APPLICATION
City Codes Accessed Via Website
www.bovnton-heach..cY-IT.
\>iww,amlcgaLc.om/bovnton beach J1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR
NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE PLAN
Has applicant attended a pre-application meeting?
Date
This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and
Zoning Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED sets of plans
including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of
the Site Plan Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED.
Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name: Parks ide
2. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name: see attached
Address:
(Zip Code)
Phone:
Fax:
3. Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made):
EastCoast Communities, Inc.
Address: 6499 N. Powerline Road, 11101, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
(Zip Code)
Phone:
(954) 680-1544
Fax: (954) 680-4862
If contract purchaser, please attach contract for sale and purchase.
4. Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant): Ruden McClosky
Address: 222 Lakeview Avenue 11800, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
(Zip Code)
Phone: (561) 838-4542 Fax: (561) 514-3442
5. Correspondence to be mailed to agent only; if no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute
is specified below:*
*This is the one address to which all agendas; letters and other materials will be mailed.
6. What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, developer,
contract purchaser, etc,)
contract purchaser
ALL OWNERS
Owner
Boynton Townhomes, LLC
KCB Enterprises, LLC
Judy J, Lange
Estelle B, Killian
George E, Ford &
Estate of Grace K. Ford
Boynton Townhomes, LLC
Boynton Townhomes, LLC
Boynton Townhomes, LLC
Estelle B, Killian
Street Address
106 Miller Road
108 Miller Road
110 Miller Road
117 Miller Road
115 Miller Road
N, Federal Highway
3506 N, Federal Highway
3480 Old Dixie Hwy
3508 N, Federal Hwy
PARKSIDE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS/STREET ADDRESSES
Legal Description
KILLlANS PARK Lot 6 and West 1/2 of Lot 7
KILLlANS PARK E 1/2 of L T 7 & L T 8
KILLlANS PARK L T 9 & W 1/2 of L T 10
KILLlANS PARK LT 16 & E 1/2 ofLT 17
KILLlANS PARK E 1/2 ofLT 10 & L T 11
KILLlANS PARK W 1/2 OF L T 17, L T 18 & E 1/2 OF L T 19
KILLlANS PARK E 1/2 OF L T 13 & L T 14
KILLlANS PARK LT 12 & W 1/2 LT 13
KILLlANS PARK L T 15
AMND PL OF TRADE WIND ESTATES L T 59
AMND PL OF TRADE WIND ESTATES L T 37
AMND PL OF TRADE WIND ESTATES LT 38 & LT 58/LESS RD R1W/
KILLlANS PARK L TS 21 TO 29 INC
KILLlANS PARK W 1/2 OF LT 19 & LT 20
PCN
00-43-46-04-11'{)00'{)060
00-43-46.{)4-11.{)00.{)071
00-43-46.{)4-11.{)00.{)090
00-43-46-04-11'{)00'{) 160
00-43-46-04-11'{)00'{) 1 0 1
00-43-46'{)4-11'{)00'{) 171
00-43-46'{)4-11'{)00'{) 131
00-43-46'{)4-11'{)00'{) 120
00-43-46-04-11'{)OO'{) 150
00-43-46-04-17 .{)00.{)590
08-43-46-04-17 .{)00.{)370
08-43-46-04-17 .{)00.{)380
00-43-46-04-11'{)00'{)210
00-43-46-04-11'{)00'{) 191
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of Lot 59, "Amended Plat of Trade Winds Estates, a Subdivision," according to
the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 73, of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida; lying west of the right-of-way of State Road 5 (U.S. Highway No.1) as
conveyed to Palm Beach County, Florida, by a deed recorded in Official Records Book
124, Page 638 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
Together with:
Lots 37, 38 and 58 of "Amended Plat of Trade Winds Estates," according to the Plat
recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 73, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida,
less that portion deeded to the State of Florida by instrument in Official Records Book
104, page 35.
Together with:
Lot 15, "Killian's Park, a Subdivision," according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat
Book 23, Page 195, in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, less that
portion of Lot 15 conveyed to the State of Florida by a Warranty Deed recorded in
Official Records Book 119, Page 453, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida.
Together with:
All of Lots 6 through 14 and Lots 16 through 29 of "Killian's Park" recorded in Plat
Book 23, Page 195, in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.
Together with:
The 30-foot right-of-way of Miller Road as shown on the Plat of "Killian's Park"
recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 195, in the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, adjoining Lots 6 thru 14 of said "Killian's Park."
Said lands containing 7.402 acres, more or less.
WPB:214125:1
7. Street address of location of site:
106-117 Miller Road, 3506-3508 N. Federal Highway, 3480 Old Dixie Highway
8. Property Control #(PCN) see attached
9. Legal description of site: see attached
10. Intended use(s) of site: multifamily residential (townhome) redevelopment
pro;ect
11. Architect: Virtual Design Group / Friese Design Group
12. Landscape Architect: George Keen
13. Site Planner: Virtual Design Group / Friese Design Group
14.
Engineer:
Winningham & Fradley
15.
Surveyor:
Absolute Surveying
16. Traffic Engineer: TrafTech
17. Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property?
No
II. SITE PLAN
The following information must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of
the site plan.
1. Land Use Category shown in the Comprehensive Plan: Special High Density Residential
2. Zoning District: PUD
3. Area of Site 7.402 acres .322,430 sq, ft,
4. Land Use -- Acreage Breakdown:
a. Residential, including ? ')? acres 34,05 % of site
surrounding lot area of grounds
b. Recreation Areas * 0.280 acres 3.79 % of site
(excluding water area)
Water Area 0 0 % of site
c. acres
d. Commercial 0 acres 0 % of site
e. Industrial 0 acres 0 % of site
f. Publicll nstitutional 0 acres 0 % of site
g. Public, Private and Canal rights-of-way 0 acres 0 % of site
h. Other (specify) acres % of site
i. Other (specify) acres % of
site
j.
Total area of site 7 4~re acres 1 OO~ % of site
*including open space suita e for outdoor recreation, and aving a minimum dimension of 50 ft.
by 50 ft.
5. Surface Cover
a.
b.
c.
courts.
site
d.
e.
Ground floor building
area ("building footprint")
2.52
34.05
% of site
acres
Water area
o
% of site
acres
o
Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking
lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic
o , 356 acres 4 . 8 ] % of
Total impervious area
5.156
acres
69.66
% of site
Landscaped area O. 277 acres 3 . 74 % of site
inside of parking lots (20 sq.ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of
Landscape Code).
f.
Other landscaped areas, 1 .811
% of site
acres
24.46
g. Other pervious areas, including golf course, natural areas, yards, and swales, but excluding
water areasO .16 acres? 11 % of site
h. Total pervious areas 2.248 acres 10 33 % of site
i.
Total area of site
7.402
100
% of site
acres
6. Floor Area
a. Residential 282.618 sq. ft.
b. Commercial/Office 0 sq. ft.
c. Industrial/Warehouse 0 sq. ft.
d. Recreational 3490 sq. ft,
e. Publicll nstitutional sq. ft.
f. Other (specify) sq. ft.
g.
h.
Other (specify)
sq, ft,
Total floor area
282.618
sq. ft.
7. Number of Residential Dwellinq Units
a. Single-family detached 0 sq, ft,
b. Duplex 0 sq. ft,
c. Multi-Family (3 + attached dwelling units)
(1) Efficiency 0 dwelling units
(2) 1 Bedroom 62 dwelling units
(3) 2 Bedroom 59 dwelling units
(4) 3+ Bedroom 0 dwelling units
d. Total multi-family 121 dwelling units
e. Total number of dwelling units 1 ? 1
8. Gross Density 161') dwelling units per acre
9.
Maximum height of structures on site
42 feet
1
stories
10. Required off-street oarkinq
a.
Calculation of required # of
off-street parking spaces.
Off-street parking spaces
provided on site plan
res. units
rec. bldg
121 x 2 =
23 required =
242
27
%9
=
b, Calculation of required #
of handicap parking spaces
1 per 7c) 1 ~pRC.~ rpqllired =
Number of handicap
spaces provided on site plan
1 pr()~d rI ",r1
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
BOARD OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY
COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT.
III. CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) 0Ne) hereby certify that
the above statements and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted
herewith are true ) (our) owledge and belief. This application will not be
accepted ess signed a e i tructions below.
IV. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
Ruden McClosky
By:
Signature of Authorized Agent
q:~-as
Date
~-X) -DS
Date
ned person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to
Date
j- de- as
Date
- dO-ClS
Date
A REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO
REVIEW THIS PROJECT,
RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION
The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge, represent and agree that
all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering, and other data submitted with this application for review by the
City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by the various boards, commissions, staff personnel and other parties
designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall
rely upon the accuracy thereof, and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and
substantial,
The undersigned hereby agrees that all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering and other data
which may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, staff or designees shall be
constructed in strict compliance with the form in which they are approved, and any change to the same shall
be deemed material and shall place the applicant in violation of this application and all approvals and permits
which may be granted.
The applicant agrees to allow the City of Boynton Beach all rights and remedies as provided for by the
applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to bring any violation into compliance, and the
applicant shall indemnify, reimburse and save the City of Boynton Beach harmless from any cost, expense,
claim, liability or any action which may arise due to their enforcement of the sa
vi RJEAY. ACK~WLEDGED AND AGREED TO this do a of
~ ~--
~' It ('{: 7 JJet-2>,J Applican
EastCoast Communities, Inc.
----
I S ~
~"'^- S ~.s"-.~~~
, 20oS"
CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR APPROVAL OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS OR PERMITS
Please be advised that all applications for the following land development orders and permits which are
submitted on or after June 1, 1990 will be subject to the City's Concurrency Management Ordinance, and
cannot be approved unless public facilities (potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, solid waste, recreation,
park, and road facilities) would be available to serve the project, consistent with the levels of service which are
adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan:
Building permit applications for the construction of improvements, which, in and by themselves, would
create demand for public facilities.
Applications for site plan approval.
Applications for conditional use approval.
Applications for subdivision master plan approval.
Applications for preliminary plat approval.
Applications for final plat approval.
Applications for rezoning to planned zoning districts.
