Loading...
AGENDA DOCUMENTS CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office 0 December 5, 2006 November 20, 2006 (Noon.) 0 February 13, 2007 February 5, 2007 (Noon) 0 January 2, 2007 December 18,2006 (Noon) 0 March 6, 2007 February 20, 2007 (Noon) 0 January 16,2007 January 2, 2007 (Noon) [8J March 20, 2007 March 5, 2007 (Noon) 0 February 6, 2007 January 16,2007 (Noon) 0 April 3, 2007 March 19,2007 (Noon) 0 Announcements/Presentations 0 City Manager's Report NATURE OF 0 Administrative 0 New Business AGENDA ITEM 0 Consent Agenda 0 Legal 0 Code Compliance & Legal Settlements 0 UnfInished Business [8J Public Hearing 0 RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the March 20,2007 City Commission Agenda under Public Hearing. The Planning and Development Board on February 27, 2007, recommended that the request be approved, subject to modifIcations to comments #2, #30, #34 and #41, regarding proximity of trees to drive aisles, recognizing fees paid, indicating utility easements per platted locations, and clarifIcation of screen enclosure locations. For further details pertaining to this request, see attached Department Memorandum No. 07-011. EXPLANATION: PROJECT: AGENT: OWNERS: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: The Estates at Heritage Club (fka Boynton Dixie) (MPMD 07-002) Jason Mankoff, Weiner A. Aronson, P.A. New Century Boynton One Development, LLLP West of FEC Railroad on the north side of Gulfstream Boulevard. (the Estate at Heritage Club PUD, fka Boynton Dixie). Request for master plan modifIcation approval to The Estates at Heritage Club PUD to reduce the approved number of fee-simple town house units from 82 town houses to 25 town houses and add 56 single-family zero lot line dwelling units (a net reduction of one unit). PROGRAM IMP ACT: FISCAL IMP ACT: ALTERNATIVE . D City Manager's Signature Assistant to City Manager 1u.L-r ~ Planning and Z g DIrector CIty Attorney / Finance S:IPlanning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTS\Boynton Dixie\MPMD 07-002\Agenda Item Request Estates @Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 3-20-07.doc S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 07-011 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members Planning and Development Board and City Commission Michael W. Rump~ Director of Planning and Zoning THRU: FROM: Kathleen Zeitler ~Z-- Planner . DATE: February 20, 2007 PROJECf NAME/NO: The Estates at Heritage Club (fka Boynton Dixie) MPMD 07-002 REQUEST: Master Plan modification to The Estates at Heritage Club PUD to revise the type of housing approved from 82 fee-simple townhouse units to 25 fee- simple townhouse units and 56 single-family zero lot line units (a net reduction of one unit). PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: New Century Boynton One Development, LLLP Location: The Estate at Heritage Club PUD (fka Boynton Dixie) located west of the FEC Railroad on the north side of Gulfstream Blvd. (see Exhibit "A"- Location Map) Existing Land Use/Zoning: Medium Density Residential (MDR)/ Planned Unit Development (PUD) Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No changes proposed Proposed Use: 56 Single-Family Zero Lot Line Units and 25 Multi-Family Townhouse Units Acreage: 8.6 Acres (entire PUD Master Plan) Adjacent Uses: North: Developed property within the City of Boynton Beach, the northeastern half of the abutting property classified MeDR Medium Density Residential and zoned R-2 Duplex Residential; the northwestern half classified LDR Low Density Residential and zoned R-1A Single Family Residential; South: The right-of-way of Gulfstream Boulevard, then property within the City of Delray Beach classified (from the southeast to southwest) Commerce (Industrial), Transitional Commercial, and LD (Low Density Residential [5 du/ac]); East: The rights-of-way of the FEC railroad and Old Dixie Highway, then property Staff Report Memorandum No PZ 07-011 Page 2 classified Special High Density Residential-SHDR (20 du/ac) and zoned PUD Planned Unit Development; and West: Developed single-family residential neighborhood classified LDR Low Density Residential and zoned R-1A Single-Family Residential. BACKGROUND Mr. Jason Mankoff with Weiner & Aronson, P.A., agent for the property owner, is requesting that the Master Plan for The Estates at Heritage Club PUD (formerly known as Boynton-Dixie) be modified to revise the type of housing proposed from 82 fee-Simple townhouse units to 56 single-family zero lot line units and 25 fee-Simple townhouse units (a