O83-48ORDINANCE NO. ~-~/8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON DEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 80-19 OF SAID CITY, BY ZONING
A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED HEREIN, WHICH IS BEING SIMULTANEOUSLY
HEREWITH ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH, FLORIDA, BY ORDINANCE AS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WITH A LAND USE INTENSITY OF
4.00; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; REPEALING.
PROVISIONS, AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR
OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, has heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 80-19, in which
a Revized Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, simultaneously herewith adopted an Ordinance annexing
a parcel of land more particularly described herein into the
City limits of said City; and
WHEREAS, the owners and agents of the property have
requested the above-mentioned zoning category; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board of the City of
Boynton Beach, Florida, has heretofore approved said development
and has recommended approval thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the best interest
of the inhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Revised
Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA:
Section 1: That the following described land, located
in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, as described'in E~hibit A
attached hereto and made a part hereof, be and the same is hereby
zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a land use intensity
(LUI) of 4.00, which intensity is determined to be appropriate
under the circumstances represented to the City in said
application, and is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan
of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida.
Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of
the City shall be amended accordingly.
Section 3: That the application of the owners and agents
of the subject property for rezoning is hereby granted for the
purpose of permitting the development of said land as a Planned
Unit Development (PUD), specifically in accordance with the
development plans and specifications therefor now on file with
the Office of the City Planner in the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida, and all requirements, terms and conditions established
and set forth in the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Board,
and the City Council of the City of Boynton Beach pertaining to
the review and approval of said application, which minutes are
hereby made a part hereof for reference and staff comments are
attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
Except as provided herein, the applicants shall proceed
in strict accordance with all ordinances of the City of Boynton
Beach, including but not limited to its bui!ding~ electrical~
plumbing, subdivision, planning and zoning codes, and all rules
and regulations of the State of Florida, Department of Environ-
mental Regulations. In satisfaction of the recreation dedication
requirements of the City Ordinances, this approval incorporates
the dedication of land as submitted by the owners in accordance
with the development plans and specifications now on file with th~
Office of'~the City Planner.
Section 4: That should any section or provision of
this Ordinance or a portion thereof be declared by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herew-ith are hereby repealed.
Section 6: This Ordinance shall become effective
upon its passage.
FIRST READING this
1983.
day of ~J~% ~V~
day of
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this
, 198~'
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
CITY CL~
(Seal)
VICE MAY~
EXHIBIT A
(ORDINANCE NO. 83-48)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Northeast one-quarter of Section 18, Township 45
South, Range 43 East, less the East 50.00 feet thereof
and right-of-way for L.W.D.D. Canal L-20 and L,21,
together with the Northeast one-quarter of the Northeast
one-quarter of the Northwest one-quarter of said
Section 18, less the right-of-way for L.W.D.D. Canal
L-20.
Said lands situate, lying and being in Palm Beach
County, Florida.
CONTAINING 155.15 acres, more or less.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 1, 1983
all be kept on site and Mr. Clark agreed and added that the
permit will not allow-it to be removed off site.
Councilman deLong moved to approve this request from Quail
Lake West, seconded by Councilman Cassandra. Motion carried
5-0.
Councilman Cassandra moved to revert to the regular order of
business, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman. Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC H~ARING - 8:00 P. M.
Approve request for amendment to Future Land Use Element of
the Comprehensive Plan submitted by Alan Ciklin to show
annexed property as Moderate Density Residential and to
rezone from AG (Agricultural District) to Planned Unit
Development with a Land Use Intensity = 4.00 (PUD w/LUI =
4.00). This proposed PUD provides for the construction of
1,005 residential units and 3.1 acres of neighborhood com-
mercial uses (Tabled)
Location:
The NE 1/4 of Section 18, less the East 50.00
feet thereof and right-of-way for L.W.D.D. Canal
L-20 and L-21, together with the NE 1/4 of the NE
1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 18, less the
right-of-way for L.W.D.D. Canal L-20. Said land
situated, lying and being in Palm Beach County,
Florida. Containing 154.56 acres more or less.