Applications for revisions to any of the applications listed above, which would increase the demand
for any public facility.
Any other application, which, in and by itself, would establish the density or intensity of use of land, or
a maximum density or intensity of use of land.
Applications for development orders and permits submitted after February 1, 1990 and which
generate more than 500 net vehicle trips per day, must comply with the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance, unless exempt from that ordinance.
Please be advised, however, that the following applications will be exempt from the Concurrency Management
Ordinance, pending final approval of this ordinance by the City Commission:
Applications for the development of property which was platted on or after January 13, 1978 and either
the final plat or the preliminary plat and Palm Beach County Health Department permit applications
were submitted or approved prior to June 1, 1990, and the use of the property is consistent with the
general use which was intended for the property at the time of platting.
Applications for the development of property, which was platted prior to January 13, 1978, the area of
the platted lots does not exceed 2 acres, and the proposed use would not generate more than 500 net
vehicle trips per day.
Applications for building permit, if a site plan or conditional use application was submitted prior to June
1, 1990 and subsequently approved and the site plan or conditional use has not expired.
Applications for the development of property within an approved Development of Regional Impact, and
which are consistent with the approved DRI.
Applications for approval of final plats, if the preliminary plat and application for Palm Beach county
Health Department permits for utilities have been submitted prior to June 1, 1990.
Applications for revisions to previously approved development orders or permits, which do not increase
the demand for any public facility.
Please be advised that these exemption rules are tentative and will be subject to final approval by the City
Commission, If you have any questions concerning the proposed Boynton Beach Concurrency Management
Ordinance, please contact the Boynton Beach Planning &Zoning Division at (561) 742-6260.
CHAPTER 4
SITE PLAN REVIEW
Section 7. Submission Requirements.
Each applicant shall submit to the Planning and Zoning Division the following plans and exhibits in the number
of copies specified by the Planning and Zoning Division, together with a Site Plan Review application and a fee
adopted by resolution by the City Commission,
12 ASSEMBLED COPIES REQUIRED
A. ExistinQ site characteristics map: A sealed survey, not older than six months, showing all adjacent
streets, alleys and driveways, and also illustrating:
1. Existing natural features, including but not limited to lakes, trees and other vegetation
and soils and topography.
2. Existing buildings, building elevations, other structures, including use, height,
dimensions and setbacks.
3. Existing utility lines and all easements,
4. Existing elevations (corner, street and finished floor)
B. Site development plan:
1. A scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed buildings and other structures, and any
existing buildings and structures, which are to be retained, including use, height,
dimensions and setbacks.
2. Proposed off-street parking spaces, driveways and sidewalks, including location,
dimensions and setbacks, traffic control markings and signage.
3. Proposed fences and walls, including location, dimensions, setbacks, height and
material.
4. Proposed location of lighting on site.
5. Proposed dumpster location.
C. Landscape plan:
1. A separate scaled drawing (at the same scale as the site development plan) prepared as
required by state law clearly illustrating proposed trees, shrubs, grass and
2. Proposed berms, watercourses and other topographic features.
3. A notation on method of irrigation.
Architectural plan:
1. A scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plan and elevations,
including height, exterior dimensions, exterior color and materials.
2. A colored elevation drawing (not mounted) showing all elevations of the building. (This
submittal can be waived by the Planning and Zoning Director when not applicable.)
E. Tabular Summary ContaininQ:
1. Total gross project area by acreage and square footage and net buildable land area in
acres and square feet.
2. Total number of proposed residential units, including characteristics by number of
bedrooms and bathrooms and gross square footage of each typical unit.
3. Proposed nonresidential floor type of use and total gross square footage.
4. Square footage and percentage distribution of the total project site, including areas
proposed for landscaped open space, vehicular use areas, other paved areas, and
building coverage and total coverage.
5. Number and ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces and number of
loading spaces.
6. Water bodies in acres and square feet.
7. Height of buildings.
F. DrainaQe plan:
1.
2.
A separate scaled drawing (at the same scale as the site development plan) showing
elevations, flow arrows, proposed drainage structures, proposed treatment facilities, etc.
An engineer's certification in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations,
codes, etc. including, but not limited to, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of these Land
Development Regulations.
Revised 10/26/01
~ Ruden
~~I McClosky
222 LAKEVIEW AVENUE
SUITE 800
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401-6112
(561) 838-4542
FAX, (561) 514-3442
KIM GLASCASTRO@RUDEN,COM
9/20/2005
Parkside
Annexation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Abandonment
Annexation
EastCoast Communities, Inc. (the "Applicant") is requesting voluntary annexation of
4.456 acres, located along the City's southern boundaries, between Federal Highway and Old
Dixie Highway. This annexation area includes twelve (12) parcels and Miller Road!. Of these
12 parcels, 6 are vacant, 4 are improved and occupied single-family residences, and 1 is
improved with a commercial building. The subject area is under contract for purchase by the
Applicant, and is proposed for assembly with adjacent properties within the City limits to
facilitate a redevelopment project.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Land Use Change)
The Applicant is requesting an amendment to the Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan to
amend the land use on a total of 7.402 acres. This area includes the aforementioned annexation
area (4.456 acres), which will be changed from Palm Beach County land use designations of
Commercial High/5 and Medium Residential 5 (5 dulac), as well as 2.946 acres currently within
the City limits that is designated with the City land use designations of General Commercial and
Local Retail Commercial. The City's Special High Density Residential (up to 20 dulac) is
requested. The proposed land use change will facilitate the redevelopment of the area with a
townhome community, Parkside.
Rezoning
Concurrent with the voluntary annexation and small-scale land use amendment, the
Applicant is requesting rezoning of the subject property from the current C3, C4, RM and CG
(latter two are County zoning) districts to Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD). The
proposed Parkside residential community is comprised of 121 townhomes for a gross density of
16.35 dulac, which is consistent with the Special High Density Residential land use designation.
! Miller Road was dedicated to the "public" via the Killian's Park Plat (PB23, PgI95), and upon
annexation of the area becomes a city road, per Palm Beach County Land Development Division
- Engineering Department.
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS · FT, LAU DERDALE · MIAMI · NAPLES · PORT ST, LUCIE · SARASOTA. ST, PETERSBURG . TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA · WEST PALM BEACH
Page 2
Consistent with the criteria contained in Section 9.C.2. of the Zoning regulations, the
Applicant offers the following for the City's consideration:
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies. The proposed rezoning to IPUD is consistent with the proposed land use
designation of Special High Density Residential (being concurrently processed).
Rezoning to IPUD will allow redevelopment of the property, which is currently
underutilized due to the antiquated subdivision pattern, with a viable new residential
community.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern,
or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would
constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted
with the protection of the public welfare. Rezoning to IPUD will promote efficient use
of the subject property. The subject property's location within the City's
redevelopment area, and within Planning Area V of the Federal Highway Corridor
Community Redevelopment Plan suggest that the requested intensity is appropriate for
the area. The immediate area can be characterized as high density residential and
commercial to the north and east, and single-family, moderate density to the west,
across Old Dixie Highway and the FEC Railroad tracks. The Property has double
frontage, Federal Highway on the east and Old Dixie Highway on the west. The land
use amendment and rezoning will redesignate the Property with a single land
use/zoning, thereby preventing underutilization of the site or the proliferation of strip
commercial. The Property to the south is not located within the City limits. The
immediate area has seen redevelopment interest in recent years and the conversion of
strip commercial uses to multi-family residential.
The Special High Density Residential and IPUD designations are consistent with the
transition in uses that are recommended in the Federal Highway Corridor Community
Redevelopment Plan. Parkside represents the logical progression of uses, which are less
intense than that of the central business district, but greater than surrounding areas.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. The
subject property is currently improved with four residences, a commercial structure, but
half of the area is vacant. Redevelopment of the property is desired, as evidenced by its
location within the City's Community Redevelopment Area. The proposed rezoning
maintains the residential character of the area, and will provide an aesthetic living
environment in proximity to the downtown.
d. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and other public facilities. The proposed rezoning and resulting townhouse residential
neighborhood will not negatively impact public facilities and services. The proposed
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS' FT, LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT 5T, LUCIE' SARASOTA. ST, PETERSBURG . TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 3
development will meet the adopted level of service standards established pursuant to
the City's concurrency management system. The Property is located within the
residential exception area and is not subject to countywide traffic performance
standards. The proposal does not negatively impact the surrounding roadway network.
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of
adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent and
nearby properties. The proposed rezoning to IPUD is compatible with adjacent uses:
County RM and City IPUD to the south, RIA to the west across the rail line, County
RM and CG, as well as City IPUD and C4 to the north, and IPUD and C3 to the east.
The subject property is separated from properties to the east by Federal Highway and
from properties to the west by Old Dixie Highway and the FEC railroad. The proposed
residential community will buffer itself from any negative impacts associated with said
right-of-ways.
The proposed project is compatible with the adjacent uses and will not negatively
impact property values. Conversely, the new development project will have a positive
impact on the value of surrounding properties; and is likely to spur investment in
adjacent properties which will further increase their values.
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning. Currently zoned as C3, C5, CG and RM, the property's intensity potential is
112,850 s.f. 28 units, a third of that proposed by the Special High Density Residential
and IPUD designations. The property's proximity to Federal Highway, Old Dixie
Highway, and the FEC Railroad, as well as its location within the CRA, are important
considerations that support the requested designation. Rezoning to IPUD, pursuant to
the Special High Density Residential land use category, will enable an economically
viable, timely redevelopment project to be developed on the site.
ti<}{!
1t7N,~--_.m._~
" ~'"'3+' 4ii4O
t,;;~ '
> .7!oO .' +
....
....
. ~';';i!
.ll~ .il_t9".~~--'-":
,I)+tH!____ I
wml. fU.1 M32 i ~
"
~ ;
"".
....
~~i
....
~ """, ,-'
MiiJ.-:t\~(- ,Hm"
.~_~-H'''''w-
;""'i"'~' 'MoMi
'"""
+1St
....
