Planner
Timothy K. Larg~
TART Member/Building Division
TO:
DATE:
September 7, 2006
Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352
1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process
does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at
permit review.
2 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind
loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the
provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind
Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the
state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
3 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction.
4 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line.
5 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from
a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of
permit application, F.S. 373.216.
6 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach
Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building
permit application:
A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for
sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
S\Development\Building\TART\TART 2006\ Boynton Village SMU
Page 1 of 2
7 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes
of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded
deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit
review.
8 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for
this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit
application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in
the development order and approved by the City Commission.
9 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the
time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United
States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and
the Palm Beach County Emergency 911.
A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West
Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013)
B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-0872)
bf
S\Development\Building\TART\TART 2006\ Boynton Village SMU
Page 2 of 2
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities
Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities
Matthew Immler, Police Chief
Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal
Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent
Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief
Wally Majors, Parks Director
Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer
Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst
John Huntington, Police Officer
From: Ed Breese, Principal Planner.t@)
Date: 8/21/06
Re: Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services
Project: Boynton Village SMU - Building M
MEMORANDUM
As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning
Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current
infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development.
Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative
for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for
anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and
provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent
us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the
proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond
no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would
enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should
you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at
742-6260.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJEcr5\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\MSPM 06-005\Impact Analysis.doc