Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS ." . . I I MEMORANDUM Utilities # 96-044 \~? ~ ~ u w ~~ Ill, ~ \ L--.." , \'11,,," :.. 1 7"': , '....-....:--.-' , .---~. I , I I .. f J Date: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Dir~ctor C'~ John A. Guidry, ..; Director of Utilities \~) . ~~ February 2, 1996 / / TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Park Ridge, New Site Plan, Second Review Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1, City water will not be supplied for irrigation. Please indicate on the plan your water source, (City Compo Plan, Policy 3C.3.4). 2. Plan shall show size and type of utility pipes. Your submittal suggests the water and sanitary sewer plans were included, Please provide for review and comment, (Sec. 26.16(a)), 3. No trees, or overhang of large trees, are permitted within Utility Easements, (Sec. 7.5-18.1). It is our recommendation that the plan not proceed through the review process until items # 2 and #.3 above are addressed. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm;parkr2 xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella I File rn1,D, m @ \ULJJ~.ffi ~ t~1[ I.,. ~JJ \ -'^iiLANNING ANO -_. : ZONING OfPT .-....-....'... ,. _~.....:JO~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-021 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director / FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: New Site Plan - 2nd Review - Park Ridge DATE: February 1, 1996 The CuI D Sac at the above location must be a minimum of 90' for sanitation and fire vehicles to be able to turn around. If you have any questions please give me a call at 375-6201. R ert Eichorst blic Works Director REier (0) rn ;~; rn B WI ~ :lwl RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-04ln1 ,.J PLANNING AND ZONlli9..DEPL~..... ,. FROM: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ! /'./ I John Wildner, Parks Superintendent Ill" ' Park Ridge - New Site Plan - 2nd ~view TO: RE: DATE: January 29, 1996 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Park Ridge. The following comments are submitted: 1. Recreation dedication requirement will be figured at the single family rate. Recreation and Park memo #95-565 remains in effect. 2. Recommend that the plan continue through the normal review process. JW:ad FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399 TO: Planning Department ~ m @ ~ n 'YJ lli ill ' ,~ fEB - ~J \: },lJ PLANNiNG ~rm ZON1!l(, "VI FROM: Fire Department DATE: January 2, 1996 RE: Park Ridge Place 2100 NE 4 St NWSP 95-012 SBMP 95-003 We have no objections to this project as shown. ~ William D, Cavanaugh, FPO I ~ Y' , cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File ~ m r~JLt tWl 00 " ,""___U_ j BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 29 JANUARY 96 PARK RIDGE - 2nd REVIEW - SITE PLAN MEMO #0206 til ..,;,) f" f ~):' ',~! !'} /. " t. , ..;::...........:....~......::- I bave reviewed tbe above plans and fin.d,:,uo.:p'(o61~mg:at' t4isJune. ..",:.'.':',',) :::;:.::,:::,:,.~,~;,.;,::.:.:,:,;",:.::,::~~.~}> U 2,:;,~~ ,.::"""S::> :::~ ...l" .J' ;/:;,.~.',::~,:"".'"'.',',:"""",.,,,,., ..t~.. ..:o:t' :.. , . : <'\..,,{"::::::,.:\ ~Respectfull\~ ~-~- .1fL~ ~:.:~.:.:.:.:.:<:... -. ;~:" ~ ;:;':-;';';o:'';'Jo~~.:. ';:::.. ;..; '.~.. :', ~ OJ ..~.. -.;. Iii S81J .Marldri HardS1: tJ::::~::~::<':::::"'/ 0 tJ~:;~::~~:~~::~} D .:.... .. ~.~: {~ W....:-:. '~":-;..~....:.:l iF , '. .,. . .... .' '.fr~;"";"";'";;:,, [80 c::~~::~~:J :.\ 1,. C::~~j (~::,x, , ~\,. '~:~>l ,............................'. I r"':<<"'::::l;'~} I f:::~:::::::::.,::;~:'} ~:-:.~;::;::;:~~::;::::-/. fJ IrlFjJ v..,~..1' ~-::.; l )J l~" :;~~''''..:>'''' /'f h> ,~~~ ~ .~. ~;'i ;:"i "(:-.. :> t ..-:-....~ .;:~-:>'\. \. -w.... ~.;:i' '~~ ~"'.<.., rl (~:~:~;:~~~~ \). t~1 ~.~ BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-041 . f':'O) ~ @ ~ n Wi ~ rm \~ llil 11~ \~J I i PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT. February 5, 1996 TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Director of Development RE: TRC COMMENTS NEW SITE PLAN - 2nd REVIEW PARK RIDGE The Building Division has reviewed the amended site plan for the above referenced project and offers the following comments: 1. The swing of the garage door needs to be changed because the interior dimensions ofthe garage will not permit the door to swing into the garage. 2. No enclosures can be built on the patio because of the 15 foot required setback. We recommend that this project be forwarded to the Planning and Development Board for consideration. AN:bg XC: William V. Hukill, P.E. PARK i~:';: DEP ARThIENT OF DEVELOPMENT II ~ ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-04 UU !1 ~ ~ n "1'., (.> (!ij ~ U \i/ i~ F=a - 2 ;S[~ TO: Tambri 1. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ukill' P.E., City Engineer February 2. 1996 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. FROM: DATE: RE: PARKRIDGE SITE PLAN - 3RD REVIEW V./e have reviewed our January 3, 1996 Memo (No. 96-007) regarding compliance with comments contained therein. We respond as follows: 1 . Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. All plans submitted for specific pennits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following: site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FOOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 3. Moot ifproperty is a condominium. 