The URL can be used to link to this page

O98-33 ORDINANCE O98-.~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDED COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CITY'S EXPANDED REDEVELOPMENT AREA; FINDING THAT THE PLAN CONFORMS TO THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1969, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO MODIFY OR AMEND SAID PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida enacted Part III of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, (The Community Redevelopment Act of 1969, referred to as "The Act"); and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, pursuant to the Act has created the Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the City Commission, pursuant to the Act, has declared an area of Boynton Beach, as described in the Proposed Redevelopment Plan to be a blighted area as defined in the Act, and that the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment, or combination thereof, of such area is necessary in the interest of the public health, safety, morals or welfare of the residents of the City of Boynton Beach; and WHEREAS, the Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Agency has caused to be prepared a Community Redevelopment Plan for "Downtown Boynton Beach"; and ~ · WHEREAS, the City Commission now wishes to amend the Community ~. Redevelopment Plan for the Central Business District, adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 89-49, so that it will not be utilized in conjunction with the plan adopted herein which includes the expanded redevelopment area; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has held a public hearing after public notice in conformanCe with the requirements of the Act. NOWf THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMI'SStON OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACHf FLORIDA~ THAT: Section 1. The Community Redevelopment Plan for downtown Boynton Beach, having been duly received and considered as provided by law, is hereby amended to include the expanded Redevelopment Area approving and adopting the Plan for the expanded area, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and ma'de a part of this Ordinance by reference. Said plan is hereby designated as the official redevelopment plan for the expanded redevelopment area, the boundaries of Which are described.in the plan. Tt is the purpose and intent of the City Commission that this redevelopment plan be implemented in the project area, and shall be utilized in conjunction with the redevelopment plan for the Central Business District adopted pursuant to Ordinance No. 89-49. Section 2. Tt is hereby found and determined that said redevelopment plan for redevelOpment of the project area: (1) Conforms with the Community Redevelopment. Act of 1969, as amended; (2) Ts necessary and in the interests of pUblic health, safety, morals and welfare of the residents of the City of Boynton Beach, and will effectuate the purpose of the Act by revitalizing the area economically and socially, thereby increasing the tax base, promoting sound growth, improving housing conditions, and eliminating the conditions which the Florida Legislature has found in the Act to constitute a menace which is injurious to the public health, safety, welfare and morals of the residents; (3) :Is sufficiently complete to indicate such land acquisition, demolition and removal of structures, redevelopment, improvements and rehabilitation as may be proposed to be carried out in the community redevelopment area; zoning and planning changes, if any; land uses; maximum densities; and building requirements. (4) Will not result in the displacement of families from the community redevelopment area, and therefor it is not necessary to provide a feasible method for the location of families displaced from the community redevelopment area; (5) Conforms to the general plan of the City of Boynton Beach as a whole; (6) Gives due consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities that may be desirable for neighborhood improvement, with special consideration for the health, safety and welfare of children residing in the .general vicinity of the site covered by the plan; and (7) Will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City of Boynton Beach as a whole, for the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private enterprise. Section 3. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the redevelopment plan hereby approved and adopted, it is found and determined that certain official action must be taken by the City Commission with reference, among other things, to changes in zoning, the vacation and removal of streets, alleys, and other public ways, relocation of public facilities, the establishment of new street patterns, and other public action. Accordingly, the City Commission hereby: (A) Pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the redevelopment plan; (B) Requests the various officials, departments, boards and agencies of the City of Boynton Beach likewise to cooperate in carrying out the redevelopment plan, exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with the redevelopment plan; (C Stands ready to consider and take appropriate action upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the redevelopment plan; and (D) Intends to undertake and complete any proceedings necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the redevelopment plan. All of the foregoing shall be done and performed in a timely manner. The Redevelopment Agency shall, from time to time, present specific developmental plans in the implementation of the redevelopment plan to the City Manager in order I that the City Commission may be assured of compliance by the said agency with the redevelopment plan. Section 4. The Community Redevelopment Plan may be amended or modified as set forth in Section 163.361, Florida Statutes., as amended. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. FIRST READING this /~ day of August, 1998. SECOND, FTNAL READING AND PASSAGE this ,~ day of September, 1998. C~-I'Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA IVlayor 'Cl~ ~lerk ~ Commi~r .' --"" Bo?ton Beach . ~ Commumty Redevelopmen Area W~t ~ -. Suba~ C~ Bo~to~ ~h BIvL Wootbr~zht Soad ~ Current CR Area Subarea ~ Proposed CR Expan: c.~ Area BOYNTON BEACH VISION 20/20' REDEVELOPMENT MASTER Pl .AN Prepared For: The City of Boynton Beach By: Duncan and Associates, Inc. (PHme Consultant) Urban Design Studio, Inc. David Plummer and Associates LB Limited and Associates, [nc. July 16, 1998 Contents Paqe # · Introduction .................................................... 1 · Overview ................................................. ! · Project Goals and Objectives ................................. 2 · Public Partici pation ......................................... 7 II. Existing Socio-Economic Conditions ................................. 8 · Population ................................................ 8 · Median Age ............................................... 8 · Housing- ................................................. 9 · Median Income ............................................ 9 · Employment of Residents ................................... 10 · Types of Businesses ....................................... 10 · Jobs in the Study Area ..................................... 10 · Sales Revenues .......................................... 11 III. The Ocean District .............................................. 12 · Redevelopment Overview ................................... 12 · Theme .................................................. 12 · Way Finding Signnage ..................................... 13 IV. Marina Area ................................................... 14 · Development Intensity Projections ............................ 14 · Nautical Theme ........................................... 15 · Ocean Avenue Bridge ...................................... 16 · Boynton Marina ........................................... 16 · Port Promenade (East B. B. Blvd.) ............................ 18 · Blue Lagoon Stormwater Facility ............................. 20 · The Cove ................................................ 21 · Joint Nautical Museum/Public Use Site ........................ 22 · Private Development Projects ................................ 23 · Architectural Guidelines .................................... 25 July 15, 1998 Contents Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 1 · Parking ................................................. 29 · Zoning .................................................. 32 , Circulation and Access ..................................... 35 V. Old Town ..................................................... 36 · 500 East Ocean Avenue .................................... 36 · Dolphin Square ........................................... 37 VI. Ocean Avenue Promenade ....................................... 38 · Proposed Project .......................................... 38 · Estimated Cost and Funding ................................. 38 · Architectural Guidelines .................................... 39 · Streetscape .............................................. 40 · Traffic Circulation ......................................... 41 VII. Town Square .................................................. 42 · Proposed Development ..................................... 42 · Estimated Cost and Fun ding ................................. 42 · Architectural Guidelines .................................... 43 · Civic Center/Old High School ................................ 44 · Senior Center ............................................ 44 · Old School Children's Museum ............................... 45 · Traffic Circulation ......................................... 45 VIII. Martin Luther King Boulevard ..................................... 47 · Land Use Plan ............................................ 47 · Traffic Calming Improvements ............................... 47 · Business Incubator ........................................ 48 IX. Major Commercial Corridors ...................................... 49 · Boynton Beach Boulevard Gateway ........................... 49 · Federal Highway (US 1) .................................... 51 · Commercial Design Guidelines ............................... 52 July 15. 1998 Contents Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 2 X. Neighborhood Revitalization ...................................... 53 · Successful Neighborhoods .................................. 53 · Resource Framework ...................................... 53 · Neighborhood Delineation .................................. 54 · Traffic Calming ........................................... 54 · Neighborhood Improvements ................................ 54 · Revitalization Strategy ..................................... 57 XI. Community Redevelopment Area Expansion .......................... 72 · Methodology ............................................. 72 · Existing CRA Area ........................................ 74 · Propose~d Expansion Area .................................. 75 · Determination of Need for Redevelopment ...................... 76 XII. Implementation Program ......................................... 83 Organization and Coordination .................................... 83 Implementation Table ........................................... 84 Financial Resources ............................................ 86 XIII. Marketing Strategy .............................................. 90 · Theme · Materials ................................................ 90 · Costs · Promotional Schedule ...................................... 91 · Measuring the Plan ........................................ 92 · Summary ................................................ 92 Appendices A: Study Area Socio-Economic Information B: Marina Parking Analysis C: Commercial Design Guidelines for Major Corridors D: Photographic Inventory of CRA Conditions E: Traffic Calming Alternatives F: City Club at Boat Landing Park July 15, 1998 Contents Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 3 I. Introduction Overview This Redevelopment Master Plan was born out of the Boynton Beach Vision 20/20: Planning Our Future American Assembly held at Indian River Plantation where approximately 100 community representatives met in May, 1996, to chart a positive future course for the city. The general agreements of the 20/20 Assembly participants were summarized in a Policy Statement centered around seven (7) major policy issues as follows: 1 .) Quality of Life/Image and Character; 2.) Commercial R~vitalization; 3.) Economic Development; 4.) Neighborhood Revitalization; 5.) Public Safety/Crime Prevention; 6.) City Government; and 7.) Education/Youth Involvement. The City used the Policy Statement to begin the process of specific planning and programming for the effective redevelopment of the downtown manna area, the Civic Center area, major commercial corridors and surrounding neighborhoods east of 1-95. The City retained the planning team headed by James Duncan and Associates last summer to assist staff, the commission and residents in the development of a detailed Master Plan for redevelopment. Since beginning the project, the consulting team along with City staff has held a number of workshop meetings to solicit public input and made numerous presentations to the City Commission on the various components of the project scope of work. The project goals were established at the outset and are presented in the next section. Jul5 15. 1998 Introduction Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 1 History/Attractions/RedevelOpment Potential June 30. 1998 [ntrodttction ~sion 20/20 Redevelopment ll/[aster Plan Page Project Goals and Objectives The goals and objectives of the 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan project were developed as one of the initial work scope tasks. To the extent possible, the seven (7) original issue areas of the 1996 Vision 20/20 retreat, in conjunction with the scope of services for the redevelopment program, were used to develop the goals and objectives presented below. Goal 1: City Image To create a positive city image which portrays a diversified family-oriented coastal community that is inclusive, progressive, balanced, stable, and self-sustaining. Objective 1.1 Evaluate urban design character including existing streetscapes, public places, parks and open space, focal points and vistas. Objective 1.2 Formulate a community identity based on historical reseamh, and current icons and images. Objective 1.3 Plan the redevelopment of the Ocean Avenue/Boynton Beach Boulevard corridor east of 1-95 as a basic building block in the city's image. Objective 1.4 Identify areas where the unifying theme wi] be incorporated into redevelopment components and marketing strategies. Objective 1.5 Prepare a community gateway concept and "way finding" graphics system. Objective 1.6 Review City design concepts for neighborhood entry signs. July ]5. 1998 Introduction Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 2 Goal 2: Commercial Revitalization To develop unique and practical urban design plans which will guide cost-effective public infrastructure decisions in the revitalization of the Primary Commercial Target Areas and generate substantial private sector investment. Objective 2.1 Determine the feasibility of a Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) boundary expansion in order to increase financial resources of theAgency during redevelopment plan implementation. Objective 2.2 Conduct an onsite public symposium to discuss market potentials and economic development strategies for the U.S. 1 and Boynton Beach Boulevard areas. Objective 2.3 Prepare an economic analysis of non-residential uses attracted to the redevelopment area. Objective 2.4 Prepare Overall Design Plans for all Primary Commercial Target Areas which include design criteria addressing public improvements, infrastructure, building placement, architectural character, s~gnnage, streetscaping, landmark opportunities and unifying design concepts. The Primary Commercial Target Areas include Martin Luther King Boulevard from Seacrest Boulevard to U. S. 1, U. S. 1 from north to south city limits, Boynton Beach Boulevard from U. S. I to 1-95, Ocean Avenue from the Marina to Seacrest Boulevard, Golf Road between U. S. 1 and Seacrest Boulevard, and the railroad property east of the FEC tracks between Boynton Beach Boulevard and Ocean Avenue. Goal 3: Downtown Redevelopment Create an exciting, yet realistic, urban design plan for the downtown Boynton Beach area along Ocean Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard between (and including) Seacrest Boulevard and the Marl na area. This plan will also address applicable portions of Federal Highway. Objective 3.1 Designate specific areas in downtown to create friendly pedestrian and bicycle friendly July 15; 1998 Introduction Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page $ environments where mixed uses and infill development wilt be encouraged. Objective 3.2 Prepare conceptual area plan and design criteria for the cultural center/marina area district addressing mix of uses, infrastructure, landscaping, signnage, and architecture character. Goal 4: Neighborhood Revitalization To prepare a Strategic Revitalization Plan for the Residential Target Areas which will encourage mixed use infill and rehabilitation of neighborhoods. The Residential Target Areas include Boynton Beach Boulevard south to city limits and 1-95 east to the Intracoastal Waterway, and the C-16 Canal north to the city limits and 1-95 east to the Intracoastal Waterway. Objective 4.1 Meet with neighborhood groups and associations in the study area to discuss the 20/20 implementation project, and solicit input on neighborhood needs and opportunities. Objective 4.2 Collect historical and current housing and neighborhood information, and analyze needs in the Residential Target Areas. Objective 4.3 Conduct field surveys of the selected Ridgewood and Mango Park South neighborhoods to identify current housing conditions and mix. Objective 4.4 Develop a citywide housing strategy to encourage greater balance of housing types within the city. Goal 5: Transportation Needs and Linkages To address current travel problems in the selected Gateway and Ridgewood neighborhoods, and propose solutions to cimulation and parking deficiencies in the downtown area which will facilitate redevelopment. July 15, 1998 Introduction Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 4 Objective 5.1 Examine travel linkages in the selected Gateway and Ridgewood neighborhoods, and identify potential areas for traffic calming devices. Objective 5.2 Investigate traffic patterns within the downtown core and propose enhanced linkages, bike/pedestrian travel and traffic calming measures. Objective 5.3 Develop a parking strategy for the Community Redevelopment Area, with particular emphasis on the downtown core. Goal 6: Public Involvement To make pubic involvement a cornerstone of the 20/20 Redevelopment Program and thereby ensure that citizen ideas and needs are fully incorporated. Objective 6.1 Hold night-time meetings with neighborhood groups and other citizens in the Residential Target Areas to discuss the project and solicit constructive in put. Objective 6.2 Publish a prosect newsletter for city residents at least three times during the prolect to provide information about the project and facil Itate public input. Objective 6.3 Present project findings and recommendations at public workshops and to the City Commission at various points during the project. Objective 6.4 Meet study area stakeholders, merchants, business leaders, real estate brokers, affordable housing developers and community-based organizations to solicit historical and current knowledge about area needs and markets. July 15, 1998 Introduction Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 l~erteveloprnent Master Plan Page 5 Goal 7: Implementation To develop a specific 20/20 implementation program based on realistic and financially- feasible public projects, encouragement of private sector investment, and a schedule which assigns community responsibility for "getting things done." Objective 7.1 Identify potential implementation agents such as community-based organizations. Objective 7.2 Recommend specific Future Land Use map amendments to help implement the Redevempment Plan. Objective 7.3 Evaluate City regulations for economic inhibitors and develop specific language to correct these obstacles. Objective 7.4 Prepare Land Development Regulation modifications to encourage redevelopment in the Primary and Residential Target Areas, and support Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies. Objective 7.5 Identify economic and compliance incentives to assist in implementation. Objective 7.6 Develop a financing plan for implementation of the 20/20 Redevelopment Program. Objective ?.'7 Prepare detailed implementation program complete with specific action tasks, responsible agencies, viable funding sources and timeframes. Objective 7.8 Develop an effective promotional and marketing strategy for redevelopment program mplementation. July 15. 1998 Introduction Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 6 These goals and objectives were used as guide~posts throughout the project to develop the data, analysis and resulting recomm~fi~l~tion~ of the 20/20 redevelopment program. Public Participation The objectives of the 20/20 public participation program were to: 1) Inform the general public about the plan and the process nvolve~l; 2) Obtain informed input from, not only those directly impacted by the redevelopment plan, but residents and businesses located outside the redevelopment area; 3) Report the findings of the focus group studies to the City Commission and staff; and 4) Include the findings in the development of the project's recommendations. The Consultants conducted 4 focus group studies, over 20 neighborhood and special interest group meetings, 2 traffic public involvement sessions, 8 city commission meeting presentations, 2 commission workshops and a final all-day community workshop which included the original Vision 20/20 task force members. In addition, the consultants assisted the City in producing two newsletters stating the objectives, timeline, and progress of the redevelopment plan. The general feedback from the public was favorable. Particular emphasis was placed on the specific ideas and concerns expressed by the community. For examole, the business community had specific concerns related to pricing out of existing owners in the business district. City leaders can move forward with confidence on the redevelopment plan due to the comprehensive public partici pation process that was incorporated. No one group can state they didn't have a chance to voice an opinion or concern. Their opinion or concern was addressed in the planning process and incorporated into this document. In conclusion, the public participated, the staff worked hand-in-hand with the consultants and the elected officials can now make the necessary commitments to lasting positive change for Boynton Beach. July 15, 1998 Introduction Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 7 I1. Existing Socio-Economic Conditions The primary source for existing soc~o-economic data for Boynton Beach and the 20/20 study area ~s the U. S. Census.. Specialized economic databases are also maintained by private firms, in the initial stages of the 20/20 project, existing soc~o-economic conditions in the study area were assessed and compared to the remainder of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County, as a whole. The base socio-economic information is contained in Appendix A. This information was analyzed, and key conditions and trends were identified. These conditions and trends are summarized in this section. Population In 1990, the population in the 20/20 study area (east of 1-95) was 25,062. This represented approximately 52% of the total city population of 46,194. Over the past eight (8) years, population growth in the study area has been relatively slow since most the area is built-out. Meanwhile, the remainder of the City has experienced rapid growth. Median Age Median age of an area can be important in assessing service needs and potential market. In the 20/20 study area, median age varies greatly as shown below moving north to south: Median Aqe North of Gateway BIvd ...................................... 40 years Ocean Avenue to Gateway Blvd ............................... 31 years West of Federal between Ocean Av. and Woolbright .............. 36 years East of Federal Hwy. between Ocean Ay. and Woolbright .......... 70 years Woolbright Road to Golf .................................... 70 years South of Golf Road ........................................ 48 years Boynton Beach ............................................ 43 years Palm Beach County ........................................ 40 years July 15. 1998 Existing Socio-Economic Conditions Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 8 Generally, median age is lower in the northern portion of the study area and nses appreciably south of Woolbright Road. A significaiit elderly population exists south of Woolbright, and east of U. S. 1 between Ocean Avenue and Woolbright. Housing In 1990, a total of 13,250 housing units existed in the entire 20/20 study area and approximately 74% of these units were owner-occupied. Renter-occupied housing varies somewhat by subarea. In the northern half of the study area 29% of all units were rental in 1990, while in the southern half, 23% were rental units. Multi-family housing predominates in the 20/20 study area. In 1990, 55% of the units were multiple-family, w~hile 39% were single-family structures. In level of multiple-family housing is much higher in the study area than in either Boynton Beach (as a whole) or Palm Beach County. Median Income Median family income provides a good gauge of area buying power and marketing potential. In the 20/20 study area. income levels vary considerably as shown below. North of C-16 $ 35,000 - 42,000 C-16 to Ocean Avenue $ 32, 000 Ocean to Woolbdght $ 36,400 - 45,000 Wool onght and Golf $ 22,800 South of Golf Road $ 55,200 Boynton Beach $ 29,000 Pal m Beach County $ 32,500 In general, incomes were h ~gher in the study area in 1990 versus Boynton Beach as a whole or Palm Beach County. July 15. 1998 Existing Socio-Economic Conditions Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 9 . ~~. OCEAN AVE Employment of Residents Coastal residents held approximately 10,200 jobs in 1990, some located within the 20/20 study area but most located in other areas of Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County. Of these jobs, 36% were in the service sector while 21% were in retail trade. There were also 138 home-based workers in the coastal Boynton area in 1990. Types of Businesses According To 1996 business data sources, the 20/20 study area contains 870 businesses which represent approximately 53% of all businesses in the city. The proportion of business_ types comprising this total are shown below. · Personal and business services - 51% · Retail trade - 21% · Financial, insurance and real estate businesses - 8%. Health servme companies (234 total) are largest part of services sector. The manufacturing and wh Dlesale trade sectors are not strong in coastal Boynton Beach, being most common in western Boynton. Jobs in the Study Area Of the total 16,100 iobs in Boynton Beach today (1996), 39% or 6,300 of these are located in the 20/20 study area (east of 1-95). These coastal Boynton jobs comprise many industry sectors, however the overwhelming number (4,000) are in personal and business services. The second largest employment sector is retail trade with 1,200 jobs. The remaining classifications after retail trade have considerably less importance in terms of job numbers. Overall, services and retail jobs make-up 82% of th a jobs in the stu dy area. Other significant sectors include real estate and insurance, construction and wholesale trade. July 15, 1998 Existing Socio-Economic Conditions Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 10 Sales Revenues In 1996, Boynton businesses generated $1.5 billion in sales in 1996. Approximately 38% of this total was contributed by business sales in the 20/20 study area. The top sales sector in coastal Boynton Beach were: * Personal and business services ($256 million); * Retail trade ($112 million); and * Wholesale trade ($105 million). It is interesting to note that while wholesale trade is far below retail trade in terms of employment, this sector is very close to retail trade when sales generation figures are considered. July 15, 1998 Existing Socio-Economic Conditions Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 11 III. The Ocean District Redevelopment Overview Redevelopment of the City's old downtown area should be based on a specific Master Plan for the area generally between Seacrest Avenue on the west, the Intracoastal Waterway on the east, N.E. 4th Avenue on the north, and S.E. 2nd Avenue on the south. This area encompassing approximately 150 acres is referenced in this redevelopment plan as the "Ocean District". The Ocean District consists of a number of distinct places and destinations as shown on the subsequent page. These include the Town Square park, anchored by the City Hall and Library, the Marina Area to the east of Federal Highway, and the Old Town area, centered on the 500 E. Ocean Avenue block. These areas are linked by the Boynton Beach Boulevard Gateway corridor and the Ocean Avenue Promenade. Relating each of these areas through a unified Master Plan for this Ocean District should reinforce their market potential and success as public places. While it is desirable to link each of these areas with auto circulation, pedestrian and bicycle pathways, as well as other unityin§ elements, each place should maintain its own unique and distinctive character. These places, their primary features, and their characteristics are described on the following pages. Theme The theme for the Ocean District should depict the unique waterside location and nautical history of this area, something a surpnsing number of coastal downtowns in Palm Beach County do not have. This is attraction that can draw many residents and visitors alike to the Ocean District. It is recommended this theming pattern be graphically established by using the "sailfish" logo shown on the next page. This logo should be used in the 'way finding" signnage described below, as well as, depicted in architectural building features and street amenities, and even City stationary. July 15, 1998 The Ocean District Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 12 0 [11 m ffi 0 ffi Formal Logomark Way Finding Signnage It is very important to provide attractive, interesting and informative signnage at key points in the Ocean District for residents and visitors alike. This signnage not only helps solidify the theme of the area, but also directs traffic away from heavily-used arterials onto side roads where interesting sites and entertainment attractions may be located. The following prototype signs have been designed by the consulting team to form the basis for the way finding system of the Ocean District: 1 .