AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
D December 5, 2006 November 20, 2006 (Noon.) ~ February 13, 2007 February 5,2007 (Noon)
D January 2, 2007 December 18,2006 (Noon) D March 6, 2007 February 20,2007 (Noon)
D January 16, 2007 January 2,2007 (Noon) D March 20, 2007 March 5,2007 (Noon)
D February 6, 2007 January 16,2007 (Noon) D April 3, 2007 March 19,2007 (Noon)
D Announcements/Presentations D City Manager's Report
NATURE OF D Administrative D New Business
AGENDA ITEM D Consent Agenda D Legal
D Code Compliance & Legal Settlements D Unfmished Business
~ Public Hearing D
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the February 13,2007 City Commission Agenda under
Public Hearing. The Planning and Development Board on January 23,2007, recommended that the subject request be
approved. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department Memorandum No. 06-222.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
Citrus Park (MPMD 07-001)
Marilyn Bonora, Prime Management Group
Wendy and Ross Cooper
Prime Management Group
Citrus Park PUD; south of Miner Road and east side of Lawrence Road.
Request for a master plan modification to reduce the minimum side yard setback for
swimming pools from twelve (12) feet to four (4) feet and the minimum side yard setback
for screen-roofed screen enclosures from twelve (12) feet to three (3) feet, on the on-zero
side of certain lots.
OWNERS:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
PROGRAM IMP ACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
N/A
N/A
City Manager's Signature
Assistant to City Manager
~(J~~
Planning and Zoni g lrector City Attorney / Finance
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Citrus Park\MPMD 07-001 More Pool Setbacks\Agenda Item Request Citrus Park MPMD 07-001 2-13-07.doc
S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-222
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and City Commission
,-,\...'0 ~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
Ed Breese ~
Principal Planner
THRU:
DATE:
December 19, 2006
PROJECT NAME/NO:
REQUEST:
Citrus Park MPMD 07-001
Master Plan modification to the Citrus Park PUD to reduce the side yard
setback for construction of pools from twelve (12) feet to four (4) feet and
the side yard setback for construction of screen roof screen enclosures from
twelve (12) feet to three (3) feet.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owners: Prime Management Group
Location: Citrus Park PUD
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR)/ Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No changes proposed
Proposed Use: Pool & Screen Roof Sreen Enclosure Installation / Setback Amendment
Acreage: 28.82 Acres (entire PUD Master Plan)
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Citrus Glen PUD, classified Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned PUD;
South:
Citrus Cove Elementary School to the southwest and Greenwood Village to the
southeast, classified unincorporated Palm Beach County Commercial, with an
underlying HR-8 and zoned Single-family Residential (RS);
East:
Greenwood Village, classified unincorporated Palm Beach County Commercial, with
an underlying HR-8 and zoned Single-family Residential (RS);
West:
Right-of-way for Lawrence Road, then Nautica PUD, classified LDR and zoned PUD.
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ 06-222
Page 2
BACKGROUND
Prime Management Group, management company for the Home Owners Association of Citrus Park PUD, is
requesting that the Master Plan for Citrus Park PUD be modified to reduce the side yard setback for
construction of pools from twelve (12) feet to four (4) feet and the side yard setback for construction of
screen roof screen enclosures from twelve (12) feet to three (3) feet for certain lots.
The subject plat is a single-family detached zero lot line residential development, comprised of 113 lots on
28.82 acres. The PUD is located on the east side of Lawrence Road, south of Miner Road (see Exhibit "A"
- Location Map). All 113 lots are developed.
The Master Plan indicates that the typical lot is dimensioned 55 feet in width by 100 feet in depth, or 5,500
square feet in area. It should be noted that the PUD contains several lots (mostly corner lots) that are
slightly larger and more pie-shaped. All lots front on an internal road network providing ingress and egress
to Citrus Park Boulevard, which connects to Lawrence Road. The Master Plan tabular data indicates the
required building setbacks are as follows: 20 feet front yard, 15 feet and zero (0) side yard, 20 feet side
corner, and 15 feet rear yard. The minimum setback for screen roof screen enclosures are as follows: 20
feet front yard, 15 feet and zero (0) side yard, 20 feet side corner, and ten (10) feet rear yard.