4. Insufficient information to complete review, This is not a rezoning request, so dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning, Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must comply with R-I district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b. pg.2-21 5. Previously in compliance, 6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art. III, Sec. J ] A, pg.6-3 7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than I foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg,6-8 & 6-9 8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is ] 001, Chap,6, Art.IV, Sec.lOD, pg.6-12 9. In compliance. 10. Previously in compliance, II. Provide undersround electrical service. Chap,6, Art.JV, See,13, pg,6-16 12. Need SFWMD & LwPD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art. VII, Sec4B, pg.6-24 The following additional conditions have appeared with the revised submittal. A. Provide proof of unity of title. B. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets, Chap.6, Art.III, Sec. I I A, pg.6-3 c. Provide sidewalk locations & details. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec. lOT, pg.6-14 D. Provide Certification by Developer's Engineer that drainage plan complies with all City codes & standards. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.SA, pg.6-7 and Chap,23, Art. 1 IF, pg.23-8 A second street name should be provided for the portion of development south of Park Ridge Circle to the cuI-dc-sac. We strongly recommend valley curbs along roadways to improve drainagc. WVH/ck (':PKRHXi[ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-055 rn rn 00 rn u~m t t l, '.' i:/j(j . i ' : PLANNING At..JD ZONING OEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Kevin 1. Hallahan, F orester/Environmentalist ~H- RE: Park Ridge - 2nd Review DATE: February 2,1996 , ], The letter of permit from the State Fresh Water Fish and Game Commission has not been received by my office. 2. The applicant should expound on item #13 of the Tree Management Plan to include specific landscape tasks to complete. These would involve: a, exotic vegetation control b. weed/grasses removal/control c. trash/debris removal/control d. trimming restrictions of preserve vegetation e. signage for area f. fencing for area g. other site specific items to protect and properly manage the preserve area while under ownership of the Homeowner Association (documents too), KH:ad PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 96-023 TO: William Hukill Department of Development Director FROM: Tambri J. Heyden --;srI) Planning and Zonin~ Director DATE: January 16r 1996 SUBJECT: Engineering Division - Memorandum No. 96-007 Parkridge Master Plan - 2nd Review Comments In your memorandum referenced above, you note that your January 3, 1996 comments due December 29, 1995 to our office, could not be prepared earlier as you only received the submittal on January 2, 1996. Please be informed that the Master Resubmittal was sent out to the Technical Review Committee, with the Technical Review Committee Aoenda on December 21. 1995. These plans were hand delivered to your office. This was also mentioned at the December 26, 1995 Technical Review Committee meeting at which the resubmittal plans were discussed. There was no representation from the Engineering Division at this meeting. TJH:arw xc: Carrie Parker Michael Haag Central Files c: Parkridge ,023 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-741 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki DATE: December 29, 1995 SUBJECT: Subdivision Project: Location: Master Plan - 2nd Review Park Ridge East side of the intersection of Northeast 20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street. John Grant, Jr., Inc. SBMP 95-003 Agent: File No.: The following is a subdivision master referenced project. list plan of 2nd review review of the comments regarding the plans for the above- Note: As of the December 26, 1995 Technical Review Committee (TRC) meeting, the issue of the land conveyance has not been addressed. It places a considerable hardship on the reviewing parties by not allowing them to determine which code provisions and standards are applicable. Various alternative solutions, as proposed by the developer's agent as possibilities, seem to contradict either the Land Development Regulation (LDR) document or other applicable codes. Therefore, the TRC has reached the consensus that before this project can be sent to the Planning and Development Board, the developer shall: A. Establish a legal framework to resolve the land conveyance issue. B. Declare anticipated ownership of the housing units and the surrounding ground. The search for the above problems solution should involve legal representatives of both sides: the City and the developer, and should be done with consideration of adopted city codes and standards to ensure that the proposed solution will meet all applicable city requirements. Our comments are made under the same assumption we made during the first review that the ownership of the proposed development will not require further resubdivision of this tract. Our assumption of this development takinq place on one tract only has already been reflected on the Plat submitted as a part of the 2nd review package. I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Relabel Site Plan to Master Plan. Resubmit full set of documents as required by the LDR (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 4.B.1) including amended written attachment. 