The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 03-17-15 Page 1 of 729 Page 2 of 729 Page 3 of 729 Page 4 of 729 Page 5 of 729 Page 6 of 729 Page 7 of 729 Page 8 of 729 Page 9 of 729 Page 10 of 729 Page 11 of 729 Page 12 of 729 Page 13 of 729 The GREAT AMERICAN CLEANUP, a project of Keep America Beautiful, is coordinated locally by Keep Palm Beach County Beautiful Inc. and the Solid Waste Authority (SWA). For more information visit www.keepPBCbeautiful.org or call 561.686.6646. Arthur R. Marshall Loxachatchee National Wildlife Refuge, 9 a.m. Boynton Beach Ocean Inlet, 8 a.m. Boynton Beach Oceanfront Park, 8 a.m. Register by completing the volunteer application on the reverse side DWZZZNHHS3%&EHDXWLIXORUJRUE\FDOOLQJ of this flyer, online 561.686.6646. Page 14 of 729 ***Please return form to the site volunteer coordinator on, or before, the day of the cleanup. To submit forms before the cleanup, please contact the site volunteer coordinator for mailing instructions. All forms must have original signatures. Great American Cleanup Volunteer Registration Event Site : _________________________ Cleanup Date: ______________________ Thank you for participating in the Great American Cleanup! Your participation is an integral part of our efforts to keep Palm Beach County beautiful. Please take a moment to complete this volunteer registration. We will not distribute or sell any information provided on this form. The undersigned volunteer does hereby release and discharge cers, directors, and employees, from any and all claims, demands, losses, costs, expenses, suits, damage, obligations, liabilities, causes of action and judgments whatsoever, in law or in equity, which the undersigned volunteer may have arising out of, or in connection with, participation in the event. The undersigned volunteer does hereby assume any and all risks of personal injuries, including death and damage or loss to property, caused by or arising out of the participation in the event. The undersigned volunteer does hereby give permission to be photographed by the event organizers or news media for any manner of publication including, but not limited to, newspaper or evensites. ***The undersigned volunteer understands and will adhere to the volunteer guidelines listed below. Name of Organization if participating with a group ___________________________________________________________________________ Name _____________________________________________ Email __________________________________________________ Address ___________________________________________ City/State/Zip ___________________________ Telephone ____________ I, the undersigned, have read the volunteer guidelines below and agree to the above waiver of liability. Signature ______________________________________________ Signature _____________________________________ (Signature of parent or legal guardian if under 18) (Signature of adult responsible for student groups if applicable) Indicate T-shirt Size: Youth Large___ Adult Sizes: Small ___ Medium ___ Large ___ XLarge ___ 2XL ___ 3XL ____ Note: Free t-shirts or other promotional items will be distributed to volunteers while supplies last. General cleanup supplies such as trash bags, disposable vinyl gloves and a limited number of pick up tools and other applicable supplies to this project will be provided while supplies last. Site supply needs may vary. Volunteers may wish to bring their own supplies after contacting the Site Manager). VOLUNTEER GUIDELINES Please make sure you sign in at the registration table when you arrive, and receive the necessary materials to do the cleanup. Volunteers may be working in sunny, hot, wet and dirty conditions and, in some cases, areas where there is heavy brush. It is strongly recommended that you wear protective clothing (check with your Site Coordinator for recommendations), closed-toe shoes such as old sneakers, and hats for sun protection. Insect repellent and sunscreen are also strongly recommended. Remove litter during daylight hours only. All trash bags should be left at the locations designated by the Site Coordinator. Please make sure they are securely tied when full and placed for pick up. No consumption of intoxicating liquids, beverages, or illegal drugs will be allowed during the clean up or other community activity. Watch out for broken glass and metal. Wear gloves and use caution when picking up sharp objects. Do not pick up any type of hypodermic needles or other hazardous waste such as paint, used motor oil, automobile batteries, etc. Note location and report it to Site Coordinator. Do not lift anything too heavy. Report location of large debris such as motors and appliances. Do not approach large drums. They may contain hazardous wastes; even vapors can be harmful. Leave the drum and report its location to Site Coordinator. Avoid suspected hazardous substances or areas where herbicides were recently applied. Avoid areas where snakes, fire ants, jellyfish, crabs or other dangerous species may be located. If you encounter domestic animals the best policy is to avoid them and leave them alone. If you are recycling, designate one member of your team to carry a bag for recyclables usually clear or blue bag. Ask the Site THANK YOU FOR CONTRIBUTING TO THE CARE OF OUR ENVIRONMENT ! Page 15 of 729 Page 16 of 729 Page 17 of 729 Page 18 of 729 Page 19 of 729 Page 20 of 729 Page 21 of 729 Page 22 of 729 Page 23 of 729 Page 24 of 729 Page 25 of 729 Page 26 of 729 Page 27 of 729 Page 28 of 729 Page 29 of 729 Page 30 of 729 Page 31 of 729 Page 32 of 729 Page 33 of 729 Page 34 of 729 Page 35 of 729 Page 36 of 729 Page 37 of 729 Page 38 of 729 Page 39 of 729 Page 40 of 729 Page 41 of 729 Page 42 of 729 Page 43 of 729 Page 44 of 729 Page 45 of 729 Page 46 of 729 Page 47 of 729 Page 48 of 729 Page 49 of 729 Page 50 of 729 Page 51 of 729 Page 52 of 729 Page 53 of 729 Page 54 of 729 Page 55 of 729 Page 56 of 729 Page 57 of 729 Page 58 of 729 Page 59 of 729 Page 60 of 729 Page 61 of 729 Page 62 of 729 Page 63 of 729 Page 64 of 729 Page 65 of 729 Page 66 of 729 Page 67 of 729 Page 68 of 729 Page 69 of 729 Page 70 of 729 Page 71 of 729 Page 72 of 729 Page 73 of 729 Page 74 of 729 Page 75 of 729 Page 76 of 729 Page 77 of 729 Page 78 of 729 Page 79 of 729 Page 80 of 729 Page 81 of 729 Page 82 of 729 Page 83 of 729 Page 84 of 729 Page 85 of 729 Page 86 of 729 Page 87 of 729 Page 88 of 729 Page 89 of 729 Page 90 of 729 Page 91 of 729 Page 92 of 729 Page 93 of 729 Page 94 of 729 Page 95 of 729 Page 96 of 729 Page 97 of 729 Page 98 of 729 Page 99 of 729 Page 100 of 729 Page 101 of 729 Page 102 of 729 Page 103 of 729 Page 104 of 729 Page 105 of 729 Page 106 of 729 Page 107 of 729 Page 108 of 729 Page 109 of 729 Page 110 of 729 Page 111 of 729 Page 112 of 729 Page 113 of 729 Page 114 of 729 Page 115 of 729 Page 116 of 729 Page 117 of 729 Page 118 of 729 Page 119 of 729 Page 120 of 729 Page 121 of 729 Page 122 of 729 Page 123 of 729 Page 124 of 729 Page 125 of 729 Page 126 of 729 Page 127 of 729 Page 128 of 729 Page 129 of 729 Page 130 of 729 Page 131 of 729 Page 132 of 729 Page 133 of 729 Page 134 of 729 Page 135 of 729 Page 136 of 729 Page 137 of 729 Page 138 of 729 Page 139 of 729 Page 140 of 729 Page 141 of 729 Page 142 of 729 Page 143 of 729 Page 144 of 729 Page 145 of 729 Page 146 of 729 Page 147 of 729 Page 148 of 729 Page 149 of 729 Page 150 of 729 Page 151 of 729 Page 152 of 729 Page 153 of 729 Page 154 of 729 Page 155 of 729 Page 156 of 729 Page 157 of 729 Page 158 of 729 Page 159 of 729 Page 160 of 729 Page 161 of 729 Page 162 of 729 Page 163 of 729 Page 164 of 729 Page 165 of 729 Page 166 of 729 SITE Page 167 of 729 Page 168 of 729 Page 169 of 729 Page 170 of 729 Page 171 of 729 Page 172 of 729 Page 173 of 729 Page 174 of 729 Page 175 of 729 Page 176 of 729 Page 177 of 729 Page 178 of 729 Page 179 of 729 Page 180 of 729 Page 181 of 729 Page 182 of 729 Page 183 of 729 Page 184 of 729 Page 185 of 729 Page 186 of 729 Page 187 of 729 Page 188 of 729 Page 189 of 729 Page 190 of 729 Page 191 of 729 Page 192 of 729 Page 193 of 729 Page 194 of 729 Page 195 of 729 Page 196 of 729 Page 197 of 729 Page 198 of 729 Page 199 of 729 Page 200 of 729 Page 201 of 729 Page 202 of 729 Page 203 of 729 Page 204 of 729 Page 205 of 729 Page 206 of 729 Page 207 of 729 Page 208 of 729 Page 209 of 729 Page 210 of 729 Page 211 of 729 Page 212 of 729 Page 213 of 729 Page 214 of 729 Page 215 of 729 Page 216 of 729 Page 217 of 729 Page 218 of 729 Page 219 of 729 Page 220 of 729 Page 221 of 729 Page 222 of 729 Page 223 of 729 Page 224 of 729 Page 225 of 729 Page 226 of 729 Page 227 of 729 Page 228 of 729 Page 229 of 729 Page 230 of 729 Page 231 of 729 Page 232 of 729 Page 233 of 729 Page 234 of 729 Page 235 of 729 Page 236 of 729 Page 237 of 729 Page 238 of 729 Page 239 of 729 Page 240 of 729 Page 241 of 729 Page 242 of 729 Page 243 of 729 Page 244 of 729 Page 245 of 729 Page 246 of 729 Page 247 of 729 Page 248 of 729 Page 249 of 729 Page 250 of 729 Page 251 of 729 Page 252 of 729 Page 253 of 729 Page 254 of 729 Page 255 of 729 Page 256 of 729 Page 257 of 729 Page 258 of 729 Page 259 of 729 Page 260 of 729 Page 261 of 729 Page 262 of 729 Page 263 of 729 Page 264 of 729 Page 265 of 729 Page 266 of 729 Page 267 of 729 Page 268 of 729 Page 269 of 729 Page 270 of 729 Page 271 of 729 Page 272 of 729 Page 273 of 729 Page 274 of 729 Page 275 of 729 Page 276 of 729 Page 277 of 729 Page 278 of 729 Page 279 of 729 Page 280 of 729 Page 281 of 729 Page 282 of 729 Page 283 of 729 Page 284 of 729 Page 285 of 729 Page 286 of 729 Page 287 of 729 Page 288 of 729 Page 289 of 729 Page 290 of 729 Page 291 of 729 Page 292 of 729 Page 293 of 729 Page 294 of 729 Page 295 of 729 Page 296 of 729 Page 297 of 729 Page 298 of 729 Page 299 of 729 Page 300 of 729 Page 301 of 729 Page 302 of 729 Page 303 of 729 Page 304 of 729 Page 305 of 729 Page 306 of 729 Page 307 of 729 Page 308 of 729 Page 309 of 729 Page 310 of 729 Page 311 of 729 Page 312 of 729 Page 313 of 729 Page 314 of 729 Page 315 of 729 Page 316 of 729 Page 317 of 729 Page 318 of 729 Page 319 of 729 Page 320 of 729 Page 321 of 729 Page 322 of 729 Page 323 of 729 Page 324 of 729 Page 325 of 729 Page 326 of 729 Page 327 of 729 Page 328 of 729 Page 329 of 729 Page 330 of 729 Page 331 of 729 Page 332 of 729 Page 333 of 729 Page 334 of 729 Page 335 of 729 Page 336 of 729 Page 337 of 729 COMPARISONBETWEENBROKERS,ARTHURJ.GALLAGHERANDGEHRINGGROUP FY14/15PolicyYearCurrentGEHRINGFY15/16PROPOSALGALLAGHERFY15/16PROPOSAL LimitsSIR/DeductiblesPremiumGehringLimits*SIR/DeductiblesPremiumGallagherLimitsSIR/DeductiblesPremium PropertyInsurance $0$0$0.00$141,406,998$25,000$599,307.00$25,000 Municipal $97,932,276$50,000$511,504.00IncinPropertyIncinPropPrem$90,000,000$462,733.47 Utility $62,370,298$25,000$207,111.00IncinPropertyIncinPropPrem$62,370,298$183,077.00 InlandMarine $15,805,308$0IncinPropPrem$17,035,695$25,000$36,709.00IncinProperty $50KEmp/$50K Crime Forg/$10KTheft$1,000$2,533.00$50,000$960.00$3,307.00 PROPERTYTOTAL $721,148.00$636,976.00$649,117.47 GeneralLiability $2,000,000/peroccur$200,000$213,439.00$2,000,000/peroccur$200,000$44,597.00$2,000,000/$200,000$209,900.00 $6,000,000/AggNoAggregateLimitmax.$6,000,000. PublicOff/EmplPractices $2,000,000/peroccur$200,000IncinGenLiab$4,000,000/peroccur$200,000$57,055.00$2,000,000/$200,000IncinGenLiab $4,000,000/Agg$4,000,000/AggNoAggregateLimitmax.$6,000,000. CyberLiability N/AN/AN/A$500,000IncinPOL/EPLIN/AN/AN/A LawEnforcementLiab $2,000,000/peroccur$200,000IncinGenLiab$2,000,000/peroccur$200,000$89,431.00$2,000,000/peroccur$200,000IncinGenLiab $6,000,000/AggNoAggregateLimit$6,000,000/Agg AutoLiability $100,000$100,000IncinGenLiab$2,000,000/peroccur$100,000$38,117.00IncinGenLiab AutoPhysicalDamage $100,000$10,000IncinGenLiabPerSchedule$10,000$26,950.00IncinGenLiab WorkersCompensation** General$500,000/$123,586.00General$500,000/$134,494.00General$500,000/$129,656.00 Fire/Pol$850,000Fire/Pol$500,000Fire/Pol$850,000 LIABILITY&W/CTOTAL $337,025.00$390,644.00$339,556.00 GRANDTOTAL $1,058,173.00$1,027,620.00$988,673.47 ΎWĂĐŬĂŐĞĞĂů Page 338 of 729 The City of Boynton Beach, Florida HR/RM Department MEMORANDUM TO: Tim Howard, Finance Director FROM: Pam Webb, Risk Administration DATE: March 11, 2015 SUBJECT: Insurance Renewals ______________________________________________________________________________ After reviewing and concluding my study of the two insurance proposals from The Gehring Group and Arthur J. Gallagher. Here are the differences in policies for the upcoming year. A simple Excel sheet is attached. The Gehring Group’s proposal is a package deal; therefore, should we separate any of the programs, there would be an increase in premium. There are some enhancements to this program such as; the General Liability there is no aggregate limit for any claims except the Public Officials and Employment Practices coverage, currently we have a $6,000,000 aggregate and the Self Insured Retention (SIR) is $500,000 for all employees compared to $500,000 (General Employees) and $850,000 (Fire and Police) for Workers Compensation coverage. One other enhancement this policy has is that any sewer back-up claims are covered up to $200,000 per incident. The City has averaged about $11,000 per year for sewer back-ups from 2012 to 2014. These enhancements, in my opinion, would not affect the City’s program based on the claims history. I will admit the sewer back-up coverage is an advantage but not to the point of the overall savings with Arthur J. Gallagher. As for Arthur J. Gallagher, there is no change in coverages except the deductibles for the Property insurance were lowered to $25,000 from the past year with a decrease in premium coverage. After speaking with Rodney Lewis of The Gehring Group, the only separation they are capable of doing is the Property insurance and the Workers Compensation Insurance together with no change in premium. I suggest the City remains with the Arthur J Gallagher program since it is a 7% decrease in premium from last year’s policy. Cc: Julie Oldbury, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Julie Alibrandi, Finance /pw "Loss Prevention & Loss Control Through Proactive Strategies" Page 339 of 729 Cover Page CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Prepared For 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Presented: 3/03/2015 Judith A. Arenz CPCU Area Senior Vice President Tom Gill CIC, CRM, MBA Area Assistant Vice President Agnes Polom, AAI Senior Account Manager Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. 2255 Glades Road, Suite #200E Boca Raton, FL 33431 © 2015 Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. www.ajg.com Page 340 of 729 City of Boynton Beach Executive Summary Executive Summary Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. and your Service Team have prepared this proposal of insurance for renewal of your program effective April 1, 2015. • Property - Municipality - Utility • Public Entity Excess Liability • Excess Workers’ Compensation • Crime Insurance • Inland Marine • Boiler & Machinery • Tenant User Liability (TULIP) State of the Property Market - Florida PROPERTY MARKET CONDITIONS • There continues to be plenty of competition and new insurance carriers entering the Catastrophic Property market place. This year there are a few new carriers entering the CAT wind market. • Many carriers have reduced their dependency on reinsurance. Consequently, these reinsurance companies are deploying their capacity into the direct insurance marketplace generating additional capacity. • There is a lot of capital coming into Bermuda and it is finding its way into the marketplace via creative reinsurance structures or risk taking vehicles supported by fronting insurance carriers. So this capacity is either replacing reinsurance carriers or adding to the direct marketplace as a new carrier. • RMS is coming out with version 15 in the spring which will continue to bring down modeling metrics that should push towards lower pricing. • Carriers are more receptive to improving policy deductibles, terms and conditions. • All these items are making the market more favorable for the insureds PROPERTY CARRIER REACTIONS • Carriers will want to hold renewals, and we will be oversubscribed on shared and layered accounts. Insureds will have choices to take new capacity or maintain long term relationships. • Overall, we believe average pricing could be pushed down 5% - 15%. However, each account will be evaluated independently and will stand on its own. Pricing will depend on how aggressively the account was priced over the years and how the terms have been structured. • Carriers are going to be more flexible to give improved terms and coverages, and deductibles in order to hold market share and premium. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 341 of 729 2 City of Boynton Beach Executive Summary (Cont.) FLORIDA EXCESS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION The Workers’ Compensation market continues to be challenging and is in a state of transition. Rate increases are common. The days of Workers’ Compensation carriers living with poor loss history because they write other lines are dwindling, as other lines are losing rate. The shifting of the market is being driven by regional/package carriers, geographic location and class of business. We expect to see continued unrest for the foreseeable future. Excess Workers’ Compensation continues to have underwriters focusing on emergency services and an appropriate attachment point given the impact of various state presumptive injury laws. We are seeing higher minimum attachment points applied by some underwriter. In addition, updated concentration modeling has impacted some carriers and their capacity deployment decisions. OTHER NOTEWORTHY TRENDS • Drone usage • Public Health resource constraints at the County/State level • Increased frequency of severity in certain judicial areas and around certain claim types (civil rights / excess force) • Wrongful incarceration claims • Death in custody claims • Issue around the aging of public entity infrastructures • Some markets looking to impose BI/PD aggregates onto their forms • Sexual abuse/molestation claims • Concussive injury in sports within education and parks and recreation context is also gaining momentum, with some carriers mandating exclusionary language, and also addressing coverage trigger implications with losses occurring over multiple policy years CYBER/PRIVACY LIABILITY This product continues to be highly publicized due to significant breaches, regulatory enforcement actions with hefty fines and penalties, and constant hacker threats. New carriers continue to enter the space and longer term players are updating and broadening their policy forms. 2015 Goals and Objectives • Total Cost of Risk - the number one priority is to control cost and develop a program that maintains a reasonable level of coverage to meet the requirements of the Stafford Act and protect the City’s assets. • Provide a full proposal on all lines of coverage • Apply updated values per appraisals • Continue broad Casualty coverage including Automobile Liability and Physical Damage • Review options for increased crime coverage • Continue to attend claim reviews and provide the City with Claims Advocacy and assistance in the management of claims • Provide Loss Control support as needed Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 342 of 729 3 City of Boynton Beach Executive Summary (Cont.) Recommended Renewal Program: 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Municipal Property : Loss Limit $100,001,133 $101,782,806 $90,000,000 $90,000,000 • Named Storm Limit $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 Utilities Property : Loss Limit $91,772,153 $91,772,153 $63,370,298 $62,370,298 • Named Windstorm Limit $30,000,000 $30,000,000 $30,000,000 $30,000,000 Exposures Total Insurable Values: Municipality $100,001,133 $101,782,806 $97,932,276 $99,705,041 Utilities $91,772,153 $91,772,153 $62,370,298 $62,370,298 Premium Municipality $644,000.00 $669,822.00 $500,000.00 $458,148.00 (1)(1) Taxes, Assessments and Fees $45,876.00 $46,207.00 $11,504.00 $4,585.47 Municipality Total $689,876.00 $716,029.00 $511,504.00 $462,733.47 Utilities $278,276.00 $292,119.00 $197,000.00 $177,300.00 Taxes & Fees $6,724.00 $6,723.00 $6,111.00 $1,777.00 Engineering Fee $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Utility Total $289,000.00 $302,842.00 $207,111.00 $183,077.00 (2) Public Entity Excess Liability $175,500.00 $220,200.00 $210,700.00 $209,900.00 Excess Workers’ Compensation Included $105,188.00 $123,586.00 $129,656.00 Required Fees, Taxes & $2,281.50 $2,862.60 $2,739.10 -0- Assessments Public Entity Excess Liability $177,781.50 $328,250.60 $337,025.10 $339,556.00 Total Crime Insurance $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $3,307 Required Fees, Taxes & $32.50 $32.50 $32.50 -0- Assessments Crime Insurance Total $2,532.50 $2,532.50 $2,532.50 $3,307.00 Grand Total $939,190.00 $1,349,654.10 $1,058,172.60 $988,673.47 (3) Miscellaneous Lines10/1/13-10/1/1410/1/14-10/1/15 (4) Boiler & Machinery Total $7,334.11 $0 Inland Marine - Hull Total $7,264.20 $7,264.22 (5) TULIP Total $5,111.00 $0 Notes of Importance: (1)Broker Fee paid to Ascension is included (2)Premium annualized to include Automobile Liability and Physical Damage (3)Miscellaneous Lines renew on October 1, 2014. (4)Boiler and Machinery is now covered within the municipal and utility property programs (5)TULIP is now an online program paid for directly by the user Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 343 of 729 4 City of Boynton Beach Executive Summary (Cont.) PROPERTY PROGRAM Program rates for the property insurance program have been decreased in accordance with market trends and our negotiations. The Municipality renewal reflects a 8.3% premium reduction The Utility rates reflect an overall premium decrease of 10% The Utility inspection fee remains at $4,000 The Hurricane Cat Fun assessment has been removed and reduces cost by 1.3% Wind Model changes will not occur until Version 15 is released. Exposures remain as expiring. CASUALTY PROGRAM The excess casualty program through BRIT is quoted with a minimal change in premium. We secured a competing indication from Safety National. They are your current excess workers’ compensation carrier and are targeting casualty lines. Their indication was $210,000, however, they cannot offer the automobile physical damage that is currently included in your BRIT excess program. Brit Global Specialty USA SIR Package clients receive access – at no cost– to the TEAM platform, a self-directed risk management LMS platform which purchased individually would cost approximately $30,000 annually. The TEAM platform is a robust online resource offering: • Unlimited training courses from a list of approximately 135 courses covering areas such as Employment Practices Liability, fundamental of safety, leave-related laws, workplace risk management, human resources, and student related risks. • Weekly training bulletins and articles about new and/or updated matters of interest. • Comprehensive model handbook. • Self-guided human resources assessments. • Built-in management tools (LMS) to track and run reports on usage (e.g., completion of training). • Customizability to: have your logo on the landing page…upload your own policies and procedures…determine the access levels for all users. • Much, much more – all free of charge to you – just contact your retail producer or Brad Bohler to establish a secure user name and password or visit www.britinsuance.com/team for additional information. EXCESS WORKERS COMPENSATION Safety National has provided a renewal premium with a 4% rate increase. This is in line with the marketplace. The carrier has completed an onsite presentation of their value added services highlighted below. Safety National - Value-Added Risk Control Services Through our MAP Client Services, Safety National offers various resources to help policyholders improve their risk management, analysis and prevention efforts. Typically provided complimentary to the policyholder, these services and resources are designed to help improve workplace safety, prevent injuries before they occur and measure/analyze the success of risk management programs. We are constantly adding risk control offerings designed specifically for the public sector. S:ERVE S:ERVE is an online driver simulation and curriculum created to educate law enforcement, firefighters and EMS personnel to drive at their safest in emergency response scenarios to help reduce collision rates. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 344 of 729 5 City of Boynton Beach Executive Summary (Cont.) CRIME The program will offer a renewed three year rate agreement with annual renewals. We are providing some options to increase your limit. We have seen a significant increase in incidents over the last few years throughout the public sector. Crime Coverage Options OPTION COVERAGE DESCRIPTION PREMIUM 1 As expiring $3,307 2Include Computer Fraud and Funds Transfer Fraud at $50,000 with $1,000 $3,723 deductible 3 Increase Employee Theft limit to $100,000 with $1,000 deductible $3,850 4Include Employee Theft, Computer Fraud and Funds Transfer Fraud at $100,000 $4,396 limit MISCELLANEOUS LINES Miscellaneous Lines expire in October of 2015. Recommendation: Arthur J. Gallagher recommends renewal of the City’s insurance program with consideration for the options provided for the Crime Insurance coverage. Thank you again for allowing us to be your partner in this placement. Judith A. Arenz March 03, 2015 Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 345 of 729 6 City of Boynton Beach Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Our Team and Commitment ServiceTeam ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Your Program Named Insured ................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Market Place Review ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 Location Schedule ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Program Details ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 Property - Municipality - Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co, (More) .......................................................................... 14 Property - Municipality - Lexington Insurance Company ........................................................................................... 14 Property - Utilities - ACE American Insurance Company .......................................................................................... 18 Public Entity Casualty Package - Comprehenive General Liability - Underwriters at Lloyd's London ....................... 22 Public Entity Casualty Package - Automobile Liability - Underwriters at Lloyd's London .......................................... 25 Public Entity Casualty Package - Public Officials - Underwriters at Lloyd's London ................................................. 26 Public Entity Casualty Package - Employee Benefits Liability - Underwriters at Lloyd's London .............................. 28 Public Entity Casualty Package - Law Enforcement Activity - Underwriters at Lloyd's London ................................. 29 Excess-Workers Compensation - Safety National Casualty Corporation .................................................................. 32 Crime - Hanover Insurance Company ....................................................................................................................... 34 Premium Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 36 Payment Plans ................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Coinsurance Illustration .................................................................................................................................................... 39 Changes / Developments ................................................................................................................................................. 40 Proposal Disclosures Proposal Disclosures ....................................................................................................................................................... 42 Insurance Company Ratings and Admitted Status ........................................................................................................... 44 Client Signature Requirements Surplus Lines Notice - Florida .......................................................................................................................................... 