AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
0 December 5, 2006 November 20, 2006 (Noon.) 0 February 13, 2007 February 5, 2007 (Noon)
0 January 2, 2007 December 18,2006 (Noon) 0 March 6, 2007 February 20, 2007 (Noon)
0 January 16,2007 January 2, 2007 (Noon) [8J March 20, 2007 March 5, 2007 (Noon)
0 February 6, 2007 January 16,2007 (Noon) 0 April 3, 2007 March 19,2007 (Noon)
0 Announcements/Presentations 0 City Manager's Report
NATURE OF 0 Administrative 0 New Business
AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent Agenda 0 Legal
0 Code Compliance & Legal Settlements 0 UnfInished Business
[8J Public Hearing 0
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the March 20,2007 City Commission Agenda under
Public Hearing. The Planning and Development Board on February 27, 2007, recommended that the request be approved,
subject to modifIcations to comments #2, #30, #34 and #41, regarding proximity of trees to drive aisles, recognizing fees
paid, indicating utility easements per platted locations, and clarifIcation of screen enclosure locations. For further details
pertaining to this request, see attached Department Memorandum No. 07-011.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNERS:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
The Estates at Heritage Club (fka Boynton Dixie) (MPMD 07-002)
Jason Mankoff, Weiner A. Aronson, P.A.
New Century Boynton One Development, LLLP
West of FEC Railroad on the north side of Gulfstream Boulevard. (the Estate at Heritage
Club PUD, fka Boynton Dixie).
Request for master plan modifIcation approval to The Estates at Heritage Club PUD to
reduce the approved number of fee-simple town house units from 82 town houses to 25
town houses and add 56 single-family zero lot line dwelling units (a net reduction of one
unit).
PROGRAM IMP ACT:
FISCAL IMP ACT:
ALTERNATIVE .
D
City Manager's Signature
Assistant to City Manager
1u.L-r ~
Planning and Z g DIrector CIty Attorney / Finance
S:IPlanning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTS\Boynton Dixie\MPMD 07-002\Agenda Item Request Estates @Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 3-20-07.doc
S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 07-011
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and City Commission
Michael W. Rump~
Director of Planning and Zoning
THRU:
FROM:
Kathleen Zeitler ~Z--
Planner .
DATE:
February 20, 2007
PROJECf NAME/NO:
The Estates at Heritage Club (fka Boynton Dixie) MPMD 07-002
REQUEST:
Master Plan modification to The Estates at Heritage Club PUD to revise the
type of housing approved from 82 fee-simple townhouse units to 25 fee-
simple townhouse units and 56 single-family zero lot line units (a net
reduction of one unit).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: New Century Boynton One Development, LLLP
Location: The Estate at Heritage Club PUD (fka Boynton Dixie) located west of the
FEC Railroad on the north side of Gulfstream Blvd. (see Exhibit "A"-
Location Map)
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Medium Density Residential (MDR)/ Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No changes proposed
Proposed Use: 56 Single-Family Zero Lot Line Units and 25 Multi-Family Townhouse Units
Acreage: 8.6 Acres (entire PUD Master Plan)
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Developed property within the City of Boynton Beach, the northeastern half of the
abutting property classified MeDR Medium Density Residential and zoned R-2
Duplex Residential; the northwestern half classified LDR Low Density Residential
and zoned R-1A Single Family Residential;
South:
The right-of-way of Gulfstream Boulevard, then property within the City of Delray
Beach classified (from the southeast to southwest) Commerce (Industrial),
Transitional Commercial, and LD (Low Density Residential [5 du/ac]);
East:
The rights-of-way of the FEC railroad and Old Dixie Highway, then property
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ 07-011
Page 2
classified Special High Density Residential-SHDR (20 du/ac) and zoned PUD
Planned Unit Development; and
West: Developed single-family residential neighborhood classified LDR Low Density
Residential and zoned R-1A Single-Family Residential.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Jason Mankoff with Weiner & Aronson, P.A., agent for the property owner, is requesting that the
Master Plan for The Estates at Heritage Club PUD (formerly known as Boynton-Dixie) be modified to revise
the type of housing proposed from 82 fee-Simple townhouse units to 56 single-family zero lot line units
and 25 fee-Simple townhouse units (a reduction of one unit).