I)tz+
~,
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT, LAUDERDALE · MIAMI · NAPLES. PORT ST, LUCIE · SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG · TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 4
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of
the neighborhood and the city as a whole. The property is slightly less than 7.5 acres in
size, and has a double-frontage configuration between Federal Highway and Old Dixie
Highway/FEC corridor. The aesthetic quality of the proposed redevelopment project
will greatly improve the visual impacts of the property on the corridor, which is viewed
as the gateway into the downtown and is targeted for aesthetic improvements. The
requested land use change and rezoning will facilitate the redevelopment of the
antiquated land use pattern in a manner consistent with the Federal Highway Corridor
Community Redevelopment Plan.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed. The Special High Density Residential land use
designation, as established by Policy 1.16.1 of the City's Comprehensive Plan, is a
desired land use in the subject area, Planning Area V, to promote redevelopment and
infill residential uses. The requested land use is only permissible in Planning Areas I
and V of the Federal Highway Corridor portion of the CRA. The subject property has
been identified for redevelopment by its inclusion in the CRA boundaries and within
the Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan.
IPUD Master Plan
A Parkside conceptual Master Plan has been submitted, which proposes 122 townhomes
on the subject 7.402 acres, for a density of 16.35 dulac.
The Applicant offers documentation to demonstrate new demand generated by
development under the proposed zoning (IPUD). The Applicant feels that any impacts can be
mitigated to ensure compliance with concurrency requirements.
Parkside will be developed in one phase, with an anticipated completion date of June,
2008.
Residential development in the area is exempt from countywide traffic performance
standards. Other public facilities and services will not be negatively impacted by the change in
uses. Water and sewer demand, based on the rates identified in the attached tables, have been
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS · FT, LAUDERDALE · MIAMI. NAPLES · PORT ST. LUCIE · SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG . TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 5
evaluated and the resulting demand can be served by the programmed capacity at the City's
water and sewer treatment plants.
Population projections under the existing and proposed uses are compared below. These
estimates are based on the 2000 Census figure of 2.27 persons per unit as a citywide, average
household size.
Existing Land Use:
Maximum Potential
County- RM5 and CH/5
City - LRC and GC
10 du' s
23 persons
Proposed Use:
Maximum Potential
SpHDR
148 du's
336 persons
IPUD Considerations
In addition to typical rezoning standards, the proposal is consistent with the locational and
internal standards for Planned Unit Developments:
Relation to Major Transportation Facilities: The property lies along the Federal Highway and
Old Dixie Highway/FEC Railroad corridor, south of Woolbright Road. Palm Tran, the County
bus service, has an established route, Route 1, which traverses US Highway One in twenty
minute intervals. The nearest Tri-Rail station is located at Gateway Boulevard, just west of 1-95;
but another is located south of Atlantic Avenue, west ofI-95.
Relation to Utilities, Public Facilities and Services: The surrounding area is developed and
served by a full compliment of City services. The proposed redevelopment project will
maximize utilization of public facilities and will promote efficient service delivery.
Physical Character of the Site: The 7.402-acre property has double-frontage along Federal
Highway and Old Dixie Highway. The individual parcels were previously cleared, half lie
vacant, but four are improved with single-family homes and one has a commercial building. The
property does not contain environmentally sensitive lands or natural resources. The property is
generally characterized by the St. Lucie-Urban-Paola soil association and is suitable for
development.
Access: The property is accessed via Federal Highway and Old Dixie Highway.
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS' FT, LAUDERDALE - MIAMI- NAPLES - PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA - ST, PETERSBURG' TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH
Page 6
Internal Lots and Frontage: The proposed townhomes are oriented internally and will not
directly front (access) Federal Highway. All of the dwelling units will be accessed via an
internal roadway. The proposed redevelopment project will be bounded on its perimeter by a
landscape buffer. This landscaping will serve as the right-of-way frontage and immediate view
of the development.
Off-Street Parking: Required parking to serve the proposed 122 residential units will be
provided on-site. No parking within public streets or right-of-ways is proposed.
Underground Utilities: All new utilities serving the proposed townhome community will be
located underground. Existing utilities that conflict with construction, required improvements or
landscaping will be relocated or moved underground.
Right-of-Ways: The subject property lies east of Old Dixie Highway and west of the Federal
Highway. No right-of-way needs or additional dedications are anticipated
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS · FT. LAU DERDALE · MIAMI' NAPLES · PORT ST, LUCIE · SARASOTA · ST, PETERSBURG · TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH
r--
Q)
bI)
c<::l
P-.
en
......
Or--
0"0
,..l:l Q)
u Q)
VJZ
4-<
:::: 0
o en
..;:: Q)
c<::l-.o I-<
~"O~
g ~ '<T
P:::Z-
or)
::::
u .s
s~
c<::l I-<
I-< Q)
E-< ~
o
Q)
.....
en
c<::l"T
~ g
.-
.....
c<::l
I-<
"0 Q)
.- ::::
...... Q)
ao
I-<
Q)
~
Q)<"l
VJ"O
l::< [;l
E S
c<::l Q)
~Q
'"
::::
~ 0
.,C .~
::::-;
E 0..
o 0
P-.P-.
Z
o
VJ
~
P-.
::8
o
U
E-<
U
~
P-.
::8
.....,
.....
::::
Q)
S
0..
o
03~
:> .-
Q) .....
o ~
.....
s 0
;::jP-.
S
.~
::8
~
VJ
:::J
~
~
....:l
-
en
01 II 01 'E
II ~ II .g
S "0 ,..l:l ;::j
Q)._ bI) ~
~::8~~
en
~
1a
0..
15
0..
\0
\0
l/i
>-.
c<::l
"0
---
en
::9
01
......
o
01
"0 "0
5E5E
(0 r--
- r--
'<T(0
~ '<T~
- -
en
::::
o
en
I-<
Q)
0..
l/i
l/i
;::j ;::j
"O~
'tl S
O'<T-
- - 00
U
P:::
....:l
Q)cJ
::30
"0 ~
::::~
c<::l::r::
....:lu
bI) ~
::::l/i
't5 ~
. ~ 6:::
~
en
~. .j-D 'E 0 l/i Zl
- II O\.g - II r-- ~
II ~ II .E II ~ II "2
S"O,..l:lenS"O,..l:l.....
Q) ~ bI) ___ Q) ~ bI) en
~::8~N~::8~~
4-<
o
en
Q)
I-<
U
c<::l
01]
0\ 0..
.....
,..l:l
0..
o
00
~
"0
---
en
::9
00
\0
(0~
01
"0"0
5E5E
NO
V) 0
(0'<T
l/i~ '<T~
l/i'<T
en
::::
o
\0 ~
\0 Q)
(00..
......
c<::l
.-
8
Q)
S
S
o
u
c....;
en
(0
-
'<T~
;::j
"0
00
'<T
-
Q)
en
:::J
"0
[;l
....:l~
"OP:::
Q)Q
i!5::r::
0..0..
OVJ
I-< '-"
P-.
4-<
o
en
Q)
I-<
~ en
0\]
\00..
.....
,..l:l
0..
\0
\0
00
o
II
o
o
"'<::1.0
~o
~JL
:E g
...<::
U
tI)
...<::
Cl)
'O:.E
~
II
o
o
-5"""
tI)~
~ II
"00
'8 ..8
U
tI)
>-.
c<::l
"0
---
en
.D
-
01
l/i
O\~
-
r<)
o
~
r<)
+
~
r.I..
C
....l
o
\D
\D
i
c
....l
"0"0
5E5E
00 0
NO
\0 \0
~ \O~
'<T (0
Il)
~:a
"0
'8
-.s 0
~ 0
IX ...<::
-- U
-; tI)
.u ;>,
.. ....
;>. ~ .s
~ -i'5 6 I=: 00
~ 'i;jg S~
U g U ~ II
o --f '0
g Jl~ ..8
N N ~ U
.... c;l tI)
15.. II ~C
-; ~ ._ cd
I=:'u 81::
.g ~ cd C1)
~ 6.0 ~8
;3 E .- <L> <L>
0. 06 C'hv
o ....; U ~ I=:
0.1=: I Vi
Cl) <L> ;>. ~
'~] -i'5.5 11
;::lUUirJJ ro
o ro::e ~ ;>, o^
...<:: t '<I' 6:-;:::: 11
1?n~\D<r)o,tI).....8o
ro..... I=:.....rou
....ro ...OIl)'H.
C1) ~ ~ rIJ ~ ;.::: .~ ~
~~.-==(1)~..::::_
II ~ ~ ~ 6' ~ ~ ~
'8 ,9 ] ~ g .... .... <8
;::l"O~o.<8<8.
Cl)EIXE-....tI)tI)~
s::: 0 Il) Il) Il) Il)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
c:) ~ t9 ~"O ~ ~'"O
i$ 0 ,:2 ~ ~ s::: s::: .
"0 '.p ..... .J _ 0 0 ro
~ 0.. ~ I-oLl ~ ".0 -- ::=
15.. 8 ~ ,&;;; ~ ~ ';;
tI)~tI)~o.ggtl)"
s::: tI) tI) c,.... Il) Il) Il)
~ro~~~CJCJ~
....11"Ooll)..........10
15..ro~::r:t;E[J
r--88..>o:ro"O"O
N)<Il)i5<n.8.8o
N>-<Qi=l<Nr/.lr/.l~
en
::::
o
r-- ~
r-- Q)
01 0..
;::j
"0
01
01
-
~
......
c<::l
en
o
0..
o
I-<
P-.
Q)
"0
.-
en
]
P-.
'-"
~r<")..yVj-.or-
----
....
Il)
...<::
.....
o
I
U
<:
l.U
co
:::?:
-'
<:
"'-
>-
Vl
~
<:
"'-
::;;:
<:
>-
.
l.U
~ tR
~ ~
<:
-'
-'
<:
>-
.
lJ
~
~
co
Vl
~
l.U
>-
l.U
"'-
t-=
Vl
.
-l'
-l
UJ
<fl
<fl
:)
~
c(l
~
UJ
f-
<fl
:)
I <:
U >-
<fl &;
<:
~
<:
Vl
.
l.U
o
~
-'
I
f-
~
<fl
>-'
~ ~
<fl Vl
o ~
-l 0
U "'-
u ·
~ ~
"'-
Z ~
UJ
o ::;;:
:) <:
~ ~
.
l.U
;;:
o
~
l.U
o
~
<:
-'
~
'-'-
.
