The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-378 TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Development Board Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner~ THRU: FROM: DATE: January 4, 1995 SUBJECT~L;wrence oaks~ile No. ANNEX 94-009) .~ippl1~ati9n #4~nnexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2 Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning INTRODUCTION You will recall the City's current efforts to annex western properties through the Annexation Program, and that the last phase (Phase 2-Group 1) included Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, Sausalito Groves, Heartland Health Care center, and the Greentr~e Plaza I shopping plaza. On October 18, 1994 the City Commission directed staff to continue implementing the annexation program by annexing the next group of eiigible properties, which are identified as Phase 2-Group 2. You will also recall that eligible properties are defined as those contiguous properties whose owners have previously consented to annexation through the agreement for watep service with the City. Lawrence Oaks is one of four (4) eligible projects now being recommended for annexation. THE LAWRENCE OAKS SITE Lawrence Oaks is a County approved project located at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road, and south of Fox Hollow (see Attachment "All). The Lawrence Oaks project received County site plan approval in 1993, was scheduled to be platted in september, 1994, and represents the final phase of the Manor Forest development (a.k.a. Fox Hollow). On June 7, 1994 the City authorized the execution of an agreement for water service for this property with the condition that the owners would voluntarily annex to the Ci"ty. Following the annexation of the Knollwood Groves property, the subj ect property became contiguous and therefore eligible for annexation. The Lawrence Oaks approval consists of 178 units designed as zero lot line patio homes. Oriole Homes, Inc. began construction of site improvements approximately 6 months ago, and the individual homes will be built by the current property owner Lowell Homes, Inc. DELIVERY AND CAPACITY OF URBAN SERVICES The providers of major urban services (e. g. Police, Fire, and Public Works) reviewed the proposed annexations for impact on service delivery, and only the Fire Department would request certain expenditures if the Lawrence Oaks site is annexed (see Attachment "B"). It should be noted that the subject properties are all within the service area (range) of Fire Station #3, Fire Station #3 has superior service capability compared to the corresponding County station (with respect to response times, staffing, and equipment), and no deficiencies currently exist or are anticipated in the near future. The potential expenditures would simply allow the City to maintain .superior back-up service to this geographical area, without assistance from the remaining stations. In general, such expenditures would enable Station #3 to respond simultaneously to three (3) emergency calls (Fire Station #3 is currently capable of providing full service to two (2) concurrent calls), the potential tax revenues from all four properties would provide the funds necessary for the potential expenditures. SUBSEOUENT REVIEW AND PERMITTING OF DEVELOPMENT The timing of annexation relative to the incomplete status of this 1 project creates a unique issue of a magnitude not previously encountered by the City. This issue relates to the review and permitting responsibility required for the remainder of the project. If, once annexed, the City were to attain total jurisdiction over this project, the City would be responsible for completing the necessary reviews, issuing permits, and conducting inspections for a project that was not formally reviewed by the City. It should be noted that the City will, prior to annexation, attempt to arrive at a solution to this problem acceptable to both the City and Palm Beach County. NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS Representatives of both Oriole Homes Inc. and Lowell Homes Inc. were directly informed of the City's annexation plans, were provi~ed a court..y notice detai1inq the annexation proqram, as well a. provided with an official zoning notice. Reqardinq opinions on the annexation of this property, no representatives have communicated any opposition to annexation. APPLICATION CONTENTS AND REVIEW SUMMARY Application #4 consists of an application for annexation and land use plan amendment/rezoning. As this property is being annexed in accordance with the City's annexation program, staff has completed the necessary applications, and the corresponding application fees were waived. Additional information on this application is found on the following page and is in the form of an abbreviated summary. This summary includes a brief outline describing the property, the application, adjacent land uses, the availability of facilities, the basis on which it is found consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, other pertinent information, and staff's recommendation. Attachment "B" summarizes data in this report as well as provides information relative to service delivery and fiscal impact. 2 REVIEW SUMMARY - LAWRENCE OAKS s.llli 42 acres LOCATION: Northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road, directly opposite the Whispering Pines Mobile Home Park. EXISTING LAND USE: PROPOSED LAND USE: Medium Residential 5 (County) Low Density Residential (4.84 du/acre)(City) EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: RS-SE - Single Family Residential with Special Exception for a PUD. PUD - Planned Unit Development CURRENT USE~: PROPOSED USE: A planned community of 178 single family, zero lot line homes No change proposed. ADJACENT LAND USES: North: Northeast: East: Farther East: South: West: Fox Hollow (single family) 19. lot single family homes Lawrence Road mobile homes Knollwood Groves agriculture LAND USE MR5 MR5 N/A MR5 A MR5 ZONING RS/SE AR N/A AR AG AR CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Consistency with the Future Land Use Plan - Consistent The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map does not recommend land use designations for unincorporated properties located west of Lawrence Road. The Future Land Use map will be am~nded to show this annexed property as Low Density Residential since it is comparable to Palm Beach County's Medium Residential 5 classification, and since it is appropriate for the Lawrence Oaks project. Maximum densities allowed under the County's and the City'S classification are 5 dwelling units per acre and 4.84 dwelling units per acre, respectively. Consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies - Consistent Given that 1) the Low Density Residential classification is comparable to the current County classification, 2) the planned Lawrence Oaks project is consistent with the definition of the Low Density Residential classification as indicated in Policy 1.16.1. and 3) since the planned development and proposed land use classification are consistent .with the adjacent land uses, the proposed annexation and land use classification are consistent with all goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. However, there are several issues that should be addressed, as they describe characteristics of this site, indicate consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and/or fulfill requirements of the Florida Department of Community of Affairs with respect to the review of plan amendments. Selection of Zonin2 District The Planned Unit Development zoning district is proposed as it is the most comparable district to the County's PUD district, and is the only City