According to the original site plan staff report, the proposed Boynton Dixie project is a Planned Unit
Development approved for 82 fee-simple townhouse dwelling units. The PUD is located on the west side
of the FEC Railway, on the north side of Gulfstream Boulevard (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map). To date,
the project has been approved for the following: an annexation (ANEX 05-003); a future land use map
amendment (LUAR 05-007) from Medium Density Residential (PBC MDR) with a density of 5 du/ac to
Medium Density Residential (MeDR)with a density of 9.68 du/ac; a rezoning (LUAR 05-007) from Single
Family Residential (PBC RS) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); a new site plan (NWSP 05-024); and a
site plan time extension (SPTE 06-008), which extended site plan approval to September 20, 2007.
Building records indicate that a master building permit was issued for the 3-unit townhouse buildings in
August, 2006, therefore this project is considered to be vested.
The Land Development Regulations require approval of a master plan concurrent with approval of a
rezoning to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district. If the project is to be constructed in one (1)
phase, a site plan may take the place of the master plan, as was done in this case, and fulfill the
requirements of both a site plan and master plan. Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the City
Land Development Regulations states that changes in Planned Unit Developments shall be processed
through the Planning and Development Board and the City Commission.
The applicant explains that market conditions for multi-family housing have recently changed, and the
property owner therefore requests to revise the approved master plan / site plan from 82 fee-simple
townhouse units to 25 fee-simple townhouse units and 56 single-family zero lot line units, for a total of 81
units (one unit less than originally approved). A revised plat for the project has been submitted to the
Engineering Division for their review and approval.
ANALYSIS
The purpose and intent of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote efficient and
economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development,
creative design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the city, and the
protection of adjacent development. This request for Master Plan modification to revise the type of
housing proposed from 82 fee-simple townhouse units to 56 single-family zero lot line units and 25 fee-
simple townhouse units will comply with the PUD requirements including unified control, consistency of
development characteristics, compatibility with adjacent development, and provision for the private
maintenance of common areas. This request was reviewed for consistency with the PUD development
standards in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments. Also, staff
reviewed the subject request and found it to be consistent with adjacent single-family residential lots as
well as other PUD's throughout the City.
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ 07-011
Page 3
The proposed overall layout of the project is very similar to the previously approved master / site plan.
Exhibit "B" depicts the previously approved plan for 82 fee-simple townhouse units and amenity area. The
82 units were proposed within sixteen (16) separate buildings with each townhouse building varying in
size between three (3) and twelve (12) units. Each unit proposed was within a two (2) story townhouse
building. A recreation area with a cabana and a swimming pool would be located at the south-eastern
portion of the development near the sole entrance, while a children's playground is planned at a more
central location within the project area.
Exhibit "c" depicts the proposed plan for 56 zero-lot line units and 25 townhouse units and amenity area.
The single-family detached zero-lot line units are proposed adjacent to existing single-family residential
subdivisions to the north and west. Each two-story single-family unit would have either a premium lot (50
feet by 72 feet), or a typical lot (50 feet by 62 feet). Premium lots would be large enough to
accommodate a swimming pool, and typical lots would be large enough to accommodate a spa. Three (3)
different models of the single-family units offer a variety in unit size and design. The 25 fee-simple
townhouse units would consist of five (5) buildings with five (5) units each, and are proposed on a typical
lot of 25 feet by 65 feet. The multi-family units would be located along the eastern portion of the property
adjacent to the FEC Railway to the east. The recreation area with pool and cabana, and the children's
playground are as previously proposed and in the same locations.