Vl
<:
u
~
<:
u
~
r--
~
"T
~
N
C:i
CL
3:
Page 8
CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed land use change from commercial and medium density residential land use
categories to Special High Density Residential is consistent with the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan and the City's Community Redevelopment Plans. Specifically, the land use
amendment is consistent with and furthers the following City objectives:
Urban Sprawl: Objective 1.13, Policy 1.13.4 The proposed land use discourages urban sprawl
by creating a compact urban area. The redevelopment project will utilize land within the urban
core versus on the suburban fringe of the City. The proposed residential project will maximize
utilization of public services and provide for efficient service delivery.
Residential: Objective 1.16, Policy 1.16.1 The proposed development project will implement the
redevelopment strategy to create transition to the downtown urban form. Consistent with the
recommendations of the Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan, the
proposed Parks ide project provides intensity that is less intense than the central business
district, but greater than surrounding areas, Also, consistent with redevelopment objectives, the
proposed project will provide new housing in proximity to the downtown area that will support
downtown businesses and general economic expansion of the redevelopment area.
Range of Land Uses: Objective 1.19 The requested land uses fulfill this policy provision by
providing new housing choices in proximity to the downtown area. Consistent with the Federal
Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan, the proposal maintains the residential
character of the area, but provides new aesthetic development that will enhance the visual
impact along the Federal Highway corridor, the City's gateway into the downtown.
Visions 20/20: Objective 1.22, Policy 1.22.4 The proposed residential land use and requested
density is consistent with redevelopment strategies to provide residential use within the
downtown area and to transition intensities through the CRA boundaries.
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT, LAUDERDALE · MIAMI. NAPLES · PORT ST. LUCIE · SARASOTA. ST, PETERSBURG . TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA' WEST PALM BEACH
Page 9
NEED FOR LAND USE
Palm Beach County is known as the West Palm Beach/Boca Raton Metropolitan
Statistical Area (MSA). Growth in this region originated in the south and moved northward.
Palm Beach County's growth rate has increased steadily during the past fifteen (15) years. In
1980, the County has a population of approximately 587,000. By 1990, the County had reached
a population of approximately 870,000, which represented an increase of nearly 48%. The
County's growth rate between 1990 and 2000 is less than it was between 1980 and 1990 due to
recessionary economic conditions in the early 90's. However, population growth has increased
significantly since 1990, and the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business
Research (BEBR) project an increased rate of growth through 2010. Population is projected to
increase from 1,008,300 in 2000 to 1,300,600 in 2010.
Based on projected population growth, there is a need for additional residences to meet
the growing needs ofthe City's population. The subject property's location presents an ideal site
for a new residential project that is located in proximity to the downtown business district and
Federal Highway corridor. This location will provide residences in close proximity to these
businesses, and will eliminate the need to traverse the roadway network to access to shop, dine,
and conduct business.
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS · FT, LAUDERDALE · MIAMI. NAPLES' PORT ST, LUCIE · SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG . TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA · WEST PALM BEACH
Page 10
Mass Transit / Multi-Modal Transportation
1. Identify the mass transit modes serving the amendment area,
Palm Tran Route 1 travels Federal Highway between Palm Beach Gardens and Boca
Raton.
The Boynton Beach Tri-Rail station is within 4 ~ miles of the subject property, but is not
conveniently accessed via Palm Tran.
2. Identify the change in demand resulting from this amendment.
It can generally be assumed that the proposed land use will have a slight increase in
traffic generation, and therefore transit trips.
Palm Tran's stated level of service is no more than a 60-minute peak hour headway
between successive trips. Ridership of Route 1 is reported at 1,483,398 with 30 minute
peak frequency. The 40' bus serving this route has a peak hour capacity of 60 persons.
Peak hour ridership data was not available from Palm Tran.
Tri-Rail's average daily capacity if 450 seated passengers. Boardings and Alightings at
the Boynton Beach station from November, 2003-April, 2004 demonstrate that the
majority of weekday travelers board at this station in the morning to travel to another
destination (work place) and return to this station in the evening. The train's peak hour
ridership varies from 600 to 627 persons. A maximum, peak hour capacity could not be
provided by SFRTA.
The Property is within the City of Boynton Beach. At this time, the City does not
provide an inter-city shuttle service, but provides a "shopper hopper" to specified
shopping destinations. A goal of the MPO's 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan for
Palm Beach County is to increase community buses operated by the bigger cities,
including Boynton Beach, to supplement Palm Tran service routes. Therefore, once
implemented, the Property may also be served by the local shuttle service.
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT, LAU DERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE · SARASOTA' ST, PETERSBURG · TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
Page 11
3. Identify the existing and planned mass transit routes and scheduled service
(headway) for the amendment area.
According to Palm Tran website data, Route 1 is served continuously between 5:30 am
and 10: 1 0 PM in 20-minute intervals on weekdays and 30-minute intervals on weekends.
No new routes are identified for the amendment area.
The Boynton Beach Tri-Rail station is served in the southbound direction between 4:42
AM and 11 :02 and between 2: 18 PM and 8: 18 PM, in hour intervals; and is served in a
northbound direction between 5:47 AM and 12:47 AM and between 3:03 PM and 9:03
PM, in hour intervals.
The MPO's FY 2004-2008 Transportation Improvement Program (and draft 2005-2009
TIP) identifies ongoing priorities to purchase of new and replacement buses, purchase of
community shuttles and construction of bus shelters, which will implement the
aforementioned goals of the LRTP. MPO's 2025 Transportation System Needs Plan
identifies the need for extension of Tri-Rail to Martin County. The TIP programs monies
for double-tracking, automated ticketing, and system extension planning.
South Florida Regional Transportation Authority's Double Track Corridor Improvement
Program, between Miami Airport and Mangonia Park is expected to be completed in
2005.
4, Describe how the proposed amendment furthers or is consistent with the concept of
a "transit-oriented development".
The proposed redevelopment project is conveniently situated in proXImIty to an
established transit route that traverses the length of the County. Residents may chose to
live in the proposed units due to accessibility to mass transit opportunities.
WPB:214174:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P,A.
CARACAS · FT, LAU DERDALE . MIAMI- NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE - SARASOTA. ST, PETERSBURG - TALLAHASSEE · TAMPA · WEST PALM BEACH
Parks ide
Existing Land Use
Water and Sewer Flow Estimate
Water
Uses No. of Units FI
Residential 14 5,236 GPO
Commercial 81,413 10,177 GPO
15,413 GPO
Sewer
Uses No. of Units Flow
Residential 14 dwelling units 14 4,200 GPO
Commercial 81,413 s . ft. 81,413 10,177 GPO
14,377
Notes:
1} Note for the purposes of calculation we used a 2 bedroom unit to calculate the total flow requirements for the project
FLORIDA PUBLIC
UTILITIES
August 24. 2005
Eastcoast Communities
6499 North Power line Road
Suite 101
Fort Lauderdale. FL 33309
RE: 120 Unit Townhouses at Miller Road Boynton Beach
D~ar: Mr. Bryan S. Gershkowitz,
As per your request, attached please find referenced plans showing the general location
of our existing gas facilities, Note the exact locations of the facilities posted (plan and
profile) needs to be confirmed by spot digging prior to fmalizing any underground design. We
have an 4" gas main in the Old Dixie Highway that can serve this project.
Our Markcting Department will be happy to provide information about the availability and
advantages of using natural or propane gas. You can contact them directly by calling
(561)838-1794.
We would like to thank you for the opportunity to review this project. If you need any
additional information or ifI can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me at
(561)366-1518.
Sincerely,
~~ k fL~_--:-
Arnold K. Klein
Engineering Technician
Enclosure
Cc Leb Stepherson Marketing Mgr.
401 South Dixie Hwy. A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 k Phone: 561.832.0872 www.fpuc.com
'-.
'_('- ---7
------
--- ----------
---------- ------=: --=:::::::::
--. -_ (~o ~
fa, ~~--:----- ~
I" ....- ~./".ISJ
. . L
'I, ON
1 \, _tl. '. - _ ..q"o/1ly.')/;." -
I .JP ~.;<] --
~8 . ..... '. 9
H~~"
:8 ~
H
iB
:8"
I '
~
--.
-: 1
- I
:"
1
1
~n
,
;1
1
, I
I
'-, --.-, -.-.,--
: ,I ~ .~ ,
, ~ 1 !i ~
!,;, :.
i ~ : ~
I . 1
: 'I
if. - I
'J g , 1
..l ~ ~ 1
! J
i S 'I
: -, i
: I
i -----~ ,:-'~ -....." -,"
, ____.. I
- - I
~ ----.-
i -lpo,if' -------
H:)IJ./ ~/J(IO
____ 010 '-~-
_____ t/<J;?'3'.:1 _____
---
----
~
,..
...
.,.
C- C
~
~ I. 4 ~
~ ~~ t, ::.
~ '7 .,.. ..
c:: :?:
t;~N;:
:x:;; ~ ~
r.t; ~ l ...:
~: e:::
... -< c ~.
= W ~,' ;
.. I t.~
.aD -!:
~
--.
.
FPL
Florida Power & Light Company, 9329 S. Military TrJ., Boynton Beach, FL 33436
Phone: (561)742-2000 Fax: (561) 742-2016
September 8, 2005
Attn: Bryan S. Gershkowitz
East Coast Communities
6499 North Powerline Road, Suite 101
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Re: Proposed New East Coast Community T ownhomelCondominium Project
V/O Federal Hwy and Old Dixie Hwy
Boynton Beach, Florida
Dear Mr. Gershkowitz:
This is to confirm that, at the present time, FPL has sufficient capacity to provide
electric service to the above captioned property. This service will be furnished in
accordance with applicable rates, rules, and regulations.
Please provide the final site plan, site survey, and electrical load data as soon as
possible so the necessary engineering can begin.
Early contact with FPL is essential so that resources may be scheduled to facilitate
availability of service when required.
