05-018 5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ORDINANCE NO. 0S- 0 18
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING THE RENAISSANCE
COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT;
ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THAT
DISTRICT; APPOINTING THE INITIAL BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS; PROVIDING FOR POWERS OF THE
BOARD; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY, CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, Compson Associates of Boynton LLC submitted a
petition to the City for the creation of a community development district to be known as the
Renaissance Commons Community Development District ("District"), in accordance with
Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the petition which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part
hereof contains the information required in Section 190.005(9)(a), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the petition was conducted by the City Commission
on March 1, 2005, at City Hall in accordance with the requirements of Sections 190.005(2)(b)
and 190.005 (1) (d), Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has reviewed the six (6) factors set forth in Section
190.005(1)(e) and the record of the public hearing held on March 1, 2005, in making its
determination as to whether to grant or deny the establishment of the Renaissance Commons
Community Development District; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that:
1. That all statements contained within the Petition have been found to be true and
correct.
S:\CA\Ordinances\Planning\CDD Renaissance Commons.doc
Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
2. That the creation of the District is not inconsistent with any applicable element
or portion of the State Comprehensive Plan or of the effective local government comprehensive
plan.
3. That the land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, sufficiently
compact and sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated
community.
4. That the creation of the District is the best alternative available for delivering the
community development services and facilities to the lands within the District boundaries.
5. That the proposed services and facilities to be provided by the District are not
incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community services and
facilities.
6. That the area identified in the Petition is amenable to be included in the
proposed District; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has determined that the creation of the Renaissance
Commons Community Development District would be consistent with the criteria for
community development districts as set forth in the Uniform Community Development District
Act of 1980,Chapter 190, Florida Statutes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1. Each Whereas clause set forth above is true and correct and herein
incorporated by this reference.
S:\CA\Ordinances\Planning\CDD Renaissance Commons.doc
Page 2 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
Section 2. In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, the
City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida hereby establishes a community
development district as follows:
CREATION ANDNAME: There is hereby created a Community Development
District to be known as RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNTY DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The legal description for the Community Development
District is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference in attachment to the Petition
which is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance. In addition, a map depicting the land area
to be serviced by the District is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit "B" and incorporated
herein by reference.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: The initial Board of Supervisors are as follows. Their
terms, powers and duties are as described in Chapter 190, Florida Statues:
(a) James Comparato
(b) Stephen B. Liller
(c) Timothy R. Kelly
(d) Carl Klepper, Jr.
(e) Robert D'Angelo
Section 3. The Board of Supervisors shall have only such powers as set forth in
Florida Statutes 190.011 and 190.012.
Section 4. That any individuals who purchase property in the District should be
advised of the existence of the District, as well as the costs associated with owning property
within the District.
S:\CA\Ordinances\Planning\CDD Renaissance Commons.doc
Page 3 of 4
1 Section 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the
2 same are hereby repealed.
3
Section 6. Should any section or provision of this ordinance or portion hereof, any
4 paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
5 such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance.
6
Section 7. Authority is hereby granted to codify said ordinance.
7
8
Section 8. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this i day of ~~ ,2005.
9
10
SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this I D day of
,2005.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 ATTEST:
28
33~
34
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
¢o--,ss,oner
' Co~issioner
S:\CA\Or'cii%nCes~hg\CDD Renaissance Commons.doc
Page 4 of 4
IN RE:
BEFORE THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH )
THE RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY )
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT )
PETITION
COMPSON ASSOCIATES OF BOYNTON LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the
"Petitioner"), hereby petitions the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida,
pursuant to the "Uniform Community Development Distdct Act of 1980," Chapter 190, Flodda
Statutes, as amended and supplemented (herein, the "Act). Specifically this Petition is made
pursuant to Section 190.005(2) of the Act, to establish a community development district with
respect to the lands described herein. In support of the Petition, Petitioner states:
1. The proposed Distdct (as defined below) is located within the incorporated area
of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. Exhibit I depicts the general location of the proposed
District. The proposed District covers approximately 86.98 +/- acres of land. The real property
within the boundary of the proposed District is a parcel of land located West of the Lake Worth
Drainage District Canal E-4, North of Canal C-16, East of Congress Avenue and South of
Gateway Boulevard. The metes and bounds description of the extemal boundaries of the
Distdct is set forth on Exhibit 2.
