CORRESPONDENCE
,",
\ ,
"-~""'~"--.....,......_,. ,
SI'i . . ~.ti.~ r
T R~.~~h~HK~.!~JlJ~NI Nk, e()uN:~'if~
," J . ~~; ,. f~: 1~-. ~ :1t~ ~: i:;t.....- r'f 7 :i"~"l,-;~ ,r,< "'C7_~U -- &j - G;]Bfl':::
I ~ Dd A~~1l1"~ ~.~: '"~ja~:NttL.;1'~L i\J' "D :~A C H 0.- ,~']~c;" ~'urct'~;:~-::
:'-",:,' .:.~=:. ~.~+--.~ ... r~':~~,~. ;::;=.:::- ~-~-l j.c_:;. ~~-~~ ."" ~';(~? ------- -"-'-.
~: - . ,. . t"'" . _ ;~~ ~.~
.._,t l' '. "'I- ".
MEMORANDUM
To:
Mr. Michael Rumpf
Planning & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
PclerG.Merritt ~
Regional Ecologist ~ L-
From:
Date:
August 11,2005
Subject: Notice of Permit Application No. 050801-6
Seaview Park Club
Attached is a notice of application for an environmental permit to conduct dredge and fill
or similar activities within or adjacent to your community. We are disseminating this
information for your review and comment.
The information provided with this notice is very brief, but you may contact the
permitting agency directly for further information if needed in order for you to assess the
impacts ofthe proposed activities on your community.
If the proposed activities are not consistent with your comprehensive plan or other locally
adopted plans or regulations, or if you have any other comments, please submit them to
the permitting agency by the deadline date indicated in the attached materials. We would
also appreciate receiving a copy of any comments you may have for our files.
Attachment
/:,l r'~-",_
Ii
'"'-.~.....,~--
: ,I.....'
r-~"~
! n
,41JG I >::
", .~.+
"Bringing Communities Together" · Est. 1976
III East Ocean Boulevard - Suite 311 - Stuart, Florida 34"4
Phone (772) 2Z1-41'1 - SC 2".41'1 - Fax (772) 221-41'7 . E-m ail - admin@tcrpc.or~
}.-7 "/V;('1 f ~('I\rW
SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686-8800 . FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 . TDD (561) 697-2574
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 . www.sfwmd.gov
'I'
NOTICE
AUG
n
August3,2005
Subject:
Environmental Resource Permit Application
Application No. 050801-6
Applicant Lennar Homes, Inc.
Palm Beach County, S 22/T 45 SIR 43 E
The South Florida Water Management District is currently processing the attached application. If
you have any comments or objections concerning this project, please submit them in writing to
this office within 30 days of receipt of this notice.
This is also an opportunity for applicable State agencies to concur with or object to the proposed
project under the federal consistency provision of the Coastal Zone Management Act. Review
must be in accordance with the procedures adopted by the Interagency Management Committee
on October 25, 1989. Findings of inconsistency must describe how the project conflicts with your
agency's statutory authorities in the Florida Coastal Management Program and provide
alternative measures, if any, which would make the project consistent. Commenting agencies
must provide a copy of all consistency comments letters to the Florida Coastal Management
Program Director, Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard, Tallahassee,
Florida 32399-2100.
Please refer to the applicants name and application number as referenced above in any
correspondence to help facilitate processing. Questions concerning this project should be
addressed to Rob Robbins at (561) 682-6951 or Tony Waterhouse at (561) 682-6867.
BAC:mw
Attachments
c:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Bureau of Protected Species Management
Department of State, Division of Historical Resources
Regional Planning Council
Department of Community Affairs
Palm Beach County DERM
GOVERNING BOARD
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
Kevin McCarty, Chair
lrela M. Bague, Vice-Chair
Pamela Brooks-Thomas
Alice J. Carlson
Michael Collins
Nicolas J. Gutierrez, Jr., Esq.
Lennart E. Lindahl, P.E.
Harkley R. Thornton
Malcolm S. Wade, Jr.
Carol Ann Wehle, Executive Director
..
OWNER(S) OF LAND ENTITY TO RECEIVE PERMIT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER)
NAME Wayne Irving, Charlene Darst, Carmen Hubert NAME David M. Baselice
Irving and Gail Ann Irving
ADDRESS c/o Kaleel & Associates ADDRESS 1015 North State Road #7, Suite C
555 N. Congress Ave., Suite 301
CITY, STATE, ZIP Boynton Beach, FL 33426 CITY, STATE, ZIP Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411
COMPANY AND TITLE N/A COMPANY AND TITLE Vice President, Lennar Homes, Inc
TELEPHONE (561 ) 738-1104 TELEPHONE (561 ) 333-4700
FAX (561 ) 738-1106 FAX (561 ) 333-2474
AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT (IF AN CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AGENT)
AGENT IS USED)
NAME David M. Baselice NAME Christine Springer, P.E.
COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE
Vice President, Lennar Homes, Inc. Carter & Burqess, Inc. , Project Manaqer
ADDRESS 1015 North State Road #7, Suite C ADDRESS 6363 NW 6th Way, Suite 300
CITY, STATE, ZIP 33411 CITY, STATE, ZIP Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
Royal Palm Beach, FL
TELEPHONE ~61 )333-4700 TELEPHONE (954 ) 315-1012
FAX 1561 )3 3-2474 FAX 1954 ) 315-1040
Name of project, including phase if applicable Seaview Park Club
Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? Dyes IX] no
Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project 3.76 ac
Total project area for which a permit is sought 3.76 ac
Impervious area for which a permit is sought 2.97 ac
What is the total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands
or other surface waters?
_acres _ square feet _ hectares _ square meters
Number of new boat slips proposed. ....t::liA-
Project location (use additional sheets, if needed)
County(ies) Palm Beach
Section(s) ~ Township 45S Range 43E
Section(s) _ Township _ Range _
Land Grant name, if applicable _
Tax Parcel Identification Number
Street address road or other location 1620 N. Federal Highway, Eastside of Federal Hwy, Seaview Circle
" -
City, Zip Code if applicable Boynton Beach
~050801-6
2
C&B #470220
Describe in general terms the proposed project, system, or activity.
3.76 ac. proposed townhome development. Surface water management system comprised of storm
structures and pipe with a control structure designed to discharge less than 27.37 cfs
(pre-development 25-year -3 day discharge) during the post-development 25 year -3 day storm
event into the adjacent intracoastal waterway. Exfiltration trenches are provided for water quality.
A seawall is being constructed along the eastern property line.
If there have been any pre-application meetings, including at the project site, with regulatory staff,
please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives.
[ZJPre-application meeting on 8/14/2004 with Carlos de Rojas at SFWMD office.
Please identify by number any MSSW/Wetland resource/ERP/ACOE Permits pending, issued or
denied for projects at the location, and any related enforcement actions.
Agency
Date
No.\Type of Application
Action Taken
Note:The followinq information is required onlv for proiects proposed to occur in.on or over wetlands
that need a federal dredge and fill permit and/or authorization to use state owned submerqed lands
and is not necessary when applying solely for an Environmental Resource Permit. Please provide the
names, addresses and zip codes of property owners whose property directly adjoins the project
(excluding applicant). Please attach a plan view showing the owner's names and adjoining property
lines. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
1. 2.
3.
4.
3
C&B #470220
By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the applicant, for the permit and any
proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information filed
with this, application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application and represent that such
information is true, complete and accurate. I understand this is an application and not a permit, and that work prior
to 'approval is a violation. I understand that this application and any permit issued or proprietary authorization
issued pursuant thereto, does not relieve me of any obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water
management district or local permit prior to commencement of construction. I agree, or I agree on behalf of my
corporation, to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the
permit to a responsible operation entity. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation
in this application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001.
David M. Baselice
Typed/Printed Name of Applicant (If no Agent is
. tJ?
.; /-~ fVl b,:--...
Signature of Applicant/Agen
0) or Agent (If one is so authorized below)
6/29/05
Date
Vice President
(Corporate Title if applicable)
AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE APPLICANT COMPLETES THE FOllOWING:
I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the
agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above; and to
furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed
agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or
authorization indicated above. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation in this
application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001.
Wa ne Irvin Charlene Darst Carmen Hubert Irvin
Typed/prin::~Na. m...e Of..APP~..) ;/
/" .-:/-' .,r;/ ( /' .l
../;/?/"i~:,k';:-~ .' . (t't--/L
Signature of Applicant! Agent -
.-
.~
Corporate Title if applicable)
P.leilSJ~..n.O.t!l;..The !llipliki'LIlt' S oriqiDal siQ.!l.<!1llm JIlo..L<l...!:-IrnXLls~,glJired aboJUL
PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE FOllOWING:
I either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and
I consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the
Department of Environmental Protection, the Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these
agents or personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection.
Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor permitted work if a
permit is granted.
Wa ne Irvin Charlene Darst Carmen Hubert Irvi ':'.
Typed/pr~~~,.~~e (,f A~7"" tr/
._-~[~~'V -A .h,/.v'L:'.~.. .?.~
Signature of Applicant/Agent
I. /!
n . rVlllll ./
! .
I ,
t / '-.
I /
/
.~~
~,
Y' Da~
(Corporate Title if applicable)
/'
{/
. ;~l~i?~irt (;f;H'~~ / .~. ~L~.t "{iJl:5 1lS;\
'hiUE ,[~,fJ~--' ~':";, i ~,":1,gL l} ~
?~~?
,.;.~::~~.;.'~ . .
4
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
DEPIWMD Application #
Date Application Received
Fee Received
ACOE Application #
Date Application Received
Proposed Project La!. _N_N_O
$
Proposed Project Long. _N_N_O
Fee Receipt
#
SECTION A
Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters?
IXJ yes D no
Is this application being filed by or on behalf of a government entity or drainage district?
D yes IXJ no
A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one)
o Noticed General - include information requested in Section B.
o Standard General (Single Family Dwelling)-include information requested in Sections C and D.
I8J Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
o Individual (Single Family Dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D.
o Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E.
o Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E.
o Mitigation Bank Permit (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F.
( If the proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system
requiring another permit defined above, check the appropriate box and submit the information
requested by the applicable section. )
o Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Section C and F.
B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one)
[XJ Construction or operation of a new system including dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and
other surface waters.
o Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by a WMD or
DEP.
o Modification of a system previously permitted by a WMD or DEP. Provide previous permit
numbers.
o Alteration of a system D Extension of permit duration D Abandonment of a system
o Construction of additional phases of a system D Removal of a system
C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Lands. Dyes KJ no
(If yes include the information requested in Section G.)
D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge
and fill permit requested:
D Individual D Programmatic General
IXJ General D Nationwide D Not Applicable
E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? Dyes 0 no
If yes provide rule number if known._
C&B #470220
SECTION C
Environmental Resource Permit Notice of Receipt of Application
This information is required in addition to that required in other sections of the application. Please
submit five copies of this notice of receipt of application and all attachments with the other required
information. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL INFORMATION ON PAPER NO LARGER THAN 2' x 3'.
Project Name: Seaview Park Club
County: Palm Beach
Owner: Lennar Homes, Inc
Applicant: David M. Baselice, Vice-President
Applicant's Address: 1015 North State Road 7, Suite C, Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411
1. Indicate the project boundaries on a USGS quadrangle map. Attach a location map showing the
boundary of the proposed activity. The map should also contain a north arrow and a graphic scale;
show Section(s), Township(s), and Range(s); and must be of sufficient detail to allow a person
unfamiliar with the site to find it. ATTACHMENT C-1, SEE PLANS
2. Provide the names of all wetlands, or other surface waters that would be dredged, filled, impounded,
diverted, drained, or would receive discharge (either directly or indirectly), or would otherwise be
impacted by the proposed activity, and specify if they are in an Outstanding Florida Water or Aquatic
Preserve: INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (LAKE WORTH WATERWAY)
3. Attach a depiction (plan and section views), which clearly shows the works or other facilities
proposed to be constructed. Use multiple sheets, if necessary. Use a scale sufficient to show the
location and type of works. SEE PLANS
4. Briefly describe the proposed project (such as "construct a deck with boatshelter", "replace two
existing culverts", "construct surface water management system to serve 150 acre residential
development"): CONSTRUCT SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO SERVE 3.76 ACRE
RESIDENTIAL SITE. CONSTRUCT SEAWALL ALONG INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (EASTERN
PROPERTY LINE).
5. Specify the acreage of wetlands or other surface waters, if any, that are proposed to be disturbed,
filled, excavated, or otherwise impacted by the proposed activity:
6. Provide a brief statement describing any proposed mitigation for impacts to wetlands and other
surface waters (attach additional sheets if necessary):
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Application Name:
Application Number:
Office where the application can be inspected:
~
~
~
t
~
~
-.-l
~
NOT TO SCALE
SITE LOCATION MAP
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
SECTION 22 TOWNSHIP 45S RANGE 43E
c./
~
o
'"
~
~
z
~
~
i
a
Iiol
t:
~
=
;;J
...
~
~
~
5
~
00
I-\Z
oQ
WI-
~Ig
:-t
6
~-~
.
u
Z
....
~
o
.;1 ...
'" 00
..
= i~
~ ~~
= eo
~ !=
Ii !~
'" z
o z
E ~
u .-
en
en en ....I
z z <(
~ ~ ~ enl-
o ci~ Q. z~
~ ~:5 ~ ~w
o <c~ <cenuC)
-en zO:: z~w<Cen
!:z -wcnC)-<(ena~
~Q ~~~ii5tll~ii5~en
Q.~ Oen-OOuoW~
en~ 0 U.Zw- 0-<(
oGi z~~<c(!)g:~ztu
x Za: <c<c~en<Cl-cnOo
W <C(Qzc)!::a:C)Z~olSC);::a:
o en(Q~zzw-~enZ::>w
~ ~<CQ.5-<(3:;60~~~3:
C) 00 <Ccnw..... <co::a:w
z z~Zoo::ocn~Oztll<Cticn
:> ~...._(!)z>- <CO~->-
;. I- _ <C a: u 0 0 a:
<c1 ~ ::i C) 0:: <C u: C) C) -u. a: -<(
.~ w w 0 Z w !:: u. z z u. W I-
~law~o'~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~
""...I Q.:>enl-~Q.I-:>cn
~ ~ ;.: J. ~il I II I! i I
: ~ ~ ;: Ii !~ I i
"~ d U Ii ~~.I :. !
;i ~ !~, ~ ~ I .
I :~:) ~I~I ~
~ I
uh
N en
0..... ,..........
101'- i-O ,..0
uu ""olS UolS
olSolS olS....M..,.J,c:o
't-N('f)~c.ocom"""-"r"""""""
OOUOOUUUOOUU
~,~.
Q.I< ~
~I~~
....I(/)
Zu.1t)
--t
o~
_Zo.
I-~~
<(u~
U\J: 3:
000
~I-
....laiN
~N
W-'
I-<Z
_0.0
en i=
u
W
(/)
I-Z
oQ
~~
ou
a:o
0.....1
i ~ W.'~~I
~i 3 lii~lgl~~
I~ ~i Un!!1
~~ i~ ~~dt;~g
!~ ~~ ~~!~~=5
z" h ~~ ~~~!~~~
j;j:ll ~:o; ~gp;j:g~
o ~i l!l~ 1ii:4~5i!'
;:: Ii i3 ~i!wlfg~
0. II ~,. ..,~...j::h!l'i
(i ~~ ~~ ;;~~~:j~z
g ~~~ i~ ~~;;~~;
w !i!6~ ~~ ~fjU~~~
~ ~II~ Ii I~~~~h~~
C) ~~ J ~~~i!h
~ ~3 ~! 8=~h~~
2
~
t
"'ill
~..
!,!l-
~~
I!l~
U
~.
.. ~~
::.:: o~
~ h
:E U
~ g~
~\ !~
W
(')
"*'
I
'"
... ~ ill
>' D~~~ ~
~ lIill~! ~
~ ~~~ 51
'" .. CD '" i ~
~ .. ~ ~ j
~ ..~t. t
atUlI>,f 0
...
..
It
U
......~....,
":JNI 'S6"OH /fYNNrI
ll:JnlI NO.LNAOfI ./0 .t1J:J
fIaT.) J1/fYJ J/.6L1 ns
~~~~~l !} ~
I: i ;1 ~ I: ~IJI~
,-
1'->
S.VOIJr.JUI:JZJS aNr SZ.LON 7Yl1ZNZ~
~
P . i ns . "
.1 ~ . lli R ,I
'I I ! II, "r.
I, iff' . ~i
11..iil~"
1'( ~ l ill R. Ul
, I I III ill~1
h ! I Iii Ii i~i I.
II ~ i l'~a iJ i~r
:' i ~. ~:~i.1 W I
.& ! · isl. b !'~
11f' il II ldi ~j Iii ·
el ~, n ~u~ ~ ti.1
"-.. --..
, '.' 'm · II . l'~ . ... I ~r !Iii:!;'!" i < '.,. i" l llllill ~r if' 'S' 4 sr's, -, i I ':;~Ii-
~ II ~ ~ ! I! I! 111.111111 ~!I!!,:IPI' h. I ~!i III II ii!f!li, ill Ii I Im!1 1!Il! Ii II! li!!II!
- SI il " I il ; Ill' I il!l! t!" li s~ !il"" II! V~ il I'I~ . ~ I II I:.fr 1~I'i I .!i~ n U,I' 'I Ii, I . l~ 'I'" I
m. ~;llld!lll ~IIII ~ I ~!li~ll, ijj !! I~I U~ llll !n,n:,:i!lijll~ illl !~I !IIIII!, II i II !i I ill.'I:I.11 'j!
I AI ill!' pi 'I b~ ; It pl' ,'- <.i II J' I 11101 .! IIll -I' 8 ! 'I I U ,. · III ,1.1., I,' h Ii !!I i' ~!iil '.,: l~ 11 ! "h;i~ ·
I ~, ~~ _n ~ ;1 i ~I ~u ~ ~i ~hl ;! ~iI ~i !ii ; ~ ~I ~!~ ~I m~! ~ !~~j j I !I ~! i~1 ;. ~:Ugn ~t!!i ~; !I:I ~l !mh I ~H ! !I ~I ~ !imd !i I
oJ .. f 0( .. oJ-"
i'''S' 'l'In I~n "I .., I ' I ' . II' 1 'i "!" , , 11'1 ~." I llt~' ""11 ~ "~I'
loalil ;,I'iI'i II. 1;11 - I ' I · I · I I.!' i I =1 ~'i II!!. I ,," f'~',. . ._, ~
Iibi1 iU i!ii il; iiil; ! ~ ~ ~ :,' ~,I I I =,'! iilj: I h il".' !.Ii~ ~ 1m, i ~1:~l~ ~ UL,
ll~l'i dii~ 111 1;;1; i I ~ I ~ ,if · ,,! :i! I 1& I:UfH! i f!la ~HW I nl;
Ill! ii',1 il)! bioi i i i Iii!;,! II ul !I~!! IdPI!Uilli! ;ill!i Ilni.l ~ lt~;1
"I' -I' !! '~11'4 - : I : ,il .1' i ,'I I", -1'1 "I"l. I ..f -; "0 I flil~
, lii~ hI! I;; Ii. II !I: :!; ~~ ;11 ;.11 id !id;'I' II n jl!iIW. i,~~!ii~!m; h~~ii: ~ iih!
dill. ""I P.U j" I II &, i ..... i. ~. ~~ 4 -~ !: i. i U A ~ !If' .~!J.~l .~I ~~!l !t '1/ tl uf
Illil inn !IIJ il;111 11;1 n il il. I Ii it !I! ~I ~ ~I J !lllil!1 Ii II: ili;milllit mii!1 ji iliui
~ .. _;I It ;: "~-,, s." It >0"
; 'ig i"1i I
· !i=, i
!; Hi I
Ii 1:;1
i! mi t
I '101 Il
.I~.. i~il Ii
lill b ~~ii II
'1' II ,SI' ';
I.i; i! ill; l'
!h. !S ,l.~ ,t
~~,' '. 'I "I " i I ", '"
., ~ i I". ,"
;' ~ ii, ~ ,Ib Ji~
j' I · i ' . I ~ii' I.f
~I il i. I ; I i:s! Id
l' ~ ". ~i I ~. . ul. il
"I II i. I'j" " -I~ ~,ib ill
;' l' II ,h' ,\ !I ',I
II :e -I ~!! Ii l~ , lid I in
~i.. !! II =..11 i! ill i.. Pi II'i'.
n~ n il II! I'; Ii 2i :111' I .:11
! Ih ~~ P ~u ~ !i I II iU: I !lh
'" III .. II.. ..
, JI I' ',' " I
1 i~ '~i
!Iin h;l!i
. ' ,.; h i
c III il! I,
"i: ~ ~ .~
I Off I !~II lid 1'1
h I ~ .at II II '
J~ :'. ' 11 , ,i
,. ...:h II ~ ! Ii ~l~ ~JI ..
'!" I ~lb~' :1' II' . i~i Itllllti .. 't ;!'
i,l! i'i~ i! '! III !!I Iii .i! ijli I~;I :0
ii~liI . stdl:; In :d.. n'l Ii! i'llil 'i~ Ji~ ,i I!:.
II I" I .-1 I' 'I' Iii I i r i "S 'all hi: ;Ii!
; I, i;1 _ i!I' ii iii :!I i. II n ~I; nll'.lliii III if ilii
- I H" l~'! il ill 111'1 III Ii' .r: I list Iii" '~II
il ~llii I I.!m ili II, :1" ~ I' I ill !UI=I;Iq 111 Iii 1 Ii!;
Ii I Illull , Ilill, ~ii ~ht ~I! ~ I , ~III ~iill!I~llilh iii !;IIi.Gi _
... .. d !I ~ ~ .. ..
, I~ !"Ii '.' 5 I I', 'I' , 11
U Ii i o. I" ' i I Ii
.1.1 ~.! ,laU l! i:1 I!", ,iI i tl'
(~I Ip"~, b. I I !Ii e it
!i H I II ~nliii II ! I I ~llIi I ,U
~ I i Hi Iii! =2 !i I i if ;! iil i I In
i I i I II II ~;!;: iilt il II n ~:d! !!i
Iii I 1'1 P' ;li~1 !ei i I_ vaPi Iii I ! I'll
i ; i Ii;! I Ii ~illli ul III! I ~I ~I ~m' !iI.
. .
~
.
I
I
I If
'I II
;,
- I,
I;!
;1
lid.
I .
ill! I
j i ; !i! I
, d !nd
~~thiJI
2 i I. .' i f -
g~-tldi i
; i i ~p P I
II ;1 I ;; I ,d ~
I, II' -dill I Ii
.IIi !. U idl II N
. il Iii ~ Ii ~I aii I m !i~ iU1 li!l l~ ~
II I I j: !!! Unl,~ ; i,jl'~ I~h lm i :1 ~.; ;,11
I~' 1'" 'olf> ~ ,,1 U1i"'I' '!'" j.
ti l I ,I j i ii, I' ,: ~h I!!! ,li, ; i' tr j, J '
!, ; i I; ~,'~ I,;; i;~ ~.... f l!~ ';i~ !!I!i i ;1 ~i illl ~
I~ i! . j ~ il i1s l": Ii HI il'. loll:! !' !1;~ ~ ~
Ii i II h! U. il :~i ~11;1 J ~.nl~~ ,!lllli.I,P! i~ iHH.I!
