Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
O86-37
090886-4 0151D ORDINANC~ NO. 86-~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH· FLORIDA· DETERMINING THAT CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT APPROVED IN ORDINANCE NO. 84-51· AND AMENDED IN ORDINANCE NO. 86-11, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATION UNDER CHAPTER 380· FLORIDA STATUTES, 1986· DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT REVIEW IS NECESSARY REGARDING SUCH CHANGES, APPROVING SUCH CHANGES· AND AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NOS. 84-51 and 86-11) FOR PURPOSES OF INCORPORATING THE APPROVED CHANGES WHEREAS, Riteco Development Corporation, a Florida corporation ("Riteco") filed with the City of Boynton Beach (the "City") an Application for Development Approval of Comprehensive Development of Regional Impact (the "ADA") on May 21, 1984, regarding that certain property (the "Property") described in Exhibit "A" · attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, the ADA was approved and the Development Order for the Property was granted December 18, 1984 pursuant to Ordinance No. 84-51 (the "Development Order"); and WHEREAS, Riteco subsequently conveyed its right, title and interest in and to the Property to Boynton Park of Commerce, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Boynton Park"), and, Boynton Park, in turn, subsequently conveyed its right, title, and interest in and to the Property to Quantum Associates, a Florida general partnership (the "Developer"), the current record fee simple owner of the Property; and WHEREAS, Developer filed with the City an application to amend the Development Qrder, which application was approved by the City in Ordinance No. 86-11; and WHEREAS, the term "Development Order" includes all amendments thereto; and WHEREAS, Developer has filed with the City another application to amend the Development Order; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Boynton Beach· as the governing body having jurisdiction, is authorized and empowered to consider applications for amendments to development orders approving developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1986); and WHEREAS, upon publication and furnishing of due notice, public hearings on these proceedings were held August 12, 1986, before the Planning and Zoning Board, and September 4, 1986 before the City Council of Boynton Beach; and WHEREAS, the said City Council has considered the testimony, reports and other documentary evidence submitted at said public hearings by Developer~ the Boynton Beach staff, the Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Board, and the public; and WHEREAS, said City Council has considered all of the foregoing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of Boynton Beach, that said City Council makes the following findings of fact: Section 1. A notice of public hearing in the proceedings was duly published on newspaper of general pursuant to Chapter April 6 , 1986, in The Post, a circulation in Boynton Beach, Florida, 380, Florida Statutes, and proof of said publication has been duly filed in these proceedings. Section 2. Developer has requested that the Development Order be amended as follows: A. That the name of the development be changed to Quantum Park At Boynton Beach. B. That the Amended Master Site Development Plan ("Amended Master Site Development Plan"), attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof, submitted by Applicant in its application for Amendment to the Development Order replace and supercede the Master Site Development Plan currently approved in the Development Order. C. That Section 4(1) be amended by adding the following subparagraph (d): (d) Quantum Park At Boynton Beach ADA Amended Master Site Development Plan submitted July 7, 1986. D. That references throughout the Development Order be revised to conform to the Amended Master Site Development Plan. 0151D -2- E. That references throughout the Development Order be the Memorandum from revised, where applicable, to conform to R. Thomas Powers (Goodkin Research Corporation) to Ed Deutsch under date of July 3, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C", and the Traffic Analysis Update prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. under date of July 3, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D". Section 3. Upon consideration of all matters described in Section 380, Florida Statutes (1986), it is hereby determined that: A. The amendments proposed by Developer do not unreasonably interfere with the achievement of the objectives of an adopted state land development plan applicable to the area. B. The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the