REVIEW COMMENTS
."
.
.
I
I
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 96-044
\~? ~ ~ u w ~~
Ill, ~
\ L--.." ,
\'11,,," :..
1 7"': ,
'....-....:--.-'
, .---~.
I
,
I
I
..
f
J
Date:
Tambri J. Heyden,
Planning & Zoning Dir~ctor
C'~
John A. Guidry, ..;
Director of Utilities \~) .
~~
February 2, 1996 /
/
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Park Ridge,
New Site Plan, Second Review
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
1, City water will not be supplied for irrigation. Please indicate on the plan your
water source, (City Compo Plan, Policy 3C.3.4).
2. Plan shall show size and type of utility pipes. Your submittal suggests the water
and sanitary sewer plans were included, Please provide for review and comment,
(Sec. 26.16(a)),
3. No trees, or overhang of large trees, are permitted within Utility Easements,
(Sec. 7.5-18.1).
It is our recommendation that the plan not proceed through the review process until
items # 2 and #.3 above are addressed.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm;parkr2
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella I
File
rn1,D, m @ \ULJJ~.ffi ~
t~1[ I.,. ~JJ
\ -'^iiLANNING ANO -_.
: ZONING OfPT
.-....-....'...
,. _~.....:JO~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #96-021
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director /
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
New Site Plan - 2nd Review - Park Ridge
DATE:
February 1, 1996
The CuI D Sac at the above location must be a minimum of 90' for sanitation and fire vehicles to
be able to turn around.
If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201.
R ert Eichorst
blic Works Director
REier
(0) rn ;~; rn B WI ~ :lwl
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-04ln1
,.J
PLANNING AND
ZONlli9..DEPL~..... ,.
FROM:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
!
/'./ I
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Ill" '
Park Ridge - New Site Plan - 2nd ~view
TO:
RE:
DATE:
January 29, 1996
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Park Ridge. The following
comments are submitted:
1. Recreation dedication requirement will be figured at the single family rate. Recreation and
Park memo #95-565 remains in effect.
2. Recommend that the plan continue through the normal review process.
JW:ad
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399
TO: Planning Department
~ m @ ~ n 'YJ lli ill
' ,~
fEB - ~J \: },lJ
PLANNiNG ~rm
ZON1!l(, "VI
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: January 2, 1996
RE: Park Ridge Place
2100 NE 4 St
NWSP 95-012
SBMP 95-003
We have no objections to this project as shown.
~
William D, Cavanaugh, FPO I
~
Y' ,
cc: Chief Jordan
FPO II Campbell
File
~
m r~JLt tWl 00
" ,""___U_ j
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS
29 JANUARY 96
PARK RIDGE - 2nd REVIEW - SITE PLAN
MEMO #0206
til ..,;,) f" f ~):' ',~! !'}
/. " t. ,
..;::...........:....~......::-
I bave reviewed tbe above plans and fin.d,:,uo.:p'(o61~mg:at' t4isJune.
..",:.'.':',',) :::;:.::,:::,:,.~,~;,.;,::.:.:,:,;",:.::,::~~.~}> U 2,:;,~~
,.::"""S::>
:::~ ...l" .J'
;/:;,.~.',::~,:"".'"'.',',:"""",.,,,,., ..t~.. ..:o:t' :..
, . : <'\..,,{"::::::,.:\
~Respectfull\~
~-~- .1fL~
~:.:~.:.:.:.:.:<:... -. ;~:" ~ ;:;':-;';';o:'';'Jo~~.:. ';:::..
;..; '.~.. :', ~ OJ ..~.. -.;.
Iii S81J .Marldri HardS1:
tJ::::~::~::<':::::"'/ 0 tJ~:;~::~~:~~::~} D
.:....
.. ~.~: {~
W....:-:. '~":-;..~....:.:l iF
, '.
.,. .
.... .'
'.fr~;"";"";'";;:,,
[80
c::~~::~~:J
:.\
1,.
C::~~j
(~::,x, ,
~\,.
'~:~>l
,............................'.
I r"':<<"'::::l;'~}
I f:::~:::::::::.,::;~:'}
~:-:.~;::;::;:~~::;::::-/. fJ
IrlFjJ
v..,~..1' ~-::.;
l )J
l~"
:;~~''''..:>''''
/'f h>
,~~~ ~ .~. ~;'i ;:"i
"(:-.. :> t ..-:-....~
.;:~-:>'\. \. -w.... ~.;:i'
'~~ ~"'.<..,
rl (~:~:~;:~~~~ \).
t~1 ~.~
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-041
. f':'O) ~ @ ~ n Wi ~ rm
\~ llil 11~ \~J
I
i
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT.
February 5, 1996
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Director of Development
RE:
TRC COMMENTS
NEW SITE PLAN - 2nd REVIEW
PARK RIDGE
The Building Division has reviewed the amended site plan for the above referenced project and
offers the following comments:
1. The swing of the garage door needs to be changed because the interior dimensions ofthe
garage will not permit the door to swing into the garage.