2. Indicate the anticipated form of ownership of the housing stock and proposed type of units (LDR, Chapter 3, Article III, Section 1.A) . 3. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate location of proposed sidewalks (LDR, Chapter 6, Article III, Section 11.A) . 4. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the dimension of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius). The LDR document (Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.D) requires provision of a right-of-way for both private and dedicated streets. Provide information in regard to the diameters of the proposed turnaround right-of-way and paved areas. The minimum diameters should be 100 feet and 90 feet, respectively. MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT. NO. 96 - 001 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning Dir m '..'..-........... R (r) '" DEl!; liI.' ~"~~ .. ! I~~ '. J . ,j " ~! ; 1 iL:.,) . PlM! N! tTG'f"ill......J ZO"I~I ,.r, ''''..,~ ,~ HJ l::L:: I. FROM: John A, Guidry, Utilities Director DATE: Jan 2, 1996 SUBJECT: Park Ridge - Master Plan/Site Plan We offer the following comments on this project: 1) Plans shall show proposed utility easements. (Section 26-33(a)) 2) Trees, other than palm trees, are not permitted within utility easements, Shrubs are permitted, (Section 7,5-18.1) 3) Permits for the water and sewer system installation will be required from the Palm Beach County Health Unit. Please coordinate the engineering plan approval through this office. (Section 26-12) 4) A minimum of 10- feet is required between water mains and any portion of a structure, This criteria is not met for the water main in the side easement along the south side of the project. 5) We have insufficient information to determine who will be the account-holder for each water services, and also be responsible for maintenance of the service lines from the City's point of service to the buildings, The applicant's representative has expressed his client's intention to sell the property under each building as part of the building structure, However, such an approach will place the meter and service lines under the responsibility of the Homeowners' or Condominium Association, which is very unusual for a single family structure. 6) This project's layout is similar to that of a single-family P,U,D., but it is being proposed as a multi-family development with detached single family units, We therefore are not certain whether to apply the 500 gallon per minute or the 1500 gallon per minute fire flow requirement. The applicant must therefore advise us in writing how the site will eventually be subdivided, what the building separation will truly be, and what type of construction will be performed, before we can make this determination. Although the Master Plan/Site Plan indicates a side setback of 20 feet, but this does not correlate to the distance between buildings. Please advise as to the actual minimum distance between buildings, The number and scope of unknowns on this project effectively prevent us from determining whether it does or does not meet code requirements, We therefore recommend it not proceed until these questions are satisfactorily addressed. Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella of this office, Attachments JAG/PVM xc: Skip Milor File TO: FROM: SUBJ: DATE: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #96-001 Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ./ Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director Site Plan - Parkridge January 2, 1996 The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site. RElcr obert Eichorst Public Works Director ~_,;;;.^_:r( / [" n '--'. n -~l!j JAN - '3 .' ///1 i \ ,[if '. PLAN'\'IN-.~' lONltJG DC AND ,-,or .cpr ......i3<e..,-.. .'....~,.. roo T :'f~.~~lm ~ RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #96-003 PLANNING AI\JO 0 -' ZONING DEPT. ~ TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Superintendent ~ Parkridge Subdivision Masterplan. q"d Review FROM: RE: DATE: JanuaI)' 4, 1996 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the masterplan for Parkridge Subdivision (2nd Review). The following comments are submitted: Recreation and Park Department Memo #95-565 indicates a recreation dedication requirement based on this subdivision being considered single family. Due to unique platting arrangements, there is some possibility that this project may be considered multifamily. Ifit is determined that the project is multifamily, then we will need to recalculate the recreation dedication requirement at a slightly lower rate. JW:ad FIRE PREVENTION :MEMORANDUM NO. 95-399 rn m@rnu\YJrn .1 11996 OOi PLANNING AND , ZONING DEPT. TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: January 2,1996 RE: Park Ridge Place 2100 NE 4 8t NW8P 95-012 al""SHMP 95-003 We have no objections to this project as shown, &~~L4~ William D, Cavanaugh, FPO I cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File -, .'.,........,~...'......,--...- _.~ \ 0) ~I (1 ... i, ; we ~~~:~,~,:~ . . PU\!",';I,';.:: '. ,0 I ZO!IJ"'G "~OT ~"""_ 'l\i,.f:._ ut.!. ~"""..