Loading...
Minutes 09-02-80MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL, BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 PRESENT Edward F. Harmening, Mayor Walter "Marty" Trauger, Vice Mayor Joe deLong, Councilman Marilyn Huckle, Councilmember Norman F. Strnad, Councilman Peter L. Cheney, City Manager James W. Vance, City Attorney Betty Boroni, Deputy City Clerk Mayor Harmening welcomed everyone and called the meeting to order at 7:30 P. M. He announced the invocation tonight will be given by Rev. Ken Ferguson, Ascension Lutheran Church, followed immediately by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Mr. James Vance, City Attorney. AGENDA APPROVAL Mr. Trauger stated under Old Business, he has some questions on the energy element, lot mowing, exHension of Congress Ave- nue, and the budget. Also, we received a letter in reference to joining the Florida Community Garden Pilot Program and asked whether this should be considered tonight or await an investigation of it and Mr. deLong suggested waiting for the investigation. Mr. Cheney stated he would like to delete Item VI-A, site development plan for Orlan Homes Corporation, since it has not come before the Community Appearance Board and cannot be acted on by the Council. Under Administrative, he would like to add Item X-J, Consideration of Approval of Special Event Sign. Mr. deLong moved adoption of the agenda as corrected, seconded by Mr. Trauger. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Harmening announced a Budget Public Hearing will be held on Saturday, October 11, 1980, at 10:00 A, M. He added this hearing was set on Saturday morning to give the opportunity to the most people if they are desirous of coming. Mr. Cheney announced that sometime around the middle of Septem- ber, property owners will be receiving in t~mail a new form, which will be a notice to taxpayers' form from the County Assessor's Office and will have a list for each property owned all the jurisdictions which apply a tax to that pro- perty. It will indicate what the tax Was in doltars last year, the new millage allowed and if aaopted, what the new tax in dollars will be. We cannot hold public hearings until after that notice has been sent. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 MINUTE S Regular City Council Meeting of August 19, 1980 Mrs. Huckle referred to Page 23 and corrected the spelling~ of the name on the third line from the top to "Turrell'~. Mr. deLong moved adoption of the minutes as corrected, seconded by Mr. Trauger. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC AUDIENCE Mayor Harmening announced if anyone in the audience wanted to address the Council on any matter not on the agenda, they may come forward at this time. He added if anyone in the audience wants to address the Council on an item on the agenda, they may give their name to the City Clerk and when that item is the regular order of business, they will be called upon to speak. Mr. Robert Eisen, lawyer representing Mr. Robert Seither, advised he was present to ask on Mr. Seither's behalf for the help and guidance of the City Council on a problem of the comprehensive land use plan and zoning. Mr. Seither owns a business located at 211 East Ocean Avenue which is located in a converted single family residence called Plants for a Pittance. He also owns the building to the west which is a six unit apartment building, He has owned the property for sometime and has improved it. He has been proceeding with a master plan which he developed sometime ago for expansion of the plant business in both locations. The expansion does not involve increasing the size of the buildings, but is to convert the existing buildings and put in shade houses to the rear. For a number of years, it was zoned C-2 but the re- cently adopted comprehensive plan provided a residential land use designation for the property and it was rezoned to R-3. In June, Mr. Seither requested rezoning to C-2 and it was denied. The existing business is now a non-conforming use which places severe limitations upon him. They have talked to the Planning Department, City Manager and City Attorney and all have been helpful to the extent they can. The Planning Director stated he has no serious problem with a business use, but as a matter of policy does not want to change the comprehensive plan in this area. Mr. Eisen stated he could suggest several solutions to Mr. Seither's problem. The comprehensive plan could be changed with rezoning to C-2. Perhaps there could be district regu- lations permitting business use in residential neighborhoods. Other cities have adopted a procedure whereby the City Coun- cil recognizes vested rights. Perhaps under a downtown development plan, there may be some room for relief. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. Eisen continued with stating that Mr. Seither has made a valuable contribution to the community and he thinks he serves some consideration. He is bringing this problem to the Council's attention and would like to know if they can offer any guidance or perhaps, it can be discussed at a work- shop meeting to explore the problems and alternatives. Mayor Harmening replied that on the final plan adoption, this particular case was thoroughly discussed as verified by the minutes and the Council listened to the problem and voted accordingly. Mr. Eisen asked if he was saying the Council has no further interest in considering this issue and Mayor Harmening replied that his suggestion is to put this on the agenda with the Planning & Zoning Board and discuss the al- ternatives mentioned. Mr. Vance added that this would appear to be the procedure to follow. Mr. Seither's problems have been through the route and were considered by the City Coun- cil. The zoning code does not contemplate the type of proce- dure Mr. Eisen has initiated here tonight. Hr. Ei,sen clari- fied that they should direct their concerns to the Planning & Zoning Board for their recommendation and Mr. Vance replied that they should direct this problem to the appropriate City agencies as outlined in the City ordinances. Mr. Jerry Niebel, 527 N. E. 20th Avenue, told about having a business on Industrial Avenue and explained his business of supplying labor for concrete placing, finishing and pumping with obtaining materials from outside sources. He has six acres of property zoned H-1. He came to apply for a permit to open a concrete plant and was told by the Building Depart- ment that concrete bUsinesses had been banned in the City, but they could not give him the reason why. He went to the Plan- ning Department and they also could not give him a reason. He would like to find out the reason. He understandS at one time concrete plants were banned because of pollution. During the past six to eight years, the pollution affects have been de- creased to a minimum. He explained how costs were increased with having to depend on material suppliers, but could be de- creased by manufacturing his own concrete. Since the land was zoned M-l, he made arrangements for the plant; trucks, chemi- cals, and m~terial suppliers. He would like to find out the reasons that concrete plants were banned. Mayor Harmening informed him at the present time, the zoning code has no provision in the M-1 zone for concrete plants. It is not an accepted use in the zoning code. Mr. Niebel stated he was under the impression from the Building Depart- ment and Zoning Department that M-1 property was zoned for a concrete plant, but it was banned-by the City. Mrs. Huckle read the prohibited uses in the M-1 zone. -3- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1950 Mr. Niebel questioned the reason for passing this law and Mr. Vance informed him that the only approach he has is to attempt to persuade the City through the normal channels to amend the zoning code to permit this type of facility as a use in the M-1 zone. In order to do that, he should make application to the Planning & Zoning Board for an amendment to the zoning code. The Board spen~ time getting details on these types of requests and sen~recommendations to the City Council. Mr. Niebel again asked why concrete plants were banned? He went to the Building Department and Zoning Department and neither one knew the answer and he was told he would have to come before the City Council. Mayor Harmening stated in 1973, there was a concrete plant at the north end of town and Rinker's and it seemed to be the feeling of a consider- able number of people in the City that they objected to the noise, fumes, trucks, etc. from concrete products. Mr. deLong added that if we tried to amend this, it would be unfair to the people if not put to a referendum. There were court fights in 1973 about this. He thinks the people should have the right to decide what type of industry they want in the City. When going into business, it is up to the owner to find out exactly what type of permissive uses were allowed at the location. He would not sit here and even toy with the idea to amend that ordinance to take care of a busi- ness. He is concerned with the people in the City and they have voiced their opinion of not having any concrete plants in the City. Mr. Niebel clarified that he was not arguing that, but would like to find out the reasons for banning concrete plants. Since 1973, the pollution and noise factor has been decreased to a bare minimum. Mr. deLong stated concrete plants were considered obnoxious in 1973 and he believes they would still be considered obnoxious. Mr. Niebel asked how he would go about finding the exact reasons for banning concrete plants and Mr. deLong suggested that he spend some time in the City Clerk's office reviewing the minutes during early 1973. Mr. Niebel stated providing that he researches the records and finds the reasons were based on pollution, noise, etc. and he can prove now that this is down to a bare minimum, what can he do and Mr. deLong replied the only way the people could be convinced would be by referendum. Mr. Vance stated this is not an appropriate question to the Council. He has not gone through the proper administrative steps of appear- ing before the Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Niebel stated that he has been to the Zoning Board and Mr. Vance clarified that he talked to the City Planner who is not the Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Niebel agreed, but advised he was told to come to the City Council to find out the reasons why. Mr. Vance stated the City Council has indicated if he checks the minutes in 1973, he will be able to find out the answer to this question and the other question is not appropriate at this time. -4- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. William Mizelle, 500 Mission Hill Road, referred to the flood on April 25, 1979, which flooded his house and other homes on his street and asked if there is anything in the works to remedy that situation in case we do have another flood? Mayor Harmening informed him the City Council has had several requests for some relief from water problems. So far, positive drainage has been installed in the Mango Heights area. It is his thinking that the areas in which we can solve the drainage problem in a cost effective manner, some- thing should be done. Mr. deLong suggested turning this over to the City Manager for a report. Mayor Harmening stated we do have a list of trouble spots and Mission Hill Road was in- cluded. Mr. Cheney advised the Council set two priorities which were on North Seacrest Boulevard and in the Mango Heights area. They have established the most cost effective way to solve a drainage problem is to put in swales. In general, the whole Chapel Hill/Mission Hill area was not constructed with swales. Mr. Trauger advised there was a french drain in this area at one time Which he believes has been clogged or covered over. He suggests that the City Manager see if it is possible to try a swale area on this strip to solve a portion of the problem. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P. M. Request: Location: Use: Owner: REZONE to R-3 from R-2 - LAND USE AMENDMENT from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential 560 N. W. 12th Avenue Construction of American Legion Post #288 Meeting Room Leroy Parker American Legion Post $288 Mayor Harmening stated after conducting a public hearing, the Planning & Zoning Board unanimously recommended that the re- zoning request submitted by the City of Boynton Beach be denied noting that this request constitutes spot zoning and it is not consistent with the comprehensive plan future land use element. Mr. Cheney referred to the issues on the American Legion site being clear and advised this comes before the Council because it was a product of the comprehensive land use plan activities. As a result of the plan, the ability for the American Legion to use this land was negated. The City sponsored this land use and rezoning amendment in response to their inquiry. The issue from the Planning & Zoning Board is that it would be spot zoning and inconsistent. The American Legion has owned this land for sometime. There was also the issue that this is a small site for a post with a limited parking area. The question before the Council is whether this use would fit into the neighborhood. -5- MINUTES - REGULAR cITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. Trauger referred to the City Council offering to try to help the American Legion and stated it looks like we have dropped them and are giving them no way out. The American Legion has worked and spent money for this property and perhaps the City could exchange City property with them giving them a site which would be more ideally suited in another area. There is land in the Public Works Building area and along 1-95, which could possibly be swapped with them on an even basis giving them a place to build an American Legion Post. The legality must be verified by the City Attorney. These people have spent money and many years planning this and now that they have sufficient funds, the zoning was changed. He thinks we should extend our hand and help and try to swap some property for this purpose. Mayor Harmening asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of this rezoning. Mr. Leroy Harris, 212 N. W. 12th Avenue, agreed that Mr. Trauger's