2. No enclosures can be built on the patio because of the 15 foot required setback.
We recommend that this project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for
consideration.
AN:bg
XC: William V. Hukill, P.E.
PARK
i~:';:
DEP ARThIENT OF DEVELOPMENT II ~ ~
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-04 UU
!1 ~ ~ n "1'.,
(.> (!ij ~ U \i/ i~
F=a - 2 ;S[~
TO:
Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~ukill' P.E., City Engineer
February 2. 1996
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT.
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
PARKRIDGE SITE PLAN - 3RD REVIEW
V./e have reviewed our January 3, 1996 Memo (No. 96-007) regarding compliance with comments
contained therein. We respond as follows:
1 . Revise documents to reflect all comments.
2. All plans submitted for specific pennits shall meet the City's code requirements at time
of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site
lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices.
Permits required from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other
permitting agency shall be included with your permit request.
3. Moot ifproperty is a condominium.
4. Insufficient information to complete review, This is not a rezoning request, so
dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning, Single family dwellings in R-3 districts
must comply with R-I district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b. pg.2-21
5. Previously in compliance,
6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6,
Art. III, Sec. J ] A, pg.6-3
7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater
than I foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg,6-8 & 6-9
8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is ] 001, Chap,6, Art.IV, Sec.lOD, pg.6-12
9. In compliance.
10. Previously in compliance,
II. Provide undersround electrical service. Chap,6, Art.JV, See,13, pg,6-16
12. Need SFWMD & LwPD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6,
Art. VII, Sec4B, pg.6-24
The following additional conditions have appeared with the revised submittal.
A. Provide proof of unity of title.
B. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets, Chap.6,
Art.III, Sec. I I A, pg.6-3
c. Provide sidewalk locations & details. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. lOT, pg.6-14
D. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all
City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.SA, pg.6-7 and Chap,23, Art. 1 IF,
pg.23-8
A second street name should be provided for the portion of development south of Park Ridge Circle
to the cuI-dc-sac. We strongly recommend valley curbs along roadways to improve drainagc.
WVH/ck
(':PKRHXi[
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-055 rn
rn 00 rn u~m
t t l, '.' i:/j(j . i ' :
PLANNING At..JD
ZONING OEPT.
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Kevin 1. Hallahan, F orester/Environmentalist
~H-
RE: Park Ridge - 2nd Review
DATE: February 2,1996
, ], The letter of permit from the State Fresh Water Fish and Game Commission has not been
received by my office.
2. The applicant should expound on item #13 of the Tree Management Plan to include specific
landscape tasks to complete. These would involve:
a, exotic vegetation control
b. weed/grasses removal/control
c. trash/debris removal/control
d. trimming restrictions of preserve vegetation
e. signage for area
f. fencing for area
g. other site specific items to protect and properly manage the preserve area while under
ownership of the Homeowner Association (documents too),
KH:ad
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 96-023
TO: William Hukill
Department of Development Director
FROM: Tambri J. Heyden --;srI)
Planning and Zonin~ Director
DATE: January 16r 1996
SUBJECT: Engineering Division - Memorandum No. 96-007
Parkridge Master Plan - 2nd Review Comments
In your memorandum referenced above, you note that your January 3,
1996 comments due December 29, 1995 to our office, could not be
prepared earlier as you only received the submittal on January 2,
1996.
Please be informed that the Master Resubmittal was sent out to the
Technical Review Committee, with the Technical Review Committee
Aoenda on December 21. 1995. These plans were hand delivered to
your office. This was also mentioned at the December 26, 1995
Technical Review Committee meeting at which the resubmittal plans
were discussed. There was no representation from the Engineering
Division at this meeting.
TJH:arw
xc: Carrie Parker
Michael Haag
Central Files
c: Parkridge ,023
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-741
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki
DATE:
December 29, 1995
SUBJECT:
Subdivision
Project:
Location:
Master Plan - 2nd Review
Park Ridge
East side of the intersection of Northeast
20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street.
John Grant, Jr., Inc.
SBMP 95-003
Agent:
File No.:
The following is a
subdivision master
referenced project.
list
plan
of 2nd
review
review
of the
comments regarding the
plans for the above-
Note: As of the December 26, 1995 Technical Review Committee (TRC)
meeting, the issue of the land conveyance has not been addressed.
It places a considerable hardship on the reviewing parties by not
allowing them to determine which code provisions and standards are
applicable. Various alternative solutions, as proposed by the
developer's agent as possibilities, seem to contradict either the
Land Development Regulation (LDR) document or other applicable
codes. Therefore, the TRC has reached the consensus that before
this project can be sent to the Planning and Development Board, the
developer shall:
A. Establish a legal framework to resolve the land conveyance
issue.