district that will accommodate the County approval of the Lawrence Oaks site plan (see Attachment "C"). Since zoning to PUD in the City requires an accompanying master plan, and since project infrastructure is under construction, it is not feasible at this time to negotiate a plan that meets City regulations to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, it is recommended that the property be zoned to PUD, with the County approved site plan. Below is a brief summary of the following zoning aspects of the Lawrence Oaks site plan, as approved by the County: A) Total dwelling units approved: 178 B) Housing type: zero lot line, patio homes C) Gross Density: 4.40 D) Typical lot dimensions: 50' x 100' E) Typical lot size: 5,000 sq. ft. F) Minimum front setback: 10' G) Minimum non-zero side setback: 10' H) Minimum rear setback: 10' I) Setback for pool/enclosures: unknown J) Maximum building height: 35' k) Maximum building coverage: 50% Prior to the property recently being platted through the County process, the Planning and Zoning Department solicited from the City's Technical Review Committee memoranda listing the aspects of the County approved plan that did not meet City's code. These memoranda have been included for informational purposes-in Attachment "D" 3 Annexation This request for annexation, which is in accordance with the City's annexation program established pursuant to Policy 8.10.4, is consistent with Florida Law. Availability of Facilities Florida Administrative Code requires that the availability of. and impact upon public facilities be analyzed. Given that the proposed land use classification is comparable to the County's classification. this land use plan amendment would have no additional impact upon the existing availability of public facilities beyond that generated (or allowed to be generated) by the County's land use classification. Impact upon Historical/Archeolo2ical Resources Not applicable Impact upon Native Habitats or other Environmental Resources Not applicable Flood Zone: "B" Consistency with the Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan The proposed land use classification represents a comparable land use classification to the current, Palm Beach County land use classification. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Department recommends that this application submitted in connection with the Annexation Program be approved based, in part, on the following: 1. The subject property is contiguous to the corporate limits; 2. .The subject property lies within the City'S Reserve Annexation Area; 3. The annexation of this property is consistent with the City'S Annexation Program; and 4. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. ~IleIX'AX.2G2'4.RI. 4 / / ATTACHMENT "A" LOCATION MAP I~.~ -, '-'"-~~I:18'ftlli9E1 _ I __L--..........J;?rii:ullldrllll~ IT'. n~rrIT ,~#~ 1-- &;;';4L ~ ITLmB1 r [F7 ~ <~ , I I I i II I s. ---'ITo-;i:1. J ~;..,..~ ~ 0- _ IZ. I', I ~t: \ r~\.. ~,. lo. J! t:;;;.:) r-/~J. ~ \'''<!i ~ Vll J I · ./ T~~ ' ~I ,-:,d. ~lAU !r~ II ~,!,'~" .~ .f ~- --r' ~ ~ J r:r -; ~: I II [ II ~'. . ~~ ._A. .'.0 V.II I . ~ ...- - ................... ~ ....... '- IV P Q .t:-I"~.' '- '.,1 lCH"i4Jtt,I'oD tlP...:r . J AG .. '. ' / l ""II I""" I h B~~"", /!jD rTrr - ~ I II · ~~ ~ '" ~~ r;:"j . I~~'/III IIII .~ TI~' .,/ II II nl II" '~ ~ ''', .."... ."" IIl1'iMMIiI ~. ~~ ""~T 1-0 ....r.'1b jT T rriJ . . ~ ~III.. .'. 1.--1'- CD ~ r::: ,ll~," , :!! fo- "_11"- ". -;;. .. ..... " ~ 11-..... m')~ _'V/""~ 11.... .. ..... I II' I APPLICATION #4 - LAWRENCE OAKS 9DOI 4/ A. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: 'r , ,fr! ? -r.~ f'v^72 cY f!?"Jj( rf INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING PLANNING DIVISION Kirk Crane, Senior Planner Laura M. Minns, Planner Ic;:x'CtA fV'-- September 21, 1995 Petition 82-71A, Manor Forest PUD BACKGROUND The following petition scheduled for the September 27, 1995 DRC meeting is located within the West Boynton Area Community Plan (WBACP) and has been reviewed by the neighborhood planning staff for consistency with the draft plan. Petition #82-71A: The property is located at the intersection of Lawrence Road and LWDD Lateral Canal No. 20. The petition is a request for a Development Order Amendment to delete internal access within an approved PUD. FINDINGS Petition #8271A: . This proposal conflicts with several draft recommendations of the WBACP. This plan is scheduled for BCC adoption by resolution on October 3, 1995 and will be used as a guide for future development within the West Boynton Area. The City of Boynton Beach adopted the plan on September 19, 1995. The proposal conflicts with the following recommendations and should be considered in reviewing this petition. . . . Recommendation 34: Reduce the need for widening major and minor thoroughfares by encouraging the placement of a well inter-connected system of collector streets. Where interconnected systems become possible, care should be given to a community's quality of life, the amount of through-traffic, the impacts on safety, and overall security. Recommendation 35: Discourage the use of dead-end streets, loop streets and oversized blocks in favor of through-street ( collectors) and shorter blocks. Provide cut-throughs for pedestrian access to transit. Promote the landscaping of rights-of- way, Recommendation 36: Encourage new residential developments to include: 1) an / ~ . ~ September 21, 1995 Page 2 interconnected system of collector streets in their development plans which consider . appropriate adjacent undeveloped parcels with a potential for future development; and 3) stub streets that tie into existing adjacent stub streets. DIsPosmON Please include the findings listed above in the Planning Division report. If you need further action contact me at your earliest convenience. pc: Maria Bello Carl Flick file: I:Ic\p\adv\laura\drcm/82-71a.kc 10/02 '96 11 :02 ID : PZ8-ZQNING FA>< :5612335,167 PAGE 1 Bu.mJ ut' County Commissioners County Admillistratol' Ken F()~lcr. Clmirman Burt Aaronson, Vice Cl1air Kmcn T. Marcus Carol A, Roncrts Warrt;n H. Newell Mm)' McCarty Mauuc F{lrd Lee Robert Wcismim Dcp1ll1mcnt !If Plnnlling, 1'.nllill~ &I BuildIng Kristin K. {Jimison, Executive DircclOr -.: . FAX COVl~1l SHEET DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMM1TTRE SECTION Fax Number: l#~ ~__~kmp/-- /I;Z: ~ '~-7i~ ' +7. 810' .. (e{j16 . 815 ~2S7 -L( Date: To:_, Firm/Company: Total numher flf pages jncluding this cover sh~\:t: If YOll have diffk:ulty rcctiving this emire trumanission, please call 233-5042. ProjectNall1c: 1M ~ ~ ~- -#-- f:L:-2l ff- Comments: ~~~5f)/r \l W~ ~ \r\l~"we>r Jrm nr.T _ 2 \996 PLfl.Nt~ING "'N[) ZONING DEPl - - -~- -- -'.--- --- - ----..-...-.-----.--..- .--.__._-~_._----~---_._.._~_._----~_..._----- 10{12 ';'6 11:06 ID:PZB-ZCt01G FHX:56:23?<;;167 DibE 11 LAND II Luncj P!a,"'rr,g DESIGN Londsc"pe AlchilE1c1l,'re r.nvlr\)nrr,el'ia~ Cor',sul1a.110rl SOUTH 4Il1-4nt601 11',j.t",:~'~?[h11!i:'Oml,.jl.I'i_;'ll.,'~~I:'" =..I"'ttojl \;~II-JC,~!>.,t\."J.,fl-tt'~,1,X' ~JtL~"I') WW:1FwlrnIWo' ttl{jr;:-:Jv:,:q MANon FOI~EST PUD .11 iSTlJiICATION H.EI'ORT W.;; arc c\lrrcmly suhmilliJll! this Dcv,lnpllll.'rll Order i\1\I<.:nJnKl1\ ;\\ the 1','lUC;! n: thc rcsrJenb "I' ilK MllIllIr FN';stl'UD, 1111<; 1\,,!,:e~1 is 10 t'llc,Clively ~:plll(in hall'. the (,II' spine ro~d (Manor Furest Ill_d.) thaI clltrcnlly run~ ill a l1<ll"lh/solllh dil\:clit1ll L1aou!?h I.he cnti;e PCD, TI1" ",,\lId ~epin<l1,e liie' llt1rthcm ~uhdivislOns, WlllCh have: been CllillplelcJ 1m ,c\"~ral )'l!M~ frol1l11K s"ll!hern [1h~~.~. which i, ~llrr~ntly un,j'T cf)nslr\lClillli. \Vc ,Ire' propoc;ng In t\:nll1!lalc ~b" l1\lrllll'r11 portH)I! "I wadwilv \V..m: M.,n,)1' FLl.