, 'I I I~' I'. j' Il" -. II ~'.l IIi ' '8" h ," .
~l II!. i ilH. i ,Pii I! ;~ij ,!!,. til lit ibl ,~Iei! ~i il Ii ji i
i 1 II I d 15 ~ I! ~... I ~,!~. I' ,oil! i ,- Ii '\ f.
I;! IS i' ,- " ~f!' I ~,'r lilt "~'l! I " il h j' ~
m !i III !I ;~ I :! ~!I ~I, ~Il! ~;",l ~W ~!n !.iI ~1!1i ! I ~h !l !i ~I !
.. .. .. I ~ .. ..
~' I . 'I i '11; I ;;~ ! li~ ;i il" i~1
I!i j!, I U..~ ~ "1 ,I-I II.! '~.l
In ill Ii I 11m! ill III! ~. iii. !i~1
!lill! 11'1 ~t ia ill!1 b!ll I Iii ~1;1! !,i~; ii;;
"II' ti II. Il , ,it !~ ~i' J I. ) ~..: II::
II i il !~ n ;Iii/ jl : II f l'i.5, !U mj ~l~:
III hi, ,il ! ~1!,1 d I i~ I. IU m. !n
!n n !IIIIII !im Uhi! II illll In mi lil~
.....,,__.. .... _o..~ of u
!I
I.
10
i~ j
,* ,~
i" il
II ~i
~ ~; ~~
I f~ '"
i i~ ii
f it; -I
I lid!
t ~i to
"U: I i I .:1 t~ I :~I I I .~~ U W' I~ iU1;
tll I :~, i.II'. (I i II d ~ ! I"; l!~ ~I lllil .1 Ki,Ha
I' ! J I !. I I Sh . "'" ,. I ., ~ ,'I
l~' I I . ~ t II " ' I." '. It! -i '~il g' "Jf
im I I~ i i : I h ;~ t II m I i I i I !!i Iii !l~il d bii!
i~! Ii IllIn I~! ill' I lfii I u II II Ill!! Iii 11111 III !!!~
illl! I ! it! ~ Ii I !a !illl ~ !hll !Ill : 11m III 1Illl !li liir,
I
Iii "!I':r~'11 :'1 ~~.. If' i
ill . i~! ,Id t !Il :1 ~II i
t.11 ~ I ", I el 1'1
!~ i .- II g
I i~~, 1 I I' I'. .";
(to I U!I hn
: 1m I 'i h~; iil~
! lilW ! ~II!I U 'tii
lilt IIi! I h lit Ii; 1m
jj;! h!11 i! !Iii In 1m
III : mi
'II !~ ~dl
I.: d :iii
d. Ii' Ie .
~.;! ~. U~I
." ,~ l~l
~'a I.' ~~I'S
~Ig ~u r '
Iii ,~!! il.;
I i',l.lui ! i ~I !Iii
@ i ~ II- Iii ;\I
II hll ~I!m~mll!~ f~ ill;
li.. .. <J
-.....-......,....,
-................-
~.-...~
......"~
f(
Ii i. I
b II II
I :~~"''''''"'''-ll''+~!''''''.'''''''I!'"''I''''~::~~~*.'~I"1l>"''''.'
SNOurLt:llfllrrf U.VY UN113rI
':JJfl 'SlilfOH IlYNNrI
lI:JrJll NOJ.NAOIl .fO LJ.l:J
1lIl1:J .YllYJ JI.:iI,lI'IiS
I f i
~ 0 I I 0 0 0 I
.. I
i:i , !il i1id I
" i ..
~ ..
i ~
~ " , ,:~'~ fH~ I '
~ ! ::
. ~ = (n~!!l,~~~
_Ii I ! i , 5 . '
.. .. i~ n ~ II;! iih ~ I
~ i I ill 5 a i ,II I ~ . j ~ H t ! t I i. II U ~
~ Ihill!! i HI II I If II I ;;
~ l~dlBIH Ih~ iiB,
~ Ihn d I fH fi ~Ih.~ ..
..
~ t IIO;-S~ lt~j tI11:"+j
Hm:n qHII~! b,,~~ ~
il!
... 1='::
I I . ~ ~ II !~ i ! I
'.~j;il~ !I~~~ill
II jihn 1.11 ~1!lli III
I in~IHH d~h IihlluH
ill',;,.",olo H H I
I. I I
Ji II, j f
!d~!~ IH
H~fi' ~iI
Ulfl~I!~1
II IdlB
HI
II I
! it
~
12 n
IJ.
H
rr
il~l
~
, ~
I
---..
....-u.......,...
1IIt~'......""'_
_.~;~
~
~
~ .
'"
~ i~
~. ~1
Q
, I
l/ ~"-
__ - \\ I
---<---
NYlJ .'lOIJ.nO/flla
":JNJ 'Sl1lfOH llYNNIl7
H:JrIltl NOJ.NAOIl 110 .u.J:J
IlD7:J XllYJ IlZI4Yl1S
*.a ~
~J i nl~ilS
il~ II nil! ~
ii~ ~ ~ liii ~~
I~! I ~ ~idin
~ ~n i ~ ~!aihi
~ dl = ~ 1~~~~li
IIi II !d;I~;
III ! i mull
~fJl i: I
~~: t ~ ~LI!~ !
!!I nl
~ i !~ ~~~@!
::I i ~. sse n
I~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ! ~ ~
~;
~ n ~~
~" H.~~
U H ..
--"--'~
__......Al1I_
"'IlBlWII't1llWlO
Nl7J g~rNrflla .. ~NItrnr.J '~NLtrJ
":JNf 'SvrOB lfJ'NNn
B:JJ'ZII NQ.UU.OII 4(1 LU:J
linT.) nrJ JjgLt'nlS
_...~~
~
9.J .L:I:IHS :US :I.vnH.J.LYJf
u ..~
! I; l:I ~
:i'
I~I
!A i
11 i
;!i
It ~
I;'
I~I
Il!
I"
\,
,0'
,I:
'0 ,
!l,
'"
O.
ill
:!!
i ~ l
Il:
;Ii
G
I ;;
r
'-;.i"k-
/. ~/ ..
,,/
.fJ/,>
~s
1;
//
~
.
~
o
,
.
,
~
~
0:
J
g
. .
. ,..f'. . ~
j"'l. -."., ~ =4
~i ,UUI ~~ . - -~~'!~'!\-"-,'_
j ill i!~ _ .. I \~ "'=S'1Il.-=-_
;;: ;;; ;;;; ;;;;.;;;; -J. L _ 5!1 I~ 5t ,,~ I~ \ .~;,- ::::
k::::,,,.:=~I::~~~;;;r==~rJ~1;;:jHfJ~;tL,_ h;. ~L
~.f:v :q-~~- . =J .. -._;~~.5
Ii '- = =. = - - ...l- illL r- -, - - ,
(!& ~-~-~--= ~~~~-".. ::==,;
. (9 'ON'tIIt If---=
k ;;;;;;;; _, _ } u,.~) 1"011 A"~l1I
--;;:;;;=::::;;;;J;;;;__ q
l(f~..'li
~4l.~i'~! II~
"I I," ;ir II N
hit ~ ll!.it ::
J'U
. -~ ~ ~~
-: .,~
~\~'~a
...~ - '.
~
. ...
I "
M1>>dt#I n1lO (lJoI ___
........,.
--~-
la_..........._
':JM'--'''~
JirU 33nlrrlltl '" 3Nrrrrv3 '3NlA"~
':JJll 'S3JrOH llY'NNZ'I
H:JJ'ZII No.lN.{OIl 40 A.I.r:J
/DID n"J Jl3LIJ'ZS
.......~
~
----
A~' ~'" I ,'~. ""
I " '-" ,:::- "
I 1~.'3 (;. 2 ~.~ 't
I "'~dt :^;.. ,-, ':-
_____ ' I~U~ ~::~ ,V). :--~
1'. . ~ ", ", i'-~
I ,'" <i .. f - '~ . ~h " " ~
~~-l~!~il M III ~J! 11 \ !~~~ =;U ~ ~~
,:~, >-,' I' ~.u, Ibi \ ,~ I ~!; 'ij ...~
I r~ \ I 'o'; \ ~U \ ,) ~ Ii! S; ~'\
~ 5 r: ~ ,~\ ~n \ ~ ~ H oi ""
Ii - ~ ""'~' \ \ '~. -~ s!!.s r.i ,~~
d ~'~~ - ~, -~\,. t~
~I:! :v-~ -===\ \ ==~: .}.. !i
'I" II ...~ '.' ~ -"" E
~ · II "'.:' - \ "'''''a. ~ Ii
HI'" -- 0. ~, ~,,?;:- ~1I
, I' ;;,~ ~i
, a~
"
I
I
i
'I
1=-~)1
,-r
I;i
'.'-. (j
1,(1
I'"
,1;
I~ ,
'i'
II:
1;!
;; i
i ~ I
:~ :
t ~ I
i:i
. I
i
I~ I
;;1
, I; I
~ l'Ti
l.S1 d:;~
III ~
'I: ~
1C"l! I
lit ...
I~ I I
! I ~
!~; ~
I~; i
; I I ~
~ I~ i ;
, ; i i ~:
~~ i~ I 1
1 .2 i i --,! ,!
i ~ i I i ------a ~.~
~~ ~ i --1 ;r=
'Q! ~ ~~~l~l"
;111 ~,~'" ~
ili ~ ---r :
! ~ ~ .;. ! Ii'
, I, J;, ' , !" I
I~' :~, I II~' ,
Y t. ;~T. ~fl!l~-
I . I :I'''!l:~
o \ ~II;,"I
\0 I I 1<. \':i~
i I: . --itl' ~~
u!. 1'.-
.ii j ~I~l'
~Il 1 --T: ! :
: i\ I ---T~i '
~...J
l
I
1
,
! O.
I;'
!li
II'
: ~; ft
,,::J .LH:iHS HHS :lN17H:J.LYJr
~f~~~J'I~
li~~ L~l.li
.....-,.
_...........,...
1IIII........IIl...aa
"--',&lW:I
IinJ ;fUn ?IlYLINrS . llJlLYJI
'1!V} 'SJlJfOH llYNN:n
vnll !io.LJUOII ./0 cUI3
HIlT.) nlY<l MJlIA ,,:IS
_....~
~
I.:J .L:I:IHS :I:IS :INI7H:J.L YN
! I ,.
,
l":j \
\"n
,:, ,
01
I,
1:,1
': ,
1'1 i
I!!
i~ !
,,1
~ I ~ i
I'
't ; l ~
i 'I:
, i~ i
,
I I ,
I~ ;
I'
! 0 i
~i
r
ffiL
l~U;
,~i~
. j
r;
I
.1'
I,
i
,.1
~
!
;~
!~
II. _~::.~_ . I'.
~ ~-.
~if~~1 iU! -.g~-
_ '_ >Iair )
'--.;;;.-- I~ ~! lW
w__~.;;;:::;;;; b- "AJtr ~~:
, _;;;;; '_'-"""" I,..
~""""'''''__ n --;;;;;;;;;;;:;:;;;;; -,_ I&.;f
..i:f~- ""'''''~'l~'''' _:..-. - -:::="" ;;;;:;;~!~~;:;;___.
!i - -_.~ ~~:=:~="",,:: ""= -="= -:-;; :..;~;~ ~ ~
(!J '01/ .'W
I.lY-lS) J'ON
- ;;;;; ;;; ;;;; ;;; ;:;; ;:;;; .;; ;:;: ,_ ..cYA8t1E/1 !l'a
-;;::;:~;;;;;;;;::;;;.;;::,.---
J~! Jj1j.l.
,ill. 10M!
~iil' :
:i ....'"
. ~;)' I'"
I
! ~n
, -;<1 n
I
jJH I\'
Il',
___' J -'I d 'If;
J-n-'-:J-o ~1 i'lt
-_.- 0
'T1 r i:~:
'.~ ,. ~~
Iii , rt
~ ~ ! n'
IL ~..r'~ It
;y! .:~l: Ii II
i,"1 ~~Ii r:: II
Ii, II
i~ i i f I
. --'-I a
I II, -.-J!i~ I i
1 :1 --i-J ~ . U
:';1 f!il
1. ;~ i, ! Iii
ill IIi
I' , 1,1
. ~;
Ii! --.'; lit
" , Iii
:, ; , I
" --.Jill I't
":1 -10: Iii
:~ 1 III
,II \Hi Iii
~Ol'l It I
111 "~.
. " , ' I J
I~ : --_I,
II II H 11'1<,
'"I ;l! -!~I
., ,~ 'd.
, ,. ' l' II
" f ! IfJ
i~ i i --;1 'I
III ~ I,. It
'-I '., I ~~ j' l{
!11 : I,. I 1
I! ,;' Jl] I ,
1<;; ~
I,ii I
Ii . I J
i,;! i ~~
,'.
,;, I
I~ I l I
;';1 , -~L!
Iii ,
'1/ ,\ .
i ~:I
:L , ~.....~ :!l..
IT: r--~ ~~,
;1 j I I ~!i I~~ '
. I 'I
I" ,~ 1 illl i
~
[} ! t..-,j'1 :
, rl, ,
rC'] , 11$,,6 I
l~i , ~!\I
tll , ----7, ~
'e; .1' I
i;1 , -1'Vp'
j i I ~IJI
I" I ~'~I
! I! i _~~I
Ie, '. I
I II 'i ~lJ:
I! ; ~ ~P:
;'. --lll~ 1
'0 I .
9:J LK:ilHS :ilKS :iINI7H:JJ.YJ'(
~
.-----
-......"--"'-."
.........NI1lI_
""___.WUMf3
NJ'74 /lUllS .r.1IY.u~ ~ 1/11.11'11
'.JNI 'SHOH Il'fN!ill7
H:J'fll1I NOJ..'UOII ~O AJJ:J
fI,11:J nt'f4 1I.ILt ns
...,..~~
iii
Ii,!
~
i~
!i~
d.
\
\
~ ~~\
-\
~(
.'
j:
\
\
\
\
\
=~
~
~
~.
I~~
j~1
I ,~
I;
. 't
,
.,
l
"
"
.~
. :i~.- ---
:,! I'
. ~:~ '~i
! I'il :~~!
"
I~
Ii
"
"
I!
':
"
Ii
:! ~~!
I: ~~~
, ,
, /
I~ ..'
'If'
H'
ll~
l'~
[11
,
"
li~
JI;
'II
"
r-'-
I
J 'J J J T . l'"
:. . ~ ,~:~ ~ II !. :!
, . i!! 'I" I ,~ " Z
. . . t ; ~ .~ if .-::is
iljJh,U ,"
~
,""
I t.>
'~:u.'IQ-0f0I
,
-~.-..,.....
.......... MlI_
")Ijl'_.1IIlJIIIlO
--
"''''''~
...-
.......
:.ar.=
"'- i ! I~
: ...
,r--'1
i i ~I
~; t JJ
~-. '
r-'---
I
-J-~
sa'~
i;'r:E'----: ~~-T!Tf---l
...._ " ,- 11"-- 1 t ~I ;~;~
....... I';! .ol~;j
~WI.oo3l; I I" ! ~.!.
'WiI!----l 'lii
I-----'._~ ,-~ !
! : I I I
I : i i ~
~_-i._+--1-. ,~-
I j! l
: ,!! i
'- ____-'_n+----+- . +__ !
: ; j J r I
: . i I d I
L,__\'+ -T--'j'
i ! !
; ,\ I I
1---0-+;-. -t--j!
t;sl ! I I i
"1- I i 1- 1
~, t-f --+---!
I I i I
1--, L.~
i 'I! '
I ;! i 1
f--+l iu ! - -~"J
;-h-- ~ -t-
I i \, ' ,
liii' ..' \ "Hi!
; I, j
: \ ~ j !
J--rtj --IJ
-. .- ~
STlUOII<l AIIYJ.TJ<<S
':JJ07 'SBON IIYNNTl
N:Jf1T1I NOJ./aOIl ~o ,(JJ;)
IIDT.J JIlrrJ .M.J/lJI Y11S
'"
4:
J:
~
o
f-
1
J:
:t
::t:
~
x
w
o
~
~
1:
~
I
J ! I J .j! '[1 ~j ~
· ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L~ '~.~~; . ~
IJII ~i:~llw~ ~ '-~~
+-
. -1O/IIItIIIII ll1IIllOt
.... ...,.
-~-..
tar.......-..,._
..'......lSIMilO
SNrlJ, :t3rN~IS Off StJNDllInl JUFflloS
'JNI 'S:iJfOH 1/YN.V:n
BJnll NOJ.NAOfI ..0 no
1lfl'l:J JrJU ~:iIA Y:iS
.......~
~
01:1 J.:l:lHS 3:lS :lNnH:1J.Y1f
0
: 1 ..
~ 'I :
\~ :
I.~ :
,
I,
! I ,
I' !
I ,
1 i
1
" ,
I;
~! i , !
" , ! ,
.
, :'jl
; i<3!
.!
I~ .
ill
l:.oj
;'
I j
I":
I
0,
,I
I '~~
I J;
)
""\ l /1 ~
:\Rl
l ~\\\
I \ ,
1[ @. ~_
i ~i ~~*
I
I
;1 t
i'l
, rt
I I ~
jl j
;'1
,"------
I'
,I
,.
t
,
'I,
l
:\
l
1---
~ --.---..
~l
,!~
! t ~
:1
I ~
I!
"
:1
II
if
.I
",
I
I
~
I
~~ ldJl
t/)
:8~~~
!r(~~
..~
~
I r~\~~~~l:~3;
;;; "";;;;;;;; ""r;;;;;;;; ';;;;.;;;;;;;;.;;;;::: ;;;;'h~_ .,
'" """'7-~q~=:::""'$=:::=""=::::-::'___ --,,;;;;:::;:;;;;;;:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:;:;,,,,t~;o __,
.1 -'_,_ -___ ~ - :r ,_.-..
:; ,- --- --~" == =-c;== ~ - -.:::::;;;;;
(g 'Oll[ 'q ! :i -. - -. - "" "
u~.zs) J'Oll[ ~i
;;;;;;;;;;;;;:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.;;;;;;=_ _ .{~JlJr.Jf88'fl
~
.'"
i~
Q
Ji~ f I
" uu"J i
~i~ ! ;;~~I J
'1' m~!111 ~I iiiil~11
!b!im~Ual ililUlM ;
....~~"...fIo!fIo!:lh.... t~h;~hl i.
.c.~o::.;;'~~':"~i::':'~.~~;'';'.':-;..~:..:.: :.
~
~
..
~
--
,::::-"-::-=.i ~
!iI
-:t-1., ;~I
; 11
I,'
."
II i
,"
ill
;'"
Ii,
:1:
I ~ I
,;
=,:>,
.
"
"I
,.....j
,
- --t~,--~J -~ iiJ .:.
\.... !i~fjj'
~ H"i!;
T-'..~ I - ~ ~~.
r:-~' ~~ \
- ~
;
II
ilfl
d
~ ,
-'II
-------'i
:1
;i I
,~ r
f),
~~ I
i~ !
ill
I: :
I"',
n
: :, HH,'
---.--c1'
I J I
-T-7 i
----W ~
~ :1 d
----=rr1i
~~
I: ~
-1~
ItB
_ 1'~1
~ j 11 i
~H~
~!i'
I ~~
--'~il\
-i---'l h i
:tjU'
--~],,:
'-_. - I.
i: II
~~~i:
:1 ~::
-I
ii, I
----r HI
-10,
- "I"
:' HI
-.fl~.:1 ~,
--_'os d I
lB' I
-! U
~Ii
- 1 nr
I I
--- 'i
----l ~ i
,I
~
~1
~~
I I:
: I:,
, I;~I ,
l---iil:
"- ___I '.:Ii I
~! I ~^ :
-ii' \1
-1; \J
-"1'01
~;"9~j
\\: fl!
_J~; I ~
-~n':
-~~ :
I; 1 ;~)
; I ~ T
III 7
nj :
, ,
;~ I j
'il :Ii
::1' ~
I~ I i
11 I i
Ii I ~
i': j ~
i~ I ~
~1! j
I i I ~~
;:: ~
;~: i
;c, J.,
.~~ ~'
I' '
::-
:1 i
""!
".
!il
! ~ I
!':I
~ I !
!
_-.~-
--..-......-
----...-
_....a~
;,
i~
I.
\
\
-~
~
~~
6.J .L33HS 33S 3NnH:J.LY1f
SNrlJ iI3'~IS at.T IroNIXlIm :JU.nll~
':JNl 'SHWOB llYNNn
BJnll NOJ.!u'OfI 40 A.U:J
IlllT.J JIlrrd Jl.HU ,HS
i)~
'~i
,
1!
~~
"
........."1
Hi
~~!
I
I
,
,
,
I
: 1~~
: ~ii
I ~...~
I }
~./;
,
J
"
Ii
I
Ii
~__n
It zl=,IJ · rl
~!"i~Ld ::
b fi i l ~ul
'"
-
~
tl
~
..
~
i~o
~l~ ~ ~
ill 'I "'''kll
i- ii~i ~ O"d~
.%1 ~"I Uh
"1 m, ,J im
n!iijid!l~!m IwJ~II.~UIIUU
Ud3maaa3aUl' dllfU liH
!!~!~: ~: !~!~;!!;!!H ~ ~ ~!nn; I ~I
"
~
~
__ ......,10IIII
1lIlI',.,.',WM.'.""
~"!I8lWlI!,ftUIIICI
....... m""'"
~sJ~~ ~f I~
- ~', I~
.,. ,;."". Iii
, 11 i I:
. C
i ~
I '
I t
sI
~ J ~~
~ Ie' .r.~
U ill ! I '
I ~
S ~ '!
I ~
i oil ~
: . ~ Pi
- "m~ ..; ~III ie j b ;!~!:
, I l' ij ~ '@. t ~ ..
I 1,lil . j!Jiji 2 N' 0 ~
,e ill~~;~~ li1k1tJ\i ~B I a~
~ 1 ~I ~ '!~~d ~~!:~~!& ~81..Q
ill ~ It:, to 111111 gUf~ fG ;e. 5
~~ ~ il gq!'i'la i '.IUif I ~
~ Ji JI'II '91~11 it .!::
~! hft;~;;~il ~ i ~
I I
i ~
< mi:~ 'I
l ~ _ \' -
, I '1r--:r--1! I~ i?'i . ';'
I" ~ \ !I' ....,~ II
" ~ l'I \
J.o ;! ! ~ ~
~ " , "'ij"
~ 100 to AI 1-1 ~/f"7' r I
Ii> i ~ ~,i
~ 1 i~' ~;rj:-"
" ~ t 0 ~ ~1' ;'.,' ,.
n )0 ~
'=: ' i ,""
je
..