} Locator Map; 2.) Pedestrian Area Map; 3.) Special District_Directional Sign; and 4.) Vehicular Directional Sign.. These signs are graphically presented on subsequent pages. They should be placed at strategic locations near intersections and along roadway linkages to address localized directional and informational needs. July 15, 1998 The Ocean District Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 13 Locator Map Pedestrian Area Map Special District Directional Sign Vehicular Directional Sign IV. Marina Area The Marina Area is the key component of the Ocean District and nas the potential for redevelooment success like no other in south Palm Beach County. It has tremendous comparative advantages in attracting a mix of entertainment, retail, office and residential uses naturally drawn to its waterside location. However, redevelopment has been hindered in the past by infrastructure deficiencies such as stormwater retention and parking requirements. These problems are being effectively addressed both currently by the City Commission, as well as, through this Redevelopment Master Plan. The City has also moved to provide incentives for private interests to redevelop key properties. The proposed conceptual long-range development plan for the Marina Area is shown on the subsequent page as a component of the Ocean District. The Boynton Marina should be visually extended to Federal Highway through the unified treatment of architecture, streetscape, graphic icons, and the recurring theme of water incorporated into the intersections at Federal Highway, the pedestrian sidewalks, and plaza spaces. Public access to as much of the waterfront as possible should be provided and protected. The Marina Area is made up of the following areas: · The Boynton Marina the heart of the marina. · Port Promenade a convertable street extending Boynton Beach Boulevard to the Intracoastal Waterway. · The Cove and Blue Lagoon mixed-use redevelopment with public plazas and new stormwater lake. Development Intensity Projections Based on socio-economic information presented earlier, analysis of current market trends, and existing development conditions in the Marina Area and affected environs east of the FEC railroad, development intensity projections were developed as a long- term guide for specific land use and urban design planning of the area. A 20-year projection period was used. These projections, separated into two (2) subareas, are presented in the table below. July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 14 OCEAN DISTR CT STUDY AREA EAST OF THE FEC RAILROAD Assure; ng infrastructure and parking problems are resolved and public sector access and beautification improvements made, market analysis showed strong potential demand for specialty retail, restaurant, entertainment (such as museum), and hotel/conference cenfer for this attractive waterside location. Nautical Theme In order to establish and promote a waterfront nautical theme for the Marina Area, marina-related names should be considered throughout the area. Special public places such as the proposed Boynton Beach Boulevard Promenade, for example, could be named "Port Promenade." This should encourage private buildings and businesses to add to the nautical theme of this special place. Buildings in the Marina Area could take names such as "Compass Center" and hotels might be named "Captains Quarters." The compass rose. with its infinite number of variations, is recommended as the graphic icon which can tie the Boynton Beach Marina area together. Some applications of the compass rose ~mage include: · pedestrian pavers · banners · signnage · architectural ornamentation · etched glass · building names and Iogos. July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 15 Banner Concepts for Marina Area June $0,1998 Ocean District Visi°n 20/20 Redevelopment lklaster Plan page Interactive Water Sculpture The integration of water with art as a way of attracting the public to enjoy the city's manna environment was discussed at severa workshops, The concept is illustrated above. It suggests a global sphere with continents raised slightly above the surface of the sphere. At the sphere's surface, water cascades down dramatically illustrating the predominace of the earth's oceans. Originatin9 from the globe are radiating lines inlaid into a public plaza showing Boynton Beach's relationships to places around the world. June 30. ]998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Compass rose applications are presented in subsequent pages. Ocean Avenue Bridge The new bridge will set the stage for redevelopment in the Marina Area. The bridge's neo-ciassical design will serve as an expression from which to draw architectural inspiration. Four spire-like towers will provide a gateway entrance and link to the two waterfront communities of Boynton Beach and Ocean Ridge. Trellis work at the towers' base offers an opportunity to integrate nautical art into the design. Immediate surrounding areas, will feature a park-like promenade to encourage pedestrian and passive waterfront activity. Design elements created for the bridge will be reflected in Boynton Beach's emerging downtown revitalization through paving patterns, colors, and light fixtures. The Ocean Avenue B~idge project has provided an opportunity to, in a manner of speaking, bridge the communities of Boynton Beach and Ocean Ridge. Through a series of meetings with task force members and representatives from each city, the Department of Transportation and its design team has succeeded in building an aesthetic design consensus. It is important to note that the height and grade configuration of the new bridge will impact existing parking along East Ocean Avenue. A number of parking spaces along the north side of Ocean near the bridge will be eliminated with the new bridge. Thus, these "lost" will need to be replaced by additional spaces within the Marina Area. Boynton Marina The Boynton Marina should be visually extended to Federal Highway through the unified treatment of architecture, streetscape, graphic icons, and the recurring theme of water incorporated into the gateway intersections at Federal Highway. Pedestrian sidewalks and plaza spaces should also reflect the Marina theme. Public access to as much of the waterfront as possible should be provided and protected. An open pedestrian mall. visually linking Ocean Avenue to the new lake north of Boynton Beach Boulevard, should be created to emphasize the pedestrian nature of the Marina Area. A full mix of uses should be present, with an emphasis on eating, entertainment and specialty shopping on the ground floor. July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 16 Boynton Marina I Compass Rose Specia 6. Parking Structure and Intersection Treatment Apartment Units 2. Special "Build To" Lines and 7. Nautical Museum with Enhance Pedestrian Environment information and Police Station 3. Retail / Office Opportunities 8. Additional Retail / Restaurants 4. Corn er Plaza with Water Feature 9. Charter and Boat Slips 5. Surface Parking 10. Residentia and Retail dune 16, 1998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan New buildings along Federal Highway, Boynton Beach Boulevard and Ocean Avenue should be built to a prescribed building line along the street (_+12' setback) allowing for wide pedestrian walks which could accommodate cafes and restaurants. This approach also screens parking in the rear and allows for the future construction of a hidden, unobtrusive parking structure. Characteristics of this prime redevelopment area should include: · "Coastal Florida" style architectural (see architectural guidelines). · Building locations that establish continuity of pedestrian walkways along Federal Highway. Boynton Beach Boulevard extending to the Intracoastal Waterway and Ocean Avenue. · Buildings should be predominantly in the two to three story range. Limited landmark structures should be considered (6 - 8 stories maximum preferred). Buildings taller than eight stories should be discouraged. The site of the former boat storage facility should be considered a prime mixed use development site. While the first one or two floors should be supportive of public waterfront activity (shops, restaurants, galleries, etc.), the upper floors would be very desirable for offices or apartments. Public access around the waterfront, however, should be provided and protected. Plazas and public amenities should be provided for wherever possible. The eastern facade and ground floor of the First Financial Center should be reconsidered for pedestrian-serving shops and cafes. The building design provides an existing "arcade" on its eastern side. which, through festive architectural detailing, could be transformed in a sheltered, pedestrian plaza with direct access to and views of the Boynton Marina. Interim surface parking can be designed to accommodate immediate and short range (1-5 year) parking demands, but a parking structure should be planned for and integrated into the Marina Area. Characteristics of this prime redevelopment area should include: · Parking that is screened from view and ultimately structured to allow for the addition of new businesses. · Shops, restaurants, galleries and other Marina Area attractions. · Ground floor shops, restaurants and other pedestrian-friendly businesses in order to maintain a continuous walking experience. · Protected view corridors (as shown on the Illustrative Master Plan) to July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 17 include: 1) Boynton Beach Boulevard to Intracoastal Waterway 2) new "Cove" lake to Ocean Avenue 3) south end of First Financial Canter to Intracoastal Waterway Residential component Excellent vehicular access to new retail, residential, office and entertainment uses should be emphasized in the early years of redevelopment. Of particular importance is the provision of a public road and/or boulevard between Ocean Avenue and the new Boynton Beach Boulevard Promenade in the area of NE 6tn Street. This can be accomplished by the extension and widening of the current NE 6,n Avenue nght-of-way north of Ocean AventJe up to East Boynton Beach Boulevard through either public purchase or private donation. The construction of the Blue Lagoon stormwater ake will remove one of the most critical roadblocks to Boynton Madna redevelopment, that is, adequate drainage consistent with current federal, state and regional regulations. Another importance hindrance to redevelopment has been parking. As with stormwater drainage, private property owners simply cannot provide necessary parking spaces on individual parcels, to meet governmental and lending institution requirements, and still have viable land remaining.to develop appropriate uses. One current restaurant owner has purchased remote parcels for parking but these have drawbacks also when trying to attract customers. Thus, the City should acquire donations, easements and/or fee simple title to centrally-located parcels to construct attractive, well-maintained surface parking spaces as a short-term strategy. One or more of tnese sites could become parking structures in the longer-term redevelopment plan. Parking alternatives are addressed in greater detail later in this section. Port Promenade (East Boynton Beach Boulevard) Proposed Development Because access to the Marina Area is vital to its success in the early years of redevelopment, Boynton Beach Boulevard, east of Federal Highway, should be July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 18 Port Promenade 1. Compass Rose Special 6. Blue Lagoon Overlook Intersection Treatment 7. Removable Bollards 2. Vehicle Drop Off 8. Enhance Appearance 3. Public Facilities / Attractionsof Lift Station 4. Pedestrian Plazas and 9. Overlook Opportunities Outdoor Cafes 10. Compass Rotary Terminus 5. Fountain Rotary with Overlook and Covered Structure June 16,1998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan designed as a visually-impressive street promenade "convertible" to pedestrian use for special events. For this reason, the "Port Promenade" is proposed for this segment of East Boynton Beach Boulevard. A graphic rendering of this signature amenity is presented in the Ocean District Redevelopment plan graphic (see Marina Area inset). A change in roadway character should be evident and dramatic as one approaches the Madna Area from 1-95 and Seacrest Boulevard. The pedestrian mal or promenade should be emphasized ay tropical plantings, specialty pavers, and significant artistic elements and features. The promenade should be terminated by a public pavilion at the Intracoastal Waterway. Characteristics of this pedestrian promenade should include: · District gateway monumentation at Federal Highway. · Water features/fountain at the Federal Highway gateway. · Public facilities on both sides of promenade entry to serve as an activity generator/catalyst for attracting businesses and pedestrian activity. · Increased building separation along the promenade at Federal Highway to emphasize visibility, create pedestrian plaza space, and allow for feature landscape and architectural treatments. · A compass rose rotary at the terminus of the promenade and at the new lake to the north to create a landmark, · Special pedestrian overlooks with benches at the new lake, existing marina inlet, and the Intracoastal Waterway. · Buildings with sidewalk cafes and second floor terraces to add life and activity to this pedestrian street. · A unified grade elevation (no sidewalks) for pedestrians and automobiles to allow for temporary or complete pedestrianization of the promenade. · Removable bollards can be used to convert sections of the promenade to "pedestrian only" for special events. Estimated Cost The estimated construction cost of the Port Promenade is $3.6 million assuming it is constructed as a convertible roadway/pedestrian corridor with parking for the full length from Federal Highway to the Intracoastal, as shown on the Ocean District Redevelopment Plan graphic herein. An additional 30' wide strip of land on the north side of the existing East Boynton Beach Boulevard right-of-way, extending from the July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 RedeVelopment Master Plan Page 19 The Cove / Blue Lagoon ~. ~ ~ - ..~ - . - .~ >-.., ~.,2~ ~ 1 New "Blue Lagoon" Retention Area 6. Entrance Pedestrian Environment 2, Board Walk System / Water Features 7. Hotel / Residential 3. The Cove Plaza and Outdoor Stage 8. Preserve Existing Ficus Tree 4. Retail / Office Facilities 9, Connection to Mangrove Boardwalk 5. Future Parking Structure and Ground 10. Mangrove Floor Retail June 16,1998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan approximate middle of the promenade east to the Intracoastal Waterway. City staff has indicated that there is a strong likelihood this additional right-of-way can be obtained through donation. City staff has proposed an alternative design for the promenade which calls for the acquisition of two (2) parcels located on each side of the promenade (east of Federal) for future office buildings, and the construction of the promenade as a walkway (not suitable for vehicular traffic) from NE 6th Street to the Intracoastal, among other features. While this alternative has many benefits, the new office buildings add substantially to the total project cost and may hinder the desirable open, tree-lined water vista, looking from the west side of Boynton Beach BouLevard east down the promenade which is intended impress approaching travele rs and spur their interest to investigate the Marina Area. Also, promenade parking, a critical need in early redevelopment, would also be greatly limited under the staff alternative. However, it should be noted that tl~e eastern walkway component of the staff proposal may be the best and most cosT-efficient alternative for addressing an existing infrastructure situation in that portion of the promenade, and thus should be given strong consideration. The estimated cost ofthispromenade option is $4.1 million, exclusive of utility relocation. Funding Sources Funding will be provided primarily by a combination of City general revenues, CRA momes, user fees and transportation grants. Blue Lagoon Stormwater Facility Proposed Development As shown on the Ocean District Redevelopment Plan graphic, the City is planning a regional stormwater retention facility in the north central portion of the Marina Area (see inset). Coined "Blue Lagoon," this important piece of infrastructure will address a critical historical hindrance to development in the Marina Area. The necessary land for the facility has been acquired and the construction plans are currently in the permitting process. Blue Lagoon is expected to be completed in 1999. July 15. 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 20 The City has also proposed a park-like walkway system around the lake, as well as, criss-crossing boardwalks over Blue Lagoon. One feature of the in-lake boardwalk system is a central platform with Ii mited seating where people can linger and enjoy the passive water environment. Estimated Costs The cost estimate for the Blue Lagoon facility itself and associated drainage improvements is $3.5 million. The projected cost for the in-lake boardwalks and peripheral walkway system is not yet available. No additional land acquisition is necessary for the lakeside walkways. Funding Sources The funding source for the Blue Lagoon facility is utility revenue bonds (approved) and eventually, user fees. Funding for the boardwalk and walkway systems will be provided either by City general revenues, CRA monies, and/or park and recreation grants. The Cove The planned sto rmwater retention lake. i.e.. Blue Lagoon, located immediately east of the Boynton Beach Plaza should stimulate the complete redevelopment of this existing stnp center. A multi-use building program (The Cove), involving public and private use, would allow for residential and/or a small hotel, office, retail, restaurants, and a public plaza with an outdoor amphitheater. These uses would allow people to take dramatic advantage of the new waterfront setting and proximity to the Boynton Marina and all of its activities. The mix of uses in The Cove should be designed to encourage its success as a public place and to maximize the joint use of parking. A mixture of offices with restaurants and retail will enable limited parking to provide for day and night time use. In addition, weekday office parking spaces will provide spaces for weekend amphitheater and Cove Plaza events. In any event, in order to maximize the use of the new waterfront environment, a parking structure should be integrated into the project design. The northern portion of this redevelopment site is a prime location for residential or hotel/conference center use. As a residential use. the target market would likely be Jul? ]5, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 21 young professionals interested in a lively atmosphere such as that anticipated with a plaza and amphitheater. As a hotel use, the §r~und floor ~acing the plaza should be considered for limited retail to support pedestrian activity. This is easier to do with a hotel use, which could also incorporate a sma~ conference center to complement the public use of the Cove Plaza. Boynton Beach currently has few buildings suitable for small 'medium business or civic confe fence activities. The Master Plan also recommends that some form of retail frontage be incorporated for the majority of the Federal Highway frontage. A major pedestrian crosswalk, linking additional parking on the west side of Federal Highway with The Cove. establishes a reasonable point at which continued retail frontage to the north may be considered optional. Joint Nautical Museum/Public Use Site Proposed Development Located in the Marina Area, a nautical museum can act as a natural visitor/tourist draw. The Nautical Museum is a concept which can be transformed into a number of different marina-oriented attractions. Palm Beach County and Boynton Beach are rich in history related to its coastal location. Whether its Boynton's sport fishing, its coral reefs or the history of shipwrecks and lost treasure, man's fascination with the ocean can form the basis for a number of educational and entertaining exhibits. A private developer, experienced in museum marketing and operations, should be sought to work in partnership with the City of Boynton Beach and the City's CRA. To help offset development costs and provide needed public services to the Marina Area. the museum should be developed as a joint use site. incorporating a police substation and marina nformation center in a portion of the new one-story building. The size of the joint use museum ~s estimated to be 2.200 square feet. however this estimate should be adjusted if necessary in the future based on input from the selected museum developer. Several potential locations for the joint use museum appear most feasible and are shown on the previously-presented Ocean District Redevelopment Plan graphic. One possible site is located adjacent to the southwest corner of the Blue Lagoon stormwater facility, immediately north of the Port Promenade. Another good location is in the northeast quadrant of Ocean Avenue and NE 6'" Street. This latter site offers the July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 22 advantage of current public ownership, in that, the FDOT had previously secured the parcel for drainage retention purposes in tkib Ocean Avenue Bridge improvement. However. this purpose was rendered unnecessary by the City's construction of the Blue Lagoon facility which can address the new bridge drainage needs. FDOT has agreed to transfer the parcel to the City for a nominal price. Estimated Costs Costs for the Port Promenade site will need to include land acquisition. Based on the estimated 2,200 square size of the joint use nautical museum, a 1/4 acre site would be appropriate (assuming no shared parking). Based on average vacant land prices in the area. land acquisition is estimated to be $50,000-60,000. Projected construction cost is $50,000 for the joint museum facility. Thus, the total cost for the facili~ at this location is estimated to be $100,000-$110,000. At the Ocean Avenue site, land acquisition would be nominal. Thus, the total estimated cost for the museum at this site would be the $50,000 construction cost. Shared parking opportunities will be available in the development of the joint use museum where some required spaces m~ght be located in a nearby city parking facility. If this concept proves feasible, the necessary site size could reduced by the total area of the shared (off-site) spaces assigned to the proposed museum. Funding Sources Primary funding sources should include City general fund revenues and CRA funds. Also, if the City chooses to enter into a joint venture arrangement with a private museum developer, then private sector funding would be available. Private Development Projects While prudently-planned public sector projects can address critical infrastructure needs and provide the initial "seeds'' for redevelopment, private sector development must be the "driving force" behind redevelopment. In the Boynton Marina Area, several key private developments are planned and have the potential to significantly accelerate the pace of future redevelopment. July 15, ]998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 23 Phase I Marina Retail/Office A development team, headed by Edward Garcia= is planning an exciting redevelopment project inthe northeast section of the Marina combining specialty retail, office an~t restaurant uses. The project is shown in the Ocean District/Marina Area graphic presented previously herein. Working with the City of Boynton Beach, the Garcia team has secured building permits for land preparation. The proposed Phase I development program is as follows: Square Feet Restaurants 13,910 Specialty Retail 17,850 Office 6,600 Total Space 38,360 This project can serve as an important first step in marina redevelopment due both to its central location adjacent to the proposed Promenade and the fact that it will draw residents and visitors to the area. Other Private Projects Several planned private redevelopment projects can reinfome the "destination" emphasis of the 20/20 Redevelopment Plan, and provide additional reasons for residents and visitors to come to the Marina Area. These important private projects are: · Two George's Restaurant- expansion of existing facility. · Dive Shop/Boat Charter- expansion and upgrade. · Banana Boat Restaurant/Other Retail- expansion of existing facility and additional of new retail space. · Intracoastal Indian Lake Village - new development. All of these projects should be completed in similar timeframes with the high-priority public improvements such as the Port Promenade. City staff is prepared to work with private developers for expediting the timely completion of these developments. July 15, 3998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ' Page 24 Marina Area Architectural Guidelines Architecture Buildings in the Marina Area should reflect a Florida Coastal style of amhitecture, consisting primarily of hip and/or gable roofs. Rectilinear forms with stepbacks and building articulation are encouraged This style derives its character from various elements associated with the Key West Vernacular Cracker and Bungalow styles of architecture. Overhangs for pedestrian canopies and visual interest should be incorporated whenever possible. Overhead structures, gateways, and arches, help define soaces, provide pedestrian comfort, and reinforce character and identity. Architectural detailing can emphasize both the historical and nautical themes within Boynton Beach. The use of thematic fences, overlooks, widows walks, open air structures and building elements can create a unique character in the Marina Area. Weather vanes, windsocks, and banners can add excitement.and movement in the air. Preferred Coastal Florida Style Elements The qualities and design elements of Coastal Florida Style Buildings include: · Metal seamed roofs; · Horizontal siding; · Hip or gable roofs; · Multi-paned windows; · Porches, balconies, widow walks, and breezeways; · Cupola: · Cool colors; · Exposed structural details (beams, rafters, etc.); · Post and rails; · Weather vanes; · Nautical detailing; · Roof overhang; · Open air structures. July 15, 1998 Marina Area BOynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 25 Coastal Florida Architecture Characteristics dune 30, ]998 Ocean DiStrict Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Discouraged Stylistic Elements · Highly reflective surfaces (glass, mirror, metal, etc.); · Large blank, unarticulated walls; · Square "Box Like" buildings; · Heavy stucco treatments; · Irregular, modernistic window shapes and rhythm; · Flat roofs; · Large plate glass windows. Exterior Building Wall Materials Exterior building walls are encouraged to use the following materials in an appropriate arrangement. These include: · Horizontal Siding; · overlap · channeled · beveled · shiplap · Shingles (finished or natural). The following materials may be incorporated, if appropriate, in limited applications (under 20% of facade). · Brick; · Smooth stucco; · Vertical wood siding. Windows In keeping with the Coastal Florida Style, windows should be rectangular and multi- paned. July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 26 UNDESIRABLE ARCHITECTURAL VERTICAL ARTICULATION HORIZONTALARTICULATtON TREATMENT ADDED ADDED 1~~ -- ;REATED IN THE BUILDINGS SETBACK AREA MAJORITY OF BUILDING WALL LOCATED ALONG STREET R.O.W. UP TO 50% OF MAJOR BUILDING FACADE MAY BE SETBACK FROM THE STREET R.O.W. 3REASED SIDEWALK CLIP BACK BUILDING CORNER ~ PROVIDES INTERESTING ~ --.z LANDMARK FEATURE PERMITTED ALLEY DES MAJOR INTERSECTION BETWEEN BUILDINGS PEDESTRIAN CUT THRU AT CORNER 12' SETBACKS ARE REQUIRED ~ ~' ~ ALONG STREET R.O.W. June 30, 1998~ Ocean District ~ Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Preferred: · Wood framed or similar appearance; · Multi-paned; · Rectangular in form: · Specialty windows may exhibit arcs and other non-rectangular forms but should be kept to a m~nimum. Porches and Balconies Preferred: · Balconies with decorative rails; · Porches/arcades covered by roof overhangs along store fronts; · Widows walks and overlooks as decorative and functional elements; · Raised decking connecting store fronts in appropriate areas; · Porches, decking and staircases should tie into pedestrian circulation throughout the Marina Area. Height, Scale, and Massing Heights of structures should relate to adjacent open spaces to allow maximum sun and ventilation, protection from prevailing winds, enhance public views of surrounding water, and minimize obstruction of view from adjoining structures. Height and scale of new development should be compatible with that of surrounding development. New development height should "transition" from the height of adjacent development to the maximum height of the proposed structure. Large buildings which give the appearance of "box-like" structures are generally unattractive and detract from the overall scale of most buildings. There are several ways to reduce the appearance of large scale, bulky structures. · Vary the planes of the exterior walls in depth and/or direction. Wall planes should not run in one continuous direction for more than 50 feet without an offset. · Vary the height of the buildings so that it appears to be divided into distinct massing elements. July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 27 · Articulate thee different parts of a building's facade by use of color, arrangement of facade elements, or a change in materials. · Use landscaping and architectural detailing at the ground level to lessen the impact of an otherwise bulky building. · Avoid blank walls at the ground floor levels, Utilize windows, trellises, wall articulation, arcades, change in materials, or other features. Setbacks The first two floors of any building fronting Federal Highway in the Marina Area must be built up to the 12 wide sidewalk or provide a hardscaped plaza (for up to 50% of Puilding face) between the building face and the sidewalk. Pedestal buildings (buildings with the first floor set back from the front property line while upper floors project out to the front property line) are discouraged. Awnings, trellises, and other accessory building structures which are relatively open and do not restrict pedestrian or vehicular movement may project into the front right-of- way. Permanent building canopies are not included in this category. Any building located at a corner intersection shall incorporate architectural features at the ground floor which emphasize the importance of pedestrian movement. These features may include building cut-offs, walk-through covered arcades, trellis structures, and other elements which focus visual interest on the comers. Where appropriate, new buildings should set back their corners at intersections to create pedestrian plazas, as well as ~mprove visual sight lines for vehicles. The corner setback minimum dimension shall be 10' from the corner (see graphic). Streetscape Streetscape elements and plant material should relate to Boynton's historical past and provide splashes of color associated with subtropical South Florida. Nautical theming should be incorporated into street furnishings and pavers through the area. The nautical Compass Rose should regularly appear in a wide range of variations. These variations should establish a strong identity for the Marina Area and add interest and July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 28 Specialty Pavers ..... :";.