-<:st Blvd, 1:',\C:S~~IS Willi lIl"C\vcpark l.allcl11c Si1U,ht:1'1l kt!, of Manor Fnre~l Bhd. J' It) be IW11il;31l'c\ in " 1l1(ldlfi,~J 'y. tmlhl-I"'UnU within \h~ existing (i\!' Rit~hl-{1r-WB} IROW). h is not p,"~sib;c: to acquire \lime land alnng tln~ R-O- W to prl1vide 11 ful! cul-Jc-~aL on the southern !xlnio!l ',lfthis H'~dw;~v. NIl.',!\wr ll)(ltlilic,ll!O:lS arc being prnp,)scd Ullhis tllne 10 Iile (kvd()pl11~1l1 !C~!t""Jm:lrut I\l~: 10,02 'ge 11 :05 I D: PZB-ZO~I I [",il, FA~: 5f12'?:'Sl'37 PAGE 10 il'~"""'''''''~~'''''; t NOIlTlT ;F-l :::,,'" :~?(:>,~,:::t~: .:,1" t:;~~:~t.J:L::1:j.;. '.'.~';/ ,~~.~:~ ,'" """ "~~,~.J (~!"fPIII(,:IY.~..:..L., NIIIII ":~~, Sj,nO:j L(~ r <uni I Y ^>.:>proved for P~I'3-1 "fJ l)pvelOI~nf~nt n.:~one lo all.ow 1~::84".8C) & ,,4- } I.:, '- ~iln9,I,e f'allnlV l): v..lo[JIlltmt 58 to .:l low 1'",fJl-99 C()nyw.~rci.'lJ Ci t [" :3 F:-Oj-14<:2 ,clll.e'1 ~ oeTV~ce N/iI H, l!:hST MR", H~; MR5 SE MH5 AR MWi AA ["arm L<md SOlT J'II inglo FamHy l{eslu.:>nct':J N/lI 'j -j WEST " ~'<tXTllJ curl Nlr. NI/\ If Jldjacenr hu"" ~IINH1rfs" rreylo..ll1ll);1,-o....1I1 by Illl~ nee fir 7.nl'1Ilg CO"lU'IH:nn. 11rl.'im.' ill4:llIrlt~ :J hll....r 'k(t.'lil'!loH of 11,.e lIPilil~"I'(f ll~{:(q .l1oJ th(' .\f\pr(H'f'i1I,\\\i:\ft": I~\O'"RC _if \mnlher nf l)wtUbe: unit! ~;.:;.:ti',':'~M')i~l1kf~NT,'6t:fJt~Yt(jij.';~9N'i),;k;Ns=;' 'h,rr~~)V A L:' .. ~~.. .H___~ C""'lll.,. Ihe followlllg If lIllllllclIhlc (llltuch lHldillollllll'~g.' If It..c~,'nl"'): A, 1I1tlfc,,(c the slnlll~ or nil .'cevlotl! c()lulIlIolI~ of II'provol: -2}~f.' de~., [:)per .3 j 11 -=()mpJi.:lnCl~ ~~:,~,__ P!~J,:;; condltJoos of iJPPFoVEll_~,,~til.L~ illy,uoJ.~llon~3.::J!Y_~,_,__"._.___ n. E~lId hllll:IIRgc of ."ch "r.,.lolls cOl1dflluII prl'I",..(d lu be IImcn:lccl (lllcllnh' cOli/lUlu" Ilmll'c.<;oluUOII IUllllher<): Nit, " I~~ncl h'll(:lIll:e or proposed IImendll,ent: _.!ili\ _"",_,,___ _"_~'__,^_'_"'_ --'--------._---.-..,,->._-_._-~,---...._-_. .-.....,._.,--,~_..._-....._'..,..- I JII.Ullcnlloll" ^ delllllul dr.Hd,'lfon of the jll~llflcl111011 for flnll 1"'(11'0..11 ""I<'II<lIIIClI' 15 reqlllreel: _, N/ A_,___,,, ._-_...._-_._---~--_.. '-" ,----...-....----...-- '--.----.-.----...-.--- --,._" .----.-.-,,--."'.--."-- .--,.--. -'-'.--..-----. . J 1::1'02 '915,11:05 lD :F';:B-ZCN[i~G ~p)< :5E;1283EIE'7 P'-!GE 8 jlnc:~."J.l ",u~1-___L ---1-, =-- ----~-- ' ~~"-="~~~ =-JI II ~- L~., ~..- .~ ., ~'----a:.....:..." =::':--:,~=="="~==~-'. ~ '. ~~ --~ ~ ~.., YI:JU~9Ut:.s~~~~~' '",.,~~~~~ '-- .' Jl N/II ....__,______..,. ^, Reqllelled Use (U) . list Il!IC(S) l'CfTuCSlcll: II. Jusllflcnlloll for each requestellllscl N/^ ..-.-----.-....------...,---....-.--.-. .__..~-- I~ ~~C(;,rLI.\Ncl~l;.toNI'J'~t1~: ~=-=~~~~=~ ..M.:..---:......~_..~..:..._.~~.,_..'"h ..:~, 'z.~--:..~n.~,. ~~~_-;:..::..=:.;----......_~~ ^. Is l,rollcl1y III curllplln'lco wills n!lllft.loLIS ~f)ndHllllls..1 .jll"O,al allll/or 1l1'I'liCllbh' CIl,h' rC'I"lrcmcJIls? If IL", I'lc~'e "<;ll.,,,, Yes ~-'-_._"--"'--"_.'---"-' --"--"'-"'-~"~ I. neporl ..lIll,C slalus uf Rllllrr.v"t\l~ ol",dlllmlO "r 1II'III'O,.l: ,\1'1 c()n~Ul i~~~~31~1'nvci~.-ill!;'. Si:lt l;;fjl;.'9_~_,_ will be ~.;.:ltJ:;fW0 wi.th tJ}~"1Iplet,~~_ol tllD d,~velol::!!Jftu1,,_._._.__,_,..___._ e"de Enrore"noo"l ClUe Nu'"bcl'!I1_".llLA.__,___.._._ .__ _._' _,_.___,___. . I. Tlol!l1 Che re-.fuest .'C'.sullll' u .s1G:nlfk..tti chnl\~c tl) H.e fh!l'clnpllu!'nl rur c.ln1r~fj\lu'c UUd(T liJll~' UluttutlmLI;'l Jf ]'1.':,10. plttt!l.1l! ell.ptu(u: }If.. WlIlllIIs rtquc.~t fe.1ult In 1I1'181111ll['llllUII rt<luesl fill' 11 Hme txle'l~hm rnr r11lllll1rnrrlllrnl of t1cVC!lilllllcnf bCCllIlSC or "Sllbslnllll~l dlallll~ IlIlalld us."? 1'IcIlSe cxplollll No VIIl. I.ANUSCAI'fNGlVI';....:n TlI ~N l'Iu.:SI~lt ~ A'n(~~;;~v AI.; .____-1 .~..._...... ~===":""". ~'. ".__~_._~.,._.._. _....__J GCnernl V.~dl\Il"1\ Sh.I."'."l: _'!'hi ;:~_~ ikl.!. 1.>ef'~H'Udll y cJ 1~<n'I~Ic1 :.k,w! l.oPc:d. ___ __ . . Clltre,,1 ~rlltl.I.I..BU"n:,~.__ _"__ 1\1IIkll'r1lr,1 fhlbh.f1 1l1."drld..\.ltO"'__.~~___1_ LII.IIIs...I'o 'rllbu!"t re<Julr.m.nl.: ---!1~____._ ___"_' ___, _. '__.__ _.._.__u -........--...,,--...-..--.----- ..._...__.------.~,._..._. .__.~--._.._-_.__....._-,~_.'- 11",,-~ lhe \'n'I""e,1 hl\llt'(lVtlllclll 'lIect,! :l~'o/. or 111. "11IlrJllsr" Vllh.. fll Ih. I'illnl fill 1.I.kll Ihe HllfI"IIl,," .'('wn? ~ 1(.'02 '95 1::04 lD :PZB-Zc:tHNG FAX:561232S167 PR,;E s iL ,:_~_~~":t}:/,.))~:, r~~111~!~~,I,~]l1ll~/IC,~T!!?~,~~-=-=_:"~-=,.,=---==~JI PIc,'!e C(lll:l'lCIC nil ~\le~lio". 011 Ih\, al'l'licaliOlL Unol ~1'1'lic"\)lc. il1.licate willi NiA. r= ~..- =- ~ ==.._-'_.__._~.._-_..~-] ),,'i')'rJP;;;EV~W:.' " -' --..,----------, ..... -- ---.~.=-- ~~-~ . j X I OeVCIO\ltTlCOlOrller Amelldmelll (DOA) Development Order Amend",cnl . c~l>ctlilell ^I'l'lic;lllo" COllllllcf"lh\l\ I EAt) NOTE: Ie rftl\lc~I"'R I(XIIt.III~.I AJIJlllcllllolI OIll~"Jclllllull (11M'). lite 'ultllltlllr, l\,hIUI(\l\lIlltl(mltll\II\1IlI~ Itqllllt'll: L IUSllllc~li(l" ~lalell1cnt - S\:C A!lidl' ~ 4.11. (Ij~peditl'd Itcvicw l'ullsi'!cr:lli",,), (1,lcllsc nU"dll WIlllen aulhOllzation from lI,e (""lilY EI1Einecr m1tl ZOlling flil'eel<l!. ll,11'llsc aUnt!>) \L ~ ~ .--~ : ';:', ,r1'Vr~(lih)d'\ "ltQl1j~ '..' ~~ - ==-:-r~ --,." --'=1. . Ii Check (,,') nlllhnt nI'IIIJ': 1l~l.Ju~!!.d tlA. (Il) Al1Icm\\IIel\lIO previous lequlretllelllslellu,[ilion(s) or ap[lruvn' A<ld IRII~ are. Ddele lalld aleG \lcdesignal. Land U'(l3 Reconngurc Ptclimil\3lY OCVe\olllJlcnll'lnu/Silc Design x 1 Olher (Indicate proposed AIlICIl<lmenl) We ara pro!X'si,IY,j to delet0 the 1;hro~llh accesr;; 'lllong 111.11)01 Forest Boulevard between PhaHe I find Phase Il:r at toe liovelopnl'3nt -----"-'-'-- ,,-"- -- ---'.~--- ...-- ~.~ - -.....-. _._,,~._"'- --'~'-"'---"'------ ~--"'-- ._- -.,--.. - -"..,.---.-.-.----.--.- ..-".-----,-..------. -~-........---..'--~ ,~-'~-_.....~ -~ ~.J m. Tvi',1iw 1,1~~,Ei,(jrMii.~t()l~im;:t) lilt ^~;;;~'\I): ~~---===--~~--i-~.~,~ _ ~~..~ . hl:fk \.J) I, pc o( JlrevlQwly appl'lIvelJ deveJuplnell1 order: CIR$I ^ C<lI1dillQtlal Use (sllcclry 8l1PlOved use): _ ClUI D Cllndit!QnRllJso (~lleciry ""1'1(...11 l1Se): _ 1< 1 1')Rnn~d Development District (lisl dlslricll}'j>e): Previously appmved fe;r il PLmned Un;' L DevL'lop1i<![,t. 0111\1' (lndirate tYI1~ I!f 1>cv~IOI'lIJeJlI Older): --~--~---'-"---'--:--'- ._--....--~._.,~-,.---~,--- ~~""- ,--..--..-'.-,---.--'.--.--- ._-' ,,--.'.-,---.- ._- --- . _.- ..-" - -' -.-------.- " .,.' IV. < ;.~;),.tdh\, 1.0(~A'\'I(iN;==-=--=--=--.-~~--,-"-"'-"~11 _~..-:--.__ ' ~.. - " ...__ ~_.. ~--===-d , s. suhJtd ,Jrlll,.,i,f lllcalooll.. 4bo fulllro ..""..,"101lIlrcu "r n In.mldl'lIl1ly(.}T If Y"'. 1l.lm,mldl'"l1ly(s" ,__,_ No 15 5ubjccl Pt'OI'.'1~ Intllled ...llhl" \)lIe II) milt 01 " mllnlclpallty "I n,I,I"relll 0111111, 'I If YO,', IIsl tIlllllldl'"IU~ nr (ClIlIl,: Yes, Boynton. B0ac~~~rUn?,~~____.___. ._ __. - - ~- ---~ --- .~---- 10/02 '96 11:04 ID :P;:8-ZDNI~JG Fq~~:5612835167 PAGE ':' un.. tla\'J/~~1I1 ~J\\o'H(..',:.) Iv SUllWI1 iIPJ)lIL::i1IH.lI1S IUI me .uJmwmg ~UlUHK p"~l'l.::'it3: ~t'~l~;'M~ LflCLl ~11t .,toc.:::tS~' agc.nl '5 auUu,aln.t.i 1m) I ^dlllllll'l'~IIve V.,iRIlCe I Admlnhlrall\'C Slle Plan Amcndmcul I ^ppeill or Adllt!llltlraltve hUel\lIelallol\ I 1I0.u<l of AdJutllllCl1I (Varll/I.e) I COIIC'Uncncy ReservlllolI or CxelllJ'lloll I Coudl1ional U.... Clu. A Dr II I } DevelOJlnlCC1I Order Abil1dooJlJenl (X ] Development Order Amendmelll (DOh) or ul~cdl1<:d ^I'l'llcllion COlltidtlalivll (UOAIEAC) I ) Devtlol.melll Review COl1llUlllce (ORe) (llllal She or Suhdlvlsionl'lall I I Olnclal ZOlllng Map ^mendrn,nl (ReZOl1l1lg) I j I'lamlW l)evelo/lmcnII>lSlrict (I'D Os) I J "leappllcllloo COllrereace/Collccl'llIll Slle I'la'l Review I I RelC&!e or Unlly of Tille I I Special Ute Perloll I } Time Eklenllons ! 