B. Declare anticipated ownership of the housing units and the
surrounding ground.
The search for the above problems solution should involve legal
representatives of both sides: the City and the developer, and
should be done with consideration of adopted city codes and
standards to ensure that the proposed solution will meet all
applicable city requirements.
Our comments are made under the same assumption we made during the
first review that the ownership of the proposed development will
not require further resubdivision of this tract. Our assumption of
this development takinq place on one tract only has already been
reflected on the Plat submitted as a part of the 2nd review
package.
I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Relabel Site Plan to Master Plan. Resubmit full set of
documents as required by the LDR (Chapter 3, Article IV,
Section 4.B.1) including amended written attachment.
2. Indicate the anticipated form of ownership of the
housing stock and proposed type of units (LDR, Chapter 3,
Article III, Section 1.A) .
3. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate location of
proposed sidewalks (LDR, Chapter 6, Article III, Section
11.A) .
4. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the dimension
of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius). The LDR
document (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.D) requires
provision of a right-of-way for both private and
dedicated streets. Provide information in regard to the
diameters of the proposed turnaround right-of-way and
paved areas. The minimum diameters should be 100 feet
and 90 feet, respectively.
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 96 - 001
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning Dir
m '..'..-...........
R (r) '"
DEl!; liI.' ~"~~ .. ! I~~
'. J . ,j
" ~! ; 1
iL:.,) .
PlM! N! tTG'f"ill......J
ZO"I~I ,.r, ''''..,~
,~ HJ l::L:: I.
FROM:
John A, Guidry, Utilities Director
DATE:
Jan 2, 1996
SUBJECT: Park Ridge - Master Plan/Site Plan
We offer the following comments on this project:
1) Plans shall show proposed utility easements. (Section 26-33(a))
2) Trees, other than palm trees, are not permitted within utility easements, Shrubs are permitted,
(Section 7,5-18.1)
3) Permits for the water and sewer system installation will be required from the Palm Beach
County Health Unit. Please coordinate the engineering plan approval through this office. (Section
26-12)
4) A minimum of 10- feet is required between water mains and any portion of a structure, This
criteria is not met for the water main in the side easement along the south side of the project.
5) We have insufficient information to determine who will be the account-holder for each water
services, and also be responsible for maintenance of the service lines from the City's point of
service to the buildings, The applicant's representative has expressed his client's intention to sell
the property under each building as part of the building structure, However, such an approach
will place the meter and service lines under the responsibility of the Homeowners' or
Condominium Association, which is very unusual for a single family structure.
6) This project's layout is similar to that of a single-family P,U,D., but it is being proposed as
a multi-family development with detached single family units, We therefore are not certain
whether to apply the 500 gallon per minute or the 1500 gallon per minute fire flow requirement.
The applicant must therefore advise us in writing how the site will eventually be subdivided, what
the building separation will truly be, and what type of construction will be performed, before we
can make this determination. Although the Master Plan/Site Plan indicates a side setback of 20
feet, but this does not correlate to the distance between buildings. Please advise as to the actual
minimum distance between buildings,
The number and scope of unknowns on this project effectively prevent us from determining
whether it does or does not meet code requirements, We therefore recommend it not proceed
until these questions are satisfactorily addressed.
Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office,
Attachments
JAG/PVM
xc: Skip Milor
File
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ:
DATE:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #96-001
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ./
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
Site Plan - Parkridge
January 2, 1996
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site.
RElcr
obert Eichorst
Public Works Director
~_,;;;.^_:r( / [" n
'--'. n
-~l!j
JAN - '3 .' ///1
i \ ,[if
'. PLAN'\'IN-.~'
lONltJG DC AND ,-,or
.cpr
......i3<e..,-..
.'....~,..
roo T :'f~.~~lm
~
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-003
PLANNING AI\JO 0 -'
ZONING DEPT. ~
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~
Parkridge Subdivision Masterplan. q"d Review
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
JanuaI)' 4, 1996
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the masterplan for Parkridge Subdivision (2nd
Review). The following comments are submitted:
Recreation and Park Department Memo #95-565 indicates a recreation dedication requirement based
on this subdivision being considered single family. Due to unique platting arrangements, there is
some possibility that this project may be considered multifamily. Ifit is determined that the project
is multifamily, then we will need to recalculate the recreation dedication requirement at a slightly
lower rate.
JW:ad
FIRE PREVENTION :MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399
rn
m@rnu\YJrn
.1 11996
OOi
PLANNING AND
, ZONING DEPT.
TO: Planning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: January 2,1996
RE: Park Ridge Place
2100 NE 4 8t
NW8P 95-012
al""SHMP 95-003
We have no objections to this project as shown,
&~~L4~
William D, Cavanaugh, FPO I
cc: Chief Jordan
FPO II Campbell
File
-, .'.,........,~...'......,--...- _.~
\ 0) ~I (1 ... i, ;
we ~~~:~,~,:~ .