I ljffi
? 3 '8
i:ti~ 5
~ . .. .
~ I " .
z: !
f I ;'" e i
11 ~~~ !
I; :g~
11;1 ,0 i ~~
~... ,-. 1110
. ~81 ..Q
~e a ~
I ~ I;
~ -
i ~
! I
. B
':JNI 'SlllfOH IlYNNn
H:JYllrI NOJ.!iAOfl .10 .uJ:J
fll1T.J ~llf'd JjllLl~llS
,
. -
I to>
S11Y.LSa :r.J~NJnla ~ :JNLI~4
I 11m""""", I
I · ',.."',.'.. ~'."
, :; :~;:~;\":.l:',
" G "
1
.~
II t,
i~s. ~i .
I :~I~ I! I ;i, I ~:
~i! '! i, I Ii'
I~ I:I!~!I I ~'b I !Iil
~, !I!~ii! I ili~ I Ii f I
~
i ~
I ~
. ~
i i-
i . I~
d~;
, I~.
o 1 ,.
Ol . 8:.
il UP.
f. : i~
Iii I~:
d hll
I
Iii ;l I
.1" . I in ;.
.. I !~: i ~
11m : II P ;
il~uI'5<!.
I ~. ~ "I'; ! ~ I
!~hl; ;ti. ~ 1
i~!1 H! !Pl a i
iti;1 Pi!' ~ ~iI
S ~II: ~ ~s ~I:~ ~:'
Ji
1I~
~Iild
fl;i~
!3'.;'
1,lil.
il~ii
~
...J
~
w
Q
Q
a::
<(
Q
Z
~
rn
o
I-
Z
o
~
u:
8
~
~ 8 I
.
I ~
~ 5
I ~
I I
.. ~
I -
~ ~
~
i I
~ I i
d__~
I
~ G= I
5
.
I
~
~
g ::I
g e
ii Q
Ii =
8 "
z
I ~
I ~
&
~
I
~ I
'8
~
.
i ~
~ 2
~ 1l
~ f
I ~
I I
I I
& '"
i
i
. i I I I
I .1 I bl
~ 1J2 jJl
I I I I
i I I I
· 11 I
B
il:
i I
!i ~I'~'I
~!. n ~ ~
~~
_W1W__
."'_'".1I_
.>>.......-0
...........,
j! . ~II
I ~i i;i In
!! i!i i~'~l
~! Ii iMUh
I l ) I
m' ~I
(1
I
I
~. .1 I
;~ . '3~
I' ~ :Ii~i '
~l\ 1
~I ~
'I ,,;
I I I"
I ~
I I "
'.1 '
; I .
~iI ~Ir ;li
.i
-
-lL
'..
I
.
.
.
o ~
~ '. S
I :.
. t j
Iii
It
k~ I
=I!:
Uii
t ~ ..
"
;to
'r
0.1
;3
~..
15ll'
.1.
1);1
ijl
'j f
!..I
iUJ
I
: I
~
.
4 ~
3 t:
a 5
~ ..
~ ~
I ~
~ ~
!i i
I !
~ z:
i
i I
I I
i
i
! " I
I I
~ ;
~ ~ I
HI
I: I
i I
IIII L
S7IY./.:ia Z3rNIl'lIa ~ 3NUrd
':JNl 'smOR I1rNN:r7
1I:J'nll N(J.lN.(OIl .0 .uJ:J
lla7:J JIlIrd JUILlrHS
~
.
OIl
i ~
I
, I
I
I
!
i I .
~ = 1-
~ ~ I
e ~
~ ~
I 8
~ ~
I u
~
I
;
I I
il ~
,) I
;
! ~_I
I 1 ~',~.
' r',
I ,<~; I-.~i J j: .; L I.
: tl ~< ~~
j \ ~.,,' .,.. '. ~ ~u..;. I
I I ... .t.
i '. ." ~ t.:
. , ,,~
, i
, "
'-.-l
. '"
~ ~ I
~
E
.
i
~.tl~ >J i ~
1); J j~ ~ s:
-' L " ~i; ~
In '. i 8
I
3
~ !
i i
\". I
I 0
~ "I' cL
5
.
.~ .. il
~ ~~ Ii !.i
~ ~o .~I.Ja
~ I .,~ ~i~ A.
I ~ h~~'IU
: ~!I;!II i:
i ~r~ii I!
I ~
~ ~
~ ~
ti ~
i i I
o ~ I
Ii,
i I
i I I I
i -
~;. .,;.
rS
_.....--~
--r--- ----."-~
""3I......"l&UflQ
, ,--I ......=.......,
n I
511
I h st . ·
:a:1 ; I
! I jd, I I. ~
. I I, . it ~
j II i! I g! < ; J
fi III ill II I d; L II
It I At -;-!5121" "II
;1.1 ~h h ,~ LiI I u
;.9 e ~ S;r~\;,'l~:9G:3~ ~~~1t
..
. I
I'i
IS!
161
ii I 1
l
~ ~-: -"- -i- '1-
.' ~ I
'I. I
I
'/
@..J. .'/4 ~
~~ ~
.:1 ., dj!i
r-:r~>)~
.~~~
r 1 ~
(I
I
I I I I I
;di i i ;~ 1.1 ~ I i !~
il'.'1 i!tiJ51 0:
II Po ~ I 1- 1 I' I; I ~t;
II ~ I' ~ . ,II ~~
S ~ Ie ; I - fll !.. ~ ~ ~~
!" . . . . . . . . 'ms
~., ._ 13 I ji
qll- .,.. ~ : ~=
1,-' iii c" I !<~
~ I i I!;
. ~
Pi I i 5~
! ~I i G i ~ I I
SNOI.I.:J8S 1Y:J/<LLJ. ~
S11P',lZa ~NLtYd
':INl 'smOH llYNN:n
Ir.Jnf1 No.lN.WIl ~o cUI:J
Il/TlJ RU MJIl4 n:s
n~i _I
~ ~fdJt ,
l \ hih
--'--'"\,---
I
Jfl'lll '!
~ ) ~ . ~I i . ~!IJJ
~ . i.. I i Ill..
i
~ i f l
I , tt ~
I\" ~,'
~~!t
1J;;r
lii,!(
~~ge
h.~
!
I
L~____
l J
P1 - ,,==8
~; '~).~
/~
.~ ~I ' :
.. \
'I / I ~
'~~i x I
:,;: ' i~ II
" li ,ft
,--~. (.)~
l {~f"!
,,(It'!
,~~~~
~ i
~ il
-lOll
II:
..
e
!
jf 1
~..,. J ( <::/.
U ~i;~ i
~I i tw-
I ~ I I
I I:
a
I . _ _
I~<i'
!~; ~ ~
it ! ~ ~
i~ Ii i i
!il'i~1
t~iq i
~. ~n ~
-I :~. ~
'~.:. ~
11:1 ~~ '
1=11 b Ii
-I j cnl
hilll~~
~
~
..
I
; ..
, I
~ "3
i
.
a
~ ~
z '"
~ 5~
~ ).Ii:
. ~j
; ~~
a S3
i ~
~
I
I
~ I
i 8
f'OlIdM ll'<<l l-~ .wu1l3lll-U
-~..........,...
_~-_'-M"'_
--:JIlI~'1f'II,W)
..............,
! ~~
i 8-
I Hid
~ f "I' I
llllr. j I
!pnh
h 11h Ii
I 31 dIg ~i
-~ .
· l~ I'd!~
I i~d! H!Ii!!!i
I I~!I .Iil' ~ IE ~I
I fBiil ~ll it I I- .1
I Ilip jl di, ?o if
. :~~~dIP;ii ii ~
~ :II' !i It I'l;~.~ II!
1 '~, ~ GII " In !'i i' ~!! ii!
i.ii,-.5~ Ill; m
I i!;I.!<l 2; ~t"$ ," 4
Zl " .# ... _ ..
I
, j
II I !
~~ f,
~ I! ;!.
\ ' " .! ~ ~ : i; !
I ~ ~~ti I
j Ii! I I
1111~ ! I I
I i
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
\
\ ~
, ~
~' ~i. ~i~' ~~w~ r I
~~1l;i1t' i jLrl:~h~;; L " 'I
. 'i a b JUl';'~ ~ I ~
' t.. S~:>:> ~ t
I .'. Y hl ~! · fD 131 ~;;~ i! I
I !'~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ,; ~.! i i! I
...! ~! 8 .~~ ~ I ~ I! ~ ~~~ I ~: :
M:5" I III~; . ~r. ,. I
~; ;,~ ~ ~ 5, ~i! ! i ~ III i I I
\ I' A I ~ · I ~..... II !:LJ ,
S71YJ.!1a .~YN~IS ~
~NDnIYIf JULYlU.
':JN1 'S:illfOB lIYNNrI
B:JYW NOJ./UOIl .10 A.I.I:J
flIl7:J J/lIYJ 11:61/1 ns
I! IJ IJ ;.~ 1,1 ,~~. CO>
, (11;JlM-
~ ~I ~ I,' : ~ ;~~ j ~
· ..!~JH~IM~ ~ ,'~;~ i to
..I
~
w
o
o
I
<f)
~
z
o
~
o
u:
o
o
::2:
.
I
~~ I
~ ~ a '8 I
~i~ ~ 1-
l ~ i I 'I
~ s '.:l ,.
! i ~ ~ I
~~~ tg I
~~~ ~; I
i;~ I~ 'I
!:I I~
~I II [; Ij II I
, ~., ~dll:~: I
,i~U i, '
- ... I
I
, i
~ I I
~ I I
.t~j ~ ! I~ i i i
.~ II :1. ~I~ ~ Q I
~~ I, Oil ;;; ~ ;
't ~ ~I~ \
~! Ed ~
~ i i I
J11 ~ ~ I
.I~! i Ol,
~!
~
TrJJ'- \ ~ i
J I ~\i~. i~, .'~
~I-l ~ ,'ll~
I (~z
\ ~
. ,,~. ~ ~
,,; ~~.'~~~ ~
~ "'69~t: li is
~I .~~!. n~ I ~i ~i
~.U :~a~J"~ 5~ ~"
~~~,. ~~;t;; '\~".' ',.." _
\ " , . ,., ,r
{8!30= r ~~'q3
IlL.:;' -"
~~.,l.
."
,I
W
~Im
-----.-
eGI........II.......
"...........fBLW:)
..............,
i. ·
jill' I :
I' ,I. I I
I,ll 1 t>., ;
'!l- 5 ~'al <,
.;~~! "~t ~j
.I,,!' loh "
In! -- ;1
..:hl ~ ir
~ \ . I
"tmJ ,.'
,J ~:' I" :""
Rf~-: ,/]
ij : '" :;f
L I 1/ ,'.
i-L--i/
/:
i ' J
2.1 i "
lil II
~~t I-
M ! ;
II
u-"-w.
'i~~j
}- "Wp. !:i~1
*E. f ~
, rfi \
~ t' i ;
,I .1 \'1
q jli !1.
. · :I l~i
I ~ U~
;II .'
Ii
~
it
~~
,- d
J~~ I
k
i~f !
J! 8
~ ,
; ~r- !
~ tf
~ I' T'::T' t;
" '-'-~.
-............. I ,......."
~u
~. Lf""""\.. 'I
'" '!~ r,~:' ,I ~
",. ~ @)) l!iI9'-~ ',.
/~~L
/ ~ .
/ -
I
I
!
i
~
. I
!,3 ,.~
,1;;'
~ii!
hu
ri>~
~
HI
.r'
i~~
~;r~
~~Ii
in.
I
\ l
\ il
'~~\\
"" \ ).
-~
1/( I "%,
II, . ill
G iJ;
~,
rd.
"i ',I
"" .
, .
~: :~
~l: ;"
!:i :~
. ;" "
I! ::: i
I Ii!."
.. . ~~ t...
I. 'lo;~;1
~ ~~!
1$:' if
I ;lil~ a.
\2 ~.: II,;
I ~~i~~!5
. Hu li
~, ~m~!
h i
II .
~ :
'I i
l~ !
Hi n
I ~ ; ~
~.~ :;
.. ~ ~ I
.~:l ~ t
i iei ~ ;
~ ~in I
~~hi'
iii: n
- UX i ,
~!:"::
,
!
!
1-
.1
if
'I
Ii
-I
II
:1
, II
i,
I l
i I
!
i
i
!
.
I
i I~
'!
S1IYL8Q NOILllfllllLSIQ IIUJ'Jl
'JIil 'SJfJfOH IIYNN:n
HJJ'8fl NOLNAOfl /f0 AJJ:)
fln1J JllIYd JUlA YHS
:(Il iIJ.J)~
i d. 1'1/
;l!l ~1~IJi~
~
i!~
~1~~i~
. I, !
! ~Ii ~!! I ! I ~>llL ;
~, -~ I~ ~ H I!!n R
Ii I; ~ ;! '. t
.~ n . ~ ! ~,!.) . ~~~ ~
~ !'I , .' ~ r7 /
· 'I I : / "/,,
~ !;, '~: ~ ~; (f ~ ~
'A~- --- .J;~l4nl-rnT'jl-[~
l1}J : I 'i1"' li.fJ" ~ 1
I : ~ ~;: j I I
i-.J~ 4--i i '
. ~--<
iQ'
~)oj! ~
~ IX 1 "
~~ I '. --,' ~H i ; ~
J /" , ~j l~ 1 L
'11 ili~ ,I ;1; " I.
,f-ic " 1 ' k
" i.; d ,'" -~ ~. * ~ !! ~! 5
.; ~~.~ ~:!~ f~ !~dl~ · ;l~ !l: ~
~ ." i I~ 1'1 I "~ll.J i j" ,I' '
! ~ is 51J ~, "h'- ~ n 'I ~ & :.l ; ~
~ .';; OJ .1 ,'!~ .. ,.' I H .
If Ii I !! ~~ ' ~ I :~,~!: 11 ililW !
, '..' W-....,..~ 'i' L ,l i .\ .' "
~" i~' J '''t ~ p' .' i'~'", .
'-... ' "! 1..-1 ,. .I~ " 51'~'i~ i
"- ' II ~$ . ~.3 5~~:::':~1I~," ~
1 ,~ 1Il:al ~ to 1:" i
-.f'! ~1'.I~ H 1I:1'1:11~!,
~ .. .', ~I' 1j~UI~~&;11
~ 'll I;Oj'f':I,,~
b .f l!~jl!;d;!~g~~
I u "'~..; ..;.,.;.._."~: :
;.
~~
!
, "
! i
; ,
, .
1
I!
t!
,. .
,po
.
lh
:;- I
~ !!' ~
\ "u
!" ,i
~ " ; i jf
~ ~1'_omT" 1_ l~
il !:j ! 'I~J r. j!
I ia \;.~\ ~~
; -.: k?" .)}, '\ ,~
" '\ r !'l"SJ..
t~ tl~ ~
! ~ I' !
I ~~ II
L'
,<
"
I
~'"
: '"
i. ~
' !
i I,
il .~i , ' :'
'~"
~ i,
~ Iq"-
)i
r
I
I,
i 1
d
~ ~
, !
Ii
i ~
- .
.. ~
~ ~ ~
~; ,
~ 'I .
J'l1
".,
,-, I
Ii .: I
i3 ~~ t
,il :1 ~
~ i. !
~~~ j~ i
i?a "l" :0;
i ii 1
r) ;:..:!
;i-,
i ~ '
'l 'I
, i, ~
! i ~ I"
: , $ i ,
! l! ~ i 1f
I! s :r! q~
~ f ~ ~, "i
;a ~ ~ ~ ~ r'll
bl~;!~l!
~I ft 1 ~ I: "i
..'.:."~I~1
H~.!p l III
~)!!!! ! I j. ,.
~fq i-! ~ !!Il ~
;I,' ~ l ! - ,\ ,
~ ~: ~ l w: ~;, ~ ~~~~~~
"l ~ d' 11 j !~::1:
~ ip; .. ~ X ~ ~,~ :t~" ~jll
'!iI~'J li1lil!~
1;1 , ! ! ,~ i; I ~;c~.
I ~ .!1 ! ~ ! ~S ~l ! ~.:g<;J
I
~ ~
) ! a
! ;; I
en
; i i ~
I 'l i
! ! i .
~ I, i
.Ii~ ~ 1:1 ~
~t !.: &
}. ! I ~
;1 ~, f
~I\ . S ...
~l i 1 ~
;j ~ ~ i
~~ l!l J~ ;
;~ ! Ii '
!h~d
~ J!!" . ,_~ ~
. .
0>
-
.
i ~
! u
f~
~~
i;;,
S'
~~
."
L
'"
I
,n;
h
~~
~ ~
~
I
I~
'1
"
!~~
l~ " ~
. .1' .,n;!
I " ~i-
~9:1-;1 t.;
~'~T 0
!i~ttj., II []-.'
l~,:.., .~..' ! I,.r\ '~.'
~ I, , 'I, >.-
(~' iJ~, !, U ~!1~ !
iL..;
--'
! i~i ~r ~,t~T
, r-~I: -:- f'
t \':' V - an
_~ I I ; ~ 1 - ,- i ~i
lu, :'~.~ ~ ~ I' Ii 7. U
d I',' 1 ., ;~
1 iL t 1 --lL 1-
_.......-~~
---.....-
:lN~'lSWr.)
..I...~~
II iff II I
!.:~jjl:
'il!i!ll
Ii HI It I
liHli~ ill
il'~ I ~~ i
tll!i~ !j I
1"ltl I. I
; 1 Ii:. i- ~
'!II:.I;' I
hpdU!l
~I,H"j' !f
1 I. i I"' 'I '
'U' II 1st
h~i ."j'I!"
I'"' II I ·
llh~r!! il
i li5!t~I!!l!1
~ 'i t ·
V --t.t;;' 9
. r,,!~ no: ~ ' ,h'
2 < "T I ~'; / ~ ~ i c;: I
i "" I .'" . , "! ~. f
i ;1 " - Ii. t:: ',,~ ,
.,!; h ~;/. . &dn; -' ·
',- I I.....::'.~, _~ ~ ~ ~1;1.d4!P!
l' 'q" '. i II'M,I ~
~'t[ , hL' h! ~ i. h ~ H:l ~~
./ .. '...I ! !'!!i~~,}lli!~
, .. ., ., " '. - j'
. I' .'--'=-"'4..-. 1," ' , '. '. P ,
. ...--" '-----'--'-. . , l . '
I p~, ~-"-r--...J Ili~1 L~,i
1oI-'i. "/ ;t..dl'Pl
~E !!if IH1il ~.h
mi ~",...-
i' ~1!
01 .g!
h l ~~.)-~l ~ . ;~k
t' j ! lh'"
, J i . .1,:
~ ;L f Ii
~ /,,~,~ I ~ ~; Iii ~
ir\l';H' I ~II. 8~ ~
~ l!- _,--'-j-i . . r!
\t'r-is J1 ~~ -~!
iltr ~ (
~J ~
'. I
! Ii '
. ~t-l
~iJ
~~ ";$.,'j. ~
I ~~. .,~
I, 'u~id
. ~; - ~ ~
I~~I-;I . id,
~''-!I''IT !
g.~ Y--...<~ r1
;i'~'1\f I ~ ~ Tn ,I
~m lU ., 1 ~ I
, '------U,
i. "
S r.,::::~<j..J, 10"'Y
, 1;-_" ' T' =--IT
l~'k;I, ! :'. J I I'.f" ,.' ~I
; i, ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
_~ U. I 1 ' . 1 ii
I I I I !
i! !! i I II
). .t' I I "
II . I 'I
II : ill' !
II ,.. , ..
> .' I II
I' I i I i
i! II I It
iIiI Iii 1 II!
h II. ill i ! I III
11'!!1 ill I ill! I! I
hIll III ; l.pl i! ,
Hllh jll,lj'l'hil.lll'
,liIW11llllpl:IIWII!I'!I.ll
lill liil 'T ..."
I . !.ll !ml/Ii .. II
~ ............. ~" ~
i
;
i",i, I.'
.jt H If, l
l~iiu!:11
,!~~~L!
~~~iiii~
!:t ii ;: i ~ t~
~~ l~~~ r!~
~,_ r" I.. ii ~
~'i i~~; ~ ~
~~ ,!; jd Ii l!
'&': iii t ~11 ij
P'~iU!. I.
'. "!. ..~ ;{ l. ,0 ."
"-Ii." t.. :fl "!. "e:..'
9111' ~I'- ".
,.' ~I ~
~: I:t~ ~~j:i
~! -.:
,
,
l
S I
! I
i i
,
!
~
~
~
id
.. fo:";t
i ; ~
~ i !
~ { ,
i -
,
a ,
~ ;~
:! !!
.
~n
I" }.
, ~
i i I
j
i
;
~ i~
I s!
S71Y~U NOIJ.IlBIIl.LSIIT llz~rM
':JNI 'smON lIYNNIl7
NJJ'IIB NOJJUOB .JO ,{.[J:J
B1l1:J JIllrJ JIm YZS
'1
n:
i ! t
i s ~
q;
,-
l~ c~!
'-~~t' ;1'
,9 .. . .' I
' /:;:~:
! 'Ii : I
J I ; ;--.,1 i
I . 'j "I
! ~ 1: ,1
,L,'--"\. '-, '----~~
~<"'I
,r~ I,,_h_l
l~ I ,___-..---J '-.,
~.. Ie
.'
.
b
~!
~ ;
~I
I.
I'
b!
~~ l
~ :
rl h !Q
~~d!i \ ,..-1-'-"':
\!! ~J;.l.r" ,
1,::,,\j
'tj . :,',.j,
... ",..:- i!
, 0 ti i ' " .'1 Ii
~(~~ \ ',' . ':.t
,. - I '.. .. ":v' t'
'~I "
. 't"!'". , -:, 'j
~g i '-'F=F"-
g! J ~i!i .!~'..
i ~ Iii ~~; ·
!'j:1 ~i'h
.< Al
~s ~
. .
o U Ii
:r----.....- . w,
.- i1\1! '.
-'-'I~'~
i ~ i~
"~. ~.
~1 ~ , jl.
~e . ," .Ii
c", Ita l~
~
\
IlL
HI
~l;
p,l
;ij
1~
Il '1 '! I '
, 1 i
, ,
; ~ 1 j! :~~
j J "AI
It 'I!
P j'k l
'~
!~ j
~
, l~
! ~i L
, ~~ q
j " '
~ lj III
di: \
I " ~ I '
; .~ i' ·
HI II ~~
l i.' q iil
i 11 l' ,;g ",
! ,.,l n l ,~li
;1;~~! .;~~h
~ "Ii] ~.. w)'e., ill
';.. \/! ~ 3 ~.~~f. ~~
i j' q ~~igi;
!, ~ :: ~:Ci i~
a -.~l ! ~, ~!!~ il
oJ~,:r:it~~
IliliHI !~
,~.. oj' : ~ ~ ~#
~ I..