2. Attached to this Petition as Exhibit 3 and made a part hereof are the written
consents to the establishment of the Distdct by the owners of 100% of the real property to be
included in the District.
3. The five persons designated to serve as initial members of the Board of
Supervisors of the proposed District are as follows:
Name
James Comparato
Stephen B. Liller
Timothy R. Kelly
Cad Klepper, Jr.
Robert D'Angelo
4. The proposed name of the District to be established is the Renaissance
Commons Community Development District (the "District").
5. There are no existing major trunk water mains, sewer interceptors and outfalls.
6. The proposed timetable for the construction of Distdct improvements is shown on
.Exhibit 4, as well as the estimated cost of constructing the improvements. This is a good faith
estimate but is not binding on the Petitioner or the Distdct and is subject to change.
7. The future general distribution, location and extent of public and private uses
within the Distdct are consistent with the zoning category of suburban mixed use. The proposed
WPB-FS 1 ~SANFORDS~505930v14~57161.010200
uses are also consistent with the future land use plan element of the Comprehensive Plan of the
City of Boynton Beach, Flodda (the "City"). The future land use map is shown on Exhibit 5. It is
further anticipated that the subject lands will be permitted to be developed for approximately 310
townhomes ranging in approximate square footage of 1,800 to 2,100 with prices ranging from
$310,000 to $450,000 and 1382 condominium units. The square footage and price ranges of
the condominium units have not yet been determined. It is also expected that there will be
approximately 337,653 square feet of commercial space consisting of retail, office and self
storage. The Petitioner intends that the District will finance (i) surface water management and
control systems, including related earthwork, (ii) water distribution and wastewater collection
and transmission facilities, (iii) onsite wetlands mitigation, (iv) readway improvements, (vi)
landscaping and irrigation in public rights of way, and (v) related incidental costs which may
include the acquisition of real property in conjunction with any and all of the above, but
particularly associated with surface water management, onsite wetlands mitigation, and
readway improvements (collectively, the "Public Infrastructure"). Upon completion by the
Petitioner of the water distribution and wastewater collection and transmission facilities and
acquisition by the District, such facilities will be dedicated to the City to be connected to the
City's existing water and wastewater lines.
8. Exhibit 6 is a statement of estimated regulatory costs prepared in accordance
with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes.
9. Petitioner hereby requests that the preposed District be granted the dght to
exercise all powers provided for in Section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes and the additional
powers listed in Section 190.012(2)(a) and (d).
10. The Petitioner is Compson Associates of Boynton LLC, a Florida limited liability
company. The Petitioner, acting on behalf of itself and certain related entities and Town and
Country Builders, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Town and Country") as the landowners, owns 100
percent of the real preperty to be included in the preposed District. Petitioner and Town and
Country will develop the land within the District, including the construction of the Public
Infrastructure, which will be acquired by the District. It is contemplated that the vertical
improvements on the developed lots will be constructed by the Petitioner and Town and Country
and possibly other builders. Copies of all correspondence and official notices should also be
sent to: Stephen D. Sanford, Esq., c/o Greenberg Traurig, P.A., 777 South Flagler Ddve, Suite
300 East, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401; (561)650-7945.
11. The preperty within the proposed District is amenable to operating as an
independent special district for the following reasons:
(a) Establishment of the District and all land uses and services planned within the
proposed District are consistent with applicable elements or portions of the effective City's
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, as amended.
(b) The area of land within the preposed District is of sufficient size and is sufficiently
compact and contiguous to be developed as one functional interrelated community.
(c) The community development services of the Distdct will be compatible with the
capacity and use of existing local and regional community development services and facilities.