The proposed street system, utilities locations, and overall layout of the project is very similar to the
previously approved master / site plan. The 25 foot rear setback for units along the north and west
property lines of the subject property remain as previously approved, and mirror the required rear setback
of adjacent single-family developments. In addition, the perimeter landscape buffer widths, screening,
and materials are as previously approved. A total of two (2) parking spaces per unit plus parking for the
amenity area is proposed. Each of the 56 zero-lot line units would have a two (2)-car garage. Parking for
each of the 25 townhouse units would consist of a one (i)-car garage plus a parking space in the
driveway, rather than a two (2)-car garage as previously approved. Lastly, the colors, materials, and
design features of the facades for the zero-lot line units are compatible with the townhouse colors,
materials, and design features, and are appropriate for the single-family nature of the area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is staff's opinion that this request for master plan modification is non-substantial and consists of
relatively minor revisions to the previously approved plan, and is more consistent with the surrounding
single-family development to the north and west. Per master plan amendment procedures, staff has
determined that the requested master plan modification is consistent with all current regulations as well as
the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this Master
Plan amendment, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval. Additional
comments recommended by the Board or Commission would also be included in the Conditions of
Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Dixie\MPMD 07 -002\Staff Report.doc
.. ~
Exhibit "A" - The Estates at Heritage Club PUD
Location Map
I I
Lu
~
NOTfIN-CITY-GULFSTREAM DR !
380 190
I
N
1,520+
I reet E
5
o
380
760
1,140
I
I
I I
I f~
t "'
I ~f~ ;"~ I
~! ~ lit ifil
_ .. ~i; il~
-=== - - i~~ ":i
I~ ~.~~
el li@
is ~:I
~! jl!
. . 01
~ni
Ii I'
EXHfBJT B
iit!
r-- _II
I ~
-~
"I.. ."'0;
~ ;iF~- ~_ r- I- f'!205 ~,... f!!r- ~ 9 ~ I !:l
~r ob I -< g!:l g51 0; ~ b ~~
~,:; i =, :,:' "I' J' , :'
:, I I !.["~~;"W'_l .I'! m !)
~I.= - - -" . -" --:.._ LII; I:E g.:uli i b
... ~ -~ .':: :: :: ;: ;: ::: -::: ;:: It:. ~ID::: I:. I:
:,~~ Jrhlr Jr~lJr.Jr~Jr lJr In:~;'.1 lir: I ~
.~- -~t:, - i I I b
I - ~ '" 1;: I:
I r"'-'. I~. W- i 1'.' I i
!~~ i,:]
II _ _ ~ __ ._ i J ~ ~
...""'-- j ;: II!: ~ ~
n."... r-t...- ; e ~ I: -<
GULF SliREAM
PLAT NO.2 (PB 13. PC S1)
GRAYSI..
.ilCHTS (PB 23. PC 220)
".~L i l
~Ugtf( I "
:! '
.. I
J ~ <
fl ,!l i
i j !
I ~ i
I 2.,
If ,i
':i, ,,(, ~..
t'
i r !' i
..~ I Ii ~
. :.!tf' I -. .~ __
'\~!II-Ii ., _/ ,j -;:- .S1
:11' 4~ ~~~~ ~; ',. r ---I"~
::::::11' E ~ ~ 1 ::: !..
! ,t-,. U,-4 - ~ i SilfJ! U!,l;' ~
I / :"' I ~-L~jirt i II i i
~ . I ac i .1). ~ 1 ' -' _ L.J !
I ~ I Noe-.J6'58"E: . '1'- \; -.-I!!.,
J - -. 647.90'f7,.5/' 1iIts<S) r_.... A}l
1/. ~- - "tAr; -, w~
I\!.~ ~ Ft.' ...
~ - ~~EA8T~ i ~
\"l L' =- ---- ~ ,=-.=~~-,=- .:\.
flZ -- .. i -
- --. t~ fir
----_i ~. -!..- ~ ~
". ~ 1--- - - ! it ______ -----=::::::::=
I I lii-f----_.~__ i
I 5 l-__~"_
--r-, .i;--J-'....
lr..
Ll t:
1;'1 ~
~lf..
r J~ 'Ii
, ~ III!"" ;:
i l' 1 ~ I
~
,i
l.