. PU\!",';I,';.:: '. ,0
I ZO!IJ"'G "~OT
~"""_ 'l\i,.f:._ ut.!. ~"""..~"~
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS
22 DECEMBER 95
PARK RIDGE - MASTER PLAN - 2nd SUBMITIAL MEMO #0199
I have reviewed the above plans and fiI14,~m:rP\o61~~~~~\4i~Ji!ne.
jf tfff;Y U z>~,&
.~. '.~ ":" ..~~:~-:., ..;/.:.,
~""',.:~,::~> ;\.<f"":':>.~:>
~"R:~
~~ f ,,:a.-.:.:....:~~::. "::" ~ 'r;':':o:':O:~"~;~\:-::::;.
)i L".~,gV }darlqI\ Harq$'l
1.,,,1""':"<-'>""';'"'' Q tL:::::::::::;;:::..}' Q
t~;:~::~::::::::::,:9~
.~..:'
[Bo
. ............:....:....:,~::
~C:~~~.;.:.::::;::r.~.-;:-
,..<",.:,.,,,)!)
t....:....:>:'...>:';-.
~
..........,...:...............
.;. "';;'.
iB)
::~:O;.:.:.:.:.:.;.....:O'......-:.~.
.~. '.:.:
ltUu
~rflt'
n rO~rry
::.....~,
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-452
I"U_<~
I JDJYcfJi !J
/1/J1 DEe 2~-~~
December 28, 1995
PZLANNING ArvD
ONING DEPT.
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Al Newbold
Deputy Director of Development
RE:
TRC COMMENTS - PARK RIDGE MASTER PLAN - 2nd REVIEW
After reviewing the plans submitted for second review and the applicant's response to the first
review comments, the Building Division cannot support this project and does not recommend it
go forward. All of our first comments still stand (copy attached) and for the type of building
shown, the setbacks for R-l should rule and each land area that will be sold with the house
should be shown on the plan for land coverage per code.
A~
AN:bh
Attachment
XC: William V. Hukill, P,E.
P ARKRIDG
..J;i1
J!/j tit
. j! i I
Ii) I
1...../
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-442
December 18, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director
Re:
Park Ridge Master Plan
After reviewing the plans for the above reference project, the Building Division cannot support this plan going
forward because of so many unanswered questions that we cannot address without such information as type of
multiple-family residential structures, i.e" apartments, cooperatives, condominiums or townhouses.
If they are to be single-family dwellings, they should comply with R-1 site regulations under LDR Section 5,
Paragraph E-2 and should have platted lots to check setbacks and lot coverage.
In addition to the above comments, the following should be shown on the plans:
1. Evaluation and floor plan unless they are single-family.
2. Distance between building to comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code.
3. Setbacks should be shown from Park Ridge Circle (See definition of lot frontage, LDR Page
1-23, Article II), also see Access for an understanding of where front setbacks are from.
4. Setbacks must be shown for pools, screen rooms, etc.
5. Sign details required for Site approval.
AN:mh
cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
PKRIDGE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
r'~----"'~'-'"''
\ [~r~ JU,-LL~l ~
~ lJl) JAN 4 1996 \ L.J
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT \'
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-007 ~.'. PLANNING P,~J()
\ ZONING DEPT.
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~ Hukill, P.E., Ci1y Engineer
January 3, 1996
P ARKRIDGE MASTER PLAN - SECOND REVIEW
We have reviewed our December 13, 1995 Memo (No. 95-473) regarding compliance with
comments contained therein. We respond as follows:
1.
2,
3.
Revise documents to reflect all comments.
All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at
time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following;
site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control
devices. Permits required from agencies such as thc FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and
any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request.
This master plan is not required as a condition of zoning, but is required as a pre-
requisite to platting, Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots or
parcels either by plat or metes and bounds, it must be platted (Chapter 1, Article
II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5, page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown
on the master plan, the plan cannot proceed without certification from the
applicant that the master plan and the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances,
rules and regulations including, but not limited to, the Boynton Beach Land
Development Regulations,
Insufficient information to complete review. This is not a rezoning request, so
dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts
must comply with R-l district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b, pg.2-21
In compliance
Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap,6,
Art.III, Sec. 1 lA, pg.6-3
Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no
greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec,5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9
Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.lOD, pg.6-12
Provide street grades no steeper than 2 1/2 per cent. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec. 1 01,
pg.6-13
In compliance
Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.I3, pg,6-16
Need SFWMD & L WDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6,
Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12,
Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo No. 96-007
Re: Parkridge Master Plan - Second Review
January 3, 1996
Page #2
Ofthese items, Numbers 1,2,7,9,11 & 12 can be brought into compliance on future documents
prior to first Building permit and/or Land Devclopment permit issuance. Numbers 3,4,6 & 8 are
not in compliance.