~ :- -' CORINTH PAVER A - FANS PA~ ! IERN PUBLIC PLAZAS AND INTERSECTION TREATMENTS PAVERS :~, .,-- ., ..- ~. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS MINOR IN~RSECTIONS {ll~illilLl COLOR: E-11 C-CIRCLE / ,~ ~'~ J~ ~. ~ UNBEVELED EDGE PA~ERN June 30, I998 Ocean District Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Bollards & Lights MODEL: M9023 NAUTICAL , = '~~,[ ':'::~ ~ THE ~UTIC~ DESIGN ALUMINUM I T~L ~--~L OF THE SALEM TAKES ITS ~" HIGH / 15" BASE DIA. : ~ ' ~ .-' ', '-~' INSPI~TION FROM THE MANUFACTURER: IRONSMITH · =~~ .~ '~ ~ MOORING POSTS USED PH.' 1-80~33~4766 , FOR ~ING SHIPS AT ~.. ~ ~ ~r~ PIERS AND DOCKS TECHTRA LIGHT MODEL: V07t SINGLE ARM V072 TWIN ARM ALUMINUM / TEAL POLYCARBONATE GLOBE STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS MANUFACTURER: IRONSMITH PH: '1-800-3.38-4766 June 30,1998 Ocean District I~sion 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Tree Grates / Benches Trash Receptacles TREE GRATES DEL SOL MODEL: M4871 ROUND M4872 REC_ L~GHT WELLS CAST ALUMINUM PER ASTM B26 BAKED POV~"OER COAT COLOR: 'TEAL GREEN 20-6081 COLOR OPT 2: BLACK 2%7001 MANUFACTL RER: IRON SMITH PH: %800-338-4766 GALLERIA, BENCH MODEL: GL24B - JA MANUFACTURER DM BRAUN & COMPANY PH: f-3'10-927~7344 TRASH RECEPTACLE MODEL: S-.42 36 GALLON / ALUMINUM COLOR: TEAL MANUFACTURER:VICTOR STANLEY~ INC. PH: ~-301-855-8300 June 30, ]998 Ocean District ~ Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Plant Material character throughout the area. The compass rose icon should appear in a variety of applications: · intersection treatment; · Plaza detailing; · Site furnish'tngs; · Sculptural elements; · Banners; · Architectural detailing; · Glass etchings. For example, pavers set in the pattern of the compass rose can help emphasize the nautical character of the marina area and serve as a way-finding device. Parking Shared Parking Shared parking is defined as parking spaces that can be used to serve two or more individual land uses without the demands of one land use conflicting or encroaching on the demands of another land use. The opportunity to implement shared parking is the result of one or both of the following two conditions: · Variations in the peak accumulation of parked vehicles as the result of different activity patterns of adjacent or nearby land uses (by hour, by day, by season). · Proximity of land uses that result in attraction to a combination of two or more land uses with a single auto trip to one destination. Shared parking is not a new idea. It has long been observed in central business districts, suburban communities and other areas where land uses are combined in close proximity. While developers and public officials recognize the existence of shared parking and patrons practiced it, typical zoning codes do not provide for it. July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 29 Pedestrian Lighting with Compass Rose Example of how the compass rose can be incorporated into light: fixtures in the Marina Area: dune 30; 1998 Ocean District Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Most zoning codes are expressed in terms of peak parking ratios for specific individual land uses. While the peak ratios reflect the differences in parking demand generated by separate land uses and under certain conditions, they do not reflect the fact that total or combined peak parking demand can be significantly less than the sum of the individual demands. That is, parking requirements may be overstated if they require space for the peak parking accumulations of each individual land use in a mixed-use environment. Typically, the peak parking accumulations for individual land uses in a mixed land use development can occur at different times. The greatest demand fluctuations occur by hour of day, but it is also significant by day of week or season. Proximity of land uses encourages multiple purpose trips in which people attracted to a multi-use development visit more that one land use. For people using an auto to travel to such developments, a single parking space can be used to serve several land uses. The significance of shared parking is connected to the emergence of mixed use development. Mixed use developments are defined as developments having: · Three or more significant revenue producing land uses. · Significant functional and physical integration of project components. · A coherent development plan specifying project phasing, scheduling, land use intensities, and other characteristics. Many mixed use projects have been successful as catalysts for urban redevelopment and are viewed as unique and interesting places in which to work, visit, or live. To increase revenue and promote a lively atmosphere, mixed use developments are frequently planned to incorporate land use activities that extend daytime activity periods into evening. Combining land uses has a number of advantages, including the opportunity to take advantage of a captive market, certain economies of scale and cost savings associated with the reduced amount of space and infrastructure, particularly parking, required. July 15, J998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 30 q ................... Parking Needs An analysis of parking needs in the Marina Area was performed to provide numerical guidelines within which the parking strategy could be developed. The analysis is contained in a sedes of tables included in Appendix B. The analysis addresses both the short-term or interim (3-5 year) redevelopment program, as well as, the 20-year build-out projections presented previously scenario. The parking strategy will focus on the needs of the interim development program, while laying the proper groundwork to also enable the City to meet the build-out needs. Accounting for shared parking opportunities, the intedm parking analysis in Appendix B shows that approximately 445 spaces in or near the Marina Area will be necessary to accommodate the short-term program. Parking Strategy Lack of adequate parking has historically hinder redevelopment and new development in the Marina Area. Private property owners simply cannot provide necessary parking spaces on individual parcels, to meet governmental and lending institution requirements, and sti have viable land remaining to develop appropriate uses. One current restaurant owner has purchased remote parcels for parking but these have drawbacks also when trying to attract customers. Figure 1 shows the existing parking areas in the Marina Area. As noted earlier, the construction of the new Ocean Avenue bridge wil eliminate a number of existing spaces along the north side of Ocean between NE 6TM Street and the Intracoastal Waterway. The proposed parking strategy is designed to address both the short-term and long- term needs of the 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan for the Marina Area. Over the short-term, approximately 445 cars must be accommodated. This need should be addressed through well-maintained paved surface parking lots, centrally-located in the Marina Area. as well as, parking spaces on the Port Promenade, on Casa Loma and near the existing Banana Boat Restaurant. Figure 2 shows several alternative locations for an initial, (=/-) 2-acre surface lot either July 15. 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 31 BOYNTON BEACH BLVD ·~ '-- *'- OCEAN AVE. --;,. --... PAR~ING AREA ~ ~E I ~-r' AVF COASTAL TOWER~ CONDO PARKING AREA ALI ~I~I~IA'IIVE FOR pARKING -~__~- Figure 2 ~ PARKING ~--I-,~ATEGY .o~o. ~,~c. ~ ~'""' dp ~O/~O REDEVELOPEMENT mASTER PLAN in front of the existing First Financial Center (FFC) or north of Ocean Avenue between NE 5th and 6th Streets. The latter location is preferred due to the fact that the site will likely become a 4-5 story parking structu re over the longer-term (5-8 years) as redevelopment accelerates, and the southern location will not block the view of FFC users, but preserve a greater size and feeling of openess for the Marina Area itself. Thus, the City should acquire through donations, public/private agreements, easements, and/or fee simple title surface use rights for either of the two (2) 'Phase 1' parcels shown in Figure 2. The estimated cost for the 2-acre parking facility is $750,000 and can be funded either from City revenues, CRA funds and/or user fees. Over the longer-term future of the 20/20 Redevelopment Plan, one (1) or more of the surface lots can be converted to 4-5 stow parking structures. It is recommended that the selected surface lot on NE 6t~ Street be the first priority for parking garage construction when warranted. The 'Future Parking Area' depicted in Figure 2 should be viewed as the second priority fon both, additional surface parking and eventual garage construction as needed. Zoning Permitted uses and site development standards in the Marina Area are under the CBD (Central Business District) in the City's Zoning Code and are presented below. Permitted Uses Restaurants Bars and lounges Public and private recreation facilities Marinas and accessory uses Dry :)oat storage at marina* (max. 45' height) Boat service/repair as accessory to boat Sire Development Standards: storage. Max. Height ................. 10' stories Hotels and motels Min. Frontage ..................... 75' Multi-family residential (up to 10.8 upa Min. Depth .......................100' and can be mixed)* Min. ~rea .................. 15,000 sq. fi. Offices and financial institutions Max. Bldg. Coverage ............... 75% Governmental facilities Min. Front Yard ...................... O' July ]5. 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 32 Churches Private clubs* Day care and p re-school facilities* Colleges and schools Auditoriums and community centers Department and variety stores Antique and art stores Gift and floral shops Music, camera, video shops Beer, wines and liquor sales (no drive-through) Furniture, appliance and decorator stores Hardware, carpet, paint and wallpaper stores Clothing stores Pet shops Office supplies and equipment Book, news and tobacco shops Sporting goods and toy stores Luggage, jewelry and cosmetics stores Eyeglasses and hearing aids Drugstores Grocery, bakery and ice cream stores Outdoor merchandise display/sales* Sidewalk sales* Auto parts sales and auto rental Personal and business services Photographic and printing shops Public parking lots and garages * Conditional use. Prohibited Uses Adult entertainment or massage parlors Dry cleaning plants Outdoor storage (except rental cars) Sale of used merchandise Pawnshops Personal rehabilitation offices Wholesale and storage establishments Service or repair of vehicles Repair shops except as accessory to retail sales. July 15, 1998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 33 Rooming or boarding houses Boat storage, dealers, repair Other Relevant CBD Provisions 1.) Utility Lines: Shall be installed underground and service eqmpment effectively screened. 2.) Parking: * In CBD, # of spaces shall be reduced by 50% from normal city requirements. When 2 or more adjacent properties combine on-site parking and construct shared parking facility, required spaces may be reduced by an additional 10%. . Above provisions may be increased/decreased by CRA Board based on study. · Parking requirements can be fulfilled either with onsite spaces or off-site spaces under long-term binding agreement. 3.) Parking Location: · No surface parking shall be permitted in front yard of any building along a majOr public pedestrian streetscape system as designated in CRA Plan. · All required parking must be owned or leased within 1,000' of building served. 4.) Landscaping: In conformance with Chapter 7.5 of LDRs. 5.) Signs: In conformance with Chapter 21 of LDRs. 6.) Non-conforming Structures: · Limited expansion allowed if consistent with CBD intent. · If expansion proposal cannot provide required parking, CRA may accept payment in lieu of parking based on formula adopted by City Commission. If no formula adopted, then no payment allowed. · Parking payments received are to be put in trust fund and used to construct public parking facilities within 1000' of where collected July 15, ]998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 34 Marina Area Zoninq Recommendations In order to ensure a beneficial and complementary mix of uses in the Marina Area, the following uses should prohibited in the CBD zoning district: · Gas stations and convenience stores. · Auto parts sales. · Laundromats. · Hardware stores. The parking, signnage, setback, landscaping and urban design guidelines for the Marina Area contained here~ n should be incorporated into the CBD regulations. Circulation and Access In the Marina Area, there are two (2) primary access concerns which must be addresses as redevelopment occurs. First, the NE 6th Street right-of-way must be completed and improved as a two-lane, paved road in the initial phases of 20/20 implementation. Second, vehicles must be allowed on the promenade at least as far east as the intersection with NE 6th Street. Successful completion of the above-stated concerns will ensure good access and circulation which is the "life blood" of retail stores and other commemial uses. The acquisition of the additional right-of-way to complete NE 6~h Street is included in the 20/20 Implementation Program. July 15, ]998 Marina Area Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 35 V. Old Town 500 East Ocean Avenue The restoration of the distinctive old 500 block of East Ocean Avenue can create a unique "pocket" of activity with its own identity in a very visible and easily accessible location. Maintaining an "old downtown" feeling by using historic acorn lighting fixtures and benches can distinguish this block from the "nautical coastal village" character of the Madna Area. A specialty market niche such as antique shops, coffee shops, bakeries and old time candy stores could establish this "mini-district" as a major destination. O~n street parking will provide easy, convenient access to stores and businesses along Ocean Avenue. Additional parking can be provided in the rear of the buildings. While only a few historic buildings exist, it is recommended that this "old town" character be maintained with any new construction proposed within a one block area to the north and south of Ocean Avenue fronting Federal Highway. Parking can be provided to the rear of buildings located along Federal Highway. Access to such parking is easily provided using S.E. 4th Street. This reinforces the ability to pull buildings closer to the street creating a widened sidewalk and pedestrian-friendly environment. July 15. 1998 Old Town Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 36 Old Town: 500 Block and Dolphin Square , ,~__,,~, 1. Infill 2. Park 3. Historic 500 Block 4. Surface Parking Opportunity 5. Continue Historic Shops 6. Extend Pedestrian Environment 7. Special Intersection Treatment 8. Dolphin Square 9. Outdoor Amphitheatre ~ i 10.Parking and ~ Service June 30,]998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Dolphin Square Located on the west side of Federal Highway, the Dolphin Square concept is to create a special social place featuring restaurants and live entertainment linked to the Marina Area. The Dbiphin Square will have a clear emphasis on local patronage. Through the creation of an intimate courtyard, local familiarity should attract regular visitors, and those living and working in the community should enjoy its "gathering place" atmosphere. "Dolphin Square" July 15. 1998 Old Town Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment ~Vlaster Plan Page 37 VI. Ocean Avenue Promenade Proposed Project Ocean Avenue is the historic "Main Street" of Boynton Beach. The 500 block of East Ocean Avenue is the historic core. With the construction of the new Ocean Avenue bridge, East Ocean Avenue will remain a readily recognized address. This factor, coupled with the civic renovation and expansion of the Town Square at Seacrest Boulevar(~, suggests that the pedestrian enhancement of East Ocean Avenue would serve tolink the Town Square with the Marina Area. It will also promote the maintenance and far,ovation of properties along this corridor and in surrounding neighborhoods. In contrast to Boynton Beach Boulevard, Ocean Avenue already has a pedestrian scale between Seacrest Boulevard and Federal Highway. While pedestrian use should be enhanced, Ocean Avenue should remain open to traffic except for special events or special evenings. The Town Square segment, in particular, should be designed as a "convertible street," allowing for ragu lar closings for Town Square events. The balance of the Avenue should be enhanced with street trees; palms for tropical character and canopy trees for shade. The image and significance of Ocean Avenue can be established at Seacrest Boulevard through the relocation of a historic gateway monument Iocatea west of Interstate-95 on Ocean Avenue at the City's train station. Through relocation, this gateway marker can once again welcome residents and visitors to the City's historic downtown and waterfront. The design elements of the Ocean Avenue Promenade are shown on the following pages. The Ocean Avenue Promenade can be completed within the existing right-of- way, thus no land acquisition ~s necessary for this project. Estimated Cost and Funding The projected construction cost for the Ocean Avenue Promenade as depicted herein July 15. 1998 Ocean Avenue Promenade Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 38 ~ ~ ~ z xx< 0~ z~ - mz~ Ocean Avenue Promenade Existing Conditions: Ocean Avenue Looking West Proposed Conditions: Ocean Avenue Looking West Facade Renovations · Streetscape Improvements · Canopy & Awning Treatments Pedestrian Lighting · Banner Program · Planters & Street Trees Specialty Pavers & Widened Sidewalks · Bulb-Out Treatment For Parking · ~ike Lanes June 30,1998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan is $1.1 million. No land acquisition is hee¢~s~_rY. Potential funding soumes include City revenues, CRA funds and transportation grants. Architectural Guidelines Architecture Buildings along the Ocean Avenue promenade include a combination of single and multifamil¥ residential units as well as some small commemial businesses toward Federal Highway. Although there is no predominant style of amhitecture, buildings are n the one to two story range and relate well to the pedestrian scale of the promenade. Preferred Single Family Residential Elements The qualities and design elements of the Ocean Avenue Promenade for single family residences include: · Florida frame or masonry vernacular style; · Gable or hip roofs; · Wood siding; · Masonry, smooth stucco; · Simple rectilinear forms; · Building height of one to two stories not to exceed 35 feet. Discouraged Single Family Residential Elements · Contemporary, Spanish. styles not typically found in South Florida; · Non-characteristic housing types such as geodesic domes, A-frames, Quonset huts, or excessively dissimilar forms; · Reflective glass, faux stone, unfinished concrete block, logs milled or rough, or excessively dissimilar, nontraditional building material. Preferred Multifamily Residential Elements The q ualities and design elements of the Ocean Avenue Promenade for multifamily residential include: Jul5 15, 1998 Ocean Avenue Promenade Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 39 · Masonry vernacular characteriStiC Of South Flodda; · Simple rectilinear forms with step backs and building articulation; · One to two story maximum height, not to exceed 35 feet · Provide balconies and covered walkways to increase pedestrian connections. Discouraged Multifamily Residential Elements · Plain "Box-like" structures, with little or no articulation; · Contemporary, Spanish or styles not typically found in South Florida; · Excessively dissimilar housing types or building material as outlined in "Discouraged Single Family Residential Elements." Preferred Commercial Elements · To be determined. Streetscape Streetscape elements and plant material should be selected to provide continuity and pedestrian comfort along the promenade. Site furnishings such as benches, trash receptacles, and pedestrian light fixtures should have a traditional character that showcase the promenade. The promenade fixtures must be distinct from the Historic 500 Block fixtu res and can be incorporated into the Town Square area. The use of the same or similar site elements in the promenade and the Town Square will emphasize the pedestrian connection and provide a natural continuation. Plant material for the promenade should consist of tall palm trees that line the street and flowering accent trees to provide color, emphasis, and immediate shade for pedestrians. As the promenade develops, banners can be attached to the light posts as well as hanging planters with colorful annuals. Potted plants along the sidewalk in the commercial area will soften the architecture and provide interest to the storefront facades. July 15. 1998 Ocean Avenue Promenade Beach Vision 20/20 Boynton Redevelopment Master Plan Page 40 Streetscape Elements PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS HAGGERSTOWN MODEL: ~ -1790 HEIGHT: 12 SPACING: 30' O.C. COLOR: CUSTOM TEAL MODEL: V03 GLOBE: TYPE V REFRACTOR PAVERS FIXTURE: CAST ALUMINUM M~,NUFACTURER:HADCO WALKWAYS PH:'1-7'i7~,59-713'1 PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS MINOR INTERSECTIONS COLOR E-11 U NBEVELED EDGE 45 HERRINGBONE PATTERN MANUFACTURER: PAVERS SYSTEMS PH: 1-800-277-5558 MARKETPLACE BENCH MODEL: B-76 CAST IRON HARDWOOD COLOR: CUSTOM / TEAL 8' LENGTHS MANUFACTURER: AMERICAN SITE ¢URNITURE PH:'1-800-366-3080 P LA N TERS TRASH RECEPTACLE MODEL# DIMENSIONS OPENING A)TCSB-1 30"H X 36" DIA, 25" MODEL: AT3-22 B~TCSB-2 12"H X 36" DIA. 25" ATLANTA LI'CI'ER COLOR: CUSTOM TEAL MODEL# DIMENSIONS OPENING MANUFACTURER:KEYSTONERIDGE A)TCO-3 27"H X 20" DIA. 11.5" PH:'i-800-284-8202 B)TCO-7 33"H X 33" DIA. 14" MANUFACTL RER: pO£YPLANTERS ~H: ~i~805-525-8800 J~me 30 ~998 ~~ I-~sion 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Plant Material June 30, 1998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Traffic Circulation One of the overall objectives of the redevelopment/infill program is to provide a linkage between the eastern commercial node in the Marina Area and the western cultural node of Town Square. This has been accomplished by the treatments proposed for Ocean Avenue which not only provides for all modes of transportation, but still maintains the flexibility to cater exclusively to the bicycle and pedestrian. Parking to serve these areas is provided at-grade, both off-street and on-street, and structured. Jul~ 15, 1998 Ocean Avenue Promenade Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 4] VII. Town Square Project Development The existing campus of public buildings, anchored by the City Hall on the north and the library on the south, should be unified through a series of connecting walkways and a public quadrangle where the existing civic building is. This "public lawn" shoutd be available to accommodate community events such as crafts fairs, pmnics, and various cultural and musical festivals. As. seen in many communities, if areas are provided where people can gather and socialize, and specifically where public events are planned within th_ese areas, people will congregate. The quadrangle should be spatially reinforced through the construction of additional buildings along its edge. These buildings should be for public purposes and/or, if private, should be complementary to the "community-serving" nature of the Town Square. To further strengthen the significance of the Town Square, a careful evaluation of the potential for adaptive reuse of the old high school should be made. Ocean Avenue. which provides convenient daily access through this area, should be redesigned through the Town Square to incorporate specialty pavers. Additionally, a center median should be created at the high school facade to feature this building. Traffic calming features should also be introduced within this area to slow vehicular traffic. This "pedestrian-friendly" avenue can then be easily closed to vehicles on weekends and for special events. These proposed changes will contribute to making this a meeting place for residents and visitors to Boynton Beach. No additional right-of-way or land parcels are needed to implement the Town Square project. Estimated Cost and Funding Sources The projected cost to be complete the Town Square improvements, including landscaping, parking, traffic circulation and walkways, is $1.5 million. Potential funding sources include City revenues, CRA funds, and park and recreation grants. July 15, 1998 Town Square Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 42 Town Square 1. City Hall Government Center 2. Police Department 3. Fire Rescue 4. Old High , School Adaptive -" Reuse 5. Childrens Museum 6. Infill Civil Building 7. Special Intersection Treatment with City Logo 8. Entry Plaza with HiStoric Gateway Monumentation 9. Special Streetscape Treatment 10.Town Square Plaza 11. Existing Structures Adaptive Reuse 12. Public Library 13.Art Center 14.Madson Recreation Center Ju~e $0,1~93 0 VisiOn 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Town Square Architectural Guidelines Architecture Buildings in the Town Square do not exhibit a predominant style of architecture. New construction and renovations should reflect and be consistent with existing architectural styles in this area; particularly, the masonry vernacular style of the children's museum or a more contemporary approach as exhibited in the library and city hall. Flexibility and creative, innovative designs are encouraged to reflect regional styles. Emphases should be placed on "People Spaces" and pedestrian connections. Overhead structures, gateways and arches, help define spaces, provide pedestrian comfort, reinforce character and identity. Architectural detailing can emphasize the civic and cultural themes within Boynton Beach. The use of thematic sculpture, art in public places, banners, textured pawng, and overhead structures can create an enjoyable public experience. The relocation of the historic Gateway Landmark to the Town Square provides a tie to Boynton's historical past. By placing this monument at the intersection of Ocean Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard, it will mark a new gateway and emphasize the eastward connection along Ocean Avenue Promenade to the marina district. In addition, the monuments' pineapple icon could be incorporated into Town Square planters, walls, sculptural elements and architectural detailing to serve as a reminder of Boynton's historical past and a welcome symbol Preferred Town Square Elements The qualities and design elements of the town square buildings include: · Masonry vernacular; · Masonry contemporary with complementary detailing; · Hip roof; · Flat roof; · Arcades; · Canopies/covered walkways; · Courtyards/outdoor seating areas. July 15, ]998 Town Square Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 43 Historic Gateway Marker Currently this historic monument resides West of 95 on Ocean Ave. Relocation of this landmark to theTown Square will once again welcome residents and visitors to the City's historic downtown and waterfront. Location - Plan Ocean Avenue Side Elevation Marker Location P?za Details Front Elevation June 30,1998 I/isi° n 20/20 Redevelopment MaSter Plan Streetscape Elements PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS HAGGERSTOWN MODEL: P -1790 HE~G --iT 12' 30' D.C. CUSTOM TEAL MODEL: V03 GLOBE: TYPE V REFRACTOR PAVERS FIXTURE: CAST ALUMINUM MANUFACTURER:HADCO WALKWAYS ~H:f-TfT-359-7't3'I PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS MINOR INTERSECTIONS COLOR: E-11 U NBEVELED EDGE 45 HERRINGBONE PATTERN MANU'FACTURER: PAVERS SYSTEMS PH- 1-8Q0-277-5558 MARKETPLACE BENCH MODEL: B-76 CAST IRON HARDWOOD COLOR: CUSTOM / TEAL 8' LENGTHS MANUFACTURER: AMERICAN SITE FURNITURE PH: 1-800-366-3080 P LA N TERS TRASH RECEPTACLE MODEL # DIMENSIONS OPENING ~ TCSB-I 30"H X 38" DIA. 25" MODEL: AT3-22 B TCSB-2 12"H X 36" DIA. 25" ATLANTA LITTER COLOR: CUSTOM TEAL ~IODEL# DIMENSIONS OPENING ~ANUFACTURER: KEYSTONE RIDGE A)TCO-3 27"H X 20" DIA. 11.5" PH:1-800-284-8202 B/TCO-7 33"H X 33" DIA. 14" MANUFACTURER: POLYPLANTERS PH-I-805-525-8800 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Plant Material June 30,}998 Vision 20/20 RedevelOPment Master Plan Discouraged Town Square Elements · Wood siding or shingles; Horizontal siding; · Highly reflective surfaces (glass, mirror metal, etc.) · Large blank, unarticulatedwalls; · Square"Box-like" buildings; · Heavy stucco treatments. Civic Center~Old High School The current Civic center building plays an important role in the community affairs of Boynton Beach. Thus, while it will be removed due to both age and location, it will most certainly be replaced. The option of combining the civic and senior centers into a single, multi-purpose facility in the Town Square should be evaluated. It is estimated that the placement of the civic with a multi-purpose facility would not exceed $2-3 million, depending on features and amenities included. The replacement of the civic center with a new building at another location in the Town Square will create a tremendous open space opportunity in this area, and enable the completion of the Town Square design concept presented herein. The redevelopment of the Old High School Building has the potential to be privately funded. The City has received several proposals including one to convert the school into 25 affordable rental housing units. Another proposal envisioned the conversion of the classrooms into office condominiums, and the gymnasium into two art theaters which would create an attraction for this area. The public sponsorship option is also available to renovate the building, at an estimated cost of $5 million, and use it for civic activities and non-p rofit organizations. Senior Center The City is planning a Senior Center. potentially located in the Town Square. This July 15, 1998 Town Square Beach Vision 20/20 Boynton Redevelopment Master Plan Page 44 facility could be combined with the new Civic Center, discussed above, into a multi-use building. A good potential location for this facility is on the south perimeter of the Town Square. The estimated cost of a new Senior Center would be approximately $2-$3 million. Old Schoolhouse Children's Museum A truly exciting concept is taking shape in Boynton Beach, that is the creation of a Children's Museum in the old 1913 Schoolhouse. With an estimated cost of $2.5 million, work got underway this year to renovate the interior of the old structure. Scheduled to open in 1999, fund-raising for the project is on-going. This museum will serve as important attractor for the Town Square. Traffic Circulation n order to provide adequate parking within Town Square it is proposed to combine the existing two (2) off-street lots along NE 1st Avenue which serve the municipal complex. Combining these two (2) facilities wi] preclude through vehicular movements along NE 1st Avenue from Seacrest Boulevard to NE 1st Street. It is also proposed to restrict traffic movements to and from this parking lot along Seacrest Boulevard. At a minimum, southbound left-turning movements into the parking lot and westbound left-turning movements to Seacrest Boulevard from th a parking lot will be prohibited. However, the current plan prohibits all exiting movements to Seacrest Boulevard. Such a plan wil help reduce congestion along Seacrest Boulevard within the influence area of the Boynton Beach Boulevard intersection. Alternate access needs to be developed to service this parking area. Vehicles destined to this parking lot from the north as well east and west on Boynton Beach Boulevard wiJ turn south onto the NE 1st Street to gain access. There is also the option of vehicles from the north and west traveling south to Seacrest Boulevard to Ocean Avenue where a left-turn will be allowed and then north on NE 1st Avenue. It is important to note that NE 1st Street is the emergency access roadway for the Fire Station From the south, along Seacrest Boulevard a right-turn into the site will be allowed. Exiting the site will require vehicles to use NE 1st Street north to Boynton Beach Boulevard or south to Ocean Avenue and Seacrest Boulevard. July 15. 