The URL can be used to link to this page

Minutes 10-07-75MI~]UTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLO/{IDA, HELD IN CITY HALL, OCTOBER 7, 1975. PRESENT Joe DeLong, Vice Mayor Edward F. Harmening, Councilman Norman F. Strnad, Councilman Emily M. Jackson, Councilwoman ~SENT David Roberts, Mayor Frank Kohl, City Manager Tereesa Padgett, City Clerk Ernest Simon, City Attorne~ In the absence of Mayor Roberts, Vice Mayor DeLong called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. He asked all to rise for the invocation by Dr. Ernest R. Campbell, Minister of the First Baptist Church, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance totthe Flag led by Councilman Strnad. Mr. DeLong noted the long Agenda and said everyone who wished would have an opportunity to speak, but no one should overdo it. Announcements Mr. DeLong asked all those wishing to speak about items on the Agenda to give their names to the City Clerk so they ceuld be called at the appropriate time. Mr. DeLong read the communication received by the Boynton Beach Bi-~entennial Co~maittee announcing that the American Bi-Centennial Florida ExhibitionTraveling Tour will be in the City from October 17th through October 19th, 1975 from 10 A.M. to 5 P.M.~at the Causeway Shopping Center and the admission would be free. The Vice Mayor annonne~d there would be a meeting of the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment & Disposal Board, Thursday, October 9th at 7 P.M. at Boynton Beach City Hall. The City Manager, Mr. Little Lea~ae Plaque with gratitude. Kohl, presented~the Chamber of Commerce to City Council which Mr. DeLong accepted Mr. DeLong announced that City Hall would be closed Monday, October 13, 1975 in observance of Columbus Day. MLN~JTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Mr. DeLong stated that although he was available, he did not substitute for the Mayor at a meeting of the Employees Pension Board on Tuesday, September 30th as he received no notice of that meeting. MINUTES Regular City Council Meeting - September 16, 1975 Mrs. Jackson referred to page 2, third paragraph from the bottom, next to last line amd corrected the word "coops" to be"co-ops". On page 3, paragraph 3, the name of Mr. Ron Marina was corrected by Mrs. Jackson to be "Rom Arrena". There was some discussion because the people in the audience did not have a copy of the Minutes and Mr. DeLong explained that the Minutes must first be adopted by Council, after which any citizen may come into City Hall and obtain a copy. Mrs. Jackson then referred to page 9, paragraph 3, line 2 -- the last word "septic" should be changed to "sprinkler". Mr. Harmening moved that the Minutes of September be adopted as co~rected~ seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Motion carried 4-0. 16th, 1975 No discussion. PUBLIC AUDI~2~CE Mr. Ron Arrena, 1200 S.W. 27th Place, Boynton Beach, wished to speak about Resolution 75-ZZ, re Tennis Fees, however, he was advised to do so when this matter came up under OLD BUSINESS. BIDS Tennis Pro Shop Addition to Boy Scout Build~ Upon the request of the City Manager, Mrs. Jackson ~oved to reject all bids and have theCity forces construct the above addition. Mr. Strnad seconded. Mr. Kohl felt this w~ld be a savings to the City. Mr. Strnad asked if this would come before theCo~u~nity Appearance Board and Mr. Kohl said yes -- the normal procedure would be followed, even though the City forces are doing the work. Mr. Harmening did not recall this Council ever authorizing going out for bid for a tennis pro shop~ although he did not miss any ' 2 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Budget Hearings, he also did not recall it being included in thom. Mr. Harmening saw no reason for a Tennis Pro Shop, or ~ven a Tennis Pro. Mr. Kohl said this was done at a meeting when the entire Tennis Court operation was presented. It was noted that he would give Mr. Harmening a copy of said authoriza- tion. In answer to a question by Mrs. Jackson, Mr. Kohl said the Tennis Pro Shop would have nothing to do with the Boy Scout Hut, although the building would be attached. Motion carried 3-1, Mr. Harmening opposed. One (1) Passive Night Vision. Systom Devic~ Mr. Kohl advised that bids on the above were opened on September 29, 1975 at 4:00 P.M. in the office of the Purchasing Agent, Mr. William H. Sullivan. The Tabulation Committee recommended - acceptance of the low bid from Jones Equipment Company of Holly- wood, Florida in the amount of $5,969.7I. Before Council were copies of the Tabulation Sheet and Affidavit signed by Mr. Millard E. Jones, Partner in the Jones Equipment Company. Mr. Kohl said all other requirements-were in order. Monies are budgeted in the fiscal year 1975-76 Budget in L.E.A.A. Account No. 862-88 for the above purchase. Mr. Kohl concurred with the reco...,endations of the Tabulation Committee. Mr. Harmening moved to accept the City Manager's recommendation above and award the bid to Jones Equipment Company in the amount of $5,969.71. Mrs. Jackson seconded. Mr. Kohl explained that this item was similar to an infra-red device where one could see as well at night as in the daylight. Motion carried 4-0. (4) Voice Alerting Portable Radio Detection Alarm Systoms Mr. Kohl said bids on the above were opened on September 29, 1975 at 3:00 P.M. in the office of the Purchasing Agent, Mr. Sullivan. The Tabulation Committee recommends acceptance of the bid from Varda-Silent Alarm Company in the amount of $3,453.92. Before Council were copies of the Tabulation Sheet and Affidavit signed by Mr. G. B. Moss, representative of the Varda-Silent Alarm Company. Mr. Kohl checked all other requirements and everything was in order. Menies for the above purchase are available in the 1975-76 Budget ink,the L.E.A.A. Accoumt No. 862-87. Mr. Kohl concurred with the recommendations of the Tabulation Committee. Mr. Harmening moved to accept the City Mamager's recommendation above ~d m, ard the bid to the sole Bidder, Varda-Silemt Alarm MINUTES - REGULAR CIT~ COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON B~ACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Company in the amount of ~3,453.92. Mrs. Jackson seconded. No discussion. Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Kohl said anyone going into any vacant buildings, etc. could be oaughtwiththis device. One (1) Computer Mr. James Brown, representative of the Burroughs Corporation, 2218 S. Dixie, W. Palm-~Beach requested to speak and said his - company was a bidder of the computer system the City ~as contem- plating. Mr. Brown them read a rebuttal to the City's possible acceptance of the bid from I.B.M. Corporation. On behalf of Mr. Brown requested that this item go out for re-bid and enumerated several reasons for same. Mr. DeLong appreciated Bnrrough Corporation' s interest ~ and noted that this Council has been very careful about this matter since 1973 in that the City has an outstanding system of public bidding. Me felt there was no question abo~t the integrity of the people involved in accepting bids. Mr. Brown said that his company has always requested in dealing with the City during the last several months that the Cil~yutilize a data processing professional to evaluate the contemplated oomputer hardware. Mr. Kohl said bids on the above were opened on September 30, 1975 at 3:00 P.M. in the office of the Purchasing Agent, Mr. Sullivan. The Tabulation Committee recommended acceptance of the bid from I.B.M. Corporation in the amount of ~86,255.00; monthly rental $2,766.00, or rental with an option to buy at ~66o00. Burroughs Corporation did not meet the City's specificatio~-~'for maintenance servi~e which was for 24 ho~rs, 7 days per week service. Before Council were copies of the Tab~Iation Sheet and Affidavit signed by a representative of the I.B.M. Corporation. Mr. Kohl checked all other requ/rements a~d is in order. ~e noted that this computer will be for Utili~ty Billing (approxi- mately 60~), Payroll and Budgetary Accounting (approximately 40%). Funds for the abate purchase are~ available as follows~ Acc~. 001-830-2~ 001--511-00 030-902-19 74-75 Budget $ 4,000.00 33,000.00 ~37,000.00 75-76 Budget ~ 8,000.00 30,000.00 ~38,000.00 Mr. Kohl concurred with the recommendations of the Tabulation Committee. Mr. Kohl said he had the Finance Director, Treasurer, and many members of other departm_ents attend the demonstrations of NCR, I.B.M. and Burroughs. Also, Mr. Addison Gilbert of Palm Beach Jr. College~ formerly the head of the County's - 4 MINUTES - RE~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACM, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Computer System Center which had two different systems, recom- mended I.B.M. Therefore, Mr. Kohl requested Council's approval of the I.B,M. system, at a monthly rental of $2,766.00. There being no motion made, Mr, DeLong handed the gavel to Mrs. Jackson and he moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manager and Tabulation Committee based upon the facts submitted and that the bid be awarded to the I.B.M. Corporation at a monthly rental of $2,766.00. Mr. Strnad seconded. Mr. DeLeng requested a roll call vote. No discussion. Mrs. FanCy, called the roll as follows: Vice Mayor DeLong - Aye Councilman Rarmening Aye Councilwoman Jackson Aye Councilman Strmad - Aye Motion carried 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:10 P.M. Proposed Ordinance No. 75-35 - To Correct and/or Revise Portions of Ordinance 75-19- Re: Zo~g Regulations Mr. Simon explained that with regard to consideration of amending Ordinance 75-19, this would be a first reading for the purpose of a public hearing-this evening. He then proceeded to read proposed Ordinance No. 75-35 in its entirety. Upon questioning by Mr, DeLong,, it was clarified that this matter had the approval of the Plamning & Zoning Board, and Mr. Kohl read from the Minutes of the P&Z Beard's meeting of October 6, 1975 to that effect (P. 4). Mr. DeLong noted that the proper procedure was being followed and he asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or against this ordinance. No reply. Mrs. Jackson moved to adopt proposed Ordinance No. 75-35 reading, seconded by Mr. Harmening. No discussion. Mrs. called the roll as follows: on first Padgett Councilman Harmening - Aye Councilwoman Jackson Aye Councilman Strnad Aye Mayor DeLong Aye Motion carried 4-0. Abandonment of 20 Ft. .818 No. Federal Hw7. Alley i%ight of Way - Mr. Joseph Tufo - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BO!~TON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 At Mr. Kohl's request, }f~s. Jackson moved to strike this item from the Agenda, seconded by Hr. Harmening. No discussion. Motion carried 4-0. Proposed Resolution No. 75-JJJ - Re: Abandonment of an Easement Mr. Louis Gomzalez }~. Kohl said replies have been received from all the utility companies re the above and he read the action taken by the FIa~mfng & Z~aimg Board on October 6th, approving the above abandonment ~rith the excepti~a of the southerly 6 ft. on the south boundary of Lot 1 and recommending same to City Council. Mr. Simon th~ read Resolution Ne. 75-JJJ in its entirety. After it was clarified forM rs. Jackson that the above exception was included in the Resolution, Mr. DeLong asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or ag Resolution. No r~ply. Mr. Harmeni~g moved for the solution No. 75-JJJ, seconded by Mr. Strnad. No discussion. ~rs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Councilmmn Harmening - Aye Councilwoman Jacksou - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Vice Mayor DeLong - Aye Motion carried 4-0. 9rdinances - 2nd Read~nK - PUBLIC M~.A~!NG PreposedOrdinance 75-29 - Re= Requiring Approval of City Council ~iven to Grantors of Easements Mr. Simon read the above Ordinance on second reading by caption only. Mr. DeLong asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or against this Ordinance. No -meply. }~. Strnad moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 75-29 on second reading. Since there was no second, Iir. DeLong gave his gavel toM rs. Jackson and he seconded the motion. Mr. Harmening felt the purpose behind this Ordinance unduly ties the hands of the Engine~ing and Utilities Departments and he was against it on that basis. Mr. DeLong felt Council was shifting its responsibility to the Engineering Department if this was not passed and he cited the example of a chain link fence being given to someone in opposition to ~n agreement made regarding an easement for sewer lines. He felt Council should m~ke all such approvals in the interest of the taxpayers and the Ordinance should be so amended. MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Mrs. Jackson said she was just in Connecticut where there was a similar problem amd it does not go before the Council there. She said there is a little give end take all over the United State~ when property is taken. Mr. DeLong felt that Council could not delegate its respomsibility to other members of the City to go out and make commitments involving taxpayers' money. Mr. Harmening noted that Council delegates authority to spend money indirectly to department~heads, etc. for it~m~ in the budget and he saw no reason to change the policy. Mr. DeLong agreed, however, he said Council did not authorize the Engineering Department to spend the money im question for the fence end he wished to have Council involved im the future in any agreements made. Mr. Strnad felt there was no harm in having the Engineering Department cc~e before Council for a comm~tmant when en easement is involved° Mrs. Jackson felt each Co~mcilmmmber should vote his or her own convictions. Mrs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Councilmen Harmening No Councilwomen Jackson - No Councilman Strnad Aye Vice Mayor DeLong Aye Motion died with a 2-2 vote. Proposed OrdinenCe 75-30 - Re: Requiring Approval of City Council Given to Grentors of Easements Other Then Exemptions for Water ...a~d Sewer connection Charges Mr. Simon read proposed Ordinance 75-30 on second reading by caption only. Mr. DeLong asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or against this Ordinence. No reply. Mr. Strnad moved for the adoptiom of Ordinance No. 75-30 on second reading. There being no second, Mr. ReLong passed his gavel to Mrs. Jackson and he seconded the motion. Mr. Strnad said he was glad to see so many people present at the Council meeting to see "what we're up against". Mrs. Jackson wished this many people were present at every meeting. Mr. DeLong said he was trying to help the taxpayers end he spoke at length about his~opposition to the mamwho was being given a fence in addition to a 186 ft. lateral end elimination of a $250.00 hook-up charge, although correspondence from the City Menager stated that a fence was only to be given if some Melaleuea trees were removed. Hefelt this was an example of double stendards and favoritism. Mrs. Padgett called the roll as follows: -- 7 MI2UJTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Proposed Ordinance 75-30 Councilman Harmeming - No Councilwoman Jackson - No Coumcilman Strmad Yes Vice Mayor DeLong Yes Motion died with a 2-2 vote. Proposed Ordinance 75-31 - Re: Eliminating Requirements that the City ManaKerReside Within the City Mr. Simon read the above Ordinance om second reading by caption only. Mr. DeLomg asked if anyone present wished to speak in favor of or against this Ordimamce. No reply. Mr. Strmad moved for the adoption of proposed Ordinance 75-31 on second and final reading. Mrs. Jackson seconded. Mrs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Councilman Harmoning - Aye Councilwoman Jackson Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Vice Mayor DeLong - Aye Motion carried 4-0. Proposed Ordinance 75-32 - Re: Amending Rules and Regulations .