1 Olher (Please Specify: 1 hive Ibe [ull knowledge lnd c(lnStlll olilll u\Vllers of rCC<Jrd of lhe projlerly llla( h Ihe $1I1>)ecl of this [equelL I \In~Wand Ihal Palm Deadl Counly. in processing ami UI">Jovl,,~ lllis rell"C51. Is relying 011 IllY 8mltalIC. II.., all ownen o[ record ale aware ollhli lcqucslllnd nI'Pro\'e of my ~ctill8 J5 ligen" ^, "J:cm, r I,ave the IWlhllrily '" ~r.rec lu cOlldhions 11.,1 may be 11I11'0,(d Anlil)~VI'I,.OliAi'!~A'I;lh~'CQ~11:[,I~';"'~~Ac:cu~r: . - .~-~ ~ ~1 JlwC (el1ify Ihallhe abuYc 5131elllcm. ~lIlllhc 'Ialell~nls or ,I,owlng' lIlade. In allY I'ol'er' or pl,m8 lul""il!ed I,crewllh are lIue 10 ll:e hesl 0" my/our klltlwled~e and beller. ~1\J1hu, IIw(. ull~crslal'" IlIai Ifth nlll'licmiall, i>llildHIIC1ll5 alld fccs lJcc!)llI~ l'arl vr Ihe offie;al recold, of the !'Ialllling, ZOlling and n~lldlllg ()eparlnlcnl oj Palm IIt"dl t.OUllIY Ol$! u,.y IllIl be .dltlldJble. llwc \l1:utfllillld thai My klIowingly r~hc iJlfolmalioll given 'IY mc/ul will rC5ull hlllic dClllal of lhe 3111l1killioll. llwe further nekllowlcdSc llral a.lIl(lIon.1 i:1flllllla ' red by I'alm Ilca~h COllnty in order 10 Ilroccu Ihi~ applicatiulI, Robar Dale: (Pelitioner's Sil\llalure) PelillOl1cr b: x I"ollerly Owner Olllcr (J>ka~e 5peclfY) . ; i ' _. ,., : .: ' ;,: ..:.; -.. ~: -:: -' ,n' ".: ", , " . (; . , J. " :. '. , ;' '. . N9~J'~lt!~EIII\,GI~No.Wf,l~i~GRMbNl'JJY J'R<Wlm'f'( PWNell:', STATE OF 1'1.0ltmA COUN'r'i tW l'.\l.~{ DEAell " \ I /'I'tii ._ day vf _i 1l>-''''~'"c.C .r ,I!I.1Lu)' TIle forellolul IIlslIUmcnl was lICknuwledlcd before 111" 1111. Rollerl, A. Iltmtz (Nalne of Penuo Aclwowlecl&lng} l.leJ'lJ.Ia.J!~!~uft~I_LklH>.wn 10 IIIll or lias llloduced ___~. l<tcIIlI lle'l Ion and dld/~j,J noll.k< all 031h, ITY/lc of ldelrlincalloll) -- -. "m' NOTARY PUBLIC lNFORMAnO~; , \ \-/: . ~'\,I J ." (J 11' , l$ ~_.1:.-( .<~_ .~ j . ,L'\_"~ ""'-J ~ of' - \,' .., ... - . (~igll~l\rc uf Ncmy),,: ,/ ,1, ,-.~-') /'- ~ /l if,; I-/. / If,' J II . , (N~nlc. Musl he lyped. 1lIll1Ied. Or 'lamj>e<l) Nutary Public: (Tille os Rank) 12tlO Nurll, Cunil.l''''':l ^'i~l\ue (SIJ<<1 Adltrus) (Serial NLlmbc:l, If Illy) ....,:.;.,::.;.... 1)!'~IlA"L ~EAL ...il' t;. \ LlLI,If,N f.. PAiVA : ~ loA';' c;J~'H\'I\~llln flCl,Ar., -. . ...~~ (NOThnV's SIlAI. ~ .' Com'" No. CC 2LJS~~B .. Of ~ .' 'tt.,,_" _ \1es~ Pal!!! ~eQch. FL 'J'jI,09 ICilY, Slale. Zip Cude) J~2--~'i.'2.1.. (Te!cl'hone N\llnber judLl<li"B Area Code) 2 10/('2 '96 1: :03 ID :P2B-Z::Jtm.J(, Fh>~ :~f,,:2~:-.:51E,7 PRGE t: .-,.-......,..,...,. ~ :=-:..,,;=~' . ...........-..~'--....";:.~~,~~.~_... ,;...;.:",-- ,"~'" ;,-..,.--; -.".,,;._~'-.,'".~,_... "JI Cll..'(;h (.J) (, 1If" uf IIl'i11ki"ilt1t(:lj) 11f11.1,""~1I~ II/l": J :/...CIJICC l ;': IUB-' I i V"l """.\~ t 1 CI~Ul'\)IlI'I1<"Y ) ~\II'~I:ill' 1'(nnH r==-~~'" .. I ""'":"~~~ '---.. . '.' L l'IWI'I.,[nV IA~C~~-:-""~~~- ~o--="~~-ll .._--ar~, '-'-"-~-=-"'~':"~~:":"'~~"=,,:-~~-;-=-::=~"Z'---:-=,:-,~=-::::-~,,,:,,:,;;,,~) A. 11I'OP~l{" Lflutl'ul Numhcr (I'CN): Jf l1ddidn;m: PC~'l'i, h~'" (}II .~ ~:'pnJllk ~lu.;(,'l ~;11.! ;lllal:h t(\ ap\Jiiultioli. &~D i'lt'.'.,,;tdl~':(l 11:;1: l'eN: L LLL:.L-11,,--L::.LJ.L._J :;J_._LL,~i ~J .,--1.... '-_ U_ JL.L.:.:.J._U_1 J_\ 1__1 It Section ~2__~_ 'lo""lt~hrp ~.:~_..._ nllllge ..__~~.~~__. T.'~;IIl\('r(-:\~t' ~d' S\I~lj('d PI'U(lC'lt)': ;~,.::..:~~~~__ Co l'IllJeCI Npl1I~:_ Ma~o~ POD,_..__,_,___ J'b'I"O":. !'dWo" H:__.~!~,_,_.. D. I'mJell ^llllrc,~~:.. N/A L Suhjccl J'r~llcrly Locnllurl (pro\illlily Iv dlJ$,;slllHvor illterscu;''il. il: IIIiH,s u:' i "',.:'''115 Ilitll(,f):,~!~(JcJ .,~.!:.!-'1L: __._ :.nt<:rsed:iall of LCI,,'r.....ce f<oClcl & J,I>.DD Liltt;l"cll Girl"l d',:. 2(' _.._-.._..__.._-.----,--..~---~._-,~-_.,.._. -....-" ..._--.~-...._..._'"---- F, 'lmffic ^"nlysls ZllllC ('I'.'\(.h _~,_ ('''11l:(l1 rc,..,y Cll~C #: 2:Q.:P3..:0' I, ,(i'::~:~1___ ,'" E~l'lrnll{)1I D:lle: 1~!/.!!!l~~. C, Qvt:1In,)' i:H~tdd$: P!t:nse Ched~ {J) "II ovc-rl'IY di1-.!l'icls :llld J!rit,.hh~ilhuOI: plm..H....l/1 ,\r't;:l:;; ll; '.vll-\.'lllht .~lJhjCl, p~il\f("liy ;i.::.~, ^~ricultul'" Rf.':iiCI'V(" C""dillol1ol Overl,\, ZOll" (L:()Z) Olo,ks ^'~' Er<m"11I1~ ((.J^.n) 11l(lhlll"",o IlelAd ellll idol' (IOi'.) ]"hul), M~cArlhut Slnl' !'nrk (11"",~il'O JonAII""1 L>ickill~(>11 Sln:e Pntk (lrccll!illo N:llj~r. UcnsySlclI1 (Nr:,O-, Nci%lIb",hv."d 1'11111: (1I1cdfy) __"._.,,_.__._._. I. J r Nl~ll.h ('~J'.j:j[)' IL:u:!;I: Unli.II\T !JC\'('.iC;'ITS. ^.uil.'F~IIl':q: I J f';d'll !3c'i.":1 Intf.'\Iwi,il:\ll:\i ^ttP{}d (J'BJ.\-O) 'I J H..'<' ,,,/, /<, T"O\l''';o.'! IIl,I<T,O) I 'I \I'"l'II;c A'I\,Ifcr l'tu.rdi"11 r:M',O) J Vllj:l~~I;Hl iinmilY U(JllU~ (VDB) ) \l1l!~!~.~i2I':/[!)vc(Ir.lc Jj~:IIlr.~ CHA nVrJ.!.t\.0J I O,il'::' l~!l{'dry) "_"_~_ ._..._.. .--.-.--.... ,- .._. ..:;;~c-:~.:;~.:!:~~........-:-=:-:~~~ II, I.ANlI W;I; ANl) 1.0N1Ni; I~FOnMATIIlN: il . .~::::=:" :-=.-~.~~"""":':'"~.,:, ...,,- .,.'~.~".~' "~".==-~"'-:=.~""~'~~~'~ < A. 7"millg Ik;!~II~lIoll; ~~_~~~u__, 11, FIIIII!C 1.111111 U;l~ l)eSll:lll1lrjJll,2~" . {"",ill); (.Iu.1I1 M!l1l *: ,.. 3.1 . . l.uulI u.<l' ,\tli\~ ~11l1' #: ~(; C, Eld.\lhlg IJse(>) Illll'ro(lcI1y: l'UD with. 0xist!!.~~;al", .r~ri~v _ 1'lollo>elll1sds):__-.:I~:~~n___."~ , _"'_ ._~..__,,_~-.J.Q.f.~f f\ ~ljV~\~~.LYD:l_~ lQJAl'~f__ :::='=::r.-:':,~,.__'~~. _ ._.,~:-;-:-:--=-~ i ._ .___-=-_,. - .~i ::..".-r:r-~:--~ _~. ..--.. 1,::;;;;7;,:,01'\') "r Hw....l: _~::.!'?rveI_~~l.~_ .._ __,.___" '.~_,:~~: _~___,--'~,==~I ^ddrcu: _ 224~lbri2~~~.d. !-S?":-~_(;i!y",J.';'y'nl.y(:.. &',,-;,,:h____w.Slnt._.J:~ 7.Jl>3342b-\i~3S ill I'hm,o; [407 )36~:::1fUJ____.._,__ FAX: L'.lQl_LJI.\:L.::J.~..._.__..._._, I: - ~ -~',~ - . -- ~j l'ellti"lltl(s) jf ,'(hel (\\qU (i\..lel\'):...._VClI19.l,1iln~ R\,a~1:tl [l('W;',,:;pilUli!: ..Q~n;~'Lil~.~.:d!l-_,.._",___ .______1' ^ddr~S5:_?}4!J 1'Ir:<:llbris)1t 1-:o"d, ,;;1'(; 3(','3_ City :'cl,lluCl ;'~'~,~~!,-1L-11j)~3:!.:(:.6::b., ii l'!ir'l'.: r ':C7 lJti9-4611 FAX: j...1Q:L~-21')1.L.--____~_ JI' L- -'" --===;1 , AC~UI:' _~.!.L.i\,~.~_._,__. CI)ltljWIY Nnmc:_J-!.lt,u... Deslgn S;:<u.1'-L__._.____. ____ . !\lHrr..I~: _)~U;c~'ol1qrer,~~..!...Lg2_? 12.. .._,.._t;Hy ,~~~~. 11. l'IIOI\~: l....JC'} I ,rlU-1!~~.._,,_.___.._, PAX l...i!ru..:D~;-'-..l '? ...~~:)k,.~o ",il'__.}J'l(I,-_ . ^" CQlI''''l,ondr.ller. niHil. S"IIC 'n PGtlli ,,"l.s~ olhol'lvl,. I'riJuc.to<l. i , !I II List fJf COl1lu1t~l1l(.': Arlllcl, (In<:lud~ nnllle NJdro.ll, J1holtc t1Ulubr.r, r~~ IHHUllcr, !'Imi 1~:,ortUiQl1nl t::oJCC( ,S('fVkCf' .l:u:;PPc'tl},j! I\'tl~l.lSRfl"LV':=82. ..~. '1\.0'_-. .... .... .~ ..'''- '''..--. -. = WOIIII:________ ._~_. '----L-..ti, __' _ '';'1\';'' l'tl.J(d H~__ _.._,_ .__.___,___, _," _,... 1110'1(,')'_._._..__. -.-., .(,;lnlf In(R~( !))':.-. .__,,___"_ __",_~." ,..I J\locllng 1:11110'_.. SE~ 1.?J!l9~._ .._. "_,_ Jutul,,' Jl.." '_"__"..AUG...ll,~~~,, _ _" I Al'l,llcnlloll SUffltlllll_,..___,_.__..__(\)'lr.) J l'\'OTc;"rli<'k"t .___ID:)jo) 10/((: '?6 11: 03 ID :p;:a-z[)>mJG FP!::~6:2:33S167 PHI~::: f:. 4. 'i'he !!laster plan should no ,,-mendod to inuicate: a. the ramoval of ~balloonedn areas; l:;, the perimeter ot"ollnd ,'\11 recreation p'lr:;"ls; c. amergency accaHS betWu8n th0 are3S to bp separdted: and, d. con6ist~ncy wi th the current l y ,'.pprovr,d milf;tE?r 1,lc..D. (Certification Issues) .QQ.!iQl,!~RENCY ,Sf-CTION ~ W.QlliL] J j -5.~ ?.21 I, A Concurrency Extonsion, SO-OS-Q~-OO,)Xl, ren'p. In:; VOl ~ i d "ub j ect v:, Hi" sta~us of the develapmont order, (Commentl QF..FICll.RF, THli ..G.Q!lli.:I.:i.AT1'Q8N.E'i (Xi?~, 3:>~:-J(,lU 1. Need agent's authorization. (Certification Issue) J::1h.NNllliLJllY;;:SION lliL......Qnme. .] 33 -5 ~ ?Hl 1. of concern IllClY P(, torth..:omir..:; L'cllI cant-act Kirk Crane I or i~n ilPFoi nnil":1t. t.ilo I:'}Zlnll1~KJ (Cr.;~mment. ) ~j,vis:;.ori, TS:JueR r1 ea~~~o 1"J.