~"~ BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 22 DECEMBER 95 PARK RIDGE - MASTER PLAN - 2nd SUBMITIAL MEMO #0199 I have reviewed the above plans and fiI14,~m:rP\o61~~~~~\4i~Ji!ne. jf tfff;Y U z>~,& .~. '.~ ":" ..~~:~-:., ..;/.:., ~""',.:~,::~> ;\.<f"":':>.~:> ~"R:~ ~~ f ,,:a.-.:.:....:~~::. "::" ~ 'r;':':o:':O:~"~;~\:-::::;. )i L".~,gV }darlqI\ Harq$'l 1.,,,1""':"<-'>""';'"'' Q tL:::::::::::;;:::..}' Q t~;:~::~::::::::::,:9~ .~..:' [Bo . ............:....:....:,~:: ~C:~~~.;.:.::::;::r.~.-;:- ,..<",.:,.,,,)!) t....:....:>:'...>:';-. ~ ..........,...:............... .;. "';;'. iB) ::~:O;.:.:.:.:.:.;.....:O'......-:.~. .~. '.:.: ltUu ~rflt' n rO~rry ::.....~, BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-452 I"U_<~ I JDJYcfJi !J /1/J1 DEe 2~-~~ December 28, 1995 PZLANNING ArvD ONING DEPT. TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Al Newbold Deputy Director of Development RE: TRC COMMENTS - PARK RIDGE MASTER PLAN - 2nd REVIEW After reviewing the plans submitted for second review and the applicant's response to the first review comments, the Building Division cannot support this project and does not recommend it go forward. All of our first comments still stand (copy attached) and for the type of building shown, the setbacks for R-l should rule and each land area that will be sold with the house should be shown on the plan for land coverage per code. A~ AN:bh Attachment XC: William V. Hukill, P,E. P ARKRIDG ..J;i1 J!/j tit . j! i I Ii) I 1...../ BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-442 December 18, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director Re: Park Ridge Master Plan After reviewing the plans for the above reference project, the Building Division cannot support this plan going forward because of so many unanswered questions that we cannot address without such information as type of multiple-family residential structures, i.e" apartments, cooperatives, condominiums or townhouses. If they are to be single-family dwellings, they should comply with R-1 site regulations under LDR Section 5, Paragraph E-2 and should have platted lots to check setbacks and lot coverage. In addition to the above comments, the following should be shown on the plans: 1. Evaluation and floor plan unless they are single-family. 2. Distance between building to comply with Table 600 of the Standard Building Code. 3. Setbacks should be shown from Park Ridge Circle (See definition of lot frontage, LDR Page 1-23, Article II), also see Access for an understanding of where front setbacks are from. 4. Setbacks must be shown for pools, screen rooms, etc. 5. Sign details required for Site approval. AN:mh cc: William V. Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director PKRIDGE TO: FROM: DATE: RE: r'~----"'~'-'"'' \ [~r~ JU,-LL~l ~ ~ lJl) JAN 4 1996 \ L.J DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT \' ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 96-007 ~.'. PLANNING P,~J() \ ZONING DEPT. Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ Hukill, P.E., Ci1y Engineer January 3, 1996 P ARKRIDGE MASTER PLAN - SECOND REVIEW We have reviewed our December 13, 1995 Memo (No. 95-473) regarding compliance with comments contained therein. We respond as follows: 1. 2, 3. Revise documents to reflect all comments. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as thc FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. This master plan is not required as a condition of zoning, but is required as a pre- requisite to platting, Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots or parcels either by plat or metes and bounds, it must be platted (Chapter 1, Article II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5, page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown on the master plan, the plan cannot proceed without certification from the applicant that the master plan and the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Insufficient information to complete review. This is not a rezoning request, so dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must comply with R-l district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b, pg.2-21 In compliance Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap,6, Art.III, Sec. 1 lA, pg.6-3 Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec,5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9 Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.lOD, pg.6-12 Provide street grades no steeper than 2 1/2 per cent. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec. 1 01, pg.6-13 In compliance Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.lV, Sec.I3, pg,6-16 Need SFWMD & L WDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12, Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo No. 96-007 Re: Parkridge Master Plan - Second Review January 3, 1996 Page #2 Ofthese items, Numbers 1,2,7,9,11 & 12 can be brought into compliance on future documents prior to first Building permit and/or Land Devclopment permit issuance. Numbers 3,4,6 & 8 are not in compliance. You did not receive these comments earlier because we only received the submittal on January 2. With respect to preliminary plat review comments contained in the December 19 letter to you received here on January 2, we will respond directly to the applicant. WVH/ck xc: Carrie Parker, City Manager Ken Hall, Engineering C:PARKRDGE.2ND TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~ R (iU R II I!.) is. ill o l D;~: ~~~.l~ ~ . -------1 PLAI~rm:G r"JD ZONING DEPT. RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-5 FROM: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist RE: Parkridge Place - Master Plan DATE: 12-26-95 The applicant should complete the following items as part of the tree preservation/environmental requirements: 1, Submit a letter from the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission that there are no endangered/protected species on the site. (Not received to date), 2. The tree survey indicates eighty-one existing desirable trees compared with sixty-two relocated into the area along NE 4th Street. There should be nine additional trees/plugs relocated to this area. (Not received to date). 