Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Minutes 09-15-81
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 PRESENT Walter "Marty" Trauger, Vice Mayor Joe deLong, Councilman Samuel Lamar Wright, Councilman Patricia Woolley, Councilmember ABSENT Edward F. Harmening, Mayor (Excused).. Peter L. Cheney, City Manager Tereesa Padgett, City Clerk James Wolf- Assistant City Attorney Vice Mayor Trauger called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. M. He announced that Mayor Harmening was on vacation in Colorado. Vice Mayor Trauger said the invocation would be given by Rev. James M. Smith, First United Methodist Church, Boynton Beach, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, to be led by Mr. Trauger. AGENDA APPROVAL Vice Mayor Trauger announced that he had the City Manager put items that had to be added to the Agenda marked in yellow and items that could be deleted or postponed marked in red. He explained the reason for this was that he had been confined to bed, and his doctor advised him to leave the meeting by 10:30. Vice Mayor Trauger said the Council had the option of adjourning the meeting for the items that could not be covered in that period of time until tomorrow night (September'16, 1981~ at 6:00 P. M. or have the three remaining Councilmembers elect their own Chairman and continue through the Agenda. Vice Mayor Trauger said he would pro- ceed with the Agenda, taking the matters in black, then the matters in yellow, if the Council would move to adopt the Agenda at this time for that sequence. Councilman deLong objected to "X, ADMINISTRATIVE, D. Appointment to Fill Vacancy on Boynton Beach Housing Authority" being marked in red. He wished it left on the Agenda. Councilmember requested that "M. under "X. ADMINISTRATIVE". Firefighter Bob Brown" be added Councilman deLong moved to adopt the Agenda as cOrrected, seconded by Councilman Wright. Motion carried 4-0. ANNOUNCEMENTS - Public Hearing for Proposed Budget Vice Mayor Trauger called the public's attention to the last Council Meeting, where the Council requested that prior to the discussion of the budget at public audience, the Council should have a chance to review it with the City Manager and Staff. Vice Mayor Trauger MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1~, 1981 announced that the City Council would meet on September 29, 1981 at 7:30 P. M. for a possible second session and, if necessary, on October 1, 1981 at 7:30 P. M., with a public hearing to be held on Saturday, October 3, 1981 at 9:30 A. M, A Special Council Meeting will be held on September 29, 1981, Councilman deLong moved to approve the dates as proposed by CitY Manager Cheney in his memorandum dated September 3, 1981, The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Motion carried 4-0. Vice Mayor Trauger announced that everyone was invited to the Leukemia Super Swim Classes to be held at the Hyatt Hotel of the Palm Beaches on Saturday, September 26, 1981 from 3:00 P. M. until 6:00 P. M. There will be a complimentary wine and cheese party at 6:00 P. M. Prominent people of the business, government, education and news media are inw[ted to swim one lap in the super swim classes to be sponsored by at least $200.00. He asked everyone to join in the fight against leukemia. The sponsors and donations would be taken at poolside on September 26th. The announcement was for all people of Boynton Beach. MINUTES Regular City Council Meeting of September 1, 1981 Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to adopt the minutes as presented. Motion carried 4-0. PUBLIC AUDIENCE Vice Mayor Trauger stated if ~nyone in the audience would like to speak on any item not on the Agenda, they may do so at this time. He added if anyone would like to speak on any item on the Agenda, to please give their names to the City Clerk, and they will be called upon when that item is the regular order of business. He asked if anyone wished to speak on any item that was not on the agenda. Larry Bartley, 3415 South Lake Drive, Boynton Beach spoke about the increase in the Florida Power and Light bills. He stated Florida Power and Light Company helps to cause inflation. Mr. Bartley said the Outraged Citizens of Florida were asking people to join with them to pull the plug on Thursday morning, September 17, 1981 at 8:00 A. M. until Friday morning, September 18, 1981 at' 8:00 A. M. Mr. Bartley said 240,000 people in Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach County have planned to join in the "Pull the Plug"movement. Pink flyers were placed in the Council .Chambers for anyone who wished them, Marion Farah, 2846 S. W. 4th St., also spoke on the "Pull the Plug" movement. She informed the Council that they have received coverage in the newspapers and Channel 12. The movement began in Dade and Broward Counties and she and Mr, Bartley are getting it started in MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Palm Beach County, They are pulling the plug to get attention as electric bills are higher than mortgage payments, Marianne Deckwitz, 3416 South Lake Drive, came before the Council, She asked the Council to review the ordinance about the height of fencing. She informed the Council that they have constructed a tennis court on their property and mostly on the property of the Lake Worth Drainage District. The Lake Worth Drainage District gave them permission to build the tennis court and to erect two ten foot sections of back stops for the tennis court, It was presonted to all neighbors within 400 feet from all property lines, including the Lake Worth Drainage District, There were 29 neighbors, and all were in favor of it. Mrs. Deckwitz continued by saying they went to the Board of Adjustment for a variance. Six members of the Board were present, Three members had gone to inspect the property and voted for them. The three other members voted against them, so the request for variance was not g~anted. Mrs, Deckwitz said she and her husband feel very strongly the variance should have been granted to them because they are not the only people in that immediate area with a tennis court. There are two more courts, and they all have variances~ She said %hey had a very large easement to maintain. Mrs. Deckwitz spoke as an agent from the Lake Worth Drainage District and presented a document to the Council showing that she could speak for the Lake Worth Drain- age District. The Lake Worth Drainage District gave permission for the tennis court. Mrs. Deckwitz told the Council they have enhanced the property. Councilman deLong was present at the Board of Adjustment meeting and sympathized with the people because in the past, several variances were given in the neighborhood, He said he did a lot of research on it, The results were that the City Council is power- less under the~present Code. Councilman deLong tried to find out from Carmen Annunziato, the City Planner, whether the Code could be amended to accommodate Mr. and Mrs. Deckwitz. He asked Mr. Annunziato to comment. Councilmember Woolley could not understand what was in the minds of the members who spoke against the variance. She said anyone who plays tennis knows you need more than a six foot fence to play, She looked at the property and two sides are on the water, so most of the balls would be lost either in the water or in the street. Mr. Annunziato said the issue is whether or not a ten foot fence can be constructed in a zone which permits only a six foot fence in the rear and side yards. He said there was no question that the tennis court should have a ten foot fence. The question was where should the tennis court be located. Tennis courts and 10 foot - 3 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 fences are permitted in the zone only if they are located in the building setbacks, The way the Code is currently constructed, a fence would be a structure, and it would have to abide by the build- ing setback regulations. In this instance, a ten foot fence would have to be constructed no closer than 25 feet to the rear property line and no closer than ten feet to the south property lines. The applicants do not have enough land that they own in which to construct a tennis court. If they had the proper number of square feet, they could have constructed a tennis court on site and the ten foot fence. Mr. Annunziato advised that variances are in the purview of the Board of Adjustment, appealable only to the Circuit Court. Vice Mayor Trauger asked Mr. Annunziato to make a suggestion. Mr. Annunziatoranswered that to ~l!ow a ten foot fence would be of benefit to an individual Property owner that would nOt be available to other property owners owning similarly zoned property, in similar locations~ It would be a benefit for one property owner~ which generally, Mr? Annunziato continued, is a ground for denial of a variance. Councilman deLong thought Assistant City Attorney James Wolf~ should be asked for his opinion, Councilman deLong spent a lot of time on the matter and felt it was a case for the-Board of Adjust- ment. Assistant City Attorney Wolf said he did not know the case well enough to know, whether or not the BQa~'~£ Adju~,~men~ was right in not granting Mrs. DeckWitz a variance. He advised the Council that they did not have the right ~to review a variance request, Attorney Wolf further advised that the only redress Mrs. Deckwitz would have would be to go to Circuit Court, He told the Council if they amend the Zoning Code, they would run into the problem that if they make an amendment for one case, they could be allowing a lot of things in an area that they really will not want to have. Vice Mayor 'Trauger wondered if it could come before the Board again, Councilman deLong remarked that it would cost $150.00 every time they would go before the 'Board. City Manager Cheney said there should be no question about waiving the fee. He thought the City Attorney should review the case and the basis on-which the Board of Adjustment could make a va~±ance. Mr, Cheney thought perhaps tennis court height limits could be studied or "tennis court fence!t'~'could be eliminated f~om the defininiion of .a structure, Councilman deLong expressed his belief that M~. and Mrs. Deckwitz were at a disadvantage because only six members of the Board of Adj~tment were present and the law requires a vote of four to approve, so he felt they were entitled to another hearing before the full Board of Adjustment. - 4 - MINUTES ~ REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Councilman deLong moved to waive the fee of Mr, and Mrs, Deckwitz and to bring the case back before the Board of Adjustment. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley, Councilmember Wright understood Mr~'..'Annunziato to say .that Mr~ and Mrs. Deckwitz did not have enough land on which to constr~uct a tennis court. Mr. Annunziato concurred that Councilmember Wright was correct. He said the land on which the tennis court would be constructed is owned by the Lake Worth Drainage District. Councilman deLong interjected that Mr. and Mrs. Deckwitz have per- mission from the Lake Worth Drainage District, Mrs. Deckwitz informed the Council that she and Mr, Deckwitz had negotiated with the Lake Worth Drainage District for over a year, The Lake Worth Drainage District has given very striCt stipulations as to their building the tennis court on their property, Within ninety days, they are to remove all fencing, All they are planning are backstops, and that is all they are asking for, They must also have insurance on the property, All of those stipulations were worked out with the Lake Worth Drainage District and she had a letter saying Mr. and Mrs. Deckwitz were acting on behalf of the Lake Worth Drain- age District. In the letter, the Lake Worth Drainage District asked the City of Boynton Beach to help Mr.~ and Mrs, Deckwitz obtain the variance. Councilman Wright said his question was answered insofar as Lake Worth Drainage District,s~Irequirements, but wondered if it would be considered a hardship. Mr. Annunziato replied that the definition of hardship is difficult to define, Generally, a hardship is something imposed by government, such as a .zoning change, Where .there are no other alternatives is a hardship, Mr, Annunziato felt the Board of Adjustment had spoken. Mrs, Deckwitz pointed out that there are two more tennis courts, one just one property away from them, and they were granted variances. She advised there was another tennis court three blocks away that was granted a variance, The other people said their hardships were back stops and balls falling in the street. Mrs. Deckwitz felt they have a stronger hardship because they.maintain three times as much of an easement as the other people in the-neighborhood. The motion carried 4-0. PUB~LIC HEARING - 8:'00' P. M. REZONE from C-3 to M-1 - LAND USE AMENDMENT from Residential Medium Density to Industrial· Location: 301 S. E. 10th Avenue (222,38' along Railroad Avenue~ - 5 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Proposed Use: To add a carpenter and cabinet shop, also wholesale ceramic and slip manufacturer Applicant: Thompson Coal and Construction, Inc., Jeff Tomberg, Esq., Agent Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner, informed the Council that the Planning and Zoning Board recommended the proposal with a split decision of 4 to 3. Mr. Annunziato said the applicants Were request- ing that three lots adjacent to the FEC Railroad track be rezoned from Community Commercial and to amend the future land use element of the comprehensive plan from medium density residential to industrial. The lot on the S, E. corner of S~ E. tOth~Avenue at Railroad Avenue contains a warehOuse. Lots 17 and 18, to the North of that, are vacant, The applicant wishes to have these lots rezoned in order to provide for the addition of a carpenter and cabinet shop, and wholesale ceramics and slip manufacturing. Mr, Annunziato said the 6 lots to the north along Railroad Avenue are vacant.~ The lots to the east and southeast contain single family or duplex dwellings. Lots tot he south are a mixture of uses, including industrial, storage yards, vacant land, a pre-school, and a lumber yard, Industrial uses and warehouses lie across the Florida East Coast tracks. Mr. Annunziato continued by saying the parcel, in question is part of a 1 lot wide strip of C-3 district extending 1400 feet along the railway, Immediately to the east is an R-2 district. To the west, across the F.E.C. track, is an M-1 district. With regard to the zoning, Mr. Annunziato advised the proposed uses would be permitted in the M-1 district. If the property were re- zoned, it would have to result in spot zoning at C-3, lying on Lots 11 through 16, separated from the remaining C-3 zoned Lots 19, Block G, and the lots south of S. E? 12th Avenue. Mr, Annunziato advised that the Comprehensive Plan addressed the lots particularly Under one of the areas of land use conflict, The area is characterized as being predominately single family, with some encroachment by multi-family and commercial~ uses. The Compre- hensive Plan recommends that this area be protect~ed from uses in- compatible with residential uses, because (12 redevelopment to commercial uses would be impractical, and would be.hindered by the abundance of commercial land with better access, and (2~ transition to commercial uses would cause conflicts with residential uses for a lengthy per±od of time. From the lot layout, Mr. Annunziato noted, there are many owners of property in the area. Conversion to commercial may result in a reduction to the value of land in ~e-area, Rezoning to industrial would contradict the Comprehensive Plan policies in the location of industrial areas. - 6 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Mr. Annunziato stated the Plan suggested that: 1. Industries he located in industrial parks or concentrated industrial areas that dould interconnect between indUstrial uses. 2. Adequate buffering between industrial and residential areas is required. In this instance, Mr. Annunziato cont. inued, it would be virtually impossible to provide for any buffering between the pro- posed industrial use and the remainder of the residential zone. Mr. Annunziato informed the Council that some of the issues involved in the request are: Should this area be maintained and improved as a residential neighborhood, i. e., should encroachments by non-residential uses be prohibited? Would rezoning of the parcels in question continue or'increase encroachments on the R-2 district? More specifically, what would be the extent of the nuisances created by the industrial uses, and what would be the effect'of these nuisances on the property values and the maintenance of nearby homes? 