~or Issuance of Beach Park~nc Permits Mr. Simon read the above Ordinance on second reading by caption only. Mr. DeLong asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of this Ordinance. Mrs. Padgett advised that four people requested to speak on this item. Mr. Joseph Aranow, 2520 N.E. 1st Court, represented the unit owmers of Village Royale on the Greem. He said all the residents of that community realized the costs involved in maintaining the beach and they did not object to paying for the parking permits and were in favor of this Ordinance. Discussion ensued between Mr. DeLong and a Mr. Small in the audience regarding the order of those wishing to speak. Mr. De~g wished to have all those wishing to speak in favor come up first. Mr. Irving Dubin of Village Royale commented about the manner in which the meeting was proceeding and then asked for some clarification about the Ordinance in question. Mr. DeLomg exp!ain~d the rate schedule and noted that the parking area MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BE~ H, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 belonged to the City of Boynton Beach. There was no objection to anyone using the beach, but people outside the City would have to park elsewh~e or pay a higher fee. This Ordinance provided for a differemt type of sticker so a better c~ntrol could be kept em the parking situation. 'Mr. Dubin was in favor of the Ordinance. Mr. Michael Smmll, Attorney, represented the Palm Beach County Unincorporated Community -- particularly south of Hypoluxo Road, north of Atla~ntic West and east of the Florida Sunshine Turnpike, but west of the City limits of Boynton Beach. Mr. Small felt it was a double standard that required a citizen of the County living west of Boynton Beach in the unincorporated area to pay a muqh higher per cent for parking than those living in the City, and also hotel and motel patrons. He reviewed provisions in the Ordinance and objected to the cost of ~2.00 for each time of parking for the non-residents. He also asked why the residents of Ocean Ridge and employees of the City did not' have to pay the higher rates. PiT. DeLong explained that the provision was granted for Ocean Ridge at the time those parcels of lend were de-annexed and that those people would have the privilege of using the beach. 'Mrs. JacKson noted that was in 1931. Hr. Small are being influx of spoke at length about the fact that more Floridians afforded less access to the beaches because of the tourists and condominiums and he read a statement including an opinion of the Attorney General rendered in regard to Delray Beach and use of the beach by non-residents. He appealed to Council for reconsideration of this Ordinance. Mr. DeLong said the City was compassionate as much as possible and made arrangements for the bus service to pick people up from the unincorporated areas in the summertime and bring them to the beach, however, no one took advantage of it. He added that the Ordimnces are onlyas good as the Court upholds them to be. M_rs. Jackson noted there were only 227 parking places and 35,000 residents and the citizens of Boynt~n Beach have to keep up the parking area~nd pay,for tha life guards , etc. Mr. Small said all the of the unincorporated a=ea ~ould be ~illing to carry their share of the cost. He suggested having the residents of ( Ridge excluded from the agreement, but it was explained that could not he done. Fir. Thomas Malley, 4303 Fran¢ina Court, Lake Worth spoke as Chairman of the Unineo.~porated Communities and was in opposition to this Ordinance. He prevailed upon Council to come up with something other than a $2.00 parking fee per visit to the beach. -9 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYMTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Mr. DeLong said this was attempted with the bus route. Mr. }{alley asked for a lower than ¥2.00 fee and discussion ensued wherei~Mr. DeLong gave anexample of a system thatwas tried in Boca Rat~a~hich was ~nsuccessful. Fir. Malley agaim requested consideratiom, especially for the senior citizens outside the incorporated area of the City. Mr. Harmening moved for the adoption of proposed Ordinance 75-32 on second a~d final reading. Fir. Str~ad seconded. ~r. Harmeni~g said he was in favor ef anyone in the unincorporated areas using the beach, but the parking facilities are so very limited, there is just nat enough room to park. He suggested gettimg car p~ols together to lessen the parking problem. Mr. DeLo~g c~v~emted about a bus service to the Beach fr~m Village Royale. Mr. H~d felt that the people livimg near Boymtonbut o~tside the City limits had the advantage ef not having to pay City taxes. Mrs. Jackson said even City residents b~ve not bee~ able ts find parking places at the.beach. She noted that this is amending the r~les and if someth~..~orks out mm the f~t~re, the Ordnance con be amended again. M~rs. Padgett called the rollas follows: Councilman Harmening Councilwoman Jackson Councilman Strnad Vice Mayor DeLong Aye Aye Aye Aye Motion carried 4-0. REC,:SS Mr. DeLong called a recess at 9:20 to allow people to leave. called the meeting to order at 9:30 Proposed Ordinance 75-33 - Re: Rescinding Interim Services & Facilities Fees Mr. Simon read the above Ordinance on second reading by caption only. Mr. DeLong asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of or against this Ordinance. No reply. Mrs-. jackson moved for the adoption of proposed Ordinance No. 75-33 on second and final reading. Mr. Strnad seconded. No discussion. Mrs. Padgett called the roll as follows: C~uncilma~ Harmening Aye Councilwoman Jackson Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Vice Mayor DeLong - Aye Motion carried 4-0. 10- MINUTES - REGb~AR CITY COUNCIL M~]ETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER ~ 1975 Ordinances - 1st Read, nE Proposed Ord~3.ce 75-28 - Re: Providing for Tramsfer of Funds ~etween GemeralFundand ~ Operat~ Capital T~prov~m~ts Fu~ Before the reading, M-rs. Jackson clarifiedwithFLr. Simonthat this Ordimanee had been corrected as requested. Mr. Simon said it was re-typed by the City Manager's office. Sylvia Wagner, 300 N.E. 26th Avenue, asked when the money would be ready to be returned to the Citizens. Mr. DeLong advised that--as soom as the City Ma~ager can make arrangements to release it -- any time after the 10 days the Ordinance becomes effective after second reading. (This is mn reference to Interim Services & Facilities Fees.) Mr. Simon read Ordinance No. 75-28 on first reading in its entirety. Mrs. Jackson moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 75-28 on first reading, seconded by Mr, Harmening. No discussion. Mrs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Councilman Harmening - Aye Councilwoman Jacksen - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Vice Mayor DeLong Aye Motion carried 4-0. .~gsolutions Proposed ResolutionNo. 75-KKK - Re: Ratification of the Boymtom Beach Professional Fire F~Khters Union - Local 1891 Mr. Simon readable above Resolution in its entirety. Mr. DeLong asked if any~e wished to speak in favor of or against this Resolution. No reply. Mr. Harmanimg moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 75-KKK, seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Mr. Kohl noted that Council had all received from him a letter regarding the Police Ratification Agreement and he requested going on record, reiterating the same letter he wrote for the Police inasmuch as many hours were spent by him amd the Personnel Director with the Police Union. It was felt the City has as good a contract as anyome in the County or in the State of Florida and Mr. Kohl felt the Ci~ was on the right track. It was agreed to sPread Mr. Kohl's statememt on the Minutes. Mrs. Padgett called the roll as follows: - lI - MINUTES - REGULA~R CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 .Proposed Resolution No. Councilman Harmemimg Councilwoman Jackson Councilman Strmad Vice Mayor DeLong 75-KKK (Cont'd) Aye Aye Aye Aye Motion carried 4-0. Proposed Resolutiom No. 75-LLL - Re: ~Jm~mmmnt of Certain E ' asements and Rights of Way im GolfviewHarbor - 2nd Sec. (TARLED) Firs. Jackson moved to take this ~tem from the table, seconded by Mr. Harmaning. Motion carried 4-0. It was noted that the City Attorney was ~upposed to look into this and Mr. Simon said the reason this was tabled was:~hat a-~'response had not been received from Florida Power & Light but it has now been received. A typographical error of the word "section~ vs. ~addition" was also c~rreeted. Fir. Simon than read proposed Resolution 75-~ ~nits entirety: Mr. DeLon§ asked if anyone wished to speak an avor of or against this Resolution. No reply. Mr. Strnad m~ved for the adoption of Resolution No. 75-LLL, seconded by Mrs. JaCkson. No discussion. M_rs. Padgett called the roll as follows: Councilman Harmening - Aye Councilwoman Jackson Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Vice Mayor DeLomg - Aye Motion carried 4-0. Other Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant - Councilwom~- Jackso~ Mrs. Jackson read a prepared statement (attached). Mrs. Jackson moved that the City Attorney for the next meeting draw up an appropriate Resolution, expressing thanks on behalf of the City for the fine service that Mr. Paul Startzman has, is and will be performing for our City because of his love and loyalty to Boynton Beach. Mr. Harmening seconded. Under discussion, Mr. DeLong felt that Mr. Startzman deserved this testimonial and he wished all to know that Mn~. Startzman's service to the City didn't ~o unnoticed. At the last Christmas party, at Mr. DeLong's insistance, Mr. Startzman was awarded a pla~ue for his 12 - MINUTES - REGULAR CITY coUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH~ FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 services to the City. He wished all ~o know that Mm. Startzman was not forgotten by the previous administration. Mrs. Jackson wanted future administrations ~o know that the City had such a man as Mr. Startzman and wished to have the Resolution in addi- tion to the plaque. Motion carried 4-0. Report on Fire Hydrant Charges Mr. Federspiel said he had submitted his opinion on this matter to the City Manager and it was noted that Council had received a copy. Mr. Pederspiel said he has now come to the conelusion that the 1950 Bond issue is fully funded, having con£erred with the Bonding counsel in Jacksonville~ who agreed to the extent that the 1950 Bond issue is fully funded as to principal and interest. Eaere is still uncertainty as to whether the surplus that exists in the reserve aeeount can be transferred out to any other aeeount or whether it's locked into the reserve aeeount or the '64 bond "reserve acuount". He felt that the 1964 Bond Resolution requires a billing of these charges as previously stated and in reviewing the provisions, he felt it should still be charged. In the memorandum co Mr. Kohl, Mr. Federspiel stated he felt that within the City the charges should be made by eounting up the 5ctua! number of fire hydrants and standpipes and transferring $75.00 for each one from the General FUnd to the Utility Fund. Non-residents should be treated on a~ case- to-case basis pursuant to the individual contracts with the respective parties. Mr. DeLong felt that when these bonding resolutions were drafted, it would appear they were made to appear as attractive as possible, not only from the standpoint of fotura of revenue but also as to credit rating whereby it would be attractive if it could be proven that additional revenues were available besides the operation of the system~ such as rental which was paid for and installed by the department. Mr. DeLong said he had questions which he felt should be answered. He noted that the public right-of-way and the water and sewer sysEem of Boynton Beach amc wholly owned by the City (the residents). He referred to the rental charge to the City to be paid from the General Fund and ssid that 34% of this fund is derived from the ad valorem Eax. He asked if it would be legally appropriate for the City to levy a fee on the Water and Sewer Department such as a charge- back possibly on a front£oot or percentage basis (or percentage of systems earnings basis) for the use of the City's rights-of- way fox the installation of all water and sewer lines including fire hydrants then whys~houldn?t the people charge for use of right-of-way. He was asking this as a legal question. - 13 - ~ES - REGULAR CITY COb~CIL MEETING BOYNTO~ BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Mr. DeLong said it was his ~nderstanding that all installation of standpipes, although they're tied into the fire lines are paid for by the developer and this cost is passed ~m to the purchaser of the residenoe. Therefore, im it legal to charge the owmer a stamdpipe fee in ~ew of the fact that the owner paid for the installation om kis ~n property where the ~raly use would be if a fire occurred -- yet the yearly fee wo~ld prevail. Me said there's no d~ubt that with the standpipes imstalled there is reason for reducing the fire insurance rates, net omly im that looa!ity, but in the entire City. These are~questions.