LEGAL APPROVAL
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
March 8, 2007
www.boynton-beach.org
Ross & Wendy Cooper
75 Citrus Park Lane
Boynton Beach, FL 33436
Re:
File No:
Location:
Citrus Park
MPMD 07-001
Citrus Park PUD (south of Miner Rd. and east side of Lawrence Rd.)
Dear Mr. & Ms. Cooper:
Enclosed is the Development Order granted by the City Commission on February 13,
2007, which represents approval of the Master Plan Modification to allow reduction of
the side yard setback for construction of pools from twelve feet (12') to four feet (4') and
the side yard setback for construction of screen roof enclosures from twelve feet (12') to
three feet (3') for certain lots, subject to those conditions accompanying the
development order attached hereto.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this
office at (561) 742-6260.
Sincerely,
'7~
11()~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Enclosure - Development Order
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Citrus Park\MPMD 07-001 More Pool SetbackslApproval Letter.doc
I
DEVELopr, \IT ORDER OF THE CITY COMM'''''-:;ION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORloJA
Development
P&Z
Building
Engineering
Occ. License
Deputy City Clerk
PROJECT NAME:
Citrus Park
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Ross and Wendy Cooper
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 75 Citrus Park Lane Boynton Beach, FL 33436
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: February 13, 2007
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Request for Master Plan Modification approval for Citrus Park PUD to
reduce the side yard setback for construction of pools from twelve (12) feet to four (4) feet and the
side yard setback for construction of screen roofed enclosures from twelve (12) feet to three (3) feet
for certain lots.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Citrus Park PUD
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3.
The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4.
The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5.
This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6.
All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7.
Other
DATED:
c!l-lfo-D7
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Citrus Park\MPMD 07-001 More Pool Setbacks\DO.doc
,.....,
'\
',1
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Citrus Park
File number: MPMD 07-001
Reference:
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- Solid Waste
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry & Grounds
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None X
UTILITIES
Comments: None X
FIRE
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None X
..
Conditions of Approval
2
c
o
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. Lots 10-12, 17-21,31-34,57-59 and 65-67 are excluded as well as comer X
lots, which would retain the same 20-foot setback for pools and 18 for screen
roof screen enclosures.
2. The rear setback for pools shall be revised to revert back to an eight (8) foot X
rear setback for pools and six (6) foot rear setback for screen roof screen
enclosures.
3. No pool or screen structure shall be permitted to be constructed in any X
easement or landscape buffer.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined. '1Lou- ()nuD
S:\Plannin \SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Citrus Park\MPMD 07-001 More poUtbaC~\COA.dOC
g
S:\Planning\Planning Templates\Condition of Approval 2 page -P&D ORA 2003 form.doc
..
1 in. = 276.9 feet
Citrus Park
EXHIBIT A
~
,.' ~
!,' t'
~
~
q:;
~
~
~
~
- ~;,,:r\~:i~i;l ;i~l :-; /~
I ~ I Ire ~~~- ~~ --~ -~, -ooJ _J . Jk"\
~ m. ~w ~ I!s~ I ~ .........,., 'i --- f--~1 -l~<< :-----,
~. r. P.g r----~ I I , ~ '\ , .. I
~ ~i~ Ii t lia I :: I 1--;-1 'i/ g! ~ i ;-1 i--~- I I.'
... aM ;j~ ~el 'x.. I I __-' -_J ,,., ,..----...
.i!; 5! a -y. r----' -_-I:x: : I
;' Iii II i~ ;~I : ~:: : ~-i-l /, ~:----- '" :--=--1 r----'
! ~~'ti itt~11 r----' (G ~I I : 1
II,I! 29.,ftJi IH;-~ ~~;-~ :-:--1, ! l), 1 :-~--l r~~--1
" ,~ I r--;-l I : I, r-:'--1 I ,.,._..._..,.~ .'
_.. '''''' I.':!
.. ~,.j ,--;'-1 . I ~~..:.. : I '1 : - Ix: I
I 0. I :5 -F-&z!~ : 1 r-:--l G
I .. -I wi.. ;! I IUt l'\:,;,., ;," 1'"'---'
a i ,..-----, '" I .. I, I It.. . I ill I
I...i ~II ~~lli !: :::- i IX:--l: i: j (i ~l'i,. i-~--;
3~1 i r---;-, t: I ~ : 5 I "'; I
~ r.i':' r I' .! " ["--';-1: j': ["--:'--1 ,..----,
~11!s ~ I;~' r-:;-1 : :\~ Ii I .. I l)o(~:
I fi!i~ &~ i ~--~-~ :--:-1 i k_. ~~~. ,J! :-i--1 ~-i-l,
= lis Wi'''' I : x -: : I r-----~" '____u..:." --~..-'Ii r----,
- I ! =,t! I : I: I :>l...~: r-"-1
; I!! ~~! · I ["--:-1 ' --~ --" --~ : I ~ I .
Ii d" 'x.~ I I r-----~ '* ~ .. iJ '.. J,lf F~~~ ,,- ~ -&!