local comprehensive plan and local land development regulations. C. The amendments proposed by Developer are consistent with the recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on file in these proceedings. D. The amendments proposed by Developer do not constitute a substantial deviation under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1986). E. The amendments proposed by Developer do not require further development of regional impact review. Section 4. The City Council has concluded as a matter of law that these proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes (1986), that Developer is entitled to the relief prayed and applied for, and the Development Order is hereby amended incorporating the amendments proposed by Developer as set forth in Section 2 above. Section 5. Except as otherwise amended herein, the Development Order shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. A copy of this Ordinance shall be transmitted by first class U.S. Mail, certified return receipt requested, to the Bureau of Land and Water Management, the Department of Community Affairs, Quantum Associates (the owner/developer), and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 0151D 3 Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage. FIRST READING this ~Z~ day of /~.~~p~, 1986. SECOND READING and FINAL PASSAGE this~/~day of ~~_~. 1986. CITY CL~K ' CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA MA~OR COUNCIL MEMBER/ COUNC~t' MEMBER ~ EXHIBITS: "A" - Legal Description "B" - Amended Master Site Development Plan "C" - Memorandum from R. Thomas Powers "D" - Traffic Analysis Update 0151D -4- EXHIBIT "A" OVERALL BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION South 89"04'32" West, along the distance of 817.85 feet more or Contai~.i~:g 5~.~55 acres more or of %~a? of reco~d. - 22nd Avenue; thence with a bearing of center!ine of N.W. 22nd Avenue a less to the Point of Beginning. ' .... less and sub'ect "';'~"~ 3 ' to easements and rights "~-~-.~'. A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tr'act-being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Sectio~ 17; thence North 1"14"39" East, along 'the West line of Section 17, a distance of 1318.10 feet to a point in the intersection with the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, as recorded in O.R. Book 1738, Page"1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, · Florida; thence with a bearing of North 89°04,32" East, along the centerline_ of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778.37 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence North 1"44'39" East, a distance of 1247.06 feet to the South right of way'line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 2-1; thence NOrth 89°08~49'' East, along the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of 635.93 feet to the ---' centerline of the L.W.D.D. Equalizing Canal E-4 Canal, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612 of Public Records of Palm Beach County, ' Florida; thence along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North' 10"32'52" ~ East, a radius of 750 00 feet,, a central angle' of 4'04'17", and an arc ~..-.: ?".~:..._."length of 53.29 feet; thence continue along the centerline of 'the E-4 ?!~':.Canal, with a-bearing of' North '12"35'00" East, a distance of 320169 feet -:~:f-'.~. -.'%::to a _point of cu~e; thence with a curve, to the left having a radius of :~:~-.:6500.~0, a cen~ral angle of 3°28'30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet; .%"-:~': ~..~'$'."<-thence North 9'06'30" 'East, a distance of 1979.16 feet 'to a point on the '~.'~!.'~: .._"~..~North Line of=Section 17; 'thence with a bearing of North 89"16'39" East, ~[:'{]{i.along the Nor=h 'line of Section 17,.a distance of 1964.50 feet; thence -:~:"South 0"02'1I" East, a distance of 2625.18 feet; thence North 89°08'49" '=':~.'-:~".-"~% · -East, a distance of 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of way line o~-~N.W. 22nd-~venue~as recorded in O.R. Book 1738, Page 1686 of the "'"?'~.._:... Public Records of Palm Beach County, Flqrida; thence South 19"27'31" :~-~:~."';': East, a distance of 50.00 feet to the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue; -.~?,:-~.:~ thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing~f North -.-' ..... o . .- ~.~'. 