47 Coverages For Consideration .......................................................................................................................................... 48 Client Authorization to Bind Coverage ............................................................................................................................. 49 Appendix Claims Reporting By Policy .............................................................................................................................................. 51 Bindable Quotations & Compensation Disclosure Schedule ............................................................................................ 52 Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 346 of 729 7 City of Boynton Beach Our Team and Commitment Our Team and Commitment Page 347 of 729 City of Boynton Beach Service Team Service Team Judith A. Arenz has primary service responsibility for your company. We operate using a team approach. Your Service Team consists of: NAME / TITLEPHONE / ALT. PHONEEMAIL Judith A. Arenz, CPCU 561-998-6780 Judy_Arenz@ajg.com Area Senior Vice President Tom Gill, CIC, CRM, MB A 561-998-6812 Tom_Gill@ajg.com Area Assistant Vice President Agnes Polom 561-998-6799 Agnes_Polom@ajg.com Client Service Supervisor Aimee Bell 561-998-6817 aimee_bell@ajg.com Client Service Associate Senior Dave Marcus 305-639-3131 Dave_Marcus@ajg.com Area Chairman Andrea Tomasek 561-998-6757 Andrea_Tomasek@ajg.com Claims Advocate Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. (561) 995-6706 Main Office Phone Number: Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 348 of 729 9 City of Boynton Beach Your Program Your Program Page 349 of 729 City of Boynton Beach Named Insured Named Insured NAMED INSUREDLINE OF COVERAGE City of Boynton Beach All Lines of Coverage included in this proposal Note: Any entity not named in this proposal may not be an insured entity. This may include partnerships and joint ventures. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 350 of 729 11 City of Boynton Beach Market Place Review Market Place Review We approached the following carriers in an effort to provide the most comprehensive and cost effective insurance program. INSURANCE COMPANYLINE OF COVERAGERESPONSE ACE American Insurance Property - Utilities Recommended Quote Company Lexington Insurance Company Property - Municipality Recommended Quote Hanover Insurance Company Crime Recommended Quote Underwriters at Lloyd's London Public Entity Casualty Package Recommended Quote Safety National Casualty Excess-Workers Compensation Recommended Quote Corporation *The premium indicated is an estimate provided by the market. The actual premium and acceptance of the coverage requested will be determined by the market after a thorough review of the completed application. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 351 of 729 12 City of Boynton Beach Location Schedule Location Schedule LINE OF COVERAGE LOCATION ADDRESS Property Multiple Locations Per Statement of Values on file with carrier Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 352 of 729 13 City of Boynton Beach Program Details Program Details Property - Municipality - Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co, (More) Property - Municipality - Lexington Insurance Company Coverage: Property - Municipality Carrier: Lexington Insurance Company Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 The following is a general summary of the Insuring Agreement. Refer to actual policy form for complete terms and conditions. DESCRIPTIONLIMITBASED ON TIV Policy Limit $90,000,000 $99,705,041 This is a Scheduled Policy ALUATION V Replacement Cost as respects Real and Personal Property Actual Loss Sustained as respects Business Income and as further describes in the policy form / Per the Lexington Insurance Company Manuscript Domestic Property Policy Form (PR8371) Perils Covered: TYPEDESCRIPTION All Risks of Direct Physical Loss or Damage including Flood, Earth Movement and Equipment Special Form Perils Breakdown/Boiler & Machinery and as further described in the approved policy form Deductibles/SIR: Each claim for loss or damage under this policy shall be subject to a per occurrence deductible amount of $50,000, unless a specific deductible shown below applies Flood Per Occurrence Except; $100,000 5% of the total values at the time of loss at each location involved in the loss, subject to a $1,000,000 minimum of - Per Occurrence Earth Movement - Per Occurrence $100,000 Windstorm - Per Occurrence, except 5% Of the total insurable values at the time of loss or damage at each location involved in $100,000 the loss or damage arising out of a Named Storm subject to a minimum of - $100,000 Any one occurrence Equipment Breakdown : $50,000 If two or more deductible amounts provided in this policy apply to a single occurrence, the total to be deducted shall not exceed the largest deductible applicable unless otherwise stated in the policy. However, if: 1. The Time Element deductible and another deductible apply to a single Occurrence, then the Company shall apply both deductibles to the Occurrence; and 2. Covered Loss or Damage by Flood arises out of a Named Storm, then the Company shall apply the Flood deductible or the Named Storm deductible, whichever is greater. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 353 of 729 14 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Additional Coverage: DESCRIPTIONSUBLIMIT Sub-limits / Per Occurrence (are part of not in addition to the policy limit): Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate for the peril of Earth Movement $5,000,000 Flood Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate for the peril of except; Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate for the peril of Flood occurring wholly or partially within Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), areas of 100-Year Flooding, as defined by the $5,000,000 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); The Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Limit for the Peril of Flood shall not exceed $5,000,000. Named Storm Per Occurrence for the peril of (a storm that has been declared by the National Weather Service to be a Hurricane, Typhoon, Tropical Cyclone, Tropical Storm or Tropical Depression) in Florida, regardless of the number of Coverages, Locations or Perils involved including but not limited to, all Flood, (however caused) wind, wind gusts, storm surges, tornados, cyclones, hail or rain. In the event covered Loss or Damage by Flood $10,000,000 arises out of a Named Storm, the maximum amount the Company will pay per Occurrence for all such Loss or Damage by Flood shall be the Sublimits of Liability for Flood. However, if Flood is not covered, the maximum amount the Company will pay per Occurrence for all such Loss or Damage by Named Storm shall exclude Loss or Damage by Flood. The Per Occurrence Limit for the Peril of Named Storm shall not exceed $10,000,000. Per Occurrence for Debris Removal or 25% of loss, whichever is less $2,500,000 Per Occurrence for Accounts Receivable $500,000 Per Occurrence for Civil or Military Authority 30 Days Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate for Biological and Chemical Terrorism Not Covered Per Occurrence for Contingent Time Element $1,000,000 Per Occurrence for Demolition and Increased Cost of Construction: Demolition Coverage A (For the loss in value of the undamaged portion of the building as a $1,000,000 consequence of enforcement of an ordinance or law that requires demolition of undamaged parts of the same building) Per Occurrence for Demolition and Increased Cost of Construction: Demolition Coverage B (For the cost to demolish and clear the sire of undamaged parts of $1,000,000 the same building, as a consequence of enforcement of an ordinance or law that requires demolition of such undamaged property) Per Occurrence for Demolition and Increased Cost of Construction: Demolition Coverage C (For the increased cost of repair or reconstruction of the damaged and undamaged property on the same or another site, limited to the cost that would have been incurred in order to comply with the minimum requirements of such law or ordinance $1,000,000 regulating the repair of reconstruction of the damaged property of the same site. However, this Company shall not be liable for any increased cost of construction loss unless the damaged property is actually rebuilt or replaced) Per Occurrence for Electronic Data and Media $500,000 Per Occurrence for the peril of Equipment Breakdown $50,000,000 Per Occurrence for Spoilage $100,000 Per Occurrence for Errors and Omissions $1,000,000 Extended Period of Indemnity 180 Days Per Occurrence for Extra Expense Included rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 354 of 729 15 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Additional Coverage: DESCRIPTIONSUBLIMIT Per Occurrence for Fine Arts $500,000 Per Occurrence for Fire Brigade Charges $25,000 30 Days subject to Per Occurrence for Ingress / Egress Maximum of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence for Leasehold Interest $500,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate for Limited Pollution Coverage $25,000 Per Occurrence for Miscellaneous Unnamed Locations $1,000,000 Per Occurrence for Newly Acquired Property for a period of 90 days, if not reported to the $2,000,000 Company in that 90 day period then coverage ceases. Per Occurrence for Ordinary Payroll Not Covered Per Occurrence for Professional Fees Not Covered Per Occurrence for Service Interruption. A qualifying period of 48 hours applies to this $25,000 coverage Per Occurrence for Transit $25,000 Per Occurrence for Valuable Papers and Records $500,000 Parked Auto Physical Damage Per Occurrence for , excluding over the road exposure $500,000 Per Occurrence for Outdoor Property, except $10,000 for Trees, Plants, Shrubs, subject to $50,000 $250 for any one tree, shrub or plant Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate for Mold as a result of a named peril $500,000 Per Occurrence for Property of Others $10,000 Per Occurrence for Signs $20,000 Per Occurrence for Inventory and Appraisal of Loss $2,500 Per Occurrence for Reward reimbursement $5,000 Per Occurrence for Lock replacement $1,000 Per Occurrence for Fire Extinguisher Recharge $2,500 Per Occurrence for Property off Premises $25,000 Per Occurrence for Personal Effects per person $5,000 BOILER & MACHINERY Per occurrence for the peril of Equipment Breakdown $50,000 Time Element $3,488,713 Contingent Time Element $1,000,000 Hazardous Substances Included Demolition and Increased Cost of Construction Demolition Coverage B $1,000,000 Demolition Coverage C $1,000,000 rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 355 of 729 16 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Additional Coverage: DESCRIPTIONSUBLIMIT Electronic Data and Media $500,000 Spoilage $100,000 Extra Expense $250,000 Newly Acquired Property $2,500,000 Service Interruption $25,000 Upgrade to Green Excluded Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Earth Movement, Flood, War Exclusion Government Action, War & Terrorism Exclusion Nuclear Hazard, Power Failure Economic Sanctions Exclusion Other Significant Terms and Conditions/Restrictions: DESCRIPTION 1. Policyholder Disclosure Notice of Terrorism Insurance Coverage (Applicable to Certified and Non-Certified Acts) 2. Terrorism Exclusion Endorsement applies if coverage is rejected or Terrorism Premium Charge Endorsement with Exclusion for Biological and/or Chemical Terrorism applies if coverage is accepted 3. 110% Margin Clause 4. Economic Sanctions Endorsement PR4225 (07/13) 5. Lexington Historical Endorsement applies for Old Boynton Beach High School Cancellation: 90 Days Notice of Cancellation except 10 days for non-payment of premium Any New locations in AK, CA, FL, HI and TX will be underwritten and rated in accordance with our guidelines at the time we are requested to add them 35% Minimum Earned Premium Binding Requirements: DESCRIPTION Subject To Receipt Of Signed Statement of Values Subject To Receipt Of Signed terrorism Disclosure Premium$462,733.48 ESTIMATED PROGRAM COST $458,148.00 Citizens Assessment $4,581.48 FIGA $4.00 Terrorism/TRIA (Optional) $5050.00 rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 356 of 729 17 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Property - Utilities - ACE American Insurance Company Coverage: Property - Utilities Carrier: ACE American Insurance Company Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 The following is a general summary of the Insuring Agreement. Refer to actual policy form for complete terms and conditions. DESCRIPTIONLIMIT $ 62,020,298 Property Damage $ 100,000 Business Interruption Policy Limit $ 250,000 Extra Expense $ 62,370,298 Total Insured Value ALUATION V This company’s Liability for loss under this policy for real and personal property (excluding stock) shall not exceed the smallest of the following amounts: 1. The amount of this policy. 2. The replacement cost of property or any part thereof, identical with property described herein, at the same location and intended for the same occupancy and use. 3. The amount actually and necessarily expended in repairing or replacing the property described herein, or any part thereof, at the same location, or another location, and intended for the same occupancy and use. 4. Actual Cash Value if the property is not repaired or replaced within 2 years. 5. Time Element Coverages: Actual Loss Sustained 6. Agreed Amount with coinsurance waived Perils Covered: TYPEDESCRIPTION All Risks of Direct Physical Loss or Damage – covering Special Form Perils Property Damage, Business Interruption, Extra Expense and Boiler & Machinery rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 357 of 729 18 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Deductibles/SIR: COVERAGEMOUNT A All deductibles listed below are per occurrence except with respect to coverage provided under the Boiler & Machinery (if provided) which shall be any one accident Property Damage Except $100,000 Well Houses $10,000 Flood: 5% of the Property Damage Total Insured Value of the damaged locations involved in the occurrence, subject to a minimum of $500,000 Named Windstorm: 5% of the Property Damage Total Insured Value of the locations involved in the occurrence, subject to a minimum of $500,000 Time Element (Including but not limited to): Business Interruption - Per Occurrence 5 Days Extra Expense - Per Occurrence 5 Days Off-Premises Power - Per Occurrence 5 Days As respects real and personal property, all claims for loss, damage or expense arising out of any one occurrence shall be adjusted as one claim and from the amount of each such adjusted claim there shall be deducted the sum stated on the Declarations Page Deductibles for Property Damage and Time Element shall be applied separately. DESCRIPTIONSUBLIMIT Sublimits are per occurrence unless shown otherwise. The sublimits below are part of and not in addition to the Policy Limit of Liability. Sublimits are 100% and are subject to Starr Tech percentage participation. Named Windstorm $30,000,000 Earth Movement $5,000,000 Flood including Storm Surge $5,000,000 Flood (Zone A or V) and all subzones including Storm Surge $1,000,000 Automatic Coverage $1,000,000 Demolition/Increased Cost of Construction $1,000,000 Course of Construction $500,000 25% of the loss (whichever is greater) for Debris Removal $500,000 Contractors Equipment $500,000 Unnamed Locations $500,000 EDP Media and Equipment $250,000 Expediting Expense $250,000 Off-Premises Power $250,000 Transit $250,000 Temporary Removal of Property $250,000 Off Premises Foam and Fire Fighting Expense $100,000 Business Interruption $100,000 rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 358 of 729 19 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) DESCRIPTIONSUBLIMIT Sublimits are per occurrence unless shown otherwise. The sublimits below are part of and not in addition to the Policy Limit of Liability. Sublimits are 100% and are subject to Starr Tech percentage participation. Extra Expense $250,000 Pollution Cleanup-Real and Personal Property $100,000 Boiler & Machinery Sublimits: Ammonia Contamination $100,000 Expediting Expense $100,000 Hazardous Substance $100,000 Water Damage $100,000 Consequential Damage $100,000 Endorsements include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION a.Common Policy Conditions b. Commercial Property Conditions c. OFAC Endorsement d. Agreed Amount- PO Endorsement e. Agreed Amount- Bl Endorsement f. Authorities Endorsement. g. Automatic Coverage (Newly Acquired) Endorsement h. Biological or Nuclear Exclusion i. Boiler & Machinery Endorsement j. Contractors Equipment Endorsement k. Data Distortion/Corruption Exclusion l. Earth Movement Endorsement m. Electronic Data Processing Endorsement n. Extra Expense Endorsement o. Flood Endorsement p. Increased Cost of Construction & Demolition Endorsement q. Millennium Endorsement r. Mold Exclusion s. Political Risk Exclusion t. Replacement Cost Endorsement u. Terrorism Endorsement (If Coverage is Accepted) rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 359 of 729 20 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Endorsements include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION v. Terrorism Exclusions (If Coverage Declined) w. Transit Endorsement x. Unnamed Location Endorsement y. Wind (Named Storms) Definition Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Earth Movement Exclusion Flood Exclusion Government Action Exclusion War Exclusion Nuclear Hazard, Power Failure Date Related Losses Earth Movement Annual Aggregate (Excluding California) Transmission and Distribution lines located beyond 1,000 feet of any insured premises are excluded Mold Exclusion Political Risk Exclusion Terrorism Exclusions (if coverage declined) Biological or Nuclear Exclusion Data Distortion/Corruption Exclusion Binding Requirements: DESCRIPTION Subject To Receipt Of Signed Statement of Values to be provided within 30 days of effective date Signed TRIA /Terrorism Premium$183,077.00 ESTIMATED PROGRAM COST $177.300.00 Engineering Fee $4,000.00 FL Surcharges $1,777.00 TRIA/Terrorism (Optional) $3,107.00 rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 360 of 729 21 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Public Entity Casualty Package - Comprehenive General Liability - Underwriters at Lloyd's London Coverage: Public Entity Casualty Package – General Liability Carrier: Underwriters at Lloyd's London Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 COVERAGEFORM TYPERETROACTIVE DATE General Liability Occurrence Not Applicable Employee Benefits Liability Sexual Harassment Claims Made 4/1/2013 Sexual Abuse Claims Made Coverage: Should you elect to change carriers (if a new retro-active date is provided) or non-renew this policy, a supplemental extended reporting endorsement may be available subject to policy terms and conditions. You must request the 6IJIVXS4SPMG]*SVQ extended reporting period in writing to the carrier within () days of the expiration date. The cost 6IJIVXS4SPMG]*SVQ of this extended reporting period is []% of the annual premium and is fully earned. The extended reporting period extends only to those claims that occurred prior to the expiration date and would have 6IJIVXS4SPMG]*SVQ been covered by the policy. Claims must be reported to the carrier within (]) days of the end of the policy period. The extended reporting period does not increase the limits of liability and is subject to all policy terms, conditions and exclusions Coverage: DESCRIPTIONLIMIT $2,000,000 Limit of Liability (All Coverages Combined) Per Occurrence excess the self-insured retention $6,000,000 Aggregate Limit (All Coverages Combined) Annual Aggregate Premises Medical Payments: Excluded Additional Coverage: DESCRIPTIONLIMIT Sexual Harassment: $2,000,000/$6,000,000 Sexual Abuse: $2,000,000/$6,000,000 DEDUCTIBLE / SIR: SIRMOUNT A Self-Insured Retention - Per Occurrence $200,000 Definition of Claim & Defense Costs: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 361 of 729 22 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Incident or Claim Reporting Provision: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form Extended Reporting Period (ERP) Options*: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form *If ERP coverage is desired, then that request must be in writing to the carrier. Endorsements include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Public Entity Package Wording (11/11) - Occurrence Indemnification Form Coverage includes but not limited to: DESCRIPTION Premises/Operations Product/Completed Operations Host and/or Liquor Liability Volunteer Workers Personal Injury and Advertising Injury Fire Legal Liability EMT’s/Paramedic Liability Employees and Volunteers as Assureds Incidental Medical Malpractice Pollution from Hostile Fire Property in the Care, Custody, Control Non-Owned Aircraft rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 362 of 729 23 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Assault and Battery, except to protect persons or property Ownership, loading or unloading, maintenance, or use of watercraft over 26 feet in length, except operations performed by independent contractors Ownership, loading or unloading, maintenance, or use of aircraft except operations performed by independent contractors Property owned by the insured Asbestos-related claims Pollution Liability Nuclear Liability ERISA War Inverse Condemnation, Eminent Domain, Adverse Possession or Condemnation Proceedings Terrorism Mold rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 363 of 729 24 City of Boynton Beach Program Details Public Entity Casualty Package - Automobile Liability - Underwriters at Lloyd's London Coverage: Public Entity Casualty Package - Automobile Liability Carrier: Underwriters at Lloyd's London Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 DESCRIPTIONLIMIT $2,000,000 / per Occurrence per occurrence excess the Limit of Liability: self-insured retention / No Aggregate Limit for Auto Physical Damage: $1,000,000 Deductibles/SIR: SIRMOUNT A Liability SIR $200,000 Physical Damage SIR $10,000 Coverage: DESCRIPTION Permissive Users Owned Autos Hired / Non –Owned Autos Endorsements Exclusions include, but are not limited to: / DESCRIPTION Property owned by the insured Employee bodily injuries covered under any Workers’ Compensation or similar law Racing, demolition contest, or stunting activities Medical Payments Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists No Fault Terrorism Mold Flood & Surface Water Earthquake Windstorm Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 364 of 729 25 City of Boynton Beach Program Details Public Entity Casualty Package - Public Officials - Underwriters at Lloyd's London Coverage: Public Entity Casualty Package - Public Officials Carrier: Underwriters at Lloyd's London Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 Form Number: Public Entity Package Wording – Claims-Made (11/11) COVERAGEFORM TYPERETROACTIVE DATE Public Officials Claims Made 4/1/2013 Coverage: DESCRIPTIONLIMIT $2,000,000 Per Occurrence excess the self-insured Limit of Liability- (All Coverages Combined): retention Aggregate (All Coverages Combined): $4,000,000 Annual Aggregate COVERAGE INCLUDES Subject to the following sublimits / annual aggregates which are part of and not in addition to the combined Section IV limit and annual aggregate: • Errors & Omissions $2M/$4M Annual Aggregate • Employment Practices Liability $2M/$4M Annual Aggregate • Sexual Harassment Liability $2M/$4M Annual Aggregate • Sexual Abuse Liability $2M/$4M Annual Aggregate Definition of Claim and Defense Cost: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form Incident or Claim Reporting Provision: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form Extended Reporting Period (ERP) Options*: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form *If ERP coverage is desired, then that request must be in writing to the carrier. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 365 of 729 26 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Intentional breach of contract Loss resulting from a wrongful act committed prior to the retroactive date Any claim brought as a counter claim or cross claim by an assured against any other assured Any claim based upon or attributable to the rendering or failure to render any opinion, treatment, or service unless acting within the scope of their duties as an assured Any claim arising out of any pending or prior litigation or hearing, as well as future claims arising out of any pending or prior litigation or hearing Claim, demands or actions seeking relief or redress in any form other than monetary damages Terrorism Mold Coverage: Public Entity Casualty Package – Employee Benefits Liability Carrier: Underwriters at Lloyd's London Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 Form Type: RETROACTIVE COVERAGEFORM TYPE DATE Employee Benefits Liability Public Entity Package Claims Made 4/1/2013 Wording Claims-Made (11/11) Coverage: DESCRIPTIONLIMIT $2,000,000 per occurrence excess the self-insured Limit of Liability: retention Aggregate Limit: $4,000,000 annual aggregate Deductibles/SIR: COVERAGEMOUNT A Self-Insured Retention: $200,000 per occurrence rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 366 of 729 27 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) tity Casualty Package - Employee Benefits Liability - Underwriters at Lloyd's London Definition of Claim & Defense Costs: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form Incident or Claim Reporting Provision: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form Extended Reporting Period (ERP) Options*: DESCRIPTION Refer to attached policy form *If ERP coverage is desired, then that request must be in writing to the carrier. Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Any negligent acts, errors, or omissions which are dishonest, fraudulent, criminal, or malicious. Bodily Injury, Personal Injury, or Property Damage. Any claim based upon the insureds failure to comply with ERISA or any similar federal, state, or local law. Any claim based upon failure of investments, including stocks and bonds, to perform as represented by the insured. Loss resulting from any negligent acts, errors or omissions committed prior to the retroactive date. Terrorism Mold rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 367 of 729 28 City of Boynton Beach Program Details Public Entity Casualty Package - Law Enforcement Activity - Underwriters at Lloyd's London Coverage: Public Entity Casualty Package - Law Enforcement Activity Carrier: Underwriters at Lloyd's London Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 Form Number: Public Entity Package Wording (11/11) - Occurrence Form Type: COVERAGEFORM TYPE Law Enforcement Activities Occurrence DESCRIPTIONLIMIT $2,000,000 Per Occurrence excess the self-insured Per Occurrence Limit retention Policy Aggregate Limit $6,000,000 Annual Aggregate COVERAGE INCLUDES Sexual Harassment $2M/$6M Sexual Abuse $2M/$6M Deductibles/SIR: COVERAGEMOUNT A Self-Insured Retention: $200,000 Per Occurrence Defense Cost: DESCRIPTION Within the Limit of Liability Reimbursement of Defense Costs Incurred Prior to Denial or Declination of Coverage: $10,000 Ground Up any one Assured $20,000 Aggregate Per Occurrence $50,000 Annual Aggregate Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 368 of 729 29 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Any claim or Suit for Bodily Injury, Property Damage or Personal Injury including any award of attorney’s fees and costs resulting from: - Any knowing and intentional violation of any subsection of Title 42 of the U.S. Code, including but not limited to 42 U.S.C 1981 thru 42 U.S.C. 1989 and 42 U.S.C. 1997 - Any knowing and intentional deprivation of any rights protected under the United States Constitution or the Constitution of any State, Territory or Protectorate of the United States - Any Act which is not reasonably related to the execution and/or enforcement of the law - Any Act committed with the knowledge and intent to cause Bodily Injury, Property Damage or Personal Injury or which could reasonably be expected to cause Bodily Injury, Property Damage or Personal Injury unless the act of the Assured was reasonably necessary to lawfully prevent injury to persons or damage to Property However, this Exclusion shall not apply to any vicarious liability on the part of the Named Assured arising solely out of an act by any other Assured resulting from Law Enforcement Activities and excluded herein, but this provision applies only to the liability of the Named Assured to pay any settlement, verdict or judgment, providing that the sole liability imposed on the Named Assured does not arise from any contractual duty to indemnify an Assured. Liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use, including loading or unloading, of watercraft 26 feet and over Damage to or destruction of Property of the Assured Liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, loading or unloading, use or operations of any aircraft, airfields, runways, hangars, buildings or other properties in connection with aviation activities Any obligation for which the Assured may beheld liable under any Workers’ Compensation, unemployment compensation disability benefits law, employers liability or under any similar law or to Bodily Injury to any employee or to any liability for indemnity or contribution brought by any party for Bodily Injury to any employee The cost of any investigation, disciplinary or criminal proceedings against an individual Assured except that the Underwriters may, at their own option and expense, associate counsel in the defense of any such investigation, criminal or disciplinary proceeding. Should the Underwriters elect to associate counsel, such elections shall not constitute a waiver or estoppel of any rights the Underwriters may have pursuant to the terms, conditions, exclusions and limitations of this policy Any claim arising from Wrongful Acts except as provided under this Section for Discrimination or Violation of Civil Rights arising out of Law Enforcement Activities Any Claim arising out of an intentional breach of contract rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 369 of 729 30 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Binding Requirements: DESCRIPTION Subject to Signed Authorization to Bind Subject to Signed TRIA accept/reject form Subject to Signed UM/UIM rejection form prior to binding Terms & Conditions: DESCRIPTION Quote based on the 2013 Public Entity wording. Gallagher Bassett is the appointed Third Party Administrator. Section II Automobile Physical Damage - Valuation is RCV for scheduled vehicles on file with underwriters. Mold coverage is excluded. Cancellation–Atbinding,theAssuredcommitstoaMinimumEarnedPremiumof50%ofthegrosspremium.There Cancellation–Atbinding,theAssuredcommitstoaMinimumEarnedPremiumof50%ofthegrosspremium.There arenoflatcancellationsallowed. arenoflatcancellationsallowed. Lloyds of London (Brit) Free Risk Management Services: Brit package clients receive access - at no cost - to the BRIT Insurance TEAM risk management platform at Brit's expense (a regular value of at least $30,000 annually). The BRIT Insurance TEAM platform is a robust online resource offering: Unlimited web-based training courses from a list of approximately 135 courses covering areas such as employment practices liability, leave-related laws, workplace risk management, human resources, and youth- related risks. Weekly training bulletins and articles about new and/or updated matters of interest. Comprehensive model handbook. Self-guided human resources assessments. Built-in management tools to track and run reports on usage (e.g., completion of training). Customizability to: have your logo on the landing page ... upload your own policies and procedures ...determine the access levels for all users. www.britinsurance.com/team Much, much more - all free of charge to you - just visit These services are an extension of Brit's partnership with our clients. We recognize the need for customized risk management tools, and we provide the BRIT Insurance TEAM platform to you with our compliments to help you manage risk. Premium$209,900.00 ESTIMATED PROGRAM COST $209,900.00 Terrorism (Optional) $2,130.00 rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 370 of 729 31 City of Boynton Beach Program Details Excess-Workers Compensation - Safety National Casualty Corporation Coverage: Excess-Workers Compensation Carrier: Safety National Casualty Corporation Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 DESCRIPTIONLIMIT Part I - Workers Compensation – Statutory Employers Liability Part II - Employers Liability - $1,000,000 aggregate per accident Deductibles/SIR: SIRMOUNT A $500,000 Each Accident, except $850,00 for Police & Per Occurrence Firefighters Exposure: STATEDESCRIPTIONEXPOSURERATE PER $100 Excess Rate Per $100 of FL Estimated Total Payroll: $48,020,728 Payroll - 0.27 Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Punitive, exemplary or compensatory damages Liability assumed under a contract Bodily Injury to an employee while employed in violation of law Bodily Injury intentionally caused or aggravated by you Self-Insurers Assessments Intentional Torts Punitive or Exemplary Damages Bodily Injury to an employee while employed in violation of law Damages arising out of coercion, criticism, demotion, discipline, defamation, harassment or termination of any employee Liability assumed under contract Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 371 of 729 32 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Other Significant Terms and Conditions/Restrictions: DESCRIPTION Subject to final audit at end of policy term based on gross payroll Includes Claims Expense as part of loss Cancellation by Named Insured is subject to the Minimum and Deposit Premium – 100% fully earned 60 day cancellation notice required of Named Insured and/or carrier, except 5 day notice by carrier for nonpayment of premium Incidental Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers Compensation Act Maritime Coverage – No Know Exposure Voluntary Compensation Same Communicable Disease Foreign Voluntary WC & EL including defined Endemic Disease Endorsements mandated by the coverage state(s) will automatically be added to your policy regardless of whether they are shown in the above schedule. In addition, a change in an endorsement form number may occur as a result of state filling requirements/updates arising subsequent to this quote. Binding Requirements: DESCRIPTION Subject to Adjustment at audit Subject to Signed Application Subject to receipt, review and acceptance of information contained in SNCC’s Vehicle Supplemental Application form prior to binding Premium$129,656.00 ESTIMATED PROGRAM COST $129,656.00 Terrorism (Included) *Subject to Audit: Annually rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 372 of 729 33 City of Boynton Beach Program Details Crime - Hanover Insurance Company Coverage: Crime Carrier: Hanover Insurance Company Policy Period: 4/1/2015 to 4/1/2016 Form Type: COVERAGEFORM TYPE Crime Discovery DESCRIPTIONLIMIT Employee Theft Per Loss (including Faithful performance) $50,000 Schedule Excess for City Manager & Finance Director $450,000 Forgery or Alteration $50,000 Money & Securities (In/Out) $10,000 / $10,000 Deductibles/SIR: COVERAGEMOUNT A Deductible $1,000 Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Third Party Employee Dishonesty Government Action Exclusion Accounting or Arithmetic Errors Voluntary Parting of Property Loss in which the existence of such loss is only proved by a profit and loss comparison or inventory records Any theft or criminal act committed by a partner of the insured Loss Due to Employee Dishonesty Date Related Losses Partners Indirect Loss Legal Expenses Nuclear War & Similar Actions Employee canceled under prior insurance Inventory shortages Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 373 of 729 34 City of Boynton Beach Program Details (Cont.) Exclusions include, but are not limited to: DESCRIPTION Loss caused by any employee required by law to be individually bonded Damages for which you are legally liable as a result of - The deprivation or violation of the civil rights of any person by an employee or - The tortious conduct of any employee except conversion of property of other parties held by you in any capacity Other Significant Terms and Conditions/Restrictions: DESCRIPTION 90 day Notice of Cancellation 45 day Notice of Non-renewal Premium$3,307.00 ESTIMATED PROGRAM COST (Per Year) $3,307.00 3 Year Annual Installment Premium Option to Include Computer Fraud and Funds Transfer $3,723.00 Fraud Each at $50,000 with $1,000 Deductible Alternative Options DESCRIPTIONLIMIT Employee Theft Per Loss (including Faithful performance) $100,000 Schedule Excess for City Manager & Finance Director $400,000 Forgery or Alteration $100,000 Money & Securities (In/Out) $10,000 / $10,000 3 Year Annual Installment Premium $3,850.00 Option to Include Computer Fraud and Funds Transfer $4,396.00 Fraud Each at $100,000 with $1,000 Deductible rthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. A Page 374 of 729 35 City of Boynton Beach Premium Summary Premium Summary The estimated program cost for the options are outlined in the following table: EXPIRING PROGRAMPROPOSED PROGRAM(S) LINE OF COVERAGE ESTIMATED COSTRECOMMENDED Property - Premium Lexington Insurance $500,000.00 Lexington Insurance $458,148.00 MunicipalitySrchrg & Asmnt $11,500.00 $4,581.48 Total Fees $4.00 $4.00 Estimated Cost$511,504.00$462,733.47 Property - UtilitiesPremium ACE American $197,000.00 ACE American $177,300.00 Srchrg & Asmnt Insurance Company $6,107.00 Insurance Company $1,777.00 Total Fees (ACE Group) $4,004.00 (ACE Group) $4,000.00 Estimated Cost$207,111.00$183,077.00 Public Entity Premium Underwriters at Lloyd's, $210,700.00 Underwriters at $209,900.00 Casualty PackageSrchrg & Asmnt London (BRIT) $2,739.10 Lloyd's London (BRIT) N/A Total Fees N/A Estimated Cost$213,439.10$209,900.00 - Excess-Workers Premium Safety National $123,586.00 Safety National 129,656.00 CompensationSrchrg & Asmnt Casualty Corporation Included Casualty Corporation Included Estimated Cost$123,586.00 (Safety National $129,656.00 TRIA Premium Included Group) Included CrimePremium Hanover Insurance $2,500.00 Hanover Insurance $3,307.00 Srchrg & Asmnt Company $32.50 Company (Hanover N/A Total Fees $2,532.50Insurance Companies) $3,307.00 Estimated Cost- - $988,673.47 Total Estimated Program Cost $1,058,172.60 Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 375 of 729 36 City of Boynton Beach Premium Summary Gallagher is responsible for the placement of the following lines of coverage: ACE American Insurance Company (ACE Group)4/1/2015 Quote From is valid until Property - Municipality Ironshore Specialty Insurance Co (Ironshore Insurance Ltd), etc...4/1/2015 Quote From is valid until Property - Utilities Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover Insurance Companies)4/1/2015 Quote From is valid until Public Entity Casualty Package Underwriters at Lloyd's London (Underwriters at Lloyd's London)4/1/2015 Quote From is valid until Excess-Workers Compensation Safety National Casualty Corporation (Safety National Group)4/1/2015 Quote From is valid until Crime Lexington Insurance Company (American International Group, Inc)4/1/2015 Quote From is valid until It is understood that any other type of exposure/coverage is either self-insured or placed by another brokerage firm other than Gallagher. If you need help in placing other lines of coverage or covering other types of exposures, please contact your Gallagher representative. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 376 of 729 37 City of Boynton Beach Payment Plans Payment Plans CARRIERLINE OF COVERAGEPAYMENT METHOD Lexington Insurance Company Property - Municipality Agency Bill ACE American Insurance Company (ACE Group) Property - Utilities Agency Bill Public Entity Casualty Underwriters at Lloyd's London (BRIT) Agency Bill Package Safety National Casualty Corporation (Safety Excess-Workers Agency Bill National Group) Compensation Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover Insurance Crime Agency Bill Companies) Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 377 of 729 38 City of Boynton Beach Coinsurance Illustration Coinsurance Illustration Coinsurance Formula: Settlement Insurance Carried ÷ Insurance Required x Loss - Deductible = Example of Coinsurance formula applied to a hypothetical loss situation: Property Value = $1,000,000 Coinsurance Amount = 80% Deductible = $500 Insurance Required = $800,000 (80% of $1,000,000) Insurance Carried = $400,000 Loss Incurred = $200,000 Settlement determined by applying the coinsurance formula: $400,000 (Insurance Carried) x $200,000 (Loss) - $500 (Deductible) = $99,500 Settlement $800,000 (Insurance Required) Note: If the property in the above example is insured for the full insurance required ($800,000), the insured will recover $199,500. In the above example, the insured will suffer a $100,000 penalty for not being insured to the proper limit. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 378 of 729 39 City of Boynton Beach Changes / Developments Changes / Developments It is important that we be advised of any changes in your operations that may have a bearing on the validity and/or adequacy of your insurance. The types of changes that concern us include, but are not limited to, those listed below: 1. Changes in any operation such as expansion to other states or new products. 2. Mergers and/or acquisition of new companies. 3. Any newly assumed contractual liability, granting of indemnities, or hold harmless agreements. 4. Circumstances which may require increased liability insurance limits. 5. Any changes in fire or theft protection, such as the installation of or disconnection of sprinkler systems, burglar alarms, etc. This includes any alterations to same. 6. Immediate advice of any changes to scheduled equipment such as contractors’ equipment, electronic data processing, etc. 7. Property of yours that is in transit, unless we have previously arranged for the insurance. 8. Any changes in existing premises including vacancy, whether temporary or permanent, alterations, demolition, etc. Also, any new premises either purchased, constructed, or occupied. No Changes and/or Developments Signature: Title: Date: Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 379 of 729 40 City of Boynton Beach Proposal Disclosures Proposal Disclosures Page 380 of 729 City of Boynton Beach Proposal Disclosures Proposal Disclosures The following disclosures are hereby made a part of this proposal. Please review these disclosures prior to signing the Client Authorization to Bind or e-mail confirmation. Proposal IMPORTANT: The proposal is an outline of certain terms and conditions of the insurance proposed by Disclaimer the insurers, based on the information provided by your company. It does not include all the terms, coverages, exclusions, limitations and/or conditions of the actual policy contract language. The insurance policies themselves must be read for those details. Policy forms for your reference will be made available upon request. We will not be operating in a fiduciary capacity, but only as your broker, obtaining a variety of coverage terms and conditions to protect the risks of your enterprise. We will seek to bind those coverages based upon your authorization; however, we can make no warranties in respect to policy limits or coverage considerations of the carrier. Actual coverage is determined by policy language, so read all policies carefully. Contact us with questions on these or any other issues of concern. Compensation One of the core values highlighted in The Gallagher Way states, “We are an Open Society,” and our Disclosure open society extends to the compensation Gallagher receives. In general, Gallagher may be compensated as follows: 1. Gallagher Companies are primarily compensated from the usual and customary commissions or fees received from the brokerage and servicing of insurance policies, annuity contracts, guarantee contracts and surety bonds (collectively “insurance coverages”) handled for a client’s account, which may vary from company to company and insurance coverage to insurance coverage. As permitted by law, Gallagher companies occasionally receive both commissions and fees. 2. In placing, renewing, consulting on or servicing your insurance coverages, Gallagher Companies may participate in contingent and supplemental commission arrangements with intermediaries and insurance companies. Contingent commissions provide for additional contingent compensation if underwriting, profitability, volume or retention goals are achieved. Such goals are typically based on the total amount of certain insurance coverages placed by Gallagher with the insurance company and/or through the intermediary, not on an individual policy basis. Some insurance markets, including Gallagher-owned intermediaries, have modified their commission schedule with Gallagher, resulting in an increase in some commission rates. These additional commissions, commonly referred to as “supplemental commissions” are known as of the effective date, but some insurance companies are paying this commission later and apart from when commission is normally paid at policy issuance. As a result, Gallagher may be considered to have an incentive to place your insurance coverages with a particular insurance company. Note: Upon request, your Gallagher representative can provide more specific market information regarding contingent and supplemental commission related to your insurance coverage. 3. Gallagher Companies may also receive investment income on fiduciary funds temporarily held by them, such as premiums or return premiums. 4. Gallagher Companies may access other facilities, including wholesalers, reinsurance intermediaries, captive managers, underwriting managers and others that act as intermediaries for both Gallagher and other brokers in the insurance marketplace. Gallagher Companies may own some of these facilities, in whole or in part. If such a facility was utilized in the placement of a client’s account, the facility may have earned and retained customary brokerage commission or fees for its work. 5. Gallagher assists its customers in procuring premium finance quotes and unless prohibited by law may earn compensation for this value added service. 6. From time to time, Gallagher may participate in insurance company promotional events or training and development that insurers provide for Gallagher employees. 7. Gallagher strives to find appropriate coverage at a competitive price for our customers. In order Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 381 of 729 42 City of Boynton Beach Proposal Disclosures (Cont.) to achieve these goals, we gather and analyze data about our customers and their insurance coverage. This data and the resulting analytical tools help us better understand the current marketplace, more accurately predict future trends and offer tailored solutions to our customers. The data may also be provided to insurers pursuant to consulting service agreements from which we earn fees. If you have specific questions about the compensation received by Gallagher and its affiliates in relation to your insurance placements, please contact your Gallagher representative for more details. In the event you wish to register a formal complaint regarding compensation Gallagher receives from insurers or third parties, please send an e-mail to Compensation_Complaints@ajg.com or send a letter to: Compliance Officer Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Two Pierce Place, 20th Floor Itasca, IL 60143 TRIA/TRIPRA If this proposal contains options to purchase TRIA/TRIPRA coverage, the proposed TRIA/TRIPRA Disclaimer program may not cover all terrorism losses. While the amendments to TRIA eliminated the distinction between foreign and domestic acts of terrorism, a number of lines of coverage excluded under the amendments passed in 2005 remain excluded including commercial automobile, burglary and theft insurance; surety insurance, farm owners multiple perils and professional liability (although directors and officers liability is specifically included). If such excluded coverages are required, we recommend that you consider purchasing a separate terrorism policy. Please note that a separate terrorism policy for these excluded coverages may be necessary to satisfy loan covenants or other contractual obligations. TRIPRA includes a $100 billion cap on insurers' aggregate liability. The TRIPRA program increases the amount needed in total losses by $20 million each calendar year before the TRIPRA program responds from the 2015 trigger of $100 million to $200 million by the year 2020. TRIPRA is set to expire on December 31, 2020. There is no certainty of extension, thus the coverage provided by your insurers may or may not extend beyond December 31, 2020. In the event you have loan covenants or other contractual obligations requiring that TRIA/TRIPRA be maintained throughout the duration of your policy period, we recommend that a separate "Stand Alone" terrorism policy be purchased to satisfy those obligations. Property These property values were obtained using a desktop Property Estimator software operated by non- Estimator appraisal professionals. These property values represent general estimates which are not to be Disclaimer considered a certified appraisal. These property values include generalities and assumptions that may produce inaccurate values for specific structures. Actuarial The information contained in this proposal is based on the historical loss experience and exposures Disclaimer provided to Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc.. This proposal is not an actuarial study. Should you wish to have this proposal reviewed by an independent actuary, we will be pleased to provide you with a listing of actuaries for your use. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 382 of 729 43 City of Boynton Beach Insurance Company Ratings and Admitted Status Insurance Company Ratings and Admitted Status .M. BEST'S DMITTED / NON- AA PROPOSED INSURANCE COMPANIES RATING ADMITTED ACE American Insurance Company A++ XVAdmitted Lexington Insurance Company A XVAdmitted Hanover Insurance Company A XIVAdmitted Safety National Casualty Corporation A XAdmitted If the above indicated coverage is placed with a Non-Admitted Carrier, the carrier is doing business in the state as a surplus lines or non-admitted carrier. As such, this carrier is not subject to the same regulations which apply to an admitted carrier nor do they participate in any insurance guarantee fund applicable in that state. *The above A.M. Best Rating was verified on the date the proposal document was created. Best's Insurance Reports , published annually by A.M. Best Company, Inc., presents comprehensive reports on the financial position, history, and transactions of insurance companies operating in the United States and Canada. Companies licensed to do business in the United States are assigned a Best’s Rating which attempts to measure the comparative position of the company or association against industry averages. A Best’s Financial Strength Rating opinion addresses the relative ability of an insurer to meet its ongoing insurance obligations. It is not a warranty of a company’s financial strength and ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. View the A.M. Best Important Notice: Best’s Credit Ratings for a disclaimer notice and complete details at http://www.ambest.com/ratings/notice. Best’s Credit Ratings are under continuous review and subject to change and/or affirmation. For the latest Best’s Credit Ratings and Best Credit Reports (which include Best Ratings), visit the A.M. Best website at http://www.ambest.com. See Guide to Best’s Credit Ratings for explanation of use and charges. Copies of the Best’s Insurance Reports for carriers listed above are also available upon request of your Gallagher representative. Best’s Credit Ratings reproduced herein appear under license from A.M. Best and do not constitute, either expressly or impliedly, an endorsement of (Licensee’s publication or service) or its recommendations, formulas, criteria or comparisons to any other ratings, rating scales or rating organizations which are published or referenced herein. A.M. Best is not responsible for transcription errors made in presenting Best’s Credit Ratings. Best’s Credit Ratings are proprietary and may not be reproduced or distributed without the express written permission of A.M. Best Company. Gallagher companies use A.M. Best Company’s rating services to evaluate the financial condition of insurers whose policies we propose to deliver. Gallagher companies make no representations and warranties concerning the solvency of any carrier, nor does it make any representation or warranty concerning the rating of the carrier which may change. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 383 of 729 44 City of Boynton Beach Insurance Company Ratings and Admitted Status (Cont.) Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 384 of 729 45 City of Boynton Beach Client Signature Requirements Client Signature Requirements Page 385 of 729 Surplus Lines Notice - Florida SURPLUS LINES DISCLOSURE and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (name of insurance agency) At my direction, has placed my coverage in the surplus lines market. As required by Florida Statute 626.916, I have agreed to this placement. I understand that superior coverage may be available in the admitted market and at a lesser cost and that persons insured by surplus lines carriers are not protected by the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association with respect to any right of recovery for the obligation of an insolvent unlicensed insurer. I further understand the policy forms, conditions, premiums, and deductibles used by surplus lines insurers may be different from those found in policies used in the admitted market. I have been advised to carefully read the entire policy. There is no liability on the part of, and I have no cause of action against, my agent for placing coverage in the surplus lines market. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Named Insured Signature of Insured’s Authorized RepresentativeDate LEXINGTON INS CO / LLOYDS OF LONDON Name of Excess and Surplus Lines Carrier PROPERTY / CASULATY Type of Insurance 04/01/2015 Effective Date of Coverage Page 386 of 729 City of Boynton Beach Coverages For Consideration Coverages For Consideration Overview • A proposal for any of the coverages can be provided. • The recommendations and considerations summarized in this section are not intended to identify all exposures. • Since Gallagher does not handle your complete insurance program, these recommendations only reflect items within our scope of responsibility. Other Coverage Considerations • Cyber Risk The above coverage may not necessarily represent the entirety of available insurance products. If you are interested in pursuing additional coverages other than those addressed in the coverage considerations included in this proposal, please list below: Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 387 of 729 48 City of Boynton Beach Client Authorization To Bind Coverage Client Authorization to Bind Coverage After careful consideration of Gallagher's proposal dated 3/3/2015, we accept the following coverage(s). Please check the desired coverage(s) and note any coverage amendments below: LINE OF COVERAGECARRIER Accept Reject Property - Municipality Lexington Insurance Company Accept Reject TRIA Coverage Accept Reject Property - Utilities ACE American Insurance Company (ACE Group) Accept Reject TRIA Coverage Accept Reject Package – Excess Liability Underwriters at Lloyd's London (BRIT) Accept Reject TRIA Coverage Accept Reject Excess-Workers Compensation Safety National Casualty TRIA Cannot be Corporation TRIA Coverage rejected Crime As Per Expiring - $3,307 Accept Reject Include Computer Fraud and Funds Transfer Accept Reject Fraud at $50,000 with $1,000 deductible - $3,723 Hanover Insurance Increase Employee Theft limit to $100,000 with Company Accept Reject $1,000 deductible - $3,850 Increased Limits Employee Theft & Computer Fraud and Funds Transfer Fraud at $100,000 limit Accept Reject - $4,396 Provide Quotations or Additional Information on the Following Coverage Considerations: Other Coverage Considerations Yes No Cyber Risk Note: Selecting the “Reject All or Accept All” option will override any selections that you have made above Reject All Accept All - Coverages for Consideration It is understood this proposal provides only a summary of the details; the policies will contain the actual coverages. We confirm the values, schedules, and other data contained in the proposal are from our records and acknowledge it is our responsibility to see that they are maintained accurately. We agree that your liability to us arising from your negligent acts or omissions, whether related to the insurance or surety placed pursuant to these binding instructions or not, shall not exceed $20 million, in the aggregate. Further, without limiting the foregoing, we agree that in the event you breach your obligations, you shall only be liable for actual damages we incur and that you shall not be liable for any indirect, consequential or punitive damages. By: ______________________________________________________ Specify: owner, partner or corporate officer Date: _______________________________________________________________________ Print Name Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 388 of 729 49 City of Boynton Beach Appendix Appendix Page 389 of 729 City of Boynton Beach Claims Reporting By Policy Claims Reporting By Policy PROPERTY When and where do you report a claim? Claims are to be reported as soon as practicable to: PROPERTY – MUNICIPALITY Email:apolom@ajg.com PROPERTY - UTILITIES Mr. Jim Jezewski, Vice President and Claims Manager Starr Technical Risks Agency, Inc. Property Claims Departent th 399 Park Avenue, 9 Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (646) 227-6348 Fax: (631) 685-3061 Email: iim.iezewski@cvstarrco.com Mr. Will Wood, Assistant Vice President Tel: (404) 946-1436 Fax: (404) 946-1498 Email:william.wood@cvstarrco.com CRIME When and where do you report a claim? Claims are to be reported immediately and reported directly to: Agnes Polom at Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. EXCESS PUBLIC ENTITY When and where do you report a claim? Claims are to be reported immediately and reported directly to: BRIT Insurance Services, Inc. Email: USA.claims@britinsurance.com EXCESS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION When and where do you report a claim? Claims are to be reported immediately and reported directly to: Safety National 1832 Schuetz Road St. Louis, MO 63146 Fax: 314-995-3897 Email: first.report@safetynational.com Excess Reporting Requirements: The following injuries should be reported immediately: • Fatalities • Paraplegics and quadriplegics • Serious burns, defined as 2nd or 3rd degree burns involving 25% or more of the body • Brain injury • Spinal cord injury • Amputation of a major extremity • Any occurrence which results in a serious injury to two or more employees If you experience any difficulty in Phone, fax or email to Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management reporting claims directly to carrier: Services, Inc. Phone: 561-998-6799 Fax: 561-995-6708 Email: agnes polom @ajg.com Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 390 of 729 51 City of Boynton Beach Bindable Quotations & Compensation Disclosure Schedule Bindable Quotations & Compensation Disclosure Schedule Client Name: City of Boynton Beach WHOLESALER, MGA OR INTERMEDIARY ESTIMATED ANNUAL COMM. % OR COMMISSION % / AJG OWNED? 1234 COVERAGE(S) CARRIER NAME(S) PREMIUMFEENAMEFEE $YES/NO Property - Lexington Insurance Risk Placement $458,148.0010%5%Yes Municipality Company Services, Inc. ACE American Risk Placement Property - Utilities Insurance Company $177,300.005.5%4.5%Yes Services, Inc. (ACE Group) Public Entity Underwriters at $209,900.0010%N/AN/ANo Casualty Package Lloyd's London BRIT Excess-Workers Safety National $129,656.0010% N/A N/ANo Compensation Casualty Corporation Public Entity Safety National $210,000.0010% N/A N/ANo Casualty Package Casualty Corporation Excluding Auto PD Crime Various Options Hanover Insurance Arthur J Gallagher - $3,307.009%11%Yes presented at the Company AFR same Commission Some carriers pay Gallagher supplemental or contingent commissions in addition to the policy commission. Contingent commissions are typically contingent upon performance factors such as growth, profit, volume or retention, while supplemental commissions are not. These supplemental or contingent commissions may range from less than 1% up to 10% of the policy premium. Please refer to the Compensation Disclosure or contact your Gallagher representative for additional information. 1 *A verbal quotation was received from this carrier. We are awaiting a quotation in writing. The premium indicated is an estimate provided by the market. The actual premium and acceptance of the coverage requested will be determined by the market after a thorough review of the completed application. ** A written quotation was received from this carrier. The premium indicated is an estimate provided by the market. The actual premium and acceptance of the coverage requested will be determined by the market after a thorough review of the completed application. 2 The commission rate is a percentage of annual premium excluding taxes & fees. * Gallagher is receiving _________% commission on this policy. The fee due Gallagher will be reduced by the amount of the commissions received. 3 We were able to obtain more advantageous terms and conditions for you through an intermediary/ wholesaler. 4 * The non-Gallagher intermediary/wholesaler did not provide their compensation information for this proposal. The usual and customary compensation to a wholesaler/ intermediary ranges from 5% to 12%, but we cannot verify that range is applicable in connection with this proposal. Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc. Page 391 of 729 52 CityofBoyntonBeach Property,Casualty&Workers'CompensationInsuranceEvaluation 2015/2016ProgramComparison CurrentLayeredProgramPreferredGovernmentalInsuranceTrust SIR/DeductiblePremiumsCarrierSIR/DeductiblePremiums PolicyLimits/TIVLimits/TIV $97,932,276AOP$25,000AOP$141,406,998AOP $511,504 $10,000,000NamedStormPGIT*5%TIV;min.$35,000NSIncludingWind/NamedStorm Property(InclContents)$50,000AOP$599,307 $62,370,298Includedin UtilityProperty$30,000,000NamedStorm$207,111PGIT*IncludedinPropertyPropertypremium $25,000AOPIncludedinProperty IncludedinIncludedin Boiler&MachineryIncludedinPropertypropertypremiumPGIT*IncludedinPropertyPropertypremium $5,000$50,000,000 IncludedinIncludedin BusinessIncome/ExtraExpense72hourspropertypremiumPGIT*IncludedinPropertyPropertypremium $3,488,713$3,488,713 Includedin InlandMarinepropertypremiumPGIT*IncludedinProperty$36,709 $15,805,308$17,035,695 IncludedinIncludedinInland MarineHullandP&IpropertypremiumPGIT*IncludedinInlandMarineMarinepremium $206,500$206,500 $50,000EmployeeTheft$50,000EmployeeTheft $50,000Forgery$50,000Forgery $10,000TheftofMoney$50,000TheftofMoney Crime/EmployeeDishonestyPGIT*$960 $1,000$2,533$1,000 SubTotal$721,148$636,976 $2,000,000perocc./$2,000,000perocc./ GeneralLiability$6,000,000agg.PGIT*NoAggregateLimit $200,000$213,439$200,000$44,597 PublicOfficialsLiability/$2,000,000perocc./IncludedinGeneral$4,000,000perclaim/ EmploymentPracticesLiability$4,000,000agg.LiabilityPGIT**$4,000,000agg. $200,000$200,000$57,055 Includedin CyberLiabilityN/AN/APGIT**$500,000POL/EPLI N/A$ 2,000,000perocc.IncludedinGeneral $/$2,000,000perocc./ LawEnforcementLiability$6,000,000agg.LiabilityPGIT* $200,000$200,000$89,431 NoAggregateLimit IncludedinGeneral $2,000,000perocc./ LiabilityPGIT* AutomobileLiability100,000$$100,000.00$100,000$38,117 NoAggregateLimit IncludedinGeneral LiabilityPGIT*PerSchedule AutomobilePhysicalDamage10,000$$100,000.00$10,000$26,950 SubTotal $213,439$256,150 Payroll:$48,020,728 $500,000GeneralEE; $850,000PublicSafetyStatutoryPGIT*Statutory ExcessWorkers'Compensation$123,586$500,000$134,494 SubTotal$123,586$134,494 TotalAnnualPremium* $1,058,173$1,027,620 Ψ/ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞͬĞĐƌĞĂƐĞ$(30,553) й/ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞͬĞĐƌĞĂƐĞ3% POL/EPLIiswrittenonaclaimsmadebasisWind/NamedStormlimitof$141,406,99 Propertycoverage:valuationbasisReplacementCost;CoverageFormSpecial $10,000,000 Named Storm limit for Municipal Property; $30,000,000 Named Storm limite for Utility PropertyandBoiler&Machineryareprovidedasblanketlimits WƌĞŵŝƵŵŝƐďĞŝŶŐŽĨĨĞƌĞĚǁŝƚŚĂϮǇĞĂƌZĂƚĞŐƵĂƌĂŶƚĞĞ Ύ ΎΎPOL/EPLIiswrittenonaclaimsmadebasis.WƌĞŵŝƵŵŝƐďĞŝŶŐŽĨĨĞƌĞĚǁŝƚŚĂϮ͘ϱǇĞĂƌZĂƚĞŐƵĂƌĂŶƚĞĞ AlternateExcessWorkersCompensationproposalwith$750,000SIRfor$111,521 Page 392 of 729 $5,000AnnualSafetyGrant $200,000NoFaultSewerBackUp Page 393 of 729 Page 394 of 729 Page 395 of 729 Page 396 of 729 Page 397 of 729 Page 398 of 729 Page 399 of 729 Page 400 of 729 ® 1:2,257 EXHIBIT "A" - SITE LOCATION MAP 00.01250.0250.05mi Page 401 of 729 00.020.040.08km created by: PBC Property AppraiserDecember 30, 2014 SEE ENLARGED PLAN OF THIS AREA ADJACENT ZONING: P.I.D.EXISTING WETLAND PRESERVE ADJACENT ZONING: P.I.D. REMOVAL OF (9) EXISTING PARKING 420' SPACES FOR OUTDOOR DOG RUN BOYNTON ALE HOUSE PROPOSED TENANT LOCATION VACANT ROSS DRESS FOR LESS DEALS TUESDAY MORNING PB VET JEWELER FLESHER YOSSI SALON VISION CARE AND SPA LA FITNESS EXISTING TO REMAIN (TYPICAL) EXTREME NUTRITION KINKOS SUSHI MASA DENTALSAMARA MARKET SMOOTHIES BOOST MOBILE POLLO TROPICAL MD NOW CHILIS 0 50'100'200' COMMERCIAL RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" SITE DATA INFORMATION CURRENT LAND USE: (LRC) LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL CURRENT ZONING: (C-3) COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA = 845,551 SF (19.41 ACRES) PARKING REQUIREMENTS TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 229,477 SF (EXISTING) ACCORDING TO STAFF REPORT (MSPM 03-007) PROPOSED TENANT AREA: 7,700 SF (EXISTING) A SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS PERFORMED BY KIMLEY-HORN PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE: PET CARE (BOARDING & HAS BEEN ACCEPTED AND OUTLINES DURING PEAK GROOMING) WITH NO EXTERNAL KENNELING DEMAND THERE ARE 89 SURPLUS SPACES PARKING PROVIDED:1,113 SPACES OPEN SPACE: 204,335 SF (24.2%) PARKING REQUIRED:1,024 SPACES WATER 24,500 SF (2.8%) BLDG. AREA179,026 SF (21.2%) APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONVERT 9 SPACES INTO PAVEMENT, CONC., SIDEWALKS437,690 SF (51.8%) PERVIOUS AREA FOR PROPOSED OUTDOOR DOG RUN REMAINING PARKING SPACES: 1,104 SPACES TOTAL PERVIOUS AREA228,835 SF (27%) SITE PLAN TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA616,716 SF (73%) Page 402 of 729 EXISTING CMU WALLPROPOSED WHITE VINYL FENCE EXISTING FIRE LINE ASSEMBLY EXISTING EXISTING FIRE LINE ASSEMBLY EXISTING DUMPSTERDUMPSTER EXISTING LOCATIONLOCATION ACCESS TO LINE OF EXISTING EXISTING COMMON CANOPY ABOVE ELECTRICAL CORRIDOR ROOM 11' EXISTING TEL. / ELEC. 4'x6' EXISTING OUTDOOR DOG RUN 4'x6' PHASE II APPLICANT PROPOSES TO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE DOG WASTE TREATMENT EXISTING EMERGENCY CORRIDOR SYSTEM IN THE FUTURE (YEAR 2 OF NEW 6' HIGH WHITE VINYL OVERNIGHT BOARDING AREA OPERATIONS). FENCE, SEE SECTION 1,557 SF TREATMENT SYSTEM TO CONSIST OF EITHER: A SEWAGE GRINDER PUMP CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING SEWER LATERAL IN DRIVEWAY OR A SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM, COMPOSTING STORAGE DOG WASTE INTO A MEN'S LOCKER / RESTROOMWOMEN'S LOCKER / RESTROOM GROUND-ABSORBED LIQUID UTILIZING ORDINARY WATER AND NATURAL HALLWAYHALLWAY ACTING BACTERIA AND ENZYMES. JAN. ALL UNDER FUTURE SEPARATE PERMIT. DRYER CAGE GROOMING GROOMGROOM TABLETABLE DRYER24x4824x48 CAGE 188 SF SMALL DOG DAY CARE DRYERDRYER CAGECAGE OUTDOOR 1,500 SF DOG RUN SM. CAGE 1,950 SF ANIMALS GROOM TABLE 24x48 SELFWASH 320 SF DRYER EXISTING CAGE OUTDOOR CATS NEW CONCRETE CURB, DOG RUN SEE SECTION NEW LANDSCAPE HEDGE, SEE SECTION LARGE DOG DAY CARE 1,840 SF (TYP. ALONG PERIMETER) EXISTING STOREFRONT GLASS WALLS TO REMAIN EXISTINGEXISTING MAIN ENTRY LANDSCAPELANDSCAPE EXISTING WALKEXISTING COVERED WALKEXISTING WALKEXISTING COVERED WALK EXISTING COVERED WALK EXISTING LANDSCAPEEXISTING LANDSCAPE NORTH PHASE II FUTURE PLUMBING TIE IN 0 10'20'40' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FLOOR PLAN Page 403 of 729 EXISTING CMU WALLPROPOSED WHITE VINYL FENCE EXISTING EXISTING FIRE LINE ASSEMBLY DUMPSTER EXISTING EXISTING FIRE LINE ASSEMBLY EXISTING LOCATION ACCESS TO LINE OF EXISTING EXISTING DUMPSTER COMMON CANOPY ABOVE ELECTRICAL LOCATION CORRIDORLINE OF EXISTING ROOM CANOPY ABOVE 11' EXISTING CONCRETE CURBING TO BE REMOVED 2'-2" 13'-10"7' EXISTING DOORS TO BE CLOSED UP NEW 6' HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE, SEE SECTION NEW LANDSCAPE HEDGE TO MATCH ADJACENT AREAS (RED TIP COCOPLUM - 3 GAL. 18"x15", 24" O.C.) EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY NEW 6' HIGH WHITE VINYL FENCE (NON-TANSPARENT). W/ POSTS AT 8' O.C. SET IN CONCRETE BASE NEW 8" HIGH CONCRETE CURB 3 NEW 1-1/2" THICK ARTIFICIAL GRASS (PET GRASS) OVER " LAYER OF 4 SHARP SAND OVER NEW LAYER OF WEED SUPPRESSING MEMBRANE MILL EXISTING ASPHALT, COMBINED WITH CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE FOR BASE LAYER (COMPACTED) EXISTING 8" SUBGRADEEXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING UNDERGROUND WATER METER AND SERVICE LINE TO REMAIN NEW CONCRETE CURB, SEE SECTION NEW LANDSCAPE HEDGE, SEE SECTION EXISTING CONCRETE FENCE IS SETBACK 53' FROM EAST CURBING TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE AND 420' FROM NORTH PL. FENCE IS EDGE OF DOG RUN 287'225'2*5816(&7,21 THRU NEW CURB, SITE FENCE, AND ARTIFICIAL TURF N.T.S. EXISTING STOREFRONT GLASS DOOR AND WALL TO REMAIN. EXISTING EXISTING LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE EXISTING WALKEXISTING COVERED WALK EXISTING WALKEXISTING COVERED WALK NORTH EXISTING LANDSCAPE EXISTING LANDSCAPE 0 10'20'40' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" DEMOLITION / SITE PLAN Page 404 of 729 Page 405 of 729 Page 406 of 729 Page 407 of 729 Page 408 of 729 Page 409 of 729 Page 410 of 729 Page 411 of 729 Page 412 of 729 Page 413 of 729 Page 414 of 729 Page 415 of 729 Page 416 of 729 Boynton Village & Town Center MPMD 15-002 Staff Report Memorandum No. 15-009 Page 2 Acreage: 106.499-acres Adjacent Uses: North: Right-of-way for the Boynton Canal (C-16), then farther north is the Renaissance Commons mixed use development, zoned SMU (Suburban Mixed Use); South: Right-of-way for Old Boynton Road, then farther south is a mix of multi- family and single-family residential, zoned R-3 and R1-AA and commercial development (Oakwood Square shopping center), zoned C-3 (Community Commercial); East: Right-of-way for the Lake Worth Drainage District (E-4) Canal, then farther east is single-family residential (Sky Lake), zoned R1-AA (Single- Family Residential); and West: Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, then farther west are developed commercial properties, zoned C-3 (Community Commercial). BACKGROUND BR Cortina Acquisitions, LLC is requesting a Master Plan Modification to the Boynton Village & Town Center Master Plan to designate the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center for 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes (see “Exhibit A” – Location Map). The property is a former dairy farm that received land use amendment and rezoning approval in 2005. The portion of the property containing the Target and Best Buy stores was zoned C-3, Community Commercial, and the balance of the site was zoned SMU, Suburban Mixed Use, and approved with a corresponding master plan for development. Staff requested a master plan for the entire site, as the interconnectivity and shared amenities warranted a comprehensive review of the 106 acres. The original master plan depicted 405,328 square feet of commercial space (retail, restaurant, & office) plus 1,120 dwelling units. A Master Plan Modification (MPMD 12-003) request was approved on July 17, 2012 to redesign the Cortina portion of the site from 458 townhomes to 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single-family detached homes, including the relocation and re-sizing of the park land dedication. Most recently, a Master Plan Modification (MPMD 15-001) was submitted to amend a 0.42-acre portion of SMU Parcel #5 from 16 townhomes to a four (4) story, 24,000 square foot mixed use building with medical uses on the first two (2) floors and four (4) dwelling units on each of the next two (2) floors. Chapter 2, Article II, Section 2. D. 6., Master Plans, of the Land Development Regulations states that changes in planned developments shall be processed through the Planning and Development Board and the City Commission. ANALYSIS The applicant is proposing to designate the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center (Cortina, WR-1 and WR-2) for 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single- family homes. These vacant parcels, listed as SMU Parcels 1, 2 and 3 on the Master Plan are currently designated for 646 condominiums, 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single- Page 417 of 729 Boynton Village & Town Center MPMD 15-002 Staff Report Memorandum No. 15-009 Page 3 family homes. As currently designated and as proposed under this amendment, there would be a total of 1,108 dwelling units contemplated to be constructed on these parcels (no increase in the total number of dwelling units). The original Master Plan approval was subject to a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service) designation for the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road intersection. A CRALLS designation is a tool utilized by Palm Beach County under their Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) review of projects, when there is not adequate right-of-way for intersection expansion to accommodate additional turn lanes and/or longer vehicle stacking for those turn lanes. The County required other on and off-site improvements to assist with improved vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian movement facilitation, including the construction of the 3 and 5 lane segments of Old Boynton Road from Congress Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, the continuation of Renaissance Commons Boulevard across the C-16 Canal and connecting with Old Boynton Road, the widening of Gateway Boulevard from Congress to High Ridge Road to 6 lanes, and the construction of the greenway path along the E-4 and C-16 canals. All of these improvements have been completed with the exception of the greenway path, which is to be constructed during the development of the Cortina portion of the site. The applicant submitted an updated traffic study to Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering who has reviewed the study and determined the proposed changes meet the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) and note that all previously approved TPS conditions and mitigation conditions related to the original CRALLS approval that may not have been completed, remain applicable. As noted above, the proposed amendment to the master plan would keep the number of dwelling units the same as existing master plan (1,108), with the townhome component being eliminated, the single-family detached homes increased from 80 to 115, two (2) additional apartments and three (3) fewer condominium units. There are no changes proposed to the commercial portion of the master plan. Staff considers the modifications to the approved master plan to be non-substantial. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Division recommends that this request for Master Plan Modification be considered non-substantial, and approved subject to the comments included in “Exhibit C” - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\ Master Plan\MPMD 15-002\Staff Report MPMD 15-002.doc Page 418 of 729 EXHIBIT A BOYNTON VILLAGE AND TOWN CENTER (MPMD) Montoro Way Old Boynton Rd ¯ 062.1525250375500 Page 419 of 729 Feet Page 420 of 729 Page 421 of 729 Page 422 of 729 Page 423 of 729 Page 424 of 729 DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: Boynton Village & Town Center (MPMD 15-002) APPLICANT’S AGENT: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc. AGENT’S ADDRESS: 2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, FL 33431 DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 17, 2015 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Master Plan Modification to the Boynton Village & Town Center development to amend the previous approvals for the vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center from 646 condominiums, 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single- family homes, to 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: NE corner of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO. ________ THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City’s Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ___ HAS ___ HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit “D” with notation “Included”. 4. The Applicant’s application for relief is hereby ___ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. ___ DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other ____________________________________________________________ DATED:__________________________ __________________________________________ City Clerk S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plans\MPMD 15-002\DO.doc Page 425 of 729 Page 426 of 729 Page 427 of 729 Page 428 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 2 Commons mixed use development, zoned SMU (Suburban Mixed Use); South: On the east side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, the south property line abuts Old Boynton Road and farther south are single and multi-family homes, zoned R1-AA and R-3 respectively. On the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, the south property line abuts commercial development within Boynton Village & Town Center, zoned SMU (Suburban Mixed Use); East: Right-of-way for the Lake Worth Drainage District (E-4) Canal, then farther east is single-family residential (Sky Lake), zoned R1-AA (Single-Family Residential); and West: Developed commercial buildings within Boynton Village & Town Center, then farther west is right-of-way for Congress Avenue and the Boynton Beach Mall. Site Details: The project site is a vacant 45.2-acreportion of the 106.499-acre Boynton Village & Town Center master planned development, which has approval for 646 condominiums, 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single-family homes. BACKGROUND Proposal: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc., representing BR Cortina Acquisitions, LLC, is proposing to construct 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes on the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center (Cortina, WR-1 and WR-2), and related site improvements. The property is a former dairy farm that received land use amendment and rezoning approval in 2005. The portion of the property containing the Target and Best Buy stores was zoned C-3, Community Commercial, and the balance of the site was zoned SMU, Suburban Mixed Use, and approved with a corresponding master plan for development. Staff requested a master plan for the entire site, as the interconnectivity and shared amenities warranted a comprehensive review of the 106.499 acres. The original master plan depicted 405,328 square feet of commercial space (retail, restaurant, & office) plus 1,120 dwelling units. A Master Plan Modification (MPMD 12-003) request was approved on July 17, 2012 to redesign the Cortina portion of the site from 458 townhomes to 34 townhomes, 348 apartments and 80 single-family detached homes, including the relocation and re- sizing of the park land dedication. Most recently, a Master Plan Modification (MPMD 15-001) was submitted to amend a 0.42-acre portion of SMU Parcel #5 from 16 townhomes to a four (4) story, 24,000 square foot mixed use building with medical uses on the first two (2) floors and four (4) dwelling units on each of the next two (2) floors. The original Master Plan approval was subject to a CRALLS (Constrained Roadway At Lower Level of Service) designation for the Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road intersection. A CRALLS designation is a tool utilized by Palm Beach County under their Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) review of projects, when there is not adequate right-of-way for intersection expansion to accommodate additional turn lanes and/or longer vehicle stacking for those turn lanes. The County required other on and off-site improvements to assist with improved vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian movement facilitation, including the construction of Page 429 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 3 the 3 and 5 lane segments of Old Boynton Road from Congress Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, the continuation of Renaissance Commons Boulevard across the C-16 Canal and connecting with Old Boynton Road, the widening of Gateway Boulevard from Congress to High Ridge Road to 6 lanes, and the construction of the greenway path along the E-4 and C-16 canals. All of these improvements have been completed with the exception of the greenway path, which is to be constructed during the proposed improvements associated with this application. ANALYSIS Concurrency: Traffic: The applicant submitted an updated traffic study to Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering who has reviewed the study and determined the proposed changes meet the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) and note that all previously approved TPS conditions and mitigation conditions related to the original CRALLS approval that may not have been completed, remain applicable. School: The applicant has applied for school concurrency determination with the School Board of Palm Beach County. As of the preparation of this agenda item, the City has not received the determination in writing, so a condition of approval has been added that the approval of the project is subject to receipt of a concurrency approval letter from the School Board, and no permits shall be issued until its receipt. Utilities: The City’s water capacity, as increased through the purchase of up to 5 million gallons of potable water per day from Palm Beach County Utilities, would meet the projected potable water for this project. Sufficient sanitary sewer and wastewater treatment capacity is also currently available to serve the project, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following site plan approval. Police / Fire: Staff reviewed the site plan and determined that current staffing levels would be sufficient to meet the expected demand for services. Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City’s review. The Engineering Division has found the conceptual information to be adequate and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review. Vehicular Access: As a master planned development, there are a number of ways to access the site, as well as cross-access through existing on and off-site developments. The Site Plan (Sheet SP-1) depicts points of access from Congress Avenue, Old Boynton Road and Gateway Boulevard (via Renaissance Commons Boulevard, through the Renaissance Commons development). More specific to the individual components of the project, the Site Plan depicts one point of vehicular ingress/egress for the single-family portion of the site, along the east side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, north of Old Boynton Road. The apartment portion of the site is proposed to haveone point of vehicular ingress/egress, along the east side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, as well as one egress only driveway just south of the C-16 Boynton Canal. The condominium portion of the siteis proposed to Page 430 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 4 have one point of vehicular ingress/egress, along the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, as well as a secondary point of ingress/egress on the west side of the condominiums, from the access drive located behind the commercial buildings facing Congress Avenue. Circulation: Vehicular circulation would include two-way circulation that continues throughout all areas of proposed development (single-family, apartments and condominiums), with the exception of the “exit only” driveway at the north end of the apartment complex, just south of the C-16 Boynton Canal. Adequate access and circulation is provided for emergency and solid waste vehicles. Perimeter pedestrian access is provided through the greenway path along the north and east sides of the development, on the sidewalk along Old Boynton Road to the south, and on the sidewalk along both sides of Renaissance Commons Boulevard through the heart of the development. Pedestrian crosswalks are also provided across Renaissance Commons Boulevard, connecting the proposed residential developments to the existing commercial components. Also within each residential component are sidewalks that link to the greenway, the sidewalks along each street, to the proposed park, and individual recreation facilities. Parking: The parking for this development was designed as part of a master design, with a table created on Sheet MSD depicting the amount of parking per parcel, as well as the entire development. The proposed single-family tract (SMU Parcel 1) proposes the construction of 115 homes. The code requires 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit, or 230 parking spaces, plus 5 parking spaces for the recreation facility, for a total of 235 spaces. The plan depicts the provision of 465 parking spaces (5 at the recreation amenity, 230 within individual garages and 230 in the driveways in front of the individual garages) an excess of 230 parking spaces. The apartment tract (SMU Parcel 2) proposes 350 dwelling units (152 one bedroom, 142 two bedroom, and 56 three bedroom units). Parking for apartments is based upon the number of bedrooms, one and one-half (1.5) parking spaces for one bedroom units and two (2) spaces for two (2) or more bedroom units. Based upon the calculations, 228 spaces are required for the one bedroom units and 396 spaces for all other units. There is also a calculation for guest parking of 0.15 spaces per unit, and based upon the 350 units, 53 guest parking spaces are required, as well as 5 parking spaces for the recreational amenity and 3 spaces for the leasing office. In total, 685 parking spaces are required and 696 are provided (98 within individual garages and 598 surface parking spaces) for an excess of 11 parking spaces. The condominium tract (SMU Parcel 3) proposes 643 dwelling units (293 one bedroom, 278 two bedroom, and 72 three bedroom units). As noted above, parking is based upon the number of bedrooms, one and one-half (1.5) parking spaces for one bedroom units and two (2) spaces for two (2) or more bedroom units. Based upon the calculations, 440 spaces are required for the one bedroom units and 700 spaces for all other units. There is also a calculation for guest parking of 0.15 spaces per unit, and based upon the 643 units, 97 guest parking spaces are required, as well as 5 parking spaces for the recreational amenity. In total, 1,242 parking spaces are required and 1,286 are provided (1,160 within the multi-level parking garages and 126 surface parking spaces) for an excess of 44 parking spaces. Page 431 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 5 All proposed parking stalls, including the size and location of the handicap space, were reviewed and approved by both the Engineering Division and Building Division. In addition, all necessary traffic control signage and pavement markings will be provided to clearly delineate areas on site and direction of circulation. Landscaping: The applicant has designed landscape plans consistent with the planting scheme of the developed portions of Boynton Village & Town Center, and has prepared individual plans for the park area, greenways, lake areas, Renaissance Commons Boulevard, and each of the residential components. The landscape plan for the park area depicts the use of Green Buttonwood, Orange Geiger, Live Oak and Cassia canopy trees and Bismark and Foxtail palm trees. Typical shrubs include Red Tip Cocoplum, Dwarf Firebush, Green Island Ficus and Simpson’s Stopper. The plan depicts the use of the Simpson’s Stopper shrub material around the fenced dog park portion of the overall park. Nearly all of the plant material proposed is listed as very drought tolerant. The greenway, twenty five feet wide along the north side of the property, along the C-16 Boynton Canal, and forty feet wide along the east side (LWDD E-4 Canal), have a meandering 8 foot wide walkway with pockets of plantings along each side.The landscape plan depicts the use of Orange Geiger, Live Oak, Mahogany and Cassia canopy trees, as well as Sabal palm trees. Again, nearly all of the plant material proposed is listed as very drought tolerant. There are two lake areas within the development, one large lake along the east boundary of the park area and a second, smaller lake within the proposed single-family portion of the development. Both are proposed to have upland and littoral plantings, which include the use of Pond Cypress, Red Maple and Slash Pine trees, Cocoplum, Wax Myrtle, Firebush, Saw Palmetto, Coontie, Fakahatchee Grass, Golden Canna and Spikerush plant materials. The landscape plan for the single-family portion of the development depicts the lining of the entrance drive at Renaissance Commons Boulevard with Royal Palm trees and a Senegal Date Palm at the terminus, the residential streets are lined with Live Oak trees, and the bermed landscape buffer against Old Boynton Road is designed to be a continuation of the landscape buffer abutting the commercial portion of the project immediately to the west, along Old Boynton Road. Three separate landscape designs are proposed for the single-family home lots to ensure there is not a uniform, monotonous planting scheme along each block of homes. The palette of landscape material to choose from includes Orange Geiger, White Geiger and Live Oak trees, as well as Coconut, Date and Foxtail palm trees, a variety of Crotons, Cocoplum, Podocarpus, Silver Buttonwood, Dwarf Schillings Holly and Green Island Ficus shrubs utilized in different planting schemes. Again, the plant material chosen is nearly all very drought tolerant. The proposed apartment complex is designed with a wide variety of landscape material, including Live Oak, Ligustrum, Orange Geiger, Crape Myrtle and Australian Tree Fern and Medjool, Royal, Christmas, Alexander and Coconut palm trees. A sampling of the shrubs proposed include Dwarf Allamanda, Variegated Shell Ginger, Red Sister Ti, Silver Buttonwood, Red Tip Cocoplum, Schefflera Trinette and Wax Jasmine, all moderate to very drought tolerant. The landscape plan for the condominium portion of the development depicts landscaping along the perimeter of the site, around the building foundation, within Page 432 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 6 the courtyard areas and in the surface parking areas. Proposed landscape material includes Live Oak, Ligustrum, Orange Geiger and Australian Tree Fern and Medjool, Royal, Christmas, Alexander, Thatch and Coconut palm trees. Some of the shrubs proposed include Dwarf Allamanda, Variegated Shell Ginger, Red Sister Ti, Wild Coffee, Red Tip Cocoplum, Podocarpus and Dwarf Firebush, all moderate to very drought tolerant. Building and Site: The detached single-family portion of the development is located in the southeast quadrant of the site, bordered on the south by Old Boynton Road, the east by the LWDD E-4 Canal and the west by Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The approximately 20-acre parcel is proposed to contain 115 single-family detached homes, 53 of which border one of the two lakes within the development and 37 of which back up to the 40 foot wide greenway and canal. There is a small recreation area solely for the single-family residents, consisting of a pool, cabana and play area adjacent to the lake. The apartment complex is located immediately north of the single-family development, bordered on the north by the C-16 Boynton Canal, the east by the LWDD E-4 Canal and the west by Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The 14.4 acre parcel is proposed to contain 350 dwelling units within a total of seven (7) buildings. The applicant proposes three (3) types of buildings, all four stories in height, and each containing either 42, 46, or 54 units. The buildings are situated around the clubhouse and leasing building, pool and play area. The City park, including the proposed dog park, and the larger lake are situated between the apartments and single-family homes. The Condominiums are proposed on an approximately 10-acre parcel located on the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard, immediate south of the C-16 Boynton Canal, and east of, and behind the northernmost commercial portion of Boynton Village & Town Center that fronts on Congress Avenue. The 643 dwelling units are split between two (2) six-story buildings, with 384 units located in the north building and 259 in the south building. The buildings are separated by a two- way drive that connects from Congress Avenue to Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The drive has parallel parking on each side and is the access point to the fully wrapped parking garages for each building. The recreation clubhouse and pool for the condominiums are located immediately east of the southernmost condominium building, along Renaissance Commons Boulevard. Building Height: Three (3) different models of detached single-family homes are proposed. All three would be two-story structures, with the height to the ridge line of the roofs varying between 27’ – 4” and 28’ – 0”, below the maximum allowed height of 35 feet. As noted previously, the applicant proposes three (3) types of apartment buildings, all four stories in height. The buildings are identically designed other than the number of units in each. Each of the three (3) types of buildings have the roof deck at 36’ – 8” in height with the typical parapet height at 40’ – 8” and the roof top of the stairwell at 44’ – 8”, below the 55 feet in height allowed by right within the SMU (Suburban Mixed Use) zoning district (Sheets A3.01 I, II & III). Additionally, the building setbacks comply with the Height Setback Envelope requirement that the multi-family structures setback three (3) times the building height from single-family Page 433 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 7 zoned property (separation in excess of 200 feet / 135 feet minimum required). The two (2) condominium buildings are proposed at six-stories and designed identically, other than building footprint and number of units. Both buildings are proposed with a roof deck at 60 feet in height, with the tallest parapet at 65 feet in height and the top of the stairwell roof at 71 feet, below the 75 feet in height maximum allowed within the SMU (Suburban Mixed Use) zoning district. However, buildings over 55 feet in height within the SMU district require conditional use approval, which the applicant has applied for (COUS 15-002). The applicant has prepared responses to the w7XERHEVHWJSV)ZEPYEXMRK'SRHMXMSREP and they are attached as Exhibit “C”. In summarizing the standards and 9WIWx applicant responses, staff focused on the pertinent criteria associated with the necessity for conditional use approval (height, and related topics; setbacks, screening/buffering, and general compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the zoning district). Relative to the requested height of 71 feet, the site was previously approved for six-story buildings with a height of 75 feet (COUS 06- 007). Since the conditional use approval is tied to a specific project and design, the previous City approval is not applicable to the most recent submittal. As previously noted, the typical parapet roof height is 65 feet, 10 feet below the maximum allowed within the zoning district through conditional use approval, but the top of the stairwell tower is where the height is measured (71 feet), even though the tower only occupies minimal square footage of the overall roof top. The applicant notes that the buildings are somewhat centrally located within the development, with commercial buildings to the west and south, Renaissance Commons Boulevard to the east, and farther east are the four-story apartment buildings. The greatest impact would be to the north. The north condominium building has a staggered setback, with the closest point being approximately 45 feet from the north property line, and an approximately 210 foot wide canal right-of-way further separating the condominium building from buildings within Renaissance Commons. Across the canal are two (2) rows of three-story townhomes (Firenze), constructed at a height of approximately 40 feet at the roof ridgeline. Just beyond the townhomes is a four-story condominium building (San Raphael), constructed at a height of slightly over 50 feet. The applicant also notes that “The buildings will be landscaped with a multi-level plant list which will provide tall vertical trees as well as intermediate and understory plantings that will aid in breaking up the mass of the proposed buildings”. The applicant also notes there is a proposed 25 foot wide greenway along the north property line and that the greenway will also have…….”multi-level plantings which will provide an additional screen along the north property line” and………..”minimize the visual impact across the canal”. Regarding the economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, the applicant states “The vacant parcels are residential parcels that will provide new residents to the area that will support the nearby retail/office/restaurant uses. Development of the residential will increase the tax base, provide recreation opportunities, and contribute to sustaining business in the general area”. Staff has reviewed the project and all of the standards for evaluating a conditional use application and believe the standards are met and adequate mitigation of any possible off site impacts has been provided within the project design. Design: As previously noted, the detached single-family homes are proposed to have three Page 434 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 8 (3) different models, all of which would be two-stories tall. The models appear to have some “old Florida” design influences with the front porches, craftsman style porch columns and metal roofs, as well as some “Mediterranean revival” influences with a few arched openings and arched windows and stucco walls, and both styles fit nicely into the south Florida architectural landscape. According to the “Material/Color Legend”, the walls of the homes will be textured stucco, painted in a variety of Sherwin-Williams colors (and )\XVE;LMXI(SGOWMHI&PYI&ERERE ), with an assortment of trim colors (, 'VIEQ6YWLMRK6MZIV7TMGIH'MHIV , and ). The roofs will consist of a 6IWXSVEXMSR-ZSV])\XVE;LMXI6S]GVEJX&VEWW standing seam metal material, painted )ZIVKPEHI1SWW7PEXI&PYIERH'SPSRMEP The three models have floor areas of 2,091, 2,352 and 2,497 square feet 6IH under air, with a typical lot size of 45 feet by 90 feet and slight variations for corner parcels. All models have a two (2) car garage with two (2) parking spaces in the driveway. The apartment complex has a modern style of architecture, with clean lines and repeating features, window and balcony symmetry and parapet type roof. As previously noted, the apartments are four-stories in height with one, two and three bedroom units. According to the “Material Schedule”, the building walls are proposed as textured stucco, with segments of stucco siding, painted white, beige and dark gold (Sherwin-Williams and ). The %RXMUYI;LMXI&PSRHI1ERRIVIH+SPH trim is proposed to be white in color (), with the Bahama shutters and 'VIEQ] railings painted black. The condominiums are arranged in two buildings, six stories in height, wrapping their associate parking garages, and located on the west side of Renaissance Commons Boulevard. The architectural style mimics that of the apartment buildings described in the paragraph above. The colors are applied in the same manner and the building materials are the same as those proposed for the apartment complex. As such, the north end of the Boynton Village and Town Center development will be presented as a unified project along both sides of Renaissance Commons Boulevard. Public Art: The original approvals for these remaining vacant parcel occurred prior to the adoption of the Art in Public Places ordinance and became vested through permit issuance. As the applications do not intensify the original approvals and actually slightly reduce the number of residential units, staff has determined no additional arts fees are due. Site Lighting: All portions of the project are designed with site lighting that meets the City’s lighting/illumination requirements. The applicant is utilizing a traditional FPL post top fixture throughout the project, similar to a coach light, black in color, and mounted on a fiberglass pole. These same fixtures are proposed along the north and east greenways and are proposed at heights between 18 and 20 feet to be compatible with the residential nature of the project and the developments across the canals. The fixtures are proposed to be shielded to eliminate any light trespass and minimize any external impacts off the property. The light poles on the top floor of the garages of the condominiums have been limited to 15 feet in height, to again limit any external impacts. The parapet roof around the building should shield these fixtures from view. Page 435 of 729 Staff Report – Cortina (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) Memorandum No PZ 15-010 Page 9 Signage: Preliminary entry wall signs have been submitted for each portion of the overall project. Any wall signage or other signs would be required to comply with the adopted Sign Program for Boynton Village & Town Center. RECOMMENDATION The Development Application Review Team (DART) has reviewed this request for major site plan modification/conditional use approval and recommends approval contingent upon approval of the accompanying master plan modification and satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit “D” – Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plan\MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002\Staff Report.doc Page 436 of 729 EXHIBIT A BOYNTON VILLAGE AND TOWN CENTER (MSPM) ¯ 062.5125250375500 Page 437 of 729 Feet Page 438 of 729 Page 439 of 729 Page 440 of 729 Page 441 of 729 4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]W Page 442 of 729 &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE 'SZIV7LIIX 4PERX0MWX (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]@+VIIR[E]W0ERHWGETI4PER4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]H[K 6)2%-77%2') '311327&0:( 4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]W &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 443 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]@+VIIR[E]W0ERHWGETI4PER4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]H[K ;67194%6')0 '%2%0 '%2%0 4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]W Page 444 of 729 &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]@+VIIR[E]W0ERHWGETI4PER4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]H[K '%2%0 '%2%0 4IVMQIXIV+VIIR[E]W Page 445 of 729 &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE 0ERHWGETI4PER &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 446 of 729 'SZIV7LIIX 4PERX0MWX (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@8[SQMHVMWIFYMPHMRK4EVGIP@0ERHWGETI4PER1MHVMWIH[K &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 447 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@8[SQMHVMWIFYMPHMRK4EVGIP@0ERHWGETI4PER1MHVMWIH[K &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 448 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@8[SQMHVMWIFYMPHMRK4EVGIP@0ERHWGETI4PER1MHVMWIH[K &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 449 of 729 'SZIV7LIIX 4PERX0MWX (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@1YPXM*EQMP]6IRXEP@1YPXM*EQMP]0ERHWGETI4PERH[K &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 450 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@1YPXM*EQMP]6IRXEP@1YPXM*EQMP]0ERHWGETI4PERH[K &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 451 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@1YPXM*EQMP]6IRXEP@1YPXM*EQMP]0ERHWGETI4PERH[K Page 452 of 729 &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE 'SZIV7LIIX 4PERX0MWX (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@7MRKPIJEQMP]@0ERHWGETI4PER7MRKPI*EQMP]H[K 6)2%-77%2')'311327&390):%6( () '%2%0 &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 453 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@7MRKPIJEQMP]@0ERHWGETI4PER7MRKPI*EQMP]H[K 9) 9) 01) () () () () '%2%0 &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 454 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@7MRKPIJEQMP]@0ERHWGETI4PER7MRKPI*EQMP]H[K ) &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 455 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@7MRKPIJEQMP]@0ERHWGETI4PER7MRKPI*EQMP]H[K &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 456 of 729 'SZIV7LIIX 4PERX0MWX (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@4EVOERH0EOI8VEGX@0ERHWGETI4PER4EVOERH0EOI8VEGXH[K &S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE Page 457 of 729 0ERHWGETI4PER (VE[MRKREQI,@.3&7@&S]RXSR:MPPEKIC@./1(IZIPSTIVWC0%C@(VE[MRKW@0ERHWGETI4PER@4EVOERH0EOI8VEGX@0ERHWGETI4PER4EVOERH0EOI8VEGXH[K Page 458 of 729 Page 459 of 729 Page 460 of 729 2 1%6/()7'6-48-32(%8) 6)%6)0):%8-32 7'%0)! *6328)0):%8-32 7'%0)! ./1(IZIPSTIVW 2;&SGE6EXSR&PZH &SGE6EXSR*PSVMHE [[[NOQHIZIPSTIVWGSQ 0)*8)2()0):%8-326-+,8)2()0):%8-32 7'%0)!7'%0)! .3&291&)6 7'%0)%7238)( -779)(%8) 4)61-8(%8) &-((%8) (6%;2&= 1; ',)'/)(&= %6',-8)'896) (-7'-40-2) &9-0(-2+8=4)- )0):%8-327 40%28=4) %'- 7,))8 291&)6 Page 461 of 729 +)2)6%0238)7 1-2-191*-2*0336)0):%8-32!2+:( &9-0(-2+77,%00&))59-44)(;-8,%2%9831%8-'746-2/0)6 7=78)14)6*7 6(6( 6(6( 3''94%2'=+63946 6)7-()28-%0 *&'7)' 2 8=4)---&'327869'8-32 *&' '6&6%%%6%' 8%&0) 7836= 746-2/0)6)( 1%6/()7'6-48-32(%8) %' ;(;(;( ;, %' ;, ;( %'%'%' ;,;,;, ;(;(;( ;( (;(; (; %08*-6)*-6)6-7)6 6-7)603'%8-3203'%8-32 ;(;( (;(; ;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;( %'%'%'%' ;,;,;,;, %'%'%'%' ;,;,;,;, ;(;(86%7,;(;( &6&6%%6%%6&& 6(6(6(6( 0IZIPW *PSSV4PER 6(6( 6(6( ./1(IZIPSTIVW 2;&SGE6EXSR&PZH &SGE6EXSR*PSVMHE [[[NOQHIZIPSTIVWGSQ '6&6%6%%6%' ;(;(;(;( %' ;, %'%'%'%' ;,;,;,;, ;(;(;(;( ;( (;(; (; *-6)6-7)6 03'%8-32 %08*-6) 6-7)603'%8-32 7034)(2&-'='0)6%'/7034)(2 1%<1%< 8=4 7836%+)36%08)0):7836%+)36%08 7836%+)7836%+)7836%+)7836%+) )0): 1%', )0)'86-'6331)0)'86-'6331 ;( ;( ;(;( %'%' ;,;, 1-2 &6& +%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+)+%6%+) .3&291&)6 7'%0)%7238)( 6(6(6(6( -779)(%8) 4)61-8(%8) &-((%8) 0IZIP*PSSV4PER (6%;2&= 8=4-'%08=4) !1; ',)'/)(&= %6',-8)'896) (-7'-40-2) -&9-0(-2+ 40%28=4) 7,))8 %- 291&)6 +6377&0(+%6)%!7* Page 462 of 729 <7'944)6 4%6%4)88=4 <7'944)6 6( 6( <7'944)6 <7'944)6 6( 6( 2 1%6/()7'6-48-32(%8) 68978=468978=4 6(6( 6(6( <7'944)6<7'944)6<7'944)6<7'944)6<7'944)6 <7'944)6 6SSJ4PER 6(6( 6(6( ./1(IZIPSTIVW 2;&SGE6EXSR&PZH &SGE6EXSR*PSVMHE [[[NOQHIZIPSTIVWGSQ '6&6%%%6%' %' ;(;(;( ;, %' ;, ;( %'%'%' ;,;,;, ;(;(;( ;( (;(; (; %08*-6)*-6)6-7)6 6-7)603'%8-3203'%8-32 ;( ;((;(; ;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;( %'%'%'%' ;,;,;,;, %'%'%'%' ;,;,;,;, ;(;(86%7,;(;( &6&6%%6%%6&& .3&291&)6 7'%0)%7238)( 6(6(6(6( -779)(%8) 4)61-8(%8) &-((%8) 0IZIP*PSSV4PER (6%;2&= 8=4-'%08=4) 1; ',)'/)(&= %6',-8)'896) (-7'-40-2) -&9-0(-2+ 40%28=4) 7,))8%- 291&)6 Page 463 of 729 2 1%6/()7'6-48-32(%8) &&' 0SFF]&&&% 0SFF]'%%&& *6328 )%78 )0):%8-32 7'%0)! &&' &&&% '%%&& 6)%6 ;)78 )0):%8-32 7'%0)! ./1(IZIPSTIVW 2;&SGE6EXSR&PZH &SGE6EXSR*PSVMHE [[[NOQHIZIPSTIVWGSQ +EVEKI)RXV] & ' '&%% '&& 0)*8 7398, )0):%8-32 7'%0)! .3&291&)6 7'%0)%7238)( -779)(%8) 4)61-8(%8) &-((%8) (6%;2&= 1; ',)'/)(&= %6',-8)'896) (-7'-40-2) +EVEKI)RXV] & ' %%&' &&' 40%28=4) 6-+,8 2368, )0):%8-32 7,))8%'-: 291&)6 7'%0)! Page 464 of 729 %'%'%' ;,;,;, ,;,; %'%'%'%'%' '%'% ;,;,;,;,;, ;(;(;( 2 (;;((;;((;(; ;(;(;(;( ;((; (;(;(;(;(; ,;;((; '%%' ;, 1%6/()7'6-48-32(%8) ;(;((;;(;((;;(;((;;(;((; ;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;( %'%'%'%'%'%'%'%'%'%'%'%' ;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;, 86%7, +6))274%') 86%7, &-'='0)6%'/ 8=4 8-)66%14 ,; '% ;( 8=48=48=48=4 (; %' ;, 8=4 ./1(IZIPSTIVW 2;&SGE6EXSR&PZH 8-)6 +6%()0):)0 $74%')7 &SGE6EXSR*PSVMHE [[[NOQHIZIPSTIVWGSQ 838%04%6/-2+!74%')7 +6))274%') 3''94%2'=+63946 6)7-()28-%0 *&'7)' ,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,; '%'%'%'%'%'%'%'%'%'%'% (;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(; (;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(;(; 8=4)-&'327869'8-32 *&' 8%&0) .3&291&)6 7836= 746-2/0)6)( 7'%0)%7238)( (;%'-779)(%8) ;, 4)61-8(%8) ;(;((;;( (;(; (;(;(; ;(;((;(;(;;(! &-((%8) (;(;(; ,;,;,;,;,; %' '%'%'%'%'% ;, ,;,;,; '%'%'% (6%;2&= 1; ',)'/)(&= %6',-8)'896) (-7'-40-2) 40%28=4) 7,))8 %-: +6377&0(+%6)%!7* 291&)6 Page 465 of 729 +)2)6%0238)7 1-2-191*-2*0336)0):%8-32!2+:( &9-0(-2+77,%00&))59-44)(;-8,%2%9831%8-'746-2/0)6 7=78)14)6*7 %00463437)((;)00-2+92-877,%00&)79&.)'883*,%6)59-6)1)287 1-2-1914%6/-2+()'/:)68-'%0'0)%6%2')! 4%6/-2+7869'896)77,%00&))2'037)(%2(1)',%2-'%00= :)28-0%8)(4)6*&'6)59-6)1)287 ,;,; %'%'%' '%'%%00'31132%1)2-8=%6)%77,%00&)'0%77-*-)(%7%%77)1&0=97) ;,;,;, 2 (; ;(;(;(;( (;;( (;(;(; 4)6*&'7)' %00633*(6%-277,%00&)-28)62%0838,)&0(+ (;;, %';(%' ;, 1%6/()7'6-48-32(%8) 3''94%2'=+639466)7-()28-%0 *&'7)' 8=4)-&'327869'8-32 *&'8%&0) 7836= 746-2/0)6)( ;(;((;;(;((; ;(;(;(;(;(;( %'%'%'%'%'%' ;,;,;,;,;,;, 86%7, &-'='0)6%'/ 8=4 8-)66%14 ;, %' ;( 8=48=48=48=4 (; %' ;, ./1(IZIPSTIVW 2;&SGE6EXSR&PZH &SGE6EXSR*PSVMHE [[[NOQHIZIPSTIVWGSQ 8-)6$74%')7 838%04%6/-2+!74%')7 8=4 ,;,;,,;;,;,; '%'%''%%'%'% (;(;((;;(;(; (;(;((;;(;(; .3&291&)6 7'%0)%7238)( %'(;-779)(%8) ;, 4)61-8(%8) (;(;;( (; (;(;(;(; &-((%8) ,; %'%'%' '% ;,;,;, ! (6%;2&= 1; ',)'/)(&= %6',-8)'896) (-7'-40-2) 40%28=4) 7,))8 +6377&0(+%6)%!7*%: 291&)6 Page 466 of 729 Page 467 of 729 Page 468 of 729 Page 469 of 729 Page 470 of 729 Page 471 of 729 Page 472 of 729 Page 473 of 729 Page 474 of 729 Page 475 of 729 Page 476 of 729 Page 477 of 729 Page 478 of 729 Page 479 of 729 DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PROJECT NAME: Boynton Village & Town Center (MSPM 15-004/COUS 15-002) APPLICANT’S AGENT: Michael Covelli, Covelli Design Associates, Inc. AGENT’S ADDRESS: 2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, FL 33431 DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: March 17, 2015 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Major site plan modification/conditional use approval to construct 643 condominiums, 350 apartments and 115 single-family homes on the remaining vacant tracts within Boynton Village & Town Center (Cortina, WR-1 and WR-2), and related site improvements. LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Boynton Village & Town Center – SMU Parcels 1, 2 and 3, the vacant tracts located along Renaissance Commons Boulevard, between Old Boynton Road and the C-16 Boynton Canal. DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHED HERETO. ________ THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City’s Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant ___ HAS ___ HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit “D” with notation “Included”. 4. The Applicant’s application for relief is hereby ___ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. ___ DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order. 7. Other ____________________________________________________________ DATED:__________________________ __________________________________________ City Clerk S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village & Town Center\Master Plans\MSPM 15-004 COUS 15-002\DO.doc Page 480 of 729 Page 481 of 729 Page 482 of 729 Page 483 of 729 Page 484 of 729 Page 485 of 729 Page 486 of 729 Page 487 of 729 Page 488 of 729 Exhibit ‘A’ Location Map: Portion of Lake Drive Page 489 of 729 Page 490 of 729 Page 491 of 729 Page 492 of 729 Page 493 of 729 Page 494 of 729 Page 495 of 729 Page 496 of 729 Page 497 of 729 Page 498 of 729 Page 499 of 729 Page 500 of 729 Page 501 of 729 Page 502 of 729 Page 503 of 729 Page 504 of 729 Page 505 of 729 Page 506 of 729 Page 507 of 729 Page 508 of 729 Page 509 of 729 Page 510 of 729 Page 511 of 729 Page 512 of 729 Page 513 of 729 Page 514 of 729 Page 515 of 729 Page 516 of 729 Page 517 of 729 Page 518 of 729 Page 519 of 729 Page 520 of 729 Page 521 of 729 Page 522 of 729 Page 523 of 729 Page 524 of 729 Page 525 of 729 Page 526 of 729 Page 527 of 729 Page 528 of 729 Page 529 of 729 Page 530 of 729 Page 531 of 729 Page 532 of 729 Page 533 of 729 Page 534 of 729 Page 535 of 729 Page 536 of 729 Page 537 of 729 Page 538 of 729 Page 539 of 729 Page 540 of 729 Page 541 of 729 Page 542 of 729 Page 543 of 729 Page 544 of 729 Page 545 of 729 Page 546 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Boynton Beach, Florida GAI Project Number: A132321.01 January 2015 Prepared for: City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department 124 E Woolbright Road Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Prepared by: GAI Consultants, Inc. Boca Raton Office 2255 Glades Road, Suite 324A Boca Raton, Florida 33431 A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 547 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page i Boynton Beach, Florida Table of Contents 1.0Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2Statutory History .