I ii
1 lS
i i I: ,,~
>. I . ~ Ii
~ d i ;~'
~! n. <I
~ijS:~~y
" II. dl,
Ii r: 3 q
! I?' "
~:t:.II.' HIl
; ~~ . i! .'
h: I; ~ ~~
i ;:- ~ ~ il ~ 3g
_.~~~~ '~~
· h, ~ ! 'II"
; 'I! J ~;. ;1
~~~~i~~~~
."',,q"
I'. " 1~ ' )!l
!ilJl ~~~!1~fS'!t
o IL!".,"Il
! iH itd l~
I
,
!
1 ~
.5
~ j
is
q
, "
. !
i ~
~~ i
Ii
oJ
," )ffi~ ~
" 1m
? ~o ,
~ ,"-, .~S i ~
!i .' wlr: ; l;.J
t' .
.
.
. ..
t~.. :
;
!
! s
i !
" .
1 ~
~
!!
~s
~g ;.
150' Z
y
J i
i i
H
; !
;
: ~ ;
,.
.'1 ~
~ I
4 i !:!
i ~;!
, , ;
; ~ ~
'I 7)
~
!.
"
~~
--~
-:-::'..'"':'::':
"";~
S7IY~Jla ~OlJ.nUnIJ.Sla IlJlJ.rJl
HJ~ SJlIIOR IlrNNTl
flIJT./OJ.NAOfl oLO AJ.13
JnrM AlliltrllS
m I
~~
ttf ;
~!
L!
r~
fll-
~!I ~
In d
~~~ lj
f2~ h
m~l
JI~ IS
~ill!
I
i
~'~.r.
; ;
~!.....
~ .
UooP'
~ '
~!"...
t
~!.,,,.
! f i
W .. II: ;a a ~ a .
l i
! " . 10 ,J~ i i
,1
r1f11
'~
~! \ [i
if ~ IHHI II
If I
kk
6 II II fi i I I ffi l'iUlI I' I
i Zi ~ ill · III :
,~ II! ~ I' E " ~1I ·
r----: I ~ ( ,i I l.w -5 ! I I i! I In Ii~ I!I ,
If IIJ II;i I '~i
I II'
I. : ' " I~' I.ii I~~ ! l I
I' I ~1'11 ! Ii , : i211hl m ! l~
11/ ~II ~ ' ~l. l;i III l L,
!! W (1 1~1 ' ~ iil !18, !il! !, !Ii i
~ II !;II ; , !. ~ -'i i~i) < -n
;1 ,Ii- I
'~ . ~~~~ :ii:~ ~m !! ~n I
H i~n
!1J
I 111~~.e'
III-I
i! i;~!'U;,
';dP!5;'1
;11-1'11'1
,a liri~ il!l! 1
'I"~ Ii
I ~~I!~Hd'
.: ".. ~....
,.
JI
Q 17
#J //
Ql,f~
! ~
n~.r.'\ l!"
,il i~ fit'
j'.:~' ~".bt
" -~-=-,.~"-..
/ j I /. i ~
i . i n:J;i ~
:~~ ~ 1 .(/ '"z'
j~!I~ Li j! Ii .,~
11m ~ !j ~Il
~~n~ ~:
!~ 'ii
t: ~~
ii~ .
t~~.l jl
,.. i~
[
1.-'1 .' ; I i ~
~I~;!i \ >~ :I~~
\n o~ I r~ · ~ if = ,1
ilJ' ~ c......:::~.~1' Ii ili;l ~ !i
,i/1l i: ;ql:.i11
~ ' /~ ;", c..-;
, r '/ ~ iI".P;
,[~ .,;,,- tw;l "ltIH~
~ ' ~t ' " I ~ ~ i I G-
1>;1 ," ,<",,". i..
Q.", Ii ",O! i l ---1'. ,I n~. q ; i:Ii
i!~ u ~~. ' '.c- Ie ill Ii · ~
~a.i I! li~ 1~J i ; ti ~ i i.. ~ ~
!il . h "I"'~
I". pt~.~~
~I l-~j~ ~.lo. I
. ~~~?!~ ~~~ I
~ ~
! ;1
i ~:
! ~ ~~
, ~ l ~
, I ~ l'
i " j t'
;( : i IiI
~,' ~ I ~,~
, ~ ii'!l
I Iii P S.;
I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ W pll
i l- ,i d dl
. f n., l ".
_..-:':\ ~ ;"ii11i :;j
",/ l ~l.,i~r'"
,. ! pq' 0,
f!lf~<~j.;A~
s!q~H! Ii!
i ;,
~ A i
I "
~ ~ ~
; i ~
t ..
~ l'
~
~
I ; ~
. I '
, ~. 2
~ '"
I , .
~ . '
I .. S
~
I
~
~
~
I I!
.~
:11 r -~"-I
!_ ~ Oo!
,I S: ii ,;. I
~i; Ii ;~~ 'iJ, l"
_e<j ~t~ 0.:.1 d
l~~ - 'In'-11l;
:1~-~+;1 Ii
" J, ~ "".d \\ 111' /
" ,. 'I < -'
!l ',j ~ " ,
~5 ~.~ -.~! I~."\
t:- '.' I ~...
~, ,,,,.~,, !J~., I
's " j ,-' 'I ~
; ~ I~--~ I
'r . X... ,_--'---' "
I'" .I~i(::" ...,~,
~ii ~;=; r-:F~--- ~
ie" :t.:1! I
!"~ I;;'
~:~~ 1~';;
ll,a i';l~
I~ l ~l
.~ i!
I; sa ~~ ,
h j- '\ ~
~~ t rr11: l~
IL{;1~.'-=(1t ~ }
~~(~ ~ ;?f
1r1,;~,..L..-,I--l..1 !
fJ [(a-~---L""",~ j
,~~'! I l ~_L-1 ;
tA ! t.q~'~-~ ~
;/" ,,~o_'I__~.
II! I~ ~;=!:-i'~ ;:
~1I"1:11
~'Sb~ ~=....\ I
~i!i ~[~;i
i'~, ii.11
~~ll
I?. -----~,
ri f- \ \
\~))
~
,--q
/~
j'?J L\\...
\'N-:;j
\~;/
bJ
;.:--!
--.--
--".'",,"--
~""".UUI'IO
-....~
~.
i~
~ ~
~p ~
Jlf .... ~
~!~. I~a~
I !C.3 3i~'
I !H~l~l!
: .; "II !~' lj
~~ ~I!f.- hh~
~ i!i~ 1i~~ B ~:l~
n_ 'I~ ~ !ilp
I IP i i! h;l!d
ji 1 'Ii ,I.. 'n~ll'
~i' :11,!~H~IH~;n
j 'i!~":'~I~..;.')
it e !hil~ll'd~ii!
Ii gI451!~j !~'ll
Oi!~" ~!~ 'l~i,i
il"""~''''ol I..n
i ..... ....~ ....g: ===
Q
.. I
~
:l
;!
z-.
.,~
"'0
...::j
"'<
"'"
u ~_
~.:::.
..=
~~
~I-
~~
...
"
.
'.
~
~ !a
Iii ~
,~ ~ ~,
1 _: Ii H
i ~. ~ 5" '!I;
I i g~i!; ~~ .;
, ; ,,'., ~ loll
I 1!~~II_P~
~ ! ~ · ,~~.ti
; ~i: 2.1.. ~ 1Hi"
'" t h~ ;1<1 '.ll'd
5 ! ~'I )ij. !an!~
y; q~~; il~~n~i;u
'" 'd .q"'<'x "
.. i it, ~8lb...lq
Ii i r.ti=..".Hf,i"
~ 'iIL,!R~H~~!1
!~d~!;r:~!2~~i;'
~ II : ~~. ; : :,' ! ! ~"; ~ :
,. .~
_; f
~
~ ~
..0
z =
pi~
;;) .:Eo
h~
~-~~
~ "'-
! ~-
~ ~f
~ ~?'"
n~
::: ':n
S
i
z
!i I~
i I;
~ .: ~
~
.
, r'"
i--~...;....J
r=j\.\: I
-+ --
L,:'!
I--r;u
:..J
L
'.
f; 1
! ~ I ~
n ~; i ~
I'; ;H ~ ~
I~.t~:r.""
. -.' ! ~ l-
I'; ![ ~. ; ~
.~l d' ~ E ~
;1!!~;2i e ~
t;1 i'l h~; ~ ~
~ ; j" ~ ~a a3 : ~
Hi g;.!5 ~ ~
ilo~ -. '-,,,;' ~ ~
-~! il ~.jl ~ S
:i1t i..~~.!1 lIII lIoo
a-~ ;. .,'-! 1
!~!ql~" ~
,!il!, li~ ,
i~!r~!:!I~ i
~ .,5t,~ ~ln
(/;1i";\ /Cr'~\ rn '~
bJ....~\,i, Q..\'~!O C!.
~) ~) ~jJ~
:~.J
J
..
, i
L--._.._..._ ..J
. .
i a r 3 -e
i 5
~ , h
! ! H !
~:! I l. . . a
~ I H ~ '"
~ ..
} >
! .. 0
. . ! 0 "
~ . t ~~
Il n ~
~i . . 8 z
'" fi ....
3 > ::!!'"
, ! I <0
'"
n ..,
0
!je
2~ ~ H ! 0
'"
~H i : ~ 2:
:;
iJi i " ~
.. e ! a
;1 " ! i
IB
JI Hi I ~!
L. . . ~!
S71T.ua 1/I1.11.I1S .II/I'JJNTS
-:JNl 'SI1NOB 1/YNNTl
VnrI NOJ.N.IOff .a kJ./:J
1lII7:J }flll'J 118UI'I1S
Jl.11JIJIJi ~
~,- ~ ~ I ;~,
I I d I-ill':';
(' --. ~
~
.
CIO
. -
i ~
b
!,
I
I
!
I "
.~ I ~..,.I .
; ,..-' :1 I
I" ~ II rt ."~ i Hf1li
.~ ;l\t: ;i!'~: I r: ,.
I ill I .1~11~, ;~> \. :f1. ,I
~ .~ /" I I
.I:t l . \..../ :Y\, I':
, . /', 'l... . I'
(, :Y ",~'Ili
"' "(' :f~ I .!
~I' .,\ ,;,",\,It. /
a.1 '.~! '-#-' \ . ~""l
,I, Tf-'I ' I
/ i';Au:~ j .
, I ( ':~ ill
i I ~ i
JI
, I . .
~l j: ~IQ Ii
q III ~_i\ g;
! I l, I'i' 1i 1i ;.
;, Ij ,: il ~l ! I
n i!l'l!~~'n!!
n \!.j Ii l~ I: n :l
; : ! ~ :~ I i ll!j ~~ ~ 'l ~~
.~ i ~ ~ -. ~ ~ I. f~ t ~ ~~
! i I"~ j ! " /i, 'I
~ I ~~! ) "h II ill j ;~
I . ,I I. ! ! l8 !ll" I'
, I j d I ,~!"., '\
I' l! III ! !! sd; ;\
. ~~ ' ; IH i !i ~~ i. 'I
I, 51 I ! ,! , ! ~ .~, ~ 1,
iG ~~ D~I~~; !~;s ~:j
t .- i I Ii i . 10 h ! ;~ '!
I il. ~ :p HPi I !.l~
d! Ij ~ ill dll, !~ i:
Q ~ ~. , : :' ~ ~ ~ ~';;d;'
l
i
~"~ :-' [i\
. <,:_- ,-,j~=. ::
';,===--5~ :v1:
~ 1 'I 1
, I "
~!D~~~" !~" I j
r"! " ~?~~-='-:-: J IV ~ k
jl / '-1'''--4 r~ ~
~~ / u
., ,
~a i
'~~ /
a
!~ I
Ilii .1I
1!19 j'l
I:i! nl
.l~. -H
,. p.
/ 'i'l
i,;
'Il
! i
II!
~ i ~
pi
d-
Il.,;:
~j\
. ,
in
,l!l
ii......r;
.i " ,1! ~ i!:!! ,
I ' . .~I ; '"'-'" !-
-l, \.' :: ;ll~ '5 ' !l
! ~p,,-, " f,r it-'-<' bl
l~. f'1'-~~~~~1ti-J~~;;
'''"--- I- '<I""
r "-'~I 'F'-' . I~;
t" ^"~-1'''-'''''-1rl!-L/
~ Ii \111
~\, '!; ~j'.
'l'\", , L. "'I ...;..
, '\ ':->-:::>---,-~-.:1p'C- "t
' t.::=-=-:::::;t::'1lJ>;-
, .'1 (-'
I ~~~ l
~~i ~
5, I
~!j, ~
H~j
I
~ .
" '
~~ ~ :
~ ~ il
,ij I !~
~ ~ ~,
.i i q:
~ ~ I l ~
! ~ i I!i
: ~2! 'i~
~iI': r:~t
l!l L ~ ~t
~:.I!'i~~
~Il'l;l~'!
!; ~ III
~ ~ !r j:i
i~~n~~l
'1
I,
e, '
II .~ '1 .1,. ;il
I ~ Iii! !l il!i In
!!~~d !1~11~
t!" \ ;zrr \:
. .1-,.~,., " l...ft1,
'.' . 'fr',":-, ~~'f:," ~.' .
. " ' '~\ f;' ,
I ,\ k
I ~; t
'I' "::,~'" ".,"j,l:
: "'~<Q;~~;;. .
~ ~~J~";ii/iI:1
, ,I I..
l~~,j'-~Ii -lli
~l~ II
~. h
Ii 1
, ' ,
,I II 1
,~ ~~i~
~ ~ ;;1: I
I! ~I.li '
!:!i ,I I
! I I! '51" ~III
,I II II ~il
5 II .'l' I'il.:~.
= I t ~ i .I~~"!! ~ J 1'1
~ !ll~!milll!
i!! i fi:!!~HIH i
.1;1 ,'I..'hi'iol
ii q dil!f!'I;!.H:
., 1.I'l,1 i .<1, ~
f"!~~!:I(.I<~~~ =:= .
iHal""'II' .
,I i i!! illl 11/1 !: ~
I)'i Ii' Ii"! i'il
i:! :1~~~~:~ lih r
i. ~ ........ '" " ,;~:::;. 1
~ ~~ .~
~ c- ~J
.
~
~
~
~ ~~
~ ~~
i n7.
~ :::::;~
..'"
=--w
; S~
~ :~
~
ij
c
f,
l>
~~
~ ~ "
~ "
~
~
:!l =:
~
~ ~
ta;o..
o~
i ~~
>It;
z ~~
~ ~z
~~
~ ",v
~o.
~ B
~ ;;
S
z
u
.
!
.1
'i
,
< '... ,
~
.
..,
..
....
-~
-'
2~
.,0
,,;:
"
1i;~
"Z
~8
....
B
;;
I.
I.
~:
~ ... I
.
~
.
;;;
~z
58
il:u
..-
:.~
~ ~~
I ""
~w
"'-
SiE
~
i
~ h
i ~~
r--4~
.1
it
~ Ulql
II' II Ii III
-I ~i II i I
· hlPil
If !bill! '
If I Iii if i!
itli Ii! III
.. '" .. ..
S7~.LZa IlZAZS .l1lY.L1
:JNI 'sa NYS
H:JY'lB NO:':O:::NaT
flfl7:J V1iVJ 0 AJ.IJ
, JlllIJ.YllS
i i! ~/'
~ijll'r)1~
J I(~'U j~ ~-:.i ,~i n ~; ,
~ ~J-v', Ii! j I~' i . 0 ;;
~ b'. ~J I~' -- ! I ! H :
~ :' ,~ ' ~. ~ ~ ~ ~
~i ~.~: I . .f~
r-r i;;~::~ <I ! i: E
.-~ I (\ "I i': <( I i -I <
Ii' J r--'- ~r ~. . I ~ 5
,~. ' ~ I' oj t' ! !: II ~ p!
:r;i iI' \ " I :,.,~! p Ii ~ ~j
~!iiG i lo~ ~ 1::& ~lo 'i ,,',c ~...I:<:
---.' ~:! I '\. I. !fl' ~ ~5i
'.[. ' L i .i ~"I ' ~ j~ H ,~,2 ~ ~~
tQ.tr; , ~ ,i B ~ in!! I i -
; _",\ "Ij th.""'_."" I I .1 "I !Ie .
L 8 '" ~~ IiI ~ i
U --IT i i II ~~ ,~a ~ ~
L..: . .... ~ h
i!
'~I...,..~I
I ; ..-I. ,
, i
! / ,
llll '1
, 1--'
'PW mIll i
J~ ;,I! Ii! i II ;
~!I iW III ~ i~
IIi In! jil;l!lj ,
II. .i III ~Ih ~I tlol
.~i~ ~i h~ ~m ~i ~II ~
I
~ \, III
!i:!.l;~
! ,I ~5!iIIH
" m!,!~~i
, ' 51 :W~I.~U I
! I l~ I~"!!,;I
II\, I ill .~;N,m
I,X !II ii!IIIH;
! I~;' i !~lil~I~U
; U" ,,!,~ tthl
i - illli UH
Page 1 of2
f; (e 5e~v', C L)
S(/c -;:::>('" "'-
Rumpf, Michael
From: Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 11 :29 AM
To: SHomrich@aol.com
Cc: breesee@ci.boynton-beach.f1. us; bressnerk@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; rumpfm@ci.boynton-
beach.f1.us
Subject: Re: Lennar's Sea View Park Proposal
Steve
As discussed this morning, we will correct the error on the landscape drawings and will provide Mike with
replacement sheets no later than tomorrow. Thanks for taking the time out of your weekend to review the
drawings and to walk the drawings around your neighbors.
Regards
Andy
SHomrich@aol.com
To rumpfm@ci.boynton-beach.f1,us
cc bressnerk@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us, breesee@ci.boynton-beach,fl.us,
Andy .MacGregor@lennar.com
Subject Lennar's Sea View Park Proposal
04/11/2005 11 :24 AM
Mike,
On Friday, Andy MacGregor brought me a copy of the latest site plan for Seaview Park. After reviewing it and
showing it to the INCA members most affected by the project, I'm happy to convey how pleased we are with
Lennar's proposal.
The only problem I saw was what I believe to be an error in the landscape plan for the southern buffer. On sheet
L 1 of 5, the key along the southern buffer that shows CB 14 should be CE 14 and the CE 28 on the right side of
the page should be CB 28. Basically the callophyllum trees and green buttonwood trees were reversed along the
southern buffer. Once the diagram and the corresponding changes to the overall list of landscape plants are
corrected, the southern buffer will reflect the landscape design we agreed to earlier.
We are particularly pleased with the change from a condominium ownership to the townhouse design. In addition
to being attractive, the layout of each unit places only bedrooms on the third floor. I believe having bedrooms on
the top floor, rather than kitchens and living rooms, will make it much less intrusive on the neighbors below.
The new plan has INCA's support. Thanks again for all your cooperation.
Steve Homrich
4/11/2005
Page 1 of 1
Rumpf, Michael
From: Harry Woodworth [nc4a@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:43 PM
To: Mike Rumpf; shomrich
Subject: Seaview
Mike,
We've reviewed the drawings Lennar dropped off and the Minor modification letter and site
notes faxed by Mr. Weiner to Mr Morell and are okay with Seaview site plan minor modification as
proposed...after the landscape changes that Steve Homrich and Lennar were making to bring the
landscape plans into compliance with previous agreement.
At last night's INCA meeting Steve had taped the "original" shoe box condo drawing next to the
"new" town home drawings. It was obvious to everyone that the new Seaview Park town homes
were a MAJOR improvement over the
"Harbor's South" design that was originally proposed. While not the two story designs and density
that most of us would have desired, these at least look nice will not be another "community
landmark" like the Harbors.
Hopefully future developers will seek community input PRIOR to drawing up plans and save us all
a lot of time and money.
Thanks for all your help,
Harry
4/1212005
Page 1 of 1
Rumpf, Michael
From: SHomrich@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 11 , 2005 11 :25 AM
To: rumpfm@cLboynton-beach.f1.us
Cc: bressnerk@cLboynton-beach.f1. us; breesee@cLboynton-beach.f1.us;
Andy. MacGregor@Lennar.com
Subject: Lennar's Sea View Park Proposal
Mike,
On Friday, Andy MacGregor brought me a copy of the latest site plan for Seaview Park. After reviewing it and
showing it to the INCA members most affected by the project, I'm happy to convey how pleased we are with
Lennar's proposal.
The only problem I saw was what I believe to be an error in the landscape plan for the southern buffer. On sheet
L 1 of 5, the key along the southern buffer that shows CB 14 should be CE 14 and the CE 28 on the right side of
the page should be CB 28. Basically the callophyllum trees and green buttonwood trees were reversed along the
southern buffer. Once the diagram and the corresponding changes to the overall list of landscape plants are
corrected, the southern buffer will reflect the landscape design we agreed to earlier.
We are particularly pleased with the change from a condominium ownership to the townhouse design. In addition
to being attractive, the layout of each unit places only bedrooms on the third floor. I believe having bedrooms on
the top floor, rather than kitchens and living rooms, will make it much less intrusive on the neighbors below.
The new plan has INCA's support. Thanks again for all your cooperation.
Steve Homrich
President, INCA
4/17/2005
-,--~,--,---~_._-_._-_.--_.- ... .
WEINER & ARONSON, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The Clark House
102 North Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
~ !
r ",;) i:
;~ I \ \ .: \ I
--- . -- - .-.- ~- -~
u J
Telephone: (561) 265-2666
Telecopier: (561) 272-6831
E-mail: jmankoff@zonelaw.com
,.
-----------.---- _... --.
~ " 1 ' .: ~-' .
I,. . "! .~ !
MICHAEL S. WEINER
CAROLE J. ARONSON
JASON S. MANKOFF
KERRY D. SAIFER
OF COUNSEL:
ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ, P.A.
Florida Bar Board Certified
Real Estate Lawyer
MICHAEL R. HARRIS
L.L.M. (In Taxation)
April 4, 2005
Mr. Steve Homrich (via telecopier (561-734-8819) and regular mail)
INCA
690 NE 15th Place
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Michael Morell, Esquire (via telecopier (561-868-6543) and regular mail)
P.O. Box 18649
West Palm Beach, FL 33416
Re: Notice of Revised Elevations for Seaview Park Club
Our File No.: LENN004
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 62 for Seaview Park Club, as agreed upon by all
parties, at least five (5) days prior to formal submittal to staff of revised elevations, builder will
provide notification of the intended submittal to the Homeowners Association known at "INCA"
and to the attorney for the 16 clients of selected residents within the Yachtmans Cove and
Coquina Cove subdivisions, and copying the P&Z Director, and will if requested, provide copies
of drawings at the time of submittal to both INCA and the attorney described above or a
subsequently agreed upon representative.
This letter is such timely notification that our client Lennar Homes, Inc. plans to submit
revised elevations as part of a minor site plan modification to be submitted to the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on Friday, April 8, 2005.