reduction of one unit). According to the original site plan staff report, the proposed Boynton Dixie project is a Planned Unit Development approved for 82 fee-simple townhouse dwelling units. The PUD is located on the west side of the FEC Railway, on the north side of Gulfstream Boulevard (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map). To date, the project has been approved for the following: an annexation (ANEX 05-003); a future land use map amendment (LUAR 05-007) from Medium Density Residential (PBC MDR) with a density of 5 du/ac to Medium Density Residential (MeDR)with a density of 9.68 du/ac; a rezoning (LUAR 05-007) from Single Family Residential (PBC RS) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); a new site plan (NWSP 05-024); and a site plan time extension (SPTE 06-008), which extended site plan approval to September 20, 2007. Building records indicate that a master building permit was issued for the 3-unit townhouse buildings in August, 2006, therefore this project is considered to be vested. The Land Development Regulations require approval of a master plan concurrent with approval of a rezoning to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) district. If the project is to be constructed in one (1) phase, a site plan may take the place of the master plan, as was done in this case, and fulfill the requirements of both a site plan and master plan. Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Development, of the City Land Development Regulations states that changes in Planned Unit Developments shall be processed through the Planning and Development Board and the City Commission. The applicant explains that market conditions for multi-family housing have recently changed, and the property owner therefore requests to revise the approved master plan / site plan from 82 fee-simple townhouse units to 25 fee-simple townhouse units and 56 single-family zero lot line units, for a total of 81 units (one unit less than originally approved). A revised plat for the project has been submitted to the Engineering Division for their review and approval. ANALYSIS The purpose and intent of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) district is to promote efficient and economical land use, improved amenities, appropriate and harmonious variety in physical development, creative design, improved living environment, orderly and economical development in the city, and the protection of adjacent development. This request for Master Plan modification to revise the type of housing proposed from 82 fee-simple townhouse units to 56 single-family zero lot line units and 25 fee- simple townhouse units will comply with the PUD requirements including unified control, consistency of development characteristics, compatibility with adjacent development, and provision for the private maintenance of common areas. This request was reviewed for consistency with the PUD development standards in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5, Planned Unit Developments. Also, staff reviewed the subject request and found it to be consistent with adjacent single-family residential lots as well as other PUD's throughout the City. Staff Report Memorandum No PZ 07-011 Page 3 The proposed overall layout of the project is very similar to the previously approved master / site plan. Exhibit "B" depicts the previously approved plan for 82 fee-simple townhouse units and amenity area. The 82 units were proposed within sixteen (16) separate buildings with each townhouse building varying in size between three (3) and twelve (12) units. Each unit proposed was within a two (2) story townhouse building. A recreation area with a cabana and a swimming pool would be located at the south-eastern portion of the development near the sole entrance, while a children's playground is planned at a more central location within the project area. Exhibit "c" depicts the proposed plan for 56 zero-lot line units and 25 townhouse units and amenity area. The single-family detached zero-lot line units are proposed adjacent to existing single-family residential subdivisions to the north and west. Each two-story single-family unit would have either a premium lot (50 feet by 72 feet), or a typical lot (50 feet by 62 feet). Premium lots would be large enough to accommodate a swimming pool, and typical lots would be large enough to accommodate a spa. Three (3) different models of the single-family units offer a variety in unit size and design. The 25 fee-simple townhouse units would consist of five (5) buildings