Loading...
R99-099RESOLUTION R99- ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH'S 1999-2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach is entering into its third year of receiving federal grant funds as an entitlement community; and WHEREAS, a One-Year Action Plan has been developed with activities listed, setting forth how the City intends to utilize the funds available to best address urgent needs, which plan is attached hereto as Exhibit "A'; NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'T RESOLVED BY THE Cl'TY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA THAT: Section 1. The City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach hereby approves the adoption of the City of Boynton Beach's 1999-2000 One Year Action Plan, which Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit "A' and made a part hereof. Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this // day of August, 1999. lerk CiTY 0 BOYNT N B CH, F. LORI'DA Ma/yor../4 // Vi~e Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Commissioner Commissioner n Plan CONSOLIDATED ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1999 - SEPTEMBER 2000 City Of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard BOynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 742-6066 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CONSOLIDATED ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER 1999 - SEPTEMBER 2000 Wilfred Hawkins, Interim City Manager Octavia $. Sherrod, Community Development Coordinator City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33435 (561) 742-6066 Application for Federal Assistance 1. Type of Submission: Application: =reapplicat~on: 2. Date Submitted 08/15/99 3. Date Received by State Applicant Identifier 59-6000282 State Application Identifier 4. Date Received by Federal Agency 5. Applicant Information Legal Name Organizational Unit CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH LOCAL GOVERNMENT Address Contact 100 E. BOgYNTON BEACH BLVD. OCTAVIA S. SHERROD BOYNRON BEACH, FL 33425 (561)742-6066 PALM BEACH 6. Employer Identification Number (EIN): Federal identifier 8. Type of Application: Type: Continuation 10. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: Catalog Number: Assistance Title: CDBG ENTITLEMENT '12. Areas Affected by Project: 7. Type of Applicant: Municipal 9. Name of Federal Agency: 11. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: 13. Proposed Project: Start Date I Start Date 10/01/99 I 09/30/00 15. Estimated Funding: a. Federal $547,000 b. Applicant $0 c. State $367,000 d. Local $470,000 e, Other $0 f. Program Incom? $0 g. Total $1,384,000 14. Congressional Districts of: a. Applicant23 b. Project23 16. Is Application Subject to Review by State Executive Order 12372 Process? Review Status: Program covered Date:: 17. Is the Applicant Delinquent on Any Federal Debt?. No 18. To the best of my knowledge and belief, ali data in this appJication/preapplication are true and correct, the document has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant will cornp¥ with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarded. MAYOR a. Typed Name of Authedzed Representative J b. Title GERALD?BROENING J d. s,gnatur, o, hedzed ,/ se gve I / c. Telephone Number (581) 742-6010 e. Date Signed 08/10/99 [[. [1[. IV. V. VI. VII. CITY OFBOYNTON BEACH CONSOLIDATED ACTION PLAN FISCALYEAR1999~000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number Annual Action Plan Executive Summary ...................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................... 3 Citizen Participation ........................................................................ 3 Available Resources .................................................................. 3 - 4 A. Community Development Block Grant B. Matching Funds Monitoring of Activities .................................................................. 4 Homeless and Special Needs Activities ...................................... ,. 4 Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction ........................................ 4 - 5 Geographic Distribution ................................................................. 5 Details of Proposed Projects .................................... '. ............... 6 - 7 Census Track Map .......................................................................... 8 Project Map ...................................................................................... 9 Proposed Projects ................................................................. 10 - 17 Certifications .......................................................................... 18 - 24 Monitoring Standards and Procedures ........................................ 