75029'49'' East, a radius of ]637.02 feet, a central angle of 9 53'58", .::: and an arc length of 282.8~ feet to a point- thence North 12°02'4~" -- · o ";~;" ~' East, a distance of 9]5.72 feet; thence North 0 3]'1]" East, a distance :':6f5399~7.0 feet; thence North 89°]2'37" East, a distance of 4~3.2] feet; ,-.thence South S8°22'56" East, a distance of ~349.70 feet to a point on "':" - ,, :. :.';~ ~:-~'~. t~.e ;..west rig' ~ n~ of.way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; thence '..r. - South 0"28'21" East, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue; thence ~,orth 88 27'3] West, along the cente'rline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a d' ~ . , ° · s ..... e of 672 97 feet- thence South 0 33'53" East, a distance of 1306.69 feeU; thence South 88°45'3]" East, a distance of 333.5~ feet to a point on the West right of way_ of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad; ..~-. thence with a bearing of South ]4°08'23" West, along the West right of way of the railroad, a distance of ~312.49 feet; thence South 0"33'53" '":.."~ East, a distance 'of 26.69 feet; thence- South 13°15'22'' West, a distance " of 920 57 ~ ~ .... .':.":'~- . ~e_~, thence North 88°50'04 West, a distance of 187.60 feet; thence with a bearing of North 0°49'2]" West, a distance of 200.00 feet; '"--" thence North 88"50'04" West, a distance of 218.00 feet; thence South 0"49'21" East, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 88"50'04" West, a ~' "' distance of 40.00 feet; thence South 0°49'2]" East, a distance of 556.84 feet; thence North 88°50'04'' West, a distance of 36]7.26 feet to a point on the center!ine of the ak.ye described centerline of the E-4 Canal; - thence with a bearing of North 5°~8']4'' ;.~est, a distance of 153.]3 feet, ...- thencq with a curve to the right having a r'adius of 450.00 feet, a central angle of ]5°36'44", and an arc length of ]22.62 feet; thence North 10°18'30" East, a distance of 988.60 feet to a point of curve; thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 450.00 feet, a central angle of ]8°20'00'', and an arc length of ]43.99 feet; thence with a bearing of ~.;orth 8°0]'30'' ~,.~est, a distance of ]255.14 feet to a point on the cehterline of N.W. 880886-1. 0558P EXHIBIT "B" SPECIFIC ~MENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT ORDER t. That the name of the development be changed to Quantum Park At Boynton Beach'. ' - 2..~ '.Tha~icth~;'.Amended Master 'Site Development Plan ("Amended Mast~Site~Deveiopment' Plan"'),' attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made ~ bart hereof, submitted'by Applicant.in its application for: Amendmen~ . to~':~the DeVelopment' Order' 'replace and supercede ~he. Ma'ste~.~Sit~/D~Vei0pment. Plan:'Currently approved in.the Development ~.- That Section 4(.1) subp~aph (d).[ ' .- . . '' (d)-' 'Quantum Park At. Boynton Beach ADA Amended ~aster S~te ·Development Plan submitted July 9, 1986. ~.. That references throughout the Development Order be revi~'to c°'nform~to the Amended Master Site' Development Plan. be amended by. 'adding the follOwing.. · 5. That references' throughout the Development Order be ~evised, where applicable, to conform to the Memorandum from R. Thomas Powers (Goodkin Research' Corporation) to Ed DeutsCh under date ~qf July ~, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit ~C~, and the Traffic Analysis Update prepared bY Kim!~iV-Horn and Associates, Inc.. under date of July 3, 1986, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D". QUANI"UI~PARK AT · , MASTER 'SITE ~"~:i-DEVELOPMENT PLaN BOYNTON BRACH '~ULY 7, 1986 Prepared %y' . QUANTUlVl AS S OC IATES In Consulta~on with: ~4~3LD L. BOWEN & ASSOCIATES, Planners and Engineers ~ROY BARDEN PIANNING GROUP, Landscape Architect ~I & ~t*~LAVASI ENGINEERS, INC., Civil Group ICIMLEY-HORNAND'ASSOCIATES, INC., Traffic Engineers ~'~KIN RESEARCH CORPORATION, Economic & Marketing Analysis ~GN~TICS,~,I~C., Marketing MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Quantu~Associates is pleased to submit herewith the proposed Master Site Deve)opment Plan. It is consistent with the Amended Plan filed with the City of Boyston Beach ondanuary 21, 1986, approved by Ordinance 86mil, passed June ~ ]986. ' FOlio~g are tWo'excerpts f~om the original ADA. pages 20-2 and 20-]9 respe~¥e]y, that.~ddress the incorporation of distribution as a light indus~l, use,_.wi.thi~-guantum. Park.'at Boynton Beach.- . . .. . A.) ~oddki'n:-Research's analysis of the supply and demand .-- ~etermin~n~s For warehbuse and industrial space in Palm -.. ~each County indicated that these uses consti'.tu'te ~-' ~ relatively rapid growth of the-"~'pulation within the : ~k's Primary Marke~Area has resulted in the constr~ction . :'~amctpianning of a significant supply of new shopping center .. -~3¢e.- Tl~is, in tUrn, increases the demand for wholesale .