You did not receive these comments earlier because we only received the submittal on January 2.
With respect to preliminary plat review comments contained in the December 19 letter to you
received here on January 2, we will respond directly to the applicant.
WVH/ck
xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager
Ken Hall, Engineering
C:PARKRDGE.2ND
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~ R (iU R II I!.) is. ill
o l D;~: ~~~.l~ ~
. -------1
PLAI~rm:G r"JD
ZONING DEPT.
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-5
FROM:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
RE:
Parkridge Place - Master Plan
DATE:
12-26-95
The applicant should complete the following items as part of the tree preservation/environmental
requirements:
1, Submit a letter from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission that there are no
endangered/protected species on the site. (Not received to date),
2. The tree survey indicates eighty-one existing desirable trees compared with sixty-two
relocated into the area along NE 4th Street. There should be nine additional trees/plugs
relocated to this area. (Not received to date).
3. A tree management plan (document) should be submitted to address the proper care of trees
in #2 above, before, during and after construction of the project. (Not received to date).
The project should continue on the normal review process.
KH:ad
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-722
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki
DATE:
December 15, 1995
SUBJECT:
Subdivision
Project:
Location:
Master Plan - 1st Review
Park Ridge
East side of the intersection of Northeast
20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street
Agent:
File No.:
John Grant, Jr., Inc.
SBMP 95-003
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the
subdivision master plan review of the plans for the above-
referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are
divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of
comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land
Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected
and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for
second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through
the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists
recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff
believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall
understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are
subject to additional comments. I recommend that the
applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the
comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code
deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review
schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me
regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal
deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement.
Note: Our comments are made under the assumption that the
ownership of the proposed development will not require further
resubdivision of the tract as to create individual lots for the
housing units. We have reviewed the conformance of this project
with relevant zoning regulations assuming that the development
contains one tract of land. Therefore, the perimeter setbacks, as
proposed, were determined to be acceptable per bulk regulation of
the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District. Our assumption of this
development takinq place on one tract only needs to be reflected on
the Plat submitted to the City for review.
I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1, Identify clearly the property lines on both Master Plan
and Survey Map, Include this identification in the
legend.
2. Indicate in the attachment and on the Master Plan who
will be responsible for the streets maintenance: the City
or developer.
3 .
Indicate in
ownership of
units.
the attachment the anticipated form of
the housing stock and proposed type of
4. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate location of
proposed sidewalks.
5. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the dimension
of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius) .
6, On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide the minimum
dimension of the rear yard.
Page 2
Memorandum
1st Review
Park Ridge
No. 95-722
- Subdivision Master Plan
7,
On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide information in
regard to land use and zoning of all adj acent properties.
8. In order to allow the City Staff to evaluate how the
proposed development fits the adjacent land use and
and its physical characteristics provide a map extending
to:
alley between Northside Condominium and the commercial
development - to the North,
trailer park, indicating the closest located units - to
the South,
Residential development across the street from the NE
4th Street, - to the West,
area across the Rail Road indicating any development that
occurs to the East within a reasonable distance.
Within the extended perimeter area indicate all existing
streets, sidewalks, footprints of the buildings r
landscape elements, and other characteristic elements of
the surrounding development.
9. In the site data, on sheet 1 of 1, replace the word
"proposed" with the word "existing" in regard to zoning
classification.
10. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the width of
the N.E. 4th Street.
11. Provide traffic analysis
concurrency requirements.
for the
evaluation of
12. The proposed Master Plan is in violation with the
zoning regulations if the plat will be approved as
submitted.
13. All information as specified in Chapter 3, Master Plan
Review, should be included or referenced on the Master
Plan, sheet 1 of 1.
14. Indicate location and provide relevant calculation in
respect to parking.
15. Provide Homeowners Association documents.
A:SBMP-PRl
MEMORANDUM
Utilities # 95- 391
lD) ffi @ V WI ffi Ifm
'1Jl1 GEe I 5 mi \ \l0:
~ ~
TO:
Tambri Heyden
Planning & Zoning Director
PLANNING A~O
ZONING DEPT.
c{f
FROM:
John A. Guidry,
Director of Utilities
~r
~
Date: December 14, 1995
SUBJECT: Park Ridge Plat and Development Plans
Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments:
1. Palm Beach Health Department permits will be required for water and
sanitary sewer systems, (Sec, 26.12),
2, This department requests a meeting with the project engineer to discuss
several additions and corrections on the proposed water and sanitary
sewer plans and details,
3, A capacity reservation fee of $4,712.40 will be due within thirty (30) days of City
Commission approval of the site plan or upon request for my signature on the
permit applications to the Health Unit. (Sec, 26-34(E))
4. The proposed development plans indicate several single family homes on a single
parcel. It is currently unclear as to who will be responsible for maintenance of the
water and sewer lines from the edge of the utilities easement to the building.