3. Would rezoning any or all of the C-3 strip to M-1 create a spot zone? Are the lots an the parcel in question physically and economically developable for residential uses? Be Should the strip of C-3 district north of S, E, 10th Avenue be eventually changed to residential'zoning? A discussion was prepared by Mr. Annunziato, and he stated some of the conclusions were as follows: 1) The adjacent R-2 district i~ a fa~ly solid, stable residential area that should be preserved. Based on available data, a 1980 tax statementstat~ p~Dbaining~to the land value of the R-2 district, which is approximately seven blocks, the total land value is $298,000.00, the total building value is approximately $1,500,000.00, for a total property value of $1,798,000.00. The average building value per building is $18,543.00· 2~ Industrial uses on the parcel in question would increase noise and congestion from trucks and automobiles, and would have a detrimental aesthetic impact on the neighborhood. The carpenter and cabinet-making shops would generate loud, high-pitched noise from the power saws, and the hazard of fire would be increased - 7 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 3)~ from t~ewoodworking andceramic manufacturing activities. These nuisances would tend to lower property values and reduce the desirability of the nearby R-2 zone, which in turn would reduce the incentive for owners to maintain and improve their property. Mr. Annunziato informed the Council that at the Planning and Zoning Board level, some questions were raised about maintenance of the properties. Since 1977, $40.,723.00 in permit valu~ has been spent for reroofing, electrical, and plumbing improvements. Residents have made an effort to improve their area based on the zoning as it existed since 1975. Rezoning of the parcels in question to M-1 would be an instance of spot zoning. Mr. Annunziato explained the definition of spot zoning as: (1) Would the rezoning be entirely for the benefit of a single owner of a small isolated parcel of land? (2) Would rezoning give privileges to the property which are not extended to similarly located property in the area? Properties similarly located were pointed out by Mr. Annunziato along the FEC Railroad which are zoned and developed for residential purposes. Other properties were zoned but not developed. (~31 Would rezoning contradict the Comprehensive Plan? Even if the Future Land Use Plan Map were amended, such an amen .dment would still contradict the text of the plan, Are the lots in question physically and economically developable? The lots in question are legally developable for multi- family uses up to a denSity of 9.68 dwelling units per acre, Two similarly situated lots to the north were recently developed for single family dwellings. ~5) Should the strip of C-3 north of S. E. 10th Avenue eventually be rezoned to R-2 zoning? Ail of the C-3 district north of S. E. 10th Avenue, which includes the parcel in question, should eventually be zoned to R-2, to bring it into conformance with the Compre- hensive Plan text. Mr. Annunziato recommended to the Planning and Zoning Board that the request be denied. - 8 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1~, 1981 Assistant City Attorney Wolf commented that.Mr. Annunziato mentioned the rezoning was in contradiction with the Land Use Plan and also the terms of ~he Comprehensive Plan. Attorney Wolf advised you cannot, under the law of the local government comprehensive planning act of 1975, which the Comprehensive Plan was adopted under, do a rezoning or any type of development which includes a rezoning if it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan; not only the land use element but anyportion of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Wolf advised that in order to rezone the property and grant the request, the Council would have to find that it was consistent with the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Otherwise, legally, the Council could not rezone or change the'land use of the property. Councilman Wright felt the text coUld be amended, Attorney Wolf agreed with him, but said it had not been brought to the Planning and Zoning Board and would have to go back to the Planning and Zoning Board in order to do that. Mr. Jim Thompson, 741 Infield, Boca Raton said he had M-1 zoning when he bought his property. It was changed to R-3. Mr. Thompson said 4/5 of all the propertySouthof'3Tenth Avenue ~.as~not C~3 as Mr, Annunziato said, Mr. Thompson pointed to proPerty on the plan, stating they were all M-l, and if they were not M-l, they were operating illegally. He stated he was operating a ~warehouse, and all of his tenants are M-l, and the property was M-1 when he bought it. It was changed to C-3 before the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Thompson did not know when, as he never received a notice that it was going to be changed, Vice Mayor Trauger asked Mr. Thompson. if he was notified of the Comprehensive Plan. He replied that he was and tried to get it changed back to M-l, but they wanted it changed to R-2.. He did not know what the outcome was. Mr. ThompsOn repeated that 3/4 of the area Mr. Annunziato showed as C-3 was M-l, ~Mr. Thompson said the lots would not fit C-3 zoning. They only fit M-t zoning, and there is not enough land area to make a C-3 zoning, Mr. Thompson asked the Council what they were supposed to do with C-3 zoning. He stated that all of his tenants were M-l, and if one left, he wondered how he,could con~er~ anM-1 to a C-3. Mr. Thompson continued that the property was close to the railroad track and said he did not think anyone would want a residence along the railroad track. Also, in M-l, there are auto repair places, repairing of stock cars, and continuous noise from air boats being rebuilt and run. He shOwed some pictures to-~he Council. Hecalso ~a~d'~p~sen~ some plans to th~ COuncil~- ~ Vice~Mayor Trauger~ informsd h~ ~h~yrsh~ul~"~go before the Planning and Zoning Board again. Mr. Thompson proposed no auto repair or maintenance of any kind. He stated they did not want it in the area at all. Mr. Thompson dis- agreed with City Planner Carmen Annunziato because OSHA has rules and regulations that govern the noise you can make for your employees. - 9 - MINUTES - REGU~LAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Mr. Thompson further informed the Council that his business would only operate in the daytime hours and not at night. Mr. Thompson said he spent a big amount of money just fixing the place up and does not know what to do because they cannot go M-l, or M-1 cannot go C-3. Mr.. Thompson said it would enhance the'tax program. Mr. Thompson also said the new houses were past 400 feet. He requested that the Council grant the zoning change from C-3 to M-1. Mr. Leonard Kanonik, 1330 S. W, 28th Avenue, had an Agenda from July 15 of last year, where the same matter came up before the Council. He noted there were only 4 present on the Council, and informed the Council that on July 15, the Council was minus two. Last year, they were voted down 2 to 1. Three months later, Mr. Strnad left the City. Mr. Kanonik noted ~Mr. Annunziato speaks about buffer zones, He said he lives at 28th Avenue, and when he looks ouH of his living room, he looks on an industrial area, BuSes run from 5:30 A. M, until 6:00 P. M., as there is a transportation company where he lives. When he bought the home, Mr. Kanonik did not think that would happen on the other side of the canal, He lives in a $120,0.00 house and does not complain, He learned to live with it, but he wa~nted to point out to Mr, Annunziato about buffer zones, Mr. Kanonik is one of the tenants in Mr. Thompson's building, wants to build cabinets. He Helen Marcus, 1107 S. E. 3rd Street, stated she and her mother own the four lots across from the ceramic shop, She pointed~ out Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block F on the map. Mrs. Marcus said the buildings have been in existence for nine or ten years and have never annoyed her. They do not make any noise. However, there is a nursery school that does bother her, Mrs. Marcus said she would rather see the nursery school out than the applicant. Mr.. Roger Barr, 1241 S. W. 27th Avenue, came forward and said he runs a ceramic business on the property in question and has been there for ten years. Mr. Barr said he had not had any problems with his neighbors, Most are unconcerned. When they come by, they can go through and see what they do.- Mr, Barr said his business provides a service to the community, community recreation areas, schools, hobbyists, and professional artists. They are trying to expand. Mr. Barr said the property was zoned M-1 when they moved in and they were given a license to operate under M-1 zoning. Then when they try to expand, the zoning changes without any notice. They had no recollection or notice whatsoever. Now they find out they cannot expand. He asked where the integrity was in the purchase of the building at M-1. Mr. Barr stated there were a lot of scare, tactics in the neighbor- - 10 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 1~5, 1981 hood. Some new residents have been running around, getting a petition against them, and having the property rezoned. One of the petitions came before the Planning and Zoning Board, Mr,~'Barr told the Council, and he had no notice of it. He said he was very surPrised and very disappointed because the person running around getting the petition signed never came over and asked him what he intended to do, never once met who owned the property, and never had any intention of know- ing what was going on, but they ran out with a copy of what M-1 zoning was and scared the neighborhood. Mr. Bark felt what they intend to do should be a matter of public record and told to the people without them being scared. They want to do'what they did ten years ago without any complaints then. Mr. Bart said they have done nothing in the community to cause a problem. Mr. Bart informed the Council they intend to build a build- ing and expand their business to serve the community. It would conform to a nice neighborhood, have plenty of landscaping, and improve the neighborhood property values. They do not have adequate warehousing to completely stock their product for the local schools. Mr, Bart further informed the Council that they sell most of the local schools and private schools crayons. They-cause no noise and have no machinery. There will be no machinery in the building that will make any noise. There axe several machines, presently, but the loudest machine would make 1/2 the noise of any woman's vacuum clean,r, Mr. Bart said they made occasional dust, which has been taken care of. Mr. Bart advised the CounCil that if ~he cannot expand his warehouse in order to stock the necessary supplies to serve the schools, they will have to go to Miami for supplies and eventually he will lose his business. He has eight employees, who feed eight families, that will lose their jobs, and a lot of people in the neighborhood will lose them. Mr. Bark said he didn't know then what would go into the building, but the man who rents the building to them will lose his tenants and his income. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Bart if he was a Boynton Beach resident, and he replied that~he was. Councilman Wright asked if the employees were Boynton Beach residents and Mr. Barr answered that he believed .all but one were. Councilman Wright asked Mr, Bar~ if his-business is ceramics now. Mr. Barr replied that they were in ceramics and schOol supplies. The business is Gulfstream Ceramics, Inc,, and they are the factory representative for Crayola Crayons and Binney & Smith Educational Products. Mr. Barr said he could not warehouse enough supplies to meet the demands of the schools. After hearing about the other petition, Mr. Ba~r talked to a lot of the residents, and a lot of residents who signed the petition were very unhappy that they signed the other petition, as they did not really understand it and were afraid they would lose their homes to a factory, - 11 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Councilman Wright asked if any of the people'who were sorry they signed the petition were present, Mr. Bart said he was not sure, but he had several signatures on his pe~i~i~ that are on the other petition. Mr. Bark continued that a lot of people were scared by unfortunate tactics in the neighborhood by someone without the facts. He introduced himself to that person~ and t~ied to explain the facts but the person would not listen. ~The person told him~point blank She was~.'opposed because it was M-1. Mr, Bart said scare tactics weue used up and down3~the neighborhood and people were told his corporation was the villain by somebody that has lived there only a short period of time, and they have been there for ten years. The other residents have gotten along fine with them for ten years. Vice Mayor Trauger said the City is still faced with the legality of the matter. Mr. Bart emphatically stated the property was purchased M-i, the businesses were purchased under M-l, and they are operating under M-1. He heard Mr. Annunziato say, "We are rezoning this in accordance with current land use. We are rezoning this to R-2 in accordance with current land use." Mr. Bart advised that current land use is M-l, Mr. Annunziato was wrong and is wrong. M~r. Barr stressed that current land use of every business in the C-3 area is at least C-4 or M-1. There are no C~3 businesses in the zone. They have been there as long as most of the residents and have co- existed with the residents without a great deal of problems, Mr. Annunziato was asked to go down and talk to them and look at the lots in the neighborhood. Councilman Wright did not feel any progress was being made and noted some names existed on Mr, Barr's list that were on the Other petition, He suggested Mr. Bart., Mr. Thompson (the owner) and residents of the area meet with Mr. Carmen Annunziato, the City Planner. Councilmember Woolley commented that ~the Council did not have the full story and only had half the information. Mr. Barr stated that was the problem. Most of the people involved refused-to come and see what the situation was. Since the scare tactics, many people have asked him to let them go through'his buSiness~rand see what it was all about. They were quite satisfied that his business w~s not causing any problem. Councilman Wright said he did not have. the chance to talk to anyone except Mrs. Mary Douglas Vlamynck~ 910 S. E~ 3rd Street, Mrs. Vlamynck identified herself as the fearful lady who does all of the scare tactics and led-the protest. Councilman Wright preferred to table the matter. Vice Mayor Trauger said they had a legal position on which way it should go because of a law. Councilman deLong said they should proceed with the public hearing and then decide what to. do~ Councilman deLong asked Vice Mayo~ T~auger to invoke the three minute limitation as. there were a lot of people who wished to speak. - 12 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Mr. Barr said there was someone there who had signed both petitions. Councilman Wright and Councilm~mber Woolley called Mr. stanley Best, 401 S. E. 12th Avenue to ~speak. Mr. Best stated he did not get all of the information because he had been out of town. He heard two different versions of what was going on. Vice Mayor Trauger asked Mr. Best if.he~was~in favor or against it. Mr. Best sa±d~he thought he would be against it. Councilmember Woolley asked Mr. Best if that meant he was not in favor of changing the zoning, Mr. Best replied, "No, I am not in favor." John Weiss, property owner adjoining the Gulfstream Ceramic ware~ houses~ who owns Lot 19 right next to the three lots of the appli- cant, came forward. He pointed to his property on the plan. He wanted the Council to know he would not benefit either'way, whether the Council votes for or against the r~quest. Mr. Weiss stated his mother was sick, in the bedroom next to the ceramic place. The ceramic place moved in, cleaned up the area, put in sidewalks, shrubs and grass, They lit up the area, which did not have any lights. They never made any noise, or he would'have complained about it. Jeff Tomberg, Attorney fOr Thompson Coal and'Construction, Inc., came forward~ He informsd the Council that ±f~they did not pass the plan, they would hurt the City of Boynton Beach, as the property is useless if it is zoned anything except M-1. Mr. Tomberg asked the Council to look at all of the ordinances, which dictate all of ~he specifications for lot sizes and'uses, and they will see there is ~no commercial use that any single lot can be used for. There is no residential purpose that any single lot can be used for. North of the subject property, Mr. Tomberg advised, the lots all the way up to 8th Avenue decrease in size. Across the railroad tracks,. it is zoned entirely M'i. The City Ordinances prohibit Mr.. Thompson from doing any major repairs. The property will deteriorate unless the zoning is changed unless Mr. Thompson is given the opportunity to improve the property. NO one wants to live with.his front door at the railroad tracks, DuplexeS are along the tracks that do not sell and do not rent. The property-has'no meaningful economic use to the City of Boynton Beach unless the zoning is passed. Mr. Tomberg further informed the Council that residents are afraid of what the Council will-do. The Planning and Zoning BOard were farsighted enough to approve the change by a 4-3 vote. Mr. Tomberg said they had appeared before and had an unfortunate affair with a 2-1 situation where two Councilmen, including Vice Mayor Trauger, were not present and they were defeated. Failure to approve the zoning will allow the property to deteriorate in sUch a state it will be absolutely useless for any economic purpose whatsoever. Mr. Tomberg submitted a plan to the Council. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Tomberg when his client purchased the property. Mr, Tomberg believed it was in 1974 or approximately 1975. - 13 - M~NUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Mr. Bryan Kanonik, 1330 S. W. 28th Avenue, advised Vice Mayor Trauger he was in favor Of the zoning change. Most of the structures are over six years old, and the zoning was just changed six years ago. Mr. Kanonik Said everything that was built is geared to M-1 zoning. He did not know if it was against the law to go against the Compre- hensive Plan, and Vice Mayor Trauger told him it was, but there was a method of changing it. Mr. Kanonik advised that Mr. Bart manu- 'factures a ceramic slip of sand and water, which do not burn. Mr. Annunz±ato had said there was a problem with fire regarding ceramics, and Mr. Kanonik did not believe there was any combustible product. Vice Mayor.Trauger asked to hear from the other Side. Mr. Brian Shaw, 814 S. E, Third Street, went through this same thing last year. Mr. Shaw informed %he Council that the real intentions of the applicants were to industrialize all the way down to the 8th Avenue intersection, which is currently all vacant lots. Mr. Shaw personally felt they were making an attempt to spot zone in M-1 and attempt to get the rest of the lots changed in order to' build another thorough- fare on 8th Avenue and bring all of that traffic into the area, Mr, Shaw stated he was a newcomer of eight years. In a seven block area, Mr. ShaW continued, there are about 60 to 70 kids of school age walking around the roads. Mr. Shaw strongly objected to spot zoning to an M-1 zone.with the anticipation that this will come up every year until the entire area is changed, There will be too much traffic to accomodate the young families that live there. There are not that many areas that young people can afford, Mr. Shaw asked the Council to look at the improvements made by the people who live there. The people are young and make their own improvements. Mary Douglas Vlamynck, 910 S, E. 3rd Street, read a letter she had written to the City Council, dated September 15, regarding rezoning. A copy of said letter is attached to these minutes and made a part hereof. Vice Mayor Trauger asked everyone opposed to'the rezoning to stand. Twenty (20) people who were opposed to the change~to M-1 stood up. Vice Mayor Trauger asked everyone who wished the ~rezoning changed to M-1 industrial to stand. There were eleven (11} who wished the re- zoning. Mr. Darrell Hinson, 915 S, E. Third Street, who owns Lots 14, 15, and 16, half of Lot 13; all of Lot 7 and half of Lot 8 came forwardand stated he was not opposed to the rezoning. He told the people who live on S, E. Third Street to learn more about cleaning up S. E, Third Street. He told them they had junk cars in their yards. Mr, Hinson stated there were no other streets in Boynton Beach with lots facing_the railroad, with M-1 zoning on the side, that are zoned residential. - 14 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Councilman Wright asked Mr. Hinson if his lots were vacant. Mr. Hinson answered that 14, 15, 16 and half of Lot 13 were vacant because no one would want to live facing the railroad. He said he was sitting with lots that were really no good. He would like his lots to be changed to M-1 also. Vice Mayor Trauger a'sked Mr. Annunziato to comment. Mr, Annunziato said Boynton Beach is not a young city. Every attempt was made to maintain the city and prevent areas from becoming an area of blight, which would be a detriment to the city. There has been an attempt on the zoning to maintain the area and maintain it as a v~iable_ community. That is a major policy of the Comprehensive Plan, to protect the existing residential areas. Another policy of the Plan concerns location of industry, Industry requires truck transportation, has employees, needs to expand, and generally makes noise, This particular industry, Mr. Annunziato continued, has proven to be a good neighbor, but there is no guarantee though that in the future t~se prQpe~i~ ~iil main in the condition they currently exist in, The properties and uses could change. Mr. Annunziato informed the applicants that the current uses were not illegal. The lots are non-conforming and the businesses can expand within the limits of the existing buildings. The lot lines have no significance. He added %here is a public right-of-way separating the lots from the railroad, .Condemnation of lots now or in the future could result. The issue that the lots are small and cannot be developed is really not an issue at all. Councilman deLong asked Mr. AnnUnziato if it wasn't one of the prime objectives with the Land Use Pla~ in older cities where they put industrial districts along the railroads in the days when the rail- roads were flourishing, to now remove them from the railroads and get them into industrial districts like in Orlando and Deerfield Beach. In other words, get them away from the railroad and get them confined to industrial areas. Mr. Annunziato said the requirement that industrial areas be located near railroads is not pertinent in this area.. In fact, Mr. Annunziato pointed out that this Council and past Councils have supported the concept which has'located industries such as Motorola where they are several miles from a railroad. Mr. Barr interrupted to say his business was totally dependent upon the railroad, and they get five railroad cars at ;a time. Assistant City Attorney WOlf advised that not~ only did. the Land Use Plan of the portion of the Comprehensive Plan address this particular area, there are specific policies within %he ComprehensiVe Plan which address the area, Once a municipality has adopted a Comprehensive Plan, they cannot pass any development orde~ and a rezoning is considered a development order by definition, - 15 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Attorney Wolf continued that it was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It does not say that the City Council cannot at a later date go back and ask that the text of the plan be reviewed. It could be done by the City Council if they wish. They could order it back to the Planning and Zoning Board. No amendment to the text has been presented to the Planning and Zoning Board, and the City Council cannot not at this time amend the text. In order to rezone, Attorney Wolf advised, the Council would ~have to £ind that it was not inconsistent with the text of the Plan. Mr. Wolf thought the Council would have a very difficult t~e doing that. Attorney Wolf said Mr. Annunziato also brought up spot zoning. Mr. Wolf said it was not his job to know if it was spot zoning but Mr. Annunziato pointed out what spot zoning is, and he agreed with his definition. Attorney Wolf told the Council they are the fact finders and they are to determine if that is what is happening here. Me stated those were the two legal issues being dealt with. Assistant City Attorney Wolf said'he had'trouble telling the Council that there was any legal way for them to rezone the parcel at tonight's (September 15~ meeting. Councilman deLong.moved to deny the application to rezone from C-3 to M-1 based upon the advice of the City Planner and the City Attorney. Councilman Wright seconded the motion. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Annunziato what Mr, Thompson could do with the property the way it is today. Mr'. Annunziato asked if he meant the property encumbered by the building, or the vacant land. Councilman Wright answered the vacant land. Mr, Annunziato replied it could be developed with a duplex. Councilm~n Wright confirmed that he is prohibited from expanding. Mr. Ann~nziato advised it was a non-conforming legal and non-conforming use. Councilman deLong researched the Comprehensive Plan, which is a legal binding document, but thought perhaps Mr. Thompson could re- zone the property. Vice Mayor Trauger said the land use should be changed first. Attorney Jeff Tomberg asked to speak again, and Vice Mayor Trauger informed him a motion was on the floor. Vice Mayor Trauger repeated the motion. Councilman Wright interrupted and asked if he could hear what Attorney Jeff Tomberg had to say. Councilman deLong did not think it was right to interfere and said both Councilman Wright and Attorney Tomberg knew What3hi~ relief is, and~they would be breaking par~imentary procedures. The motion carried 3'1 to deny the rezon±ng. dissented. Councilman Wright - 16 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 ABANDONMENT OF UTILITY EASEMENT - 15' .strip of land, a portion of Lots 3, 4 and 5, SAM BROWN JR.'S HYPOLUXO SUBDIVISION, in conjunc- tion with Fisherman's Landing Plat Mr. Annunziato explained the plat and said the easement was present- ly encumbered only in certain parts. The proposed plat for Fisher- man's Landing will pro.vide for the relocation of the gravity sewer lines and the sewer force main which currently encumber parts of the easement. The application was reviewed by the Technical Staff and went to the Planning and Zoning Board with the recommendation that the application be approved subject to the applicant relocating the gravity sewer lines and the sewer force main and that the plat be recorded, It was unanimously recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board that it be approved subject to the same staff comments, Vice Mayor Trauger asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of this proposed abandonment and received no response. He asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in oppositiOn to the proposed abandonment and received no response, Councilman deLong moved to approve the abandonment request submitted by Michael B. Schorah, Agent for Blenheim, Inc., to abandon the utility easement located at the proposed Fisherman's Landing Plat, subject to staff comments. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Motion carried 4-0. Vice Mayor Trauger announced the public hearings were ended, Councilman deLong moved to revert to the regular order of business, seconded by Councilman Wright, Motion carried .4-0. BIDS Construction of a 1,000,000 Gallon Ground Storage Tank and Booster Station - U~ilities Councilman deLong moved to approve the award of the contract to the lowest bidder, Koblar Constructors & Engineers, Gainesville, Florida, as recommended by Russell & Axon, Consulting Engineers. Base Bid $849,672 plus additive alternate of $50,700 for a total of $900,372, as per memo dated September 9, 1981. Councilmember deLong alSo moved that the said memo be made-a part of the publici~record, together with the memorandum from Perry A. Cessna, Director of Utilities, dated September 10, 1981. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Motion carried 4-0, Wilson Park Fencing Additions - Recreation and Parks Councilman deLong moved to award the bid to Bulldog Fence Co., Boynton Beach, in the amount of $8,703.00, in accordance with the recommendation of the Tabulation Committee, Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-0. - 17 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Wilson Park Area Irrigation Modification - Recreation and Parks Councilman deLong moved to approve the Tabulation Committee's recommendation and award the bid to Kent Ewing Enterprises, Inc., Boynton Beach, in the amount of $5,965.23. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion, and the motion'carried 4-~0. Wilson Park Suction Pump System - Recreation and Parks CounciLman deLong moved to approve the recor~mendationof the Tabula- tion Committee and award the b~d to Kent Ewing Enterprises, Inc., Boynton Beack, in the amount of $4,570.73~ which,~was-the sole~_~bid, as set forth in the memorandum of September.~t5, 1981. ~The mo~ion was seconded by. Councilmember Woolley and carried 4-0. Rolling Green Park Irrigation Modification -Recreation and Parks Councilman deLong moved to approve the recommendation of the Tabu- lation Committee and award .the bid to Kent Ewing Enterprises, Inc., Boynton Beach, in the amount of $5,398,00, Councilman Wright seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-0, bEVELOPMENT PLANS Final Plat Approval - Fisherman's Landing (Eastern terminus of both Las Palmas'B~ulevard ~a'n'd ~La~keside'~arbo~r D~iVe~ TABLED City Manager Cheney understood someone would be at the meeting from Lakeside Harbor Drive to request that this item be left on the table. Councilman deLong said the request was made to him and he forwarded it to City Manager Cheney. The people opposed to making the private street a public street have engaged an attorney and are waiting until such time as the attorney can become, familiar with the subject matter. It was decided to leave the matter on the table. Eunice Clark, 605 Lakeside Harbor Drive, came forward. Councilmember Woolley moved to take the matter from the table, seconded by Council- man Wright. The motion carried 4~0, Mrs. Clark said the residents spoke to.Mr. Mike Scho~ah, thinking they had reached an agreement. It was presented to Carmen Annunziato, City Planner. They did not have enough time to get legal representa- tion. Mrs. Clark informed the Council that their Attorney, Alan Ciklin, advised them to ask for a continuance. City Manager Cheney explained that the issue had' not been turned down. Only the City Council can approve it or turn i% down. The Technical Review Board reviewed the situation again and recommended that some kind of connection be included, Mr. Cheney thought it appropriate that Mrs. Clark and the residents Of Lakeside Harbor Drive have an attorney. The concern of the staff about the connection between the residents of Lakeside Harbor Drive's private street and the development is truly on safety. - 18 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Gary Glickman, Attorney for the developer, came before the Council. He informed the Council they were tabled two weeks ago at the original scheduled hearing on the final plat approval. The people of Lakeside Harbor Drive never came forward at any time up until final plat approval. They met with the developer and'nothing was resolved. Attorney Glickman said if they want to continue protracting this out, the development is halted. The 'developer has done exactly what the City requested and asked to be heard tonight, Councilman deLong pointed out that e~en though it has been an in- convenience to the developer, the City lives with the people, and the people should be given every opportunity to engage counsel and present their case. He felt the matter should be back on the table, Assistant City Attorney Wolf advised alSo that the matter should be tabled. He stated he Knew both attorneys, He felt if he and Mr. Annunziato sat down with the two attorneys, they could possibly reach an agreement rather than battle the issue out. However, he informed the Council there was one legal issue and he wanted to hear from both sides on the issue in order to advise the Council, Attorney Wolf said he would not feel comfortable to give advice at this time. Councilman deLong moved to lay the matter on the table. There was a lot of discussion about what ~he motion should be. Councilmember WQolley advised that in the future, .when~it- is known an issue is to be tabled, the people should be nOt'±fied so they will not have to come and sit for a long period of time, The attorneys should have been notifiedalso~ Councilman Wright agreed with Counci!member Woolley, Vice Mayor Trauger repeated that a motion was mad~ to table. The motion was seconded by Councilman Wright and carried 4~0. Accept Final Site Plan - Meadows 300~, Pla~ NO.