(d) The proposed District will be the best altemative available for delivering
community development services to the area to be served because (i) the District provides a
WPB'-FS I~,ANFORDS~505930v14~'7161.010200
2
governmental entity for delivering those services and facilities in a manner that does not
financially impact persons residing outside the District, (ii) the Act authorizes a community
development district to acquire infrastructure improvements previously constructed by the
Petitioner or allows for a community development district to, in the first instance, construct such
infrastructure improvements, (iii) the timing for the creation of the proposed District and the
issuance of special assessment bonds is compatible with the timing for the construction and
acquisition of such infrastructure improvements which will result in direct benefit to the
landowners and their assigns within the District, (iv) establishment of a community development
district in conjunction with a comprehensive planned community, as proposed, allows for a more
efficient use of resources as well as providing the opportunity for new growth to pay for itself,
and (v) establishment of the Distdct will provide a perpetual entity capable of making reasonable
provisions for the operation and maintenance of many of the District services and facilities.
12. The Petitioner undertakes on behalf of the District that the Distdct will provide full
disclosure of information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements to
real property to be undertaken by the District as required by Section 190.009 and Section
190.048, FIodda Statutes of the Act, as amended.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
WPB'FSl~SANF~5930vl 4~57161.010200
3
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the City Commission of Boynton Beach,
Florida to:
Hold a public hearing as required by Section 190.005(1)(d), Florida Statutes to consider
the establishment of the Renaissance Commons Community Development District; and
,
Enact an ordinance pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, granting this Petition and
establishing the Renaissance Commons Community Development District.
Respectfully submitted this j ~,~ ~'J). day of December, 2004.
,a
W PB-FS I~.~^N FORDS~05930v08VI 1/8/0447161.010200 4
Exhibit 1 --
Exhibit 2 --
Exhibit 3 --
Exhibit 4 --
Exhibit 5 --
Exhibit 6 --
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
EXHIBITS
Location Map
Legal Description
Consents and Proofs of Ownership
Construction Timetable and Good Faith Cost Estimate
Future Land Use Map from the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
Comprehensive Plan depicting the location of the proposed District
Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
WPB-FS1~SANFORDS~505930vl 3~12/10/04~57161.010200 5
RENAISSANCE COMMONS LOCATION MAP
SUBJECT PROPERTYI
0 187.5 375 750 1,125 1,500
-- -- Fee{
951 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 320
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
SURVEYING & MAPPING
Certificate of Authorization No. LB7264
Tel: (561) 241-9988
Fax: (561) 241-5182
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(NOT A SURVEY)
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ALL OF "RENAISSANCE COMMONS, A P,U.D.", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED [N PLAT BOOK 102 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 62 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLOR]DA.
TOGETHER WITH:
ALL OF "RENAISSANCE COMMONS PLAT TWO, A P.U.D.", ACCORD[NO TO THE PLAT
THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 103 AT PAGES 104 THROUGH 107 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT TRACTS Z-I, Z-2 AND Z-
3, THEREOF.
SAID LANDS SITUATE IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND CONTAIN 84.909 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
NOTES
1. REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID
WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED
SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
2. NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WAS MADE
IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION.
ABBREVIATIONS
L
C0NC.
COR.
D
D.E.
I.R.
I .R.C.
L.B.
L.S.
MON.
O.R.B.
P.O.B.
P.O.C.
P.B.
P.B.C.R.
PG,
P.S.M.
R/W
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON
COMPLIES WITH MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS CONTAINED IN
CHAPTER 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THAT SAID SKETCH AND
DESCRIPTION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF AS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION.
ARCLENGTH
CONCRETE
CORNER
DELTA (CENTRAL ANGLE)
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
IRON ROD
IRON ROD AND CAP
LICENSED BUSINESS
LICENSED SURVEYOR
MONUMENT
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PLAT BOOK
PALM BEACH COUNTY RECORDS
PAGE
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
~ MAPPER
RIGHT-OF-WAY
UTILITY EASEMENT
JEFF S. HODAPP
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA LICENSE NO. LS5111
LAST DATE OF FIELD WORK : NOT A SURVEY
DATE: 2/24/2005
dSH
JS SHEET 1 OF 2
JPFojec* Nome, REN~SSANCE COMNONS I
JOB NO. 02151 DWG BY,
CK'D By=
8
Z-I
TRACT F~
TRACT A-6
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(NOT A SURVEY~
GATEWAY BOULEVARD
NOT
INCLUDED
TRACT t~7
TRACT
TRACT D-5
TRACT
TRACT Z-I
TRACT
TRACT
TRACT
TRACT
TRACT A-4
TRACT C-I
TRAC~ F I
TRACT O-4
TRACT A-I
TR,,~.T D-5
TRACT
TRACT D-2
TRACT C-I
TRACT Ad
TRACT A-$
TRACT
TRACT
TRACT A-2
TRACT A-2
TRACT E-3
TRACT
IJOB NO.
