Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS 7.C.l BOYNTON VILLAGE SMU, BLDG M (NWSP 06-028) NEW SITE PLAN TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: PROJECT NAME/NO: REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-189 STAFF REPORT Chair and Members of the Planning and Development Board and City Commission Michael RU~ Planning and Zoning Director Ed Breese ~ Principal Planner October 10, 2006 Boynton Village SMU - Building "M" / NWSP 06-028 New Site Plan Property Owner: Agent/ Applicant: Location: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC Kimberly Glas-Castro, Ruden McClosky Approximately 1,800 feet north of northeast corner of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map) Existing Land Use/Zoning: Mixed Use Suburban (MXS)/Suburban Mixed Use (SMU) Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change Proposed Use: Acreage: Adjacent Uses: North: South: East: Request new site plan approval to construct a 12,120 square foot retail building (Building "M'') on Outlot #5 of the approved Boynton Village project 68,967.90 square feet (1.583-acres) Ingress/Egress drive off of Congress Avenue, then further north undeveloped Outlot #6 of Boynton Village with a Mixed Use Suburban (MXS) land use designation, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU); Undeveloped Buildings "J" & "K" of Boynton Village with a Mixed Use Suburban (MXS) land use designation, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU); Undeveloped residential (Boynton Village Condominiums) with a Mixed Use Suburban (MXS) land use designation, zoned Suburban Mixed Use (SMU); and Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028) Memorandum No PZ 06-189 Page 2 West: Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, farther west is developed commercial (Wachovia Bank Professional Building) with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use designation, zoned Community Commercial (C-3); Site Characteristic: According to the site plan, the subject site is currently vacant, and approximately 210 feet deep and 335 feet wide. The subject parcel is one of the Outlots associated with the approved Boynton Village project (Outlot #5). It is the first Outlot north of the Mainstreet, between the Boynton Village and Town Center projects, fronting the proposed Boynton Village Condominiums. Proposal: Concurrency: Traffic: Utilities: BACKGROUND Kimberly Glas-Castro of Ruden McCloskey, representing 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC, is requesting site plan approval for the construction of a 12,120 square foot retail building on the 1.583-acre parcel. Outlot #5 is one of the parcels fronting on Congress Avenue that were not completely designed when the overall site plan for Boynton Village and Town Center was approved by the City Commission on September 20, 2005. While the approved plans depicted the Outlots, the in-depth detail for each of the parcels was to be provided in the submittal of separate site plan applications for each. ANALYSIS A traffic statement for the entire Boynton Village and Town Center project was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. In a response dated February 1, 2005 , Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards, with conditions limiting the number of new PM peak hour external trips that could be generated by any new construction and linking them to required roadway improvements. Therefore, a monitoring matrix has been created between the City and the master developer's traffic engineer to assist in the issuance of building permits for the various phases, to ensure compliance with the overall development order. Additionally, a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service) designation for various roadway linkages was adopted by Palm Beach County which recognized the difficulty of certain intersection improvements (i.e. additional turn lanes for certain turning movements at Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue). As stated earlier, construction of this component of the project may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order(see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water for this project. Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required, especially on the water delivery system for the project, depending on the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028) Memorandum No PZ 06-189 Page 3 local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is also currently available to serve the project. The applicant has already paid the capacity reservation fee for the entire master development. Police / Fire: Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: School concurrency is not required for this type of project. Driveways: The site plan (Sheet C5) shows that three (3) points of ingress/egress are proposed for the retail building. One driveway opening would occur at the northeast corner of the parcel, and another at the southeast corner, both of which would connect with the westernmost north/south drive directly to the east of all of the Outlots. A third point of ingress/egress is proposed at the southwest corner of the parcel, and serves as a cross-access drive with Buildings "J" & "K" to the south. Parking Facility: In the review of the master development plan for Boynton Town Center, parking was calculated on the basis of a shopping center, due to the nature of the mixture of uses proposed. According to the Land Development Regulations, shopping centers require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. The site plan (Sheet C5) proposes a 12,120 square foot retail building, which would require 61 parking spaces. The site plan depicts 64 parking spaces, including three (3) designated for handicap use. Therefore, there would be three (3) excess parking spaces provided. All spaces, excluding the handicap spaces, would be dimensioned 9 feet - six (6) inches in width and 18 feet - six (6) inches in length. All proposed parking stalls, including the size and location of the handicap spaces were reviewed and approved by both the Engineering Division and Building Division. The master developer also entered into cross-access and cross-parking agreements, which provides for overflow parking in times of need. The dumpster and trash compactor have been sited to provide maximum accessibility and maneuverability for waste removal equipment. Traffic circulation is maintained completely around the building in order to allow optimum emergency response capabilities. Landscaping: The proposed open space or "pervious" area would be 18,074 square feet or 26.21 % of the total outlot. The master plan for the entire Boynton Town Center was approved with a 25 foot landscape buffer along the west (Congress Avenue) side of the project and included Live Oak and Mahogany trees, Royal Palm trees, Cocoplum and Plumbago shrubs, among others. This 25 foot landscape buffer is Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028) Memorandum No PZ 06-189 Page 4 the master developer's responsibility for installation and maintenance, along with various other site improvements, such as sidewalks and roadways. As such, no Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) will be issued for this building without the installation and final inspection of these common improvements (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The other three (3) buffers are also scheduled to be part of the master planting for the site and include Live Oak, Tibouchina, Pink Trumpet and Royal Palm trees, along with Viburnum, Cocoplum and Podocarpus shrubs. According to the landscape plan (LA-l), the applicant proposes to landscape around the parking areas and building utilizing Live Oak, Royal and Sabal Palms, and Cocoplum, Podocarpus and Indian Hawthorne shrubs/groundcovers. Staff recommends the height and density of plant material along the building facades be increased to provide specimens at varying heights (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). A non-potable water source will be required for irrigation purposes. Building and Site: The building and site design as proposed would generally meet code requirements when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. Architectural style, building materials and colors for all buildings proposed within Boynton Village and Town Center were submitted and approved as part of the overall master plan. This retail building is designed as a two (2)-story structure to provide the required height along Congress Avenue, however, functionally it would operate as a one (1)- floor retail space. The elevations indicate the ridge of the hip roof portions of the building at 39 feet - two (2) inches in height and the top of the rounded parapet feature in the center of the structure at a height of 40 feet. The remainder of the roofline varies with different parapets ranging between 30 feet - six (6) inches to 33 feet - six (6) inches in height. Design: As noted above, architectural style, building materials and colors for all buildings proposed within Boynton Village and Town Center were submitted and approved as part of the overall master plan. The applicant proposes to incorporate design elements from the approved materials and color palette. The elevations show that the standing seam metal hip roofs would reflect the terra-cotta color approved for Retail Building "L" immediately to the north and Red Lobster and Smokey Bones to the south. The architectural design of this building reflects the style of Building "L" to the north and the various facades along Mainstreet to the south. The retail building has a number of windows facing west towards Congress Avenue and both north and south, with some groupings displaying an arched molding at the top and others displaying the typical Mainstreet storefront look. The building contains the smooth stucco finish, masonry and precast moldings, which are of the type approved in the materials and color palette for the entire center. According to the elevations and materials board, the main body colors of the various retail building storefronts would be "Pure Cream", "Honey Beige", "Sandelwood Beige", and "Manor White". The trim/accent colors are proposed as "China White" and "Allspice". The masonry and precast elements at the base of the building would be: "Wire Cut Red", "Crystal White", "Dark Pink" and "Sandstone". Signage: The master developer has prepared a Sign Program for the entire development. The review of all signage for this project will be based upon the regulations contained within this final document. Staff Report - Boynton Village Outlot #5 - Building "M" (NWSP 06-028) Memorandum No PZ 06-189 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION The Technical Application Review Team (TART) has reviewed this request for new site plan approval and recommends approval contingent upon satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\Shared\Wp\Projects\Boynton Village & Town Center\Boynton Village SMU - Bldg M\Staff Report.doc Exhhsit A -Site Locatiow Map Boynton Village SMU - Building M SITE \ x j SMU - Suburban Mixed Use ~ ~ o 160 320 r-\...