Sincerely,
-n0tc'
Marietta Hicks
Customer Project Manager
II
.1 1
1'1
i
an FPL Group company
@ IELLSOUTH
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Engineering Department
2021 So. Military Trail
Room 107
West Palm Beach, FL 33415
Office: 561-439-9110
Fax: 561-964-3499
September 15, 2005
Bryan Gershkowitz
6499 N. Powerline Road, #101
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
Re: Development on Federal Hwy in Boynton Beach
Dear Sir:
This letter is to confirm that BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. will be the source of
supply for telephone service with adequate capacity to the above referenced project,
provided we are granted a means for our facilities to get to each individual unit (by
recorded easement or conduit). It should be noted that BellSouth Telecommunications,
Inc. does require an exclusive easement having dimensions of 25 feet by 25 feet for
structures that house electronic switching equipment. (See attached Easement
Document).
The BellSouth representative who will be working with you and members of your
organization on this development is Stephen R. Buck OSPE - Engineering. He can be
reached at (561) 988-6507. Please contact the Engineer to schedule a Pre-Construction
Meeting at your earliest convenience.
During the Pre-Construction Meeting, various topics will be discussed to ensure
successful and timely construction oftelecommunications facilities within the
Subdivision. These topics will include scheduling of service dates for different residential
building construction phases, procedures for damage prevention, damages to facilities
and easements and rights-of-way required for placement of Bell South facilities within the
development.
Additional information regarding rights-of-way and easements in the development is
provided below to facilitate BellSouth's placement of facilities.
Florida Public Service Commission Rule 25-4.090(2) provides that the utility does not
have any responsibility to provide local exchange service via underground facilities
unless rights-of-way and easements suitable to the utility are furnished by the applicant in
reasonable time to meet service requirements and, at no cost, cleared of trees, tree
stumps, paving and other obstructions, staked to show property lines and final grade, and
must be graded to within six (6) inches of final grade by the applicant all at no cost to the
utility.
The applicant must maintain the clearing and grading during construction by the utility.
(See attached Certificate of Final Grade Document).
Under the Rule, rights-of-way and easements must be cleared of paving and other
obstructions, and the clearing must be maintained during construction by the utility.
BellSouth cable is generally placed behind the curb/sidewalk in a utility easement;
however, in certain places within the development, it will be necessary for the cable to
cross the roadway.
Ifroads, driveways and sidewalks are placed in advance of Bell South cable placement,
the following alternatives exist to provide and maintain cleared rights-of-way and
easements as required by the Rule: (1) placement of conduit for BellSouth where it will
be necessary for BellSouth cable to cross the paved roadway, driveway and sidewalks or
(2) maintaining gaps in the paved roadways and driveways and/or removing the paving in
those areas for BellSouth when it commences construction to place cable.
Note that conduit is not required for the cable, which can be direct buried in easements
provided by the developer. But, if paving occurs prior to placement of the cable, the
conduit essentially maintains a "clear" area for cable placement notwithstanding the
obstruction created by the paving.
If you choose to place conduit, BellSouth will work with you to provide crossing
locations. BellSouth will attempt to call for crossings at locations where the electric
company is crossing to minimize expense to the developer but requires information from
the electric company on a timely basis to accomplish this goal. BellSouth will also, upon
request when feasible, work with you on site when conduit crossings are placed and
provide "electronic markers" to be placed at the appropriate locations.
If placed, the conduit will be provided by the developer and should be 2- 4" schedule 40
PVC sleeves at the road and driveway crossing locations, placed at a minimum 24" depth,
but not to exceed 30" below final grade, and should extend behind the curb/sidewalk 4'
into the utility easement. The sleeves should terminate under a future grass area, not
under a sidewalk or other obstruction. The ends of the sleeves are to be marked above
ground or using "electronic markers" provided by BellSouth. If conduit exceeds 30"
maximum depth, the developer will be responsible to expose the conduit on both ends
and provide proper shoring per OSHA requirements.
Below is a list of documentation and information that must be provided to the BellSouth
representative associated with this project:
CADD file ofthe project (overall site plan in either Microstation or AutoCAD format)
Full size hard copy of overall site plan
Full size copy of platted drawings
Full size hard copy of water and sewer drawings
Full size hard copy of electrical drawings (if multi-family or commercial buildings)
Completed 25' by 25' Easement Documents in order to give service to your subdivision.
Property Control #
Address of each unit
This information must be provided to the BellSouth representative a minimum of 4
months prior to the first expected service request. If temporary service to a construction
trailer/office is requested prior to permanent service to the development, a charge for
special construction may be required.
The company shall have no responsibility to provide service unless these conditions are
met.
As always, we will work with you individually and help to resolve any particular issues
you may have regarding these requirements.
If you have any other suggestions regarding how our companies can work together to
accomplish the desired and required ends, please let us know, If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Stephen R. Buck
OSPE - Engineering
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
EASEMENT
For and in consideration of ten dollars ($ 10.00 ) and other good and valuable
consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned owner(s) of the premises
described below, hereinafter referred to as Grantor, do(es) hereby grant to BELLSOUTH
TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Georgia corporation, its licensees, agents, successors, assigns, and allied and
associated companies, hereinafter referred to as Grantee, an easement to construct, operate, maintain, add, and/or
remove such systems of communications, facilities, or related services as the Grantee may from time to time require
upon, over, and under a
portion of the lands described in page Palm Beach
County, Florida, Records, and, to the fullest extent the grantor has the power to grant, upon, over, along, and under
the roads, streets, or highways adjoining or through said property. The said easement is more particularly described
as follows:
All that tract or parcel of land lying in Section
Meridian,
, Township , Range
County, State of Florida, consisting of a
(strip) (parcel) of land
The following rights are also granted: the exclusive right to allow any other person, fIrm, or corporation to attach
wires or lay cable or conduit or other appurtenances upon, over, and under said easement for communications or
electric power transmission or distribution; ingress to and egress from said easement at all times; the right, but not
the obligation, to clear the easement and keep it cleared of all trees, undergrowth, or other obstructions; the right, but
not the obligation, to trim and cut and keep trimmed and cut all dead, weak, leaning, or dangerous trees or limbs
outside the easement which might interfere with or fall upon the lines or systems of communication or power
transmission or distribution; and the right to relocate said facilities, systems of communications, or related services on
said lands to conform to any future highway relocation, widening, or improvements. Grantee may use systems and
facilities placed in the easement area to provide services to customers within or outside the development wherein the
property that is the subject of this easement is located.
To have and to hold the above granted easement unto BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., its licensees, agents,
successors, assigns, and allied and associated companies forever and in perpetuity.
Grantor warrants that grantor is the true owner of record of the above described land on which the aforesaid
easement is granted.
SPECIAL STIPULATIONS OR COMMENTS:
The following special stipulations shall control in the event of conflict with any of the foregoing easement:
Preparer's name and address:
(Return document to the
BellSouth address on back)
In witness whereof, the undersigneu'haslhave caused this instrument to be eXt.A1ted on the
200
day of
Signed, sealed, and delivered
in the presence of
Name of Corporation
By:
Title:
Witness
Attest:
Witness
State of Florida
County of
I HEREBY CERTIFY that personally appeared before me and
acknowledged that he/she was the same. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, by ,(name and title of officer) of
corporation. He/she is personally known to me or has produced as identification
and did/did not take an oath.
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this
day of
Notary Public
Print Name
Commission Number:
My Commission Expires:
Grantor's Address:
Grantee's Address:
BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
TO BE COMPLETED BY BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
District Wire Center Authority
Drawing Location Plat Number RfW Number
Approval Title
Trat Tech
ENGINEERING, INC,
August 24, 2005
Mr. Robert Hall
Principal
East Coast Communities
6499 N. Powerline Road
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
Re: Parkside (Boynton Villas) - Traffic Study
Dear Mr. Hall:
Per your request, Traf Tech Engineering, Inc. conducted a traffic study for the Parkside
(Boynton Villas) development planned to be located between Federal Highway and Old
Dixie Highway in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. The location of the project site is
illustrated in Figure 1. The site is currently developed with four residential units and a
small commercial building.
This traffic study was conducted in order to document the traffic impacts generated by
the proposed project. The traffic study addresses the following items:
o Trip Generation Comparison Analysis
o Driveway Analysis
Trip Generation Comparison Analysis
A trip generation comparison analysis between the parcel's existing and proposed land
uses was conducted. The analysis was performed using the trip generation equations
published in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's ITE Trip Generation Manual
(th Edition). The trip generation comparison analysis was undertaken for daily, AM peak
hour, and PM peak hour conditions. The analysis was based on the following
assumptions:
EXISTING LAND USE
o Residential
Four single-family homes
o Commercial
1,400 square feet of commercial space
PROPOSED LAND USE
o Residential
121 townhomes
8400 North University Drive, Suite 307, Tamarac, Florida 33321
Tel: (954) 582-0988 Fax: (954) 582-0989 E-mail: joaquin@traftech,biz
.....".'
SE 23rd Avenue
Project Site
Trat Tech
>-
co
3:
.J::
.2>
I
Q)
:8
o
:2
o
-
>-
co
3=
..c
0>
I
co
s-
O>
"'C
0>
LL
--
T"""
CI)
:J
ENGINEERING. INC.
Project Location Map
>-
co
~
2
co
$
co
-
en
co
o
<.>
co
.....
-
c
'-"
A
<(
.......
<(
FIGURE 1
Parkside (Boynton Villas)
Boynton Beach, Florida
..
'"
According to ITE's Trip Generation Manual (7th Edition), the most appropriate "land
use" categories for the existing and proposed land uses are:
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (ITE Land Use 210)
Daily Trips
T = 9.57(X)
Where T = average daily vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
AM Peak Hour
T = 0.75(X)
Where T = average AM peak hour vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
PM Peak Hour
T = 1.01(X)
Where T = average PM peak hour vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
TOWNHOMES CITE Land Use 230)
Daily Trips
Ln(T) = 0.85 Ln(X) + 2.55
Where T = average daily vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
AM Peak Hour
Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 0.26
Where T = average AM peak hour vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
PM Peak Hour
Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 0.32
Where T = average PM peak hour vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
COMMERCIAL (ITE Land Use 820)
Daily Trips
T = 42.94(X)
Where T = average daily vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
AM Peak Hour
T = 1.03(X)
Where T = average AM peak hour vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
3
Trat Tech
ENGINEERING, INC.