with five (5) units each, and are proposed on a typical lot of 25 feet by 65 feet. The multi-family units would be located along the eastern portion of the property adjacent to the FEC Railway to the east. The recreation area with pool and cabana, and the children's playground are as previously proposed and in the same locations. The proposed street system, utilities locations, and overall layout of the project is very similar to the previously approved master / site plan. The 25 foot rear setback for units along the north and west property lines of the subject property remain as previously approved, and mirror the required rear setback of adjacent single-family developments. In addition, the perimeter landscape buffer widths, screening, and materials are as previously approved. A total of two (2) parking spaces per unit plus parking for the amenity area is proposed. Each of the 56 zero-lot line units would have a two (2)-car garage. Parking for each of the 25 townhouse units would consist of a one (i)-car garage plus a parking space in the driveway, rather than a two (2)-car garage as previously approved. Lastly, the colors, materials, and design features of the facades for the zero-lot line units are compatible with the townhouse colors, materials, and design features, and are appropriate for the single-family nature of the area. RECOMMENDATION It is staff's opinion that this request for master plan modification is non-substantial and consists of relatively minor revisions to the previously approved plan, and is more consistent with the surrounding single-family development to the north and west. Per master plan amendment procedures, staff has determined that the requested master plan modification is consistent with all current regulations as well as the intent and purpose of the comprehensive plan. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this Master Plan amendment, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval. Additional comments recommended by the Board or Commission would also be included in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Dixie\MPMD 07 -002\Staff Report.doc .. ~ Exhibit "A" - The Estates at Heritage Club PUD Location Map I I Lu ~ NOTfIN-CITY-GULFSTREAM DR ! 380 190 I N 1,520+ I reet E 5 o 380 760 1,140 I I I I I f~ t "' I ~f~ ;"~ I ~! ~ lit ifil _ .. ~i; il~ -=== - - i~~ ":i I~ ~.~~ el li@ is ~:I ~! jl! . . 01 ~ni Ii I' EXHfBJT B iit! r-- _II I ~ -~ "I.. ."'0; ~ ;iF~- ~_ r- I- f'!205 ~,... f!!r- ~ 9 ~ I !:l ~r ob I -< g!:l g51 0; ~ b ~~ ~,:; i =, :,:' "I' J' , :' :, I I !.["~~;"W'_l .I'! m !) ~I.= - - -" . -" --:.._ LII; I:E g.:uli i b ... ~ -~ .':: :: :: ;: ;: ::: -::: ;:: It:. ~ID::: I:. I: :,~~ Jrhlr Jr~lJr.Jr~Jr lJr In:~;'.1 lir: I ~ .~- -~t:, - i I I b I - ~ '" 1;: I: I r"'-'. I~. W- i 1'.' I i !~~ i,:] II _ _ ~ __ ._ i J ~ ~ ...""'-- j ;: II!: ~ ~ n."... r-t...- ; e ~ I: -< GULF SliREAM PLAT NO.2 (PB 13. PC S1) GRAYSI.. .ilCHTS (PB 23. PC 220) ".~L i l ~Ugtf( I " :! ' .. I J ~ < fl ,!l i i j ! I ~ i I 2., If ,i ':i, ,,(, ~.. t' i r !' i ..~ I Ii ~ . :.!tf' I -. .~ __ '\~!II-Ii ., _/ ,j -;:- .S1 :11' 4~ ~~~~ ~; ',. r ---I"~ ::::::11' E ~ ~ 1 ::: !.. ! ,t-,. U,-4 - ~ i SilfJ! U!,l;' ~ I / :"' I ~-L~jirt i II i i ~ . I ac i .1). ~ 1 ' -' _ L.J ! I ~ I Noe-.J6'58"E: . '1'- \; -.-I!!., J - -. 647.90'f7,.5/' 1iIts<S) r_.... A}l 1/. ~- - "tAr; -, w~ I\!.~ ~ Ft.' ... ~ - ~~EA8T~ i ~ \"l L' =- ---- ~ ,=-.=~~-,=- .:\. flZ -- .. i - - --. t~ fir ----_i ~. -!..- ~ ~ ". ~ 1--- - - ! it ______ -----=::::::::= I I lii-f----_.~__ i I 5 l-__~"_ --r-, .i;--J-'.... lr.. Ll t: 1;'1 ~ ~lf.. r J~ 'Ii , ~ III!"" ;: i l' 1 ~ I ~ ,i l. ~ I. i$ b i I ~: ~ i 'i~ ~: ':~ R ~ ~ !'l ~ ~ i .. m - -..lIiiI!'C. -Jf,' ,~~... ~ i ,,~ Lr' ';' e.1I ,- 110 ~ [i I ;: ,~ .1,,1, I ;: f1f e "d li .8 .! :r-- .-... ~. .. -".L "'.11:"" ,.. . .;.;t- ~.-" 0- ;:"; IS i!. . I -,...'. ;: ;: ! tl r It S E I I .. ~ I ~: ~ : fib : I' i: ~ I I r .. ! g .. ----'......-.- ;: Ij~.,,:;: i 1.1, J.Jt. II II I;: '<I ~d II ~ I, ! .;, i tl ! ! (i L "~ ~ . ~ I~of -- -c 'r-- '" x '" .. . '1;~s;1 :1 ni id ~~ Sil ~ .~ ~i~ D~. 8 Iii il . ~ '"'' !l~ o ... ..~.u~.u~il ~ I; Iii I I~ ~-&- ~~ I ~~~ :~U' I rw I It I l ~/iL_ U~i-' S, ~ rl1-- sa ! "!! "', Ii I ~:! ' ''Oc' t I !i g ... "", . "l:J ~ I~ II ;1 . ~ -I ;,i ;md~ b .G, ~ ;;~;"t ~ I l: I .~ III'~~ ~ ~ I :~I lili I III I ,Slfi~~ I ! I. ;111 1-. ~ J I . ~.il :1.--;;;;: .. ~"..".... ~; N i.1 ~a~~ 1iI S i:U,,; ~ a. = ~ ~/lj;/I/lj; ~ S 15 t f i ~E~~; ~ Ii I J l '--- utI o! 1~~2",1 '1lT~:<"'i 1 $ I .JI~ ~ i~ ~ ~ i BOYNTON DIXIE ,~J.