-_ 640 1,280 I Feet N w.' 960 s EXHIBIT B 0r0WI, ftOI'lIlJ: H:\04714aOO7-Iol"'WfI Wotor\471.eoo7\CAOO\2000 eo~TON ..... , DATA\SU8Mll. XOOA-PlN 9ilS II; PlOT FILES WJR M MOO 0lI-0I2~\psX06A-SWU-"'sm Sll( PI..AN.dlf9 -,,_.;ct 02, zooe ~'7pm rau (~~ ~Uh rai~ ~U~j .~~~9 ~il1~~ "m II~i 1;1 II i!i III li:~ li:1 1;11 I I I j I . I ii~ I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ i · j ~ ~d! j ;;~ ~~~ Q E r ~;~ " "I m ~~ ih j~ ! Iu ~~ ~; i~ ~= ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.Ii ille ~ ~r i . ~ ~ . ~ ~e@@@@ ~t~;; ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~.~~ ~ ... ~ ~ 1ll1ll1A1Cl I ~ 0 I ~ ^ . _ I m~ I~:~ . ~ ~J Ii: BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU () : .~ tJ~ DEVELOPER: U1i~~ ~ C ~ ~~:;: 1950 ONGRESS AVE., LLC. P"-lM BEACH COUNTY FlORIOA SITE PLAN ""''''''1[1)--- lIII""'1_n~ -.mSTCOR ..-~.:==- III.J_U IndAllociUll,"- 1IltA-.!'TAY 60742 44.l1P~-d>.-..n::...:-=-~rwn ocoo .... f'MON[ (51\1 M$-0I85 rid (!IlIl)lU--lln RQ.I _1lM.CT__.QllII tA_ R~SlONS DATE BY Ora""", _ H:\47148007\CAOO\2OOll M UOD IJ - XOfA\CAOO\LM05CN'E\SWl. IkI1dln9 M." LA-1 Oet 02. 200e ~~ ~ .....enlc.dutT EXHIBIT B __t.",,- _ _~_............._...._I.._ ..~..._~,... ...._____.... _11_ ~_.,,_-..-_.. ___ ___ _-...._..,.-,...-_-... _ _... _1_,,,.-,...-..___ ~ Iii I .. I IiI I nd i i 'II H': I f . ~~; l i I U!I J p;: ! u, I ~, . I~ ~~ 3' jl I 8 : : r r · · i · 1 i t I : :1::1 tl II II I f J~ f f " ~ i f f r. f f t if Ii ~ j ilgj . . ~ f 1 ! ~ ~ t . X .'! i: ~ · f f x x . ~ ~ ~!~ii'!liml!~I!ii~i !! qlr i lii~! ~1 m!lq r. r i 4 f , - il"!II 'r ~ll~i If. I ~ ~ . ..... .1 U :lIm II !I!I' UIB! 'll:t'~ I III !jl!! I ~~ I ii~ ,I' !~!Hi:!im 'i ~!Ir:I.!~: HiIi!ll! !!!iI!i1U1!!:jiiilffi!!Ji t~. "!',q' I. ,I !f ""'I!I;;r l'lf~!I'"", ...!/I' [ I!! IIliU;! I : ' II d "~l:h J'~! hHil~'J 'il l<II'! i "I' .1 '.1, J II 'I "'\:1, 'I' 111 I'!',' "'.I, !"ll~J!"1 f ! "~\I;,S !l'1 ;I, J'I~';'I!I !il~ [ ('," ",j!: J I I '~!I'1 'ill I~ :!I" ;1l'~11 1,1,' ","Il! .. ,', , I!>! .~. ,l' 1'",101 !I,.(, r ~ r -ill;"'1 r f {i I i . H H jn: I ~E .' ~JH fi H J if ., Ii fl! f~ J Jil I J : J :' ,"mIl (!l f jf W Il l HI ,f ;j It t If It ullll J ft ,:w.! i} ~ I "i . 1 f If tijHi jlll~ 'If !Ii ~ 11 JI,t" L.f ill If I f~ { ~ lllift1 It I ,11"1 ~ \ fi Hili' l' II ~ It dl 't I II f I P ~ f IJ \lr I ( ; \lll1 II ! 111 I" " f" I ,-' f h I j I ! HiH It! n 1) i : R i !hu II li'l! t j! f !Ii' r d f f t 1 if II if ~ I l~~ ~~~ r ; ~~ lil BOYNTON VILLAGE - SMU 1" i i ~ ~ ~ DEVELOPER: ...... i ~~ 8 .~~~C~~:RESS AVENUE, L~~~~A 7~' ~~"I! ~i~ii'!li illl! m~qll!i!J. II q1r ' !.hllll:l, ~l i~l II. . 1'1 Iii- I,ll' i j i J l I I 111111 I~ m J n1f.J ~ ~'l!lj ~ u !1!1I~ O! ~ Ihllld I~ I~!!!ll, F! P 'II/,ll ~I\l 'I. I l' I I' . i -II" I l~:~ LANDSCAPE PLAN BUILDING M (SMU) ""'AS NOlED ~ -- JII"'1_n KmIey-Ibn ......" 1M'" 1.0000"" a...J_U IIId AIMlCIIIII, h:. --.. :: IU*M~: -- _~::':;,-:--. -:.0 ~"'n. ~ CMEOCO rr fIl<<M (rnl 112-'IWI ,All (m:) 1ft..- ~ STAfT COMMOlTS OTW _lllIIIl.EY~ tAllllOOOIIl ~ -22-060f'0 DATE BY a. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . ~~ _0 "... !~ '1Z "' !I: ~ n on .. o o " ,. ~ is. ~ / i: I ':"~ f---- ..... t--- ':"~ f---- t--- ~ ':" I t--- 0'" OJ 3 Ii' -l"'1J all ~~ ali~~ cai ~[g~! ;... "'-Q'l1t ..... ~~-l'T1!: ~ ~ii ~~ ~ ~~ijj ~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~, H! ~ ~~ i if f~ Ci) I>> c.S'-= I ~[ ! t--- t--- ':"~ ~ - - - , jl\' J 1\ ~, . }I - J\ · -,,~ ':"~ -' 'J EXHIBIT/B ~:.:.:~><~, "'~:""I':"<:'" ::.~.:-~ I\h--~';" . . . :-- 0 --.:s ,',/ ..~'/ II II II I:::::.. . .-::::: .... . . . . . . . . . . "1J~ ~~ "1J =_ mOJO -f(")zOJ Iome mzcn. -cn-fO ~-f07 ~c=<G) <(").s: ~ )>-fs:' :::0 0 m....... -<z:::oJ'.> "TI'Q~ -ri I'n ~ ........ O"1J~cn s::::Or="T1 wZm o^_ -. d~ ~m Qo 6N' I rY30~ . . ~ . \2 ~ . . . . ~~~ . . . ~ T '.~ ::J / . . : 'I' f--" _\'* :~ --L--.J'r---------- .. ~::J L- ..- r- ~::J IL ':.51' I ~~. 75';- . ~ r"-- r-- L- r- "'-- or- I'-- {~Jtll,uG:- ::J " , 'T'C' 'JQ ~ ,...- . . . . ~ \. ~ .-- ~~ F r., r................ I I I I .. .. .. .. .. .. 'EJ" . . . . --I .. . . . . . . . . . --= - . i!!1II > -- -_!. g '" ~-a H 11!IIl li~()::I::~- Boynton Town Center I "'1 a .. " : rt-1 :::c rt-1 ~2 Mixed Use Development iI III!!. fl'! ~ :::c - -a ^=-oz:~ ~ ~ ~i I Illil 1m rt-1 .. ~~ I i () :::c :::z rt-1 . !:;:Cj -n-f. :~ .. li8 11I:1 ;11' Q o .~ @;t ~ ~.~ ~' , ,0 ('1 " h,"!', __,' .~.. ... ~..~ ~ .,. .,. ~ ~ .,. ~ '1 c I ~ ~ ;;. ,2 t ' ; I " 6 -i L.J -, o!' ~ ~ .,. , ~~ E t i~ f' . ... ;1 H f; i:l . c =.. a'l . .. : . i ! .. . : ;. EXHIBIT B .,. ~ ~ :~ ~~ :El it] ~ iLi U ~ ~ H H i! ~ ~ ~ all~& ~ & ~ ~ . "" 'SS ~.!! ~ ;;,n u m na,~ I! D D ~ 0 ~ t J :iiiiHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i ii iiiiHiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiHi'Hi f HIUHenenn~u . _ . .' . l innii;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;--- ulur - -lfff HHiHHi~iiUjijji iij~i.HjjHiijini.iijiiiH i i--i-ii:iiii~ir.lt...rIHjiiii I Ill! ~HHII E ~I ~ :~ I nIl II ... ~iPiii I fl'! i .' 1 , . ---,..--- ----1------------- --:-----.-.--.------.-'--- ---,--- UUUI iln~ 1IIIIiIIIlUII!1 ., I ;UIUluli;un un; EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: Boynton Village SMU File number: NWSP 06-028 nd hOb 3 2006 P & Z d ki Reference: 2 review plans identified as a New Site P an wit an cto er , ate stamp mar ng. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS- General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: None FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 2. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 3. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Conditions of Approval 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 4. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 5. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 6. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 7. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 8. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The U S Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City GIS Division, and the P B County Emergency 911 shall approve the addressing plan. A. Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561 233-5013) B. United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 9. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant olant soecies (oer the South Florida Water Manae:ement District '- DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 10. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of clusters of specimens in the 4-6 feet high range along the foundation planting beds. 11. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall where attached. 12. No Building permits shall be issued until the necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order have been initiated. 13. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center project. 14. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument sign on outlots. 15. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as well as all depicted sidewalks. 16. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 17. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. 18. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit door on the east elevation. 19. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the building, like depicted on the south side. 20. All non-vision glass on the elevations shall appear identical to areas of vision glass relative to color and appearance. The only arched areas on the second story of the west elevation shall also be fitted for non-vision glass. ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\COA,doc Project name: Boynton Village SMU File number: NWSP 06-028 Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16,2006 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. (MfVJ .u.~(':'-C?-~_ revl 1 ~ i I:" .,' , ' ,-.---- ~! Li, 1----. , 1st REVIEW COMMENTS !}jj ------..- N S. PI U L.c! OCr - 3 ew de an L~rc-. . . f DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster V' enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster V' enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the / Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No / Parking - Loading Zone." 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M. V 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are ~ indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.R) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. V 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue ~ into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. \/'" 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of / Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) UTILITIES Comments: 11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the / setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, / Section 26-12). 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, / Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. yI Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature / on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to V service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide V' meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design / Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be ~ reflected on all appropriate sheets. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments ~ may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of ~ permitting. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings / and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site Approval: 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. 25. Lil!htinl!: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments ~ may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or / structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that / / v 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of v' Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the / proposed construction. 29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. v' 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that V utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: V- A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, /' provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for V' review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton ~ Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. vi 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting V" areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District V Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. V' 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material V' may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff ~ suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the V compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak ,/ trees within the parking lot and around the building. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter v' 4, Section 7.D.). 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall V' where attached. 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color V' number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. v" Please note this on all architectural sheets. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the ~ Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). . 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 7 "-- 48. 49. necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour tri s noted in the Bo ton Villa e & Town Center develo ment order uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, iden 1 roposed throughout the Boynton Village and To roo ect. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed to standard wall acks. All signage IS subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument SI on ou arcels. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful oundcover and a minimum of two 2) colorful shrub s ecies. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and finaled, as well as all de icted sidewalks. Staff recommends one of the three HIC parking spaces located on the south end of the buildin be relocated to the north end of the buildin . At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised lans. Each set should be folded and sta led At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8h inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each Ian to a com act disk and submit that to staff as well. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the roO ect, such as one of the roundabouts. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form and submit at time of TART meetin . The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at time of TART meetin . The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of TART meetin . The Cover Sheet (Cl) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those a es included. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. INCLUDE v"" €- ~ tlJI ~ V' v v v v v V' V" ~ / v' v' V' 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 8 DEPARTMENTS 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent data for Building M (Outlot 5). 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in hei ht, with no ortion lower that 30 feet in hei ht. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the buildin an 0 mimic windows. 68. St ecommends the inclusion of a ings over each tenant entrance / exit oor IJ,J ~ W 1r11&"J . 69. taff recommends awnings over e windows on the north side of the bu.' like de icted 0 uth side. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. MWR/sc INCLUDE REJECT v V' V' V' v v' ~ V' S;\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc - tru- fVtTIJ... V 1$,(&111 ~ 8'N n+e. EZEVkrl~ ,:,1f1rU, ~ 11>evn~ ro ~ or IItf.l(}6\) ~ fU:l.A1Jl/ft 7lJ ~~ MfJ~. If/€. t/7UL-'f ~~~1!J(J.Y t7'f 17M. fJol.J- VISIoN ~ trIlOfc.!> ~ 7)11:.11 W1:!::Jr ~M7&AJ.$~ ~~P/~ ~~. 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan , ,I , .j Project name: Boynton Village SMU - "', File number: NWSP 06-028 , . ,/ Reference: 1 8t review plans identified as aNew Site Plan with an August 16. 2006Planniiig"and-ZomIUL Deoartment date stamo markinS!. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast corner of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast corner of the Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M. 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) UTILITIES Comments: 11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site ADDroval: 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 4 DEPARTMENTS The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doorslbays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. 25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads), Calculations that INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 29. On the drawinJl: titled site plan identifY the property line. 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of Permit application, F.S. 373.216 31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 6 ./ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District V' Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. ~ 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight ,/ triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the V compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak V trees within the parking lot and around the building. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter V' 4, Section 7.D.). 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall /' where attached. 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color V number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. ~ Please note this on all architectural sheets. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the a/' Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). ,..- 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 7 ~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ( 48. I Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the / J necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. 49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, ~ identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center proj ecl. 50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building ::Is. n1'\M"oA / to standard wallpacks. , 51. All signage is subject hi (~ ,I Development Board and Cil . , or proposed location has bel , area, including the dimensio V' the sign program prepared b: sign on outparcels. 52. The base of the monument si ~ / with colorful groundcover ani 53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occu until all required landscapin~ v' well as all depicted sidewalks. 54. Staff recommends one of the' ~ end of the building be relocate 55. At the technical advisory re" ~ responses to all staff s comme plans. Each set should be fold. 56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of ~ reduced drawings, sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly ~ advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. v" Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. 59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form V and submit at time of TART meeting. 60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at V" time of TART meeting. 61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of V" TART meeting. 62. The Cover Sheet (Cl) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to V' Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those pages included. 63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. a/' 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 8 /' DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent v" data for Building M (Outlot 5). 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an ~ average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look y/' for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the V" buildin~ and those areas designed to mimic windows. 68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit ~ door, ",., ~ i:.~1' QEV k11e.N 69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the buildin~, like depicted on the south side. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a ~ minimum distance of 600 feet. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being / treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 1"",,"., 1...-1" REVIEW COMMENT~'; \~~=~~~~J\ New Site Plan \, j\< I ,rT _ 3 -;I"' \\! \i I ", I c. )\_,0 L Project name: Boynton Village SMU t~\ ---.-- File number: NWSP 06-028 " \ i -- ' , . ';:{' Reference: 2nd Submittal for New Site Plan NWSP 06-028. ~sponses to 151 review comments. \ \ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster .,,~ enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. This application is solely for Building "M", however, we have made the revisions to those areas as requested. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast corner of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster ,. enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-l 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast corner of the Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste ,. pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-l PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." ~ Loading area for building "M" has been incorporated in site plans as requested. Please refer to sheets C-5 and C-9 for revised site plan. 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M. '" Fire lane has been added to Signage and Stripping plan on sheet C-9 as required by LDR. 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend " on Sheet C9.) Please correct. Pedestrian crossing signs have been added at cross-walks to Congress Ave. at Buildings "L" and "M". Since scope of this submittal has been narrowed to only items affecting building "M", only revised sheet C-9 has been included in this set. The revised sheet C-8 will be included on the next Rectified Site Plan submittal. ,"'"..'~ -, "",... 2nd submittal - Response to I st review comments 10/02/06 Page 2 . II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS-Forestrv Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. Sight triangles have been incorporated to Landscaping plan sheet LA-l as ,- requested. 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. , Sight triangles have been corrected for driveway from Congress A venue into the Development (between Buildings "L" and "M"). Please, refer to revised sheet LA-I. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. '> We will provide root barriers around the trees that will be affecting those areas. Please, refer to sheet LA-l 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of ..... Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) Note has been added to sheet LA-l as requested. UTILITIES Comments: 11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the "- setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. Revised time line is being submitted as part of this response package. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Comment noted. We will contact Palm Beach County Health Department ,,",J 2nd submittal- Response to 15t review comments 10/02/06 Page 3 " DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT regarding the proposed changes to the system. 