suggestion would be the right step. He knows the American Legion Would appreciate if the City could swap another piece of property for this. In many cities, pro- perty is donated. Mr. deLong asked how much they paid for improving the streets and Mr. Harris replied that he can't recall, but they did pave N. W. 12th Avenue and N. W. 5th Street. Mr. deLong told abou~ there being property just south of the Day Care Center south of 9th Avenue and agreed possibly a swap could be made as in the past, these things have been arranged. He told about the members of this Post being active at various occasions. He also told about the spirit of patriotism reaching a low ebb in the nation. These people should be admired for their patriotism in this day and age and he thinks this City 'Council owes a debt of help- ing them. Mr. Harris replied that they would appreciate it if it could be done. Mr. Sam Wright, 318 N. E. 10th Avenue, President of the Con- cerned Citizens of Boynton Beach, stated they feel the Ameri- can Legion does have a hardship with being dedicated with raising funds to build this facility; however, they also realize there may be hardships to the people living in the area not wanting this building there. He was informed by Rev. Davis the property was for sale for three years and they did not receive one offer for the property. He concurs with the recommendations from the Vice Mayor. -6- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. deLong referred to canvassing the area and stated he thinks the American Legion should forget about building at this loca- tion. This property would not justify what they are trying to do as it is small with limited parking. The residents living in single homes on the north side are disturbed about their plans. He thinks it would be ill-advised even to think about trying to put a prosperous Post at this location and it would be a spot zoning situation. Mayor Harmening asked if anyone was in opposition to this rezoning and received no response. He then requested Mr. Cheney to read the attached letter from Constance S. Lassiter into the record. Mayor Harmening ascertained there were no further comments from the public and declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Trauger asked Mr. Vance if it is possible to exchange even value appraised or property suitable to their needs and Mr. Vance replied this suggestion should not be a part of the zoning consideration. The Council should consider the zoning as it appears before them. He would have to check out the other matter. It appears it would be gener- ally possible we could acquire this property for a park site or trade other property provided we had a good use. Mr. deLong moved to uphold the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board and deny this rezoning application, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Under discussion, Mrs. HuCkle added in talk- ing to Mr. Annunziato with regard to this parcel and after looking at the parcelf she was reminded in addition to rezon- ingf there would be conditional use plus other problems to acquire a variance from the Board of Adjustment. With all these obstacles, she feels this motion is definitely the way to go on this. As requested, Mrs. Boroni took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Councilman deLong - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilmember Huckle - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Motion carried 5-0. Mr. Trauger move~ to uphold the comprehensive land use plan and accept the P%anning & Zoning Board's recommendation denying the land use amendment. Mr. deLong seconded the motion. No discussion. As requested, Mrs. Boroni took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: -7- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Councilmember Huckle - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harmening summarized that the suggestion seemed favor- able contemplating an exchange of property and he suggests this be turned over to the City Manager to see what might be available and submit a recommendation. Mr. Vance added the simplest way would be to have the present owners of the Ameri- can Legion write a letter to the City Manager requesting that the City purchase their property for a park or trade them some property. Mr. deLong so moved, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Mayor Harmening clarified it was moved and seconded to direct the City Manager to explore the possibility and values of land contemplating an exchange of land to the American Legion and come back with a recommendation. Under discussion, Mayor Harmening added that the City Attorney had an excellent sug- gestion if the members of the American Legion would send a letter to the City setting forth their thoughts and their request for an exchange of land. Mr. deLong included this in the motion, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Motion carried 5-0. Amendment to 1979-80 General Revenue Sharing Fund Mr. Cheney announced this public hearing was advertised in order to consider amending the current year's general revenue sharing budget. We currently hav~ in the current year's revenue sharing budget a reserve in the amount of approxi- mately $117,000. There was some discussion and interest on the part of the Council to expend some of that money for demolition and reconstruction of the Royal Palm Clubhouse on N. E. 22nd Avenue. In order to make an amendment of the general revenue sharing fund, we must h~ve a public hearing. The issue is whether to transfer $101,000 from the balance in reserve to the account for demolition and reconstruction of this clubhouse. We advertised for bids for construction under the Davis-Bacon federal wage rates. We are in a posi- tion to proceed with this project if th~ Council transfers funds as a result of this hearing and adopts the resolution. Mayor Harmening asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of this re-allocation of general revenue sharing funds. Mrs. Dee Zibelli, 440 Ocean Parkway, stated she thinks this would not only be a great boost to the people of the north end to have a nice clubhouse to hold meetings, get-togethers, etc., but it has been a ~great help to many people in the area in the past. She hopes the Council will go ahead and build it. -8- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mayor Harmening ascertained nobody wanted to speak in opposi- tion to this re-allocation of general revenue sharing funds and then declared the public hearing closed. He added that no action was required, but approval of the resolution later. PUBLIC AUDIENCE (Continued) Mr. Bob Olenik, 306 S. W. 12th Avenue, asked the Council what they plan to do regarding the recently adopted Clean Air Ordi- nance adopted by the County Commission? Mr. Strnad commented that with having smokers on both sides of him, it was evident how he was going to vote. Mr. Vance stated according to the Constitution, if the County adopts a proposed County-wide ordi- nance of this type and specifies it to be a County-wide ordi- nance, it does apply in those municipalities which don't have conflicting ordinances on the book. If a city does nothing, the County ordinance woul~ applY within the city limits or the City Council could adopt ordinance of its own opting out or providing a variance. Discussion followed about the response from restaurants and organizations in refer~ recommended that we do no~ by the County ordinance ar clarified that if the Cit5 fect, smoking will not be BIDS NONE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS NONE LEGAL Ordinances - 2nd Reading Proposed Ordinance No. 80- ~ to this ordinance. Mr. Trauger .hing at the present time and abide .d Mr. Strnad agreed, Mr. Olenik · does nothing, when this takes ef- permitted at all public meetings. Public Hearing 37 - Re: Occupational License Fees Mr. Vance read proposed Ordinance No. 80-37 by title: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15 (LICENSES) SECTION 15-18 LICENSE TAX SCHEDULE BY REVISING THE LICENSE FEES PROVIDED FOR IN SAID CHAPTER; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. -9- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mayor Harmening asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of this proposed ordinance and received no response. He asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in opposition to this proposed ordinance. Mr. Bob Olenik questioned why the occupational license fees to the businessmen were being increased and Mayor Harmening replied the last time the occupational license fees were set was in 1971 and during that period, we have had approximately a 100% increase in inflation. This is revenue producing, but the City does spend a considerable amount of funds to regulate various businesses in the City to be sure they operate in the proper manner, zoning category, etc. The costs have increased in the administration of the occupational licenses. The City is in need of additional funds and this is one method which will not affect the ad valorem taxes.~ The cities were not privileged to increase their rates until this year when al- lowed by the legislature. All the cities are trying to recoup increased costs and keep the taxes low. Mr. deLong added that it is nog possible to go into a store today and purchase some- thing for the same price as it was six years ago. The City has expenses which have increased and we must increase the revenue. Mr. Joseph Tufo, 1320 S. W. 26th Avenue, questioned why the fees were being doubled and not just being increased a cer- tain percentage? Mr. Trauger gave the example of the cost of ice cream cones and hamburgs having increased in price since 1970. Mrs. Huckle clarified that only the license fees under $100 will double and the others are proportion- ately increased. Mr. deLong moved adoption of Ordinance No. 80-37 on second and final reading, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. No discussion. Mrs. Boroni took a ~roll call vote on the motion as follows: Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Councilmember Huckle - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Motion carried 5,0. Proposed Ordinance No. 80-38 - Re: Amend Code Enforcement Board Mr. Vance read proposed Ordinance No. 80-38 by title: -10- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 79-28 AND ORDI- NANCE NO. 79-35 IN RELATION TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH TO MAKE SAID ORDI- NANCES COMPLY WITH THE MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD'S ACT OF 1980 BY PROVIDING FOR THE BOARD TO HAVE SIX (6) MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR FOUR (4) MEMBERS TO BE A QUORUM; PROVIDING FOR THE TERM OF MEMBERS; PROVIDING FOR THE READOPTION OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD PURSUANT TO THE 1980 LEGISLATIVE ACT; PROVIDING FOR A SAVINGS CLAUSE AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mayor Harmening asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in favor of this ordinance and received no response. He asked if anyone in the audience wanted to speak in oppo- sition to this proposed ordinance and received no response. He added the reason this was changed is because the City Codes Enforcement Board was set up under a local act which was passed by the Legislature last year. At the last ses- sion, the Legislature set up the Codes Enforcement Board throughout the State of Florida and the structure of the Board is slightly different than the local law. The general law supersedes the local law and we must comply in order to maintain the Codes Enforcement Board. Mr. deLong moved adoption of Ordinance No. 80-38 on second and final reading, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Under discus- sion, Mr. Strnad remarked that as much as he hates to, he must vote against this ordinance the way it is written. He cannot possibly realize a Board could be made up of six people where there would be the possibility of a deadlock would be a reality. He cannot understand how the Legisla- ture would have a six member Board. Mr. deLong asked if we have an alternative and Mr. Uance replied that Mr. Strnad has an interesting point, but the law is law. Mrs. Boroni then took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Councilman Strnad - No Councilman deLong - Aye Councilmember Huckle - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Motion carried 4-1. Ordinances - 1st Reading Proposed Ordinance No. 80-39 - Re: Readopting 1979-80 Budget until 1980-81 Budqet has been adopted Mr. Vance read proposed Ordinance No. 80-39 by title: -11- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, READOPTING THE BUDGET OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF 1979 - 1980 AS AMENDED AND AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF MONIES ON SAID BUDGET UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A TENTATIVE BUDGET FOR THE 1980 - 1981 FISCAL YEAR HAS BEEN ADOPTED; FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. Mr. deLong moved adoption of proposed Ordinance No. 80-39 on first reading, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. No discussion. Mrs. Boroni took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Councilman deLong - Aye Councilmember Huckle - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Harmening explained tha~ according to the TRIM Bill from the Legislature, it will be sometime in late October before we are able to operate under the new budget. Resolutions Proposed Resolution No. 80-GG - Re: General Revenue Sharing Budget Amendment 1979-80 Mr. Vance read proposed Resolution No. 80-GG by title: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING GENERAL REVENUE SHARING BUDGET AMENDMENT - 1979-80 Mr. Vance added that this goes with the public hearing which was held. Mr. Trauger moved adoption of Resolution No. 80-GG, seconded by Mr. deLong. No discussion. Mrs. Boroni took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Councilmember Huckle - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Motion carried 5-0. -12- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. Cheney advised that this allows us to go ahead on the club- house. A preconstruction conference was held, furniture will be removed this week, and it is anticipated that demolition will begin next