In April of 2005, a Master Plan Modification was approved for 33 lots within this PUD. The lots all had the
same model type of house plan and received permission for the same pool and screen enclosure setbacks
now being requested for the remainder of the "typical" lots within the PUD.
Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the City Land Development Regulations states that changes
in planned unit developments shall be processed through the Planning and Development Board and the
City Commission.
ANALYSIS
The purpose and intent of setbacks is to create separation between units, primarily for safety and
maintenance purposes, and secondly for light and air flow. This is accomplished by allowing buildings and
ancillary structures to be setback a certain distance from the property lines. The Master Plan, as modified
in 2005, indicates a minimum four (4) foot setback requirement for pools and three (3) foot setback for
screen roof screen enclosures on the non-zero (interior) lot line side of the lots. However, as noted above,
this modification affected only 33 of the total 113 lots, since the request was for lots with units containing
particular f100rplan designs. Those particular units had a notch in the rear building facade that would
accommodate a kidney or L-shape style pool with the adjusted setback. The HOA is now requesting to
amend the Master Plan to allow the same regulations to apply to the other "typical" lots in the PUD. Since
some of the other lots have unit types with varying building depth, other owners may be able to take
advantage of amended setbacks to construct pools. This request would still exclude Lots 10-12, 17-21,31-
34, 57-59 and 65-67. These particular lots are located on cul-de-sacs or lots on the curvature of the
roadway, and have much larger side and/or rear setbacks to accommodate pools and screen enclosures.
Corner lots would also be excluded from this request and would retain the current setback regulations.
During the 2005 Master Plan Modification, the rear setback for pools and screen enclosures were
inadvertantly amended, making pool and screen setbacks more restrictive. Staff recommends the rear
setbacks for pools and screen roof screen enclosures revert back to the previous Master Plan regulation of
an eight (8) foot rear setback for pools and six (6) foot rear setback for screen roof screen enclosures,
from 11 feet and 10 feet, respectively. This would provide greater opportunity for construction of these
amenities, and is in line with the pool regulations for typical subdivisions throughout the City. In no
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ 06-222
Page 3
instance, whether side or rear yard, would a pool or screen structure be permitted to be constructed in
any easement or landscape buffer (see "Exhibit D" - Conditions of Approval).
This request was reviewed for consistency with the PUD development standards in the Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments. Also, staff reviewed the subject request by
focusing on the subject PUD and comparing it with similar planned residential developments that exist
throughout the city. The review found the request to be consistant with the previous amendment to the
Citrus Park PUD (2005) and with the requests being made by other HOA's throughout the City. Staff also
believes that the primary objective, safety, is still maintained with this request. The secondary objective of
light and air flow may be reduced to some degree, but at the choosing of the residents.
RECOMMENDATION
It is staff's opinion that this request would neither be injurious to the area nor detrimental to the public
welfare, and rewards more residents within the PUD with the same flexibility provided in the earlier Master
Plan Modification. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this Master Plan amendment, subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval. Additional comments recommended by the Board
or approved by the Commission would also be included in the Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Citrus Park\MPMD 07-001 PoolIStaff Report.doc
" ;I~,"
..
1 in. = 276.9 feet
Citrus Park
EXHIBIT A
~
r-
~
~
'I:
~
~
~
~
I
-..,. ....
~/.A" _-, -:', --11-:~~ :.~".Ul<:.-.
; :: ',> : \ g I :;: (II! : ,I
. . ,/ __~ I ,. ,~
f ! · ~I --~ --~ --~. __J
! i I I ~; ~~-7 ~
I; "~; IO! I ---...t.... .....- 11 - -, -~l
Eiw !~ i GI :--:-1 ,--;-1:11, ~! : I ~-I
i-aM i! .E~ r----., IX co ,. , --~ __J __J
i ;.ulli! !=I !?<-:: : ::;::;-1 1/ r -________" ,--;'--T
I !~'ti 121u, ,--;-1 .. , (('~"-'--~\ ,. !
ii.'.3= 2.h I~!= !x.. , :-:--1 [ yj i-i-l
it II" 9. iit' ~ ,--;;-1 . : j )! 1
. - t "'" lO I r-----, I I r----.