25 Appendix Meeting Notice and Minutes for March 18th, 1999 Meeting Notice for August 3fa, 1999 CiTY OF BOYNTON BEACH ANNUAL ACTION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fiscal Year 1999-2000 · Description of Key Projects The City of Boynton Beach Annual Action Plan details the planned use of various grant dollars in Federal, State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) and local match funds. The major focus of these funds are as follows: $210,000 for the rehabilitation of substandard housing units for very Iow, Iow and moderate-income homeowners $70,000 for installation of sidewalks on various streets within the Target Area $30,000 for emergency repair of substandard housing units $67,050 to provide family develQpment services to very Iow, Iow and moderate-income residents $15,000 for summer-camp scholarships $30,000 to provide grants to match funds for owners of commercial properties located within the target area $109,400 Administrative Costs including costs associated with promoting fair housing activities $367,670 for new homeownership opportunities (SHIP) · Location All activities will take place within the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Target Area. ·, Housing Goals The plan provides for the rehabilitation of 15 owner-occupied housing units, the emergency repair of ten (10) and new homeownership opportunities for approximately 20 Iow and moderate-income families. CONSOLIDATED ACTION PLAN FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 I. INTRODUCTION The City of Boynton Beach, now into year three of implementing its Five Year Strategic Plan, will continue to focus on the issues identified in the Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 assembly held in May of 1996. The general consensus of the participants was to develop a detailed master plan, which would include the components necessary to stimulate the economic growth and revitalization of the community. The Annual Action Plan reflects the funding available for activities consistent with the Priority Needs as established in the Five Year Consolidated Strategic Plan and the statutory requirements to provide decent housing, suitable living environments and expansion of economic opportunities. Emphasis this year is placed on Affordable Housing, Housing Rehabilitation, Family Development Services, Economic Development, Neighborhood and Commercial Improvements and the promotion of Fair Housing. II. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The City involves the citizens of the target area community in the annual planning process by means of public advertisement in a public forum format. The meeting, which as held in the Commission Chambers, provided an opportunity for social service organizations as well as the general public to give input on community needs. City staff prepared a proposed budget that was discussed with the citizens of that meeting. The citizens had an opportunity to voice opinions concerning the proposed budget dudng this Public Hearing meeting held on March 18th, 1999. The transcript of the minutes of the citizens comments of the needs Assessment meeting is found in the Appendix. Ill. . AVAILABLE RESOURCES A. Community. Development Block Grant The City expects to receive $547,000 in CDBG funds for FY 99/00. These dollars will be used to provide owner-occupied housing rehabilitation to include emergency repairs, youth services, fair housing activities, economic development, neighborhood and commercial improvements, fair housing initiatives and the administrative costs associated with the CDBG program. Detailed project activity descriptions are located in the CPD Consolidated Plan Listing of Proposed Projects table. Geographic distribution is described in the accompanying maps. B. Matching funds As an Entitlement City, the City of Boynton Beach receives State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP), funds which may be used to fulfill the match requirements of federal funds. SHIP dollars may be used for housing rehabilitation, down payment assistance, gap financing and closing costs. The City's allocation for FY 99/00 is estimated at $367,670 with 14% allocated to new construction, 43% allocated for rehabilitation, 33% for homeownership and rehabilitation and 10% for administration cost. Since 1989, the affordable housing programs have been enhanced by a contribution from the City's general revenue fund. These dollars were used to fund the Infill Construction program. Funding has been used for neighborhood association activities and exterior improvements to owner-occupied housing units. The City also 'contributes dollars to Habitat for Humanity in the form of lot conveyance for the construction of new homes, as well as Paint Your Heart Out of Palm Beach County, which paints the homes of eldedy and handicapped residents. IV. MONITORING OF ACTIVITIES The City of Boynton Beach will continue to monitor CDBG funded projects and sub-recipients in accordance with regulations and statutes governing all such activities. Construction supervision of rehabilitation will be done by certified inspection staff during the entire rehab process. Sub-recipients of CDBG funding enter a written agreement with the City of Boynton Beach developed in accordance with Federal regulations governing "Administrative Requirements for Grants Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized India Tribal Governments" (24 CFR Part 85). V. HOMELESS AND SPECIAL NEEDS ACTIVITIES The City currently does not house any homeless facility. However, its effort to sustain this area is by way of supporting local agencies who have the needs of homeless as their concern by preventing homelessness, as well as assisting homeless individuals and families locate available housing services and other needs required for them to become self-sufficient. VI. LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION Since only 1.5 % of the city's