\~':lr:J,OPMl',;NT DlvrSlQN (Mi:". .~I1." (j;)4-4,O'lli.. ~ 'l'P,,",fFIC D,[VTSIOl'l (Mr.~:;.. 684::40;lOt ll" rhCft?: u.T"C numerous ('!rro:-'s and Qmi~~5ion~~ Wl!}~:j.'; t:ie ";lpplica~.lon :,nd Ma~t.r Plan and therofore the Enqineerlns DepKrtmen~ ~ill not rev~e~ the application until ther.:a <lro con'Qo:.:t",c~. The ,'lpplic.:lnt shoui(J sclwdule a meet inq witJ, th~ F.nqineerin') DC;Ci'l"tl1l,,,!",t to :]0 over ttw appJi~a~ion 8G snon ilZ possible. (Cnrtjrl;~licr lss~~) llidiQO lc-1?2Jl1W _~. .J:lQrJ'1tJ oct 0'; L t, J Ij :-,?.3 ;Ii 2 ':. 1. The S,,:hool Dist.ric":: ,'Int.cip"t"'$; llO nm;atl\'(; lmpilct.;; en t.~lO public ~chool ~y~tem from this Fa:itlon. (Comnent) 3jncerely. ~tof~ ~ Principal Planner ~c: P~t~tlnn Pile RESULT3. R\,)1-?4-96\OOAU2-71 \A) PlIGF: ' 1\>')2 '96 1::03 lD :PZB-Z[N[NG FRX :56123::''5167 PH';::: -; l'oiHd ()l ('nuJlIY Curnllli~:-.iofW;'" ({'lll~t;. A{1rt1Hli-';:I,lhil '.tTi j..I'O'II'I. l 'halrlrt.ln 'it/1' i\;trOn~;ol~, Vi,"!' j 'h.liIIH.I'i '..I~l'n 'I M.llYU-, 11-.11 ^ I~,,;,...:\'h V,HTI'!~ l! N\'.~.l'!1 .1.i!)' Mil <Illy _j,ll!.J, j'[lfd [.i'l' j{llhl';l 'IV ~'il.,Jl1.1n DtI1..\l"tt't'V\\1 '.,1 Ill,illrqllp.. l\\uir.g ~'.. H1\\ltHli}, ,J~n\.lary ]8, 1996 ~ .,;J~~.": . ;:_.... .',,<'f~~ '"1 . r\ ' ~5-'" ; / nil] l\i~ \ h,;j"lll;' Mr. Robert Bentz wand Design 50iltJ\ 1280 N. Congress AvenU0 Suite 215 West Palm B03Ch, FL 13409 RE: DRe RESULTS - PETITION NO. PO~e2-71(A) VANGUARO REALTY , DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - Ih~ERSECTION OF L~WRENCE RD. , LWDD ~ATE~L CANAt NO. 20 (MhNORFOREST POD) D';'Cor Mr. Bentz: Tho abov<' refl'lror.ced Clppll Gdtion was pn~>tpoJ~("l i.1t t.ho Develop::Jent Re\fleW Committee (PRe) meeting on J ilnuary J, 1 ')9(,. Your pet j t 1.:n i 5 sd1C'dul ed fot. the Janllilt'j 24,1996 LmC mC(!ti:lg. The rr,eet.ll1{) \.:ill COmm0.11',e <'It 9:00 a.m. in Room 441 of t.ho plilnninq, Zoning and Buildinq Uepllrt,me:-,t, 10<:ated at :DO Australidn Avonue, West Pnlm Beach, Florida. l'lease (;cntuct the qovermnc,ntaJ agen'-'y ~denl:i[ied in the I"';ldjnq r)01 0'''' , t,,,,) I.:ommom:.s, c0.rtlfication .i.S!:l\Jes and cond'i~icnr, I,riol' \'-' the DI',C mcotinq. The DRe 10'111 certi fy YOllr i1ppll cation Il,;or, your reso I v i n9 ,;!; ce:-t.i f iCi1t il1n ;osues ilnd YO\1r accopt;~ne(, ot t.he DRe cO;HHt.i.on:,: Z.2lUNQ Dl'.}~Sl.9N _t!:1fu..l':nk~'tQn-':'ayl..Q.L..2J3-,~(.Jj6L 1. The ~pp1ication should be amended to indicate ct~,letion uf tho portion of tr,e PilI) located wi1;:,in tile City 01 !.JOjntDr1 !.leach ~:sOL1lh port:icn.1 ' (Cert]ric~tion J5~ue) 2. 'I'he nlilstel' plan hhoule! be I!.lI'd3ndi:".l :ndiC:i1ti.;-I'~ Ih.: del.etion c" 1::\1(, .:;outhnrn port,ion 0 t the~ deve I <,>pm€nt. :~nd ".'ornpl i ilt)C<' \~ I t.i1 .';'~ct i un 6. S (J f t-h~ t:..,UC (}{es1dnntiill l'lanrwd :7r:ir D(:v'.'loP1T'''r1t'l. (Certincati:wl ISSue) J, Additional infoJ:mntion ~6 H'quir~d reqal'cilnq t.he :ociltion of t.):0. <I!HIPxati en line:. (C(,rt.ificntioll 1 ""Hle) RESr.JLTS,P,\01-24-%\DOl.f\~-ll(l\1 PAGE 1 "^'ll'q\L 1i.~jl!\<lr~\ltUl\ t\llill1'"",.',. ;\"l\"I\ t 1\'1,1\\'1 1('/02 '9f 11 :02 ID :PZ8-ZDNI~jG FA>:: :$1 2'33':' 167 P~iGE 3 ({'n' ] ';;.,1\. I, t l\.lll'l',.\f\ ',ud ^;11 LIII:~1 'II. '.. ,:. l 'h.lIl'1i(,\!\ <.;Hell T ~.Ir~.;" "J\II ^ H\)I~I'I!. V,1lfl'n II N.,W!'1' ..1.\1')' lvk( ,\\\y ,1;lIHI., r"ll d j ,('~ l OLJJlty ^dminisLtJl1l1 h:l.'ht'rt \'\I;,j'-In.ll"l '~u.\n" 01 Cuu1ny l.'o;T1ml~o,;inlh>r~ j)l.!,.irrIJn'~d ul Jll.Hlldrq!" ZllninJ~ &. Uuildirw. ~d;ru<lry 22, 'l.99G ~~ \.~) ~-~~~~/ ,. Inmn", l 'j',..bion l>lr', P.ol)ort Rentz L~nd Design South L~80 N. conyress Avenue suit.'.) ~lS West. PilJlIl Beach, FI. 3'\409 RE: DRe COMMENTS - PETITION NO. ~A82-71(h) VANGU^RD REALTY , DEVELOFKENT CORPORATION - INTERSECTION OF LAWR~NCE RD. ~ LWDO LATERAL CANAL NO. 20 (HANOR FORES~ PUDl U!?iH' Mr. 8ent?: rf'hf~ -1JYJve l:'C'f e,.,c' nCF.!(i ijpplic.-~t.j(,jn t..ht8 ~H...,t ~.:c~rti!'i(:~ jt .t.he r)(":,V~l~~lpille~t Hc-;'.;\('v.: CCjmril1t.t.ct. (I.)RC) meeting Orl \.,.l't)rJll;:try ,"1, ,,1<":;)1.10 '7,:,:ur ,pl~:'.:.11:':'Cln 1:': ~"'ct~r:.'=(JU)9(j f01' trle F('bcl..1tiry 2f!r ](")9.... DP.I.:: mc"!et.ioq. '.'~\P ;",";(:<.'_L:...n("J .....'.1.1j. 1'::-,\.)J'iJ":1enr:-(~ It J~I)O ~'l.rrl. ill R'.)cm 4~'1 ,~)f Lhl? ;):~"\n"';1!l4: f.Un.1J",. 1'1;-...1 !-':lIl1dir.q DC~:'nrtment. l',..~'i~t(':l':t ;It ~fd) t\u~,1 ,r-di i;.u: l>,\U~n\i\':, WC"~',~ Pd]'m h(',v'::1 j"1';1!'j'~,i.:l. ;,I}J)JW; J2!.y'Tf'!JlJ:! (lli' ,Xi.nk":n!1::;::j~.l:>.!~.?Ji::.:<;j <c.!. ,:. 1. This will l,t> tlw l;wt Of.'P01't.llT1.ity ~Ol. 11,1.'.: f:i,'tlt.je:1 to be ccrt.ifi€.d s.irJ.ce tl)(: i_n~t.i.;)l ."~~q\1st ?J, }q96 (,~~jx '1.';H'h:-:.1 rn(.~"t.IJ1.r.; ':iPtte, C0t!(:I_'nRF:~1.:Y :lt~i.:l'T!).tl We, w".n:..; ( U; - ~i~;')' l'.... ConclIrrE'n:'y F:d.c'f;slon~ ()t)-O"~"'(lq-n~'}I)X,: ( r:;,ll'l,:; v/~'ljd s~_~b~'ll:'ct to t.1 ('~ hj ,~l~L::; <11 tl1f' (1( '';p'.1op'rrwr:.1 nl"i.~('r. ,\~nmm(:l1t., ~J_tl; ~ ~" ')f~~1!JE ,..cow NT: 't... "1T.:1Q.g~tEYn {~~~_ B~rrs. '~,~J (J::~' (~)..!;.) Ne~d aqent's ~u"":.h()rizp.t.ion, .-(~:{lr"ti-fi,r..-~)t.10;) l~'~;;Llt:::) ;'LI\NNJNq.nJ.VT~m2tl (:'-'r, .Cnllj~. n,},~",r.(!J ~-~...:;l40S 01 ~:C~l\"~?rn Inul" bt? ((1rthc~)1~\:~"q r t'(;;";\ Pieii~'H? cont~,;:",ct. J<j:r'I: CrfJ.no te)l" an ;tppO'nt'm('(!+, u.(' \OL,nn i nq (('(;mm~n't i D:.visiUJ1. I'!\CE , , , . COMMEtrt'S. B\02-211-%\Il(\/\132-'ll tAi ^ 1\ i ~l .1,,: ~ "PI"1I'1411111 \ ,jl! '" ,!". \'! I, II I ,: i, f I~II' /1.".,1. .I,'" '\\'1"0'1 ',V"...II'"t~l, '1"..,11 1'I01'! h ....'\.I,'lh iV' I'~ :'",III'!I I \' .1(I-'\"2_\"':J;',~,', 1('/02 ',)6 11:02 1f!:P28-ZiJNING FRY. ::;:,t>~2335167 PAl,E ,) "- 30ard of Coulll) COlflmi...h'l1crs (tn\... roSIer, <':hilirman lurt .~Jn)nson, Vin' Ch.,irm,lII (a~n T. MnrcLJ'" ',1101 A, F.cbl'rt~ '.'arren H NI'",,-I! .lal)' McCarty ~.Jud,' PUllll."" CO:lllty AdrninistrafClr 1\ol.",rl Wdsn,.l(l n~p~rtm"nl of l'lanning, Zoning &. Buildln!; ;'orling Divbirlll June 10, 1996 Robert A, &1112, Land Design South Congress Business Centcr 1280 North Congress Avenue, Suite 215 West Palm Re<lch, Florida 33409 Re: Manor Forest (Petition 82-71A) Dear Mr, I3entz: 'rhe refercnced application was suhmitted by your office A;Jgust 17, 1995 and has not been certified by the Devdupmcnt Review Committee (DRe). All appllc<ltions 1\ot cnf.tln\\e-d for mOle than 6 months are administratively withdrawn In acC'ord;[llc~ win1 the llnH1cdu.nd Pevcloi)fl]Cr:t ellde (ULDCl. therefore, the application has be'cn wi:hdrawll. r';;~(.flj' , W~\~J1l [', Whiteford, AWl', Princip:11 Planner cc: L M;trtin Hodgkins, A1Cl\ Zoninll Direclm Petitioll Flk fi h'. f: "UM~l \hwll iL,-'fll\h~'rI17 ',~ l /\1\ \ >.\q,d \ II'P-.qtllll.')" /\lIiJ',l."'llj\l' ,'JII\lJI i.lll! ,I'.I"J "."",,~q'''~1 :j'~~i~~ lIln All';\'.\\;,,\l\ ,^,."lllJI.' '.VOl: I't'llrn nt'.l(jl, Illlrld.1 .l1Hk, (llJ:'1 2.n.rl['11~! I i\,\ r..Hlil ':.3-' 'i lh':; - ~--,_._- ,-~ ...---..----------- -1; L c', (! e'!!:! )-.--- eJ.c"- &1 (-6 H~ , )}Lti-'Lf/'2~ )!.2{ti-Zl/ ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-059 TO: \~~~r:eamA. Parker, City Manager V~~~ Hukill, P.E., City Engineer March 6, 1995 m .. t_ ,iI: @ ;.( FROM: DATE: RE: TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS - LAWRENCE ROAD The 1994 average traffic count on Lawrence Road between NW 22nd Avenue (Gateway) and Hypoluxo has been reported to us by the County to be 7972 trips. The current FDOT Level of Service Manual defines the threshold traffic level for LOS D for 2 lane undivided streets as 13,400 trips. Those two numbers are important in studying Lawrence Road traffic because the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has informed Mr. Hall of this office that widening of two lane roads in the County system is not seriously considered until LOS D is reached. Lawrence Road is a County road. The Traffic Division has also opined that about 1000 more units can be occupied on Lawrence Road before LOS D is reached. Well over 1000 more units have been approved by either the City or County, as follows: l Lawrence Oaks 178 units I- Nautica I 177 units I.