~fa~ch should be answered from a legal standpoint. Mr. Federspiel said regarding standpipes, it should be dif- ferentiated between charging a rental fee against the owner amd what is actually being charged for is the availability of the water supply. The ad valorem tax pays for fire protec- tion. The fee comes out of the ad valorem tax -- stamdpipes are just~like fire hydrants within the City and should be billed as such. They shouldn't be billed yearly but the City's General Fund should be billed for the standpipes. It was noted that standpipes water comes out of the fire line. Regarding the charge backs, Mr. Federspiel said that the previous Resolution's covenants were in effect in default and the City is invitation at the present time. There are some serious problems in collection. An_ attempt should be made to try and¢olleet internally and externallyi Mr. DeLong said if the City did go along with a charge to that department for the installation, then it would be evened off and he %fished te ~ave some legal tho~g~on this. Mr. Simon said he and Mr. FederspieI discussed this matter at great length before rendering an opinion and atthoughMr. DeLong's ideas might be good, they can only give,an opinion on what has already been exercised. Mr. DeLong said basedonwhat is now in existence and the way the Bond ~e~'l~ie~swere set up years ago, it seems that all the later Bond resolutions were a repetition in that field. The money is not now available to repay the Water and S~wer System, therefore, this means the millage will have to be raised at the begim~ing of next year at least one mill to get a head start. Mrs. Jackson noted that the pipes will have to be oversized which means more water. There was some further discussion about the Bond resolutions and how they were set up. Mr. DeLong felt in the future there should be more caution as to the contents of what the Bonding resolutions require. Mrs. Jackson referred to her motion at the last meeting and said she still feels a procedure is needed 14- MINUTES - REGULAtt CITY COUNCIL M~.TtNG OCTOBER 7, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA whereby the Utilities Director tells the Fim~nce Director how many fire hydra,ts amd standpipes there are. She asked ~iro Kbib~ .~e~ a 4efi~ite c~t o~ the fire hydr~ts ~4 st~dpipes ~. ~:K~i~s said yes, at this point, alth~gh he is Rot positive ab~ st~dpipes. ~. De~g a~eed ~d felt that ~e ~ief sh~ld als~ be involved ~d ~ere w~Id be a syst~ of checks ~d ~al~ees. ~. K~hl s~d ~is was the directi~ given the City ~er at the las~ meeting ~ich was c~ie4 h~wever, ~ office ~f ~e CftF Att~ey advis~ mo~ t~ proceed. ~, Fed~spiel ~shed to se~ ~er ~f~ati~ h~ev~ he felt ~. Kohl should p~ceed, ~, Fedm~spisl said since he ~rived at the c~eluSi~ ~at ~e 1950~ B~d Resoluti~ Is ~lly f~ded, ~ere is not~s ~er th~ the 1964 Resoluti~ ~y s~se~ Bo~d ~d~t~e ~hat r~res a ~75,00 c~rge. ~e c~rge is. set by the ~esoluti~n ~d t~ 1964 requires e~y that no ~ee s~ice be =~d~ed mot preferential rates ~ or out ~f the Ci~. ~. Federspiel felt t~t ~e Resoluti~s ~e to be c~pt~ed ~ as ~ey stud, Co~eil has the right to c~ge ~a ~a~ s~c~re, ~ere must be a charge, b~t not neees~ily $75.08. if Mr. Simon explained that his office can advise that Council has a right to make the change,~ but whether it's fiscally wise is not in the jurisdiction of his office° Mrs. Jackson noted that Mr. Cessna had pointed out how many thous~ds of gallons of ~ater c~Id be ~sed sh~Id there be a fire. If the standpipes ~d hydr~ts ~e ~ot metered ~ the ~ter is taken fr~ there, the City is ~ a way giving free se~ice ~d prefer~tial trea~t. ~. DeLong said t~s is ~y the citiz~s pay their t~es for such se~ices. Mr. Federspiel said the probl~ really e~sts outside ~t~ ~d ~atever is c~ged ~thin the Ci~ which is c~r~tly ~o.uu ms theeretically ~at should be c~er~g fire protecti~ being render~ to the non-r~sidents ~d it is a fiscal ~tter. Mr. DeLomg su.ggested having ~.~.s~, ~Jack,s. om meet with the City See M~nager and Finance Dire~z~s~c~ be ~orked out with Mi . respect to reducing the rate for the City inside its limits, 10/2~75 Anything outside the City could be handled later. It was noted that the Utilities Director should also be included in the above meeting. ~,~r. Federspiel noted that Mr. Shepard of the fiscal agent, Hough & Co, was in the audience if Council wishe~ to question him, however, it was decided to let the Committee with _Mrs. Jackson work it out. OLD BUSINESS D~meuss Resolution 75-ZZ - Re: Tmn~s Fee S~st~ It was noted that several p~ople_wished to speak on this item. MINUTMS -REGULAR CIT~ COUNCIL MEETLNG BOYNTON BEACH, FIDRIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Mr. Kohl read his mem~ regarding an alternate plan for the tennis fee system (attached). Mr. DeLong noted that a Resolution had been adopted and this would have to be amended with a new Resolution drafted to void the previous one. Those who voted for the previous resolution would have to make a motion to rescind their previous action if so desired. Fzrs. Jackson said she was ready to move to rescind the previous Xesolution as she felt M~. Kohl's alternate plan was more suitable. Discussion ensued wherein Mr. DeL~nE felt no action should be taken until the Mayor's return due to the importance of this matter, and the vote may end up in a deadlock. M~r. Gene Eddy, 1104 S.W. 26th Avenue, Go!fview Harbor, felt the original Resolution encompassed an acceptable charge. He preferred the higher charges and believed those who use the tennis facilities should pay for them. Discussion again ensued about whether or not any action should be taken until the Mayor's return. There was also discussion about when PiT. Arrena should speak. Firs. Jackson moved to rescind Resolution 75-ZZ. Fir. Harmening seconded. Fir. Harmening said the charges set up in this Resolution were ~ust an additional tax which he felt was un- warranted. Regardiug the 8% of the population %4ao plays tennis, l~. Harmening commented that he felt far less than 8% played Little League baseball -- so there should be a fee schedule for that, as well as shuffleboard and other public facilities. Mr. DeLong asked Fir. Kohl to make a note of all these fees and come up with a recommendation to City Council. Mr. Strnad said he would like to hear Mr. Eddy's co~ents about keeping the current Resolution. Pit. DeLong requested a roll call vote, which Mrs. Padgett c~nducted as fullows: Councilmen Harmening - Aye Council~mman Jackson - Aye Counci~m~n Strnad No Vice Mayor DeLong No Motion died With a 2-2 vote. Resolution stands. Fir. DeLoug advised the interested citizens to come back when the Mayor returns. Mr. Eon Arre~a came forward and discussion ensued about the proper procedure to be followed regarding persons Wishing to speak. Mr. DeLong explained that l-ir. Arrena had spoken about Resolution 75-ZZ at the last meeting end the Resolution was still effective. If a new Resolution is presented, the public may then speak on it. !~r. Arrena said he had asked to speak under Public Audience end was told to wait until the matter came up on the agenda. After some further ~discussion, he was given the floor. - 16 - FfINUT~MS - RMGULA~ CITY COUNCIL M~TING OCTOBER 7, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Mr. ken Arrena, 1200 S.W. 27th Place referred to comments made at the last City Ce~neil meeting and said since then he has circulated a petition in opposition to the t~r-lts fees. He felt such fees would pose a hardship on the citizens and he read the petition which contained 628 signat-~ares. He did not agree with keeping people off the courts by charging these fees to both residents and noR-residents and he felt that the residents' property taxes were paying for the c~n%struction and upkeep of the ceurts. Therefore, Mr, Arrena asked that the fees for City residents be rescinded. Mr. Gary Winter said he would save his remarks until the next meeting. Mr. Richard Caldwell, 1350 S.W. 27th Place, felt that the fee schedule constituted a double taxation. He felt at this time there was no over-all recreational program and there were intermittent charges for shuffleboard, softball, etc. Before any fees are determined for teunis, Mr. Caldwe11 believed all fees for residents should be halted and the ~ecreation Department should investiga_~e an all-encompassing pregram under one fee and the issuance of a recreation permit to be used by all residents. There was some e~ent about an article by Mr. Caldwell in the Sun Sentinel regarding the Little League Field and Mr. DeLong suggested Mr. Caldwetl getting together with the City Manager and Recreation Director to discuss his ideas, however, Council was net in favor of this. Mr. DeLong clarified that he did not mean to form a committee, but that Mr. Caldwell was free te tell his ideas to the City M~ager and Recreation Director. Discussion ensued about the p~=ition with the 628 signatures and it was n~ted that it would be placed on file with the City Clerk and it was up to each Councilmem~er to recognize it and make his or her own decision. .,Receipt of Correspondence fro~ Mr. Arnold Strosbm~- l~r. Kohl said Mr. Stroshein was in his office on Septmmher 30 and submitted a check to him fer 9962.65 which he considered to be the final payment on the liens with the City as indicated in his attached correspondence, which was before Council. Mr. Kohl felt this was strictly up to City Counci! as to whether or not they are willing to settle for this amount. Until a decision was made, Mr. Kohl stil~h~ldMr. Stroshein's check. Mrs. Jackson said this was voted down in May and Mr. Stroshein claimed that he put a lot of asphalt down although the City 17 - MI~JTES - REGULAR CITY COb%~CIL ~E~-TiNG OCTOBER 7, I975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA was not consulted er involved. She referred to 1970 when the City gave Mr. Stroshein a piece of property which they abandoned in the amount of ~6 x 167.94 ft. He made a canal for boats at a condominium and it was he who asked to have the streets surfaced. He picked up some other property where people c~uldn~t pay the assessments and he is the only person who has not paid theLlien. M~s. Jackson saw no reason why he didn't have to do it when everyone else does. This referred to an assessment roll and Mr. Stroshein picked up one where someone c~aldm~t pay the assessment amount of ~2,181.40 and ha didn't even pay his own iu the amount of $ 39.00. It was noted he couldn't do ~8 anything .with his property until the lien was satisfied. Mrs. Jackson noted months ago, Council unanimously voted not to abate Mrs. Jackson moved to have the City Manager return the check to Mr. Strosheinand inform h/m exactly what his dues are, including 8% interest. Mr. Harmening seconded. No discussion. Motion carried 4-0. Consider Change Order No. I for General Services Maintenance Garage Mr. Kohl noted that he had discussed this matter with each Councilm~mber by phone and he referred to correspondence before Council from Kozich and Kozich dated September 23, 1975 with proposal for t~o changes that will add approximately 332 square feet to the area of the building and provide additional clearance in the high bay where large packers will be serviced. The - additional cost on a unit cost per square ft. basis is consider- ably less than the overall unit price per square feet for the entire building and approval of the change order is reco~m~ended. A change order d~c~ment has been prepared and was before Council. Fir. Kohl requested C~uncil~s approval to sign the change order. Firs. Jackson moved that the City~ager be directed to proceed with the above change order as requested. Mr. Harmening seconded. No discussion. Motion carried 4-0. piscuss Adopted Resolution 75-~: - Vice Mayor D,I~?, Mr. DeLong noted that this Resolution amended certain sections and rules of the Civil Service Regulations. Council was all in favor of the change made in Rule 6~ Sec. 15~ page 10 of said Regulations regarding bonus increases, whereby the Ctty Manager 18 - MINUTES - REGULAi~ CITY CO~CIL MEETING BOYMTUN BEACM, FLORIDA OCTOBE~ 7, 1975 is authorized to approve a bonus of ~500.00 when such a bonus is justified in ~riting on the prescribed form by the Department Head. This bonus ~rill not effect the employeefs pay grade ~nd step, etc. (Mr. DoLing read the rule in its entirety). Mr. DeLong felt everything was f/ne except for the system of payment and he suggested putting it on a quarterly basis. He gave an example of tM employees whose merit increases were rescinded because of their actions and also noted that an employee may quit as so~n as the ~500,00 is received. After some co~,,ent, Mr. Strnad moved that the City Mmnager be instructed in conjunction with the City Attorney to come back with a method of paying the $500.00 bonus, probably on a quarterly basis during the term of employment. Mrs. Jackson seconded. It was ¢iarified that the ~500.00 would be pro-rated over a period of 12 months. Motion carried 4-0. ~onsider ~eceipt of Correspondence from Mr. Stanley G. _T. atm Fr. Kohl noted that Mr. Tate's letter was before Council,-listing the p~ice of $53,375.00 for the property needed for the 1-95 right-of-way to c~mplete the S.W. 23rd Avenue access road. He asked for Council's decision on this matter as to whether or not they wished tO spend the additional ~53,375 to accomplish this project or go out for condemnation. Mr. Strnad felt this matter has gotten way out of proportion and he would n&t go along with this price. He said he did a Iittle investigating on his own and asked t_hat the City Manager be permitted to make a feasibility study into the proposal he has outlined which he felt would be better than having a road come into 23rd Avenue. Council discussed Mr. Strnad's proposal at length and seemed to be posa~ concerned opening upio~ agreement %zith same. (M~. Strnad'~ pro- lO/2i/ 25th. Avenue. ) 7f Mr. ~.