housing stock was built prior to 1972, and renters occupy 23% of those, combined with the city being primarily Iow density in nature, the potential for problems from lead based paint is not as probable as in most areas. The Palm Beach County Health Division responds to suspected incidences of lead based paint poisoning and routinely tests the young children of its clients. Although lead based paint does not appear to be a serious problem in this city, Rehabilitation staff evaluates to determine the necessary measures to 4 be taken in order to create a safe environment for families occupying properties that are suspect of being contaminated. VII. GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Activities described in this plan will be concentrated within Census Tracts 5602, 6100, 6202, 6203 and 6300. Activities relating to SHIP and most housing programs are city-wide or are located within the target area. A location map is included. 5 CDBG PROPOSED PROJECTS HOUSING REHABILITATION Rehab Single-Unit Residential $120,000 This is an eligible activity undertaken for the purpose of providing rehabilitation to permanent, residential structures which are occupied by very-low, Iow and moderate-income persons. Grants provided to the very-low, Iow and moderate-income homeowners of substandard units in order to brings the units up to standard condition. Rehabilitation of building and code violations i.e., windows, doors, flooring, electrical and plumbing upgrades ars typical project items. REHABILITATION ADMINISTRATION $90,000 Staff and overhead costs associated with housing rehabilitation. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT Public Facilities $70,000 Install sidewalks on various streets in the Target Area. The location of the sidewalks will coincide with Neighborhood Association Projects. Funding for new sidewalks on various streets within the Target Area. Estimated costs of the project are between 2,500 to 2,600 linear feet of sidewalk to be installed in conjunction with organized Neighborhood Association Projects. EMERGENCY REPAIR Rehab Single-Unit Residential Owner Occupied Units $30,000 This is an eligible activity undertaken for the purpose of providing or improving permanent residential structures which may be occupied by very-low, /ow and mode/ate-income persons. Grants will be provided to very-low, Iow and moderate-income homeowners for emergency roof, entryway, electrical and plumbing repairs. Units requiring full housing rehabilitation will be placed on waiting lists to receive additional serVices. 6 FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Public SerVices $67,050 Eligible Activities to include programs regarding Crime Prevention, Neighborhood Stabilization, Youth Mentoring and Housing DeveloPment. Self sufficiency programs for very Iow, Iow and moderate-income families with children, to include self help programs, counseling and referral services, and other as needed programs. SUMMER CAMP PROGRAM Youth Services $15,000 An eligible activity to assist very Iow, Iow and moderate'income families with children to be able to participate in the City's summer youth programs. The Summer Camp Programs provides financial assistance for scholarships, staff salaries and related, similar recreational programs. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $30,000 An eligible activity to aid in the removal o~ slum and blight. Grants and loans on a matching basis to provide exterior repairs to privately owned business in the CDBG Target Area, to provide continued improvement of the business C°rridor for area residents. ADMINISTRATION $109,400 Administration costs associated with the Community Development Block Grant Program. These costs include but are not limited to the planning, oversight and operation of the administration of the Community Development Block · Grant Program. 7 CENSUS TRACK MAP fin production) PROJECT MAP (in production) 9 0 lO z Z 0 0 12 Z Z 0 14 r-c~m o~-~ Z Z 15 0 0 16 Z Z 0 CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing - The jurisdiction will affirmatively further fair housing, which means it will conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to ovemome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard. Anti-displacement and Relocation Plan - It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CFR 24; and it has in effect and is following a residential anti-displacement and relocation assistance plan required under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the CDBG or HOME programs. Drug-Free Workplace - it will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: . Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about: a) The danger of drug abuse in the workplace; b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance plans; and d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph I that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will: a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and b) Notify the employer in writing or his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) calendar days after such conviction; 18 5~ Notifying the agency in writing, within ten (10) calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar day of receiving notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted: a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-frae workplace through. implementation of paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Anti-Lobbying - To the best of the jurisdiction's knowledge and belief: No Federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement; = If any funds other than Federally appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member Of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Repoff Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions; and It Will require that the language of paragraph 1 and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub-grants and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that ail sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. 