- Nautica II 197 units I- -M&aEiewwuod Gl::O"~ ( C1 ktt: Knollwood~"h<;' 539 units Fox Hollow (aka Manor Forest) 185 unbuilt units, est. I.- Sausalito Groves 164 unbuilt units, est. i-- Jonathan's Grove 32 units i-- Lawrence Grove 75 unbuilt units, est. /- Citrus Glen 20 unbuilt units, est. v Citrus Park 113 units TOTAL 1680 unoccupied units The figure 1680 is not propounded to be exact, because each of the entries marked "unbuilt units" represents our estimate of how many units remain to be occupied in uncompleted developments. Traffic from occupied units appears in actual traffic counts totaling 7972 trips. We believe it is reasonable to predict that when all unoccupied units in all listed developments are in place, the Level of Service Standard will exceed LOS Standard E, which is 15,000 trips. LOS D will be reached when approximately 2/3 of the 1680 future units are occupied. Engineering Division Memo No. 95-059 Traffic Observations - Lawrence Road March 6, 1995 Page #2 We have been unable to obtain accurate estimates of revenue collected from dwelling units now contributing to the 7972 trips on Lawrence Road. If we assume 1600 dwelling units have generated those trips, and the average traffic impact fee collected was $1500 per unit, the total fees generated to date exceed $2,400,000. The total fees due from 1680 additional units will exceed $2,500,000, representing a total at build-out of $5,000,000I generated by these developments to be spent in the immediate area. These numbers are estimates, of course, and should be adjusted for traffic impact fees generated by other users who pay such fees (commercial, etc.) and those who don't (schools). Our conclusion is that it is time for the County to begin planning for widening of Lawrence Road so that when LOS D is reached, action can be immediately implemented to begin construction. A four lane undivided road will support 23,520 trips at LOS D, which is adequate for all completed and currently proposed development along Lawrence Road. WVH/ck C:LAWRENCE.LOS xc: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Ken Hall, Engineering Aide Michael Rumpf, Senior Planner TAIiILE lA LEVEL OF SERVICE D 'rest 1 A1tern&te Peak Hour AnT Test 1 LO~ D LO", 0 1.00"' D f'^CILIT't "l'\,PIl G'l'l'\NDJI\.RD &:TANDARD S'l'AN[)AAJ) 2 lanes ut\dLvLd~(j 1,220 13,400 1,030 3 lanes two-way 1,280 14 , 000 1,080 2 tanuij one-way 1,600 17,600 2,650 3 lanee o:1~-way 2,450 27,000 4,000 4 l~nea 1,10 a i.\-ided 2,140 23,520 1,770 .. lanelJ dlv:~d"cl 2,"0 29,400 2,210 5 lanes di'lid.ad 2,670 29,400 2,210 6 Lan.as divided 4,100 45,000 3,330 a lanee rilvided 5,010 55,800 4,170 4 1:1ne 8 eXi'rCS9way 6,070 68,900 3,450 6 lanes eXpr88y.....ay 9,100 103,400 5,170 6 lane~ e~pre5~way 12,130 137,900 6,990 10 lanes ~xprQ~~w~y lS,170 172,3QO 8,610 So~rce: ?DOT Level ot Service M4nual, Generalized Daily Level of service Maximum Volumes, Group C and Croup 1, and Ger,erali:z:ed Peak Hour/Pea.k Directional Level of serv:'ce Maximurn volumes, Group A and Group 1 tor urbani:z:ect are.. '~pr~l 1992). ~or the Detailed Analysls for Alternate Teet One. Level of service 0 shall be the Sum of the crltical Volumes of onB thousand fQUC hundred (1,400) in accordance wlth the PlannLng Method in the 1985 Manual. TABLlil 1 B LEVEL OF SERVICE E teet 1 Alternate Peak Hour Teat 1 LOSE LOS J: LOD E FACILITY T'rP~ S'l'ANOMU) SThNDl'\RO S'l'ANOMD ~ lau~1I \! nd b L:lad 1. 370 15,000 1,280 3 lanAS t',Jo-~/ay 1,450 15,700 1,340 2 lanes one-way 1 , 760 19,300 3,120 3 lanes one-wsy 2,660 29,JOO 4,670 4 lanea undJ,vict&<1 2,3'0 25,800 2,080 4 l.sneD d l v tried 2,930 32,200 2,'00 S lanGo t"'Q-"a:f 2,Q30 32,200 2,600 6 l3nl.!Y divid~d 4,440 48,800 3,890 a lanes divided 5,550 60,400 4,810 4 lan~s eXpre9&Way 6,500 74,000 3,710 6 laneB eXfrcs8way 9,780 111,200 5,560 e lan~~ exp~e35way 13,050 14',200 , ,410 10 Idnc= expL"=liJswa}' 16,310 lQS, JOO g,260 Sour~e; FOOT Level of Service Manual, Generali%~d Daily Level of Service Ua;(imur" Volumes, Group C and Group 1, and Generali~ed PeAk Hour/Peak Oi:ectional Level of Service Maximum Volumes, Group A and Group Hor urb~nl~ad areas (April 19'2). W'.;)l(' 1:ho Ctileaihad An.a.1Y8ia for ,.LtQrnat:g Te.t One, Level of ServLce E shall be the Sum of th~ Critical Volumas ot one thouaand fLve hundred (1,500) in accordance with the planning MQthod in the 19B5 Manual. The Level of Service Stan4ardB for Tese 2 are Level ot service ~ in Table la. TOTAL P.02 - ~.... Fair Share Contribution for Road Improvement. P.e Table Boynton Beach Description Road ree -------------------------~-~----------------~------------~---------------------- ReaLdentLal --------------------- Slngle F&ml1y Detached Single Family Att. per unit congr Living racLl, per unit Mobile Home Non-Re8idential 1,650.00 1,155.00 353.93 825.00 \ ------------------------------ "General Office 10,000 8q.tt. per 1,000 8q.tt1 50,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 8q.tt. 100,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft. 150,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 200,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 300,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 400,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 Iq.ft. 500,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 600,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 700,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 800,000 sq.ft.& over per 1,000 8q.tt. Medical Office per 1,000 Bq:~~ ..- "."'. -- . -.--.-. - ------ ...- 1,353.00 911.90 771.65 699.05 651.75 592.35 547.80 519.75 497.75 481.25 465.30 1,879.35 General Commercial Retail Example8 --------------------------------------------------- . , 10;000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 50,000 .q.tt. per 1,000 sq.ft. 100,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 200,000 eq.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 300,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 aq.ft. 400,000 sq.ft. per 1,000 sq.ft. 500,000 8q.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 600,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 aq.ft. 800,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 1,000,000 Iq.ft. per 1,000 sq. ft. 1,200,000 sq. ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 1,400,000 aq.ft. per 1,000 8q.ft. 1,600,000 .q.ft. per 1,000 sq.tt. Milcellaneous Hospital, per bed NurlLng Home, per bed Warehoua. per 1,000 Iq.ft. Hlnl-warehoule per 1,000 sq.ft Gen. Recreation per parkLng space Ceneral IndultrLal per 1,000 sq. ft. Fast rood wI Orive Thru per 1,000 8q. ft.. -Quality Reataurant per 1,000 sq. ft. -High Turnover Sit Down Rest. per 1,000 aq.ft. Drive-In Bank per 1,000 aq.ft. Gas Station per station Convenience Store per 1,000 eq.ft. Hovie Theater per aeat Racquet Club per court Church/Synagogue per 1,000 sq. ft. Day Care Center per 1,000 sq. ft. New Car Sales per 1,000 sq. ft. Carpet Stores per 1,000 sq. ft. Veterinary Clinic per 1,000 sq. ft. Hotel per room Hotel per room Elementary Schools ~er 1,000 sq. ft. Hlgh Schools per 1,eOO 8q.ft. r:). -\. L M ~~11I ~~~~ , V 5,069.60 2,822.82 2,215.50 t., 7bB..5J 1,648.37 1,479.10 1,403.00 1,359.49 1,360.28 1,359.01 1,384.12 1,398.19 1,431.93 ------------------------------ - 647.35 143.00 268.40 143.55 165.00 383.35 12,168.31 4,511.84 9,600.58 7,876.74 8,639.40 11,162.10 96.80 2,359.50 512.60 3,923.37 2,638.35 5.95 l,e04.00 560.45 478.50 589.60 599.50 \ r PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 94-378 TO: Chairman and Members, Planning and Development Board THRU: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Senior Planner~ DATE: January 4, 1995 SUBJECT: Lawrence Oaks - (File No. ANNEX 94-009) Application #4 - Annexation Program, Group 2 of Phase 2 Applications for Annexation, Land Use Amendment/Rezoning INTRODUCTION You will recall the City's current efforts to annex western properties through the Annexation Program, and that the last phase (Phase 2-Group 1) included Palm Beach Groves, Knollwood Groves, sausalito Groves, Heartland Health Care center, and the Greentr~e Plaza I shopping plaza. On October 18, 1994 the City Commission directed staff to continue implementing the annexation program by annexing the next group of eligible properties, which are identified as Phase 2-Group 2. You will also recall that eligible properties are defined as those contiguous properties whose owners have previously consented to annexation through the agreement for watep service with the City. Lawrence Oaks is one of four (4) eligible projects now being recommended for annexation. THE LAWRENCE OAKS SITE Lawrence Oaks is a County approved project located at the northwest corner of Lawrence Road and Knollwood Road, and south of Fox Hollow (see Attachment "All). The Lawrence Oaks project received county site plan approval in 1993, was scheduled to be platted in september, 1994, and represents the final phase of the Manor Forest development (a.k.a. Fox Hollow). On June 7, 1994 the City authorized the execution of an agreement for water service for this property with the condition that the owners would voluntarily annex to the Ci'ty. Following the annexation of the Knollwood Groves property, the subject property became contiguous and therefore eligible for annexation. The Lawrence Oaks approval consists of 178 units designed as zero lot line patio homes. Oriole Homes, Inc. began construction of site improvements approximately 6 months ago, and the individual homes will be built by the current property owner Lowell Homes, Inc. DELIVERY AND CAPACITY OF URBAN SERVICES The providers of major urban services (e. g. police, Fire, and Public Works) reviewed the proposed annexations for impact on service delivery, and only the Fire Department would request certain expenditures if the Lawrence Oaks site is annexed (see Attachment "B"). It should be noted that the subj ect properties are all within the service area (range) of Fire Station #3, Fire Station #3 has superior service capability compared to the corresponding County station (with respect to response times, staffing, and equipment), and no deficiencies currently exist or are anticipated in the near future. The potential expenditures would simply allow the City to maintain .superior back-up service to this geographical area, without assistance from the remaining stations. In general, such expenditures would enable station #3 to respond simultaneously to three (3) emergency calls (Fire station #3 is currently capable of providing full service to two (2) concurrent calls), the potential tax revenues from all four properties would provide the funds necessary for the potential expenditures. SUBSEOUENT REVIEW AND PERMITTING OF DEVELOPMENT The timing of annexation relative to the incomplete status of this 1 f ~ project creates a unique issue of a magnitude not previously encountered by the City. This issue relates to the review and permitting responsibility required for the remainder of the project. If, once annexed, the City were to attain total jurisdiction over this project, the city would be responsible for completing the necessary reviews, issuing permits, and conducting inspections for a project that was not formally reviewed by the city. It should be noted that the City will, prior to annexation, attempt to arrive at a solution to this problem acceptable to both the City and Palm Beach County. NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS Representatives of both Oriole Homes Inc. and Lowell Homes Inc. were directly informed of the City's annexation plans, were provided a courtesy notice detailing the annexation program, as well as provided with an official zoning notice. Regarding opinions on the annexation of this property, no representat_ive~_ have communicated any opposition to annexation~- ~.--- ------- APPLICATION CONTENTS AND REVIEW SUMMARY Application #4 consists of an application for annexation and land use plan amendment/rezoning. As this property is being annexed in accordance with the City's annexation program, staff has completed the necessary applications, and the corresponding application fees were waived. Additional information on this application is found on the follqwing page and is in the form of an abbreviated summary. This summary includes a brief outline describing the property, the application, adjacent land uses, the availability of facilities, the basis on which it is found consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, other pertinent information, and staff's recommendation. Attachment "B" summarizes data in this report as well as provides information relative to service delivery and fiscal impact. 2 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Sgt. Jim Cummings, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp. Office of the City Engineer Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Engineer Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~~~ July 27, 1994 FROM: DATE: RE: staff Review of Manor Forest (Lawrence Oaks) (residential development to be annexed) The City Manager is requesting that staff review the attached development plans for the proposed zero lot line, single family detached residential development to be known as Lawrence Oaks; the undeveloped phase of Manor Forest, located on the east side of Lawrence Road in unincorporated Palm Beach County. The property is located within the city's utility service area and recently the Commission approved a water/sewer service agreement contingent upon an annexation application being submitted. The attached plan reflects what has been approved to date by Palm Beach County. Please format your comments by indicating which items on the plan do not meet city codes. Please submit your comments to me by 5:00 p.m. August 5, 1994. attachment TJH/jj cc: MEMO ONLY Carrie Parker, City Manager City Commission (5) Don Jaeger, Building Official Floyd Jordan, Fire chief Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director Steve Campbell, Fire Department Bob Gibson, Public Works Central File Lanker Engineering Services Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Dorothy Moore, Zoning and Site Plan Reviewer Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner Project File Chronological File TRC File (Original) a:..norfor*oak PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Sgt. Jim Cummings, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp. Office of the City Engineer Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Engineer Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~~~ July 27, 1994 FROM: DATE: RE: Staff Review of Manor Forest (Lawrence Oaks) (residential development to be annexed) The City Manager is requesting that staff review the attached development plans for the proposed zero lot line, single family detached residential development to be known as Lawrence oaks; the undeveloped phase of Manor Forest, located on the east side of Lawrence Road in unincorporated Palm Beach County. The property is located within the city's utility service area and recently the Commission approved a water/sewer service agreement contingent upon an annexation application being submitted. The attached plan reflects what has been approved to date by Palm Beach County. Please format your comments by indicating which items on the plan do not meet city codes. Please submit your comments to me by 5:00 p.m. August 5, 1994. attachment TJH/jj cc: MEMO ONLY Carrie Parker, City Manager City Commission (5) Don Jaeger, Building Official Floyd Jordan, Fire chief Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director Steve Campbell, Fire Department Bob Gibson, Public Works Central File Lanker Engineering Services Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Dorothy Moore, Zoning and Site Plan Reviewer Mike Rumpf, Senior Planner \/Project File Chronological File TRC File (Original) ll:mIlDorfor.oaJt N RfNYl PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Al Newbold, Deputy Building Official Sgt. Jim Cummings, Police Department John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist Clyde "Skip" Milor, Utilities Chief Field Insp. Office of the City Engineer Vincent Finizio, Deputy City Engineer Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~i?