Customarily, said maintenance is the responsibility of the homeowner who owns
the property. In this case ownership is not clear.
We have no objection to the plan proceeding through the review process if the question
regarding type of development and maintenance recan be satisfactorily addressed.
If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or
Peter Mazzella at 375-6404.
sm
xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor
Peter Mazzella
File
pkrigl
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM #95-207
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM:
Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director
SUBJ:
Site Plan - Park Ridge
DATE:
December 13, 1995
The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site.
RElcr
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO.
~-~~ ~ @ :U \J/ ~l~'
l\ DEG '4i. \~~
!
i
95-473\
<
PlhNNING A\IO
ZONING DEPT.
'Y1'1",V
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
~m Hukill, P.E., City Engineer
December 13, 1995
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
PARKRIDGE - MASTER PLAN
We have reviewed the master plan for Parkridge (or is it Park
Ridge?) sheet 1 of 1 and find as follows:
1. Revise documents to reflect all comments.
2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the
City's code requirements at time of application. These
permits include, but are not limited to the following;
site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping,
irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required
from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other
permitting agency shall be included with your permit
request.
3. This master plan is not required as a condition of
zoning, but is required as a pre-requisite to platting.
Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots
or parcels either by plat or metes and bounds, it must be
platted (Chapter 1, Article II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5,
page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown on
the master plan, the plan cannot proceed without
certification from the applicant that the master plan and
the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules
and regulations including, but not limited to, the
Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations.
4. Insufficient information to complete review. This is not
a rezoning request, so dimensions must comply with R-3
zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must
comply with R-1 district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5,
par.G2b, pg,2-21
5. Provide statement regarding subsurface conditions.
Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec. 3M, pg.3-5
6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and
collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.l1A, pg.6-3
7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003
feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet.
Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9
8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap. 6, Art, IV,
Sec.10D, pg.6-12
9. Provide street grades no steeper than 2~ per cent.
Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.10I, pg.6-13
Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo No. 95-473
Re: Parkridge - Master Plan
December 13, 1995
Page #2
10. prov ide street names as required in Chap. 6, Art. IV,
Sec.10Q, pg.6-14
11. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.IV,
Sec.13, pg.6-16
12. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering
approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24
The package we received included sheets 1 thru 8 of infrastructure
and L-1 thru L-3 of landscaping, all of which are due upon approval
of the master plan. (Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4A, pg.6-19) We will
retain them for review at that time.
WVH/ck
xc: Ken Hall
A:PARKRDGE,MPR
BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC UNIT
O'J. :' \',11 ~ ~
j-] il ';1'
, _ ~ or I t r
U~[~t~:-;-=1 ]
PLANNING N'JO ));?U/
ZONING DEPT.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
REF:
TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR
SGT. MARLON HARRIS
11 DECEMBER 95
PARK RIDGE - SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN-1st REVIEW MEMO #0196
I have reviewed the above plans and fi~.4.::~:Q:l')rob~~i:~i:tlR.s,,tWle,
":,:,.:::,:,:",:,,"::.:::,,,.::':;:1: ;:~;:,~::;.:~,.~?,~> U Zl~~ ~
,,' .,::,,'\:\)
.:....;.. ;:(~.. ..::;::(:.;;..,
"~'''::'-'';... .....). .... ."' .
""'::~.-f \., i .~...,=: ::::~
r::~~7 Respec ly\( ~"\:.\{\
"," m~'\~.". {:~
....;::~
.
tf3 '"
t'..:::.. .:o:.:>;.~~::~:~..;~::, r"';'~: ~:~::::::::.-.-::::..
:~l sgil Marldd Ha.fdS%
13 If;;:;0 '" LLJ) 0
(::::;:::::::;:~;;;:::;:;)
t::.;~::::::::,!:)
CQ
.r.::::;.:.....;.;...
l>t""":':~~:::;::::::::~;:::t)
:t../
~@JJ
o{i~Ql
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 395-575
RE:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
Kevin J. Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist ~\-
Parkridge - Master Plan
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
December 12, 1995
The applicant should provide a 1) tree survey and 2) Tree Management Plan for the property. The
applicant should receive written approval from the State Gave and Fresh Water Fish Commission that
there are no gopher tortoises/scrub jays on the site, The plan should continue on the normal review
process,
K.H:ad
~~,
i'::"---;;-'-~~~ II ~ ~ \~\ \
"':\ \', II!) is ~i'.\1
\\ n) ,)].,";"."~..,.-.. '. \ "\ \ \
i '\~ ,.1., ' 'J inn, r: ,'.' \"
' \\ \, \ '- \. l::-j:J' 1
OJ t ~, I i -. \
,\ I' ' , , I
" .' t ~':;:rfr'^:;{VX
"":1~"?'W1' "
'.. ',.,,:;............~,.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-722
~OO--'"'~-'--- - '--:- \fi \"2' rill' ,
,',.' , '.' lr: I
. 0 L"...c :":~=.-" :;:"~.'. J n.. ~..;
, r Hip:
; tW' I l 5 ' ' : ',I ;.