~distribution space in the area, in order to meet the ~eds of the expandi.ng retail 'base. Man~ of these · ~fstributors, (e.g., food warehouses, appliance -~istributors, department, store warehouses, general ~arehous~) require rail, and can therefore be '~t~ategical!y located within the subSect property. The · ~i~volumtraffic generated by these tenants makes the -~meof trucks, as their ma~or means of transportation, -~omical. Interviews with Seaboard C~stline Railroad - ~icated that these types of distributOrs are relatively ~[~arge and._occupy, on average, 50,000 to !00,000 square f~t, With the most popular-buildings containing about ~O,000 to 70,000 square ~eet. ~sfgnificant'Feal estate demand '(inveSt~ent)-opportunities at the s~te.. The demand For warehouse space'is stron~, and ~tthoug~'sever~l new industrial parks are competing in the ~ark~plaCe. the ~ub~ect ~roperty offers a clo~e-in and '~,i.ghly visible location. ~e tenant mix will be quite vgried Cepending upon eventual demand and as-such is difficult to estimate. However, Goodkin Research suggests that the following tenant mix is reasonable and'attainable: Office Warehouse/D i~tr i but i on Micro-electronic teleconmunications equipment. Z. Medical electronics (e.g., electronic health mort i tor ing systems ). 3. 'Process control technology. e Electronic survei Ilance systems and other electronic components. 5. Computer systems. 6. Engineering, research and design. ' 7. pharmaceutlca]/medical products, and 8, ShiP~rs.~ distributors? wholesale supp]ier~t -operations centers? 1. i.qht manufa_ct.urin_q and The i~-oposed plan redistributes the 'land uses ,of the former approved plan'-in order ~=accOm~Odate the layout of a proposed distribution user that requires a larg~parcel w..fth rail-access. In so doing, the commercial parcels were arr~a]on~l'~'frontage· road, consistent with the desires of the City's P ! ann;~r~ ~epartment-.-' Diag~A~ Indicates the ar, ea of the plan that has undergone reconfi'guration. As sl~. tJ~ese reconF~guratj, ons have occurred only in the very center of the park. ~ within' the southern loop roadway. Outside of this area minor use vari~.. (JTndustrial land changed to R & D. etc.), without change in parcel conF~gz~at~on, have occurred in order t© maintain a nearly Identical ]and use di_s~t:~_rJ_~on. Diagram "B" illustrates the proposed plan while Diagram l I lus~=~a~_~ the approved Amended Master Sil~e-Development Plan. Tab~e.-N~mber ) ha,s been excepted'from the previous Amended Master Plan submi-':~]~ The thir~d column has been added to -il]~ustrate the comparative dif~e~ between our' currently proposed p]an and the approved plan. Inctud~--~'-~herein is a dopy oE a Memorandum From R. Thomas Powers of Goodkin Res~ In it he restates the Fact that distribution uses had always been cont~la~ed as a use within the light industrial areas oF-thePark. Tra~c-Analysf~ Also~.fncluded herein is a copy of the traffic analysis and amendment, prepared byjf~Zook of Kimley-Horn. it identifies the consideration of distributfon us~ [~ determining traffic generation for the original ADA-DR! and subsequent · MA~E~q SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ,-'~+"--'"-"'"'I i --- - ....... ~t~nDo,,. , ,'---t;' .;bISP'I^ ;'"'m"' ~-':"-~"' "~. _. "~ ~ q~i~ ...... ~:::~" ...... ..~.-,o.~.,,--,.,_ ,,., ... ~,~: ~ .... o,., ~,. ........ [[.m~T AND' -, ...... ,,.0,-, .... ... ............. DIAGRAM "C" i ! I I ~cooo o 0 GOODKIN RESEARCH CORPORATION- Advisors to The Real Estate and Financ,a! t.r,z~stries MEMORANDUM To~. From=_ Date Mr. Ed Deutseh . R. Thomas Powers . -- Quantu.m; Park At Boynton Be'ach ' - : July 3, 1986 .:% . - - .' ' ;.',.-':"'~ -_-'.:.~' ~1984, t?e Goodk'in Research Corporation completed the original economic analysi~i~r w?at was then 'known as the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. The park at that ~im~ was in its planning infancy. The analysis completed then was likewise based-~m a conceptual plan and the resulting economic analysis and forecasts were heav~iy~.couehed in Palm Beach countywide averages for employees per square foot, construe~on costs, wage and s~lary levels, and the like. ~}~85) the 'park was purchased by Quantum Associa'tes and was renamed 'Quant~_,~n ?ark At Boynton Beach. Today the park is more than a concept; "liVe~ tenan~m-~re negotiating for "real" space. The. development of what is South FIorida's most advmn+~geously located, high quality business park is a reality. ~'odkin Reseat. ch was recently ~etained to take another, more qualitative, look at t~ ~qu~ntum Business. Park and the way it was initially b~ginning to build its tenant base. ~Some concern has been expressed about the impact that the first tenant, Publix, woUi~-,~m_~e on the overall employment forecast completed in the original DRL Several point~!d be stressed along these lines: The originai DRI applied Countywide employee-per-square foot averages to the then proposed land uses. These forecasts then became baselines used to evaluate