Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS MEMORANDUM February 22, 2006 TO: Mayor Taylor, Mr. McCray, Mr. Mc~oy, Mr. Ensler, Mr. Ferguson, Kurt Bressner, James Cheroff, Mike Rumpf FROM: Stan Nitkowski, President INCA SUBJECT: Yachtsman's Cove Townhome Agreement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This memo is intended to summarize the five site plan conditions for the Yachtsman's Cove Townhomes as agreed to by the Developer and INCA. Details for each point listed below is attached. 1. Adjust the landscaping in the center medians on 15th Place and along the southeast wall along Ocean Inlet Drive. 2. Extend the concrete wall, which makes up the projects southeastern border, to replace what presently exists. 3. The sidewalks from the southeaster (A) unit on Building #12, the southern most building, is to be reconfigured to not exit onto Ocean Inlet Drive. 4. Include a low landscaped fence structure in front of Building #12 5. Increase the setback on the southern border. RECEIVED I FE B 2 2 2006 CITY MAN,~GER'S OFFICE February 21, 2006 Mr. Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Dear Mike, This letter is meant to summarize the agreed to compromises made between the Yachtsman's Cove Town home project and INCA. As you know, we have been in continuous discussions over the last several months in an attempt to better the project and help it fmd its place more seamlessly within the neighboring community. To this end, Banyan Development has worked very diligently to gamer the support of INCA and its members, in the hopes of presenting a unified front to both the eRA Board as well as the City Commission. In order to achieve this unity, Banyan Development and . INCA have been in constant communication. It is from these dialogues, for the expressed purposes of forming a consensus that these 5 revisions to the project's site plan have arisen. The following is a brief narrative about the proposed compromises and their justifications: 1) Adjust the landscaping in the center medians on IS. Place and along the southeast wall along OceaD Inlet Drive. Currently, the shape ofNE 15th Place provides a buffer between the homes to the east and Federal Highway. With the re-alignment of the street some of the natural buffering is lost. To help offset this INCA has asked for, and Banyan Development has agreed to adjust the landscape plan to provide additional height and/or coverage to the median's canopy. The new plan calls for a combination of ground cover, a signature Live Oak and Saba! Palms to be placed in the medians. Clusters of tall Sabal Palms have been added to both sides of 15th Place where the project meets the single family residences and along the southeastern wall along Ocean Inlet Drive to buffer the three- story townhomes from the residences. 2) Extend the concrete wall, which makes up the projects southeastern border, to replace what presently exists. INCA had asked that the eastern wall per plan, which now terminates with the pool fencing, be extended to help shield the single family residences directly on the corner from oncoming headlights. This change will extend the wall to where it. presently exists today and allow it to terminate after the parking spaces on the projects southeastern corner. A section of the AS IS site survey has been included to illustrate the walls present location. . 3) The sidewalks from the southeaster (A) uBit on Building #12, the southern most building, is to be reconfigured to not exit onto Ocean Inlet Drive. TIris change would require the southeastern most walkway begin adjacent to the two parking spaces in the southeastern comer and terminate at the end units door. INCA . had requested this change in order to reduce the number of outgoing sidewalks onto Ocean Inlet Drive and to help discourage parking and congestion on this drive. Banyan Development felt that this change was not only acceptable but increased the utility of the sidewalk for the dwelling by aligning the walk to best service their guests aniving at the closest guest parking spaces. 4) Include a low landscaped fence stnlcture in front of Building #12. INCA had asked, for the purposes of,symmetry, to have some type offence detail included on Ocean lnlet Drive to balance the Gated Murano Bay Community to the south. Originally. we had proposed a 30" picket fence which INCA felt was insufficient and asked for a 48"structure. We have agreed to a 36" compromise with gates on each of the 4 remaining walks onto Ocean Inlet Drive. 5) Increase the setback on the southern border. INCA requested additional relieffrom our project's 10' setback on Ocean Inlet Drive. By keeping the position of the SE unit stationary and pivoting Building #12 a few degrees we were able to extend the buffer between 0'.7'. These changes, while minor to the overall scope of the project, have proven important to INCA's efforts to build support for the development, and as such both parties are in favor of their inclusion. Mike, as you can see this is probably the best example of cooperation between a developer and its neighbors. It is in keeping with this spirit that we now ask the City to join us in sustaining this cooperative effort by allowing at least the fIrst four points to either be included on the site plan prior to the Commission Meeting on the 28th or be attached as notes to the project. If the 5th point cannot be included at this time. we would like to add it as an amendment at the earliest possible date. K.o~ Cohen Banyan Development DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-015 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Board and City Commission DATE: Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director Eric Lee Johnson, AICP <ii4-- Planner (J February 8, 2006 THRU: FROM: PROJECT NAME/NO: Yachtsman's Cove / NWSP 006-003 REQUEST: New Site Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: Yachtsman Properties, LLC Applicant: Yachtsman Properties, LLC Agent: Atlantis Environmental Engineering, Inc. Location: On the east side of Federal Highway, approximately 375 feet north of the Boynton (C-16) Canal (Location Map - Exhibit "A") Existing Land Use: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Existing Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3) Proposed Land Use: Special High Density Residential (SHDR - 20 du/ac) Proposed Zoning: Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) Proposed Use: 61 fee-simple townhouse units Acreage: ::1::3.35 acres Adjacent Uses: North: An existing mobile home park recently approved for condominiums and townhouse units (Seaview Park Club) with a Special High Density Residential (SHDR) land use classification and zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD); Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 2 South: Right-of-way for Ocean Inlet Drive, then farther south is developed property (Murano Bay) with a Special High Density Residential (SHDR) land use classification and zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD); East: Developed single-family residential lots with a Low Density Residential (LDR) land use classification and zoned Single-family Residential (R-1-AA); and West: Right-of-way for Federal Highway, then farther west is right-of-way for the Florida East Coast (FEe) railroad. PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION Owners of properties within 400 feet of the subject site plan were mailed a notice of this request and its respective hearing dates. The applicant certifies that they posted signage and mailed notices in accordance with Ordinance No. 04-007. Site Characteristic: The subject property is comprised of two (2) irregular-shaped parcels separated by the Northeast 15th Place right-of-way. The property lies within Study Area I of the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Plan. The survey shows the parcels are currently developed with one (l)-story commercial buildings, parking areas, and lighting fixtures. No ground elevations were shown on the survey. BACKGROUND Proposal: Atlantis Environmental Engineering, Incorporated, agent for Yachtsman Properties, LLC is proposing a new site plan for 61 fee-simple townhouse units. As previously mentioned, the subject parcels are located within Study Area I of the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Plan. The Redevelopment Plan allows for higher residential densities within this area, above the current density of 10.8 dwelling units per acre allowed by the Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use classification. The developer is simultaneously requesting to reclassify the land use from LRC to Special High Density Residential (SHDR) and rezone from Community Commercial (C-3) to Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD). Also, the developer is requesting to abandon the curved portion of Northeast 15th Place, where it currently dissects the subject property into two (2) lots. The intent is to abandon the roadway, straighten its configuration, and re-align it approximately 100 feet to the north (measured at the centerline) to connect to Federal Highway. In should be noted that Northeast 15th Place would still remain as a public right-of-way. Therefore, approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the corresponding requests for abandonment (ABAN 06-001) and land use change / rezoning. The north parcel would be 0.943 acres and the south parcel would be 2.237 acres. Fee-simple townhouses are permitted uses in the IPUD zoning district. Under the Special High Density Residential land use category, the maximum allowable project density would allow for 67 dwelling units. However, the project proposes a total of 61 dwelling units, which equals a density of 18.2 dwelling units per acre. The entire project would be built in one (1) phase with the completion of the first building anticipated in November of 2006. Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 3 Concurrency: Traffic: Utilities: ANALYSIS A traffic study was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the proposed redevelopment project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Furthermore, the County would support the re-alignment of the eastern segment of Northeast 15th Place, to align with the segment west of Federal Highway, to eliminate the 110 foot offset. The Division suggests the developer conduct a "traffic signal warrant analysis" at the re-aligned intersection, as suggested by the developer's traffic engineer. The traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. No building permits are to be issued after the build-out date of 2008 (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water for this project (project estimated to require a total of 26,300 gallons per day). Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required, especially on the water delivery system for the project, depending upon the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve the projected total of 13,000 gallons per day, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site plan (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Police I Fire: Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. All South Florida Water Management District permits and other drainage related permits must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). School: The School District of Palm Beach County confirms that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the proposed 61 dwelling units. The project is located within Concurrency Service Area (CSA) #17. Driveways: The project proposes a total of five (5) driveway openings. Four (4) of the five (5) driveway openings are proposed along the relocated Northeast 15th Place, while the fifth opening, is proposed along Ocean Inlet Drive. Out of the four (4) driveways proposed along Northeast 15th Place, two (2) of them are proposed on the north side of the road while the other two (2) openings would be located on the south Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 4 side of Northeast 15th Place. Although not dimensioned on the site plan (sheet SP- 1), all the drive way openings proposed along Northeast 15th Place would be wide enough to accommodate two (2)-way traffic movements for ingress and egress. The fifth driveway opening, proposed along Ocean Inlet Drive would be a point of egress only and vehicles would only be allowed to make a right (west) turn. It should be noted that the landscape median within Ocean Inlet Drive was purposely designed with no breaks to discourage vehicles from entering the site from a street other than Northeast 15th Place. The street system within the development is generally proposed in a north-south direction. Each two (2)-way drive aisle would have 10-foot wide travel lanes, which would conform to current engineering standards. All of the underground infrastructure (i.e. potable water lines, sanitary sewer lines) would be placed underneath the street network, internal to the development. Also, residents would access their garages via these drive aisles. A 24-foot back-up distance is proposed to allow for easy vehicular access into each unit's garage. The sidewalks are proposed separately from the street system to ensure the safety of each pedestrian. Parking Facility: Two (2) and three (3) bedroom dwelling units require two (2) parking spaces per unit. The project proposes 36 two (2)-bedroom units, 25 three (3)-bedroom units and a recreation facility. Therefore, based upon the above referenced number of units and the amenity, the project requires a total of 127 parking spaces. The site plan shows that each unit would have a two (2)-car garage, which would thus equate to providing 122 parking spaces. The size of each unit would vary but generally, each garage would be dimensioned 18 feet in width by 20 feet in depth. The plan also proposes six (6) 90-degree parking spaces and two (2) parallel parking spaces. According to the Typical Parking Stall Detail, the 90-degree parking stalls would be dimensioned nine (9) feet in width by 18 feet in length. The handicap parking spaces would be dimensioned 12 feet in width (with extra 5-feet of striping) and 18 feet in length. According to the site plan (sheet SP-1), the parallel parking spaces would be 10 feet in width by 25 feet in length. Combining the garage spaces, parallel spaces, and gO-degree spaces, the site plan would provide for a total of 130 parking spaces or an excess of three (3) parking spaces. Landscaping: The civil drawing (sheet C-1) tabular data indicates that 39,457 square feet (0.9 acres) or 27.4% of the site would be pervious surface. The plant list (sheet L2) indicates the landscape plan would provide a total of 151 canopy trees, of which, 83 trees or 55% would be native. The plant list indicates that 84 or 50% of the 168 palm trees would be native. Also, the landscape plan would contain 1,462 shrubs / groundcover plants, of which 1,412 (96%) would be native. In summary, the project would provide for a complimentary mix of canopy and palm trees. The tree species would include the following: Brazilian Beautyleaf, Green Buttonwood, Savannah Holly, Purple Glory tree, Pink Trumpet tree, High Rise Oak, Silver Buttonwood, Yellow Geiger tree, Japanese Fern tree, Red Crape Myrtle, Ligustrum tree, Travelers palm, Soliataire palm, Medjool Date palm, Florida Royal palm, Cabbbage palm, and Foxtail palm. Staff recommends that the lands remaining outside the individual fee-simple area be under the control of the Homeowner's Association to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas (see Exhibit "C" - Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 5 Condition of Approval). A note on the landscape plan (sheet L2) indicates that canopy trees will be placed far enough back from the drive aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. A bio-barrier shall be used with all canopy trees along streetscapes and sidewalks and where trees are adjacent to any underground utilities. With regards to aesthetics, the applicant agrees to install Redtip Cocoplum hedges around utility boxes and structures that are not currently known or shown on the plan at this time. Furthermore, the at- grade air-conditioner units behind each unit would be screened using native hedge material. Project compatibility is judged on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting properties. The Conceptual East and West elevations illustrate how the mature landscaping would soften the appearance of the townhouse buildings. The site plan shows that the western landscape buffer (adjacent to Federal Highway) would be at least nine (9) feet - eight (8) inches wide at its narrowest point. The landscape plan shows that this buffer would consist of Florida Royal palm, Green Malayan Coconut palm, Medjool date palm, and a row of Redtip Cocoplum hedges. It appears that most of the trees would be installed at a tip-to- tip spacing with the Royal palm trees installed at a height of 25 feet. Each townhouse unit proposed along Federal Highway would have a side walk that directly links to the sidewalk on Federal Highway. The site plan shows that the south landscape buffer (adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive) would be at minimum, approximately 10 feet - six (G) inches at its narrowest point. The landscape plan proposes the following plant material: Green Buttonwood, Foxtail palm, and Redtip Cocoplum hedges. The Merano Bay project (south of Ocean Inlet Drive) already contains landscape material along its northern landscape buffer. The landscape material proposed in the south buffer (for this project) would compliment Merano Bay's north landscape buffer. The site plan shows that the north landscape buffer (adjacent to Seaview Park Club) would be five (5) feet in width at its narrowest point. However, a majority of the buffer would be over 20 feet wide. The landscape plan proposes the following plant material: High Rise Live Oak, Brazilian Beautyleaf, and Redtip Cocoplum hedges. Although not required, a six (G)-foot high wall is proposed along the entire perimeter of the north property line of the subject property. However, this may cause a conflict with the six (G)-foot high pre-cast concrete wall that was already approved along the south property line for the Seaview Park Club project. This could conflict because it would create a situation where there would be a narrow gap between the subject property's proposed buffer wall and the approved buffer wall (on the abutting property to the north). Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant works with the abutting property owner to the north to see if there may be mutual interest in eliminating one (1) of the walls where two (2) walls are proposed parallel to each other (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The site plan shows that the east landscape buffer (adjacent to the single-family residential neighborhood) would be nine (9) feet - 11 inches wide at its narrowest point. It would contain the following plant material: High Rise Live Oak, Savannah Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 6 Holly, Green Malayan Coconut palms, and a row of Redtip Cocoplum hedges. Similar to the north buffer, a six (6) foot high wall is proposed along the northern segment of the east property line. However, near the pool area, the plans propose a wall / fence combination. Staff recommends extending the wall along the entire perimeter ofthe east property line of the subject property. This will help buffer the subject property from the residential neighborhood as well as to help screen the intrusion of automobile headlights on neighboring properties from parking areas and driveways (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Building and Site: As previously mentioned, the applicant is requesting to rezone the property to the IPUD zoning district at a project density of 18.2 dwelling units per acre. The maximum density allowed by the Special High Density Residential land use classification is 20 dwelling units per acre. The 61 dwelling units are proposed within 12 separate buildings on the 3.35-acre site. Each building would contain a varying number of dwelling units, ranging from three (3) units to six (6) units. The unit plans (sheet A-801 through sheet A-804) show the proposed size and configuration of each unit. The floor plans propose four (4) model types, ranging from 1,887 square feet to 2,511 square feet of "under roof area". As previously mentioned, the site plan proposes 36 two (2)-bedroom units and 25 three (3)- bedroom units and a recreation facility. No individual swimming pools or screened enclosures are proposed (or allowed) and would be noted as such within the Home Owners Association documents. Likewise, the developer does not intend to screen- in the balconies either (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The PUD zoning district allows buildings to reach a maximum height of 45 feet. However, a lesser building height could be imposed if compatibility with the adjacent properties would be in jeopardy. The code defines building height as follows: The vertical distance in feet measured from the lowest point at the property line of an adjacent property or from the minimum base flood elevation as established by FEMA, whichever is highest, to the highest point of the roof for flat roofs, to the deck line for mansard roofs and parapet roofs with parapets less than five (5) feet in height. Gable and hip roof heights shall be measured to the midpoint between the eaves and the ridge. The elevations show the buildings would either be two (2) or three (3) stories in height, the tallest of which would be 34 feet - two (2) inches in height measured at the mid-point of the pitched roof. All buildings would comply with the height limitation of the IPUD zoning district. It should be noted that the peak of the roof would be 42 feet - one (1) inch in height. Although not dimensioned on the elevations, the peak of the decorative cupolas is proposed at 46 feet - nine (9) inches height. At the time of permitting, the elevation pages would have to be revised to indicate the height dimension for the decorative cupolas. Furthermore, the peak of the cupolas cannot exceed 45 feet in height or the developer would have to request and be approved for a height exception (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). As previously mentioned the abutting properties to the east are zoned R-1-AA and developed with a mix of one (1) and two (2) story, single-family detached homes. The R-1-AA zoning district only allows a maximum building height of up to 30 feet (at mid-point of roof), a difference of 15 feet. Initially, the developer indicated to staff a desire to propose buildings that were all three (3) stories in height. However, staff informed the Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 7 developer that the proposed building height on the subject property would be a critical design element to consider when requesting to rezone to the IPUD zoning district. Staff suggested that the applicant reduce the proposed building height of those buildings proposed closest to the single-family residential homes, from three (3) stories to two (2) stories. In heeding staff's suggestions, the developer is now proposing a mix of two (2) and three (3)-story buildings. As proposed, the three (3)-story buildings would be located near the center and western portions of the site (along Federal Highway) while two (2)-story structures are proposed along the eastern fringe (adjacent to the single-family detached homes). The Street Elevations (sheet A-405) illustrate how the buildings would appear from both Federal Highway and from the adjacent properties to the east. As designed, the pool/recreation area (of the subject project) and the two (2)-story building (depicted as Building 4 on the site plan) is comparable in height and compatible to any structure built within the R-1-M zoning district. The site plan shows that Building 4 and the pool area are proposed between the three (3)-story buildings and the existing homes located within the R-1-M zoning district. Staff feels that this proposed configuration represents an excellent compromise to improve compatibility between the subject property and the abutting properties to the east, in order to mitigate the height discrepancy. However, Building 1, proposed as a three (3)-story structure at the northeast corner of the subject site, would be located only 12 feet away from the east property line that abuts property with a single-family home. As proposed, Building 1 is comprised of six (6) units with varying model types. Staff opines that the proposed height and proximity of Building 1 (to the adjacent lot to the east) is not compatible with this residential property. Therefore, staff is recommending the applicant implement one (1) of the following two (2) solutions: Either eliminate the easternmost unit of Building 1 (depicted as Model "A" of Building 1 on the site plan) or reduce the height of Model "A" from three (3)-stories to two (2)-stories. Staff feels that decreasing the height of the east fa<;ade of Model "A" of Building 1 would provide an equitable transition between the maximum height of 30 feet allowed in the adjacent single-family neighborhood and the 45-foot height allowed in the IPUD district. After considering the ultimate height of the proposed structure (34 feet - two (2) inches), evaluating the effects of comparable situations elsewhere, considering that the majority of adjacent single-family homes are one-story or two-story and less than 30 feet in height, and after contemplating the intent of the IPUD district to maximize compatibility, staff has determined that compatibility would be achieved by limiting structure height of the easternmost unit (Model A) to a maximum of two (2) stories (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). As indicated in the ordinance, a "transition" should be accomplished in this situation, which is best achieved by a height which does not exceed the existing heights of the adjacent multi-family development, and which transitions from the maximum height allowed in that adjacent multi-family district, 45 feet. It is important to note that the homes in Yachtman's Cove to the south may be developed as two (2) story structures with a maximum building height of 30 feet. The IPUD zoning district perimeter setbacks shall mirror setbacks of adjacent zoning district(s) but with a minimum of the setback required for a single-family residence as determined by the orientation of the structures in the IPUD (Chapter Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 8 2, Section 5.L.3.). The property to the north is zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) and was approved with a similar, multi-family residential project. The buildings in the project to the north were approved with a 48.32-foot setback from the north property line of the subject project. The site plan for the subject project proposes a 10-foot north (side) setback. This is acceptable, given the fact that both projects will have comparable-sized landscape buffers. The area immediately to the south is right-of-way for Ocean Inlet Drive, and then farther south is a developed, townhouse project (Murano Bay) zoned IPUD. The townhouse buildings inside Murano Bay are setback 16 feet from its north property line (adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive). However, the townhouse buildings in this site plan (Yachtsman's Cove) are proposed 10 feet from the south property line, adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive. The difference in the building setbacks between the two (2) projects as they relate to Ocean Inlet Drive is six (6) feet. It should be noted that the City and CRA endorse projects that are designed to engage the publiC domain, such orienting buildings towards a roadway or park. The Murano Bay development was designed and built with the back of their townhouse units and privacy wall facing towards Ocean Inlet Drive whereas the front fac;ades (and doors) of the subject project are oriented towards Ocean Inlet Drive. The latter's design is more desirable. For this project, the proposed south side setback (of 10 feet from Ocean Inlet Drive) is appropriate. Furthermore, any additional building setback (along Ocean Inlet Drive) could be detrimental to its design and performance. Also, as previously mentioned, most of the plant material proposed adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive were chosen specifically to compliment Murano Bay's landscaping. The properties to the east are zoned Single-family Residential (R-l-AA). These lots have been developed with single-family detached homes and the IPUD regulations specifically addresses compatibility requirements with these types of developments. The sides of these single-family detached homes abut the subject property. The side setback of the R-l-AA zoning district is 10 feet. In addition, it should be noted that a structure on the perimeter of an IPUD project that is adjacent to an existing single-family neighborhood must adhere to additional setback requirements. The IPUD regulations require an additional one (1) foot building setback for each one (1) foot in building height that exceeds 30 feet. Building 1, proposed at the northeast corner of the property, would be 34 feet - two (2) inches in height. This translates to a minimum required building setback of 14 feet - two (2) inches from the east property line. Please note that according to Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.g.