West of North Congress Avenue, between L-20 and
L-21 Canals.
Mr. Cassandra moved to remove both items from the table,
seconded by Mr. deLong. Motion carried 5-0.
Mr. Vance referred to discussions between the city staff and
developer being on-going and stated just prior to the
meeting, a letter was hand-delivered to him from Mr. Ciklin.
He then read the attached letter into the record. He added
that essentially these conditions have been reviewed by the
city staff and present no problem. It will take approxima-
tely five weeks to complete the annexation process and the
deeds will be furnished to the staff during that period. He
gathers the staff, as a whole, has essentially resolved the
pending matters in relation to this annexation and from the
staff's viewpoint, it can proceed.
Mr. Cheney added that having been a proponent of this, we
are satisfied and it has our approval. He knows all the
issues have been resolved. He thinks the equities are fair.
It is an important piece to the City. If this causes an
ordinance to be required in the future for all subdivisions,
~EGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 1, 1983
it is a good step forward for the City.
approval.
He recommends
There was reference to this squaring off the Congress Avenue
area and some discuSsion regarding a few pieces along
Congress Avenue still not annexed into the City.
Mr. Vance requested Mr. Alan Ciklin, attorney representing
the Melear family, to come forward. He asked if Mr. Ciklin
was the representative for the Melear family for this pro-
posed annexation and Mr. Ciklin replied affirmatively. Mr.
Vance clarified that the letter which he read was written by
Mr. Ciklin as the representative of the Melear family volun-
tarily in order to achieve annexation and PUD zoning in the
City of Boynton Beach and Mr. Ciklin responded affir-
matively.
Councilman Cassandra asked if there was a stipulation that
we should have an ordinance and Mr. Vance replied negati-
vely, only that we agree to consider in good faith, which
he believes the Council is desirous of doing.
Mr. Zimmerman questioned the exact location of the three
acres and Mr. Ciklin informed him it would be at Miner Road
& Congress Avenue.
Mr. Annunziato reminded the City Council there were several
staff comments attached to this annexation and certain
issues on the PUD and if the Council goes forward, it should
be predicated on those comments. Mr. Cheney referred to Mr.
Ciklin agreeing and Mr. Ciklin replied affirmatively.
Mayor Warnke asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of
this request and received no response. He asked if anyone
wished to speak against this and received no response. He
then declared the public hearing closed.
Councilman deLong moved that this request be forwarded to
staff for their consideration and recommendations.
Councilman Cassandra seconded the motion. Under discussion,
Mayor Warnke referred to voting against this at the last
Council meeting and then read the following statement:
"There is an old adage of the military which states that
no matter how fast you are advancing, do not, under any cir-
cumstances, advance faster than your services of supply. In
my opinion, the City of Boynton Beach has now come to the
point of outrunning it's supply capabilities.
"I have always been adament in my stand to serve the
present residents before any outside developments. We have
- 8 -
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 1. ~983
now reached the stag~, in my opinion, to have the City
Council present a unified front and say to the developers,
enough is enough. By approving more and more annexations
with water and sewer agreements we are, in effect, deluding
purchasers of homes in this area by saying 'there is plenty
for all'.
"Councilman deLong has said 'let the voters decide how
large our city should grow' and I agree. As more and more
developments come to our city for servies, we will have an
increase of our services dealing with water, sewers, roads,
schools, recreational facilities, beach usage, library needs
and fire and police capabilities. If the citizens choice
amendment, otherwise known as Proposition One, passes next
year, we will have to curtail the services our citizens now
enjoy and there will certainly be no room for services to
developments that we approve today.
"It is, in my opinion, time to collect our breath and
take a more serious look at where we are going in the near
future. We should not approve any more annexations or uti-
lity expansion outside of our city limits until such time as
the voters decide how far they Want our city to expand and
we know the full effects of Proposition One on our future
budgets. I sincerely hope that this Council will put this
in the form of a referendum to the voters.