~ 1~ Councilman d~Long moved, seconded by Councilman Wright, to accept the final site plan. Motion carried 4~0. Preliminary Plat Approval - Bethesda Park PUD (Northeast corner of S. W. 23rd Avenue at 1-95), submitted by Burl Gentry, Agent for summit Investment - for construction of sewer, water, paving'and drainage facilities 'to serve 48 units plus recreational facilities Mr. Annunziato presented the'plan to the Council and informed them they had seen it as a part of the master plan'. The applicant is now coming forward with construction plans and a pla~. The application was reviewed by the City Staff and came from the Planning and Zoning Board with a positive recommendation. Mr. Annunziato read the following staff comments: - 19 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Engineering "1. Dept.: The traffic impact fee is $9,600 as per Charles Walker's letter of September 16, 1~980. A stop sign should be shown at the intersection with S. W. 23rd Ave. 3. Details for culvert headwall should be added. Dedication should include driveways and drainage easements, Cost estimate should include quantities of materials and unit prices. The cost shown for the recreation room is low. The P. & Z. Board called for a westbound decelera- tion lane. No construction is shown for this although striping is shown as requested by Charles Walker in his letter of September 16, 1980. The book and page number should be entered for the offsite utility easement. Be Condominium documents are to conform with Jim Wolf's letter of September 10, 1980." As to number 7, Mr. Annunz±ato said the applicant did secure an ease- ment, He continued reading from the Memorandum of the City Engineer, Tom Clark, Engineering Dept.: "Approval is recommended subject to above." Police Dept.: "Subject to traffic signs," Recreation Dept.: "Fee in lieu of land dedication," Councilman deLong moved to approve the preliminary plat, subject to staff comments, and to also approve in addition, based on a recent appraisal of tbs tand, the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation setting the land value for recreation and parks purposes at $47,894,93 per acre. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-0. Master Plan Modification - Motorola PID - Request no substantial change determination Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner, advised the Council that the modification was as follows: As initially approved, the master plan provided for three connections to Congress. The applicant is requesting that the northerly most turn cut be deleted and substituted - 20 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 with an additional curb cut on 22nd Avenue. The result of this is to relocate the impact of the traffic which would have entered and exited the site to the easternmost exit, which is currently planned on N. W-. 22nd Avenue. The additional curb cut on 22nd Avenue serves visitors' Parking, The application was reviewed by the Technical Review Board and comes with a recommendation that a~finding of no substantial change is being made. Additionally, Mr. Annunziato had the opportunity to talk to Mr2 Walker, the County Traffic Enqineer, and although the change will require a change to the construction plan on Congress, the modifications are minor in nature. Councilman Wiright moved that the Master Plan Modification of Motorola PID has no substantial, change in its determination and, therefore, should be approved in accordance with the comments of staff's memorandum dated September 15, 1981 and with the memorandum of the Engineering Department datedAugust 28, 19..81, Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-0. LEGAL Ordinances - 2nd Reading - PUBLIC HEARING Proposed Ordinance No. 81-28 Re: 20 Year Retirement for Members of the Police Retirement Program Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Ordinance No. 81-28 by title only, on second and final reading: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF-THE CITY OF.BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, A-MENDING CHAPTER 18 'PENSION RETIREMENT' ARTICLE III, ~PENSIONS FOR POLICE OFFICERS' BY ENACTING SECTION 18-169 'NORMAL RETIREMENT DATE' OF THE BOYNTON BEACH CITY CODE, 1981 CODIFICATION, BY PROVIDING NOTWITH- STANDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 185 THAT ALL MEMBERS OF THE PENSION PLAN ON ACTIVE DUTY AS OF THE ADOPTION DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO RETIRE A'FTER 20 YEARS OF SERVICE NOTWITHSTANDING THEIR AGE; BY ENACTING SECTION 18-170 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS OF THE BOYNTON BEACH CITY CODE, 1981 CODIFICATION TO PROVIDE FOR A DEDUCTION OF 7% FROM EACH INSTALLMENT OF SALARY AS A CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS THE PENSION FUND, PROVIDING FOR REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY TO CODIFY AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Vice Mayor Trauger asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of the proposed Ordinance and received no response. He asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in opposition to the pro- posed ordinance and received no response. - 21 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Councilman deLong moved for Hhe adoption of Ordinance No. 81-28 on second and final reading, seconded by'Councilman Wright. No dis- cussion. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call on the motion as follows: Councilmember Woolley - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Councilman Wright - Aye Motion carried 4-0. Proposed Ordinance No. 81-29 Re: with Boynton Beach Regional Park Annexation and Zoning in conjunction Assistant City Attorney WOlf read proposed Ordinance No. 81-29 on secOnd and final reading, by title only: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING A CERTAIN. UNINCORPORATED TRACT OF LAND THAT IS CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY LIMITS WITHIN PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THAT WILL UPON ITS ANNEXATION, CONSTITUTE A REASONABLY COMPACT ADDITION TO THE CITY TERRITORY PURSUANT TO A PETITION OF THE OWNER OF SAID TRACT OF LAND, REQUESTING ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 7(32) OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA AND FLORIDA STATUTES 171,044; PROVIDING THAT ORDINANCE NO. 80-19 OF THE CtHY IS HEREBY AMENDED TO REFLECT THAT THE ZONING~ OF SAID TRACT OF LAND SHALL BE WITHIN THE (REC) ,RECREATION~ DISTRICT O'F THE CITY; AMENDING SECTION 6 AND 6A OF THE CITY CHARTER BOUNDARIES AND BOUNDARIES AND TERRITORIES OF GREATER BOYNTON BEACH AREA TO INCLUDE THE SAID PARCEL; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 79-24 BY DESIGNATING THIS PARCEL OF LAND ON THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS RECREATIONAL; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITHi; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING FOR ADVERTISING; AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Vice Mayor Trauger asked-if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of the proposed ordinance and received no response, He asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in opposition to the proposed ordinance and received no response. Councilman deLong moved for the adoption of pr0posed Ordinance No. 81-29 on second and final reading. Counc±lman Wright seconded the motion. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on ~the motion as follows: Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Councilman Wright - Aye Councilmember Woolley - Aye Motion carried 4-0. - 22 - MINUTES ~ REGULAR C~TY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Emergency Ordinance to Extend Current Budget Assistant City Attorney. Wolf read proposed Ordinance No. 81-31 by title only: "AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, READOPTING THE BUDGET OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF 1980/1981 AS AMENDED AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF MONIES ON SAID BUDGET"UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE 1981/i982 FISCAL YEAR HAS BEEN ADOPTED; FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilman Wright, to adopt Emergency Ordinance No. 81-31. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Councilman deLong - Aye Councilman W~ight - Aye Councilmember Woolley - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Motion carried 4-0. ORDINANCES - 1st Reading: Proposed Ordinance No. 81-32 Time Sharing Ho~els Re: Amending Append±x A, "Zoning" Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Ordinance No. 81-32 on first reading, by title only: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ZONING; AMENDING APPENDIX A ~ZONING' ~ORDINANCE NO. 75-19~, CODE OF ORDINANCES,' BY DELETING THE MINIMUM SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY ~750) SQUARE FOOT REQUIREMENT CONTAINED IN THE DEFINITION OF TIME SHARING HOTEL; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY TO CODIFY; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Councilman deLong moved, seconded'by Councilmember WoOlley, for the adoption of Proposed Ordinance No. 81-32 on first'reading only. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call on the motion~as follows:- Councilman Wright - Aye CoUncilmember Woolley - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Motion carried 4-0. - 23 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 RESOLUTIONS Proposed Resolution No. 81- Plat Re: Accepting Fisherman's Landing TABLED This matter was left on the table, Proposed ResOlution No, 81-AAA Re: City Holidays Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Resolution 81-AAA by title only: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE'CIVIL SERVICE RULES AND REGULATIONS, RULE XI, GENERAL PERSONNE-L POLICIES AND PROVISIONS~ SECTION 2, LEGAL HOLIDAYS" Councilman deLong moved the adoption· of Resolution 81~AAA, seconded by Councilman Wright. City Manager Cheney recommended that the date should be filled in as effective September 16. .'Mr. Cheney said the Resolution exempts the Fire Department, as their contract specifi- cally.has Columbus Day. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Counc±lmember Woolley - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Councilman Wright - Aye Motion carried 4-0. Proposed Resolution No. 81-BBB Re: Approving Agreement between City of Boynton Beach and Metric Engineering, Inc. relative to improvements on 10th Avenue Assistant City AttOrney Wolf read proposed Resolution 81'BBB by title only: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE SAID CITY THAT CERTAIN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT~WITH METRIC ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF." Councilman Wright moved the-adoption of Resolution 81-BBB, seconded by Councilman deLong. Mrs, Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Vice Mayor Trauger Councilman deLong Councilman Wright Councilmember Woolley Aye Aye Aye Aye Motion carried 4-0. Proposed Resolution No. 81-CCC. Re: Compensation to all City Employees IHj~ured While on Duty - Requested by Councilman Joe deLong Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed Resolution 81-CCC by title only: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-NN." Councilman deLong moved the adoption of Resolution 81-CCC. Councilman deLong requested City Manager Cheney to 'comment. Mr. Cheney said by the Resolution becoming effective on .Oct~)ber 30., 1980, it includes the Fire Department and the one person the City was concerned about, Steve Campbell, and he willgetCredi%'~b~ck~for the sick leave and vacation leave. Counc±lmember Woolley seconded the motion, Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion as follows:- Councilman deLong - Aye Councilman Wright - Aye Councilmember Woolley - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Motion carried 4-0. Proposed Resolution No. 81-DDD Re: Meadows 300 Assistant City Attorney Wolf read proposed~Resolution 81-DDD by title only: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE PLAT OF THE MEADOWS 300, PLAT NO, 1, A SUBDIVISION WITHIN THE CITY ~OF BOYNTON BEACH." Councilman deLong moved the adoption of proposed Resolution 81-DDD, seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Councilman Wright - Aye Councilmember Woolley - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Motion carried 4-0. OLD BUSINESS Report on Mutual Assistance Agreement with Town of Ocean Ridge - Requested by Councilman Joe deLong .... TABLED - 25 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SETPEMBER 15, 1981 Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilman Wright, to remove the Mutual Assistance Agreement Report from the table, City Manager Cheney informed the Council that he discussed the~matter with~the Town Manager of Ocean Ridge, who had discussed'the proposed Agreement. The Town Council of Ocean Ridge has not met, but the Town Manager of Ocean Ridge is~ confident, since the Council had read it, that they are satisfied with.~he agreement. Therefore, City Manager Cheney felt the Council could go ahead and approve the Agreement and he felt the Town of Ocean Ridge would also approve it, Councilman deLong moved that City Manager Cheney be directed to proceed with the Mutual Assistance Agreement with the Town of Ocean Ridge. The motion was seconded by Councilman Wright and carried 4-0. OTHER Execution of Drainage Easement City Manager Cheney said the easement pertained to the Field family, was reviewed by the City Attorney and approved. Councitman~deLong moved to accept the easement, as stated in the memorandum of September 14, 1981. Councilman Wright seconded the motion, and the motion carried 4-0. OLD BUSINESS Consider Cemetery Board Recommendations - MaUSOleum T~BLED Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilman~ Wright, to remove the item from the table. Motion carried 4~0. City Manager Cheney reported that three people visited Boca Raton. In addition, Edgar D. Hurford, Chairman of the Cemetery Board, City Manager Cheney and others had a long conversation with Mr, Osborne of the Boynton Beach Mausoleum, Inc. regarding who was to do what, and a letter will be worked oUt for the Cemetery.Board to approve, A letter will then go ~to Mr. Osborne for his approval. One issue to be addressed would be the l~ft, which Mr~ Cheney felt was the responsibility of Mr. Osborn to provide. The Cemetery-Board feels that because Mr. Osborn is building the storage room, that the lift would go in with what he had not proposed earlier. Mr. Osborn pro- vided a secondhand lift in Boca Raton, which the~ replaced, Mr. Cheney said Mr. Osborn never planned to provide a lift of this kind. He may have planned to provide some scaffolding but not a lift like the City would ~want to use, He recommended the Council authorize the purchase of the lift the Cemetery Board recommended and, hopefully, that would assist the City in additional negotiations with Mr. Osborn r~lative to other things that have to be done such as landscaping and moving the road east about five feet. In view of the fact that the funds were coming from the Cemetery Fund, Councilman deLong moved to accept the City Manager's recommenda- tion in the purchase of a lift for the masoleum in the amount of - 26 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 $9,700.00. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley and carried 4-0. Report on Status of Water Conservation TABLED Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilman Wright, to remove the Report on Status of Water Conservation from the table. Motion carried 4-0. City Manager Cheney passed a letter to the members of the Council from the South Florida Water-Management. Board. Mr. Cheney - recommended that the Ordinance be left on the books but that a motion be made instructing the City to suspend enforcement of the Ordinance. Councilman deLong moved to leave the Water Conservation Ordinance on the books but suspend the enforcement of it'until further n6tice, seconded by Councilman Wright. Motion carried 4-0. NEW BUSINESS Consider Proposal for Beach Concession TAB'LED Councilman Wr±ght moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to remove the proposal from the table. Motion carried 4-0. City Manager Cheney stated that two issues were involved, one being the matter of dollars involved. Mr. Cheney had suggested'it be a lease that would start at $1,500.00 and go up 10% per year, instead of a fixed amount. Mr. Cheney asked the Council what happens if the building is torn down, Should there be a fixed rent or a cancellation clause? What does the City do if they tear down the building and build a new one? Councilman deLong informed ~.