~$~ns, Area Engineer for 1-95, South Palm Beach County of the Department of Transportation referred to the previous public hearing ~t ~hieh he spoke. He said he pointed out exactly what would transpire and that it has transpired accordingly. He said at that time that there was a great possibility if the existing plan was revised the City might end up ~-ith no road at ail. He felt t~his still might happen, He observed Strnad~s plan at the last public hearing he attended and he assessed that the pr~mmry objection of the local residents in Forest Hill was that they seemed to have incurred additional traffic due to people trying to shortcut through their sub-division to and from the hospital. He said the City Engineer and City Y~nnager concurred with his opinion that the best overall solution to this problem would be a direct access to and from the hospital. - 19 - MINUTES - REGULA~ CiTY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLO!tlDA OCTOBEI~ 7, t975 He said a~ extension of either of these existimg streets over to 23rd would provide ~n alternate r~ute to the hospital, but this would be a City function and it would not entail any revision to the DOT's plan. However, it w~uid have eliminated the problem that has been generated by putting the thru street through a residential area in close pro~mdty to the hospital. Subsequent to this the DOT forwarded throu~ the District Engineer the City's resolution. ~{r. Evans said he has consulted %rith the City,s %professionals at length and he c~mplimented them for their cooperation. Fir. Evans said the current problem is that the right-of-way costs on 23rd will be prohibitive to aceomplish the original intent of the ~esolution which was forwarded to the District Engineer. Fir. DeLong said if in the event the City felt it was going to abandon that particular idea and thought it would be more ec~%omical for the City to go in -- even if it had to ask for an order of taking for this right-of-way for the continuation of ~bth Avenue to Seacrest; what type of effect would this h~ve with DOT. Mr. Evans said that would have no effect whatsoever -- the problem would be that this would be no Federal aid,~;~o~-participating. Therefore, the Federal Govern- ment and the State of Florida w~ald not be able to pay for any phase of the construction. This is why at the original hearin~ he recommended the City's exercising its Police power and if it was chosen not to use the ramp, it could be closed off at no cost to the city or any resident, and at no delay to DOT's contract. He said at the present time, only a minimal cost has be~ incurred. In order to facilitate the construction of the Interstate Project, Fir. Evans has had to instruct the contractor to proceed on the bas~ that the City would be able to obtain the right-of way due to the City's commitment and receipt of the check for ~23,0~0. The curve and gutter has been extended across the originally intended point of access from 23rd Avenue existing"!~to 23rd Avenue,newly constructed. If the City were to rescind its ~eso!ution an~ request that DOT revert to the original plan~ DOT would probably have to deduct from the City's money forwarded to the State for costs incurred and there is a possibility that some small time delay to the contract might be incurred, whereby the contractor would have to be recompensed. Mr. Evans said if the City were to rescind the ~esolutienand delete the requirement that there be direct access from 23rd to the Forest Hill subdivision, the ~ity would incur no additional ?ost and als? save the State qui~e abit of money because there zs.cgns.truct~on ~e Statewould have to do to revert to the original con=rat=, Also, as of today, there are 32 contract days See z MINUTES - REGUIA~ CITY COUNCIL BOYNTON Bi&CE, FLORIDA OCTOBEK 7, 1975 remaining. If there is a substantial delay, the State will be open to a ~ime delay charge by the contractor. It was clarified t~hat if the City goes hack to -the original plan, the ramp would have te be put in at 6th Street. The City would incur some damages as a result of the costs the State would incur in changing over. I~r. DeLong felt there were two courses to follow. The City could go in for an order cf taking an~ also abandon that, or go over and c~ademm or ask for an order of taking on the other piece, which he believed would be less expensive than that bordering ~ 23rd Avenue. If the City cannot negotiate the ~operty owners, Mr. DeI~ng asked if DOT would proceed with what they're doing now. How much time will be give~ the City because it will take time to get an ~rder of Ltaking. Mr. Evans said he could proceed as soon as an order of taking is obtained. Mr. Stm-~d_~said if this Council decides to eliminate the ramp and specifies that it does not want any access to 23rd Avenue from 6th -- ho~ much money would the City get back from the ~23,000. Mr. Evans said all of it. Mr. DeLong sai~ the City csimot eliminate the ramp -- it can rescind its requesting the extension of the ramp further east -- but if the City walked away~ the State would be compelled to put the ramp back at 6th Street~ u~less the City specifies they did not need it. Mr. Harmaning asked what the approximate cost would be if the City decide4 to go back and put the ramp in and remove the curb and~ ~uttsr that's already been installed. Mr. Evans said it would be approximately ~4,00 per foot, or ¥400.00 plus the contractor would most likely put in a claim for mobilization because he would then have to make a fill in a very restricted area, where he e~utd have originally constructed it adjacent to a larger fill -- it will be a more complicated operation. He felt this would probably cost about ~4,500.00. If .the Ci,t~ stipulates that the access there is no longer needed, mt won t cost anything. Mr. DeLong felt it would be good to eliminate the access because it is a traffi~ hazard. Mrs. Jackson q-uestioued if the problem was going to be transferred from 6th Street to 25th a~ it ,was explained there were no houses in that area, so this would be in the future. Mrs. Jackson suggested if the City still had the original ramp and put a light at ~hapel Mill Boulevard, it might help. 10/21/75 Mr. Evans said he went to the District Office and spoke to the - 21 - ~TES - Rf~OLAR CITY C0b~CIL M~ETiNG BOYI~fON BEACH, FLO~DA OCTOBER 7, 1975 design people. They made another study of it and ~en though it appeared to be dangerous, the slight distance in the original location and the turning radius of the ra~ were considerably more safe than af~ereit was going to be relocated. Mrs. Jackson noted in addition to the purchase price asked by Mr. Tare, there would also be a fee for relocation of utilities. Mr. Evans said he also understoed there was a c~mmitmentby Council that the right-of-way w~uld be obtained by the first of this month. He felt there %~ruld be a legal o~t since it was not able to be obtained in time. The only expense to be incurred would be in falling back amd returming to the original comstructic~hich he felt ~ouI~bem/nimal. Mr. Evans asked fur Coumnil's decision as he was to meetwith the District Inspection ~k~gineer tomorrow. lit. Rudy Btan~, 702 S.W. 25th Place, felt if the ramp is allowed to continue, S.W. 6th Street would turn into another Seacrest Blvd. The residents in his area do not ~rish to close off 6th Street hut desire access going east and west. He felt F~. Strnad's suggestionv~ould take dare of that, and he spoke about the advantages of using same, He suggested using the ~23,000 being returned by the DOT to put through a permanent road for the use of the City and he said in speaking to the residents on 25th Street, he found no objection. After further comment, Mr. Blank said he had no objection to local traffic but the residents objected to the people coming in at Chapel Hill and using 6th Street as a short-cut. Fir. Blank said DOT felt they were doing the residents a favor by replacing a road that was closed off and opening another road for the benefit of the coa~uni~f. }~r. Evans a~reed. H~wever, Ptr. Blank said they didn't realiza the type ofcondition they would create. [Mr. Harmening said he sympathized with the community in question, but no~ that it's gotten completely out of hand, he felt the City should reve~ to the original plan. i~ir. ~vans reiterated that the original ramp fell ~-ithin the safety requirements for a 35-55 mph speed. Fir. Evans said several people who called him were not aware that. they were going to be losing access to 23rd from Forest PLill and they were quite distressed about it. ~e~felt the City should, prOvide them some sort of access, even if it's just putting up a sig~ to make it one way. Sixth Street could be made one way coming out and the ramp could be one way onto 23rd -- a fire engine could go in on an emergency as there is no problem about going one way in that case. Mr. Blm~ felt there might be a traffic hazard in making a left turn off the ramp and it was felt that a determination of traffic control could be made later. - 22 - MINUTES - REGbVm~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BMACH, FIDRIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Discussion ensued about the cost of the property needed for the right-of-way which was originally estimated to be about ¥15,000 amd other alternatives to the problem in question. Y~, Evans referred to DOT's original plan which had~two walk- ways, which the relocatiom of the entrance-way d~ tc the proposed relocation ~rill mean that there will be a walk-~ay betwee~ two roads and he felt it wo~Id not be safe tc walk there. He felt fr~m a~ engineering standpoint the revised location was the worst thing to dc. Mrs. Jackson wished to make a motion, rescinding the Resolution in question and reverting to the original plan and discussion ensued about the best w~y to handle this matter, One of the main concerns was safety and whether traffic should be made to go one way east, or if there should be a traffic light installed. Mr. Anthony Cevasco,-2638 S.W. 6th Street, complained about traffic speeding down his street and was in favor of the one- way suggestion. He noted in speaking to Lt. Gardner of the Police Department, it was felt that once'feets were more Min. hazardous, and he said Lt. Gardner would make a recommendation 10/21/75 against it. Mr. Cevasco hoped that an arrangement could be made whereby most everyone could be satisfied. Mrs. Jackson said she was trying to make a motio~ to be helpful and she would go along with any amendment to it and she moved to rescind the Resolution sent to DOT by the City and revert to the original plan, Mr. Harmening seconded. Mr. Evans said Che stated at the original public hearing on this problem that the reason 6th Street was used was it was the only'place available to provide access to the homes on 23rd and 24th~ and this most nearly approximated reproduction of the access that had prior to this time been present on 8th Street. Mr. Blank said he belieged that originally the City's Engineering Department sug- gested the use of 4th Street (S.W.) because it was a thru-street going all the way through Chapel Hill and he rebutted the use of 6th Street. There being no further discussion among Council, Mr. DeLong requested a roll call vote which Mrs. Padgett conducted as follows: Councilman Hamnening - Aye Councilwoman Jackson - Aye Councilman Strnad Vice Mayor DeLong - No Motion died with a 2-2 vote. - 23 M~ES - REGUIAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYI{TON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 A person in the audiencewished to ask Mr. Evans a question and Mr. Evans said he would he happy to give any answers. He was a professional employee of the DOT and was at the meeting on his own t/~e. He said at the original public hearing on this matter, he tried to convince everyone of the problems that would come up if attempts were made to change something already in the works. Mrs. Jackson commented about Mr. Strnad's statement that he would not go for so much money (Mr. Tate's prioe for the right-of-way) and now she felt this was the course to he followed sinc~ her motion did not pass. Mr. Strnad clarified that he said he would like the City Manager to find out if it was feasible to cut 25th Avenue and take a piece of ground for a road as outlined im his proposal. Mr. Evans felt that Council should work ~at their problems bet-ween themselves but he wished they would advise the State what to do. He stressed there were only 32 days remaining to the contract. He felt if anymore time went by the City would end up with no road. Mr. DeLong felt the best way to handle the matter was to go for an order of taking and it was understood that it would be with the City's own funds. Disonssion ensued about the problem of timing and Mr. DeLong felt the best way to resolve the matter would be te have Mr. Kohl work on it the first thing in the morning. An answer wonld be given no later than Thursday, as Mr. DeLo~g would set up a special meeting the same day as the meeting for the Regional Facility. Mr. Blank said the residents in his community would be grateful to get any relief and he was in favor of Mr. Strnad's suggestion. Discussion ensued as to what Mr. Kohl was to fimd out and Mr. DeLong said he was to investigate Mr. Strnad's proposal. Mr. Hsrmening said he was against it and Mrs. Jackson did not want an order'of taking. Mr. Harmening said he was sorry he voted for the Resolution sent to DOT. After some further comment~ it was decided to see what could be done hy Thursday. Consider Resotutiun - Re: Jackson Parental Responsibility - Councilwoman Mrs. Jackson moved to table this-item. Mr. Harmening seconded. No discussion. Motion carried 4-0. NEW BUSINESS Discuss Woolbright Rd. from Con,,~ress Avenue to 1-95 Mr. Kohl advised Council that the County needed a~decision on this matter. Councilmembers had the entire file before them. MINUTES - REG~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Mr. Evans said in regard to 15th Avenue, he contacted the City Engineer and pointed out that there would be a tremendous traffic problem with a one-sided interchange when 1-95 is opened. The west side will have to be blocked off. He tried to contact the County Engineer and they will need a considerable amount of fill. Mr. Evans advised the City Manager that DOT has an excess amount of fill available and he could contact the contractor involved or have the County de so to save some money. Mr. DeLong said from the corresp~dence he's read on the matter, there's no doubt that there is a quid ~pmo-quo suggested which is definitely in violation of State statute insofar as dealing in zoning is concerned. He felt this request should follow the legal procedure of going to the Planning & Zoning Board and having an application made to the P&Z Board so the Board can come back to Council with it~3 recommendations. Mrs. Jackson moved to have the City Manager instruct the applicant to follow the legal procedure of filing for the rezoning with the Planning & Zoning Board. Mr. Harmening seconded. No disenssion. Motion carried 4-0. Consider A~mexation Reqnest - Mr. Joseph Cogen Mrs. Jackson moved to table this-item, seconded by Mr. Harmening. No discussion. Motion carried 4-0. ADMIN]~ TRATIVE Request Approval for Renewal of Com~ty School Contract Mr. Kohl's letter for the agenda stated that before Council was the proposed agreement between the Palm Beach County School Board And the City of Boynton Beach for the renewal of the Community School contract. The Community School program in the City has been operating smoothly and is providing positive services to the City's residents. ~nis is a renewal of an existing contract. Funds are budgeted in the Recreation Department and Mr. Kohl requested authorization to sign this contract. Mrs. Jackson moved to the C~ity School, Motion carried 4-0. approve the renewal of the contract with seconded by Mr. Harmening. No discussion. - 25 MINUTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL I~ETING OCTOBER 7, 1975 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA .City Manager's Report on Water Treatment Plm~t Expansion Meet~l~' Mr. Kohl read his memo for the agenda on the above subject and referred to correspondence from Russell & Axon which