"In the meantime I cannot, in all good conscience, vote
for any more growth proposals outside of our city limits.
We are outrunning our service of supply to the detriment of
the Boynton Beach taxpayers."
Councilman deLong stated that he has an item on the agenda
under Other - Legal tonight which will be a motion that the
proper procedure be drafted so the people will decid~ at the
next election whether they want annexation or not. It will
only include those parcels in the city limits at this time.
Councilman Cassandra referred to being concerned about water
and sewer consumption, but stated we also have to be con-
cerned about squaring off the city limits and not having
open spots. This concern is valid, but to stop at this
moment and not approve a piece of land use to square our
corners is not favorable. We agree that two years from now,
we will have a problem. He thinks we should be concerned
about squaring off our city. This is not going outside our
western boundary, but squaring off what we have now.
Vice Mayor Zimmerman clarified that the parcels which front
on Congress Avenue, this being one and two others remaining,
rightfully should be part of the city.
- 9 -
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 1, 1983
Mayor Warnke clarified that the motion was to approve this
request for amendment-to the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan submitted by Alan Ciklin to show annexed
property as Moderate Density Residential.and to rezone from
AG (Agricultural District) to Planned Unit Development with
a Land Use Intensity = 4.00 (PUD w/LUI = 4.00). As
requested, Mrs. Boroni then took a roll call vote on the
motion as follows:
Councilman Cassandra - Aye
Councilman deLong - Aye
Councilman Wright - Aye
Mayor Warnke - No
Vice Mayor Zimmerman - Aye
Motion carried 4-1.
Approve request for annexation submitted by Alan Ciklin,
Esq. providing for the annexation of a 154.36 acre tract of
land located on the west side of Congress Avenue, west of
Dos Lagos PUD, south of Meadows 300 PUD, north of Congress
Lakes PUD and between Lake Worth Drainage Canals 920 and 21.
(Tabled)
Legal
Description:
The NE 1/4 of Section 18, less the East 50.00
feet thereof and right-of-way for L.W.D.D.
Canal L-20 and L-21, together with the NE 1/4
of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section
18, less the right-of-way for L.W.D.D. Canal
L-20. Said land situated, lying and being in
Palm Beach County, Florida.
Councilman deLong moved to approve this request, seconded by
Councilman Cassandra. No discussion. Mrs. Boroni took a
roll call vote on the motion as follows:
Councilman deLong - Aye
Councilman Wright - Aye
Mayor Warnke - No
Vice Mayor Zimmerman - Aye
Councilman Cassandra - Aye
Motion carried 4-1.
Councilman deLong moved to revert to the regular order of
business, seconded by Councilman Cassandra. Motion carried
5-0.
LEGAL
Ordinances - 2nd Reading - Public Hearing
None
- 10 -
~MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH; FLORIDA
SEPTEMBER 13, 1983
the railroad track. Parking would be in front, inbetween
the buildings and the railroad track. The only thing Mr.
Kirsner can get financing for now is a discount center. Mr.
Mauti asked if Mr. Kirsner can apply for a special use which
would, more or less, restrict him to that 45 foot height and
restrict himto most of the C-3 areas. Mr. Annunziato
~ad~ised that~our current zoning requirements do not provide
for a planned commercial district. Therefore, it was his
opinion that there was no way to up front determine the uses
or configuration of the structures other than site plan
review.
Mr. Annunziato informed Mr. Mauti that Mr. Kirsner did not
have a master plan avenue open to him. Mr. Annunziato
advised that the problem is not with the site plan but with
the use.
Mr. Hester moved that the request of Boynton Discount Center
on Federal for rezoning be denied. Mr. Mauti seconded the
motion, and the motion carried 7-0. The request was DENIED.
Annexation
(2) Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Alan Ciklin, Esq. for Carilla, Larry, and
Michael Melear
Annexation for a 154.36 acre t~act of land
located on the west~side of Con, re'ss Avenue
between Lake Worth Drainage Canals #s 20 and
21.
west side of Congress Avenue, west of Dos
Lagos PUD,. South of Meadows 300 PUD, north
of COngress Lakes PUD.