~. : : I : , : ~ : I I',.. j.-"'--""
~ ~.:, I--~-l 1.lM~':' : r; II : Ix:' r
I Gt I . .:5 -F=";~ : I I' I ..
~ !Ill I . i I : ~ IUt \1 '" r----'
I .i.. ,-----, '" , .. I, ill I I .. ,
.l.1 13111 ! := I- i :x.:--l i j ;1 r-~~--:
. gi.: i ;---;;-, 5 il \,! I ~ !
fj elfll I ..! ,--~-1' , ,----..,
illO 1:1: I' I: r::i-l !" ,-;-1 1 ! ~ Ii ;-;--1 :r~-~-~
I II ~ , · I :.1 .~ I I .. , I
sin _:lIf .1 :~~-: I :-:-1;( \~:'::_~~~'-::;;: ~i-l Ix~! '
i Ii~l! ~il!; . I ,---;'-1 --1 --, I --,,
l_f,.rUlir... .. ,x." : r----., * I .. IJ ,.111 r--=; T
~ r----~ :~ I ! I=': ~ : III I ... I
"~ :: : q .. --~ I--.J . --~: l 'lI ./ c
r--:'-l '=~-- ti I ~I ~f
' ... i ~ ~l ~l ~ ~ I !) II ~~
-,~l II ':-_J!..J ;,~J ~: i J3 I~!i
I ~ ~.i>!
"lAY ~~ .<~.' j '.' ...~=,!!.;l. ~
\ '" ,.---., .;'.---:------- "J I r--"'- ....-
'-./ ) 14: (J c../-_=..\\ I ",,/1'\..1 ",,;!
--- Ix..: : ,\ ,----, "'I I /..
L---J!l .-----, ,(, ~~~., \. r---, ,s!!'
d. : }~..! I : ,\) I ... \ J
~i L_~_J ,--;-1: .\ ~ {l' ~ I' 0
S .. I :: I l,' "____.."". j I I
: i l_~J -----\~ ~\ I
i t I 0 I" I .;.:' ~-i:~ "\ I
'><." I ... I .. I I. I '\i \.)
G i L___-' 1 -~ ::: ::: I "'-- _ _ =- I
, ., l i _--1 --! I---J ,----------, i !
I .. I \..
I '-___.J r ~
~~
lt~. I
"I
I
_J
--'l
:~I ",
I "," \
--~ (',=
, '
""1.. \ ['--':--1
r----,f' J. i
I .... I
! · I
--,
I
...1
"'"
I
--~
r----~
, .. ,
IX- II
,----,
I . I
J .. 1
r-,:",,---r
lx~ J
r----'
, .. ,
I . I :I
~~.t:
I .: I I
...----., '6
I .. ,
I .. I
1---'
! ~ ! ~-
~::.::;'",
I ..,.- I
I ... !
I . I
1")(." r
L___..J.
Iii
~;
~...
f
r---lJ!.,
I . I
, .. I
...____1f,
~ ... ~
~-l
.. I
" I
,
__J
--,
X I
.. I
" I
I
__J
I ... I
I'X." I
~___..J
r ----..,
I .. I
I " ,
:")(.=: . --., /,. ---,
...,---;\~~~~-~: (.. ;:~; i"~ ..,~
\ I. ... I ,
\ : i :; 7 ',' .. 'I
\.......__- .........,. ........'\ ','. ~ ~\
I OIl \ I j;\I
: I .. \ I ~,\
... / .......), ~/, I
--.1 ....i (( :
\ -I
',,\ ~:
"'~J
f\... '---'-----,
r----"
\".1-
'-'-
1""----"1
.VFt
-->-
r----,
\ .. \
r-----,
. ' . I I
i~-L
o 1____, II
~ : .. :
z
"
~ ""'----,
> : . !