Monday. The contractor has indicated a four to five month period of construction. Mr. Trauger referred to the energy plan and stated since we are now proceeding with this building, he would like the Building Department to review the recommendations on the final drawings. Mr. Cheney replied that he thinks most of the preparation of the plans for the clubhouse was done by Joe Holland and he is confident they are energy efficient, but he will check that nothing was missed. Proposed Resolution No. 80-HH - Re: Recognition of Rev. Warren Nubern for his Community Services Mr. Vance read proposed Resolution No. 80-HH in its entirety. Mr. deLong moved adoption of Resolution No. 80-HH, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Under discussion, Mrs. Huckle advised there is one error and corrected "Board" to "Band" on the third line. Mr. deLong moved the adoption with this correction, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Mrs. Boroni took a roll call vote on the motion as follows: Vice Mayor Trauger - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Councilman deLong - Aye Councilmember Huckle - Aye Mayor Harmening - Aye Motion carried 5-0. Other Proposed Ordinance No. 80- Re: Tree Ordinance (Tabled) Mayor Harmening ascertained there was no further input. Mr. Trauger moved to leave this on the table, seconded by Mr. deLong. Motion carried 5-0. OLD BUSINESS Report on Golf Course Architect Selection Procedure and set date for City Council Interviews Mayor Harmening referred to there being a memorandum submitted to the City Manager from the Recreation Director regarding the golf course architect selection and read that the committee was composed of: MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Charles C. Frederick, Recreation & Park Director Perry A. Cessna, Director of Utilities Thomas A. Clark, City Engineer William H. Sullivan, Purchasing/Personnel Director Grady W. Swann, Director of Finance Mayor Harmening continued that the committee has reviewed eight- proposals and read the list of eight firms who sub- mitted proposals. The committee recommended the following four firms be interviewed by the Council: 1. Karl Litten, Inc. 2. Charles Ankrom,. Inc. 3. Van Hagge & Devlin, Inc. 4. Bill Watts Mr. deLong moved to make this particular communication a part of the public record before taking any action, since this is a big project. Mr. Trauger replied that he doesn't follow his logic and Mr. deLong clarified that this is a recommendation regarding the selection of an architect and it has been sub- mitted to us by staff and he would like it a matter of public record in case we have to refer back to it. Mr. Trauger then seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mr. Strnad asked if this would be put in the minutes normally and Mayor Harmening replied negatively, but it would be in central file. Mr. deLong added that we should be able to look at the record in the future. Motion carried 5-0. Mr. Trauger referred to the committee appointed by the City Council and questioned their input into this report and Mr. Cheney informed him the process which has been going on is part of the ordinances and state law. The ordinances call for a recommendation to the City Council for further consider- ation. This committee has reviewed eight proposals and met with architects and have submitted a staff recommendation. The ad-hoc committee may have a recommendation also. The staff committee wrote to all the people who the ad-hoc com- mittee talked to and invited them to make a submission. From this point, there may be two recommendations, one from the staff committee and one from the ad-hoc golf committee. From those two sets of recommendations, the Council would have to decide which ones and how many they want to inter- view. It is suggested in the ordinance that at least three be interviewed. It would have to be limited to the eight people submitted here. Mr. Trauger referred to information from the ad-hoc committee and Mr. Cheney replied that the ad-hoc committee interviewed a number of these people and he suspects they have recommen- dations to make. For clarity and simplicity, the two sets of recommendations must be separate. -14- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. Vance explained that we must comply with the competitive negotiations act. He clarified that the Council may inter- view any or all the applicants, but will have to follow cer- tain requirements of the competitive negotiations act. Mr. Trauger questioned why the ad-hoc committee wasn't in- volved in the interviews? Why did the City go thrOugh the efforts of appointing an ad-hoc committee if we do not extend them the courtesy to find out this same information? Mr. Cheney informed him that the ad-hoc committee has had meet- ings and discussions with a number of ~rchitects. He has never attended any meeting when an architect was interviewed because he knew he Would have to be involved as a staff mem- ber in the selection process. The ad-hoc committee has been involved. The staff committee was kept separate in making recommendations because of the statutoI cedure. He is sure the ad-hoc committ~ these architects and the recommendatior can be considered. Mr. deLong referred to a confliction be Huckle asked if it was contrary to the ad-hoc committee introduced into these Council adhere to the recommendations o Mr. Vance informed her that all the ap~ viewed if desired. The method set up w is to save some of the Council's time. tiations act applies when hiring an arc technical type. This method was set up having eight or ten firms coming in and time. Mrs. Huckle referred to letters already four architects and stated she believes Mr. Vance stated a date could be set to tional four applicants. Mr. Cheney add sent to the four who were not among the status indicated. Mr. Cheney stated this procedure was br~ attention at a previous meeting and May, that he isn't disturbed about the proce, that the chairman of the ad-hoc committ give their recommendations. Mr. deLong referred to the report being y requirement and pro- e is familiar with all s from both committees ing created and Mrs. statutes to have the interviews or must the f the staff committee? licants could be inter- ith the staff committee The competitive nego- hitect, engineer or by the City to avoid taking up the Council's having been sent to this was preclusive. interview the addi- ~d that letters were top four with the )ught to the Council's )r Harmening replied ~ure, but suggested ~e be called upon to very thorough, but questioned who appointed this committee and Mr. Cheney re- plied every time there has been consulti~nt selection, we have gone this same route and he has appointed a staff com- mittee. Mr. deLong stated the specific purpose in appointing -15- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 an ad-hoc committee was to be guided by their recommendations and not ~o be bypassed and have the City Manager appoint his own comm_ttee. Mr. Cheney replied that the ordinance should be changed then. He added that he brought to the Council a suggesti¢~n for amending the procedure for consultants' review · previously and suggested possibly changing the procedure and even putting a Council member on that committee, but the City Courcil chose to use the same procedure. It was a com- plication having the additional ad-hoc committee, but they are a recommending committee. The two committees must be kept separate. Mr. Fred DiSalle, 1316 S. W. 18th Street, stated the advisory committee was appointed by the City Council presumably to take care of all the preparatory work for the golf course. He understands it is a procedure to appoint a committee composed of department heads to dispose of these matters. However, the advisory committee is a committee with official status and limited powers. If it was necessary to set up a five man committee, why wasn't the advisory committee extended the courtesy of being invited to give some suggestions. How could thes~ five men make an intelligent choice? What cri- teria was used for this qualifying process? Among the eight proposals submitted, two were engineers of national reputa- tion but they did not qualify even though 2/3 of the services will be engineering. Why weren't all the architects inter- viewed by the committee? Mr. DiSalle then referred to the four recommended as the best qualified a~d told about Von Hagge & Devlin not having the courtesy of returning his call; Karl Litten, Inc. never built a golf course on his own and is.a former employee of Von Hagge & Dev~in; Bill Watts submitted the highest estimate; and Charles Ankrom, Inc., they know nothing abOut. It is not his intention to question the integrity of the committee, but the selection of two un~rown and the two .who submitted the highest estimates raises many questions. He asks that consideration be given to this. ~ Mayor Harmening asked if the Council wanted to set a date to interview these architects and Mr. DiSalle replied affirma- tively. Mayor Harmening asked if the Council wanted to modify the selection of the screening committee and Mr. DiSalle re- plied affirmatively. Mr. deLong moved to interview all ~eight applicants, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. Under discussion, Mr. deLong stated this was based on the fact that the architect given first priorty has never built a golf course. Motion carried 4-1 with Mr. Strnad dissenting. -16- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mayor Harmening referred to a date for interviewing these architects and after discussion, it was agreed to have the City Manager-try to arrange the interviews for September 10 and 11. Confirmation of City Council Workshop Discussion on Beach Planning Mr. deLong moved to ratify the action we took at the workshop meeting regarding the beach consultant design selection. Mrs. Huckle seconded the motion. Mr. Cheney added that the plans are on the table if anyone desires to look at them. No dis- cussion. Motion carried 5-0. Energy Element Mr. Trauger stated in reviewing the proposal of the City Planner to the City Council concerning the energy plan of the comprehensive plan per his memo of 8/25/80, he notices reference to implementation on Page 11. He referred to recommendations made for energy conservation and stated we are coming up to budget time and stated he wants to make sure these items have been considered in the budget. Mr. Cheney informed him that in part, they have. Some of the things might be done over a one year period. The energy plan is being reviewed by State agencies and won't be adopted until after the budget is adopted. We have been training a number of inspectors as energy auditors. We have tried to take advantage of schools as they come along. We have reduced the sizes of a lot of vehicles. Mr. Trauger clarified that if we do not have budget consid- eration, there is no point adopting the energy plan. Mr. Trauger referred to implementation and stated he would like to have a plan of dates and targe~ submitted to the City Council noting the implementation of this plan. He wants to make sure we have a program to follow step by step to lead into adoption of the energy element plan. He wants target dates and elements when they will be done. We will have to adopt this within the next year and he wants the City well prepared. Mr. Cheney replied this will be done. Mr. Trauger moved to instruct the City Manager to follow this plan and submit to the City Council within the next couple meetings. Mr. deLong seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. '17- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Extension of Conqress Avenue Mr. Trauger referred to the County Commission discussing funds for Congress Avenue and asked if the City Manager had contacted the County regarding this and Mr. Cheney replied that he attended the meeting. He advised the money for Congress Avenue comes through new funding from the State for industrial development projects. He explained the pro- cedure for applying for this funding and told about the application on the agenda for the County Commission to cover Congress Avenue for Motorola. However, Pratt & Whitney also submitted an application for Bee Line Highway. The result was that the two projects were supported by the County Commission with the clear indication that Motorola was first choice and Pratt & Whitney was second, but both should go ahead. He told about the procedure to follow and advised that he hopes to know about this within a few weeks. Lot Mowing Mr. Trauger asked if the tractor was back in service for lot mowing and Mr. Cheney replied negatively, but we are bidding a new tractor. Mr. Trauger referred to the grass growing and Mr. Cheney advised that he will look into leasing a tractor. Budget Mr. Trauger referred to a public hearing being scheduled on the budget on Saturday, October 11, and stated two weeks ago, the Council instructed the City Manager and Finance Director to bring the budget into line at 7.4 mills and asked if the Council will have a workshop to review this before the pub- lic hearing to see if the recommendations were followed or changes made? Mr. Cheney informed him that he is planning to put this on the agenda for the next City Council meeting. He will have a complete report of changes to comply with the Council's direction. It can be discussed at the Council meeting and they may want to set a workshop meeting later. Mrs. Huckle commented that she will be away from October 1 thru 10 and hopes the workshop will be scheduled before she leaves. NEW BUSINESS Code Enforcement Board - Re-Appointments Mr. deLong referred to reviewing the actions of the Codes Enforcement Board since they have been inaugurated and he thinks everyone has done a good job~ He moves to re-appoint the entire Board. Mayor Harmening informed him at the pre- sent time, there are five members with two alternates and one must be changed from an alternate to regular member. -18- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. deLong questioned who the alternates are and Mrs. Huckle replied: Henry Hyams and Richard Kurtz. Mr~ deLong stated that Mr. Kurtz has had the experience and background and is qualified. Mr. deLong ~nominated Mr. Kurtz as the new regular member with leaving Mr. Hyams as the alternate. Mr. Strnad moved to close nominations, seconded by Mr. deLong. Under dis- cussion, Mrs. Huckle referred to checking i~to ~his appoint- ment and stated from the people she spok~ with and the original City Attorney's directive, Mr. Hyams was noted as the first alternate. Mr. deLong replied that not make any difference to the Council and this appointment and he made the nomination based on ence. Mr. Trauger referred to professions bein¢ in the ordinance and asked if one was noted for appointment? Mr. Vance~ informed him that a sub. was added, but it is not mandatory and reads whE sible. However, the members are to be appointe~ tain terms. : it does is a re- experi- I listed the new .contractor Inever pos- for cer- After discussion, it was clarified that the appointments should be: George C. Davis - three years Enrico Rossi - three years Richard Lambert - two years Samuel Scheiner - two years Foy Ward - one year Richard Kurtz - one year Henry Hyams, Alternate - one year Mr. deLong moved to make the above appointments, seconded by Mr. Trauger. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. ADMINISTRATIVE Expiration of Term of Office on Boynton Beach Housing Authority Mr. deLong moved to leave this on the table, seconded by Mr. Strnad. Motion carried 5-0. Report on Police Firing Range Mr. Trauger moved to leave this on the table, seconded by Mr. deLong. Motion carried 5-0. -19- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Ratification of South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment & Disposal Board Resolution No. 6-80 Mayor Harmening announced this is the resolution whereby the Board increases the user charge from 25¢ to 30¢ per thousand gallons. Mr. deLong moved to ratify the action ~of the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment & Disposal Board in regard to the user fee increasing from 25¢ to 30¢. Mrs. Huckle seconded the motion. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. Outline of Possible Amendments to Election Procedures Mayor Harmening referred to having several amendments to put on referendum possibly and stated the first is in the area of choosing a Mayor. The three methods most commonly found in the area are: 1. The Mayor is chosen by the elective body itself at the first meeting following an election by a majority vote. An example of this is in the City of West Palm Beach. 2. The office of Mayor is an elective office sepa- rate and apart from council seats and candidates run for this office. In all cases in Palm Beach County that have been reviewed, the election of Mayor who runs in this manner is at large. 3. The individual councilmember receiving the highest number of votes in any given election is desig- nated as Mayor, which is the current system we have now. Mayor Harmening stated if we are going to act on this, we must determine whether to put .it on the ballot. Mr. deLong stated if his memory serves him correctly, there were requests for all these propositions made by the people of this City - districts, doing away with the primary elec- tion, etc. It was not a question of any personal feeling of any member of this Council's part, he doesn't believe at the time. The City Manager and City Attorney were instructed to draft the language of the propositions to be placed on the ballot. Mayor Harmening replied that before the City Manager and City Attorney can draft the proper language, he thinks it is incum- bent upon the Council to tell the City Attorney precisely which form they want to put on the ballot for referendum or if they do. -20- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. deLong requested to finish and continued with advising this was all taken care of at the meeting at the time it was proposed and instructions were given to prepare the proposi- tions for the ballot, not to make a study of it, but to pre- pare the propositions and it was voted in favor 5-0. Now, we knew at the time what the system of electing Mayor accord- ing to the three methods outlined here. He thinks every member of the Council was well acquainted with that. We didn't need this information because we already have it. We decided at that meeting that it was going to be by a vote of the people to decide and to vote independently for the Mayor, which was one of them. The next was whether or not they wanted to do away with the primary election. We agreed also to put that on the ballot. Then we came to districting and we also discussed all these things would be by city-wide vote and would be by at-large, particularly in the districts that you aren't just going to vote for the individuals in each separate district and that it would be at-large. We discussed all these things and at that time, we said go ahead and prepare. Now, if any background information was needed or if any studies had to be made, these were on the ballot before. All that has to be done is to revert back to the language in the propositions as they were placed on the ballot in 1976. It is just as simple as that. Now, the question is, are we going to still accommodate the people who requested voting on these particular propositions or not? He would say as long as we did at one time vote to do it, he would be willing to go ahead and still put the propositions before the public. Mayor Harmening stated since it is on the agenda and is within the purview of the City Council, the City Council has to say in effect to put it on the referendum and we should make a final choice. What is the Council's thought regarding the office of Mayor? It is his opinion there are no additional possibilities that should be offered above or beyond the three set forth. Mr. deLong stated we have already conducted this business by the City Council and the directive was given back many months ago. He thinks it was the unanimous vote of the Council, 5-0, that these propositions would be on the ballot. If we are going to change our mind at this time, he doesn't see how we can do it unless reconsidering the previous action. To re- consider the previous action has to happen on the date the action was taken or the following day. He thinks Mr. Vance has his parliamentary procedure book with him and Will find that is correct and they make allowances for holidays. -21- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. Vance replied that it was not his recollection that there was a decision as to the various items at the original Council meeting. Mr. deLong suggested that he listen to the tape, which is sufficient proof. He knows he was the mover of the particular questions and he put the questions to the Council and the Council came to be in agreement at that time. If the Council does want to switch, it is their prerogative. Mayor Harmening stated he doesn't know whether it has any bearing on the parliamentary procedure, but the Council is presently constituted differently than it was at that time. Mr. deLong replied that one member changed, so there would still be the will of four which would be the majority. Mayor Harmening asked what the desire of the Council was. Mr. Trauger replied that he sees nothing wrong with this, but what he thought he would be looking at was a proposal that would be practically the same as you would see on a ballot giving us these things. That is what he was looking for. Mayor Harmening replied that it doesn't matter as far as the language is concerned because there are three alter- nates which can be proposed and put into the proper language to put on the ballot. He thinks the only action we need to take on this portion is if we are in'agreement, post these three methods for the process of selecting a Mayor. He can't think of another one or better one which should be added or any that should be deleted. He thinks these are the three most viable alternatives expressed in these three set forth. Mr. deLong agreed these are fair. Mr. deLong moved to put ~hese three methods for choosing a Mayor on the ballot. Mayor Harmening asked if there was a second to this motion. Mr. Cheney advised that one of the problems, it seemed to him, was putting a grab bag of things on the ballot, we may get some inconsistent things adopted. We may get a Mayor running at large, districting, and somehow left out the pro- cess of Vice Mayor. We must be sure if a grab bag is put on there that no matter what combination of things might or might not get adopted or turned down, that they all fit to- gether and make an operating package. Mayor Harmening agreed. Mr. deLong stated a date must be set for this to go into effect. He would not want to see anybody who would be run- ning in this election be deprived of the opportunity to serve. It would take effect, after the person who would serve out their term or would be selected as the Vice Mayor underneath our present setup. It wouldn't look right to cut them off now and say even if you are the highest man, the people voted to vote independently. He wouldn't want to see that happen. Give everybody the opportunity to run in -22- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEE~TING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 this election and if they make it, fine, let them in. He cannot understand now how everybody was all in favor of these propositions and now all of a sudden since the elec- tion is over and it was a hot item during the election, everybody was in favor of it and a lot of people came in here and crowded the assembly chambers interested in it and the Council went along and said they were going to give them the four propositions. Mr. Trauger clarified that he is not against the thing, but he is thinking of the precise method of implementation and of the election and the wording, so that we are avoiding this very point we are talking about. Mr. deLong suggested reverting back to what was on the ballot in 1976. Mr. Trauger replied that he doesn't know what we had on the ballot in 1976. Mr. deLong stated it would be appropriate to give us what we already had instead of giving us this report and if there were any improvements to be made on it, suggestions could be made. Mr. Trauger referred to the election date getting closer and stated he was nervous looking at this again. Mayor Harmening suggested since we have an architects' meet- lng on September 10, why not arrange to have a workshop meet- ing and table this tonight. We can have a workshop meeting and study this in detail and see whether or not there are any conflicts if portions of this get passed and portions of it do not pass. Also, we can obtain a copy of the minutes of the meeting when we passed this in concept originally and work the whole thing out at that time. It shouldn,t take long and tonight we all seem to be in the blind a little bit. Mr. Trauger asked if we could have the actual ballot which was voted on at that time and see how the balloting went. Mr. deLong added that we must take into consideration that we have a time factor here for advertising. Mayor Harmening replied the tenth should be in time. Mr. deLong asked if this was correct and Mr. Vance replied he was sure it would be on schedule. Mayor Harmening continued that if necessary, we can go into a special meeting and pass it after the workshop meeting. Mr. Cheney advised we could have first reading of the ordi- nance on October 7 and not have a problem. Mayor Harmening clarified that a workshop meeting will be held on September 10 after the architects' interviews. -23- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. deLong moved to table this until the special meeting on September 10, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Under discussion, Mayor Harmening clarified we will have a workshop meeting on September 10 following the architects' interviewing ses- sion. Also at that time, if you will include these other items and preferably disseminate them to everyone prior to the meeting. Mr. deLong clarified his motion was to lay this on the table until we have the special meeting on September 10. Motion carried 5-0. Mr. Vance advised that Council needs to schedule a special meeting for September 10 and Mr. deLong replied this was included in the motion. Discussion of Current City's Cable T.V. Requirements Mr. Cheney advised this is presented as a result of a number of condominium developments wanting to have a master receiv- ing antenna and not necessarily tie up with cable T.V. The current zoning ordinance has a height limit of 25' for an antenna. If someone wants to go above 25', the ordinance provides for applying for a cable T.V. franchise. He has suggested to a number of condominium developers that they apply for this franchise as it is not a complicated process, but it seems to scare them away. He is looking for direction from the Council. He doesn't know the history regarding heights on antennaes. Mr. Vance added that our present zoning ordinance permits a height exception only for a com- mercial antenna. If it is admitted that it is a commercial antenna, then a franchise is necessary. Mayor Harmening asked how many requests there have been and Mr. Cheney replied about three, Hunter's Run, Cranbrook, and Orlan Homes. Mr. Vance advised if they want to permit this type of commun- ity T.V. antenna, they would have to amend the franchise ordinance to exclude community T.V. antennaes which do not charge a fee and would have to amend the zoning ordinance to provide an exception for commercial and this. Mayor Harmening replied if we agree to go along with this, we should find another name for this type of operation and pre- scribe a limitation. Discussion followed with comments made regarding the original reasons for enacting the height limitation, · Mr. Ch~ney referred to having a receiving antenna license of some kind and Mr. Vance agreed this might be possible. Mr. Cheney referred to the height and discussion ensued regard- lng the proper height for satisfactory television reception. -24- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Mr. Trauger suggested that the City Manager get an electronics engineer and go through the code with the City Attorney re- garding interpretation and what would be feasible. Mr. Cheney clarified that the Council wants to solve the problem so they have something and Mr. Trauger replied affirmatively. Mayor Harmening clarified that they have the option now to go to a franchise and he should try to sell them on that idea or come baCk with a little more information. Request for Refund on Cemetery Lots: Lots 582A & B, Blk. N, Boynton Beach Mem. Park, Addn. ~1 Lot 603B, Blk. N, Boynton Beach Mem. Park, Addn. ~1 Mr. deLong moved to grant a refund on both, seconded by Mr. Trauger. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. Budget Transfer Request - Unemployment Compensation Mr. deLong moved approval of this request, seconded by Mr. Strnad. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. Approval of Zoning for Alcoholic Beverage License - Strebs South Restaurant, Inc. dba Strebs III Restaurant, 2320 S. Federal Hwy. Mr. deLong moved to approve this request, seconded by Mr. Trauger. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. Approval of Bills Mr. Cheney read the following bills: Aetna Life & Casualty Workmen's Compensation Insurance Pay from the following: 001-000-155-03-00 401-000-155-03-00 170,831.00 Aqua Chem Co., Inc. Lime for Water Treatment Plant Pay from Water & Sewer Rev. Fund 401-332-533-30-65 9,569.03 Board of County Commissioners Use of County Landfill for month of July Pay from General Fund 001-341-534-40-9A 10,742.00 Bulldog Industries, Inc. Sara Sims Park Fencing First & Final Payment Pay from General Fund 001-000-115-87-00 Re-imbursable from Community Dev. Grant Council approved 7/1/80 4,963.00 -25- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 Se Caldwell, Pacetti, Barrow & Salisbury 5,500.00 Re: Sewer Lift Station Sites & Permanent Easements Pay from Utility Gen. Fund 401-000-169-11-00 Florida Power & Ligh~ Payment for 3 phase service for storm water pump - Mango Heights Pay from General Fund 001-411-541-60-5C 1,693.00 7. Garden Store - Partial Payment #2 Shrub planting at Sara Sims Pay from Comm. Dev. Grant 001-000-115-87-00 Approved by Council 7/1/80 2,349.00 IBM Corporation Rental on computer for August, 1980 Pay from General Fund 001-133-513-40-21 3,740.00 Lot Services Drainage improvements, Seacrest Blvd. and Flamingo Drive Pay frOm-General Fund 001-411-541-60-5F Council approved 7/1/80 20,012.00 10. M. D. Moody & Sons, Inc. 5,555.00 Sullair Compressor Pay from Water & Sewer Rev. Fund 401-333-533-60-42 Per bid of 6/6/80 Council approved 6/17/80 11. 12. 13. Publix Market Meals for needy & infirmed Pay from Fed. Rev. Sharing 320-641-564-40-5A Ordinance #73-15, passed 5/15/73 49.85 Russell & Axon 4,300.28 Professional services rendered on various projects Pay from following accounts: 401-000-169-11-00 1,736.35 401-000-220-63-00 1,413.83 401-000-220-64-00 1,150.10 Signal Construction Co. Fire Department Traffic Signals Total Bill 35,513.00 Less 15% 5,326.95 Amt. to pay 30,186.05 Pay from General Fund 001-411-541-60-33 14,673.05 Pay from Fed. Rev. Share 320-411-541-60-33 15,513.00 30,186.05 -26- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 14. 15. 16. 17. Underground Supply Co. For 256.2' Ductile & 1 - 10 x 4 steel tap sleeve Pay from 401-000-220-65-00 Re-imbursable from Stallone's Escrow Acct. 1,431.29 Isiah Andrews Driver for Senior Citizens Club - 2 weeks Pay from Fed. Rev. Sharing Fund 320-641-564-40-5A Ordinance #73-15, passed 5/15/73 110.00 Willie Ruth McGrady Server for Senior Citizens Club - 2 weeks Pay from Fed. Rev. Sharing Fund 320-641-564-40-5A Ordinance #73-15, passed 5/15/73 96.00 .South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment & Disposal Board Month of August 27,540.00 Mr. deLong moved to pay the bills, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Under discussion, Maylor Harmening asked if Aetna has gone up again and Mr. Cheney informed him the workmen's compensation is lower than estimat!ed, as Mr. Swann had an estimate for $180,000. Mayor Harmening referred to self-insuring groups and Mr. Cheney replied this will be discussed in October. Mr. Trauger asked if the Fire Department signal was for only one and Mr. Cheney informed him it was for signals at both fire stations. Motion carried 5-0. Approval of Special EVent Sign Mr. Cheney showed the plan for a special event sign for a benefit golf tournament to be held at Hunter's Run to cover the second annual Exchange Club Pro-Am on October 20. This is a charity event and they have requested approval to put this sign up on Congress Avenue. Mr. Strnad moved to approve this request, seconded by Mrs. Huckle. No discussion. Motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Harmening thanked Mrs. Boroni for filling in for Mrs. Padgett. Mr. deLong moved to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Trauger. Motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was properly adjourned at 10:15 P. M. -27- MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 2, 1980 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ATTEST: ~City Clerk ordihg Secretary (Three Tapes) -28- V. PUBLIC HEARING 1 1359 Aloha Lane Tacoma, Washington 98466 August 18, 1980 Mrs. Tereesa Padgett, City Clerk City of Boynton Beach 'B°~ton Beach, Florida 33435 Mrs . ~admett: Constance S. Lassiter, was born and reared in Boynton Beach. I have concerns about management of this very beautiful, rapidly growing city; as a tax paying citizen this community, I wish t6 have this letter read aloud at both the August 26, 1980 September 2, 1980 meetings. Thank you for your serx~ice. main purpose of this letter is to, again, respond to the announcement of-"Notice Hearing" which I discussed with you in person last month. Why should the at 560 N.W. Avenue be considered for rezoning from R-2 to R-3 when there are other locations available? officials are usually the trusted persons that are expected to fairly and artialiy deal with the community concerns and problems. Thus, while I trust the and integrity of the members of the planning and zoning board, I am aware of the many factors that influence able leaders' decisions. Therefore~ ope that the persons involved in the decisions about this request for rezoning will it and will keep in mind the spirit of-the zoning and variance laws. the way, on July 28, 1980 I was surprised when I observed that cement bricks already been dumped on the lots in question. Apparently, the persons making the request confident about the outcome. It would be unfortunate if the records revealed that with regard to rezoniug requests have been highly favorable. that to allow the Leroy Parker American Legion Post.#288 to construct a building 367 through 370 in Cherry Hills Subdivision will imply that city officials are their care and responsibility for some of the citizens. ~e majority of area contain minorities and they require the same protection as other members of community. They, indeed, require protection from organizational and business that result in residental nusiances. present board members and City officials cannot be held responsible for the of Cherry Hills, which began with the construction of those terrible fire box-shaped rentals and the Bobo beer and wine ~'joint;" However, to allow any that is not well constructed and not for residental purposes is an obvious act ~etuate deterioration of that subdivision. Any future construction in this area enhance wholesome family living. As an aside, may I say that condemnation of buildings referred to above should be part of the improvement plan for Cherry Hills. The very idea of the possibility of adding to the existing problems in this area is disturbingly sorrowful, indeed. According to the request, the use of the construction is for a meeting room. only. I '?iud that the request is incongruent with the purpose intended. How many members does "~the'Leroy Parker Legion Post #288 have and how much space is needed for a meeting room? 'Like other established meeting halls, I suspect .that the members of this organization will sponsor social events and allow the building to be rented for social entertainment. Who will monitor the manner in which the building is used upon its completion or is this ~ major concern of the city-decision makers? assuming that the construction will be used as sta~ed, nevertheless, there a~e problems. The request should not be gra~ted because to allow it~rill distract area's family environment. In addition, to allow the request wi!I: stimulate density above the norm; create a potential noise factor; encourage loiterers; the time/activity patterns; mud rid residents of a pleasant view. ~ere are ramifications of this situation. ~nat about the children living inclose proximity? Should not they be given some consideration? What good ~ill a meeting hail do for this area? ~urthermore, I have an investment in rental property in Cherry Mills not ~nly for long term benefits but, also, because of'the need and demand for decent family dwellings; wh~e families with small children are permitted. As an owner of the adjacent to the 560 N. W. 12th Avenue location, I regret the tRought of my. ~erty value d~minishing. I keep-that quadraplex in top condition an~tr~ to attract citizens to occupy the 'units. I anticipate a change in the kinds of tenants that screen in the future if the request for rezoning is allowed. believe the surrounding families, the ~ommunity, and I will suffer the effects of this of Post #288 if it is granted. I~ this proves true,, the communiLq~must prepare its complaints legally and I, too, shall hold the city responsi~Ie for losses in connection with my property and future investment earnings. object and protest the constructionof the proposed building i m the Cherry vicinity and recommend that the zoning laws continue to restrict' fm~ilities that enhance but tend to become a nuisance to single and multi-family d~elling units° recommend that the city purchase the property f~om the Leroy Parker American Post #288 either for a beautification project or for the developmemt of a park. park is ~xtremely. suitable for Cherry Hills. ~ery truly, ~preciate the consideration given to deny the request for-rezoning and to OhS. S. Lassiter MEMORANDUM VII!. OLD BUSINESS A August 25, 1980 TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney City Manager RE: Golf Course Architect Selection Based on your direction, the Golf Course Architect Selection Committee composed of: Charles C. Frederick,.Recreation & Park Director Perry Ao Cessna, Director of Utilities Thomas A. Clark, City Engineer William H~ Sullivan, Purchasing/Personnel Director Grady W. Swann, Director of Finance have reviewed eight proposals submitted by interested architects submitting were: ' Firms ~aConte/McAnlis Associates - Golf Course Design & Engineering Lake Park, Florida 2. Karl Litten, Inc. - Golf Course Designers Boca Raton, Florida In Association: Charles F. Ankrom~ inc. - Environmental Golf-Course Planning & Design Stuart, Florida Reynolds, Smith, and Hills- Architects~ Engineers~ Planners Inc. Ft~ Lauderdale, Florida 4o VonHagge & Delvin, Inc The Woodlands, Texas 5. Bill Watts - Golf Course Architects Ft. Lauderdate, Florida Gee & Jensen - Architects - Engineers - Planners West Palm Beach, Florida and Ward W. Northrup - Golf Course Architect Ocean Ridge, Florida Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc. - Architects, Engineers, Planners and Surveyors; West Palm Beach, Florida in consultation with ~, William H. Dietsch- Golf Course Architect Hialeah~ Florida 0 Kirby, Player, and Associates, Inc- Golf Course Architects Norcross, Georgia TO: Mr. Peter L. Cheney RE: Golf Course Architect Selection August 25, 1980 Page 2- Upon review of submitted proposals, the Committee chose four firms for final interviews: 1. Karl Litten, Inc. 2. Charles Ankrom, Inc. 3. Von Hagge & Devlin, inc. 4. Bill Watts Interviews with these firms were conducted August 15th, 18th, and 21st~ Firms were interviewed pursuant to Sec. 270 of our Code of Ordinances. Specific factors utilized for interview evaluations were: !. Philosophy (project approach) 2o Interest in Project (site visitation~ advanced research) 3. Adequacy of Personnel and Associates (number experience, expertise) ~ 4. Past Experience (related to this project) 5. Firm's Success of Service (project completions, time schedules) 6. Availability of Service (commence/completion projections) 7. Project Presentation (quality, preparation ability to respond) ' Other elements and considerations utilized were: 1~ Willingness to provide service on a three phase basis: (1) Initial Design (2) Final Design (3) Completion of Specs & Plans 2. Willingness to provide cost estimates for each phase performed by an independent cost estimate consultant or the architect/engineering firm if that firm can show it has such proven ability~ Explanation of cost analysis format and procedures utilized~ 3~ Complete course layout and design (landscaping, hydrology, agronomy~ irrigation)° Specia~ emphasis on provisions for drainage. 4. Architectual services for clubhouse design and other structures (c~pability and philosophy)~ 5. Complete site analysis for course development including the potential for a 27-hole facility. 6. Development of a management and operations program for the proposed course (willingness~ qapability, supervision provided). 7~ Experience and knowledge in S0dth Florida municipal course design and operations~ 8. Construction supervision procedures (time, personnel, reports).. TO: Mr~ Peter L. Cheney August 25, 1980 · RE: Golf Course Architect Selection Page 3 Upon completion of the interviews, each Committee member ranked each firm in priority order based upon the evaluation criteria. Individual rankings were then accumulated to reveal the following priority order: #1 #2 #3 Charles Ankrom- 2 2 i 1 ' 0 Von Hagge/Devlin 0 1 f' 2 2 Bill Watts 0 1 1 3 Based upon the accumulated ranking selections, the Committee recommends the four firms for consideration in the following priority order: First Selection: Second Selection: Third Selection: Fourth Selection: Karl Litten, Inc~ Charles Ankrom Von Hagge/Devlin Bill Watts Charles Co Frederick Recreation & Park Director Committee Chairman CCF: as CC: Perry Cessna Tom Clark Bill Sullivan Grady Swarm fuli CITY BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTOt~ BEACH. 734-8111, x-627 August 26, 1980 ~r. xarl?,Li~'~en-' .':.-'/ ..... _ Karl~Litten, 'Incorporated . . 