Legal Description:
The NE 1/4 of Section 18, less the East 50.00 feet thereof'
and right-of-way for L.W.D.D. Canal L-20 and L~21, together
with the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section
18, less the right-of-way .for .L.W.D.D. Canal L-20. Said
lands situate, lying and being in Palm Beach County, Florida.
CONTAINING 155.15 acres, more or less.
Also proposed by Staff for annexation is Old Boynton Road,
east of Knuth Road.
Legal Description of Old Boynton Road:
A portion of Old Boynton Road in Section 19, Township 45 South,
Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particu-
larly described as follows:
- 10 -
MINUTES - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 13, 1983
A forty (40) ~oot road right-of-way adjacent to the South
line of Lots 31 through 38 in ,,Subdivision Section 19, Twp.
45 South of Range 43 East", as recorded .in the Palm.Beach
'County, Florida official Records in Plat Book 7, Page 19,
said forty (40) foot road right-of-way now being known as
OLD BOYNTON ROAD, and the south twenty (20) feet of said Lots
31 through 38 deeded to Said Palm BeaCh County for additional
road right-of-way as recorded in said official Records in
official Record Book 3012, Page 1485, and the north twenty
(20) feet of Lots 39, 40 and a portion of Lot 41 deeded to
said Palm Beach County for road right-of-way as recorded in
said official Records in official Record Book 2584, Page
1018 and BoOk 3652, Page 531.
Land Use Amendment and Rezonin~
(3) Applicant: Alan Ciklin, Esq. for Carilla, Larry, and
Melear
Request: Amendment to Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan to show annexed property
as Moderate Density Residential and to re-
zone from AG (Agricultural District) to
Planned.Unit Development with a Land Use
intensity.= 4.00 (PUD w/LUI = 4).
Location: West side of Congress Avenue, ~S~o_f~.Dos
Lagos PUD, south of Meadows 30~'~U~,~'?~°rth
of Congress Lakes PUD.
Proposed
Use: Planned Unit Development providing for the
construction of 1005 residential units and
3.1 acres of neighborhood commercial uses.
Legal Description: Same as above "Legal Description".
chairman Ryder announced that one application is for annexa-
tion into the city and the other is for Land Use Amendment
and rezoning.
Mr. Annunziato, City Planner, referred to the annexation of
Old Boynton Road and said the City has done this kind of
thing in the past-to bring in rights-of-way where the City
finds-they~are going'to annex the property ~adjacent to the
rights-of-way or failed to annex the rights-of-way where
they were never annexed previously-
Mr. Annunziato referred to a memorandum from him to the
chairman and Members dated September 6, 1983, which has four
or five exhibits appended to it. - First, Mr. Annunziato said
he would discuss in introductory form what the applicant is
proposing to do, how one would get through the procedure and
- 11 -
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO:
RE:
ALL DEPARTMENTS
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate.~the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner
,Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present Population
Sq. Ft. or / j-y:~ acres
EStimated Number of Existing Housing Units
Existing Use
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes NO ~/
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department. need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
'Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
City Clerk
Planning
Utilities
Public Works
Energy
Finance
Police
Fire
Library
Data Processing
(Attach if'insufficient space.)
City Engineer
Building Official
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & ~ecreation
Please return this form to the City planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment:
Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
C-
TO:
RE:
ALL DEPARTMENTS
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact-that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner /q~L~-A~
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Present Population.. ~
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units /
Existing Use "i"~/~j~..-~ ~/j.,~
Sq. Ft. or /~<"y.~ acres
Proposed Use /~J~~T~z~<~ ,d~_Z.L.,,~.-(_.~,,~,..,.d<..~..,<.,~ ~.zz_ ?o¢~- c,'.,..,_,....~..r .~..~
Would 'your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? yes No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated-annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital_ outlay:
,'7
. · _ . /;-
. ' . /~ . .... ~/.- ~- ....... ~ ·
~ - ~ . . ~ . · ~ · .