~ 51 anA SHAH 1_ ~ ;;! TOWNBOllES ,~ .,~M tl .l!l ,~nRO'l'OS ,__ i '" :flY OF 8ll'1YlTlllN ~. p- lI&!CH COIINlY. FLllRIO.\ l !l 11 !l ~ ".. S S 0 C I ATE S - - ~,. __ P" .a.... i!'~ C._.e.... af "'..............tl.... No. LB6..S6 .. s1l.I.A ~, MUI.... ........ ........ Eitt. ........... --.. .fl. H054 PH.:,'~ ""F"-:I5:4"'~7S4 aE W 1110., - ., . ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ l! 1m EXHIBIT "e" U I r '-"'- 11 ~[ , -~ jH Illln mil i~IJ f ~l Ii I{ "..t ..,. ..,. rl r.' , m rl lilf rrJi rrll , .". ,..(..., '"'' . i ' _Jl[[lf f I ! r o 0. i .,n :. nrn..Z 'oz .~ $: roM * ~-l ~ : _C ~~-< ; . o :~ ~ I) t;[ij ~ ..,m 5 g-= '" r ~ E ~ ~ . ~ ' 1 ~~ r-'- \.. ill lIP., I II :.j !I !i ~'l" : IU 'i ~ :1' " r-J_-_~_ ~i I , ------~-- FLORIDA EAST C I" --------- OAST RA" hO -I'! --- -~=-~-~2 , I ----------__ I ------~-- ------------------------------ - D'!:!.':'!'GHWA Y ---- i . ., ----------- \ f - - -----------'------- " I, I~TIB Overall Landscape Plan ~~2~~~8~1II D S~,..."'.."'" , ...J!... ~::..(::..l.,~~e.IT'(TUn ?--.;:s Or~! ~~- The Estates at The Heritage Club QJ 0: .nUIl.rllt...~ '1'C1Uf.. - !~ ~~~'sI ~~ 0 gi t- Gu11stream Boulevard ~li~K !l,.~~~~~L ~.~U~~_~E Roynt.on fhmc:h. Florid" -- ~ ~ EXHIBIT "D" - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Master Plan Modification Project name: Estates of Heritage Club File number: MPMD 07-002 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with a January 30,2007 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Solid Waste Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- X 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a). PUBLIC WORKS - Forestry Comments: 2. Revise plans to relocate canopy trees far enough back from drive aisles to X minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high-profile vehicles. PUBLIC WORKS-Traffic Comments: None X ENGINEERING Comments: 3. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be X reflected on all appropriate sheets. 4. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X comments. Acceptance of these plans during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review. 5. Upon satisfactory Commission approval of the site plan, the applicant shall X enter the process to re-plat this property through the City's Engineering Division. All Conditions of Approval (COA) generated by the City Commission applicable to this new site shall be reflected on the new record plat. 6. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the X LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 7. Paving, drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction X acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in Estates at Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 Conditions of Approval Page 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. UTILITIES Comments: 8. Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer X services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 9. All utility easements and utility lines shall be shown on the site plan and X landscape plans (as well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that may interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 10. Palm Beach County Health Department permit revisions will be required for X the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 11. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included X within utility easements in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 6. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in CODE Sec. 26-33(e). 12. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer X utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 13. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has X approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 14. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability X at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Estates at Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 Conditions of Approval Page 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates) and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. FIRE Comments: 15. All buildings, except freestanding private homes, that are over 30 feet high X must have a fire sprinkler system per NFP A 13R. 16. Entrance gates and all roadways must be a minimum of 20 feet wide for two- X way traffic and 12 feet wide for one-way traffic. 17. Entrance gates must have a KNOX key override installed for Fire and X Emergency Forces entry. 18. Fire hydrants shall be spaced a maximum of 400 feet of road travel apart with X no part of any building further than 250 feet from a hydrant. 