1998 Town Square Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 45 As indicated, Ocean Avenue is proposed to be a major east-west connector from Seacrest Boulevard to US 1. However, the emphasis will be on pedestrians, bicycles and Iow speed auto movements. Streetscaping will be designed to calm vehicular traffic and provide a pleasant experience for the pedestrian and bicyclists. The segment of Ocean Avenue from Seacrest Boulevard to East First Street will be reconstructed with special pavement treatment and a raised landscaped median. This link could be closed to through traffic, without disrupting access to/from parking, to create a large pedestrian plaza. July 15, 1998 Town Square Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 46 VIII. Martin Luther King (MLK) Boulevard Martin Luther King Boulevard has a rich history as a former neighborhood commercial center in Boynton Beach. The boulevard has fallen on hard times in recent years with the movement of the city's commercial center west of 1-95. With proper land use planning and urban design, this primary street can redevelop as a mixed use area with commercial uses at the intersection of Seacrest Boulevard and MLK Boulevard, and a mix of office and residential uses to the east. The consulting team has developed prototypes which can easily accommodate home-based businesses and even small-scale retail uses on the same srte with residential uses. Land Use Plan The graphic on the next page shows the future land use pattern proposed for MLK. A traffic calming improvement at Seacrest Boulevard and MLK Boulevard is also proposed to slow traffic, increase potential for commercial traffic to stop in the area, and enhance safety for residents and school children. This improvement will also facilitate the development of new commercial uses and a business incubator at the corner of Seacrest Boulevard and MLK Boulevard Traffic Calming Citizens within the study area have expressed concerns with the speeds along Seacrest Boulevard. a five (5) lane facility throughout the study area. The impact of speed vehicles is exacerbated by the curvilinear alignment north of Boynton Beach Bou[evard. There is also a problem with single family residences fronting Seacrest Boulevard and having to back out of driveways into moving traffic. it is recommended that the City further explore a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway at Lower Level of Service) designation for Seacrest Boulevard. This concept is supported by the Palm Beach County Engineenng. Under the CRALLS scenario Seacrest Boulevard would be reduced to two (2) thru lanes without hindering redevelcpment of the downtown area.. This would slow traffic, create a more July ]5. 1998 Martin Luther King Boulevard Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Po~ "/7 pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment, and still allow Seacrest to function as a north-south thoroughfare. To begin this process and also facilitate the redevelopment of the area around Martin Luther King Boulevard, it is recommended that Seacrest north and south of MLK Boulevard be reduced to two lanes to reduce traffic speeds, make pedestrian usage easier, and allow greater visibility and accessibility of commercial uses on MLK near Seacrest. The estimated cost for this initial traffic-calming improvement is $60,000. Business Incubator The northeast corner of Seacrest and MLK Boulevards is a potential site for the construction of a business incubator for local start-up companies and entrepreneurs. The facility could also house job training, interview counseling and resume preparation services for local residents. In addition, a computer linkage to job and contract bid announcement bulletins boards maintained by the Business Development Board, Palm Beach County and other entities could be provided. The estimated cost of this facility would be $350 000. July 15, 1998 Martin Luther King Boulevard Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 48 IX. Major Commercial Corridors Boynton Beach Boulevard Gateway Boynton Beach Boulevard will continue to be the major access from 1-95 to the downtown area as well as a connector over the Intraceastal Waterway via Ocean Avenue. Future volumes on the link from 1-95 to Seacrest Boulevard will continue to increase as redevelopment occurs and will continue to be lower than volumes between Seacrest Boulevard and US 1. A preliminary analysis of 2015 daily volumes utilizing Palm Beach County Florida Standard Urbar. ized Transportation Model Structure and the proposed redevelopment intensities shows that adopted level of service standards will be maintained. These segments of Boynton Beach Boulevard should remain as a divided facility throughoul the study area. East of Seacrest Boulevard it is proposed to provide enhanced pedestrian linkage particularly on the south side. A preliminary analysis shows that four (4) lanes are required to support future redevelopment. Boynton Beach Boulevard shou id serve as an important gateway to the City. This boulevard has the potential to provide an important statement and welcome visitors to Boynton Beach, especially due to its central location within the City. It already prewdes direct, convenient access from Interstate-95 to downtown. A wayfinding and simple graphic system for quick and friendly orientation can easily be incorporated along the boulevard. Widened pedestrian connections and bicycle lanes, particularly between Seacrest Boulevard and Federal Highway, should be enhanced to encourage the use of this boulevard by modes of travel other than just motor vehicles. Streetscape improvements are already underway and need to be continued to emphasize the stateliness of this main thoroughfare. The streetscape can also become more unified if parking areas were screened from view by urban walls or moved behind buildings. This has the added effect of furthering the pedestrianization of the boulevard. With some embellisnments, Boynton Beach Boulevard has the opportunity to create a positive, memorable first impression of the City of Boynton Beach. July 15. 1998 Major Commercial Corridors Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 49 The automobile-oriented character of Boynton Beach Boulevard should be softened through the use of landscape treatments and architectural upgrades. In addition, the emphasis on pedestrians in the Ocean District should be visually established through an expanded sidewalk along City Hall, which would guide pedestrians to Federal Highway and the Marina District. An expansion of the commercial depth along the north side of Boynton Beach Boulevard, particularly at its intersection with Seacrest Boulevard, would also serve to promote redevelopment of the corridor. Characteristics of Boynton Beach Boulevard from 1-95 to Seacrest Boulevard should be as follows: · Renovate-architectu ral facades reflecting the importance of this gateway corridor; · Continue streetscape improvements; · Continue sidewalk improvements; · Complement F.D.O.T. new plantings at 1-95 ramps to make an entry statement on both sides of the boulevard at Galaxy Elementary School and the Holiday Inn (see Gateway Plan); · Install wayfinding signnage to facilitate destination orientation; · Locate parking to rear of buildings where possible; · Screen parking areas with urban wall treatments; · Encourage infill businesses to reduce vacant parcels; · Convert select vacant parcels (sites adjacent to church) to a pedestrian park. Characteristics of Boynton Beach Boulevard from Seacrest Avenue to the FEC Railroad should be as follows: · Renovated architectural facades reflecting the importance of this gateway corridor; · Enhanced informal landscaping to create a green approach to the more urban and pedestrian-friendly areas east of the FEC Railroad; · An expanded pedestrian promenade [8' - 12' preferred) on the south side of the Boulevard connectin9 the City Hall to the Marina District. This promenade would be very visible to motorists heading east and would emphasize the pedestrian focus of development to the south and east; July 15. 1998 Major Commercial Corridors Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 50 Federal Highway (USI) Central ~-~"' / The intersection of Federal Hightway and ~;'~ ~ Boynton Beach Boulevard is surrounded with commercial land uses exhibiting ¢1i '="'= ' little or no character defining elements. This Florida Vernacular style commercial center offers pedestrians an enjoyable experience by the use of covered waikways, balconies and a trellis structure located at the sidewalk. A mix of small motels, restaurants, and banks make up the majority of commercial land uses along the central section of Federal Highway. The bank building is an example of architecture that responds more to the automobile than pedestrian circulation and interaction. A few small, local restaurants are scattered throughout this area. June Id ]998 Executive Summary I/ision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Federal Highway (USI) North The EE.C. Railroad tracks run along the northeast portion of Federal Highway allowing only a limited number of access roads and no parcel frontage. A few small commercial strip centers with parking accommodations in front are scattered along the roadway. Small. stand-alone businesses make up a large percentage of frontage in this area. There is no predominat style of architecture Most buildings exhibit an ecclectic style that is typical of commercial establishments throughtout the study area Many lots fronting the north section of Federal Highway are undeveloped or have vacant buildings on them. ,June 30,1998 Major Corridors Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Federal Highway (US1) South Major shopping centers occupy the south side of the Federal H ghwayRVooIbright Road intersection. The Winn Dixie Plaza is currently undergoing m~jor renovations. Many restaurants front Federal Highway in the south section. While most retain a corporate identity, some exhibit a more regional style of architecture such as that which is demonstrated in this Florida Vernacular style. Many small, economy style motels are present in this area. No predominant style of architecture is apparent. Various other land uses are present and include a lumber yard, produce stand, nursery, U-Haul dealer. and some gas stations. The Gulf Stream Mall is located at the south end of this area but does not recieve as much business as the shopping centers to the nor[h. June 30, 1998 Major Corridors Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Federal Highway Existing Conditions: Federal HighwayLooking North Proposed Improvements: Federal Highway Looking North Streetscape Improvements · Banner Program · Bike Lanes on Both Sides Remove Unsightly Utility Lines(Underground) · Urban Wail Treatment to Screen Parking June 30,1998 Major Corridors Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan · Uses which are more pedestrian-oriented on the south side of Boynton Beach Boulevard; · Buildings which are Iow in scale (one to two stodes) with a three story maximum. Characteristics of Boynton Beach Boulevard from the FEC Railroad to Federal Highway should be as follows: · New development replacing the outdated existing structures; · An expanded pedestrian walk (12' preferred) on both sides of the Boulevard to provide for increased pedestrian use and accommodate building design; · Formal lan. dscape treatment to emphasize and accommodate pedestrian use; · Uses which are pedestrian-oriented on both sides of Boynton Beach Boulevard; · Buildings which are Iow in scale (2-3 stories) with exceptions for landmark buildings (6 to 8 stories maximum preferred). Federal Highway (US1) Federal Highway (US1) is a major north-south arterial which traverses the City of Boynton Beach connecting the northern and southern city limits. Similar to Boynton Beach Boulevard, Federal Highway provides direct access to adjacent properties, as well as connections to other arterials and collectors. It is currently a four lane roadway with a raised median. Completed roadway design plans for improvements include median and landscaping treatments, as well as the elimination of some on-street parking. Corridor Recommendations · Create fund from tax revenue to place utility lines underground. · Target commercial facade program to C-16 to Boynton Beach Blvd. area. July 15, 1998 Major Commercial Corridors Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 51 Boynton Beach Boulevard Inventory Boynton Beach Boulevard (SR804) is a major east-west arterial providing connection from the interstate to east of Federal Highway. The roadway Provides direct access to adjacent properties as well as connection to north- south arterials and the collector roadway system. Its five lane cross section includes two lanes in each direction with a center two-way left turn lane. In most cases the parking for commercial strip centers is located n front with lit'tle or no landscape treatment. Simple masonry vernacular buildings are common along Boynton Beach Boulevard. Small professional offices are scattered among commercial retail establishments. A few examples of franchised restaurants such as KFC and Buds are present. Extensive landscape treatments in both cases help to soften architectural edges and provide outdoor people spaces. June 16.1998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan · Create Federal Highway Overlay Zoning District. · Prohibit additional uses in CBD area: · Gas stations and convenience stores · Auto parts sales · Laundromats · Hardware stores · Prohibit adult entertainment business between Gateway and 23rd Avenue. · Establish coordinated slgnnage regulations for Federal Highway corridor. · Create minimum lot depth reqmrements for Federal Highway overlay. · Complete bikeway system along corridor and connect to east-west linkages. · Enhance landscape standards for corridor, · Establish buffedng standards for adjacent residential areas. Commercial Design Guidelines As new development and redevelopment occurs along these commemial corridors, adherence to coordinated design guidelines can significantly upgrade their aesthetic qualities. The recommended commercial design guidelines for the major corridors are included in Appendix C. July 15. 1998 Major Commercial Corridors Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 52 Federal Highway- North ® lm prove Gateway Approach to City Increase Residential Buffering increase Neighborhood Awareness Through Identification Markers West Side Commercial ~. Development Is Re~ricted By EE.C. Railroao New City Club Implement Commercial At Boat '~ Guidelines Landing Park Overall Character and Unattractive Utility Consistency __ Poles Located On East Side to Continue Streetscape Be Replaced with ~: Improvements Underground Lines :2~ Neighborhood Identification Markers NORTH ~ Additional Landscape Treatment Suggested to Unify Streetscape In Front of Vacant Parcets June 30, 1998 Major Corridors II,sion 20/20 Redevelopment ~laster Plan Federal Highway - Central Emphasize Bike Lane and - Connection to Greenway Major Facade Renovation Urban Walls to Screen Parking and Unify Building Frontage 4 Four Story Height Limit Encourage Street to Line" Parking Regulate Parking to 12' In Front of Buildings Bu Idings to incorporate s and Canopies (~ Comfort Building Scale and 2 Story Height Limit Relate to Correspond with Scale Residential Character iround Level 25' Setback with 2 Story Height Average Increased _andscape to a 8 Stow Treatment Buildings Future Reloca Federal and Lines(Underground) Urban Walls to Intersection Screen Park ng Cross and Un~' Building Frontage Building Stepbacks __ Future Relocation A~long Federal Highway sw ~ s AVE. -- of Utility Lines WOOLBRiGHT RD. (Underground} East Side of Federal to Inco,r, porate "Coastal molement Sign Florida Style Regulations and Architecture/lnfill Design Guidelines NORTH ~.~ Neighborhood Identification Markers June 30,1998 Major Corridors l/ision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Federal Highway - South Streets~ Underway Locate Utilities Underground implement Signage Regul~ Design Guidelines Increase Landscape Treatment (Hedge and Trees) Provide Bike Lane on East Side Independent Regulations and Design Guidelines for Corridor NORTH 0 Neighborhood Identification Ma~ers ~une 30,1998 Major Corridors ~sion 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan X. Neighborhood Revitalization Successful Neighborhoods Successful neighborhoods combine a number of critical factors into an integrated geographic space. These include, but are not limited to: · Pedestrian-friendly street system with limited outside accessibility; · Extensive homeownership; · Commitment to property maintenance; · Teamwork in addressing problems and seizing opportunities; and · Extended social network. These factors have historically been present in the older Boynton Beach neighborhoods around downtown and east of 1-95. However, a number of changes have occurred aver the past 50 years which have hurt these neighborhoods. Primary among these is the development of newer housing in the suburbs and the movement of businesses west to service these new areas. The resulting exodus from older established neighborhoods east of 1-95 has adversely impacted the factors listed above for those areas. Resource Framework One of the first steps ~n conducting a neighborhood analysis project of this type is to collect and analyze information= particularly with reference to resources and opportunities existing in the study area. The map on the following page is a graphic inventory of existing resources supporting, and opportunities available to, neighborhoods in the 20/20 study area. It establishes the basis, or framework, for neighborhood planning and the delineation of special districts. Community features such as the roadway network, significant buildings and landmarks represent the building blocks of the redevelopment plan. July 15. 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 53 Framework Plan BOULEVARD DISTRICT UEMOR~,_ pAF~ CORRIDOR SEABOARD C~LAXy DISTRICT GALAXY ELEMENTARY J OCEAN DISTRICT COASTAL BOYNTON BEACH CORRIDOR BOULEVARD CORRIDOR SOUTH OCEAN PARK L__ FRAMEWORK PLAN <> = ~' ~ TEADE '~ ~ DISTRICT Neighborhood Delineation After collecting a variety of background information, the project consulting team began the task of delineating neighborhood boundaries. This was done in order to facilitate planning analysis and to organize neighborhood areas according to similar problems, issues and opportunities. The three (3) maps following this page show the recommended neighborhood boundaries drawn by the project team and presented at public workshops. During the public participation phases of the project, residents suggested changes to original lines drawn and these modifications were made to arrive at the maps shown here. Redevelopment efforts are facilitated by the active participation of established neighborhoods, property owners, and merchants organizations. The intent of these maps is to encourage individuals within the delineated areas to work together toward common goals. Traffic Calming During neighborhood meetings conducted during the project, many residents identified traffic speeding and "cut-througtY' vehicles as major problems in their areas. Solutions for these problems are proposed below for the selected neighborhoods. However, these problems are prevalent in many other neighborhoods. To help the City and residents understand the traffic-calming options available, a comprehensive discussion (with illustrations) of the various alternative techniques is included in Appendix E. Neighborhood Improvements As provided for in the original project scope of work, the neighborhood analysis was used to help select three neighborhoods where detailed field surveys would be performed and used as a basis to develop specific recommendations to improve traffic and/or overall neighborhood conditions. Based on the consulting team's recommendations, the City Commission selected the neighborhoods discussed below for detailed study. July 15. 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 54 ROLLING GREEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/PARK EZELL HESTER JR. ~' COMMUNITY CENTER BOYNTON BEACH BARK BOAT CLUB PARK GATEWAY sT~,,,,,,,,~ NEIGHBORHOODS, DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS POINCIANA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WILSON PARK BARTON MEMORIAL PARK [ SAR~ $~M$ PARK L GALAXY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/PARK [ GALAXY PARK PENCE PARK FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/PARK CITY CENTER s=,o.,..,.~ NEIGHBORHOODS, DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS commoncharactedsticsandcon$iderations II ~.~¢J[J /~! /{~ UTTLE -- - LEAGUE ~ ~'~..~' I ' ' -- ' SCOUT ,~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ //// .~ ~T~'~ ~ ~ I- - [-~1 ~ ////~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ ////~ ~ ~ I/I/ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ...... , ~~. // ~7~1~'~ ~ - · ~ , ,~S~%%[ Il NEIGHBORHOODS, DISTRICTS AND CORRIDORS Gateway Neighborhood The Gateway neighborhood was chosen to identify traffic problems and potential solutions, particularly in light of the proposed five-laning of Gateway Boulevard through this neighborhood. After several public meetings in the neighborhood including Saturday field surveys with residents, the resulting traffic calming recommendations were developed and are shown in the table below. Sidewalks on Gateway Boulevard ¢) Pedestrian Pedestrian signal on Gateway Pedestrian Boulevard at Village Royale (2) ~ndscaping along Gateway Boulevard Speeding Cimuitous alignment on Gateway Speeding Boulevard (~) Speed humps on Ocean Parkway Speeding The improvements listed above are shown on the next page. July 15~ 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 55 ~ m !I I ! _~__1~1!~ . PEDESTRIAI~ SIGNAL SIDEWALKS VISION 20/20 PROPOSED STRATEGIES Ridgewood Neighborhood The Ridgewood neighborhood was chosen both for quality analysis and traffic problems. After several public meetings in the neighborhood including Saturday field surveys with residents, the traffic calming recommendations presented below were developed~ Four-way stop signs at intersections of 3rd and Speeding, cut-through traffic, traffic accidents 4th Street with 6th Avenue Four-way stop signs at intersection of 3rd and 4th Speed ng, cut-through traffic, traffic accidents Street with 4th Avee_ue Limiting access at 9th Court, at 6th Avenue and Speeding, cut-through traffic, traff'~c accidents 5th Court with Seacreet Boulevard Reccnfiguration and improved s gnnage of traffic Traffic accidents, signnage circles The improvements listed above are visually-depicted on the next page. The Ridgewood neighborhood is unique because of the variety of housing types, styles, values, conditions, and maintenance efforts. Issues of concern include absence of sidewalks on numerous thoroughfares, particularly those leading to area schools, trash piles, inconsistent street signnage and no street signs, among other factors. The neighborhood is served by 5 parks within a 1 -mile radius, all of which are well- maintained and contain adequate facilities. Housing programs to help eliminate blighted conditions should be accelerated in the area. A program of street sign replacement and new streetlights, designed to build on the historic character of Ridgewood, has been recommended as part of the 20/20 Master Plan. Several of the historic icons recommended for this neighborhood are shown on subsequent pages. July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 56 l ADD BANNER POSTS DECORATIVE-'" TO CREATE COLOR AND NEIGHBORHOOD FINIAL ~ :~ IDENTITY EXISTNG CONCRETE HISTORIC LI(;- HISTORIC LANDMAF~K ~ FIXTURE CUSTOM NEIGHBORHOOD SIGN CITY LOGO SPECIALTY PAVERS / ,~ DECORATIVE FINIAL Ill ~ ~ CUSTOM HISTORIC CONCRETE'~I ~ NEIGHBORHOOD GATE POLE I!