3. A tree management plan (document) should be submitted to address the proper care of trees in #2 above, before, during and after construction of the project. (Not received to date). The project should continue on the normal review process. KH:ad PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-722 TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki DATE: December 15, 1995 SUBJECT: Subdivision Project: Location: Master Plan - 1st Review Park Ridge East side of the intersection of Northeast 20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street Agent: File No.: John Grant, Jr., Inc. SBMP 95-003 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the subdivision master plan review of the plans for the above- referenced project. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment(s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subject to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. Note: Our comments are made under the assumption that the ownership of the proposed development will not require further resubdivision of the tract as to create individual lots for the housing units. We have reviewed the conformance of this project with relevant zoning regulations assuming that the development contains one tract of land. Therefore, the perimeter setbacks, as proposed, were determined to be acceptable per bulk regulation of the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District. Our assumption of this development takinq place on one tract only needs to be reflected on the Plat submitted to the City for review. I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1, Identify clearly the property lines on both Master Plan and Survey Map, Include this identification in the legend. 2. Indicate in the attachment and on the Master Plan who will be responsible for the streets maintenance: the City or developer. 3 . Indicate in ownership of units. the attachment the anticipated form of the housing stock and proposed type of 4. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate location of proposed sidewalks. 5. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the dimension of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius) . 6, On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide the minimum dimension of the rear yard. Page 2 Memorandum 1st Review Park Ridge No. 95-722 - Subdivision Master Plan 7, On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide information in regard to land use and zoning of all adj acent properties. 8. In order to allow the City Staff to evaluate how the proposed development fits the adjacent land use and and its physical characteristics provide a map extending to: alley between Northside Condominium and the commercial development - to the North, trailer park, indicating the closest located units - to the South, Residential development across the street from the NE 4th Street, - to the West, area across the Rail Road indicating any development that occurs to the East within a reasonable distance. Within the extended perimeter area indicate all existing streets, sidewalks, footprints of the buildings r landscape elements, and other characteristic elements of the surrounding development. 9. In the site data, on sheet 1 of 1, replace the word "proposed" with the word "existing" in regard to zoning classification. 10. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the width of the N.E. 4th Street. 11. Provide traffic analysis concurrency requirements. for the evaluation of 12. The proposed Master Plan is in violation with the zoning regulations if the plat will be approved as submitted. 13. All information as specified in Chapter 3, Master Plan Review, should be included or referenced on the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1. 14. Indicate location and provide relevant calculation in respect to parking. 