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3Purpose and Objectives ................................................................................................ 1 2.0Existing Water Supply Facilities ............................................................................................... 2 2.1Service Area Boundaries ............................................................................................... 2 2.1.1Potable Service Area Boundary ......................................................................... 2 2.1.2Reuse Service Area Boundary ........................................................................... 2 2.1.3Self-Supplied Systems ...................................................................................... 2 2.2Water Supply Sources and Facilities .............................................................................. 5 2.2.1Surficial Well.................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2Aquifer Storage and Recovery ........................................................................... 5 2.2.3Floridan Wells .................................................................................................. 7 2.2.4Reclaimed Water ............................................................................................. 7 2.2.5Bulk User Agreements and Other User Agreements ............................................ 8 2.3Water Treatment and Storage Facilities ......................................................................... 8 2.3.1East Water Treatment Plant .............................................................................. 8 2.3.2West Water Treatment Plant ............................................................................ 9 2.3.3Water Storage Facilities .................................................................................... 9 2.4Water Distribution System ............................................................................................ 9 2.4.1Interconnections ............................................................................................ 10 2.5Summary .................................................................................................................. 14 3.0Population and Water Demand Projections ............................................................................. 15 3.1Historical Population Information ................................................................................ 15 3.2Historical Water Use Information ................................................................................ 15 3.3Population Projections ................................................................................................ 15 3.3.1Existing Service Area ...................................................................................... 16 3.3.2Potential Impacts on Service Area Population .................................................. 16 3.4Water Demand Projections ......................................................................................... 17 3.4.1Projections in the Existing Service Area ........................................................... 17 3.4.2Projections in the Proposed Service Area ......................................................... 17 3.5Water Conservation ................................................................................................... 17 3.6Water Demand Supply Analysis ................................................................................ 21 4.0Water Supply Projects Identification ...................................................................................... 27 4.1Water Supply Projects Update .................................................................................... 27 4.1.1Wellfield Interconnection Project Raw Water Main......................................... 27 4.1.2Wellfield Interconnection Project Ionic Exchange Water Treatment Process Located at the East WTP .......................................... 28 4.1.3East WTP Rehabilitation Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule ........................... 29 4.1.4East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency 3MG Storage Tank ......................................... 29 4.1.5Expansion of Reclaimed Water System to Achieve 8 MGD ................................. 30 4.1.6Other Water Supply Projects Beyond Five Years ............................................... 31 4.2Summary .................................................................................................................. 31 A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 548 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page ii Boynton Beach, Florida LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Raw Water Wells ......................................................................................................... 6 Table 2-2 Description of ASR and FAS Wells ................................................................................. 7 Table 2-3 ..................................................................... 8 Table 2-4 Interconnections with Other Entities ........................................................................... 10 Table 2-5 Current Average Day Potable Water Production Capabilities .......................................... 14 Table 3-1 Historical Population for the City ................................................................................. 15 Table 3-2 ............................................................. 15 Table 3-3 ......................................................... 16 Table 3-4 Water Demand Projection for t ....................................... 19 Table 3-5 ..................................... 20 Table 3-6Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) Existing Service Area ......................................................................... 22 Table 3-7Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals Existing Service Area... 23 Table 3-8Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) with Maximum ASR Withdrawals Existing Service Area ................ 24 Table 3-9Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) Proposed Service Area ...................................................................... 25 Table 3-10Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals Proposed Service Area ................. 26 Table 4-1 Summary of Wellfield Interconnection Project - Raw Water Main .................................. 28 Table 4-2 Summary of Ionic Exchange, Water Treatment Located at the East WTP Plant .............. 29 Table 4-3 Summary of East WTP Rehabilitation Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule .................... 29 Table 4-4 Summary of East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency 3MG Storage Tank ..................................................... 30 Table 4-5 Summary of Expansion of Reuse Water System Project ................................................ 30 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1The City of Boynton Beach Utility Service Area ............................................................... 3 Figure 2-2Existing and Proposed Reclaimed Water Service System ................................................. 4 Figure 2-3Aerial View of East Water Treatment Plant .................................................................. 11 Figure 2-4Aerial View of West Water Treatment Plant ................................................................. 12 Figure 2-5 .................................................................................... 13 APPENDICES Appendix A Second Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach for the Purchase and Sale of Bulk Potable Water Appendix B City of Boynton Beach Utility Improvement Plan 5-Year Plan with Project Budget and Funding Source . © 2015 GAI Consultants, Inc A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 549 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 1 Boynton Beach, Florida 1.0Introduction 1.1Introduction Chapter 163.3177(6)(c)3 Florida Statutes (F.S.), requires that local governments must amend their comprehensive plans, including the development of a work plan, covering at least a 10-year planning period, to identify the specific water supply projects that meet the projected future demands within 18 months after the governing board approves an updated regional water supply plan. The Lower East Coast (LEC) Water Supply Plan Update was approved by the South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) Governing Board on September 12, 2013. Therefore, the deadline for the City of Boynton Beach (City) within the LEC Region to update its Work Plan and amend its comprehensive plan is March 2015. The City provides potable water to its residents and to an extended service area of customers in a s Utilities Department is in charge of producing, treating and distributing drinking water within the service area. The City is responsible for ensuring enough capacity is available for existing and future customers. The Work Plan Update will reference the initiatives already identified to ensure adequate water supply for the City. According to state guidelines, the Work Plan and the comprehensive plan must address the development of traditional and alternative water supplies, service delivery and conservation and reuse programs necessary to serve existing and new development for at least a 10-year planning period. The Work Plan Update will have a planning time schedule consistent with the comprehensive plan and the LEC Water Supply Plan Update. 1.2Statutory History water supply needs. These bills, in particular Senate Bills 360 and 444 (2005 legislative session), significantly changed Chapters 163 and 373, F.S. by strengthening the statutory links between the regional water supply plans prepared by the water management districts and the comprehensive plans prepared by local governments. In addition, these bills established the basis for improving coordination between local land use planning and water supply planning. 1.3Purpose and Objectives systems and provide an updated plan for implementing water facilities improvements to meet the future potable water demand. This Work Plan Update is divided into four sections: Section 1 Introduction; Section 2 Existing Water Supply Facilities; Section 3 Population and Water Demand Projections; and Section 4 Water Supply Projects Identification. Specifically, the Work Plan Update will update the following information: Population Projections; Water Suppliers; Water Demand Projections; Water Supply Sources and Treatment Capacities; and Water Supply Projects. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 550 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 2 Boynton Beach, Florida All or The Work Plan Update will strengthen the coordination among Development Department land use planning responsibilities, Utilities Department water supply facilities planning activities and the water resource development responsibilities of the SFWMD. 2.0Existing Water Supply Facilities 2.1Service Area Boundaries 2.1.1Potable Service Area Boundary The City is approximately 16.1 square miles with a population of approximately 71,000. The approximate boundaries of the City are Hypoluxo Road to the north, the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) L-30 to the south, the LWDD E-3 Canal to the West and the Intra Costal Water Way to the east. Figure 2-1 illustrates the boundaries of the City. Also as shown in Figure 2-1ce area is approximately 16,066 acres of which 10,304 acres s city limits. The Utilities Department serves approximately 106,000 customers and the approximate population served within the City is 71,000. The Utilities department also serves portions of unincorporated Palm Beach County, Town of Briny Breezes, Town of Ocean Ridge, Town of Gulfstream, and parts of the Village of Hypoluxo. The potable water service area extends approximately from Hypoluxo Road south to the City of Delray Beach, from the Atlantic Ocean west to the E-3 Canal west of Military Trail. About one third of the service area and popula 2.1.2Reuse Service Area Boundary The City operates and maintains wastewater collection system in the service area. The City is served by the South Central Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Board (SCRWTDB) through an Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach. SCRWTDB, founded in 1974 as a special district, treats wastewater collected from these two cities at the South Central Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility (SCRWRF). The reclaimed water is shared between two municipalities. The City distributes a portion of reclaimed water to the customers within its water service area. Reclaimed water is conveyed into the City along Congress Avenue, extended along Woolbright Road (west of Congress Avenue), Golf Road, Seacrest Avenue, Woolbright Road and Federal Highway (to Boynton Beach Boulevard). Figure 2-2 illustrates the existing reclaimed water distribution system in The reclaimed water lines serve both public and private facilities. Existing and identified potential end users and average flow of reclaimed water consumed will be discussed in Section 2.3. 2.1.3Self-Supplied Systems The City has identified five communities within the water service area that are self-supplied. These communities are listed as following: Royal Manor Estates is a small private water supply system serving approximately 700 people with per capita rate of 85 gallons per Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) #50-03348-W was issued by the SFWMD on October 5, 1994 and expired on October 5, 2014. Colonial Estates is a small private water supply system projected to serve 450 people -10245-W was issued on March 25, 2013 and will expire in 20 years. Two existing wells were permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 18.24 million gallons (MG). The maximum monthly allocation is 1.55 MG. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 551 of 729 Mark Dr The City of Boynton Beach Utility Service Area 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-1 City of Boynton Beach, Florida Page 552 of 729 LEGEND Exiting and Proposed Reclaimed Water System 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-2 City of Boynton Beach, Florida Page 553 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 5 Boynton Beach, Florida Pine Grove Village is a small private water supply system serving approximately 270 people and landscape water use. The water usage is 80 gallon per capita per day on average. The CUP 50-02858-W was issued on December 20, 2006 and expires on January 1, 2027. Two existing wells were permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 14.31 MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal shall not exceed 1.76 MG. Parry Village is a small private water supply system serving approximately 200 people. The water usage is 150 gallon per capita per day on average. The CUP 50-07737-W was issued on February 14, 2007 and expires on March 27, 2027. Two existing wells were permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 10.95 MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal shall not exceed 0.18 MG. Tropical Breeze Estates is a small private water supply system serving 623 people with an average per capita use rate of 51 gallons per day. The CUP 50-00137-W was issued on May 30, 2007 and expires on July 13, 2027. One existing well was permitted to withdraw groundwater from the Surficial Aquifer with an annual allocation of 11.60 MG. The maximum monthly withdrawal shall not exceed 1.18 MG. 2.2Water Supply Sources and Facilities potable water facilities includes: two Surficial Aquifer wellfields (East Wellfield and West Wellfield), two water treatment plants and two aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) wells, four storage facilities, and over 350 miles of water distribution system. 2.2.1Surficial Well The City raw water supply is comprised of two Surficial Aquifer wellfields, the East Wellfield and the West Wellfield. The East Wellfield contains 20 wells. Well 3E is abandoned and other 19 wells are operational. The West Wellfield contains 11 operational wells. Table 2-1 shows nal details. The City is implementing a complete system integration plan by building a pipeline to connect its West Wellfield to its East Water Treatment The City raw water withdrawal is governed by CUP 50-00499-W issued on December 13, 2009. The permit will expire on December 10, 2029. The main water source for the City is the Surficial Aquifer System (SAS). Both wellfields withdraw groundwater from the SAS. The maximum withdrawal for East Wellfield is 2,373 MG annually (6.5 million gallons per day [MGD]) after the completion of the pipeline connecting the West Wellfield to the East WTP. The current withdrawal from the East Wellfield is limited to 2,373 MG annually (6.5 MGD). The annual withdrawal allocation is 7,615 MG (20.86 MGD) and maximum monthly allocation limit is 698.43 MG. 2.2.2Aquifer Storage and Recovery Two operational ASR w excess water from the Surficial Aquifer is treated and stored in the ASR wells. During the dry season, water is pumped from ASR wells to supplement water from the Surficial Aquifer. The total capacity of two ASR wells is six MGD. Typically, the City recharges its ASR wells with finished water. According to the current CUP, the maximum monthly withdrawals for ASR wells are limited to 155 MG. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 554 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 6 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 2-1 Raw Water Wells East Wellfield Wells Well Diameter Total Well Design Pump Well Number Status (inches) Depth (feet) Capacity (GPM) 1E Operational 8 54 115 2E Operational 8 60 87 3E Abandoned 8 62 850 6E Operational 12 76 550 7E Operational 12 74 500 8E Operational 12 70 500 9E Operational 12 103 700 10E Operational 16 104 1,000 11E Operational 16 104 1,100 12E Operational 16 63 1,100 13E Operational 16 75 1,100 14E Operational 16 273 1,100 15E Operational 12 233 700 16E Operational 12 233 700 17E Operational 12 201 500 18E Operational 12 200 500 19E Operational 12 205 500 20E Operational 12 203 500 21E Operational 12 203 500 22E Operational 12 203 500 West Wellfield Wells Well Diameter Total Well Design Pump Well Number Status (inches) Depth (feet) Capacity (GPM) 1W Operational 16 163 1,500 4W Operational 16 159 1,500 5W Operational 16 150 1,500 6W Operational 16 161 1,500 7W Operational 16 161 1,500 8W Operational 16 151 1,500 9W Operational 16 167 1,500 10W Operational 16 160 1,500 11W Operational 16 153 1,500 12W Operational 16 163 1,500 13W Operational 30 235 1,500 A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 555 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 7 Boynton Beach, Florida 2.2.3Floridan Wells The City proposed Floridan Aquifer System (FAS) wells and is anticipated to install FAS wells by 2023 to meet the maximum month water use demand. The total maximum monthly allocation FAS wells shall not exceed 37.5 MG. Table 2-2 describes ASR wells and FAS wells operational and construction details. Table 2-2 Description of ASR and FAS Wells Well Diameter Total Well Design Pump (inches) Depth (feet) Capacity (GPM) Well Number Status ASR-1 Operational 16 909 1,400 ASR-2 Operational 24 910 2,800 F-1 Proposed 16 1,400 1,300 F-2 Proposed 16 1,400 1,300 F-3 Proposed 16 1,400 1,300 2.2.4Reclaimed Water The City receives reclaimed water from the SCRWRF. The SCRWRF has a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)-permitted treatment capacity of 24 MGD. The annual average daily flow in 2013 was 16.6 MGD. Approximately 5.83 MGD of treated wastewater was reused in 2013. About 10.58 MGD of treated wastewater was disposed of through deep well injection and 0.2 MGD through an ocean outfall. SCRWRF employs the deep well injection as primary treated wastewater disposal method and disposal through ocean outfall is only for emergencies. The Board complies with the Leah Schad Memorial Ocean Outfall Program. The City operates and maintains a reclaimed distribution water system with pipe size ranging from six inches to 36 inches. The primary purpose of reclaimed water is for irrigation. The to provide reclaimed water to selected irrigation projects in two phases to be completed in 2010 and 2016, thereby terminating or reducing their allocations. The total reclaimed water credits will be approximately 4.6 MGD upon the completion of these projects. The City needs the assistance of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) in transforming the potential users from potable water or other raw water withdraws to reclaimed water for irrigation application. The current users are listed in Table 2-3. The total reclaimed water usage for 2013 was 0.34 MGD. The City is expanding its reclaimed water distribution system and more users will be served. The details are discussed in Section 4. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 556 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 8 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 2-3 Arbor Memorial Park Boynton Senior Center Median on Seacrest Bethesda Healthcare Boynton Beach th Median on 4 Street City Tennis Courts Calossa Park East WTP Boynton Cemetery Pence Park Boundless Playground Wxel Cross Point Boynton Ball Park Median on Fed Hwy Entrance to Chapel Hill Elementary School Forest Park Elementary Children Museum Doctors Office HighPoint Residential Las Ventanas Boynton Library Galaxy School Boynton Center Condo Sterling Village City Hall Galaxy School Park 2.2.5Bulk User Agreements and Other User Agreements 2.2.5.1Bulk User Agreements The City signed an agreement with Palm Beach County on December 21, 2004, for the purchase and sale of bulk potable water. On October 2, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners approved the First Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement. On October 29, 2013, the Commissioners approved the Second Amendment of the bulk water sale agreement. The agreement includes the purchase of one (1) MGD firm capacity of potable water from Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department (as shown in Appendix A). In emergency, there is a flexibility to purchase up to five (5) MGD as needed with advance notice. The new termination date of the agreement is December 31, 2043. Water purchased from Palm Beach County is blended with the West WTP finished water and integrated into the system. 2.3Water Treatment and Storage Facilities . Although the system is interconnected by the finished water distribution system, there is no physical interconnection between two treatment plants and two wellfields. The locations of both WTPs are illustrated in Figure 2-1. 2.3.1East Water Treatment Plant The East WTP is located at 124 East Woolbright Road and is a conventional lime softening plant consisting of: Lime softening flocculation for hardness reduction; Gravity filtration; and Chlorine disinfection of finished water. The aerial view of the East WTP is illustrated in Figure 2-3. The plant was originally constructed in 1963 and expanded in 1978. The plant is rated by the FDEP at 19.24 MGD on a maximum day basis. However, finished water produced by the plant is limited by the amount of raw water withdrawal from the East Wellfield. Currently, the SFWMD limits the amount of water available to the East Wellfield to 2,555 MG (seven MGD). The East WTP also has two ASR wells that can provide an additional five MGD of capacity. By completing connecting the West Wellfield to the intake of the East WTP, the East WTP will be allowed to fully utilize A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 557 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 9 Boynton Beach, Florida its treatment capacity. The treatment losses during conventional lime softening processes are conservatively estimated at five percent. The treatment efficiency of the East WTP ranges from 95 to 97 percent. 2.3.2West Water Treatment Plant The West WTP is located on Boynton Beach Boulevard, east of the Lake Worth Water -4 Canal. The plant is a nanofiltration (membrane softening) plant consisting of: Pre-filtration; Membrane softening to remove hardness, color, and organic compounds; and De-gasification and chlorination for disinfection. The aerial of the West WTP is illustrated in Figure 2-4. The plant was built in 1993 and re- efficiency is 85 percent and the plant is permitted to blend up to 1.7 MGD (up to 20 percent) of filtered water from the Surficial Aquifer with the membrane plant throughput. 2.3.3Water Storage Facilities The City has one elevated concrete water storage tank and three concrete ground storage tanks. One and a half MG elevated water storage tank is located at the East WTP. The elevated storage tank helps to maintain the system pressure. Three MG ground storage tank is located at the West WTP. The storage tank is used for blending water purchased from Palm Beach County Utilities and helps achieve the chlorine contact time required for proper four-log disinfection of water treatment at the West WTP. Three MG ground storage tank is located on Minor Road between Congress Avenue and Lawrence Road. The storage tank is used to balance water production and peak demand. One MG ground storage tank is located on Woolbright Road west of Congress. The storage tank is used to balance water production and peak demand. The City is anticipating an additional three MG ground storage tank to be added to the system by 2016 to meet FDEP peak hour storage requirements. The new storage and pumping facilities will be located at the East WTP site. 2.4Water Distribution System As shown in Figure 2-5, The City has approximately over 350 miles of water mains in the distribution system. The discharge pipe of the West WTP is the largest water main, which is 42-inch diameter. It divides into two 30-inch pipelines to support the western grid and the whole transmission and distribution system. The discharge pipelines from the East WTP are one 30-inch and one 24-inch water mains. On the east side of the City, the largest water mains run north and south on First Street and Seacrest Boulevard. These pipes include 23-inch and 20-inch water mains. These water mains go through Woolbright Road and other major arteries to support the entire water piping network. The existing water mains were constructed and built with the development of the City. There were a variety of materials used and some of the water mains are over 50 years old. The relatively new mains are mostly ductile iron. C-900 PVC has been used east of U.S. 1 in the areas that may be subject to aggressive and salty soil conditions. There is also small portion of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. One section of HDPE pipe is owned by the Town of Ocean Ridge and functions as the northern A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 558 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 10 Boynton Beach, Florida intracoastal connection from the City to the Town of Ocean Ridge. Town of Ocean Ridge owns its water distribution system. The City owns and reads the meters, and provides some reimbursable maintenance for the Town. Other section of HDPE pipes are located on the south end of Seacrest Boulevard where a directional drill was used to install the pipe and avoided the disruption of the busy traffic. 