,;
PM Peak Hour
T = 3.75(X)
Where T = average PM peak hour vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
Using the above-listed equations from the ITE document, a trip generation comparison
analysis was undertaken for the existing and proposed land uses. The results of this
effort are documented in Table 1.
TABLEt
Trip Generation Comparison Analysis
Parks ide (Bovnton Villas)
Number of Trips
Land Use Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak
EXISTING LAND USE
SF Homes 4 units 38 3 4
Commercial 1,400 sq.ft. 60 1 5
Total - 98 4 9
PROPOSED LAND USE
MF Homes 121 units 755 601 702
I Difference I I 657
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (ih Edition)
56
61
As indication it Table 1, the proposed land use changes associated with the Parkside
(Boynton Villas) development would result in 657 additional daily trips, 56 new AM
peak hour trips, and 61 new trips during the PM peak hour.
Driveway Analysis
The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed residential
development were assigned to the two project driveways (a right-turn in/right-turn out
driveway off of Federal Highway and an outbound-only driveway on Old Dixie
Highway). Based on the surrounding land uses and the transportation network located in
the vicinity of the proposed project, the following trip distribution was assumed for the
Parkside residential development:
o Forty percent (40%) on Federal Highway north ofthe site
o Forty Percent (40%) on Federal Highway south of the site
o Ten percent (10%) on Old Dixie Highway north of the site
o Ten percent (10%) on Old Dixie Highway south of the site
1 10 inbound trips and 50 outbound trips.
2 47 inbound trips and 23 outbound trips.
4
Trat Tech
ENGINEERING. INC.
"
J
Figure 2 depicts the AM and PM peak hour traffic assignments on the two project
driveways. Based on the peak hour turning movement volumes developed for each
driveway, the following driveway geometries are recommended for the subject project:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY DRIVEWAY
o One southbound shared through/right-turn lane (no improvements necessary on
Federal Highway)
o One right-turn-only exit lane
OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY
o One exit-only lane (shared left-turn/right-tum lane)
Please give me a call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
F TE~;~rtERJNG' INC.
uin E. Vargas. p, ., TOE
or Transportatio Engineer
5
Trat Tech
ENGINEERING, INC.
........~
"'""""
LEGEND A
40 AM Peak Hour Trip
(19) PM Peak Hour Trip
-
I'--
~
--
0
~
~ 5 (2) Project Site J
~ 5 (2)
(19)40 ~
-
>- >-
co
co 3:
3: ..c
..c 0>
0> I
I -
Q) co
"-
'x Q)
(5 '"C
Q)
'"C LL
--
0 T"""
en
::>
FIGURE 2
Trat Tech Driveway Traffic Assignment Parkside (Boynton Villas)
ENGINEERING. INC. Boynton Beach, Florida
Land Use: 210
Single-Family Detached Housing
Description
Single-family detached housing includes all single-family detached homes on individual lots. A
typical site surveyed is a suburban subdivision.
Additional Data
The number of vehicles and residents have a high correlation with average weekday vehicle trip
ends. The use of these variables is limited. however, because the numbers of vehicles and
residents was often difficult to obtain or predict. The number of dwelling units is generally used
as the independent variable of choice because it is usually readily available. easy to project and
has a high correlation with average weekday vehicle trip ends.
This land use included data from a wide variety of units with different sizes. price ranges,
locations and ages. Consequently, there was a wide variation in trips generated within this
category. As expected, dwelling units that were larger in size, more expensive. or farther away
from the central business district (CBD) had a higher rate of trip generation per unit than those
smaller in size, less expensive, or closer to the CBD. Other factors. such as geographic location
and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip
generation.
Single-family detached units had the highest trip generation rate per dwelling unit of all residential
uses, because they were the largest units in size and had more residents and more vehicles per
unit than other residential land uses; they were generally located farther away from shopping
centers, employment areas and other trip attractors than other residential land uses; and they
generally had fewer alternate modes of transportation available, because they were typically not
as concentrated as other residential land uses.
The peak hour of the generator typically coincided with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic.
The sites were surveyed from the late 1960s to the 2000s throughout the United States and
Canada.
Source Numbers
1,4,5,6,7,8,11,12,13,14, 16, 19.20,21,26.34,35,36,38,40.71,72.84,91,98,100,105,
108,110,114.117,119,157,167,177, 187, 192,207,211.246,275.283,293,300,319,320,
357,384,435,550,552,579
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
268
Institute of Transportation Engineers
~
.~
i
$
'l
Single-Family Detached Housing
(210)
t
:1
I
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies:
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units:
Directional Distribution:
350
197
50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
9.57
4.31 - 21.85
3.69
Data Plot and Equation
I;?
I"
~
,
~~ :
30.000
en
'tl
c:
W
,g.
.=
al
(3
:E
al
>
al
Cl
Cll
CD
>
oCt:
II
~
../'
/
/
. /
.........~
x .' /
....../
20,000
x;
i
x
I
10.000 -:
.5<
x
o
x x
o
1000
2000
3000
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.71
R2 = 0.96
i,Trip Generation, 7th Edition
269
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Single-Family Detached Housing
(210)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
On a:
Dwelling Units
Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m,
Number of Studies:
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units:
Directional Distribution:
274
201
25% entering, 75% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
0.75
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.33
2.27
0.90
Data Plot and Equation
3,000
CIl
-g 2,000 1
w
a.
~
co
13
E
Q)
>
co
Cl
<1:l
Cii
>
~ 1,000 ~
I-
x
" /'
~ -- /"
, /'"
.-' ,//
~ ~ /....
//
,,' //
//
".,;.//
.-'/
",/
, ..-
, /
"","'/-"
,,'/
,',,/
...."'//
,/'
"....
x ,;.:<;' x
,'x '
y!
x
x
><
o
o
1000
2000
3000
x = Number of Dwelling Units
x Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.70(X) + 9.43
R2 = 0.89
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
270
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Single-Family Detached Housing
(210)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.rn,
Number of Studies: 302
Avg, Number of Dwelling Units: 214
Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
1.01
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0.42
2.98
1.05
Data Plot and Equation
3,000
x
en
'0
C
W
,g.
~
Q)
:2
.r:
Q)
>
OJ
Cl
ltl
Qi
>
:ex:
II
~
,<
x /'
/
/~
/
/'/
../
//"
//
/'
,/' X
//
,//,/
2,000 --:
,<
/, x..... //
/' /'
x " ../"
,..../
Y.
1,000 ~
)(
o
o
1000
2000
3000
x = Number of Dwelling Units
;>< Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.53
R2 = 0.91
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
271
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Land Use: 230
Residential CondominiumlTownhouse
Description
Residential condominiums/townhouses are defined as ownership units that have at least one
other owned unit within the same building structure, Both condominiums and townhouses are
included in this land use. The studies in this land use did not identify whether the
condominiums/townhouses were low-rise or high-rise. Low-rise residential
condominium/townhouse (Land Use 231), high-rise residential condominium/townhouse (Land
Use 232) and luxury condominium/townhouse (Land Use 233) are related land uses,
Additional Data
The number of vehicles and the number of residents had a high correlation with average weekday
vehicle trip ends. The use of these variables was limited, however. because the number of
vehicles and residents was otten difficult to obtain or predict. The number of dwelling units was
generally used as the independent variable of choice because it is usually readily available, easy
to project and had a high correlation with average weekday vehicle trip ends.
The peak hour of the generator typically coincided with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic,
The sites were surveyed from the mid-1970s to the 2000s throughout the United States and
Canada.
Source Numbers
4,92.94.95,97.100,105.106.114, 168, 186,204.237,253,293.319,320.321,390,412,418.
561,562.583
J
~
"
j
j
,
i
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
366
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Residential Condominiumn-ownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
On a:
Dwelling Units
Weekday
Number of Studies:
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units:
Directional Distribution:
54
183
50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
5.86
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
1.83
11 .79
3.09
Data Plot and Equation
8,000 ,.------
7,000-'
6,000 -+
CIl
"C
c::
UJ
9-
.=
Ql
u
E
Ql
>
Ql
C)
C1l
CD
>
<(
II
r-
2,000 -
~'
~
~"
~
/-:"~
///
///--'
,//
,/'
///
/
x,, ///
,<,/
,'>/ x
Xx;/'
x XX- ,/
'X '/'x
, x/x
1'OOOl.;x ,,)t
j x x
. y X/x
x
5.000 -;
x
4,000 -
3.000 -;
x
:i'
x
o
~ -----;-
o
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900 1000 1100 1200 1300
x = Number of Dwelling Units
Y Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.85 Ln(X) + 2.55
R2 = 0.83
Trip Generation. 7th Edition
367
Institute of Transportation Engineers
"
:!
~
.
.~
J
Residential CondominiumlTownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
On a:
Number of Studies:
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units:
Directional Distribution:
Dwelling Units
Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a,m.
59
213
17% entering, 83% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
0.44
0.15
Range of Rates
0.69
Standard Deviation
1.61
Data Plot and Equation
en
'C
c::
W
,9-
~
Q)
13
:.c
Q)
>
Q)
Cl
~
Q)
>
<(
1/
r-
, x ~
..~
..~x/
" ~/
xX",~/
X
600
I
I
500 1
400
300
~1
x
x
~
i
I
I
100 -\
I
I
~
I
I
I
o :
o
x
x
100
200
300
400
500
x = Number of Dwelling Units
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.80 Ln(X) + 0.26
X Actual Data Points
Trip Generation. 7th Edition
,~
x'
x x'
600
700
800
900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Fitted Curve
R2 = 0.76
368
Institute of Transportation Engineers
.~
i
I
1
Residential CondominiumITownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 62
Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 205
Directional Distribution: 67% entering, 33% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
0.52
Standard Deviation
0.75
0.18
1.24
Data Plot and Equation
500
CIl
'tl
c:
W
a.
~ 400
ell
(3
E
ell
> ,
Ql 300i
Ol
as
Q;
>
<t: "
1/ I
l- i
,
200 -:
!
1
100 -+
j
I
0 !