~! i ' BANNER CITY LOGO UNIFIED STREETSCAPE ELMENTS SUCH AS ~- BENCHES,LIGHTS,BOLLARDS.AND SPECIALTY PAVERS WILL FURTHER ESTABLISH NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER SPECIALTY PAVERS June 30, 1998 ~r~ Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page Mango Park South This neighborhood was selected to examine housing mix and overall neighborhood quality. It is located across from Bethesda Memorial Hospital and thus has experienced encroachment of medical office uses into formerly residential areas along and near Seacrest Boulevard. Field surveys of this neighborhood revealed good to fair environmental quality. There was no preponderance of trash and litter piles, and streets appeared to be clean, particularly in the northern half of the neighborhood. The easternmost boundary of this neighborhood, next to the FEC railroad tracks exhibited negative conditions. Illegal dumping occurred on the railroad right-of-way, and the multi-family complexes located near the southern boundary are in deteriorated condition. Generally, the southern area of Mango Park South is in poorest condition, exhibiting more garbage piles and overgrown lots. Revitalization Strategy Expansion of Existing Programs The following programs--already in existence in the City of Boynton Beach--are being recommended for expansion. In some cases, the City can be the lead agency/catalyst for increasing program production through expansion; however, often it is the City which ~31ays a role as one of the partners in a collaborative designed to bring additional resources into Boynton Beach. n cases where the City plays a more collaborative/coordinative role, the particular programs being recommended are explained in further detail in a following section. It is recommended that Boynton Beach continue existing efforts to support the Boynton Beach Community Development Corporation (BBCDC), its only Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO), both administratively and programmatically. The City should work jointly and collaboratively to implement the many programs that are recommended in this document. Federal housing rules require that a portion of some Federal funding resources (the HOME program, for example) be allocated to a CHDO. provided the City and the CHDO have created a local partnership that will own: sponsor, or develop new homes within a certain targeted area. Assisting the BBCDC to build its capacity and track record beyond that which has already been July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 57 established under the L.I.S.C. organization would produce a win-win situation, and should only serve to bring more housing resources into the City and enhance the City's housing development capacities and capabilities. Sinqle-Family Rehabilitation To date, the City has operated a paint-up/fix-up program and has awarded approximately $20,000 in grants for approximately 25 homes that have been completed at an average cost of $1,500 to $2,000, as depicted in the following chart: YEAR CASES AVERAGE REHAB COMMENTS 1989 3 $1,648.67 1990 9 2,262.78 1991 3 2,148.13 1992 2 1,598.75 1993 I 2,165.00 1994 2 2,213:75 1995 0 No $ 1996 3 1,789.17 1997 1 3,000.00 1 pending Under current City guidelines, rehabilitation loans are forgiven within 15 years, and the maximum grant amount per unit is $22,000. Recommendation: In addition to the existing rehab program (for homes requiring $22,000 in repairs), the CDBG program funds should additionally be utilized for housing rehabilitation and both the SHIP and CDBG programs should be modified to include provisions for the moderate rehabilitation of deteriorated properties not requiring more than $10,000 to $15,000 in repairs per unit. Current eligibility standards for both the household and the property would continue to apply, as they are generally set by Federal and State regulations. July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 58 Combining CDBG Fundinq with Existing Proqram Funds Although the City does not currently utilize its CDBG funding for housing rehabilitation, each loan is funded in accordance with the following formula: Up to $10,000 S.H.I.P. Funds 15,000 City (ad valorem) Funds $25,000 It is recommended that a portion of the CDBG funding received by the City each year be allocated to supplement ad valorem tax funds as well as S.H.I.P. funding, thereby allowing the City to expand the rehab program and complete even more homes. Loans vs. Grants The City of Boynton Beach has historically not utilized housing rehabilitation dollars as a loan program due to the cumbersome nature of servicing and it's attendant problems. Given the size of the City's program and the need for expansion of program activities noted project during the fieldwork survey, it is recommended that the City consider combining its CDBG, ad valorem and S.H.I.P. funds as a revolving loan pool, utilizing repayments made monthly by Iow- to moderate-income working families who receive assistance to replenish the pool for other families. Repayment terms can be flexible and creative given a family's ability to repay; however, senior citizens should be g~ven grants with a life estate interest in the property, with no repayment required during their lifetimes. Interest rates should be nominal and the loans still forgiven in 15 years as is currently practiced. Repayments from loans is one potential source of funding that= when returned to the revolving loan pool from the sale of each promissory note, would provide additional funds to onginate new rehab projects. The loan servicing problem can be alleviated by the City's sale of each note to a secondary market created especially for non-profits (and in some cases mumcipalities/ who originate such loans, as traditional secondary markets would not be interested in such loans due to Iow yields. Should the City be interested in pursuing this form of program expansion, it is recommended that contacts be made to the national offices of FANNIE MAE, The Ford Foundation (Enterprise Fund) and Neighborworks, a division of Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation. for more details on the requirements and the potential for selling loans through a local non-profit. As an alternative, the local LI.S.C. office may be helpful in locating organizations participating July 15. 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Beach Vision 20/20 ~l Boynton Redevelopment Master Plan Page 59 ~n the housing secondary market for non-profits. The housing rehabilitation program should continue its focus on owner-occupied, low- to moderate-income families or senior citizens: however, its scope should be citywide. The City may wish to target its rehab, efforts in the older Ridgewood neighborhoods surveyed east of 1~95; however, spot rehab, in the Mango Park South and other "fringe" neighborhoods that would assist in preventing further decline should also be considered, provided that each household being considered for assistance meets eligibility standards. The expansion of these programs to include single-family rehabilitation should result in improvement in the "deferred maintenance" evidenced in many of the areas surveyed. Single-family rehab, should also be utilized to return vacant, boarded-up properties to the tax rolls at much high_er valuations and also for the purposes of providing housing to Iow- to moderate-income populations. Infill Housinq Program The City currently has developed a single-family first-time homebuyer's program through its State Housing Incentives Partnership /S.H.I.P.) program. Funded at $300,000 annually, the 1997-95 fiscal year is its first program year. The City operates an existing program, and productivity in this program, which buiJ ds new homes for first-time euyers on tax-delinquent or foreclosed lots, has been exemplary thus far; there have been more than 13 lots purchased upon which homes forfi rst-time homebuyers have been built. The following table represents the City's infill housing program productivity since 1989: Bank financing for qualified homebuyers is available from a variety of resources; however, the traditional constraints for infill housing programs are availability of lots and funds for 'gap' or downpayment/closing assistance. Field surveys noted at least two to three lots on some blocks within Ridgewood that may be available for purchase by either the City or potential homebuyers. However. all of the lots on desirable blocks have been purchased and new homes built. The remaining lots on the City's inventory are in less desirable blocks. City staff, however, feels confident that the homes will nevertheless be marketable. More productivity could be achieved in this program if more grant or Iow-interest loan resources could be located to purchase lots and provide financial assistance to eligible buyers. Unfortunately, CDBG is one of the few resources available to municipalities for lot purchases by potential homebuyers.. It is recommended that the City, in order to avoid utilizing its limited CDBG funding, team Jp with a non-profit community development corporation that can obtain grants July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 60 or even Iow-interest loans to pumhase lots for infill housing. Palm Beach County is another source of lots. Tax-delin(~uent lots with excessive liens for clearance of debris and mowing may be turned over to the City for use in its infill housing program. It is recommended that the City aggressively pursue this avenue/resource for obtaining additional properties. The County's Commission on Affordable Housing (CAH) program is another source of down payment, closing costs, or gap financing subsidies for qualified buyers as well as other subsidies. Although much of the funding available is now targeted to the Iow or very Iow-income population, it is not recommended that any changes in the City's program eligibility requirements be made at this time; particularly since program participation eligibility is determined in part by bank underwriting criteria, it would not be advisable to increase the demand for housing units before there has been time to come up with an adequate strategy to increase the supply of housing units. Additional subsidies to developers, such as payment of impact fees~ utility and other infrastructure costs, may be helpful in obtaining the private sector cooperation that is so vital to these types of efforts. There are funds--loans and/or grants--from a number of State and/or Federal ~)rograms that are available for lot purchases, and now that Boynton Beach has become an entitlement City, it may be eligible as a participating jurisdiction and have the ability to access the HOME program and other funding sources. The City's CHAS refers to meetings to be conducted during 1998 with Palm Beach County to develop an organizational cooperation strategy and affirms that the City will meet with the County to join the existing structure. These meetings should clarify and affirm the City's ability to access certain funding sources available only to entitlement cities currently utilized by Palm Beach County. City staff shou d additionally consult with its HUD area representative who can advice of funding sources available under the entitlement City status. Program Expansion The City should consider creating several programmatic tiers to its current housing programs as recommended in this section July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach VisiOn 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 61 Housin.q Spruce Up/Fix Up This program--which would encompass exterior painting and/or landscaping and possibly minor exterior repmrs--can be operated very effectively, efficiently, and can be highly cost effective for homes not seriously deteriorated. This program, which is very much like and can be utilized in conjunction with the existing paint up/fixup program--with the addition of volunteer labor and materials. Just utilizing staff (or volunteer) time. area merchants can be contacted to donate paint. Area banks seeking CRA projects or other organizations (such as the Kiwanis Club or The Junior League) can be utilized to provide donated labor for weekend painting or spruce- up/fix-up projects. In West Palm Beach, such a project involved a local area non-profit as project coordinator, paint supply compan les, and volunteers from for-profit organizations in the C_ity who were willing to help. The media assisted by covering the event, thereby providing positive publicity for the organizations volunteering labor. Good candidates for these types of weekend projects are single-family homes occupied by senior citizens without the adequate funds necessary to pay for the work themselves. Emerqency Roof Repairs Utilizing the same guidelines for family program eligibility as currently exist, it is recommended that the City utilize approximately 10-15% of its CDBG allocation for emergency roof repairs for eligible owner-occupant families or senior citizens. It is common for such emergency repairs to receive priority in obtaining funding due to the threat of health and safety that roofing problems pose. In order to expedite this work, many cities waive the normal bid process and require only two telephone bids to get work completed expeditiously. The expansion of these single-family rehabilitation programs should result in reproving the deferred maintenance evidenced in many of the areas surveyed. In Mango Park South, a "fringe" neighborhood, spot rehabilitation could reverse decline that is beginning to occur. Single-family rehabilitation, in addition to providing housing for Iow- to moderate-income populations, can be utilized to return vacant. boarded-up properties to the tax rolls to enhance the City's tax base. Ju(v 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 62 Rental Rehabilitation The Boynton Beach does not currently operate a rental rehabilitation program. Rather than having a specific numerical goal. it is recommended that the City consider presenting this program as an incentive to property owners whose single- or multi- family rental units have been cited for code non-compliance and whose properties constitute a nuisance or display slum and blighting conditions that serve to impact and further distress neighborhoods. In order to get units repaired without utilizing existing CDBG resources, the City can promote developedowner participation in the State's Apartment Incentive Loan Program (S.A.I.L.). Ori~cinated by The Florida Housing Finance Agency, qualified profit, non-profit, or public sponsors who_intend to provide rental housing affordab]~ to very Iow-income persons may apply for a loan for an identified gap in financing in developing a project. Application is made directly to the State Dept. Of Community Affairs, and Iow-interest loans are given to developers on a competitive formula basis that considers grants, donations, contributions, and pdvate financing as part of the criteria for analyzing a project. Loan amounts are set by formula on a per project basis. Developers and/or project sponsors who receive financing must pledge to keep a percentage of the units for Iow- to moderate-income families for the duration of the loan period Funding is approximately $40 million, gathered from the Documentary Stamp program, the SAIL Trust Fund. and excess State revenues, and is usually available on a open competition bas~s annually in the spring of each year. The 1998-1999 funding cycle of this highly competitive program---which opens with a comprehensive workshop to explain the program and how to apply--has already been closed. Repayment terms are dictated by the State, and projects are usually underwritten by First Housing Corporation very much ike a private lending institution with 15-30 year payment term, and below market interest rates. This program Js highly competitive= and S.A.I.L. applicants obtain additional points if they can show city support. Therefore, the Boynton Beach could provide local incentives to property owners to participate in the program by offering letters of support, payment of impact fees through CDBG or other funding, land acquisition support, or the use of existing rahab, inspection staff to assist in the process of loan applicatior~, which is lengthy and requires heavy documentation. Another incentive the City may offer would allow owners or sponsors To quality for larger grants, ~ncreased density, or zoning variances if they renovate their properties for senior citizen facilities. for example. July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 63 Other private resources are available through the Consortium for Affordable Home Financing, a group of twenty-one banks who share risks, pool resources, and loan funds on higher risk projects. Art Fleming, Consortium executive director, currently works with City staff on single-family !nfill housing loans, and would be helpful in directing City staff in the use of Consortium resources for multi-family rental rehabilitation and new construction programs. Neighborhood Improvement Programs The following programs are geared to benefit the Ridgewood study area, and can be described as an area benefit as opposed to a direct beneficiary activity (there would be no individual household determination of sligibility required). Some of the recommendations are outgrowths of existing programs and others are new program concepts. Designed with the goal to improve neighborhood appearance and quality of life. the following are relatively simple, tow-cost activities that the City can undertake and supervise as the lead agency with other groups and organizations cooperating and without any significant additional funding. Concentrated Code Compliance Specifically in the Ridgewood neighborhood, this program would increase the frequency and amount of code violations cited, perhaps utilizing additional inspectors to flag violations of the building and appearance codes in a more aggressive manner. The Project Team noted the following top five compliance problems: 1. Garbage piles 2. Trash piles 3. Scattered debris 4. Overgrown vacant lots 5. Illegal dumping July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton BeaCh Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 64 Program ideas to improve neighborhood appearance include: 1. Neighborhood cleanups. 2. "Amnesty" days. 3. Neighborhood improvement watch. The Boynton Police Dept., working in conjunction with Public Works has explored ways to catch dumping violators, and seminars have been held on the subject. It is mportant to involve the Ridgewood community in these discussions and to enlist their assistance, ideas, and cooperation with such programs. The Pro)ect Team noted an abundance of vacant, overgrown lots. some with scattered debris and others with_ neat debris and trash piles in the Ridgewood study area. The presence of this lack of maintenance has a major ~mpact on neighborhood appearance, detracts from property values, and contributes to slum and blighting conditions. It is recommended that the City approach this problem as a procurement of services issue and in a wel ~-publicized.neighborhood meeting pose the problem to area residents. There will undoubtedly be a workable solution that could potentially involve a contract with a local lawn maintenance/landscaping firm. Liens that are placed on lots cleared and mowed under this program will help the City to assemble land for an affordable housing project, should they decide on the option of foreclosing on such properties. The City can also attempt to purchase or acquire problem lots that owners do not maintain for the infill housing program. This solves two problems. One is the vacant, overgrown lot piled with debris, and the other is the need~ to provide affordable housing for iow- to moderate-income families. Coupled with concentrated code compliance activities, information should be made available to property owners who may qualify for single-family housing rehab. assistance. Inspectors utilized in this program should be thoroughly familiar with available programs for housing assistance in order to facilitate applications from property owners seeking relief and who wish to upgrade their properties. The City may wish to hire additional inspectors through its CDBG allocation specifically for this and other relateC programming, in order to handle the increased demand which will undoubtedly follow these efforts. Education and marketing are the key components that will make these programs a success. Along with concentrated code compliance efforts, the use of the print and electronic media, and catchy slogans, the City can publicize all of its efforts at July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 ~.~ Redevelopment Master Plan Page 65 neighborhood revitalization and likely obtain voluntary cooperation from its citizens. Additionally, residents must be urged to report abuses to the various codes as they are observed. The addition of a telephone "hotline" line--perhaps a line where citizens could be anonymous) may be a way to receive tips from ordinary citizens on matters of concern with respect to these issues. Landscapinq/Streetscape/Beautification Proqram~ n addition to enhanced code compliance efforts, Iow-cost efforts to assist property owners can be implemented in conjunction with existing City maintenance and beautification efforts. The City, utilizing its existing nursery and bulk buying capacity, can purchase additional nursery materials and set them aside for homeowners in Iow- to moderete-income areas, such as Ridgewood, for assistance with landscaping and lawn maintenance needs. The City's nursery could ~)e operated to provide Iow-cost landscaping materials. Perhaps some joint programming with the CDBG staff on funding for nursery staff for a specific program and period of time will help in beautification efforts for Ridgewood and other neighborhoods. Palm Beach County's Environmental Management Dept. has a free tree collection and re-planting program, and staff are conetantly in search of new projects and areas to relocate trees gathered from road or other clearance projects. Low-cost signnage for community identification, and new street signnage is needed for several of the Ridgewood neighborhoods. These items are eligible as CDBG expenditures. The City has in place a Neighborhood Partnership Program where the City may split the cost of improvements with residents, particularly from Condominium Associations with budgets. Since CDBG funding is eligible for neighborhood improvements in Iow- to moderate-income areas such as Ridgewood under the area benefit category, it is recommended that this program be extended to the Ridgewood area. The program can be structured so that the 50% participation required by residents can be paid through the CDBG program, with the sweat equity portion--to install, monitor and maintain the improvements, including tree or swale watering, plantings, etc.-- still coming from the residents. July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 RedeVelopment Master Plan Page 66 Demolition/Replacement Housin,q This program can do much to enhance a slum or blighted block with unrepairable homes requiring demolition. It is noted that tt~e City does not yet have in place a policy for demolition or replacement housing, however such a policy is being considered fcr adoption in City codes within this fiscal (1998) year. This policy would define eligible properties and instances where it may be implemented. For example, the City of West Palm Beach utilizes a definition similar to the following for property owners occupying single-family properties that are "beyond repair:" 1. To rehabilitate the property would mean investing funds in excess of market valu 6: or 2. If the rehab costs equal 50% or more of the property's value. In such cases, the City should consider activation of its displacement/relocation policy, a plan that is customary requirement for a CDBG entitlement city and utilized in CRAs as well. Even though it is a direct benefit activity, this program can be utilized as a [ool for land clearance/assemblage, housing redevelopment, as well as for the removal of slum and blighting conditions. It also provides for the fair treatment of any occu pants of housing considered beyond repair, who would potentially lose their homes as a result of any clearance/redeve] opment efforts. There is an elaborate process involved which includes a formal declaration by the City (or governing body) of the pending project, adequate notification of property owners and tenants, and compensation to displaced persons allowing them funding for relocation into comparable dwellings, sometimes on the same site. The current Consolidated Plan does not allow for demolition/replacement funding, however the Project Team noted approximately 10 dwellings in the Ridgewood area that would qualify for this program. Developing a demolition/replacement program involves the physical removal of a building beyond repair, temporary relocation its occupants, and a new comparable dwelling built, often on the same lot, for the property owner. Possib[e priorities for properties to be included in this type of program are properties owned by the elderly, or properties on targeted blocks. July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 67 New Programs The following brief program descriptions are of program grants potentially available to the City of Boynton Beach and/or its participating non-profit organizations in collaborative joint ventures. Transitional Housing For individuals or families not yet ready to meet credit underwriting standards for homeownership, transitional housing is one answer. It provides safe haven for individuals with families and chi] dren while supportive services such as budget, pre- purchase and financial counseling are offered to assist potential borrowers obtain the economic and training assistance that will help them qualify to purchase homes under the City's programs. Funds from the HOME, as well as, the CDBG program are eligible for th~s purpose. If the City would wish to target the homeless for this type of program, Emergency Shelter (ESGI Grants are available. However, for both of these funding resources, the City must implement its organizational and operation strategy with Palm Beach County and the Homeless Coalition, both organizations that control access to these funds countywide, to learn what potential role the City or any of its participating organizations may have as an eligible applicant for these funds. Urban Community Economic Development Designed to provide employment and business development opportunities for Iow- income persons through business, physical or commercial development, created through the Office of Community Services (part of U S. Dept. of Health and Human Services), projects must create full-time jobs, business opportunities and move participants towards self-sufficiency. Intended beneficiaries are public welfare recipients, displaced workers, at-risk teens, public housing residents. Among the many eligible applicants are non-profit community development corporations. There are seven funding categories, with varying etigible applicants, funding amounts, and criteria. Following is a selected sampling of categories within this funding source for which the City or its "participating organizations" may be able to qualify for: July 15. 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 68 Type of Grant/ Eliqible Applicant Purpose Amt. Avail. Operational Grants Help provide "employment and $17 million ownership opportunities for Iow-income for 25 grants Open to eligible CDC's people through business, physical or commercial development." Pre-Development Grants Grants to evaluate projects geared $750,000 for toward Iow-income communities, 10 grants Recently established (no develop a business plan for a project, more than 3 years old) and mobilize resources for that project. CDCs Developmental Grants Grants to provide employment and $2.5 million for community development opportunities 10 grants Private non-profits for Iow-income individuals through business, physical or commercial development. Because affordable housing is very much contingent upon economic development activities to create jobs for potential home purchasers, the City may determine the necessity to become involved in the coordination of economic development activities to further enhance its housing programs. There are many such programs available on the State and local, and even Federal levels of government some of which are available through the State of Florida and work in tandem with [he local organizations such as the Workforce Development Board. YouthBuild: Youth Emplovment and Traininq This program provides training, education and housing for Iow-income youth. In this program, which targets dropouts and trains them to build new, affordable housing in their communities, funds are utilized to g~ve participants a means to achieve self- sufficiency and instill in them a sense of community. As an ancillary benefit, such a program may have a positive impact on the loitering problem noted in the neighborhood assessment completed in the Ridgewood area, specifically in the northeast quadrant. A wide array of entities are eligible applicants--inclu ding cities-- and, since the entity must be eligible to provide education and employment training, July ]5, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 69 the Project Team recommends that the City's role be imited to a catalyst to encourage such programs in the study area. For this particular resource, it is recommended that the City coordinate with the Workforce Development Board. for the employment and training aspect and utilize the BBCDC or its own CDBG Division to provide the worksites (homes to be built) for the program's youth participants. (The Workforce Development Board was the funnel through which the first business incubator in Palm Beach County was funded--a pilot demonstration for new incubators that is now nonexistent, but was in place duri 1993-94.) It is also recommended that the City obtain these and other grant applications and study these programs_ at least nine months to one year in advance of actually making application. During this time period, the appropriate collaborators should be located, and the projects readied for application: i.e., land condemned or purchased, homebuyers sought, contracts for acquisition be negotiated, and all interagency agreements in place, etc. In the competitive grant process, having a project "ready to go" places the City or the non-profit at a distinct advantage as opposed to other sites that may not be as advanced in planning and/or implementation. Neighborhood Summary In today's funding climate, it is necessary to not only develop a patchwork quilt of funding resources for any specific project, but to develop the required partners and collaborators in order to implement the many neighborhood revitalization projects needed [o prevent and reverse neiglqborhood decline. Municipalities are not always eligible for various resources; it may often be necessary to develop collaborative efforts with non-profit organizations or semi-autonomous authorities in order to successfully implement programs. Funders are more and more conscious of the need for organizations to interact, jointly implement programs, and collaborate more successfully in this climate of dwindling resources. Successful cities understand these dynamics, and search out or create such entities as may be necessary to help them fulfill their mission. In addition to being collaborators, the City should consider becoming an information broker for all the resources available that exist to assist property owners or potential homebuyers. Information is power, and the City can utilize information on available July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 70 property improvement programs as leverage in obtaining 'coopbr~tion from property owners in meeting compliance with existing codes. This Redevelopment Plan contains a number of specific recommendations to modify current city programs and initiate new programs to help neighborhood associations improve their areas. The analysis and programs recommended in the 3 neighborhoods presented previously should be viewed as "models" which can be replicated in other neighborhoods in the future by City planning staff, July 15, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 71 XI. Community Redevelopment Area Expansion One of the most important recommendations resulting from the Visions 20/20 Policy Plan was for the City of Boynton Beach to consider the expansion of the current boundary of the Community Redevelopment (CR) Area. The existing CR Area was initially established in 1982 and expanded to its current configuration, as shown in Figure 3, in 1988. This Finding of Necessity for Redevelopment is a