City Clerk
Planning
Utilities
Public Works
Energy
Finance
Police
Fire
Library
Data Processing
(Attach if insufficient space.).
City Engineer
Building Official
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO:
RE:
ALL DEPARTMENTS
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate.~the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner /~L~-A~ ~c~/t~ u~.z;r- ~o~/-n~
Area of Subject Property Sq. Ft. or /j-~.g acres
Estimated Present Population ~
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units /
Existing Use ..... ~/~3~-- ~/3~q
Would-your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No /'~
Estimated number of additional personnel req~'ired: --
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No ~'
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning
Police
Building Official
Utilities
Public Works
Fire
Library
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Energy
Data Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO:
RE:
ALL DEPARTMENTS
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate.~he initial impact'that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of .Development/Owner
Area of Subject Property Sq. Ft. or /o~y.~
Estimated Present Population ~
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units /
acres
Existing Use .....
Proposed Use /~J~-~T-~:~{~ ~z](=-LdA~-- ~
Would your Department need to increase the number of personne~.~--~
result of this annexation? Yes No ~'"
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
result
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated annual' increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
t ' ' i . . ~. ~ ~ --
I ' ' -- . (Attach if~~ent space.}
City Clerk Finance ~P~,~City Engineer-
Planning Police
Building Official
Utilities
Public Works
Fire
Library
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Energy
Data Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible°
Attachment:
Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO:
RE:
ALL DEPARTMENTS
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENEi~LLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate.khe initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name .of Development/Owner /q~L~A~ ~L~Az~
Area of Subject Property Sq. Ft. or /j-y.~ acres
Estimated Presen~ Population
'Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units /
Existing Use~"'=~/~j~- ~~
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes No
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation?. Yes No
Estima'~ed a~nual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance: ,
· capital outlay:
/ /' '. ~ ~ ' ~ I/
' g . (Attach if 'insufficient space.)
city Clerk
Planning
Finance
Police
City Engineer
Building Official-
Utilities
PubliC Works
Fire
Library
Personnel and
Purchasing
Parks & Recreation
Energy
Data Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
tachment tion ~ ~%A~Z~
At : Loca Map ~__..~3~'v..]. ~~ ~ O,
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED-HEREIN
Please eva!uate.~the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will'have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner
Area of Subject Property Sq. Ft. or /j-~.~
Estimated Present Population ~
Estimated Number of Existing' Housing Units /
acres
Existing Use ..... ~/~J~=-- L_/3~c~g
would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as.a
result of this annexation? Yes No /
Estimated number of additional personne~ required: ~
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No v~
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Comments:
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk.
Planning
Utilities
Public Works
Finance
Police
Fire
Library
City Engineer
Building Official
Personnel and
Purchasing
.Parks & Recreation
Energy
Data Processing
· Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment:
Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO:
RE:
ALL DEPARTMENTS
ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate.~he initial impact'that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner
Area of Subject Property
Estimated Presen~ Population
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units
Existing Use -'~'~/~j~--
Sq. Ft. or /j-y.~ acres
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as D
result of this annexation? Yes No /
Estimated number of additional personnel required: ~.~,
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result o~
this annexation? Yes / No
Estimated a~nual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
capital outlay:
Connnents:
/
(Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk
Finance
City Engineer
Planning Police
Building Official
Utilities Fire
Public Works Library
Personnel and
.Purchasin~
Parks & Recreation
Energy
Data Processing
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW FORM
TO: ALL DEPARTMENTS
RE: ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY AS GENERALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN
Please evaluate the initial impact that the annexation of property
described herein will have on your department.
Name of Development/Owner /~L~A~
Area of Subject Property Sq. Ft. or. /j-y.~ acres
Estimated Present Population
Estimated Number of Existing Housing Units /
Existing Use ..... ~/%j~--
Would your Department need to increase the number of personnel as a
result of this annexation? Yes NO
Estimated number of additional personnel required:
Would your Department need to increase expenditures as a result of
this annexation? Yes No
Estimated annual increase in salaried:
operating & maintenance:
· capital outlay:
Comments:
SEE ATTACHMENT
Attach if insufficient space.)