19. A flow test shall be conducted within six months of submittal of this project X that shows 1500 gpm at 20 psi available above normal domestic use for Fire Department operations. POLICE Comments: None X BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 20. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional X comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review. 21. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the X minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 22. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X proposed construction. Estates at Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 Conditions of Approval Page 4 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 23. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed X perimeter fence. Identify the type of fence material and the type of material that supports the fence, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the fence that includes the depth that the fence supports are below finish grade and the height that the fence is above finish grade. The location and height of the fence shall comply with the fence regulations specified in the Zoning Code. 24. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 25. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: . The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. . If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. . The number of dwelling units in each building. . The number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. . The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 26. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. X For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review. 27. At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of X Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property. The following information shall be provided: . A legal description of the land. . The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. . If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided. The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans. . The number of dwelling units in each building. . The total amount being paid. (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) Estates at Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 Conditions of Approval Page 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 28. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 29. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X documents at the time of permit application submittal. The addressing plan shall be approved by the United States Post Office, the City of Boynton Beach Fire Department, the City's GIS Division, and the Palm Beach County Emergency 911. . Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning & Building Division, 100 Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, Florida (Sean McDonald - 561-233-5013) . United States Post Office, Boynton Beach (Michelle Bullard - 561-734- 0872) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 30. Park Impact Fees total $105,533 (25 Single Family Attached x $1,045/unit = X $26,125.00 and 56 Single Family Detached x $1,418/unit = $79,408.00). The remainder of unpaid portion will be due at time of permitting. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 31. Revise plans to depict an elevation cross-section detail (similar to sheet AOI0) X of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of planting to (proper scale) to visually buffer the proposed buildings and parking areas from the Gulfstream Estates single family residences, and from the Gulfstream Boulevard and Old Dixie Highway road rights-of- way. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 32. Label on site plan (sheet CE-2) the zoning of adjacent development. X According to Chapter 2.5, Section 9.B., PUD setbacks shall most closely resemble required setbacks of abutting yards when in other zoning districts. 33. Revise typical single-family lot layout / setbacks on site plan and landscape X plan to match. Estates at Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 Conditions of Approval Page 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 34. Revise plans to indicate easements, including five (5) foot utility easement in X front and rear of each unit, on all landscape plans (LP-l thru LP-8). 35. The removal/relocation of landscape material are subject to review and X approval of the City Forester / Environmentalist. 