15. Provide Homeowners Association documents. A:SBMP-PRl MEMORANDUM Utilities # 95- 391 lD) ffi @ V WI ffi Ifm '1Jl1 GEe I 5 mi \ \l0: ~ ~ TO: Tambri Heyden Planning & Zoning Director PLANNING A~O ZONING DEPT. c{f FROM: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities ~r ~ Date: December 14, 1995 SUBJECT: Park Ridge Plat and Development Plans Staff has reviewed the above referenced project and offer the following comments: 1. Palm Beach Health Department permits will be required for water and sanitary sewer systems, (Sec, 26.12), 2, This department requests a meeting with the project engineer to discuss several additions and corrections on the proposed water and sanitary sewer plans and details, 3, A capacity reservation fee of $4,712.40 will be due within thirty (30) days of City Commission approval of the site plan or upon request for my signature on the permit applications to the Health Unit. (Sec, 26-34(E)) 4. The proposed development plans indicate several single family homes on a single parcel. It is currently unclear as to who will be responsible for maintenance of the water and sewer lines from the edge of the utilities easement to the building. Customarily, said maintenance is the responsibility of the homeowner who owns the property. In this case ownership is not clear. We have no objection to the plan proceeding through the review process if the question regarding type of development and maintenance recan be satisfactorily addressed. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact Skip Milor at 375-6407 or Peter Mazzella at 375-6404. sm xc: Clyde "Skip" Milor Peter Mazzella File pkrigl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #95-207 TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director FROM: Robert Eichorst, Public Works Director SUBJ: Site Plan - Park Ridge DATE: December 13, 1995 The Public Works Department has no problems with the above site. RElcr DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. ~-~~ ~ @ :U \J/ ~l~' l\ DEG '4i. \~~ ! i 95-473\ < PlhNNING A\IO ZONING DEPT. 'Y1'1",V TO: Tambri J. Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director ~m Hukill, P.E., City Engineer December 13, 1995 FROM: DATE: RE: PARKRIDGE - MASTER PLAN We have reviewed the master plan for Parkridge (or is it Park Ridge?) sheet 1 of 1 and find as follows: 1. Revise documents to reflect all comments. 2. All plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to the following; site lighting, paving, drainage, curbing, landscaping, irrigation and traffic control devices. Permits required from agencies such as the FDOT, PBC, SFWMD and any other permitting agency shall be included with your permit request. 3. This master plan is not required as a condition of zoning, but is required as a pre-requisite to platting. Since the land is to be subdivided into two or more lots or parcels either by plat or metes and bounds, it must be platted (Chapter 1, Article II, page 1-33 and Chapter 5, page 5-1). Since the subdivided lots are not shown on the master plan, the plan cannot proceed without certification from the applicant that the master plan and the plat will conform with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, the Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations. 4. Insufficient information to complete review. This is not a rezoning request, so dimensions must comply with R-3 zoning. Single family dwellings in R-3 districts must comply with R-1 district requirements. Chap.2, Sec.5, par.G2b, pg,2-21 5. Provide statement regarding subsurface conditions. Chap.3, Art.IV, Sec. 3M, pg.3-5 6. Sidewalks are required on both sides of all local and collector streets. Chap.6, Art.III, Sec.l1A, pg.6-3 7. Provide swale and detention area slopes no less than .003 feet per foot and no greater than 1 foot per 4 feet. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.5B, pg.6-8 & 6-9 8. Minimum cul-de-sac ROW diameter is 100'. Chap. 6, Art, IV, Sec.10D, pg.6-12 9. Provide street grades no steeper than 2~ per cent. Chap.6, Art. IV, Sec.10I, pg.6-13 Dept. of Development, Engineering Div. Memo No. 95-473 Re: Parkridge - Master Plan December 13, 1995 Page #2 10. prov ide street names as required in Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec.10Q, pg.6-14 11. Provide underground electrical service. Chap.6, Art.IV, Sec.13, pg.6-16 12. Need SFWMD & LWDD acceptance prior to Engineering approval. Chap.6, Art.VII, Sec.4B, pg.6-24 The package we received included sheets 1 thru 8 of infrastructure and L-1 thru L-3 of landscaping, all of which are due upon approval of the master plan. (Chap.6, Art.V, Sec.4A, pg.6-19) We will retain them for review at that time. WVH/ck xc: Ken Hall A:PARKRDGE,MPR BOYNTON BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC UNIT O'J. :' \',11 ~ ~ j-] il ';1' , _ ~ or I t r U~[~t~:-;-=1 ] PLANNING N'JO ));?U/ ZONING DEPT. TO: FROM: DATE: REF: TAMBRI HEYDEN, PLANNING & ZONING DIRECTOR SGT. MARLON HARRIS 11 DECEMBER 95 PARK RIDGE - SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN-1st REVIEW MEMO #0196 I have reviewed the above plans and fi~.4.::~:Q:l')rob~~i:~i:tlR.s,,tWle, ":,:,.:::,:,:",:,,"::.:::,,,.::':;:1: ;:~;:,~::;.:~,.~?,~> U Zl~~ ~ ,,' .,::,,'\:\) .:....;.. ;:(~.. ..::;::(:.;;.., "~'''::'-'';... .....). .... ."' . ""'::~.-f \., i .~...,=: ::::~ r::~~7 Respec ly\( ~"\:.\{\ "," m~'\~.". {:~ ....;::~ . tf3 '" t'..:::.. .:o:.:>;.~~::~:~..;~::, r"';'~: ~:~::::::::.-.-::::.. :~l sgil Marldd Ha.fdS% 13 If;;:;0 '" LLJ) 0 (::::;:::::::;:~;;;:::;:;) t::.;~::::::::,!:) CQ .r.::::;.:.....;.;... l>t""":':~~:::;::::::::~;:::t) :t../ ~@JJ o{i~Ql RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM 395-575 RE: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director Kevin J. Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist ~\- Parkridge - Master Plan TO: FROM: DATE: December 12, 1995 The applicant should provide a 1) tree survey and 2) Tree Management Plan for the property. The applicant should receive written approval from the State Gave and Fresh Water Fish Commission that there are no gopher tortoises/scrub jays on the site, The plan should continue on the normal review process, K.H:ad ~~, i'::"---;;-'-~~~ II ~ ~ \~\ \ "':\ \', II!) is ~i'.