02151
BOYNTON CANAL C-16
tProject Nome, RENAISSANCE COMMONS I DWG BY: JSH SCALE: 1"'300'
X I CK'D By: JS DATE: 2/24~2005 SHEET 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT 3-A
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND CONSENT
TO THE CREATION OF
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
On this ~ day of December, 2004, personally appeared before me, an officer duly
authorized to adminis'[er oaths and take acknowledgments, Stephen B. Liller, who, after being duly
sworn, deposes and says:
1. Affiant, Stephen B. Liller, an individual, is a Vice President of Town and
Country Builders, Inc., a Florida corporation (herein, the "Corporation").
2. The Corporation is the owner of the following described property, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property").
3. Affiant, Stephen B. Liller, hereby represents that he has full authority to
execute all documents and instruments on behalf of the Corporation, relating
to the Petition before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, to enact an ordinance to establish the Renaissance Commons
Community Development District (the "Proposed CDD").
4. The Property represents a portion of the real property to be included in the
Proposed CDD.
5.Affiant, Stephen B. Liller, on behalf of the Corporation, as the sole owner of
the Property in the capacity described above, hereby consents to the
establishment of the Proposed CDD. ~
FURTHER, AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. ~~
Stephen B. Liller
Subscribed and sworn to before me this (~ ~ day of December, 2004, by Stephen B.
Liller, a Vice President of Town and Country Bail'dare, Inc., a Florida ~..p.~.~.who personally
appeared before me, I~'~s personally known to me or [] produced -
identification. _ as
[NOTARIAL SEAL]
WPB-FS 1 ~d~IFORDS~505930v0~I 1/8/04~7161 ~010200
Notary:
Print Name'.*
Notary Public, State of Florida
My Commission Expires:
951 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 320
Boca PatCh, Florida 33487
SURVEYING & MAPPING
Certificate of Aulhorization No. U37264
Tel: (561) 241-9988
Fax: (561) 241-5182
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(NOT A SURVEY)
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
TOWN AND COUNTRY PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS I THROUGH 240, TRACTS A-I, A-2, B-I, B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5, B-6, F,
AND G-I THROUGH G-II, ALL IN "RENAISSANCE COMMONS, A P.U.D.", ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 102 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH
62 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
TOGETHER WITH:
TRACTS D-5, D-6 AND B-8 OF "RENAISSANCE COMMONS PLAT TWO, A P.U.D.", ACCORDING
TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 103 AT PAGES 104 THROUGH 107 OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
SAID LANDS SITUATE IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND CONTAIN 27.453 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
NOTES
1. REPRODUCTIONS OF THiS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID
WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED
SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
2. NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WAS MADE
iN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION.
ABBREVIATIONS
L
CONC.
COP.
D
D.E.
I.R.
I .R.C.
L.B.
L.S.
MON.
O.R.B.
P.O.B.
P.O.C.
P.B.
P.B.C.R.
PG.
P.S.M.
R/W
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON
COMPLIES WITH MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS CONTAINED IN
CHAPTER 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THAT SAID SKETCH AND
DESCRIPTION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF AS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION.