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by Insurance underwriters, ", whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Fire Flow Calculations have already been performed. Please, see copy attached to this submittal. 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please "' demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. We have added a new fire hydrant next to the proposed compactor on the SE side of the building. Please, refer to revised utility plan sheet C-13. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site " plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Capacity reservation fee has been paid. 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. '. Comment noted. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the , main line. Separate service line for Building "M" has been removed as requested. Service line for building "K" now has been upsized to 10" from 8" in order to serve both buildings "M" and "K". Please, refer revised utility sheet C13 for details. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) '., and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be "~.J "- ~ 2nd submittal- Response to 1 sl review comments 10/02/06 DEPARTMENTS reflected on all appropriate sheets. Comment noted. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Drainage plans pertaining to Building "M" have been included with this submittal. Drainage calculations have been already been submitted to SFWMD and a permit has been granted by SFWMD. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Please, refer to sheets C-16 and C-18 for PGD plans. Please, refer to sheets C-30 and C-31 for PGD details. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site Approval: The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. Developer will work with Police Staff to create and administer a Construction Phase Security Plan for this Building. Page 4 INCLUDE REJECT " " \; \. .,.' '" ,/ ......,. 2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments 10/02/06 Page 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. Comments noted 25. Li2htin2: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. Comments noted. Site lighting plans have been coordinated with Landscaping, Irrigation and underground utilities plans in order to avoid conflicts. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Comment noted. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Comment noted. 29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Property line identified on site plan. Please, refer to sheet C-5 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 Please, refer to attached water-use permit by SFWMD issued February 6,2006 II'" . , / '-' 2nd submittal- Response to 151 review comments 10/02/06 Page 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 3l. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) The above information will be provided at the time of building permit. 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. This comment will be addressed by the Developer at the time of building permit. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) Comment noted. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. Comment noted. Weare not aware of any comments that have not been addressed. 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. We will add root barrier around trees in those areas. It should be noted that these trees were located at the request ofP&Z. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE J' -.. 2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments 10/02/06 Page 7 . II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. All trees, palms and shrubs are classified as drought tolerant. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. We have revised the sheet and title block to reflect Building "M" 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. This issue has been addressed with prior site plan approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. Please note that using Pygmy Date Palms in a pedestrian area, especially with the thoms, could pose a health safety and welfare problem. We propose to leave the landscaping as shown and as submitted on a preliminary basis to P&Z. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. We have revised the species to Podocarpus and rearranged the plants in that area so as to address the comment. Please, see revised sheet LA-l 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak trees within the parking lot and around the building. Comment noted. We have revised the plans to provide additional plant material in that area. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Material information has been added. 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall where attached. Comment noted. ,r' , ..... 2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments 10102/06 Page 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The materials board, previously submitted and currently in the possession of P&Z, will be the same for Bldg M. 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. Please note this on all architectural sheets. A note stating the same has been added. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Revised color elevations are included. 48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. Comment noted. 49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center project. Please, refer to site lighting plan for pole detail. All poles will follow design shown on this sheet. 50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed to standard wallpacks. Decorative lighting is illustrated. 51. All signage IS subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument sign on outparcels. Master signage program nearing final approval with Staff. 52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species. Comment noted. 53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and finaled, as well as all depicted sidewalks. Comment noted. 54. Staff recommends one of the three HIC parking spaces located on the south end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building. HIC parking space has been relocated to the north side of building "M" as requested. Please, refer to sheets C-5 and C-9. 55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled Comment noted. 56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Comment noted 57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly ,. " ~,"" 2nd submittal- Response to 151 review comments 10/02/06 Page 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. Comment noted. 58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. Comment noted. In discussion with Staff. 59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form and submit at time of TART meeting. Completed form submitted as part of this package. 60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at time of TART meeting. Executed rider was submitted with first application. 61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of TART meeting. Completed application pages submitted as part of this package. 62. The Cover Sheet (C 1) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those pages included. Cover has been revised to reflect "Building "M" Major Modifications". All sheets that do not pertain to Building M have been removed from the submittal . 63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. Sheets have been removed as requested. 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent data for Building M (Outlot 5). Sheet C-5 has been updated to include information for SMU Parcel 6 - Building "M". 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height. Parapet heights have been adjusted accordingly. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. Revised elevations, submitted as part of this package, maintain consistency and compatibility while still offering variation from other buildings. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the building and those areas designed to mimic windows. Comment noted and addressed. 68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit door. Locations of awnings, as depicted on submitted elevations, have been located to emphasize aesthetic appeal rather than over points of egress. 69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the building, like depicted on the south side. . r ;"" ""*"" " .;' 2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments 10/02/06 Page 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Awnings placed on the North elevation are not necessary due to it's northern sun exposure. Additionally, as explained in comment response #68, awnings placed on North elevation would not appear aesthetically correct. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. Comment noted. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being treated as a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. All revision clouds have been removed from this submittal. MWR/sc h:\047148007-boynton village\47148007\permits\city of boynton beach\major mods - building m\9-28-06 - second submittal\2nd-submittal- responses.doc (? J D .A j Ail ~/)'Yff/Iil4~ . ~~ /()/3/0C IstREVIEWCOMMENTS New Site Plan , "( (, () Project name: Boynton Village SMU File number: NWSP 06-028 Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16. 2006 Planiifng and Zbhing , Deoartment date stamo markinl!. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article IT, Section B.2 and Section M. 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) UTILITIES Comments: 11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site Approval: 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 4 DEPARTMENTS The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doorslbays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. 25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak trees within the parking lot and around the building. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall where attached. 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. Please note this on all architectural sheets. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meetin~ (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Villa~e & Town Center development order. 49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center project. 50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed to standard wallpacks. 51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument sign on outparcels. 52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species. 53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as well as all depicted sidewalks. 