\1 \\ n) ,)].,";"."~..,.-.. '. \ "\ \ \ i '\~ ,.1., ' 'J inn, r: ,'.' \" ' \\ \, \ '- \. l::-j:J' 1 OJ t ~, I i -. \ ,\ I' ' , , I " .' t ~':;:rfr'^:;{VX "":1~"?'W1' " '.. ',.,,:;............~,. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 95-722 ~OO--'"'~-'--- - '--:- \fi \"2' rill' , ,',.' , '.' lr: I . 0 L"...c :":~=.-" :;:"~.'. J n.. ~..; , r Hip: ; tW' I l 5 ' ' : ',I ;. . ' ~ .-..~ . , 'wi 1 ~""'J..,.,,,,,...-..-.,.,,,,...--~......~~. .. ~ i , N\"""""""\"6 ~"<.. _t\~.;'ll\l. ' '.1'J 1~1 t'i. :'i.lJ ,70i'i!NGDEPl ~"., .,"_....:-<""..,__.....;.:~...~.;v"......co.;"~...'/:~O<Il:. .. TO: Tambri J. Heyden Planning and Zoning Director FROM: Jerzy Lewicki DATE: December 15, 1995 SUBJECT: Subdivision Project: Location: Master Plan - 1st Review Park Ridge East side of the intersection of Northeast 20th Avenue and Northeast 4th Street Agent: File No. : John Grant, Jr., Inc. SBMP 95-003 The following is a list of 1st review comments regarding the subdivision master plan review of the plans for the above- referenced proj ect. It should be noted that the comments are divided into two (2) categories. The first category is a list of comments that identify deficiencies from the City's Land Development Regulations (L.D.R.) that are required to be corrected and shown in compliance on the plans and/or documents submitted for second (2nd) review in order for the project to continue through the site plan review process. The second set of comment{s) lists recommendations that the Planning and Zoning Department staff believe will enhance the proposed development. The applicant shall understand that all documents and plans submitted for site plan are subj ect to additional comments. I recommend that the applicant/agent contact me regarding questions related to the comments. If the applicant is not intending to correct code deficiencies and they request that the project remain on the review schedule identified in the attached letter they should contact me regarding the procedures, application forms, fees and submittal deadline dates for seeking relief from the code requirement. Note: Our comments are made under the assumption that the ownership of the proposed development will not require further resubdivision of the tract as to create individual lots for the housing units. We have reviewed the conformance of this project with relevant zoning regulations assuming that the development contains one tract of land. Therefore, the perimeter setbacks, as proposed, were determined to be acceptable per bulk regulation of the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District. Our assumption of this development takinq place on one tract only needs to be reflected on the Plat submitted to the City for review. I. SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS: 1. Identify clearly the property lines on both Master Plan and Survey Map. Include this identification in the legend. 2. Indicate in the attachment and on the Master Plan who will be responsible for the streets maintenance: the City or developer. 3. Indicate ownership units. in of the the attachment the housing stock anticipated form of and proposed type of 4. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of I, indicate location of proposed sidewalks. 5. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of I, indicate the dimension of the proposed cul-de-sac (diameter or radius) . 6. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of I, provide the minimum dimension of the rear yard. Page 2 Memorandum 1st Review Park Ridge No. 95-722 - Subdivision Master Plan 7. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, provide information in regard to land use and zoning of all adjacent properties. 8. In order to allow the City Staff to evaluate how the proposed development fits the adj acent land use and and its physical characteristics provide a map extending to: alley between Northside Condominium and the commercial development - to the North, trailer park, indicating the closest located units - to the South, Residential development across the street from the NE 4th Street, - to the West, area across the Rail Road indicating any development that occurs to the East within a reasonable distance. Within the extended perimeter area indicate all existing streets, sidewalks, footprints of the buildings, landscape elements, and other characteristic elements of the surrounding development. 9. In the site data, on sheet 1 of 1, replace the word "proposed" with the word "existing" in regard to zoning classification. 10. On the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1, indicate the width of the N.E. 4th Street. 11. Provide traffic analysis concurrency requirements. for the evaluation of 12. The proposed Master Plan is in violation with the zoning regulations if the plat will be approved as submitted. 13. All information as specified in Chapter 3, Master Plan Review, should be included or referenced on the Master Plan, sheet 1 of 1. 14. Indicate location and provide relevant calculation in respect to parking. 