. := .1.... .:~ I "I 0 I ~ '" I All' r--~ ;-
I.::.. 1 .l ["'--:-1 14' - .:"_J ~~' :_J!. 'll" ~ c I : 1
.. :---:-1 ~ 1_ ~l ~l t:~.~ -~ ~~ i,):, ~"If .
,._ ~~l i P'"'ii GI I t:I I I 0 I ~ "'t
,. I '! ~ I ill r-:-_J ___J _~ .:: I ! I ~ ~:o. i
'lAY !llliw~ "':";:{':<<l I I .' ~~' t
\.. I,r ""'0 ..lit -""1, I":"-~"" I I(..t,r\ r--...-........ ..
'-' ./ ') ''''' 1'\ \ '*~ I \..' " ..
----- ! ~~-1. _ _ :,\ -::~7~', I" I ___ " I
c,; 5'!-':><-! : il \'1 ;,~,(
~ L~J" ,.-1 II' ~ it r,f 0 '\ \
i n~ - I' ~ ~~'~l-1t~~_V~: ,
: :: \..i _-1 -J 1----1 '----------~I.l)J8:
I l~~: r-;-f1';;1 ~i ~r;i r::---111 ~I
I .... I I -! :::::. I i~: : \.. I ~~
~:_J r-;--1 __J __J ~t-J r----l
L~~j ,.. ~----l {~:-:;__~~, \.. 1 ro-
L :~: (- ~~l. \)' ~ '~;\ '~r-~~~~, ~r
~. /~",,! ,'\ \ r-~ 1. \ \
\ : ~ :; 7 ',' 1&1 '.\ ~---l
\......--- .......... ""'"'\', ",', ~ ~ I I '
/ .., I j ,II . ,
.. , "" '~,'
111 I .). I I ci
i .......J...... ...i ,./ ~ .. r-:-j I ~
(,f . : ; ---L-...L :
" '\ i : 0 .----., ~
'\':.~J ! : h: -:-
~ ~----, 5
I.!
--,
I
" I
.. ,
~, I
, " J
~"'., --
- ,
, 'r
"'....)
,
.. ,
,
........../
,---,
..'
..,
I
__J
--1 -1 I
: :, ::: r-~--l
T~-~~'_~_~]\' /,:~,~:
, I ~ \
.:!i=-I~) I
J _-J __J " ./
y
,('~ '-
,<Y$~
~;1: .. )
~ ~ '"' /
, ..
" /'
I v
I I'
--,
.1
~I
I
---'
--1
. I
~ 1
1
_-'oJ
-~
I
-'
-I
I
__oJ
I
j
I --
11I1I11l11l1l1l11l1t111l1l1l1l1l1l1l11l11l11l"1I~11l~
EXHIBIT "B"
ai
III
...
<
...
CoO
III
2:
!;
0,
w
~
~
Cl>.
It.
-m
I~'
~'I
~ .tr- ~J
:/1
Ih, "
" '~
i'
I'
, ~'
!l
~, '
'1
"
~I
- ",t
, '
:' ,!.....-.
'~. 'p",,"ii :m~
, ;"L~ ~;~oi
, ~~~~ ~"~.
ooort
:::~ I
i II
I i.~~ 9
:,g~~~5U
I "iI m
i .-: I I! fiH 1.1
l ~ !III iI
II JI I~ !II! I~
I~III ill! I!
~o ~
!"j' ;,-{
II. "1'<
, .' <
I ::
J 'IJ ,I L,:
. '~! I "
11!1!i!}
JJi!Jli'~
Illdlnll:lt .
l~
j
-,
, (J ~ in f!!'I:~ i
.~i~9' .~~' ::( U!illl
Ill! ~! Iii i !lli!!! I
!I- ! I' ail:. 9;i i iL !i
-I~!. I ,i;:~ i II~ I I!ili
199;- '! 51 ~ = Ii zllll::ll
~Cil!a !;. =n I i ~ I !!~!~
'= ~ II~I II
ti ~ . I il!1
i ~; IfiCJI
~ ~ ~ I hum
~.~ Ii ~;i
,'~ I '/'~, j ~
'~ i : ~ ~
~ 3~1
,.10" ........
~"1=if::;:
-L[~~T i
lUJ-----=-:.;:~-~-::ld [
, i Ij
a IE ~
,S
.
R
;
.
i
I
.-
~
-: t
-.
~c
a
" q, !
If: i
-=. :
u: .~
~~ i! Pri
~.~ !i!..
-
filtH 1I,IIIIUIlItIUlIllllllllIllllllllI
V;'I. .......-::.:a .. __. _.
~~",,';jjjj ,
.111"" ~"'ll:I:"',~""'III''''~II''~::':':''','''''I''''''"'''''',''n:'''''llll''~:,~
EXHIBIT "e"
A
,i'RIME
P'{ENTGIlOUf>
At'JffRS1SlRVIcF~
September 19, 2006
Mr. Ed Breese, Principal Planner
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Setback Reduction
Boynton Estates Homeowners Association
Dear Mr. Breese:
We the Homeowners Association of Boynton Estates hereby request to amend
pool setback restrictions from 12ft. to 4 ft. within the planned development for
all lots within the communities excluding lots:
10-12
17-21
31-34
57-59
65-67
This is for the purpose of building swimming pools, as was previously approved
for 32 lots in 2005.