54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south end of the buildin~ be relocated to the north end of the buildin~. 55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled 56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. 59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form and submit at time of TART meeting. 60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at time of TART meeting. 61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of T ART meetin~. 62. The Cover Sheet (CI) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those pages included. 63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent data for Building M (Outlot 5). 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the building and those areas designed to mimic windows. 68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit door. 69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the building, like depicted on the south side. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 't Jc('. \. ~0~ 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan , ~ ! ~ OCT co ~, ~ Project name: Boynton Village SMU File number: NWSP 06-028 Reference: 1 st review plans identified as aNew Site Plan with an August 16. 2006 Planni~ and Zoning . Deoartment date stamo marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopv tree/palm PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article IT, Section B.2 and Section M. 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.R) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) UTILITIES Comments: 11. Provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site Approval: 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 4 DEPARTMENTS The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doorslbays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. 25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. j. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. V 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting / areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak trees within the parking lot and around the building. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall where attached. 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. Please note this on all architectural sheets. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. 49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center project. 50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed to standard wallpacks. 51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument sign on outparcels. 52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species. 53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as well as all depicted sidewalks. 54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south end ofthe building be relocated to the north end of the building. 55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled 56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8~ inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. 59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form and submit at time of TART meeting. 60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at time of TART meeting. 61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of TART meeting. 62. The Cover Sheet (C1) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those pages included. 63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent data for Building M (Outlot 5). 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the building and those areas designed to mimic windows. 68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit door. 69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the building, like depicted on the south side. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc .. ~ ~U~bl~ ~~t3P W/1J~ C,J.-lf)rrtaJs,- ~- 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS /.. ..- New Site Plan . /&- 3~,. . \ j Project name: Boynton Village SMU File number: NWSP 06-028 ' - Reference: 1 streview plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16.2006 Planning and Zoning' Department date stamp markine: . .---- DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopv tree/palm PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section l1.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M. 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") Thev are not 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) UTILITIES Comments: II. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. , 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site Approval: 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 4 DEPARTMENTS The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. 25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. ]. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that INCLUDE REJECT / / 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of ~ Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. V 29. On the drawinJ1; titled site plan identify the property line. V 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that V utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: / A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, 1/ provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for V review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach / County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a topplim~ problem during a wind event. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak trees within the parking lot and around the building. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall where attached. 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. Please note this on all architectural sheets. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. 49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center project. 50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed to standard wallpacks. 51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument sign on outparcels. 52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species. 53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as well as all depicted sidewalks. 54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building. 55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff's comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled 56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. 59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form and submit at time of TART meeting. 60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at time of TART meeting. 61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of TART meeting. 62. The Cover Sheet (CI) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those pages included. 63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent data for Building M (Outlot 5). 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the buildin12; and those areas desij2;lled to mimic windows. 68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit door. 69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the building, like depicted on the south side. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name: Boynton Village SMU File number: NWSP 06-028 Reference: 151 review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 16. 2006 Planning and Zoning D dat ki 'eoartment e stamn mar nl!. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M. 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. PUBLIC WORKS-Forestrv Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") Thev are not 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) UTILITIES Comments: 11. Provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site Approval: 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 4 DEPARTMENTS The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. 25. Li2htin2: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 31. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 6 f<\~ to.3 00 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. FORESTERJENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak trees within the parking lot and around the building. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall where attached. 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. Please note this on all architectural sheets. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. 49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center proiect. 50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed to standard wallpacks. 51. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument si~ on outparcels. 52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species. 53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and finaled, as well as all depicted sidewalks. 54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building. 55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled 56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8\12 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. 58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. 59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form and submit at time of TART meeting. 60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at time of TART meeting. 61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of TART meetinj2;. 62. The Cover Sheet (Cl) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those pages included. 63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 10/02/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent data for Building M (Outlot 5). 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the building and those areas designed to mimic windows. 68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit door. 69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the building, like depicted on the south side. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being treated as a a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center 1\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\NWSP 06-028\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc '""" '-'" 'wII 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan ~,..., t;:;\...-, f' \ ". II" I ~ ,! ' O ' I?' ,tr" ! , j, I , ...--- .-- I ,., I l I I II I <:, I 6 I; I: c~cil ~~_~3 :OO~[J Project name: Boynton Village SMU t," :'.,".)0 File number: NWSP 06-028 , i"::,, Dr;! Reference: 2nd Submittal for New Site Plan NWSP 06-028. Responses to 151 review corriiheirtS.------' J DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. This application is solely for Building "M", however, we have made the revisions to those areas as requested. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast comer of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-l 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast comer of the Building "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm We have changed the species of plant to Royal Palms. Please, refer to sheet LA-I PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 4. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." Loading area for building "M" has been incorporated in site plans as requested. Please refer to sheets C-5 and C-9 for revised site plan. 5. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M. Fire lane has been added to Signage and Stripping plan on sheet C-9 as required by LDR. 6. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. Pedestrian crossing signs have been added at cross-walks to Congress Ave. at Buildings "L" and "M". Since scope of this submittal has been narrowed to only items affecting building "M", only revised sheet C-9 has been included in this set. The revised sheet C-8 will be included on the next Rectified Site Plan submittal. " "-' " ...., ,""""" 2nd submittaI- Response to 1 st review comments 10/02/06 Page 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS-Forestry Comments: 7. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15 foot sight triangles for interior driveways. Sight triangles have been incorporated to Landscaping plan sheet LA-l as requested. 8. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Avenue into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. Sight triangles have been corrected for driveway from Congress A venue into the Development (between Buildings "L" and "M"). Please, refer to revised sheet LA-I. 9. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. We will provide root barriers around the trees that will be affecting those areas. Please, refer to sheet LA-l 10. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) Note has been added to sheet LA-l as requested. UTILITIES Comments: 11. Provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. Revised timeline is being submitted as part of this response package. 12. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Comment noted. We will contact Palm Beach County Health Department ".. ....... -;... """'" 2nd submittal - Response to 1 sl review comments 10/02/06 Page 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT regarding the proposed changes to the system. 13. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by msurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Fire Flow Calculations have already been performed. Please, see copy attached to this submittal. 14. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. We have added a new fire hydrant next to the proposed compactor on the SE side of the building. Please, refer to revised utility plan sheet C-13. 15. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Capacity reservation fee has been paid. 16. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Comment noted. 17. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24 feet from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. Separate service line for Building "M" has been removed as requested. Service line for building "K" now has been upsized to 10" from 8" in order to serve both buildings "M" and "K". Please, refer revised utility sheet C13 for details. 18. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Comment noted ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 19. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be r' ""'.... '<~ "" 2nd submittal ~ Response to I sl review comments 10/02/06 Page 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT reflected on all appropriate sheets. Comment noted. 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Comment noted 21. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Drainage plans pertaining to Building "M" have been included with this submittal. Drainage calculations have been already been submitted to SFWMD and a permit has been granted by SFWMD. 22. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Please, refer to sheets C-16 and C-18 for PGD plans. Please, refer to sheets C-30 and C-31 for PGD details. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: 23. Construction Site Approval: The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. Developer will work with Police Staffto create and administer a Construction Phase Security Plan for this Building. "'-""- ......., " ..-' 2nd submittal - Response to 1 st review comments 10/02/06 Page 5 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 24. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: b. Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. c. All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. d. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. e. Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system. f. Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. g. Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. Comments noted 25. Liehtine: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: h. Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). 1. Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. J. Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. Comments noted. Site lighting plans have been coordinated with Landscaping, Irrigation and underground utilities plans in order to avoid conflicts. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 26. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Comment noted. 27. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Comment noted. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Comment noted. 29. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Property line identified on site plan. Please, refer to sheet C-5 30. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216 Please, refer to attached water-use permit by SFWMD issued February 6, 2006 r"" ~ .., '..J 2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments 10/02/06 Page 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 3l. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) The above information will be provided at the time of building permit. 32. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. This comment will be addressed by the Developer at the time of building permit. 33. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Comment noted. 34. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561- 233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) Comment noted. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 35. All previous comments that have not been addressed must be prior to approval. Comment noted. Weare not aware of any comments that have not been addressed. 36. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. We will add root barrier around trees in those areas. It should be noted that these trees were located at the request ofP&Z. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE P""- ......... " -# 2nd submittal - Response to 151 review comments 10/02/06 Page 7 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 37. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. All trees, palms and shrubs are classified as drought tolerant. 38. The landscape plan should be only for Building M, as should the Plant List. We have revised the sheet and title block to reflect Building "M" 39. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. This issue has been addressed with prior site plan approval. 40. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number of taller specimens. Staff suggests the use of the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet along the foundation planting beds. Please note that using Pygmy Date Palms in a pedestrian area, especially with the thorns, could pose a health safety and welfare problem. We propose to leave the landscaping as shown and as submitted on a preliminary basis to P&Z. 41. Staff recommends the use of taller, more dense shrub material around the compactor enclosure, like proposed around the dumpster enclosure. We have revised the species to Podocarpus and rearranged the plants in that area so as to address the comment. Please, see revised sheet LA-l 42. Staff recommends the use of shrub material underneath all of the Live oak trees within the parking lot and around the building. Comment noted. We have revised the plans to provide additional plant material in that area. 43. The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Material information has been added. 44. All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall where attached. Comment noted. , .... -", """'" 2nd submittal - Response to 1 51 review comments 10102/06 Page 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 45. Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). The materials board, previously submitted and currently in the possession of P&Z, will be the same for Bldg M. 46. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. Please note this on all architectural sheets. A note stating the same has been added. 47. Include a revised 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). Revised color elevations are included. 48. Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. Comment noted. 49. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center project. Please, refer to site lighting plan for pole detail. All poles will follow design shown on this sheet. 50. Staff recommends the use of decorative lighting on the building as opposed to standard wallpacks. Decorative lighting is illustrated. 51. All slgnage IS subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finish, and letter color(s), following the sign program prepared by the Master Developer for a typical monument sign on outparcels. Master signage program nearing final approval with Staff. 52. The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful groundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub species. Comment noted. 53. No C.O. (Certificate of Occupancy) will be issued for this particular parcel until all required landscaping has been installed, inspected and final ed, as well as all depicted sidewalks. Comment noted. 54. Staff recommends one of the three HlC parking spaces located on the south end of the building be relocated to the north end of the building. HIC parking space has been relocated to the north side of building "M" as requested. Please, refer to sheets C-5 and C-9. 55. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled Comment noted. 56. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8 Yz inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Comment noted 57. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly ,'., ......... "" '.","", 2nd submittal- Response to 151 review comments / / P 9 10 02 06 age DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. Comment noted. 58. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation. Staff recommends that the fee for this and all other outlots be combined and the Master Developer create a more elaborate display in a more visible location within the project, such as one of the roundabouts. Comment noted. In discussion with Staff. 59. The Public Art Form was left incomplete. Please totally complete the form and submit at time of TART meeting. Completed form submitted as part of this package. 60. The rider to the site plan application was not submitted. Please submit at time of TART meeting. Executed rider was submitted with first application. 61. The application is missing pages 3,4,9 and 15. Please submit at time of TART meeting. Completed application pages submitted as part of this package. 62. The Cover Sheet (C1) should be changed to reflect the project as Building M at Boynton Village SMU. The sheets within the Plans that do not relate to Building M and the parcel on which it is located (outlot 5) should be removed from the submittal and the index changed to reflect only those pages included. Cover has been revised to reflect "Building "M" Major Modifications". All sheets that do not pertain to Building M have been removed from the submittal. 63. As noted in the comment above, remove the P.C.D. Plat, sheets 1-8. Sheets have been removed as requested. 64. The Site Plan (Sheet C5) should contain a site data chart for all pertinent data for Building M (Outlot 5). Sheet C-5 has been updated to include information for SMU Parcel 6 - Building "M" . 65. Building M is required to be 35 feet in height. Staff is amenable to an average height of 35 feet, but this building does not even approach an average overall height of 35 feet. Please adjust the building to an average of 35 feet in height, with no portion lower that 30 feet in height. Parapet heights have been adjusted accordingly. 66. The facades are too similar to those of Building L. While staff does look for consistency and compatibility between adjacent structures, staff recommends a little more variation for interest in the facades. Revised elevations, submitted as part of this package, maintain consistency and compatibility while still offering variation from other buildings. 67. The building elevations should clearly discern between glass areas on the building and those areas designed to mimic windows. Comment noted and addressed. 68. Staff recommends the inclusion of awnings over each tenant entrance / exit door. Locations of awnings, as depicted on submitted elevations, have been located to emphasize aesthetic appeal rather than over points of egress. 69. Staff recommends awnings over the windows on the north side of the building, like depicted on the south side. "........ -'- ,.,,",,, "'-' 2nd submittal - Response to 1 51 review comments 1 0/02/06 INCLUDE DEPARTMENTS REJ Awnings placed on the North elevation are not necessary due to it's northern sun exposure. Additionally, as explained in comment response #68, awnings placed on North elevation would not appear aesthetically correct. 70. All rooftop equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. Comment noted. 71. Remove bubbled / clouded areas from all drawings, as this project is being treated as a New Site Plan for Outlot 5. All revision clouds have been removed from this submittal. MWR/sc h:\047148007-boynton village\47148007\permits\city of boynton beach\major mods - building m\9-28-06 - second submittal\2nd-submittal- responses.doc 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/13/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJ FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: NONE PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: Include 24" X 36" color rendering of all four (4) elevations at the Technical Review Committee meetin (Cha ter 4, Section 7.D.). Y Provide paint swatches including manufacture, paint name and color number for the elevations of all buildings (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). (li>J(~p y The elevation pages shall indicate the exterior finish, paint manufacturer's name, and color codes. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). All shrubs and hedges are required to be at minimum 24 inches in height, 24 inches in spread, and planted with tip-to-tip spacing measured immediately after planting to adequately cover the planted areas on the s' e (Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.4.). Landscape detail information should be depicted on Sheet LA-l regarding the (3) landscape islands in the west parking area, as they are not within the landscape buffer easement "to be done by others". These islands should have a minimum of one tree, shrubs and oundcover. Staff recommends additional landscape material along the west, south and north elevations, to include a greater number oftaller~ specimens.MMl ~1'HltlH8 gf }1alRl!!. Staff suggests the use of c lmt<>..~ ef taBu }1RIHls<<t t~P i...rl~~+~n "rp;lS m.Rl'I-~ tUI ~ !,1B)l.aet6 ~a<hns an~ proposed aHa tke liBel ef the pygmy date palms clusters every 15-20 feet il!HI.. kllle along the foundation lantin beds. Staff recommends the planting beds be continued closer to the front door and that some type of signature planting (tall, narrow and stately) be inserted on either side of the entry (not plants that could conceal any wron doin , but followin CPTED idelines. ~. l. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have 6 feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Landscaper / Environmentalist review and approval. Staff recommends increasing the amount and density of plant material along 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/13/06 7 )( )( DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT the east landscape buffer to help shield/screen the drive-thru teller o eration. A uniform pole and light fixture shall be utilized for all out-parcels, identical to that proposed throughout the Boynton Village and Town Center ro . ect. A Photometric Plan should be submitted, depicting compliance with City Codes and ensurin no li ht s illover onto ad. acent ro erties. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Planning & Development Board and City Commission. No detail for a monument sign or proposed location has been provided. Please provide a detail of the sign area, including the dimensions, exterior finis~d letter color(s) (CRIi~tBr, ~ ~ I '7 T"\ .~.the Master Developer RIl~ 8 Q1 typical monument sign .tG be ~flarefl v:it.R t.R~ JW'lttiug Qwt parsel. f~ sign Cll3emel'lt fer tflc 3halcd The base of the monument signs should be totally surrounded and enhanced with colorful oundcover and a minimum of two (2) colorful shrub s ecies. Please provide, in tabular form, a breakdown of sign calculations for all signage for the entire site, depicting the code requirement and that being ro osed, indicatin com liance with all code re uirements. All monument signs shall clearly indicate the project street address at the to of the si Non-word depictions on signs shall be limited to 20% of the area of the sign. Please provide calculation indicating compliance with this re uirement. If any other on-site directional signage is proposed, please provide proposed location, detail includin size, materials and color, and ro osed wording. ~. ~. ~ 7': Staff recommends the use of decorative~gting on the building as o osed to standard wall acks. A smooth stucco finish is required on all buildings within this development. Please note this on all architectural sheets. The metes and bounds description and associated drawings on Sheet 1 of 1 by ACTAlASCM Land Title depicts the 25 foot landscape buffer easement along Congress Avenue within this parcel. Why is the landscape buffer depicted within this parcel, when installation and maintenance thereof rests with the master develo er? No e.o. (Certificate of occupanc~.ll be issued for t~i icular parcel until all required landscaping has e(i stalled, inspecte a fi led, as well as all de icted sidewalks. r;V ~ 't1'f 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/13/06 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ~ On the Site Plan (Sheet C-3), lot coverage indicates the inclusion of a retention pond. Obviously this would be a common area pond. Please provide some analysis as to how this part of the pond was allocated to this project. ~ On the Site Plan (Sheet C-3), under total site area, please explain the calculation of site area for this particular outparcel, and correct it to indicate outlot 2 instead of 1. ~ On the Site Plan (Sheet C-3), what is the square item immediately east of the H/C ramp leading to the front door, a decorative design in the concrete? ~. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled ~. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8YS. inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. ~. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007. ~. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program and must demonstrate their participation.", MWR/sc ~~11IM S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\RCB Centura\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc ~~ftSYJ.. MtArSli, ~ ~ A4'I> ~ fJ11Id. ~ ~ lit IrW ~ ~~._~ /fJ A _ ~ L-J ~ /)I>I'--.,J AJ ;"e ~ ~",v->.- rrrl ~ 111h ~ VIS'~ wCA"f1 * nJl ~Ir~ ~ ~ ~. ~ :><,j' J v~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT X The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the X "Art in Public Places" program and has demonstrated their participation through the submittal of the Public Art Information Form. Associated Art fpp," are due at time of permitting. ,:yr: All equipment located on the building shall be painted to match the wall X / where attached. ~. If for any reason, potable water use becomes necessary, the use of drought X V tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservation designs (such as a drip system), where possible. ~ Construction of this project may only proceed with the initiation of the X necessary road improvements triggered by the number of external PM peak hour trips noted in the Boynton Village & Town Center development order. J --- ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: 1. None X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: 1. To be determined. '" ',," \ . '" S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Red Lobster\NWSP 06-018\COA,doc V /#e 14POJ.. 17; nI€ ~7Z fJltM/ ~~ /QI14 Nvr ~/~. ~ ~/r K71~ 6F 7Ntr 1ka;T)A)(;. .7 111& ~e /kr ~ ~ tor I~" p~ ~ ~ 711€ ~.u.ri!J ~ I r Ar 771U1# 4= 71J1Z.r fklJllAJ a," v' ~ /hItJuU7l~ IS /)t(,uINt; ~ J + '1 41r PuH€ ~/rA7' 11M6 ~ 71f1'/..r /lUa:TtfM,. , I ~ . v'"' THe eWSl-.$tIa;r (CI) JI./4V~ ~ ~ 7!