Please feel free to contact me or our client Mr. Andy MacGregor directly if you should
have any additional questions. His telephone number is 561-333-4700 x-171.
Jason S. Mankoff
JSM:lg
cc: Mr. Michael Rumpf (via telecopier and regular mail)
Mr. Andy MacGregor (via telecopier and regular mail)
Michael S. Weiner, Esq.
O:\LENN004\NOTICE LETTER.doc
APR-04-2005 04:08PM FROM-WEINERARONSON
+
T-430 P,OOl!002 F-044
Weiner & Aronson, P.A.
Fax
Mr. Michael Rumpf
From: Jason S. Mankoff
To:
Fax:
742..6259
Date: April 4, 2005
File No.: LENNOO4
Pages: ~ including cover sheet
Re: Notice of Revised Elevations for Seavlew CC:
Park Club
DUrgent
o For Review
o Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle
From the desk of...
Jason S. Mankoff, EsquIre
Weiner & Aronson, PA
102 N. SWinton Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
(561) 265-2666
Fax: (561) 272-6831
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this transmission is attomey-client privileged and (Xlnfidential. It is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distr1but/on or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us Immediately by telephone. collect. and return the original
message to us at the above address via U.S. Mall, we will reimburse you for postage. 'T'hank you.
APR-04-2005 04:08PM FROM-WEINERARONSON
+
T-430 P.002/002 F-044
WEINER & ARONSON, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The Clark House
102 North Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach. Florida 33444
Telephone: (561) 265-2666
Telecopier: (561) 272-6831
E-mail: jmankoff@zonelaw.com
MICHAEL S. WEINER
CAROLE:J.ARONSON
JASON S. MANKOFF
KeRRY D. SAJFER
OF COUNSEl.:
ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ, P.A.
Aorlda Bar Board Certlfted
Real Estate LaWYer
MICHAEL R. HARRIS
L.LM. (In Taxation)
April 4, 2005
Mr. Steve Homrich (via telecopier (561-734-8819) and regular mail)
INCA
690 NE 15th Place
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Michael Morell, Esquire (via telecopier (561-868-6543) and regular mail)
P.O. Box 18649
West Palm Beach, FL 33416
Re: Notice of Revised Elevations for Seavlew Park Club
OUf File No.: LENN004
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 62 for Seaview Park Club, as agreed upon by all
parties, at least five (5) days prior to formal submittal to staff of revised elevations, builder will
provide notification of the intended submittal to the Homeowners Association known at "INCA-
and to the attorney for the 16 clients of selected residents within the Yachtmans Cove and
Coquina Cove subdiVisions. and copying the Paz Director, and will if requested, provide copies
of drawings at the time of submittal to both INCA and the attorney described above or a
subsequently agreed upon representative.
This letter is such timely notification that our client Lennar Homes, Inc. plans to submit
revised elevations as part of a minor site plan modification to be submitted to the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on Friday, April 8, 2005.
Please feel free to contact me or our client Mr. Andy MacGregor directly if you should
have any additional questions. His telephone number is 561-333-4700 x-171.
yours,
Jason S. Mankoff
JSM:lg
cc: Mr. Michael Rumpf (via telecopier and regular mail)
Mr. Andy MacGregor (via telecopier and regular mail)
Michael S. Weiner. Esq.
O;\LENlllOO4\NOTICE lE'lTER.doc
...
~
Michael Wm. Morell
Attorney and Counselor
Administrative, Governmental and
Regulatory Law
Land Use, Planning and Zoning Law
Redevelopment Law
Historical Preservation Law
Elections, Ethics and
Public Disclosure Law
Mailing Address:
Post Office Box 18649
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-8649
(561) 714-7533 Office
(561) 868-6543 Fax
morellmw @ bellsouth.net
Also admitted to the
District of Columbia
Via Hand Delivery
February 11, 2005
Mike Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach City Hall
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Re: Seaview Park Club Project; LUAR 04-010 (legislative public hearing on small
scale plan amendment and quasi-judicial pubic hearing on rezoning) and NWSP
04-0 14 (quasi-judicial public hearing on request for new site plan approval)
Dear Mike:
My sixteen (16) clients who own land and reside in the Yachtmans Cove and Coquina
Cove subdivisions have diligently and cooperatively worked togclher with representatives of
Lennar since the Commission's February 1,2005 meeting. I am pleased to report progress in
those talks and that my clients have reviewed Mr. Weiner's letter to you dated February 9,2005.
My clients are in agreement with the details reported in that letter, the progress that has been
made bclween the parties and the emerging spirit of continuing cooperation between them and the
applicant.
Therefore, my clients are no longer requesting that you add the three (3) new conditions
that were specifically referenced in my January 25, 2005 letter to you. However, my clients
would like to see the details of Mr. Weiner's lclter, including the revisions to Condition #48
which have been agreed to, incorporated into a development order for the February 15, 2005 City
Commission meeting.
While my clients don't fully agree with the City's interpretation of the revised IPUD
ordinance as it relates to Lennar's project, in a spirit of cooperation they have worked within
those limitations as best they could to make changes to Lennar's original proposal to improve the
project's compatibility with their neighborhoods.
Mike Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
February 11, 2005
Page Two
Via Hand Delivery
My clients and I are most appreciative of the time that their City Commissioners, eRA
Members and staff, and you and your staff have taken to listen to their concerns about the project
and make changes that reflect many of their interests.
My clients will continue to cooperate with both staff and representatives of Lennar and
look forward to continued discussion with all parties.
Sincerely,
~~W
MWM:mm
cc: Mayor Jerry Taylor
City Commissioner Bob Ensler
City Commissioner Mack McCray
City Commissioner Muir C. Ferguson
City Commissioner Carl McKoy
City Attorney James Cherof
City Manager Kurt Bressner
Quintus Greene, Director of Development
Michael Weiner, Esquire
Andy MacGregor, Lennar Project Manager
CRA Members
Doug Hutchinson, CRA Executive Director
Michael Wm. Morell
FEB-l0-2DD5 11:26AM F~WEINERAI IN
+
T-248 P.OD2/0D3 F-705
WEINER & ARONSON, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The Clark House
102 North Swinton Avenue
Delray Beacn, Florida 33444
Telephone: (561) 265-2666
Telecopier: (561' 272-6831
c-mail: mweiner@zonelaw.com
MICHAeL S. WEINER
CAROLE J. ARONSON
JASON S. MANKOFF
KERRY D. SAlFER
OF COUNSEL:
ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ, PA
Flerida Bar Board Certified
Real Estate Lawyer
MICHAEL R. HARRIS
LLM. (In Taxallon)
February 9, 200S
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach,
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach" Florida 33428
Via Tele.:opiel'
Re: Seaview Pazk Club Projeet; LUAR 04-010 (legis~ative publiC: hearing on
small scale plan mneacbnent and quasi-Judicial public hearmg on rezoning)
and NWSP 04-104 (quasi..judicial puhlic hearing on :request fo:r new site plan,
approval)
Ou:r File No.: LENN004
Dear Michael:
By letter dated January 31, I provided my client's reaction to the letter from
Michael Morell, Esquire dated January 26, 2005. Since that time, my client has met with
several of Mr. Morell's clients to discuss the items of concern. This letter is intended to
provide an update to you and to the City Commission as to the outcome of that meeting.
1. Revisi.ons to Condition of Ap'proval ~B.
As was stated in my letter dated January 31,2005, Lennar will accept the proposed
modifications to Condition #48 as described in Mr_ Morell's letter of January 26,
2005.
2. Provisions of Building Elevations
As previously stated, Lennar is currently working on modifications to the building
design and will provide revised elevations to staff' at the earliest opportunity taking into
account the new height restriction of 38' and the additional conditions imposed by the
revision to Condition #48~..rfive (5) days prior to fonnal submittal to staff of revised- I
elevations, ~ will 'provide notification of the intended submittal to the
Homeowners' lAssociation known as "INCA uand to'~' el]"and will. ifrequested,
provide COPi{:S ~f,~awingS\~t th~~~Of submittal to' IN1 an~ t~Ji' ~re~.
{ .
O;\I.ENNOO4\Lc,*" Mi1lo RlImpf (andy'll leaz:r)Fcb 9.d~ \'
c,
<
'I..
'1
C(!e.7 ~ c
IJ':IG.
.1
't
J
V
J
It:
'1
, r~_.. ~
"
.J
,..I~ I'~A L''- ."'... ~
FEB-l0-2005 11:26AM FROM-WEINERAI IN
+
T-24B P.003/003 F-705
3. Dock Facilities
Lennar and their marine consultant Mr. Charles Isiminger, met on February 9,,2005 with
Mr. Han:y Woodworth, Mr. Buck Buchanan, Mr. John Alvaro e and Mr. Steve Homrich to
discuss potential concerns associated with the provision of dock facilities at the Seaview
project. The meeting was very positive and provided LeMar with a good
understanding of their neighbors' concems. Shortly. Lennar' will be starting udue
diligence" work to assist with the proposed design of the dock facilities and once a
proposal is ready they will meet again with this same group of neighbors to review the
initial design concepts. As with the building elevations, Lennar will provide five (5)
days notification to this group of neig~ors of any formal submittal to the relev~t
permitting authorities. . , ,
'^'
'-
, (
.;~v
('
F i ,"
4. Pool LilThting . '<)". ' ~1' .,,,.,'..,4;' "",j
~ - I' -,-_>: '1
", /1 '" ,-{~' '""', '" ,--- (', ".' ;
Lennar have now completed the supplemental photometric design drawing for the n .1,
recreation area. The design provides for cut-off lighting around the pool deck area
adjacent to the Intracoastal. This drawing was reviewed with Mr. Woodworth, Mr.
Homrich. Mr. Alvaroe and Mr. Buchanan and received favorable conunents.. Twelve,
signed and sealed copies of this drawing are enclosed. with this letter for staff's reView. .j
,'. . I- ! \.' '_/ /I , ". '(' i ' , ' r.. ,
. , - '.' -" . . , '- '1' , ,. ( < F', .,'
S. South Landscape Buff~ I, ;. " " j ,r .l I ' ,'/ I - '
J'
. . '- I.. . ,. ,',,. .
. . . . I, . I .
As previously stated. Lermar have continued to work with both INCA and staff to revise'
the south landscape buffer to incOIpcrate changes suggested by INCA. An e1ectro1'1ic ,-
copy of this drawing was previously submitted to staff. Twelve, sig:ned and sealed
copies of this revised landscape plan are attached to this letter to supplement the
existing site plan package.
tinue to cooperate with both staff and our neighbors and lookfoxward to
sion with all parties.
i ' i
S. Wein
~
co: Mayor Jerry aylor (via te1ecopier)
City Conunissione:r Bob Ensler (via telecopier)
Vice Mayor Mack McCray (via regular mail)
City Commissioner Mike Ferguson (via regular mail)
City Commissioner Carl McKoy (via. regular mail)
City Attorney James Charof (via telecopier)
City Manager Kurt Bressner (via telecopier)
Quintus Greene, Director of Development (via regular mail)
Mfchael Wm. Morell. Esquire (via telecopier)
Andy MacGregor, Lennar Project Manager (via telecopier)
,Pt,A
O:\I.ENNOO4\Lr:!ner Milcc Rumpf (aDdy's IctlCr)Feb 9.~
JAN-31-2005 03:23PM FROM-WEINERARON'
+
T-932 P.002/004 F-375
WEINER & ARONSON, P .A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The Clark House
102 North Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Telephone: (561) 265-2666
Telecopier: (561) 272-6831
E-mail: mweiner@zonelaw.com
MICHAEL S. WEINER
CAROLEJ.ARONSON
JASON S. MANKOFF
KERRY D. SAlFER
OF COUNSEL:
ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ, P.A.
Florida Bar Board Certified
Real Estate Lawyer
MICHAEL R. HARRIS
L.L.M. (In Taxation)
January 31,2005
Via Telec:opier
Privilege-Settlement Discussion
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Re: Seaview Park Club Project; LUAR 04-010 (legislative public hearing OD
small scale plan amendment and quasi-judicial public heariq on
rezoning) and NWSP 04-104 (quasi-judicial public hearing on request
for Dew site plan approval)
Our File No.: LENN004
Dear Michael:
I understand you received a letter from Michael Morell, Esquire dated
January 25, 2005. My client's reactions to the four (4) suggestions in the letter
are as follows:
1. Revisions to Condition #48
Lennar will accept the proposed modifications to Condition #48.
2. Provision of Building Elevations
Per the Site Plan Condition of Approval #48, Lennar is working
diligently on modifications to the building design and will provide
staff at the earliest opportunity with revised elevations of the
proposed buildings taking into account the new height limitation of
38'. Lennar understands that staff will then review the revised
elevations and will make a determination as to whether the proposed
LENN004 Letter to Mike Rumpf Jan. 31,2005
JAN-31-2005 03: 23P1.4 FROtA-WE I NERARr '~
+
T-932 P.003/004 F-375
Mr. Mike Rumpf
Page 2 of 3
revised elevations satisfy the criteria for a minor modification to the
approved site plan. Lennar retains the right to have the continuing
opportunity to work with staff until such time as the elevations could
be properly processed under the ordinances of Boynton Beach,
Florida. Lennar will not agree to any condition which preempts
Staffs authority to consider elevations and site plan conditions and
jumps to the conclusion that such modifications require further
hearings.
3. Dock Facilities
As has been stated previously, the current approved site plan does
not contain a provision for dock facilities. Pennitting of dock facilities
will be undertaken via the appropriate regulatory bodies and of
course in consultation with our immediate neighbors and with the
Inlet Cove Association. Once we have a firm proposal, and as
required by the City of Boynton Beach, we will submit our plans for
review by staff. At that time, staff will make a determination as to
whether the proposed dock plan satisfies the criteria for a minor
modification to the approved site plan or whether they would require
the application to be processed as a major modification. In the
meantime~ we have requested a meeting with neighbors, INCA and
our marine consultant at which we can discuss any potential
concerns with future integration of dock facilities.
4. Pool Lighting
We are in the process of preparing a detailed photometric lighting
plan for the pool recreation area adjacent to the intracoastal. This
design, which will supplement the existing photometric detailism
which already meets the City of Boynton Beach Code requirements,
will be of the lowest intensity required to adequately illuminate the
pool area in a safe manner and to meet building requirements.
As staff is well aware, since approval of our site plan on January 18th~
2005. Lennar has continued to work with both staff and with INCA to
address concerns associated with the southern landscape buffer and
have already delivered to staff a revised landscape plan which has
been developed in conjunction with INCA.
LENNOO4 Letter to Milce Rumpf Jan. 31,2005
JAN-Sl-2005 OS: 2SPIA FROtA-WE I NERARI"' '1
+
T-9S2 P.004/004 F-S75
Mr. Mike Rumpf
Page 3 of 3
At the hearing before the Community Redevelopment Agency and before the
City Commission, you and your staff indicated that the types of changes that
might be required in order to meet the intent of the four (4) items detailed above
would require only a minor modification to the site plan which could be conducted
and completed at the staff level. Lennar sees no reason to deviate from standard
practices and procedures instituted by the City of Boynton Beach.
Certainly Lermar wants to cooperate with the neighbors, the neighborhood
and the desires and wishes of the citizenry of Boynton Beach but it is not required
to have a design by committee. Moreover, once again, we point out to you that of
the sixteen (16) people represented by Mr. Morell, some of them have different
interests and competing interests. The process for land planning is to have an
applicant satisfy requirements of the municipality as a whole. The process does
not require a design to satisfy each and every individual. We would be
establishing a precedent that would lead to chaos in the process for making
govemmentalland planning decisions.
ing this with all parties further.
MSW:lg
Cc: Mayor Jerry Taylor (via telecopier)
City Commissioner Bob Ensler (via telecopier)
Vice Mayor Mack McCray (via regular mail)
City Commissioner Mike Ferguson (via regular mail)
City Commissioner Carl McKoy (via regular mail)
City Attorney James Cherof (via telecopier)
City Manager Kurt Bressner (via telecopier)
Quintus Greene, Director of Development (via regular mail)
Michael Wm. Morell, Esquire (via telecopier)
Andy MacGregor, Lennar Project Manager (via telecopier)
LENNOO4 Lettcf to Mike Rumpf Jan. 31, 2005
JAN-31-2005 03 :23PM FROIA-WE INERARO~' .,
+
T-932 P,OOl/004 F-375
COVER
SHEET
FAX
To:
Fax #:
From:
Subject
Date:
Pages:
cc:
Mr. Mike Rumpf
742-6259
Michael S. Weiner, Esquire
Seaview Park Club Project
January 31, 2005
4, including this cover sheet
COMMENTS:
Please see the attached letter regarding the above referenced matter.
From the desk of...
Michael S. Weiner, Esquire
Weiner & Aronson, P A.
102 N. Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444
(561) 265.2666
Fax: (561) 272-6831
Confidentiality Notice
The information contained in this transmission is attorney-client privileged and confidential. It is intended onlyforthe use
of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message Is not the intended recipient. you are hereby
notified that any dissemination. distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication In error, please notify us immediately by telephone, collect. and return the original message to us at the
above address via U.S. Mail, we will reimburse you for postage. Thank you.
Memorandum
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Commission
Kurt Bressner, City Manager
FROM:
James Cherof, City Attorney
DATE:
January 31, 2005
RE:
Seaview Park Club Project
Morell Request For Additional Conditions of Approval
Please recall that Michael Morell, Esq. Represents sixteen (16) residents who
oppose the above referenced project. The project returns to the Commi~~~;ion at the
February 1, 2005 Commission meeting for second reading and public hearing of
Ordinance 05-007, which ifpassed will effectuate rezoning ofthe property from R-3 and
C-3 to IPUD.
Ordinance 05-007 (rezoning) was reviewed by the Commission, along with
consideration of the site plan in the marathon quasi-judical hearing conducted January 18,
2005. The Ordinance was approved without conditions. The site plan was approved with
54 conditions. By letter dated..Mr. Morell has suggested modification to one ofthe
conditions of approval (481.'iIhti the addition of three (3) new conditions.
Staff previously noted the inseparable nature of rezoning and site plan review
in pi unit developments. If the Commission wishes to revise conditions of approval
/..t t were made to the site plan, or add additional conditions, it must do so by way of a
,.---- mo~ioryto reconsider. the site pl~n..l If the n:otion to reconsi1er passes, that matt~r ~s re- _ ~ l
/notIce:.tor the followmg Com~IssIon meetmg (February 15t ) when the CommIssIOn can . .,_"l':~..4:.. ~.' :,; (e ;~{
mo y, add, or remove condItIons of approval. f' .. ~ cJw').-!~" /
~ )1<1 tp ,L '/; f ~'1
The Commission can proceed with the adoption of Ordinance 05-007 ~r it can ,:~~:{"""k ,. 7" (,~_./
table it so that passage coincides with the site plan reconsideration. /t ~ {,L.- rf :/
1 Motions to reconsider a decision made at a quasi-judicial proceeding may only be made at the meeting
when the action was first taken, or the next regular City Commission meeting. Code Section 2-20.
S:\CA \COMM\2003 memos\Seaview Park.rt[
Page 1 of2
,.
~
Rumpf, Michael
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:57 PM
To: 'Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com'
Cc: Breese, Ed
Subject: RE: Seaview Park Club Project; copy of letter sent from Morell to Rumpf dated 1-25-05
Andy, I spoke to Mike Morell to clarify the first added condition. The intent is only to view the revised elevations
prior to final approval. Meaning if Lennar brings them Tuesday night for presentation, and the group is satisfied,
that condition goes away. You may also accomplish this by an independant meeting with them prior to Tuesday.
You really want to accomplish this by or on Tuesday to prevent further delay (the condition reads "prior to
approval of the development order").
Mr. Morell also believes his clients do not want to add additional process to your approvals, thereby possibly
supporting the suggestion to modify new conditions 2 and 3 to require the major modification process if unable to
obtain approval from the homeowners.
Lastly, I relayed to him your approval of the changes to item #48.
He was very encouraged by what I shared. I said after I recieved information from you
regarding status of preparing revised elevations drawings for their approval Tuesday, I would write a letter to both
parties, copying our administration, indicating what is agreeable and what is suggested to new conditions 2 and 3.
Mike
-----Original Message---n
From: Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com [mailto:Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 6:00 PM
To: rumpfm@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; breesee@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
Subject: Fw: Seaview Park Club Project; copy of letter sent from Morell to Rumpf dated 1-25-05
Mike, Ed
I know you guys will be busy preparing for P&Z tonight but please give me a call in the morning to
discuss the letter sent from Mr Morell.
Regards
Andy
----- Forwarded by Andy MacGregor/PALMBEACH/EAST/Lennar on 01/25/2005 05:58 PM -----
"Michael Wm. Morell" <morellmw2@bellsouth.net>
To <Andy.MacGregor@lennar.com>
01/25/200502:58 PM
cc "Michael S. Weiner Esq." <mweiner@zonelaw,com>
Subject Seaview Park Club Project; copy of letter sent from Morell to Rumpf dati
25-05
1/26/2005
Page 2 of2
,..
Andy,
Attached is an Adobe Acrobat "pdf' file which is a copy of a letter I sent to Mike Rumpf today
regarding the Seaview Park Club Project. Since I don't have your mailing address, I am e-mailing
you your copy and also providing a copy of the letter and this e-mail message to Mike Weiner by e-
mail also.
Michael Wm. Morell
Attorney and Counselor
P.O. Box 18649
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-8649
561.714.7533 Office
561.868.6543 Fax
morellmw@bellsouth.net
Privacy Disclosure: This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not read, use,
copy or disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in this message or any
attachments to the message. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender
by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you.
[attachment "050125.ltr.MWM-Rumpf.pdf' deleted by Andy
MacGregor/P ALMBEACH/EAST /Lennar]
1/2612005
;.
...
Administrative, Governmental and
Regulatory Law
Land Use, Planning and Zoning Law
Redevelopment Law
Historical Preservation Law
Elections, Ethics and
Public Disclosure Law
Via Hand Delivery
Mike Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach City Hall
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
1
Michael Wm. MoreU
Attorney and Counselor
Mailing Address:
Post Office Box 18649
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-8649
(561) 714-7533 Office
(561) 868-6543 Fax
morellmw @ bellsouth.net
Also admitted to the
District of Columbia
January 25, 2005
Privileged - Settlement Discussion
Re: Seaview Park Club Proiect; LUAR 04-010 (legislative public hearing on small
scale plan amendment and quasi-judicial pubic hearing on rezoning) and NWSP
04-014 (quasi-judicial public hearing on request for new site plan approval)
Dear Mike:
On behalf of my sixteen (16) clients who own land and reside in the Yachtmans Cove and
Coquina Cove subdivisions, the purpose of this letter is to respectfully request that the City
approve the following suggested clarifying revisions to existing Condition 48 and three (3) new
clarifying conditions regarding the Seaview Park Club Project. The existing conditions for the
project were approved by the City Commission at the January 18, 2005 public hearing:
We suggest the following revisions to existing Condition 48:
48. Staff reeommeods limitiflg The maximum building height of Buildings Two,
Three, and Four shall not exceed te 38 feet (to top of parapet or to midpoint of gable Or
hipped roof) and a maximum oftbree (3) stories in order to maximize compatibility between
the subject property and the abutting properties/structures. No terraces. patios. gazebos.
viewing spots. recreational areas or other amenities shall be permitted on the roofs of any of
the four (4) buildings. and the use of roofs shall be limited to building repair and
maintenance purposes only.