19 Authority of Jurisdiction - The Consolidated Plan is authorized under State and local law (as applicable) and the jurisdictions possess the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with Plan - The housing activities to be undertaken with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are consistent with the strategic plan. Section 3 - It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135. TITLE 2O Specific CDBG Certifications The Entitlement Community certifies that: Citizen Participation - it is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR 91.105. Community Development Plan - Its consolidated housing and community development plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that provide decent housing and expand economic opportunities primarily for persons of Iow and moderate- income (see CFR 24 570.2 and CFR 24 part 570). Following a Plan - It is following a current Consolidated Plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. Use of Funds - It has complied with the following criteria: Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities that expect to be assisted with CDBG funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum- feasible priority to activities that benefit Iow and moderate-income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a' serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are not available. Overall Benefit The aggregate use of CDBG funds including Section 108 guaranteed loans during program year(s) 1997, 1998 and 1999 (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons of Iow and moderate-income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period. Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of IoW and moderate-incor~e, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. 21 The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108, unless the CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements financed from other revenue sources. In this case, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the pubic improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. Also, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate-income (not Iow-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force - It has adopted and is enforcing: A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against anY individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrationS; and A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent- civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. Compliance With Anti-discrimination Laws - The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with Title VI or the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 USC 3601-3619) and implementing regulations. Lead-Based Paint - its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures concerning lead-based paint will comply with the requirements of 24 CFR 570.608. Compliance With Laws - It will comply with applicable laws. DATE TITLE 22 APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS, A. Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. B. Drug-Free Workplace Certification 1. By signing and/or submitting this application or grant agreement, the grantee is providing the certification. The certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed. when the agency awards the grant. If it is later determined that the grantee knowing rendered false certification, or otherwise violates the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act, HUD, in addition to any other remedies available to the Federal Government, may take action authorized under the Drug-Free Workplace Act. 3. For grantees other than individuals, Alternate I applies. (This is the information to which jurisdictions certify.) 4. For grantees who are individuals, Alternate 11 applies. (Not applicable jurisdictions.) Workplaces under grants, for grantees other than individuals, need not be identified on the certification. If known, they may be identified Jn the grant application. If the grantee does not identify the workplaces at the time of application, or upori reward, if there is no application, the grantee must keep the identity of the workplace(s) on file in its office and make the information available for Federal inspection., Failure to identify all known workplaces constitutes a violation of the grantee's drug-free workplace requirements. Workplace identifications must include the actual address of buildings (or parts of buildings) or other sites where work under the grant takes place. Categorical descriptions may be used (e.g., all vehicles of a mass transit authority or State highway department while in operation, State employees in each local unemployment office, performers in concert halls or radio stations). If the workplace identified to the agency changes during the performance of the grant, the grantee shall inform the agency of the change(s), if it previously identified the workplaces in question (see paragraph 5). 