City Clerk Finance
Planning Police
Utilities Fire
Public Works Library
Energy
Data .Processing
City Engineer
Building Official
Personnel and
Purchasing
X Parks & Recreatio~
Please return this form to the City Planner's Office. as soon as possible.
Attachment: Location Map
DEPARTMENT
Public Works
PerSonnel &
Purchasin~
Police-
Engineering
Energy
Building
Utilities
Finance
Data Process~
Fire D~~-~
Planning
Recreation an~
Parks
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION-
MUNICIPAL STAFF
INCREASED INCREASED
PERSONNEL CAPITAL
No
Yes
No
No
No No
No No
No No,
No No
No
No
OTHER COMMENTS
See attached
See attached
See attached
See attached
See attached
See attached
See attached
See attached
DEPARTM~[?
Planning, Zoning
& Build~n9
COMMENTS ON ANNEXATION
PALM BEACH COUNTY STAFF
CO~4ENTS
See attached
POLICE DEPAt{~_:
~-ENGINEERING DEPT.:
ENERGY DEPARTMENT:
BUILDING DEPT.:
UTILITIES DEPT.:
.This annexation, along with all other construction
planned in the northwest area of the City will
impact upon manpower negds in the future. The
future needs have not as yet been determined.
Administration for construction of new subdivisions
increases the work load, but the direct impact of
this annexation alone is not significant as far as
the Engineering Department work load goes.
Developed public rights-of-way will presumably
· .mean additional street lighting requirements at
~approximately $72 per year, per light, operation
and maintenance only.
All annexations effect our department in the future
pertaining to personnel, overall cost etc as the
land is developed. ' '
Developer will be required to furnish capital costs
for utilities. One developer will not increase
manpower except meter reading, ultimately requiring
added men.
FIRE DEPARTME~iT:
See attached study.
RECREATION & p~o~: See attaChed study.
PLANNING DEP/~.TD~NT: Billboards are to be
of annexation.
removed within sixty (60) days
Board of County 'Commissioners
Peggy B. Evatt, ~L-maa
Ken Spillias, Vice ~~
Dennis P. KOehler
Dorothy Wilken
Bill Bailey
August 23, .1983
Mr. Carmen S. Annunziato
City Planner
120 N.E. 2nd Avenue
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beaq.h, Florida 33435
Dear Carmen:
County Administrator
John Ci Sansbury
of. Planning, Zoning, & Building
' · . Robert El. Basehart
Director
As you requested,. I have reviewed the proposed annexation called
Melear Planned Unit Development.
The Planning.Division,s analysis indicates the subject
(154.6 acres) is presently zoned AR (Agricultural Residential)
property
allowing for one unit per five acres. The County's Comprehensive
Plan designates~ the area as Medium to Medium High having a
potential density range of eight units per acre in a standard
subdivision and twelve units per acre in a Planned Unit
Development. However, the allowable density is determined by the
project's ability to meet the following five mandatory
performance standards: Water Services, Sewer Services, Major
Thoroughfares~ Environmental Impacts, and Market Analysis.
It is assumeJ that water and sewer services will be provided by
the City of Boynton Beach. There appears to be no environmental
impact from the proposed project and according to County
S'tandards.~ a market analysis is not required for a commercial
area within a PUD as long as there is no direct access off
Congress Avsnue.
The Traffic: Performance Standard appears to be the major problem
area of the-proposed annexation.
The Traffic impact Analysis identified over 10,~00 trips per day
generated from 1,005 units, causing major roadway links to be
impacted within a five mi%e radius of the project.