key step in the planned expansion of the Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) jurisdiction. In Florida, the establishment and/or expansion of a Community Redevelopment Area and the exercise of redevelopment powers must be supported with an official finding, consistent with the criteria specified in the Florida Community Redevelopment Act, Chapter 163.355, F.S. The following report was prepared in order to ensure tha~t the proposed boundary expansion meets the Redevelopment Act criteria. Methodology A number of information sources and analytical techniques were used in the determination of the need for redevelopment assistance in the proposed expansion areas as follows: 1.) Public Records - The Palm Beach County Property Appraisal file was used to determine aggregate property valuation, ownership characteristics and age of structures. City and County platting information was also used to examine lot layouts and configurations. Boynton Beach planning, building, zoning and code enforcement records were the source for plan designation, zoning and current use information by parcel and block, and code enforcement actions. July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 RedeVelopment Master Plan Page 72 ~ ~ Boynton Beach- Community Redevelopment Area Gateway Blvd. Boynton Beach Blvd. Legend: [] Current Community Golf Rd. ~ Redevelopment Area Figure 3 Prepared By: James Duncan and Associates Date: January 20, 1998 2.) Field Surveys - Surveys were conducted in October and November 1997 througi~out possible expansion areas of Boynton Beach to provide accurate assessments of physical conditions, including infrastructure deficiencies, building structure conditions, transportation characteristics, unsanitary conditions and prevalence of vacant lots. The surveys were conducted by the 20/20 consulting team. The information collected was assessed against the following criteria, as defined in Florida Statutes Chapter 163, to determine th e existence of slum and blight conditions. * Unsanitary and unsafe conditions. * Building deteriorati_on. ' Prevalence of closed/vacant buildings. ' Presence of vacant lots. ~ Building and property code violations. * Site deterioration. ' Infrastructure deficiencies. * Incompatible uses. ' Transportation system problems. Declining property values. ' Lot configuration and ownership constraints. In order to meet the spirit and intent of the State law, an area does not have to have all of the above characteristics but must exhibit a predominance of these problems, the combined effect of which is serving to inhibit redevelopment and normal tax base growth. Although the primary goal of this report is to examine the slum and blighting conditions ex~sting in the proposed Expansion Area, it will also include an overview of these same conditions present within the current CR Area boundaries. This is due to the fact that the existing CR Area and the proposed Expansion Area must be viewed as an integrated whole for redevelopment analysis, planning and implementation purposes. Thus, it is critical that this analysis of slum and blight conditions present these conditions for the current and proposed area. It also follows that any finding of necessity for redevelopment made by the City Commission should be based on the presence of these negative conditions throug;qout the entire CR Area. including proposed Expansion Areas. July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 73 Existing Community Redevelopment Area The current Community Redevelopment (CR) Area is shown in Figure 3. This area was been previousiy qualified under State law as slum and blighted, and i~ need of redevelopment planning and assistance. This finding occurred in two (2) stages. The initial CR Area was established in 1982 with a size of 180 acres focused primarily around the downtown marina area. The CR area was expanded in 1988 to its current configuration which totals approximately 520 acres. The existing Community Redevelopment Area now generally encompasses lands between 1-95 and the Intracoastal Waterway, and the C-16 canal and Ocean Avenue. While significant progress has been made over the last 10-15 years through the concerted efforts of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), this area continues to exhibit slum and blighted conditions both in commercial areas and residential neighborhoods. I~ 1990, the U.S. Census found that over 20% of the households in a large portion of this area had incomes below poverty level. This current CR Area has a substantial number of homes which are in disrepair. Code enforcement cases for trash dumping, over-grown lawns, exterior disrepair and interior life-safety violations are among the highest in the city. Palm Beach County has designated a significant portion of the current Boynton CR Area as a "Development Region" where enhanced property owner investment strategies and job creation are needed to reduce poverty levels and generally upgrade the physical building stock. This is accomplished through loan and grants programs offered by the County through the Development Regions Program. A number of commercial parcels along on U.S. 1 a~d Boynton Beach Bou ~vard in the current CR Area exhibit out-moded structural characteristics and tand subdivision constraints, particularly insufficient lot depths, which are not conducive to modem retail and service business trends. Some buildings are in deteriorated condition, signnage throughout the area is uncoordinate0 and streetscapes are generally devoid of landscaping and unattractive. Traffic flow, drainage and parking are major problems inhibiting redevelopment i~ the downtown area of the existing CR Area. Property values in the current CRA have not grown at a significantly lesser rate since 1990 in comparison to Boynton Beach as a whole. Areas near the existing CRA boundary have a large impact on redevelopment July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision20~20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 74 planning in the CR Area. In particular, the U. S. Highway I corridor north and south of the present CR Area constitutes an integrated extension of this primary arterial in downtown Boynton. The incorporation of the north/south U. S. I corridor extensions constitute a logical planning process whereby the entire U. S. 1 area can be coordinated for effective redevelopment. The industrial areas west of 1-95 between Boynton Beach Boulevard and the C-16 canal, which constitute the West Subarea, could also play an important role in the successful redevelopment of the current CR Area by supplying nearby employment opportunities for CRA residents. Thus, it is clear that expansion of the current CRA boundaries could provide important urban planning and implementation linkages for the Boynton Beach CRA. Proposed CRA Expansion Area Based on initial field surveys and other relevant information, the City has determine~ the most appropriate boundaries for the expansion of the current Community Redevelopment Area. The Community Redevelopment (CR) Expansion Area is shown in Figure 4. It comprises approximately 657 acres which, if approved, would bring the total size of the expanded CRA to 1,176 acres. The proposed Expansion Area is delineated into three (3) subareas for the purposes of this report. These subareas are identified as the North Subarea, West Subarea and South Subarea. These subareas were identified, following months of research and analysis of larger areas, as areas of critical need for economic and housing redevelopment planning and assistance in Boynton Beach The boundaries of the CR Expansion Area were determined based on the need for physical redevelopment, as well as, to protect commercial, industrial and neighborhood areas from the presence of blighting conditions. As an overall guideline, the Expansion Area boundary includes parcels which clearly meet slum and blight criteria, as well as other parcels that may not be considered blighted individually, but which are otherwise necessary to prevent the spread and achieve the elimination, where possible, of slum and blighted conditions. Aisc, some physically- sound areas were included in the CR Area based on the need to both minimize threats to such areas from nearby slum and blighted conditions thereby preserving their long term viability, and recognize the existence of functional relationships in the CRA Area July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 75 · Boynton Beach Community Redevelopment Area City Limit Gateway Blvd. North · Subarea Subarea .! Boynton Beach Legend: W~olbright [] Current CR Area SOuth SUbarea [] Proposed CR Expansion Golf Rd. Area Figure 4 Prepared By: James Duncan and Associates Date: January 20, 1998 that produce a sense of neighborhood or place. Lastly, in drawing the proposed boundaries, the necessity to nurture the growth of existing mutually supportive relationships and linkages between discrete sections of Boynton Beach was taken into account. For example, the U.S. 1 corridor through Boynton Beach will not be viable if adjacent areas remain blighted. Inclusion of these b~ocks into the larger area can help establish a broader sense of community and security, and encourage vibrant redevelopment of the area for residents and tourists. The Determination of Need for Redevelopment Section which follows witl address the relevant conditions within both the existing CR Area, as well as, the proposed Expansion Area. Determination- of Need for Redevelopment Building and Housing Stock Conditions In the current CR Area, there are a s~gnificant number of dilapidated and deteriorated structures. Code enforcement efforts of the City of Boynton Beach are focused in this area and great strides in improving housing conditions have been made i~ recent years. The City has a regular program targeted to the demolition of unsafe structures in this area and citywide. In 1990. Census figures indicated that 13 housing units in the area lacked adequate plumbing facilities and approximately 19% of all units were vacant. Renter-occupied housing accounted for 44% of the total housing stock in the current CR Area, the highest percentage in the city. Overcrowding was also a significant problem in the existing CR area in 1990, with 107 units (7.7 % of housing stock) reporting greater than 1.51 persons per room. Housing conditions in the current CR Area can benefit from continued effective redevelopment planning and additional financial resources. The Expansion Subareas (see Figure 4) also exhibit inadequate building conditions in many areas. In the North Subarea, the eastside of the U. S. I corridor from the C-16 Canal to Gateway Boulevard, contains, unattractive commercial areas, older mobile homes, boarded homes and open trash piles. Appendix D shows some of these conditions. Commercial buildings along U. S. I also show signs of building deterioration in many instances. In the South Subarea, the building deterioration is evident both along U. S. 1, and between U. S. 1 and the FEC railroad tracks. July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 76 Appendix D shows some represent examples of marginal building conditions in parts of the South Subarea. These conditions include boarded commercial buildings, open trash piles, deteriorated housing structures, unattractive streetscapes and bare commercial frontages. Vacant Buildings and Lots Large areas of vacant land stit~ exist within established neighborhoods in the current CR area which have experienced disinvestment over the years. A tragm example of this trend is noted around Martin Luther King Boulevard (NE 10th Avenue) where former commercial structures have been removed with no rebuilding. These vacant tracts represent potential sites for residential redevelopment in the future. A significant of number boarded (vacant) residential structures are evident in the existing CRA area as well. Appendix D contains photograph of slum and blighted conditions in the proposed Expansion Area. A number of examples of boarded residential and commercial structures are present in the CR Expansion Area. These and other marginal structures indicate a strong need for redevelopment planning in this area. Significant numbers of vacant lots also exist in the individual subareas targeted for CRA expansion. Appendix D shows some representative examples located in the North and South Subarea$. In the North Subarea, a number of vacant parcels exist east of U. S. 1, particularly in a single-family area located south of the C-16 Canal. Drainage requirements have hinaered development of infill lots in this interesting neighborhood and it could substantially benefit from coordinated infrastructure planning. The West Subarea (see Figure 4) also contains large areas of vacant industrial land which, when developed, can be a significant contributor to the employment component of the redevelopment program for the CRA. Site Deterioration The field surveys also examined blighting site conditions. Site deterioration was July 15, ]998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 77 defined as areas with broken or unpaved sidewalks, debds piles, deteriorated parking lots. abandoned foundations and deteriorating site improvements such as fences. Site deterioration has been discussed previously with respect to the current CR Area. Numerous examples of broken-down automobiles, open trash piles, broken fencing and glass, and over-grown grass are evident in many parts of the area. Persistent code enforcement efforts of the City in recent years has served to improve this situation in the CRA, however strong future programs are necessary, through a combination of regulatory means and financial assistance, to help landowners bring properties up to minimum maintenance standards. Appendix D shows prime examples of unacceptable site conditions in the Expansion Area such as open trash plies and poorly-maintained parking lots. Deteriorated site conditions contribute to a negative image of these areas which can be reversed with effective redevelopment planning. Infrastructure Deficiencies Inadequate infrastructure, including unpaved roads, traffic congestion drainage, central water and sanitary sewer, can indicate blighted conditions and present formidable barriers to redevelopment. Several types of infrastructure deficiencies exist 'n the current CR area including sanitary sewer, drainage, downtown parking and traffic congestion. In addition, the FEC Railway tracks form a significant barrier to east-west access in the CRA which has hindered city development and will need to be addressed in redevelopment planning. Drainage problems are prevalent in the area. This creates periodic unsanitary and unsafe conditions in various parts of the redevelopment area, particularly during the summer months. New governmental drainage requirements promulgated in recent years has served to virtually halt redevelopment of the downtown marina district. The City of Boynton Beach is now moving expediously to address this pressing problem with the programmed construction of a regional stormwater facility near the marina area.. Parking standards in the downtown area have been difficult for prospective developers to meet as well because Boynton Beach has the typical site constraints present in older, coastal urban areas. For this reason, Boynton Beach has moved aggressively July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Beach Vision 20/20 Boynton Redevelopment Master Plan Page 78 ~n the past several years to adopt flexible parking standards in the downtown business district and thus facilitate redevelopment projects. Substantial deficiencies in infrastructure also exist in the proposed expansion subareas. These problems include lack of central sewer, inadequate drainage, traffic congestion, unpaved roads and parking difficulties. Appendix D shows an example of drainage problems and unpaved roads in a residential area south of Woolbdght Road in the South Subarea. Property Values Property values in th_e existing CR Area have grown by just 1.3% since 1990. This is considerably lower than tax base growth of 26% for the entire City of Boynton Beach over the same period. This trend of lower-than-normal property value growth is an indicator of an area in need of aggressive redevelopment planning. The inclusion of additional areas into the CRA will help to spur redevelopment efforts and increase the financial resources available to address public and private projects implementation Property values in the subareas proposed for inclusion as part of the Boynton Beach CRA have also experienced less-than-normal growth when compared to citywide trends. Since 1993, tax base growth (or decrease) in these areas has ranged between -2.6% to +8.7%, again far below the performance of the city as a whole. This is due to a number of reasons including infrastructure deficiencies, State growth management policies promoting westward urban expansion in Palm Beach County, and regulatory reqmrements which make urban redevelopment difficult. By addressing these and other hindrances to solid tax base growth, the expanded CRA can direct and facilitate effective redevelopment which can accelerate private investment and concomitant growth in property values, Incompatible Uses Adjacent incompatible uses exist in a number of locations, primarily where commercial and residential (zoning) districts meet. in the existing CR Area. These situations are most prevalent south of Boynton Beach Boulevard between U. S. 1 and the FEC railroad tracks. In these areas, commercial uses have been allowed west of U. S. 1 in July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Beach Vision 20/20 Boynton Redevelopment Master Plan Page 79 transitional neighborhoods and have adversely-impacted the tranquil nature and visual attractiveness of these older single-family areas. Similar areas also exist north of Boynton Beach Boulevard. In particular, the first tier of single-family homes immediately north of Boynton Beach Boulevard have been adversely-impacted by boulevard businesses. Likewise, the businesses along the northside of Boynton Beach Boulevard have been prevented from increasing lot depth to meet modern retailing standards by the single-family homes behind them. Examples of incompatible uses in the expansion areas abound. In the North Subarea, there are several adult entertainment establishments which are out-of-character and incompatible with redevelopment concepts designed to upgrade property values, and attract visitors and families to visit and shop in the U.S. 1 corridor and the marina area. In the South Subarea; many examples of incompatible uses exist between U. S. 1 and the FEC railroad tracks. Similarly to the situation described above the current CR Area, this expansion subarea also suffers from the incursion of commercial uses west off the U.S. 1 frontage into predominantly residential areas. Appendix D shows an example of this problem where a retail plant business has been allowed in a residential neighborhood along Old Dixie Road. Ownership and Lot Configuration Constraints Pre-existing plats and excessive ownership pamelization can be a serious barrier to effective redevelopment. The current CR Area has a number of older plats, particularly along the U. S. 1 frontage, which are inappropriate for future commemial development and redevelopmant. In addition, numerous small ownerships in the Area may hinder the aggregation of land into parcels appropriate in size for planned redevelopment projects. A prime example of this problem was mentioned previously. The businesses along the northside of Boynton Beach Boulevard have been prevented from increasing lot depth to meet modern retailing standards by the platting single-family homes behind them. This situation is prevalent also in the marina area where platted lots and complex ownership patterns have divided this area into many small parcels without adequate planning. The resulting lot configurations have hindered past redevelopment plans and must be effectively addressed in current planning efforts. The proposed North and South Expansion Subareas along the U. S. 1 corridor also July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 80 exhibit difficult subdivision and ownership patterns which have adversely-impacted past development initiatives. Generally, commercial lots fronting U. S. 1 have inadequate depth and frontage to easily accommodate retail, service and entertainment uses using modern site development standards. This situation will need to be addressed in order to facilitate effective redevelopment_of the vital U. S 1 corridor through Boynton Beach. Conclusion The subject Community Redevelopment Area, including the proposed Expansion Area, in Boynton Beach meets the criteria of slum and blight as defined in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Building and site deterioration, open debris piles, overcrowding of structures, vacant buildings and land, building and property code violations, infrastructure deficiencies, marginal property value growth, land use incompatibilities and lot configuration constraints are evident throughout the proposed CR Expansion Area and serve to highlight the need for effective redevelopment planning and program implementation. Community redevelopment assistance is necessary within the proposed Expansion Area to remove slum and blighting conditions, enhance the tax base, encourage economic growth, improve living conditions, and to upgrade and preserve Iow- and moderate-cost housing. The proposed CR Expansion Area, shown in Figure 4, is a logical and prudent extension of the current Boynton Beach CRA boundary. The U. S. 1 corridor is a crucial link in the successful redevelopment of the coastal urban area of Boynton Beach. This entire corridor establishes the city's visual image and character for visitors and residents to Boynton Beach, and the downtown manna area. Piecemeal redevelopment efforts in only a portion of the corridor can not be successful because they will not address the full development potential of this unique and historic transportation facility. Likewise, concentration of redevelopment on the frontage parcels only will also have limited potential for positive impact because the adjacent residential areas provide the local market area for corridor businesses and must be considered as an integral part of the corridor. The West Subarea is critically important to the CRA due to its great potential to generate nearby well-paying jobs readily- accessible to CRA residents. The combination of the current CR Area and proposed Expansion Area will provide July 15. 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 81 Boynton Beach with an integrated area possessing enormous potential for effective redevelopment planning, funding and implementation, July 15, 1998 CRA Expansion Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment MaSter Plan Page 82 XII. Implementation Program Organization and Coordination This implementation program addresses the key components of each project proposed in the Boynton Beach 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan over the next five years. Priorities and scheduling of individual projects are proposed below with staff input and accounting for public comments. The cost estimates below are maximum figures, and generally do not account for potential developer and landowner contributions which may be obtained dudng the redevelopment process, except where indicated. It is ~mportant to not& that this implementation schedule is conceptual in nature and will be subject to change in the future as redevelopment occurs. Changes may be generated based on receipt by the City of new information or as a result of specific requirements necessary to successfully implement public/private partnerships in the Ocean District, surrounding neighborhoods and other parts of the redevelopment area. Thus, this 20/20 redevelopment master plan implementation schedule should be used as a strong initial redevelopment guide, but with enough flexibility to enable decision- makers to respond to future changing conditions in order to achieve success. Implementation for the proposed 20/20 Redevelopment Program will require a major commitment of staff resources and coordinated direction of the various activities over a sustained period of time. Continued strong leadership both at the Commission level and senior staff management level will be essential. It is recommended that the City appoint a single senior staff member to oversee implementation of the city responsibilities. This person shou Id be supported by an internal team of professionals experienced in planning, real estate, finance, and construction who meet regularly and assist as needed in project implementation. July 15, 1998 Implementation Program Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 83 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Implementation (Draft) I.l Blue Lagoon $ 3.5 million 1998-1999 Utility revenu 9 City Stormwater Facility bond, user fees (underway) 2.) Port (East B. Beach $ 3.6 million 1998-2000 ISTEA CRA* Blvd.) Promenade grant/CRA*/ special district 3.1 Ocean Avenue $1.1 million 1998-2000 City/CRA/ISTEA CRA Promenade grant 4.1 Marina Area Parking- $750,000 1998-1999 CRA revenue/ CRA Phase I Surface developeduser Lots for 200 Cars fees 5.) City Club at Boat $1 million 1998-1999 CRA/City City Landing Park 6.1 Continuing $75,000/ 1998-2003 City General City Neighborhood year Fund/CDBG Planning and Funds Improvements 7./CRA Expansion .... 1998-1999 Not applicable City 8.) Adopt 20/20 Land ..... 1998-1999 Not applicable City Use & Urban Design Criteria 9.) Commercial Facade $100,000/ 1998-2003 PBC dev. region City Improvements year grants/CRA 10.) Affordable Housing $350,000/ 1998-2003 CDBG/SHIP/ City Program year HOME July 15. 1998 Implementation Program Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 84 ! 11.) Ridgewood I $50,000 1998-2000 City/CRA CRA NeighborhoodI revenue Improvements 12.) Gateway I $15,000 1998-1999 City capital fund City Neighborhood Traffic Calming 13.) Designate Full-time I $120,000/ 1999-2003 CRA CRA CRA Director and I year staff (1) I 14.) New Senior Center ~ $2.0 million 1999-2001 City capital City in Town SquareI fund/CDBG 15.) Implement 20/20 ~ $32,000/ 1999-2003 CRA/City City Marketing Strategy'~ year t 16.) Acquire NE 6th St, ~ $150,000 1999-2000 CRA/developer CRA R-O-W in MarinaI contributions Area 17.) 1913 Schoolhouse ~ $1.5 million 1999-2000 City/private Museum Board of Museum in TownI donations Directors Square 18.) Remove Civic I $5.0 million 2000-2002 CRA/grants/City City Center/Redevelop J (estimated) Fund Old High School I 19.) Business Incubator ~ $350,000 2000-2001 PBC dev. region CRA Project- MLK Blvd.I grant/City/CRA 20.) Town Square ~ $1.5 million 2000-2002 City/CRA City/CRA CampusI revenues 21.) Federal Highway j $800,000 2000-2001 Grants/CRA CRA Streetscape I Phase I 15, 1998 Implementation Program Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 85 22.) MLK Blvd./Seacrest $60,000 2001-2002 Grants/CRA CRA Traffic Calming 23.) Madna Parking- $ 4.0 million 2001-2003 CRA/ CRA Phase 2 Garage for develop)er/user 400 Cars fees * CRA: Communi .ty Redevelopment Agency. Financial Resources There are a number of revenue sources available to the City now to begin mplementation. There are also several new funding mechanisms which could be applicable to Boynton's 20/20 redevelopment. The following section summarizes the available and potential funding sources. Existing CRA Current Tax Base - $75.8 million; 1.8% annual growth 1994-98. Current Tax Increment - $16 million; 12% annual growth 1994-98. Projected CRA Year-End (9-30-98) Balance = $398,000. * 1997-98 Tax Increment Revenues = $190,500. * Average Annual Expenses (approx.): $200,000. · Projected Increment Growth (based on 1997-98 tax rates): Baseline - 12% year plus committed projects. Potential 10-year revenue bond proceeds = $3 million. July 15, 1998 Implementation Program Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 86 Proposed CRA Expansion Areas * Estimated Base Year (1998-99) Value: $188 million Can bond future revenues after year 2004. Revenue and bond capacity estimates based on 1.0% -1.5 % average annual growth rate. Estimated Year 2000-2004 revenues: $325,000 - $505,000 Estimated lO-year bond capacity projection (years 2005-2014): $ 2.0 - 3.0 million. Primary Grant Sources MPO Bikeway (ISTEA) Grants: $ 350,000- $ 500,000 for B.B. Promenade and other improvements. PBC Development Regions Grants: $ 50,000- 100,000/year for businesses. Community Dev. Block Grant: $570,000/annually to fund eligible facilities. SHIP (Affordable Housing): $ 300,000/annually for housing rehabilitation. HOME (Affordable Housing): Available for Infill Housing. New Potential Funding Sources · Parking and other Fees · Impact Fees · Special Improvement Districts. Available City and CRA Funding Sources Based on the above figures and input from City staff, the following total pool of City funding sources are available to help finance the initial redevelopment priorities. None of the funding sources presented here would impact the City's general operating July 15, 1998 Implementation Program Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 87 budget or require an increase in ad valorem taxes. It should be noted that these funding sources represent to total pool of financial resources available to the City, however it will be prudent to only utilize a portion of these funds to ensure that some of these monies are available for projects and programs which are not a direct part of the 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan. Current Funds Available · CRA 1997/98 Fund Balance $ 417,000 · General Fund 1997/98 Fund balance 1,000,000 · CIP Unappropriated 1997/98 Fund Balance 600,000 Subtotal - Current Funds ............................. $2,017,000 Future Fundinq 1 .) Available beginmng FY 1998/99 for annual loan payments: · CRA Annual Increment $ 228,000 · Community Dev. Block Grant 500,000 Total - 1998/99 $ 728.000 Potential loan amount based on 10 years @ 5.4% interest ............................ $5,500,000 2.) Available beginning FY 2000/2001 for annual loan payments: · CIP (40% of utility tax funds) $ 800,000 Potential loan amount based on 10 years @ 5.4% interest .. $6,000,000 Based on the above figures, the City of Boynton Beach has a total of $13.5 million available over the next three (3) years to initiate priority redevelopment projects. July 15, 1998 Implementation Program Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 88 Funding Summary The City has many options in funding the proposed 20/20 Redevelopment Program. Exclud!n§ the Blue Lagoon Stormwamr Facility which already has a dedicated funding source, the initial construction projects (nos. 2-5) listed in the Implementation Program (Section VII) total approximately $6.45 million. This amount comprises about one-half of the total funds available to the City and CRA summarized above and would appear to be a prudent financing level at this time. This amount of City/CRA funding, some of which will be offset by applicable grants, user fees and other soumes, will allow the aggressive implementation of the 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan priorities, while providing adequate funding for other citywide projects and without the need for an increase in ad valorem taxes. A bond program appears unnecessary at this time. Assuming the CRA expansion is approved, the City and CRA financial resources, in combination with user fee mechanisms and available grant and loan programs, appear adequate for the foreseeable future to fund the 20/20 Program. July ]5, 1998 Implementation Program Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 89 Xlll. Marketing Strategy Theme The promotional theme wi] be consistent with the overall Vision 20/20 design plan. The plan identifies the Marina Area by way of a Nautical Theme. This theme is consistent with the historical character that exists in that area. The overall theme for the entire Vision 20/20 area (city limits east of 1-95) is the sailfish icon as displayed in this final report. This is adaptable to existing neighborhoods and the commercial district, as well as any new public areas that will be created by way of the redevelopment plan._ The designated logo, streetscapes, identifiers and correspondence materials will all have the same look. A slogan may be incorporated to complete the process. Materials The mix of marketing materials wil allow the City of Boynton Beach to update information instantaneously and disseminate it in a variety of ways. They include: · Promotional brochure(s) · 5-7 minute promotional video · Boynton Beach web site · Updated press releases/stories · Speakers Bureau (presentations and workshops). Costs The estimated costs in the first year for marketing are as follows: · Promotional Brochure - qty. 10,000 $ .85 to 1.10 each (color). · Promotional Video (5 - 7 minutes) $1200 per minute. July 15, 1998 Marketing Strategy Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 90 · Web site (development & updates) $2500 (inbludes set-up, r~onthly updates, dial-up access and host charge) · Press Releases $600 · Presentations (as needed) $145 per hour (prep work/graphics) · Miscellaneous Expenses $1000 Total estimated cost range $24,000 to $32,000 Promotional Schedule Year One · Expand special event committee · Identify all attractions/events in Boynton · Develop materials (brochure, web site) · Make presentations · Generate press coverage · Coordinate industrial/commercial development marketing · Open Childrens Historical museum Year Two · Address staffing · Track success of special events Imake adjustments) · Develop promotional video (budget for year one) · Develop "Boynton as a Destination" strategic plan July 15, 1998 Marketing Strategy Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 91 Year Three · Open additional attractions · Open hotel · conference center · Expand special events · Track room nights (bed tax revenue) Measuring the Plan It is very important to-measure the effectiveness of the marketing strategy as it is implemented to ascertain %vhat works and what doesn't" and make adjustments as appropriate. The following factors can be used to provide measuring tools: · Resident surveys · Media coverage · Attendance at special events · Number of new businesses / occupancy rates · Improved tax base · Increased population · New occupational licenses · Bed tax revenue (during season/events) · Sales tax revenue (during season/events) Summary The first rule of marketing is "have something to market". With the implementation of the Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Plan, the City will definitely have something to market. The City of Boynton Beach has some well established cultural and civic activities July 15, 1998 Marketing Strategy Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 92 including 16 years of presenting the Gala Festival. Other venues include the soon to open Children's Historical Museum, a Green Market, "Toons in Town", a Quilt Show, the Surf Festival, Tennis Challenge and plans for a new music/art festival in conjunction with the Chamber of Commerce. The current hub of activity is in the current civic/cultural area south of City Hall. The business district, marina, mangrove park and waterfront are all sites to be developed which can be used for events. The structures available for future events/activities include a new amphitheater, the restored school buildings, a renovated senior center, a new high school, the library and other recreational facilities that currently exist. The plans to expand the Gala Festival, introduce a new 9vent, develop water/waterfront sports and make the civic/cultural center the initial focus of activity will require a solid commitment from the residents of Greater Boynton. With the commitment of the residents comes the ability to attract visitors. As visitors (those south of Boca and north of Jupiter) become regulars, the next opportunity is out of state visitors who then occupy hotels or condos. The key to success is to develop attractions verses amenities. The City currently has amenities (waterfront, marina, special events) but needs one or several attractions to qualify as a "destination". This process may take 3-4 years to develop. The City must commit dollars to the marketing effort. These dollars can be derived from sources other than tax revenue. A line item is recommended for marketing/promotion. This figure wou~d only grow if the redevelopment implementation is successful. The further development of a marketing plan can be done through a committee or may be provided by professionals or a combination of both The ongoing marketing plan must be flexible and considered a working document. The City is off to an excellent start oy committing to improve the quality of life in Boynton Beach. The process should be continual with periodic updating. July 15; 1998 Marketing Strategy Boynton BeaCh Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Page 93 APPENDIX A Study Area Socio-Economic Information July 15, 1998 Appendix Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan A. 1990 Census Data Source: 1990 Census Of Population And Housing Summary Tape File 3A CENSUS TRACTS 57.02 60.03 ri 62.01 60.0, 60.O5 62.03 ~":'~'"'~:' TI{ACT BOUNDARIES o 'moo =oeo 4mo U.S. CENSUS. 1990 F~'., Table 1. Population By Sex and Race Trac~.::::::::: ......... . .: .~ Male ,:¥ .:.. ::..F r~ ..................... ;Total::::.:.....:.::~e~ .:...~:¥: ::::::::::::::::::::: :::...~e~r:.::: :.:::H~sl~at3~¢ 57.01 1,759 2,039 3,798 2,519 1,199 80 453 57.02 2,436 2,517 4, 953 1,797 2,950 206 636 61 2,240 2,475 4,715 1,171 3,488' 56 352 62.01 1,654 1,724 3,378 3,027 2,77 74 171 62.02 745 1,047 1,792 1,726 44 22 93 62.03 843 1,239 2,082 1,976 56 50 167 63 1,999 2,345 4,344 4,118 134 92 200 Stu dy Area 11,676 13,386 25,062 16,334 8,148 580 2,072 Boy nton 21,575 24, 619 46,194 35,912 9,296 986 3,124 Beach Palm Beach 414,538 448,9,80 863,518 732,231 107,705 23,582 66,613 County Table 2. Population by Age :: ,I, .... . . :i.):: ·' .::~:..::i:. :. :: ~ .:i :::: i.: :-.: :..:.:i!i.:!.ii:ii :::::.::..i :.~:: :... i: ::~ ::~ :~'~' edJ'al~ T~act 5yrs. ~ !5-17 . 1'8~24' :2544' 1'45~54 7~ ~.::.%~al" :.: ~g:~'::: 57.01 245 568 283 986 272 193 407 844 3,798 39.8 57.02 4dd 1,112 443 1,513 392 321 306 422 4,953 31.5 61 450 1,012 479 1,349 497 354 309 265 4,715 30.9 62.01 227 498 281 1,187 294 325 270 298 3,378 35.5 62.02 27 59 76 231 106 200 436 657 1,792 70.1 62.03 52 80 100 276 96 218 490 770 2,082 70.0 63 202 448 253 1,099 425 487 675 755 4,344 48.7 Study 1,647 3,777 1,915 6,641 2,082 2,098 2,893 4,009 25,062 Area Boynton 2,695 5,710 3,296 12,544 3,680 4,272 6,527 7,470 46,194 42.7 Beach Palm Beach 53,216 116,337 64,908 253,892 80,558 84,367 116,306 93,934 863,518 39.9 County Table 3. Household Characteristics to~ : ~rao.sPar · ~:i '..' ~ ~a~y: ~ :.:.:: Tract ::' ' ' :. : H~sehO!ds::.:':.::::::! .:ltl~J~eh~ ~ :::;. :::.. i: Hoi~S~hO~d~.':':'%:.: :.~lt~f~le~:;-::'i:';;~:? F~]~:$~:.:!?:.:::::..:...: 57.01 1,641 2.31 975 166 57.02 1,541 3.14 1,105 280 61 1,575 2.97 1,096 420 62.01 1,383 2.41 872 144 62.02 1,107 1.62 495 55 62.03 1,263 1.65 581 68 63 2,051 2.12 1,299 155 Study Area 10,561 2.37 6,423 1,288 Boynton Beach 20,292 2.25 12,983 1,924 Palm Beach 365,558 2.32 242,273 31,514 County Table 7. Employment Status, By Sex (Persons Aged 16+) * Males ' :.:: Fe~{~s · Ti'ac[ :"' ': ': ': ':: ::' :'~i~iri ;":;'~ :'": ~";:~::::"::: !'i:':;::;:::':~.:'~:'~:~';:'i~:::~:: ::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::: ~:'~:i~?'il: i:::~?':::~';::;'' : ::"~:'"~:-: · :' ::::' :" ' :: '~6~ ' '[ab0i-::': ::~iSt~i: :;:::: ?:;'::::!;!;;:;:~;':::':':::::? :~:~':: :.':.:':::! ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..::....:.:., Employed :; :..Empiwed Eo[ce. ::..::.;: Aged.:?~6~. ;';.:~t~yed~ .; ~:::EmPlay~d~ :~, ~.E~i~::;:::::: 57.01 764 90 562 1,416 682 68 946 1,696 57.02 1,152 96 435 1,683 1,018 84 732 1,834 61 945 93 473 1,511 1,043 117 774' 1,934 62.01 960 35 360 1,355 823 30 536 1,389 62.02 247 37 441 725 215 ' 14 793 1,022 62.03 245 28 496 769 252 25 879 1,156 63 1,036 26 611 1,673 812 29 1,155 1,996 Study Area 5,349 405 3,378 9,132 4,845 367 5,815 11,027 Boynton Beach 10,379 532 6,704 17,815 9,204 557 11,357 21,118 Palm Beach 212,301 11,073 112,748 336,t22 174,973 9,969 189,544 374,486 County · Excluding Armed Services Members Table 8. Employment By Industry Tract A . Mfg Censt; TCPU . ~. :~eta F m :: ~ Serv~ces~.. Pub [c .Totat ..... . 57.01 99 169 141 104 41 312 100 452 28 1,446 57.02 142 212 152 179 82' 404 132 785 82 2,170 61 128 107 - 200 141 67 369 122 823 31 1,988 62.01 33 145 245 67 79 421 130 538 125 1,783 62.02 7 11 35 8 33 114 21 202 31 462 62.03 57 15 27 43 42 118 33 162 0 497 63 28 99 169 114 98 399 131 687 123 1,848 Study Area 494 758 969 656 442 2,137 669 3,649 420 10,194 Boynton Beach 743 1,461 1,618 1,255 959 4,066 1,644 7,087 750 19,583 Palm Beach 15,155 36,991 33,415 25,735 19,089 74,327 36,135 131,619 14,808 387,274 County * Agriculture & Mining ** Transportation, Communications, Public Utilities *** Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Table 9. Work Trip Length (Workers Aged 16+) Minutes Less Worked Tract than 5 5 - 9 10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 + at Home 57.01 27 73 245 367 240 94 260 0 88 20 57.02 28 204 339 497 403 116 375 50 110 0 61 81 248 283 442 414 110 275 9 79 5 62.01 102 311 324 306 267 91 174 16 159 15 62.02 7 79 127 60 47 9 81 5 28 11 62.03 0 79 85 102 58 20 38 0 58 19 63 75 324 280 350 298 60 219 52 90 68 Study 320 1,318 1,683 2,124 1,727 500 1,442 132 612 138 Area Boynton 520 2,464 3,126 3,881 3,534 1,163 2,615 278 1,436 258 Beach Palm 10,152 40,173 62,077 71,338 62,303 22,466 54,129 8,001 39,451 10,170 Beach County Table 10. Educational Attainment (Population 25+) Less than 9 - 12 Some Associate Bachelor's GradJProf. Tract 9th Grade No Diploma H.S. Grad College * Degree Degree Degree 57.01 378 620 927 483 71 159 103 57.02 541 765 798 530 115 149 104 61 681 663 614 432 147 114 114 62.01 167 420 769 564 160 244 44 62.02 168 338 553 319 66 172 60 62.03 178 427 764 240 42 100 100 63 151 523 1,024 791 251 482 144 Study Area 2,264 3,756 5,449 3,359 852 1,420 669 I Boynton 3,334 6,016 10,918 6,658 2,113 4,034 1,644 Beach Palm 47,090 86,989 190,158 127,435 40,543 91,931 47,932 Beach County No Degree Table 11. Vehicles AVailable (Households) By Tenure Owners Renters Four or Four or Tract None One Two Three More None - One Two i Three More 57.01 178 710 329 44 34 26 174 141 32 3 57.02 60 528 448 147 54 ! 52 124 74 32 22 61 89 328 269 142 30 172 383 133 , 26 3 62.01 60 313 376 173 16 32 203 153 40 17 62.02 125 574 75 32 0 84 191 28 6 0 62.03 115 768 80 13 0 43 182 54 0 0 63 184 882 502 87 23 22 120 156 0 0 Study 811 4,103 2,079 538 157 431 1,377 586 136 51 Area Boynton 1,024 8,413 4,652 1,126 303 530 2,207 1,638 281 122 Beach Palm 14,798 112,909 101,871 25,504 7,812 15,077 48,368 32,(367 5,962 1,190 Beach County Table 13. Overcrowding lndicatom By Tenure (Households) Persons Per Room Owners Renters Tract 1.00 or less 1.01 to 1.50 1.51 or more 1.00 or less 1.01 to 1.50 1.51 or more 57.01 1,230 17 48 339 35 2 57.02 1,079 99 59 233 34 37 61 756 52 50 598 62 57 62.01 906 16 16 431 0 14 62.02 789 9 8 309 0 0 62.03 969 0 7 229 16 34 63 1,652 26 0 13 0 0 Study Area 7,381 219 188 2,152 147 144 Boynton 15,067 246 205 4,349 253 176 Beach Palm Beach 257,921 3,232 1,741 93,077 5,426 4,161 County Table 15A. Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income - Households with Incomes Less than $10,00 Per Year. .': Less~tban?..: .. : .[ :~.:':. ~ .~i:-::.!::::. ~. i..: ::.::;:?.~ :::: i~i:ii:: !:.i':i[i~!i.::.I. ::. ::ii:i:.:?.~:!;i::; ii..[i:i:i::.i.::i~:?Nbt..:.:[:i :::i::? .~.::.:i i: ::i:~ i: ~c~. .'. ,.. '.: ::.,~ ~%:: : .~ :.. :. ~/~i~.~::~~ ~::~4~.~:~%i:'~: ~i~ii~:~4~i.~:i: i::i~:::; 57.01 0 0 0 17 11 28 57.02 0 0 6 50 0 56 61 8 0 14 160 20 202 62.01 0 0 0 36 6 42 62.02 0 0 0 74 20 94 62.03 0 0 0 77 11 88 63 0 0 0 26 0 26 Study Area 8 0 20 440 68 536 Boynton 8 0 20 595 94 717 Beach Palm Beach 652 569 725 13,424 2,625 17,995 Coun~ Table 15B. Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income - Households with Incomes of $10,000 - $19,999 57.01 0 3 3 51 13 70 57.02 0 0 20 58 0 78 61 21 33 50 108 50 217 62,01 11 10 45 72 0 138 62.02 24 0 6 30 0 60 62.03 0 0 20 61 0 81 63 0 0 0 29 0 29 Study Area 56 46 144 409 18 673 Boyn~n 56 43 149 728 46 1,022 Beach Palm Beach 2,103 1,766 2,619 14,816 975 22,279 Coun~ Table lSC. Gross Rent as a Percentage of HouSehold income. HOuseholds with Incomes of $20,000 - $34,999 57.01 33 60 25 25 4 147 57.02 48 19 10 3 7 87 61 119 35 36 15 17 222 62.01 48 40 7 13 0 108 62:02 38 30 20 12 0 100 62.03 39 13 6 9 0 67 63 37 68 19 0 0 124 Study Area 362 265 123 77 28 855 Boynton Beach 480 439 297 232 53 1,501 Palm Beach County 11,533 7,612 4,819 5,617 1,096 30,777 Table 15D. Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income- HousehOlds with Incomes of $35,000 - $49,999 Tract I 2~% ' : 25%~ 29% :::; :; ~0~:~ 3~:::;!: :'35%. or m°~e:! 'i~b~!' '-.':i To~i~ ".~ " 57.01 79 0 0 0 0 79 57.02 41 8 4 0 0 53 61 41 0 0 0 0 41 62.01 100 7 0 0 0 107 62.02 25 0 0 0 0 25 62.03 22 0 0 0 0 22 63 44 18 8 0 0 7o S~dyAma 352 33 12 0 0 397i Boyn~n Beach 730 93 12 8 8 851 Palm Beach Coun~ 13,224 1,902 707 756 283 16,872 Table 15E. Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income - HoUseholds with Incomes of $50,000 or More 57.01 51 0 0 0 1 52 57.02 24 0 0 0 6 30 61 35 0 0 0 0 35 62.01 43 0 0 0 0 43 62.02 30 0 0 0 0 30 62.03 21 0 0 0 0 21 63 30 10 0 0 15 55 Study Area 234 10 0 0 22 266 Boynton Beach 619 17 0 0 38 .674 Palm Beach County 13,14l 593 229 30 369 14,362 Table 16A. Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income - Households with Incomes of Less than $10,000 Per Year Tracf~.. .-= 2'5%:: .: 57.01 0 17 0 51 10 78 57.02 - 12 0 0 53 4 69 61 9 9 0 32 12 62 62.01 0 0 0 50 8 58 62.02 0 0 0 16 4 20 62.03 0 0 10 0 10 20 63 0 0 0 31 24 55 Study Area 21 26 10 233 72 362 Boynton Beach 153 84 64 429 130 860 Palm Beach Coun~ 1,825 891 585 6,727 1,338 11,366 Table 16B. Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income - Households with Incomes of $10,000 to $19,000 Per Year 57.0'1 45 16 2 20 0 83 57.02 88 6 6 67 0 167 61 136 0 5 35 0 176 62.01 87 6 6 65 0 164 62.02 8 0 7 7 0 22 62.03 12 12 0 6 0 30 63 49 37 16 ;~7 0 149 Study Area 425 77 42 247 0 791 Boynton Beach 1,053 166 65 429 0 1,713 Palm Beach County 8,337 1,450 1,186 7,747 7 18,727 Table 16C. Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income - Households with Incomes of $20,000 to $34,999 Per Year :., :. ] ... ::i i::Z: ::::::::::::::::::::: }:i:.;:::;.i..q.;::i:::.;.::.:.: · ;::..:;.:~.~.:.~:;~:;:.::..:~:::::;: .:¢::.:.:;. e .. ~:.: .:::.:'/:.' '~:':.:;:;.:;:.:.: 'Tract.?.:};.'. i::':i'.i;:-'25% ::i!: .25~:to~:2~?/~::!.!:! .::3~:~-~?~:;::;;:ili ?.!~:i~;'~i::i;i :::~'~:";iiiii i~;:~otars:!::!ii:i~::::i::::~i.:~;??:; 57.01 105 24 36 31 0 196 57.02 99 31 41 35 0 206 61 67 7 32 24 0 130 62.01 132 24 9 50 0 215 62.02 11 0 0 7 0 18 62.03 33 23 6 0 0 62 63 185 40 21 35 0 281 Study Area 632 149 145 182 0 1,108 Boynton Beach 1,881 295 315 452 0 2,943 Palm Beach County 18,355 4,287 3,823 8,711 0 35,176 Table t6D. Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income - Households with Incomes of $35,000 to $49,999 Per Year 57.01 66 9 0 13 0 88 57.02 1_95 27 8 3 0 233 61 135 6 0 0 0 141 62.01 199 56 15 6 0 276 62.02 12 0 0 0 0 12 62.03 6 0 0 0 0 6 63 , 126 24 26 0 0 176 Study Area 739 122 49 22 0 932 Boynton Beach 1~549 272 145 102 0 2,068 Palm Beach County 22,697 4,788 2,931 3,467 0 33,883 Table 16E. Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income- Households with Incomes $50,000 or More Per Year 57.01 50 0 0 0 0 50 57;02 17_2 10 0 0 3 185 61 109 11 0 0 0 120 ' 62.01 150 4 0 0 0 154 62.02 38 0 4 9 0 51 62.03 15 0 0 0 0 15 63 285 8 0 0 0 293 Study Area 819 33 4 9 3 868 Boynton Beach 2,414 214 71 52 3 2,754 Palm Beach CounbJ 54,963 5,372 2,653 3,386 15 ~ 66,390 TABLE t 7A. Number Of Businesses By Place Of Employment 01-09 Agriculture, 826 31 17 Forest~ And Fishing 10-14 Mining ' 8 0 0 15-17 Co~.stnmfion 2,773 121 53 20-39 ManUfacturing 1,339 54 19 40-49 T~, And 1 171 35 21 · Public Utilities 50-51 ,VVholesale Trade 2,339 103 35 52-59 Retail Trade 9,344 385 186 60-69 'Fina ~nce, Insurance 4,965 152 68 And Real Estate 70-89 P~And 18,922 720 440 90-97 Public' 788 , 33 30 Adminis~ 99 ': Non-~. ;lassifiable. 1,031 5 1 TOTALS , ¢. 43,506 1,639 871 Source: Claritas, Inc.; Amedcan Business Information, Inc. TABLE 17B. Total Em ployment By Place Of Employment 01~ Ag~m, 7,215 F~ F~hi~ 1~14 M~ 21 0 0 1 ~17 ~ns~n 19,412 970 257 ~ Ma~ 32,~ 2,~ ~ T~, ~ 12,~ ~1 70 ~1 ~ T~ 19,514 7~ 52~ R~I T~e ~,~ 3,~7 1,2~ ~ F~ ns~n~ 37,~1 7~ 2~ ~ Re~ E~ 7~ P~ ~ 1~,976 5,~ ~ 4,015 ~97 ~ 9,611. ~in~ ~ E~b~hm~ TOTA~ ~,~ 16,1~ ~: C~, I~.; ~ ~sin~ I~afi~, I~. TABLE 17C. Total Sales By Place Of Employment ($ MILLIONS) 01-09 Agriculture, 464 39 2 Forestry And Fishing 10-14 Mining 2 0 0 15-17 Construction 2,144 109 37 20-39 Manufacturing 4,526 . 105 8 40-49 Transportation, And 1,626 29 6 Retail[ Trade 52-59 10,098 :)26 112 60-69 ~Rnance, Insurance 11;!04 164 39 iAnd Real Estate 70-89 Personal And 8,822 360 256 ~97 i:Pub~ic o o o Administmtion 99 Non'Classifiable 0 0 0 E~btb~hment~ TOTALS 49,592 1,564 565 Source: Claritas, Inc.; Amedcen Business Information, Inc. pREpARE'D FOR: LA_ND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC BoYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 3-SEP-97 clarltas Inc. Support' (800)780-42'37 Sales (8881231-4237 study Area Summary SUMI~RY BUSINESS DATA REPORT BY 2-DIGIT SIC CATEGORY (Page i of 2) ..... Estimated ..... Total Total Sales (in Estab. SIC Estab. Employ. millions) 20+ Emp. code Business Description ................. ................. ............................. 1666 16132 1590 130 TOT ALL INDUSTRIES 114 9 MAN ALL MANUFACTURING (SIC 20-39) 60 2994 RET ALL RETAILING (SIC 52-59) 389 3631 ~ 328 42 01 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION - CROPS 0 351 33 0 0 0 0 0 02 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION - LIVESTOCK 31/~ 132 6 2 07 AGRICULTURAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 08 FORESTRY 0 0 0 0 09 FISHING, HUNTING, AND TRAPPING 10 METAL MINING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 COAL MINING 0 0 0 0 13 OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION 0 0 14 MINING NONMETALICS, EXCEPT FUELS 0 0 15 BUILDING CONSTRUC.-GEN- CONTRACTORS 36 151 24 2 16 HEAVY CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT SIC 15 5 20 % 0 17 CONSTRUCTION-SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACT 80 799 81 8 20 FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS 3- 62 15 2 0 0 0 0 21 TOBACCO MANUFACTURES 0 0 0 0 22 TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS 0 0 23 APPAREL & OTHER FABRIC PRODUCTS 2 12 24 LUMBER & WOOD PRODUCTS, EX. FUR~IT. 3~ 45 6 1 25 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES 3- 6 i 0 26 PAPER A1N-D ALLIED PRODUCTS 1' 27 6 1 27 PRINTING, PUBLISHING, & ALLIED IND. 12' 94 11 2 28 CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS 0 10 3 0 29 PETROLEUM REFINING & RELATED INDUS. 0 0 0 0 30 RUBBER AND MISC. pLASTICS PRODUCTS i 6 0 0 31 LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS 0 0 0 0 32 S~ONE, CLAY, GLASS, & CONCRETE PROD 3' 0 0 0 33 PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES 2 90 23 2 34 FABRICATED METAL iPRODUCTS 5 35 4 1 35 IND. & COBH. MACHINERY & COMPUTERS 7 184 25 1 36 ELECTRIC./ELECTRON.EQUIP- (EX-COMP') 4 2382 2 1 37 TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 38 INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED PRODUCTS 4 26 8 0 39 MISC. MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES 4 10 1 0 40 RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0 0 41 LOCAL, SUBURBAN, & INTERURBAN TRANS 2 6 0 0 42 MOTOR FREIGHT TRANSPORT. & WAREHOUS 11 95 8 2 43 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE i 0 0 0 Prepared by Claritas Inc. using the business database from American Business Information, Inc. Copyright 1997 Claritas Inc. Arlington, VA PREPARED FOR: LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC BoYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 3-SEP-97 claritas Inc. - ~ Supp~ (800)78~4~7 sales (888)231-4237 study Area S~mmary SUMMARY BUSINESS DATA REPORT BY 2-DIGIT SIC CATEGORY (Page 2 of 2) ..... Estimated ..... Total Total Sales (in Estab. SIC millions) 20+ Emp. Code Business Description Estab. Employ. 44 WATER TRAlqSPORTATION 3 40 3 1 45 TRANSPORTATION BY AIR 0 0 0 0 46 PIPE LINES, EXCEPT NATURAL GAS 0 0 0 0 47 T~ANSPORTATION SERVICES 10 32 2 0 48 COM/~NICATION 7 70 16 1 49 ELECTRIC, GAS, & SA/~ITARY SERVICES 1 198 0 0 50 WHOLESALE TP~ADE-DURABLE GOODS 71 522 230 6 51 WHOLESALE TRADE-NON,UP-ABLE GOODS 32 217 202 2 52 BLDG MAT'RL/GARDEN SUP./MOB'L HOMES 20 333 60 2 53 GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORES 7 540 61 5 54 FOOD STORES 49 294 35 2 55 AUTO. DEALERS & GAS. SERV. STATIONS 30 104 22 0 56 APPAREL AND ACCESSORY STORES 28 129 12 0 57 HOME FURNITURE/FURNISHINGS/EQUIP. 46- ~48 24 0 58 EATING ~ DRINKING PLACES 95 1516 51 24 59 MISCELLANEOUS RETAIL 110 563 61 8 60 DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS 26 242 31 3 61 NONDEPOSITORY CREDIT INSTITUTIONS 9 26 55 0 62 SECURiTY/COMMODITY BROKERS & SERV. 6 25 16 1 63 INSURANCE CARRIERS 5 12 5 0 64 INSURANCE AGENTS, BROKERS & SERVICE 30 146 13 1 65 REAL ESTATE 76 314 44 4 _67~_ HOLDING & OTHER INVESTMENT OFFICES 0 0 0 0 70 HOTELS AND OTHER LODGING PLACES 12. 127 6 1 72 PERSONAL SERVICES 91 324 11 0 73 BUSINESS SERVICES 73- 269 19 2 75 AUTO. REPAIR, SERVICES, AND PARKING 57.' 149 13 0 76 MISC. REPAIR SERVICES 30 66 4 0 78 MOTION PICTURES 5' 30 2 1 79 A/4USE. & RECR. SERV. (EX. MOVIES) 32' 188 10 3 80 HEALTH SERVICES 234 3346 255 17 81 LEGAL SERVICES 32 75 9 0 82 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 18 535 0 9 83 SOCIAL SERVICES 35 269 4 5 84 MUSEUMS, ART GALLERIES, ZOOS, ETC. 0 0 0 0 86 MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATIONS 55 220 0 2 87 ENGIN./ACCT./RES./MANAG./RELAT.SERV 45. 296 27 4 88 PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS 0 0 0 0 89 ~ MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 1- i 0 0 ~90 PUBLIC ADMINISTEATION (SIC 90-97) 33 187 0 1 12 0 0 99 NONCLASSIFIABLE ESTABLISHMENTS 5 ......... ===== Prepared by Claritas Inc. using the business database from American Business Information, Inc. Copyright 1997 Claritas Inc. Arlington, VA pRePARED FOR: LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC ~. 3-SEP-97 claritas Inc. Support (800)780-4237 sales (888)231-4237 (State: 12, Florida County: 099, Palm Beach County, FL) (Weight: 100.04) SUMMARY BUSINESS DATA REPORT BY 2-DIGIT SIC CATEGORY (Page I of 2) ..... Estimated ..... Total Total Sales (in Estab. SIC millions) 20+ Emp. Code Business Description Estab. Employ. ............................ 43626 383113 49629 3527 TOT ALL INDUSTRIES 211 MAN ALL MANUFACTURING (SIC 20-39) 1399 32463 4536 RET ALL RETAILING (SIC 52-59) 9344 89494 10102 1022 01 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION - CROPS 60 2160 208 12 02 AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION - LIVESTOCK 9 78 9 2 07 AGRICULTURkL SERVICES 754 4964 246 50 08 FORESTRY 2 3 0 0 09 FISHING, HUNTING, AND TRAPPING i 10 I 0 0 0 0 0 10 METAL MINING 0 0 0 0 12 COAL MINING 0 13 OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION 2 I 0 14 MINING NONMETALICS, EXCEPT FUELS 6 20 2 0 15 BUILDING CONSTRUC.-GEN- CONTRACTORS 991 4717 809 57 16 HEAV~/ CONSTRUCTION, EXCEPT SIC 15 161 2126 258 24 17 CONSTRUCTION-SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACT 1621 12569 1077 140 20 FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS 66 3861 917 17 21 TOBACCO MANUFACTURES I 0 4 0 22 TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS 14 337 44 2 23 A~PAREL & OTHER FABRIC PRODUCTS 46 566 31 8 24 LUMBER & WOOD PRODUCTS, EX. FURNIT. 57 715 99 8 25 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES 42 420 53 3 26 PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS 27 100 30 2 27 PRINTING, PUHLISHING, & ALLIED IND. 371 6010 422 38 28 CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS 38 947 120 7 29 PETROLEUM REFINING & RELATED INDUS. 5 418 128 1 30 RUBBER AND MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS 47 647 87 10 31 LEATHER ANDLEATHER PRODUCTS 5 25 2 0 32 STONE, CLAY, GLASS, & CONCRETE PROD 74 942 512 13 33 PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES 29 383 95 7 34 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS 93 688 90 9 35 IND. a CO/TM. MACHINERY & COMPUTERS 140 1805 242 25 36 ELECTRIC./ELECTRON.EQUIP- (EX-COMP-) 76 6306 365 28 37 TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT 43 5007 991 11 38 INSTRI/MENTS AND RELATED PRODUCTS 53 1610 204 12 39 MISC. MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES 172 1676 90 10 40 RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION 2 i i 0 41 LOCAL, SUBURBAN, & INTERURBAN TRANS 96 1010 49 13 42 MOTOR FREIGHT TRANSPORT. & WAREHOUS 287 1671 179 23 43 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 33 1200 0 12 Prepared by Claritas Inc. using the business database from American Business Information, Inc. Copyright 1997 Claritas Inc. Arlington, VA pREpARED FOR: LAND RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, INC 3-SEP~97 claritas Inc. Support (800)780-4237 sales (888)231-4237 (State: 12, Florida County: 099, Palm Beach County, FL) (Weight: 100.04) SUMM~RY BusINESS DATA REPORT BY 2-DIGIT SIC CATEGORY (Page 2 of 2) ..... Estimated ..... Total Total Sales (in Estab. SIC Estab. Employ. millions) 20+ Emp. Code Business Descript=on ............. ......................... 105 846 88 7 44 WATER TRANSPORTATION 52 499 49 10 45 TRANSPORTATION BY AIR 0 46 PIPE LINES, EXCEPT NATUP~AL GAS i 0 8 47 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 329 2033 145 12 217 3775 -778 51 48 coMMTrNICATION 329 14 49 ELECTRIC, GAS, & SANITARY SERVICES 49 1887 50 WHOLESALE TRADE-DUPABLE GOODS 1656 11545 5561 120 51 WHOLESALE TRADE-NONDURABLE GOODS 743 7969 5145 90 52 BLDG MAT'RL/GARDEN SUP./MOB'L HOMES 541 4489 764 52 53 GENERAL MERCI{ANDISE STORES 143 7779 889 71 54 FOOD STORES 821 9891 1212 65 55 AUTO. DEALERS' & GAS. SERV. STATIONS 963 10412 3304 81 56 APPAREL AND ACCESSORY STORES 1008 4926 425 32 57 HOME FURNITURE/FURNISHINGS/EQUIP' 1187 6478 1103 55 58 EATING AND DRINKING PLACES 1924 30732 1026 529 59 MISCELLANEOUS RETAIL 2757 14787 1375 137 60 DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS 479 5744 2726 69 61 NONDEPOSITORY CREDIT INSTITUTIONS 332 1625 2830 18 62 SECURITY/COMMODITY BROKERS & SERV. 440 4532 2469 69 63 INSURANCE CARRIERS 122 1072 482 10 64 INSURANCE AGENTS, BROKERS & SERVICE 909 5975 533 58 65 REAL ESTATE 2651 17307 2146 185 67 HOLDING & OTHER INVESTMENT OFFICES 32 746 18 7 70 HOTELS AND OTHER LODGING PLACES 263 11122 562 67 1967 7795 290 46 72 PERSONAL SERVICES 2278 14105 869 127 73 BUSINESS SERVICES 31 75 AUTO. REPAIR, SERVICES, AND PARKING 1261 5191 463 608 1892 136 18 76 MISC. REPAIR SERVICES 154 688 123 6 78 MOTION PICTURES 468 101 79 AMUSE. & RECR. SERV. (EX. MOVIES) 678 8339 80 HEALTH SERVICES 4900 48268 3698 249 81 LEGAL SERVICES 2457 9247 1093 73 82 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 410 20609 19 188 83 SOCIAL SERVICES 808 8738 190 98 84 MUSEUMS, ART GALLERIES, ZOOS, ETC. 36 341 0 5 86 MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATIONS 1163 8630 0 73 87 ENGIN./ACCT./RES./MANAG./RELAT-SERV 1870 8942 896 81 88 PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS 0 0 0 0 89 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 69 79 15 0 90 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (SIC 90-97) 788 9611 0 64 99 NONCLASSIFIABLE ESTABLISHMENTS 1031 1374 0 14 Prepared by Claritas Inc. using the business database from American Business Information, Inc. Copyright 1997 Claritas Inc. Arlington, VA I?REPA~ED FOR: L~JCD RESEARCH SELECT~ C~$~S T~CITS IN P~ ~CH (..Lar=t as Inc. 9-SEP-97 ~a].es (888)2~1-%237 Support. (~00)T'80-~237~ ~II~Y BUSi]~SS I)N~A REPORT BY 2-DIGI~ SIC ~T;E~RY (Paqe 1 of 2) ..... Esti~te4 ..... ~'.IC Total Total Sales (in E~tab. C.o~Ie ~usine:~s De~c~:i')t~.on E:~tab. ~ploy. ~11icns) 20~ ~. TOT ~,L INI)USTR]:E~}~ $71 6341 582 50 ~ ~L ~NuMACT~:I]~ (SIC 20-39) 19 86 10 0 R}iT ~L RE~AI~I~IG (,~IC 52-59) :L86 1208 114 15 01 ~GRICULTU~, ~,RODUCTION - CROPS 0 0 0 0 02 kGRICUhT~, PRODUCTION - LI~TOCK 0 0 0 0 0~ ~GRICULT~ E.Ei~V~ES 17 35 2 0 0~ FORESTRY 0 0 0 0S FISHINGS, H~G, ~ T~PING 0 0 0 0 10 ~T~ :HINiNG 0 0 0 0 12 CO~ M][NiN~ 0 0 13 ,)IL ~D ~S E}LT~CTION 0 0 0 14 i~I~IN~ NO~T~dL~C~, ~XCEPT F~LS 0 0 0 0 15 '.~UILDIi~G CONS='.~UC.. -GEN. C0~CTC ~S 1~ 81 12 2 16 ~A~ CONST~UCTZO~, EXCEPT SIC 15 2 6 i 0 17 CONSTK~CTIO~-S~]~CIAL T~E CO~.~T 38 170 24 2 20 :~OOD ~ KIND~ZD PRODUCTS 1 5 I 0 21 ~OBACC0 ~U~A~?