2.4.1Interconnections The City currently has emergency interconnect agreements with Palm Beach County, City of Delray Beach, Town of Gulfstream, Village of Golf, and Town of Lantana. Potable water purchased from Palm Beach County is blended with the finished water through the interconnection located in West WTP. There is a second interconnection with Palm Beach County at Flavor Pict Road for additional water required. The other interconnections are for emergency of maintenance needs only and pipes are valved and normally closed. The valve at the interconnection with Town of Gulfstream is one-way-feed-only automatic valve and operates on pressure. The rest of the valves are only opened at the direction of the Director from both entities and/or their designees. All the interconnections are metered. The locations and characteristics are listed in Table 2-4 and in Figure 2-5. Table 2-4 Interconnections with Other Entities Reference # in Description Location Figure 2-5 Size of Pipe 12-inch pipe w / Palm Beach Interconnect 1 5469 West Boynton Beach Boulevard 1 8-inch meter 12-inch pipe w / Palm Beach Interconnect 2 Flavor Pict Road west of Military Trail 2 8-inch meter 12-inch pipe w / Palm Beach Interconnect 3 Hypoluxo and Hypoluxo Farms 3 8-inch meter Lantana Interconnect 1 Hypoluxo and Seacrest 4 6-inch meter Lantana Interconnect 2 Hypoluxo/San Castle 5 6-inch meter City of Delray Beach South Swinton Avenue 6 6-inch meter City of Delray Beach South Lake Drive-Lake Ida 7 6-inch meter Town of Gulfstream A1A-Little Club 8 6-inch meter (one way feed only) Village of Golf Military Trail and Woolbright Road 9 8-inch meter A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 559 of 729 Document Path: Z:\ComDev\2012\A121151.02 - Miramar RLOI 13-02-11 Reg\CAD\Report\F7-5 C9Recharge.mxd Legend ACCESS RD Recharge Pipeline to C9 Miramar WWTF WWTF Discharge Point (C-9 Canal Branch) Copyright:© 2013 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community 01,100550 Feet CONCEPTUAL PIPING LAYOUT OF CANAL RECHARGE East Water Treatment Plant Aerial Map FIGURE REGIONAL RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM EXPANSION 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-3 9-5 7-5 2255 Glades Road, Suite 324A FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN City of Boynton Beach, Florida Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone 561.988.2614 Fax 561.997.9392 MIRAMAR, FL Page 560 of 729 FIGURE West Water Treatment Plant Aerial Map 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-4 2255 Glades Road, Suite 324A City of Boynton Beach, Florida Boca Raton, FL 33431 Phone 561.988.2614 Fax 561.997.9392 Page 561 of 729 4 5 9 8 6 7 0IKIRH 4EPQ&IEGL-RXIVGSRRIGX 4EPQ&IEGL-RXIVGSRRIGX 4EPQ&IEGL-RXIVGSRRIGX 0ERXERE-RXIVGSRRIGX 0ERXERE-RXIVGSRRIGX 'MX]SJ(IPVE]&IEGL 'MX]SJ(IPVE]&IEGL +YPJWXVIEQ-RXIVGSRRIGX :MPPEKISJ+SPJ-RXIVGSRRIGX ;;IWX;84 ))EWX;84 The City of Boynton Beach Distribution System 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update 2-5 City of Boynton Beach, Florida Page 562 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 14 Boynton Beach, Florida 2.5Summary The City operates a well-maintained and appropriately sized water system, which is in fair to good condition and appears to be consistent with utility industry standards. The current permitted water supply allocation is adequate to meet the existing customer demands. Ongoing reclaimed water expansion activities will retain historical usage levels from the Biscayne Aquifer and establish the additional alternate water supply needed to support growth. To meet the increasing water demand from a growing population, the City plans to continue to diversify the array of alternative water supplies as previously mentioned in Section 2.2. Table 2-5 summarizes the existing water sources and water treatment capacities. Table 2-5 Current Average Day Potable Water Production Capabilities (1) Wellfield Installed Firm Capacity (MGD) East Wellfield 16.06 West Wellfield 21.60 Combined 37.66 Regulated Wellfield Capacity (MGD) East Wellfield 7.00 West Wellfield 13.86 Combined 20.86 (2) Treatment Plant Capacity (MGD) East WTP 19.24 West WTP 10.4 Combined 29.64 Aquifer Storage and Recover (ASR) (MGD) 5 Bulk Water Purchases from PBC (MGD) 1 Potable Water Available (MGD) 18.4 Notes: 1. With the largest well out of service 2. Plant capacity represents the lesser of treatment plant capacity or regulated wellfield capacity A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 563 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 15 Boynton Beach, Florida 3.0Population and Water Demand Projections In this section, the water demand for the City service area is projected for a 20-year planning period starting 2015 and extending to 2035. 3.1Historical Population Information Historical populations for the City are shown in Table 3-1 from the year 2008 through 2013. Table 3-1 Historical Population for the City 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Population 66872 66,671 66,978 68,217 68,409 68,741 70,131 71,608 2008-2013 % Annual -0.3% 0.46% 1.85% 0.28% 0.49% 2.02% 2.11% Increase Notes: 1. pulation figures 2008 2013: United States Census 2010 and estimates by 2. Average annual population increase during 2008 2013 period: 1.44 percent. In 2008, th, which reflected the economic downturn. But since 2009, the growth rebounded. 3.2Historical Water Use Information Historical water use provides the basis for projected future water demands and reflects the past potable water service level provided by the City Utilities Department. historical water demand data for its two water treatment plants was obtained from the Ci Operating Reports. Table 3-2 served and finished water use from the year 2009 through 2013. Table 3-2 (1) Year Population Served Per Capita Demand (gpcd) Finished Water Demand (MGD) 2009 97,000 139 13.52 2010 98,000 141 13.86 2011 99,000 141 13.99 2012 102,512 136 13.94 2013 105,169 127 13.40 Note: 1. Per Capita Demand (gpcd) is defined by average daily demand by the permanent population. 3.3Population Projections Population projections are the initial and key step in developing water demand projections. Population A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 564 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 16 Boynton Beach, Florida Division and the SFWMD LEC Water Supply Plan Update 2013 (SFWMD LECWSP Update 2013). Palm Beach County Planning Division continues to use Business Research (BEBR) population projections as their base for the municipal projections. However, local government and service providers require small area projections for the planning of future service needs. For this reason, the County developed the Population Allocation Model based on the Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ). The model allocates the projections among the municipalities and the unincorporated county by TAZ, based on the land use categories, densities, annexations and redevelopment plans etc. In the LECWSP Update, population historical data and growth trend were studied and they were based on and consistent with BEBR medium projections. 3.3.1Existing Service Area The pfrom 2015 to 2035 in five-year increments using both methods are shown in Table 3-3. The (the average growth rate of one percent) than LECWSP update (the average growth rate of 1.1 percent). Table 3-3 Population P 2013 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 Boynton Beach 69,968 71,752 76,144 79,903 83,901 87,218 Unincorporated Palm Beach 32,005 32,761 34,599 36,066 37,092 38,081 County Village of Hypoluxo 582 589 599 617 643 674 Town of Ocean Ridge 1,829 1,862 1,927 1,995 2,067 2,155 Town of Briny Breezes 603 604 885 896 913 924 Town of Gulfstream 182 184 220 223 228 231 Total Population Based Upon Jurisdictional 105,169 107,753 114,375 119,700 124,844 129,283 * Population Figures SFWMD Lower East Coast Regional Water 106,331 108,877 115,242 121,607 127,972 134,337 Supply Plan Update Note: *: Source: PZ&B 2013 Population Allocation Model 3.3.2Potential Impacts on Service Area Population Town of Manalapan is a small beach side community. It is bordered on the north by the Ocean Avenue Bridge, beach access road and beach for the Town of Lantana; on the west by the Intracoastal Waterway (known as Lake Worth Lagoon); on the south by the South Lake Worth Inlet; and on the east by the Atlantic Ocean. The Town owns and operates a Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant. The Town provides potable water service to both the Town of Manalapan and portion of the Town of Hypoluxo. The City is studying the possibility of merging the two utilities. The project is in a very preliminary stage and details of merging utilities are not available currently. Since this water supply planning period is 20 years, population projectio By 2035, the A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 565 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 17 Boynton Beach, Florida population in the Townarea will be approximately 3,172 based on LECWSP Update data. The City is also in discussion with three mobile home parks (MHP) regarding potable water services. These MHPs are service area Department. They are: Royal Manor, Colonial Estates, and Whispering Pines. These MHPs are all in the high-density residential district. The populations in those MHPs as well as other three self-suppliers discussed in Section 2.1.3 3.4Water Demand Projections The average- prod as estimated in Section 3.3. max- population projections and the per capita water use rate of 200 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) defined in the current Level of Service. 3.4.1Projections in the Existing Service Area The City has a single per capita average day demand in total of 158 gpcd. The value combines industrial, commercial and residential usage because water use cannot be separated by sector match the current use distribution (residential versus non-residential). The current per capita average day demand represents finished water and combines system losses, production in efficiency and the variations of water use by the different geographic areas. Table 3-4 projects the overall system per capita average day demand onto the component municipalities to project future water demands. Although it is not possible to isolate individual water demand, it is anticipated that the City, unincorporated Palm Beach County and the Town of Ocean Ridge will continue to use the similar, higher per capita usage while the Village of Hypoluxo and the Town of Briny Breezes will have a lower per capita usage because of the distribution of smaller homes, smaller lots and the percentages of multi-family dwellings. 3.4.2Projections in the Proposed Service Area water system goes through and conversion of MHPs to high rising multi-family dwellings takes place, the City will have additional water demands from these users. Table 3-5 provides the projected finished water demands from 2015 to 2035 in the expanded service area. 158 gpcd was used to estimate the average day demands because of the same reason as stated in Section 3.4.1. However, 221 gpcd was used to estimate maximum day demands because the level of service (LOS) of 700 gpcd, defined in the Town of Manalapan, is 3.5 times higher than the LOS of 200 gallons maximum daily flow per capita of peak . population for water supply and treatment as in the previous Work Plan221 gpcd was derived from weighted average method by multiplying the LOS by current populations in both entities, respectively, then dividing the sum by total populations served. 3.5Water Conservation The City is continuously implementing several conservation elements to actively and passively reduce per capita water demand. Ordinances have been passed by the City Commission restricting irrigation, mandating low flow fixtures and identifying and repairing internal waste and losses. The following per capita usage at 158 gpd): A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 566 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 18 Boynton Beach, Florida Permanent Irrigation Ordinance Palm Beach County Ordinance 93- service area. It is enforced by the County and the City. Xeriscape Ordinance and landscape medians by increasing the use of permanent native vegetation. The conservation percent of all new landscaping consist of native / Xeriscape / Waterwise plant species. Ultra-low Volume Plumbing Fixture Ordinance The City has adopted Ordinances No. 092-41 and 092-42, requiring new and replacement toilets, showerheads, and other fixtures to be low flow. These ordinances adopt the Standard Building Codes, and Uniform countrywide Amendments. Water Conservation Rate Structure In 1990, the City Commission adopted an eight tier conservation-based rate ordinance, whereby the more water used, the higher the rate per thousand gallons, as a means of reducing demands. In 2002 the Commission amended this ordinance to adjust the conservation based rate structure. Under these amendments, the rate of the highest tier increased by 17 percent. Leak Detection Program As two--for water is 5 percent. Therefore, a formal leak detection program is not required. However, the City will continue to put forth an effort in keeping the unaccounted-for water losses to a minimum. Rain Sensor Device Ordinance The City has adopted Section 373.62, F.S., requiring rain sensor devices on all new automatic irrigation systems. Waterwise Program The Utility Department used to run Water Conservation Education Program and now is named as Waterwise Program. Waterwise Program provids tours to school groups, youth organizations, homeowner associations, and other interested parties, with water conservation being an integral part of the tour, distributing flow restrictors, toilet dams, dye presentations to various civic groups. Alternative Water Resource - Wastewater treatment is provided for the City by the SCRWRF. The City as co-owner of the SCRWRF has co-funded the existing 24 MGD reclaimed water facility that serves irrigation systems at the Village of Golf, Pine Tree Golf Club, Quail Ridge, Delray Dunes and Hunters Run. The City will work through the Regional Board to encourage the more effective use of reclaimed water by existing users. The City plans to develop Reclaimed Water Program Phase I to connect more potential large users. Additional Elements - The utility has hired a part time water conservation officer who is responsible for implementing the utility's water conservation plan. The conservation plan is reviewed, assessed, and improved regularly. Each facet of this plan implemented and reviewed as part of the City's continuous improvement program. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 567 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 19 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 3-4 2015 2020 2025 Per Capita Per Capita Per Capita Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Demand Population (GPCPD) (MGD) Population (GPCPD) (MGD) Population (GPCPD) (MGD) Boynton Beach 71,752 158 11.34 76,144 158 12.03 79,903 158 12.62 Unincorporated Palm Beach 32,761 158 5.18 34,599 158 5.47 36,066 158 5.70 County Village of Hypoluxo 589 158 0.09 599 158 0.09 617 158 0.10 Town of Ocean Ridge 1,862 158 0.29 1,927 158 0.30 1,995 158 0.32 Town of Briny Breezes 604 158 0.10 885 158 0.14 896 158 0.14 Town of Gulfstream 184 158 0.03 220 158 0.03 223 158 0.04 Total Population Based Upon Jurisdictional 107,753 17.02 114,375 18.07 119,700 18.91 * Population Figures SFWMD Lower East Coast Regional Water 108,877 17.20 115,242 18.21 121,607 19.21 Supply Plan Update 2030 2035 Per Capita Per Capita Demand Demand Demand Demand Population (GPCPD) (MGD) Population (GPCPD) (MGD) Boynton Beach 83,901 158 13.26 87,218 155 13.52 Unincorporated Palm Beach 37,092 158 5.86 38,081 155 5.90 County Village of Hypoluxo 643 158 0.10 674 155 0.10 Town of Ocean Ridge 2,067 158 0.33 2,155 155 0.33 Town of Briny Breezes 913 158 0.14 924 155 0.14 Town of Gulfstream 228 158 0.04 231 155 0.04 Total Population Based Upon Jurisdictional 124,844 19.73 129,283 20.04 * Population Figures SFWMD Lower East Coast Regional Water 127,972 20.22 134,337 21.23 Supply Plan Update Note: *: Source: PZ&B 2013 Population Allocation Model A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 568 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 20 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 3-5 Proposed Service Area Projected Average Per Average Maximum Population in MANALAPAN MHPs Total Capita Maximum Per Daily Water Daily Water Projected Projected Projected Demand Capita Demand Demand Demand (1) Service Area Population Population Population (GPCPD) (GPCPD) (MGD) (MGD) Year 2015 2015 108,877 2,571 385 111,833 158 212 17.67 23.71 2016 110,150 2,601 770 113,521 158 212 17.94 24.07 2017 111,423 2,601 1,155 115,179 158 212 18.20 24.42 2018 112,696 2,601 1,540 116,837 158 212 18.46 24.77 2019 113,969 2,601 1,925 118,495 158 212 18.72 25.12 2020 2020 115,242 2,722 2,310 120,274 158 212 19.00 25.50 2021 116,515 2,752 2,695 121,962 158 212 19.27 25.86 2022 117,788 2,752 3,080 123,620 158 212 19.53 26.21 2023 119,061 2,752 3,465 125,278 158 212 19.79 26.56 2024 120,334 2,752 3,850 126,936 158 212 20.06 26.91 2025 2025 121,607 2,872 4,235 128,714 158 212 20.34 27.29 2026 122,880 2,872 4,620 130,372 158 212 20.60 27.64 2027 124,153 2,872 5,005 132,030 158 212 20.86 27.99 2028 125,426 2,872 5,390 133,688 158 212 21.12 28.34 2029 126,699 2,872 5,775 135,346 158 212 21.38 28.69 2030 2030 127,972 3,022 6,160 137,154 158 212 21.67 29.08 2031 129,245 3,022 6,545 138,812 158 212 21.93 29.43 2032 130,518 3,022 6,930 140,470 158 212 22.19 29.78 2033 131,791 3,022 7,315 142,128 158 212 22.46 30.13 2034 133,064 3,022 7,700 143,786 158 212 22.72 30.48 2035 2035 134,337 3,172 8,085 145,594 158 212 23.00 30.87 Note: 1. Adjusted per capita based on the current service area populations and maximum day standards from the City of Boynton Beach and Town of Manalapan. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 569 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 21 Boynton Beach, Florida 3.6Water Demand Supply Analysis supply analysis is performed for both existing service area and proposed service area. Tables 3-6, 3-7, and 3-8 summarize potable water availability based on restrictions imposed by the SFWMD and operational issues for both the East and West Water Treatment Systems through 2035 in the existing service area under projected AADF demands, projected maximum month demands with maximum eastern wellfield withdrawal, and projected maximum month demands with maximum ASR withdrawal, respectively. Tables 3-9 and 3-10 summarize potable water availability for both the East and West Water Treatment Systems through 2035 in the proposed service area under projected AADF demands and the projected maximum month demands with maximum eastern wellfield withdrawal, respectively. In conclusion, the City has planned and implemented water facilities expansion including alternative water supply projects that will provide sufficient capacity to meet long-term growth requirements in the existing service area and proposed service area. In addition, by continuing to implement the reclaimed water guidelines previously summarized and by increasing public awareness, it is anticipated that the City will keep per capita use to 158 gpcd by 2035. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 570 of 729 Table 3-6 Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) - Existing Service Area Average Average Western Daily Raw Eastern Water Purchase Daily Total Supply Facility Capacity Surficial Year Population Water Surficial From PBC Demand (MGD) Surplus (Deficit) (MGD) (a) Demand Aquifer (MGD) Aquifer (MGD) (MGD) 2015108,87717.2018.307.0011.90118.301.09 2016110,15017.4018.516.5014.36121.063.66 2017111,42317.6018.736.5014.36121.063.46 2018112,69617.8118.946.5014.36121.063.26 2019113,96918.0119.166.5014.36121.063.06 2020115,24218.2119.376.5014.36121.062.85 2021116,51518.4119.586.5014.36121.062.65 2022117,78818.6119.806.5014.36121.062.45 (b) 119,06118.8120.016.5014.36121.552.74 2023 2024120,33419.0120.236.5014.36121.552.53 2025121,60719.2120.446.5014.36121.552.33 2026122,88019.4220.656.5014.36121.552.13 2027124,15319.6220.876.5014.36121.551.93 2028125,42619.8221.086.5014.36121.551.73 (c) 126,69920.0221.306.5014.36121.551.53 2029 2030127,97220.2221.516.5014.36121.551.33 2031129,24520.4221.726.5014.36121.551.13 2032130,51820.6221.946.5014.36121.550.93 2033131,79120.8222.156.5014.36121.550.72 2034133,06421.0222.376.5014.36121.550.52 2035134,33721.2322.586.5014.36121.550.32 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 20.86 MGD on annual average basis East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (b) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (c) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 571 of 729 Table 3-7 Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals - - Existing Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations (Maximum Month Basis MGD) Facility Maximum Water Total Capacity Proposed Floridan Well Month Eastern Average Daily Purchase Supply Year Population Surplus Western Field + LPRO Treatment Demand Surficial (c) Demand (MGD)From PBC ASR (e) (Deficit) Surficial Aquifer (MGD) (a)(b) (MGD) (MGD)(d) Aquifer Finished Raw (MGD) 2013106,33116.8018.147.0011.902.50 - - 120.802.65 2014107,60417.0018.367.0011.902.50 - - 120.802.43 2015108,87717.2018.587.0011.902.50 - - 120.802.22 2016110,15017.4018.806.5015.031.00 - - 122.653.85 2017111,42317.6019.016.5015.031.00 - - 122.653.64 2018112,69617.8119.236.5015.031.00 - - 122.653.42 2019113,96918.0119.456.5015.031.00 - - 122.653.20 2020115,24218.2119.666.5015.031.00 - - 122.652.98 2021116,51518.4119.886.5015.031.00 - - 122.652.77 2022117,78818.6120.106.5015.031.00 - - 122.652.55 (f)(g)119,06118.8120.326.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.67 2023 2024120,33419.0120.536.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.45 2025121,60719.2120.756.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.23 2026122,88019.4220.976.5013.821.001.210.97122.982.01 2027124,15319.6221.196.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.80 2028125,42619.8221.406.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.58 (h) 126,69920.0221.626.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.36 2029 2030127,97220.2221.846.5013.821.001.210.97122.981.15 2031129,24520.4222.056.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.93 2032130,51820.6222.276.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.71 2033131,79120.8222.496.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.49 2034133,06421.0222.716.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.28 2035134,33721.2322.926.5013.821.001.210.97122.980.06 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 22.53 MGD on maximum month basis. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Ratio of maximum month to average daily flow is 1.08 based on MOR (2011-2014) (b) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (c) - The combined pumping from the east wellfield and ASR is 9.5 MGD till 2015. Afterwards it will be 7.5 MGD. The City wants operational flexibility to maximize ASR use and minimize wellfield withdrawals during high demand periods and drought conditions. (d) - Maximum month FAS withdrawal is 1.21 MGD (e) - Total water available to system - surficial treatment plus ASR recovery (f) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (g) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (h) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 572 of 729 Table 3-8 Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD)) - with Maximum ASR Withdrawals - Existing Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations (Maximum Month Basis MGD) Facility Maximum Average Water Proposed Floridan Well Field + LPRO Capacity Month Total Supply Eastern Daily Purchase Western Treatment Year Population Surplus Demand (c) (e) Demand Surficial From PBC Surficial (MGD) ASR (Deficit) (a) (b) (MGD)(MGD) Aquifer(d) (MGD) Aquifer Finished Raw (MGD) 2013106,33116.8018.144.5011.905.00 - - 120.832.69 2014107,60417.0018.364.5011.905.00 - - 120.832.47 2015108,87717.2018.584.5011.905.00 - - 120.832.25 2016110,15017.4018.802.5015.035.00 - - 122.713.92 2017111,42317.6019.012.5010.005.00 - - 122.713.70 2018112,69617.8119.232.5010.005.00 - - 122.713.48 2019113,96918.0119.452.5010.005.00 - - 122.713.26 2020115,24218.2119.662.5010.005.00 - - 122.713.05 2021116,51518.4119.882.5010.005.00 - - 122.712.83 2022117,78818.6120.102.5010.005.00 - - 122.712.61 119,06118.8120.322.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.73 (f)(g) 2023 2024120,33419.0120.532.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.51 2025121,60719.2120.752.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.29 2026122,88019.4220.972.5013.825.001.210.97123.042.07 2027124,15319.6221.192.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.86 2028125,42619.8221.402.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.64 (h) 126,69920.0221.622.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.42 2029 2030127,97220.2221.842.5013.825.001.210.97123.041.21 2031129,24520.4222.052.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.99 2032130,51820.6222.272.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.77 2033131,79120.8222.492.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.55 2034133,06421.0222.712.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.34 2035134,33721.2322.922.5013.825.001.210.97123.040.12 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 22.53 MGD on maximum month basis. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Ratio of maximum month to average daily flow is 1.08 based on MOR (2011-2014) (b) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (c) - The combined pumping from the east wellfield and ASR is 9.5 MGD till 2015. Afterwards it will be 7.5 MGD. ASR well be used to provide most of tne water for the East WTP during maximum month conditions to minimize impacts to the regional system and potential for upconing. (d) - Maximum month FAS withdrawal is 1.21 MGD (e) - Total water available to system - surficial treatment plus ASR recovery (f) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (g) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (h) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 573 of 729 Table 3-9 Summary of Finished Water Demand and Supply Projections (AADF, MGD) - Proposed Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations Allocation From Manalapan Average Facility (Annual Average Daily Basis MGD)Floridan Average Water Daily Raw Total Capacity Daily Purchase Year Population Water Supply Surplus Western Eastern Demand From PBC Raw From Finished Demand (MGD) (Deficit) (c) Surficial Surficial Raw (MGD)(MGD) (b) Water Manalapan (MGD)(MGD) (a) Aquifer Aquifer 2013108,75217.1818.287.0011.90 -1.341.07119.372.18 2014110,10017.4018.517.0011.90 -1.341.07119.371.97 2015111,83317.6718.807.0011.90 -1.341.07119.371.70 2016113,52117.9419.086.5014.360.581.341.07122.644.71 2017115,17918.2019.366.5014.360.581.341.07122.644.44 2018116,83718.4619.646.5014.360.581.341.07122.644.18 2019118,49518.7219.926.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.92 2020120,27419.0020.226.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.64 2021121,96219.2720.506.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.37 2022123,62019.5320.786.5014.360.581.341.07122.643.11 (d) (e) 125,27819.7921.066.5014.360.581.341.07123.193.39 2023 2024126,93620.0621.346.5014.360.581.341.07123.193.13 2025128,71420.3421.636.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.85 2026130,37220.6021.916.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.59 2027132,03020.8622.196.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.33 2028133,68821.1222.476.5014.360.581.341.07123.192.07 (f) 135,34621.3822.756.5014.360.581.341.07123.191.80 2029 2030137,15421.6723.056.5014.360.581.341.07123.191.52 2031138,81221.9323.336.5014.360.581.341.07123.191.26 2032140,47022.1923.616.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.99 2033142,12822.4623.896.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.73 2034143,78622.7224.176.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.47 2035145,59423.0024.476.5014.360.581.341.07123.190.18 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 20.86 MGD on annual average basis for the City and 1.915 MGD for Manalapan. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending Manalapan Plant RO Treatment (Floridan) = 80% recovery efficiency (a) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (b) - By 2023, all surficial raw water in treated at the east WTP. (c) - Manalapan RO plant is still in operation (d) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (e) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (f) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 574 of 729 Table 3-10 Summary of Finished Water Max Month Demand and Supply Projections (MGD) - with Maximum East Wellfield Withdrawals - Proposed Service Area Finished Water Equivalent Allocations (Maximum Month Basis MGD) Facility Proposed Floridan Well Field Allocation From Water Maximum Month Average Daily Capacity + LPRO Treatment Manalapan Total Supply Purchase Population Demand Demand (MGD) Surplus Year Eastern Surficial Raw From Western (g) From PBC (d) (MGD) ASR (MGD)(a)(Deficit) (b) (c) Surficial Aquifer Aquifer Manalapan (MGD) (MGD) Finished (e) (f) Finished Raw Raw Water 2013108,75217.1818.567.0011.90 - 2.50 - - 1.721.38122.173.61 2014110,10017.4018.797.0011.90 - 2.50 - - 1.721.38122.173.38 2015111,83317.6719.087.0011.90 - 2.50 - - 1.721.38122.173.08 2016113,52117.9419.376.5015.03 - 1.00 - - 1.721.38124.034.66 2017115,17918.2019.656.5015.03 - 1.00 - - 1.721.38124.034.38 2018116,83718.4619.946.5015.03 - 1.00 - - 1.721.38124.034.10 2019118,49518.7220.226.5015.03 - 1.00 - - 1.721.38124.033.81 2020120,27419.0020.526.5015.03 - 1.00 - - 1.721.38124.033.51 2021121,96219.2720.816.5015.03 - 1.00 - - 1.721.38124.033.22 2022123,62019.5321.096.5015.03 - 1.00 - - 1.721.38124.032.94 (h) (i)125,27819.7921.386.