We suggest the following first new condition:
Prior to approval of the development order by the City Commission. provide
elevations which show revised roof details (i.e. - parapet. gable or hipped.
shingle detail. etc) consistent with the building height. maximum story and roof
usage limitations contained in Condition 48.
;
Mike Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
January 25, 2005
Page Two
Via Hand Delivery
Privileged - Settlement Discussion
We suggest the following second new condition:
With the exception of the removal of the existing dock facilities currently at the
site. any new proposed dock facilities or revisions to the existing dock facilities
shall be required to be processed as a major amendment to the approved site plan.
We suggest the following third new condition:
The addition of a lighting program for the pool area shall be required to be
processed as a major amendment to the approved site plan.
My clients view the suggested revisions to existing Condition 48 and the suggested 3 new
additional conditions as both clarifying and reasonable conditions which are supported by the
testimony regarding compatibility presented by the applicant, my clients and their expert witness
at the January 18, 2005 public hearing. Furthennore, the suggested additional conditions
specifically regarding major amendments to the approved site plan for the lighting program and
dock facilities are supported by the City's existing criteria for determining whclher an amendment
to a site plan should be processed as a minor amendment (Sec. 9.C.4.): "Does the modification
have an adverse effect on adjacent or nearby property or reduce required physical buffers, such as
fences, trees, or hedges."
Thank you in advance for your consideration of, and response to, the suggested revisions
to Condition 48 and the suggested 3 new additional conditions. I am aware that only the City
Commission may approve these suggestions. However, my clients and I would appreciate it very
much if you could provide us in writing with the Planning Department's response to our
suggested revisions and additions as soon as possible so that we may complete our preparation for
the February 1,2005 public hearing.
Sincerely,
~~w.
MWM:mm
cc: Mayor Jerry Taylor
City Commissioner Bob Ensler
City Commissioner Mack McCray
City Commissioner Muir C. Ferguson
City Commissioner Carl McKoy
City Attorney James Cherof
City Manager Kurt Bressner
Quintus Greene, Director of Development
Michael Weiner, Esquire
Andy MacGregor, Lennar Project Manager
Michael Wm. Morell
Page 1 of 1
Rumpf, Michael
From: SHomrich@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:05 AM
To: Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com
Cc: SHomrich@aol.com; BRINIO@aol.com; LuluDac49@aol.com; morris_g@bellsouth.net;
rbgone@hotmail.com; Bel indabythesea@bellsouth.net; keithjblack@yahoo.com;
Ozzrosa@aol.com; businessmgr@palmbeachnational.com; rumpfm@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us;
horenburgerm@boyntonbeachcra.or
Subject: INCA Meeting on January 10, 2005
Andy,
As promised, I'm getting back to you with the results of vote taken at last night's INCA meeting regarding Lennar's
revised proposal for the Seaview property.
The meeting was very well attended and we had a good and open discussion. By a vote of 39 to 1, INCA voted
against your latest proposal. Interestingly, this was by a greater margin than the previous vote on Lennar's
original 4 story proposal. I believe this isn't because the members viewed the original proposal as being better
than the first but rather is due to the increased realization of how large and incompatible the proposed building is
relative to the Yachtsman's Cove neighborhood and the implications of the precedent that would be set by this
project on the other INCA neighborhoods.
It was also clear that, although Seaview Trailer Park is viewed as a good neighbor, the membership is fully
supportive of a new development that would be in keeping with the newly revised IPUD ordinance's mandate for
compatibility. The Murano Bay development received a resounding endorsement as an example of what INCA
views as a compatible in-fill development next to single family residential neighborhoods.
Andy, I look forward to working with you to achieve our mutual goals of development & compatibility.
Steve Homrich
President, INCA
1/11/2005
....
Page 1 .f2
Rumpf, Michael
From: TomorrowCn@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, December 11,20047:13 PM
To: Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com
Cc: Taylor J@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; McCrayM@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; McCoyC@ci.boynton-
beach. fl. us; Ferguson M@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; EnslerR@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us;
Hutch inson D@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; BressnerK@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; Heavil inJ@ci.boynton-
beach. fl. us; GreenQ@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us;
SHomrich@aol.com; buck@tomorrowconnection.com
Subject: Lennar Seaview Park Project/INCA Meeting
Andy,
Thanks for accepting my invitation to our INCA meeting on Monday, December 13th. I look forward
to seeing you there. As I stated in my invitation, I can give you 10 minutes under old business. This
will provide time to present the revised Lennar/Seaview Park plans but will not allow it to be the main
focus of the meeting. As you know, I run a tight meeting, so please shoot for a five-minute
presentation to allow five minutes for questions.
These revised plans, as submitted to the City and slated to be presented to the CRA on January 11 th,
have been disappointing to the INCA members who have had the opportunity to review them. Most
ofthe concerns we raised following our November 4th meeting are not fully addressed, especially our
major concern of having a massive 4-story building placed on such a narrow lot. Other noted problem
areas, like the rooftop decks and the unmitigated impact of the east wall, remain such. Surprisingly,
the pool area that you moved further west still juts out into the cove beyond the neighboring seawalls.
INCA is pro development, but only when the development is compatible with our existing viable
neighborhoods. We believe our efforts have made Boynton Beach a better place to live. For example,
where the attractive two-story Murano Bay exists, there once was proposed an auto parts store.
INCA's strong objections to the auto parts store and support of the present development resulted in a
compatible project and an enhancement to Boynton Beach.
Compatibility is an important issue to the City and the CRA as well as INCA. As you know, IPUD
development was placed on hold for months to allow for a rewriting of the ordinance to produce
compatible and desirable projects that preserve and protect neighboring properties. A number of
INCA members dedicated a lot oftime and energy providing input to the City and CRA to produce an
IPUD ordinance that achieves that goal. We believe that the compatibility requirement clearly
protects us in this situation.
The neighbors living in single family residences on the south side of your project have felt all along
that only a two-story development like Murano Bay would be compatible with their homes. There are
a number of successful, beautiful two-story developments on similar properties nearby. To date
Lennar has refused to consider even a three-story development, which would be a considerable
compromise on INCA's part, especially considering the impact of much higher density on the local
area.
I believe that INCA would support a well-designed three-story project as a compromise, provided that
12/13/2004
Page 2 of2
the swimming pool and project recreation areas do not jut into the cove beyond existing seawalls and
that an acceptable maximum dockage plan is included, and would support it in front of the CRA
Board and the City Commission.
While it does not appear that this or any other project of such mass, height, and density would meet
the IPUD requirement of "ensuring compatibility of infill redevelopment with adjacent existing
single- family development," we look forward to your presentation on Monday to examine these
Issues.
Ifwe remain convinced that the height, mass, and density of this project on this narrow lot is not
compatible and an acceptable compromise cannot be reached, we will be forced to move forward with
a strict interpretation of the ordinance which restricts your project to "the same unit type or height
allowed by the adjacent zoning district."
We believe this direction is the best way to pursue the mutual goal of the City, CRA, and INCA of
making Boynton Beach "A Great Place To Live."
Sincerely,
Buck Buchanan
12/1312004
Date: 12/9/2004
Number of pages including cover sheet 4
South Florida Land Division, Palm Beach
FAX
To: . Jason Mankoff
From: Andy MacGregor
Phone:
Fax: 5612726831
Phone: (56}} 333-4700 Ext. 171
Fax: (561) 753-5533
RE: Seaview Park
Jason,
Please find attached certificate from DEP with legal description of the section of land at the east
end of the Seaview Park Property.
Regards
~()1
1015 North State Road 7, Suite C
Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411
Telephone: (561) 333-4700
Facsimile: (561) 753-5533
· fD),~ (n U ~ ~
WI DEe I 4 200l ~
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENl
11/29/2884 12:87 56173811B6
KALEEL LAW
PAGE 82/84
~
"'-
Trustees No. 40227(5542-50)
CERTIFICATE
Upon application of Wa.yne Irving and Charlene Darst. each as tenants in
common with one third interest, and Carmen Hubert Irving and Gail Ann Irving, as Co-
Trustees and their Successor Trustees of the Cannen Hubert Irving Revocable Living
Trust dated May 12, 2003, as to an undivided one-third interest, whose adtbss is c/o
Kenneth M. Kaleel, Esq. 555 North Congress Ave. Stc. 301. Boynton Beach, PL 33426.
and pursuant to Section 92.16 and sub-section 253.12(9), Florida Statutes, the
undersigned, on behalf of the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL
IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, purswmt to Rule 18-
21.0J9, Florida Administrative Code, hereby certifies that the boundary separating the
lands of private ownersbip from the adjacent state owned sovereignty lands on July 1,
1975, is described as follows:
DESCRIPTION
THE WATERWARD BOUNDARY LINE AS OF nJL Y I, 1975, LYING ALONG
LAKE WORTH. IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 45 soum, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID LINE BEING MOREPARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTIlEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY DBSCRIBED
IN WARRANTY DBEDS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 13958, PAGE
0739, AND IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 15287, PAGE 1396 OF TIlE PUBliC
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTII OI01S'31" WEST ON1HE EAST
LINE OF SAID DESCRIBED PROPERTY 158.36 FEET TO nIB NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID DESCRIBED PROPER'IY, ALSO BEING'IBE INTERSECTION
WITH TIlE SOum: LINE OF THE PLAT OF uLAKE vn.LAGE", ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT TImREOF RBCORDED IN PLAT BOOK 21, PAGE 18 OF TIm PUBUC
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORm 90000.00" EAST ON SAID
SOUTH LINE 122.18 FEET TO TIm SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PLAT OF
c'LAKE VILLAGE" AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF HEREIN DESCRIBED
LINE; THENCE SOUTH 0'r'37'OO" WEST ON TIlE SOtJ'mERL Y EXTENSION OF
TIm WEST LINE OF SAID PLAT OF "LAKE VILLAGE" 0.94 FEET TO THE
INTERSECTIONWlTH THE NORTIi EDGE OF WATER. OF LAKE WORTH;
THENCE ALONG SAID EDGB OF WATER TIlE FOLLOWING 7 NUMBERED
COURSES: I) NORTII 90000'00" WEST 7.92 FEET TO A POINT OF CURV AnJRE
OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCA VB SOimmAsT; 2) SOUTHWBSTERL YON
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. WITH A RADIUS OF 10.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 58005'39" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 10.14 FEET TO A POINT OF
TANGENCY; 3) SOUTH 31054'21" WEST 34.59 FEET TO A POINT OF
CURVATURE OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCA VB EAST; 4) SOUTHERLY ON
TIlE ARC OP SAID CURVE, WITH A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLBOF 36043'13" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 48.07 PEET TO A POINT OF
TANGENCY; 5) soum 04048.52" EAST 7.30 FEET TO A POINT OF CURV A TIJRE
OF A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCA VB WEST; 6) SOUTHBRL Y ON THE ARC OF
SAID CURVB. WITH A RADIUS OF 75.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
24010'41'" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.65 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY;; 7)
SOUTH l!}O21 '49" WEST 41.28 FEET TO TIm INTBRSBCI'ION WITH TIm NORTH
LINE OF "yo ACHTSMAN COVE" ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGE 225 OF TIm PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY, AlSO BEING TIm POINT OF TERMINUS OF HEREIN DESCRIBED
LINE.
The above legal description was prepared with information furnished by John F. Pulice,
Florida Professional Surveyor and Mapper No. 2691.
Page J 013
11/~9/2884 12:87
5617391186
I<ALEEL LAW
PAGE 83/04
..,,'
Trustees No. 40227(SS42~SO)
NOTE: (1) This certificate is issued without a tide examination of all tidally influenced
land or tidally int1ucnced islands bOrderiDg or being on sovereignty land. which have
been pClDl8llClltly ~ded, filled, added to ~tstlng lands, or created before July 1,
1975, by filL lying landward of the above described waterward boundary line. and the
Board ofTrustces oftbe Intemal Improvement Trost Fund of the State of Florida may not
bave any right, title or interest in any of these lands. (2) The Board of Trustees of the
Internal Improvement Trost Fund of the State of Florida has not determined or verified
the riparian rights Jines of the applicant's privately owned uplands. (3) This certificate
does not constitute a determination by the Board of Trustees of1he Internal Improvement
Trost Fund of the State of Florida that the applicant owns the fUled area that extends from
applicant's lands that are immediately upland oftbe filled arm.
~
Page 2 of3
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused to be affixed hereto
the official seal of the Board of Trustees of tbe Intema1lmprovement ~ Fund of the
State of Florida at its office in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this "-a.t day of
.. "'~ea~ ,2004.
:,.' .... rt ,.. ',' ,. , . to ,'.
.. ,'~ '~&'.~~'~~')," ':.:,. .
zo'. ... .... ~~I ."ot ',"'\ ,
,: ,~..... r n~fttbod'~oftbe
r _. .a~---,w"'''''' ~..
." -. . mmaJ ~ahent Trost
.r I.,: . _ '; r\ . ,T. - '....
~ . {, ~ .' tm~ 9f the a~ofFJorida
" ....".. \ r .1 ~'l .....,.. ;'."
.... -.....~
\.. -.',.. .... . . .. ~~
..:~.. ."'~. -
, .
...W' S~~'
11/29/2884 12:87 5617391186
Trosteea No. 40227(5542-50)
~~~fe ~Van5
(Typed Printed Name of Wi mess)
&#d ·
Witness ~
&,; I:? tlu~
(Typed or Printed N of Witness)
K.6l ~ LAW
PAGE 84/84
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST
FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
By:
Terry E. '1kinson, er
Bureau of urvcy and Mapping
Division of State Lands
State of Florida Department of
Environmental Protection
as agent for and on behalf oftbe Board
of Trustees of the Internallmprovancnt
Trust Fund of the State of Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF LEON
. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 24 "Tfo\ day of
~I:!.t? . 2004, by Terry E. Wilkinson, Chie( Bureau of Survey and Mapping,
Division of State Lands, Department of Environmental Protection. as agent for and on behalf of
the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Tn1st Fund. of the State of Florida. He is
personally known to me or has produced a chiver's license as identification.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
LEGALITY
Dcparbnent of Environmental ProteCtion
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000
My Commission B'lpires:t..\oV_ ~O) eoo ~
Page 3 of3
Page 1 of2
Rumpf, Michael
From: TomorrowCn@aol.com
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 6:40 PM
To : Andy. MacGregor@Lennar.com; HeavilinJ@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; hutch insond@ci.boynton-
beach. fl. us; BressnerK@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; GreenQ@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us;
RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; breesee@boynton-beach.f1.us; Taylor J@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us;
McCrayM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; McCoyC@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; EnslerB@ci.boynton-
beach.f1.us; FergusonM@cLboynton-beach.f1.us; nc4a@msn.com; SHomrich@aol.com;
buck@tomorrowconnection.com
Subject: SubJ: Revised Lennar/Seaview Proposal
Dear Andy,
Thanks for taking the time to brief Harry Woodworth, Steve Homrich, and me on Lennar's latest plan
for Seaview Park. Your new plan is a step in the right direction concerning compatibility.
We particularly applaud your relocation of the pool to the west and preliminarily feel that, pending
more detailed landscape screening and wall information, you may have arrived at an acceptable
solution for the pool.
We still have our same concerns about a massive four-story project on such a narrow lot next to
single-family residential areas. While your new plan attempts to disguise the fourth story, it does not
overcome the reality that it is still a massive four-story ptoject on a very narrow lot.
However, as was discussed, we look forward to the development of a simulated graphic representation
of the project in place in existing surroundings to see ifthe "wedding cake" design, with the removal
of fourth floor units on the south side, approaches compatibility. '/
At this time we feel that this new design still has some serious problems: \, 1f <';' t,." ~ "',' ; " :; ~
"'It . \ (I I ,.,'
- the stark appearance of the south wall of the truncated fourth floor (which will be\.--- f" (.. v\( ,
visible from nearly everywhere but the immediate adjacent south) ,~ ." #: ~ K.- t
\ e-;;{{, ' c' C
- the south-facing decks for the fourth floor units (which are sure to be extremely hot\ I I
thus engendering the proliferation of unsightly umbrellas and awnings and having \ 4 ,...' ,
the visual effect of putting the fourth story back on the south side) '/
",,"r' ('
- the use of vinyl fencing on the south perimeter (which is not as durable as pre-fab t, ~ J~)
concrete that is almost as space efficient) 015-'
- the unmitigated impact on the east side (which is clearly visible from the east to the 1
south southeast and probably can only be mitigated with a "weddil}.,Kfl!l<:e"_ design
on the east side of the project also)
~~,_",u..........-"---'----' ,-" ~.,. ,
Q
~,-,:; c'o
-/
We look forward to continuing to work with you toward a plan that we can fully support before the
CRA and City Commission.
Sincerely.
11/812004
Ctrw~IJJ,t-1i~ uf A1J~ AJ.(! <Me-~
Sf lDuAJArL ~ rz+ @ IZ:~
I. ~,,~ 'T1h:1.e AIT!I, M,C#rMil..
n ~ A tG(iIU. ~~ A~-
~/.cI'(;, 71ItIr I F ~ ~ tMllf-6c.e 7't)
~1Jt41F T71l€ n ~/) AAI~'fO~
i(A41R1 P/l()J~CT 1& JJtJu.. i lbbl AS A-tLe
A'lNS ~ A-Ph.i,..U.
2. r",N(~ T1IEc!/ ~ Aba 17> ~
hEED IV. 1JTE:x, ~ c:ttl .JNHEn8tJr7!JP€
6F EUvIt~ / ~Fj:. ~ ~
~~.6-1hcJ8L~~.~~
Mt$ 1ttM1~ 1M illtIZItIJ ~ ~.
~ fb 1tP~1!JU 11J~ 1~~/mt6ce.
oJ. IA<<r> $ IItNl. 1f/.aj7.AJr;, biD -''''PI'"-
lAC- ~~ ~MU i€
/
1lE1./D1~ ~.Y ~ HrtIU.: ~ 9JiiEr
~ ~ "tlWJ.Hci.I. 'TD ~~ ~
~.:sI~~~~
~ WITN t.fJtr.e~ /l.tx?r A/IU..S.
'lIE.!! u/wu:> tJ1Tl(U If ~~"'';e
~ IN.J'1BN> ~ ~ 4011 ~
.tJt~.
./: .AEP /.1" 1Z4Y/S.h~ /Pro ~ TZI&
p~ ~ ~ ~ 1111 12rD.e
tH.u. ~.I':A-U~~I'~
1htV~.$oM8'H1,u-t;. ItV ION)'eS .
Page 1 of 1
Rumpf, Michael
From: Hutchinson, Douglas
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 8:35 AM
To: Rumpf, Michael
Subject: Lennar's Project
Mike,
Please be ready to address INCA's position that this project does not meet the IPUD Code and will be turned
down because it is not compatible. They quote several lines from the IPUD code in their latest letter to Lennar.
Thanks
Doug
12/13/2004
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Johnson, Eric
Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11 :08 AM
Pawelczyk, Mike
Swanson, Lynn; Breese, Ed; Rumpf, Michael
RE: Seaview Park - 1620 North Federal Highway
I apologize for the lack of information.
The applicant (Lennar Homes) submitted a site plan to develop condominimums on an existing mobile home site.
However, a portion of the property includes previously filled land (owned by the State by virtue of it lying within the
Intracoastal Waterway). During the site plan review process, staff made the following comment:
On the survey (sheet 2 of2), explain the significance of the dashed line identified as "East of Property in Warranty Deeds
in O.R.B. 13958, Page 0739". Does your client own the property e.ast of this line? Is this a separate parcel? Does it have
a separate Parcel Control Number? Please identify the actual eastern extent of the subject property. Is the eastern
property line submerged under water?
We want to make sure that the State deeded over the right of the previoulsy "filled property" and the submerged land to the
upland property owner, which in this case, is the project developer / applicant. I suppose it would be good for us to give
you a site plan package so that you can review the survey yourself. Let me know if you need it, and I'll have Sherie
forward it to your office. If you need anything else, please do not hesitate to call or email me. Thank you for your
assistance in this matter.
Eric Johnson
-----Original Message-----
From: Pawelczyk, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 10:40 AM
To: Johnson, Eric
Cc: Rumpf, Michael; Swanson, Lynn
Subject: Seaview Park - 1620 North Federal Highway
Eric:
You recently dropped off with our office documentation and correspondence pertaining to the above property, and
requesting our review of the same. However, absent from your documentation is a memorandum or correspondence
from you to our office identifying what the purpose of our review.
The documentation you provided includes an August 11,2004 letter from a law firm to DEP, a DEP Application to Fill
Lands, and documents that appear to support the application.
Please let me know why our review is being solicited in this circumstance, and I will then attempt to assist.
Thank you.
Michael J. Pawelczyk
Assistant City Attorney
1
,',
6363 N, W 6 Way, Suite 300
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
Phone: 954,315,1001
Fox: 954,315,1040
Carter==Burgess
www.c-b.com
October 5, 2004
Via Mail Deliverv
Mr. Eric Johnson, Planner
City of Boynton Beach
Planning & Zoning Division
City Hall - West Wing
100 Boynton Beach Blvd,
P,O, Box 310
B6ynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Seaview Park Club
C&B Project # 470220
Boynton File # NWSP 04-014
Dear Eric:
Please find enclosed literature on the proposed private lift station that will be located along the
north side of the cabana/restroom building, The pump station will be a small grinder station,
These types of stations require minimal maintenance, are visually benign, easy and safe to
access, and very cost-effective. A full list of advantages is included within the literature,
The small pump station is necessary because the City's existing sewer system is not deep
enough to provide gravity sewer service to the Cabana/restroom building located at the far east
side of the site, Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at
954-315-1012,
Sincerely,
cart~r & Bu,r#~e.,ss, ~Inc.
/,~c{ l . ~f<
'-tine M, Springer, ,E.
Project Manager
Enclosures
CMS/np
cc: Andy MacGregor, Lennar (via fax 561-753-5533)
q,,'
lJt
Corter & Burgess, Inc, Corter & Burgess Architects/Engineers, Inc, Corter & Burgess Consultants, Inc.
C&B Architects/Engineers, Inc, C&B Architects/Engineers, Pc. C&B Nevada, Inc.