23 8. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant: Place of Rerformance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) City of Boynton Beach Division of Community Redevelopment 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Bo_vnton Beach. FL 33435 Check Q if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here (the certification with regard to the drug-free workplace required by 24 CFR part 24, subpart F). = Definitions of terms in the Non-procurement Suspension and Debarment common rule and Drug-Free Workplace common rule apply to this certification. Grantee's attention is called, in particular, to the following definitions from these rules: "Controlled substance" means a controlled substance in Schedules I through V of the Controlled Substances Act (21 USC 812) and as further defined by regulation. (21 CFR 1308.11 through 1308.15); "Conviction" means a finding of guilt (including a plea of nolo contendere) or imposition of sentence, or both, by any judicial body charged with the responsibility to determine violations of the Federal or State criminal drug statutes; "Criminal drug statute" means a Federal or non-Federal criminal statute involving the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, use or possession of any controlled substance; "Employee" means the employee of a grantee directly engaged in the performance of work under a grant, including (i) all "direct charge" employees; (ii) ' all "indirect charge" employees unless their impact or involvement is insignificant to' the performance of the grant, and (iii) temporary personnel and consultants who are directly er~gaged in the performance of work under the grant and who are on the grantee's payroll. This definition does not include workers not on the payroll of the grantee, (e.g., volunteers, even if used to meet a matching requirement; consultants or independent contractors not on the grantee's payroll; or employees of sub-recipients or subcontractors in covered workplaces). 24 MONITORING STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES Boynton Beach will monitor activities under its federal grant program and initiate monitoring plans for new programs as they are developed to meet the specific requirements of those programs. Key elements of the monitoring plan are: Negotiate a project or activity specific sub-recipient agreement that identifies and quantifies the activities to be implemented and includes a budget showing the specific expenditures authorized. 2. Require monthly status reports and establish an on-site monitoring schedule based on the nature and complexity of the activity and the amount of the funds involved. 3. Provide technical assistance and training when the sub-recipient requests or requires it. Review request for payment or reimbursement to assure that proper documentation is provided and that expenditures are for eligible activities under applicable rules and regulations, and authorized under the sub-recipient agreement. 5. Assure sub-recipients meet federal single audit requirements and review audits t'o assure that concerns and findings are addressed. 6. Assure compliance with other program requirements, such as labor standards and fair housing laws, through in-depth monitoring and program review. 25 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 1999 AT 6:00 P.M. PRESENT OctaviaSherrod, CommunityDevelopmentCoordinator OPENING REMARKS Ms. Sherrod opened the Community Development Block Grant Public Hearing at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 18, 1999. Ms. Sherrod informed the audience that the City is required by HUD to hold a public meeting on the City's Community Development Block Grant Program. The purpose of the meeting is to gain public input for recommendations that the public may have for uses of the entitlement funds. Ms. Sherrod handed out to the audience the definition of "Entitlement Status" and a List of Eligible Programs and Activities as an Entitlement City, together with the Proposed Budget for FY 98/99. Ms. Sherrod stated that when the City received its first entitlement in FY97/98 the entitlement was $569,000. The Community Development Office prepared its one-year action plan based on that sum. However, in February HUD informed our Office that the allocation has been decreased to $547,000. Ms. Sherrod said this is not uncommon when HUD takes on more municipalities the distribution is decreased proportionately with other municipalities. Ms. Sherrod said it was necessary for her to readjust the budget. Ms. Sherrod stated that no particular activity was significantly decreased. However the proposed relocation program was deleted when it was determined that other funds were available for that program.. Ms. Sherrod circulated a ~ign in sheet to be signed by all those present. PUBLIC HEARING PARTICIPATION Mr. Larry Finkelstein asked if the proposed budget should be the FY 99/00 budget. Ms. Sherrod said the budget year was correct because the funds have not been disbursed. Also, the budget