ARCLENGTH
CONCRETE
CORNER
DELTA (CENTRAL ANGLE)
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
IRON ROD
IRON ROD AND CAP
LICENSED BUSINESS
LICENSED SURVEYOR
MONUMENT
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
POINT OF BEG[NNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PLAT BOOK
PALM BEACH COUNTY RECORDS
PAGE
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
8 MAPPER
RIGHT-OF-WAY
UTILITY EASEMENT
JEFF S. HODAPP
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA LICENSE NO. LS5111
ILAST DATE OF FIELD WORK :
JoBPr°jectNO. Non"~,02151RENNSSANCE COMMONS DW¢ BY: JSH
CK'D B~, JS
NOT A SURVEY
DATE: 2/24~2005
SHEET 1 OF 2
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Z-I
TRACT
TRACT
TRACT Z-I
TRACT D-7
TRACT
(NOT A SURVEY)
GATEWAY BOULEVARD
NOT
INCLUDED
TRACT A-5
TRACT F-I
8
TRACT D*9
TRACT D-8
TRACT D-I
TRACT C-I
TRACT
TRACT A-5
TRACT L~4
TRACT E-4
TRACT D-2
TRACT C-I
TRACT
TRACT E-.~
TRACT A-5
TRACT C'2
IJOB NO.
02151
I Pr-ojec* Nome: RENAISSANCE COMMONS
X
BOYNTON CANAL C-16
I DWG BY: JSH
CK'D By: JS
SCALE: 1"-300'
DATE, 2/24/2005
SHEET 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT 3-B
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND CONSENT
TO THE CREATION OF
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) ss
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
On this Oj ~
day of December, 2004, personally appeared before me, an officer duly
authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, James Comparato, who, after being
duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. Affiant, James Comparato, an individual, is the Manager of Compson
Associates of Boynton LLC, a Florida limited liability company, the
Manager of Compson Associates of Boynton II, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company, and a principal of certain other related entities formed
and to be formed (herein, collectively, the "Companies").
2. The Companies are the owners of the following described property, to wit:
See Exhibit "A' attached hereto (the "Property").
3. Affiant, James Comparato, hereby represents that he has full authority to
execute all documents and instruments on behalf of the Companies,
including the Petition before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida, to enact an ordinance to establish the Renaissance
Commons Community Development District (the "Proposed CDD").
4. The Property represents a portion of the real property to be included in the
Proposed CDD.
5. Affiant, James Comparato, on behalf of the Companies, as the sole owner
of the Property in the capacity describe~ove, hereby consents to the
establishment of the Proposed CDD. / / ~
FURTHER, AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. { /..,~., . ~.~ .__ X
~ Su. bsc..ribe.d, and sworn to before [~ th/ ~ 'C~ay~f/December, 2004, by James
L;omparmo,~ne Manager of Compson/Ksso~of'ates of Boynton LLC, a Florida limited liability
compa~,~the Manager of Compson /~so/~ates of Boynton Il, LLC, a Florida limited liability
c.o_..FH~ny, and a principal of Certain otl'fer"related entities, who personally appeared before me,
~is personally known to me or E] produced as identification.
[NOTARIAL SEAL]
Notary Public~tate o~ plorjda --
My Commission Expire~ ~,~_.., /~, D_,,3 0 "tz---
WPB-FS [\SANFORDSk522538v01 \ 12~7/~M~57161.01 t 12()~)
951 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 320
Boca Patch, Florida 33487
SURVEYING & MAPPING
Certificate of Authorization No. LB7264
Tel: (561) 241-9988
Fax: (561) 241-5182
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(NOT A SURVEY)
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
COMPSON ASSOCIATES PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
TRACTS A-3, B-7, C-I, C-2, D-I, D-2, E-I, E-2, E-3, H-I AND H-2, ALL IN
"RENAISSANCE COMMONS, A P.U.D.% ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK IO2 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 62 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
TOGETHER WITH:
TRACTS A-4, A-5, A-6, D-3, D-4, D-7, D-8, D-9, E-4 THROUGH E-7, F-I AND F-2,
ALL IN "RENAISSANCE COMMONS PLAT TWO, A P.U.D.", ACCORDING TO THE
PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 103 AT PAGES 104 THROUGH 107
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
SAID LANDS SITUATE IN THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND CONTAIN 57.455 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
NOTES
1. REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH ARE NOT VALID
WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED
SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER.
2. NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS WAS MADE
IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION.