890CT. 6.20041:11:S9AM6143CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PLANNING DEPT
NO. 323 P.l/3 01
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BE CH COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMEN
3320 FOREST HI~L BOULEVARD - C331
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33 06
FACSIMilE TRANSMITTAL
PHON~: &61/434-8020
TO:
DATE:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
COMMENTS =
Attachn1ent
FAX: 5611 4-8187
Number of page. ..nt (Including cover p ge): 3
~"""~
Mr. Dfck Hudaon. Senior Planner. City of D~ ~rl-
October 5, 2004
S61-M3.7221
,
David DeYoung. AIOP, Planner, SDPBC
Attached please find a copy of the approved soh 01 concurrency
application amendment and provider tonn for Seavl Park Club.
S:\P\IIn"ing\PubI!Q\lNlE~QOV\Ccncur~rll:.y\Concun'lncy t1etelminlltlCln Lelters\PD8I\FXa40g2102C,OOC
690CT. 6.20041: :12: 00PM614SCITY OF DELRi=lY BmCH
Pl..ANNING IEPT
NO. 323
P . 2/3 tl2
.
~1lltIGf~
THE 80f0CX.DfSTI' ')F
PAlJ'BEACHcot.INrr. A.0Al~
PLANNNG~
3:100 FOREST HILL BLW.. c.1,0
WEST PALM BEACH. FL 334OG-$I13
(561) ~20 FAX: (S$1) -434-$187
$
C. JOHNSON, Prl.D.
October 51 2004
Mr. Dick Hudson
Senior Planner
Planning Department
City at Delray Beach
100 N.W. Fil'8tAvenue
Delray Beach, FL 33444-
RE: CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION - CASE tI04082102C - SEAV
PARK CLUB
Dear Mr. H~dson=
The Palm Beach County Schoof District has reviewed the request
Determinatfon on the above referenced project for 72 high rise condos.
Attached pfease find the approved Palm Beach County School Drs net Concurrency
Appli~tion and Service Provider Form for Seavlew Park Club. is Concurrency
Dewnnination is valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. Once a 01 lapment O~er
has been issued for the project, the concurrency determination will be valie for the life of the
Development Order.
Conc:;urrency
If you have any questions regrarding this detennlnatron. please feel free 0 contact me at
(561) 434-7343.
David DeYoung,
Senior Planner
ce; MIchael Weiner, Weiner & Aronson, P.A.
enc.
S:\P18lIJIiDs\PQblic\IN'7nGaV\Co-.nen~Oll~llrrcnc:~ DerminBtiaa ~~~~I~.clall
AN Eou~L. OPflQRTUNlTV el'v1Pl.OYER
~~OCT. 6.2004L;12:00PMbLq~CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
1"'L.MI'I'I.I.I't1.:l l.ICr I
NO. 323
P.3/3 1:1.,:1
Fte. Paid & Dati
LoCI' Cov't.
ItAIlIIm com.pltlld ill CDl
JIIIIaIdq DIp
.. Ba.1 DIeIDt .....1.... C!G..~
!!20 ....... ~ CUI
'W.h'...Iu4, a..,..u
(!S11)4JWIIO III' " lHI4177
J'III; lIft)G+I1I' fir (80) GUllS
Att:entlon= Co eLfrNftCy Section
School Dlllrtct
School District of Palm leach Count)'
School Concu.....ncy Application Ind S.rvlce
Provid.r Form
Jhltructlons: Submit one copy Of the complRtd application Ind feu for fie 1'1 , for .ach new
residential project requiring. a deterrnlndon or concurreMy for "hooll. A detennJ . wm be PfOIJIded
Wfthin fifteen (16) 'NOrking days of receipt of 8 complete Ipplalio". A detel'l'l'llnatian is not t nsferebl. Ind la
valid for one year ~ dEde of jssUMce. Once U1e Devefopment Orqer is Issued, the c::oncu cy determinaton
shall run with the Oevelopmll'\t Order.
Part L To be cOmpllted by Appllca
Owner'l Name:
Agenra Name:
MIDln" AcldruB~
T.l.phone Number:
Project Name:
Mltnlcipallty Dr Unil'\carpar_tecJ PBC
Prop,.,rt't Contral Number (PCN):
Project !.:oCQtian;
ConoulTency Service Al"el! (CSA):
PEVELQPMENTR~QUeST:
Total #/. Of UnIts: 1'1.
I ~t) II. fdJ,J. If/ ~w;
..J:.1 ~
Types of Units:
,. 6~rl ,+,." ""1"1,
c..'A t.-, I1FA "1'1-
1(l/l~J fJlV8'~t
N.J.;
~~
cs,d" 30S
=/..
~ v:; I
Slngl. Femlly
AparDnents (3 storti or Jtsa) (, .,L)
HJghRise ApaJIC~81 ~,\.Q, l.{ S"""'''I
Age ~cted Ad. Only
Pm'llde Covens t
P~a15;ng PII!lI'l:
If applicable, pleale attach a ~mpJete Phsslng Plilln showing ttle number IInd type of units ta ive certificate
of occuPlllncy yeany.
~o, of Own...hl ~ Pi.... atlilc:h capy of w.rr. DMd and CGn..nt Fa
P'~~.!"m.nt ~eYfew
Lo1ril Governmlnt Rapru.l1tative
Prlrtt Nam~~ ,~
Date PlIIeI
Petition ,:
TitI, ~. ~LJ..auL .
Pm In. . To be completlld by Soho~r PJstric:t Staff
On and Time RllaMd: , J /2- Vo ~ Fbi. Number:
V I verify that the project complies with the adapted Level of Service (LOS) far Sch
I verify that th& project win comply'tNfth the adopted Lavef of Service (l.OS) far S I. subject fa
the attached conditions.
I cannot verify "'t the project
with ttle
.'iVe
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
PO, Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T Marcus. Chair
Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H, Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
. An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
October 4, 2004
Mr. Michael W, Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE: Seaview Park Club
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study for the proposed
redevelopment project entitled; Seaview Park Club, pursuant to the Traffic Performance
Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project
is summarized as follows:
Location:
East side of North Federal Highway, about Y.. miles north of the
Boynton Canal.
Boynton Beach
64 Mobile Homes
72 MF Residential Units
184
3 AM and 7 PM
2006
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed residential
redevelopment project is located within the Palm Beach County designated Coastal
Residential Exception Areas, and therefore, meets the Traffic Performance Standards of
Palm Beach County. No building permits are to be issued by the town, after the build-out
date, specified above, The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project
Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance,
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
EER
I'.,
! ,
"l
/Y7.
cc: Carter & Burgess, In,,"
File: General- TPS - Mu'l - frafllc Study Review
F:\TRAFFIClrna'AdminlApprova!s\040S21 ,doc
/ J' t' .'
)/.. ".)
" ('-. , .
c {;,~'~,. . i
September 29, 2004
Mayor Jeny Taylor
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Mayor Taylor,
I am writing in regards to the proposed Infili Planned Unit Development (IPUD) by Lennar
Homes on the Seaview Park Club site. The constmction of a quality development that is
compatible with the surrounding area is important to me as I live in a house next to that property.
The property is quite narrow, causing anything built to greatly impact the people living next door.
Therefore, it's especially important to construct something compatible with the neighboring
residences. The IPUD ordinance was recently revised to deal specifically with this type of
problem. Lennar's wish is to build four large 4-story buildings and to extend the property into the
Intracoastal Watelway beyond the line of neighboring seawalls to make room for their pool and
clubhouse. Lennar is proposing the very maximum allowed under the ordinance and then some.
But the ordinance clearly states that the maximwn is only allowed when it is compatible with the
neighbors. Their proposal is not compatible. Perhaps it would be if the site was bordered on both
sides by 3-4 story buildings or if the site was much wider and could provide substantially more
than the available 5 foot buffer. But without these things present, it is impossible to consider
their 4th story balconies looming over the backyards of single family residences, or their pool area
extending beyond the neighboring seawalls as being compatible.
Lennar's representatives have graciously met with us and seem open to "window dressing" type
modifications. However, they have been unwilling to compromise on our main concerns which
are the height of the building and their plans to extend the property further into the waterway.
Presently, our neighborhood is a really nice place to live. If you get a chance, please take the
time to drive our street to get a better perspective of our concerns. Envision 4-story buildings
backing up to our homes, Ifit's bad for our neighborhood's future, then it's also bad for
Boynton's future. I remember the League of Women Voters debate when you said you would
vote against incompatible developments. Well, this is a perfect opportunity to do just that. A
compatible development should enhance the entire area and not come at the expense of the
neighbor's propel1y values or privacy. When this comes before you in November, I ask that you
and the other commissioners vote only to approve a development that we could support with 2 or
.L~!!ke Murano Bay & Manattee Bay and please J!9j:>J:h.~1ll f.r9!!1: e)(Ea.~~J.1gJ\u:!her into !he
~aterw~ We too would like to see redevelopment in Boynton Beach, but we believe good
compatibility is essential if we want our neighborhoods to continue being great places to live.
Sincerely,
%~/7~~
Steve HOlruich
690 NE 15th Place
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Cc. City of Boynton Beach Board of Commissioners, eRA Board Members, Plann41g.and....,.____ .,
Zoning Director and Director of Development G~ r [;: )~ ..J~ :,
1<
i nil '1
lrLi : ~(
I
L-'----,-~,-,
!,~ ~r.. r.... ~ ,~-_ ""t-- I'---r r-'r--.
WEINER & ARONSON, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The Clark House
102 North Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Telephone: (561) 265-2666
Telecopier: (561) 272-6831
E-mail: jmankoff@Zonelaw.com
MICHAEL S. WEINER
CAROLE J. ARONSON
JASON S. MANKOFF
OF COUNSEL:
ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ, P.A.
Florida Bar Board Certified
Real Estate Lawyer
MICHAEL R. HARRIS
L.L.M. (In Taxation)
September 27, 2004
Via Te/ecoDier & Reaular Mail
James Cherof, Esquire
Goren, Cherof, Doody & Ezrol, P.A.
3099 E. Commercial Blvd., Ste. 200
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33308
Mr. Michael Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
City Clerk
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
~ET'
~ t-'
?nnt
Re: Seaview Park Club
Our File No.: LENN004
Dear Gentlemen and City Clerk:
Enclosed please find a proposal of the information to be included on the Public
Hearing Notice. I am confirming with you that before we order the appropriate sign that this
sign will meet the requirements of the ordinance. For instance I am confirming with you
that we only need to put the date of the first public hearing on the sign. Please advise
whether we need to put additional scheduled dates on the sign or if any other changes
should be made.
Please also advise me of what form I should include in the notice to each of the
residents within the mailing radius. Please provide me a copy.
O:\LENN004\Letter to Cherof and Rumpf.Sept 23.doc
James Cheraf, Esq., Mr. Mike Rumpf and City Clerk
September 23, 2004
Page 2 of 2
The first public hearing is scheduled for November 9,2004. To be safe, we plan on
sending the notices and posting the signs no later than Friday, October 8,2004, which is
thirty (30) days in advance of the first public hearing. Thus, please advise us on the
appropriate form to include in the mailing labels as soon as possible.
Thank you very much for you assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours,
JSM:kp
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Andrew MacGregor (via telecopier)
Michael Weiner, Esquire
Mr. Jose Herrera
O:\LENN004\Letter to Cheraf and Rumpf.Sept 23.doc
Typical DimensionsINot to Scale
Sign shall be legible from a distance of 1 00 feet.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
K} tJt@'\.~{ q jaClD'i Time: 5: .30
Date:
Type of Application(s): L-il'lJ US~ Irf"df'--t""+, ~?iJ/1i~ ,S"! k r/~~\
_ / t ,.' r
RIGS' JL-~J. t1e/)rt-t 4 xce/h Q,'1
Proposed Use(s):
~
oe
....
Location:
City Commission Chambers, City Hall
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Information:
Department of Development
(561) 742-6265
24"
Page 1 of2
Johnson, Eric
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 8:52 AM
To: Breese, Ed; Hudson, Dick (Orran); Johnson, Eric
Subject: FW: INCA Motion re Seaview Park Project
FYI
-----Original Message---n
From: TomorrowCn@aol.com [mailto:TomorrowCn@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21,2004 10:58 PM
To: Lisa.Maxwell@Lennar.com; Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com
Cc: hutchinsond@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; GreenQ@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us;
HeavlinJ@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; TaylorJ@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; McCrayM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us;
McCoyC@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; EnslerB@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; FergusonM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us;
BressnerK@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
Subject: INCA Motion re Seaview Park Project
Dear Lisa and Andy,
Thank you for attending our INCA meeting last night and providing the update on your Seaview Park
proposal. When you left before the end of the meeting, you requested that you be informed of the
result ofthe vote of the motion that was on the floor.
The motion, in essence, was for INCA to strongly oppose your project in its current configuration
because it is not compatible with nearby neighborhoods and for INCA to work with Lennar, the CRA,
and the City toward a project that meets the intent of the IPUD ordinance.
After discussion, the motion passed overwhelmingly by 34 to 5. While there were a number of
comments complimentary of your efforts to respond to certain previously voiced concerns, the general
feeling was that compatibility, the cornerstone of the IPUD, is being ignored.
The project appears to have been initiated with the idea of what can be built that's 45 feet tall, plus
variances, when it should have been initiated with the thought of what can be built that preserves and
protects the character and tranquility of existing homesteads.
Preserving and protecting the neighborhoods is the clearly stated intent of the IPUD and is also the
strength of it. Only if that is satisfied can a project be considered for IPUD.
This is reasonable since in many cases, and this one in particular, single family zoning must be
converted to a much more intense form of development. To be granted that privilege, the developer
must be most protective of existing neighborhoods.
From your first presentation through your most recent last night, Lennar has been intractable on the
height of this proj ect. Yet, the sheer height and mass of the buildings would dominate and overwhelm
the area.
Further, the proposed extension of the project into the "upland" to the edge of the Intracoastal
Waterway - an area which is now natural beach, water, and vegetation - for a communal pool and
recreation area would disrupt the ambiance and tranquility of the cove and the property surrounding it.
9/22/2004
Page 2 of2
The residents of INCA strongly feel there is no way to realistically mitigate these conditions which do
not preserve and protect the residential neighborhoods.
In keeping with the spirit of this motion we look forward to working with you toward a project that is
beautiful and desirable, profitable for Lennar, and compatible and protective of our homesteads.
Sincerely,
Buck Buchanan
9/22/2004
Page 1 of2 ,~~
5~-Ji
-5>.J -
Rumpf, Michael
From: TomorrowCn@aol.com
Tuesday, September 21,200410:58 PM
Lisa. Maxwell@Lennar.com; Andy. MacGregor@Lennar.com
hutch insond@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; GreenQ@ci.boynton-
beach .f1.us; HeavlinJ@cLboynton-beach.f1.us; Taylor J@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us;
McCrayM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us; McCoyC@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; EnslerB@ci.boynton-
beach. fl. us; FergusonM@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; BressnerK@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us
Subject: INCA Motion re Seaview Park Project
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Dear Lisa and Andy,
Thank you for attending our INCA meeting last night and providing the update on your Seaview Park
proposal. When you left before the end of the meeting, you requested that you be informed of the
result ofthe vote ofthe motion that was on the floor.
The motion, in essence, was for INCA to strongly oppose your project in its current configuration
because it is not compatible with nearby neighborhoods and for INCA to work with Lennar, the CRA,
and the City toward a project that meets the intent of the IPUD ordinance.
After discussion, the motion passed overwhelmingly by 34 to 5. While there were a number of
comments complimentary of your efforts to respond to certain previously voiced concerns, the general
feeling was that compatibility, the cornerstone of the IPUD, is being ignored.
The project appears to have been initiated with the idea of what can be built that's 45 feet tall, plus
variances, when it should have been initiated with the thought of what can be built that preserves and
protects the character and tranquility of existing homesteads.
Preserving and protecting the neighborhoods is the clearly stated intent of the IPUD and is also the
strength of it. Only if that is satisfied can a project be considered for IPUD.
This is reasonable since in many cases, and this one in particular, single family zoning must be
converted to a much more intense form of development. To be granted that privilege, the developer
must be most protective of existing neighborhoods.
From your first presentation through your most recent last night, Lennar has been intractable on the
height of this project. Yet, the sheer height and mass of the buildings would dominate and overwhelm
the area.
Further, the proposed extension of the project into the "upland" to the edge of the Intracoastal
Waterway - an area which is now natural beach, water, and vegetation - for a communal pool and
recreation area would disrupt the ambiance and tranquility of the cove and the property surrounding it.
The residents of INCA strongly feel there is no way to realistically mitigate these conditions which do
not preserve and protect the residential neighborhoods.
In keeping with the spirit ofthis motion we look forward to working with you toward a project that is
beautiful and desirable, profitable for Lennar, and compatible and protective of our homesteads.
9/2212004
'\)6" (v
" ,(~, ~ Co /'./ /
."
Ur1 tl.tlsu
. ..,-or'
ADRIAN & HELEN WINCHELL
635 N.E.15TH PL.
BOYNTON BEACH, FL. 33425
COMMISSIONER Mc CRAY
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FL. 33425-0310
=ear Mr. McCray and fellow Commissioners:
I am writing to inform you of our serious concern regaralng
the the Seaview Park CLUB AND LANNAR HOMES development.
Our home is located immediately south of the proposed units
with our pool area 21 ft. from the Seaview site.In viewing
the plans we are unable to see where where a proper buffer
could be installed that would not allow the project to invade
our privay and rights.
In viewing the most recent site plans on 9/20/04 it is our
opinion the plans do not raeet the requirements as set forth in
the fallowing IPUD, City of BOYNTON BEACH regulations, which I
have attached to this letter and are a part of.
We can see no good reason to change the zoning on this parcel
from R1-AA. The owners and residents of Seaview Park have been
the best of good neighbors of ours for the past 26 yrs. that we
have lived in this house. Upscale large single family homes
with deeded dock space would be a good fit for this parcel.
We ask you, Mr.Mr.McCray and earh of yor colleges on the
commission to review the proposed site plans and the IPUD
REQIREMENTS and support the regulations and the residents of the
neiborhood and district 2.
Sincerly,
\
P.?RIAN & ~ELE~~ W NCHELL, , /1 ' \ 'I
':kt-/'(J / ( (;;, ' , !; ,'/ ,/ ,.# ,.
. c~/_A- ......ti'.. /Cr<- L0v'--\. '- L /L-f.. / ::...,fc..-c... ,( ,;'
- --;
Dated 9/21/04
W R 0" r2 fl PC) f' n")
o ~L, !~I~,~'~_l~ " .1 n.. .... !:,,/
f ',:
I,:, II
I I SEP 2V04 i i :' I :
I JLJI
DEPARTMENT OF DEV[[ OPMr Nl I
"'" ,
Section l.d " In order to be approved, an IPUD project must be compatible with and preserve
the character of adjacent residential neighborhoods. Further, it must be an enhancement to the
local area and the city in general. Presentation of projects that fail to do so will be denied."
Clearly the scale and density of the proposed condo complex is totally incompatible
with the character of our single family residential neighborhood. The four story
buildings are squeezed into a narrow lot. They dominate the local area and seriously
invade our privacy.
Section 3. "Maximum height: 45 feet ( lesser height may be required for compatibility with
adjacent development)"
While the Parapet line of the condo may technicalfy comply with the 45 foot
maximum spec. We don't believe a variance to 49 ft. 10 in. is warranted. We also feel
strongly that a significantly lesser height is REQUIRED due to the obvious
incompatibility of these large buildings with our adjacent properties.
Section 4.a "Massing. The proportions and relationships of the various architectural components
of the buildings should be utilized to ensure compatibility with the scale of other development in
the vicinity. The buildings should not detract or dominate the surrounding area."
The width and length of the proposed condos is the absolute maximum possible on
the property and may even exceed this since the site plans do not show the required 2
foot set back for the 6 ft. wall along the southern edge. The buildings are significantly
taller than our single family homes. They are also taller than the adjacent R-3
apartment complex at Manatee Bay on the north side. Our balloon test photos clearly
indicate the the proposed buildings would dominate the surrounding area.
Section 4.b. Screening and Buffering, (4.b.2) "Such screening must shield neighboring
properties from any adverse effects of the proposed development."
Almost 78 % of the property is impervious surface. This leaves only 22 % for open
space or buffer plantings. The proposed screening and buffering does little to shield our
neighboring properties from the view, noise, lights and the loss of privacy from the
upper two stories of the proposed 72 condos.
The extended 3rd floor balconies adjacent to my property at 685 NE 15th Place are
especially invasive.
Section 4.g. Compatibility with surrounding development (4.g.1) Compatibility will be judged
on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting
properties. For this purpose, elevations and cross sections showing adjacent structures shall be
included with the site plan application."
The required cross section elevations were not filed with the site plans. Photo's from
our balloon tests clearly indicate the elevation of the proposed buildings is out of
context for the adjoining properties. The mass of four, four story condos doesn't
fit next to any single family residential neighborhood. We've been unable to find
any existing examples of four story condos in such close proximity to single family
homes anywhere in Boynton Beach.
Section 4.g.a "Any IPUD located adjacent to an existing single family residential de'/e!oon;ent
must locate stru::tures of the same type or height allowed by the l3djacent zoning district."
r!~J':3 t).tG
,ie'!/c;fo~f)r:lenr seekszonir19 c:hange from R1-;.iA,r
.,' ~~"
,f::: f)1;:;)i< 23 riD e J ,."~: ;"..
:~D n,i?fch structw"e; type or height tvith our adjacent commumi:y. ;-ile (lrop05ed CDt? ,,~,
..~,;l"c:('" F :<'::'E:'r::,'~?' ~:~';;~E:~' fi(~jgI'.~~' :..'::~ ~:r;e ::](:Cj;H::;(~nt tel-:) ~-=],f-17Jrtment r:r:;:rtiP)~3:.':' ,~.; ~ j\],a;;:Citr:'" .
Page 1 fl;2 ,
~t~
Rumpf, Michael
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
TomorrowCn@aol.com
Friday, September 10, 200410:14 AM
Lisa. Maxwell@Lennar.com; Andy. MacGregor@Lennar.com
hutchinsond@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; Heavil inJ@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; BressnerK@ci.boynton-
beach .f1.us; RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; Taylor J@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us;
McCrayM@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us; nc4a@msn.com
Lennar Seaview Park Project
Follow up
Subject:
Follow Up
Flag:
Flag
Status:
Flagged
Dear Lisa and Andy,
As president of INCA, I was asked to moderate a meeting of the residents of Yachtsman's Cove, the
neighborhood adjacent to Seaview Park and one of the components of INCA, on Monday, August
31 st. I had intended to relay the results of that meeting to you earlier but preparation for and recovery
from hurricane Frances prevented me from doing so.
The residents continue to be supportive of your goal of developing Seaview Park into a residential
community compatible with and an enhancement to their neighborhood and the other neighborhoods
of INCA. However, since your first presentation, your plans have been fleshed out so that the scope
of the project is more fully understandable and as such are causing great concern in three areas:
height, density, and extension to the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW).
The unanimous opinion expressed at the meeting was that there is no way that a four story structure
rising in places to nearly 50 feet can be compatible with their and other neighborhoods within viewing
distance.