had to be adjusted because the funds were decreased from $569,000 to $547,000. Mr. Finkelstein inquired if the Redevelopment Program funds were earmarked for any specific area. Ms. Sherrod said these funds were for downtown. Mr. Finkelstein asked if the funds were for any specific project. Ms. Sherrod quoted from the Action Plan: MEETING MINUTES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 18, 1999 "It is a continuation of the City's Vision's process for certain improvements in the downtown CRA area. It is proposed that certain improvements will benefit from these. Upon completion of this plan public facilities will be constructed in this area that will also eliminate blight." Therefore, the funds were not specified for any particular project. Mr. Finkelstein inquired if some of the funds could be used to purchase vacant lots. Ms. Sherrod said acquisition was allowable, but you pannot bank land with CDBG funds. Ms. Sherrod stated if land were purchased, it should be purchased with a specific purpose. Mr. Finkelstein inquired if the land could be used to construct single family homes for Iow- income citizens. Ms. Sherrod said people who would be recipients of these, homes would have to be identified first. Mr. Finkelstein inquired if there were any people in this program waiting for homes. Ms. Sherrod said there are several applicants, but Ms. Sherrod said that because of federal restrictions, it was more feasible for the City to usg its own funds for this program, which is less restrictive. Mr. Finkelstein asked how a person would approach the Community Improvement Office with a specific project? Ms. Sherrod said the purpose of tonight's meeting was to inform her Office of particular plans and how the residents would like to see the funds applied. Mr. Finkelstein said he would like to see the funds earmarked for downtown for blighted areas. In particular there are a couple pieces of property that are vacant and the roofs are caving in and the funds could be used to acquire the property for demolition. Ms. Sherrod inquired if Mr. Finkelstein purchased this property, would he make it available for others to purchase. Ms. Sherrod said that land could be purchased downtown and then sold to a developer, but those funds would become income from CDBG funding and the funds would have to be used for other CDBG eligible activities and would in turn become part of the entitlement allocation. Ms. Sherrod stated that CDBG funds cannot lose their identity. Ms. Sherrod said she would research this further. Mr. Finkelstein asked about the timing of submitting his ideas and Ms. Sherrod said Mr. Finkelstein should make it known to others because she is going to begin the action plan for next year. Mr. Finkelstein inquired when the funds would be available and Ms. Sherrod said there might be some funds available now but are usually available by October 1st. Ms. Stephanie Mingo-McKoy inquired if involvement with youth, both educationally and recreationally, would fall under the category of Public Services. Also, Ms. Mingo-McKoy 2 MEETING MINUTES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 18, 1999 asked how much funds would be allocated for this particular category. Ms. Sherrod informed Ms. Mingo-McKoy that the category Public Services is divided into two different entities. 15% of the funding can go for public services, which could be a wide variety of public services. It could include a food shelter, a non-profit organization that feeds people daily, a tutoring or mentoring program and those types of services: Ms. Sherrod said when considering an application, it is determined that the sole livelihood of the organization is not based on CDBG fund and the CDBG funds are a tool to assist an organization. Ms. Sherrod's Office would need to see statistics on the needs of the organization, as well as some history of the organization. Ms. Sherrod said it is important to have figures on how many children have benefited from the organization, as well as the poverty level and income level of the children who would be benefited. This is very important. Ms. Mingo-McKoy said she is looking for a place where her organization can place computers for use by the children utilizing the Library, but stated her organization is n6t a profitable organization and is grant supported. Ms. Mingo-McKoy said the main focus of her organization is to help youth become productive citizens. Mr. Finkelstein stated he thought the City was going to institute this type of program at the Civic Center. Ms. Sherrod asked if Ms. Mingo-McKoy had a specific plan and she said she did. Ms. Sherrod requested that Ms. Mingo-McKoy put her plan in writing on an application. Ms. Sherrod said it is important in making application that the entire organization is not totally dependent upon CDBG funds. Ms, Sherrod stated she receives a groat deal of literature on youth and the etdedy, 'which are two important focus points and there are always grants available in these areas. However, Ms, Sherrod said they usually look for matching funds. Ms. Katherine Murphy inqu. ired if funds would be available to assist in building an out-of- school program for Iow to moderate-income families. Ms. Sherrod asked the person to clarify this and she said it would be an after-school program. Ms. Sherrod said that 51% of the participants must include very Iow.