I
j
1111111
--,
a \ ~')
.. I ~ I
,,................ __1 N "
~~? ....,./
. -----.J..... J'
~!J
~//7.. > -1 --1
/ ":,,,/ :: =:
I" t I
I I _..J __".J
-11 J --1
: Ii:! ~
__.J d __.J,
.---1
.'
"I
I
__J
-, I
I I
::: r----'
I' I" t
_J___~I /""-,
!\' ~ )
-;1 /~~\ '~I
__J ~ !}
1I111~ .ltIlIIlIlIIlIUlllllllllllllUlu7.
"I'.--~"A... ... h. -.'
--1
.,
'"
""I
__.J
~
~
16
III
=
i
.
~
~
Cil
EXHIBIT "B"
<f .
lL
'I
.hill"
~~, I
i II
I' .~~ft
~B:~~5U
I il~m
I JI-~: I ;1 I! ~ II
. :.)' .alill~Jl!mll Ji fl ;0 G
tilllall;II!1I~111 illl u
!!~ !
~ll it
!OJ' '.i
ll.
!
P
l~iJ!n
I ~I' ~. I ~'. .
IJ&~' ~^
Ii . I IU.
IlIds n ut'
j
om :
I'''':' J
lib!
I h!~! I
i !!!!!!! I
!! I I
i~ ~ I II
In IlllIl
1~.::..llmm
II ~ P!!!!!!
!i~ Iff
. I~
11111111
I v :
! i
f
~
I
.
. ~~ ii5;
~.. L~ ~~~".uf
'."". ~~~, ~"~..
.
~
:
. q. !
,f .. i
I~J ;
I!. _~
;~ !I [e
a
i
~
..
Iii
ZC
00
. ..
!!..
..,
~!
;::
.-
....
i..
~ I
! i
~ ~
u
V
I
;
.
i
I
'"
~
~ I
~
it
o ~
. ~
. .. ~
'I~
. 'I!JJ
Q
,.
~
..
0:
C
r;..
I
.'~'H
~
9
I
i
l
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItlllllllllllllll~lll~lII
I
.'111111 I ~""'r':"'.~":""'"'l~"l:,~~,~,:",,,,",,,,,,,,,"u"."n~'""l'1I11~;:,'.'.:.__
\-0;
~
.
..i.
u
.
1~
1
~
l
'l
EXHIBIT "e"
A
"i'RIME
P'4~GroUP
.t:lFIIlS7SBMa'_
September 19, 2006
Mr. Ed Breese, Principal Planner
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: Setback Reduction
Bovnton Estates Homeowners Association
Dear Mr. Breese:
We the Homeowners Association of Boynton Estates hereby request to amend
pool setback restrictions from 12ft. to 4 ft. within the planned development for
all lots within the communities excluding lots:
10-12
17-21
31- 34
57-59
65-67
This is for the purpose of building swimming pools, as was previously approved
for 32 lots in 2005.
94.ariCyn ft. (Bonora
f.~l fJ(7[7.'>~~ -i,';' -ft-:)I
,: '/ r--- --""-"-'---'1'1' I
" ~, /, I
I! ~ . J 'i I,
l ~! \ i r w...-<, Vi t'\ ! I: ' :
; . '~.. ; , ~ t.~ i: ( )' I
Sincerely,
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Citrus Park
File number: MPMD 07-001
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- Solid Waste
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry & Grounds
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None X
UTILITIES
Comments: None X
FIRE
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None X
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. Lots 10-12, 17-21,31-34,57-59 and 65-67 are excluded as well as comer X
lots, which would retain the same 20-foot setback for pools and 18 for screen
roof screen enclosures.
2. The rear setback for pools shall be revised to revert back to an eight (8) foot X
rear setback for pools and six (6) foot rear setback for screen roof screen
enclosures.
3. No pool or screen structure shall be permitted to be constructed in any X
easement or landscape buffer.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Citrus Park\MPMD 07-001 More Pool Setbacks\COA.doc
S:\Planning\Planning Templates\Condition of Approval 2 page -P&D ORA 2003 form.doc