he had before Council. (Copy attached). Mr. Kohl said he coneurred with the stipulations set forth in R&A's letter and he has since received other letters which he requested. M-rs. Padgett advised that Mr. Anderson wished to speak on this item. Mr. DeLong advfsed~l~r. Anders~n that Council has had time to digest the information from the City Manager and the intention is to go along with lime treatment process. Mr. Anderson's proposal was to be in opposition to the lime treatment proeess and Mr. DeLong asked how lone Mr. Anderson would need to make his presentation. Mr. Bruce Anderson, Point of Use Water Industries, said he was supposed to have a meeting with the City on August 12th, however, he was unable to attend at that time. He noted other contacts with the City and said he had a 2-% hour presentation made with Russell & Axon on July 30th. He requested a special meeting with Council. ~ir. Kohl noted that l~ir. Anderson had a letter which the City also had received from lzn~. Gene Moore that there was no meeting to be held. Therefore, there was no meeting called. Y~rs. Jackson said Mr. Anderson had called her and she told him to leave his ~correspondence in the mailbox. Mrs. Jackson said she vrrote a letter through Mr. Kohl today, enclosing Mr. Anderson's letter as she did not wish to be in the middle and she did not wish to be the only one knowing what he had to say. After some further comment among Council, ~fr. Anderson requested permission to read a five minute statement. Council agreed. Mr. A~iderson identified himself aoazn~ ' and said he was locally employed By a group called Water Resources Consul, consisting of 15 water cenditiouing dealers in the State of Florida. His address is 3601 Park Center Boulevard, Minneapolis, Minnesota end Mr. Anderson reiterated that his~purpose tonight was to seek the meeting once before agreed upon to have a special meeting. If that was not agreeable, he wished to read his statement in opposition to the lime treatment process which he then~read. Mr. DeLong wished to call on Mr. Hal/man of Russell & Axon to present the reason they chose the lime treatment. Couneil will then have both sides and can mmke up its mind whether or not to accept the'=ecommendation of the City Manager. Mr. DeLong advised }~r. Hallman there w~uld be no cross-examination in this matter. - 26 MINUTES - ~LAR CIT~ COUNCIL BOIrNTON B~ACH, FLORIDA OCTOBE~ 7, 1975 Mr. Milton L. Hallman, Jr., Vice ~resident of Russell & Axon, said he had not ever received a copy of Mr. Anderson's statemeat. He said R%~ssell & Axon still stands behind their recommendation to meet the re~air~meRts of the Board of Health amd this was the most cost-effective method of meeting the requiremonts~of the Department of Pollution Control or the Health Department, as it is now. After speaking im opposition ~o some of Mr. AndersonYs statements~ Mr. Hallman said R~sseII & Axon's recommendation was made because the method that was chosen after I~okimg at the alternatives that were available~ was the most cost-effective end beneficial to meet the requirements of the Department of Health. Mrs. Jackson asked if the Health Department said this had to be do~e now and Mr. HallmeR said yes' and the method ~as agreed to be the most acceptable for this type of water to meet the re- quirements of the Health Department. Mrs. Jackson wa8 concerned because she had received a phone call from the Mayor of a neigh- boring town who would ~ue the Health Department if it couldn't be proven this was the proper method. Mr. DeLong noted this particular pt~ has beer on the board for quite a while and with the expansion, it would eliminate these moratoriums that were necessary ~_n the s~.mmer months. }ir. Kohl concocted. Mr. F~rme~ing moved to accept the recommendation of the City Manage~ in his communication of October 7, 1975, regarding the water treatment pta~t sand the use of lime treatment. Russell & Axon are directed to proceed in order to comply with the requirements of the State Board of Health for additional chemical treatment to the water system. Also included in the motion was instruc. tion to the ~ity }reneger to direct Hough & Co. to proceed with the ~3.9M validated bond issue to cover the cost of this plan. There being no discussion, Mr. DeLong requested a roll call vote, which Mrs. Padgett conducted as follows: Councilman Harmening - Aye Co~eilwoman Jackson - Aye Councilman Strnad - Aye Vice Mayor DeLong Aye Motion carried 4-0. Consider Proposed Resolution of Pa!mBeaeh County Municipal League - ~e: Inequities in Road & Bridge Fund F~so Jackson noted that the City has not been getting amy f-~nds and she moved to instrnct the Ci~yAttOrney to draft the - 27 - MINUTEs - RE~JLAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 appropriate resolution in conjunction with that which was circulated by the Palm Beach County Municipal League relative to the inequities in the Road and Bridge Fu~d. Mr. Har~ening seconded. No discussion. Motion carried 4--0. Consider Relocation of Used Auto Shop - Mr. Jmmes J. Walden Mr. Kohl referred to a copy of the application for license which was before C~ncil and an excerpt fr~a the M/nutes of the Planning & Zonlno Board meeting of September 23, 1975, appr~ing the request providing the former location at 902 N. Federal Highway be abandoned. Mr. Harmening moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board, contingent upon the applicant's compliance with the criteria set forth. Mrs. Jackson seconded for discussion. Fzrs. Jackson asked if this was the same location t-~rned down previously and the answer was yes. She then asked why this was called a used auto shop instead of a used car lot. Mrs. James Walde~n explained it should be used auto sales. Mrs. Jackson noted that someone else had been turned down because of not being under cover and in driving aroumd, she has not yet seen a used car lot under cover. ~lr. DeLong said he saw one in ~est Palm Beach. ~rs. Jackson said she did not agree with that pro%rision and Far. DeLong felt that the used car lots should be eliminated to try and upgrade the area in question. Mrs. Walden said she has tried te keep her lot clean and within the requirements of the City. Firs. Jackson felt the City should not turn businesses away and~should try to encourage more bus,ness to come to the City. Mr. DeLong felt he would have to be con- sistent in 5is thinking and he thought it wasn't appropriate for Mr. Jones to have his used car lot at that location, so he didn't see how he could ch~utge his opinion now. b~s. Jackson said that l~rs. Walden has kept a very nice place. Mrs. Walden said the difference between Mr. Jones and the Waldens is that the Waldens do not dea~ in junk or have a junk yard. They keep their place clean and close by 7:30 in the evening. Mr. DeLong requested a roll call vote which Mrs. Padgett called as follows: Councilman Harmening - Aye C ' ~ouncllwoman Jackson - Aye /Vice t.~yor DeLomg - No ~C°unCml~an S t-mad - No ~iotion died with a 2-2 vote. Mr. apply again. DeLong said Mrs. Walden could - 28 - H~UTES - RE~ CiTY COU~ICIL MEETI~IG BOI%~TON B~ACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975~ Discuss Resident Members for Fa/nicipal Fire_men'sRetzrement' .Trust Fund and Municipal Police Officer's Retirement Trust Fir. K~I~-p memo for the agenda stated that the City Clerk advised that the term of the resident member of the Board of Trustees of the 2%unicipa! Firemen's Pension Trust Fund and said member of the Municipal Police Officer~' Retirement Trust Fund has expired. It was further suggested that Council might like to consider keeping the two appointees om under a temporary appointmentuntil the first of the year when all other appointments are mmde, ~vir. Richard D'Angelo is presently servi~ as a resident mmm~er of the Firemen's Fund an~I4r. Kenneth R. Hall is of the Police Fund. It was the City Manager~s recommendation that these appointments coincidewith the o~herboerd appointments made at the beginning of each year and ha requested t3mat approval be given so the City Attorney may prepare the appropriate 4ocu- ments to accomplish this. It ~ould~ seem far more logical to have all the terms of the boar~ m~-mhers terminate on December 31st rather than make a re-appointment twomonths prior to the others. F~s.Jacksonmoved to follow the City Manager'$ recommendations above, seconded by Mr. Harmening. It was clarified by~r. Simon and included inCthe motion that the two-year appointed term ~ili be carried over to the first of the year as well as the other (taking into consideration that one ~a two-year appointment). No discussion. Motion carried 4-0. Consider Application for Permit to Solicit: S. Palm Beach Chapter- National Secretaries Associations League of Wom~ .~oters of S. Palm Beach Countyi Leisureville Veterans of Foreign Wars 10050; Boynton Beach J~. Woman's Club Mr. Kohl clarified that everything was in order and Mr. Marmening moved that the permits to solicit he o~rente~. Mrs. Jackson seconded. No discussion. Motion ea~r~.ed~' ' 4-0 . Approval of Bills Kohl read the following bills for approval: Xerox CorP. Xerographic paper Pay from General F~d Central Office Supply Acet. ~.avis Meter & Supply Butterfly v~!ve with pneumatic cylinders Pay from hudgeted funds 030-810.20 29 - 1,496.00 2,034.71 MIhVdTES - REGULAR CITY COUNCIL BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBE~ 7, 1975 Approval. of Bills (Cont'd~ ~.~. WittiamsP~mp ~ P~mp for Welt #I0 - Pay frembudgetedlfumds 030-910.34 Letter of Authorization dated 9/10/75 ~.oleElectric Coo Replace light pole at Wilson-Field Pay from budgeted ~ads 001-875.30 021-812 Authorization dated 9/2/75 ~300.00 900.00 Ted Sorg~ Vince~t DiBattista, Bradford T~itiom - Career Development Supervision I Class Pay from Police Education Fua%d 001-507 e ~almBeach Jr. Colleg~ - - Tuition for 13 Officers - Mid-Management Class Pay from Police Education F~d 001-507 Rubin Construction Co. Adjust seven (7) manhole rums-and c~vers Pay from budgeted funds 001-854.90 tn com/ection with Contract dated 5/13/74 e Greater Boymten Beach Chamber of Commerce Boymten Beach City Maps -- Pay from ~nc~mbered f%~/ds 060-~O0 ~2,100.00 Balance from budgeted funds 060-820 150.00 West Construction Co. Est. ~3 New Office, Lab amd Maintenance Shop Wastewater Treatment Facilities Pay from Atlamtic National Bank 1975A Series Water & Sewer Bond Issue Contract dated 7/1/75 10. .Cynthia Lewis _ Assistant cook for Sr. Citizens Club - 2 ~ks. Pay from Fede~al Revenue Sharing F~nd 020-800 Ordimamce ~73-15 passed 5/15/73 11. IsiahAndrews _ Driver for Sr. Citizens Club - 2 wks. Pay from Fede~al Revenue Sharing Fund Ordinance ~73-I5 passed 5/15/73 020-800 3O 3,369.48 1,200.00 90.00 390.00 1,015.00 2,250.00 17,494.50 96.00 90.00 M~UTES - ~EGULAR CITY COUNCIL ~TING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 Approval of Bills (Cont'd) 12. Russell &Axon 6858-21-II&CPS Inv. ~8 Preparation of u~nstruction plans end specs for expension of existing transmission on distribution mains and storaEe facilities Pay fr~mUtility General Bund Re-covetable from future bond issue Authorization dated 1/20/75 13. ..Ru. sseI1 &Axon 6858-12-III&CPR Inv. ?? Sewage Treatment Plant Improvements Pay fromAtlantte National Benk 1975A Issue Authorization dated 1/I7/74 ~I7,523.85 1,184.97 14. Russ~ll &Axon 6858-6-IiI~CP Inv. Engineering services f~r conet~uction of wells Pay from budgeted funds 030-801.09 Authorizatien dated 5/4/73 15. Russell &Axon 6858-4A-II&CPS Inv. ~3 S. Central Regional Lift S~ations & Force MaiRs Pay from Utility General Fund Refundable from future bond issues 75% EPA Reimbursable Authorization dated 11/72 1,704.52 12,688.50 16. gussell &Axon 6858-4-III&CP inv. ~17 Upgrading existing Wastewater Tre~ment Facilities Authorizated dated 11/20/73 Pay from Atlantic National Bank 1974 Issue 4,312.25 17. Retirement Plans, Inc. Professi~nai services in conneetion with Retirement Plen Pay from budgeted funds 001-885.40 Authorization dated 4/16/74 2,937.50 The bills described have been approved and verified by the department heads involved; checked end approved for payment by the Finance Director; funds are available in their respective budgets. Mr. Kohl recommended payment of these bills. It was clarified for Mr. DeLong that the last item pertained to the ~ctuary from the ~id~est. Mrs. Jackson moved to pay the-hills, seconded by Mr. Strnad. No discussion. ~otion carried 4-0. - 31 - MINUTES - REGULA~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 7, 1975 OTHER Mr. Kohl said he was trying to get the Building Departmemt up to snuff. He wished to make the third part-time girl there a full-time employee. Mrs. Jackson moved to give the City Fmnagerpermissi~n to straighten out the employment situation as far as the girls are concerned in the Building Department. Mr. Strnad seconded. No discussion. 14orion carried 3-1, with Mr. Harmenimg opposed. ADJOUENMk~T Mr. Harmeming moved to adjourn, seconded by Mrs. Jackson. Motion carried 4-0. Meeting adjourmed at 12:37 P.M. CITY OF BOYNTON B~CH, FLORIDA ATTEST: By Mayor ~ ~ouncilmemb er ' '~ ~o~cilmember ~ Clerk CITY OF BOYNTON BEAC~ Schedule of Payments Ail Funds For the Month of September, 197 5 Prepared by: Department of Finance G~T~R~T, JOTJ-P~L ACCT. DATE CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT NO. NO. ~PX ~ _ 3__~..~g JOHN TUITE {-:-*--.-;00-- ~--A~----*~ .---.*.~.~*-..~ ........... N~AN-~0~M.i.0~-PAy~-N~$--TG-RE~ [50.00 ;FP~ ~3 D~.eO KEN ~W . 175~1 ~0.00 ~ T, 3~.00 ' ~WARD SULLIVAN ~0.00 E~ ? I236.00 RE~ CARRIER 6.~50.00 ~:~Z [- ~237.00 FRA~ JOHNSON :A-~-~:b'5-'- ~---;::;--'-['~3'~':e~' ........... o~l'vE'"w~'~-: ................................................... ~,~50.00 ~ ~% t259.00 W0b~RO~ EUT~Y ~ ~50.00 ~Z ~ !?~O.O0 ELE~OR mJF~R . D;6"50.00 ~p~ ~ ~2~1.00 W.T.. WELCH . 0,~51.00 ~ ~ t2.~2 GE~ V~ At KEN* '- D,~.~.~,~.O{.. ~ %~ l 3.A2 SYLVANIA FR~ERICK 0,~51.00 ~-- ~. [2~.C0 RICH~O CHESTER ' . ~,~02.00 ~3 T, '4&O.CC ELSA %~RTH!~ ~O.O0 ~'~_g~2.00 ~p~ %~ '~BO.CO MA~ATT~ TROPHIES 227~D ~,.~,0:[ EPS l~ ',~32.00 R~I~TON OFFICE ~PPLI[ 277~6 ~,[7.0~ --~ 15 ~.~89.00 . BEC~R O STR 7288 316 ' 200,~ ~i7.O. ~ i5 !~OZ.~ .~RY BERICZ. 122~5 ZO0~ Or,~O.O1 ~ 15 ~93.00 A~ERTtSERS PRE~S 3282~ O~.eo ~ ~5 ~.5o9.oo HO~S BY LEON 50.~ J~7~O .~ ~ ~.5 11.00 PALM BEA~ UR COLLEGE ,~0,00 ~ ~ 7,676.~ CITY ~ B,5, ~0:~ ~A ~5 1~7~.00~' ~ILLt~ PEflStNN~ . . 9.70 ~79.0~ ~k %5 ~91~ B.8. FIRE D~PT ~9:9,~2 j~% ~5 ~91.~ B.B. FIRE D~T ..... ~:9,0~ !~ ~5 ),507D0 FIRST BA~ TRUST BOCA ~O%OO. ~ ~5 ).907~ FIRST BA~K TR~ST 80CA -k%1~ ~5.01 ~5 15 9.512.00 ERNESTO ~RTINEZ ' .~7.00 ~5 A5 gS[5.O0 H~RRY H~T .553~ ~2.0o-~5.-~--~g~-3~-~0o ............. CHA-~ES-~ODFa[~- .................................................... 30~--- :~02;C0 ~5 ;5 jq.522.C~ EVA RAYMO~ .~J~2.OC ~5 A5 ~.523~0 BETTY GA~RIGA . . 30.~ ,~J~2.