~ES 0 0 0 0 22 ~EXTILF, MILL PRODUCTS 0 0 0 0 2~ ~%PPAREL & OT~R F~RIC PRODUCTS I 10 0 0 2& L~ER R WOOD ]~BODUCTS, EX. F~IT. 0 0 0 2~ PA~ER i%~ ~II~D PRODUCTS 0 0 0 0 27 PRINTI~'~, PUBLX~HIN~, & ~LI~ I~). 6 36 3 0 2.~ (:HEMI~%LS ~ ]~,LIED ~RODUCTS 0 0 0 0 2;) I~ETROLI~ REFIIrIN~ a ~TED I~U~]. 0 0 0 0 ~0 I{~BER ~ MIB[~. P~TICS PRODUCT;] 0 0 0 0 31 L~THER ~ 5~Jk]'H~R PRODUCTS 0 0 0 0 32 ~ITON~, C~Y, ~ht~S, a CONC~TE PROD I 0 0 0 ~3 I'RI~R1~ ~TA~ ]~USTRIES 0 0 0 0 t4 t'~RI~TED ~T.~ PRODUCTS 3 ~ I 0 35 1'.~. ~ CO~. HkCHiN~RY 36 F, LECTR]:C./EL:~CT~.0N.EQUIP. (EX.C0~ . 2 8 1 0 t8 3'N~TR~S .~i~ ~TED PRODUCTS 0 0 0 0 ~9 ~ISC. )I~FACT'ir~IN~ I~USTRIES 3 % 0 0 40 ~AILRO~D T~S:?C RTATION 0 0 0 0 .~:! ~:OTOR F~I~ TR~SPORT. · W~OUlt 5 36 3 i Clarit&s Ino. usiLg the business database frott ~eriean Business Information, 1997 Cla~i~a~ inc. ~lington, VA ~REPA~.D FOR; LA/TD RESF~%RC~ MANAGEME~.I , INC. ~EI~C~' CE~'SUS T~CTS IN P~ BEA~ CC'~Y, FL CLarit as Inc. 9-S~-97 ~a].es (888)231-4237 Support ~'~RY ~USINESS DATA Ri~PORT BY 2-DIGIT SIC (~T]~RY [Pa~e 2 of 2) ..... Es%imatad SlI: Total Total Sales (in Cc,~'.e ~u.sine~s De~.cr ~.~tio~ Z~t~. ~ploy. millions) 44 WATER U~SFOF.~AT!ON 2 7 0 4] ~.~S~0RTATIO~ ]~Y AIR 0 0 0 0 4~ ~IPE LI~S, E~=]~PT NAT~ ~ 0 0 0 0 47 ~R~SPORTAT~ O}:' ~ERVICES 7 13 1 0 4~ =O]~!CAT!CN 4 11 2 0 4S ~LECTR]iC, G~.S, ~ S~IT~Y SERViCeS i I 0 0 51 ~O~S,~ T~]~..NO~U~LE GOODS 11 34 / ~021 0 52 ]~LD~ ~,T~RL/GA]H)E)~ S~./MOB'L HOM~g 11 165 30 53 GE~, ~RC~)I~E STO~S 2 54 6 1 55 AUTO. DE,ERS ;~ ~S. 5ERV. STATI0~ 22 67 1~ 0 56 ~%P~L ~ ACC~:SSORY STORES ' 6 6 -~ I 0 57 HOI~ FI~ITU~;,'I'U~ISHIN~S/EQUIP. 17 42 7 0 5~ ];~TIN~ ~ DRI'~:ZN~ P~%~S 4~ ~73 20 10 59 HI SCEL~OUS R~TAIL 50 19S 20 2 60 I)EPOSI]~Y INS ~ITUTIONS 10 88 61 ~O~EPOSITOKY ~=EE~ZT INSTI~ION~ 0 0 0 0 ~2 ~IEC~ITY/C~OI~TY BROKERS a SERV. 2 3 4 0 63 ];NSU~CE ~R I~:R~ 3 8 3 0 6,} ];NS~C~ AGaTe, BRO~RS & SERVI~:E 13 49 4 0 65 ~:~ ESTATE ~0 137 19 2 67 ~[OLD~G a OTIE~. I~S~ OFFICE~: 0 0 0 0 70 EOT~S .~ OTH~?.R LODGIN~ PLACES 12 60 2 1 72 ~ SRSONAL SERVi C~S 46 109 ~ 0 13 ~USI~S S~R~CRS 40 163 10 2 75 ~,~O. R:EPAZR.. :~ERVICES, ~ P~I~.[(} 39 85 7 0 76 ~ISC. ~EPAiR S}~R~CES 20 36 2 0 7~ ~DTION ~IC~RE~ 0 0 0 0 75~ ~SE. & ~CR. SERV. (EX. ~0VIES} 16 31 2 0 80 ~TH :~ERVI CE,~ 158 2~08 220 12 81 LEG~ S]ZRVIC~S 15 34 ~ 0 8~ EDU~TION~ SEt,VICES 11 401 0 7 83 SOCIAL SERVICE~ 24 142 2 2 84 MUS~., ART GALLERIES, ZOOS, ETC. 0 0 0 0 8~ M~B~SHIP OR~%~IZATIONS &0 90 0 0 87 ENGIN. /ACCT. /RES. ~AG./RE~T. S~V ~9 56 4 0 88 P R~ATE HOUS~HO=DS 0 0 0 0 89 MZSCELL;~OU~ ~:~VICES O 0 0 0 ~,0 P'~LZC .~MINIST~%TION (SIC 90-97) 30 f~6 0 1 99 ~)NC~S~IFI~LE ]~ST~LIS~S ' i~ 6 0 0 Pre'.~are~ b~,' ~l~ritas !nc. usin] the business database fro~ ~.~a::ican Business Inf~a=:~n~ Inu. Cop~i~':=~: 1997 Clari~a~ Ins. ~lin~on, VA APPENDIX B Marina Parking Analysis July 15, 1998 Appendix Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Parking and Circulation Parking lot design can be a criticat factor in the success or failure of a commercial use. In considering the possibilities for developing a new parking area. a developer should analyze the following factors: ingress and egress with consideration to possible conflicts with street traffic; pedestrian and vehicular conflicts; on-site circulation and service vehicle zones; and the overall configuration and appearance of the parking area. A. Parking aisles should be separated from vehicle circulation routes whenever ;)ossible. B. Common driveways which provide vehicular access to more than one site are encouraged. C. Parking areas should be separated from structures by either a raised concrete walkway or landscaped stdp, preferably both. Situations where parking spaces directly abut the structures should be avoided. D. Shared parking between adjacent businesses and/or developments is highly encouraged whenever practical. E Design parking areas so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving cars. Minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles and landscape areas. F. The parking area should be designed in a manner which [inks the structures to the street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedestrian environment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, or a special landscaping treatment. July 15, ~998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ........ APPENDIX C Commercial Design Guidelines for Major Corridors July 15. 1998 Appendix Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES Site Planning Placement of structures should consider the existing built context of the commercial area, the location of incompatible land uses, the location of major traffic generators as well as an analysis of a s~te's characteristics and particular influences. A. Structures should be sited in a manner that will complement the adjacent structures. Sites should be developed in acoordinated manner to provide order and diversity and avoid a jumbled, confused development. B. Whenever possible, new structures should be clustered. This creates plazas or pedestrian malls and prevents long "barracks-like" rows of structures. When clustering is impracticat, a visual link between separate structures should be established. This link can be accomplished through the use of an arcade system, trellis or other open structure. DO 'DII~ DON'T DO THIS Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ..... ~ .... · · C. Locate structures and on-site circulation systems to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts where possible. Link structures to the public sidewalk where possible with textured paving, landscaping, and trellises. D. Recognize the importance of spaces between structures as "outdoor rooms" on the site. Outdoor spaces should have clear, recognizable shapes that reflect careful planning and are not simply "left over" areas between structures. Such spaces should provide pedestrian amenities such as shade, benches, fountains, etc. E. Freestanding, singular commercial structures should be oriented with their major entry toward the street where access is provided, as -we!i as having their major facade parallel to the street. F. Loading facilities should not be located at the front of structures where it is difficult to adequately screen them from view. Such facilities are more appropriate at the rear of the site where special screening may not be required. DO THIS DON~T DO THIS July 15, '1998 Commercial Design Guidelines ~? City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ..--.-.~ .-. ..... · AWNING SIGNS: On ground floor level; 30% maxImum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. On the second floor level and above; 20% maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface area of each awning. Lettering on awning fringe, not to exceed 75% of the valance. AWNING SIGNS July 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Walls and Fences A. Walls should be used to screen, loading and storage areas, and utility structures. The intent should be to keep the waits as low as possible while performing their screening and security functions. B. Where walls are used at property frontages, or screenwalls are used to conceal storage and equipment areas, they should be designed to blend with the site's architecture. Landscaping should be used in combination with such walls whenever possible. C. Long expanses offence or wall surfaces should be offset and architecturally designed to prevent monotony. Landscape pockets should be provided. Elevation of Staggered Wall 1 ~o' 1 EtevoEon of plc~Jet=/WcEI Ju/y 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan -.-., · Screening A. Screening for outdoor storage should be a minimum of 6 feet and a maximum of 10 feet high. The height should be determined by the height of the material or equipment being screened. Exterior storage should be confined to portions of the site least visible to public view. B. Where screening is required, a combination of elements should be used including solid masonry walls, berms, and landscaping. Chainlink fencing should be concealed by a hedge of equal size when visible from the public right-of-way. C. Any outdoor equipment, whether on a roof, side of a structure, or on the ground, shall be appropriately screened from view. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated~with the adjacent structure in terms of materials, color, shape, and size. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. July 15, 1998 Commercial. Design Guidelines 0 City of Boynton Beach . . Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan . . ..... Architectural Design Guidelines A. Heights of structures should relate to adjacent open spaces to allow maximum sun and ventilation, protection from prevailing winds, enhance public views of surrounding mountains and minimize obstruction of view from adjoining structures. B. Height and scale of new development should be compatible with that of surrounding development. New development height should "transition" from the heigt~t of adjacent development to the maximum height of the proposed structure. C. Large buildings which give the appearance of "box-like" structures are generally unattractive and detract from the overall scale of most buildings. There are several ways to reduce the appearance of large scale, bulky structures. 1. Vary the planes of the exterior walls in depth and/or direction. Wall planes should not run in one continuous direction for more than 50 feet without an offset. 2. Vary the height of the building so that it appears to be divided into distinct massing elements. 3. Articulate the different parts of a building's facade by use of color, arrangement of facade elements, or a change in materials. 4. Use landscaping and architectural detailing at the ground level to lessen the mpact of an otherwise bulky building. 5. Avoid blank walls at the ground floor levels. Utilize windows, trellises, wall articulation, arcades, change in materials, or other features. Undesircble Architectural Hodz~nfcl Atticul~on Added Treafrnent Vertical Articulc~tion Added July 15, 1998 Commercial Design GUidelines ~~;i citY of B oynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ~'~- D. Scale, for purposes here, is the relationship between the size of the new structure and the size of adjoining permanent structures. It is also how the proposed building~s size relates to the size of a human being (human scale). Large scale building elements wil appear imposing if they are situateC in a visual environment which is predominantly smaller ir scale. 1. Building scale can be reduced through the proper use of window patterns, structural bays, roof overhangs, siding, awnings, moldings, fixtures, and other details. 2. The scale of buildings should be carefully related to adjacent pedestrian areas (i .e. plazas, courtyards) and other structures. 3. Large _dominating structures should be broken up by: 1) creating horizontal emphasis through the use of trim; 2) adding awnings, eaves, windows, or other architectural ornamentation; 3) use of combinations of complementary colors; and 4) landscape materials. $lorefront elements ond pede.,.flfi=n ~orm ~nd Ieee ~d be r~ed level det~ provide cn ~flm~e sc~e in a mcnn~ to pro,de a sense of ~i~ within ~ I~e m~. Ju/y ~5, ~g98 Commercial Design Guidelines ~i~. City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan · ........ PROJECTING SIGNS: Allowed on ground floor level only; maximum size of sign not to exceed 5 square feet. PROJECTING SIGNS SHOULD PROJECTING SIGNS SHOULD NOT EXCEED FIVE SOUARE HA VE A MINtMUM CLEARANCE FEET OF 8' FROM THE SIDEWALK UNDER CANOPY SIGNS: Allowed under a canopy, roof, covered walkway, or porch maximum size of 3 square feet per door entrance; minimum of 8 feet vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Although Boynton Beach currently does not exhibit many opportunities for under canopy signs, future infill may. July 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City o£ Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan DI$COURAGE~ SIGN TYPES · Freestanding s~gns · Any signs above the first story · Roof mounted signs · Animated signs, except time and temperature displays · Emitting signs · Rotating, moving or flashing s~gns · Light bulb strings-except holiday decorations · Off-site signs · Paper, cloth or plastic streamers and bunting-except holiday decorations · Portable signs (except for menu boards) · Statues used for advertising · Ads/Sale temporary signs like those displayed in the illustration below · Traffic sign replica THESE SIGNS BLOCK BUILDING ELEMENTS AND CREATE A CHAOTIC IMAGE July 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Lighting A. Lighting should be used to provide illumination for the security and safety of on-site areas such as parking, loading, shipping and receiving, pathways, and working areas. B. The design of light fixtures and their structural support should be architecturally compatible with the main structures on-site. Illuminators should be integrated within the architectural design of the structure& . C. As a security device, lighting should De adequate but not overly bright. All building entrances should be well lighted. D. All lighting fixtures should be shielded to protect abutting residential uses. July 15, ~g98 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan E. The use of colors should carefully be considered and applied. 1. Large areas of intense white color should be avoided. While subdued colors usually work best as a dominant overall color, a bright trim color can be appropriate. 2. The color palette chosen for new structures should be compatible with the colors of adjacent structures. An exception is where the colors of adjacent structures strongly diverge from these design guidelines, 3. Whenever possible, minimize the number of colors appearing on the structure's exterior. Small commercial structures should use no more than three colors. 4. Primary colors should only be used to accent elements, such as door and window frames and architectural details. 5. Architectural detailing should be painted to complement the facade and tie in with adjacent structures. Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan *::: :':' *' ',*:'":'::: Roofs A. The roofline at the top of the structure should not run in continuous plane for more than 50 feet without offsetting or jogging the roof plane. B. Nearly vertical roofs (A-frames) and piecemeal mansard roofs (used on a portion of the building perimeter only) are strongly discouraged. Mansard roofs, if utilized on commercial structures, should wrap around the entire perimeter of the structure. C. All rooftop equipment shall be screened from public view by screening materials of the same nature as-the structure's basic materials. Mechanice[ equipment should be located below the highest vertical element of the building. VENTED SCREEN WALL HO~ZO~L W~D ~E~ ~ ROOF ~~ ~0 July f5, f998 Commercial DeSign Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan -. Awnings A. The use of awnings along a row of contiguous structures should be considered for pedestrian comfort. Color of the awnings should be consistent and a minimum 8 foot vertical clearance should be maintained. B. Signs on awnings should be painted on and be limited to the awning's flap (valance) or to the end panels of angled, curved, or box awnings. C. Plexiglas, metal, and glossy vinyl illuminated awnings are strongly discouraged. Canvas, treated canvas, matte finish vinyl, and fabric awnings are encouraged. July 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Signs Every structure and commercial complex should be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing. Provisions for sign placement, sign scale in relationship to the building, and sign readability should be considered in developing the signing concept. All signing should be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, material, and placement COLOR Color is one of the most important aspects of visual communication, it can be used to catch the eye or to communicate ideas and feelings. Too many colors used simultaneously can confuse and negate the message of a sign. Even the most carefully planned sign may look unattractive due to ppor color selection. Consider the following: A. Limit the number of colors to 2 or 3 on any one sign. Small accents of several colors may make a sign unique, but the competition of large areas of many different colors decreases readability. B. Colors or color combinations that interfere with legibility of the sign copy or that compete for attention and, therefore, interfere with viewer identification of other signs, should be avoided. C. Sign colors should complement the colors used on the adjacent buildings and the area as a whole. D. Contrast is an important influence on the legibility of signs. Light letters on a dark background or dark letters on a light background are most legible. For any internally SIGN )ARK LETTERING ON LIGHT LIGHT LETTERING ON DARK BA CKGRO UND BA CKGRO UND July 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan :-"-- ............. illuminated cabinet signs, use white letters on black or dark color opaque background. MATERIAL Signs can be fabricated from many materials; brick, concrete, glass, metal, plastic, stone, wood, and even painted directly onto the store. While there is nothing inherently wrong with any of these materials, insensitive use of materials can cause a deterioration of Boynton Beach's visual environment. A. Sign materials should be compatible with the materials on the facade where they are placed. B. The selected materials should contribute to the legibility of the sign. For example, glossy finishes are often difficult to read because of glare and reflections. C. Neon tubes are a popular sign material and can contribute to the night time ambiance of the area. However, care must be taken not to over do the use of neon signs, because of their brightness and attention attracting properties. D. Paper and cloth signs/banners are not appropriate for prolonged exterior use because they deteriorate quickly and do not present a quality business image. Paper and cloth signs are appropriate for interior temporary use only. TEMPORARY SIGN (OUTSIDE) TEMPORARY SIGN (INSIDE) NOT APPROPRIATE APPROPRIATE July 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan SIGN ILLUMINATION The way in which a sign is to be illuminated should be considered carefully. Like color, illumination has considerable value for visual communication. A. First, consider if the sign needs to be lighted at all. Lights in the window display may be sufficient to identify the business. This is particularly true if good window graphics are used. Often, nearby street lights provide ample illumination of a sign after dark. B. If the sign can be illuminated by an indirect source of light, this is usually the best arrangement because the sign will appear to be better integrated with the buildings' architecture. Light fixtures supported in front of the sign will cast light on the sign and generally a portion of the facade as well. Thus, indirect lighting emphasizes the continuity of the buildings' surface and the sign becomes an integral part of the facade. C. Internally illuminated light fixtures, usually fluorescent tubes placed within a translucent sign, have an advantage over indirect/external sign illumination in that the f'~xtures are protected from weather and vandals, and the sign cabinet has a cleaner profile, uncluttered by the struts of most indirect lighting systems. Although there are these advantages, there is a disadvantage that when lighted, the sign alone becomes bright, separating it from the buildings' surface. The sign then becomes an element that is obviously attached to the facade of the building rather than a part of it. D. Individually cut three dimensional back-l~ghted solid letters (reverse channel letter sign), are a preferred alternative to internally illuminated letters or cabinet signs. Signs comprised of individual letters mounted directly on a building can often use a distinctive element of the building's facade asr a backdrop, thereby providing a better integration of the sign with the building. EXAMPLE OF ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS July ~5, 'i9~8 Commercial Design Guidelines ~! City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ........... ~ ............ · ........ PLACEMENT Signs should be placed in a way that enhances the character of the architecture and therefore the quality of the building. A. Look at the facade of the building in relation to where adjacent businesses have placed their signs. It may be that there is already an established pattern of sign locations. Locating signs in this fashion can establish visual continuity among the' storefrcnts, and at the same time provide uniform sight lines for viewers. B. The size and shape of a sign should be proportionate with the scale of the structure. C. When the architectural details of a ~)uilding do not suggest the shape of the signs, choose simple shapes. Squares, circles, rectangles, and ovals are considered to be most effective for visual communication. Avoid signs with strange shapes. Signs that are unnecessarily narrow or oddlyshaped can restdct the legibility of the message. D. Place signs consistent with the proportions of building elements within the facade. Within a building facade, the sign may be placed in different areas. A particular sign may fare well on a Plain wall area, but would overpower the finer scale and proportion of the lower storefront. A sign appropriate near the building entry may look tiny and out of place above the ground level. PREFERRED SIGN TYPES SIGNS SHOULD BE PLACED TO COMPLEMENT THE BUILDING FORM Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ......................... · ............. · Wall mounted signs · Permanent window signs · Temporary window signs · Awning s~gns · Projecting signs · Under canopy signs · Murals · Building address numbers · Marquee signs · Building signs containing the name of the business at rear entrances used by customers · Banners. flags and pennants if they do not directly advertise [he business UNDER CANOPY SIGN WALL SIGN CANOPY SIGN WITH EXAMPLE OF WALL MOUNTED SIGN LETTERING ON AND UNDER CANOPY SIGN VALANCE July 15, ~998 Commercial Design Guidelines !i~ City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 RedeveloPment Master Plan ~-~"~','~: :~ .............. ............ WALL MOUNTED SIGNS: Maximum of one square foot per front linear foot of building. To be located not higher than the lowest of the following: · 25 feet above grade · bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows · cornice line of the building INAPPROPRIATE SIGN LOCATION RECOMMENDED SIGN PLACEMENT July 15, 1998 Commercial Design Guidelines City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ......... PERMANENT WINDOW SIGNS: On ground level, coverage should not exceed 20% of the total window and door area visible from the exterior. On the building's second level coverage should not exceed 30% per window. PERMANENT WINDOW SIGN SHOULD NOT EXCEED 20% OF TOTAL WINDOW AREA TEMPORARY SIGNS: On ground level, coverage should not exceed 20% of the total window area visible from the exterior. If there is a combination of permanent and temporary signs, the total window coverage should not exceed 40%. This allows for displays and makes the signs more readable. Temporary signs should not be displayed on the second story. TEMPORARY SIGNS SHOULD BE USED IN MODERATION. July 15, ~998 Commercial Design Guidelines Ci~ of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan High Density Housing Home Based Business BUILDING OPTIONS: I. FRONT TO BACK (2 UNITS PER LOT) DISPLAY AREA FRONTING STREET #2 VENDOR-TYPE [5' TYR DEPTH) DISPLAY WiTH ROLL DOWN ENCLOSURE II. UP AND DOWN (2 UNITS PER LOT) HOUSING DISPLAY III. STAGGERED UNITS (2+ UNITS PER LOT) DISPLAY June 30,1998 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan High Density Housing Home Based Business PARKING OPTIONS: I. DIAGONAL ON-STREET PARKING MARTIN LUTHEP, KING JR. BLVD SIDEWALK ~ O UNIT II UNIT~IiI UNIT II. COURTYARD PARKING WITH URBAN WALL MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD. · URBAN WALL'-~ t I~ UN~I~NtT ~1 ~ ~ I~ U' ~T ~'~ U~T I!1. REAR PARKING iVIARTIN LUTHER (ING JR. BLVD SiD EWALK~-"~ ENTRY ~"~ /~,,~ W/~ =.~'WALL MI UNiT i~l UNiT /I J~e $0, 1-.°-o8 Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan .. APPENDIX D Photographic Inventory of CRA Conditions July 15, 1998 Appendix Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan Blighting Influences in North Expansion Subarea Open Trash Pile Boarded House Blighting Influences in South Expansion Subarea Open Trash Pile Vacant Commercial Building Vacant Land in Proposed Expansion Area North Subarea South Subarea Infrastructure Deficiencies in Proposed Expansion Area Drainage and Unpaved Road Drainage and Unpaved Road APPENDIX E Traffic Calming Alternatives July 15, 1998 Appendix Boynt°n Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC/SAFE~ CAMPAIGN PROGRAM (Education) A'Stage 1 Tool Activities that inform and seek to modify driver behavior. Techniques include printed information, meetings and workshops with staff, interaction with :neighbors, signing campaign, .. enforcement activities, school programs, parent outrcac~, etc. ENFORCEMENT (Visible and Active Police Presence) A Stage 1 Tool Sporadic monitoring of speeding and other violations by police. Police officers can come out to a neighborhood for short periods of time to issue tickets. Additionally, police officer~ can "take a neighborhood under their wing," and monitor traffic on a regular basis. SPEED HUMPS (about 2.67" x 12') A Stage 2 Tool Speed humps are waved-shaped paved humps in the street The height of the speed hump determines how fast it may be navigated without causing discomfort to the driver or damage to the vehicle. DiscomfOrt increases as speed over the hump increases. Typically, speed humps are placed in a series rather than singularly. lqote: . Speed humps can be the most cost- effective traffic-calming measure for reducing o~en generate considerable opposition from drivers, public safety agencies, and service agencies. ~peed humps have repeatedly been shown to be effective in reducing travel speeds by 5 to 10 mph on residential streets, and they are relatively i~expensive to install and maintain. There is some evidence that the over-i~se 6f speed humps can lead to negative reactions, especially fi-om injured . persons being transported, etc. SPEED TABLES (3-4" x 22') A Stage 2 Tool llll~ Speed humps with a long fiat section, o~en used as crosswalks. : MEDIAN ENTRY/EXIT ISLANDS A Stage 2 Tool Traffic islands used to create narrower roadway I I at entry/exit point. ~-J/I!" ,~ ~ :5.~-~ ..... MEDIAN BARRIERS A stage'2 Tool A median barrier (raised median) is used at the intersection of a major and a minor street to prevent lef~ tums to and from the minor street, in addition to through movements across the major street. MEDIAN MID-BLOCK ISLANDS A Stage 2 Tool narrower roadway or provide refuge for crossing pedestrians. ONE-WAY..ENTRY/EXIT CHOKERS, HALF-CLOSURES, SEMI-DIVERTERS A Stage 2 Tool direction of a street that permits traffic in the opposite direction to pass through. In a sense, it is a physical.reinforcement to a regulatory "Do ' ~ Not Enter" sign and is normally accompanied by such a device, as well as by turn prohibition ~ signs on the crossing'street.' It 'is an-alternative - _.! to using a one-way street designation for the same block, and allows residents on the block limited two-way travel opportunity. WITH SFaMl-nl~4I~RT£1t AUO HALl: CLOSURE - STOP SIGNS A Stage 1 Tool Red hexagonal signs displaying the word "STOP." These signs can be twO-way or four-way and ~re used to designate the right of'way at intersections. Note:~ "A p~ssible':'reason r~id~nt, beliefs about the speed control effectiveness of stop signs is contrary to the findings of en_~eering studies is that there is some evidence 9ha?st'6p :s~gni~do reduce the mid- block speed, of the fastkst ~rehicles in the traffic stream. It ~-probably these fastest vehicles, rather -than those traveling at the median or gSth percentile -:speed,~that disturb:residents. Elimination of extreme . ~peeding b? the few, very fastest vehicles could -satisfy the; residents' concerns without altering the 85th percentile: or median speeds at all. Another reason neighbors may feel stop signs to be an effective speed control device is that they perceive traffic slowing down and stopping at the controlled intersection as a real benefit, regardless of what effect t_he signs have on/~dt~J~ck ~e~ds.~ STREET STRIPING A Stage 1 Tool Highlighting various areas of the street to increase the driver's awareness of speed or other conditions (e.g., edge of travel way to create a narrowing/slowing effect while defining space for yolisu). ~ Homburg~r, Wolfgang $.; Institute of Transportution Engineers 'Residential Stre~ D~sign and Traffic Control,' 1989. APPENDIX F City Club at Boat Landing Park July 15. 1998 Appendix Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan City Club at Boat Land Park Project Package Proposed Development The proposed Gateway road improvement project will eliminate a popular community meeting place. In order to replace the valuable function of this civic building, as wel as, take advantage of a city property with wonderful water amenities, the City is proposing to_construct a community activity center at Boat Landing Park. The project concept plan is presented on the next page. Estimated Cost This City-sponsored project consists of a 6,500 square foot, one-story building with frame construction on piles, eight (8) feet above ground. The land and utilities belong to the City. Together with access ramps and deck, the seawall and floating dock in front, the estimated construction cost is about $85 per square foot or a total of $552,000. If the seawall requires replacement and floating docks are added, the total construction cost could range between $750,000 - $1 million. No land acquisition is needed for this project. Funding Sources This project will be funded from City general funds, and potential park and recreation grant sources. Schedule The planned schedule calls for detailed design planning in 1998 and initiation of construction in 1999. July 15, 1998 Appendix Boynton Beach Vision 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan ~ ~ ,,,z_< ,,~.j 0 ~o O0 z'uJ ~Z