(2), if vegetation, screening or other barriers and / or creative design on the perimeter of an IPUD achieve compatibility with adjacent uses, the city may grant some relief from the following: Structures on the perimeter of an IPUD project, in addition to the basic setback requirements, must be setback one (1) additional foot for each one (1) foot in height for the perimeter structures that exceed 30 feet. A landscape barrier is defined as follows: A near solid element combining a wall and / or natural vegetation intended to block all direct and reasonable views. It shall be comprised of a berm, buffer wall and / or natural vegetation (as deemed appropriate by the city) consisting of various trees species planted tip-to-tip in two or more staggered rows. The site plan indicates that the proposed setback would Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 9 be at least 12 feet (for Building 1) but when scaled, it appears to be over 15 feet. Therefore, the building setback would conform but as previously mentioned, staff still has concerns regarding the compatibility between Building 1 of the subject project and the existing single-family house to the east. The intent of the IPUD code is to exceed the minimum requirements of typical multi-family developments. Therefore, reducing the height of Model "A" (of Building 1) from three (3) to two (2) stories would help the project achieve compatibility and conformance with the intent of the regulations. Land to the west is right-of-way for Federal Highway. The site plan proposes a 10-foot setback along the west property line. The main recreation area would be located at the eastern side of the site. It would include a swimming pool, BBQ area, cabana building, and bicycle racks. The "open" portion of the cabana would face the townhouse development rather than the single-family neighborhood to the east. The building would be located over 10 feet from the east property line. The area calculations (sheet A-205) indicate that the bathrooms and covered area would be 500 square feet in area. The elevations do not indicate the actual roof height but depicts it as a one (l)-story structure, which staff understands would be 13 feet - one (1) inch in height. The site plan proposes several open space areas between the rows of townhouse buildings. The site plan indicates that "public art" would be the centerpiece of the public area. The actual artwork is yet to be determined. A total of 12,200 square feet of usable open space is required. According to the Usable Open Space plan (sheet SP-2), the project would provide 14,400 square feet of usable open space. This space would be consist of four (4) open space areas, namely, the pool and amenity area, the garden belt, the pedestrian connections to Federal Highway, and the north pedestrian area. Design: The proposed townhouse buildings and clubhouse have hints of a contemporary Key West style with its standing seam metal roof, wood fascia, trellises, shiplap siding, and white aluminum shutters. Other decorative design elements include Pre Fab Sunburst Fypon, decorative medallions, aluminum window frames, Clad Garage doors, aluminum railing, and portholes. The project proposes multi-colored buildings consisting of the following Benjamin Moore paints: Color code Paint Name Color Location # CC-962 Gray Mist Off-white Main wall # 2143-60 Moonlight White Cream Main wall # CC-807 Soft Sky Light blue Main wall # CC-507 Grecian Green Sage green Main wall #721747 Charcoal Tweed Dark qreen Canvas Awnings The elevations of the cabana building show that it would have the same standing seam metal roof, exterior finish, and paint colors as that of the townhouse buildings. The photometric plans propose one (1) type of outdoor freestanding lighting fixture. The Pole Detail indicates it would be 12 to 14 feet in height, made of aluminum, and have decorative lamps. The photometric plan demonstrates that lighting levels would be adequate and not "spill" over onto adjacent properties. Similar to other recently approved townhouse projects, the front doors of each unit Staff Report - Yachtsman's Cove (NWSP 06-003) Memorandum No PZ 06-015 Page 10 are oriented towards the streets. Staff endorses how the buildings "engage" the main streets and rates the overall design and site layout above most other projects recently approved by the city. Signage: No signage is shown or proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed this request for new site plan approval and is recommending approval, contingent upon the successful request land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06-003), Northeast 15th Place abandonment (ABAN 06-001), and subject to satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\yachtsmans Cove\NWSP 06-003\Staff Report.doc 230 I 115 ._OCATION MAP Yachtsman's Cove o 230 460 Exhibit "A" 690 N + 920 I Feet I" . . I "".t "....-., EXHIBIT B Vl ...... --I m ""0 S; Z t,~ _~ --~. ~ ----r:----------------- ----=t:---t rfli-cr ~~ ~~ - C~ - - - ~ - ~ ~- - - - - - ~ - ~.~.-~t-'.:.f,;'- I /f j--:--b----_-l /: ....t r,-- T J ~ ~ -~ '- T -/: ~Ta l< : iJL'i ..-.~" i I h i b i / -:::'..(" 1/ .. \-.'=- ':, i [j: 1 W ~ j 'I , r a~ -----11 I j : ", /~: : I I . ~a;~ J-l, 0 J I lJI~ ( : l--I I a-""l' I {) l}:t , "': d J- I I I I I () I" - ~ -I..ur "I I ! 011 _/I ~~/\~---"7 I :: L- ___J;/ - -)> ',1___ -J 1 ~I '--J.'- " !1',;",iJ' . : :', ~ < j ,> _ / : . F~ / r- ',),.,. ~L~' .1.' / ',~.n.4r L, . ~ - ~Ji~ dd-m-.-, i-~'=: =to --n-lf=~1 'l) j' ". ~"'i/-'" tJJ-.!jLf-; ---- t-~~.J ~ . r--=/ Irmr '<)j <\ I ~ ~ ~.~ ~ j t -, 1lIIL. it ',>, I " ---..{- I.i I (,[ , i -)-----.(, / . ")-L.\ '7'F i " i 0/ " '.i.T _ ,- " i 0/ i I i ~ a: 0 / lL \ / i i{ ---1:: '\1/ ::t--~; r : ! i / . ,1 ~ \L I 7" r.Ffl 'b t (): --~-- : () Ii 2 : ~ d ' I' ,,,,It J... --.._J' , '''' n" '/ ^ ',' ~ , , ,ft-:~''''-",. / I ~? - ,.=..~-lL1!r~:~ -0" : I i ~_-y /~^" ~-.=-" -J i I~I 1 I. .-fl.::":;]~T-- 'ii" 'r cJ. '" ~~.<ii:=='~ r'" ",.1 36-'. / \L '. { -7[-- ~ .~ . r- ". m- ~-111r7A11{ ~ .. - df;:~;:~:-~~2., -~.. · ~ -. - ~~ .L . ~ & ,------J ~ ----=- ;, fi ~~~~~---~tJ~;C,'j I., ~~JgNit<~~~ j I J -r 1~-::7\ h /,,--f! i / t-----------~ I ! !~----~_____ flIL244"" : \ri'~\ /~/~~, If ~ ~ J)!/ 'y' \( J f,j~/T."A..~, 'I: l: ) /i....-~, ~&. cj \ ',Y \' r ~ \ ~. fL~' ~L '..-,,,,.,,,.. I;;" -r' , : r---- 1/, '""t"'~ ''''-'''~ \\ !!T.~.k' 'il,..,j ~ T , · !. g~~'m f 1i I! ! I :t-J f 0 ;: : ! /~tJ Ff ~li~ UI I ~rl ~\, _11/.7-,--11._-; I .b ~---->.-l. 'I dii~ ,~1 !.,., ~ ;, \\.1' (,", / , -" ~i:!l " ;", , l':: ITl ; iik S ' ~ .~ I ~\\,' ~u ,I ,I:,; 'T;~J m\ ''',~ , '"', 0 ,,)j,_:W~) !--f -, '<,JI OJ 'J-~'-0' nffc->J 'fi7F--H--- J~ If ~Sl OJ~~Jlir- - ; ,u//'>\ /::-' ~ :;~ '" ...L V . -t' J ~rc.i. ,~ ,?oi': ~" "1' \J: : l:~~ -1d-/ ,/,/ "': ,~~ : . < r+ )" ~....... --.J~J' ~" ' i (l!:~' '"-< I! .~'-0' " ,,\ ,^ / "g II , , '" /l~, J " ,/ell', /EJ ~ ri'~' , " .,/<. / - III #-.:~/ h"-..:/:I r: Ii i-----\ 1 ~ I r-----~...;/Ii r ~t:~ ~ r--~- ~-i-' L.ut. II r--, ---f! ~ ~_1!1' f) ,',-.; f " ~ I () I II "'~ jM I \! I.!.~ -<<:.:et--~----t ri" '~-E'-=--:l-_---I~r-~i- ~ J li~ Ii-~, I ~~L 'L_ ~-0- _~_ " ;. ""~~D:-f--~1-.. ,7, ir -;/["1 [/11 ~ -, 'I ~~~uh ~t-'-~~'-1~fi l ~::::"1! -t- :, :~ L.._~ rtf~\:"~-'f= .--~, ~". =\,,---=-1'1 r@,.r,iftc ~6 ~ II J __ lo.---__-1 I, t1 t; -- f?-' ~ I rr i1CtI ~ W : 'f( .-.~\ it, ! ml...T:;~~L" ") :~'=j'~;J(" . ..., ~ L : :J"~L, --t J-l1 IIw- lill '---J r IT f '---J r: ph ~r~ / 1 n : I !L :-------k_____ 1 2 '.. I I----__~__ : II ~ ",~/':\'_~~f: rf:JJ ~/i---..~, 7 :: , ) /i.-.-.~~..7 ! t;!i ' .... . ~ ! ~ril ~ ,/,/1"P i:: zg"U' G' I: 'r'" '~t i' / · ft.eiA2 .. ~(i""~ I I I () I h f-J! n I I L J .. AI i ~ 'If ~,J "'j\--~;.-.('" I ~, .;:7'\~--~) if': / '\ lit) 4 '\ 'I> i ! "', ~ _III!! 'I"'- Tr' ~1~r>;:/1f ~ f~. It; ~ 'n '\Li (1",,;1 ',,, I~ ,!L 11~1~~\, i "!8 'I ~~i I '\~/ \ V I '~, 11 (J) n, '~, j~ "w 6 mil ::,1 i -''''-J ! U !I >~:/r ...l ' "-./~'------ IliII '\t~\OJ ,~ : ~t J ~ , J I s; f1iil........, 'l I "~'J: I :;~ ::1 : ,L._._.17 (PO ,~~ -~' f:..\// D- \<,:' "I12J' . < III :------l>.------1I7/ l () i ]' n---; f 'I ~. / ) r--. ",!I I I,...... _ _: I I l::!' / /' J__ I (,I 24"0~ I i I J ( ----r I J -f-f ~iI / '---i177-e.: 'j.;-."CJi ,) \L_...y (;) I:) \L.. '"T/?fP it! / ~:L. ~ ~ :' :-------~----_l II ill :-------b-____~__ f f Sa --- .:l::...--_~ It' JiJ;, I __ I II I ! __ -j I~:"f ~ / / ~f '1l 0'1 - - 1$ .: _ .l_ I t!1 ~':-'__ I l ~ / ~ N..-~.. (rr '\~ -. -, //. 0/ fl)1..../.... \,y..../\~t:! ~~~ ~\l II G 1\ I~/: # -'-, -J..J ," 'Jr ""',l" Jl jii - ~ ~ C I '.., ~ ,J ,~; I'~: ~,[lJ: ! ~ ~ ~ / I ~ I , I~'" ~ . I I 1/ ~/\, : - "\' ~ 'i)-nnA .. Iil =-,-nn~ I c0 /'k, j ~I~I \~\, :, D f,lJ.. I '-..:; =-=f ;/~ _'-____ ~ "'-T, 0/" I 1/ _:j ~ fr~'~J-JI'1+--~}+i -tf -f~-'~IZ '~~Iti~ ~t--:-1 Li ''T -ti I'~-~--;~:it-~ - I -tt-- -~~ =3E:" .... : - 0 --1~t- Il r!-I ! ~ I~--\..../ p.\ / 'ifT f In I j 1/ ":')...... ',I ~ I I I I II I ~. ~-~-~~!' !~ i \',~ r=,_J- /~^t>, ~-r G /-)! I I / I I 11 """c./'-f ..~~ '~+ '" n;"~'"::=' _ /' '" '" I '/ / ,~::_,:~--TT-r16'~ l-rirr -~;,'1.>-+-~ -rr- I I I I ~ L I l' riI o m ~ r- :r Gi :r ~ -< ~ . i I OCEAN INLET DRIVE m -~ SITE PLAN ----E------------ Ul ! 'k \J ~ ~~ lH I "l t; ~ " ~ 8 ~t ..... D~ ~ . ~ i . ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA z :..., o SITE DATA (f) ! ! ~ itl r~ ~ ~~ \J I ~~ ~i4 ,n N (J> -p '" "'U '" )> :E !! JJ )> ,! ~ I r Z r G) I 0 (f) m -l -l )> I ;!:: r r r 0 I m -l . ~ ;!:: ~ r ~ u> I -p '" )> '" z :E 0 )> 0 r )> r "'U 0 (f) m Q !lnll 11m -l i,h.! ~ z -l!I ,.iil. j!l !lll!!~ r 0 l'j)ll I!! m '~ii;x II! In -l I!,! Ii' ;!:: I " r c (f) )> OJ r m o "'U m Z (f) "'U )> o m "'U r )> Z I , I , I , I , I , L. , I , I , I , I , I , I '\ -I )0.>>> ~ ~~~~ I o ~" 8)'J ~~ ~o cc ~~ eF;; cO z~ ~~ ~~ ~ " r o o )> -l 6 z zS:: Ci)> fI'"'U .........N..... ;~~~ ~~~; ">2> a~~ :q .~ ~ ~ .............0'1 0>',,1'00\ l1lOVlQ 0000 ~~~~ u> -p - '" uaa llll 1M !&~. !~ t ~I t , I I ! i OJ ^ m JJ )> o ^ o m z-l :...,~ 0r D~ ~ . ~ . i YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA EXHIBIT B ! ! I! n '"' i ~ II I ~ Hi i ! ~ ~ ~ . ! mnl II ~! ~~I i " ~ ~ ~! , nl II ; , i,. ' ~ 1;0 eel ! HI I' i l , 'I I " 0" i i ~'" i::f ! ~~ ~ , ! II ii I' ~ ~ ., , , ~ ~I III l!ll ' ~ l! ~ ,II ~~ 'i 'Ii i flUI '! , " a i ~f:ii .. il hi 1 .11 i! III ill! ;1 . , m ~~ , !~ ;i >. l 3 I! !, I W~! !! Ii !il .8- t I , m !i '! n, d. !il " , I Ii Fi ~l II A ; ~ j" , ,Ill ill !l! " Iii " !. '. . I 'e j " " ,~. i~ I l I " ~j i" ji 'I " ll! i i i~' Ii I" II ,; ~ ! ! i h i" .! ;ii II il .1' Ii lO l\ ! !I l!l II ! . .j " , llrr Ul !ml !I!lrl !!lI!!!!1 :'1,00" . :1 Iii !m :lll~am :lllian ,I Ja~' " ~ ~s ~ o~~s ~ o~~s ~ o~~ , If; Iii; If ~ ~ II k~~:o~ 1:: ~E~ e!e!~ ~dh!: id~~h ,"0". ............'" ...........". "~-" '" '" -" -...."" "':"' ~."""" ~~~~'~ IH:I !~ ~ ~ 'I 1""1 I ~ ~ ~'~ i i~~h~ ~ ~ ~ Jn~5 oj!j!j!!j: "n~!i: l'l~! mI. "l~' lUil lime :1::; ii' ,! I' ! ., :I:,~ III . .' !:!: 0: ~Ii~~ ......wi ~h::;;jii ~~~~ hH~ ~:n~ii '::'::~'::~ ,::,::,::l:l ~:- ";" n '::'::'CO::x 1::'::r;:'::~ !1W~ 1111'1 111"1 ""'I ""'~ !iW: iii~: ;ii~l ~j! ~ j!~ j!;it,t,t!;l6 " ~, "l~' , '!' , '1" I!~!'- 1! !,. 'II . '!! :!:,~ :11 e' :1:" ~&i~~ ~~i*~ :-' !".? ~ im~ W!~ ~3: l!:::;;; '::;;~'::r;:~ r;:r;:r;:;~ r;:r;:~r;:x """"n '::'::;;t.>; dl!![!!i!!!!l!!l!!l!!l!!l!!l!!l!!l!!l!! "11'~ 1m'! 1'"'1' ~~!!!!!~~~~~~~ it :<06 lime iiim I,ij: ;1 ~ it ~~;;1 ~ mmmm! r · I" I!I" ~1!U1!iHlHlHipj ;:~~~ mmmam ge ~*l!:::;; 0; ~~iH ~~~H~~Q~~S99 '::'::':: ~i'l '::'::'::'::lll r-r-,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,t.t,t m!iiiiiim :c ..... "'... "".. "".. w "'..... iiiHHiiiiiii ..!^"''''......!''!''!''!''Y'..!^ ""......."................ I? n ~~ . . ~ a i . ~ ~~ 3: m !~i ~ m " 'Ii d. ';;: , ill r ! ! r m G) 19 lQ] m Z <> Ii ill ~~ !Ii EiiI IriiI I~ n ~l ~~ .~ I I ~~ II lli ~e .1 BEl IIi! ~l iil I , I 6 ~ 'Ii! ~l! ! i& i& ;111 il & ~ ~ U'III I !Iie ! ~[QJ m !i~ f' I" ill !l~ I ~ ......J. MEAN ROOF I-I!IOoI-IT ~.~ OVEllUll elJlLDINCO JoEI6J.11 ~r 'm L~ 5 ~Ul I-t o m m r m < ~ (3 Z g ~. ~ " ~ '! EXHIBIT B )<1'.1" I"'EAN 1ClOOFl-E1GoO<l ~~ H1 ~I ~--1 Ul I-t o m m r m < ~ (3 Z ! ~~ ~ ~ . . ):> ~ . I , 8~ I. , ~ ; r! i~ ~ ~ !'-i 0 ,. 8 ...... q THREE STORY - 6 UNIT BUILDING ELEVATIONS I~_~,_ I YACHTSMAN'S COVE : BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA i~ . t " , f i ~ b ~ 3: I' ~ m ,I '" " ~ ,I r I! m !' Gl m @] z 0 Iii l'~ 11 ! lQ] !II ~I~ ! [g] IJIi h~ . I ~ il ! ~ ~I ;:0 !~ ~ m ,r II )> ~% ;:0 ,. If)] m &, r I II m I < I ~ ...... ~ 0 z ., I! 11 Ii B B if I! "' ~ l! II II EI jl Ii il ~ n '2 I ~ II ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ "TI r o o ;:0 "'\J ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ;n ."... ~ I: ~ . . . 1"---~----------71 I "- I I I I "- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IL_____ Ii] - y I I I I I I I I ---~ S I'J ~ ~i "TI s S ;:0 ~ R ~~ > ~~ 0 ,~ R' > ~~ z -l ,~ m &, r I m I :;;; -l ...... 0 Z J: . ~ . <f -I: ~ . . r ;:0 m ~ ...... ::!l ,r G) ~% I ~ ' . -l 0 & Vl I ...... m I 0 I m I m r m m < r m ~ < ...... ~ 0 ...... z 0 z ):> I ! !: g ! 0 N ' '0 i E i ~ ? ~ 0 Ii U1 CABANA PLAN AND ELEVATIONS Di ~ ~ , YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA -f ~ < . ~ ~ 1<. ~. . i ~ EXHIBIT B llllllill i[~ n$ ~~'2. ~te ~ ~ e: ~ir . . . ".~ -" " ,." j~ EXHIBIT B \ 'I '" "~,~~,~:^C, dC2 '" c::/ _"_~ . n laaHS aas a~nHJ.1 vW ---------------~------------------- ",-, -n m o m ;to )> r I Gi I ::;; )> -< '" x ~ z '" <f> o ~ .,.. '" ~ ~ Z ~ Z C1 QCEI\N lNLET DRIVE ~ c z ~ I ~ ~ ,; M ,0 ~ rn Y ACHTSMA ' BOYNTON BEA~ S COVE . FLA. ijW;,:. !!!;ll~'i ~l~ijl! ~;g ~:-N ~i ~~g m ~Hg: ~; ~tl fir ~ ~I:"~~ ~ f _,. i ~ ~ ~ = m ~i ~~ H~ 0 II A.' lab' ~i! ~'l ~h U: o .. "~~ "~ 0 ,." i~ * * * * * -< -< -< 9 S 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ IJ IJ IJ f'T'l ::u ::u :::0 ~zozozo g~~~~~~~ ~;;;;8;;;;8~8~ ~~~~~~~~ ;~~~~~E;~ ~~~;g(/)~;~ ::ugo ~rrI;U 2g~ Ul~g DZI'T1 LI ;u C)OD :::0 f'T'l ~8 ~ ~ ::uri9 ~ ~ ;g::U 0 0 o < ~ o I * -- * ~~~~~~ * 1.O(];'*U1 O'l 0 *01 ~ ~ E. * * ~ r > Z ~ ~ Z :C1 ~ i~ ~r ~> ~t-:7 if~ BANYAN T'OWNHOWES 0 ~ ~ 1; ~ ~ ro m ~ ~ ~ = <; No I:'""" ~ ~ ~ m ~ a "" "'" l\:J ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ Cll ~ ~, ~ " ~ ;~ H~ ~ n 1= ... ~ --- ;! -< -<-< ~ ** 0 00 * -< -<-< ~~ '" ~~ t:l:l -< -<V> ~~ ~:: ~ ~ c::: (I) ~~ (/))> ~ ~? ~ ~~ E ~ ~~ ""3 n' ~ ,g ~ - g~ 8;~ 8 0 ~~ Z E~ ~.~ ~~ ~[;l II ~ ~ .~~ 0;' 0' ~k ,0 ~~ ~ '" '" '" ~ )> 0 :u Gl ... '" '" "<0 -N <0 ~'" -< -<'" ~ ~~ V> V> * * ~ . ~ . ~ g ~- 0'" ~::1 B~ ~~ V> ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ '" '" . . yJy--; '" c:: ------r(~~ - - - - -. I'll' t';:ith p\.AC;l' L-----1~ _ _ - - -;:;s_a~w5iYw .-0 lRelocoled) _ _ _ _ _ _ -f;Fi\ - -\1. .LtltlHS ,b --- --- n tJ *0 ** 088 e ~0~~ Cl')8 * * 8~~@~~@~ *** ** ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ . 0 )> ~ ~ n -u ~ F ~ <'I P ~ 0 'iI ~ ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ - - z ~ iii" 0 0 n 0 ~ 0 CD 0 0 3" CD -r CD i < ~!;l !!. ~~ ~ n ~1 "2 :J ~ n. ,,~ g~ ~8 V> ~" cc ~E ~~ ~~ i2 ~, ~~ ~5 ~8 mn II> ~~ ,. ~" .. _0 ~~ gg ~~ ,,~ Cm ~. ~ <> 00 ~ ~ mm g~ ~~ ~n ~~ ~g ~z ~~ .z ~E ;;lg ~~ ~~ ~~ .11> mo ~~ ~~ ~~ 02 ~g ~~ h ~g cO :J ~ .- ~~ ~; ~~ .. ~~ :~ ~~ ~~ E< oX OX 'g I'l~ ~~ ~~ ~~ "C ~~ 3~ CD <z ~o ~E ~~ P 0 i~ .~ ~~ g~ U1 "~ ~a ~~ ~~ z ~g 'Ii O' ~~ ~i ~ij 5~ ,. ~o .c ~ C ~~ ;; ~ ~~ ~E .n ~E << ~. ~~ ~~ ~. Zc 8 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ g. ,~ ~~ 0< ~< ~ II> .2 ~n ~> z~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ C ~o ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ :;; liz C ~> ~~ ~ C ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I:~ CT fili ~ < 8~ ~~ ~~ c;~ 8n ~. ! II> Ii. ~ ~ ~~ i"li ~2 " .. ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 ,< .~" 8~ '. ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ gj. < ~~- " 0 ~ C :J a. 0 0 - < .u .. , " ~ ~ ~5b C<- ~~ ~'. ~~ ~~ .~ ~.if "!.o: t..:;;; ". l'!.;i .....m ~ ~ ~ ~ " (::tD. ~~ ;;:..... ~~; ;~. ~~ n~ 0.!. ~~ ~~ ~~. ~~. ~~ ~r ~ ~?'i1 ~o no no ,>. H ~: ,. i 0 i 0 ~~ ~8;:t: gr ~r ~ x ., o. r . . . 0 ' > ~ ~ ~~!f z. ~~ dX x o~ <' Ox ~: ~ 0 ~~ ~. n n. 82e " ., ~ .~ o~ z. c C g . -. ~~~ ::<,-1 nx ....1' 'I .x OX 2X .x . , x X -. Z . m -< ~q ~F~ n ;;'1 ~. nO>. . <- ~. 8 ~ .~ ,. u.~ 8~ . . ~ (j:-i .~ O. F~'z ~ ~~ ;"!,(l ~ ~. , ~-~ c' , , ~~ .~ z' . n ~: '" 6~. ~" 2 , . ~~ '" ~~ ~~ ~ . ~ .~ ~ '" . ~. ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, n ~' -t " ~9 r' < n ~~ 0,< u. n ~ ~~ ~ n' ?'~ rC ~ '< ~ " . ~> -(~ ;l>'~ ~ ~ ~ n ~r ~ <~ ~ ~ ~p u, , '< '< '< ~ , .. r-l ~ n ~ ~ ~~ 0 . ~ ~ > ~ 0 -~ 0 0 0 ~- ". .~ z - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . ~ & , ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ,; ;;; ~ , ~ ~ ~ > 'l ~ > ~~~~~~~.~~:~.~~;~~~~2:~.i~~~~~~~~2~2~~~c~p~~~.~.~~'~g~.~~.~.~u~~~~~~~c ~~~~~~~~~~5~~~~~~~~~~~~~e~~~~;~~~~~~8~~~~~ ~r~~~~i~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~F~~~ ~o ,,~~ z n ~~2 ~ ~~~. 2. ~ ~~O~~"~, ,,~"~ ~-z '~gO~O > ~. . ~~.~~~g ~ 5~~~-(~~;~m~~~~d:~~:~>~~~~~~:~~~~~~~:~~~~. I ;~~i~~6~;~~~~~~!~a~~~!;I~a~ ;~~;! :i~~;:~:;!;ii~~~;:~~~i~!~~!~!~:~~~ I !~:!:~i~~ij~i!;~~~;~~i~I~;fi ~~~~~ ~~ ~!~~~; ~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~In~g~~ffi B :~~~~:~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~p~. ~~ ~~~ffi~ ~~ ~i~~i~~;~;~:~~~~:~:~~;~:~~~~~~~ ~ ~;:~i~~~~;~~:~5 ~ ~~i:~~ ;~ ~~cg8 ~ ~~~n=~~gFo8~~c~ n ~>~~~~~n~~~M~ r ~~~ ~ n~c~M~~d~ ~ -8Q~>~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~:I~~~~~~~i:e~ I ~~~~~~~;IF~~; i ;~~ ~ ~;~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~:; :: ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~:~ ~ ~~~~m~5 G~>~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~9 roo~~~~ ~ ~~~~~; an ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~:~~~~~~i~~~~ ~ ~~~~6~~~~~~~~~ ~ g6~ ~ ffl2 Q~~~~~ : ~~~~g~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ZY2~~0~ro"~~~ 0 g~ rno~8z~ox z~ O~ 'z ~~" ~ m n %. ~~ ~F~~ ~~ ~; ~~~g~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~;~~~~~~~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~: ~ ~~~~~g ~~ ~ro~ ~Q ~ z~ ~~m~ ~~~>> ~. z -~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~c>~~~ ~ ~COiM~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~Qg~~~~~~S~~~ ~ ~~~ x ~~~~o: ~ a2~. c~ ~~ :;~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~A~~Q~ ~ ~:~~~~~~i~~~~ ~ ~;~ ~ i; ~;~~~~ : ~. ~~~: ~~ zg::o iIi:: ~-< 0 ;O;;'IIll:lo!l1II-U ~ -ll:;t;. -~-lrll) C-uI'Tl;il OC :z: ;o~;!!:5!i!::1: S -l~:lO~ c;) ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~I~~F::~ ~ ~~~~~~~~!l1~gi~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~w~~~~ ~ ~8~~ ~ ~I~~ cl'Tl - ~lI) ~ ~~~~ ~e~ ~1'Tl~~~~lI)g~'Mz~ ~ ~r~ ~~ ~l'Tlg ~% :10 ~ ~~_1'Tl ~1'Tl~~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~m~~~~~~ M %;~~~~~~'i~~6 ~ 81'Tl~ !i ~~ a~ I ~ . ~~~ ~~~~ $ 11)-1: ~g~~ ~~~ 0 ~~~~g~~~~g~~g ~ -1 8 ~i ~F d ~~ I'Tl ~ ~~ ~~; ~~j;; z~ .:0 R -<;0 n t; n..~;u~ tH, Ii '01 HH~I' m~ ~~ i' ht iI ItW t! m n~g. iqn ~ hsi ;,{ i '1 t'f'''l:t 0 .0 E-~ m !i'~ j:a.~ :::~5 ::tl !i: Sli ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLA. ~~ ;~ QQ ~~ , , ~i B -0 o ::::J r+ o ::::J Q. :s:: o r+ C1l :l" o (f) r- oo" r+ ~~~ z'~ E~~ ~~ o. ~n o~ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ." zp o~ z o r+ C1l !'1 z 0 >-3 trj n z >-3 Cl ~ 0 ~ tl' trj U1G. trj Z ~I Ul ::rq n -0 \l:' r )> tr:j 0 'tl Cl >- ~ ~ 1-3 Ul e Ul = > 0 ~ r z >- ~ >-3 >-3 trj ...... ~ (f1 trj 1-3 0 "":l ...... tr:j Z Ul r >-3 >- tr:j t'" f; -< >-3 > ...... 0 1-3 z ~ ~ 0 ~ Z \I EXHIBIT g ~ ~q~~~ z !1 m ~ ~ .. B ~ s ~ ? t'""" ~ .. ~ ~ e oj>. C)1 ~ ~_" ~ "" ~ ~ ';> ~ HU~ . YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLA. !If;!mf i ~l P I&~~ ~:~~!i~i ~ !i[;'~:l~ -~~ tl~~f ~~ dU1 ~~ mi ~H nt;'~: -. :1... E:e-~ (') (') 5 1=i"'C gi ~~i .o~ i;: !!"'!; I:l ~~:i ~i r 1 , :; = ct ~~ 2lf.. 'I i lit ~~ 0 *.!. ~~ ,~rt ~g'~ Do!' BANYAN TOWNHOllES v EXHIBIT B z ~ ~ '" ~ ~- -0 0: r )> () rTJ z 0 >-3 tI:l n >-3 :;0 0 tI:l tI:l Z Ul n P:> ~ 'i:l > ~ ~ ~ Ul e Ul l:I: > 0 ~ r z > ~ >-3 >-3 > ...... is:: W. tI:l ~ 0 "%j ...... ~ z Ul r >-3 > ~ t'" < 5: ;; >-3 > ...... 0 ~ z ~ 0 ~ Z BANYAN TOWNHOllES YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLA. Pi,...." !'jhh~i~ i s:i [: l~~'! ~:~.[ii~i ~ ii~iH~~.f a Idj~ ~~ m Hfi' nt"~~ --,~ ~t~" ~ Ei ..... eg t~r [~~.llli~~l:l ;"' :ri ~lg ogr:,,=lt t: ~ e5!'o i ~~.: 0 cl.,!. It:! ,e (I ~E POi fj.!' g ~ qu~~ ro ~ ~ .. u ~ = ~ (}1 I:"'" ~.. ~ B ~ cr.> ~ ~"~.. ~ m" ~ H~u . \I EXHIBIT B z n z 0 f'1 0-,1 0 tzj ~'" Z (J1 o. ~I :J"" o~ 0-,1 n " ::c r )> tzj trj 0 tzj f'1 U) ~ R" ~ "tl C ~ > s:: t"""4 U) U) ::= ~ 0 ~ trj w. > 0-,1 ~ s:: ~ trj c:: ::c t"""4 tzj trj = <: tzj ..... c;") > ::= ~ :-'l ~ 0 ~ Z BANYAN TOWNHOYES g I g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z NP t""" ~ ! ~ ~ C]1 ~ .. "'" --1 ~ ~ ~ 0> ~ ~s ~ ~i ~H .'" YACHTSMAN'S COVE I BOYNTON BEACH, FLA. ~~ ~;I;Hf {~i~i~[~~ r:~;i~~h [i f;i~~~;f .a If Hi -. ~~ !i; !! ~~~ ~~ Otll{ J.,!. .l~ ~ ~ . ~ ~H n ~ g. d!;! h$i ~ 2 ~~ ! ,~.. "J> ~ n 0 >-3 0 tzj Z >-3 n ::c tzj ~ tzj u.l ~ P:> ~ 'tl cj > > ~ u.l ~ u.l ::= ~ 0 ~ > ~ rJ1 > >-3 ~ a:: > ~ >-3 C1 ::c ~ tzj ~ ::= < tzj ,; ...... > l;") ::= [~ ~ :-3 ii'~ 10 ~ ~z BANYAN T01fNHOMBS 0 ~ g ~ ~ 200 m p ~ 1\:)0 ~ ~ ~ ~ C)1 t""' ~ .. 0l>- eo ~ ~ .. ~ 0> ~ !as ~ ~i U~ Z fTl S' en o. OY I " 0, r }> 0 fTl ~1------------------ . YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLA. v EXHIBIT B n [;iiHf iiiPlh~ ~:~~~i~i ~ !.!" i'~.~ ~i ~Er~t'" rj ft8ii - '. ~~ ~i: Ht' 13'~t:'~" . ~~A" <l Ei ..~ i~ [i~ i Hi m rf ~ i ;t ~~ 0 ~o ,Ii m !"i Q,!t !! ~~ .l..!. ~i EXHIBIT B G) Ul -l }J m ::J: 0 n ...... 0 }J c c 0 c z (i c z z ~ ~ '1 0 0 " " .! " " r " " 0 r r 0 0 0 }J 0 0 }J }J "1J "1J "1J S;; S;; S;; z c c ':1 z II ~ z z '1 ;1 '1 rj rj rj c c c i~ z z z '1 :1 '1 '1 0; 0; 0; ,I c c c z ~ ~ 'I '1 rj rj rj ,- I I C c ':1 I I I Z z '1 I 11 '1 '1 " I " " ~ ~: I ~: ~ ~: I L_ c z '1 0; c z '1 0; 'I 11 3 STORY - 6 UNIT BUILDING FLOOR PLANS Di ~ I )> I ! ~! iLl I " i il N ~ ? ~ 0 ~ ~ p ~ ....... c ~ 0; ~ p. ~ i m YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA (J) ...... -I m ""'C I o -I o 3: m -I ;;0 ...... () (J) ""'C [ ~ PHOTOMETRIes )> I ! ~l . , I ~i co ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~ ~ I VI EXHIBIT B I I I ! ~- _of :--:;~---------------------7 ~, ------~---------------------7 ~. ~ V> .~~, ~~. ---l>.J.... ..... !;LJ(!)... ___ : ~ ~/i/f ~~ ~ ",:.." ~,~,~~, ~ 1 Ff ~ I I 'rt1J ~ 3 ~ ~j ~ ...J .,.".-, -C [ /: I! I I i f I UI iiJL; :: ~ I ! ! I I I r--:-f-1 iJ':- ~ ~ L-I1wl ~ . i I ~L---~~~;~~~~-~~-l<J~:~~~~mo~ ~~ : / i ; : : : : I tfJ)l ----;;~::~;-..-~~-;-;-~-;-Th~:.~lj,irf ~~i i 3if/ ,: i: : :; : . . ~ ..... <Dlf) ~ ----v< <D (i)N If)---m" ~ r..... f I f'-- Nt..) co Ul CD ~(l) .....NI ";,;;;:~l Ii :__ _~'jf i~~j ro r ro iJ!f~~ ' · d~ ff,.,:,t--,... -mt::;.J ~ ~ \ h ,~.~ I II t: t:;> i . I~ .._ r=.~. ~~ll----"- -~z I --- I ---==-=-=- - -HE 15th PlI'C. + - - ~ ~~ L --, (Rsl="s," J ~ / 'J ~~ (; .,r --0 -. JT --CF=mf- ---<1>-' ...-- ___--1 · ~.U ';" 0 ~ .~ ~ >:0> b; ~ ..... -.-... . 1J ;;~~ ,@ t;;~W II r---H-1 ~;; ~ &. -l l ~ .~ r. / · !~ iiJ ~~ ~ d~ ~ : i ~iJ ~g f L - JJ i f=t "f~ : ~ ~~ ~6:;] - - / : 3 17-Y ~ ~- ~J f~i;- :1 gJt> ~ rE'!Ln , J n >.i~"iJ: - J;J: f i;r---~' Ii ~ ,...:.: -"--"'-'0 ;J]~ I- ----4,;~i.~~ - u;;;J f f~;; ~ ~ j .n:J K.n ~~ ~ ~ Li : (f'V~ 0 ~~....... " I -:-I~ ~ ~ I / ~0: ': __ '" ~~ ,,- Orrt'" N. ~. ~;;" :;:" ~ I ~1J 8l~; ; -LJr~'j~ ~ rr-- diJ~ "';; ; ; ~~ 'f : E' U1'<< ~- ~ '" I " rnD~(.)I <D~ I I (1jJ-l ~;- ~. Jil ~.>O. II ~ Io-~ ~ :: w I c.~ 'ff~"t-f-I 0 l1> ~ I wiit ~i i pm -J-;J. E~J-l iiJ ~~ : > I R,tl- 'ill" '" ~ 1 0 ~ f l /0 ~ ': ~: ~m~ c; .;; ~ _ }J ~ ~1.J ~ ')t: ; ~1 ~- ~ 31 t~ ~ rr ~ ~ ; ; fi ~ ~ ;;& ~; : L -p;; c;..3.il l ~ 7'P~- ~f59:' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ r~ ~ :~EL;;; ~r~f f (1 ~ ~ 1 /-E..-c; 00 r--. i: ut~ t;;::; ~ / / .~ rv",,,, =~L:J ,I' alj~~ // /: / ~. "" ..... ..... u U to ~ ""~ 11l:.,.. I / '--:jE ~)~: ~ ;;"'~ '; :; ~ :; ;; t;;~~~,;,~ ~ Y/ R~ ~ ~:: :: .:: t; ~ : 6 ~ ~:t>~ ~ ~ e ~ 6/ ~ I ~ / / f/"'''" ~ iiJ; ;lJ.~ :i~A 6 ~ ~~: ;;-:'It;;(j),;:~i t:i // 0$ '-- t P ~~ 9il Co ~ gf "'~ ~ ~ I I / / f ::..::: _ _ _ -<1l ~ _0_ ~ _ _ ill _ _ ill I- _ _ L / '>i / CD!-" ~ ?')> l/t:o I ~--:rtr ~ j--~- -~ -~ --[~ ~f! / \.- _ -=tH- _ ~~ ..-, H''''' '''''- +- KP.- I .,." J ~ V \'- -} f---- ---f -Tf---- ,,,", :.? - I JI o m ~ r- :r G1 :r ~ -< I J I 66 J: ~+T. ! ! r,+, i I ~1d ! I i ,! 5 I I i ! I I I i i ~~ I I I I I , , I I ~ .. ; ; / /:: ~+-r I ~~, OCEAN INLET DRIVE i)> D~ " ~ ~ i -' ;~ ~ ; ~ . ~ YACHTSMAN'S COVE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Yachtsman's Cove File number: NWSP 06-003 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a January 10. 2006 Planning and Zoning date stamp marking, DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 1. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering, 2. Incorporate a second handicap visitor parking space in the northwest comer of the project. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 3. The applicant shall proceed through the abandonment process (through the P&Z Department) for road relocation and accompanying abandonment for NE 15th Place. 4. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 5. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) Please provide photometrics as part of your TART plan submittals. 6. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A. Lb.). 7. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-feet and 8 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). 8. The medians on Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr., along the south side of NE 15th PI., and the pocket park on the east side of the Yachtsman Cover plaza have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Bovnton Beach. Anv damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as COA.doc 02/08/06 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and revise Note #7 (Sheet L2) to include all the above stated information. 9. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. 10. Ensure tree species specified along Federal Hwy will not conflict with the overhead power lines. Add a note to the plan requiring the landscape architect and contractor to use FPL's "Right Tree / Right Place" publication for plantings near power lines. 11. Staff recommends the use of cultivars such as "High-Rise" or "Cathedral" for the Live Oaks to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. 12. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 13. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 14. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 15. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). COA.doc 02/08/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 16. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-l6(b)). 17. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. The submitted plan does (per se) meet this requirement, however, it does not reflect an existing fire hydrant along the east side of Federal Highway (at the existing intersection of NE 15th Place), and in addition, will require an additional fire hydrant along Ocean Inlet Drive just southwest of the recreational swimming pool area. 18. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 19. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 20. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancv. 21. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 22. Please provide engineering calculations supporting the proposed water main design, including documentation that required fire flows will be met. 23. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit aoolication. FIRE Comments: None COA.doc 02/08/06 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT POLICE Comments: None BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 24. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 25. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 26. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table 1607.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 27. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 28. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 29. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: . The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD' s surface water management construction development regulations." . From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. . Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 30. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. COA.doc 02/08/06 5 DEPARTMENTS 31. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall. Identify the type of wall material and the type of material that supports the wall, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall that includes the depth that the wall supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall shall comply with the wall regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 32. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story pool building, provide the following: · Will the pool building be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? · Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the pool building? · Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? · Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the pool building. 33. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 34. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 35. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. · The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) INCLUDE REJECT COA.doc 02/08/06 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unity of Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels, or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 37. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 38. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: · A legal description of the land. · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 39. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 40. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 41. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 42. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (Chapter 4, Section 7.BA) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. COA.doc 02/08/06 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 43. Any dwelling unit that has the optional elevator installed shall comply with the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Additional requirements of the Fair Housing Act may be applicable, such as parking and accessible routes. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 44. Park Impact Fee - 61 Single-family Attached DU's @ $771.00 each = $47,031.00. Payment to be made prior to issuance of first permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 45. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to be preserved in place, relocated or removed and replaced on site. The replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet L2. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]. 46. All shade and palm trees on the Trees and Palms List must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida # 1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any gray wood (gw) or clear trunk (c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C. 2.1- 47. The landscape plan proposes four (4) Brazilian Beautyleaf trees along the north property line. Staff recommends substituting these trees with a native canopy tree. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 48. Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for abandonment of Northeast 15th Place (ABAN 06-001) and land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06-003). 49. A traffic study was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency review in order to ensure an adequate level of service. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the proposed redevelopment project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Furthermore, the County would support the re-alignment of the eastern COA.doc 02/08/06 8 DEPARTMENTS segment of Northeast 15th Place, to align with the segment west of Federal Highway, to eliminate the 110 feet offset. The Division suggests the developer conduct a "traffic signal warrant analysis" at the re-aligned intersection, as suggested by the developer's traffic engineer. The traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. No building permits are to be issued after the build-out date of 2008. 50. Although not dimensioned on the elevations, the peak of the decorative cupolas would be 46 feet - nine (9) inches height. At the time of permitting, the elevation pages would have to be revised to indicate the height dimension of the decorative cupolas. Furthermore, the peak of the cupolas cannot exceed 45 feet in height or the developer would have to request and be approved for a height exception. 51. With regards to the east property line, staff commends the developer for substituting the three (3)-story models with the two (2)-story townhouse models / recreation area where it abuts the single-family neighborhood. However, the building at the northeast comer of the project is still proposed at three (3) stories. Staff anticipates that the proposed height and proximity of Building 1 (to the adjacent lot to the east) would negatively impact said lot. Therefore, staff is recommending one (1) of the following two (2) solutions: Either eliminate the easternmost unit of Building 1 (depicted as Model "A" of Building 1 on the site plan) or reduce the height of Model "A" from three (3)- stories to two (2)-stories. This modification will help the project comply with the compatibility requirement of the IPUD zoning district. 52. At the time of permitting, on the site plan tabular data, indicate the square footage and percentage distribution of pervious surface and also indicate the proposed lot coverage per Chapter 4, Section 7. Note that lot coverage cannot exceed more than 50 percent (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.). 53. At the time of permitting, provide a detail of the fountain / sculpture proposed on the landscape plan (sheet Ll). Include its dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 54. All building elevations, including the cabana, should indicate paint manufacturer's name and color codes (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 55. In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from private property to "buffer tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. 56. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bougainvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have six (6) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe- sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. INCLUDE REJECT COA.doc 02/08/06 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 57. The subject site is located along Palm Tran Bus Route 1. Staff recommends installing an upgraded shelter if a Palm Tran stop is located along Federal Highway, abutting the subiect proiect. 58. As proposed in the new site plan, southbound egress (onto Federal Highway) will occur from the re-aligned Northeast 15th Place. However, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) staff in discussions with I.N.C.A. recommends that the developer create a new left-hand stacking lane (on the northbound side of Federal Highway) approximately 550 feet north of the proposed intersection of Northeast 15th Place and Federal Highway. This new left-hand stacking lane would allow for V-turn traffic movements onto southbound Federal Highway. This would allow for an alternative and safer method for southbound egress onto Federal Highway from the subject project. The developer would be responsible for the cost of said improvements should the Florida Department of Transportation approve the concept. 59. Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) staff is requiring a detail on site plan of how overhead utilities along Federal Highway will be installed underground. 60. No individual swimming pools or screened enclosures are proposed (or requested by the developer) and would be noted as such within the Home Owners Association documents. Likewise, the developer does not intend to screen-in the balconies either. 61. A six (6)-foot high wall is proposed along the entire perimeter of the north property line of the subject property. This may conflict with the six (6)-foot high pre-cast concrete wall that was already approved along the south property line for the Seaview Park Club project. This could be a potential conflict because it would create a situation where there would be a narrow gap between the subject property's proposed buffer wall and the approved buffer wall (on the abutting property to the north). Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant works with the abutting property owner to the north to see ifthere may be mutual interest in eliminating one (1) of the walls where two (2) are proposed. Also, staff recommends extending the wall along the entire perimeter of the east property line of the subject property. This will help buffer the subject property from the residential neighborhood to the east as well as to help screen the intrusion of automobile headlights on neighboring properties from parking areas and driveways. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMENTS: Comments: 62. To be determined. CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: COA.doc 02/08/06 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 63. To be determined. MWRlelj S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJ ECTS\Yachtsmans Cove\NWSP 06-003\COA.doc Johnson. Eric From: Sent: To: Subject: Brooks, Vivian Wednesday, February 08,200610:49 AM Johnson, Eric RE: Reject. Thanks Vivian L. Brooks Planning Director Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Agency 635 E. Ocean Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33435 561-737-3256 561-737 -3258 brooksvi@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us From: Johnson, Eric Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:49 AM To: Brooks, Vivian Cc: Breese, Ed Subject: Vivian, You had the following comment for Yachtsman's Cove: Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) staff is requiring the site plan be modified to identify the locations for public art on site plan. The site plan shows the location of the art but it doesn't identify the actual art itself. Your comment seems to be fulfilled. How do we want to proceed with this? Do we want to keep the comment? Reject the commment? Revise the comment? Thanks, Eric 1 . ((7...~....'. \'\~ . I 'i.r / ;') >J DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-020 TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner Planning & Zoning Division FROM: Eric Johnson, Planner Planning & Zoning Division H. David Kelley, Jr., PEfpSM~/ City Engineer DATE: February 3,2006 REF: Memo #06-005 dated 1/11/06 E-mail dated 2/01/06 SUBJECT: Proposed Abandonment of NE 15th Place for Yachtsman Cove As I stated to you in the above noted e-mail correspondence (and in receipt of your Memorandum #06- 019, dated 1/31/06), this office has reviewed and accepted the latest version of the legal description for the proposed abandonment of a portion of NE 15th Place. This latest version is subsequent to our Memorandum noted above. We suggest that a proviso be added to the agenda item that will be prepared for the City Commission action on the ordinance that will be required for the abandonment process to proceed. That proviso should read (to this effect): "This abandonment shall not take effect until the proposed relocated portion of NE 15th Place had been reviewed and accepted by the City Commission through the re-platting of the existing Yachtman's Cove commercial area into the proposed townhome development. " If you need any further clarification, or have any questions, please advise me at x6988. HDK/ck xc: Laurinda Logan, PE, Sr. Engr. Mike Rumpf, Dir. ofP&Z Div. Peter Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Abandonment - NE 15th PI for Yachtsman Cove. doc Johnson, Eric From: Sent: To: Subject: Mazzella, Pete Wednesday, January 25, 20064:25 PM Johnson, Eric RE: Yachtsman's Cove NWSP 06-003 Eric Answers below. Pete From: Sent: To: Subject: Johnson, Eric Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:43 AM Mazzella, Pete Yachtsman's Cove NWSP 06-003 Pete, As you know, the Yachtsman's Cove site plan (for 61 fee-simple townhouse units) is scheduled for the February 14, 2006 CRA meeting. As such, I need to indicate how potable water and sanitary sewer services will be provided for. Please complete the following paragraph. Thanks, Eric The City's water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water for this project (project estimated to require a total of 26,300 gallons per day). Local piping and infrastructure improvements may be required, especially on the water delivery system for the project, depending upon the final project configuration and fire-flow demands. These local improvements would be the responsibility of the site developer and would be reviewed at the time of permitting. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is currently available to serve the projected total of 13,000 gallons per day, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the site plan (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). 1 .' ATLANTIS Environmental Engineering, Inc. Civil & Ellvirollmelllal Engineering January 10, 2006 City of Boynton Beach Planning & Zoning Division 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Attn: Sherie Coale Re: Yachtsman's Cove Dear Sir: We received your comments with respect to the above referenced project and provide herein our responses. Albert R. apeliini, P.E. Atlantis Environmental Engineering, Inc. 1311 Newport Center Drive West, Suite C, Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442 Tel: (954) 428-6300 / Fax: (954) 428-0122 1514 Broadway, Suite 201, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 E-mail: atlantis@carolina.net Engineers . Scientists . General Contractors Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-06.} ~-E 1 of 29 PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL Comment 1 Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). Response 1 Refuse to be individual unit pick up in city approved containers. Comment 2 Provide a minimum inside turning radius of 35-ft. at all intersections for Solid Waste turning movements. Response 2 35' turning radius provided. See SP-1 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC Comment 3 Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. Response 3 Acknowledged - Submitted November 23, 2005 - RE-SUBMITTED Comment 4 On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. Responses 4 Architectural Site Plan to show information of permit drawings. Comment 5 Increase double yellow lane separators to a minimum 20-ft. length at all stop bars. Response 5 Acknowledged Comment 6 Incorporate a second handicap visitor parking space in the northwest corner of the project. Response 6 N/A, Parking spaces deleted by relocated Building 1 height/setback requirements. See sheet SP-1 Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-06'1 L-E 2 of 29 Comment 7 On-street parking will not be permitted along the NE 15th Place. Response 7 Acknowledged Comment 8 A dedicated right turn lane is required at the west end of NE 15th Place onto Federal Hwy. Response 8 Provided. See sheet SP-1 ENGINEERING Comment 9 Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. Response 9 Provided. See note 8, sheet SP-2 Comment 10 All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. Response 10 Acknowledged. See general note under index of drawings, sheet SP-1. Comment 11 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. Response 11 Acknowledged Comment 12 The applicant shall proceed through the abandonment process (through the P&Z Department) for road relocation and accompanying abandonment for NE 15th Place. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0612-E 3 of 29 Response 12 Acknowledged Comment 13 Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. Response 13 Acknowledged Comment 14 Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. Response Provided. See all sheets. Comment 15 Correct discrepancies between the survey and plan sheets to accurately depict the medians in Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr. The survey accurately depicts the Ocean Inlet Dr. median as continuous from Federal Hwy. east. The site and landscape plans indicate a break in the median. Response 15 Medians corrected. See SP-1 Comment 16 Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.4.) If possible please provide photometries as part of your TRC plan submittals - it is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit! Response 16 Will provide prior to 2nd submission as allowed. (Sentence 3 on comment cover.) Comment 17 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b.) Response 17 Acknowledged Comment 18 Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0bI2-E 4 of 29 Response 18 Acknowledged Comment 19 The medians on Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr., along the south side of NE 15th Pl., and the pocket park on the east side of the Yachtsman Cover plaza have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds ~ivision of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and revise Note #7 (Sheet L2) to include all the above stated information. Response 19 Acknowledged Comment 20 Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. Response 20 Acknowledged Comment 21 Ensure tree species specified along Federal Hwy will not conflict with the overhead power lines. Response 21 Acknowledged Comment 22 Staff recommends the use of cultivars such as "High-Rise" or "Cathedral" for the Live Oaks to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. Response 22 Acknowledged Comment 23 Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P.) Response 23 Acknowledged Comment 24 Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0612-E 5 of 29 Response 24 Acknowledged Comment 25 Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Response 25 Acknowledged Comment 26 Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Response 26 Acknowledged UTILITIES Comment 27 - AEI - B Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. Response 27 Acknowledged Comment 28 All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. Response 28 Acknowledged - Site plan revised Comment 29 Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0b12-E 6 of 29 Response 29 Acknowledged Comment 30 Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). Response 30 Acknowledged Comment 31 The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on, each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. The submitted plan does (per se) meet this requirement, however, it does not reflect an existing fire hydrant along the east side of Federal Highway (at the existing intersection of NE 151h Place), and in addition, will require an additional fire hydrant along Ocean Inlet Drive just southwest of the recreational swimming pool area. Response 31 Acknowledged - SHEETS C1 &C2 Comment 32 The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. Response 32 Acknowledged Comment 33 Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). Response 33 Acknowledged - WILL SUBMIT FINAL EASEMENT DOCS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CODE Comment 34 This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0b 12-E 7 of 29 Response 34 Acknowledged Comment 35 A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. Response 35 Acknowledged Comment 36 PVC material is not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP. Response 36 Acknowledged Comment 37 Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. Response 37 Acknowledged Comment 38 The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. Response 38 Acknowledged - SHEETS C-3 Comment 39 The City has an existing Lift Station in the Ocean Inlet Dr. median. Please indicate if any proposed improvements in connection with this project will impact this lift station. Response 39 Acknowledged Comment 40 Water main sizes are shown larger than normally installed for the service mains for this size project. In addition, the existing water mains serving both Ocean Inlet Dr. and NE 15th PI. are 6-in. diameter, not 8-in. as indicated. Further, some of the water main currently in existing NE 15th PI. is not shown at all to which abandonment and/or relocation should be indicated. To add to the confusion, the plan reflects a water interconnect between the two (2) roadways at the east property line, when there is none. Sheet C-3 needs to be corrected and resubmitted for proper evaluation. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-06"1 ~-E 8 of 29 Also please note that all existing utility lines located in current NE 15th PI. are not shown, which would need to be abandoned and removed before any buildings could be erected in the conflict area. The applicant needs to show the existing force main from Lift Station #203 (located in Ocean Inlet Dr.); this will validate that no interference with its function will occur. Response 40 Acknowledged - SHEETS C-1 & C-3 Comment 41 Please provide engineering calculations supporting the proposed water main design, including documentation that required fire flows will be met. Response 41 Acknowledged - DOCUMENTATION 10 Comment 42 Water meter banks as depicted on the plans are not acceptable. Each townhome shall have a service connection and associated water meter from the main to the front of the home. Response 42 Acknowledged - SHEETS C-1 & C-3 Comment 43 Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Response 43 Acknowledged Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0612-E 9 of 29 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plans FIRE Comment 1 During construction all roads shall be compacted to 32 tons to accommodate Fire Department apparatus. These roads shall be maintained from the finished road to the site of vertical construction. The pouring of the slab is considered vertical construction. See FOOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division II, Section 160, Stabilizing. Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around shall be provided throughout construction. Should any Fire Department vehicle become stuck due to poor roads or turn around, the developer shall be liable for any cost inclined. All gates and turn around systems will be tested with a Fire Department engine before construction begins and before a CO is issued. Response 1 Acknowledged Comment 2 All gates shall have a KNOX padlock or entry system. Gates shall have a width of 12 foot in the clear if they are one way and 20' in the clear if two way. Response 2 N/A Comment 3 Provide a sheet that clearly shows the location of the fire hydrants and the size of the mains feeding these hydrants. Provide hydraulic calculations using a flow test conducted by the Boynton Beach Fire Department that show fire flow of not less than 1500 gpm @ 20 psi. Buildings shall not be more that 200 feet from a hydrant. All hydrants shall be operable before vertical construction can begin. Response 3 Acknowledged - SHEETS C-1 & C-3 - Flow test has been ordered Comment 4 Site address shall be posted before construction begins and maintained throughout the project. This address shall be visible from the main road, in numbers not less than 6" high that contrast with their background. Response 4 Acknowledged Comment 5 All buildings, regardless of their purpose, that are 30' high or taller, shall have an Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 L-E 10 of 29 approved NFPA 13 or 13R fire sprinkler system. This distance is measured to the underside of the highest point of the building from the point of lowest entry. See Chapter 9, Section 7-2-2A 1. An external signaling device shall be installed to alert passers by and dwellers that a sprinkler head has activated. A horn/strobe is preferred. Response 5 Will be provided on Permit Drawings Comment 6 Any living unit with an attached parking garage shall have a carbon monoxide detector installed within the living unit and tied into the smoke detectors. Response 6 Will be provided on Permit Drawings POLICE Comment 7 It is recommended that a photometric light study be completed to show that standards are met and the site has safe lighting levels. Response 7 Will be provided on Permit Drawings BUILDING DIVISION Comment 8 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. Response 8 Acknowledged Comment 9 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. Response 9 Provided. See sheet SP-2 Comment 10 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3 Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-06.IL-E 11 of 29 Response 10 Provided. See sheet SP-2 Comment 11 The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. Response 11 N/A Comment 12 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Response 12 Will be provided on Permit Drawings. Signed and sealed calculations will submitted at permit Comment 13 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. Response 13 Will be provided on Permit Drawings. See note 2, sheet SP-2. Signed and sealed calculations will submitted at permit Comment 14 Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table 1607.1. Indicate the live load (psf) on the plans for the building design. Response 14 Will be provided on Permit Drawings. Comment 15 Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-00 ,2-E 12 of 29 Response 15 Will be provided on Permit Drawings. Comment 16 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. Response 16 Will be provided on Permit Drawings. Comment 17 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Response 17 Will be provided on Permit Drawings. Comment 18 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: . The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation NGVD is above the highest 1 DO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." Response: Noted. See sheet SP-1 & SP-2 . From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. Response: . Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). Response: Noted. See sheet SP-1 & SP-2 Comment 19 Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall. Identify the type of wall material and the type of material that supports the wall, including the typical distance between supports Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall that includes the depth that the wall supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061.<:-1:0 13 of 29 shall comply with the wall regulations specified in the Zoning Code. Response 19 Provided. See Detail 2/SP-2 on sheet SP-2 Comment 20 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. Response 20 Provided. See sheet SP-1 Comment 21 As required by the CBBCO, Part 01 titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. Response 21 Provided. See dimensions on Sheet SP-1 Comment 22 To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story pool building, provide the following: . Will the pool building be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? Response: Yes . Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the pool building? Response: Yes . Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? Response: Individual residence Le.: USPS, OED EX, etc. . Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Response: Yes, H.O.A. to contract out. Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the pool building. Response: Acknowledged Comment 23 Add to the floor plan drawing of the pool building a breakdown of the floor Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 L-t: 14 of 29 area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated for the pool building and other uses located within the building. Specify the total floor area that is air- conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor spaces. Response 23 Provided. See sheet A-20S Comment 24 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. Response 24 Acknowledged Comment 25 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. Response 25 At permitting Comment 26 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: . The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. . If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. . The number of dwelling units in each building. . The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. . The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) Response 26 Acknowledged Comment 27 At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels, or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061'L-1:O 15 of 29 Response 27 At permitting Comment 28 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. Response 28 Acknowledged Comment 29 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: . A legal description of the land. . The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. . 1.f the project is a multi-family project, the building numberls must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. . The number of dwelling units in each building. . The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) Response 29 At permitting Comment 30 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. Response 30 Provided. See note 8 on sheet SP-2 Comment 31 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. Response 31 Acknowledged Comment 32 Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 L-E 16 of 29 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. Response 32 At Permitting Comment 33 Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LRD, Chapter 4, Section 7.8.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. Response 33 Will provide prior to 2nd submission as allowed. (Sentence 3 on comment cover.) Comment 34 Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be on each floor and within the building. Response 34 Provided. See sheets A-801 through A-804 Comment 35 Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building. Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable floor plan drawing: · Common area covered walkways; Covered stairways; Common area balconies; Entrance area outside of a unit Storage areas (not part of a unit); Garages (not part of a unit); Elevator room; · Electrical room; Mechanical room; Trash room; Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and · Any other area under roof (Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3) Response 35 Applies only to Pool Pavilion. See sheet A-205. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 Z-t: 17 of 29 Comment 36 Any dwelling unit that has the optional elevator installed shall comply with the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Additional requirements of the Fair Housing Act may be applicable, such as parking and accessible routes. Response 36 See note 9 on sheet SP-2 PARKS AND RECREATION Comment 37 Park Impact Fee - 61 Single-family Attached DW's @ $771.00 each = $47,031.00. Payment to be made prior to issuance of first permit. Response 37 Acknowledged COMMENTS 38-49 ARE LANDSCAPE Comment 38 Trees must have a 3" caliper at DBH. Response 38 Acknowledged Comment 39 Plan must include two of the City's signature trees. Response 39 Acknowledged Comment 40 Irrigation must use a non-potable water source, have 110% coverage, provide a bubbler at each trees and separate zones for planting and sod areas. Response 40 Acknowledged Comment 41 Above ground mechanical equipment must be screened using cocoplum. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 ,,-E 18 of 29 Response 41 Acknowledged FORESTERlENV1 RONMENT ALlST ExistinQ Trees ManaQement Plan Sheet L2 Comment 42 The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to be preserved in place, relocated or removed and replaced on site. The replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet L2. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Response 42 Acknowledged Plant and Materials List Sheet L2 Comment 43 All shade and palm trees on the Trees and Palms List must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be larger than 121-141 to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any gray wood (gw) or clear trunk (c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.] Response 43 Acknowledged Comment 44 The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] Response 44 Acknowledged Comment 45 The planting details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. Response 45 Acknowledged Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 L-E 19 of 29 Comment 46 The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the gray wood, clear trunk and height of all of the palm trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. Response 46 Acknowledged Comment 47 The white bird of paradise plant listed (L2) should all have a spread size. Response 47 Acknowledged Comment 48 The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection. Response 48 Acknowledged Comment 49 The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. Response 49 Acknowledged Comment 50 The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of planting to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings from the Federal Highway right-of-way. Response 50 Acknowledged Irriaation Plan Comment 51 Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. Response 51 N/ A Permitting Comment 52 Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0612-E 20 of 29 Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] Response 52 N/A Permitting PLANNING AND ZONING Comment 53 At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. Response 53 Provided Comment 54 At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 81/4 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. Response 54 Provided Comment 55 Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review, the last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. Response 55 All comments have been addressed that pertain to this office's discipline. Comment 56 Project compatibility will be judged on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting properties. Provide elevations and cross- sections showing adjacent structures within this site plan application (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.g.