ABBREVIATIONS
L
CONG.
COR.
D
D.E.
].R.
] .R.C.
L.B.
L.S.
MON.
O.R.B.
P.O.B.
P.O.C.
P.B.
P.B,C.R,
PG.
P.S.M.
R/W
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON
COMPLIES WITH MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS CONTAINED IN
CHAPTER 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND THAT SAID SKETCH AND
DESCRIPTION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF AS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION.
ARCLENGTH
CONCRETE
CORNER
DELTA (CENTRAL ANGLE)
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
IRON ROD
IRON ROD AND CAP
LICENSED BUSINESS
LICENSED SURVEYOR
MONUMENT
OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK
POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PLAT BOOK
PALM BEACH COUNTY RECORDS
PAGE
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR
8 MAPPER
RIGHT-OF-WAY
UTILITY EASEMENT
JEFF S. HODAPP
SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
FLORIDA LICENSE NO. LS5111
I LAST DATE OF FIELD WORK : NOT A SURVEY I
Project No~= REN/~SSANCE COMMONS DW6 BY; DATE: 2/24/2005
IJOB NO. 02151 JSH
CK'D By-' JS SHEET 1 OF 2
SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(NOT A SURVEY)
GATEWAY BOULEVARD
NOT
INCLUDED
TRACT 0'5
TR,~T D'6
TRACT
TRACT A-!
TRACT
TRACT A-2
-- TRACT
IJOBNO.
02151
TRACT A-I
BOYNTON CANAL C-16
Projecf Nome= RENAISSANCE COMMONS DWC BY: JSH SCALE= 1":500' I
X CK'D By: JS DATE; 2/24/2005I SHEET 2 OF 2
EXHIBIT 4-B
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
GOOD FAITH COST ESTIMATE
Stormwater Drainage, including related earthwork
Water and Sewer System
Landscaping and Irrigation in public rights of way
Roadway Improvements, including paving,
lighting, striping and signage
Onsite Tree Relocation Mitigation
street
TOTAL
$1,745,000
$2,123,061
$2,331,776
$3,012,502
$ 800,000
$10,012,339
EXHIBIT 4-B
RENAISSANCE COMMONS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
GOOD FAITH COST ESTIMATE
Stormwater Drainage, including related earthwork
Water and Sewer System
Landscaping and Irrigation in public dghts of way
Roadway Improvements, including paving, street lighting,
striping and signage
Onsite Wetlands Mitigation
TOTAL
$1,745,000
$2,123,061
$2,331,776
$3,012,502
~ 800,000
$10,012,339
WPB-FS1~SANFORDS~505930v14~57'I61.010200
RENAISSANCE COMMONS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
December, 2004
Prepared by
Special District Services, Inc.
11000 Prosperity Farms Road, Suite 104
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
(561) 630-4922 Phone
(561) 630-4923 Fax
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs ("SERC") supports the petition to
establish the Renaissance Commons Community Development District ("District"). The
District comprises approximately 86.98+/- acres of land located in the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in
Section 190.002(2) (d), F.S. (governing community development district establishment)
as follows:
"That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be
fair and based only on factors material to managing and fmancing the service delivery
function of the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or planning of the
development is not material or relevant."
1.2 Overview of Renaissance Commons Community Development District
The District is designed to provide district infrastructure, services, and facilities along
with their operations and maintenance to a master planned residential development
containing 1692 residential units within the boundaries of the District consisting of
townhomes and condominium units. There will also be approximately 337,653 square
feet of commercial space.
1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs
Section 120.541 (2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory
costs must contain:
(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to
comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely
to be affected by the rule.
(b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local
government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any
anticipated effect on state and local revenues.
(c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals
and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the
requirements of the ordinance. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct
costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include
filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed
or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional
operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting.
(d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S.,
and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section
120.52, F.S. The City of Boynton Beach is not defined as a small City for purposes of
this requirement.
(e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful.
(f) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good
faith written proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement adopting
the alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the
proposed ordinance.