-income people. Ms. Mingo-McKoy asked what scale is used to determine income. Ms. Sherrod said they' utilize the income criteda established by HUD. Ms. Sherrod said income is adjusted for family size and is based on census and the median income in Palm Beach County. Ms. Sherrod stated that the latest statistics for Palm Beach County show the median income for a family of four is $55,000. This would mean that usually you would be dealing with families that are below 50% of the median for Palm Beach County. Ms. Sherrod said that all records must be open for monitoring by her Office, since HUD also monitors the records. 3 MEETING MINUTES. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 18, 1999 Ms. Sherrod stated that in establishing a program for youth, the organization needs to utilize an application that would determine what the income level is for the applicants. Ms. Sherrod said that in the summer youth program the cdtaria was if a student was eligible for free lunch, they would be eligible for CDBG funding. Mr. Hendrick said that they have started an organization called "Citizen's Concerned About Our Children" and their first project was to establish a tutorial program. They were able to do so, but because of lack of funds, they joined the PAL Program to provide services to children who were having difficulty in school. Mr. Hendrick said they would like to be incorporated and asked if this type of program might be eligible for funds. Ms. Sherrod said it might be possible, and Ms. Sherrod explained what would be necessary for the organization to make application for funds. Ms. Sherrod said she would have to look further into their request for funding, but thought funds for recreation were not covered if it were earmarked for equipment. Ms. Sara Williams inquired if the funds, for the redevelopment program included downtown redevelopment and Ms. Sherrod said the Central Business Distdct is the specific area for these funds. Ms. Williams inquired about the job training programs that could be funded and Ms. Sherrod said it was specifically geared for welfare-to-work people who were under trained and under educated. Ms. Sherrod said that an RFP was advertised for this program and that an Agency had been approved recently and a contract is in the process of being signed. Ms. Williams questioned that the funds are not being used for the targeted group of low to moderate-income people. Ms. Williams noted the cost for summer camp increased from $80 to $200 per child and most of the money is being curtailed for the targeted youth. Ms. Williams said that more money should be allocated toward summer camp and other initiatives to enhance the quality of life of our youth. Ms. Williams said that more participation by the residents in these headngs for the allocation of the funds was' necessary. Ms. Sherrod said that one .of the federal requirements is that the meetings be advertised in a newspaper with general circulation and the meetings were advised in the Palm Beach Post because it reaches a wide audience and this advertisement costs a great deal of money. Ms. Sherrod said they couldn't control who attends these hearings. Ms. Williams said it should be advertised at the Community Forum. Ms. Sherrod stated that the Community Forum only reaches one specific group and Ms. Sherrod said it must be advertised for everyone to see. Ms. Williams said the Community Forum could be used in addition to the newspaper. 4 MEETING MINUTES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 18, 1999 Mr. Tom Williams added that the Forum is open to everyone in the City. Further, Mr. Williams felt that all single mothers in the City who cannot pay $200 per child should be able to send their children to summer camp. Mr. Williams noted that the City offers parents an opportunity to earn credits by volunteering in order to send their children to summer camp. Mr. Williams said single parent mothers do not have time to do volunteer work and these single parent mothers have to worry about feeding their children. Mr. Williams further stated that the City of Boynton Beach has become very greedy. Mr. Williams said he is getting together with some other concerned citizens and is going to contact HUD to determine what is going on in the City and that the money is not being used as intended. Mr. Williams said there used to be game rooms for the children in the Civic Center, but it was closed down several years ago. Mr: Hendrick stated that no matter how well the City is built if we don't do something for the youth that will be using the City in the future, it is a waste. There must be things In place to keep the children from being idle and a place for them to go where they are being supervised. Mr: Henddck noted that there are students in the PAL program that are A students, but if a child has nothing to do, he goes with the crowd. Mr. Hendrick said drugs are killing the community. Mr. Henddck said that because of the availability of some small programs in the City, things are not as bad as they could be and the City needs more programs. Mr. Williams said that Boynton Beach couldn't become an All America City if the Police Department chases children out of the Library. Mr. Finkelstein inquired about the allocation of $25,000 for the two parks. Ms. Sherrod said the funds were for land acquisition and