0
700 ,
I
1
600 -+
i
,-
~'
"'~
~
" /
x ,./~
x ,~
.,,' -~ ,
x
/
x
,>'
x
x
~x
100
I
300
400
I
500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
200
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 0.32
R2 = 0.80
Trip Generation. 7th Edition
369
Institute of Transportation Engineers
x
i
I
1
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
I
i
1
i
I
!
1300
Land Use: 820
Shopping Center
Description
A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned,
developed, owned and managed as a unit. A shopping center's composition is related to its
market area in terms of size, location and type of store. A shopping center also provides on-site
parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands. Specialty retail center (Land Use
814) and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses.
Additional Data
Shopping centers, including neighborhood centers, community centers, regional centers and
super regional centers, were surveyed for this land use. Some of these centers contained non-
merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, banks,
health clubs and recreational facilities (for example, ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf
courses). The centers ranged in size from 1,700 to 2.2 million square feet of gross leasable area
(GLA). The centers studied were located in suburban areas throughout the United States and
therefore represent typical U.S. suburban conditions.
Many shopping centers, in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or
enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the
perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings
are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data
herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, it can be
assumed that some of the data show their effect.
The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the GLA of the center. In cases
of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same
as the gross floor area of the building.
Separate equations have been developed for shopping centers during the Christmas shopping
season. Plots were included for the weekday peak hour of adjacent street traffic and the
Saturday peak hour of the generator.
Information on approximate hourly, monthly and daily variation in shopping center traffic
is shown in Tables 1-4. It should be noted, however, that the information contained in
these tables is based on a limited sample size. Therefore, caution should be exercised
when applying the data. Also, some information provided in the tables may conflict with
the results obtained by applying the average rate or regression equations. When this
occurs, it is suggested that the results from the average rate or regression equations be
used, as they are based on a larger number of studies.
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
1448
Institute of Transportation Engineers
a
21.38
Shopping Center
(820)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
On a:
1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Weekday
Number of Studies:
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA:
Directional Distribution:
302
328
50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
42.94
12.50 - 270.89
Standard Deviation
Data Plot and Equation
70,000
x
60,000
20,000
x
, ,
X," x
y. x x,' x
X x
X x x,
x'
x
x
~
x
x
/- ~x
x
x x
x x X
~:ox x x
x
x x
x y
x
x
~ I I , I , I ,
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
50,000
en
1:l
c:
W
0-
'i::
t-
ell
C3
:c
ell
>
ell
Cl
ell
"-
ell
>
<(
II
t-
40,000
30,000
10.000 1
o
o
x = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
)( Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(X) + 5.83
R2 = 0.78
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
1451
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Shopping Center
(820)
f
.'
I'
I
;
- -.. ._-~ ~--- _._----~_.- -----.
J
]
~
,
,~
J
.~
;
1
!
;~
~
~
"
~
i
,
~
:~
J
4
.t
~;
I
.\
'1
i'
:}
;J
I
i
;
"~
'I
1
~
,1
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
Ona:
1000 Sq. Feet Gross leasable Area
Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
~-- -~--_.- ~-..- ..-.-. -----.---- ------ .._-,-. ._._~.----,._-~_._._-_. ------
Number of Studies:
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA:
Directional Distribution:
98
287
61% entering, 39% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
------
1.03
0.10
Standard Deviation
9.05
1.40
Data Plot and Equation
1,600
1,500 -:
1.400 -,
1.300
1,200
x
en 1,100
'0
c:
w
,9- 1,000 -
~
Q) 900 ~
U 1
i: I
Q) 800 1
>
Q)
Cl 700
<ll
CD
> 600
<(
II X ;<
~ 500 j<.,
,;
y
~~-
Y'
x
-----'~-
y
!~--
x
~
x: )<
,< _/-~
Y
.\-.--- - -<;(
XX ____ / X
400 1 ~ x - x.>( ,:,~)y"'~'-
i /' ::./ ',(
3001" x/xx
~ ~.>(:xx /,
I, /,/(/. 'S<-'%
200 -t ~}('x x'
~j. y'f<i)(
100 -< /' , X
o. . ~ ~--r-~r--~~
o 100 200 300 400 500 600
x
"
y'
I -'r---r---~--------:----r----'
700 800
900
1000 1100
1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
x = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
>< Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.60 Ln(X) + 2.29
R2 = 0.52
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
1452
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Shopping Center
(820)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
Ona:
Number of Studies:
Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA:
Directional Distribution:
1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
407
379
48% entering, 52% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
3.75 0.68 - 29.27
Standard Deviation
2,75
Data Plot and Equation
9,000 -,------ -----
I
j
I
8,000 -1
7,000
'"
"0 6,000
c
w
,s.
.=
aJ 5,000 i
(3
1::
aJ
>
aJ 4,000
Cl
<tl
CD
>
<(
1/ 3,000
~
2,000
x
x
x
x
~ ,,'0/
o
;<
/.
x
x
X
.x
x
;.<
x
--
..--
._r----
')( ~
>( ./ -~----
'/
----
'X
)(
.'
x
o
--1----,~,----
1000
2000
x = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
/ Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.66 Ln(X) + 3.40
Trip Generation, 7th Edition
Fitted Curve
- - - - - - Average Rate
R2 = 0.81
1453
I
!
I
I
i
I
I
j
I
i
I
I
I
I
3000
Institute of Transportation Engineers
4,
PROJECT NAME: Palm ~ove fka Miller Road Project ,,4.,
LOCATION: East of Old Dixie Hwy; West of Federal; North of Gulfstream Blvd.
PCN:
I FILE NO.: NWSP 05-031 II TYPE OF APPLICATION: I
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: Multiple
Ruden-McClosky ADDRESS:
ADDRESS: 222 Lakeview Avenue # 800
West Palm Beach, FL 33401 FAX:
FAX: 561-514-3442 PHONE:
-
PHONE: 561-838-4542
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITT AL 9/21/05
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 10/7/05
PUBLIC /IP ARC NOTICE: Applicant Only: 12/2/05
TART MEETING: 10/25/05
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED
(SITE PLANS):
LEGAL AD:
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
MEETING:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 12/13/05
AGENCY BOARD
CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 1/3/2006
COMMENTS:
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\PARKSIDE\NWSP 05-031 \2005 PROJECT TRACKING INFO,doc
1..I."VV"J1vNINGHAIVI & FRADLEY" INC.
il," ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS
November 7, 2005
!:
: r, :
" '
,~ "
DRAINAGE STATEMENT
for
Palm Cove
NOV - 8 2005
i_
Introduction
Palm Cove is a proposed townhouse project located on O.S, Highway
No,l (S,R, 5) and Old Dixie Highway in the City of Boynton Beach and
contains 7.402 Acres of land, Currently the property contains six
existing structures. The property slopes from west to east and
drains into the D,S, Highway No. 1 right of way, unrestricted. The
existing property has no evidence of any existing water management
facilities,
This project proposes the construction of 121 Townhomes with a
Recreation Center/Pool Facility, The proposed building coverage for
this project is 2.65 Acres with an additional 2.73 Acres of
impervious area, The remaining portion of the site will be green
containing 2,027 Acres. The water management system will consist of
an exfiltration system that will contain the storm water run-off from
the proposed project, Discharge into the D,S, Highway No, 1 right of
way will match the pre-developed discharge rate, The propose
discharge method will be similar to the existing property, over land
flow into the right of way, The detention volume will be stored
within the exfiltration trench and a low green area located at the
recreation area, No wet detention is proposed on this project,
SFWMD and FDOT drainage permits will be required for project
approval,
Proposed Improvements
The proposed land-use breakdown is as follows:
Green:
Impervious:
Buildinqs:
Total:
2.027
2.73
2.645
7.402
Ac.
Ac.
Ac.
Ac.
Abstraction for the property:
(8.18") (2.027 Ac.) (1'/12")=1.38 Ac-Ft,
25 Year,3 Day Event: 13 Inches of Rain Fall Per SFWMD Figure C-8,
(13") (7,402 Ac,) (1'/12")= 8.02 Ac-Ft. Storage Required.
7154 S,E OSPREY STREET, HOBE SOUND, FLORIDA 33455
772-546-5466 FAX: 772-546-4475
storage Provided in 1977 feet of Exfiltration Trench: (See
Exfiltration System Calculations)
(7.93") (7.402 Ac.) (1'/12")=4.89 Ac-Ft.
Above Ground Storage Required during 25 Year storm event:
(8.02 - 1.38 - 4.89)= 1.75 Ac-Ft. (Surplus Water)
Pervious and Impervious Area of the site: 4.75 Acres
Average Depth of surface water on the site.
(1.75 Ac-Ft.)/(4.75 Acres) = 0.37 Ft.
The average depth of water on the site during a 25 Year, 3 Day Storm
event is 0.37 Feet.
5 Year,l Day Event(Parking Lot): 7 Inches of Rain Fall Per SFWMD
Figure C-3.
(7") (7.402 Ac.) (1'/12")= 4.32 Ac-Ft. Storage Required.
Storage Provided in 1977 feet of Exfiltration Trench:
(7.93") (7.402 Ac.) (1'/12")=4.89 Ac-Ft.
Above Ground Storage Required during 5 Year storm event:
(4.32 - 1.38 - 4.89)= (-)1.95 Ac-Ft. Surplus Provided
Pervious and Impervious Area of the site: 4.75 Acres
The average depth of water on the site during a 5 Year, 3 Day Storm
event is 0 Feet. Storage provided below the ground elevation.
A General Permit Application will be submitted to the SFWMD for the
proposed site plan. The engineering plans for the proposed site will
comply with the original SFWMD permit criteria.
WINNINGHAM & FRADLEY, INC.
J.j', 4'/ /..). ~
'I/", -f-..-
I"~r:~t~s.' ~es~g P.E.
License Engineer No. 40046
State of Florida
Date: 22.Qct-2005
By GSB
Proj~ Palm Cove
Description: Exfilt I Storage for Detention
EXFILTRATION SYSTEM DESIGN
1 , Site Runoff Data:
1 ,1 Area Breakdown
1,1,1 Lake and lake bank, AI...............,................................... ==
1.1,2 Dry retention area, Ad ...............................................
1,1,3 Roofs (connected to the drainage system), Ar* .......,..... ==
1,1,4 other impervious areas, Ai ..................................