9darilyn ft. (}Jonora
Ir~ r~-':,-;--~-.._.; '-;-:---~
.il'"j' .' I (' _bji~ I' ~' U: Ir) I
. ,~r---- . ___...____ ~
" , ---'1 "
I' , ,J,
:1 (i; J J 'i II
i: ,: ,; (' ~>-', Pj 0 i Ii "
!' ;'__ : '.'. i: ,I"
Si ncerely,
Meeting Minutes
Planning and Development
Boynton Beach, Florida
January 23, 2007
Anderson Slocum, architect for the project, explained the building was a five bay
station. With all the concrete, the building was harsh. They softened the entrance up
and addressed comments from Quantum Park about exposure of the apparatus directly
from the street. The design was actually cheaper, and was designed as a category five
hurricane building.
Ms. Jaskiewicz commented the hourglass driveway criteria could meet some of the art
criteria.
Motion
Mr. Cwynar moved the request for new site plan approval to construct a two-story
42,739 square foot fire rescue station to also include Fire Administrative offices, ITS, the
Emergency Operation Center (EOC) and related site plan improvements on a 4.47-acre
site zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) be approved subject to all staff
comments. Ms. Jaskiewicz seconded the motion that unanimously passed.
D. Citrus Park
Master Plan Modification
1.
Project:
Agents:
Owner:
Location:
Description:
Citrus Park (MPMD 07-001)
Marilyn Bonora, Prime Management Group
Wendy and Ross Cooper
Prime Management Group
Citrus Park PUD; south of Miner Road and east side
of Lawrence Road.
Request for a master plan modification to reduce
the minimum side yard setback for swimming pools
from twelve (12) feet to four (4) feet and the
minimum side yard setback for screen-roofed
screen enclosures from twelve (12) feet to three
(3) feet on the non-zero side of certain lots.
Chair Wische read the request for swimming pools and noted there were three staff
comments associated with the item. Mr. Cooper, Agent for the project responded they
were in agreement with all comments.
Mr. Breese reviewed in 2005 there was a request for a very specific floor plan and this
item mirrored that request. He explained the Homeowners Association asked staff to
identify other lots in the development for the same potential. Staff recommended the
same criteria apply to all the other typical type lots in the development short of those on
curvatures with the larger back yards and larger sides that can meet the current day
regulations of the PUD. Staff recommended approval of the request.
Chair Wische opened the floor to public hearing. No one coming forward Chair Wische
closed the public hearing.
10
Meeting Minutes
Planning and Development
Boynton Beach, Florida
January 23, 2007
Mr. Saberson took issue with blanket, or de facto, approvals occurring within PUDs. The
earlier applicants with the single-family home who applied for a variance had rigid
variance criteria applied against them. Here it was a HOA, and not individual property
owners, asking for a blanket variance. The criteria applied to the single-family variance
did not apply to this at all.
Mr. Saberson spoke about other homes abutting the PUD. Mr. Breese explained
property owners were noticed up to 400 feet, outside and inside the development. In
this particular instance these were side setbacks being applied against units inside the
development, not rear setbacks affecting outside property owners. Mr. Breese clarified
this was a master plan modification only for side yards, for all the lots except for those
on corners and those with pie shaped lots. This request was granted for 33 of the lots
in 2005.
The board further discussed the difference between this request and a variance, was
this development was a PUD and the HOA endorsed the change. The Jenkins request
with the single-family property affected other property owners. Mr. Saberson thought at
some point, the board should review these modifications.
Ms. Jaskiewicz commented the request seemed extreme. Mr. Breese explained the Code
required three feet from the screen room from a wall of an adjacent unit and four feet
from a pool. The Code did not require access on all four sides of a pool, therefore the
screened room could be brought right up to the decking and coping of the pool. This
request applied to the non-zero lot line side.
Mr. Blehar asked if Mr. Cooper could produce 113 signatures from within the
community. Mr. Cooper explained the Homeowners Association signed off on the
request. Mr. Blehar noted the request might not have been unanimous.
Chair Wische clarified it was the majority or whatever percentage was specified in the
bylaws that 'counted with the Homeowner Associations. Mr. Blehar understood, but
commented homeowners purchasing homes under certain conditions might be
disappointed.
Motion
Mr. Casaine moved the request for a master plan modification to reduce the minimum
side yard setback for swimming pools from twelve (12) feet to four (4) feet and the
minimum side yard setback for screen-roofed screen enclosures from twelve (12) feet to
three (3) feet on the non-zero side of certain lots be approved with all staff conditions.
Mr. Cwynar seconded the motion that passed 5-2 (Ms. Jaskiewicz and Mr. B/ehar
dissenting).
E. Polio Campero
New Site Plan
1.
Project:
Polio Campero (NWSP 07-003)
11