the economic impact of the park at buildout. Like any forecast based on averages, the mid-term results are likely to deviate some through build-out as averages becom~ reality. To hold thOSe forecasts as rigid "law" at every point during build-out does not account for what must be a reasonably flexible development plan in an ever. changing market. Distribution functions were always seen as an integzal use within the park. The original market analysis and the DRI recognize distribution functions as a natural for a park located contiguous to major north-south rail and rubber tire transport arteries (not to mention the major West Palm Beach Airport). Gacxfikin Building, 275 Commercial Bou!evard. Lauderdale-by-lne-Sea. Florida 3330B [335} 493-5311. M~ami 940-6006 Memo~-mndum to Mr. Ed Deutsch Jub~ 3.. 1986 Page 2 GOODKIN RESEARCH CORPORATION tt is no surprise to Goodkin Research' 'that a major quality, highly visible tenant like ~blL~ chose to make its home here; And the fact that they are the flagship tenant suggests'that the quality of the park'at buildout will be even higher than ori~y foreseen.' i,This is because quality tends to breea qual!ty; nigh quallt~./'tenants ~ibuti°n, by its very nature, employs fewer ~mployees-per-square foot than do sam~ of the'more "intensive-use,, industrial tenants detailed in the original DRI- ~lec~-anics, medical, engineering/planning and the like. Simply put, the distribution funet~c~ was.part of the 'original employmerlt fore'eaSt. 'And because it is the first tenan~ as oppos.ed to the tenth, for example, is not cause to worry that the'original employment for:eeasts cannot be achieved. --- . RTP/I~z~ 4431 'Embarcadero Drive. West Palm Beach, FL 33407 · (305) ~45~0665 ---~ West Palm Beach. Taml~a. Orlando. FL Lauderdale. Miami. Palm C~. ' j Raleigh. Durham, Charlotte. Nashwlle. Dallas. Ausbn. Phoeni~ July 3, 1986 --~ 4479.06(07)/TO21-49 : Mr. Ge0rgoe Zimmerman Deutsch Ireland Propertie~; · Suite 1106, i~ternational Building 2455 East Smnrise Boule.wird: Fort Laud~e, Florida~ 33304 Re: 'Boyr~onBeach l~ark of Co m'm~rce (Quantum) Tra~e- Analysi .s. Update - er~ma Dear Mr. Zi.mm n: . 'As requested by. you, we have updated the traffic analysis for the above referenced project to-reject the most recent site plan changes ' (plan dated June 23, 1986). these changes re~ect an internal road[~ay' network change south of NW 22nd Avenue. Our review ~ included the specific use for a 55.0 acre ' industrial parcel (Warehouse~/~m~cr}bution Center) also south NW 22nd Avenue. The ~c generated by the updated site plan .was assigned to the revised roadway system. (K~: c~hange in traffic distribution would result from the' plan revisions), the external ~acls had no change but the.intersections along NW 22nd Avenue within the projec~ wfl! have some minor lane use changes. The peak'hour traffic volumes and the inters=~c~n needs for the. revised network are depicted on the attached sketch. Also enclas~:~¢{ith this'letter are the-critical path capacity analysis computer printouts showing t~he[e~et of service at each intersection. Re~ the warehOuse/distribution center, it should be noted that this is a use assumed ,:;~.thin the industrial category reflected by the ITE traffic generation rates. Therefore ~.~he~ use was already considered by the traffic studies and updates which have been completed, including this update. . Enci~-~d under separate cover is an appendix to this letter report containing traffic assignmeLrt~ .update work sheets. Please let us 'know if you or the City of Boynton Beach has a que~n regarding this report. JRZ/nan- A t tachme,,~r~s Very truly yours, K-I~ILEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. · i /kC, ' :. James RXZook, P.E, ', ]' ' Z'O-.<' .~z TRAFF:/fl_.. VOLIJM~$ 14 tJ. 22"~"AV~. lklTEI~SECTIg)I,,I EXHIBIT "C" GOODKIN RESEARCH CORPORATION -Advisors to The Real Estate and Financial lrdustries MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Date: Mr. Ed Deutsch R. Thomas Powers Quantum Park At Boynton Beach July 3, 1986 In 1984, the Goodkin Research Corporation completed the original economic analysis for what was then known as the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. The park at that time was in its planning infancy. The analysis completed then was likewise based on a conceptual plan and the resulting economic analysis and forecasts were heavily couched in Palm Beach countywide averages for employees per square foot, construction costs, wage and salary levels, and the like. In 1985, the park was purchased by Quantum Associates and was renamed Quantum Park At Boynton Beach. Today the park is more than a concept; "live" tenants are negotiating for "real" space. The development of what is South Florida's