. ' ~ .-..~ .
, 'wi 1
~""'J..,.,,,,,...-..-.,.,,,,...--~......~~. .. ~ i
, N\"""""""\"6
~"<.. _t\~.;'ll\l. ' '.1'J 1~1 t'i. :'i.lJ
,70i'i!NGDEPl ~".,
.,"_....:-<""..,__.....;.:~...~.;v"......co.;"~...'/:~O<Il:. ..
TO:
Tambri J. Heyden
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM:
Jerzy Lewicki
DATE:
December 15, 1995
SUBJECT:
Subdivision
Project:
Location:
Master Plan - 1st Review
Park Ridge
East side of the intersection of Northeast
20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street
Agent:
File No. :
John Grant, Jr., Inc.
SBMP 95-003
The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the
subdivision master plan review of the plans for the above-
referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are
divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of
comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land
Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected
and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for
second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through
the site plan review process. The second set of comment{s) lists
recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff
believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall
understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are
subj ect to additional comments. I recommend that the
applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the
comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code
deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review
schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me
regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal
deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement.
Note: Our comments are made under the assumption that the
ownership of the proposed development will not require further
resubdivision of the tract as to create individual lots for the
housing units. We have reviewed the conformance of this project
with relevant zoning regulations assuming that the development
contains one tract of land. Therefore, the perimeter setbacks, as
proposed, were determined to be acceptable per bulk regulation of
the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District. Our assumption of this
development takinq place on one tract only needs to be reflected on
the Plat submitted to the City for review.
I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Identify clearly the property lines on both Master Plan
and Survey Map. Include this identification in the
legend.
2. Indicate in the attachment and on the Master Plan who
will be responsible for the streets maintenance: the City
or developer.
3.
Indicate
ownership
units.
in
of
the
the
attachment the
housing stock
anticipated form of
and proposed type of
4. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of I, indicate location of
proposed sidewalks.
5. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of I, indicate the dimension
of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius) .
6. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of I, provide the minimum
dimension of the rear yard.
Page 2
Memorandum
1st Review
Park Ridge
No. 95-722
- Subdivision Master Plan
7.
On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide information in
regard to land use and zoning of all adjacent properties.
8.
In order to allow the City Staff to evaluate how the
proposed development fits the adj acent land use and
and its physical characteristics provide a map extending
to:
alley between Northside Condominium and the commercial
development - to the North,
trailer park, indicating the closest located units - to
the South,
Residential development across the street from the NE
4th Street, - to the West,
area across the Rail Road indicating any development that
occurs to the East within a reasonable distance.
Within the extended perimeter area indicate all existing
streets, sidewalks, footprints of the buildings,
landscape elements, and other characteristic elements of
the surrounding development.
9. In the site data, on sheet 1 of 1, replace the word
"proposed" with the word "existing" in regard to zoning
classification.
10. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the width of
the N.E. 4th Street.
11.
Provide traffic analysis
concurrency requirements.
for
the
evaluation
of
12. The proposed Master Plan is in violation with the
zoning regulations if the plat will be approved as
submitted.
13. All information as specified in Chapter 3, Master Plan
Review, should be included or referenced on the Master
Plan, sheet 1 of 1.
14. Indicate location and provide relevant calculation in
respect to parking.
15. Provide Homeowners Association documents.
A:SBMP-PRl
Id30 eNINOZ,
OIliV ~N1NN'(la
RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-56
~rn
~::~8:a ~ ffi
TO:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parl<s SuperintJmdent r
Parkridge ~
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
December 8, 1995
The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Parkridge Place, The
following comments are submitted:
1. Based on 34 single family homes, the recreation dedication requirement is calculated
34 d.u, X .018 acres = .612 acres
2, The plan gives no infonnation 1bat the developer plans to apply for one-half credit for private
recreation. The full dedicatioo requirement is required as cash in lieu of land.
JW:ad
BUILDING DIVISION
m( -...~. :-~ B::l~
\ill L ,G I 9 I9!l) , \.!!J
,
PlANN1~iG t,!\,H) ~, '
ZONING DEPT.
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-443
December 18, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Department of Development Director
Re:
Park Ridge Site Plan
Please refer to Memorandum No. 95-442 for comments relative the Master Plan and Site Plan.
(Copy Attached).
~
- "/ ~
. . j ,
Al Ne old ~
AN:mh
cc: William V, Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director
PKRIDGE
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 95-442
December 18, 1995
To:
Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director
From:
Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director
Re:
Park Ridge Master Plan
After reviewing the plans for the above reference project, the Building Division cannot support this plan going
forward because of so many unanswered questions that we cannot address without such information as type of
multiple-family residential structures, i.e" apartments, cooperatives, condominiums or townhouses.