(1)). In the past, the Community Redevelopment Agency Board (CRA) Board has been very diligent in requesting developers to provide a drawing that shows what the project would look like when viewing the subject property from an adjacent property, in this case, from the east. Therefore, staff recommends that you provide a supplemental drawing that shows the east elevations (abutting the single-family homes) that depicts the buildings with the plant material at maturity. Response 56 Provided. See sheet A-405. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-0612-t:: 21 of 29 Comment 57 Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for abandonment of Northeast 15th Place (ABAN 06- 001) and land use amendment I rezoning (LUAR 06-003). Response 57 Acknowledged Comment 58 It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007 Response 58 Acknowledged Comment 59 A unity of title may be required. The Building Division of the Department of Development will determine its applicability. Response 59 Acknowledged Comment 60 Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. Response 60 Acknowledged Comment 61 The traffic impact analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes prior to the issuance of any building permits. Response 61 Acknowledged - re-submitted Comment 62 The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach County regarding school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building permit. It would be preferable to have this approval prior to the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting (February 14, 2006). Response 62 Acknowledged - re-submitted Comment 63 A drainage statement is required prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting . Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 ,,-E 22 of 29 (Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.). Response 63 Acknowledged - SHEET C-3 Comment 64 Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. Response 64 Acknowledged Comment 65 The IPUD zoning district perimeter setbacks shall mirror setbacks of adjacent zoning district(s) but with a minimum of the setback required for a single-family residence as determined by the orientation of the structures in the IPUD (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.3.). The property to the north is zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) and was approved with a similar, multi-family residential project. The buildings in the project to the north were approved with a 48.32-foot setback from the north property line of the subject project. The site plan for the subject project proposes a 10-foot north (side) setback. This is acceptable, given the fact that both projects will have comparable-sized landscape buffers. The property to the south is right-of-way for Ocean Inlet Drive, and then further south is a developed, multi-family residential project zoned IPUD. The townhouse buildings inside Murano Bay are setback 16 feet from its north property line, adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive. The site plan of the subject property proposes a 10- foot south setback, adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive. This is acceptable. The properties to the east are zoned Single-family Residential (R-1-AA). These lots have been developed with single-family detached homes and the IPUD regulations specifically addresses compatibility requirements with these types of developments. The sides of these single- family detached homes abut the subject property. The side setback of the R-1-AA zoning district is 10 feet. In addition, it should be noted that a structure on the perimeter of an IPUD project that is adjacent to an existing single-family neighborhood must adhere to additional setback requirements. The IPUD regulations require an additional one (1) foot building setback for each one (1) foot in building height that exceeds 30 feet. Staff cannot determine if the 10-foot setback would be an acceptable setback because the proposed building heights are not correctly identified on the elevations. Please note that according to Chapter 2, Section 5.LA.g.(2), if vegetation, screening or other bathers and / or creative design on the perimeter of an IPUD achieve compatibility with adjacent uses, the city may grant some relief from the following: Structures on the perimeter of an IPUD project, in addition to the basic setback requirements, must be setback one (1) additional foot for each one (1) foot in height for the perimeter structures that exceed 30 feet. A landscape bather is defined as follows: A near solid element combining a wall and / or natural vegetation intended to block all direct and reasonable views. It shall be comprised of a berm, buffer wall and / or natural vegetation (as deemed appropriate by the city) consisting of various trees species planted tip-to-tip in two or more staggered rows. Land to the west is right-of-way for Federal Highway. . Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061 ;!-E 23 of 29 Therefore, minimum required setbacks cannot be determined for the west property line of the subject property. The site plan proposes a 10-foot setback along the west property line. This is acceptable. Response 65 Northeast building relocated. See sheet SP-1. Comment 66 The code defines building height as follows: The vertical distance in feet measured from the lowest point at the property line of an adjacent property or from the minimum base flood elevation as established by FEMA, whichever is highest, to the highest point of the roof for flat roofs, to the deck line for mansard roofs and parapet roofs with parapets less than five (5) feet in height. Gable and hip roof heights shall be measured to the midpoint between the eaves and the ridge. On all elevation pages, indicate the proposed building heights. Also, include the dimension of the peak of the highest portion of the roof. Response 66 Provided. See sheets A-401 through A-404 Comment 67 With regards to the east property line, staff commends the developer for substituting the three (3)-story models with the two (2)-story townhouse models / recreation area where it abuts the single-family neighborhood. However, the building at the northeast corner of the project is still proposed at three (3) stories. Staff recommends replacing the entire building (or at the very least, the easternmost portion of the buildings) with the two (2)- story model. This modification will help the project comply with the compatibility requirement of the IPUD zoning district. Response 67 The building in question has been relocated to comply with height/setback requirements. This building also complies with the adjacent zoning of allowable 3-story single-family structures. Comment 68 It is a basic public expectation that landowners requesting the use of the IPUD district will develop design standards that exceed the standards of the basic development standards in terms of site design, building architecture, and construction materials, amenities and landscape design (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.l.b.). The city is not obligated to automatically approve the level of development intensity request for the IPUD. Instead, it is expected to approved only such level of intensity that is appropriate for a particular location in terms of land use compatibilities (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.l.c.). Response 68 Acknowledged Comment 69 Describe the proposed method of trash collection. It should be noted that dumpsters or trash containers should not be located within setbacks abutting. single-family residential . Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-06"1.::-E 24 of 29 developments (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.e.(3).). Response 69 Provided. See note 10 on sheet SP-2. Comment 70 Special emphasis should be placed on screening the intrusion of automobile headlights on neighboring properties from parking areas and driveways (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.b.(4).). Staff recommends incorporating a buffer wall into the design of the east landscape buffer where vehicle headlights could shine on abutting properties. Response 70 Islands provided. See sheet SP-1 Comment 71 Are these fee-simple townhouse units or townhouse-style condominium units? If fee- simple, revise the site pan or provide an alternate plan showing the lot lines of the fee- simple area. Also, will the 2',d story balconies extend outside of the fee-simple area? Response 71 Fee simple Comment 72 The IPUD zoning district requires 200 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit. The plan proposes 61 dwelling units, and therefore, 12,200 square feet of usable open space is required (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.3.). On the site plan tabular data (sheet 101), please indicate that 12,000 square feet of usable open space is required. The pool / clubhouse area may be used to meet this requirement. Response 72 Provided. See Site Data sheet SP-2. Comment 73 On the site plan tabular data, indicate the square footage and percentage distribution of pervious surface and also indicate the proposed lot coverage per Chapter 4, Section 7. Note that lot coverage cannot exceed more than 50 percent (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.). Response 73 Provided. See Site Data sheet SP-2. Comment 74 On the overall site plan tabular data (sheet A-1 01), indicate that the project lies within the Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan Study Area I. Response 74 Provided. See Site Data sheet SP-2. .. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061:.::-E 25 of 29 Comment 75 Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so, show its location on the site plan. Response 75 NO LIFT STATIONS Comment 76 If a fence is required around the pool/clubhouse area, provide a detail of the fence including the dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Response 76 Provided. See Site Data sheet SP-2. Comment 77 Provide a detail of the fountain / sculpture proposed on the landscape plan (sheet L 1). Include its dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Response 77 FUTURE SELECTION Comment 78 All building elevations, including the cabana, should indicate paint manufacturer's name and color codes (Chapter 4, Section 7.11). Response 78 Provided. See sheet A-205 Comment 79 Provide paint swatches for the elevations. Staff recommends using a color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.). Response 79 Previously submitted Comment 80 Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.0.2.). These will be on display at the public meetings. Response 80 Previously submitted Comment 81 Will there be a provision for outdoor patios, concrete patios, screen enclosures, or solid- roof enclosures? Please discuss these amenities with staff prior to the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. The proposed setbacks for the aforementioned amenities need to be indicated within the, overall site plan tabular data. Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061.:.-1:0 26 of 29 Response 81 See sheet SP-1 Comment 82 Are parking spaces proposed along the relocated Northeast 15th Place? If so, show their location and dimensions. Response 82 Removed. See sheet SP-1 Comment 83 Provide a drawing of a typical freestanding outdoor lighting pole. The typical drawing of the freestanding outdoor lighting poles must include the color and material. The design, style, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.1.). A minimum average light level of one (1) foot candle shall be provided, with no more than 10% of the pot readings below one (1) foot candle and none below IA foot-candle (Chapter 23, Article 11.A.1.a). Response 83 Provided. See attached 8 W' x 11". Comment 84 Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.2.). Response 84 N/A Comment 85 Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 10.F.3.). Response 85 Acknowledged Comment 86 In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from private property to "buffer tracts" that would be owned and maintained by the Home Owners' Association. Response 86 Acknowledged Comment 87 On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. Also, please indicate the proposed species and quantity on Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061..::-E 27 of 29 the landscape plan (sheet L2). This makes it much easier to determine compliance with applicable codes. Response 87 Acknowledged Comment 88 Place a note on the site plan that all above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, and back-flow preventers shall be visually screened (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Staff recommends screening the at-grade AlC units proposed behind each unit with native hedge material. Response 88 Provided. See note 1 on sheet SP-2. Comment 89 All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). This applies to the Green Malayan Coconut palm, Yellow Geiger tree, and Ligustrum tree. Response 89 Acknowledged Comment 90 The trees proposed around the townhouse and condominium buildings must be installed at IA the building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.). Response 90 Acknowledged Comment 91 Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: 1. Shade trees, 2. Palm trees, 3. Shrubs & Groundcover. On the landscape plan, indicate the total quantities within each category and their native percentages. Response 91 Acknowledged Comment 92 A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bougainvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have six (6) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. Response 92 Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061<.':: 28 of 29 Acknowledged Comment 93 Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be subject to the City Forester / Environmentalist review and approval. Response 93 Acknowledged Comment 94 All signage is subject to review and approval of the Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission. Will this development have a subdivision identification sign? If so, the sign face may not exceed 32 square feet in area. Please provide a detail showing its dimensions, sign type, exterior finish, letter font, and letter color(s) that comply with Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 1.0. The sign structure must be located at least 10 feet from the property line. Staff recommends that the sign be externally lit, with ground up-lighting. Response 94 Signage removed. See sheet SP-1. Comment 95 In the past, the CRA Board has been very diligent in requesting that developers provide a drawing that shows what the project would look like when viewing the subject property from public rights-of-way. Therefore, staff recommends providing a supplemental drawing that shows the west elevations (along Federal Highway) that depicts the buildings with the plant material shown at maturity. Response 9.5 Will provide prior to 2nd submission as allowed. (Sentence 3 on comment cover.) Comment 96 Include bike racks near the swimming pool area. Staff recommends that they be covered or sheltered. Response 96 Bike rack provided. See sheets SP-1 and SP-2. Comment 97 The Murano Bay project to the south already contains landscape material along Ocean Inlet Drive. Therefore, for this project, staff recommends matching the vegetation proposed along the south property line (adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive) with Murano Bay's landscaping. The trees in the north landscape buffer of Murano Bay include Foxtail palms and Green Buttonwood trees. Response 97 t .. . oJ Yachtsman's Cove - 2005-061.:::-t: 29 of 29 Acknowledged Comment 98 Staff recommends substituting the Cabbage palm trees (proposed along Federal Highway) with Royal palm trees. Response 98 Acknowledged Comment 99 The subject site is located along Palm Tran Bus Route 1. Staff recommends installing an upgraded shelter if a Palm Tran stop is located along Federal Highway, abutting the subject project. Response 99 Review options with City to upgrade shelter and move bus stop location. Comment 100 Although proving surplus parldng spaces is endorsed, staff recommends eliminating the space proposed at the northeast corner of the property. The elimination of this space would allow for a better perimeter landscape buffer along the east property line, abutting the existing single-family detached home. Response 100 Removed. See sheet SP-1. CRA STAFF COMMENTS . Show fencing and wall detail on site plan. Response: Provided. See sheets SP-1 & SP-2 . Provide a left hand turn lane on Federal Highway for cars exiting N. E. 15th Place. Response: Provided. See sheet SP-1 . Show detail on site plan of how overhead utilities along Federal Highway will be installed underground. Response: . Identify locations for public on site plan. Response: Provided. See sheet SP-1 Yachtsman's Cove - City of Boynton Beach -1/9/06 1 st review Comments - Landscape Comment Responses 33. Complied 38. Complied 39. Complied 40. See Note on Pian 41. Complied 42. See Note on Plan - TBD 43. Complied 44. Complied 45. Complied 46. Complied 47. Complied 48. Complied 49. Complied 51. See Note on Plan 52. See Note on Plan 56. Complied 85. See Note on Plan 87. Complied 88. See Note on Plan 89. Complied 90. Complied 91. Complied 92. Complied 93. See Note on Plan 95. Complied 96. Complied 97. Complied 98. Complied 100. Complied Wayne Villavaso Landscape Architecture, Inc. 268 Flamingo Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Ph. (561) 820-1566 Fax (561) 833-6707 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-005 TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner Planning & Zoning Division H. David Kelley, Jr., PFJPS~ City Engineer FROM: DATE: January 11, 2006 SUBJECT: Proposed Abandonment of NE 15th Place for Yachtsman Cove I have reviewed the proposed legal description for the proposed abandonment of that portion ofN.E. 15th Place that will be necessary for the re-creation ofY ACHTSMAN'S COVE into the proposed townhome project. I am suggesting that the legal description submitted be modified per the following comments, in order to make it acceptable for this Division to recommend to the City Commission for abandonment via a proposed ordinance. My suggested changes are as follows: a. 2nd paragraph, 1st line, capitalize the word "Beginning". b. 2nd paragraph, 6th line, change the word "along" to read "and". c. 2nd paragraph, 10th line, replace with phrase "said West Line, along" to read "the West Line of said Lot 1, and". d. 2nd paragraph, 13th line, between the word "feet" and the word "an", add the following phrase, "and a central angle of 820 23' 00",". e. 2nd paragraph, 15th line, change the word "said" to read "the"; in the same line after the word "projection," and before the phrase "a distance", add the following phrase, "of said Right-of- Way line, " . f. 2nd paragraph, 19th line, change the word "along" to read "and". g. 2nd paragraph, 21 st line, change the word "along" to read "and"; in the same line change the second word "along" accordingly. h. 2nd paragraph, 24th line, change the word "along" to read "and". 1. 2nd paragraph, 26th & 27th lines, capitalize the words "Point of Beginning". I will review this again during the abandonment application review once that document is submitted to this Division for review and comment. I am forwarding a copy of this memorandum to Mr. Michael Purmort of Davis & Purmort, Inc. (the preparer) via mail directly for his attention. If you have any questions, please advise me at x6988. xc: Michael Purmort, PLS, via fIrst class mail. Jeff Livergood, PE, Dir. ofP.W. Laurinda Logan, PE, Sr. Engr. Mike Rumpf, Dir. ofP&Z Div. Peter Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director File S:\Engineering\KribsWachtsman Cove (NE 15th Place) Proposed Abandonment.doc rr . .------.- -~ f1 -~-f? Q , , I" r :, -- -- .' fl < \. -----~ II 'II' IJ ' JAN lOW 'i.01' L_______ :J proje~_~~~':-tfachtsman' Cove File number: NWSP U5-0 3 Reference: 15t review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a November 23. 2005 Planning and Zoning date stamp marking ~~, \2. i-- It; \J IIJ IS .st REVIEW COM~hs.~\ New Site Plan, n,l \.. ~ 1 -:-~,~~ , _-.... "J j .< ~!-- ctsl-e,~ "' DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section L,/ 10-26 (a). 2. Provide a minimum inside turning radius of 35 feet at all intersections for -:7 Solid Waste turning movements. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance / Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control V devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. / 5. Increase double yellow lane separators to a minimum 20-foot length at all / stop bars. 6. Incorporate a second handicap visitor parking space in the northwest comer V" of the project. ~ 7. On-street parking will not be permitted along the NE 15th Place. / 8. A dedicated right turn lane is required at the west end ofNE 15th Place onto t/ Federal Hwy. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: /' 9. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific / permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm V Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 10. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be V reflected on all appropriate sheets. II. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional V comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 12. The applicant shall proceed through the abandonment process (through the V P&Z Department) for road relocation and accompanying abandonment for NE 15th Place. 13. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A V preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Develooment Permit. 14. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. V 15. Correct discrepancies between the survey and plan sheets to accurately depict the medians in Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr. The survey /' accurately depicts the Ocean Inlet Dr. median as continuous from Federal Highway east. The site and landscape plans indicate a break in the median. 16. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.BA.) Please provide photometrics as part of your TART plan /' submittals. 17. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, / Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.l.b.) 18. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-feet and 8 V feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 19. The medians on Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr., along the south side of / NE 15th PI., and the pocket park on the east side of the Yachtsman Cover plaza have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and revise Note #7 (Sheet L2) to include all the above stated information. 20. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive V aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. 21. Ensure tree species specified along Federal Hwy will not conflict with the ~ overhead power lines. 22. Staff recommends the use of cultivars such as "High-Rise" or "Cathedral" ./ for the Live Oaks to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high- profile vehicles. 23. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways ./ and shall be six (6) inches thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P.) , 24. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof V (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). 25. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of r/ permitting. 26. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in / accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 27. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer / services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 28. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and / landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 29. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the / water and sewer svstems serving this proiect (CODE, Section 26-12). 30. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) / with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 31. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. The submitted plan does (per se) meet this requirement, however, it does not V reflect an existing fire hydrant along the east side of Federal Highway (at the existing intersection of NE 15th Place), and in addition, will require an additional fire hydrant along Ocean Inlet Drive just southwest of the recreational swimming pool area. 32. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site t/) plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 33. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on / the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 34. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the t/ City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 35. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department t/ has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 36. PVC material is not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be V DIP. 37. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water 1/ service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other t./ appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 39. The City has an existing Lift Station in the Ocean Inlet Dr. median. Please t/ indicate if any proposed improvements in connection with this project will impact this lift station. 40. Water main sizes are shown larger than normally installed for the service mains for this size project. In addition, the existing water mains serving both Ocean Inlet Dr. and NE 15th PI. are six (6) inches in diameter, not eight (8) inches as indicated. Further, some of the water main currently in ~. existing NE 15th PI. is not shown at all to which abandonment and/or relocation should be indicated. To add to the confusion, the plan reflects a water interconnect between the two (2) roadways at the east property line, when there is none. Sheet C-3 needs to be corrected and resubmitted for proper evaluation. Also please note that all existing utility lines located in current NE 15th PI. are not shown, which would need to be abandoned and removed before any buildings could be erected in the conflict area. The applicant needs to show the existing force main from Lift Station #203 (located in Ocean Inlet Dr.); this will validate that no interference with its function will occur. 41. Please provide engineering calculations supporting the proposed water main design, including documentation that required fire flows will be met. V 42. Water meter banks as depicted on the plans are not acceptable. Each townhome shall have a service connection and associated water meter from the main to the front of the home. v/ 43. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in / accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 44. During construction all roads shall be compacted to 32 tons to accommodate C/ Fire Department apparatus. These roads shall be maintained from the finished road to the site of vertical construction. The pouring of the slab is considered vertical construction. See FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division II, Section 160, Stabilizing. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around shall be provided throughout construction. Should any Fire Department vehicle become stuck due to poor roads or turn around, the developer shall be liable for any cost ~ incurred. All gates and turn around systems will be tested with a Fire Department engine before construction begins and before a CO is issued. 45. All gates shall have a KNOX padlock or entry system. Gates shall have a V width of 12 foot in the clear if they are one way and 20' in the clear if two way. 46. Provide a sheet that clearly shows the location of the fire hydrants and the size of the mains feeding these hydrants. Provide hydraulic calculations V using a flow test conducted by the Boynton Beach Fire Department that show fire flow of not less than 1500 gpm @ 20 psi. Buildings shall not be more that 200 feet from a hydrant. All hydrants shall be operable before vertical construction can begin. 47. Site address shall be posted before construction begins and maintained V throughout the project. This address shall be visible from the main road, in numbers not less than 6" high that contrast with their background. 48. All buildings, regardless of their purpose, that are 30' high or taller, shall have an approved NFP A 13 or 13R fire sprinkler system. This distance is t/ measured to the underside of the highest point of the building from the point of lowest entry. See Chapter 9, Section 7-2-2A1. An external signaling device shall be installed to alert passers by and dwellers that a sprinkler head has activated. A hom/strobe is preferred. 49. Any living unit with an attached parking garage shall have a carbon /' monoxide detector installed within the living unit and tied into the smoke detectors. POLICE Comments: 50. lt is recommended that a photometric light study be completed to show that standards are met and the site has safe lighting levels. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 51. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional / comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 52. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as ~ defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 53. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined ,/ in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. 54. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of / construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. 55. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that / clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 56. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or / structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 57. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table t/ 1607.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 58. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic / sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 59. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents / the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 60. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the /' proposed construction. 61. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) ~ that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: . The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD' s surface water management construction development regulations." 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT . From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. /' . Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the / building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 62. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall. Identify the type of wall material and the type of material ~ that supports the wall, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall that includes the depth that the wall supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall shall comply with the wall regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 63. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. V' 64. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each / property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 65. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story pool building, provide the following: · Will the pool building be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? / · Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the pool building? . Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? . Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the pool building. 66. Add to the floor plan drawing of the pool building a breakdown of the floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, / covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated for the pool building and other uses located within the building. Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor spaces. 67. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may / not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 68. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that / utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 69. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be / provided at the time of building permit application: · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. · The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 70. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of t/' Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels, or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 71. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, V provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 72. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: V · A legal description of the land. · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 73. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting V shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 74. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, t/ the plans for this project must be submitted to the Buildinl! Division for 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 75. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- / family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 76. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR, t/ Chapter 4, Section 7 .B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. 77. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the / total area of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be on each floor and within the building. 78. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building. Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown ./ shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable floor plan drawing: . Common area covered walkways; . Covered stairways; . Common area balconies; . Entrance area outside of a unit; . Storage areas (not part of a unit); . Garages (not part of a unit); . Elevator room; . Electrical room; . Mechanical room; . Trash room; . Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and . Any other area under roof. (Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3) / 79. Any dwelling unit that has the optional elevator installed shall comply with V the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Additional requirements of the Fair Housing Act may be applicable, such as parking and accessible routes. PARKS AND RECREATION 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 80. Park Impact Fee - 61 Single-family Attached DUs @ $771.00 each = /' $47,031.00. Payment to be made prior to issuance of first permit. 81. Trees must have a 3" caliper at DBH. / 82. Plan must include two of the City's signature trees. V 83. Irrigation must use a non-potable water source, have 110% coverage, V provide a bubbler at each trees and separate zones for planting and sod areas. 84. Above ground mechanical equipment must be screened using cocoplum. V" FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Existine Trees Manaeement Plan Sheet L2 85. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of / existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to be preserved in place, relocated or removed and replaced on site. The replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet L2. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]. Plant and Materials List Sheet L2 / 86. All shade and palm trees on the Trees and Palms List must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any gray wood (gw) or clear trunk (c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.]. 87. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the ,/ minimum SIze specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] /! 88. The planting details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the V diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. - 89. The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the gray wood, V clear trunk and height of all of the palm trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection I 90. The white bird of paradise plant listed (L2) should all have a spread size. V 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 12 -1. , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 91. The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the height and ~ spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 92. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not ~ currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. 93. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of 1/ planting to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings from the Federal Highway right-of-way. Irrieation Plan V 94. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 95. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to V the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staffs comments and questions. Submit 12 sets ofrevised ~ plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. 97. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8Y2 inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each V plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 98. Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review, the / last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. 99. Project compatibility will be judged on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting properties. Provide elevations and cross-sections showing adjacent structures within this site plan application (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.g.(l)). In the past, the Community Redevelopment Agency Board (CRA) Board has been very diligent in requesting developers to provide a drawing that shows what the project would look like when viewing the subject property from an adjacent property, in this case, from the east. Therefore, staff recommends that you provide a supplemental drawing that shows the east elevations (abutting the single-family homes) that depicts the buildings with the plant material at ~ maturity. ~~ 100 Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the / accompanying request for abandonment of Northeast 15th Place (ABAN 06- 001) and land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06-003). 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 13 DEPARTMENTS 101. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the new site plan is publicly advertised in accordance with Ordinance 04-007 ~ A unity of title may be required. The Building Division of the Department of Development will determine its applicability. Abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. The traffic impact analysis must be approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for concurrency purposes prior to the issuance of any buildin ermits. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach County regarding school concurrency prior to the issuance of a building permit. It would be preferable to have this approval prior to the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting (February 14,2006). X A drainage statement is required prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2.). ~ Applicants who wish to utilize City electronic media equipment for f\,. presentations at City Commission Public Hearings must notify the Planning and Zoning Department representative at least one week prior to the scheduled meeting. Staff recommends using a PowerPoint presentation at the Community Redevelopment Agency Board meeting. 108. The IPUD zoning district perimeter setbacks shall mirror setbacks of adjacent zoning district(s) but with a minimum of the setback required for a single-family residence as determined by the orientation of the structures in the IPUD (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.3.). The property to the north is zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) and was approved with a similar, multi-family residential project. The buildings in the project to the north were approved with a 48.32-foot setback from the north property line of the subject project. The site plan for the subject project proposes a 10-foot north (side) setback. This is acceptable, given the fact that both projects will have comparable-sized landscape buffers. The property to the south is right-of-way for Ocean Inlet Drive, and then further south is a developed, multi-family residential project zoned IPUD. The townhouse buildings inside Murano Bay are setback 16 feet from its north property line, adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive. The site plan of the subject property proposes a 10- foot south setback, adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive. This is acceptable. The ro erties to the east are zoned Sin le-famil Residential (R-l-AA. These INCLUDE REJECT ~ ~ ~ c/' ./ / / v ./ / 7.. I (' . 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 14 DEPARTMENTS lots have been developed with single-family detached homes and the IPUD regulations specifically addresses compatibility requirements with these types of developments. The sides of these single-family detached homes abut the subject property. The side setback of the R-1-AA zoning district is 10 feet. In addition, it should be noted that a structure on the perimeter of an IPUD project that is adjacent to an existing single-family neighborhood must adhere to additional setback requirements. The IPUD regulations require an additional one (1) foot building setback for each one (1) foot in building height that exceeds 30 feet. Staff cannot determine if the lO-foot setback would be an acceptable setback because the proposed building heights are not correctly identified on the elevations. Please note that according to Chapter 2, Section 5.LA.g.(2), if vegetation, screening or other barriers and / or creative design on the perimeter of an IPUD achieve compatibility with adjacent uses, the city may grant some relief from the following: Structures on the perimeter of an IPUD project, in addition to the basic setback requirements, must be setback one (1) additional foot for each one (1) foot in height for the perimeter structures that exceed 30 feet. A landscape barrier is defined as follows: A near solid element combining a wall and / or natural vegetation intended to block all direct and reasonable views. It shall be comprised of a berm, buffer wall and / or natural vegetation (as deemed appropriate by the city) consisting of various trees species planted tip-to-tip in two or more staggered rows. Land to the west is right-of-way for Federal Highway. Therefore, minimum required setbacks cannot be determined for the west property line of the subject property. The site plan proposes a 10-foot setback along the west property line. This is acceptable. he code defines building height as follows: The vertical distance in feet measured from the lowest point at the property line of an adjacent property or from the minimum base flood elevation as established by FEMA, whichever is highest, to the highest point of the roof for flat roofs, to the deck line for mansard roofs and parapet roofs with parapets less than five (5) feet in height. Gable and hip roof heights shall be measured to the midpoint between the eaves and the ridge. On all elevation pages, indicate the proposed building heights. Also, include the dimension of the peak of the hi hest ortion of the roof. ecof '. CiA o{ i~"- 1\ ltf ::: 110. With regards to the east property line, staff commends the developer for substituting the three (3)-story models with the two (2)-story townhouse models / recreation area where it abuts the single-family neighborhood. However, the building at the northeast comer of the project is still proposed at three (3) stories. Staff recommends replacing the entire building (or at the very least, the easternmost portion of the buildings) with the two (2)- story model. This modification will help the project comply with the com atibili re uirement of the IPUD zonin district. \ ~ It is a basic public expectation that landowners requesting the use of the IPUD district will develop design standards that exceed the standards of the basic development standards in terms of site design, building architecture, and construction materials, amenities and landsca e desi (Cha ter 2, INCLUDE REJECT v 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 15 DEPARTMENTS Section 5.L.1.b.). The city is not obligated to automatically approve the level of development intensity request for the IPUD. Instead, it is expected to approved only such level of intensity that is appropriate for a particular location in terms ofland use compatibilities (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.1.c.). Describe the proposed method of trash collection. It should be noted that dumpsters or trash containers should not be located within setbacks abutting sin le-famil residential develo ments Cha ter 2, Section 5.L.4.e. 3 .). X Special emphasis should be placed on screening the intrusion of automobile headlights on neighboring properties from parking areas and driveways (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.b.(4).). Staff recommends incorporating a buffer wall into the design of the east landscape buffer where vehicle headlights could shine on abutting properties. Are these fee-simple townhouse units or townhouse-style condominium units? If fee-simple, revise the site pan or provide an alternate plan showing the lot lines of the fee-simple area. Also, will the 2nd story balconies extend outside of the fee-simple area? 115. The IPUD zoning district requires 200 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit. The plan proposes 61 dwelling units, and therefore, 12,200 square feet of usable open space is required (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.3.). On the site plan tabular data (sheet 101), please indicate that 12,000 square feet of usable open space is required. The pool/clubhouse area may be used to meet this re uirement. f)., fR l tJ Jt-. - -1 116. On the site plan tabular data, indicate the square footage and percentage distribution of pervious surface and also indicate the proposed lot coverage per Chapter 4, Section 7. Note that lot coverage cannot exceed more than 50 percent (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.). On the overall site plan tabular data (sheet A-WI), indicate that the project lies within the Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan Stud Area 1. 1~ Will an on-site lift-station be required as a result of this development? If so, /~ \ show its location on the site plan. If a fence is required around the pool/clubhouse area, provide a detail of the fence including the dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section .D.. rovide a detail of the i:.lIi l' rj " / sculpture proposed on the landscape plan (sheet L1). Include its dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.D. . All building elevations, including the cabana, should indicate paint manufacturer's name and color codes Cha ter 4, Section 7.D. . INCLUDE REJECT i/ / ~ V' / v /" 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 16 z DEPARTMENTS 122. Provide paint swatches for the elevations. Staff recommends using a color schedule Cha ter 4, Section 7.D. . 123. Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the TART meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). These will be on display at the public eetin s. ill there be a provision for outdoor patios, concrete patios, screen enclosures, or solid-roof enclosures? Please discuss these amenities with staff prior to the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) meeting. The proposed setbacks for the aforementioned amenities need to :be indicated within the overall site Ian tabular data ('IDte OY\ -St~ lP Are parking spaces proposed along the relocated Northeast 1 Place? If '- so, show their location and dimensions. t Provide a drawing of a typical freestanding outdoor lighting pole. The typical drawing of the freestanding outdoor lighting poles must include the color and material. The design, style, and illumination level shall be compatible with the building design (height) and shall consider safety, function, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, Section IO.F.I.). A minimum average light level of one (1) foot candle shall be provided, with no more than 10% of the pot readings below one (1) foot candle and none below Yz foot-candle (Chapter 23, Article II.A.I.a). ~ c,,~ Lighting shall not be of an intensity that produces glare on adjacent property Cha ter 9, Section IO.F.2.). l~ Feature lighting emphasizing plants, trees, barriers, entrances, and exits is ^ encouraged (Chapter 9, Section 1O.F.3.). In order to ensure proper maintenance of the buffer areas, staff recommends converting them from private property to "buffer tracts" that would be owned and maintained b the Home Owners' Association. ~ On the landscape plan, ensure that the plant quantities match between the l\ tabular data and the graphic illustration. Also, please indicate the proposed species and quantity on the landscape plan (sheet L2). This makes it much easier to determine compliance with applicable codes. V Place a note on the site plan that all above ground mechanical equipment .Y\ such as exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, and back-flow preventers shall be visually screened (Chapter 9, Section IO.CA.). Staff recommends screening the at-grade AlC units proposed behind each unit with native hedge material. All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). This applies to the Green Malayan Coconut palm, Yellow Gei er tree, and Li strum tree. INCLUDE REJECT '/ / v ,,/" v v- v 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 17 DEPARTMENTS 3. The trees proposed around the townhouse and condominium buildings must \. be installed at Y2 the building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M. . '.<';ifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species /',' (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize as follows: 1. Shade trees, 2. Palm trees, 3. Shrubs & Groundcover. On the landscape plan, indicate the total quantities within each category and their native ercenta es. A signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulsola, or Bougainvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance / exit. The signature trees must have six (6) feet of clear trunk if placed within the safe- sight triangle (Chapter 7.5, Article 2, Section 5.N.). Alternative plant material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not available or undesired. ;\( Any substitution of plant material (for the signature tree requirement) will be sub'ect to the Ci Forester / Environmentalist review and a roval. 137. All signage is subject to review and approval of the Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission. Will this development have a subdivision identification sign? If so, the sign face may not exceed 32 square feet in area. Please provide a detail showing its dimensions, sign type, exterior finish, letter font, and letter color(s) that comply with Chapter 21, Article IV, Section I.D. The sign structure must be located at least 10 feet from the property line. Staff recommends that the sign be externally lit, with ound u -Ii htin . S i ')OJ' .Q.cJ:t4 . &~<<40 w~,. /" INCLUDE REJECT ~ /138. }n the past, the CRA Board has been very diligent in requesting that ~ developers provide a drawing that shows what the project would look like when viewing the subject property from public rights-of-way. Therefore, V staff recommends providing a supplemental drawing that shows the west elevations (along Federal Highway) that depicts the buildings with he plant material shown at maturi . {,.. .' {,..- ~ ~ ?f. Include bike racks near the swimming pool area. Staff recommends that the be covered or sheltered. The Murano Bay project to the south already contains landscape material along Ocean Inlet Drive. Therefore, for this project, staff recommends matching the vegetation proposed along the south property line (adjacent to Ocean Inlet Drive) with Murano Bay's landscaping. The trees in the north landscape buffer of Murano B,ay. include Foxtail p ms and Green Buttonwood trees. "- I{). 141. / v t/ v/ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 18 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT " ~ The subject site is located along Palm Tran Bus Route 1. Staff recommends , installing an upgraded shelter if a Palm Tran stop is located along Federal Highway, abutting the subject project. )( . Although proving surplus parking spaces is endorsed, staff recommends , eliminating the space proposed at the northeast comer of the property. The ~ elimination of this space would allow for a better perimeter landscape buffer along the east property line, abutting the existing single-family detached home. CRA STAFF COMMENTS Comments: Show fencing and wall detail on site plan. Provide a left hand turn lane on Federal Highway for cars exiting N. E. 15th Place. Show detail on site plan of how overhead utilities along Federal Highway will be installed underground. Identify locations for public art on site plan. MWRlscS:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTSWachtsmans Cove\NWSP\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc 13, ' P III pty -~ lL ~kat ~-S vi ~ 1::- ~ {;p-~~kt~ ~ ./ ~usellt-Ue o~-Sfue ~ ~ ,/ '~ t-z- s~~ L- J- !/ _ /1R.C~d ~ h'i/d" (cdoYKj 1C;'Ar~) 0/ ~l ~W1Y ~[VI-1~ W Llq tJ ~~ JWJ IJrtwl 1 S fr! W1 ~GrJj. .---, Project name: Yachtsman's Cove File number: NWSP 06-003 Reference: 1st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a November 23, 2005 Planning and Zoning date stamp marking. 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan 111()I06~_~ 1-- 7 Qp DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). 2. Provide a minimum inside turning radius of 35 feet at all intersections for Solid Waste turning movements. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 5. Increase double yellow lane separators to a minimum 20-foot length at all stop bars. 6. Incorporate a second handicap visitor parking space in the northwest comer of the project. 7. On-street parking will not be permitted along the NE 15th Place. 8. A dedicated right turn lane is required at the west end ofNE 15th Place onto Federal Hwy. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 9. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencIes such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 39. The City has an existing Lift Station in the Ocean Inlet Dr. median. Please indicate if any proposed improvements in connection with this project will impact this lift station. 40. Water main sizes are shown larger than normally installed for the service mains for this size project. In addition, the existing water mains serving both Ocean Inlet Dr. and NE 15th PI. are six (6) inches in diameter, not eight (8) inches as indicated. Further, some of the water main currently in existing NE 15th PI. is not shown at all to which abandonment and/or relocation should be indicated. To add to the confusion, the plan reflects a water interconnect between the two (2) roadways at the east property line, when there is none. Sheet C-3 needs to be corrected and resubmitted for proper evaluation. Also please note that all existing utility lines located in current NE 15th PI. are not shown, which would need to be abandoned and removed before any buildings could be erected in the conflict area. The applicant needs to show the existing force main from Lift Station #203 (located in Ocean Inlet Dr.); this will validate that no interference with its function will occur. 41. Please provide engineering calculations supporting the proposed water main design, including documentation that required fire flows will be met. 42. Water meter banks as depicted on the plans are not acceptable. Each townhome shall have a service connection and associated water meter from the main to the front of the home. 43. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 44. During construction all roads shall be compacted to 32 tons to accommodate / Fire Department apparatus. These roads shall be maintained from the finished road to the site of vertical construction. The pouring of the slab is considered vertical construction. See FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division II, Section 160, Stabilizing. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around shall be provided throughout I construction. Should any Fire Department vehicle become stuck due to poor roads or turn around, the developer shall be liable for any cost incurred. All gates and turn around systems will be tested with a Fire Department engine before construction begins and before a CO is issued. 45. All gates shall have a KNOX padlock or entry system. Gates shall have a V width of 12 foot in the clear if they are one way and 20' in the clear if two way. 46. Provide a sheet that clearly shows the location of the fire hydrants and the size of the mains feeding these hydrants. Provide hydraulic calculations using a flow test conducted by the Boynton Beach Fire Department that v/ show fire flow of not less than 1500 gpm @ 20 psi. Buildings shall not be more that 200 feet from a hydrant. All hydrants shall be operable before vertical construction can begin. 47. Site address shall be posted before construction begins and maintained / throughout the project. This address shall be visible from the main road, in numbers not less than 6" high that contrast with their background. 48. All buildings, regardless of their purpose, that are 30' high or taller, shall v:- have an approved NFP A 13 or 13R fire sprinkler system. This distance is @! measured to the underside of the highest point of the building from the point " of lowest entry. See Chapter 9, Section 7-2-2A1. An external signaling device shall be installed to alert passers by and dwellers that a sprinkler head has activated. A horn/strobe is preferred. /' 49. Any living unit with an attached parking garage shall have a carbon (if V, monoxide detector installed within the living unit and tied into the smoke detectors. POLICE Comments: 50. It is recommended that a photometric light study be completed to show that standards are met and the site has safe lighting levels. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 51. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 52. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan EIVe ,'- Project name: Yachtsman's Cove File number: NWSP 06-003 Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a November 23. 2005 Planning and Zoning date stamp marking , n :~,. .~- ~ .,,' DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). 2. Provide a minimum inside turning radius of 35 feet at all intersections for Solid Waste turning movements. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: ~ 3. Provide a traffic analysis arnt,notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 5. Increase double yellow lane separators to a minimum 20-foot length at all stop bars. , . ( 6. Incorporate a second handicap visitor parking space in the northwest comer of the project. '" - \. 7. On-street parking will not be permitted along the NE 15th Place. ~ 8. A dedicated right turn lane is required at the west end ofNE 15th Place onto Federal Hwy. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 9. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 10. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. '. 11. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments '. may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 12. The applicant shall proceed through the abandonment process (through the P&Z Department) for road relocation and accompanying abandonment for NE 15th Place. 13. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 14. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. - .: &5. Correct discrepancies between the survey and plan sheets to accurately depict the medians in Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr. The survey accurately depicts the Ocean Inlet Dr. median as continuous from Federal > Highway east. The site and landscape plans indicate a break in the median. 16. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) Please provide photometrics as part of your TART plan J' submittals. 17. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A. Lb.) 18. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.S-feet and 8 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.H.) 19. The medians on Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr., along the south side of NE 15th PI., and the pocket park on the east side of the Yachtsman Cover , plaza have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and revise Note #7 (Sheet L2) to include all the above stated information. 20. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. 21. Ensure tree species specified along Federal Hwy will not conflict with the '. overhead power lines. I'. " ~ . ~ .' .; ~ t , . I , ...: I' I , ., 't; :L _.- # .. - ,. " ; . . .,; Ui ~ ~. ~ ;,' t.~'lt_ "I; . ~ . . ., ,,, . ! '.' I .' I.. , . I " 22. Staff recommends the use of cultivars such as "High-Rise" or "Cathedral" ,. , ),' . for the Live Oaks to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high- profile vehicles. 23. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be six (6) inches thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P.) 24. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). 25. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of .." ~ permitting. 26. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 27. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. I , "' i....'.' ..' ..,' 1'1 1", I ~." i, '\ 28. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may .\(\ determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so ~ , 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 29. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the . , water and sewer systems serving this proiect (CODE, Section 26-12). 30. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 31. The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. The submitted plan does (per se) meet this requirement, however, it does not reflect an existing fire hydrant along the east side of Federal Highway (at the existing intersection of NE 15th Place), and in addition, will require an additional fire hydrant along Ocean Inlet Drive just southwest of the recreational swimming pool area. 32. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 33. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on .' the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 34. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that .. , setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 35. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 36. PVC material is not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP. . . 37. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other .. appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 39. The City has an existing Lift Station in the Ocean Inlet Dr. median. Please indicate if any proposed improvements in connection with this project will )c impact this lift station. 40. Water main sizes are shown larger than normally installed for the service mains for this size project. In addition, the existing water mains serving both Ocean Inlet Dr. and NE 15th PI. are six (6) inches in diameter, not eight (8) inches as indicated. Further, some of the water main currently in existing NE 15th PI. is not shown at all to which abandonment and/or relocation should be indicated. To add to the confusion, the plan reflects a water interconnect between the two (2) roadways at the east property line, 1'1; " when there is none. Sheet C-3 needs to be corrected and resubmitted for proper evaluation. Also please note that all existing utility lines located in current NE 15th PI. are not shown, which would need to be abandoned and removed before any buildings could be erected in the conflict area. The applicant needs to show the existing force main from Lift Station #203 (located in Ocean Inlet Dr.); this will validate that no interference with its function will occur. 41. Please provide engineering calculations supporting the proposed water main design, including documentation that required fire flows will be met. 1W ~~ '>,~ 42. Water meter banks as depicted on the plans are not acceptable. Each townhome shall have a service connection and associated water meter from the main to the front of the home. 43. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 44. During construction all roads shall be compacted to 32 tons to accommodate Fire Department apparatus. These roads shall be maintained from the finished road to the site of vertical construction. The pouring of the slab is considered vertical construction. See FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division II, Section 160, Stabilizing. JAN-27-06 09:28AM FROM-atlantiF vircnmental en,ineerin, 9544280122 T-709 P.003/003 F-293 s,.,.. ." geW .. FLOW TEST Request Date: 1/9/06 Company: Atlantis EngineerIng 1311 Newport Center Dr #C Deerfield Beach, FL. 33442 Requested From: AI Cspellini Telephone Number: 954..52Q-0476 Facsimile Number: 954-428-0122 1........ ,j OJ l(j~ .. /l... . r Location: Yachtsman's Cove - NE 1st' Place * DIAGRAM * (Include direction, street names, hydrant locations, Intersections and main sizes) i N F E D E R A l H#(!) H NE 15TH PLACE W HH) y Hydrant 1: Static Reading: 56 psi Hydrant 2: Flow Reading: 42 ~sl = 1 Q91 gpm Assign Date: 1/11f.06 Tested By: FF III Aaron Residual Reading: 48 psi Test Date: 1/16/06 Time Tested: 10:00 hrs AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL: 2~178 gpm JAN-27-06 09:27AM FROM-atlantis Yachtsman's Cove 2005-(l612-E 1 of 1 'ronmental eniineerini 9544280122 o T-709 P,OOI/003 F-293 ATLANTIS Environmental Engineering, Inc. Ciwl & Erll1lTlmmmtl1l ElIgj"~f!r;ng January 26, 2006 Mr. Eric Johnson City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Division 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Re: Yacht&man's Cove Fire Flow Availability Dear Mr. Breese: Pursuant to your request, we have ordered a flow test by the Boynton Beach Fire Department. Attached is a copy of the flow test, demonstrating the availability of 2,107 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. Also, find attached the hand calculation demonstrating the flow demand from the largest building, in affected area, is 1,500 gpm. We find the available flow to be adequate. '.., -. 1-:-4"-0' Albert R., Capell~ Ilpe Florida Professional Engineer # 35168 Florida Specllilllnspectlon j 1080 Cc: Ed Breese 1311 Newpnrt Center Drive West, Suite C. Deerfield Beach. FIDrid~ 33442 Tel; (954) 428-6300 I FilX; (954) 428-0122 1514 BrelldwlIY, Sui~c 201, Fort Myer., Plorlda 33901 E-moil: "1I"nIl8@~"l'<>Jin...n..t EIlgiIl<<TS . Se:llIlllists . G~lIertll Can/rae/or. JAN-27-06 09:28AM FROM-atlantiF 'j ronmental eniineerini 9544280122 T-709 P,002/003 F-293 Fire Flow Demand Calculation Yachtsman Cove National Fire Code: C=18 x F x (A)^.5 The following is a fire flow calculation for the Yachtsman Cove Development Effective Area (square feet) 17,820 Occupancy Reduction 0.85 Construction Factor (Joist masonry) F=1 C"'18 x F x .85 x (A)^.5 Therefore: C = 2,042 gpm Communication & Exposure Faotor (X+P) o NFF = ex 0 x (1+(X+P) \ Reduction for sprinkler systems 0.75 Required Fire Flow (NFF) '" ,.075 xC x 0 x (1) = MAXIMUM FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENT 1,532 gpm MAXIMUM FIRE FLOW AVAILABLE .@ 20 PSI RESIDUAL 2,179 gpm Conclusion: Adequate water available for fire flow ~ N en (,l Ui s:: ~ ~ n :r N I\) 0 ~ 0 m m 01 >< >< (0 10 ~ :3 ::l (,l ~ ~ N en ~ -l OJ CD tJl .j>. tJl " N 8" tJl ::l m .j>.)> . --'0 co 2,: ~ I\) 0 0 en 01 .j>. N (,l .j>. W 0 Ol ~ s:: OJ Ol'< --I\) .....0 .j>.0 01 Ol N ..... Ol N CO 0"'0 OJ ..... lO,Q, .. m .,.,~ ::!, -< :::OJ ~n c.v:r --ur 2fi:3 OJ ::l n o < m -l 3' ~ S' m ~ to co -.j 01 (J1 .j>. c.v I\) 0 ~ ~ $~ ::l (') (fl "'0 (fl Q Q (') (fl tJl 0 ~ m Iii -< -< ::0 c:: ~ 3 :3 ;::l. )> 0- '0 (') ;:;: (') (') (') III 3 ~ 0 0 Cii' 'TI 0 ::0 0 3 3 0 tJl ~ 6' ::l m ~ ~ 6' ::l ~ < 3 3 a. ::l s:: (ii' OJ Cii' Cii' sa. c:: ~ 8" m ~ :E tJl 6' tJl ~ 'TI 6' 0 6' ::! Q ~' 0 )> ~ ::l n ::l -< '0 c:: I\) '0 -l III 3 ::l ~, m a. a )> i5: ::! ::0 < ::0 S' ur m ~ to OJ a. S' to to c.v 01 ~ I\) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a. a. a. a. a. 0.. a. a. OJ a. OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ '< OJ '< '< '< '< '< '< '< tJl '< tJl tJl tJl tJl tJl tJl .............................................................. "'0 (fl a -g,. co ;::;: m tJl tJl -l m tJl " "'0 (fl ~ .2. c:: 3 CD m tJl ~ 3 8" OJ (fl -.< ::l "'0 c:: m m 3 to m 3 OJ -.< . o m OJ B: S' m y (5 Q -l m C/l ^ Z m 3 m o c:: fi 5' :::l ~1u Oi::l c:: OJ :::-.< .....1\) Olo o .....01 N N -< ~ C'l ::r - 1/1 3 ~ ::l (') o < (1) =! 3 ~ ::l (1) ..... N (0 N'TI Uim g- c:: NOJ ::::-.< NI\) o ~~ to 0"0 III ~ ~ is ar.Q. 0 to CD -oJ 0) (J1 .j>. W N .. <ll ~~ ~~ Li1 Li1 Q ~() t '~:~ w:T -- ~ 0'" 0)3 III ::l :;- () (J) "0 (J) Q () () (J) -l 8 '" 0 or <ll or .z ~ ::tl c: III ~ C' '" < ~ 3 ::l- ::l- )> 3 ^ <ll '0 () () () () OJ Z ~ 0 0 (ii' -l "TI 0 ::tl 0 3 3 0 '" III 3' ~ 5' ::l <ll ~ Q) 5' 3 ::l ~ < 3 3 a. ::l <ll 9l. $; (ii' III (ii' (ii' a c: ~ 0" 5' <ll ~ ~ '" 5' <ll ~ "TI 0 '" ::l Q [ 5' 0 5' )> ::l ::l .z () '0 c: N '0 -l OJ 3 ::l !:, <ll a. (3 )> c: ::l ::tl < ::tl lJ (J) -l 5' en <ll 21. (3 '!2. III CO III '" a. CO ;:;: " 5' m CO '" '" OJ :i;; '-- ~ c: ::l <ll ~ N 0 ~ 0 0) ex> 0) N (J1 -oJ N -< -oJ '-- ~ <0 c: 0 lJ (J) ~ -< ~ .2. c: N ... 3 CD ~ 0 l/I <ll 3 '" 0 3 ~ III 0" OJ 0) ~ (J) -< ::l ~ lJ c: <ll -oJ III 3 N ("') CO <ll 3 '" 0 N Q) < -< -oJ CD w =! . 0 3 ex> ~ (j) )> c: ~ CO CD ~ c: ~ '" N 0 ~ 0 I\) 0) 0 ex> 0 m m N <ll X X -oJ III en en 9:: 3 3 to 5' 21. 21. W (J) <ll <ll ~ -l '0 III ~ 10 CD '" '" ^ 0 3 0" '" C' ::l ~ ~ <ll N l.-, . -oJ 0 Y 0 0) to N .j:>. ...... ~ ...... 0 0 C) CO 0" ...... C' ~ ~ N (J1 0 0 ...... 0) 0 N I\) ~ 0 N CO ...... ...... z (j:; 0 < 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan \)(V\UVVl Project name: Yachtsman's Cove File number: NWSP 06-003 Reference: 1 sl review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a November 23. 2005 Planning and Zoning date stamo markinll DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). 2. Provide a minimum inside turning radius of 35 feet at all intersections for Solid Waste turning movements. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 5. Increase double yellow lane separators to a minimum 20-foot length at all stop bars. 6. Incorporate a second handicap visitor parking space in the northwest comer of the project. 7. On-street parking will not be permitted along the NE 15th Place. 8. A dedicated right turn lane is required at the west end ofNE 15th Place onto Federal Hwy. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 9. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 18 DEPARTMENTS 142. 143. Although proving surplus parking spaces is endorsed, staff recommends eliminating the space proposed at the northeast comer of the property. The elimination of this space would allow for a better perimeter landscape buffer along the east property line, abutting the existing single-family detached home. CRA STAFF COMMENTS Comments: Show detail on site plan of how overhead utilities along Federal Highway will be installed under ound. Identi locations for ublic art on site Ian. MWRlscs:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTSWachtsmans Cove\NWSP\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc INCLUDE REJECT ~ " 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 6 DEPARTMENTS Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around shall be provided throughout construction. Should any Fire Department vehicle become stuck due to poor roads or turn around, the developer shall be liable for any cost incurred. All gates and turn around systems will be tested with a Fire Department engine before construction begins and before a CO is issued. 45. All gates shall have a KNOX padlock or entry system. Gates shall have a width of 12 foot in the clear if they are one way and 20' in the clear if two way. 46. Provide a sheet that clearly shows the location of the fire hydrants and the size of the mains feeding these hydrants. Provide hydraulic calculations using a flow test conducted by the Boynton Beach Fire Department that show fire flow of not less than 1500 gpm @ 20 psi. Buildings shall not be more that 200 feet from a hydrant. All hydrants shall be operable before vertical construction can begin. 47. Site address shall be posted before construction begins and maintained throughout the project. This address shall be visible from the main road, in numbers not less than 6" high that contrast with their background. 48. All buildings, regardless of their purpose, that are 30' high or taller, shall have an approved NFP A 13 or 13R fire sprinkler system. This distance is measured to the underside of the highest point of the building from the point of lowest entry. See Chapter 9, Section 7-2-2Al. An external signaling device shall be installed to alert passers by and dwellers that a sprinkler head has activated. A horn/strobe is preferred. 49. Any living unit with an attached parking garage shall have a carbon monoxide detector installed within the living unit and tied into the smoke detectors. POLICE Conunents: 50. It is reconunended that a photometric light study be completed to show that standards are met and the site has safe lighting levels. BUILpING LffiIISION -7~( 1J~ : j i ,.., / ,1 /' I/IV/t/b Conunents: 51. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional conunents. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional conunents may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. INCLUDE REJECT / ~ 52. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as -/ defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. < y 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 53. Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined V in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. 54. The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the V building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. 55. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table V 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 56. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and V the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 57. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table V 1607.1. Indicate the live load (psf) on the plans for the building design. 58. Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F.S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic / calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 59. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents V the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 60. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the J proposed construction. 61. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: ~ . The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." ...., 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT . From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. ~ . Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 62. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall. Identify the type of wall material and the type of material V that supports the wall, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall that includes the depth that the wall supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall shall comply with the wall regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 63. On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. .V' 64. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each ~ property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 65. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story pool building, provide the following: · Will the pool building be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? / · Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the pool building? . Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? . Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the pool building. 66. Add to the floor plan drawing of the pool building a breakdown of the floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area J dedicated for the pool building and other uses located within the building. Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor spaces. 67. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are ~ readily available. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 68. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that v' utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 69. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. / · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. · The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 70. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels, or tracts combined as / one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 71. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, ~ provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 72. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: · A legal description of the land. ~ · The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. · If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. · The number of dwelling units in each building. · The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) ". 73. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting / shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. ".. 74. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, .~ the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for - 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 75. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. t/ The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 76. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR, ~ Chapter 4, Section 7.BA) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. 77. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned ~ and, where applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be on each floor and within the building. 78. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building. Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable floor plan drawing: . Common area covered walkways; . Covered stairways; . Common area balconies; . Entrance area outside of a unit; . Storage areas (not part of a unit); . Garages (not part of a unit); L/ . Elevator room; . Electrical room; . Mechanical room; . Trash room; . Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and . Any other area under roof. (Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3) 79. Any dwelling unit that has the optional elevator installed shall comply with / the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Additional requirements of the Fair Housing Act may be applicable, such as parking and accessible routes. PARKS AND RECREATION ... 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 75. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 76. Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.BA) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. 77. Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be on each floor and within the building. 78. Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building. Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable floor plan drawing: . Common area covered walkways; . Covered stairways; . Common area balconies; . Entrance area outside of a unit; . Storage areas (not part of a unit); . Garages (not part of a unit); . Elevator room; . Electrical room; . Mechanical room; . Trash room; . Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and . Any other area under roof. (Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7.E.2 and 3) 79. Any dwelling unit that has the optional elevator installed shall comply with the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Additional requirements of the Fair Housing Act may be applicable, such as parking and accessible routes. PARKS AND RECREATION 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 11 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: \/ 80. Park Impact Fee - 61 Single-family Attached DUs @ $771.00 each = ../ $47,031.00. Payment to be made prior to issuance of first permit. 81. Trees must have a 3" caliper at DBH. V 82. Plan must include two of the City's signature trees. \/' 83. Irrigation must use a non-potable water source, have 110% coverage, provide a bubbler at each trees and separate zones for planting and sod V'" areas. 84. Above ground mechanical equipment must be screened using cocoplum. / FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Existine Trees Manaeement Plan Sheet L2 85. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to be preserved in place, relocated or removed and replaced on site. The replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet L2. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]. Plant and Materials List Sheet L2 86. All shade and palm trees on the Trees and Palms List must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida # I (Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any gray wood (gw) or clear trunk (c. t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.]. 87. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the minimum SIze specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] 88. The planting details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 89. The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the gray wood, clear trunk and height of all of the palm trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection 90. The white bird of paradise plant listed (L2) should all have a spread size. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 11 ~~ ~ . \0 . 01. ' DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 80. Park Impact Fee - 61 Single-family Attached DU's @ $771.00 each = $47,031.00. Payment to be made prior to issuance of first permit. 81. Trees must have a 3" caliper at DBH. 82. Plan must include two of the City's signature trees. 83. Irrigation must use a non-potable water source, have 110% coverage, provide a bubbler at each trees and separate zones for planting and sod areas. 84. Above ground mechanical equipment must be screened using cocoplum. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Existine Trees Manaeement Plan Sheet L2 85. The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of / existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to be preserved in place, relocated or removed and replaced on site. The replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet L2. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.]. Plant and Materials List Sheet L2 86. All shade and palm trees on the Trees and Palms List must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground), / and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any gray wood (gw) or clear trunk (c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.]. 87. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina / granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the minimum SIze specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] 88. The planting details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the 7 diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 89. The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the gray wood, / clear trunk and height of all of the palm trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection / 90. The white bird of paradise plant listed (L2) should all have a spread size. v . .. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/29/05 12 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 91. The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the height and ~ spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 92. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not V currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. _I \" 93. The applicant should show an elevation ~~ detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation ~e time Q[ V plantin.K. to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings from the r Federal Highway right-6t-way. f- ~':.\~ i + weC;,i Irrieation Plan v/ 94. Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 95. Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to t/ the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 96. At the technical advisory review team (TART) meeting, provide written responses to all staff s comments and questions. Submit 12 sets of revised plans. Each set should be folded and stapled. 97. At the technical advisory review team meeting, also provide a full set of reduced drawings, sized 8 ~ inches by 11 inches of each plan. Save each plan to a compact disk and submit that to staff as well. 98. Staff considers these plans to be at the final stage of site plan review, the last stage prior to permit review. As such, all comments need to be addressed and shown on the plans prior to the TART meeting. 99. Project compatibility will be judged on how well the proposed development fits within the context of the neighborhood and abutting properties. Provide elevations and cross-sections showing adjacent structures within this site plan application (Chapter 2, Section 5.L.4.g.(1)). In the past, the Community Redevelopment Agency Board (CRA) Board has been very diligent in requesting developers to provide a drawing that shows what the project would look like when viewing the subject property from an adjacent property, in this case, from the east. Therefore, staff recommends that you provide a supplemental drawing that shows the east elevations (abutting the single-family homes) that depicts the buildings with the plant material at maturity. 100. Approval of this proj ect IS contingent upon the approval of the accompanying request for abandonment of Northeast 15th Place (ABAN 06- 001) and land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 06-003). ... DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-133 TO: Michael Rumpf, Director Planning & Zoning Division Ed Breese, Principal Planner Planning & Zoning Division .'1 FROM: H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM"~ City Engineer D DATE: December 8, 2005 SUBJECT: City Abandonment Indication 50-foot R/W of N.E. 15th Place, part of YACHTSMAN'S COVE Site Plan Application NWSP 06-003 The above noted proposed development application was filed on November 23, 2005; a copy was forwarded to this Division on or about December 2nd for review and comment. We submit to you the following comments on N.E. 15th Place only. This project's legal description as shown on the topographic survey (prepared by Avirom & Associates, Inc.) is noted as follows: "Section I, COQUINA COVE, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 14, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, less the right-of-way for U.S. Highway #1 (State Road #5) TOGETHER WITH: Lot 19, YACHTSMAN'S COVE, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Page 225, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida." This survey encompasses two (2) lots, one in each subdivision, one on each side of existing N.E. 15th Place right-of-way. The Sketch and Description of the proposed development not only encompasses the above legal description, but incorporates a portion of N.E. 15th Place (assuming that this portion is to be abandoned and a proposed new typical section relocated through the new site plan). Nothing in the application (or plans) reflects any of existing N.E. 15th Place to be abandoned, nor the proposed relocation of same. In addition, this proposed development incorporates all of the (tentative) N.E. 15th Place abandonment and reflects a new residential building onto same (see application package Sheet C-2). Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 05-133 Re: City Abandonment, 50 ft. RJW. ofNE 15th Place, part of Yachtsman' s Cove December 9,2005 Page 2 You are advised that any abandonment would have to follow state statutes, which divides any right-of- way/easement abandonment equally (50% to each side of the abandonment centerline) with the adjacent property owners. This is reflected in the state statute (s 336.12, circa 1955) involving any public property abandonment. There are numerous city and county case histories holding this state procedure applicable to them also. There are certain rules and procedures applicable to apportionment when the roadway centerline is curvilinear. This proposed development does not follow this requirement; it arbitrarily confiscates the entire right-of-way to allow for the additional proposed building (most easterly building). Attached as Item "A" is an excerpt from the applicant's plan reflecting how they want the proposed abandonment to be handled for their benefit. Attached as Item "B" is how the state statute states how the roadway abandonment needs to be. This would disallow the additional building the applicant is showing. We recommend that this application be DENIED as presented and returned to the applicant for reconsideration. To continue it forward in the approval process, will require our ol'position as it is presented. A copy of this memorandum is being directed to the City Attorney's Office 'for their comment on the abandonment procedures of the city. Please keep this Division informed as to the progress of the application. If you have any questions, please advise me at x6988 (note new extension number). HDK/ck xc: Jeff Livergood, PE, Dir. of Public Works Laurinda Logan, PE, Engineering Division David To1ces, Esq., City Attorney's Office Ken Hall, Plans Analyst, Engineering Division File S:\Engineering\KribsWachtsman's Cove Abandonment, 50' R-W,doc I I I I I I I I '------I I I I I I .,-~ j I I I I I ~ _:J I , \---- \~! i I -------1 I I J / I I I I I I I ~i - I I =r I I I I 0:::: U wm >0..: o u- L.() (J)C"-J - C"-J Z ~ . :20 f-CL I U - ~C"-J >-1'0 )~ u <( ---1 0.- ~ I~ I-b , 0 LOci 10 ~........ w z ,,--..., I J I I I f J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ , \ \ \ I I ------------------, ------------1 I r I I I I I I I I I I I t-----_______. I I I I r-- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - "- - _ _ ----I I I I I I I- I I w g I > w ~ rvW I o > t:J> I u ..-8 zO I o::U O{f) : U _ I I-Z (f)<{ I w~ I 3~ I II I- U 1--------______ ::)<{ I 0>- I (f) '-../ I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ~ W U <{ -1 30.. 'I' 0::1- I~ I- ::)" 0lL! (f)Z h . I' '\ I, I , I \ I , , , o~ o L() ... 'lo.q. ~ ~o O)L() to (f) ... ... '" ... ................ LZ.zr L w > o U N(f) ....Z o<{ .....JL l- I U <{ >- ~(f) I-{f) 0- -1Z w<{ Z~ _(f) -11- I-I {f)U ~~ - 1-2 O<{ .....JL I- 'I U <{ >- M ..OO,Z't7.LO S ""-- - !----~ I I -_ I -- I -------~ . - ... "" ... ............. ......'" ... ... "" ... \ \ \ ~ \ ~\ \ \ \ ~-----~ I I I I I J I I I l ~I- t z ~Iv<( I-jg0 op<( -l-l> '00 I tt') I- o .....J N I- o ....J I- '""""' OW -1> o wU ~<{ -1Z I::> 1-0 0::::0 Ou Z '-../ '""""' W .-> o I-t)U ~-1<{ 30::Z IW::) I-ZO 0::0::0 000 Z U '-/ '\ 8~.~ I r------------ I f------------- I I I I I I I : I I , I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I : : , I : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - ---. I I I I I I I I I , .'\ I I I ---I I I I I I I I I . I ~I ~ I I =r I I I , I I ~ I ~;r 'LOa I ~e I I I ___ r I , I wI 0, <{I 3: it I '-.. I : ct:to'l I..- I- I :J . I o lL.! I (f)Z ~ I ___ ,-- @ 0:::: U w~ >Q o U L()- _(J) ~ Z. <(0 :2Q l- I U - <(N >-1"') U <C ---1 II . W Z I I I I I I I I j i\ 1\ 1\ \ I \ I \ I \ I I I 1 i\",' , " '01{) !?~ -.- --r I{) d- __ _ .... !PI{) 0) IX) (J) / -...... 7 '/ I LZ'zr L I @ N_(/) t-Z 0<( --12 l- I U <( >- ....(/) t-z 0<( --12 I- 'I U <( >- I I --- --I I I I I I I I , I I I I ~-- , I I ------------./ --- I I S~ ! o::W I w> I zO 0::0 I O(f) I Oz I I-<{ I (f):2 I ~~ I :r: I t-----___ 1-0 I ..- :J<{ 0>- w > o u w > o u ~ ~ o "-0 I-(f) 0- -lZ <{ w:2 Z(f) -l l- I 1-0 (f)<{ ~C M ,.OO,Z'I7.LO S .. "" , I\: ~\ 1 I ~ ___ i -- ! I I I I I I I I I l r-.J l- t Z """Iv~ 1-10 u O,O~ -.J-.J> 'm I tt') I- o --1 '" l- e f-~ OW -l> o WO ~<{ -lz I:J f-a 0::0 00 Z'--' ~ W ..-> 1-0 1-00 (f)-l<{ ~ 0:: Z , IW:J \ I-Z a 0:: 0:: 0 000 Z U '--' ! ~ ~,~ -~ ~ G f\'\ Q ~ tiJ CD N ID ~ t-:" " l" 'J ,~tso cO b ,~ ~ r~J ~ 1">- "- /' aD\'-- v t;1 ~ 1I f\ I' ~.0 ~CLt-J-1 ~@J I I - I 00, (). , ----~--~ -,'-..... I r I f---- I I : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : I I I ~"l --- Page 1 of 1 Breese, Ed From: Immler, Matt Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 3:40 PM To: Breese, Ed Subject: Yachtsman's Cove Ed, Approval of the Yachtsman's Cove site plan will not negatively impact PD operations, G. Matthew Immler Chief of Police City of Boynton Beach 561-742-6101 immlerm@ci,boynton-beach.fl.us .0 12/5/2005 FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner FROM: Rodger W. Kemmer, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal DATE: December 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Yachtsman's Cove Oceanside New development projects involving multi-family or high-density commercial projects should be approved contingent upon consideration of future upgrades in emergency dispatch capability. These enhancements include new technology related to CAD, GIS, and AVL capability, as well as adequate staffing. All other factors (personnel, training, technology, fire station placement, building design features, etc) depend on a reliable and efficient method of getting the resources provided where they are needed in time to mitigate the consequences of an emergency, regardless of the type of response. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-135 .~ {~ /'~/-2-:S/ C7 b FROM: Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning . ;:." ~ Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer Xi \ -~( TO: DATE: December 22, 2005 RE: Review Comments New Site Plan -1st Review Yachtsman's Cove File No. NWSP 06-003 The above referenced Site Plans, received on December 2, 2005, were reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LOR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). 2. Provide a minimum inside turning radius of 35-ft. at all intersections for Solid Waste turning movements. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 3, Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. 4. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. See City Standard Drawings "K" Series for striping details. 5. Increase double yellow lane separators to a minimum 20-ft. length at all stop bars. 6, Incorporate a second handicap visitor parking space in the northwest corner of the project. 7. On-street parking will not be permitted along the NE 15th Place. 8. A dedicated right turn lane is required at the west end of NE 15th Place onto Federal Hwy. ENGINEERING 9. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other Public Works Department/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-135 Re: Yachtsman's Cove December 22, 2005 Page 2 permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 10. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 11, Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 12. The applicant shall proceed through the abandonment process (through the P&Z Department) for road relocation and accompanying abandonment for NE 15th Place. 13. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the City's Engineering Division. A preliminary plat application may be initiated during the site plan review to expedite issuance of the Land Development Permit. 14. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. 15. Correct discrepancies between the survey and plan sheets to accurately depict the medians in Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr. The survey accurately depicts the Ocean Inlet Dr. median as continuous from Federal Hwy. east. The site and landscape plans indicate a break in the median. 16. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4.) If possible please provide photometries as part of your TRC plan submittals - it is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit! 17. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b.) 18. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5-ft. and 8-ft. above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) 19, The medians on Federal Hwy. and Ocean Inlet Dr., along the south side of NE 15th Pl., and the pocket park on the east side of the Yachtsman Cover plaza have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. The contractor shall notify and coordinate with the City of Boynton Beach Forestry & Grounds Division of Public Works a minimum of six (6) weeks in advance of any underground activities. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and revise Note #7 (Sheet L2) to include all the above stated information. 20. Staff strongly recommends placing canopy trees far enough back from drive aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. Public Works Department/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-135 Re: Yachtsman's Cove December 22, 2005 Page 3 21, Ensure tree species specified along Federal Hwy will not conflict with the overhead power lines. 22. Staff recommends the use of cultivars such as "High-Rise" or "Cathedral" for the Live Oaks to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. 23. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P.) 24, Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.g). 25. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 26. Paving, Drainage and Site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES 27. Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 28, All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 29. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 30. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 31, The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. The submitted plan does (per se) meet this requirement, however, it does not reflect an existing fire hydrant along the east side of Federal Highway (at the existing intersection of NE 15th Place), and in addition, will require an additional fire hydrant along Ocean Inlet Drive just southwest of the recreational swimming pool area. Public Works Department/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-135 Re: Yachtsman's Cove December 22, 2005 Page 4 32. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 33. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(a). 34. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 35. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 36. PVC material is not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP. 37. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 38. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all other appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 39. The City has an existing Lift Station in the Ocean Inlet Dr. median. Please indicate if any proposed improvements in connection with this project will impact this lift station. 40. Water main sizes are shown larger than normally installed for the service mains for this size project. In addition, the existing water mains serving both Ocean Inlet Dr. and NE 15th PI. are 6-in. diameter, not 8-in. as indicated. Further, some of the water main currently in existing NE 15th PI. is not shown at all to which abandonment and/or relocation should be indicated. To add to the confusion, the plan reflects a water interconnect between the two (2) roadways at the east property line, when there is none. Sheet C-3 needs to be corrected and resubmitted for proper evaluation. Also please note that all existing utility lines located in current NE 15th PI. are not shown, which would need to be abandoned and removed before any buildings could be erected in the conflict area. The applicant needs to show the existing force main from Lift Station #203 (located in Ocean Inlet Dr.); this will validate that no interference with its function will occur. 41. Please provide engineering calculations supporting the proposed water main design, including documentation that required fire flows will be met. 42. Water meter banks as depicted on the plans are not acceptable. Each town home shall have a service connection and associated water meter from the main to the front of the home. Public Works Department/Engineering Division Memo No. 05-135 Re: Yachtsman's Cove December 22, 2005 Page 5 43, Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. LUck Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.! P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\KribsWachtsman's Cove New Site Plan 1st Review,doc \ ! DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 05-235 List of Acronvms/Abbreviations: ANSI - American National Standards Institute ASCE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBC - Florida Building Code FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F,S. - Florida Statutes LDR - Land Development Regulations NEC - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District TO: Ed Breese Principal Planner FROM: Timothy K. Large~ TART Member/B~ision DATE: December 7,2005 SUBJECT: Project - Yachtsman's Cover File No. - NWSP 06-003 - 1st review Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6. 3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3. 4 The height and area for buildings or structures of the different types of construction shall be governed by the intended use or occupancy of the building, and shall not exceed the limits set forth in Table 503 of the 2004 FBC. 5 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704.8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704.8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302.2. 6 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads), Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 7 Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the loads and forces encountered per the 2004 FBC, Section 1607 and Table 1607.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. S\Development\Building\ T ART\ TART 2006\ Yachtsman's Cove Page 1 of 4 /' 8 Buildings three-stories or higher shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system per F .S. 553.895. Fire protection plans and hydraulic calculations shall be included with the building plans at the time of permit application. 9 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 10 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 11 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 1 DO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations." B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans). 12 Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter wall. Identify the type of wall material and the type of material that supports the wall, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall that includes the depth that the wall supports are below finish grade and the height that the wall is above finish grade. The location and height of the wall shall comply with the wall regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 13 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line. 14 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the buildings. The leading edge of the buildings begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 15 To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the one-story pool building, provide the following: A Will the pool building be restricted to the residents of the entire project only? B Will the residents have to cross any major roads or thoroughfares to get to the pool building? C Will there be any additional deliveries to the site? D Will there be any additional employees to maintain and provide service to the site? Please have the applicant provide the City with a copy of the letter that will be sent to the impact fee coordinator. To allow for an efficient permit review, the applicant should request that the County send the City a copy of their determination of what impact fees are required for the pool building. S\Development\Building\TART\TART 2006\Yachtsman's Cove Page 2 of 4 16 Add to the floor plan drawing of the pool building a breakdown of the floor area. The area breakdown shall specify the total area of the building, covered area outside, covered area at the entrances, total floor area dedicated for the pool building and other uses located within the building. Specify the total floor area that is air-conditioned. Label the use of all rooms and floor spaces. 17 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 18 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 19 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: A The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. B If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. C The number of dwelling units in each building. D The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. E The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 20 At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed CBB Unit of Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels, or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions, of each property that is being unified, is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 21 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 22 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: A A legal description of the land. B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. D The number of dwelling units in each building. E The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) S\Development\Building\ T ART\ TART 2006\ Yachtsman's Cove Page 3 of 4 23 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application. 24 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 25 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. 26 Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LRD, Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TART plan submittals. 27 Add to the floor plan drawings of the individual units a breakdown of the area within the unit. The area breakdowns for each unit shall specify the total area of the unit, area of the balcony, total area that is air-conditioned and, where applicable, total area of storage and garage space. If the garage and storage areas are not part of a specific unit, the area shall be included and identified within the area of the building. Indicate how many of each type of unit will be on each floor and within the building. 28 Add to the site data the total area under roof of each residential building, Provide tabular area data for each floor of each building. The breakdown shall include the following areas and each area shall be labeled on the applicable floor plan drawing: A Common area covered walkways; B Covered stairways; C Common area balconies; o Entrance area outside of a unit; E Storage areas (not part of a unit); F Garages (not part of a unit); G Elevator room; H Electrical room; I Mechanical room; J Trash room; K Mailbox pickup and delivery area; and L Any other area under roof. (Chapter 4 - Site Plan Review, Section 7,E.2 and 3) 29 Any dwelling unit that has the optional elevator installed shall comply with the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Additional requirements of the Fair Housing Act may be applicable, such as parking and accessible routes. bf S\Development\Building\ T ART\ TART 2006\ Yachtsman's Cove Page 4 of 4 // TRC COMMENTS PROJECT: YACHTSMANS' COVE LOCATION: 1550 N. Federal Highway FILE# NWSP 06-003 TYPE OF PROJECT: TOWNHOUSES CAPACITY: 36 UNITS COMMENTS 1. During construction all roads shall be compacted to 32 tons to accommodate Fire Department apparatus. These roads shall be maintained from the finished road to the site of vertical construction. The pouring of the slab is considered vertical construction. See FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division II, Section 160, Stabilizing. Adequate Fire Department vehicle turn around shall be provided throughout construction. Should any Fire Department vehicle become stuck due to poor roads or turn around, the developer shall be liable for any cost incurred. All gates and turn around systems will be tested with a Fire Department engine before construction begins and before a CO is issued. 2. All gates shall have a KNOX padlock or entry system. Gates shall have a width of 12' in the clear if they are one way and 20' in the clear if two way. 3. Provide a sheet that clearly shows the location of the fire hydrants and the size of the mains feeding these hydrants. Provide hydraulic calculations using a flow test conducted by the Boynton Beach Fire Department that show fire flow of not less than 1500 gpm @ 20 psi. Buildings shall not be more that 200 feet from a hydrant. All hydrants shall be operable before vertical construction can begin. 4. Site address shall be posted before construction begins and maintained throughout the project. This address shall be visible from the main road, in numbers not less than 6" high that contrast with their background. 5. All buildings, regardless of their purpose, that are 30' high or taller, shall have an approved NFPA 13 or 13R fire sprinkler system. This distance is measured to the underside of the highest point of the building from the point of lowest entry. See Chapter 9, Section 7-2-2A1. An external signaling device shall be installed to alert passers by and dwellers that a sprinkler head has activated. A horn/strobe is preferred. 6. Any living unit with an attached parking garage shall have a carbon monoxide detector installed within the living unit and tied into the smoke detectors. ./,- CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM / TO: Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: December 15, 2005 FILE: NWSP 06-003 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Yachtsmans Cove REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: 1. It is recommended that a photometric light study be completed to show that standards are met and the site has safe lighting levels. TRC Memorandum Page 1 of2 / Coale, Sherie From: Hallahan, Kevin Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:25 PM To: Coale, Sherie Cc: Breese, Ed Subject: TART comments - Yachtsmans Cove Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Ed Breese, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Yachtsmans Cove New Site Plan - 1st Review NWSP 06-003 Date: December 6, 2005 Existing Trees Management Plan Sheet L2 The Landscape Architect should tabulate the total diameter inches of existing trees on the site. The tabular data should show the individual species of trees proposed to be preserved in place, relocated or removed and replaced on site. The replacement trees should be shown by a separate symbol on the landscape plan sheet L2. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article I Sec. 7.D.p. 2.] Plant and Materials List Sheet L2 1, All shade and palm trees on the Trees and Palms List must be listed in the description as a minimum of 12'-14' height, 3" DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades and Standards manual). The height ofthe trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the 3" diameter requirement; or any gray wood (gw) or clear trunk (c.t.) specifications. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. S.C. 2.] 2. The landscape design does not include the City signature trees (Tibochina granulosa) at the ingress / egress areas to the site. These trees must meet the minimum size specifications for trees. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5.C.3.N.] 3, The planting details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the diameter and height, of all of the shade trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 4, The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the gray wood, clear trunk and height of all of the palm trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 5. The white bird of paradise plant listed (L2) should all have a spread size. 6, The details sheet L3 should include a line indicating where the height and spread of the shrubs will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 7, The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or shown on the plan) should be screened with Coco plum hedge plants on three sides. 8. The applicant should show an elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed 12/1612005 TRC Memorandum Page 2 of2 landscape trees and vegetation at the time of planting to (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings from the Federal Highway right-of-way. .Irrigation Plan 9, Turf and landscape (bedding plants) areas should be designed on separate zones and time duration for water conservation. 10, Trees should have separate irrigation bubblers to provide water directly to the root ball. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.] Kjh 12/16/2005 Page 1 of 1 ~ Rivers, Jody To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie Subject: Site Plan Review - Yachtmans Cove Project: Yachtmans Cove File No,: NWSP 06-003 1, Park Impact FEe - 61 Single-family Attached DWs @ $771,00 each = $47,031,00, Payment to be made prior to issuance of first permit. 2, Trees must have a 3" caliper at DBH 3, Plan must include two of the City's signature trees, 4, Irrigation must use a non-potable water source, have 110% coverage, provide a bubbler at each trees and separate zones for planting and sod areas, 5, Above ground mechanical equipment must be screened using cocoplum, )ool~ Ri.vers Parks Superintendent City of Boynton Beach 100 E, Boynton Beach Blvd, Boynton Beach, FL 33425 (561) 742-6226 (561) 742-6233 (fax) 12/16/2005 LITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORrOA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Dick Hudson, Senior Planner DATE: December 15, 2005 FILE: NWSP 06-003 FROM: John Huntington, Officer Crime Prevention Unit SUBJECT: Yachtsman's Cove Impacts Assesment on Services REFERENCES: Impacts of Proposed Site Plan Upon Police Services ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the building plans and proposed project for Yachtsman's Cove, formally Yachtsman's Plaza at 1500 N. Federal Highway. Yachtsman's Cove is planned for 61 residential attached town homes. For the purpose of this analysis, a similar project was used as a comparison. Also, a statistical analysis was completed to show the percentage of increase of police calls for service for the selected project. With the projected development throughout the city, an estimated 30% increase in population can be expected. Total police calls for service have increased 66.8 % from 1990 - 2000. A 15% increase in calls for service is expected due to this current growth. In relation to total calls for service to the zone, one officer handled 6,672 calls or 9.5% of all calls for service. In addition, there are two residential attached town home projects soon to be completed from 1400 N. Federal Highway to Gateway Blvd. The new planned communities will increase calls for service by an estimated 7% for one officer. Service requirements for the police department will be greatly impacted and the demand for more police personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and non residential traffic into our city. The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard P,O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www,boynton-beach.org To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities Matthew Immler, Police Chief Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Wally Majors, Parks Director Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst John Huntington, Police Officer From: Ed Breese, Principal Planner J!.b; Date: 12/1/05 Re: Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services Project: Yachtsman's Cove MEMORANDUM As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development. Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would enhance the project are certainly welcomed. I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6260. 5: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\yachtsmans Cove\Impact Analysis,doc View Hit: First Last Next Prev Hit-list Quit < > Got hit 'a' from page 1 Business/Common Place Information Page Name: YACHTSMAN'S COVE Address: 1406 N FEDERAL HWV High Number (if a range): Hydrant1: Reference Business Code if an Alias: ( ===================== Information Returned by Geoprocessor Loc Found:1406 N FEDERAL HWV Map Grid: Police - Sector: 3 Geocode: Fire - District: Latitude/Longitude: IF THIS IS AN ALIAS, YOU MAY STOP HERE Record Type: C Phone: 734-2628 Hydrant2: ------------------ ------------------ RA: 303 Box: 12 / ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Type: SUBDIVIS Group: HOUSING Complex Name: Municipality - Code: Name: BOYNTON BEACH Area - Code: Name: Development - Code: Name: Landmark/ID Tag: Nearest Cross Street: Computer Code* 954 Most recent update on 11/07/2005 by JACKDAWN <Next Screen> for Names. <Select> for Business Facts. 0; =' - -- - -- ;;;;; CAD Incident Search Results " - Page 1 of 1 I" I CAD Incident Search Results v3.41,0001 I:] Search Again CAD Seat"ch Results Go To Sql Statement I Incident# Fire# 5060158 5021225 5019528 5011664 5004807 Police# Date/Time Location Incident Type 504111208/08/200507:42:22 1406 N FEDERAL HWY BURG DELAYED 5014191 03/18/2005 17:44:10 1406 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 5013045 03/12/2005 17:47:16 1406 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 5001445 5007822 02/12/2005 21 :44:04 1406 N FEDERAL HWY ALS 500332401/19/2005 16:10:11 1406 N FEDERAL HWY HIT&RUNINO INJ SQL Statment Used in Search select distinct cadinclog.incnum, cadinclog.dtreceived, cadinclog.stnum, cadinclog.stname 1, cadinclog.fincnum, cadinclog.pincnum, cadinclog.inctype from cadinclog, cadincclasslog where cadinclog.incnum = cadincclasslog.incnum and ((cadinclog.dtreceived between "2005-01-01 00:00:00" and "2006-02-1423:59:59")) and (cadinclog.stnum like "1406%") and (cadinclog.stnamellike "N FED%") and (cadincclasslog.dispclass like "POLICE%") and (cadinclog.pincnum is not null) order by cadinclog.incnum desc; r::J Search Again Number of Incidents Listed 5 http:// 172.22.0 .34/Q EDI 1 cadpartner/cad97 1 search! srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 e o View Hit: First Last Next Prev Hit-list Quit < > Got hit 'bl from page 1 Business/Common Place Information Page Name: YACHTSMAN PLAZA NORTH Address: 1600 N FEDERAL HWY High Number (if a range): Hydrant1: Reference Business Code if an Alias: ( ===================== Information Returned by Geoprocessor Loc Found:1600 N FEDERAL HWY Map Grid: Police - Sector: 2 Geocode: Fire - District: Latitude/Longitude: IF THIS IS AN ALIAS, YOU MAY STOP HERE Record Type: C Phone: Hydrant2: ------------------ ------------------ RA: 203 Box: 12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Type: OTH BUSN Group: OTHER Complex Name: Municipality - Code: 1 Name: BOYNTON BEACH Area - Code: Name: Development - Code: Name: Landmark/ID Tag: Nearest Cross Street: Computer Code* 414 Most recent update on 09/04/2002 by SOLO DOUG <Next Screen> for Names. <Select> for Business Facts. :' : ~_.=:;;; .. ~- -- ---- ----- ------ Boynto'ffc'. -- -- --- ..- = ii lr IL-- --_I' ;;; ~ -- I \i. r CAD Incident Search Results Page 1 0[9 CAD Incident Search Results . v3.41,0001 r::t Search Again Go To Sgl Statement CAD Search Results I Incident# Fire# Police# Date/Time Location Incident Type 6011512 600765802/12/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP INCIDENT 15:45:41 6011220 6007471 02/11/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY LOST /FOUND 15:18:31 PROP 6010761 600717302/10/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 05:48:16 6009543 600637002/05/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 12:09:05 6009408 6006279 02/04/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 21:32:44 6009104 6006077 02/03/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 19:04:07 6007859 600522801/30/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 00:25 :43 6007764 6005173 01/29/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 16:53:44 6006799 6004541 01/26/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 01 :31 :07 6006267 6004186 01/24/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 01 :01 :29 6005346 6003561 01/20/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 19:01:10 6005122 600341801/19/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 19:53:25 6004900 600325801/18/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 21:48:23 6003887 6002561 01/15/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 00:43:30 6003380 600224301/13/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY BURG DELAYED 08:28:50 6003379 600224401/13/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY BURG DELAYED 08:28:22 6003371 600224001/13/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 07:58:49 6003328 6002197 01/13/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 00:09:16 6003004 600198901/11/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY VERBAL THREATS 19:51:41 http://172.22. 