most advantageously located, high quality business park is a reality. Goodkin Research was recently retained to take another, more qualitative, look at the Quantum Business Park and the way it was initially beginning to build its tenant base. Some concern has been expressed about the impact that the first tenant, Publix, would have on the overall employment forecast completed in the original DRI. Several points should be stressed along these lines: 1) The original DRI applied countywide employee-per-square foot averages to the then proposed land uses. These forecasts then became baselines used to evaluate the economic impact of'the park at buildout. Like any forecast based on averages, the mid-term results are likely to deviate some through build-out as averages become reality. To hold those forecasts as rigid "law" at every point during build-out does not account for what must be a reasonably flexible development plan in an ever changing market. 2) Distribution functions were always seen. as an integral use within the park. The original market analysis and the DRI recognize distribution functions as a natural for a park located Contiguous to major north-south rail and rubber tire transport arteries (not to mention the major West Palm Beach Airport). Goodkin Bu~laing. 275 Commercial Bou!evara. Lauderdale-by-lhe-Sea. Florida 33308 [305) 493-5011, Miami 940-6006 EXHIBIT Memorandum to Mr. Ed Deutsch July 3, 1986 Page 2 GOODKIN RESEA, RCH CORPORATION It is no surprise to Goodkin Research that a major quality, highly visible tenant like Publix chose to make its home here. And the fact that they are the flagship tenant suggests that the quality of the park at buildout will be even higher than originally foreseen. This is because quality tends to breed quality; high quality tenants tend to cluster. Distribution, by its very nature, employs fewer employees-per-square foot than do some of the more "intensive-use" industrial tenants detailed in the original DRI -- electronics, medical, engineering/planning and the like. Simply put, the distribution function was part of the original employment forecast. And because it is the first tenant, as opposed to the tenth, for example, is not cause to worry that the Original employment forecasts cannot be achieved. RTP/lct EXHIBIT "D" - fimio¥.Horn and.Z ssoc;.atos, fnc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive, West Palm Beach. FL33407 · (305)845-0665 West PaIm Beach. Tampa, Orlando. Ft Lauderdale. Miami. Palm Raleigh, Durham, Charlotte, Nashwlle. Dallas, Austin. Phoenix July 3, 1986 4479.06(07)/TO21-49 Mr. George Zimmerman Deutsch Ireland Properties Suite 1106, International Building 2455 East Sunrise Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304 Re: Boynton Beach Park of Commerce (Quantum) Traffic Analysis Update Dear Mr. Zimmerman: As requested by you, we have updated the traff4c analysis for the above referenced project to reflect the most recent site plan changes (plan dated June 23, 1986). these changes reflect an internal roadway network change south of NW 22nd Avenue. Our review also included the specific use for a 55.0 acre industrial parcel (Warehouse/Distribution Center) also south NW 22nd Avenue. The traffic generated by the updated site plan was assigned to the revised roadway system. (No change in traffic distribution would result from the plan revisions), the external impacts had no change but the intersections along NW 22nd Avenue within the project will have some minor lane use changes. The peak hour traffic volumes and the intersection needs for the revised network are depicted on the attached sketch. Also enclosed with this letter are the critical path capacity analysis computer printouts showing the level of service at each intersection. Regarding the warehouse/distribution center, it should be noted that this is a use assumed within the industrial category reflected by the ITE traffic generation rates. Therefore the use was already considered by the traffic studies and updates which have been completed, including this update. Enclosed under separate cover is an appendix to this letter report containing traffic assignment update work sheets. Please let us know if you or the City of Boynton Beach has a question regarding this report. Very truly yours, JRZ/nan Attachments t<'~ILEY-ttORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Jah~es R.~Zook, P.E. ~rincipal ~ ~ /,'"~/ "'.~4~//__ LOS ~ .,,K-, 12.10 4~9q ~ 22~'"~, io~? ,.