~
I. i$ b i
I ~: ~
i 'i~ ~:
':~ R ~
~ !'l
~ ~ i
.. m
- -..lIiiI!'C. -Jf,' ,~~...
~
i
,,~
Lr'
';' e.1I
,- 110
~ [i I ;:
,~ .1,,1, I
;: f1f
e "d
li
.8 .!
:r-- .-...
~.
..
-".L "'.11:""
,.. . .;.;t- ~.-" 0-
;:"; IS
i!. . I
-,...'.
;:
;:
!
tl
r
It S E
I I .. ~
I ~: ~ :
fib :
I' i: ~
I I r ..
! g
..
----'......-.-
;: Ij~.,,:;:
i 1.1, J.Jt.
II
II I;:
'<I ~d
II ~
I, !
.;, i
tl
!
! (i
L "~ ~
. ~
I~of
--
-c
'r--
'"
x
'"
.. .
'1;~s;1
:1 ni
id ~~
Sil ~ .~
~i~
D~. 8
Iii il
. ~
'"''
!l~
o
...
..~.u~.u~il ~
I; Iii I I~ ~-&-
~~ I ~~~ :~U' I rw I It
I l ~/iL_
U~i-' S, ~ rl1--
sa ! "!! "',
Ii I ~:! ' ''Oc'
t I !i g ... "", .
"l:J
~
I~
II
;1
. ~ -I
;,i ;md~ b
.G,
~
;;~;"t
~ I
l:
I .~ III'~~ ~ ~ I :~I lili I
III I ,Slfi~~ I ! I. ;111 1-. ~ J
I . ~.il
:1.--;;;;: .. ~"..".... ~; N i.1 ~a~~
1iI S i:U,,; ~ a.
= ~ ~/lj;/I/lj; ~ S 15 t
f i ~E~~; ~ Ii I
J
l
'---
utI o! 1~~2",1
'1lT~:<"'i
1 $ I .JI~
~ i~
~ ~ i BOYNTON DIXIE ,~J.~ 51 anA SHAH 1_
~ ;;! TOWNBOllES ,~ .,~M tl .l!l ,~nRO'l'OS ,__
i '" :flY OF 8ll'1YlTlllN ~. p- lI&!CH COIINlY. FLllRIO.\ l !l 11 !l ~ ".. S S 0 C I ATE S -
- ~,. __ P" .a.... i!'~ C._.e.... af "'..............tl.... No. LB6..S6
.. s1l.I.A ~, MUI.... ........ ........ Eitt. ........... --.. .fl. H054
PH.:,'~ ""F"-:I5:4"'~7S4
aE W 1110.,
- .,
.
~
~
0
~ ~
l!
1m
EXHIBIT "e"
U
I
r '-"'-
11 ~[ , -~ jH
Illln mil i~IJ f ~l
Ii I{ "..t ..,. ..,.
rl r.' ,
m rl lilf rrJi rrll ,
.". ,..(..., '"''
. i '
_Jl[[lf
f
I
!
r
o
0.
i .,n
:. nrn..Z
'oz
.~ $: roM
* ~-l ~
: _C
~~-<
; .
o :~ ~ I)
t;[ij
~ ..,m
5
g-=
'"
r
~
E
~
~ .
~ '
1
~~
r-'-
\..
ill lIP., I
II :.j !I !i ~'l"
: IU 'i ~ :1' "
r-J_-_~_ ~i I
, ------~-- FLORIDA EAST C I"
--------- OAST RA" hO -I'!
--- -~=-~-~2
,
I
----------__ I
------~--
------------------------------
- D'!:!.':'!'GHWA Y
----
i
.
.,
----------- \ f - -
-----------'-------
"
I, I~TIB Overall Landscape Plan ~~2~~~8~1II D S~,..."'.."'"
, ...J!... ~::..(::..l.,~~e.IT'(TUn
?--.;:s Or~! ~~- The Estates at The Heritage Club QJ 0: .nUIl.rllt...~ '1'C1Uf..