It is my understanding Charles Walker, Director of the Traffic
Division, has been requested to review and.comment on the
potential impact of the subject developm%nt on County roadway
systems and consistency with adopted Comprehensive Plan policies
and objectives. His comments along with the Planning Division
review will ultimately determine Plan consistency with regard to
the Traffic Performance Standard.
3400 BELVEDERE_~_. ~ . . , ~ ROAD,, ._ WEST PALM,.,, BEACtt, FLORIDA 33406 - (305) 471.3520
Page Two ' '. .' ~i~ ~'~ ,' ~ '
Carmen A~_unz ia to '
Aug ust 23~ !983
-~-Sincerely,
-- Richard F. ~e~ley /
Principal Pl.~nne r
In summary~ ~e proposed overall gross density of 6.5 units per
acre in the Melear PUD is substantially below the density range
of 8 to 12 (PUD) units per acre-in the County's Medium to Medium
High Land Use Designation of the Comprehensive Plan for the
.subject site. However, the actual allowable density of the
project will'~ be predicated upon the project's ability to satisfy
the County's Traffic Performance Standard as defined by Ordinance
81-6. Depending upon the results of the County Traffic
Engineers, Analysis and the Planning Division's determination,
the density could'conceivably be much less than what the County
Comprehensive Plan designates for the area unless major road
improvement are made to offset road impacts.
If you have any. questions, please do not hesitate to write or
call.
RFM: cb
cc: Charles' Walker, Traffic Engineering
Start -~ ~'
~.s=ick, Planning Director
bJ
TO:
H EH O R A N D Ui~l :
Hr: C~en Annunziat o DATE:
City ?l~ner
August 26', 1983
RE: Helear Annexation - Departmental Review
The ove~al~ growth projections of the N.W. Congress Avenue corridor will
have significant :impact upon park and recreation services and facilities.
The annexation of this property will strengthen this impact, as 1,005
additional units will translate into over 2,000 people.
While this development and otherS already approved for development do
include some private recreation facilities, they generally do not include
facilities --~uch as lighted athletic fields, auditoriums, public beaches,
boat ramps, major recreation centers, or programs such as youth and adult
athletic leagues, day camps, playgrounds, and a multitude of other
instructional and social programs offered by this department.
The devel~ent of Motorola and the Boynton Mall will create a f~milv-
oriented population increase which will place greater demands on the
above men5i~-.~ad facilities.
The nature of the overall N.W. section expansion will require the continual
provisicn cf capital outlay funds, along with-operational funds to provide
for pers~.~.a!, materials, and maintenance.
CCF:as
Attachment
CC:
John Wildner, Park Supt.
Charles C. Frederick
Recreation & Park Director
EXHIBIT 'E' '.
~'TAFF COMMENTS ON CIKLIN REQUEST FOR
ZONING TO PUD W/LUI = 4.0
UTILITY DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
RECREATION AND,PARKS DEPT.'
CITY ATTORNEY:
See attached memo
See attached memo
See attached memo
See attached letter
TO:
~'r. Ca rmen Annun z ia to --
-city Planner
~e!ear Property
September 8, 1983
I approved the concept of the master plan subject to their'
Providing an appropriate sized piece of land in the northwest
corner of the.property.
This land will be approximately 250' x 300' in' diameter.
This is to accommodate a 2 million gallon ground storage
re-pump station which will be approximately 25' high with'
a building to house the necessary pumps, controls and would
be quite similar in'design, except for diameter, to the one
on Wool~right Rd. and Congress Avenue.
Perry A. Cessna,
Director of Utilities
MEMORANDUM "
TO:
FROM:
RE:
7 September 1983
File
C~rmen S. Annunziato, City Planner
Ciklin. Rezoning/Melear PUD
Rezoning of-this property is recommended subject to
comments as follows:
1. ~elocate proposed commercial tract to the area
shown as Phase 3 on the master plan;
2.. dedicate acreage in southeast corner of the
proposed PUD for public purposes;
dedicate all lands required for public improve-
ments within sixty (60) days of rezoning of
this property to PUD; and
prepare an agreement to comply with required
traffic improvements as noted in Mr. Walker's
letter of September 1, 1983 (attached) prior
to the ~City Council r~questing a waiver to
Palm Beach County zoning and subdivision require-
ments.