~ MOT T4) FF_-AK T~AFF:Ir__ VOL~Utvl ~ IklTF_. R'SEC_TIOM NOT TO F TLE: (:,iUANC ~ NF'M]'. CMA CR I T i F'" HOVEMENT ~ ,I~-,L., .:. I :=: REPI-JRT F.)UANTLIH CIR. ANO NW-22 AVE. I]ATE PM PEAK HOIJR TOTAL TRAFFIC LEVEL OF 'SERVICE B SA]'I..iRAT I ON 65% CRiTiCAL N/S VOL 224 CRITICAL E/W VOL G:54 CRITICAL SUM 1078 NC:RTH BL'iI_:N D _IV WIDTH i R.. 12.0 2 L.. I'2.0 3 L.. 12.0 NOR'FHBOUND LANE GEOM, ETRY SlltLl'Fl-I B:illJ [4 [i EA::;'I' Bl'"lUhlg rlOV W ID-FH 1'4OV W l DTH I"RAFFiC VL]L_I_iMES SOUTHBOUND EAE;I'BF~t_iND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WESTBOI_INB LEFT :--:34 THRU 0 R l GH'F i :-':0 (...~'] II 0 0 0 1017 :'::11 Osq I) 106 O ] RI_lC:KS (%) NC',RTliBOLINO 10 SOU-FHBOUND 10 EAS'FBO!.iN D 10 W E S ]' B OIj,N ii 10 BUF;E::; (~/FIR) PEAK FiOIjR FACTOR A . '5' O .9 O . O · '.-? PHASING N/S : 5. E/W : 4. PEDES'FRIA;--I ACTIVITY : 1. CYCLE LENGTH : 120 LEFT'.=:/CYCLE : 0 '-I "REp' l GN L i ' ' -- 1- :SEPEi:~A'i' I OH BFZITH ]"IJRNS PRO-FL-.'CTED (WITH 0 - ':.-/i2 ( i-~i-:'ED'.S/HR ) '.:; E C 0 N D S JvERLAF ) CRITIC:AL L.ANE VOLUME::; BY Mcr,/EMEN-F THRU -iA'IGHT L.EF'F 'f l-i B I.-,t_ ;"4 Iii :E; IiIl_l I"H B,iI i_l i"4 E E A :'.--; l- B C, Li N D .... :, 0 4._, _ 224 0 0 t,4 E:.-:;'T' BIZ, IJl'...I Ii LEFT TI_II-RN CHL--C:K NI-IR'F h B I"H_ _ _I;'-J b :=';13 I_l'l" H B ] l_1i'4 i'3 EA.:,'"'" "-' "a .... BUI_I, 4 g" '-I W E I.=; l' B i:,i_l;,,I O NB'I_IT VOLI_i;'qE :3:':;4 I_') U 31 l ~ AD._ILI'.STED VFIL 42:3 0 0 :z:,:? ,...-~ L..F Al_. I J Y' 0 0 0 O ;-Ir.'~V E;'IEN"F ,'1 i A ;'-J 1 A ;4 / A N / H 7 FILE: R'. 1 Ri_-11]I'4LYPM. 1_.i lt-~ I~.,'x[, I _.r~L HOVEMENT A,4~-d_'t.=,l.=, REF'OiqT NW..-":'"~.:- AVE. AI'4D WE:::;T (::C~Pi?iERCiAL '",_':IR. [ t-~ I = F'M F'E"AK HOUR I"OTAL 'FF:AFF I C LEVEL OF SERVICE A SA I'URAT i ON 41% CRITICAL N/S VEiL ,.:.:,i~ CRITICAL E/W VEIL 648 CR I T I CAL Si_li'-I 742 LANE 1 2 3 4 5 6 NORTHBOUND M_ ¢ WIDTH R,. 12.0 NORTH BOUNi] LANE GEOM, ETRY Sf'iU T FiBA U N D EA S TB:iILt?4 D MOV W I D'['H r"tOV 1,41 DTH ....... R.. 12. O ....... T.. 12.O ....... '['.. 12.O ....... 't".. 12.0 TRAFFitD VOLI_iMES SCdJTHBOUND EA:E;TBOI_IND WESTBOUND MOV WIDTH WESTBOijND LEFT 0 0 ~-) 0 THRU 0 0 l .:,,+.- 1447 IR I L3HI' '77 d 146, 0 HORTt4BOUND SOU'FHBC~UND ~-"" ....'Fi'" ' ,--,.:. TB. ,j, ~D tgE'.-:;TBnUND (%) LOCAL BU:-_-;ES (.~:~/HR) 10 O 1 O O 10 O 10 0 F'EAI< HOLiR .9 F'ACTCiR PH AS I NG N/:=5 E/W PEJ3ESI'R I AN ACT I V i TY CYCLE~ LENG-i'FI L El:: T :::; / C Y C L E l .... _lr-M.:, L '~ i"IOVEMEI'4T F:RITI_.~L LANE Va'.Cfi._l'"" ~" THRU -RIGHT LEFT ;"4 O R T H B 0 U N D L:;lII IJ ]- t-t B 13 IJ N 1:1 E A t-~; "1' B O :_li",l El 9.: ~* 0 6 (.) 1 O 0 O W E ST blllUN Fi 648. 0 LEFT 'FI.IRN CHECK ;'.J f_': R T l- i l~ I] I_l ?'4 [I:_:; Ill U T H B f-, I_l ;'-{ [-I E A ::Z;"I' B IZilJ FI I] W [-- f-:-; ]' B Ill I_l N D ,~>. I I'4F'I_IT VL]LI_ti"iE (:1 0 0 0 P, Eh_II_I:=51'E Ii VOL 0 0 0 0 C A P A C I T Y 'P 4 0 (:~ 4'7 i'll:l~ EI'I[-]I'-,i"I' 0 K 'il-::' (il-::] I] r~ ~NT22PMTI i. CMA CR i T I PAL PIOVEHENT ANALYS1S REPORT &).UANTUM BLVD. AND hW ]-"2 AVE. L~ PM F'EAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC LE'V~-L OF' '.SERVICE C SA FURAT iON 74% CRITICAL N/S VEiL ='"~'._,-/> CRI'i-iCAL E/W VOL 623 CR l 'i" I CAL SUM 1222 NOR]'HBm]UN[; LANE MOV WID-FH LANE GEOM E'I'RY UT H BC',U N B MOV WIDTH EASTBOUNii MOV WIBTH WEF:TBOUND MOV WIDTH I R.. 12.0 2 T.. 12.0 3 L.. 12.0 N _]RTHBC;LiN[I LEFT 11. ._, (..l q ...,] THRI_I i ] 4 RIGHT 0 (6 I} R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 TRAFF i C -' :' ...... v'L, LU .P_.:, '.~; 01. l-r H.~3 CH_IN IJ 684- 114 ':..'12(~,q) R.. 12.0 T,. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12, (] EASi'BCIUi',~D 1,:._ 7 R.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 WE:BTBOUND TRUCKS (%) N:,'q':;THBOUNB 10 E; 0 U T H B 0 I_1 i'.i El 10 EASTBOUND 10 W E S l' B 0 U 1'4 D 10 PHAS I NG N / S E/W PEDESTRIAN AC'i'i V i YY CYCLE LENGTFI LEFT'.-]/CYCLE LOCAl.. : 4. BOTH ]"i_lRNS : 4. BOTH ]"I_IRt'4S : 1. ,:} : ]. 20 '.E;ECC~N'I'~S : 0 B _1.:, c. o (~./i-IR) PEAK HOUR 0 . '-2 0 . 'F.-' 0 . ? 0 .9 F A CT OR I-'RO'FEC]'EB (Wi TH _ vr-.r~L.~r ¢ F'ROTECq'ED ( W ]'TH OVFRI_AP ) · . ,.. ~,- lc. Et.z, / H 1~ ) CRITICAL'L~l'..,c."' ,,- VF'II.UMES. BY i'IOVEI'iEN¥ -, ...... I'HRU -RIGHT L Ei---F NC~R'FF-;B C,I_,h:O :.~;t::UTH BOLiND 1£ A::';l- BCflJ,'"40 WE'.'STBf3UNB 1 :'-': '.:.:' 25%' ._k; ,_,;' ._,'-:" 4.20 14 7 4/-,0 15,/_-, ,'-,0 LEFT TURN F':HEC~:: N 0 R "1' H B O I_i N El :_:;i-! I_ITI-t i3 lei I_[ lq [i [:~ A :..:i ' B ('; I_1 ,'.~ E] W E E; ]' ]3 IZI 1..I ['..i iii I NPIjT V,]LLi~'.I,E I 1. 5 6::::4 122 4.7 'v~' AI],_Iij:-'; I'EEI VOL 147 8'/7 156 60 C A PA C 17' Y ",': _ " 1 ~.._, (-) 4 '~ '.-' 0 M, OVEi'-iENT NiA N/A ?IIA NiA ROt. IF:'MT . CNA CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANAi_YSiS REPORT NW 22 AVE. AND EASI* COMMERCIAL DATE F'M F'EAK HOUR TOTAL TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE C SATURA'i' Z ON / -' "' .3 i C:RiTICAL N/F-; VOL 12.5 CRiTiCAL E/W VOL 1034- CRITICAL SUM 1159 C FR. NORTHBFflJND LANE PiOV WIEiTH LANE GEOi'4ETRY SOU THBOLtNO MOV WIDTH EASTBOUNB hJV WIDTH WES'FBOUND MOV WIDTH N O R ]- H B O U N D "FRAFF I C 'vLILI_,MI::.