15. Provide Homeowners Association documents. A:SBMP-PRl Id30 eNINOZ, OIliV ~N1NN'(la RECREATION & PARK MEMORANDUM #95-56 ~rn ~::~8:a ~ ffi TO: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director John Wildner, Parl<s SuperintJmdent r Parkridge ~ FROM: RE: DATE: December 8, 1995 The Recreation and Park Department has reviewed the new site plan for Parkridge Place, The following comments are submitted: 1. Based on 34 single family homes, the recreation dedication requirement is calculated 34 d.u, X .018 acres = .612 acres 2, The plan gives no infonnation 1bat the developer plans to apply for one-half credit for private recreation. The full dedicatioo requirement is required as cash in lieu of land. JW:ad BUILDING DIVISION m( -...~. :-~ B::l~ \ill L ,G I 9 I9!l) , \.!!J , PlANN1~iG t,!\,H) ~, ' ZONING DEPT. MEMORANDUM NO. 95-443 December 18, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Department of Development Director Re: Park Ridge Site Plan Please refer to Memorandum No. 95-442 for comments relative the Master Plan and Site Plan. (Copy Attached). ~ - "/ ~ . . j , Al Ne old ~ AN:mh cc: William V, Hukill, P.E., Department of Development Director PKRIDGE BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 95-442 December 18, 1995 To: Tambri Heyden, Planning & Zoning Director From: Al Newbold, Deputy Development Director Re: Park Ridge Master Plan After reviewing the plans for the above reference project, the Building Division cannot support this plan going forward because of so many unanswered questions that we cannot address without such information as type of multiple-family residential structures, i.e" apartments, cooperatives, condominiums or townhouses. If they are to be single-family dwellings, they should comply with R-I site regulations under LDR Section 5, Paragraph E-2 and should have platted lots to check setbacks and lot coverage, In addition to the above comments, the following should be shown on the plans: 1, Evaluation and floor plan unless they are single-family, 2. Distance between building to comply with Table 600 ofthe Standard Building Code. 3. Setbacks should be shown from Park Ridge Circle (See definition oflot frontage, LDR Page 1-23, Article II), also see Access for an understanding of where front setbacks are from. 4, Setbacks must be shown for pools, screen rooms, etc. 5. Sign details required for Site approval. AN:mh ~' cc: William V. Hukill, P,E" Department of Development Director PKRIDGE FIRE PREVENTION MEMORANDUM NO, 95-399 ~. ,-~.-,--~-- 'OOD rn @ ~ ~ W ~ r [_._~'-~. --- 't,n I'} I 1 , t... U I.; r !i -.- . $!. PlANNlrlG A~lD i "l lONING DEPT. I J. _"'_~__-"t. ~ .,~..._ TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire Department DATE: December 20, 1995 RE: Park Ridge Place 2100 NE 4 St NWSP 95-012 vSHMP 95-003 We have no objections to this project as shown, (" cc: Chief Jordan FPO II Campbell File 'I'RACKING ....llG - SI'l'E PLAN REVIEW SUBk...r'l'AL PARKRIDGE SUBDIVISION MASTER PLAN NEW SITE DLAN 12/6/95 AM'JUNT: FILE NO.: SBMP 95-003 PRUJJ::C'!' 'l'l'rLE: 1.l1::l:i~lUE''l'lON : '}''iE'I::: DArl'E: REC: D: MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION 1 nnn nn kl::CBIPT NO. : * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 'fWELVE (12) SETS SUBMITTED: 12/6/95 COLORED ELEVA'l'IONS REC' D: (plans shall be pre-assembled. The planning & Zoning Dept. will number each sheet of their set. The PlanniIlg Dept. set will be used to check the remaining sets to ensure the number and type of sheets match.) . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * * * * * . . * . * * * * * APPLICATION << SUBMITTAL: DATE: ACCEPTED 12/6/95 DENIED DATE: DATE OF LET'fER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 2nd SUBMIT'I'AL ACCEPTED DENIED DATE: DATE: DATE OF SUBMITTAL ACCEPTANCE LETTER: REVIEWER'S NAME: * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * , (Label TRC Departments on each set of plans) DATE AND MEMO NUMBER OF MEMO SENT TO TRC TO PERFORM INITIAL REVIEW, DATE SEN'lI: /cf{/diS- RETURN DATE: /d// 6J~!:J MEMO NUMBER: 9F- 613 ~st REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED Planning f Building Engineer Engineer forester v MEMO # / ,? -.1....'" / ./~. ,,i.d.. C)s - <'f'-/-J / '15"- <f -r ~ / / .295 .51'/5 I I ~/) J... I "C" I~ /~ I~ /- I~ PLANS MEMO # / DATE I "e" q~-~L/~/~ q5-~1 /1JJi?) /.iL- 95- 65" / 1~:,7;1!~ /_ <-15 dJTl I .,. 0 / V,C (]Vt6 / ILl II /~ PLANS util. P.w, E'arks . E' i re police ~ 'I y TYPB OF VARIANCE(S) DATE OE' MEETING: DATE OF LETT~R SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: (Aesthetic keview App., dates of board mtgs, llc checklist sent out w/ commen~: NINETY DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2nd REVIEW: (Must be assembled. Reviewer shall accept amended plans & support documents) / 1..---- COLORED ELEVATIONS RBC' 0: MEMO SENT TO/!~C TO PERFORM and REVIE~. n DA'l'E SENT: !E!id I HBMO tt: I~c.. U'1tAwlLO'o.-' RETURN DATE: JJP1/?:J 2nd REVIEW RECOMHENDATIQNlDENIAL MSMO * / ~~!B I" R/. U" 1ft. ~aol / -hl-i--I c- ~fJ:>-OOI I if ~ / c- ~ - 003 /iItii" / C- Qr;-Z;99/ ( / V" o fqq I .... / C/ Planning BUilding Engineer Engineer Forster PLANS 'I HBHO .. "15' - 'f41 q~-16a q(P~oo1 96 ~"c:;q / / DATE I i '21:1.1{ . fL1~ ~ I ! ~j1" / / 1)/ d6 /"R/D" I c. Ie--- /C!./ I / ,- '/' ' - ,... Util. P.W, .~Parks Fire Police y PLANS 1= -=-- y LETTER TO APPLICANT RBGARDING TRC APPROVAL/DENIAL AND LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATB SENT/SIGNS INSTALLED: SCHEDULB OF BOARD MEETINGS: PAD CC/CRA DAT~ APPROVAL LETTER SENT: A: 'l'kA~KING.::;P