/bks
Carmen ~./An~~
City. Planner
Septembe= !, 1983
Mr. Carmem ~-~ Annunziato
City Planne=
City of Bo)~t~n Beach
120 N. E. 2nd Avenue
Boynton Be~ch, FL 33435
SUBJECT: Proposed Melear, P.U.D.
Dear Mr. Annunzi~t'o:
DcDuTrr,.,,t~! of En.,3;:~ee. ri,,o-
H. F. Ka:~lcrt
County E..~inee~
4)
3)
This is to confirm our meeting of August 30 with yourself and the developer
of Metear, P.U.D., in which the developer agreed to certain conditions which
would allow h~s. project to meet the requirements of the traffic performance
standard. The p~oposed development is a category A project, i.e.,
a significant impact on a road or roads which are already operatingat one orha~ing
above level of service D. As this is the case, the project must limit it'~
traffic to !i~ss than a significant impact on two category A road links, those
being Lantana Road and Hypoluxo Road between Congress Avenue and 1-95. Our
calculations indicate that project development should be limited to 50% of
the residenrlal units, with the balance.of the residential units and all of
the co~ercla~ not being allowed to develop until Lantana Road and Hypoluxo
Road are cc.m~nructed as four lane facilities. Additionally, this project
should be ~red to:
1) Dedicatm i08 feet of right of way for and construct Miner Road across
the Project's north property frontage.
2)a) Reimfmu~se the County for the cost of constructing left turn lanes at
the Project's entrance on Congress Avenue and at Miner Road. These
turn 2ames will be included in the Congress Avenue four laning project
curr-~n~x~ under contract. The County will bill the developer for this
work ba~d on unit prices at the time of Congress Avenue construction.
b) Construct right turn lanes on Congress Avenue at thm project's entrance
and at F~iner Road. The~e turn lanes should be constructed at the time
the project's entrance road and ~iner Road are built.
Pay t?]e cost of signalization at the following intersections, when war--
ranted, as determined by the County Engineer:
a) Congress Avenue and Miner Road.
b) Entrance Road and ~iner Road.
c) Entrance. ROad and Congress Avenue.
Pay "Fair Share Impact Fee" upon iss~an~e of building permits.
BOX 2429 WEST PALkl EEACH, FLORIDA ·
1305) 6~q4-4090
As w~:~fmcussed, it'is anticimated that the City will enter into a formal
ag.re~'~'.with the developer ~o ensure that all of these Conditions are
comp~e~ with in order that this project'would meet the requirements of the
traffic ~er£orraance Standard.
The oppoz-t~mity to co~ument is, Sincerely appreciated.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
Charles R. Walker, Jr.,
Director, Traffic Division
CR~'.~ct
cc: Stan Redick
MEMORANDUM
September 7, 1983
TO: C~en Aununziato, City Planner
RE: Meiear p.U.D.
Ba~ed on our T.R.B. meeting of September 6th, Melear representatives
are to provide written documentation to include:
.List of specific recreational facilities to be
provided, including size and/or number of each
facility.
Provide adequate written guarantee that each
phase of development will include adequate space
and facilities for private recreation based on
sub-division regulations. (These are in addition
to the comanon facilities as presented at the
T.R.B. meeting.)
Ass~ing that written documents submitted are adequate and proper,
recommend one-half (½) credit be given for public land dedication and
that th~ fee in lieu of land be required.
m~=~c on the proposed units:
.018 x 83 units = 1.49 Acres
.015 x 922 units = 13.83 Acres
'-=~ ae~.ication requirement. ]..
15.32 Acres
~-ha!f credit for adequate private recreation facilities reduces
the ~re~iu~..~ement to 7.66 acres to be provided in equivalent dollars.
CCF: pb
CC: John Wildner, Park's Supt.
Charles C. Frederick, Director
Recreation & Park Department