1,1,5 Green areas, Ao .,..,......,..........,.........................,....
1.1.6 Total area, At ........................................................... --
1.2 Imperviousness for Water Quality Calculations:
1.2.1 Site area*, Aqs=At-(AI+Ar) ,..........,..,...,...............
1.2.2 Impervious area., Aqi=Aqs-(Ao+Ad) ........................... --
1.2.3 Impervious percentage*, IP=(Aqi/Aqs)(100) ............. --
1.3 Runoff, R:
1.2,1 Method A, Ra=(1/12)(At)...............................m....,.....,m ==
1.2.2 Method B, Rb=(2,5112)(IP/1oo)(At-AI) .......,..........,..,
1,2,3 Runoff, R=MAXIMUM(Ra,Rb) ,...............................,
1.4 1 ,~, 1 P~~treatment, P=1/2..xAt-AL...................................
2 "K" value per project in area
3, Trench Design Data:
3,1 Trench width, W .........................,..,..,.............m..............
3,2 Unsaturated trench height, Hu .........,.......................,...,...
3,3 Saturated trench height, Hs ................,.............................
3.4 Maximium head on trench, h .....................'........m............
3,5 Length of trench, L ...........................................................,
4. Trench Exfiltration Data:
4.1 Bottom exfiltration, Eb=3600(L)(W)(h)(K) ......'...........m
4.2 Unsaturated side exfiltration, Eu=7200(L)(Hu)(K)(h-Hu/2).......,
4,3 Saturated side exfiltration, Es=7200(L)(Hs)(h)(K)............
4.4 Total trench exfiltration, E=Eb+Eu+Es ,...........................
5, Storage Data:
5,1 Pipe Storage, Vp:
Pipe diameter ...."".,..,."."""""""""""'..""'.....,.,....".,,.,,..
Submerged depth of pipe........,......................................
Area of pipe above water, Ap ............................................'
Length of pipe, Lp ..,..................................,...........,...........
Pipe volume, Vp=(Lp)(Ap) ................,....................,...,......'
5.2 Trench Storage, Vt:
Gross area above water, Ag=(W)(Hu) ...........m..,....m""m,
Net area, An=O,5(Ag-Ap) ,.........................,..........,............
Trench volume, Vt=(An)(L) ...........................m..,............,..m
5,3 Dry Storage, Vd:
5.3,1 Retention Depth, Dr ................................m...........
5.3.2 Volume, Vd=1 ,5(Ad)(Dr) m..,................,m........""",,",
5.4 Total Storage, S=Vp+Vt+Vd ....,......m...................."'",
6, Sunwnary:
6.1 Total Exfiltration and Storage, O=E+S ..,......................,....,
6.2 Percentage of Required Quality, MS=100*(O/R) ............m..
6,3 Equivalent Inches over the site (Excl. Lake Area)....,..........
6.4 Volume Exfiltration per SFWMD computation..,......,...........
OR........
Prinred:
lllO8/0~
Project No,: 06604
% of Site
, 0.0 sf 0.00%
, 0.0 sf 0,00%
, 115168.0 sf 35.72%
, 11Sm.0 sf 36.84%
, 88486.0 sf 27.44%
, 322431.0 sf 100,00%
, 207263,0 sf
, 11sm.0 sf
, 57,3 %
26869,3 cf
, 38495.2 cf
38495.2 cf
, 13434.63 cf
10,60 Acln
==>1
1.140E-Q3
, 5.00 fl
, 3.00 fl
, 0.00 fl
, 3.00 fl
, 19n.00 fl
, 121704,12 cflhr
, 73022.47 cflhr
, 0,00 cflhr
, 194726,59 cflhr
, 2.00 fl
, 0.00 fl
, 3.14 sf
, 2137,00 fl
, 6713.58 cf
15.00 sf
5,93 sf
11722.04 cf
0.00 fl
0.00 cf
18435,62 cf
" 213162.2 cf
" 663.74 %
> 7.93 in.
> 58.21 Ac.ln.
> 211312.3 cf
0:\0'\05504\05'04 exfi1tndc totlll.qpw
612
AREA OF PIPE ABOVE WATER
3,142 fully above water
1 ,571 % submerged
o SUBMERGED area of pipe
#
- 6-
I LOCATION
I
DE PT H
(feet)
SOIL
DESCRIPTION
II Y)) RA U L I (':~~~,I
I
CONDUCTIVITY'
(cfs/ft2 per foot
of Head Induced)
1.99 xlO-3
BHP-l
0- 10,0
Brown to Light Brown Sand
I
Clrllll!1dwater Depth: 7,0 feet below existing grade
< l
LOCATION I (feet) DESCRIPTION 2
II (cfs/ft per foot
I of Head Induced) I
!
BHP-2 0-10,0 Brown to Light Brown Sand 4.46x 1 0-4
I
I
I
DEPTH
SOIL
I1YDRAlfUC i
CO~DUCTI\'ITY I
(jround'vvater Depth: 8.0 feet below existing grade
LOCATION
SOIL
DESCRIPTION
HYDRAULIC l
CONDUCTIVITY !i
I (cfs/ft2 per foot .
. of Head Induced)
1 9,9Ixl(f"
I
DEPTH
(feet)
,.,. ~___________l______.m___L_
BfII~~3~ro-=]()_,-O_n- T 'l3rown to Light Brown Sand
I
(jroundwatcr Depth: 8,0 feet below existing grade
Avq:::
//~ y/o ,-3
t.6e:-:.--:J //'7' (0LC?{/~/7ctY.s
~,astCuast COlIJlllunitirs
I a RRA File \0, 6611-(l~-331
'I irr'ra, IlIl,
/Unt ~
PR \PPLICA TION CONFERENCE REV. vv FORM
Date 4- / 7 - 0 ~
Attending as Applicant
Phone
Time Started II: ()O
KIM ~, CUTI't<J
Time Finished
Fax
Applicant Must Initial for Receipt of n / FJ ~
Art in Public Places Ordinance 05-060~ and Art Program Info Sheet: ~
Proposed Project Information
Proposed Project Name and t4Ull1 &V€. (NIUb2. ~ p~)
TypelUse cStnmI ~~ I/-tvU
Site Location (Address if Available)
Site PCN
Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
Existing Land Use.Density Proposed Land Use/Density / Vacant
Anticipated Submittal Date
Notes and Comments
Lot Area
Lot Frontage
Lot Depth
Setback
Height
Parking Requirements or hnprovements
Landscaping/Buffering
Non-conforming Use or Change in Use
Other Zoning Changes Required
Hazardous Material
Notes/Comments/Recommendations IJ.JC ~CA-rvr 1$ /N~-ztJ IN IlUJt>IF/I/~
-
I J.W l)6;}/rlG /$ ~ ~ ~ # ~ 2..s
~ 'Ii Z.3 0'. /HI ~
~~.s f VIOl) 1:Jc1Z,S. ~ tJlfIll':J J()N~ ~ ~ ~~
(rJ 3. TJ.Wi. ~e1M/7 I~ M...$r) C6-1vt,~~ ~,(j-(p T1Je ~r ~
WI'T"}.>f JI- tH-P PUf&Al> IAl rJJC f#Uv60,4f( 'f'1hf-"r ~ A<Un</ -'W~ tI~-HCt,(i,
I
//) etVIet2- ()~84lJ n.tfJ,ol.1J..6 ~ to:>P. I9rnvAI'€ IJ,Usld?- I.!S )'tJ ~ UJI rH-
~€~.!I ~ 17-fE, ~/IbIUf& (}F ~~..v ~~. ~1IJ1Irt4.-
~lAf?llId.J rJI€ /~ ~A-1Z:tJ 1()f71-f' 11i€- ~U(p. ~r ~ INlIo~'"
~ bF rDo"(7 J)/J ~ M/J/-6)4.. - VS - IUII4CY2- ~PIc+n1J</J ~T1?Uk
4Md ~~. Ip1>/~ /P 1'1J<<: Sf ~ ~~ ~ 71Ie: 5'%
~) ~ nIe PlUCe55 W8tJt,/) ~ II-- M/NM- ~r:=t0ff1(}.IU ~
.4u.bI6Cr- "fl) 'r/.kZ A1tr' IAI /JaI/xi e.. ,~ ~/A/1hfJ~ .
NOTICE: The purpose of this conference shall be for staff and applicant to discuss overall community goals,
objectives, policies and codes as related to the proposed development and to discuss site plan review procedures.
Opinions expressed at the pre-application conference are not binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff
comments may be forthcoming based on actual plans submitted for review.
S:\Planning\Planning\Pre-App Form pp 1-3\Pre-application Form p2.doc
,,<",'
,I ~
~
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
SIGN IN SHEET
PLEASE PRINT
MEETING DATE:
TIME:
ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT:
NOTICE: The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and appUcant to discuss overall
community goals, objectives, poUcies and codes as related to the proposed development and to
discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions expressed at the pre-appUcation conference are not
binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forthcoming based on actual
lans submitted for review.
City of Boynton Beach Attending for Applicant
Attendin Staff
LLLU vw~l\ Lctl':.A.-Y)
R-Db~ ~Ll -lee
~~
S:\Plannlng\Plannlng\Pre-App Form pp t-3\Pre-appllcatlon Form p3.doc
,,~
.,e.,:.,:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
".':':.:. .... . . . . e e . . . . .
" .~.. .... . ..... -. .... . .
' " ...... '"
.
..v
COo
J:::.. .
Oz
~o
-.0'
OJ
i~
i I
, "'"
!-.......:
i
/
,
.![j:j. . ... . ": "":" ":"
' ..............."..
. . ........'a1........._
. .. . .. . .. '" ........ . ........... ............ - .
~. · ......s.."'..~ · .. ',-'. .. '-:';','{rrl.:. .~."_..__ .
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 'a'.'_' . . . .
. . .. . . . . . ~ . . . . . '-' . , .
. .. . " . 'a'_' . . .. .. _
... .
. . .
. .
. . .
. .
. . .
. .
. . .
. .
. . .
....
.....
'. .
. . .
....
-. o.
. . .
....
'. .
. . .
. .
. . .
....
... .
'1"."""''i':;...:.