1499 West Palmetto Park Road 'Interstate Plaza Building Suite 410 Boca Raton, F~orida 33432 Dear lit[ Litten,' The Golf Course Selection Committee has reviewed the four firms who participated in the interview sessions~ The fims will be presented to the City Couneil'on September 2,.1980 for consideration with the following priority designations: Priority Priority Priority Priority ~arl Litten~ Inc. Charles Ankrom yon Hagge & Devlin, Inc. Bill Watts After the City Council review, I will be in contact with you relative to their considerations and final presentations. It will not be necessary for you to attend the September 2nd meeting. Thank you for your very interesting and professional presentation. Sincerely CCF: as CC: Mr. Peter L. Cheney City Manager RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT Charles C. Frederick Director CITY ot: 'BOYNTON BEACH P. O. BOX 120 N.E;. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435 734-8111, x-427 - August 26, 1980 .Mr. Charles Ankrom Charles Ankrom, Incorporated Environmental Golf Course Planning & Design Post Office Bdx 170 Stuart, Florida 33494 'Dear Mr. Ankrom, The Golf Course Selection Committee has reviewed the four firms who participated in the interview Sessions, The firms will be presented to.the. City Council on September 2, 1980 for consideration with the following priority designations: ' Priority # i: Marl Litten, Inc~ 'Priority # 2:' Charles Ankrom Priority # 3: yon Hagge & Devlin,' Inc. Priority # 4: Bill Watts After the City Council review, I will be in contact %rith you relative to their considerations 'and final presentations~ It will not be necess-ary for you to attend the September -2nd meeting. Thank you for your very interesting ~and professional presentation, sincerely, " RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT CCF:as CC: Mr. Peter L. Cheney City Manager Charles C. Frederick Director CITY BOYNTON BEACH P. O. E~OX · ~ ~20 N.E. 2ND AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435 ..... ~' .i, ~'~Mr z 'Ron-Prichard '~ ' ~ ~. "''. '.~-mon Hagge '&;..Devlin, Inc. ~';-~220 Buckthorn~ Place August 25. 1980 Suite 202 L ~ .The Woodlands~'Texas 77380 Dear Mr. ~richard, 'The Golf Course Architect Selectiom Committee has reviewed the four firms who participated in the final interview sessions. The firms will be presented to:the City Council on September 2, 1980 for consideration with the following priority designations- Priority # 1: Priority # 2: Priority # 3: -Priority #'.4: Karl Litten, Inc. Charles Ankrom yon Magge & Devlim Bill 'Watts After the City Council review~ i will be in .contact with you relative to their considerations and final presRmtations. It will not be necessary for you to.attend the September 2nd meeting. Thank you for your very interesting and professional presentation. CCF:as : CC: Mr.'Peter L. Cheney Sincerely~ RECREATION & PARK DEPARTMENT Charles C~ Frederick Director CITY of BOYNTON BEACH I~. O. BOX 310 : ~,ZO N.E. 2NO AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 334311 736-8111~ x-627 August 26, i980 i~.Mr: ~ill Watts '~7'Bill':Watts, -~Golf Architect· 7400:~;W. 24th Place.-- Sunrise ~Ft. >Lauderda!~ 'Florida 33313 .Dear to their considerations and final presentations° for you to attend the September 2nd meeting~ Priority # 1: Karl Litten~ Inc. Priority # 2: Charles Ankrom _Priority.# 3: won Hagge & Devlin Inc. Priority $ 4: Bill Watts .After the City COuncil review~ I will be in contact with you relative It will not be necessary Thank you for your very interesting and professional presentation. Sincerely, RECREATION & PARKDEPARTMENT CCF:as CC: ~'~. Peter L. Cheney Charles C. Frederick Director '8129/80 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CURRENT MONTH CHECKS HECK,." VENDOR ",. L- 40 160410 2'~39 .... 2315'73 27982 020405 27983 021540 ~7984 ....... 026480 !7985 030501 ~7986 080432 2798~ 084660 27988 104508 27989 104509 27990 .... 104510 7991 166300 ~7992 190945 VENDOR NAME P~L~' BEA£H NEWSPAPERS WE~R AUTO ELECTRIC~INC. CONSTANCE BAISH FRANK AD 5EDNARICK OBE BUTLER RENA CARRIER' JOHN HARRINGTON' MU~IEL HOLZMAN FRANK JOHNSON GEORGE A. JOHNSON JOHN JOHNSTON ELEANOR PUFFER JOHN SCHNEIDER ~_~90.940 ...... MARY E. SCHORR 27994 192592 ADA SHOOK 27995 202515 tEE THOMAS .~7.~.6 ...... 20.2550 _..JA~ES C. THOMPSON 27997 230452 OLIVE WALLACE 27998 231580 W.T. WELCH 2~99_ _266~'~00 .... ~ILDRED..A. ZWAR% 28000 340006 LENON HARRIS 2~' O1 280004 WIrLLIE BAGLEY ~60 _ EDWARD SULLIVAN 03 106450 GEORGE JUNNIER 004 081650 HAROLD HERRING 005 .... 12~590 ..... NORMAN LOLATTE 8006 194290 KEN SNOW 8007 206300 JOHN M. TUITE 80Q~ ...... 2_35495..] ..... CURTIS E. WRIGHT __ 8~09 22279~ JOHN VICKI 8019 014240 tSIAH ANDREWS' 130959 ..... WILLIE RUTH MCGRADY 150413 PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS 09 014150 AMERICAN WATER ~ORKS ASS0 0 ............016020 A_TLANTIC NATIONAL BANK ~ 111 02472n BOYNTON BEACH CHAMBER 28112 024760 BOYNTON GLAS. S SERVICE, __.CADILLAC ENGRAVEP, S 114 033631 THOHAS A. CLARK 28115 0~0410 DATA SUPPLIES 28116 ........]OAi6iD __DELRAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY 2~i 17 0~2863 RITA DISARLI i -18 0~5452 ~RI SLIOE 28118 ....... 045~5~ DRI SLIOE 28119 06042~ JENNIFER FASONE 28120 0~3692 FLORIDA BOLT g NUT 28121 ___ 06~752 FLORIDA LEVEL g TRANSIT 28122 0~650~ FUTURA PRINTING 28123 071587 GEOTEC, INC. 2~124 . _ OB03iO HALSEY g GRIFFITH~ INC. ADMINISTRATIVE PAGE CHECK DATE TOTAL 'A~OUNT 7/22/80 7/25/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/~0 8/01/80 8/O1/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 8/01/80 7/31/80 .8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/O5/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/8O 8/05/80 8105/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/90 8105/80 1,358.15CR 60.OOCR 53.79 108.59 227.58 63.23 397.99 88.75 88.66 .625.19 91.28 I33.20 253.66 202.2I 795.9I .......... 7%.19 168.90 82.65 ............... 77 · L3 551.53 519.98 ................ 19~.1_0 1,045.78 30.34 .......... 4~.96 225,41 91.50 ....... 1,499,59' 920.69 55.00 ............ ~8_.00 7.74 43.00 .... 500.~00 1,009.00 34.81 ........ 18.13 16.15 175.20 26.10 88.44CR __ . 88._¢4 26.10 20.34 40.50 98.25 700.00 130,00 cc: Finance Dept. '8129/80 CiTY OF BoYNTON BEACH C U ~ R E N T H O N T H C H E C K S ,, V'ENOOq, .,,-" ,V.ENDOP. NAME --2,R1~2.5 084690 :8126 0'90!0o ,2 27 130313 28128 114600 28129 120410 '~28130 131'753 28131 131766 2'8132 1404i.5 28135 160374 ~M 8.137 1'60457 ~8~ B~ 1 '627 4'3 2 B l 39 18469 23140 1~6310 28141 18650D 28142 191519 28143 128144 195998 2814'5 205542 2~i'46 216415 2~'~47 230400 2'~i48 2304l~ 28i~9 23157~ ZBIEO -450043 2R15i 0'~6355 23152 390013 28153 370006 2~154 320002 23155 4~0016 28156 2'70007 28157 340034 2315'8 270001 28159 290010 23160 440023 29162 130953 Z8164 010~16 .~28165 011203 28166 0t3730 28157 013782 168 013920 2m169 015313 28170 01602D 2~171 01692~ 23173 020~73 2817~ 02120I 23175 02153~ EDGAR NOWELL I'C-~ MUNICIPAL DATA SERV'I JACK'S CAMERA CENTER KOPY KING PRINTING CENTER LANAP UNIFORMS MEYER SOD MIAMI ELEVATOR CO. NALCg CHEMICAL CO. NAT:IONAL COMmITTEE-ARTS NDRTH~OOD SCREEN PRINTING PALM BEACH COMMUNICATIONS PAiN ~EACH O~¢ICE SUPPLY PARK PRACTICE PROGRAM PIG-A-T~IP TRAVEL AGENCY RD':ELL OISTRISUTING CO. RJBIN CONSTRUCTION CO. RUSSELL & AXON SEACREST PETROLEUM CO. SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUT ST, PETERSBURG BANK g TRU TRIANGLE REPROGRAPHICS UNIVE:RSAL BEACH SERVICE CHARLES WALDNER, M.D. WALGREEN DRUG STORE WEIR AUTO ELECTRIC,INC. JOHN ~. SHANAHAN CO, STOM FIBERGLASS COACHES LAURA MUDRYK LANA M KOESTER ROBERT FERRELL GEORGE ~ATSON ANTHONY ALBURY DEWEY E. HURLEY JR. ALEXANDER, MARJOR'IE K. CHARLES L 'CASE JIMMY ROGERS IS!AH ANDREWS WILLIE RUTH MCGRADY A DIXIE SAW'SHOP ABERDEEN CONSTRUCTION CDR ADAMS CHEVROLET ALLIED CHLORINE C ALLSTATE EOUIP~ENT&RENTAL AMERICAN ARTIST A~UACHEM COMPANY ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK ATLAS CONSTRUCTION OF WES AgTGP-RODUCTS~ INC. B.B. AUTO PA-RTSt INC. BO. OF CO. COM~ISSION'ERS BEANE EXTERMINATING CO. CHECK DATE 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/90 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05180 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05/80 8/05?8O 8/05/80 8/06/80 8/09/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 '8/08/80' 8/08/80 '8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 .,8/08/80 8/oe/8o 8/o8/8o 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/0B/80 8/08/80 8/08/90 PAG6 TOTAL 2 A~OUNT 12.05 90o00 150.14 357.00 184.80 100.00 54.78 659.45 3.50 4o7.z 23~70 950.00 10.00 244.00 65.10 43.88 6,715.87 lt257.88 68,870.22 363.07 ...... 48.5.95 311.65 88.00 29,95 30.00 94.86 ...Zt929.SZ 382.06 279.62 260.58 205.48 433.59 ._ 446.24 185.89 682.86 117.84 55.00 ~8.00 18.75 2,554.50 26,00 . '2,733.00 44.35 7.00 9t314.40 144,499.87 9~591.65 472.90 159.91 9~933.00 161.00 CI'TY OF BOYNTON BEAC:H R R E N T M O N T H -,C H E C K s PAGE '3 q E CK # .~fE N DD:R,." ~/':E NO:OR NAME :8 17:b 0,2'4- 7 lO ._ 024'733 2817 9 324-76,,0 - 281%0 O ~5 ~'22 2:.8 181. 0302'99 Z3 182 a:30303 28183 032 9:05 .~.2B lIB 7 ......... D~05 ;B l~S:'8 28189 Z.B190: ......... 281,91 0503 L 3 28192 062820 2 B Z._~.3 ...... 06291 2819~ 063783 28195 0~0400 28195 .... ~70~15 2fi-197 074500 Z ~98 OB03iO BDYNTf]N AUTO SUPPLY ~gYNTON BEACH RETIREMENT ~OYNTO.N GLASS SERVICE, B'R~:N~DE'MBER'G~ S AMOCO CAIN 'FEED E SUPPLY :CA,LDWE.LL,~ P AC ETT t ,BARROW :CITY O:F ,9'ELRA'Y BEA'CH C3CA CgL~ BOTTLING CO~ CRQWM L DAVIS NETER E SUPPLY JOHN DEN'SON JOHN B. 'DUNK'LE JOHN B, DUNKLE .EASY PAY TIRE STORE F[R'EHEN' S REL FIRST BANK ~ TRUST FLORZDA PDNER ~ L[GHT CO. BETTY GARR~GA _GAYLORg BROTHERS C~ARLES GODFREY HALSEY 28.19~ ........ ~.8~00 .... HARDBIVES, ZS20O 08~620 z~zol 0B6350 28203 090103 282~ 10~5~1 INC, HOLLY ACCUMULATOR & HUCKLEBUCK MUSIC HJSSEY ELECTRICAL'CONTR. IoBoH. CORPORATION J~HNSDN-DAVIS, INC-. 282_~5 ...... !~.0,~50 _ LANIER BUSINESS PRODUCTS ' 28206 120563 .LAWNMOWER HOSPITAL 2920'7 1.21679 DR. HERMAN I, LEVIN 282Q8 ..... Z.~280Q__ L!~D.SLEY LUMBER CO. 28209 122911 L[OYDS OF BOYNTON BEACH 28210 130500 ~ANUFACTURERS LiFE INS. ~2821_1 .......... ~.~05_65 ~AURV'S TOOL CHEST 2q212 1316~9 MERRILL FOX ENTERPRISES~ 28213 .132771 MILLER DODGE 2BZI~ ....... 13277~ TA~! ~ILLER 28215 i36~20 MUNICIPAL POLICE 28216 1~0~13 NALCO CHEMICAL 282~7 .... ...... 1~170~_ NEPTUNE METER CO. ~q. 218 151313 DDDR CONTRqL SYS:TEHS ~.21~ 160365 PAINT CENTER 28228 .. t5'0373 PALN BEACH BRAKE g WHEEL 2R221 160~O7 PALM BEACH HYDRAULIC JACK 2822~ I6Oq1~ PALM 'BEACH NEWSPAPERS ' <223 .___!.'~lS~R LEON AND LILLY PERRY 23224 16,2753 PICA:RD CH:EMICAL CO. 28225 16620~ PJ.~LIX MARKET 2~226 t6520.! PUBLIX HARK,ET CHECK DATE 8/08/80 8./O8/9O 8/08/B0 8/08:/80 8/38/80 8/08/80 8/08/90 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/09/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/.80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/0~/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 -8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/09/80 8/08/80 s/ob/so 8/08/80 8/3~/'80 8108/80 8/05/80 8/09/80 8/09/83 8/08/80 8/08/80 8108/80 U/OB/SO 8/08/83 81.08/80 8/08/BO 8/0B/83 TOTAL AMOUNT 7-16,86 8,.338..87 2,874,92 95,00 72.00 2,176.85 75,50 .~33Bo95 .... 221,25 i6.00 10.60 ......... 14.60 817,56 ...... 16,448.82 15,348,03 30.00 .......... 337.42 30.00 236,21 ._ 210,7Q ..... 49,48 100,00 255,00 3tZ89.00 8,024.69 160,59 50.90 32,50 679.06 3.75 30.66 520.28 80.00 1,398,53 629,09 12,284.78 125,35 16.BO 83,25 50.55 1,295.15 280.00 214.25 77.00 101,52 fi:[T¥ -,qF BDYNTON ,,BEACrl ~7 HECK 'S ILl '~ ~R E N T N 0 N T 'H C H VEN'DOR -,'; ¥~EN..90R NA~E 9228 29 2'39 242,31 .~8 233 ~234 - 282:37 : 2~ 238 28241 28242 24 180509 EVa RAYMOND 186500 RUSSELL E AXON ,1"90'3':53 SAF.ETY KLEE. N £ORP. 19039''~) SAL"S SPORT S~OP 190059 OLYVE ,E, SCHODLEY 19;[705 SEYF A-RTH, SHAW, FA I R WEATHER 1'g~597 S, CENT. NASTEWATER TREAT 19~70~ SOUT'~ERN BELL TELEPHONE .l~bOl~ STATE .OF 'FLORIDA DEPT. OF :1~'~;0l~ STATE OF FL'0R,tDA 196225 FLORENCE STUBBINS 196420 ~U'P-E~IOR ~NG:INEERING SALE ..... 23i573 WEIR AUTO ELECTRICtINc. 2'32512 MARK ~ILL'IAMS - 242'~09 XEROX CORPORATION 2700t9 L~ANNE ALLEN 29244 2a245 28246 2~2,47 5~49 28250 28251 2'~252 28253 2'825.4 28255 340035 349935 460010 340035 023803 0,15709 021200 021702 036330 03634B 05'0300 051300 054373 28256 28257 2,4258 2:8259 29260 '2B261 '¢r~8262 28263 28264 28255 28265 28267 28268 2~270 2~271 28272 ~8273 28.27~ 28275' 232'76 060421 063000 353593 053700 064633 071550 074540 075453 075589 075619 084623 084667 0fl635.0 090105 100310 1ZlVq2 130'310 13,3565 13278? 140450 140463 JOHN D. HJGELMEY:ER JOHN D. HUGELMEYER GLEN,DA CHARLENE TRAIL JOHN D. HLIGELMEY'ER BLUE CROSS OF FLORIDA ASGRQW OF FLORIDA BO, DF CO. COM,~ISSIONERS BETHESOA MEMORIAL FUND CURTIS 1000, INC. CUSTOM AUTO TRIM EAST COAST· FIRE EQUI'P. EDWAqDS ELECTRIC CORP. ENGINE'ER~NG MACHINE CO. RD N. FARMER SUPPLY CO. FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLORIDA BOLT E NUT FLORIDA BRAKE £ F3UR STEEL CORPORATION GENERAL~Mu' C TRUCK GOLDCOAST PLUMBING GRAY,AR ELECTRIC CO.. IN~. GULF OIL CORP. GULFSTREAH LUMBER CO. HDLLY ACCUMULATOR & HONDA SOUTH , UuHES SUPPLY I.B.Mo CORPORATION JACK'S CAMERA CENTER LEXINGTON FEED g SUPPLY WHITT MACDOWELL uA'JRY ' S TOOL CHEST ~I LL I POP, E CORPORATION NATIONAL LINEN SERVICE NATIONAL WELDING PRODUCTS E C .K S CHECK DATE '8/38/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/O8/8O 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/09/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/08/80 8/09/80 8/08/80 8/O8/8O 8/08/80 8/08/80 .8/08'/80 8/08/80 8/11/80 ·8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/8o 8/12/80 8liZ/~O 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/1.2/80 8/12/80 8/i2K8o 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 ~/12/80 ~/i2/8o 8112/80 8/12/80 8/i2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 PA~,E 4 TOTAL ,A~OUNT 36. Oo 6,319.84 38.50 33.00 15.00 1,371.46 49,567.50 2,585.55 145.23 136,31 15.00 59.62 144.00 ......... ~.,J88.oo 360.45 52.18 .......... ~,535~_81CR 1,535.81 116.62 _ 1,594,62 22~2I,i.80 30.20 50.00 200.'31 ._ ....... 70~00 45.20 198.96 ...... 4.1.5o 28.25 225.12 109.17 35.08 32.51 35.00 33.17 51.54 _..6_,785~83 415.83 2t9..80 38.97 45.20 483.07 45.45 94°97 908.45 19.50 23g.36 329.88 122.31 ., ,~,,/2;o/'~0 C'tT'Y OF 'BOYN'TON BE'ACH C U R R E N T M O N T H C H E C ,. ENDOR,," VENDOr. !277 16.04-23 PALM BEACH OFFICE SUPPLY 2E '8 151720 PETTv CASH WATER ~ SEWER 28279 16275~ PICA~D CHEMICAL CO, 2828C 162790 PIERCE TI~E CO,~ INC, ~823t 16460] PDMP~NQ OFFICE SUPPLY~ CO 82'82 .... 