~ July 27, 1994 FROM: DATE: Staff Review of Manor Forest (Lawrence Oaks) (residential development to be annexed) The City Manager is requesting that staff review the attached development plans for the proposed zero lot line, single family detached residential development to be known as Lawrence Oaks; the undeveloped phase of Manor Forest, located on the east side of Lawrence Road in unincorporated Palm Beach County. The property is located within the city's utility service area and recently the Commission approved a water/sewer service agreement contingent upon an annexation application being submitted. RE: The attached plan reflects what has been approved to date by Palm Beach County. Please format your comments by indicating which items on the plan do not meet city codes. Please submit your comments to me by 5:00 p.m. August 5, 1994. attachment TJH/jj cc: MEMO ONLY Carrie Parker, City Manager City Commission (5) Don Jaeger, Building Official Floyd Jordan, Fire chief Charles Frederick, Recreation & Parks Director Thomas Dettman, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Utilities Director steve Campbell, Fire Department Bob Gibson, Public Works Central File Lanker Engineering Services Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Dorothy Moore, Zoning and site plan Reviewer ~ike Rumpf, Senior Planner Project File Chronological File TRC File (Original) a:..norfor.oak. MEMORANDUM Utilities #94-257 TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoni g Di ector FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities DATE: August 5,1994 SUBJECT: Staff Review of Manor Forest (Lawrence Oaks) (Residential Development to be Annexed) Staffhas reviewed the above referenced project and offers the following comments: Utility Department concerns were addressed during the HRS/DER review process for water and sanitary sewer permitting. It is our recommendation that the plan proceed through the review process. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. 19b xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella ;!-- File moo rnm AUG "" IW""" 8 $Vf .~l! "... c! PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM FF.Olv1: James cherof City Attorney 'L Ii C Tambr:. J. HeYden-d~~ Q Planning and Zoning Directo~ ~~ TO: DATE: Oc~ober 2G! 1994 SUB~ECT: Lawrence Oaks - County permitting and inspections after City anne:<a1:10n As you will recall, at the annexation meeting held September 20, 1994 wlth the Clty Manager, the Utilities Department, the city Engineer, my department and yourself, the above-referenced issue \vas discussed. As agreed at this meeting, I have approached K~is Garriscn of Palm Beach County, regarding their interest in en1:e~lng into an in1:e~local agreement to have the County continue permitting and lnspections up to a period of five years for the Law~e~ce oaks projec~, currently under construction, and in process for annexation. She stated that we needed to talk to Bob Banks wit~ their attorney's office, as she questioned whether such an arrangement would be legal. At the September meeting, you indicated that you would contact Bob Banks regarding this issue. Please let me know the outcome of your discussions. This annexati0n will corne before the commission and Planning and Development Board in December for publiC hearings. Staff is currently working on determining an appropriate land use and =oning for the property which could be affected by this a;;r.:=emen"C . xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager .r...: LOakIn1:r RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 194-285 TO: Tarnbri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ,11~ Manor Forest (Lawrence Oaks) - Annexa/a:- FROM: RE: DATE: August 8, 1994 The Recreation & Park Department has reviewed the MasterPlan for Manor Forest. The following comments are submitted: 1. Art. IX, Section 8 of the Ci ty subdivision regulations requires that "park and residential land for residential subdivisions be dedicated in accordance with the general standard of 6 acres per one thousand (1,000) persons". This MasterPlan calls for a total of 178 single family and duplex units to be constructed in the P.U.D. Based on an average household size/d. u. of 3.0 for single and duplex units the following formula applies: .0180 (average acreage requirement/d.u.) X 178 d.u. = 3.204 acres. 2. This same section allows the City the option of requiring either land (or a fee in lieu of land) and allows the City the option of granting up to one-half credit for private recreation provided. In order to qualify for one-half credit, the developer must provide 5 separate recreation elements of sufficient size to serve the residents of the community. 3. If the developer decides to apply for one-half credit, the City would consider accepting cash in lieu of land equal to the acreage required. JW: ad w rn ill ill All; , 8 "",.,.., PLANNING ANO ZONING DEPT. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MEMO # 94-227 DATE: AUGUST 1, 1994 TO: TAM~~IHEYDEN, PLANNING DIRECTOR THRU: ~M HUKILL, CITY ENGINEER FROM: KEN HALL, ENG. AID@ SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON UNDEVELOPED PHASE OF MANOR FOREST TO BE KNOWN AS LAWRENCE OAKS The engineering department finds that the following site plan details do not conform to city codes: 1. STREETS: A. The local streets and the collector street do not meet minimum right of way widths. [Appendix C, Art. 10, Sect. lOB], and minimum pavement widths are not specified. B. Dead-end streets are prohibited unless they end in a cuI-dc-sac [C/X/lOD]. C. The minimum distances between some local streets connecting the collector street do not meet the minimum distance required (660') [C/X/I]. D. A crosswalk may be required for access between units 44 and 173 based on the length of the block [C/X/3D.2]. 2. The parking lot for the sales trailer shall conform to Chapter 5, Article 10 ofthe city's codes. 3. No access from individual lots shall be allowed directly onto collector streets [C/X/7]. 4. The plan will require permitting from other agencies such as the S.F.W.M.D., P.B. Co. Engineering Dept., D.E.R.M. and possibly L.W.D.D. 5. The site plan should have P.B. Co.certification of concurrency approval and comply with their traffic performance standards ordinance. A traffic impact analysis may be required if one is not already done. Please note that the density of the site was calculated based on 42 acres; however, the parcel to be annexed and developed is only 27 acres. The engineering department reserves all other comments regarding this site plan subject to review of the master plan and preliminary plat. KRH/krh lawroaks rn AUG 2. ill ,"'