- !~ ~~~'sI
~~ 0 gi t- Gu11stream Boulevard ~li~K !l,.~~~~~L ~.~U~~_~E
Roynt.on fhmc:h. Florid" --
~ ~
EXHIBIT "D" - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Estates of Heritage Club
File number: MPMD 07-002
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with a January 30,2007 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- X
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section
10-26 (a).
PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry
Comments:
2. Revise plans to relocate canopy trees far enough back from drive aisles to X
minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles.
PUBLIC WORKS-Traffic
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING
Comments:
3. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be X
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
4. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review
Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the Commission and at permit review.
5. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall X
enter the process to re-plat this property through the City's Engineering
Division. All Conditions of Approval (COA) generated by the City
Commission applicable to this new site shall be reflected on the new record
plat.
6. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the X
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
7. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction X
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
Estates at Heritage Club
MPMD 07-002
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
UTILITIES
Comments:
8. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer X
services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for
the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide
milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the
setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the
adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon
the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible.
9. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and X
landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may
determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with
utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within
utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so
that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in
the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives
public utilities the authority to remove any trees that may interfere with utility
services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way.
10. Palm Beach County Health Department permit revisions will be required for X
the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12).
11. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included X
within utility easements in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 6. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings,
using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via
separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(e).
12. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer X
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
13. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has X
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
14. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability X
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Estates at Heritage Club
MPMD 07-002
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be
reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
FIRE
Comments:
15. All buildings, except freestanding private homes, that are over 30 feet high X
must have a fire sprinkler system per NFP A 13R.
16. Entrance gates and all roadways must be a minimum of 20 feet wide for two- X
way traffic and 12 feet wide for one-way traffic.
17. Entrance gates must have a KNOX key override installed for Fire and X
Emergency Forces entry.
18. Fire hydrants shall be spaced a maximum of 400 feet of road travel apart with X
no part of any building further than 250 feet from a hydrant.
19. A flow test shall be conducted within six months of submittal of this project X
that shows 1500 gpm at 20 psi available above normal domestic use for Fire
Department operations.
POLICE
Comments: None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory
Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be
generated by the commission and at permit review.
21. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the X
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are
signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida
shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
22. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X
proposed construction.
Estates at Heritage Club
MPMD 07-002
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
23. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed X
perimeter fence. Identify the type of fence material and the type of material
that supports the fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also,
provide a typical section view drawing of the fence that includes the depth
that the fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the fence is
above finish grade. The location and height of the fence shall comply with the
fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code.
24. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216.
25. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
. The number of dwelling units in each building.
. The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit.
. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
26. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. X
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review.
27. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information
shall be provided:
. A legal description of the land.
. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
. If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans.
. The number of dwelling units in each building.
. The total amount being paid.
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
Estates at Heritage Club
MPMD 07-002
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
28. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
29. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X
documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan
shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton
Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County
Emergency 911.
. Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian
Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013)
. United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734-
0872)
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
30. Park Impact Fees total $105,533 (25 Single Family Attached x $1,045/unit = X
$26,125.00 and 56 Single Family Detached x $1,418/unit = $79,408.00).
The remainder of unpaid portion will be due at time of permitting.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
31. Revise plans to depict an elevation cross-section detail (similar to sheet AOI0) X
of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the
time of planting to (proper scale) to visually buffer the proposed buildings
and parking areas from the Gulfstream Estates single family residences,
and from the Gulfstream Boulevard and Old Dixie Highway road rights-of-
way.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
32. Label on site plan (sheet CE-2) the zoning of adjacent development. X
According to Chapter 2.5, Section 9.B., PUD setbacks shall most closely
resemble required setbacks of abutting yards when in other zoning districts.
33. Revise typical single-family lot layout / setbacks on site plan and landscape X
plan to match.
Estates at Heritage Club
MPMD 07-002
Conditions of Approval
Page 6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
34. Revise plans to indicate easements, including five (5) foot utility easement in X
front and rear of each unit, on all landscape plans (LP-l thru LP-8).