"Note: the references to "rule" in the statutory requirements for the Statement of
Estimated Regulatory Costs also apply to an "ordinance" under section 190.005(2) (a),
Florida Statutes."
2.0
3.0
3.1
A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required
to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of
individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance.
The Renaissance Commons Community Development District will serve land that
comprises approximately 86.98+/- acres of residential development to be made up of an
estimated 1692 residential units as described above. The estimated population of the
District is 3350 +/-. The property owners in the District will be individuals and may own
and operate industrial, manufacturing and other retail and non-retail related businesses
outside the boundaries of the District.
A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local
government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any
anticipated effect on state or local revenues.
There is no state agency promulgating any rule relating to this project that is anticipated
to effect state or local revenues.
Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance
Because the results of enacting the ordinance is establishment of a local special purpose
government, there will be no enforcing responsibilities of any other government entity,
but there will be various implementing responsibilities which are identified with their
costs herein.
State Governmental Entities
There will be only modest costs to various State governmental entities to implement and
enforce the proposed establishment of the District. The District as established on the
proposed land, will encompass under 1,000 acres, therefore, the City of Boynton Beach is
the establishing entity under 190.005(2), F.S. The modest costs to various State entities
to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance relate strictly to the receipt and
processing of various reports that the District is required to file with the State and its
various entities. Appendix A lists the reporting requirements. The costs to those State
agencies that will receive and process the District's reports are very small, because the
District is only one of many governmental units that are required to submit the various
reports. Therefore, the marginal cost of processing one additional set of reports is
inconsequential. Additionally, pursuant to section 189.412, F.S., the District must pay an
annual fee to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs which offsets such
costs.
3.2
4.0
City of Boynton Beach
There will be only modest costs to the City for a number of reasons. First, review of the
petition to establish the District does not include analysis of the project itself. Second,
the petition itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. Third, the
City already possesses the staff needed to conduct the review without the need for new
staff. Fourth, there is no capital required to review the petition. Finally, the City
routinely processes similar petitions though for entirely different subjects, for land uses
and zoning changes that are far more complex than is the petition to establish a
community development district.
The annual costs to City of Boynton Beach, because of the establishment of the District,
are also very small. The District is an independent unit of local government. The only
annual costs the City faces are the minimal costs of receiving and reviewing the various
reports that the District is required to provide to the City. However, the Petitioner has
included a payment of $15,000 to offset any expense the City may incur in the processing
of the Petition, or in the monitoring of this District
Impact on State and Local Revenues
Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on state or local
revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed to
provide infrastructure facilities and services to serve the development project and it has
its own sources of revenue. No state or local subsidies are required or expected.
In this regard it is important to note that any debt obligations incurred by the District to
construct its infrastructure, or for any other reason, are not debts of the State of Florida or
any other unit of local government. In accordance with State law, debts of the District
are strictly its own responsibility.
A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals
and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance.
Table 1 provides an outline of the various facilities and services the proposed District
may provide. The water and sewer utilities, stormwater drainage, on site tree relocation
mitigation and certain offsite improvements will all be funded by the District.
Table 1
PROPOSED FACILITIES AND SERVICES
FACILITY FUNDED O&M BY OWNERSHIP
BY BY
Stormwater Drainage System CDD CDD CDD
Potable Water Supply System CDD City City
Sanitary Sewer System CDD City City
Landscaping & Irrigation CDD CDD CDD
Roadway Improvements CDD City/County/CDD City/County/CDD
Onsite Tree Relocation Mitigation CDD CDD CDD
The petitioner has estimated the costs for providing the capital facilities outlined in Table
1. The cost estimates are shown in Table 2 below. Total costs for those facilities, which
may be provided, are estimated to be approximately $10,012,339. The District may issue
special assessment bonds to fund all or a portion of the costs of these facilities. These
bonds would be repaid through non ad valorem special assessments levied on all
properties in the District that may benefit from the District's infrastructure program as
outlined in Table 2.
Prospective future landowners in the District may be required to pay non-ad valorem
assessments levied by the District to secure the debt incurred through bond issuance. In
addition to the levy of non ad valorem special assessments by various names for debt
service, the District may also impose a non-ad valorem assessment to fund the operations
and maintenance of the District and its facilities and services.