=, L:;FdJTHBOUND R.. 12.0 T. · 12.0 'i-.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 E A S '1' B 0 t_1 I'-4 ]'l T,. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L. · 12.0 WES'f'BOUhID I_EFT 0 0 0 1 ._ 4 T FIRU 0 0 1 '?::32 1210 R I GHT 10:3 0 10 0 -FRL CI.::S ( % ) 1'4ORTHBi3iJi'JD 1 SOUTFiBOLli'4[: 10 E A'.:;]'BC:LI?4 D i 0 W E::-';T B 0 U N D 10 PHASING N/S E/W PEDESTR.[AN ACmFiViTY CYCLE LENGTH LEFTS/CYCLE L. CiCA L B U S E S (~/HR) 0 0 F'EAK : 1. NEll-HER TURN F'RO'i'ECTED :2. HEAVIES-I- TURN PROTEC'f'ED : i. 0 - '.9'.:.~ < ~F'EDt3/HIR ) : $)0 SEC:ONFIS : I H;Z;UR F A C T 0 R CRITICAL- LANE VOLUMES BY M.JVb. i,~.N r THKU -RIGHT LEFT WES"FBOUND 146 LEFF TURI'~ L'.:F.IECI~,.'. _.,-~I I i ._.A~ MOVEMENT ANAL. YSi:S REPORT HIGH RIDGE RD. AND NW 22 AVE. DATE PM F'EAK HOUR ]'ATAL TRAFFIC LEVEL OF SERVICE D '.~;ATUR~-F I GN '7S~% CRZ'FZCAL N/S MOL 484 CRiTiCAL E/W VOL 820 CRi-FiCAL SUM 1304 LANE 1 2 3 5 6 NOR]-HBC;IJND M 0'-2 W 1 D ]" H R.. 12.0 '£.. 12.0 L.. 12. C) L.. 12.0 LANE 3EF$1E'£RY Si-iiJTHBFdJND MOV WtDTH R.. 12.0 ]'.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 E A S T B 0 U ;'4 El MOV WIDTH R. · 12.0 "f'.. 12 · 0 "1'.. 12.0 '1".. 1. 2. (..' L · . 12 · 0 NORTHBCflJN[ TRAFF il": VOLLMEF; SCd_I'I-FIBOUND E A'F.;'i' BOLiND LEFT THRU R i GHT 201 107 WE.:, [ r. UUNU I'-IOV W I DTH .TRUCKF-; ( % ) NORTHBOUND 10 SOUTHBOUND 10 EASTBOU;,,ID 10 WES]"BCflJNL3 10 R.. 12.0 T ·. 12.0 T.. 12.0 'r.. 12.0 L.. 1 '2.0 W,-' .:,] BUI_INE :3}"i? (.~oq) 133 (~o$ J 1 ~._, 1 485 -.:z'i.) ('~s5) 0 ( i~ '] ) ' LOCAL BUSES (.~/I--{R) PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0 . '2 0 . 0 . O .9 F'HAS i NG N/S : 4. E/W : 4. PEDESTRIAFI ACTIVITY : CYCLE LENGTH : LEFTS /CYCI_E : BO1'H I'UiR;4S F'ROTE:'CTEO (WITH AVEITLAP) BriTH ]'l_iF(i'4f-:; I::F'.OTECTED (WI]'H OVERLAF') 1. 0 - ':;)'.':;' ( ~Pi"-"DS/l'-if:~ ) 120 F;ECONDS , Hnl_l -R I led'IT LEFT N Fi R '1' H B d: U ;'4 it :::; f't U-I' H B G U ~'.,i [I E A :E; "t' I3 L-i U [4 Et W E :_--; "1' 13 ii~ U N El -', a =- 1:2: I]) 650 ~ ~ ..... 221';' :3 C) 1 2:2:'~.? 4 ::', d, 17 0' LEFT TURN CHECK N 01:;~' r H B Et iJ~'-j 1"1 ::_:;l.]l_l"F Fti3, 0 I_IN Et 1:_' A'.::;T B C~l_i N l-1 H i:'.:; '1' BI.)l_ll',l[I ]. NF'I_IT VEd. I_II'-iE zi. 4F:: .:,"": '._,,_', :'::7'F.¢ 1 :'::.3 /~"'" AB._ILI'._-';TEB VEiL 574 456 4:E:6 17(_-) Ii: A F' A C i T Y 0 C) (_) 0 i~O',/ENENT N/A N/A N/A N/A APPENDIX PROJECT ~?o ~_ CALC. BY .,~'~ DATE CHECKED BY,, DATE~ SHEET NO. REVISED BY OF__ DATE __ ,,_ \ z?..5 V PROJECT CALC. BY 't~' DATE L& ,J SHEET NO. OF. CHECKED BY, DATE REVISED BY__ DATE __ PROJECT C~L~C. BY ~ DATE 'T_.llO .,---- II CHECKED BY , DATE SHEET NO. REVISED ~ OF~ DATE . I0 0 CALC. BY ./~;?" DATE CHECKED BY DATE .. SHEET NO REVISED BY __OF__ DATE~ PROJECT ~F-dp <'"_ .~ALC. BY 1'./:? DATE ·/// ,~ CHECKED BY__ DATE __ SHEET NO. ~ REVISED BY .... .OF__ , DATE~ PROJECT ~,~-d) c_. //.,9., CALC. BY .?~?~ DATE '7//,/-.~.~ /.c '.6 ¢._¢~ CHECKED BY DATE__ L / / 0 I f / / ? SHEET NO.__ REVISED BY_~... DATE . OF, PROJECT CALC,. BY ?/':~'- DATE CHECKED BY__ DATE __ SHEET NO. , OF __ REVISED B~Y,~ DATE PROJECT ~-?'''~O C_ /~q~ALC. BY ./~'.'~' DATE. IKimley. Horn I ./~-/--; 'Tz..'/c'( t-/q"7~, o~'_~ SHEET NO. ~ OF CHECKED BY~ DATE_ REVISED BY__ DATE PROJECT L~V~__. /~..-~--/_.' 7~.,,ht ~qq?. ~ALC. BY J~,'"'~ DATE ?//?~ CHECKED BY DATE ~ J SHEET NO o OF_ REVISED BY I DATE__ I?..'12 ---- REVISED BY ! DATE ?_///';"~ CHECKED BY_ DATE OF_ DATE PROJECT -~' ..~ALC. BY ,/~:~' DATE IKimley. Horn I CHECKED BY__DATE__ SHEET NO. ~ OF __ REVISED BY../~ DATE__ PROJECT CHECKED BY DATE SHEET NO.__OF,, REVISED B~Y,~ DATE __ p S -~ I / PROJECT ~-"~v*~'~ ,,/.,'9..-. CALC. BY/, , DATE IKimley. Horn I CHECKED BY DATE_ SHEET NO .__ REVISED BY, OF__ DATE J PROJECT CHECKED BY DATE__ SHEET NO. OF,, REVISED BY_ DATE~ .5'77 CALC. BY ~/~'-,"~ DATE --- I~, ~.~ IKimley. Horn SHEET NO. CHECKED BY DATE__ REVISED BY , OF__ DATE 0 I / / PROJECT BY /~/~'~' DATE CHECKED BY DATE_ c'" SHEET NO REVISED BY_ ~OF~ DATE __ PROJECT CALC. BY J~ DATE CHECKED BY~ DATE~ SHEET NO OF~ REVISED BY DATE __ ~[ tu PROJECT ~.,'~,~'o ~'. //~ .- .~>LC. BY/~ DATE CHECKED BY DATE SHEET NO._ REVISED BY OF, DATE ,., r,l PROJECT, CALC, BY _/~'-"~ DATE IKimley. Horn 1 CHECKED BY ~ DATE SHEET NO. OF __ REVISED BY_.~._ DATE p,~ LY '') ) 1 CALC. BY/-~'"~' DATE '7///-;, c CHECKED.BY_ DATE __ SHEET NO._ REVISED BY , OF DATE CHECKED BY DATE__ SHEET NO. OF REVISED BY~ DATE / Io~' ). /~ °/o PROJECT BY ?-~"~ ' DATE il(imley. Horn I CHECKED BY__ DATE SHEET NO. REVISED BY OF, DATE ............................. :.:....- '. _:.'.': -( C M~-~TEIR SiTE DEVELOP~NT PLAN DIAGRAm! "A"