35. The removal/relocation of landscape material are subject to review and X
approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist.
36. The trees proposed around the townhouse buildings must be installed at ~ the X
building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.).
37. Revise detail (sheet LC-l) of the fence proposed around the pool/clubhouse X
area and along Gulfstream Blvd., to include material and color (Chapter 4,
Section 7.D). Also provide the same detail for the emergency access gate off
of Gulfstream Blvd.
38. Revise detail of the decorative posts (sheet LC-2) proposed on each side of X
the entry drive (west of mail kiosk), to include materials and colors.
39. Revise detail of the typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture (sheet LP-5) X
to also include the exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum)
and color(s).
40. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) to indicate locations of proposed entrance signs. X
Revise sign detail (sheet LC-2) to include the colors of all exterior finishes
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
41. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) by adding a note to address location of screen X
enclosures allowed in rear yards of lots adjacent to Gulfstream Blvd to read
"screen enclosures will be limited to the underside of roofed porches. No
exterior screen enclosures will be allowed".
42. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) note 6. and note on typical for premium X
homesite re: height of screen enclosures to one-story.
43. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) graphic for premium homesite typical lot layout X
from 6 feet to 8 feet on the non-zero side setback for screen enclosure, to
match tabular data.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
44. Condition #2 to read: Revise plans to relocate canopy trees far enough back X
from drive aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-
profile vehicles, if an exception based on tree selection (i.e. use as of Pigeon
Plum) cannot be granted.
45. Condition #30 to read: Park Impact Fees total $105, 533 (25 Single Family
Attached x $1,045/unit = $26,125.00 and 56 Single Family Detached X
x $1,4l8/unit = $79,408.00). Records indicate $63,322 has been paid to
date. The remainder of unpaid portion ($42,311) will be due at time of
permitting.
Estates at Heritage Club
MPMD 07-002
Conditions of Approval
Page 7
II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
46. Condition #34 to read: Revise plaBs all landscape plan pages (LP-l thru LP- X
ill to indicate all platted easements required, including such as five (5) foot
utility easement in front and rear of each unit. on all landscape plans (LP 1
thru LP g).
47. Condition #41 to read: Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) by adding a note to X
address location of screen enclosures allowed in rear yards of lots adjacent to
Gulfstream Blvd to read "soreen enoloslHes will be limited to the aRderside
of roofed pClfohes. No exterior soreen enolosures will be allovled" "should
not extend beyond the roof line".
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Dixie\MPMD 07 -002\COA.doc
1!:>>( REVIEW TEAM MEETINb
AGENDA
TO:
Rick Lee, Fire Plan Review
John Huntington, Police Department
H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department
Laurinda Logan, Engineering Division
Timothy Large, Building Division
Jody Rivers, Parks Division
Ed Breese, Planning & Zoning Division
Eric Johnson, Planning & Zoning Division
Kathleen Zeitler, Planning & Zoning Division
Gabriel Wuebben, Planning & Zoning Division
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf, Chairman
DATE:
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
TIME:
10:00 AM
PLACE:
Planning & Zoning Conference Room
A.
10:00 AM
Master Plan Modification
PROJECT:
Estates @ Heritage Club
AGENT:
Weiner & Aronson, P.A.
OWNER:
New Century Boynton One Development, LLLP
LOCATION:
West of FEC Railroad; North of Gulfstream Blvd.
DESCRIPTION:
Master Plan modification to The Estates at Heritage Club PUD to revise the type
of housing proposed from 82 fee-simple townhouse units to 56 single-family zero
lot line units and 25 fee-simple townhouse units (a reduction of one unit).
Nancy Byrne, Asst. Development Dir.
Jeffrey Livergood, Public Works Director
Kurt Bressner, City Manager
Carisse Weise, Assistant to City Manager
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\AGEN DASH ART\ 1-30-07 .doc
Larry Quinn, Public Works-General
Matt Immler, Police Dept.
Pete Mazzella, Asst. Utilities Director