> tzeFteC:r ~ ~ ~ &I/{,/)IAJ..6- M A1" l:vy,Q~ V;UMI~ e5'Ml(. IJIE. ~#a'r.s fAJ/7HtJJ 'f1IE; p~ 1Jhfl/"r.k>tfJ1rr ~ n (Dvr&Jt1f 5 ) ?;Jv/lJ>I~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ t()Hf(!JJ If' /~ ~^ 1J/(1h)~ 1#6 ~et:J ~ 72IE ~/711f<, 1tiI/.b 7J.Ii, J~ ~~ (lJ ~ ~ ~ I'4U5 JQC-tU()Q)" vY' ~ ~ JQ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1l1€ fJ.c.~. Pt.n: ~IhETS /-8. /TJIId .$m PUftV (~e5) ~CONr1t'IJ) '.sI"TE. I>1t17r ~11saA<L PEl-7}~ ~ Ph. fu~ M (ourturS). ~'1 y: ~ ~$ 71.fE. It.IJ€ dF 71KU1L, ~ ~ J#fLUJ;>~.u ~ ~~J TJJ(;J I"A ,ttf! tJ1"f7I~En/~_U~~~71Ie~~~ ~. ~ 1If~1"fi(]/€. t<.IL oF d~ ~ 40 ()~jJen-1f/~ 4-U.... ~ 1JIe !',VB OJ1&, ~ 1h/7l#J) fi.Ie ~MJ4lcy ~ ~ ~ l>v/~~. .. ~ ~ ~B ~ 711€. 77-HU:E. Hie hbu4~ ~ ~ kp nIe ~ 191/1) ~ 7J.IE /XJIUI'~ eE ecu~ 7lJ me A.f!mn.t ~ OF ~ ~/~K~. v /;cJ1t1;, 1))6 M 10$ IZ6!pVI/1.e:IJ 1f; ~ ~5 t:a:r /,() ~/~ ~ IS bUov~ 'TO .IN ~ lleltlll-r ~ 35 IToer Bur 1Jh.s lAIl~/il-(, ~.s IVO 7 ~Dt) J ~ ~ w~ ~ #O~ ~.3S 16d. p~ M..tU$r ~ ~/lbAH; 7;0 A10 I;f)~ c1;: .JS n:c:r JA) ~ IC;/ff tOJ T14' AJt; f2wLn iH1J ) t-~ ~ 3v~ I'" ~~. / lilt. P1r~.I!rIZe (lrt) ~/l-14-IZ- 7b ~ 6F ~I U~ t-. Wu-,U' ~71IFF /}Cfi6 ~ faz.- ~/.$r~ ~ ~".-nl;xta!:J UlZoBDV Itil~ ~, ~ ~~ k tJ7TU ~ ~~7t(M) ~ /~}If) -rn ~. / ~ ~/Cbw..A& a&vffl~ c$~ ~J ~$C8e1J ~ ~ ~ lht) 771€ bJ/~'~ A?v() ~ ~ ~/~f2iJ 'to tulAke- /)#~~. / ~1"IrFF ~~ 7lJ€ /,fJ ~(~ "'" IJ('(.h()-I~ 6tkn- 6~ Tbv.vr ~M. /6:..~"" ~. vY .J,..q..'fP-- ~ AtVPfJ.J.4S ~TU€ WI~ fwtJ ~ ~ Slt>e OJ: 7l/{; /bOIUJ~~ u~ bd>1~ tnU 1716 ~7#JI&Xi... I o /Jtl ~ ~u'fllLevr ~r the ~~~ ~ ~ 1/1fC1f) Ar A- fH,{ All M.uM. ht6 ~ U ".. Ca; Fe?cr: ~. ~ ~/~~~~~/~M7Hd'~/.s II ,,1 tE:.J~ ~ lIS .4 tfllj)() $/~,PtMJ f?#L ()vrtbr 6. .J (/:'" ',' fY' \ I ;,.l , \ I "\ ... ....-. ( J ]--! DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-102 TO: FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer~ September 14, 2006 '\ --,~ DATE: RE: Review Comments ''-.~ Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review Boynton Town Center &, Village. SMU File No. MSPM 06-005 The above referenced Major Site Plan Modification, received on August 22, 2006. These plans address revisions to the site in Outparcel 5, Building "M." The changes include an increase in building area and changes to associated site details caused by the enlarged building. The plans were reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE ~, 1. Live Oaks are depicted immediately east and south of the proposed dumpster enclosure for Building "L" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the dumpster enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 2. A Live Oak is shown south and east of the proposed dumpster enclosure at the northeast corner of Building "M" that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oak away from the dumpster enclosure' or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. 3. Live Oaks are shown on the east and west sides of the approach to the proposed compactor enclosure located in the southeast corner of the Buildir;1g "M" parcel that may create a vertical conflict with Solid Waste pickup. Please relocate the Live Oaks away from the compactor enclosure or replace with a non-canopy tree/palm. PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY & GROUNDS 4. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H) using 15-ft. sight triangles for interior driveways. 5. Correct the sight triangles shown for the driveway from Congress Ave. into the development (between Buildings "L" and "M.") They are not oriented correctly and should be constructed using Palm Beach County Standards. /.~6. Provide sufficient setback between proposed trees and curbing to allow for growth and minimize heaving of curb and adjacent pavement. 7. The medians on Congress Ave. have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-102 RE: Boynton Town Center & Village - SMU, Major Site Plan Mod -1st Review, MSPM 06-005 September 14, 2006 ~ Page 2 contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the appropriate plan sheets with the above stated information (verbatim.) PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 8. Provide a loading area (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.) Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area", include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone." 9. Provide Fire Lanes in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section B.2 and Section M. 10. Pedestrian crosswalks are indicated on the west side of Buildings "L" and "M", connecting to Congress Ave. No "Pedestrian Crossing" signs are indicated for the two crosswalks (although they are included in the legend on Sheet C9.) Please correct. ENGINEERING 11. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. "-""'12. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 13. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 14. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit appljcation. UTILITIES 15. Provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 16. Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for revisions to the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). ~7. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 06-102 RE: Boynton Town Center & Village - SMU, Major Site Plan Mod -1st Review, MSPM 06-005 September 14, 2006 - Page 3 18. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Modified Building "M" appears to be insufficiently covered. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 19. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 20. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 21. A separate main line tap has been proposed for the water meter and fire service for Building "M" that is approximately 24-ft. from the tap for Building "K." Delete the proposed tap for Building "M" and provide meters and fire lines for both Building "M" and "K" from one tap off the main line. 22. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. ~ Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Forestry & Grounds Manager, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste R~ . S:\Engineering\ Memorandums\Memorandums 2006\06-102 LOGAN 1 st Review Ellipse.doc ~ Page 1 of 1 // Rivers, Jody To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie Subject: Site Plan Review - Boynton Village SMU Project: Boynton Village SMU File No.: MSPM 06-005 1. All previous comments that have not been adressed must be prior to approval. 2. It is not recommended that large canopy trees be planted in small planting areas. The root system is not allowed to properly develop, thus creating a toppling problem during a wind event. JO~!:j Rivers. Parks Superintendent City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd Boynton Beach, FL 33425 (561) 742-6226 (561) 742-6233 (fax) A sense of COMMUNITY...lt Starts in Parks What transforms a crowd into a community? Parks provide that chance. Boynton Beach's parks are where lifetime friendships are formed, where generations can come together, where people discover what they have in common. It starts in parks. /25/2006 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ~ TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: August 31, 2006 FILE: MSPM 06-005 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Boynton Village SMU - Building M REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: All previous conditions must be met. In addition, the department staff recommends the following conditions of approval: Construction Site Approval: The Staff recommends that prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer/project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce/minimize entry/exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. Commercial: The Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: a) Landscaping should not obstruct view from doors, windows or walkways. b) All perimeter doors should be equipped with reinforced, case hardened strike plate. c) Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. d) Delivery doors/bays should be secured with locks and alarm system. e) Directories shall be placed at the ingress points and strategically place directories with arrow indicators for buildings throughout the property at vehicle driver slight level. f) Bicycle Racks shall be installed near building entrances or in close proximity to buildings. Not in parking lots. ... Liahtina: The Staff recommends the following as a condition of approval: a) Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (to include long-term tree canopy growth). b) Building lighting (non- glare) should be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk. c) Provide timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting for above or near entryways to residences and commercial buildings and all pedestrian sidewalks. y/ SUBJECT: Project - Boynton Village SMU File No. - MSPM 06-005 - 1 st review List of Acronvms/Abbreviations: ANSI - American National Standards Institute ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBC - Florida Building Code FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F.S. - Florida Statutes LDR - Land Development Regulations NEC - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-125 FROM: Ed Breese Principal Planner Timothy K. Larg~ TART Member/Building Division TO: DATE: September 7, 2006 Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 2 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 3 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 4 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 5 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 6 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) S\Development\Building\TART\TART 2006\ Boynton Village SMU Page 1 of 2 7 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 8 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 9 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. A Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) B United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-0872) bf S\Development\Building\TART\TART 2006\ Boynton Village SMU Page 2 of 2 The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities Matthew Immler, Police Chief Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Wally Majors, Parks Director Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst John Huntington, Police Officer From: Ed Breese, Principal Planner.t@) Date: 8/21/06 Re: Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services Project: Boynton Village SMU - Building M MEMORANDUM As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development. Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6260. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJEcr5\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Boynton Village SMU NWSP 05-004\MSPM 06-005\Impact Analysis.doc