1. The proposed structures will tower over the residences and even over Manatee Bay
to the north.
2. To be truly compatible with the neighborhood, the project height should be less than
that of Manatee Bay and similar to Murano Bay.
3. No amount of vegetation can adequately screen a 45 - 50 foot structure with only six
feet of planting space and if it were possible, there is no way to guarantee that the
screening would be maintained. (And I would have to agree as I sit here in my living
room with a now unobstructed view of Manatee Bay, which is more distant and much
less imposing than the Seaview proposal, thanks to hurricane Frances knocking down
a few palm fronds.)
4. A project ofthat height could enhance the neighborhood only if it had a greater
presence on Federal Highway with the tallest portions kept in that area.
5. While the setbacks sound large, when the actual distance from the property line of
cantilevered walls and balconies is computed, the effective setback, as opposed to
technical setback, gets as small as 25 feet.
The density is of concern because the large number of potential residents utilizing the pool and other
common areas, planned for the area next to the ICW, would be very disruptive to existing quiet
9/1312004
..
Page 2 of2
residential neighborhoods.
The extension of the project to include construction on the "upland" on the ICW thrusts the
development into the faces of existing homes and cannot possibly be screened to prevent that and still
attract potential buyers.
Yachtsman's Cove had a number of suggestions for a compatible, profitable venture including a small
number ofluxury homes with a common dock (a successful example of which can be found on Flagler
Drive, south of Southern Boulevard, in West Palm Beach), a very upscale townhouse development,
expansion ofthe project on Federal Highway that could include the taller portions of the project, and
others that they would be happy to explore with you.
Because of hurricane Frances, and now Ivan, I'm not sure when our next INCA meeting will take
place. I'll let you know as soon as it's scheduled so you can attend.
Stay safe,
Buck Buchanan
9/1312004
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
August 25, 2004
Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re: Traffic Study: Seaview Park Club
Dear Mr. Atefi:
The enclosed traffic impact analysis, prepared by Carter Burgess dated
August 2004, was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-
referenced application.
Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building
Code Administrator and me with your written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-
6260.
Sincerely,
1J)~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/sc
Attachments
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Seaview Pari< Club\nwsp 04-Q14\Traffic #2.doc
"
..
LENNAR
(}IIO[I/\ 'alii( JIlIt;':"ll
..
July 28, 2004
COpy
James Batmasian
215 N. Federal Highway
Boca Raton, Florida 33432
Dear James and Marta Batmasian,
I am writing to inquire about the property you own on the East Side of Federal Highway
in Boynton Beach. I represent Lennar Communities of South Florida, Inc., a division of
Lennar Corporation that is responsible for land acquisition and development. We
currently have the trailer park to the north of your property under contract and we are
planning to develop it into a multifamily residential community. We are interested in
purchasing more land in the area and would like to speak with you if your property is for
sale.
Lennar has been building homes since 1954 and is now considered the second largest
homebuilder in the nation and the leading homebuilder in Florida. Lennar Homes prides
itself on building quality homes that will enhance the community and offer a superior
value for the homeowner.
I would appreciate the opportunity to speak with you in regards to this property. We are
serious about purchasing land in this area and have consistently been able to offer
potential Sellers market value for their property. Please do not hesitate to contact me at
561-784-0489 or Robert.G.Smith@Lennar.com if you care to discuss your plans any
further.
Thank you for your time.
b 'G. mith
Director of Land Acquisitions
Wi~-~-----:--'-'~'----':"'" :--....
<; \'~ r, ,.....,
o 1 .1t_~ 0 'i !~.. '.'.' ' '
, r -.-'-....-"..1.. ,
, , I',
, , I"
I SEP, 4 2004 I '
I L__.... ". J
Pi ,,:-i:;;G-i'\'~in '-,.-.
'/
tii~
1015 N. State Rd. 7 · Suite C. Royal Palm Beach, FL 33411 · Telephone: 561-333-4700. Fax: 561-753-5533 . www.lennar.com mJm'
Page I of2
..
Johnson, Eric
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Monday, August 30,200410:10 AM
To: Breese, Ed; Hudson, Dick (Orran); Johnson, Eric
Subject: FW: Question on Seaview Park Prints
Oh, I forgot to specifically mention the "profile drawing" referenced by Harry. Dick that must be your issue. MR.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com [mailto:Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 8:44 AM
To: Harry Woodworth
Cc: Rumpf, Michael; TomorrowCn
Subject: Re: Question on Seaview Park Prints
Thanks Harry
Good notes. I will take a look again at the drawings referenced in your comment reo missing dimensions. As you
indicated, we had indeed missed the sectional elevation showing the properties north and south of our property
relative to our new building. This will be turned in this week and I will make sure you receive a copy directly.
I will get back to you as soon as we have looked at the other items discussed.
Regards
Andy
"Harry Woodworth" <nc4a@msn.com>
To "Rumpf, Michael" <RumpfM@cLboynton-beachJl.us>
cc "Andy MacGregor" <Andy.MacGregor@Lennar.com>, "TomorrowCn"
<TomorrowCn@aol.com>
Subject Question on Seaview Park Prints
08/30/2004 12:36 AM
Mike,
Our Friday evening meeting with Andy Macgregor was helpful in reviewing the drawings. While we
discussed the "scale issues" we have with the proposed condos, we could not reach agreement.
However, we did discuss a number of other specific points and we'd like to Thank Andy for giving
up his Friday evening to help us better understand the project.
We pointed out to Andy that the plans Lennar submitted did not include a profile drawing as the
IPUD ordinance requires. I'm sure your staff has also noted that this critical drawing was not
provided. Andy indicated that Lennar would address this oversight. It was noted that the proposed
Condos are much higher than our neighborhood AND the 37 foot Manatee Bay apartments to the
north.
8/3012004
Page 2 of2
,,'"
The buffer landscape along the 6 foot wall appears to be "code minimum". The basic issue is that
any buffer under 18 feet does little to screen the view either way. Andy said Lennar would review
it. He asked for any suggestions. ( Andy, Steve says look at 20 ft Royal palms with 12 foot
minimum Clusia , batched Sable Palms and Green Buttonwood underneath)
We discussed the fact that the entire Pool and Patio area is shown east of existing seawalls along
the
water. Aside from the fact that this appears to be east of the construction line, we pointed out that
the noise and light impact of this extended pool area would seriously disturb every home along the
bay. Andy indicated that Lennar had some flexibility and would review the pool area. We suggested
solid sound walls surrounded by heavy noise/ light buffer plantings. We already hear the pool noise
from Manatee Bay!
We also pointed out the the proposed 16 foot omni direction pole lights would be easily visible in
our homes.
He indicated that this was an oversight and would be addressed.
We agreed to ask the adjacent property owners if they would agree to having the 6 foot wall held
to the property line rather than set in 2 feet as required by code. We will respond after tomorrow's
neighborhood meeting.
We asked for conceptual information on the proposed marina. Andy indicated that they have no
plans yet and may not for at least a year. We continue to wonder how the impact of a water front
project in a waterfront community can be determined without knowing what the marina concept is.
Lennar left us a set of drawings.( Thanks Andy!) I've had a little time to look at them and have a
couple of comments.
The setback chart calls out the 25 foot setback of the east end of Building Four, however the
drawings on sheets A2.09 and A2.04 do not dimension the third floor balconies that create this
setback.
I believe that the "east end view" of Building Four on both sheets should show these balcony
projections and dimension them.
Please advise when the missing Profile Drawing is received and I can come over to see it.
Thanks,
Harry
8/30/2004
Page 1 of2
Johnson, Eric
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Monday, August 30,200410:09 AM
To: Breese, Ed; Johnson, Eric; Hudson, Dick (Orran)
Subject: FW: Question on Seaview Park Prints
For your information. Some of the information is good but some problematic. Please consider in
your reviews and comments, and let's address upfront any problematic issues like wall
placement. Thanks, MR.
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Woodworth [mailto:nc4a@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:37 AM
To: Rumpf, Michael
Cc: Andy MacGregor; TomorrowCn
Subject: Question on Seaview Park Prints
Mike,
Our Friday evening meeting with Andy Macgregor was helpful in reviewing the drawings. While
we discussed the "scale issues" we have with the proposed condos, we could not reach
agreement. However, we did discuss a number of other specific points and we'd like to Thank
Andy for giving up his Friday evening to help us better understand the project.
We pointed out to Andy that the plans Lennar submitted did not include a profile drawing as the
IPUD ordinance requires. I'm sure your staff has also noted that this critical drawing was not
provided. Andy indicated that Lennar would address this oversight. It was noted that the
proposed Condos are much higher than our neighborhood AND the 37 foot Manatee Bay
apartments to the north.
The buffer landscape along the 6 foot wall appears to be "code minimum". The basic issue is that
any buffer under 18 feet does little to screen the view either way. Andy said Lennar would review
it. He asked for any suggestions. ( Andy, Steve says look at 20 ft Royal palms with 12 foot
minimum Clusia , batched Sable Palms and Green Buttonwood underneath)
We discussed the fact that the entire Pool and Patio area is shown east of existing seawalls along
the
water. Aside from the fact that this appears to be east of the construction line, we pointed out
that the noise and light impact of this extended pool area would seriously disturb every home
along the bay. Andy indicated that Lennar had some flexibility and would review the pool area.
We suggested solid sound walls surrounded by heavy noise/ light buffer plantings. We already
hear the pool noise from Manatee Bay!
We also pointed out the the proposed 16 foot omni direction pole lights would be easily visible in
our homes.
He indicated that this was an oversight and would be addressed.
We agreed to ask the adjacent property owners if they would agree to having the 6 foot wall
held to the property line rather than set in 2 feet as required by code. We will respond after
tomorrow's neighborhood meeting.
We asked for conceptual information on the proposed marina. Andy indicated that they have no
plans yet and may not for at least a year. We continue to wonder how the impact of a water front
8/30/2004
Page 2 of2
~
project in a waterfront community can be determined without knowing what the marina concept
is.
Lennar left us a set of drawings.( Thanks Andy!) I've had a little time to look at them and have a
couple of comments.
The setback chart calls out the 25 foot setback of the east end of Building Four, however the
drawings on sheets A2.09 and A2.04 do not dimension the third floor balconies that create this
setback.
I believe that the "east end view" of Building Four on both sheets should show these balcony
projections and dimension them.
Please advise when the missing Profile Drawing is received and I can come over to see it.
Thanks,
Harry
8/3012004
(i!G
-----
August, 31,2' jt!-o.-J ~ c ~
Mr. & Mrs Michael Falletti
655 NE 15th Place
Boynton Beach Fl. 33435
Att: Planning & Zoning (Dept. of Development)
My name is Dolores Falletti, my husband Michael and I live at Yactmans Cove in
a single family home at 655 NE 15th Place Boynton Beach FI. 33435., We have
live here for 24 years now. I am a member of INCA, and I'm also a volunteer at
the Senior Center for over 4 years. Our back yard faces Seaview Trailer Park.
At this time it is for sale, Lennar is interested to buy and are planning to build 74
apartments 4 levels high. The code now is zoned for 3 levels high. I would hope
that the code will remain at 3 levels. My neighbors and I are not happy to have
about 12 apartments facing our back yard. We hope to preserve some privacy
with shrubs. On the other side of the Seaview Trailer Park there is Manatee Bay
apartments at 3 levels high. All along Federal Highway there are apartment
homes 3 levels high, why should it be changed to 4 levels. I have a single one
level home on the next block. I would appreciate if you can help me and my
neighbors keep the code of 3 levels. Thank you for your cooperation.
Mrs Dolores Falletti
I<W-;;;~~ ~L'~
August, 31,2004
Mr. & Mrs Michael Falletti
655 NE 15th Place
Boynton Beach FI. 33435
rc: ~cc~nw~IT
In]1 1111/
J u! f ?D04 /1.111
I ,:::;
------.I
L r ~c~~,'~r C~,'" ~. ",' ;' '" ' ";," " .- ~ IT
Dear Mr Quintus Greene
My name is Dolores Falletti, my husband Michael and I live at Yactmans Cove in
a single family home at 655 NE 15th Place Boynton Beach FI. 33435., We have
live here for 24 years now. I am a member of INCA, and I'm also a volunteer at
the Senior Center for over 4 years. Our back yard faces Seaview Trailer Park.
At this time it is for sale, Lennar is interested to buy and are planning to build 74
apartments 4 levels high. The code now is zoned for 3 levels high. I would hope
that the code will remain at 3 levels. My neighbors and I are not happy to have
about 12 apartments facing our back yard. We hope to preserve some privacy
with shrubs. On the other side of the Seaview Trailer Park there is Manatee Bay
apartments at 3 levels high. All along Federal Highway there are apartment
homes 3 levels high, why should it be changed to 4 levels. I have a single one
level home on the next block. I would appreciate if you can help me and my
neighbors keep the code of 3 levels. Thank you for your cooperation.
Mrs Dolores Falletti
/cSJ~ I ~-.J '~4'-L"c.Fz ~c-;
.......
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
August 25, 2004
Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re: Traffic Study: Seaview Park Club
Dear Mr. Atefi:
The enclosed traffic impact analysis, prepared by Carter Burgess dated
August 2004, was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-
referenced application.
Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's
Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building
Code Administrator and me with your written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-
6260.
Sincerely,
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/sc
Attachments
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Seaview Park Club\nwsp 04-014\Traffic #2.doc
V'i~.~ER & ARONSON, P .A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
The Clark House
102 North Swinton Avenue
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Telephone: (561) 265-2666
Telecopier: (561) 272-6831
E-mail: jmankoff@Zonelaw.com
MICHAEL S. WEINER
CAROLE J. ARONSON
JASON S. MANKOFF
OF COUNSEL:
ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ, P.A.
Florida Bar Board Certified
Real Estate Lawyer
MICHAEL R. HARRIS
L.L.M. (In Taxation)
September 14, 2004
Ms. Sherrie Coale
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
\"~'-r?(;~- <'-'1'-
I i ~I \ r,.,l:" _ '
t I ~ i
1 \ ,....1, f
1'1' SEP 5
Ii:! i I iOOJ
I Ie \. t"
I
I_..____~--- .
Re: Dates
Our File No.: LENN004
Dear Sherrie:
Thank you for confirming with us that the date for the TRC meeting is October 5,
2004 and that the signs and mailings have to be sent and posted, respectively, by no later
than October 31,2004.
Please send us a copy of the form of the letter to be mailed out to the residents.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
z~YOurs,
Jason S. Mankoff
JSM:jfh
cc: Mr. Andy MacGregor
Michael Weiner, Esquire
O:\LENN004\Letter Confirming to Sherrie Coale 9.13.04.doc
, cd ~<A/ ~<<J
~7'
,}
The City ofBoynYon Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
September 1, 2004
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Faletti
655 NE 15th Place
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
Subject: Lennar development and maximum building heights
Dear Mrs. Falletti:
Thank you for your letter communicating concern and interest in the development of property
adjacent to your neighborhood. Staff has received some very helpful information from the results
of INCA's ongoing review of this project, which is always quickly relayed to me by Mr.
Woodworth.
To assist you with your continued review of this development and future projects, I want to
clarify current regulations and maximum height limits. The zoning district under the nearby
Manatee Bay apartments is R-3, Multi-family. This project may have been built at 3 stories but
the zoning district allows up to 4 stories or 45 feet. Similarly, the Lannar project is proposed to
be rezoned to another multi-family zoning district that also allows a maximum of 4 stories or 45
feet. With the exception of stairwell towers, I understand that the project will be slightly less than
the maximum of 45 feet. The zoning ordinance requires greater setbacks for such heights, and
improvements such as maximized landscaping will be considered in the site plan review process
to help buffer the neighborhood and improve the transition from single-family homes to this
proposed multi-family project.
I hope I have improved your understanding of city regulations; however, I urge you to continue
your involvement in the review process facilitated for INCA by the developer, and contact me
should you have further concerns.
Sincerely,
W~
Michael Rumpf
Planning & Zoning Director
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Seaview Park Club\nwsp 04-014\Falletti letter. doc
Page 1 of 4
Johnson, Eric
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Friday, August 27,20044:50 PM
To: 'Harry Woodworth'
Cc: Breese, Ed; Johnson, Eric
Subject: RE: Proposed Lennar Project at Seview Trailer Park
Harry, real quick for now:
1) We will ask them to show all potential features so we know what site elements such as
landscaping could be ultimately affected, and to prevent future requests for minor
(administrative) modifications;
2) I won't try to sell anyone on the proposed height but to explain that our regulations have a
height measurement methodology that varies by roof type. Height is measured to the roof
disregarding the parapet where the parapet is 5 feet or less; and the IPUD district is similar to
others residential and commercial districts which allows for specific exceptions to the maximum
height as stated in the Height Exception section of Chapter 2 of the LOR. Allows it subject to full
review and approval by Commission; and
3) The property boundary will be explored and confirmed in the review process. Development
outside the property boundary is unlikely. This issue will be investigated and will require proper
documentation from the applicant.
I'm glad your not charging me for your review time and comments. Let's keep in touch. Have
family obligations tonight; good luck with the developer. I am very pleased to see the time the
developer is committed to spending on this project and with neighbors!
Let's keep in contact, Mike
[Rumpf, Michael] -----Original Message-----
From: Harry Woodworth [mailto:nc4a@msn.com]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:05 PM
To: Rumpf, Michael
Subject: Re: Proposed Lennar Project at Seview Trailer Park
Mike,
I reviewed the prints and got info we needed for review with Andy MacGregaor at our Inca
Land Use team meeting tonight. ( You're more than welcome to drop by if you'd like. It's
6:30 to 7:30 at 832 East Road, you'll know everyone there.)
I had a couple of questions on the prints...maybe you can guide me.
1. The site plans didn't show anything related to the marina which Lennar said that they
planned to build.
I know that the land lease and marina permits come from the state, but doesn't the city
review the entire
proposed project in concept?
2. The height of the Parapet all the way around the building is shown as 46 feet. There are
stairs and elevators going up to 49 ft 10 inches. What does the 45 foot maximum listed in
8/3012004
Page 2 of4
the IPUD regulation mean?
Is there something we're missing?
3. The survey shows that Seaview property line is 44 feet WEST of the shoreline of Lake
Worth. There is construction on the land to the east of the property line. ( parking lot, pool,
restrooms, etc).
Who owns the parcel between the eastern most property line of Seaview and Lake
Worth? How will Lennar legally be able to build on land that they don't own? Is this part of P
& Z review process?
I had a lot of "comments" but we'll review those with Andy and the INCA team, then copy
them to Lennar and the City next week after our Yachtman's Cove neighborhood meeting.
By the way, Pat was extremely helpful taking me through the timeline for the review
process this morning.
We always get great service from your staff. Please let them know that we appreciate it a
lot!
It looks like the Technical Review is Oct 5th, CRA Nov 9th, Commission Nov 16th and Dec
7th. We will track these dates and the public notices but if anything changes I'd appreciate
if you could drop me an email. INCA interest level in this IPUD is extremely high for obvious
reasons.
Many Thanks,
Harry Woodworth
685 NE 15th Place
----- Original Message -----
From: Rumpf. Michael
To: 'Harry Woodworth'
Cc: Coale. Sherie
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: Proposed Lennar Project at Seview Trailer Park
Harry, tomorrow is fine. As for regular communications and updates on the project, I want
to support your knowledge of the project particularly given your role as a contact for
INCA. I just have to keep in mind that all citizens need to be treated equally, and if many
property owners came asking for the same service, we'd be overwhelmed. If you
understand the review system, you will know when to expect comments to be prepared. I
will be your point of contact. Stay in touch and I'll keep you informed, including supplying
you with the comments when assembled, upon your request.
Sincerely, Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry Woodworth [mailto:nc4a@msn.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 26,20042:15 PM
To: rumpfm@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
Subject: Proposed Lennar Project at Seview Trailer Park
8/30/2004
8/3 012004
Page 3 of 4
Mike,
When would be a good time tomorrow, Friday, for me to come over and look at
the Seaview trailer park site plan drawings submitted by Lennar this week?
I work from home so any time that's convenient with P & Z is fine with me.
Also, I'd like to be notified of any file submissions related to this project so I'm able
to keep current on
changes to the plan. I understand your reluctance to have "citizens" at meetings
between P & Z and Lennar. I don't feel the need to attend these meetings if P & Z
could contact me by email or phone as things come and comments or changes are
made to the file. As an adjacent property owner I just want to keep up on this
project as it works it's way toward public hearings.
Thanks,
Harry Woodworth
685 NE 15th Place
Boynton Beach, FI 33435
Cell: 561 436 1199
Original Message _un
From: Harry Woodworth
To: rumpfm@cLboynton-beach.f1.us
Cc: Buck Buchanan
Sent: Friday, August 06,200410:08 AM
Subject: Seview development
Mike,
A majority of the residents of NE 15th Place met with Lennar last night to
preview the proposed condo development on the adjacent Seaview property.
It was a good session with an open exchange of ideas and concerns. Lennar
seemed very positive and willing to work with us to achieve a "win-win" site plan.
They took a lot of notes and will be meeting with INCA next Monday to continue
the process.
I know they will be meeting with your staff shortly so I'm forwarding some of the
more significant concerns we have.
1. They plan to raise the property to about 10 ft elevation and then build up
another 45 feet PLUS the usual roof top machinery. While the set back is 50 feet,
this is still MUCH higher than anything along Federal in this part of town. At a
minimum we'd like to see the final profiles and some balloon test shots of final
roof line elevation. People sitting on the third floor balcony will be at least 10 feet
higher than the peaks of our existing homes.
2. We were unable to establish the eastern most building line...it should align with
the existing homes eastern most walls to maintain everyone's privacy.
3. The proposed road will still enter Federal on the North end of the property and
8/3012004
Page 4 of 4
exit on the South end..
Aside from being "backwards" it creates a situation where traffic going all the
way to the east end and coming around to head out again going west will throw
their headlights across my back yard and ALL the back yards of ALL the waterfront
homes over on the north side of Ocean Inlet Drive. With 72 units this is a LOT of
traffic. They may be able to screen my yard but the eastern homes on Ocean inlet
will be a bigger issue. If the traffic entered on the south side and exited on the
north as you'd expect it to, this would not be an issue.
4. The wall and landscape along the south side needs to block the noise and lights
from all the traffic next to our back yards as well as keeping some privacy from all
the third floor balconies now overlooking us.
Since this will be a condo we need to insure that proper screening is planted and
maintained from day one as changes later will be impossible.
5. There were no plans yet for the marina so we had limited discussion on lights,
and noise.
6. Could the long straight roads have speed bumps? Otherwise speeding WILL be
a problem. We have it on all our INCA roads already.
7. As interested adjacent property owners we'd like to be notified of all P & Z
meetings with Lennar or their subcontractors as this project moves forward. Please
advise if we can do this informally or if we need to
submit a specific request.
Thanks,
Harry
PS..I will be out of town on vacation next week but can be reached on my cell at
561 436 1199 if you have questions.