~ .Cheney that Jim Snowden originally built it, not the City. When you move people out of their homes, you have to find a place for them to go. Mr. deLong said, "Certainly, he moves into the new building," and he stated he would move in that direction. Mr. Cheney asked if that was to be at a predetermined ren~, and ±nformed the Counc±l that Mr. Lichtenstein .had a fixed rent for five years, and the second five years could be negotiated. Mr. Mitchell Gimelstob came before the Council and advised the Council that his attorney, Sam Costa, Jr.. spoke to City Manager Cheney today (September 15, 1R81). Mr. Gimelstob said he would agree to the 10% and the raise in rent. Mr. Gimelstob expressed that all he wanted was a fixed rent for the five years witch a five year option, which was agreed on to be 10%. Mr. Gimelstob thought a new building would be a service to the people and felt it was only fair tha~ he be moved from the old facility to the new facility. Councilman deLong agreed, - 27 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 City Manager Cheney said a few years from now, he did not think it would be found to be fair since the new facility will be a great improvement over the existing facility, so he thought it should be discussed, as someone could say, "Why do you let them have the new facility with the same lease and make a lot more money?" He pointed out to the Council that for the next ten years, Mr. Gimelstob would have a fixed rent for either building. City Manager Cheney felt it should be fully discussed so there would be no q~estions. Councilman deLong asked why it couldn't be left open until it is clarified as there is no guarantee that the City will vote for a bond issue. City Manager Cheney answered that the City couldn't because Mr. Gimelstob is spending a lot of money to make a commitment and he wants more than just a five year commitment. Therefore, it cannot be left open. Vice Mayor Trauger asked about a buy-out of the lease, which City Manager Cheney said could be negotiated. Councilman deLong disagreed, saying Mr, Gimelstob is investing his money, and the City wants to buy him out after he starts to flourish. Councilman deLong suggested that the lease be drafted the way it now exists, and give him a five and five. Mr. G±metstob agreed to a 10% increase every year for ten years. City Manager told Council- man deLong the present lease does not have a fixed rent for the second five years. Rig~ht now, as of next May, Mr. Lichtenstein has to negotiate the second five years wi~h the City. The new proposal is that there will be no negotiating after five years, and it will be a fixed amount of rent for ten years. City Manager Cheney asked the Council if they wanted to agree to fix the second five years at a rent of 10% escalation. Councilman Wright did not th±nk that would be fair. Louis LichtenStein advised the Council that the business depends solely on the weather. Last winter was the coldest winter in 31 years, and it reflected on his business. He stated Mr.~Gimelstob is vesting money without knowing what will happen from year to year. Last year, there were three months of cold weather. Mr. Gimelstob said the 10% ±ncrease is more than 10%. If.the first year is $1,500.00, the second year would~ be $1,650.00, and the t~ird year it would be $1,~50.00. Mary Lessler, 949 Isles Road, questioned the Council as to whether Louis Lichtenstein was allowed to sell the lease given to him by the Council. Mr'. Lichtenstein advised Msl Lessler that he purchased the lease. Ms. Lessler asked why the lease did not go back~ to the Council and go out for bids. She felt that would be more fair, Councilman deLong answered it would be unfair at this time, as Mr. Lichtenstein invested his money in the procedure, which had been that Jim Snowden actually built the place, he sold it t~ someone, who handed it to - 28 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 someone else, and on down the line. Mr. Lichtenstein has an interest in it and has every right to protect his interest. The City did not build the building originally. Ms. Lessler asked if it would ever come up for bid. Councilman deLong replied.that if the plan goes through, there will be a more attractive building, and then plenty of people will be in the field to bid. -Ms. Lessler felt there would be plenty of people who would bid right now~and stated she was one of them. Ms. Lessler emphatically said she would certainly pay more to the City than is being paid to them right now. She asked Mr. Lichtenstein what he was being paid for the beach concession. Mr. Lichtenstein said he worked five years, seven days a week, and holidays, and was tired and wished to move on. If he does not ~ell, Mr. Lichtenstein informed-Ms. Lessler that he would keep the concession and continue working there for his option, and it would not go out for bids. He further informed Ms. Lessler that his lease stated that if the beach is restored, whoever holds the lease will have first option on the concession. Vice Mayor Trauaer asked City Manager Cheney if he was correct in his understanding that Mr. Lichtenstein had a lease where the first five years was fixed and the second five years was negotiable. City Manager Cheney said that was correct. Councilman deLong thought ~er~h~ng~,was to 'be taken care of before everyone came to-the meet- ing. City Manager Cheney said it was, but they could not agree. City Manager Cheney explained that the Council wanted a lease like the LiChtenstein lease with the first five years fixed and the second five years negotiable, which was not acceptable to Mr. and Mrs. Gimelstob. Councilman deLong thought Mr. Lichtenstein understood the new lease was to be on the same terms as his lease. City Manager Cheney suspected that if the City said five and five, Mr. Lichtenstein and Mr. Gimelstob would renegotiate the purchase price because~ obviously, five and five would not be as valuable as a fixed ten. Mr. Gimelstob retorted that five and five is really a five because five years from now, you could say $1,000.00 a day. Mr. Cheney told him he would have the option to negotiate, and Mr. Gimelstob asked, "At what price? Can you put a cap on the second five years?" Mr. Gimelstob informed the Council that his attorney, Mr. Costa, tried to contact Mr. CheneY all week and could not get in touch with him until today (September 15). Mr'. Cheney said he tried to contact Mr. Costa also but it would not have mattered because they had tried to agree for two weeks and still had not agreed. Councilman Wright could not see where it would be rational for Mr. Gimelstob to fix himself in for ten years. Mr. Gimelstob stated he would agree to the option bu~ there would have to be a cap on the price. He said the Council may not be here in five years. Someone may be asking $5,000.00 a month. Councilman deLong did not believe in a gentleman's agreement. - 29 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 City Manager Cheney suggested that Mr. Lichtenstein and Mr. Gimelstob come back in two weeks. ~Councilman deLong commented that the matter had been hanging on so long. Mr. Lichtenstein informed the Council that when he got the lease, he understood ~hat at the end of the first five years, he would re- negotiate a rental. Mr. Lichtenstein was not Worried about the second five years because he was sure the Council would adjust the last five years and bring ' it up or keep it the same. He was not afraid of the Council raising his rent to $1,000.00 in the second five years. Mr.-.Lichtenstein asked the Council to bear in mind that the success of the business depends~upon the weather. He spent a lot of money in the business to keep it going during months when there was no money. Mr. Gimelstob stated he could not invest his money on what he assumed would happen. Councilman Wright adv-ised everyone has to take chances in life. Mr. Gimelstob remarked that he could not afford to gamble. Gouncilman Wright moved to support City Manager'-s recommendation of five years' fixed rental and the remaining five years to be negotiable. He said he would not agree to ten years of fixed rental. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-1 with Councilman deLong opposed to the motion. councilman deLong moved to continue to clear up the items on the Agenda and placed Councilman Samuel Lamar'Wright's name on the Agenda as Acting Chairman for the remainder of the meeting after Vice Mayor Trauger leaves. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley and carried 4-0. Ratify Union Contract City Manager Cheney informed the Council that they had received a copy of the Union Contract. Mr. Cheney said it was supposed to have been ratified by the Union on Thursday evening (September 10, 1981). Two or three changes were requested by the 'Union at the meeting Which were no problems but for clarification. One ~hange not on the copies presented to the'Council was Article 34, where an additional phrase was added which, in essence says the contract will continue from year to year. City Manager Cheney recommended that the Council ratify the contract with the understanding that when. the contract is signed, that phrase will be in there. The Union, their Attorney, and the City Attorney understand that. Councilman deLong moved to ratify the Union contract with the amend- ment to Article 34, as presented. Councilman deLong wished the memorandum read into the record. C±ty Manager Cheney~read his Memorandum dated September 11, 1981 addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding the Fire Department Union Contract. A copy of - 30- MfNUTES - REGULAR. CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 said memorandum is hereto attached and made a part hereof. Councilman deLong moved to accept City Manager Cheney's recommendation for ratificatfon, as staq.ed in his Memorandum of September 11, 1981 to the Mayor and City Council, and.that Article 34, as pr.esented, be amended to include the wording of the current contract from year to year. The motion was seconded by Councilman Wright and carried 4-0. Vice Mayor Trauger felt both sides could learn something from the negotiations. Many demands were made from both sides. Vice Mayor Trauger. Said a lesson 'should be learned, that from here on out only proposals should be made to make the department more productive or a better department for the City instead of seeing who could hold off the longest. Vice Mayor Trauger turned the gavel over. to Councilman Wright and left the meeting. ADMINISTRATIVE Report on Workmen's comPensation and Approval of New Insurance Company City Manager Cheney referred the Council to a letter addressed to him, dated September 10, Ig81, from William H. Sullivan, Personnel Director regarding Workmen'~s Compensation. Through Ray Allen, the Insurance Agent for the City, the City has been With Aetna Insurance Company for sometime. Mr. Allen has recommended the City switch to Peninsular Fire Insurance Company, with a potential savings of $34,000.00. Therefore) City Manager~Cheney recommended that the City approve the contraCt. Councilman deLong moved to accept the recommendation of the City's Insurance Agent, Ray Allen, and switch the workmen's compensation insurance to Peninsular Fire Insurance Company. Councilmember Woolley seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion carried 3-0. Councilman deLong moved to suspend with the regular order of business, se'conded by Councilmember Woolley. Motion carried 3-0. NEW BUSINESS Consider Proposal for Pre-paid Legal Assistance Program for City Employees TABLED Councilmember Woolley moved to remove the item from the table, seconded by Councilman de'Long. The motion carried 3-0. Acting Chairman Wright asked Assistant Attorney Wolf if City Attorney Vance had finished his report. Mr. Wolf reported that City Attorney Vance had been ill. Acting Chairman Wright said he was in favor of the proposal. Councilman deLong advised Mr. Gavras, Regional Manager, Pre-paid Legal Services Inc., that the question would have - 31- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 to be put back on the table, as the previous action of the Council was to hear a report from City Attorney Vance before acting. Councilmember Woolley explained that City Attorney Vance did not think he would hear anything negative but he had written to Tallahassee and had no' reply ~as of this date.. Councilman deLong moved to lay the matter back on the table, seconded by Council- member Wooltey. Motion carried 3-0. Councilman deLong moved to revert back to the regular order of business, seconded by coUncilmember Wootley. Motion carried 3-0. ADMINISTRATIVE Consider Proposed New Excavation and Fill Requlations TABLED City Manager Cheney adviSed that this matter should be left on the table. Pedestrian Siqnal - South Federal Hiqhway - Fundinq TABLED City Manager Cheney advised the Council to leave this matter on the table. ApPointment to Fill Vacancy on Boynton Beach Housing Authority not Accepted by Last Appointee Councilman deLong moved that the nominations be opened for appoint- ment, seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Councilman deLong placed the name of Lottie Pierce for nomination. Mr. deLong informed the Council that Lottie Pierce had given her entire life to Boynton Beach and has been very active in civic and church affairs in her area. Council~member Woolley Seconded the motion. Coun~cilman deLong moved the nominations be closed, seconded by Councilmember Woolley. The motion carried 3-0. Approval of Change ~Orderi. No.~ ~2 - E~4 Canal, CroSsing - 16!~Water ~Main and~10!%~Force Main - Southeast Underqround Construction, Inc. Perry Cessna, Director of Utilities, explained to the Council that Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $8,179~00 represented the modi- fication of land item quantities and several other items. Most of the changes deal with the amountof quanti~es~. In addition, Mr. Cessna informed the Council there are several lines that provide service to MotorOla and Sunny South Subdivisions. The east connec- tions were not established at the time of the bid. Mr. Cessna continued that item 13 adds height and valves for connec- tions at Dos Lagos. Item 14 involves furnishing a 16 inch steel jack and bored casing. The original contract called for an open cut. - 32 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 The open cut happened to be too close to a bridge. jack and bore were the only solutiOn. Therefore, a Item 15 was installing extra 45° bends in the same crossing at Congress. This permitted crossing under the deep ditch which neared the canal and also under' telephone.cable on the east side. Changes in elevation required~'l~the utilization of '45° bends. The other items include modifications of quantities, explained Mr. Cessna, and. he,.reviewed the items for the Council. Mr. Cessna said Russell & Axon, Consulting Engineers recommended that the change- over be accepted. ~'M'r-. 'Cheney ~ commented that this was not City money but the fund set up by the developers, but the City has the responsibility to administer the contract like any other one. Councilman deLong moved to accept the recommendation of Russell & Axon, as concurred with by Perry Cessna, Utilities Director of the Cit~ in his memo to the City Manager dated September 11, 1981. Said memo is hereby made a part of these minutes and attached hereto. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley and carried 3-0. Approval of Payment to von Hagge and Devlin and Golf Course Project Status Report City Manager Cheney advised that a couple of months ago, it was indicated that there would be a delay of possibly three months in the process of the golf course due to the problem of the drought and the Withdrawal Permit from the SoUth~FlO~ida~ter~2k~agemenf'DiS~r±ct At that time a Withdrawal-Permit was requested, effective next July. City Manager cheney reported 'he had not heard the status of that but he wrote to the-South ~Ior±d~ai~[aqer'-Managemen~'Distzict. In the meantime, City Manager Cheney said the design work had progressed to the point where the City is almost through Phase II. In addition to Phase II, the contract obligated the City to pay $56,000.00. Mr. Cheney said there were a few things left to be done to complete Phase II and it is ta~king longer because there isn't any pressure to push it along. Mr. Cheney felt the City had an obligation to pay yon Hagge and Devlin a ~ignifiCant portion of the $56, O00~00 because they have just about completed all of their requirements in Phase II. It is just about ready to bid, Mr. Cheney recommended that the Council authorize the payment of $45,OOO.00. Councilman deLong thought the selling of bonds was a big roadblock. City Manager Cheney hoped a. couple of months would get the~City to where it would not be a roadblock. Councilmember Woolley asked why they should pay it 'now, before'it has been completed. City ~Manager Cheney said the Council would be paying them out of fairness for the work they have done. - 33- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 .C?