16~707 MARTHA 'POT ~E-R 32~'3 1655~D LOUIS PROSSEN 828.~ 1~700 R ] LA~D TRUCK EQUIP,~ INC .~'~BZ'9,5 .. Z'B'~5~S 10 R~O:~'t N CONSTRU.CTION C D. 28285 1~5319 JEFF RUDAY Z~287 i.O1 lOO SCOTTY,S ~ ...... Z~ ~915t~ SE~CREST PHARMACY .3289 i9459~ S2UTH FLORIDA MACK TRUCKS . 28290 19~705 S3UTHERN BUILDING CODE ' H Z:329~._ ........... ~9~717 SOJT ,ERN HYDRAULIC INDUST 28292 1,9,~720 SDUT,HERN PAPE~R CO. 28293 196030 STATE INSTRUMENTS INC. 25294 ........... 205413 TRaIL-FORD TRACTOR CO, 2'8295 .. 450010 ALLEN SMITH 23295 530054 DAVID ALLEN 2~29T ........... 530059 NOCHOLAS Oo ALVARO 29~9.8 530060 WILLIA~ F. AND· REWS' 26..99 54003~ BiLT uR~ BLDRS. CO, INC, 28300 540195 BA'RTON DEVELOPERS 2~-'~6i ........... -~0'-~95-' -WILLIA~ BARTON JR. 28302 -5~+3197 SAMUEL 'E, BIGBIE '28303 .......... 5~019B .... ."]. C, BRIDGES ,2830N 540199 28305 550104 2830~ 550127 2~307 55013! Z~3o8 55oi3z 28309 '550133 553]34 li 550135 .. 512 550136 283-13 5'50137 25314 550138 28315~ 560025 ~za316 .... "-~ '28317 560105 2'8318 563105 2<~31'9 57003G 2,.,'329 53005~ 2~32! 580075 28322 590077 590132 60009! 28325 500127 28325 5~006t 2~327 6~0081 TERRY BURKHARDT CASTLE BUILLD.ERS JUDY CATO MICHAEL CADY VIS, CENT [ARRELLI HIRAM CARHONA DOUGLAS R. CHI.LSHOLH MICHAEL W, CONLON JAMES V, COURT -Ho -ED EOX GEORGE CUMMINS JR. DREXEL PROP, INC DICK 'DUNCAN HENRY DE ~OER FRANK DI HAR~A F. D. EALLON~RDO FL. CONSTRUCTION MGMT. VIRGINIA FOSTER JARMAN ROY FEWER~ACHER R.ICH~RD GRAHAM HdNTERS RUN SUNDAY HUEBNER ROBERT KELLER ~NTONY LATINO K S CHECK DATE 6/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/B0 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/8o 8/lZ180 8112/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/.12/80 8/12/80 8/i2~80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 a/12/8o 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/&0 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 .8/12/80 ~112t8o 8/12/80 8112/80 8/i2/B0 8/12/80 8/12/~0 8/12/80 8112/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 PA'GE TOTAL '5 A~OUNT 50.17 21.25 199.50 3~281.95 53.80 I3.50 88,44 22.69 236.52 30.00 523.23 ....... 193.20 8.10 69,00 _. 62.16 95.56 ..... 16'~.,43 29.75 13.50 ..... 25.80 21.50 15.00 o ........ ZT.ZO_ 4.70 10.80 ...... ZT~Zo 31.70 10.8.53 21,60 32.00 6.50 7,10 25,80 11.15 18.20 22.20 25,10 41.88 10.30 21.50 27,27 35.50 2.80 25.80 94.40 12,20 913.50 16.30 11.50 27.20 CUR-RENT MONTH CHECKS 4E'CK.." VENDOR ,Z?~328- 640092 ~-329 540n93 Z,_ .30 650105 Z8331 650!53 28332 650154 'E 8332 650 I54 ~8 33;3 650 ~'92 ~33~ 65G] 93 ~8335 ~65 O ~ 233'36 65019'5 ,~B 33~ ..... ~501 93 ~33~o 65Ol 9~ 283~I 6&0'931 z85~2 .... 6~0017 28343 670027 zs3~._.. 67oo2~ 28345 680115 283~b ~80116 28347 680117 28348 5BOllB 2z~'~49 680119 2~350 700074 2335i '7~0098 28382 -7OOLO$ 2~.353 700107 28354 700108 28355 700109 283'56 710155 28357 710177 28358 7'10173 28359 710179 28360 710180 28351 71018! 2~362 710182 ~28363 71'0183 2836q 720075 28S65~ 720075 28366 740C29 2~357 7~003D 28368 75010q 28369 780005 . ~70 793153 22'371 793151 28372 793~52 283~3 793153 ~,~_2~37~ 793154 2~375 7P315~ 28376 793!56 28377 793157 ~N~OR NAME N'IETHA LONG [AVETTE LIND$EY MINTQ CONSTRUCTION I~C. ~ARINER VILLAGE 'OF B.B. ~M~A K. MAY,ER EM~A Ko NAYER ROBERT MANGOLD ~ARR¥ MARKOWITZ ~ER~RY-GO-ROUNO RESIURANT ~ H.~ R'L E¥ GEORGE MC CANN DEBORAH,MC INTYRE D, ,F. NIFF,ENEGGER ORLAN HOMES CORPo N. A. OVERFIELD OVERLAND CONSTRUCT]OM VINCENT PACHEO JOHN PAULDO JOHN P£NZA JO~N PFUNO PYRAqID BUILDERS RIOGEWOOD BUILDERS RffODES CONSTR'UCTIDN INC. CLARK REGNERUS ANTONIO RIVERA JOHN ROTELLA 5U%ANNE ROY SEA~AY VILLAS H. C. SANFORD RAYMOND SAPYTA FRANK SARRA JDHN SCHWEGLER " RICHARD A. SEARLS GEORGE SIKORA, ~ARV[S SUNDBERG ALBERT TAKACS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE ViTA VALENT[NO V. I. P. BEAUTY SHOP WILLtA~ NATSON JOSEPH ZFNAGE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH C~TY O~ B,OYNTON BEACH CiTY 0~ ~OYNTON BEACH CITY OF ~OYNTON BEACH CITY OF ~DYNTON BEACH CITY OF ~OYNTON ~EACH CHECK DATE 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/I2/80 8112/80 8/12/80 8-/12'/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/8o 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/1Z/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/1.2/80 8/12/80 8/12~80 8/12/~0 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/I2/80 8/i2/80 8/t2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 '8/i2/80 8/I2/~0 8/I2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 ~l~2/ao 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/i2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/t2/80 8/12/~0 8/12/80 PA GE 6 TOTAL AMOUNT 32.90 7.50 459.00 57.20SR 57.20 30~00 27,20 19.85 30.O0 10.90 '8.70 24.70 8.70 4.70 190.40 21,50 24.40 3.65 26,90 15.OO 26,50 10,20 56.50 24.50 25.28 13,00 5.28 27.20 9.90 45.50 IS.gO 4.70 12,30 8.00 24,80 27.20 ~.85 215.60 2°35 25.10 12.20 30,DO 30.00 4.20 30.00 2.80 2.80 4.20 15.00 C ! ,T Y QF BDYNTON .:B'E AiC'H 4ECK,." VENDOR,." ~"-'q 378 793 158 __..¢' '*,79 7931 59 2839'1 793161 '2'8 BB2 ~93 162 '"-163'~3 ....... 793163 ~ B .83 4 793~.5~ ~ 8,385 793165 M 5 N T H C H NAME 3;8;3~& ........... ~:93_I 6:5. Z83~87 793,167 28388 793169 .. 39.0 ?'93 t 73 C -I T Y OF Z8391 793171 CITY 283~.2 ........ :~'931 72 .. C I T Y ~ F 28393 793173 CI'TY O.F 283'94 79317,& CITY DF Z53~5~ ........ 793! 75 .... CITY DF 28:39,6 79317'5 C I TY 28397 793177 CITY OF 283~ ....... 7~3. l~8_ CITY DF 28399 T93I~9 6iT'Y /~-~'03 793183 CITY 28~02 795~82 28~03 793183 CITY OF 2~05 793185 CITY OF  9405 793186 [ITY OF 28408 793188 CITY 28'~09 793189 CITY 20411 793191 'CITY 28412 '793192 CITY CITY ~841~ 79319~' CITY 8415 793195 CITY zs~!s~ ......... 7~p~?s C~TY 98417 793197 CITY 2~418 79319fl CITY 28~9.__j 793199 . CITY 7.93~0D CITY ~ ~21 793201 CITY - ' 28~422 ...... 793~02 CITY 28~23 793203 CITY 28q2~ 7932OR CITY ~,281~2 5 793205 CITY 28/~ 25 7932'0'5 C I TY 25'627 793237 CITY 28~28 793209 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH C~I~T¥ O':F B-OYNTON B-EACH CITY 'DF BOYNTON BEACH £.ITY DF 'BOYNTON BEACH CITY 3'F 'BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF ,BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH ,CITY OF BGYNTON BEACH CITY 3F BOYNTON BEACH ._ C-ITY Dc BOYNYON BEACH -BOY. N'TON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNT:ON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH _B:OYNTON .BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BDYNTON BEACH BO-YNTDN BEACH DF '*BDYNTON B. EACH OF BOYNTON BEACH OF DF DF OF DF OF DF OF DF DF DF Or: OF OF DF OF OF DF OF BOYNTON BEACH BOY.NYON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOyNTON.BE, ACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BDYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYN'TON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BE&CH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BDYNTON BEACH BDYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH BDYNTON BEACH $OYNTON BEACH BOYNTON BEACH E C K S CHECK PAGE ? DATE TOTAL AMOUNT '8/12/80 15.00 8112/80 30.00 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/80 11.37 8/IZ/80 28,00 8/12/80 ........ 30.00 8/12/80 8.50 8/12/80 22.90 8/12/80 _ 4.20 8/12/80 3.~5 8iiZl~o 7.80 8/1z/8o ..... 30.00 8/12/80 15.00 8/12/8o. A.9o 8/tZ/80 32.73 8/12/80 15.00 8/12/8o ........ 14.oo 8/i2/80 34.1.2 -8/12780 24.50 8/1'2/8o ............... 1.5.0o ..... 8/12180 34.20 8/12/8o 30.00 8/12/80 ...................... 3D.90 8/i2/$0 2.8O 8/12/80 30,00 8/12/80 2.80 B/12/8o 2.80 8112/80 2.90 8/12/8o 2.8o 8/12/80 ............... Z.B.~ 8112/8o z.8o 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/80 2,80 8/~2183 2.80 8/~2/80 Z.80 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/90 13.50 . 8/12/80 2.80 8~12/80 ........ 2-.~0 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/80 2.80 8/12/80 2,80 8/12/80 10.00 8/12/80 21.50 8/12/80 2,80 8/29-/30 CITY OF :BOYNTON ~ E~AC H I£CK # VENDOR ~ 'VENDOR NAME ~F 30 793213 2~931 7J321! 28432 793212 ~433 793213 ~43~ 7P'3214 ~8435 703215 848.6 793216 Z:84-37 7~93~t7 28~38 793219 2843~ 793229 za4,4z 793223 8 ' 2 4~3 793224 28446 793Z27 z'8 4 ........ 28448 703229 z .aSo .......... 323I 28452 703233 28453 79323~ 28454 284~5 28456 23457 2B458 ~28459 84'60 28461 28 62- 2~463 ~8465 28466 .79323S 7~3236 793~37 .7'93238 793239 932 o 793241 ,793242 793Z~3 793244 793245 793246 79324v £8467~ ..... ~3.2~4~. CITY 28~68 7932~ ~28469 793251 28470 793252 2~-471 793253 i~472 79325~ 28~73 79325~ 2847G 7~3256 28475 793257 '28477 7~3259 ,28478 79~260 28479 7932bi CITY Om BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH CITY D.F BOYNTDN BEACH CITY OF PDYNTON BEACH CI%Y 3F BOYNTON BEACH CITY 3F BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BDYNTON BEACH CITY D~ BDYNTDN BEACH CITY 0~ BD:YNTON ~EACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BgYNTON BEA, CH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH CLITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CI-LTY OF ,B'OYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BDYNTON BEACH cITY 3F BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF ~OYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTDN BEACH CITY DF- BOYNTDN BEACH CITY OF BOYNTDN BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CiTY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY O~ BOYNTON BEACH .CITY DE BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON ~EACH 3F BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH ~ Ty ~I OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITy DF ~OYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF ~OYNTON BEACH CITy OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH E C K S CHECK DATE 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 - 8/12/80 8/12/80 8./i2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/i2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/i2/8o 8112/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/~o 8/12/B0 8/i2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 ~liztso 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/I2/80 8/lZ/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80' 81i2/80 PAGE 8 TOTAL AMOUNT 18.20 '7.70 2.80 4.20 15.00 15.00 15.00 3,50 7,50 30.00 15.00 2.80 27.10 2,80 2.80 2.80 2.80 30.00 60.00 30,00 IO,i5 7.50 19.10 6.30 7.50 6.30 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3,50 2.80 2.80 2.80 2,80 ..... 2.80 2.80 2.80 2,80 8.50 5.60 3.10 3.50 -49.80 15.00 48.50 ........... 4.72_ 3,50 30.00 _. ~7.00 SITV gF I50YNT:ON B'E,A£H ?7 C U R R E N T M 0 N T .H C H E .C HECK ~; q'EN~OR,,~' VEN'gOR WA; '42' 2q483 2P484 ~435 ~P~B3 2~4S'9 28490 28491 ~493 2~494 28495 Z~496 2~497 ..... ' 28498 29499 23500. __ zm5Ol 793262 793264 793255 793266 793267 79326B 7q3269 793270 793271 793272 7P3~73 79327~ 793275 .79327~ 041686 340019 460007 490001 3~0029 450008 280010 28090~ ........ 380012 270008 01424D 130950 340016 010900 .01~033 O160OJ 02044~ 02~204 02173i 024725 324733 024'776 024780 024991 02560D 034578 036355 062818 062820 052910 06460~ 06559~ 071573 074640 375509 075511 28534 2~505 28:50.6 28507 23508 2850:9 2~510 28511 28512 28514 '8516 28517 285.18~ 28519 2~521 28522 2' 24524 22525 2~526 28528 28530 CITY OF. BOYNTON BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACM -CITY OF BDYNTON BEACH CITy OF BOYNTON 'BEACH CITY DF BOYNTON ~EACH CITY OF BOYNTON ~E~CH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY ~F BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BOYNION 'BEACH CITY OF ~OYNTQN BEACH CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH CITY OF BDYNTON BEACH CITY O~ BOYNTON BEACH CITY O~ BOYNTON BEAC~ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL DALE HAM~ACK BAPRY TAYLOR WENGLER, THOMAS E. LISA J. METHFESSEL ROBERT J. SHAW JOHN BYNES RE LILLIAN BDNNER CLIFFORD LEWIS 'LEONARD ALBURY ISIAH ~NOREWS WILLIE RUTH MCGRAOY CA-RRQLEIZER HERRING ACR SUPPLY .AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOC. ATLANTIC HARDWARE BANYON BOOKS B.D. DF CO. COMMISSIONERS ~EYOND COPING BOYNTON CITY FEDERAL CRED BOYNTON BEACH RETIREMENT BOY'NTON ~EDICAL OXYGEN BDYNTON PUMP & SUPPLY ~ ROBERT d. BRADY CO. BR~ARO PU~P ~ SUPPLY C. Oo COLONIAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL CUSTOM T'S FIPEFLY BOOKS LTD ~IREHEN'S RELIEF & ¢IRST BANK ~ TRUST ~3UR STEEL CORPORATION CHARLES FREDERICK GENERAL TOOL & MACHINING GOLDCOAST PLUMBING G~IFFiN POLLUTION GROLIER YEARBOOK, INC. CHE. C K DATE 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8112/80 8/12/80 8/I2/80 8/12/80 - 8/12/90 8/i2/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/12/80 8/13/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8115/80 8/15/80 8/15'/80 8/15/80 8/15/~0 8/15/8o 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 a/zs/8o 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 't1518o 8/15/8.0 8/1.5/80 8/15/80 8115/80 8/I5/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 PAGE 9 TOTAL AMOUNT 9.72 2.80 17.70 2.80 .... 30.'00 30.0O 15o00 2,80 5.15 4.90 2,80 20,00 ,00 ...... 334,26. 225.8i '292.66 ........ 492.66 342.66 173.26 ......... 966.0~ 431.22 55.00 .......... 48,0.0 126,56 81.85 ................... lO,DO . 8.91 3.00 8,232.87 1,079.32 82,00 546.31 15,26 57.80 101.50 ..... '. 57.85 4.46 813,24 16,432.35 12o95 79.3.0 55.00 29.74 466.00 8.00 VENDOR,, 24534 ~.2-8.535 28536 28537 2a-538 28'539 28541 3 28544 2 8545 23546 28547 28543 285'~9 2 R 550 28551 075580 080,403 09.0'564 08635O 09419'0 100319 106451 112770 115601 120453 12{525 124741 I31601 131682 131760 I34625 I34710 136~2~ 28,552 140A.66 2 ,53 1~1701 28554 155500 2~555 160454 28556 162870 2~557 I76304 28558 176305 285'59 I7630~ 2~560 190610 28561 l.g06ll 2~562 Ig0966 28563 19279~ 28564 205533 28565 210153 ~28566 23,1780 23567 241602 28568 2800ib 28569~ ......... 290031 28~?0 390030 ~28571 390031 2~572 420'017 2~573 070~09 ~. 574 074500 28575 24576 igOqSO :28577 196225 28578 01135D 23579 020tOq 28580 285B1 020C~O .,"-~I TY O'F BOYNT,ON BE ACH r. N T M 0 'N T H C ;H 'E VENDOR NAME GULF OIL CORP. HARDR. tVES, INC.. U~' A~S D~INK-ING FAUCET CO. H UCKLEBUCK MUSIC INDUSTRIAL ELECTRICAL JACK'S 7CAMERA CENTER N JJNO I DUSTRIES KtPLINoE. WASHINGTON EDIT KDPY KING PR'INTING CENTER THE -S.:S. KRESGE STORY C/O EL'EANOR' K'RUSELL LANIER BUSINESS PRODUCTS PAUL DAVIS LECLAIR LOT SERVICE ~ERIT EMPLOYMENT ASSESS,ME LISA METHFESSEL MEYER SOD ~4000¥'9 INVESTORS SERVICE ~OViE FILM SERVICE LAURA MUDRYK ~JNICIPAL POLICE NATIONWIDE ADVERTISING ~p Nm TUNE METER ORGANIC GARDENING JI~ PATTERSON PITNEY BO~ES OUIXOTE CENTER ~UIXOTE CENTER O~ORUM BOOKS SAV-ON UTILITY SUPPLIES SAVVY SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOC.~ CAROLYN SIMS TRANSI-TRONICS, IMCo U.S, P~STMASTER- WESTERN AUTO ST~RE x'ERO× CORPORATION BOYNr.ON CITY F[D.ERaL CRED JA~ES D. CLARK P:EORO ~.ESA CAROL 4. MARC~ THOH~S J. PENNEA BETTY GARRiGA CHARLES GODFREY ~VA RAYMOND 9LYVE E. SCHOOLEY FLORENCE STU.SBINS aDMINISTRATIVE CHARGE5 $ ~ H SALES -THE BAKER ~ TAYLOR CO. T~ q~ ~AKER ~ TAYLOR CO. C K S CHECK DATE 8115/80 8/15/8o 8115/80 8/15/aO 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/90 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/B0 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8115/80 8/15/80 8/15/8o 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 .8/15~8o 8/15/8o 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/i5/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 8/15/80 -..8/15/80 ~115/8o 8118/80 8/18/80 8118/80 8/i8/90 8/1~/80 8/I9/80 8/19/90 8/19/80 8/19/80 PAGE tO TOTAL AMOUNT 141.35 28.00 7-84.30 lOO.O0 325.05 415;40 32.00 125.35 7.60 79'.30 1~007.50 5,00 .963.17 496.70 79.30 818.00 ......... 1,7~0.00 400.00' 79,30 ............ 17159.12 379..09 440.22 19.00 79.30 45,00 4,45. 7.00 35.00 49.80 12.00 9.48 79.30 50°00 2,OO0.O0 50.34 64.00 487.32 539.91 741,46 562.50 2,840.56 39.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 22,000.00 568.44 32.59 2~027.76 C'ITY 9F ~OYNT~]N 8EACH 'C -U 'R R 'E :N.T M O N T H C H E C K NECK "' D R .,, ENDOR ,,. -VEN 0,. V NAqE :'~3582 020455 .~r '9S 021599 28~94 -021631 ' 28585 041684 23586 041690 .9537 .... 042635 859.8 044750 8'5~9 0~6453 ~'8"59i 0537.5-6 28592 363787 '594 28596 ...... 030425 28597 084693 23597 094693 2~598 080350 ..... s 28600 090!00 .286~_! ............ 1.00310 2~A02 11281~ 2~ 03 130320 BARRON'S BE'LL £ HOHELL MPD BELL & HOWELL CO. J]HN DENSON OETEC¥~VE BOOK CLUB DIAZIT CO., INC. O-DU~LEDAY C CO. JOHN B. DUNKLE FLAR~D~ INTELLIGENCE UNIT FLORIDA METER SERVICE CO. FLORIDA PJBLIC UTILITIES .GJLF OIL CORP, G, K, HALL E CO. HALSEY ~ GRIFF[TH~ INC. _HANO'S RDBERT HOWELL ROBERT HOWELL .HUCKLEBUCK MUSIC HJSSEY ELECTRICAL CONTR~ I.Bo~, CORPORATION _JACg'S CAMERA CENTER KIRK MATERIALS, INC. MACMILLAN PUBLISHING CO. 2859~ ............. 139~00. : ~ANHATTAN 28605 140410 28606 'IAiTOI 28507 .......... ~0~2~ .... 2~6o'8 28609 190188 28518 653153 28619+ ......... 04.0395 2~,Sz.o ~oozt ..... ~ZB~21 380002 28&22 46000-5 2~5!23 ~0915 ~. ~24 440001 2~5125 450044 2P6i26 490020 286,27 450025 :~'"286,28 014249 .' - 2~12~ 130950 2q6)30 0~5~21 2~5G1 350933 TRNPHIES NALCO CHEMICAL CO. NEPTUNE ~ETER CO. PALM BEACH POST-TI~ES P~PA~O OFFICE SUPPLY, CO S&q FARM SUPPLY,INC. SEACREST PETROLEUM CO. SEACREST VETERINARY SILVER 8URDETT UNDERGROUND SUPPLy WARREN GDRHAM g LA~ONTt I WATER HYDRANT SERVICE J.Jo~o ~OLF FR.E~H DISTo XEROX CORPORATION MAqI~R ViLL.AGE OF DALE'S PAINT ~ BODY SHOP T.H~S WILLIamS VERA LEWIS ~.ARY TENK SHARON RANDOLPH JO~N E. REYNOLDS W]I. LIA~ Ho SULLIVAN LOJISE M. WARD WARREN H SHELHAME, R ISIAH ANDREWS WILLIE RUTH ~CGRAOY ORE~S GOLF SHOP THQRLEY JOHNSON S CHECK DATF PAG-E 11 TOTAL A~OUNT 8llq/BO ~3.90 8/.19180 239.00 8/19'/80 900.94 8/i9/80 32.00 8/19/80 23.69 8119/B0 2~.22 8/19/80 81.'47 8/19/80 3.40 9/191_o ............ 29.90.. 8/19/80 795.00 8/19/80 ~23 8/19/'80 _ __16,18~.61 8/19/80 31.32 · 8/19/80 206.07 8/lO/80 ...... 12.70 8/19/80 24.00CR 8/19/80 2~.00 8/i9/80 .............. 100.00 8/19/80 .275.00 8/19/80 245.94 8/19/80 ........... 8/19/80 8.1.00 8/19/80 70,78 8/19/80 .223.55 8/1q~80 ....... 867.55 -" 8/19/80 153.27 8/i9/80 9.40 8/1~/8o z64.16 --' 8119/80 82.50 8119/80 .............. 99.5.58 8/19/80 176.50 8/19/80 9,87 8/19/80 ........... I91.90 8119180 i95.00 8/lO/80 4,250.00 8/19/80 5.50 8/1~/80 137.30 8/19/80 57,20 8/Zg/BO 3,159.67 8122/90 416.18 8/22/80 54.54 8/22/80 471.96 8/22/83 177.91 8/22/80 _1~003.08 8/22/80 295.52 8/22/80 211.74 8/22/80 _ . 55,00 8/22/80 49.00 8/22/q0 49.40 8/22/80 159.32 !E CK,~" f'"'q 532 r~'3b 3'7 ~639 23641 ~ 646 ~8647 23649 28651 2~8652 2~653 28655 28~56 28557 28359' 8660 866~ ~662 >65 3667 3668 2i8669 28673 28671~ ~28672 2~673 28674 2 75 Z~576 2~78 ~:bso CITY OF 'BOYNTON :BEAC'H C U ~ R E N r M 0 VENDO~ ~; VEW)OR NAME 010150 011409 013723 31435? 0'15503 '025379 0~'5"5'0 04'!58~ 040455 3~43~1 063752 0%0399 070400 074500 975450 07'5530 091~53 084693 0~4301 104602 120413 120540 123574 124741 130400 134700 14041~.~ 141701 16031~ 163413 160456 161705 162753 166200 190188 190~99 1~2779 1~6170 195225 235603 206353 21~426 230453 235501 241603 261535 06~-i0 024725 a. BE.LTRAN TYPEWn'ITER ~gVA'MCE air CONDITIONING ALLEN INSORANCE AGENCY AHERI.CAN PLANNING ASSOCIA VEVA ARMBRUSTER DR-, JAMES E. BU~FFAN - 'COCA COLA BOTT'LING CO. JOHN DENSON GERALD DUNKLEBERGER ENGINEERING AND EQUIPMENT FL3RIDA LEVEL " E TRA,~SiT GARDEN'STORE BETTY GARRIGA CHARLES GODFREY GRAYBAR ELECTRIC R.L. GRUMMONS PRINTING HFS, CO ROBERT HOWELL INTERNBTIONAL CITY JONES EQUIPMENT CO. LA~Aq UNIFORMS LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOC. LAWYFRS TITLE INSURANCE LOT SERVI~E MANHATTAN TROPHIES MCCALL'S ~ORKING MOTHER ~DTDROLA, INC. NALCO CHEMICAL CO. NEPTUNE METER CO. PAriFIC,. UNIVERSITY LI~RAR PALM BEACH NENSPAPERS PARKER C SON PETTY CASH POLICE PICARO CHEMICAL CO. PUBLIX MARKET Sg~ ~ARM SU.PPLY,INC. SAL'S SPORT SHOP SAX ARTS C CRAFTS SIMON'S ~JNIFOR~S STEVEM'S DRUGS FLORENCE STUBBINS TRO, PIo S, INC TUqF NASTER OF FLORIDA UM!dERSITY OF FLORIDA EARL WALLACE FORD, IMCo WRIGHT LINE XEROX CORPORATION ZEN'ITH CONTROLS INC. FIRST BANK g TRUST B~YNTOFI CITY FEDERAL CRED BBYNTON BEACH .~TIREM~NT C K S CHECK DATE 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/9O 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/2~/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/$0 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 .8/22/80 8/22/80 8/227~0 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 a/z2/~o 8122/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8'/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8122/80 8/22/80 8/22/80 8/22/R0 8/22/90 8/22/80 PAGE 12 I-DIAL AMOUNT 149.50 119.79 397.00 29.00 1'5.00 100.00 76.50 16.00 30.OO 189.29 65.00 1,200.00 30.00 30.00 5.04 =~ 257-~10 1,619.00 324.OO 21.75 213.00 68.90 250.00 114.00 130.65 6.95 984,00 895.44 11,722.48 40.00 1,420.75 1,350.00 79.30 74.25 49.85 123.75 155.00 590.91 85.95 98.16 15.00 92.30 7,200.00 lbO.O0 3,333.65 690.00 209.45 37.55 15,667.17 8~270.21 2,890.90 [.IT'Y OF E~OYNTQN BEACH ,..~' U R R '~:_ N T M O N T H C H E C wECK ~ VENDOR-"., <~'8683 135420 28595 012758 .... 28,587 01392C 28:588 014803 8~5~9 324760 EBb~0 080!84 29o'9.1 .... 030303 29692 031700 28693 ,r¢~869~.. 041581 869'5 041722 ~9595 0'50303 2869.7 ...... 065590 28698 070410 28699 075580 28700 ........ 080425 28701 28702 090401 2,B,70~ 09~503 28708 090108 2~70.9 ....... 0941~2 28710 101507 2871'1 111553 2~712 ....... [23410 2~:~[3 L2OSOO 28714 12~741 28716 10t701 28717 150353 ...... 28718 161659 28719 16450~ 2B723 16~70D 2972_t~ ......... 190966 28722 103990 ~28723 1~4703 2,8'7:24 196~09 ~.7'2'5 230~95 ~ 725 205532 297~7 295595 2~728 21015S 28729 2]6359 -287.30 21'b39! 2~731 230543 9732 231600 a133. 232809 CENSOR NA'~E MON!OIPAL POLI.CE FIRE~EN'S RELIEF & ADVA~,!£E AIR CONDITIONING RO~EPl D. AILSTOCK J~. ~MERICAN ARTIST [ARMPN ANNUNZI'ATO BOYNTON GLASS SERVICE, C g O RoqFING CO, CALDWELL. PACE[Ti.~ARROW PERRY CESSNA COUNTS RESCOE EQUIP JOE DELONG ~EZgR~ A UNIT OF GENERAL EAST CO&ST FIRE E~UIP. £d&RLES FREDERICK GAYLORO BROTHERS R.L. GRUMMONS PRINTING HAND'S EDWARD HAR~ENING HAROLD'S SALES & SERVICE HELCg EQUIPMENT CD. JOSE~q T. HOLLAND EDGAR HOWELL MARILYN HUCKLE HJSSEY ELECTRICAL CONTR. I~ A RET!.REMENT C.ORP. INDOSTRIAL ~ MUNICIPAL DEE G. J~GHERS BERT KEEHR LAM~R UNIFOR~qS BOB LATHAM LOT SERVICE NAL£O CHEMICAL CO. NEPTUNE ~qETER CO. TEREESA PADGETT ~H RLES PERSING ROBERT POCSIK PORTER PAINt CO. $CIENC~ RESEARCH ASSOC. SH!TTy'-S SERVICE SHOP SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE NORM'AN S'TRNAD J.S.T.AYL0~ LOCAL ARRANGE WALTER M. TRUDGER TROPICAL SUPPLY CO.~ INC. U.S. POSTMASTER UNDERGROUND SUPpLy UNIJ.AX, INC. WATER DEPARTMENT THOMAS E= WENGLER EDWI~' K S CHECK DATE 8122/80 8122/80 8/25/90 8125/83 8/25/80 8126/80 8125/80 8/261~0 8/26/90 8/26/80 8126/B0 81'25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/20/80 8/26/80 8/26/80 -8f26/80 8/26/80 8/25/80 8/26/80 8/25/80 8125/80 8125/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/26/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 .8/26/80 8125/8o 8126/80 8~26~80 8/25/80 8/26180 8/25/80 8/26/80 8/26/8'0 8/25/B0 8/26/80 8/25/80 8126/80 8/26/80 8/25/80 8/26/80 8126/80 ~AGE I3 TOTAL A OU4T 1,022.29 804.41 569.47 275-.00 14.00 75.00 35~70 259.00 2,678~45 175.00 125000 .............. 56.qo 175.00 100.00 ...... s9_5 · 44 595.89 40.00 175.00 315010 152.93 I12.02 1~625o3~ 125.00 65.00 125.30 639.02 900.00 979.30 1)210.80 4,980.45 175.00 175.00 100.00 13.13 ._ _ 125.00 858.75 162.25 _.115.00 24.48 167.15 ....... 26.00 140.00 278.00 _ 20~.6.7 ._ 87.50 125.00 ...... 125.00_ 135.00 193.04 165.00 2'9780 ,, VENgOR ,' y ,..~.T OF BDYNTON' gEACH -R-E N T M O N T H C H E C 'K S ~/ENOOq "lANE CHECK ' '~1734 ........ 241603 _ '-35 2:5152D 28,36 254553 28737 340032 28738 4509~2 8739 195023 8788 ~20001 8759 01~2~3 _~770 130950 28771 400013 28772 280'009 ~8773 42OO08 ~477.5 45002! 287'76 015500 2R'~7-7 ........ 28778 020100 28779 020163 7'8-0 ....... 28781 020439 28782 020fi53 024725 0247~3 024765 28~90 030355 . 28791 · zBfOz .......... ~-3~599 28'193 03~673 28794 035560 z~798 D~5~53 28603 050306 2~02 062691 28~03 052823 2680~ .... 06'2~10 ~ ~05 D63679 XERGX CORPORATION ZEE ~EDICAL SUPPLIES BETTY ZOBEL CHARLES HETTEL PH~LTP STEN~UIST STATE OF FLORIDA DEPT. PA~GETT, TEREESA E. ISIAH ANDREWS WiLLTE RUTH MCGRADY HARRY NEWTON ARTHUq BLACK STANLEY £. PORTER ELIZABETH J. ZOBEL SA~ S~ELTON VEVA ARH~USTER AUTOPRODUCTS, INC.' B g H SALES BoB. ASSOC. FIREFIGHTERS B.~o AUTO PARTS~ INC. THE BAKER 8 TAYLOR CO. THE BAKER ~ TAYLOR CO. BAKER ~ TAYLOR COMPANIES Ho-BORDAN--NORTH OF THE BO 6OVNTON CITY FEDERAL CRED BDYNTON BEACH RETIREMENT ~OYNTON GUN ~ LOCK~ INC, BYRDS ELECTRIC HONOR CADILLAC ENGRAVERS CARDID TRONICS CAPEL KLANG COHPANIES COMMERCE CLEARING HOUSE CONGRESS COMMUNITY SCHOOL CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO. QICTAPHONE WILL!AH P. DONEY DOUBLEDAY ~ CO. JOHN Bo DJNKLE oE ALD DUNKLE~ERGER EAST NOD.DS PRESS EMERGENCY MEDICAL & SAFET RoNoFIFLD AND JOHN MCNUTT ~IREHEN'S RELIEF g FIRST BANK & TRUST FLA ASSOC OF PLUMBiNG-GAS 363va~ FLOR!DA POWER a LIGHT 053799 FLORIDA TREND 063B0q FLORID& UNEMPLOY~AENT FUND ._~65~53 FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE 070)oq GARR~TT CONSTRUCTION INC. ...... 0~0~1! ..... G~YLn~O BROS.,INC. DATE 8126/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/25/80 8/27/80 8129/80 8/29/80 8129/80 8129/80 8129/80 8/29/80 8129/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/2~/80 8/29/80 8/29/~0 8129/80 8t29/~0 8/29/~0 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/89 8/29/80 8/29/80 8129/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29780 8/Og/~G 8/29/80 '8-/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/2~/90 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 8/29/80 '8/29/80 8/29/80 PAGE TOTAL AMOUNT I01.62 27.00 40.00 374.28 688.68 7,50 496.00 55,00 48.00 .374.32 749.64 ~52.97 ~_'42.94 15,00 57.00 166.41 308.88 66'3o45 33.81 20I 18.33 20.00 8,252.02 3,02*0.79 350.00 595.00 19.58 948.20 55.56 22.80 455.17 _4_, 159o 85 25.54 1ZO.90 5,56 15.00 3D.O0 24.20 34... 45 26~100.00 816~99 16,244.06 20.00 44~ 798° 75 5.18 1,775.30 2~514o22 480.75 30.00 I 10.. O0 -8/,29/.82 CITY OF L~OYMTON SE'ACH C U R R F N T M O N T H C H E C ;ECK,," vENDoR d 07.2672 .4 074500 28815 .... 075~53 28816 075530 -~8817 080319 9819 082723 8820 084676 2'9821 ...... 09~681 28822 134514 28823 t20~4 ,~k88 Z.~ _ = ..... _1215 23 8825 130940 28825 131593 288'27 .......... 13.1_763 2,3828 132799 HENAY E. GIBSON, SEC, TRE CHARLES GODFREY GRAY'AR ELECTRIC COo INC. R.L. GRUMMONS PRINTING HALSEY & GRIFFITH, INC, HARPER'S HIGHSMITH CO., INC. VICTOR HOTHO 7 CO. HOU~,.TON MIFFLIN TH~ JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERS LA,WYERS TITLE INSURANCE LEAHY COSINESS ARCHIVES ~CCAIN SALES ~ER'CU'RY ~tL'NSTRUMENTS INC. MIAMI COURIER NEWSPAPER MINNESOTA ~INING 28829 134673. WILLIAM MORROW & CO., INC 28830_] ..... 136~23 .... MUNICIPAL POLICE . . 2883.1 140413 NALCO CHEMICAL CO. 28832 140426 NATIONAL BOARD OF YWCA CO 2~_8_~3 ..... ~60~09 ..... ~ALM_.BCH, COUNTY Zm-~34 161713 PETTY CASH RECREATION i 21,035 't64600 PO'4P~NO OFFICE SUPPLY~ CO _28_8~6 .]A~39.& ._~.NNI_NG_PRESS. 28837 .1P6503 RjSSELL ~ AXON 28838 190963 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 288.}9_ _122769 ..... SILVER BURDETT 28840 194403 SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRI~UT 28841 194703 SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE 28~.~2_ 1952Z~ ...... ~.LgRENCE STUBBINS ,28843 195411 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMEN 28844 106415 SUN SENTINEL 2~.$9~ .... 2.!6~.2 .....~E.RGROUND SOPPL-Y Z~8~6 216391 UNIJAX, INC. 28847 215419 UNITED WAY OF PALM /¢"~n848 230543 WATER DEOART~ENT ,,,288 '9 ........ 241' 0 - CORPOrATiON 25853 490007 D3R3THY WE ~ONER 28851 490002 WOJCIEEHOWSKI, RAY 2885F ......... 4205i~ "JA~ES R'. PATTERSON ~ 28853 340007 GJS R. H~RT BCH. K S CHECK PAGE' 15 DATE TOTAL AHOUNT 8/29/83 12.30 8/29/80 30.00 8/29/80 537.60 8/29/80 13,.25 8/2~/80 143.34 8/29/80 ..... 16.00 _ 8129/80 83.03 8/29/80 234.86 8/29/8.0 93.83 8/29/80 12.50 8/29/80 117,00 8/29/'80 ..... 377.30.._ 8/29/80 806.00 8/29/80 52.62 8/29/80 ............. 28o00.. 8/29/80 270.70 8/29/80 159.84 8/29/80 ......... 1,047.49 .... 8/29/80 895.44 8/29/80 5.95 8/29/80 .................... 2_8:.0Q ........ 8/29/80 60.18 8/29/80 285.06 8/'29/8o ............. 6..7~ ..... 8/29/80 5,-545.77 8/29/80 Zl.O0. 8/2.9/80 .............. 9.87 8/29/83 53,536.98 8/29/80 297.56 8/~9/80 .............. lS_._OO .... 8/29/80 14.00 8/29/80 59.60 81.29/80 .......... _~23.2~ 8/29/80 112.80 8/29/80 430.40 8/2'9/80 1,35!.50 8/29/80 80°70 8/29/80 1~179,16 8/29/80 535.74 8/29/80 416,64 8/29/80 760.50