design. Ms. Sherrod said the City does not have a park in the south area of Boynton Beach. Ms. Sherrod said the biggest problem with rectifying the situation is that there is no land for a park. The City has been looking at pocket areas to determine their use for a basketball court or baseball diamond. Ms. Sherrod said the City has been talking to some landowners about purchasing their property and the City is in the design process on some of the parks. Ms. Sherrod said the Palmetto Green Park would be an extension of the park on the east side of NE 13~ Avenue. Ms. Sherrod also said there have been talks with Mr. Zill about his property, which is a mango farm and the possibility of using some of his property for a park. It is important that the park not be located too far south. Mr. Finkelstein said he knew of a large piece of land that was available in the location being considered and Ms. Sherrod requested he send her some information on the property. MEETING MINUTES . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 18, 1999 Ms. Mingo-McKoy inquired what "Interim Assistance" under eligible activities pertained to and Ms. Sherrod said she would look this up to make certain what it enCompassed. Ms. Williams inquired further about the job training program mentioned eadier and Ms. Sherrod said that LISC responded to the job training request. Ms. Sherrod said that since she did not get much response to the ad she called other organizations including Workforce Development Board and Tech Center in Deiray. LISC will be receiving $50,000, which is last year's and this year's allocation and they will be matching the funds. LlSC will be providing the manpower for education, training and technical support for Community Development Corporations to get on board. The Weed and Seed people will also be working with LlSC. Ms. Sherrod said that Construction Management Institute, Inc. responded to the economic development portion of the request and this would be a program in conjunction with FAU where people can receive degrees and/or certificates from FAU. People will be trained in non-traditional, above-minimum wage jobs and obtain skills that' can develop into careers. Also, the program will be available for training women in non- traditional jobs, such as electricians and plumbers. Ms. Mingo,McKoy inquired if it would be a conflict of interest if the City's Recreation Department formed a partnership with one of the organizations in their proposal. Ms. Sherrod said an applicant could be creative. Ms. Sherrod said that economic opportunity is a new area and is being prioritized by the federal government. Ms. Williams said that at last year's hearing she recommended that money be used for the Wilson Pool and questioned if anything has been done along these lines. Ms. Williams said that she heard the pool was in great need of renovations. Mr. Tom Williams said the Pool is being worked on and is being taken care of. Ms. Mingo-MCKoy inquired if the City owned Quantum Park. Mr. Finkelstein said that the City owns a lO-acre parcelin Quantum Park. Mr. Hendrick asked if the Senior Center had been pumhased. Ms. Sherrod said it has been bought and paid for. Mr. Hendrick inquired about the $120,200 budgeted for the Senior Center. Ms. Sherrod said that the City is reimbursing itself for paying for the Senior Center. Ms. Sherrod said these funds are strictly acquisition funds and do not include any kind of equipment. 6 MEETING MINUTES. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MARCH 18, 1999 Ms. Sherrod informed the audience that this is not the only place people can express their concerns. People are at liberty to go before the City Commission to tell them how you feel. Ms. Sherrod said the Plan is due on August 15, 1999 with HUD, but she intended to file the Plan before that date. There being no further business, the meeting properly adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara M. Madden Recording Secretary (two tapes) 7 No 605007 NOTICE TO CITIZENS -The City of Boynt°n Beach Community Development Block Grant Program One-Year Action Plan - Public Hearing A public headng will be held Tuesday, August 3rd, 1999, in Commission Chambers at City Hall 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FI 33435 b_ln S~upport of its. Five Y..earStrategic Plan, the city of Bo nton eacn prop.oses ~o use ;~s FY 99/00 CDBG Funds for the~ollow- mg project activities (beginning 10/02/99): · Housing Reh.abilitation Grants .............. $210.000 (to very-low ;nCome hOmeowners) · Sidewalk Installation (within target area) ....................... $70,000 · Emergency R.ehabilitations Grants ............ $30,000 (to very-low ~ncome homeowners) · PUblic Services ' · $82 050 (Crime ........................ , Prevention/Neighborhood Stabilization Youth Mentodng and Housing Development) ' · Economic Development Administrative Costs ............. $30,000 ...................... $109,400 (In.c. lu..d, ing costs associated with promoting fair housing actiwties) , U_nproDosed projects ..... _..__~..$15,550 TOTAL FOR FISCAL YEAR: _The Plan.. will be available for review at the Ci".'- ~'.'.--'-'- - ~y o ~lVl,~lon .o.,! uommum~, Redevelopment, located in the West Wing of City Hall, 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard. Contact Octavia $. Sharrod at (561) 742-6066. Published: July 28, 1999