0.34/QED//cadpartner/cad97 /search/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results 0 0 Page 2 of9 . 6002728 600180501/10/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 18:39:18 6002375 600157401/09/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY EXTRA PATROL 11 :57:38 6002076 600139001/08/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 NUISANCE 09:52:47 6001686 600112301/06/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 19:48:45 6001506 6001011 01/06/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 09:39:10 6000859 600059201/04/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 05:05:32 6000836 600057201/04/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 01:41:10 6000817 600055501/03/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 22:58: 17 6000736 600049801/03/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 18:05:31 6000513 600033801/02/2006 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 21 :52:13 5099653 5067851 12/31/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC W /0 INJ 16:37:25 5099557 5067792 12/31/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 OPEN LINE 10:41 :48 5099090 5067484 12/29/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 NUISANCE 18:36:25 5098902 5067375 12/29/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP VEHICLE 06:35:58 5098288 506694012/27/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY WARRANT 00:29:26 ARREST 5098284 506693612/27/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 00:10:01 5096529 5065767 12/20/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 18:21:50 5096390 5065673 12/20/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 07:16:07 5096374 5065660 12/20/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 05:18:16 5095648 506517512/17/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 10:27:50 5094434 5064342 12/13/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 02:46:40 5094217 506419012/12/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 09:37:03 5094157 5064149 12/12/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 01 :55:38 5093947 5064017 12/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 06:29:09 5093938 5064013 12/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM http://l 72.22. 0.34/QED/ /cadpartner/cad97 /search/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results 0 0 Page 30[9 . 05:12:41 5093582 5063788 12/09/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 22:13:37 5093517 5063739 12/09/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 18:44:18 5091141 5062172 11/30/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 18:45:26 5091097 5062143 11/30/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC W 10 INJ 16:27:35 5090866 5061988 11/29/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 18:45:09 5090215 5061561 11/27/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 07:59:22 5089019 5060761 11/22/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP VEHICLE 10:41 :28 5088886 5060672 11/21/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 20:38:49 5088187 5060218 11/19/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY EXTRA PATROL 10:07:59 5088073 50098735060145 11/18/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY CHILD LOCKOUT 21 :30:32 5087520 5059771 11/16/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 20:41:18 5087234 505958411/15/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 19:27:40 5086525 5059107 11/13/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 02:16:51 5085450 5058340 11/09/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 02:18:17 5085165 5058135 11/07/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 23:07:48 5084268 5057525 11/04/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 16:09:58 5083700 5057183 11/02/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY FRAUD 14:39: 14 5082945 5056707 10/31/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 INFO 10:23:50 5081184 5055675 10/26/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 09:43:08 5081010 5055547 10/25/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY BURG IN PROG 19:56:02 5080914 5055502 10/25/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 OPEN LINE 14:06:56 5079973 5055128 10/23/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 15:05:39 5079857 5055057 10/23/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 02:30: 13 5078689 5054253 10/18/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 18:54:33 http://l 72.22.0 .34/Q EDII cadpartnerl cad97 1 search! srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 ...... CAD Incident Search Results () 0 Page 4 0[9 . 5077459 .50084795053373 10/13/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC UNK INJ 21 :14:46 5076752 505283710/1112005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 01 :52:06 5076483 5052652 10/1012005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 01 :36:22 5076068 5052363 10/0812005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 11:03:17 5075764 5052155 10/0712005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY BURG DELAYED 06:37:26 5074749 5051434 10/0212005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 20:35:15 5074592 5051331 10/0212005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 06:51 :38 5073635 5050618 09/2812005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 14:30:39 5072529 5049846 09/2412005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 01:05:28 5070813 5048655 09/1712005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 OPEN LINE 11:23:11 5070790 504863909/1712005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DRUNK DRIVER 09:24:54 5070466 504841209/16/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 06:31 :00 5070012 504807609/1412005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 15:27:31 5069027 504737709/1012005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY STOLEN 14:36:47 AUTOIDLY 5068272 5046836 09/07/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 18:04:48 5067784 5046466 09/0512005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 17:21:22 5067669 5046383 09/0512005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 07:37:26 5067531 5046289 09/0412005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY mv TRBLIPROG 16:05:55 5067461 5046239 09/0412005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 07:57:50 5065629 5044929 08/2812005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 INFO 12:50:31 5064807 5044365 08/2512005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 14:55:22 5063650 5043553 08/2012005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 23:09:39 5063643 50435490812012005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 22:38:38 5061958 504236508/1412005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 16:58:33 5061946 5042357 08/1412005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP http://1 72.22. 0.34/QED//cadpartner/cad97/searchlsrchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results 0 0 Page 5 0[9 . 16:23:59 5060046 5041031 08/07/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ANIMAL 19:24:37 5060025 504101708/07/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 17:33:19 5059786 5040846 08/06/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 18:45:01 5059545 5040697 08/05/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY EXTRA PATROL 21:51:50 5059516 5040673 08/05/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY FRAUD 20:21 :34 5058757 504011908/03/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP VEHICLE 00:09:03 5058659 5006508504005008/02/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC UNK INJ 16:53:35 5058292 5039781 07/31/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 22:58:17 5056806 503875207/26/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC W 10 INJ 15:02:28 5056777 503873807/26/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 12:27:23 5056441 503851007/25/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 10:01:31 5055040 503754407/20/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ASST MOTORIST 09:14:08 5054714 503731507/18/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 20:34:58 5054598 503722707/18/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 12:35:09 5054273 503701807/17/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY RECKLESS DRVR 01:07:24 5053867 5036734 07/15/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC WIO INJ 13:36:46 5052484 503573507/10/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 11 :09:02 5052353 503564307/09/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 20:57:21 5051562 503508007/07/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 04:12:06 5051294 5034882 07/06/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 08:14:25 5050867 5005691503457907/04/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY THEFT IN PROG 17:46:25 5050682 5034444 07/03/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 22:59:06 5049277 503347206/29/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 08:07:48 5048612 5033014 06/26/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB NOISE 20:05:41 http://l 72.22.0 .34/Q EDI I cadpartnerl cad97 I search/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results 9 0 Page 6 of9 . 5047864 . 5032495 06/23 2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 20:44:57 5047077 5031943 06/20/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 21:50:16 5046749 503171006/19/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 INFO 13:27:39 5046737 5031705 06/19/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 12:13:52 5046698 503167906/19/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUICIDE THREAT 08:47:29 5045725 503096306/15/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 21:40:59 5045042 5005085503047606/13/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALS 16:11:46 5044921 5030399 06/13/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 04: 13:37 5044720 503025806/12/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 11 :22:41 5044548 503012706/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY WARRANT 17:33:00 ARREST 5044542 503012506/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 17:16:30 5044541 503012406/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 17:03:45 5044369 5030005 06/10/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 22:34:58 5043868 5029662 06/09/2005 1600 N FEDEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 01 :01 :20 HWY 5043244 5029221 06/06/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 17:04:15 5041971 502833406/01/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 20:11:38 5041958 502832506/01/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 19:09:15 5041007 5027638 OS/29/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY EXTRA PATROL 01 :20:38 5040998 5027630 OS/29/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 00:26: 11 5040670 5027407 OS/27/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC W /0 INJ 19:10:11 5039877 5026844 OS/25/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 02:33:14 5038617 5025986 OS/20/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ABAND VEH 18:58:57 5038610 5025982 OS/20/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP INCIDENT 18:34:50 5037860 502547505/17/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 19:29:19 5037144 5024961 05/15/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY BURG DELAYED http://172.22.0.34/QED/ /cadpartner/cad97 /search/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results 0 0 Page 7 of9 . 06:42:21 5037026 5024877 05/14/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 18:23:25 5036745 502469005/13/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 17:46:37 5035385 502372405/08/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC WIO INJ 14:08:29 5035082 5023508 05/07/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 NUISANCE 13:22:48 5035080 502350605/07/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 13:14:40 5034837 502333005/06/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 17:17:41 5034716 5023244 05/06/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 09:41:02 5033401 5022374 05/01/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 11 :49:03 5031230 5020896 04/23/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 09:05:28 5028974 501938204/15/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 07:03:01 5027959 501870404/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DRUNK PED 15:54:00 5027858 501863904/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 08:54:33 5026470 5017691 04/06/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 10:15:18 5025800 501721904/03/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 15:54:25 5025518 501703704/02/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 NUISANCE 13:08:55 5024239 5016193 03/28/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 22:30:07 5023819 501592003/27/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 13:48:01 5021888 5002643501461903/21/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP INCIDENT 01 :33:45 5021537 5014408 03/19/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 17:50:43 5021484 501437303/19/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 14:58:00 5020059 501339203/14/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY THEFT DELAYED 15:10:31 5019923 501330403/14/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 02:31:13 5019297 501290303/11/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY LOUD MUSIC 21 :45:28 5017837 501189903/06/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY JUV TRBL/DL YD 13 :25 :46 http://l 72.22.0 .34/Q EDI I cadpartnerl cad97 I search! srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results 0 0 Page8of9 . 5017618- 501176303/05/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 17:32:01 5017413 5011621 03/04/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ACC W 10 INJ 21 :10:01 5017411 501162003/04/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP 21:06:34 5017323 501156903/04/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY V AND DELAYED 15:12:05 5016150 501081002/28/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP INCIDENT 12:57:26 5015984 501069602/27/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY LOUD MUSIC 20:32:06 5015852 501061402/27/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 12:13:00 5015194 501018202/25/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 07:42:39 5014989 5010052 02/24/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 14:09:06 5014573 500977602/23/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY ALARM COMM 03:12:44 5014425 5009668 02/22/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 17:17:27 5013041 5008761 02/17/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY SUSP PERSON 19:46:52 5012367 5008318 02/15/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY HIT &RUN/NO INJ 13:18:41 5009309 5006319 02/04/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY POLICE ASST 18:14:50 5008359 5005694 02/01/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC STOP 16:03:58 5007952 5005453 01/31/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY OPEN DOOR 06:46:46 5006069 500417501/24/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY FRAUD 12:36:49 5005711 500393201/22/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY EXTRA PATROL 21 :21 :42 5005314 5003661 01/21/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DISTURB GEN 12:24:33 5004017 500277001/16/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY THEFT DELAYED 13:48:50 5002945 500204001/12/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY THEFT DELAYED 13:48:17 5002376 500163201/10/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY BURG DELAYED 11 :59:35 5001817 5001231 01/08/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY DRUNK PED 00:06:49 5000817 500056601/04/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY TRAFFIC COMP 11 :46:50 5000112 500008401/01/2005 1600 N FEDERAL HWY 911 HANGUP http://l 72.22. 0.34/QEDI Icadpartner/cad97 Isearch/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident ~earch Results 0 11:40:11 o Page 9 0[9 ... SQL Statment Used in Search select distinct cadinc1og.incnum, cadinc1og.dtreceived, cadinc1og.stnum, cadinc1og.stname 1, cadinc1og.fincnum, cadinclog.pincnum, cadinc1og.inctype from cadinc1og, cadincc1asslog where cadinc1og.incnum = cadincclasslog.incnum and (cadinc1og.pincnum is not null) and (cadinc1og.stnamellike "N FED%") and (cadincclasslog.dispc1ass like "POLICE%") and ((cadinclog.dtreceived between "2005-01-01 00:00:00" and "2006-02-1423:59:59")) and (cadinc1og.stnum like "1600%") order by cadinc1og.incnum desc; C Search Again Number of Incidents Listed 191 http://l 72.22. 0.34/QED//cadpartner/cad97/search/srchresults.j sp 2/1412006 o e View Hit: First Last Next Prev Hit-list Quit < > Got hit 'c' from page 1 Business/Common Place Information Page Name: YACHTSMAN PLAZA SOUTH Address: 1550 N FEDERAL HWY High Number (if a range): Hydrant1: Reference Business Code if an Alias: ( ===================== Information Returned by Geoprocessor Loc Found:1550 N FEDERAL HWY Map Grid: Police - Sector: 2 Geocode: Fire - District: Latitude/Longitude: IF THIS IS AN ALIAS, YOU MAY STOP HERE Record Type: C Phone: Hydrant2: ------------------ ------------------ RA: 203 Box: 12 / ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Type: OTH BUSN Group: OTHER Complex Name: Municipality - Code: 1 Name: BOYNTON BEACH Area - Code: Name: Development - Code: Name: Landmark/ID Tag: Nearest Cross Street: Computer Code* 415 Most recent update on 09/04/2002 by SOLODOUG <Next Screen> for Names. <Select> for Business Facts. I ( I i " I- I; , 15th Ave { . ~ ru~ ~ ;:.. ~I:>.U- .::: ;; =-t' ~-,- , = .. '= CllII" 'U'~'J' l.~,.l-.._ ,f"", -!:!.~;.;o:,::;..,~_ z Cll , ,,' II ,_, N rt' h'" d' ",.,,"" -- ...."'~~;E , -....~._- - ~-~. ,- 0 ,'''D <D '~....,. ". c:" ~;;~ ~. ~ " III [___ "~,.~, 1/1 '~-. ' ,_.- -"~ "-', ,,~~,..... ..'-=-- . J .. r-.....: -'~':- ~ ....1'K:....~...-:::"'~1"h...-- -"- - - '. -, " i~ ~~~-'-'-- _, ...;m. -" . ; .,,::E __ _ III _ ... - ;;;......~' - - :;::::;;~ , C. El - , r ~ . .'~ . '" .- -.., , ':: ':: ~Boyiiton Canal' 1\il1 CAD Incident Search Results Page 1 of6 CAD Incident Search Results v3.41,0001 C Search Again Go To Sgl Statement I CAD Search Results I Incident# Fire# Police# Date/Time Location Incident Type 6011237 6007482 02/11/2006 1550 N FEDERAL 911 HANGUP 16:14:30 HWY 6010001 6006674 02/07/2006 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 10:14:26 HWY 6009594 6006406 02/05/2006 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP PERSON 17:19:43 HWY 6006156 600410701/23/2006 1550 N FEDERAL 911 INFO 16:38:18 HWY 6005702 6003793 01/21/2006 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP VEHICLE 22:53 :36 HWY 6005085 600339001/19/2006 1550 N FEDERAL 911 HANGUP 17:14:22 HWY 6004704 6003118 01/18/2006 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 01:19:13 HWY 6000769 600052001/03/2006 1550 N FEDERAL FRAUD 20:07 :46 HWY 5099757 5067905 12/31/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP PERSON 22:41:59 HWY 5090699 5061875 11/29/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 05:22:17 HWY 5089029 5060768 11/22/2005 1550 N FEDERAL 911 HANGUP 11:18:43 HWY 5088820 5060629 11/21/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 16:21:31 HWY 5087951 5060072 11/18/2005 1550 N FEDERAL 911 HANGUP 13:09: 17 HWY 5084009 5057359 11/03/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 17:46:59 HWY 5080918 5055505 10/25/2005 1550 N FEDERAL BURG DELAYED 14:13:19 HWY 5076750 5052836 10/11/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DOMESTIC 00:55 :34 HWY 5069735 5047872 09/13/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ST ALKING/DL YD 13 :36:39 HWY 5068445 5046966 09/08/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB GEN 14:54:38 HWY 5068061 5046674 09/06/2005 1550 N FEDERAL VERBAL THREATS 19:32:47 HWY http://1 72.22. 0.34/QED//cadpartner/cad97 /search/srchresu1ts.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results () 0 Page 2 of6 50676..54 504637009/05/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 06:04:21 HWY 5067569 5046321 09/04/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP VEHICLE 18:53:59 HWY 5065054 5044521 08/26/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUICIDE THREAT 13:43:40 HWY 5064810 5044368 08/25/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB GEN 15:14:51 HWY 5063338 504333508/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL 911 HANGUP 22:25:17 HWY 5060921 504163708/10/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 22:23:54 HWY 5058323 503980308/01/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 05:20:12 HWY 5057970 503955507/30/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DRUG CASE 18:28:59 HWY 5057805 5039451 07/30/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 06:32:33 HWY 5056106 503826907/23/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 22:36:09 HWY 5054061 50060035036871 07/16/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ACC W /0 INJ 05:38:37 HWY 5052897 503603007/11/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 20:55:27 HWY 5044664 503021406/12/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB NOISE 02:28:04 HWY 5044165 5029867 06/1 0/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 05:49:32 HWY 5041569 50047105028055 05/31/2005 1550 N FEDERAL INVESTIGATION 10:19:06 HWY 5041563 5028054 05/31/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 10:02:17 HWY 5040454 5027247 OS/27/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 00:46:21 HWY 5038407 502583805/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP INCIDENT 22:26:50 HWY 5038186 502569005/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 04:27:51 HWY 5037398 5025143 05/16/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 04:15:55 HWY 5037086 502491805/14/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 21 :52:04 HWY 5035295 502366905/08/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP VEHICLE 02:05:50 HWY 5032342 502164804/27/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP PERSON 15:04:19 HWY 5031435 5021026 04/23/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 23:23:42 HWY 5029915 502002904/18/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP http://l 72.22. 0.34/QED/ /cadpartner/cad97 /search/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results () 0 Page 3 of6 19:09:54 HWY .- 501914604/13/2005 1550 N FEDERAL 5028611 EXTRA PATROL 22:03 :09 HWY 5027798 501859304/10/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 23:35:53 HWY 5027790 501858704/10/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 23:04:28 HWY 5027788 501858504/10/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 22:58:22 HWY 5027501 501839204/09/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE AOD 23:02:34 HWY 5027464 5018361 04/09/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 20:45:19 HWY 5027180 501817504/08/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 22:14:08 HWY 5026256 501752804/05/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 12:48:14 HWY 5026127 501743304/04/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOST/FOUND PROP 22:43:38 HWY 5026125 5003101 5017431 04/04/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 22:35:20 HWY 5026097 5017413 04/04/2005 1550 N FEDERAL WARRANT ARREST 20:49:27 HWY 5026088 501740604/04/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 20:24:46 HWY 5025897 5017281 04/04/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 00:32:42 HWY 5025682 501715604/03/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 01:11:32 HWY 5025672 501714804/03/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 00:25:37 HWY 50~5656 501713404/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 23:29:49 HWY 5025633 501711704/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 21 :46:44 HWY 5025410 501697404/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 01 :47:02 HWY 5025407 5016972 04/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB NOISE 01:12:01 HWY 5024850 501660603/31/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 00:46:03 HWY 5024071 5016084 03/28/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 11:11:54 HWY 5023968 5016013 03/28/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 00:09:31 HWY 5023949 501599903/27/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP INCIDENT 22:42:59 HWY 5023667 501581703/26/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 22:41 :41 HWY http://l 72.22. 0.34/QED/ /cadpartner/cad97 /search/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results 0 0 Page 4 of6 5023~0 501581203/26/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB NOISE 22:04:47 HWY 5023411 501565503/26/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 00:35:20 HWY 5022154 5014816 03/21/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 22:33:56 HWY 5022019 501471603/21/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB GEN 15:23:51 HWY 5021897 501462603/21/2005 1550 N FEDERAL WARRANT ARREST 02:41 :12 HWY 5021874 501461003/20/2005 1550 N FEDERAL STOLEN AUTO/REC 23:34:26 HWY 5021866 501460603/20/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 22:24:39 HWY 5021587 501444303/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 21:16:59 HWY 5021579 501443803/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 20:42:00 HWY 5021354 5014281 03/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB GEN 02: 1 0:07 HWY 5021312 501425203/18/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB NOISE 23:27:55 HWY 5021088 501409403/18/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 09:08:43 HWY 5021055 501407003/18/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 06:25:49 HWY 5020487 5013691 03/15/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 23:30:41 HWY 5019903 501328403/13/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 23:50:39 HWY 5019885 5013271 03/13/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB NOISE 22:14:37 HWY 5019639 5013111 03/13/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 00:07:23 HWY 5019335 5002351 501293203/12/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ASSAULT 01:59:19 HWY DELAYED 5016945 501132603/03/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 03:29:55 HWY 5016922 501130703/03/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 00:26:29 HWY 5016658 501113603/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 04:34:54 HWY 5016304 501091502/28/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 22:14:44 HWY 5016023 501072502/27/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 23:01:01 HWY 5015803 501058202/27/2005 1550 N FEDERAL STOLEN AUTO/DL Y 06:07:58 HWY 5015572 501042502/26/2005 1550 N FEDERAL V AND DELA YED http://1 72.22. 0.34/QEDI Icadpartner/cad97 Isearchfsrchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incident Search Results () 0 Page 5 of6 , 11 :03:06 HWY r 501037902/26/2005 1550 N FEDERAL 5015501 DISTURB GEN 02:00:54 HWY 5013687 5009208 02/20/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 00:32:28 HWY 5013606 500915602/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ALARM COMM 18:59:28 HWY 5013396 5009011 02/19/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 01:21:32 HWY 5011424 500766902/12/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 00:25:00 HWY 5011184 5007511 02/11/2005 1550 N FEDERAL BURG DELAYED 09:54:57 HWY 5009927 5006701 02/06/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 23:15:29 HWY 5009872 5006669 02/06/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 18:37:27 HWY 5009670 5006544 02/05/2005 1550 N FEDERAL LOUD MUSIC 23:49:09 HWY 5008749 5005932 02/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 20:39:35 HWY 5007618 5005224 01/30/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 00:54:03 HWY 5007339 5005014 01/29/2005 1550 N FEDERAL DISTURB GEN 01 :32:29 HWY 5007335 5005011 01/29/2005 1550 N FEDERAL CITY ORD VIOL 01 :19:09 HWY 5007334 500501001/29/2005 1550 N FEDERAL ASSAULT 01:17:46 HWY DELAYED 5007328 500500601/29/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC COMP 00:57:36 HWY 5007281 500497201/28/2005 1550 N FEDERAL EXTRA PATROL 21:25:37 HWY 5003900 5000498500267001/15/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 22:06:20 HWY 5002401 500164601/10/2005 1550 N FEDERAL BURG DELAYED 13 :53 :32 HWY 5001838 500124501/08/2005 1550 N FEDERAL POLICE ASST 02:19:40 HWY 5000270 500019501/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL TRAFFIC STOP 00:40:54 HWY 5000265 5000191 01/02/2005 1550 N FEDERAL SUSP INCIDENT 00:09:54 HWY SQL Statment Used in Search select distinct cadinclog.incnum, cadinclog.dtreceived, cadinclog.stnum, cadinclog.stname 1, cadinclog.fincnum, cadinclog.pincnum, cadinclog.inctype from cadinclog, cadincclasslog where cadinclog.incnum = cadincclasslog.incnum and ((cadinclog.dtreceived between "2005-01-01 00:00:00" and "2006-02-14 23:59:59")) and (cadinclog.stnum like "1550%") and http://1 72.22. 0.34/QED/ /cadpartner/cad97 /search/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006 CAD Incid~nt Search Results (} Q (cadinclog.stnamellike "N FED%~ and (cadincc1asslog.dispc1ass like "POLICE%") and (cadiflc1og.pincnum is not null) order by cadinc1og.incnum desc; Page 6 of6 C Search Again Number of Incidents Listed 114 http://l 72.22.0.34/QEDI Icadpartner/cad97 Isearch/srchresults.j sp 2/14/2006