_unci/membe~'Wc~tleyreiteratedthat. ~hedidn°t think it would have to be paid until the Work is compl-eted and asked Why the;iCity was paying them now. City Manager Cheney repeated it would be' fair mn the City's dealings with von Hagge and Devlin. Councilman deLong asked'how much the City had coming, and City Manager replied they had $56,000.00 coming when Phase II is complete. ~ctI~;Ch~i'~.~%f_~ght~[thou~ht City Manager Cheney meant it was not von Hagge and Devlin who delayed the project, but the City, so they should not be penalized: ~ouncilman deLong asked how much of Phase II was completed. Mr.~ Cheney advised him 95%. ~cting. Ch~rman-~Wfight f eltit would be fair to give them $45,000.00. Councilman deLong moved to accept the re.commendation of City Manager Cheney and authorize payment of $45,000.00 to yon Hagge and Devlin. Councilmember Woolley di'sagreed with the motion. There was · discussion as to whether they should wait for a full Council and rescind the motion. Councilman deLOng said. the majority of three would be two, which wou!dlconstitute a majority of a quorum. Councilman Wright seconded the motion; The motion carried 3-1, with Councilmember Woolley opposed. Request for Temporary T~ailer - B & M Construction Company, Mobil S~rvice Station, corner of Woolbriqht and.Conqress Avenue Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to approve the request. Motion carried 3-0. Request for TemporarQ Special Event Siqn - Golf View Harbour Bazaar City Manager Cheney recommended that the request be approved. Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to approve the request. Motion carried 3-0. Write off of Accounts Receivable - Utilities and General Funds Councilman deLong wished to leave this item on the table, as he was disappointed that companies like Burnup & Sims and Rinker could not pay. City Manager Cheney asked Mr. deLong not to come to the conclusion that all of those were legitimate bills, as they were put on the books sometime ago. Councilmember Woolley asked what happened to the bill collector. City Manager Cheney replied that the bills were much older than the bill collector. Councilman deLong noted there were several companies still in business and felt the bills could be collected. City Manager Cheney explained that just taking the bills off of the books did not mean that they would not be available for collection and doubted if someone had a bili since 1968, they would be particularly ready to pay it. Mr. Cheney said the people had been billed over and over again. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Councilman deLong asked hoW anything like this could.ever exist, and he read .from City Manager Cheney's memo, "It is recommended that a total of $45,573.45 in the Utility Fund, $9,385.73 in the General Fund, and $15.00 in the Cemetery Fund be declared uncollectible and be written off of the City's books.'! Councilman deLong asked how it could be permitted to happen. City Manager Cheney said the bills may not be legitimate but they had been sent out and were on the 'books. City Manage'r Cheney asked the Council to remember that they are not saying the bills are uncollectible but want to take,them .off .the books as accounts receivable. The auditors had asked him to do this, as they are inflating the City's assets. They are not realistic assets. There was a lot of discussion about the bills and the companies. Councilman deLong moved to write off the accounts receivable prior to the close of the fiscal year, September 30, 1981, and instruct the City Manager to give~the Council an updated status report of the accounts. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Motion carried 3-0. List of Payments - Month of Auqust, 1981 Councilman deLong moved to accept the list of payments for the month of August, 1981 and that they be placed on file_ Councilmember Woolley seconded the moti6n. No discussion. Motion carried 3-0. Approval of Bills City Manager Cheney read %he following bills for approval: Allen Insurance Aqency Total Workmen.'s Comp. bill - $156,580 ~5~ due this payment, balance due in eight monthly installments Pay from General Fuad 001-000-155-03-00 Allied Chlorine & Chemical' Products Chlorine for Water Treatment Pay from Water & Sewer Revenue 401-332-533-30,63 $ 39,145.00 2,014,26 Boyle Construction Co. Proj. 626-681-45-6 Pu~p Stations 316 & 319 for period 7/20/81 to 8/20/81~ Pay from Utility General Fund 403-000-169-11-00 75% Reimbursable from EPA Grant C-120496020 133,768.26 4. Con~reial Union Insurance Companies Annual Insurance premium for 3 Ambulances Pay from General Fund 001-000-155-03-00 3, 818.00 - 35 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 Davis Waste Industries Inc. For Odophos Liquid No. 1 delivered to pumping stations. Pay from Water & Sewer Revenue 401-352-535-30-65 $15,680.00 Division of Forestry Urban Forestry~Assessmenti~_rtial payment for period, of~arch~l - SePtember 1, 1981 1,500..00 ~C Truck Saies &Service 1981 One Ton Pickup Truck Pay from Federal.Revenue Sharing 320-411-541-60-83 Per bid 7/14/81, Council approved 8/18/81 9,975.00 South Central Reqional Wastewater Treatment Board Services in T~eatment and Disposal of Wastewater fOr nOnthof August, 1981 Pay from Water & Sewer Revenue 401-353-535-40-91 27,549.00 South Eastern Pre-Stress Concrete, Inc. 3Hauling Poles for Wilson Park Project Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing 320-000-247-06-00 1,121.00 10. IsiahAndrews Driver for'Senior Citizens Club - 2 wks. Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing 320-641-564-40-5A Ordinance #73-15 passed 5/15/73 99.00 11. Willie Ruth McGradyr Server for Senior Citizens Club - 2 wks. Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing 320-641-564-40-5A Ordinance #73-15, passed 5/15/73 86.40 12. Sunshine Paintinq Painting inside South Water Tower and Blast prime & paint twe line silos Pay from Water & Sewer Revenue 401-332-533-40-3L Per bid 5/26/81, Council approved 6/2/81 19,600.00 Earl Wallace Ford, Inc. 1 - 6 cylinder pick up truck Pay from Federal Revenue Sharing Council approved 7/2.1/81 320-411-541-60-83 6,386.39 City Manager Cheney said there was one addition for South Central R~gional Board in the amount of $25;000,. Councilman deLong referred to the bills having been found in order and moved that they be paid, seconded by Councilmember WoolleY. Motion carried 3-0. - 36 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 F.P.L. Conservation ConVersion Aqreement City Manager Cheney explained that this was simply a street lighting' agreement, which relates to the new sodium vapor lighting. It amends the old 1950 street lighting agreement with Florida Power and Light Company. Mr. Cheney informed the Council that they would be authorizing the adoption of the mew rates for sodium vapor lighting to conve~t from the old mercury vapor to sodium vapor. City Manager Cheney recommended the Council approve the agreement. Councilmember Woolley moved to approve the-execution of the agree- ment, seconded by CoUncilman deLong. The motion~ carried 3-0. Firefiqhter Bob Brown - Requested by'Councilmember Woolle¥ Councilmember Woolley withdrew this item, as she decided to give City Manager Cheney a copy of the letter and have him respond to her. Councilmember deLong felt it was only fair that City Manager Cheney be given an opportunity to analyze 'the request and apprise the Council. City Manager Cheney suggested the Council go back and add the Ordinance on first reading on the twenty year retirement for the Fire Department. Mr~ Cheney advised that he had the Ordinance. Councilman deLong moved to 'suspend the regular order of business and revert back to "B~ ORDINANCES'~ 1st Reading", seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Motion carried 3-0. City Manager-Cheney confirmed that the legal advertising had been taken care of. LEGAL Proposed Ordinance No. 81-33 Re: Department 20 Year Retirement - Fire Assistant Attorney Wolf read proposed Ordinance No. 81-33 on first reading, by title only: 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 18 'PENSION AND RETIRE- MENT', ARTICLE IV, 'PENSIONS FOR FIREMEN', BY ENACTING SECTION 18-185 'NORMAL RETIREMENT DATE' OF THE BOYNTON BEACH CITY CODE, 1981 CODIFICATION WHICH SHALL PROVIDE NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 175 THAT ALL MEMBERS OF THE PENSION PLAN ON ACTIVE DUTY AS THE ADOPTION OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE ELIGIBLE TO RETIRE AFTER TWENTY (20) YEARS OF SERVICE NOTWITHSTANDING THEIR AGE; BY ENACTING SECTION 18-186 'PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS' OF THE BOYNTON BEACH CITY'CODE, 1981 CODIFICATION TO PROVIDE FOR A DEDUCTION OF 7 PERCENT FROM EACH INSTALLMENT OF SALARY AS A CONTRIBUTION TOWARD THE PENSION FUND~ PRO- VIDING FOR A REPEALING CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR - 37 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 AUTHORITY TO CODIFY: AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES." Councilman deLong moved the adoption of proposed Ordinance 81-33 on first reading only, seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Mrs. Padgett took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Councilman deLong - Aye Councitmember Woolley - Aye Acting Chairman Wright - Aye Motion carried 3-0. OLD BUSINESS Report on Speeding on Woolbright Road - Requested by Vice Mayor Walter M. Trauqer City Manager Cheney advised the Council that the report on speeding was the only item the Council had not talked about. He advised the Council had a report from the Police Department and comments from citizens. Mr. Cheney said %he speeding did not appear to be bad, but he understood there was an accident there Sunday (September 13, 1981). City Manager Cheney reminded the Coun3cil that Vice Mayor Trauger had suggested sometime ag~that~a sidewalk be added there. Construction of a sidewalk on the north side of Woolbright will begin tomorrow (September 16, 1981), Mr. Cheney advised. Councilman deLong said the report from the P61ice Department was a very thorough report~ and he felt Captain Hillery and Patrolman Marlon Harris should be complimented. Councilman deLong moved to accept the report from the. Police Depart- ment regarding speeding on 'Woolbright Road, seconded by Councilmember Woolley. Motion carried 3-0. ADJOURNMENT Councilman deLong moved, seconded by Councilmember Woolley, to adjourn. The motion carried 3-0, and the meeting adjourned at 11:25 P. M. - 38 - CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 ~./ ~ ~ ' Councilme~r-- ATTEST: Councilman ~~~CCity Clerk - 39- TO: The City Council of Boynton Beach Appendage to 9/15/81 City Council Minutes (see page 14) FROM: Mary-Douglas Vlamynck DATE: September 15, 1981 REF: Rezoning I wish to thank Messers Winter, Hester and Ryder of the zoning board for their courage and integrity in upholding the law. They displayed 'their abilities in logic and clear, thinking in reaching the conclusion they did. They voted against the proposal last week. They adhered to the Boynton 'Beach Planning Department,s recommendation that it would be detrimental to Hathaway Park to allow even a toe hold of Industrial Spot Zoning in this area. They, those three men, were capable of seeing that some people do choose to live by a railroad track -- that three new duplexes have been built andare being occupied and maintained at an acceptable level to the community within the past three years. It is true that I, and possibly some of my neighbors who are single wage earners or retirees supporting a house, cannot afford to buy in a more influential residential area, but is that any reason that we should be subjected to further noise or traffic than we already have. Should our present way of life be downgraded for the profit of a few---the majority of'whom do not live in this area, but only receive their resources here to'maintain homes elsewhere. Each person from the floor who spOke last week in favor of downgrading our area has a financial monied interest in seeing that you allow this to happen. It is a well-known ~conomical fact that a business must expand in order to maintain itself and show a profit. Mr. Thompson and his cohorts say they only wish to expand on these three lots; but where will they go or wish to grow in another ten years? I contend that if you allow them this exemption and rule in their favor,'they wilt come back to you again and yet again to extend their industrial enterprises. That is the logist~.CS of good .business. If once this is allowed, any or all industrial zone businesses will Be allowed in our neighborhood.. We have no guarantee that Mr; Thompson or any other property owner will only manufacture -ceramics, Crayolas, and cabinets. We have no assurance that Mr. Thompson will not sell his property. Would you like to 'live in an area of carpenter shops with buzz~-.~_-~-,~-*~!~ue~ ~ ~ a perpetual on-going visit .to the dentist? Would you enj~-~-~q-~ a ceramics .manufacture~ dribbling slip down your street as~it~d~per]od]cally down;3rd? Look at the corner of lOth ~nd 3~d .... ~~-~ slip wash back to Mr. Thompson's plant as I did. When I bought my property in November of 1978, I bought from Mr. HensOn who owns the house directly across 3rd Street from me, as well as adjacent to the proposed lots in question. At that time the plan for the City and the zoning for this area was, and today is., R2 with C-3 zoning along a 1400 foot I lot wide strip. I do not wish my neighborhood downgraded to an industrial district with the potential of autobody shops, storage yards, and dog kennels. I protest this proposed infraction on my aesthetic sensibilities, my investment of time, effort, and hard earned money in my home. The City Council of Boynton Beach Pa§e 2 September 15, 1981 Mr. Thompson says he only wishes to expand his business ventures. That is laudable of him, but not at the expense of opening up this area to industrial use'. We have enough noise.now. You have heard, perhaps, a few of the complaints, even though as a Whole,~'residents of Hathaway Park are not complainers and whiners. We have.not loudly protested to anything. ' We did protest last year when spot zoning of the so c~lled railroad street land was proposed. You defeated it then. I call upon.you to show your courage and integrity once more -- now that a more subtle method has been introduced to further the purposes of Mr. Thompson in his efforts to gain his own ends. Do not allow our area to be opened up little by little to the uses of industrial.. zoning. Do not allow a creeping canker, to grow and spread. We have been subjected to two yearsof protesting this encroachment. Must we submit or can ~e not, together, hold firm. Let us all work for upgrading our City by adhering to our plan for the orderly growth and maintenance of our Community. M E M O R A ~ D U,M Appendage tm 9/15/81 City. Council Minutes- (see page 30 ~ 31)' 'Septe.mber 11, 1981 TO: RE: Mayor and City Council Fire Department Uhion Contract The d~aft Union Contract was reviewed by the members of the Fire Department at a meeting on Thursday evening, September 10~ 1981, and was ratified by the union membership at that meeting wi~h the under~ standing that three articles would be corrected or ch.anged. Consideration of ratification of the contract 'by the Mayor and City Council will be added to the Agenda for the Agenda Approval at the Council Meeting on September 15, !981~ In addition to approving the contract, if that is the City Council's choice, City Council should als° take action to amend existing rules concerning Workmen~s Compen- sation for members of the Fire Department Bargaining Unit as has been agreed to during our negotiations. I would also recommend that the current Workmen's Compensation Program be made retroactive to cover the injury incident for Steve Campbeil~ Attached is the basic Union Contract as reviewed by the union membership. One change in each of Articles 13, 34, and 38 has been brought to my attention by the union membership and these sheets will be changed prior to ratification by the City Cou~ncit~ The only major change recommended in this contract, not previously approved by the City Council~ relates to the basis upon which the three time non-recurrent payments are based. The Council approved basing these payments on the pay of the employee on September 30, i980, but this contract recommends that the percentage be based on the gross pay for the period October 1~ 1980 through September 30, t981, which is obviously an advantage for ~he members of the bargaining ~, ~= the most part~ language changes in the contract, ;~hich ~ and the City Council have felt were important~ have been agreed to in the proposal and, therefore, I recommend that the City Council ratify the proposed contract at its meeting on Tuesday,.September 15, 1981. PLC:jc Attachment Peter L. Cheney City Manager . "~' ' ~ FROM ~ Appendage TO City Co~cil Mihutes Mt. Peter L. Cheney (see. page 33) City Manager Per~ A. Cessna, Director of UtiliZes BJECT- change Order ~2, M~r Rd. Ext.10" Force Ma~ 9/11/81 ~u~ ~ -DATF- Transmitt~ herewith is the above:~which should be presented to ~~ ~ ~__the City_ - ~C°~ciI for' their approval. · condur wi~ R & :apt PLEASE REPLY TO ~ SIGNED Per~ A, Cessna SIGNED .... : ........ THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED CUP. ~!TY DF or]¥'Nl.r)~ bEAEH R E N T M O~,r-~ T H C H E bo494 055313 ;6875 350C02 · 36982 353783 ...... 37335 23300~ 37036 020405 37037 321543 37338 37039 030561 37040 333633 37041_ ._ 08043Z /~,;37042 222794 379~3 37345 19~509 37346 134519 373~8 1~6303 37049 190945 37053 3~05! i~Z59~ 052 450024 37353 232516 3735~ 29'2553 37055 23045~ 37955 ~900i8 37057 231580 37058 256900 37059 32t2i~ 37060 10645O 370gl i94693 3-O6R 1~63~! 37063 081650 3796~ 124593 37055 ~'m3706S 236303 37957 22279a ~7068 235495 37071 320005 37072 320036 37125 lqOg5q 37137 '138 3713~ 290041 37143 355313 37i4i 37142 216~27 37143 3~30i~ 37144 510003 37144 5100~3 EOJITABLE LIFE ASSUkAt.ICE SEIEN c -USrUM E PLANETAP EDJITABLE Li~E ASSJRAN~E FREDERICK -IRELANO FLORIDA POWER g LIGHT WILLIE 5AGLEY [3NST&NCE BAISH ~R~NK a. BEDNARtCK O~E PJTLER C, R, CL~.RK ODHN HARRtNGTON JOHN VICKI ~JRi EL H]LZMAN FRANK GEORGE A, JOHNSON JOHN JOHNSION GREICqEN.LUBY. ELEANOR PUFFER JOHN SCHNEIDER MARY E. SCHORR ADA SqOOK F~NK SMITH LEE THOMAS JA~4ES C. THONPSON OLIVE WAbLAEE ~ ~RTHUR WATERS W.T. aELCH ~4[LDRED Ao ZWA~T BRADFORD B~XL~Y GEnRGE,~ JUN~i- ER THEODORE SORG ~RS. FLORENCE SOL~IVAN HAROLD HE~R:I NG NDR~AN LDLATTE KEN SNO)~ JD~N ,M. rUITE J3~N CJRT[S E~ WRIGHT O3PA' FOR~NEK DORA FOR'4ANEK DLYVE E~ SCHOOLe~ PLYVE E. SCHOPLEY FR&TE~NAL -ORDER OF POLICE ~NTDINETT CULLEN E~JITARLE LI~E ASSUR~N26 CH~Rt_ES UNIVERS'ITY OF FLORIOA EARRDLEI ZER HERRING ~lCHAEL S YURA ~ICHAEL S ~EOK 'DATE 7/05/82 6/26181 7/35/31 7/Zq/Bi 7/2~/R1 8/0l/~1 8/3!/31 ~/C1/81 8/0t/q! 8131/ai 8/3t/8i 8/CI/8! 8/0!/8! 8/01/81 8/01/81 8/01/.8i 8/01/~i 8/0t/81 8/0!/81 8/0!/8I 8/01/81 8101/8i 8/01781 · - 8/01/81 8/01/81 8/01/81 8/01/81 8/0!/8i 8/5!/8i 6/3!f8z StO~/8~' 8/01/81 8/0t/8~ 8/0!/8i 8101/81 8/01t81 7/31/B! 7/31/Bt 7131181 8/0~/8i 816c/81 8/u~/B1 8/j~181 8/$~/~I 8/05/81 U/37/ql J/OSISZ 53.79 !dEoS9 36D',8~ 471o98 16a.46 88,75 88.5~ ~481.54 41~,72 91,28 t33,20 202.21 81,46 795.0i 7!.19 454~7i 82.55 77o13 194.16 33.34 42.~6 225.41 9!o5~ 9~!.!~ !,395.3~ 23~.96ER 1iP~4~ i5.0~ 1,537.&3 5.57~oa5 3o3.aZ 229,00 275.45 S29.35 ~.IIY OF ;3OYNTON g, EAC.,-t 2 g ~ R E N T. H D '~ T H C H F C { S .~371a5 145 '~'J]7147 ZROOI3 37143 440015 37149 ~0015 '~37150 340045 37151 03290I 37152 440005 37153 37154 312837 37155 3i37~3 37156-_ 3!37SD /~7157 D!4~3~ 37158 01~lSD '~7159 ....... 3!4£~D 37153 315561 37151 015907 37152 .... D!5300 37163 020ib9 37154 0204~7 .... 37165 ........ 020477 37166 021200 f _ t57 02t53~ 37158' ___ _D2q590 37159 024652 87173 32~71~ 3717_1 .......... 92~720 37172 32~769 37173 3~5583 37!7q 025b0~ 37175 Dl&STU 37176 326396 . 37177 033~99 7 _ 3 178 03079g 37179 030336 37180 33~403 ~37181 382893 3%182 034598 37183 935563 37t~4 ~41a!8 37185 04t61~ 3715~ D~1633 v~187 041684 ~.188 D44750 37189 345453 371q0 051259 37101 053900 ~ ~37192 95~37D 371~3 062687 371P5 35371.5 CYRIL S DEAL LAJRA MUDRYK JE~ALD BAUTZ SdAADN RANDOLPH ~O~GE w~TSON CLYDE HARRIS CITy DF ~3YNTON BEACH MICHAEL RHdD~ AA ELECFRtC AL~X~ND~ BATTERY SAL~5 ALLEN INSORANCE AGENCY ALLIED CHLDR!N~ AMERICAN LIBRARY A$SDCo AMERISAN W~TER NORKS ASSO ISIAH ANDREWS ARTIC AIR CONDITIONING ASSOCoOF; A~ERtCAN RAILROA AJTOPRODJSTS~' !NCo B.Bo ASSOC. FIREFIGHTERS BANYON 833KS BARNES INDUSTRIES~ INC. BDo OF CO. COHMISSIONERS BEANE EXTERMINAIING THOqAS BOJREGY" g CO, R.R. BOWKER BD~NTDN &'dTO SUPPLY BDYNTDN BEACH CHAMBER BDYNTDN GLASS SERVILE, BRODARI ~RD~aRD QUMP 07° JA'-IES ~. 3UFFA~I ~JREAJ OF FIRE STANDARDS JJDY 2ALA.~RA CAIN ~YSD g SJPPLY ~RoTt~OTHY CANNON CHASE MANHATTAN BAN& CITY DF BOCA RATON, HELVtN COLGIN Cq]RN LIFE INSURANSE CO. DE BRA TJRF ~ INDUSTRIAL DELRAY ELECTRIC SOPPLY PETER DELJ£IA JSHN DENSON DSJ~LEDA¥ & CO. JSqN ~. DJNKLE EDISON RESORg CLEARANCE EHERGENCY HEDI[AL ~ SACET ENGINEERING qACrtINE CO. FtDELER ~ISHEq S$IENTIFI[ FLORIDA DIESEL TRU[< CHE~ DATE TOTAL A~OUNT 8/05/81 592.70 8/05/81 443.42 ~/05/81 373.4B 8/05/81 309.98 8/05/81 237.26 8/05/St . 127.76 5/07/8i 53,07 8/07/81 522.35 ~/07/~81 .... ~/~7/8! 8/07/Bi ~!9o00 8/07/81 8/07/81 11o00 8/07/81 ~3.OO 8/37/81 ................... 55.00 8/07/81 1,970.00 8/07/81 25.00 8/07/81 ........... 473.88 8/07/81 512.74 6/07/81 .i5.39 8/07/81 .................. 83~5~ .... 8/07/81 8/07/81 172,00 8/07/8i .......... 2!~36 8/07/81 28o50 ~/07/8! 1,185o55 8/07/81 ..... 8/07/81 ~i7~61 8/07/81 185.46 8/'07/8i ...... -_. · ~/~7/8t IE~-Ob 6/07/81 lgD.90 8/07/81 ........ 15~gO 8/07/8i 77.25 8/07/8i 163.35 8/07/81 177,77 8/07/81 49~093.00 8/07/81 35.00 8/07/81 8/07/81 1,949.27 8/07/81 15~.58 8/u /8z .260.0C 8/07/8! 32.,O0 8/GT/Bi 15!.~5' 6/07/81 _. . 13o~0 8/07/81 5O!oq5 8/07/81 204.~5 8/07/81 !77.89 8137/81 19.55 8/or/Bi !59o~5 B/07/8i 1,437.70 ~IECK ,. VE'~DDq ;; R E N T M 3'N ? H Crt E C VENgOm NAUE .~7195 355722 FLORIDa [H~PTER,~PA °7 053752 FLORIDA LEVEL C TRANSIT ~7198 35378~ FL~ID& PDW~ ~ LIGHT ~" 7im9 353Rb3 FL3~IDA J~EMPLO'f~ENT 37200 054600 FOUR STEEL CORPORATION ~7231 354703 FOX VALLEY MArKINgS SYST~U ~7202 365523 CHARLES H. FROST $7233 370~02 BETTY GARAIGA N72]G 373~1m ~qCYLBqO ~-!205 07q50,2 CqA~[_ES GDOFRmY )72~5-. 3~5~g~. ~ ~ GJLF 3IL 'DRmo 37207 0e3~25 HAND'S ~A7208 081700 qEWL~TT PACKARD 7239 33~61n_ JOHN F. HDELIH '7210 $gsIoR I.~.~o C~RPORATiON ~7211 39~283 TNTERCOUNTY CONSTRUCTI~ 372!2 39~3~5 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF 3~213 100~ JAC S CAMERA-CENTER 3721~ I~~4gu.~ .... JONES EQd]P~ENT CD. 37215 l!J~_ JEaN KARR ~. CO. 37216 Ilt6~9 RD~ERT KENYON 3~17 115631 EL~AND~ KRU$~LL ~.. _18 120309 LAROR-~IANAGEMENT REL~TIO'~ 372t~ !23453 LA'~IER BJSINESB PRODUCTS 3~2E3 133323 ~AC~iLLAN PJBLISHING CD, 37221 130GOO ~AN~ATTAN~ TROPHIES %7221 130433 ~ANdATTAN TROPHIES 3~222 1335'65 MAJRY'S IDOL CHEST 37223 130950 WILLIE RUTH $7223 132771 ~4iLLE~ OODGE 37225 13~3i~ HJ~ERN V~NETIAN DLIND CDR 37227 1~1731 NEPTdNE N!ETE~ CO.. 37228 1~45u~ NSLCO CHEMICAL CO. 3722~ i6~35~ JDH~ PAGLIARULD~LOG.C~SiT 37232 i50~2 PALM BEAEH jR. COLLEGE /~7231 16G~O~ PALN BCH. COUNTY P.~.Ao /7232 151739 PETTY CASH LtJRARY 57233 i6275~,= PI[ARD CqE~I£AL CO. 3723~ 165532 PRSDJSTS FOR iNOUSTRY I~C =~=37235 155231 PJBLIX MARKET 37230 180500 EVA RAYNONO ?~-2~7 13157q ReaL 5STATE DATA ~,233 19175m ~EV£X~JE C3NSULTANTS,INC. 37239 1B2RO? RINK~q NATERIALS CORP. 37243 I36533 AJSSELL g AXOW 72~1 190181 SS~,~T3 BOARD ~242 193~53 SAmET¥ KLEEN SOAP, ~37243 lP35i5 SATFELLIrE P~gDdETS~ = ,372~ 1~095P qLYVF ~, SCHODLEY 3724~ 1~3a$6 S~TENS~ PES~AR[.H ASSDC,~ K S CrtEC< ~/37181 8/37/81 6/37/8i ~/37/81 8/07f8! 6137191 ~/jv/Bi 8/0~/81 5/]7/Si ~/~/51 8/07/81 8/0~/81 8/37/81 8/3~/81 ~/07/81 8/37/81 8/&7/81 8/'J~/8i 8/37/81 s/cv?~ 8/~?/81 8/G7/B1 8/3~/8i 8/07/81 ~.o7/81 ~/37/81 6/37/8i 8/L7/81 8/u /8~ 8/~ /8~ 8/07/81 8/07/81 8/3~/81 6/37/8! 8107/8i 8/37/81 8/57/8i 8/3~/81 8137/81 5/57/Bi 8/$7/81 8137181 6/$7/ei ~/57/Bi D,' TOT&L AqOUNT ~5.00 4,75 78,98~,97 1,~47.71 93.2t B.72 13.75 33.~4 ~5.00 5,423.44 17~50o50 15.53 79,31 36t395.OO 30,00 34.24 28°30 7.30 387.00 1S.O0 23,00 23~o22 72,00 253o00CR 253,0C 158.55 ZOO.g0 ta,37~.69 619o75 1,303o00 23°00 ~8.79 45°0O 1~355.?C 1,!65o0C 29,~8C.23 75!.00 133.95 15.00 u ECK,~ VENDD2 # 37245 %7245 7247 lqiSiO 37248 372~P iPtTD5 37255 37251 37252 174673 37253 im4597 3'7254 3?255 1~601~ 3725~ iq5031 37258 2056C9 37259 236~25 3725D 215353 37261 216~t0 37252 37263 3725~ 233&53 37255 2315~7 37266 232480 ~-7267 23255~ ~'725B 23465~ 37269 2416Cq 3727D B2~OD1 3v271 370019 37272 D629t0 37273 D2q725 3v27q D24732 37275 iBb42D . 37275 D52~CD 37277 37278 37279 O137&O 37283 015~90 _~ 3728t 520172 '37282 02153? 37283 DCq7dO 3728q 334553 37285 &403C~ 37287 O%iRD~ ~7288 ~289 342505 37200 0503CZ ~72~I ~3~jq /".~i 37293 060500 3~7295 D?~535 2! IV OF BOYNYP, N bEACH SZOTTY'S SSqTTf'S SEaCREST PETROLEUM COo SEACREST VETERINARY SILVFR BURDETT SDCIA'L SECURIFY 2DNT~IBUT SOOTH TECHNICAL CENTER $IANL~Y'S AUTO ~ODY STAT~ LIBR&RY-OB FLORIDA THORNDIK~ PR~§S T~OPISAS, INC. VERNITA TERNQUIST ONOERGROJND SJPPLY UNITED WAY OP PALM UNIVERSAL BEACH SERVICE EARL WALLACE MOTORS, INC, WALLACF MCHAPG~ R~BERTS WEBSTER'S SPORT CENTERS ~ERB ~ILLARD TRUCKING TOM WiLLIAmS Ti~ WOOD 2ORP~ XEPO× [ORPOR*TIDN R~BERT FRANZ DOROTHY KOCH FIRST BANi & TRUST ~DYNTON CITY FEDERAL BDYNTON q~ACH RETiRE,.~2NT ~J~JZCIP~L POLICE F[RENEN'S RELZEF C SDCIAL SE~RZTY CONTRIBdT ~DVANZED FAbrICATOrS ALLIED CHL~R~N~ E ~TLANTIC SOAST FIRE ~o~. AUT~ PARTS~ tNC. .BEANE ~XT~RMIN^TING ~]WNT~N, PO~p E SUPPLY IDEA' COLA BOTTLING CO. D.U.T. WEIGHT FUND D~VIS METER E SUPPLY DELRAY KaY,SAKI JOqN DEb~SON DiaZ!T CD., 'INC. EAST COAST FIRE EQDiP. ~'tEqGEMCY MEDICAL 5 SA~ET GE3. F~NLE~ WELDING FJTG~ PRIN~!NG GENERAL TIR~ & RU33&R GOLD COAST CH~ICAL CORP, E C ,q S CdEC< DATE TOTAL A~'OIJ',!T 8/v7/81 66o50CR 8/~7tBi 65.50 ~/07/81 1,3i4.27 8/S7/81 1~!o~0 b/~7/81 21,15~.85 ~/DR/~l 10.07 ~/07/81 87,553.52 -8/OR/Bi 55.D0 6/07/81 255.00 8/07/81 33.0C 8/87/81 124.00 8/$7/81 275.00 8/J7/~1 !,027oll 8/07/81 556.95 8/G7/8i 3!t. OO 8/~7/81 219.90 8/37/81 15,glO.OB 8/07/81 35.00 8/C7/8i 321.90 8/07/81 ._- ~/07/8i 3G$oOO 8/07/81 ~12.94 8/~7/81 121.5. 8/07/81 5.00 8/07/81 23,855.12 8/07/8i C/u7/81 8/~/_,1 !~.~17,77 8/07/8i 8/37/81 66.50 8/1!/81 !59.00 ~/11/81 199.32 8/11/~1 53.50 8/1!/81 38~57 d/il/B1 5O.O0 ~/ll/qi ~/il/Bt 39.90 8/11/~i t62.DO 8/11/9-1 8/11/Bi 105o95 8/il/91 32~00 8/ll/ql 2Go72 8/11/~i 22.25 8/i!/31 235.~5 8/11/~i 7Po27 8/il/Bi '- 2~5,~5 8/1t/5i 81J!/~t- -ITY DF 39YNTON [)EACH PAGE 5 :MECK# VENDDt fi VENDOR NAME £MEC< 372P5 374543 GDLDCDAST PLUMBING ~297 J80~25 HARLEY DAVIDSON O~ PAEq _ 2P8 336441 HAROLD'S SALES & SERVIC~ 372~9 3845j~ WENDY HOLLIEN 37303 084620 HOLLY ACCUMULATOR £ 37501 S95353 HJSKLEBOC< MUSIC 37302 115601 EL~AN3R KRUCYLL 37333 i23~53 LANiEq BJSINESS DRDDU£TS 37334 133203 ~or.~. EQJIPHENT CORP. 37305 130~OO q~l~A TT~ TRGPHIES. 37335 L335~5 ~&itqw' S TDqL 37337 132771 MILLEq DODGE 37308 1404~2 NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATIO 37339 151853 3FFISE EDJIPo SERVICE 373!0 150365 PAINT CENTER 37311 i5~4!D PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS 37312 153423 PALM BEAgff O~FICE SUPPLY 37313 151511 PEACOCK'S RAD%ATOR SERVIC 3731~ 151723 PETTY CASH ~ATER & SEWER 37315 152753 PICARD CME~iCAL CD, 37316 152790 PIERCE TIRE [iD,, INC. 37317 181689 RESCUE AID ~'~318 18g~OO RIMKEq MATERIALS CORP, b~3!9 '18~749 DIAN~, ROJRK 37323 lPlS15 SEACREST PHARMACY 37321 191700 SEWELL HARDWARE CO,, I~C. 37322 192799 £A~DLfN SIMS -37323 i9~694 SOJTH FLORIDA MACK TROC<S. 37324 194720 SOUT~ERN PAPER CO, 37325 lq60t2 STSTE .OF FLORIDa 3YPT. Dm 37325 196015 STATE OF 37327 1g5~27 SJPERtOR SURGICAL ~FGoC3, 37328 231553 TENNIS SJPPLY 37329 £D1705 TESTING LAB! OF TH~ 37333 23566~ T~3PISAS0 INC. 37331 215393 JwlJAX 37332 2304~B EARL ~ALLACE MOTORS, INc. 37333 24i~39 XEROX CORPORATION 3733~ 420023 aNTHONY PR!NCIPE 37335 7~01~8 CITY OF ~OYNTON BEACH 37335 375537 JJDY 5!JENST 373~7 023ROD ~LUE CROSS O~ =LORIDA 37333 450~i3 ~ILL!E Go TOR~AN ~339 ~2~22~ GEORG~ PHILLIPS 37340 3~0017 SAM HARRIS 37341 460021 JOHN TES<A 37342 ~50QOR RD3tPT J. SH~N 37343 270007 ANTHONY ALBuRY 3734& 2gOClg SiLqS CLARK DATE B/1!/81 8/it/~1 81i!/81 8/1!/B1 8111/8i' 6/111Bi 8/t!/8~ 8/1!/81 8/1!/81 8/i!/81 8/il/~i 8/11/8i 8/11/8t 8/it/8~ 8/11/8i 8/t!/8~ Slillat 8/11/81 8/11/81 B/il/BI 8/1I/8~ 8/11/81 ~/t!/~Z ~/il/~1 &/ll/BZ 8/11/81 8/~1/8~ 8/11/81 8/t!/~i ~/!!/~i 8/ll/~i 8/11/Si 811tI~1 8/tl/81 8/il/81 8/1!/B1 8/il/Bi 5/il/81 8/il/~1 ai12/81 8/ii/Bi 8/14/81 8/i~/B1 8/t&/81 8/14/81 8/1~/81 B/14/~ TOTAL A:~OLtNT 62.94 25,20 745.55 32.06 33~.50 lOD.OO 15,16 15,30 34oBq 71.47 15.00 382.50 326.97 56,00 6.50 ..2o8,05 42,41 53.75 3~523o89 320.50 905.23 2D.DG 65.00 9Q,16 99.00 '355.52 365.47 211.97 liB~5Z 205.P0 359.q0 32,00 25.0C 295.20 234.99 1~t$2.15 33,00 37o13 29,5blo!6 391.26 145.30 54B.9t 172.94 374.50 474.P9 · - 402.52 232.96 67q,92 CITY QF 50YNTON oFACH PAGE 373a7 ~373~ 3 35~ 3735~ 373~2 373~3 37~5~ 37355 373~7 37358 37359 ,~-~xB7360 ,(37351 ~37362 37353 37365 373~6 37357 37368 ~369 ~370 _ 37371 37372 .37373 37374 37375 3737~ 37377 37378 37379 3738D 37381 37382 37383 3738~ 37385 3738~ 37337 3~338 37389 '7393 ~7391 37392 37393 373~4 37395 37397 E C K ~ £HECq 33~0£? ~RTflUq GlAss 390D~! CLYDE ',IILDR 420005 RDgERT POCSIK 3!372D ALLEN !NS~RANCE D1~333. aMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC. 014150 ~MERICAN ~TER NOR}tS A559 Dt424D IS!A~ AND~E~S 315990 ATLANTIC COAST TIKE 016~? ATLA~T!C 316q20 AT' ~T- 0~044~ TIlE BAKER g TAYLOR CO. 02~45i THE BOND BUYER' 324710 BOYNT~N AJTD SUPPLY 02q725 6DYNTON'CITY FEDERAL CREO S2~730 BDYNTDN BEACH RETIR'EMENT 024773 BDYNTDN MEDICAL OXYGEN 025603 BRDNARD ~UMP & SUPPLY CD, 0254~0 BJSINESS. REEK~ 030298 J2OY CALANDRA~ 332905 £ITY DF DELR&Y BEACH 33 ~ ~¢5J E3CA COLA BOTTLING CO. 0¢1603 DELRAY CHEMICAL CO. 05031D EASY PAY TIRE STORE 253601 YLE£TqIC 35~373 ENGINEERING MACHINE D$2820 FIREMEN'S' RELIEF ~ S62P10 FIRST BANK & TRUST 96~598 THE FDUNDATIO',~ "EqTER 954503 FD.JR STEEL CORPORATION 05656~ FdTUq~ PRINTING 37335q gALE RESEARCH 370~00 BETTY GAR&ICA 07~500 CqARLES GO~FREY 375633 PoL. SRU~M~NS PRI~4TiNG 075610 GOLFST~EAH LUMBER D~03iP ~LS~¥ g SRIFF!IH, INC. 093425 ~AND'S IgO3~g JACK'S CAMERa CENTER 1!277] KIDLI~GER WASH!NGTO~ EDiT 120450 LANieR ~JSIN~SS PRDDUCIS 121725 LE,~IS qFFICE SUPPLIES 122~1! LL]¥DS ADTD ELECTRIC 13~, ~4~ HAN~TTAN TROPHIES 133549 MARVEL COMTES 130555 ~A.IRY'S TOOL CHEST 1~0950 WILLIE RUTH ~CGRADY 1~542P ~JNIEIPAL PULI~E i513i'] ODqR 2ONTROL SYST~S i539~7 O~NI 1~553~, JISA~IICo~^RJENING,, 150~75 PALM BEAC~ CA~VAS CO. D&TE TDTAL A~DUNT 8/1~/61 146.78 8/14/81 , 15~.99 ~/I~IBI 24Do68 8/14/81 ~g!.gO ~/z~/8! t~,00 8/l~/Bl l~3.OC- 8/la/al 55.00 6/i~18t bB.OO 5/1~/'31 8/I Cl~i !86, · u/14/3i 2,o87,P5 8/1~/B1 ...... 8/i~/8! 11 8/14/81 8/14/81 .., 3~5!3.95 U/t~/81 8/1~/8! 25~45 8/1~/8i ....... ~/14/~1 15.00 8/i~/8t 53.47 8/lq/Bi ...... 8'/I~/81 703.18 8/i~/B i ! ,086.82 8/i~/8i 8/1~/81 991.5~ 8/14/5i _.. 20,755,79 8/14/81 45 8/i4/81 1CB.2~ 8/i4/81 45.00 8/1~/8i 98.35 8/t4/B1 906.50 8/14/81 g/!a/81 it .15 B/la/B1 72 8/i4/81 ~/14/Bl 8/1~/8t 89,70 8/14/81 8/1~/81 125.DC 8/ia/81 6.50 8/t4/8! 163,00 8/14/81 ! t273.~7 6/Ia/Bi B/i~/~ ~ 165355 1BOSG3 18531,q lO0q5o tq!139 1924~.q 196029 2101Bq 230535 2'3178D 2324~3 0553I~ 23248P 234525 23~69~ 2~15~0 2at6~1 53002? 5~0t~5 540108 540109 54D! 1! 5~0!12 5~0113 540114 5~D! 15 540115 540117 5401 Z4 553DD! 550938 550051 55D952 55G~53 550~6~ 550365 550225 550~55 5~D~57 5~09Z2 5703Z3 373~B 37401 37493 3749b 37~97 374~7 37408 .3743~ 37~11 37~12 37413 37415 37~t6 37~!7 37~i 37~22 37423 37424 37425 37427 37429 37430 32~31 q~-37432 J7433 37'434 37435 37q35 37~37 37438 q3~ 3v443 37441 3v442 374q3 3v446 R R PREVENTION ~A'qSELINE FEEO E .SUPPLY .E-_ ~/A RJ-DIK PRIN[tNG -)LY'¢'E E. SSHODLEY S23ITY'S RICHARD L.SHEPARD ~ ASSJC SI~,tE DF ~LD~IDA DEPT. l.S. WCWS g WOmLD R~PO~T ii, S. S. AGR U.S.S. AGqi-CH{~!ICALS tq~ WASHINGTON-POST NESTEqN AJTD STORE. J. ~HITE ALU~tNON~ ~UITABL~ LI~E ASSURANCE ~RD RtLLARD TRUCKING J.J.a. NDLF FRESH DIST. WORKOUTS' XERDX CORPDRAYtJN X~R~X CORPORATION RA~IOALL fi. ASLEY LEONARD ANDERSON ROBERT BASSETT ~ ~'43N ~ET~NCOU~.T B~AND CONSTRUCT iOW ~ANK B~C,~ AN~SO C~RLES BOOP BARRY BOYCE FAI~ER J.N. BRADLEY GE~TRJDE OAV~ g~YaNT ~LB~RT G. BRO~N L.J. BURGER, qI LDRED -BUR~WE LL LlXlDA GERTPUUE BRdNNER ~A2Y LOO BUCKLER CASTLE BLDRS, CARTIER CD~STRUGTION ELiZ~BETq CATE ~4qS. J. COLLINS M&LJR~EN V. CRA~ER TOM CqAWLEY A~NE ~UNNANE C ~r~OLIC ARC~OIOC~SE ~E~EL PROP. iNC KORAN DALO] A~ DEL-TIM' ELECTRONICS DANIEL OJF~y WILL!AM E~G~RT 5. ELI'~DDRI C'L. TDLWU~ST K S E'--I E 2 < :')'ATE 8/14/8! o/l~/Bl 8/1%/B! 8Ii%/8i 8/i4/91 6/I~/Bi 8/14/B1 ~/!4/81 ~/t~/8i ~/1~/81 8/I~/81 8/14/Bt 8/I~/Bi 8/i4/Bi 8/14/81 8/14/81 8/14/91 ~/i4/~! 