~ ~5 A5 ~,52h.00 C~A COLA BOTTL[;~ 2~.85 :~ ACCT DATE CHECK- VENDOR AMOUNT NO: NO. · 41, D99.01 -~5 15 ~5~1~00 P~I~ P~NStON rb~O 831.71o O.l_0.~02.. ~-~-a:~--. LS.~.I..~ ........... ~.t~_~5].~N..E~O ................................ i ...... ElL.Il .... J99,~! ~5 ~5 L5~1.00 P~I~ PENSION F~D . ' 851.71 )99,01 -~5 %5 }.542.~ FIR[~NS PE~ION FG~ )10.02 ,-~5 ~t L5~2.00 FIREMEN5 PENSION FUND 526~2 ~:0,399,01 ~S IS ).544.00 RETIR~NT-TRUST F~D ' 1.399,~0 ~5 ~5 t544.00 R~TI~.E~ TRUST Fb~O .. /~',10.0D ~5 ~3 ~5~3.00 B-B. CREDIT UNION .. ~t0 01 ~% ).5~5.~ FIRST ~l~ TRUST 90.00 ~5 ~5 .27g.00 PHOTO MUaALS 20.00 -~ ~ :~l.~ !,~ ~ ~.a ~ --- 20.0 ~ ~s ~ : - _ . ~..-.0~ g~B ~% 1,248.00 '- ' :''' ' 5~1.O ~% ~ 1 250,00 d~ ~ATT~ I0.99 f20.00 ~g 1! ?.685.~ OlTY ~ B,B, .,~20.00 ~g t~ ~S&.O0 F~N~5 VAUGHN 17.00 ~g A5 [5~8 ~0 sOUTHERN FE~-~5~ ~ 02.00 ~g' $5 9~50.~0 LISA CAR~ERgTTO ~o~.o~ ~ t~ e~i.~ a. ~o~o ~o /02.02 ~g S~ ,~554~ 0~15 sMITH '.. 502.00 ~g 95 ,~55.~0 TERRY ~AN5 ~5.C0 ~50.04 ~g 1% 'L557.~ 8~NT~ AUTO ~ASS - ..... ~,......-.-~ --- - - ~... ......... n~ ..... Si~ - ...... , ~ 'a ...................... ~;12.00 i?~? ~.570.C0 STATE OF ~A 35~.00 t(~20.00 [P,,15 9,6~9~0 RO~LD KNOLL} 23~010'20 ' "J20.O0 ~%%T: :6gl.O0 LOUIS SHEL~R 1.~0 ~o.oo ~ ],~.oo c~E o~ B.~. . ........ M0~-aO0gl~G .................................................... Ig_O_C.O .... ~17.00 ~%%1% '.]5]~.00 KOZICH ~0 KOZi~ 1 T:O0--'- [~'V~5-'--'~ ~5-~-~;00--- Z500.00 i ACCT. NO'. .4o .oo 1~1 7.00 ~-~ .00 I,~ -~.00 :oo-' 6~ 02.00 ~02.00 ~5 ~.00 ~0.02 "~ Y0'.O'I" Lpi moa L0.099.~0 DATE CHECK NO. .57 ~SO .57 6.00 D7 7.00 53 O.C:O 5~ 7.00 597.C0 5g 8.00 599.00 9D 3.GO 60 C.O0 99.~1 99.0! 10.02 9 9.~2 g.o i 600.00 SOl.CO 6C 1.60 60 1.00 6O2.GO 41/~1 0.01 1.00 ~ 0.00 17.00 .G2-.~0- ~ 40.01 ~ 5 1.00 1.00 .00 .00 .6 697.00 ) 02.00 02.00 6 41.00 259.00 2 16.00 2 t6.00 }97.01 J SEP/~_15 2 I&.C'O VENDOR COCA COLA BOTTLING THE CELLAR REST..7¢60 VEVA ARk~3RUSTF. R BETTY GARRIGA AMOUNT !0 ~-.C 0,/ 1 C.CO*v'' 30.C Or' ........ CHARi;.-t~S-- C-OD FREY .................................................... EVA RAY,MONO B. ~GHES STEL~ PL~ VIL~GER ~Pt~ COMPLE 10~0 SE~ST PETROLEUM ........ C-i*~*-CF--B ;B~ .......................................................................... Ct~ OF 8.B. POLICE PENSION ~ POLI~ PENSION FU~ 70 Fi~NS PENSION ~J~ Fl RE~NS , EN:.0N FU~ RETIRD~NT ~UST ~ ........ R E-} {-RE~N~---~gSl-- a~ ............................ RETIRE~T TRUST ~ i.~D 1~7 W~a~iE HARP ?0.79 JAMES COACH~N ........ ORA--JORDAN ................................................................. CITY OF ~.B. 7.~0 R 1 VA HA~uN~ DONS TR~Ki~ 6635 R.t. GRU~ON~ 5 JA~$ AL~ACK ~ 03.75 AL ~NZO ~ ILS ON 17 CITY ~ B.B.' 19A~ EDWARD KANA J HELEN DOMSKt 5339 NORA CONSTR ~213 ~I~IE S~REAT I ON OOR 1S SPANGLER 12.00 CHARLES 30~REY 50.00 VEVA ARk~ RUSTER EVA RAYMONO ......... BEt IY..-GAa~ [ ~ ...................................................... BOYDS BODY SHOP THOMAS PONTERELL~ GENERAL FUND GENERAL FUND .GENERAJ.. FUND 10 7'D,O 00 .DOD 7 5,OO0.O0 7 5.0 O0 ACCT. DATE NO% :..p .-[, .~ CHECK NO. ,~ 99 .C0 ,7 00.00 ,701 VENDOR CITY OF ~.gTILITY ~'~..T[R DEPOSITS MRS ILLA ~ADSWORTH CITY FO ~.B.- J.J. ~ALSH CONST~ - ,7 0:~.00 CITY OF ,7 0~.00 ROSENO0 T 1JERNO .70D.O0 ,CITY C,F 8.8. .7 06.00 CiTY OF 7 07.00 CiTY OF AMOUNT 8 .BO 17,00 5.60 ............. 1-~-~(~-- 23 25 2& .80 CI'TY OF ~--'3. '3-.7D... .......... ..................................................... i'7 .lo CiTY 0~' ~. JOHN GALE WATER SE]ER REV- ~ATER SE~ER REV. ~ATER SE~ER REV. SE~ER ~ATER ~P. SEWER WATER DEP. ............ SE'"~ E R-- -~! A*TE-R-- ~i= . ........................ : ................... .1~-1- 9-~-~DO- CENTER CITY INS. 7~0 .. ......... ~NRY...~OBERS~ .............................................. :._..'.1~0_.~.._ PALM BOM JR. COLLEGE 600~ ~OCA ESTATES INC. 200~ ;v~RR ILL ~YNCH 1 ~5 5~ ~RR 1 L~ ~YNCH 1 ~5 52.1~ ........... ~.1Z~.. _~...~ ~_~.~ .................................................... ~_~ .~0.~... CITY ~ ~-B- I7.60 CiTY ~ D-B. 23.~ CITY ~ B.~. 7~0 CiTY OF FRANCIS ~IITT CHR I STOPHER CH IOOO MANHATTAN TROPH i ES LT. CARL DIXON UNIV. OF GEORGIA NORMAN .MAJOR ............ B*,~ D ~--'- GENERA -kF~iJND .................................. ARNOLD OUTCHER CITY OF B.B. - RA,~tOND CORI[ ..IR. CITY OF CiTY OF 8.B. - CITY OF B.B. CA~:'BELL CONSTRUCTI ON GEORGE MATESON CITY OF ~/IALT ER MCGLYN AL~A MOSS ---' CITY- OF B,S, CiTY OF EVERETT H. CALL . . CiTY OF 52~0 7.92 ........ .... I O0.00 38 AO 175.00 1B~.IO ........ 2 O0.00 7~ 1I .90 ............... .~. ACCT. DATE CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT NO,~ NO. 30.320.0 ~%15 7,73~.00 StD~Y ELLIS - · '~'.20.0~ ~5!5 ~73&.00 D~ALD HOUSE - ~-~520.00 ~%%1S 7.739.00 CITY- 0F B,B, ).520.00 ~%~15 7.7~O~0 P~ER M~0N 520.00 '~%%~5 7,7q5~ NORMAN EVANS . 3~0,0, -~'~5 ;.7 75.00 BE3E BELEHE~ , .00 ~%%1% r,776.~ CITY ~ B-CTILI~ ~T/R DEPOSITS 7.gO ACCT DATE CHECK VENDOR AMOI/i~ .00 -~P%'9lh ~676.00 CITY OF B.~IRST BANK TRUST 1,(~99.50 ~t~ 978,00 PATROL Cl~ OF B.C. ~-(~10.02 ~P%9~5 97~0 PAYROLL CITY DF B.8. l 9,0[ ~%9~5 ~677.00 POLI~ PENSION ~ 70~.77o 1,9~L0.02 ~9~5 q677.00 POLI~ ~NSION ~ .- ~ 700.77 [,q99.~[ ~%91%~ ~&77,00 POLI~ PENSION ~ . 700.77 )t0.02 :[P~9~ ~678~0 FIRE,NS ~NSION ~ 758.17 99.01 ~915=. 9679.00 RETICENT ~UST ~N. [,C, 99.h0 fP~91% 9679.00 RETICENT ~U'ST ~N . g~lO.05 ~9~h ~6~0.00 8.B. ~ CR~iT UNION ~lO.O[ ~%9~ ~b8[.O0 FIRST B~K ~UST - 7.766.70 L~'62.00 ~V~15-968A~0 0LYdiA SPORT SHOP - ..... ~3Z~2~00 :~9~5 L2S6.OO FLAG~tP NATL, ~A~ ~ . ' .. '~0.02 ;r~l~ ~723OQ GULF 0IL CORP~ATt0N 128A.05 )'~40.02 :~TZI~ ~725[~G SE~REST PE~OLU~ , '. ~51.00 ;:PtZ~ ~26 ~.00 GREGORY D~ T [~g~.30 F~27!'- {}.7~8 00 WA~R. SEWER REVENUE 5 t 9.00 ~t315 ~758.00 PIERCE T l RES ~D'~2.00 ~ZE~: g~53~.00' DISPLAY STUDIO CREATIONS ~q,~O.C4 _~pZ~i~ ~7 ~6.00 ~ATER SE~ER REVE~U~ .. l ~6 ~7.02' ('~8,~0 ~?~% 9,7~7.00 SE~R WATER ~PO~ . ~t~,~0~gg~31 _~_~' '%'- g.7~7.OO SE~R ~ATER DEPOS . . ~O50~O ~011.02 _~231~ 9.7~7.00 SEWER ~A~ER DEPOS - ~050~0" ~797,~0 ~3tb 9.7~8.00 ~tLtTY uENERAL . ' ~95~5 kTDg.00~p 5~wLY { ~ ~ '~ CHARLES GODFREY 30 ~' ACCT. DATE I CHECK VENDOR AMOUAVf NO: NO. 30,~20.00 -~P15I% ,'.78&.00 CITY ~F '3.B- ~0.00 ~c1~'Z3~¥ L788.00 CITY OF 9*B- 11..~ --3-~- .~ O-,O0-- -,S[P.~%%b---:L'Za9.,O0 ............ RCS£a.T...QIID- ....................................... 50,;~..,0.00 '5[P'~b 287.00 SOUTHERN ~ELL 5 17.00 ~-P~'= 9.7 80.00 CA~ON HO~5 010.02 ~2~ 9,782~0 CITY ~ 8. B. 099.30 -~5 ~000.00 Ci~ OF 30098~0 ~65% ~000.~ CITY 0F B.~.. . ~3~0.02 ~l!}~ ~.78~.~ POLI~ PENSION F~D 711.19 ~399~a2 ~5 ~.TS~.OO FIRE~NS PENSION F~D 178~1 :~0',~99.01 ~5~5 ~,785.~ RETiRE~ TRUST.F~D ' . ~703.~< ~ O [ 0.0l _~2675 ~7 89 .~ ~T I RE~NT TRUST F~D . %310.05 ~5 ~786~ B.B. CREDIT ~[0N _ ~O.O1 ~5~ ~,787.00 FIRST BA~ TRUST 1,~-t0.06 ~95 %788.00 b~ITEQ WAY ...... ~0,~20.00 ~2%I5 7.791.00 CITY ~ S.S- - · 5~.~20.00 ~15 7.79ZDC CITY ~ B. 8- _ . 3~,$20.00 ~t5 7,79~ CITY uF ?~, 37~0,00~% %795~ TRIESTE GO~STR. _ 1 5 02.00 ~91~ 0,7 95 ~ BEATRICE AHLGREN ; ~n~ nn ~t9~ ~797~0 C~A COLA BOTTLI~ ~9.~ ~ ~ ..... " & 2 ', :~ ~ ~ ~7g~O ' JERRY HyUAN 2 '"'W ~'A~'g~"i~lY :L799.OO R~ERT WEIR ~; ~ ~ '~0 '~-~a: _~8 O0 .~ BUNNY SaEOO · · -- ~ .OO 1, ~ 0- .u , - ¢ ~ 502 C0 -~'191~ -.S01.OO B~ ALbeRT .... - '~'~'al ~Zql% ~)aO~.~ UOHN L~RY ROBERTSON .. ~80.~ t~17'C0 ~291" '~811~0 HETZEL STORAG~ .7739 - -~nR~o ~ ~ ~5 * 288 O0 I ~S AQRI.CHEMI~ALS 3,B20,00 ~lg!b 'L796.00 CITY ur ~-o. __--2 ' ~'n~;.20,O0 [~Zglb 'A799.~ CITY ~ B-S. · ._ACCTJ NO~ ~ o00 3 0,~10.0~ .._ ~..0.9.9..30__. $ 0;~ ~J0 50,,~% 1.0! '~97.01 -9-7-.9t- 10.01 97.30 · .oo LQ3 ~.00 Lq ~ ~.00 -5~0-~--- DAT~ CHECK VENDOR NO. L85~0 WA~R SE~R REVEN~ .~50.00 SE~R ~ATER DEPOS ,860.00 SE~R WATER OEPOS S60.O0 $E~.R WAT~ DEFOS .S6 [.o0 UTILI~ GENERAL 861.00 UTILt~ GENER~ 86~.00 UTILIR G~ER~ ~6D.OO FLORIDA ~SJC CO S6 ~0 B.B. ~TO VEVA ~RUST~ CHAR~S G~FREY HOL L ~ ~ORTH MANHA~AN T~PHtES I .B.M. CORP BOSTON ~EACH FL~tDA PO~ER LtG~ XEROX C~RP Ct~ OF RI~D COONEY 11 CITY OF ~.'B. FIRST BANK ~T RUSSEL~ A~ AXON .: RUSSELL A~ AXON RUSSELL A~ AXON B,B. FlEE D~T, ' B,B, FIRE D~T, _. ~viO~T ....... 678.90o 675.50 7 ~ 7~0 7~0 .=_...'....!9.,~9~ ..... 155~2 2.I00.00 ............. ~-~ 1 a.50 1 7 33 7~0 7.00~ 7~0 3 ACOT. 2.00 ~10.00 99.1t 99.01 9920 10~0 9931 99~1 9.50 1 · 0.01 9.01 .9.5.0 .... 0.00 7.21 DATE NO. VENDOR .90~.00 .907~0 O07D0 .908m0 _~..0.~... .gO8~O ,909~0 .909~0 g09~0 glO~0 g t 0D0 ~ I 1.0o ~'ALM BEACM OFFI ~. SUPPLY PIERCE TIRES THE OLYI~°IA SPORT SHOP ......... j~-O ~...~' '-~0 [.-,~ ' '00' ............................................. CIVIC CENTER CIVIC CENTER C ! VI C CENTER FEDERAL REV SHARE FEDERAL REV SHARE .................................. OPER.CAPI TAL IMPROVE OPER.CAP ITAL iMPROVE OPER.CAPi TEL ! ~ROVE POLICE RETIRE,VENT FUND POLICE RETIP, E~ENT FUND POL RETI RE'~-J~J'" ~"~G ....................... FtREh~F_NS PENSION FLi~O FIRE,',,~NS PENSION Fgt,,l] AMOUNT 6.12 ........... 9'g'.'uO ..... 18.10 1~.10 1,897~t. 6 ~> hSgT~6 .... ."~S'971I '6 ..... 9~5~90 595.89 ~.529~ 50 P5~5 1.00 FIRE~NS PJ;NStON FUND 9.06 ~2.00 8.B.m.P ....... ' "' 2.00 ....... -~iEi~iP': .................. 2.00 B.~.U.P. E~O SOUTHERN PA~RP ~ O SE~RE ST PETE OL~UM ......................... ~....~ ................................................. GE~R~L ~U~ .~ GE~RAL FU~ 3.00 GE~ ~AL FU~ ~0 GEN~ ~A~ FU~ ~_~.~ .... OPER;CAP ITAL iMPROVE OPER .~API TAL 3~.~0 10 EXPENDITURES ACCT, DATE ~J~ECK VEiFDOR AMOUNT _~ . NO. NO. ? ~0.7h ~P2 % ~,~7.00 D0~OAU ~ ~0 10.~ 1~13~2 ;FP~ '[% ~,~.00 WATER-DEPARTMENT 1JtDl.12 :~ ~ ~.~h~.O0 WATER O~ENT . : ~670.2D LI~60.12 ;Let %-~ ~ ~h 8.00 WATER DEPARTmeNT , 237~5 J?O.[2 ~Pt t-, ~hS,~O WATER DEF~ENT , 17.h5 ";-'~zj 66.12 ~P~ V~ ~h~.O0 WATER DgPARTMENT ~ 1,~'7 5;1'2 .~'p~ 'P~ '~ h~ g.O0 WATER DEPAR~E ~T . 1.680.50 jt,6~.80.12 ['~ %, ='4q~.O0 WATER DEPART~(EHT 92.~5 ..~,~ 13.1~ ,[Pt % 9~'9~0 -../L~IDA PO~ER LIGHT Z317.~ ~.50.13 FPZ *[b ~)ffhgO0 FLORIDA PO~ER LIGHT I '~Z l~ )~h-GO FLORIDA POWER ~ ~,~ 60.13 *p~ '[- 9qh9:~O FLORIDA PO%~ER LIGHT i Zl,Jt~.4~ : [~,E~70.13 ;P'~ 't', :3.449.00 FLORIDA PO~ER L1GItT L 251.65 k o.z 2 , ~g 180.7~ A,~80,7~ ~ '~:,~5329 ~P~ % ~I~7.00 ?ATE OF FLA ~,~51.29 '~W'~ 't~ ':h59.('.:~ ~IATE OF FLA 3,00 ~0~2 [~r~ -~'~ 9.4~.7.C 3 i:NGEL$ UNIFORL~ 5J:5 ' ~ .......................... : ....... i ..... ~ .................... ..................................... ~¢0330 '~"P3 ['~ '¢~ )C ~ !~A~A"~"'OF''~i'~'t , ,. ,.. r z~,~ fiD,CD 'JJj~ll,~!2.59 .i-P~ :, ~;A, 7.c.; ~'¥E'8'$'C'A'~gO'c'rATE'5 ......................................... ~ AC,CT. DATE CHE~ VENDOR AMOUNT NO. NO. 1820.75 %~.~ ~ , - 4o-.. ,3 >ALM 5EACft OFF ~ SUPPLU IOn ~ 8 [ ~.5 g ,,, , · .... ~, ....~..~..~I[R~.Y....U iC. .................. ' ........................ l.,...,..~. .............. ~J ........ ~*_.~.~ ................ '~ ~ , '~;-z~--g ~P?, ~, .~"%1.,.~J - 'A~ BEACH SPR ~ ~6 1812.~9 ~LP5 'It ~:4~3.03 ~NOW CO~RETE . ~763 1812.59 ~j,'r-~ ~.. r 484.r',~." JOUTit F~ PART~ '. ~1 ~51.64 ~.'~ ',-~ ~,~.~5.0~ 'RIPL~ CEDAR ~tRSENY , 25.75 ~ ............................. ~2.5~ ~L~}~'" ~ "%-. .... '.487.~]i" ....... '" .............................................................. :ASY PAY TiF~S ~ ~ 7.~0 [~ g,~, ':.487.g ~ '.ASY PAY TIRES J 345.21 ~50.46 ~[P3 }-~ (,4~[,.6> IALSEY GRIFFITt ~ [7.~.,~...:~3.L.~-~..._L ~.. ~r. ,, ~ ............. ALSgY GR IFFI T~ ~ i .~2 .................................................................................... ~:~0.)10.62 ;t~'3 }'~ 91g.~ ELRAY ~HEMICA[ ~ 155,00 ~;~0')20.51 ~P3 }'. 91~.,,,~ ~ORTH PAI~ CO : , ~- ~R SHALL BOLT' AND NUT C ~ IIF )()10.30 ;Li~ ~, g23~r' . .K, ELECTRIC ' · ~1.36 FP3 -~ ~i'25'~ ~AR~L A~ DE~ND J ~0%,6" u.B. ~UTO PARTS · , tO~o(; c.B, AdTO ,~T~ ),~ f,20.56' .FP3 'i~ ;_,1 ~, 6:., B,B,. vAtJTO~, KPARTS ' I ;,~.!l .... ~ ~-O-~O.... ~.~,..:~ ........... ~.~.¢.~ ............. ~ A.LS~.,..,,~B.L.I.I~ ..................................... F(~10,63 .~Pq ~' g. k94J 0 .. ALLIED 0 L ' ~ '4"-0 (,920,63 ~p~ -~ q.494 ~ 0 AL?ED CHLORINE · ..................... .9,~ ~9 (0 O~U~tA HOUSE~ , 19.gh '~880.74]~ 885,22 .~.i'A'A~ A~, ~: 9.500.(0C0 BOYNTON:AUToiBLUE CROSS ~GLAs~rLA : 220,~153~4 '* B 12,~8 ~L~A 'u~ ,502 ~812,28 .~[p~ ~'~ 9~0~.(8 ~HITT ~0 D~ELL r 10,0 ~50~ (0 ~ulTT ~ DO*ELL 10.~ 1~52.28 ~P~ '~> j ¢~5~.28 ~P~ lg~ g. 50~.(O ~HITT ~C DO'~ELL ~860,28 ,~p~ ~-~ 9,50~.(0 ~HITT MAC DO,ELL . ~, -70.00 ~865.28 ~A "~-~ 9.503.(0 WHITT M~ OO~EuL 12~0 :_ ACCT DATE CHECI~ VENDOR AMOUNT NO. NO. ~ < .00 ~p~ t~. 9.5 05J 0 ODOR OONTROJ~H~.L~&~I~JTR. ~ERV CE 28.80 ~812,59 ~ ~', 9.508.~0 FIRE EQUIP SALE~ N.O0 " ' 8 85,52 .~r~ ~'; 9,50.$ 4 0 ~ATER OEPT , ~-~'820.19 ~P% ~-: ~2~J 0 FLANA~AN ~TO~LF -,,~cg 00.10 --~'t'~ %'~ 950,~0 PERRY OESS"~A ~ 99.70 5C900.28 ~EP~ {'. 931~0 WHtTT MAC [JOWELL ~ 15.00 50g10~8 ~r~ 'u; g3['.t 0 WHITT ~O .... ~0920.28 ~PA '{5 g3[[O ~HITT ~C DO,ELL 30,00 : 30901.10 [CPA 'it g32,i0 PAUL STARTZMAN } 25,00 · g~SJ 0 CITY'~ B8. ~ ~250.00 309~8.00 ~_pk -~ ~880,7q ..~b It ~518.(~0 F~LETT LIBRARY BOOK gO' :8 12.&9 ..~ 1% ~5 19.(~0 PETTY CASH :8 13,~2 ..~ ~. g,31~.(,0 PETTY OASH ~ 850,46 ..SLP5 i. 9.519J,0 PETTY OASH ~, 434 .~ < 852',30 _.~Pb }'. 9519X,0 PETTY OASH i 55' ~ 866,97 -~P5 %~, 9,5194~0 PETTY OASH . ~ 865,&9 S~5 ? 9,5 lg.~=O , PETTY CASH - 136 812,59 ,.~5 ~;> %525.(:0~t ADVANCE AIR G(NDtTIONING 33.59 '; 853,50 --SIP5 '~'~ 9.527.(.0 BYROS ELEOTRI( MOTgRS ~ h~ .60 ; 850,~0 -SEP~ ~5 9.52aX.0 ' GLASGO~ EQUIP SERV ................................................. ' { v~ 05 ~ 875,87 ~F5 ~% g. SZg.~O HALSEY GRtFFI1 ~ ~ . KEATTS TRUCKI~ ] ' 85h,35 .~ 1% q,53~.:,0 a7 50 ,,, 812,59 .D2Pb }', 9.~3o ~O ~EA5 ~U~I~ 3 5.30 ~, 850,24 -~iP~ 1~ g,~,:.O HORTIOU~TURE ~ JBSCI~IFTiO ~ O0 PETTY CASH · 921:~6 SkF5 ~h gsh.(0 PETTY CASH r 1.28 ~..J ~10,59 -~ %5 953.CO ~ uREEN GRAN~.COI4ORETE SER ' 87~.75 '~ ACCT. DATE CI-IECK VENDOR AMOUNT NO. NO. ~ 30,)20,30 SU'5 ',~ 91~I,0.,, R£PL~LIO FREIG-iT 17,,1'1 L813.q5 =~% ~. 9.5~a O0 U.S, POST,STiR . ' ~. 750}0 L,8 12=39._.~9 I 9,5h7,~0 EUGE~ NORFUS ~' 1 20,~ .,875=3g.~s[~9 '~' 9~9 ~ FI~[ E~UIP SA.ES ~ 25.50~ . /%1,830A6 '5i'1' I o l~~,5~ l,O 0 ~E~Y CASH ~ ...1851.29 - ' ' 1851.29 5[~'~i 9~6~,0D ~E~Y CASH : ~.~865.69 ~%uT~' 9~62.00 'g~Y CASH '3 i ~8.00 · ~,852.55 5f?%o'l: 9.565.00 ~IULF OIL 00RP ' ~ 1,85269 ~[r%u'~' 9~66.0D )0LPHIN BOLT A O ~?~ 56~7i :~0, ~lna6 ~'~-~'. 9A5.03 ;~g~f CASH ~0, t1030 ¢'~-~,= ~a3n~ I.QUIP~NT FOR i~UITRY ~e, )i0.51 ~'~;v~ 1. g~ 9,OD liU~AN .ENTERPR I SE S ~'"~,~'~'FO'O:'~'5"',_~F:E'¥'"'~ .- ~'"~'~":~'~0. [ ............. t~E'~'UESS~A.. ............................................... , ~z~;OC"., )01.t0 ~i'~i 951.0 I i~AU~ ST~TZ)~AN t 3~ 875.30 ~"ttl~ g,5~2.~,O ' .E~HS SQD q2.00 88 2q' SLe~21' ' ~';56500 tODAYS HE~ 1 551.62 5iP%~'i~ vf~.~ia ,%5QRO~ FLORIDA CO 360.68 ~',P('z'i', ~'539~0D ~tATIONAL LIhEN '_t9.60' 1366~7 {~F~?~-, 955'-.0D IIATIONAL LIf~N ' z1~-37~ ~ B7 5.39 %-?y~.'~- '=.5~' g.O } liATIOI~L Li~N . ............................ .: :'.7""~ ............................. ; .... - ~ 380.30 Sri'~z~ ',,DuC.v} IIE;.NE EXTEfl~I~Tt~ .312.51 9'P~z['~ '.,.59~'03 tIE.dE EXTERMIN,~TI~ 1 35039 ~:~-~[~ ,5~,[}'0) I;E~E EXTERMIE TtN~ : ~.00~ 330.30 ;:~{~'~. :~9')~ 9; ~iO~ OALGULA' OR ' ~,~0~ .L.~:...1;;;'42 ;~;,~' , :,'-J"~ ~ ~:g~J~lg~A~ ~6IsitlNa 1 ) ..... · '".: - - ' .~ ACC~- - DATE CHECK VENDOR AMO~ ' NO. NO. 20JlO0;O0 ;[P~t~, !2'.0~ ISlAH A~RE~S ~60.12.~i,~ 9.605,~ TROPIGAS . ' ~6.1V. ~ 60,69~.S~t%t- C,606 ~0 P~LIX SUPER ~IARKET ~85.~2 S~ih~ ~L607 ,0 BLUE CR055 ~ FLA ~2D~O' *,851 ~9 ~P~S[:': q60~ .0 ADAM5 CHEVROLET : ~8.~.~.~.9....~.~.~:¥~p.~L&~: ~ ........... ~-~A~-*~HEYRG~ .~ ........ r ........ ~-:~-- ' ~,~ 12.69 ~5~' 9,5 09 ~0 ATLAS EL/GTRt( SUPPLIES ..... ~ 51,30 ~P~%~' q.~Og ~0 ATLAS ELEOTRI SUPPLIES ; 323 ~,SDl,6g ~;,~:- 0.609.~,0 ATLAS ELEOTRI( SUPPutE~ . 23,07 3865,69 SIPS;,? 9,60gXO AT~A5 ELEGTRt( S~,'hi~S , ~.67 /~,~.87~,30 ~:,~'~' %609.(0 ATLAS ELE~TRt( S~[-LI~ '~ ~,8 12,31 .-~ ¢~'~ ~.6 11 {~O ~0YNTON G~ASS 38 .... ~4.[ A~o.,~6. ,.~,,,,~, --9+-~-6-:~ o .............. a~=ps~EA~*-~.u~ ,~a ................................ ; ........ ~-,~-. ',~ ~. ~6~ ~LLY TRAOTOR ~ ~5,71 ~ ~853,~0 ~p, A., 17.( JORDAN HYDRA~L 05 1,8 I2,51 -~+%5~5 5.o224'0~P P~OARD CHEMI~A' ~ ~ ; ~Dl,~O -~;'t%~ 9.623 ~o SOUTH FLORtD~ ~'~ "' , ~1]00 lSD~,~O U¢.lS,S g,624~,(0 T~AIL'FORD T~A'~rOR ' !865.30 "SLFt51~ 9625 {O ~EtR AUTO ELE~F~t~ ~0.00 9 "St? ~595 9 5~ ( ) SEAR5 ROEBUoK ~e ~ 2o ,so ........ , - '""; ...... ~'SL~" r~ ~311.29 '~;¢;~1A 9~7'~) ~AMS OHEV~OLE[ ' , . ) 20,30 5Lf ~$15 9,52.03 ,.i~. EL[CTRIO ......... [*I'l'~bD'"' 7 -c-;:r. Ai TOOL ~ i ~'] .00 )20,30 ~ ~I~ 9654)) .'~ -'" ~ '~'~360.00 ~f,~%~ ~,280.0~ k. AUTO FART : ' ,, , .~875;~6 ~615 9~2.(0 - PETTY GASH ]; ' 875,51 .~ ~2.(~ PETTY GASH 15.32 ~ 875,53 ~['~G~5 ~,&32.1 PETTY CASH :1I .~{875,61 ~P%b~ 9,b3Z,i~ PETTY CASH - · ~AA.-~-AA-¢ ................................ ACCT. DATE CHECK VEbTDOR AMOUNT NO. NO. [85~ -5[P~61'-, 9,6k0 tlO FLOERIOA EAST COAST R.~. &.O0 ' 8 20.18 SkP%615 9.6 42 qO PALM BEACH NE-,%$?APEitS I 05 O0 go2~q6 .SEPt6~.% 966.~0 U.S. POSTMASI'ER g01.11 ..~E~6t% 967,~0 ~PAU~ ATARTZ~, ~ 130.00 870.39 ~P~ 96B,(0 JAMES SMOOT g21~62 %P%61'~ 9~9,C0 KEM ~iANUFAOTU~ING ) 9 ~8~3~38 _~P%6¥. 96~.[0 XEROX CO~ · : ' 20b.22 ~85~,92 $~115 9,692.~:0 BOARD COUNTY ;OHM, ATL~NT ! O HARD~ ~EE · ~ 5 .~0 ~ 51,62 _SEP~lZ5 9.657.t,0 ~LCO SAFETY ~UIP. 8,75 ~5h:61 ..~P~]~% 9.657j,0 HELOO SAFETY. t ~UIP. : B54,62 ~SEP%ll% g.b58.~)O . ~, ICEMACHIf~[ 00, ) 16g.~ 3~.g 10;51 _~PV~¥~ 975J ATLAr~TIO HAR~ ARE b.Sb ARE · 910,59 _~f~l'~5 973.~,0 ATLANTIC HARd, ARE ~ ~1.68 ~3 c.g 20 ;31 .~P ~l]% 9 73 .~0 ATLANT i 0 ATLANT i O HARD~ ARk 12.0~ ~,9 20 :~ St, t3,5 ~7, .,~ ATLA?T lO HARD~ ARE " r: ~.&l ' !3~920,61 ~Pt~5 973.~ ' ATLAWTIO HARD~ARE [~ B.B. CHILD CAR[ CEN~ER BSl~q -SD't%15 g.65~.(~ PETTY CASH ..... 2.50 B 51.69 _%p ~535 9,6 59 j PETTY CASH ' , & .60 ~53.69 -S[PtSq5 965:~,~ 0 PE]TY CASH ~ 7.18 B 65 ~0 -%~ ~'t5 9,6 ~') ,~0 PET TY GASH ~870~8 ~E~%%]5 ~.66~i~ XEBOX OORPORATION · 'B80.15 ~P%~15 9.669.~ 3 DO~S BROTHERS ~ 192~0 I,~30~q ~'k%l~ 9,b70 ~ 3 ~EC~ETARY OF 5rAr~ [' 1250 ~353.29 :[[Pt~15 9.672.C3 JORDAN HY~.RA~ICS ' j !b~l~ AC,CT. DATE CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT NO. NO. 3C,9 11,53 ~5E~%~'1~ 9 7q.30 PETTY 0ASH g 21,61 ,._~p %~'1~ 9 7 ~ )0 PETTY OASH ~-'g 10~31 --S[~' ~1% g75.~)0 G~FSTREAM LU~ ~ER 5~ .09 g 01~38 -~%~5 g 76~:.0 XERO~ CORPORA" I ON 76.52 ~g 10 ~29 ~ ~%~ g 77 .~0 ADAM5 OHEVROL~.T ~3C~920.29 ~%S~S 977J)0 ADAM~ CHEVE~JT 8 O0.00 ~ %%~ 129 ,l~O IStAH ANDREWS ~C800.00 ~FtS~5 130J~O CYNTHIA LEWIS -. kS.00 ~C860.00 ~,~%~15 1.2~5J~0 G~FTREAM LURER CO, ... .1J;20.q6 ~'~%9~ 9.&~,O,) ,ACKS O~EA ~ 1~2 ' ............................................... ~'"A-~:~-O"' 51~0 f~:~S 9.6~7D, : 1 RAIL FORD'T~A~ rog ,1j,53.3o ~:P~9~S ~6s7.o~ · . 1RAIL FORD TR~ fOR 199.78 52.62 iPI~IS 9,6~2.0( AATIONA~ WE~IN PR~, I11.83 7 5.39 ;P~A5 9.~ 9 20( N ATi ONAL WE~ IN ~. t 9.00 ~i~ 6 5.51 *Pl3~ ~.69 ~[ PICA~ CHEMIC~ 62.90 ~1880.7~ P%915 )6~.0~ D ~LEDAY CO,MI~' ~[1,~80.7~ P~15 ~.701.0( B ,Kgfl TAYLOR ~ [L~80.7Q ;'~q% ).705~ M ,'MtLLAN ~]~lSl~l,l~D CO. ,~ ~ ~ 2.00 L AG 90.00 i,820.~5 ~'~9% ).70G.OC ~MITA MID~EST ; ~L87 5.30 V%915 ;.70 8,0C ~ AYBAR E~OTRI 21 6.36 ~1,812~1 P~91~ ~709,0~,- .TIONAL ~BURA~0RIES ~D,~11.20 ['%915 97~,00 'B O~,~D PUMP ~] PLY D,~20.~1 ~t9~5 9BO~O P)RTER PAINT CO ' '~,,~ a g I 1.61 ,~.~' ~9~ 961.C HAfiDWARt. ~910.62 ~tP~ 98~ ~E~AY CHEMICA[, ~ 135.Z8 910.62 ~PXgl5 ~5.C } URTIN ~THESO~i 378.67 810.00 ~[~9~ 1~1~:~ ROy't~D PUMP SLP)LY ~ 4A5.29 DATE CHECK 3.53 5.22 2.69 2.50 3.29 ~0.6 2 0.46 60.11 6.11 S[P'~SI5 5.11 ~.F15~5 Z0.73 3.32 1.30 5.29 ~.92 ~t ~ 73'~5 5.69 ~2.5q ?~0.73 r.? 315 VENDOR 97 i 9.7 i t71 'q7~ AMOUNT 972 7.0 9: ~.7~: M B Ol L CORP. PETROL !. MACDU AUTO AUTO SU ~'PLY ~,i TON AUTO )YNTON AUTO SUI')-LY *YNTON AUTO ~PuY L. GRUNt. S PRtNTI~ YNTON AUTO SU~ PLT ~OUT~RN BELL lOUT ~RN BELL iOLN ~RN BELL O~RN BEL~ BELL OUT~RN BELL BOOK DI OFF I~E )OLRHI N BOLT D AIR ~SPLUNOH SERVI ( ,UTOFRODUCT $ 11' 'OARD CQUNq'Y C( ENTitY POOL TI O,NtNG PAY TI IRBY SALES OUT HF-... RN BUI 2,7i g.~-4 28, I A 9 &0.70 ..... ? 6.7 B 5.0 O 33.1~ 10 0.6~ 489,67 63.g3~ ~ ?.0~ 221.00 7.25 ~7 ~.79 23 B.1 l 1~0 -8.~ 0 90~5 '_..~.- ,: i:'43 MA( ~ ACCT ':~ NO~. J .00 ~"~6 6.97 _. 5.3g ! .54 254 0.30 -i 9.761 .C 8 0,7q 8 0,74 8 0,74 ,8 0,74 ~60.2g 10.00 5 4.29 j ~ 65 66,97 11 02.18 00.00 0 O .go 9.7 71 %7 7 9,77~ 0 ~.78! ~.782 0 ;0 0 )0 :0 )0 )0 -0 ENGINE ELE CT R ~AIRS ICE :LLY TRACTOR t.F. IVASON EQU :LSONS GAR/~E IERCE TIP, S IEROE TIRES OUFING PLUS ;E~'~LL HARDWAR ~ SER¥ F~ENT CO ;HERWIN WILL! $ ;HERWlN WI'LL I :OUT HLAND EQU ,TEVENSON FEEt STORE OUTHERN BELL OUTHERN BELL STEE'C' SC'RV'[ C'E ,~ND ti ~ALE S UCKER MFG. CO OHS A~ l GN}~ NT iC~ 0~ ALI G~ENT ICE ~0 C~M~RCE CLEAi i~ HOUSE A~RI CAN GIRL R,R. ~CMILLAN P~{ I~HIHG A~[ R ICAN L RIES B~ER AND TAYLIOR SOUTHEAST PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY GASH P. EI~:f...G~.U... PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH GOVERNMENTAL JOHN DUNKLE CYNTHIA LE~IS ISIAH ANDRE~$ Ui DES 5~.I0 ~3 7.59 812.~0 20.25 ~50.C0 ~ 7.6~ ~.Ci 26~5 73S.~0 t 34.15 j j ~ 2 9.0 O ]0 12,00 h.~O 4.02j ..... il ~.~ 5 3.55 2 10.00 2.70 2.50 7.00 5 ,~0 2.50 i 0 2 ;50 i 1 ~ 30 I '5 .~0 k .60 ~8 ~0 ~ 5 ACCT DATE CHECK NO. 1t8 3 0 ;46 I- '0 8 40-46 8 6 5 ;46 g,S~O 0 8 75 ~69 9~ 20 860~39 SfPT-~h- c~ 12~1 9.792 ~P~) t~ 9,792 860~53 9P~"b 9.793 0.6g g,7 9~ 9,8 03. 00,~1 Sfp'~g!- g.S 05 ~O.g3 S~P?q~ 9.806 880,7~ Sfp?o~ 9,~ 07 ,51 SLF?,~ 9.8 ~ 0 SIP?gl_ g.813 54.29 g.S 15 ( 51.29 S[~?~:~ 9.816 52;30 SiP?g':", 9.a I6 ~ 60,2g ~.P'~9 ,.- 9.817 .~ 9.817 9.S 17 9,8 19 ~0 618 21 9.8 21 9,822 ( 0 9.8 23 9.8 2~; 0 9,8 2 3 J 9.8 2 5 ~0 9.8 26 0 VELqDOR PIORD OHEMII CHI GULF TIRES SLPER X DRUGS WHITT MAG CHARLES WA[ K.E.GUIDO BANYAN PSYCHI; ~AOMILLAN PU~I TAYLON RENT~ ZEP MANUFAO' MANURY8 TOOL HAVATA~J~A AUTOPROOUCT$ AUTOPROOUCTS AUrOPRODUOT$ AUTGPRODUCTS AUTOPRODUOT5 AUTOPROOUCT$ ALqOPROOUCT: 8.13. AUTO B,B, AUTO 8,B, AUTO S B,B. AUTO PAR' S B,E. AUTO PAR' DONS '/IHI TT MAC ltlHITT MAG DOW STEVENS DR U,..ql LLOYO$ OF B,8. LLOYDS OF LLOYDS OF B.Bo LLOYDS OF 0.$. HALSEY GRIFF H EASY PAY T ~A£'¥-P'A-Y---~- MOTORS ~-L O CL 1 .NI IN,?, AMOUNT 55.02 I~ .77 56.01 60.88 8 3,67 5.70 3-~-,~- 37 .~0 5.00 00~ 2.~ ~8.00 2 u9 34 .S~ 17.77 5~ .95 34~9 1,64 ~ .O7 17 .I~ 1 5.27 ~-.~* 27.00 7 06.00 ~ .86 1~ .00 ~-9-~. 35.00 57.50 20.00 ~'9 .~ 7.95 2g .77 DATE CHECK NO. ~46 20 00.10 00:~6 O0 5 2.69 53.29 7',~ 6 0.2 g 5 1.30 L 5.01 ~.00 "[,'0'O g*] 1.0 10 J LOll.{ 1.0 ll "1:0-I"2-:( 1,0 12 .( LO12. 1,0 1 l~O 14 1,0 VENDOR ~O~T l:g 1,0 ~0 20 J MURRAY A,MO dEE PIOARD PAUL STARTZMAr ~A'r! CASH'hE~iSTEE TAYLOR RE.TALE FLORIDA ELECT61C MOTOR5 AUTOPRODUCTS AUTOPflODUOTS AUTOPflODUCT$ jro PART~ BOYNTON GRIFF HAL3EY HALSEY GRIFF HALSEY QRIFFi CALERA L ~IER~E TIRES SERVICE AUTO .ASS INDUST{{IAg SUPFL 5TTY CASH OASH CASH .~3. AUTO FAN F.?, · B. AUTO PAll rs ,B. AUTO PAR'FS ~.B. AUTO PAH FL; 8 ~ 25 ,O0 2g 90 74.5,9 2.e4 10.95 ½;~',,,%- 55.00 29 DO 17 ~0 10.73 1 IS 1557 29.5O .-1-.~0-,2~-. 4 1 g 8 O0 4 6 7 2 7,2~ i.,: ~ I O ('.'33 ? '-' 150.00 6 ?.liO 60.nO 6.00 1 0.4:5 .......................... .aO 16.50 8.5 O 62 9.00 D.~ ~ 7.50 ................................................... zO0.o0 10.CO J ACCT. DATE CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT ~.]E0'0.10 'p%:.,v: L83 ~.(,( DAVID ROBERTS .... 1,E 00.10 'PS~, Ym~qC.O~ JOE DE LONG ~ ~0.10 2'~'~-. ~6q ~.O( TER~A P~O~TT 25.00 ...0, B~Y LAW- 2~I'0 ~,.~ 6-.~. C ~LE~ FR~ERt~:K 7 5,00 ;a [1-0=1-0---~ ~3u'~: ..... ~>rq-~cc ............ ¢ ~'~K-'~H~'"""': ...................... ~' ......... ': ..... 1870.I0 ;F~-3~'~*. ES51.0 ~ ]HRi ~OPHER SCIMtDT I¢..~0 1870.10 .... ~- 52.0 D ~ 0TT. . tP5.C0 }~5~-~?-- :~ ............. ~U~*S*-PE~E ....................................................... ~...:I.~.~,~D.. ~,870.[0 ':S~.rSb%, 9.855.0 ) ,ItU FELLOWS ' ' ~B71.10i ;t'p3.Jl'~ ~-.8 =.`6.0D ',HLBO~N CRAIGi 913.12 i~FSal.. 98,~.,7.09 !~ATER DEPARTMEt~T . 1 ~ B&~,t--2-- ~*~,~-~- ...... 9..8~-7-~ ~ ........... ] ~A~-QEP~I~ I ............................................... ~..~..:...= ...... ~B65.12 ,[i'3~', g,~57.0~ t~ATER DEPART~T 22~.75' ~,B66.12 ~,t:{~ 9.897,0 ATER D~P~EI T ~ 3-1-~,1-~* ~'~'-',L-~-~-,-~-,--- .G~35.~..~; ..... L~.[DA..~[~..J J.~)JT [,,~ 7.69 ~50,t3 Y;P3:~ ~'- g.85E.OD I'L~IDA. PO~ER~ : t IGH~ ......................................... ~"~'~*~':~"*,=~ . 5' ) I'h~iOa POrkeR I~I~HT i ~ .~, ..,,. 6,0 z~51.30 ~'.- ~, ; tE~Y CASH '. ~.Io ~53.30 ~'~.,'~.. ~'S~.. ~.(,,,: ~E~Y CASH ~.00 ~J80.q6 ~:p~ ~7.o~ J'E~Y OASH ;. ~ 2.o0 I [60~5 ~P3C{'~ 9.368.0~ ~E~Y CASH ~ .4o0 ,~ J60.~6 T~Sgv. ~.'~ ~,,, ,STTY CASH .1~ .~..Q,~. '~;'- ~" ~:~5 ~ C~ ~E~Y CASH ,~,;60.56 ~5~i, -z~;~ S,O~ ............. }~E~Y"CA'S'H ................................................................... _~60.69 '[~3c'~=, g. 85~.0~ FE~Y CASH 3~.60 / ~,1~7 ~.69 ,.t~..,~i'3:;~ ~,. % '3f~ q r,( ~-ETTY CASH 'zj~8~°Z~°o.7 ~ ~?'50 u) ~j~'~'~']~ ............. ~ ~[T~?"~'E'NT'A" ACCT. 1~0. DATE CHECK VENDOR AMOUNT 80.24 ~?~,.~ ~ 75.46 : r :.,~ :.,. 5.69 t'~: 2 2 920.13 ~01.13 )00.10 )00.69 )11.30 11.5~ 5.0 ii 120.20 0 .q 6 J l 2.28 51.28 5 5.28 5 q.28 60J8 6 5.28 1 5 q.35 ~ .2 g 60.SO 51.29 55~8 5'5'~29" 60.2 g 55.38 1'5'~*~" 51.69 9,~ 9 1,02 1,02 1,02 1,02 2.0 1.02 21, 1.023.0 1,O 2 .3,C 1,02 1,02 1.02 1.02 LO- 2 LO2 1,2 ~ 0.0 %90 ~tgO 990 991 0 0 0 LLAN PUBL FI WORTH KRUS£ :HARt. ES [ACH OFF ROS. ~0UBJ.EOAY ~ATER DEPAR TMEt ~ATER DEPARTME~ LOR IDA POWER FUBL. 1~ M.D. SUPPLY LUR IDA POWER LOR IDA PO~I[R IGHT CASH ETTY CASH ~ETTY CASH CASH 'ETTY CASH COPPER iiAL EL£C O'",qATl't *1TY APPE,~ ,B. FIRE: DEPT ~ALM EBEACH To GRANT MAO DO~ ITT MAO ITT MA~ .g ITT MAO .L /HITT MAC .L /HITT MAC .~. MAC ,L ~TLANTi C HA ANCE BOA ~,E SUPPL ~ELRAY CONC RETI I.R. MASON EqUJ FEWENT A~Y PAY TIRES :OL2JAN AND Y EATTS LOYDS OF D~/ERT ISERS PRE DVERTI SEAS PRE . W. ~,'ERQ't AN T lttTT M~ AYLOR RENT~ S ORTH C~MI SS S$ 7.F7 16.79 5.60 6,~0 .3~ 6,C0 112.50 7 1.20 13.72 257.75 1 .k122.30< h122~0 10 ~.~O :1,2,510.52 ~.~0 7.O0 13 ?~/., "1:'I'~'5;(~'0"1~ ~.q 1 q 2.93 I 0.0O lo.oo I ~ 5.00 ~ ~.00 2 ~.00 70.eO 58.90 .~-2:~-. ~ 5.00 lq 1.98 3q 1.t, 6 9 S 7.50 2--~-- 62.10 55.10 q ...................... 2110 DATE NO'. 1.~ 62.58 .~ 1,~60.28 '-'~60,69 q. 93 5.0~ 60.29 ~,5~' 6'0'.~2"' 12.69 7 5.30 q.29 7 5.69 5 5,29 60.69 5.29 0.29 5.29 0.29 1.54 1.64 1.30 ~0.28 720.28 )2 0.56 )2 0.59 ~t 0.61 ~0.29 ~0.~6 )20.61 11.20 :1.~0 .0.56 g5 4,0C 291. O0 1,051.£ hO3 ?.C 1.03 '2 ,C 1,05 1.0 3 3.0 1.05 1.03 3.0 1.03 3.C I.~3 ~.~ LO~ 1,0~ 1.0~ ~,~ 1,05 1.036.0~ hO~ 7.0 ~ VEI~DOR OLIO AY RENT A CAE RAH Si. TR~N lC $ CAMERAS I ONAL WELD ONAL HAF~q RAD IAT£ 5.[ PA ii{ CHEVROLE1 PUMP..S }Y ~L Y PUMP. tP i~ Y TEST OORP lEERING MAC fil NE t?~.J PP I NG TRUCK TRUCK NOTORS ~TORS OF BB, AbiC JEEP P ERCE TIRES ~ ~UTH FLORIOA ............. ~'iiE~T':F BEACH APERS ~er of Corette ANOL~T~ ! $ 7.00 ~, 7.17 20,05 22.45 Y0.CO .... 2.!.~.,~ ~;:... 2~,04 - 67.46 .............. j ..... ~-~-~ ~.11 =.: 3.7 2 .................. ~2'3'7'7:8'~ ..... 600. O0 ~AUL STARTZI~AN fliiTT MAC DOWEi.c IH ITT MAC DOWEt.L O /HITT M~' DOWEI.L O Irt ITT MAC DOWE!.L ............ ......................... TLANTI ~ ~¢ ~.B. AUTO P~T~ ............ ,... ................................ · B. AU~ ,B. AUTO P~T~ ~.B. AUTO .8. ~T0 P~T~ · B. AUTO P~T~ .B. AUTO 50.~0 5.00 15.00~ 40~0 6.05 3.03 5,06 ~.06 27.66 I 137 D7.59 .B. AUTO PART, ROWARD PUMP ROWARD PU),~P HRMAN CLARK LOR IDA £LECI"Rt 201.89 lNG 1 L"O TO R~ 3 2.00 ~ ACCT. DATE NO: =~'O 11.29 '.20, 00.00 CHECK NO. 1.03 1.03 1.04 0.0~ LOIt 1,04 11 9.eL VEI~TDOR RAYOAR ELEQI]m~ ARRY' JARELL ALM BEACH OF'FI OWERS AlE El.RAY CHEMICAL ............ A 3 A~I$ CHEVROLET B 3YNTON PUi~",P, I~NT R~PAt R5 CF.. SUPPLY IT IONI ~--EF.-f~A-{ R .............. 120.00 ........................ ,h-£h6-g .... ~ 5.00 AGENDA October 7, 1975 OLD BUSINESS: A. Resolution No. 75-ZZ re: Tennis Fee System The new tennis court operation plan recently presented for adoption and approved by city Council was prepared after surveying many ex- isting municipal tennis centers and after considering the City's recent capital outlay for tennis courts and the estimated yearly operational Cost of the tennis facility. The adopted plan is obviously an accepted method of operating a tennis facility and the fees established are not out of line with existing systems in neighboring communities. (A copy of the survey is attached). It has been common practice and philosophy of municipalities to require s fee system for special recreation facilities. Generally, such facilities are defined as facilities which require substantial capital outlay to construct, which require yearly operational costs, and which receive small percentage use by the total community pop- ulation. A termis complex meets these definition requirements. (An expenditure summary is attached). While tennis is increasing in popularity and courts are crowded, it is estimated that only around 3% of the population play on a regular basis (weekly) and another 3% of the population play on an irregular basis (once a month or less) with a general estimate that over-all play does not exceed 8% of the population. This would indicate that the majority of taxpayers are paying for a facility and operation which they do not use. The theory of "double taxation" is overused and under proven. Where in our charter or any government charter, local, state, or federal does it say that taxes are to pay for all services provided, and fee structures will not be established to supplement the cost of services. We pay water, sewer and garbage rates in addition to taxes; we pay for building permits; we pay for dog licenses; zoning applications; beach decals; occupational licenses, and other fees. ~, ~ENDA VI~.. OLD BUSINESS: ~ A. Resolution No. 75-ZZ re: Tennis Fee System October 7, 1975 ........................................................................ However, as there seems to be some opposition to the established fee rate, an alternate fee structure is proposed for consideration: RESIDENT (ANNUAL) NON-RES ZOE~ (Amman) $10.00, adult, single $30.00, $15.00, family $I0.00~ $ 2.00, junior (17 & under) $ 1.50, $ .50, adult, non-member $ .50, daily fee $ .25, junior, non-member daily fee adult, single junior (17 & under) adult daily fee junior daily fee NIGHT LIGHT FEE: $ .50 per court per hour. It is recommended that all other requirements and procedures remain intact, along with the addition of the following: Ail City Employees, classified and non-classified, regardless of residency, shall be eligible for a resident membership. At your request, Mr. Charles Frederick, our Recreation Director and I, developed the above for your reconsideration. FK:pb Attachments City Manager Page No. 2 oge Retort ) Beach Single Adult 3O 55 25 eerfietd e±ray t. Myers ake hark aples atm Beach 20 30 15 24 in all ; 25 MAINTENANCE & REPAIR $ 3,000 720 4,200 960 320 300 $ 9,$00 PERSONNEL COSTS $ 8,200 5,000 2~500 $ 1~,700 $ 25,200 Does not include (personnel and $ 22,000 22,800 $ 44,800 $ 12,000 City of Boynton Beach TENNIS COURT EXPENDITURES (6 courts, lighted) YEARLY OPERATIONAL COSTS Court resurfacing ($2,500/ct. Light replacements ~48 lights Electric bill ($350/month) Net replacement (2 per court Windbreaker (800' ~ $2/ft. Other (locks, fence, gate electrical repairs) TOTAL every 5 years) @ $15) per year) every 5 years} repairs, $ 56,800 Tennis Manager (40 hours) Tennis Attendant (40 hours) Tennis Attendant (20 hours) TOTAL TOTAL YEARLY OPERATIONAL COST parks maintenance and ground keeping materials) TENNIS CAPITAL OUTLAY (1973--76) Court resurfacing and renovation of lighting system. 2 new courts with lighting plus practice wall and landscaping TOTAL OUTLAY IN LAST 2 YEARS Pro Shop and Control Center ~OTAL (direct costs)* costs I973-74 1974-75 1975-7fi By Mrs. Emily M. Jackson~ Councilwoman At City Council Meeting of 10/6/75 Re: Our Joint Sewer Regional Plant Oum Regional Sewer Plant with Delray Beach is moving i would like the reco~d to show that the prime mover in keeping this joint ventume from a deadlock with De!may is out lis/son man, Mm. Paul Startzman. Our citizens should all be made aware that had it not been for Fir. Startzman, with his foresight~ patiences stick-to-itiveness and~ above all, his knowledge of the past in Boynton Beaeh~ as well as problems that could smise with the sewer plants and his awareness of the problems already in the sewer ptant~ that Boynton Beach might have turned out to be a TENANT of Delray Beach, rather than Joint Owner and on an equal footing with Delray Beach, as our Inter!oeal Agreement now provides. No one knows the eountless hours of thought~ figuring~ meetings and persuasiveness ever since November~ 1973~ that Mr. Startz- man put in before Detray Beach finally agreed that we should be on an equal footing with them~ and the two Councils should be equal as the Board of Directors. I~ anyone thinks that was easy~ they are very much mistaken. .Mrs. Jackson - Re Joint Sewer Regional Plsnt Council Meeting 10/6/75 Page 2 I'd like to give a little background on Mr. Startzman: Back in the 1950's M~. Startzman, together with 4 other volunteers civic-minded men: served as an Advisory Board to the City Council. They worked on the Railroad Crossings, the Libra~y~ the Sewer and Water Plants and other projects. Their report is in booklet fora and still in the City Clerk's file~ and makes for very interesting reading. This five man Advisory Board received no pay, but did it because of their loyalty to Boynton Beach and because they wanted our City to progressively become a better place to liveo Not long ago i was talking to someone who said, "That Mro Startzman is such an intelligent~ hardworking man it must be costing the City a fortune for his services°" it is true his service to the City is invaluable. However, I would like the people to know that all Mr. Startzman gets is just enough to pay for all his necessary long distance telephone calls and the gas for his car - and maybe not all of that! He is a volunteer[ I want the record to show that our City is in the enviable position of having M~. Paul Startzman doing all he is doing for us and future generations at no cost to the taXpayers. What other city can claim as fine a civic-minded person as this? ~erefore, I move that the City Attorney, for the next meeting draw up an appropriate resolution expressing our thank% on behalf of }4ms. Jackson - Re Joint Sewer Regional Plant Council Meeting 10/6/75 Page the City, for the fine service Mm. Paul Stamtzman has, is, and will be per£omming for oum City, beeause of his love and loyalty to Boynton Beach. AGENDA October 7, 1975 IX. ADMINISTRATIVE B. Report of Meeting - Water Treatment Plant Expansion At the regular meeting of September 16, City Council directed that I schedule a meeting on the above. On Wednesday, Septem- ber 24, I met with Mr. Milt Hallman and Mr. Joe Swan of R & A, Mr. A1 Shepard of Hough and Company, Mr. Perry Cessna, Utilities Director, and Mr. Kenneth Kribs, Finance Director, to discuss the attached letter regarding the above. One of the important questions I raised during this meeting was whether or not this would entail an increase in water rates. am sure that after much discussion I did not receive a positive answer as to whether this $3.9M bond issue would mean an increase in our water rates. I was informed by both Mr. Shepard and Mr. Hal!man that letters would be forthcoming from them in which all details pertaining to this bond issue would be submitted to me. As I have stated previously there is no doubt in my mind, and from our discussions I assume you agree, that the plant must be expanded. This is absolutely necessary and we are all aware of it. According to the State Health Department who issued their directive to the Palm Beach County Health Department, an additional chemical treatment to the water system is required. We have already received correspondence from the Palm Beach County Health Department stating this is indeed an essential requirement. According to the experts who attended a special meeting here at City Hall a few months back, the best chemical additive would be the lime treatment. The end result is that the ~3.9M bond issue would take care of expansion and treatment at the same time. This would be a savings in money of approximately $200,000, and in time approximately eight months, if we combine our efforts. FK/db Att 6 pages I concur with the stipulations as set forth in the attached letter from R & A, providing they put in writing that this particular bond issue will not entail a rate increase. At this writing I have not received either letter, and if they are re- ceived before our next ~eeting, copies will immediately be sub- mitted to you. / Frank Kohl /City Manager Established in 1920 Engineers · Planners · Architects Incorporated September 9, 1975 The HonorableNayor'and City Council City ofBoynton:Beach' P.O. Boynton Beach,'Florida 33~35' Attention: Gentlemen: Subject: Frank Kohl; City Manager Water Treatment Plant Expansion City of'Boynton:Beachl- Project'No."6858-15 In accordance with your authorization dated May 8, 1974, for water facilities ~xpansion, we have completed the. plans and specifications for the expansion and mprovements to the'water treatment plant. The'plans and specifications on the subject project'ha~e been'.approv~d'by the'Division of Health and are no~t ready to be advertised for:bids.- The plans and specifications were prepAred'so'that the addition of chemical feed, sludge facilities'and washwGter recovery facilities could be added to the existigg plant immediately; 'The'second phage'of the Water treatment plant im- provements.plans and specifications provides for'the expansion'of %he plant from 8 million gallons per day to 16 million gallons per day. The phasing of improve- ments wa~ necessary due to the availabflity of financing for the e~tire expansion, as well as meeti.n~ the'schodule and directions of the 'Division of Heal addition of additional treatment of +h ~ .... ~ ....... t~ for the the d]stributionlsystem. ~,,e ~.:~,: ~:~ur prior to ~schArg~gg into During recent months, the need for expanding the water treatment" 1 = k-~ has become apnarent to' the ~+~ ~= ~=- ~'~ .. p ant imm~diatel g program for'the'Utilities ge"artment ~:- -' i .... v tme · - ~ rut ~ne nex~ three [3) years. -At the request of the staff and financial advisor, Mr. Al Sheppard, we prepared a schedule of flow of funds to make all known improvements to the utility systems for the. next three yea¢s. This included phasi.ng some of the construction of the 167 N. E. 2ND AVENUE. POST OFFICE BOX 1837 ,. DELP. Ay BEACH. FLORIDA 33444 ' MaC, ar/City Council Pa§e~ 2 ' ' ~ 'S~'ptember g, 1975 Project No. 6858-I5-' transmission and distribution system. After two rough outlines of the.flow of funds needed to meet the improvmments required for the utility system, it was decided to revise the flow of funds as accurately as possible and forward this information to Mr. Sheppard for his review and recommendations. This revised flow of funds was prepared and for~arded to Mr. Sheppard on August 15, 1975. After discussions with Mr. Al Sheppard, Mr. Perry Cessna and our staff, we have ' revised the three-year financing plan and attach a copy of it for your use and information. Mr. Sheppard and I will be available to discuss this financing plan at your request. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements to the water treat- ment plant have been reviewed by your Utility Department staff and are ready to be advertised. . for bids. If it is the City's desire to advertise the full expansion and?mprovements to the water treatment plant for bids, some revi ' would be required to combine the plans and specifications into one contract~]°ns prior'to advertisi.ng; this additional work would be done on a cost plus basis. If the improvements and expansion of the water treatment plant were phased as we were authorized to prepare the plans and specifications we would estimate the project as shown below. ' Phase I Part A Estimate $1,400,000 Part ~hase'II Estimate Subtotal ,$ 300:000 $1,700,000 Estimate $2,000,000 TOTAL -~3,700,000 rowdes treatment improvements, chemical feeds, washwa~er and sludge handling facilities. Provides a 126 x 61 water distribu- tion maintenance building and ware- house, including landscaping and sprinkler system. Provides plant.expansion from 8 MGD to 16 MGD ~' l~e, yor/City Council ~ 'Pa~e, a . S~eptember 9, 1975 Project No. 6858~t~ If the improvements and expansion of the water treatment plant were all combined into one contract and bid immediately, the estimated construction cost~muld be $3,500,000. We respectfullyawait' your instructions on how the bids would be reJeived and ' if it is the City's desire ~o Combine the contracts and phases into one contract. Very truly yours, RUSSELL & ~tXON Vice President RLH:tan cc Mr. Perry Cessna, Pit. of'Util.- ~ tmgust 1~ 1975 FUTURE BOND ISSUES FOR BOYNTON BEACH PC: · Item ~2: The below listed cost estimates do not include bond discounts, capitalized interest, capitalized reserves, fiscal, legal and administrative fees. All' project cost estimates listed below are those not included in the 2.6 million sale and as outlined in the official statement, April 1975. Item #1: City portion of engineering plans and specifi- cations for force mains and lift station final plans for Regional Facilities, Step II Application - ............. FDER & EPA supporting data to maintain, grant eligibility ........ Item #3: The remainder of engineering plans ~nd specifi- cations for expansion of the existing WTP to' 16 MGD and the necessary first phase transmission mains and storage facilities -... Item #4: Item #S: Item #6: Item #7: Item #8: Item #9: Raw water supply wells #15, 16 & 17 Engineering for water supply wells Raw water transmission header for wells . Engineering for water transmission header for wells . Water distribution maintenance building and warehouse, including resident inspector ...... Matching funds to implement Step III for grant offer fQr. Regional Boynton/Delray WBTP . . .SUBTOTAL - $3,122,200.00 40,800.00 26.400.00 300 ,gO0.O0 1,500,800.00 Item-#lO: Item #11: Construction Contingencies for Items 4, 6, 8 & g SUBTOTAL - $3,358,200.00 Estimated construction cost of expansion of )¢FP from 8 MGD to 16 MGD after softener is 6dded (construction cost = $2,000,000; resident inspector cost = $40,000 ...... .236,000.00 Item #13: Estimated c6h~ruction cost of expansion of distribution system, elevated storage, etc., (required with Item 11 above) (construction cost = $6,000,000; resident inspector cost =- $t20,000) .......... New Wellfield location study, South Florida Water Management District Report on Raw Water Wells &'Raw Water Supply Application Item #14: City portion of regional lift station & force main construction and resident inspector ($6,000,000 total estimated cost) Item #15: Construction Contingencies Items 11, 12 & 14 . . SUBTOTAL - $14,052,200.00 Item #16: Raw water supply wells #I8, 19 & 20 (1976- 1977) ....... Item #17: Engineering for raw water supply wells #18, 19 & 20 ..... Item #18: Raw water header for wells #18, 19 & 20 . . Item #19: Item #20: Engineering for raw water header for wells #18, 19 & 20 . . Boynton's share of. 2nd phase regional Boynton/ Delray wastewater treatment plant expansion . Engineering in Boynton/Delray regional wastewater treatment plant 2nd phase expansion Property purchase for regional L.S. 316, 317, 319, 356, 358, 357 .......... Auxiliary power supply for wells t5, t6, 17, 18., 19 and 20 ............. Engineering cost of auxiliary power supply for wells 15-20 Item #21: Item #22: Item #23: Item #24: TOTAL - $16,812,200.00 - - $6,120,000.00 35.000.00 1,530,000.00 969,000.00 - . 375,000.00 45,000.00 '-150,000.00 18,000.00 - - 1,500,000.00 .. 240,000.00 270,000.00 5o,o05.o0 12,000.00 F~NAL DRAFT` Revised Sept, 9, 1975 Bi-Annual Bond Issues 'ion 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 2t 22 23 24 '$ 275,000 60,000 260,000 340,000 48,980 220,000 28,400 300,000 1,500,000 236,000 2,040,000 6,120,000 35,000 1,530,000 275,000 45,000 150,000 18,000 1,500,000 240,000 270,000 150,000 12,000 180,000 30,000 360,000 180,000 1,500,000 180,000 ' 39o,ooo 35,000 150,000 $ 125,000 30,000 170,000 24,480 21,120 75,000 17,000 700,000 320,000 510,000 5i,000 138,000 $ $ $ $ 170,000 12,240 110,000 2,640 75,000 38,500 1,'2~0,]000 510,000 155,500 120,000 13§,000 12,240 llO,O00 2,640 11,000 1,000,000. 810,000 500,000 50,000 30,000 345,000 27,000 18,000 50,000 14,400 3,600 1,500,000 120,000 50,000 100,000 10,000 2,000 r~mMnder of / Dist. 1.75 Million remainder of Cont. - 411,500 100,000 3.855 ~ill'ion ~ 2.1786 Million 2.59588 Million 1,89728 Million 2.5686 Million