Furthermore, locating in the District by new property owners is completely voluntary.
So, ultimately, all owners and users of the affected property choose to accept the non ad
valorem special assessments as a tradeoff for the benefits and facilities that the District
provides.
A community development district ("CDD") provides property owners with the option of
having higher levels of facilities and services financed through self-imposed revenue.
The District is an alternative means to manage necessary development services with
related financing powers. District management is no more expensive, and often less
expensive, than the alternatives of a municipal service taxing unit (MSTU), a property
association, provision by the City, or through developer equity and/or bank loans.
In considering these costs it shall be noted that ownerSof the lands to be included within
the District will receive three major classes of benefits.
First, landowners in the District will receive a higher long-term sustained level of public
services and amenities sooner than would otherwise be the case.
Second, a CDD is a mechanism for assuring that the community services and amenities
will be completed concurrently with development of lands within the District. This
satisfies the current growth management legislation, and it assures that growth pays for
itself without undue burden on other consumers. Establishment of the District will ensure
that these landowners pay for the provision of facilities, services and improvements to
these lands.
Third, a CDD is the sole form of govemance which allows District landowners, through
landowner voting, to determine the type, quality and expense of District services they
receive, provided they meet the City's overall requirements.
The cost impact on the ultimate landowners in the District is not the total cost for the
District to provide infrastructure services and facilities. Instead, it is the incremental
costs above what the landowners would have paid to install infrastructure via an
alternative management mechanism. Given the low cost of capital for a CDD, the cost
impact to landowners is negligible. This incremental cost of the high quality
infrastructure provided by the District is likely to be fairly low.
Table 2
COST ESTIMATE FOR DISTRICT FACILITIES
Cost Estimates
Stormwater Drainage System $1,745,000
Potable Water Supply and Sewer Systems $ 2,123,061
Landscaping and Irrigation $ 2,331,776
Roadway Improvements $ 3,012,502
On Site Tree Relocation Mitigation $ 800,000
Total $10,012,339
5.0
An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S.,
and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by
Section 120.52, F.S.
There could be both positive and negative impacts on small businesses because of the
establishment of the District. Positive impacts could occur as a result of the additional
population in the District requiring more goods and services from small businesses.
Negative impacts could occur because of the increased competition generated by the new
business in the commercial area within the District. The City of Boynton Beach has an
estimated population in 2004 that is greater than 10,000; therefore the City is not defined
as a "small" City according to Section 120.52, F.S, and there will accordingly be no
impact on a small City because of the formation of the District. Palm Beach County has
an estimated population in 2004 that is greater than 75,000; therefore the County is not
defined as a "small" County according to Section 120.52, F.S, and there will accordingly
be no impact on a small County because of the formation of the District.
6.0 Any additional useful information.
The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic
theory, especially as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits.
Inputs were received from the petitioner's Engineer and other professionals associated
with the petitioner.
REPORT
APPENDIX A
LIST OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
FL. STATUE
CITATION
DUE DATE
Annual Financial Audit
Annual Financial Report
TRIM Compliance Report
Form 1: Statement of Financial
Interest
Public Facilities Report
Public Meetings Schedule
Bond Report
Registered Agent
Proposed Budget
Public Depositor Report
190.008
& 218.39
190.008
& 218.32
200.068
112.3145
189.415
189.417
218.38
189.416
190.008
280.17
12 months after end of fiscal year
12 months after end of fiscal year
no later than 30 days following the
adoption of the property tax levy
ordinance/resolution (if levying
property taxes)
within 30 days of accepting the
appointment, then every year thereafter
by 7/1 (by "local officers" appointed to
special district's board); during the
qualifying period, then every year
thereafter by 7/1 (by "local officers"
elected to special district's board)
within one year of special district's
creation; then annual notice of any
changes; and updated report every 5
years, 12 months prior to submission
of local government's evaluation and
appraisal report
quarterly, semiannually, or annually
when issued within 120 days after
delivery of bonds
within 30 days after first meeting of
goveming board
prior to October 1
annually by 11/30