8/t4/~t 8/14/81 U/i~/Si d/t~/~i 8/1~/~i 8/i~/81 ~/i4/81 d/i~/81 8/14/8! 'TOTAL A MOU N r i'? 45.90 174.37 ZD.B5 I3PoOO 44.D5 !6.00 83°22 1bO.~C 6.50 52~.Y5 71,06 125,~+5 22.00 5.15 ~.70 97,20 42,.70 39.00 !5o9C 37.9;2 ~.70 24.40 27.20 4°70 1.7C 15 !6! ,75 5.5.15 39.96 I , ~0 15.99 IS.o. ~q'.7O 71o~1 g!.15 32.55 i'.70 7.99 2! qECK ;; VENDO? ?i U R '[[Y qF BOYNFQN ~3EA£4 E ~1 T M 3 N T ri C H 37447 5f13338 FAMILY SdPEN ~RKET ~4~B 533242 ~AY FSUST ~ ~4~ 5~004! MARGARET ~tJLHAgER 37453 530347 F:~AZZOLI CDNST, 3]RP. 374~1 590055 PHILIP -374%2 5g&059 C, DEAN GALOTTA 37453 5qOC~] JA~IET GEYER 3~45~ 573051 CHRISTIN!A GILL 37457 50005q CJBIE HARRIS 37458 ~30059 DAVID W. dEALY .~--3745~ 53335t J7463 500052 DAVID HIETAPEL~O 37451 ~30353 RIS~D 37452 5DO~b~ DJNALD O. HUNTER 37463 50000! HJNTFRS PUN 37464 510335 INLET CAY ~SSOC, 37455 520020 LAJR~CE JAQUiSS 37455 520022 DSOGLAS L. JOqNSON 37457 523224 MARVIN W. JAHN, SRo 37463 6.30039 KEITH KNIGHT ~-~69 6303~3 H. K~qLERT 3f471 5~0043 JJLILtS LAZICK 37471 540244 ~IKE LONG 3747~ 650073 SE3AGE MD:ENERT 37473 __ 553388 NARK ~ILASK 37474 550091 Mill [ONSTRUCTiON 3~475 ~59!~3 SALLY 37475 550104 FRANK MANCHES-F~R 37477 553135 h~3 ~. 37478 553137 ~ARK S. qAPPES 37479 550108 JEFPERY 37483 65~!09 C~RLOS M3~ALES 37481. ~531~3 ~EDI~RR~NEA~ R6$TJR~NT 37482 550111 JAMES ~C LEOD ,r~'~37~83 550153 ~ARiNER VILLAGE OF 8.3. 37484 650017 NJR,4AN'S HOTEL 37485 670023 ELIZA~ETq-3;~ENS 37495 570027 Mo AD OrE,FIELD 37487 58&~24 JOaN PAGLIARULO 37q88 59005~ TqD4^S R. 37489 590955 JJLIAN PATRIC< "490 0~0056 GEqRQ& PHILLIPS 3/4gl bBOg5? DAVID PRICE 374?2 590~;59 GERALD PRiE~E 374~4 593032 3JAIL RIDGE I-~C 37~P5 730055 2PNl'© DEVELSP~ENT DF FLA 37.~97 73u~55 RDnE~[ A. ROWLAND E C .< S PAGE 8 CdEC< .n~TE TOTAL AMO'U:~T ~ ~ - 10,~5 o/ig/8i 13.40 d/iA/ql 2°50 6/14/3i 27,20 8/i~/R1 16.70 8/14/8i 23.8~ 8/t~I8t 8.70 8/i4/9t 12.qG ~5/i~/5i 2.?9 a/ic/~! !.0'3 8/14/81 5'5,63 8/-14/81 3o30 8/i4/61 11o55 8/i4/8t . 8/14/8t 2,35 8/14/81 753,70 8/14/81 8/14/8i 11,50 8/14/B1 . 15 8/14/81 ................ 17,75 8/t&/81 23,00 ~/1~/81 le,3C 8/1~/8t _2!.50 ~/i4/81 12o00 8/!4/8i 2!,50 8/14/81 - 2g.O0 8/t4/_z 11,50 ~/i~/81 12,30 8/i4/81 2~,20 a/i4/3Z d5 7.~ a/14/8~ 25.80 811~I8i .~,~0 8/14/81 13o30 8/14/~i 13.~5 ~/i'~/81 12,50 8/l&/91 57.Z0 8/!4/91 33.90 8/1~/81 12.20 8/14/81 ~,00 8/i4/~ ~4.60 8/1~/B! .. 23.q0 8/1~/?i la,2O 8/1&./81 42,5C 8/i~/Bi i9.~6 8/!4/~1 12.26 8/1~/8i 25.10 8/14/8i 19v.20 8/14/81 ~- 23o5G 8/~/...1 57.20 8/t~/31 25.50 ~374~B 730357 "499 700093 3[503 710115 37531 710115 37502 710117 ' 375~3 71OltB~ 375~4 7!0!2D 37505 7tC1_2! 37537 723U27 37503 72uo2~ 37509 720035 ,f¢~'~7510 7~0035 37511 7500~3 37512 750055 37513 750057 37514 750058 37515 7 37516 75005% 37517 770C07 37518 780005 57519 793000 /520 O!iaD3 37521 37522 020101 37523 921718 '37524 D22q30 37525 D2~b53 37526 D2~78S 375~ ~7 J~5595 375~8~. 3752~ 330283 37530 031650 37531 041419 375~2 37533 063690 /'~'37534 37535 355503 37536 075489 37537 075500 37538 080309 37539 0q0572 X75~3 3q5350 ~754i 130313 375a2 1!4~07 37543 12345P 375~5 375~6 132771 375&7 375~g 150P15 R R 5 ~,I T M D'N I H C H E C VF'NtO OR NA'4~ JAUES P. REIMEP q--lOOE S CONSTRUCTION SIS."( S APD',IE LESLIE SARKKINSN ~iILY SA~NO I :~ENE SCHEUEP DR. C. ~. STARR WESLEY STEUN5 Y~q,~ S STJ~ANO T~S !700 ~EV, CORP, VINCENT TESORI E'RO LDOlS TDLIE WEST CONSTRUCIION CARMEN NAL~ER C,L. NEY GLADYS W.ILLIAHS LEWIS WI LLIA~.SON JDHNN~ LEE WYNN CLARENCE YOUNG T~E3ODRE ZLEPKO CITY OF ~3YNTOM ~EACH ADVAN~ _O FABRICATORS A~rlC AI~ COND~.T!ONiNG BCL F6~D SUPPLY, INS. B~T~5~ BJ-SIN~S5 BISHOP'S T~J.BDWLES 5LSCTRIC CO. BDYNTON PU%~P [ SUPPLY r~ JR ROJqHS F ~o ~n~ CADILLAC E>IGRAVERS CENTLIRY POOL SERV.LCES OE ~A ~O~Fr B ~NDOSTaLAL DELRA~ CHE~[CAL FLO~TDA qOLT ~ NUT cDj~ STEEL F~ANKdOOSE ELECTRIC G~FFLN EQUJ PHENT G~]F~L~I P3LLUT~ON HALSEY *S DENNIS E, HAYNES ~J" ~I_E~U:~ JA&K'S CASERA CENTER <3PY <I,NG PRINTING 2ENTER LA'~IFR GJSI,~_SS PRODUCTS ~EYER HI&MI ELEV~TC~ ~ILLE~ D32GE "~R. I-E '~ACHINES D25ANA PJ3LIC~TiQNS K S CMYC< D~TE 3/14/m1 8/i~/8t 8/14/91 8/14/81 8/14/91 8/14/~1 S/i4tB~ 8/l~/ql 8/14/81 8/14/'8~ 8/14/B1 8/14/8~ 8/14/~i 8/14/81 8/1~/B~ S/~/~ S/iS/Sl 8/lB/SI 8/1~/~! ~/iS/8i 8/l~/~i 8/iB/~! 8/18/8t ~/t~/Bi 8/iF/Si 8/iq/81 ~/i5/Bi 8/iq/~l 8/15/SI ~/i~/~I TOT 6L AHOUNT i2.50 269.0! 27.2G ~.70 27.20 4.56 17.90 33.50 4.70 ~,20 39,00 5.70 43.90 4.70 4.70 36.40 2,~05.72 1,35~.89 37.50 137.28 832.51 42°00 195.46 127.5C 85~72 I~.95 92.58 85.38 21.90 5°77 17.15 27,85 425.00 ~65.30 ~,7C 5.25 5?,SC i2.~C '£ j ~ N T :'-t 0 N l' ii C d E C ~ 550 37551 37552 ,.37553 3755~l 37555 3755b 37557 3-1558 37559 ;7561 37552 37552 37563 3756~ 37565 37566 37557 37568 _. ?~559 ~573 37571_ 37572 37573 16337-2 162873 210153 210159' 230453 232500 2a1503 333013 350054 359011 3800!6 44002~ 4~003! 360019 453327 ~50025 032qO! 91135D 013782 014038 37574 ...... 315703 37575 3~329D 37576 020~3~ 37577.. 323443 37575 323453 37579 020455 37583 ..... ~21201 375ql 02~3!0 37582 024595 7553 .D245~8 ~3758q D~4723 37525 3.24725 37585 _ DZ~733 37597 030298 37588 334673 37559 Oqq750 -'7593 350353 ~75~1 351253 37592 351300 37593 05~373 3750~ 354373 37595 35Z5~7 375~& 35~7~3 375~7 05g~29 375aB 3529Z0 PAL'q BEACH AUTO PaqTS ~IT~C-Y BOWES qEACREST PETROLEUM CO. SDME'S U~FORqS UoS. POSTqaSTER Uo%oSoAGRI-CHEVI£ALS JNDERSROJND SJPPLY EARL ~ALLAEE FORD~ .]3~ ~iLLi~'4S PLJ'~p S~V}2c ~L ,~:'~ Ho BEATTY HARK 4. SDODMA~ LLOYD So~IC~ JR. .]3qN Jo JOSLIN JO~q J. JOSLIN ~qARILYN LO£KHARI KAMEN ROSS EARNEST L. ~H~TE JR. LARRENCE JAQUISS LDMNIE SJLLIVAN WARREN H SHELJAMER CITY OF BDYNTON ADMINISTRATIVE C~ARG~S ALLIED CHLORIq~ C a~qISAN METAL CONTAINERS ISTAH AND'RE.S AS~oKo~ OF FLORIDA TH~ BAKER ~ TAYLOR COo TqE ~AKER ~ TAYLOR ~A~E2 S TAYLOR COMmANZ~S BARRON'S SD. DF CO, $OMMISSIONE~S B03'S BARR!'CADES 8JYLE CONSTRUCTION CO. BOyNTON'S ~OYNTON BEACI4 CHILD CARE ~]YNTON EiTY FEDERAL BOYNTON BEAC~ RETIPEMENT JdOY CALANDRA CONGRESS SOMMONITY SCHOOL DDOOLEDAY 6 ERSCO INDJSTRIES,I~IC, EDISON RECORD CLEARANCE EDWARDS ELECTRIC CORm. E~SI'IEERING ~4CqlNE CO. E~GI~E~R SERVICE FIDELfiR =I~k g P]LICE PERSDN~EL FIRE~tN'S R6LIEF g PlRST BANi ~ TRUST ,< S CHEC< ~nqE ,.3ATE TOTAL A'4OU;IT 8/i~/81 29.~2 8/15/81 t~.36 8/13/81 !,755o4~ 8/18/5i 23.00 5/18/8l 2,EODoOC 8/in~ .2C ~,oi 201 8/Iq/81 953,00 5/1~/~1 51.53 8/1~t31 6.50 5/18/81 1,394.82 7/iB/81 $.752R 8/18/2i ......... Bo75 8/1~/81 183.3~ 8/18/81 342.87 8/18/81 ....... 19,23 8/iP/Bi 8.75 8/19/81 324°04 8/21/81 ............... 484.90 ~/2t/81 65,56 8/2!/81 Z5,541,57 8/21/9i __ 2,313,30 8/21/81 4,773.00 ~/21/81 55,30 8/21/91 ......... lqRl. 4C 8/21/8i 8,505.90 8/2!/8i 273.,3£ 5/21/~1 28o43' 8/21/81 4P.OO 8/21/81 8/2!/ml 5/2!/81 I04,415o09 8/21/81 153o:J6 8/2t/8i 9,155.60 8/2~/G1 3,47~,!q 8/21/8i i5oD0 8/21/9! 23.30 d/21/81 32.33 8/2!/~I _ 714~59 8/21/51 8/21/8L 3,1CO.3O 8/2!/81 i~.35 8/21/81 ~ 72°00 8/21181 953.40 8/c!/5t 8~3t/9l 4ECK ;~ VEN;'~O::', ,"; -%7599 3.3 3';531 37532 37533 '3753q 37535 375~-7 3763U 37~0:~ 37513 ¢~611 37613 3761q 37615 37616 37617 37618 37519 _ 521 37523 37525 3~5'25 3~527 3752~ 37533 3753~ 37532 37533. ~'h7~35 37536 37537 3753~ ~37639 ~75ql 3754q 375q5 37~q7 37~4~ 37569 ,! R 373403 070411 371573 37q-'532 375533 33i%93 081703 3~0139. 112801 133565 i33e53 130e50 i3277~ i3q59~ 135420 143qql 143453 i~173q i53~03 150413 162501 15275~ 15~209 i ~3~95 i 83533 !~0593 19095~ l~tqg3 ~1525 191735 10275~ i 9399C. 235595 215353 FUTU~A PPlNTTNG aETTY ,%E~E~AL TOOL & ~4^qtES SDDFREY R.L. GRU~MONS PRI;~TING ~ALSEY & GRiFFITH, INC. HE!NLZET~AN~S TRUS< qENLETT PACKARD qOT ROD T.B.~ CDRPORATION IC~A REII&EMENT CORP, JACK'S CAMERA CENTER JJDf <IR~qEN PAUL OAVTS LECLAIR ~A'JRY'-S TOOL CHEST WILLI; RJIH ~2GRAOY '4CGR~.N - HILL BOOK CO, ~ILLEq BEARINSS MONEY' FOND SA~I'V '4JNi£I PAL POLICE NATIONAL REGISTER PUBLISq NATimNAL LIBRAmY RESDORCE NATiPNAL LINEN SERVICE NATIONAL LEAGJE OF CITIES *' MP ;)9~T JLY iA S. · . SH_;r · . PALM 8EACd NE4SPAPERS PALM ~EADH ~CST-Ti*qES mETTY [ASa ~F¢~EATIDN PqYS!3-CDWT~OL Dt[ARD Cq2~iCAL C~, PJqLTX MARKET PJ~LIX MARKET ~ANSE~ C]NSTRUCTIDN INDUS EvA EAYHONO SATU~]AY REVIEW 3LYYE E, SC~qDLEY SE^L fI~E PLUr4RING CD, SE~RS, ROEBUC< & CO. SEYFg~TH,SHA4,=AIRW~ATqER glLVE~ bJKO~T] SMIITf'S SERVICE' SHOp ~. '=NT, elASTEWATEo., TREAT fNqPI%AL SUPPLY 3N3E.~SRDJND SUPPLY 4ATE~ HYDRANT SERVILE 3/~1/8i R/2!/gl a/il/az o/~!/R1 m/~/st 5/21/81 o/~!/Rl 3/2!t81 ~/2!/8i 8/2t/B1 8/21/8i 8/21/81 ~/21/8i 8/21/81 8/21/8i 8121/81 8/Z!/aL 8/2!/81 8/2t/51 8/2!/8t 8/21/81.. ~/2!/8! ~/2!/5L 8/21/81 8/g!/81 8/2!/~i 8/2t/~1 8/2!/8! 8/21/$i 8/21/8i 8/:'1/51~_ 8/21/el 8/2!/~1 8/£!/ql 8/21/91 u/21/3! 8/£1/aZ 8/~I/81 5/21f91 8/2!/8i 5/2t/81 t'DT '~t 1i A '" O"J 'q -r !7B.7~ 7m.30 32m,75 35m.74 ~3.75 2B.OO 42.80 21,90 13,50 '30.00 ~8,00 lq3,23 49.00 1,233o33 113o90 115.62 ' 3'92o3i 99.00 384,.~.~ 9.75 ~B.S7 120.90 5~.~1 ~31og2 35,377.!1 ~5oOO ~o,O0 15.00 1v9,OC 23.59 3,63~.49 iDoO7 ~5,5C 52.43 A,537.SG =~.37553 '-55I 3,552 37553 37654 37555 37557 37~5~ 37651 ~37552 3~553 37564 37665 37565 37567 37559 37570 37573 37674 37675 B7675 37577 37578 3767~ 37083 37551 375B2 37533 37719 37723 377'~2 377~3 377~ 37725 37727 37729 3773~ 37731 37732- 3~7~3 3773~ 37?35 2317113 465TF~N ~'JTJ STORE 2B00~3 ~IC~D ~. DEE 3~31i7 CAVlLL= PZJ. LEbL~,~C 4q'3032 HAPRIET WEITZENFEL~ I gOldT' %LA ~LORiDA CqAPTEp 0B5~51 ~3&q q"DD~, . ~cSTOU,_ 6i 550..~ ~J:rJO<CDJST ~, 320133 -R g H %ALE~ 3247!3 BO~NTDN &JTO NUPPLY 02~725 BDYNTON BEACH VOLUNTEEP D2wv85 ~3~NTDN RESTAURANT SUPPLY 070393 GARDEN STORE l!OgbI KA~AS~KI 114503 KDPY <IN~ PRINTING CENTER I22532 LIBERTY ELECT~!C, iN~C. 1333i3 CHili qA~DONFLL 13~571 HEIN~KF 9ISEOUNT MUFFLERS 140412 NALCD CH:qtCAL 161703 PETTY CASH LIdPARY 152752 PI CARD CqE'~ICAL i3280~ ~IN]K~ M~I~RIALS ~DRP. 1~035C SAFETY KL,EEN CORP. 194499 S3[IETY DF ..... T¢ ?~u,'~. ~ I P~L AR~O I o~9q oRADY W SWAN'q 201583 TENNTS SUPPLY 215393 .. 230399 WALDEN 603K CO.,lNG ~40j17 gASlL g. tOOINSON 153415 PAR A'qERIC~]N ALJM'INJM ~DOOi9 HARRY NEWT 0,~ 453931 :~aNCSS F. SCEBLD 2°0045 DiAN~ ~ARHESKI 69nn~3~,.~= L]'Jiq~. M. WARD 3~302o LiSA J. '4ETHFESSEL ~0,.~1 T qU,q~x S wILLIAMS ~30725 FR=3 DELA~IATFR 33,,3327 RITA OI SAPLI 313312 ~ ~[~IF SAW SHOP SI~2% aBLE qYNT-ALL ~ SAL~S 0! 140~ AgVAX~C~ AIR CONDIT Dl~24~ ~SIAH ~!~S~ CA~M~N AMNU~ZIATO OZOlO3 n q q SAL~S 323163 ;~.~. ASSD:. ¢tREFIfiHTE~S 3~J173 9.5. A'.JT] PARTS~ 579439 Tq~ qA. Kc~ 5 TAYLOR, ~ S TOT ,tL A'14jit;,~r 9Idll3i dl)l/Rl= 738o72 8/2'~/81 ~/2!/~i 2,35~.64 d/2]/ql 1,232.57 B/21/~t 5/dt/qt G5.O,'j 8/2~/~1 3u2.0~ 3/25/~i 25.02: b/Z5iqi 23~.q1 '~/gS/ql 8125/81 53n.36 8/25/~1 175.9G 8/25/81 2~.q5 8/25/81 41.91 8/25/81 20v.OC 8/25/81 54.12 8/25/81 i5o95 8/25/8i 23o5C 8/25/31 93!.0C 8/25/~1- ~,.~ 85 8/25/81 887.9~ 8/25/81 7.25 8/25-/~1 7~.55 8/25/8i !32.~2 8/25/31 41.75 8/25/61 15.~0 6/25/81 28°00 8/25/81 3/251~ S//S/Bi 8/25/81 .. 8/25/81 7.50 8/2q/8i 8/2B/8i 123.06 8/~n/81 15-o00 g/dB/gl 3i~o52 8/29/81 28~.52 6/23/81 954.52 8/28/81 139o59 8/28/8i 134.47 8/2~/ai 43.30 8/28/~t ~8.00 6/23/81 ~o02 0/2:~/81 55 5/23/81 IO2.CC 8/29/81 9u.~. 8/)p/~ 5~ a/2B/81 2q.59 813!/nI '' 7736 ..~ 37 37737 37738 .37739 ½7740 ~77al ~77~2 37743 37?44 37745 ~-3774'6 7747 37748 37749 37753 37751 37752 37753 37759 37755 3t757 3775~ 37759 37753 37751 37752 37763 3775~ 3v765 37765 37757 37758 37759 37771 37772 37773 37774 37775 ~7775 7777 37778 37779 37783 3773! 377~3 37786 37785 CITY OF 'm .... r 2 U ~ R E ~! T M O'N T H C h E C VENDD:I :~ fk-.N')O:~ HAHG_ 020443 020447 023B53 02159o D2gGOD 024733 025582 325600 033298 330303 33243~' ~33o31 3345~q 0~!581 042605 34~647 04~5~j 353371 051253 352823 2529i~ ]5555] 055590 383313 3B~62D 390595 0O~192 09423~ 130310 191537 5 ~13634 12353~ 122gll !39q~D 130950 1{~42~ T,-IE BAKE~ & TAYLOR CO. g6LL C HO'.~LL BETTY BORDNi BOYNTON CITY FEDEkAL c~En 80YNTON R~AC~ RETI~E',I~NT BDYNTON SLASS SERVtCE~ ~,~]f'4rBN -DU~'tP cl S~IPPLY L[LLI~N ~OOY B~OWARD ~U~P ~ 'SUPPLY J JOY -AL&NORA EALDWELL, PAC~TT~i ~ BAR ROW C~ARL~S BROS.AIR CDND. I'~C THOMAS A, CLARK CDMMERCE CLEARING HOUSE JD5 DELONG DIAZIT CO., INC. WILLIAM P. DDNEY DSObLEDAY & PAUL ECK~RT EDISON R~]ORO FIREMEN'S RELIEF FI?S! BANK & TRUST F~AIERN~AL DROOP. DF PDLIC~ ~NaRLES EDERICK G~YLD~D B~OT~E~S C~ARLES GDDFRCY ~LSE~ ~ 6?iFFITH~ lNG, HAND'S ~DWAPD HAR~NING ~OLLY ACCJ~UL&TOR g ROSA? HO:~EL t NOgH dUDDL~STON I.~.~.I.]F PALM b~AC4 2 [NDJSIRIa~ ELECTRICAL IN~USIRi~L & MUNICIPAL !NDOSiRI~L W~LDING~ IN JACK'S C~MER~. CENTER DE~ G. J=_oMERS K~LLY TRA' Tum KLIATI P&PER?ACK ~K %U!J~ LLqYOS AUTO ~-L~%TRI~' ~ANM&iTAN TROPHIES WIt. LIE RUTH ~4CGRADY ~sj~liCI PAL PGL iCE K $ 8/Z~/~i s/g~IBi 8/f~/ei 8/za/81 5/Z~,"8: 8/23/81 8/'28/B! 8/~/~1 8/28/~i 8/28/81 8/2B/8i 8/~8/81 8/23/Bt 6/2~/81 :' 8/28/:1 8/2~/8! 8/2~/~ 8/2~/~1 8/23/51 8/i8/81 8/28/81 8/28/8i 8/28/~i 5/29/81 B/£B/Bi $/29/81 ~/£~/~i S/ZB/~i 8/ZB/~i TOTAL A ;~3U'~T 154,29 409,01 255o9C iD.CC q,039.60 75~.52 161.33 52°75 ........ 110~t0 15.00 4,06~88 2q.03 1,728o~9 75.00 ......... 9~.90. 155.C0 29.72 ~ OD 9.91 2OD.D0 922.20 29,72~.59 3,553.52 133.30 ~5~ 53 i75,0C 5~.70 33,0C aVB.56 ...525,70 _2_.o30 203.00 203.00 99.89 24.00 33~.55 1,239.D4 207o0C · .2 .J R ~ : N T 4ECK,, CHE2< DArE =37795 3./88 37789 37790 -=37791 37792 37793 3?794 377P5 377~6 37797 ~-37798 7799 3789~ 37801 37892 37832 37803 3789~ 37835_._ 37836 ?~37 3~898 37899 37813 37811_ 3~8!2 37813 3731q 37815 37816 378!~ 37818 i37819 37823 ~3782i 37822 37823 37824 37825 ~37825 37827 '823 37829 37833 37~31 37~32 f-~'3~833 .37834 37835 1~04~'5 15035~ 1504S0 153413 i5165q' 154503 1~D95~ 101513 194697 19~8b% lg5417 I~5~27 2D255D 23541P 2D54i~ 29553? 2154iq .230450 23054D 23D547 231503 232358 23~625 ~346&! 235496 26455~ i327d] il5&!2 013780 02043~ 025650 D25391 330185 032399 93246~ 93545~ 036359 040335 3~i6i3 OSg?O1 0537~5 J5~602 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SijCl TEqEES4 OALq 3EA~ ~RAKE g w~EEL PALM 8CH. COIJ~Ty PALM B~A'H NEJSPAPSRS C~ARI_ES P~RSING RO$EqT POCSiK EVA S~£-,cST PST, ~LcU So CENT. WASTEW'AI'ER TREAT SPORT SJPELCO~INC. SJmERIOR SURGICAL MFGo£3o THDRNDTKE PRESS T~IL FORD T~AETOR CO. TRAIL FO~D TRACTOR CO. WALTER Mo TRA~GER ~T_D WAY OF PALM ~ARL WALLACE FORD~ NAT~P D~P~RT~4~NT ~AT~R POLLLJTI3N C3NTROL F d~..,~S Eo WENG~R EDWIN! W. NINC~ JoJ.A. JDLF FRESH DIST. PATRICIA Lo WOOLLE¥ GAMJEL L. WRIGHT B~TTY ZOBEL Gl'. PETERS~JRG HAqDLD*tilLL~'? FRANK L. ALLIED C~LDRI~? & THE BAKER ~ TAYLDi~ CO. THE BAKER g TAYLOR B~3N~D PJMP ~ SUPPLY ~JPEAJ OF BUSINESS PRA£Tt C,K,'S LOCKS~OP, iNCo CALI=DRNIA SLASS E~AF!N HUSiC £~TEFS TRAINTNG F~ND CiIMMINS COMPANY, INC. CJGTOM BJ$!NESS YACHINES D.D.T, WEIGHT FONJ DELRAY ELECIRI[ SOPPLY JO~N B. DJNKLE FIRST BANK g TRUSI OF PAL ~L~NA3a~ - HEICALF, INC. FLDRIDA OiESEL TROEK g IN FOUR STEEL C~RPGRATION 8/28/8i 8/29/~1 812~tBi 8/gP/B1 0/2~/81 u/gB/ql 3/2~/'Si ,:~/qi $/2~/~i 8/2Sf8i 81ZP/B1 8/g=/81 8/29/B~ ~/2~/~1 8/ZS/81 8/ZB/81 8/Z~/81 ~/~8/~i 8/2~/@i 8/g~/~ S/~I/B! ~/3!/81 S/S!/~! 8/~!/~ ~/3'~/~ S/3!/~i S/3!/Sl 8/3!/~i 8/3!/81 8/3!/81 TOTAL A'4OU',; T 31.95 15.00 262o0C 45.90 !5;90 55207~ 0°97 5~o57 263.40 ~.03 ,9.07 ~55,D0 ~45.75 .......... 459~80 3,g5~.60 1,I.00 203.00 5°50 155o30 I55o00 125~9C 253~00 ~oOO 19P.32 165o98 729.99 i~.84 5~o~0 25°94 95oC0 209.00 25.00 157.42 59o3C 324,00 i5.6~ 27.59 15o90 5,503.D0 56.86 1,025,32 52.59 8/311gt =IIY nF 5DY'-ITPN B, cACH R F '.i T iq 3~:'~ I' H C ~-I E C %7835 37555~ GJI F OIL 3nRP 37 37838 DgDOgg I.~.~o CORPORATION 37839 390135 1.5.N~. CORPORATION 3784j 114635 --~"37o4i 123563 KEVI~- CLEMENT 378~2 12152a PALIL DAVIS L~:LAtR 378~3 1%1752 ~lI~I 37.d~ 37345 143043 '~AFiDNAL iNbTITjTE 37d~7 t~t701 NEPTUN~ t4ETER ..... '.78c8. 1~03~ -n PALM ~EASd. JR~ COLEEG~ J78~9 iS15il PE~C3'CK'5 RADIA, TDR SERVi£ 37850 i51705 PETTY CAS~ POLICE 37851 155525 P~D ONE ALL$OD~T% 37852 t~47o~, mDNL4ND ~u~ qQUIP., INC 37853 185533 RJSSELL ~ AXON 3785G lqO!SB Sa~I FARM 5UPPLY~IN£o 37855 iq0615 .SAY ARTS g CRAFTS 37856 lm4~33 S]2IIL SE2UR!i'Y '3NTRI~UT ? ~,857 la~733 SDJT.HERN B~L[, TELEPHDN~ ~ 858 ~35qZS TA&IL FORD TPA(TOR CO. 37859 23554~ T~¥~L 37860 216350 UNDERGROUND SUPPLY 37661 2304q8 EARL NALL,ACE qOTDRS, INC. 37852 £]O~5D EARL N~LLACE FORD, INC. 37863 232~03 Jo WHITE ALU~INUM 3735~ 232~2 H.S.Nd!TE CD°, INS, ~7a~5~., 2~i533 Xa23Y C©RPDRATION K 3 U/3!13~ 8/3!IRi 0/3!/81 8/31181 813!/81 8/3i/8i 5/3!/Ei o,/..~I/S: 8/31/81 8/31/8i 8/31/gi 813t18i 8/31/gI 8/3]./8i 8/3t/81 8/3!/R1 3/3!/81 8/3J/Si 8/31181 8/3I/8~ -8/3i/~! 8/31/8~ 8/31/81 8/31/81 8/3!/81 8/3tt8i 6131/ai PA'iE 15 TOTAL 12So13 83o0G 7m.3! 3!5.35 271.24 5.OL 2i~.40 3~ O0 9~.55 99~,0C 265,50 96~, 66 49,70 3lB,OO 57.57 8~.!9 24.00 72~!5 !3I.!L 1,279,035.B3