If they are to be single-family dwellings, they should comply with R-I site regulations under LDR Section 5,
Paragraph E-2 and should have platted lots to check setbacks and lot coverage,
In addition to the above comments, the following should be shown on the plans:
1, Evaluation and floor plan unless they are single-family,
2. Distance between building to comply with Table 600 ofthe Standard Building Code.
3. Setbacks should be shown from Park Ridge Circle (See definition oflot frontage, LDR Page
1-23, Article II), also see Access for an understanding of where front setbacks are from.
4, Setbacks must be shown for pools, screen rooms, etc.
5. Sign details required for Site approval.
AN:mh
~'
cc: William V. Hukill, P,E" Department of Development Director
PKRIDGE
FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO, 95-399
~. ,-~.-,--~--
'OOD rn @ ~ ~ W ~ r
[_._~'-~. ---
't,n I'} I
1 , t... U I.; r !i
-.- . $!.
PlANNlrlG A~lD i "l
lONING DEPT. I
J. _"'_~__-"t. ~ .,~..._
TO: Planning Department
FROM: Fire Department
DATE: December 20, 1995
RE: Park Ridge Place
2100 NE 4 St
NWSP 95-012
vSHMP 95-003
We have no objections to this project as shown,
("
cc: Chief Jordan
FPO II Campbell
File
'I'RACKING ....llG - SI'l'E PLAN REVIEW SUBk...r'l'AL
PARKRIDGE
SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN
NEW SITE DLAN
12/6/95 AM'JUNT:
FILE NO.: SBMP 95-003
PRUJJ::C'!' 'l'l'rLE:
1.l1::l:i~lUE''l'lON :
'}''iE'I:::
DArl'E: REC: D:
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
1 nnn nn kl::CBIPT NO. :
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
'fWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: 12/6/95
COLORED ELEVA'l'IONS REC' D:
(plans shall be pre-assembled. The planning & Zoning Dept. will number each
sheet of their set. The PlanniIlg Dept. set will be used to check the
remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.)
. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * * * * * . . * . * * * * *
APPLICATION << SUBMITTAL:
DATE:
ACCEPTED
12/6/95
DENIED
DATE:
DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES:
2nd SUBMIT'I'AL
ACCEPTED
DENIED
DATE:
DATE:
DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER:
REVIEWER'S NAME:
* * * * * . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
,
(Label TRC Departments on each set of plans)
DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW,
DATE SEN'lI: /cf{/diS- RETURN DATE: /d// 6J~!:J MEMO NUMBER: 9F- 613
~st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED
Planning
f Building
Engineer
Engineer
forester
v
MEMO # /
,? -.1....'" /
./~. ,,i.d..
C)s - <'f'-/-J /
'15"- <f -r ~ /
/
.295 .51'/5 I I ~/) J...
I "C"
I~
/~
I~
/-
I~
PLANS
MEMO # / DATE I "e"
q~-~L/~/~
q5-~1 /1JJi?) /.iL-
95- 65" / 1~:,7;1!~ /_
<-15 dJTl I .,. 0 / V,C
(]Vt6 / ILl II /~
PLANS
util.
P.w,
E'arks
. E' i re
police
~
'I
y
TYPB OF VARIANCE(S)
DATE OE' MEETING:
DATE OF LETT~R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS:
(Aesthetic keview App., dates of board mtgs, llc checklist sent out w/ commen~:
NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID:
DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW:
(Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents)
/
1..----
COLORED ELEVATIONS RBC' 0:
MEMO SENT TO/!~C TO PERFORM and REVIE~. n
DA'l'E SENT: !E!id I HBMO tt: I~c.. U'1tAwlLO'o.-'
RETURN DATE:
JJP1/?:J
2nd REVIEW RECOMHENDATIQNlDENIAL
MSMO * / ~~!B I" R/. U"
1ft. ~aol / -hl-i--I c-
~fJ:>-OOI I if ~ / c-
~ - 003 /iItii" / C-
Qr;-Z;99/ ( / V"
o fqq I .... / C/
Planning
BUilding
Engineer
Engineer
Forster
PLANS
'I
HBHO ..
"15' - 'f41
q~-16a
q(P~oo1
96 ~"c:;q /
/ DATE
I i '21:1.1{
. fL1~
~ I ! ~j1"
/
/ 1)/ d6
/"R/D"
I c.
Ie---
/C!./
I
/ ,-
'/' '
- ,...
Util.
P.W,
.~Parks
Fire
Police y
PLANS
1=
-=--
y
LETTER TO APPLICANT RBGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS
PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATB SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED:
SCHEDULB OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD
CC/CRA
DAT~ APPROVAL LETTER SENT:
A: 'l'kA~KING.::;P