36. The trees proposed around the townhouse buildings must be installed at ~ the X building height of the building (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section S.M.). 37. Revise detail (sheet LC-l) of the fence proposed around the pool/clubhouse X area and along Gulfstream Blvd., to include material and color (Chapter 4, Section 7.D). Also provide the same detail for the emergency access gate off of Gulfstream Blvd. 38. Revise detail of the decorative posts (sheet LC-2) proposed on each side of X the entry drive (west of mail kiosk), to include materials and colors. 39. Revise detail of the typical outdoor freestanding lighting fixture (sheet LP-5) X to also include the exterior finish, materials used (i.e. concrete or aluminum) and color(s). 40. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) to indicate locations of proposed entrance signs. X Revise sign detail (sheet LC-2) to include the colors of all exterior finishes (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.). 41. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) by adding a note to address location of screen X enclosures allowed in rear yards of lots adjacent to Gulfstream Blvd to read "screen enclosures will be limited to the underside of roofed porches. No exterior screen enclosures will be allowed". 42. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) note 6. and note on typical for premium X homesite re: height of screen enclosures to one-story. 43. Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) graphic for premium homesite typical lot layout X from 6 feet to 8 feet on the non-zero side setback for screen enclosure, to match tabular data. ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: 44. Condition #2 to read: Revise plans to relocate canopy trees far enough back X from drive aisles to minimize the potential for vertical conflicts with high- profile vehicles, if an exception based on tree selection (i.e. use as of Pigeon Plum) cannot be granted. 45. Condition #30 to read: Park Impact Fees total $105, 533 (25 Single Family Attached x $1,045/unit = $26,125.00 and 56 Single Family Detached X x $1,4l8/unit = $79,408.00). Records indicate $63,322 has been paid to date. The remainder of unpaid portion ($42,311) will be due at time of permitting. Estates at Heritage Club MPMD 07-002 Conditions of Approval Page 7 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 46. Condition #34 to read: Revise plaBs all landscape plan pages (LP-l thru LP- X ill to indicate all platted easements required, including such as five (5) foot utility easement in front and rear of each unit. on all landscape plans (LP 1 thru LP g). 47. Condition #41 to read: Revise site plan (sheet CE-2) by adding a note to X address location of screen enclosures allowed in rear yards of lots adjacent to Gulfstream Blvd to read "soreen enoloslHes will be limited to the aRderside of roofed pClfohes. No exterior soreen enolosures will be allovled" "should not extend beyond the roof line". ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: 1. To be determined. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Dixie\MPMD 07 -002\COA.doc 1!:>>( REVIEW TEAM MEETINb AGENDA TO: Rick Lee, Fire Plan Review John Huntington, Police Department H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department Laurinda Logan, Engineering Division Timothy Large, Building Division Jody Rivers, Parks Division Ed Breese, Planning & Zoning Division Eric Johnson, Planning & Zoning Division Kathleen Zeitler, Planning & Zoning Division Gabriel Wuebben, Planning & Zoning Division Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist FROM: Michael W. Rumpf, Chairman DATE: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 TIME: 10:00 AM PLACE: Planning & Zoning Conference Room A. 10:00 AM Master Plan Modification PROJECT: Estates @ Heritage Club AGENT: Weiner & Aronson, P.A. OWNER: New Century Boynton One Development, LLLP LOCATION: West of FEC Railroad; North of Gulfstream Blvd. DESCRIPTION: Master Plan modification to The Estates at Heritage Club PUD to revise the type of housing proposed from 82 fee-simple townhouse units to 56 single-family zero lot line units and 25 fee-simple townhouse units (a reduction of one unit). Nancy Byrne, Asst. Development Dir. Jeffrey Livergood, Public Works Director Kurt Bressner, City Manager Carisse Weise, Assistant to City Manager S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\AGEN DASH ART\ 1-30-07 .doc Larry Quinn, Public Works-General Matt Immler, Police Dept. Pete Mazzella, Asst. Utilities Director