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.933.56 2023 2024126,93620.0621.666.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.933.27 2025128,71420.3421.966.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.97 2026130,37220.6022.256.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.69 2027132,03020.8622.536.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.40 2028133,68821.1222.816.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.932.12 (j) 135,34621.3823.106.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.931.84 2029 2030137,15421.6723.406.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.931.53 2031138,81221.9323.696.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.931.25 2032140,47022.1923.976.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.96 2033142,12822.4624.256.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.68 2034143,78622.7224.546.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.40 2035145,59423.0024.846.5013.820.581.001.210.971.721.38124.930.09 Limiting Conditions Total East Wellfield Withdrawal - 7.0 MGD, after completion of the pipeline connecting the Western Wellfield to the Eastern WTP, reduces to 6.5 MGD Total withdrawal allocation is 22.53 MGD on maximum month basis. East Plant Lime Softening (surficial) - 98.5% recovery efficiency West Plant Nano Treatment (Surficial) = 85% recovery efficiency + 20% bi-pass/blending (a) - Ratio of maximum month to average daily flow is 1.08 based on MOR (2011-2014) (b) - Beginning 2016, available Surficial Aquifer water from Western Wellfield is pumped to the East WTP for treatment and distribution (c) - By 2023, all surficial raw water in treated at the east WTP. (d) - The combined pumping from the east wellfield and ASR is 9.5 MGD till 2015. Afterwards it will be 7.5 MGD. The City wants operational flexibility to maximize ASR use and minimize wellfield withdrawals during high demand periods and drought conditions. (e) - Maximum month FAS withdrawal is 1.21 MGD (f) - Manalapan RO plant is still in operation (g) - Total water available to system - surficial treatment plus ASR recovery (h) - Assuming by the end of 2023, the East WTP is expanded to 24 MGD maximum day production. (i) - FAS wells are anticipated to be installed by 2023. (j) - Current WUP expires on 12/10/2029. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 575 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 27 Boynton Beach, Florida 4.0Water Supply Projects Identification 4.1Water Supply Projects Update This section details the water supply projects that will be implemented in order to meet the City water demands through 2035, particularly in the next five years. The City will be continuously actively engaged in diversifying it sources of water supply over the next planning period. At present, the City is dependent upon the Surficial Aquifer as a supply, but also has two ASR wells in operation. The overall Aquifer during the dry season of the year, while maximizing availability of Surficial Aquifer water during the wet season. Anticipating additional restrictions on the Surficial Aquifer, the City has developed a Water Supply Plan that calls for the following actions: eastern wellfield with additional water from the west. The withdrawal from the eastern field is limited due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean while the East WTP has idle capacity; Reuse distribution system expansion (eight MGD); and Continue to increase efforts to conserve ultimately keeping and may lowing the per capita usage of 158 gpd by 2035. 4.1.1Wellfield Interconnection Project Raw Water Main According 50-00499-W, withdrawals from the Eastern Wellfield are limited to seven MGD on average, while withdrawals from the Western Wellfield are 13.86 MGD on average. The East WTP has idle treatment capacity because of limited withdrawals. By interconnecting the two water treatment plants, the city will be able to take full advantage of the East treatment capacity by pumping water from the West Wellfield to the East WTP. Also at this location, the City can store the water in their two ASR wells. This complete wellfield interconnection project will include three parts: the construction of a pumping station at the West WTP, approximately seven miles of 36-inch raw water piping, and WTP to remove color and naturally occurring organic content prior to lime softening. The raw water main project is broken down into three phases: Section A: along Military Trail from the West WTP to the intersection of Woolbright Road and Military Trail; Section B: along Woolbright Road from the intersection of Woolbright Road and Military Trail to the intersection of Woolbright Road and Congress Avenue; and Section C: along the route of Woolbright Road, beginning west of Congress Avenue and ending east of Interstate 95. Both Section A and Section B are completed. Construction of Section C is expected to start in early 2015 and complete in the end of 2015. Table 4-1 provides a summary of the project, funding source and expenditure by year. This project has been approved and funded by the City Commission. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 576 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 28 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 4-1 Summary of Wellfield Interconnection Project - Raw Water Main Raw water main, transmission line from the West Wellfield to East WTP : From West Wellfiled to East Wellfield : Expansion of the water treatment system by conveying water from the west wellfield to the East WTP. The project includes approximately last two miles of 36-inch diameter raw water main. The project is part of a larger scope to get western wellfield water from the west to the East WTP. In essence, there are three parts, pipeline, treatment, and pump station system to pump the water. : It will allow the City to utilize water from the western wellfield at both treatment plants, and reduce long-term demands at the eastern wellfield. The eastern field is limited due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. (UE Obj. 3C.1, Policy 3C.1.10, 3D.1.1) : Capital Facilities Fund (404) Estimated Cost FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Project Total Design* $97,327 $0 $0 $0 $0 $97,327 Construction $4,402,673 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,402,673 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $4,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500,000 *: Adjusted based on 2013-2014 Adopted Budget. 4.1.2Wellfield Interconnection Project Ionic Exchange Water Treatment Process Located at the East WTP This project is another major component of the larger effort to move raw water from the West WTP to the East WTP. An ion exchange pre-treatment system situated at the East WTP will be necessary to pre-treat the water. A waste stream from the ion exchange units will be transported back and disposed of via the deep injection well located at the West WTP. Table 4-2 provides a summary of the project, funding source, estimated cost and expenditure by year. The conceptual design in underway and it is anticipated that this project will complete in September 2016. This project has been approved by the City Commission and is funded in Table 4-2 Summary of Ionic Exchange, Water Treatment Located at the East WTP Plant Ionic exchange, water treatment located at the East WTP : East WTP : This project is a subset of the larger effort to move raw water from the West WTP to the East WTP. An ion exchange pre-treatment system situated at the East WTP will be necessary to pre-treat the water. A waste stream from the ion exchange units will be disposed of via the deep injection well. The project is part of a larger scope to get western wellfield water from the west to the East WTP. In essence, there are three parts, pipeline, pump station system to pump the water, and treatment. It will allow the City to utilize water from the western wellfield at both treatment plants, and reduce long-term demands at the eastern wellfield. The eastern field is limited due to its proximity to the Atlantic Ocean. (UE Obj. 3C.1, Policy 3C.1.10, 3D.1.1) : Capital Facilities Fund (404) Estimated Cost FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Project Total Design $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $438,398 Construction $15,985,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,727,184 Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $16,395,195 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,165,582 A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 577 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 29 Boynton Beach, Florida 4.1.3East WTP Rehabilitation Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule FAC 62-555 requires that suppliers of water using ground water that is not under the direct influence of surface water but that is exposed during treatment to the open atmosphere and possible microbial contamination shall provide treatment that reliably achieves at least four-log inactivation or removal of viruses before or at the first customer at all flow rates. This Statute is a direct response of the United States Environmental Protection Agency promulgation of the Ground Water Rule, which establishes additional microbial and disinfectant monitoring requirements for systems using groundwater as a source. This project will proactively establishes four-log inactivation/removal of viruses, it will be exempt from the triggered source water fecal indicator monitoring requirements of this rule, as well as potentially reduce the extent to which corrective action would be needed if any deficiency were to be uncovered during a sanitary survey. Table 4-3 provides a summary of the project, funding source, estimated cost and expenditure by year. Table 4-3 Summary of East WTP Rehabilitation Groundwater Rule Regulation Rule Summary of East WTP RehabilitationGround Water Regulation Rule : East WTP : Modifications to the East WTP to accommodate the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Groundwater Rule and make the plant compliant with the regulations on four Log Virus Deactivation. This project is part of a larger scope that is rehabilitating the East WTP, meeting regulatory requirements, increasing capacity and making it more energy efficient. This is an unfunded mandate. In December 2009, the EPA introduced the new Ground Water Rule. The rule mandates new testing requirements for water distribution systems fed from ground water as the source. In order to meet the requirements of the rule medium and large-size water treatment facilities need to acquire four Log Virus Deactivation certification from the Health Department. This project implements the recommendations of our engineering consultants to meet the requirements of the rule. The other improvement work is consolidated in the progressive design built project. : Capital Improvement Program (403) Estimated Cost FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Project Total Design $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 Construction $563,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $563,280 Other $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 TOTAL $698,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $698,280 4.1.4East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency 3MG Storage Tank This project will add additional 3 MG storage tank, new high efficiency High Service Pumps and transfer pumps to the water supply system. It will provide additional emergency storage of finished water and keep the pressure in the citywide distribution system. High efficiency service pumps will reduce energy consumption. Table 4-4 provides a summary of the project, funding source, estimated cost and expenditure by year. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 578 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 30 Boynton Beach, Florida Table 4-4 Summary of East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency 3MG Storage Tank Summary of East WTP Modifications Related to Growth, Storage and Energy Efficiency 3MG Storage Tank : East WTP : East WTP rehabilitation including additional 3MG Storage Tank and new high efficiency High Service Pumps and transfer pumps. This project is part of a larger scope that is rehabilitating the East WTP, meeting regulatory requirements, increasing capacity and making it more energy efficient. The technical review of the East WTP has identified several additional recommendations to improve the operation and reduce cost. The new storage tank provides additional emergency storage of finished water for emergency relief and fire protection citywide. In addition this would require new high service pumps which would be designed to be high efficiency to reduce energy consumption. : Capital Improvement Program (403) Estimated Cost FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Project Total Design $0 $705,000 $0 $0 $0 $705,000 Construction $0 $2,951,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,951,000 Other $0 $604,000 $0 $0 $0 $604,000 TOTAL $0 $4,260,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,260,000 4.1.5Expansion of Reclaimed Water System to Achieve 8 MGD The reuse distribution system has completed a Phase I trunk line from the plant to some distribution destination areas. The next area identified and a part of the CUP credit towards potable water is the Lawrence Road Corridor to include Cypress Creek Country Club. Completed projects include Seacrest from the Library to C-16 Canal, SE Federal Hwy/ 4th Street Corridor and Galaxy Elementary. This project will deliver an additional 1.73 MGD in 2015. The City needs assistant of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) in transforming the potential users from irrigation withdrawal users to reclaimed water users. Table 4-5 provides a summary of the project, funding source, estimated cost and expenditure CIP. Table 4-5 Summary of Expansion of Reuse Water System Project Reuse Distribution Systems, to achieve full 8 MGD : Lawrence Road Corridor : The reuse distribution system has completed a Phase I trunk line from the plant to some distribution destination areas. The next area identified and a part of the Consumptive Use Permit credit towards potable water is the Lawrence Road Corridor to include Cypress Creek Country Club. Completed projects include Seacrest from the Library to C-16 Canal, SE Federal Hwy/ 4th Street Corridor and Galaxy Elementary. : The City intends to use expansion of the reclaimed water system as a means of securing additional water allocations from the Surficial aquifer. : Capital Facilities Fund (404) Estimated Cost FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Project Total Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $1,844,358 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $8,000,000 A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 579 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Page 31 Boynton Beach, Florida Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL $1,844,358 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $8,000,000 4.1.6Other Water Supply Projects Beyond Five Years When the raw water main project (Section 4.1.1) is completed, in order to treat raw water coming from the West Wellfield at the East WTP and accommodate the future water demands beyond 2020, the City is also planning to expand the East WTP from 19.2 MGD to 24 MGD. East WTP improvement and rehabilitation project will increase plant capacity to 24 MGD including rehabilitation of the East Softening Basin, valve replacement, additional lime Storage and other process chemical systems to meet Federal and State code and replacement of the electrical systems to provide additional generating capacity and new electrical switch gear. The City will revisit the necessity of West WTP RO conversion beyond five years. The current CUP allows approximately 1.21 MGD of Floridan Aquifer withdrawal by 2023. 4.2Summary The City has successfully implemented a well planned program to provide and maintain permanent water supply, residents. The current Capital Program includes requisite improvements and budgets to address ongoing renewal and replacement needs of the existing systems, as well as provide for treatment capacity expansion to help meet projected water demands for the future (See Appendix B). Particularly, when projects mentioned in Section 4.1 are implemented, a surplus will be made available each year throughout the planning period in the both existing service area and the proposed expanded service area. A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 580 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Boynton Beach, Florida APPENDIX A Second Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach for the Purchase and Sale of Bulk Potable Water A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 581 of 729 Page 582 of 729 Page 583 of 729 Page 584 of 729 Page 585 of 729 Page 586 of 729 Page 587 of 729 Page 588 of 729 Page 589 of 729 Page 590 of 729 Page 591 of 729 10-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department Boynton Beach, Florida APPENDIX B City of Boynton Beach Utility Improvement Plan 5-Year Plan with Project Budget and Funding Source A132321.01 / January 2015 Page 592 of 729 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CIP FINANCIAL SUMMARY REPORT with FUND BALANCE Proposed Account PROJECTProject 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/20162016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 PROJECT CIP Adopted Project Name Available PRIOR YR Expenditures @ Encumbrances Project # Budget + PY TOTAL TOTALPlanPlanPlanPlanPlan Budget EXPENSES06/30/14@ 06/30/14 FundDept/DivExp AcctObj Code Encumbrance Neighborhood Utility Improvements 403500053565.04SWRChapel Hill/Mission Hill/Lake Eden SEWER Impv - 125,000 $ 125,000 - 403500053865.09STMChapel Hill/Mission Hill/Lake Eden STORMWATER Impv. - 449,000 $ 449,000 - 403500053365.02WTRChapel Hill/Mission Hill/Lake Eden WATER Main Replacement - 700,000 $ 700,000 Chapel Hill subtotal - - - - 125,000 1,149,000 - - $ 1,274,000 - 403500053565.04SWRGolfview Harbor SEWER Main Impv 135,000 $ 135,000 Golfview Harbor STORMWATER Improvements-surface water 403500053865.09STM - 300,000 282,000 299,000 - $ 881,000 quality pre-treatment Golfview Harbor subtotal - - - - 435,000 282,000 299,000 - $ 1,016,000 5006 234,139 234,139 40353565.04SWR115Lake Boynton Estates SEWER Main Impv 234,139 - $ - 403500659065.04SWR115Lake Boynton Estates SEWER Main Impv 19,952 9,345 10,607 5,879 1,208 3,520 $ - 5006 430,091 9,345 413,659 40359065.07STM033Lake Boynton Estates STORMWATER Impv. 420,746 5,879 1,208 5006 75,723 54,509 7,040 40359065.02WTR133Lake Boynton Estates WATER Impv. 21,214 11,758 2,416 $ - 403501053865.09STM033Lake Boynton Estates STORMWATER Impv. 27,905 587 26,731 538 26,193 - $ - 5010 1,368,438 1,580 565,278 940 79,433 484,905 40353365.02WTR133Lake Boynton Estates WATER Main Impv 800,000 $ 800,000 Lake Boynton Estates subtotal 2,156,247 75,365 $ 800,000 1,278,715 24,993 110,459 1,143,263 800,000 - - - - 403500053865.09STM029Lakeside/NE 20th Ave STORMWATER Impv 370,000 - 370,000 $ 370,000 980,000 - 403500053365.02WTR123Lakeside/NE 20th Ave WATER Main Impv - 305,000 675,000 $ 980,000 250,000 - 403500053365.02WTR123Lakeside/NE 20th Ave WATER Main Impv - 250,000 $ 250,000 Lakeside/NE 20th Avenue subtotal 1,600,000 - - - - 555,000 1,045,000 $ 1,600,000 8,990 8,173 - 403500059096.07STM022Seacrest Corridor Swale/STORMWATER Management 5006 167,742 88,935 (0) 40359065.09STM022Seacrest Corridor Swale/STORMWATER Management 25,185 11,898 13,288 - 5010 9,726,316 939 2,494,500 40353865.09STM022Seacrest Corridor Swale/STORMWATER Management 2,724,438 7,045 222,893 2,500,000 4,500,000 $ 7,000,000 R 403500059096.02WTR106Seacrest Corridor WATER Main Replacement 371,246 370,429 - $ - 5006 251,613 133,403 (1) 40359065.02WTR106Seacrest Corridor WATER Main Replacement 37,776 17,847 19,930 $ - 5010 9,420,211 1,772 2,077,923 40353365.02WTR106Seacrest Corridor WATER Main Replacement 2,417,030 4,768 334,339 2,500,000 4,500,000 $ 7,000,000 R Seacrest Corridor subtotal 19,946,117 603,650 5,204,429 41,557 590,450 4,572,422 5,000,000 9,000,000 - - - $ 14,000,000 30,504 24,837 - 403500059096.11REU004REUSE Galaxy Elementary School $ - Large Meter Replacements - Town of Gulfstream, Briney Breezes, 403500053563.12SWR109 44,714 9,750 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 $ 25,000 Little Club 5010 1,433,514 526,023 106,010 40353565.04SWR059Manhole R & R 150,000 43,990 - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 $ 750,000 500,000 - 403500053365.02WTRSand Castle Water Distribution Improvements 500,000 $ 500,000 403500053865.02STMOak Street Stormwater Improvements 650,000 - 150,000 500,000 $ 650,000 2,950,000 - 403500053865.02STMVenetian and Treasure Iles, NW 1st Ave -Storm Drainage Systems 2,950,000 $ 2,950,000 East Heart of Boynton stormwater study (NE 3rd Street) 403500053865.09STM035 400,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 200,000 $ 200,000 Stormwater Improvements Pipeline Rehab (gravity, F/M, laterals) SEWER various locations, 5010 6,725,807 3,883,956 2,737,428 40353565.04 2,737,428 $ - r SWR064 Phase V repairs Pipeline Rehab (gravity, F/M, laterals) SEWER various locations, 2,100,000 - - 403500053565.04SWR064 - 500,000 500,000 500,000 300,000 300,000 $ 2,100,000 11/12 Barista Way Purchase 1 Replacement Pump for Pump Station 415 & 357 5006 5,000 - 5,000 40353865.09STM 5,000 - - - - - - $ - STORMWATER 5006 1,243,025 243,025 - 40353865.09STM031Rehabilitate STORMWATER Systems, various locations - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 1,000,000 WATER Main Replacement (Federal Hwy DOT agreement, 1,317,863 560,058 288,204 403500053365.02WTR054Seacrest Blvd - reuse project) Potter Dimick - 395,000 106,796 - 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 $ 350,000 Lawrence Road, N. Federal Hwy 12/13 North and South Road Stormwater Improvements PH 1 403500053865.09STM032 2,011,639 11,639 - - 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 STORMWATER Neighborhood Utility Improvements - TOTAL 43,114,429 5,938,303 $ 9,975,572 $ 217,336 $ 700,909 $ 9,057,327 $ 12,930,000 $ 11,680,000 $ 2,856,000 $ 1,024,000 $ 725,000 $ 29,215,000 Page 593 of 729 Z:\ComDev\2013\A132321.01 - Boynton Water Supply Plan\Reference Docs\RAI\CIP\Utility CIP 2014-15 Budget w Project Sheets (Fund 403) - Proposed 07012014:Fund 403 CIP FY14-15 (Proposed)1 of 31/5/2015 4:34 PM CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CIP FINANCIAL SUMMARY REPORT with FUND BALANCE Proposed Account Project Project 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/20162016/2017 2017/2018 2017/2018 PROJECT CIP Adopted Project Name Available PRIOR YR Project # TOTAL Budget + PY TOTALExpendituresEncumbrancesPlanPlanPlanPlanPlan Budget EXPENSES FundDept/DivExp AcctObj Code Encumbrance Water Supply and Plant Improvements Wellfield/Supply/Storage 91,028 95,618 - 403500059096.02WTR105Wellfield Rehabilitation - Replace Electric Panels Wellfield & Water Storage Control Telemetry (Asset Mgmt) 10,000 403500053365.02WTR105 10,000 - - - - - - $ - WATER 1,071,536 1,358,169 - 403500059096.02WTR075Wellfield Rehabilitation - column pipe, pumps, motors, etc. 403500053365.02WTR075Wellfield Rehabilitation - column pipe, pumps, motors, etc. - - 360,677 150,745 44,804 165,128 425,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 $ 1,625,000 Plant Improvements 1,071,536 612,603 501,885 (719) 403500053365.02WTR017Replace Pumps and Speed Drives, Sludge Pumps, transmitters, etc. 83,000 83,719 $ - Scrubber, Media & Chemical Pump and storage tank replacement 1,171,188 1,008,016 38 403500059096.02WTR017 50,000 - 49,962 $ - (Fluoride, Sodium Hydroxide), ammonia system replacement 500,000 - 403500053365.02WTR020Water Plant Repairs - Mechanical - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 $ 500,000 403500053365.02WTR021Water Plant Repairs - Electrical 600,000 - - 100,000 150,000 100,000 150,000 100,000 $ 600,000 425,000 - 403500053365.02WTR022Water Plant Repairs - Treatment - 125,000 25,000 125,000 25,000 125,000 $ 425,000 425,000 - 403500053365.02WTR023Water Plant Repairs - Structure - 425,000 $ 425,000 403500053365.02WTR025Water Plant Repairs - Chemical Containment Rehab 60,000 - - 60,000 $ 60,000 40,000 - 403500053365.02WTRChemical Feed Flow Meters - 40,000 $ 40,000 70,000 - 403500053365.02WTRStorage Tank Valve Replacement - 70,000 $ 70,000 403500053365.02WTRRaw Water Main Painting 20,000 - - 20,000 $ 20,000 500,000 - 403500053365.02WTRWater Treatment Plant Expansion & Rehabilitation - 500,000 $ 500,000 403501053365.02WTR112East Plant rehabilitation (filter repair, offices, basin rehab) 300,000 - 300,000 300,000 $ - r 5006 2,296,037 2,238,381 (0) 40359065.02WTR112Water Treatment Conversion Clo2-Nah20 19,283 3,133 16,150 $ - East Plant rehabilitation - Ground Water Rule regulation 5010 698,280 - 698,280 40353365.02WTR112 698,280 $ - r requirements East Plant rehabilitation - East Plant replacement capacity , basins, 5010 7,995,139 - 7,985,094 40353365.02WTR112 7,994,139 9,045 - $ - valves, generator, plumbing, controlr 407,231 204,126 - 403500059096.02WTR127Water Plant Security 27,975 27,975 $ - 403500059096.10WTR127Water Plant Security 208,386 202,518 5,868 5,868 0 $ - Security upgrades - perimeter protection and surveillance entry 242,673 - 115,000 403500053365.02WTR127 115,000 115,000 $ 115,000 notification 403500053365.02WTR008Admin Building Repairs, carpeting, A/C, roofing, flooring 818,415 99,415 243,000 38,514 17,653 186,833 201,000 150,000 125,000 $ 476,000 280,749 165,321 - 403500059096.02WTR132Integration of Water Plant Control System 115,428 17,500 97,928 $ - 5006 259,528 86,131 (0) 40359065.02WTR132Integration of Water Plant Control System 173,397 173,397 $ - Miscellaneous Improvements 17,930,230 403500053365.02WTR017Water Main Valves Program 432,185 69,185 - 15,000 168,000 180,000 $ 363,000 318,817 124,872 26,082 403500053365.02WTR103Replace Laboratory Equipment 32,000 5,918 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 32,000 $ 160,000 163,665 13,665 25,000 403500053365.02WTR060Water Meter Replacement 25,000 - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 $ 125,000 403500059031.9WTR137Migration/Repl Amr-Ami - - - - $ - 1,835,580 150,737 (109,222) 403500059096.02WTR138Migration/Repl Amr-Ami 698,861 376,340 431,743 $ - 2,527,838 353,764 403500053365.02WTR138Water Meter Flex Net meter reading improvements 2,527,838 2,153,361 20,713 $ - Water Supply and Plant Improvements - TOTAL 24,279,851 6,318,040 $ 13,479,746 $ 2,860,332 $ 864,136 $ 9,755,277 $ 2,253,000 $ 950,000 $ 987,000 $ 632,000 $ 682,000 $ 5,504,000 Proposed Account Project Project 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/20162016/2017 2017/2018 2017/2018 PROJECT CIP Adopted Project Name Available PRIOR YR Project # TOTAL Budget + PY TOTALExpendituresEncumbrancesPlanPlanPlanPlanPlan Budget EXPENSES FundDept/DivExp AcctObj Code Encumbrance Wastewater System Improvements - Lift Stations - 974,538 6,584 (28,633) 403500053565.04SWR075Lift Stations Pump Replacement program 120,000 82,019 66,614 220,000 220,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 $ 800,000 481,048 471,238 (6,835) 403500059096.04SWR075Pump Replacement Program 6,835 - $ - Master Lift Station Rehabilitations - Mechanical & Electrical, 403500053565.04SWR102 2,294,655 244,655 900,000 21,073 443 878,484 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 316, 319, or 356 dependent on Pence pumps and odor control r Park LS relief Master Lift Station Rehabilitations - Mechanical & Electrical, 1,500,000 - - 403500053565.04SWR 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 LS309 pumps and odor control 403500053565.04SWRForce Main Valves and Air Release Valves (Congress) 775,000 - 775,000 $ 775,000 126,137 123,473 - 403500059096.04SWR112SCADA Sys Repl Integ Tel $ - 5006 570,377 569,966 - 40359065.04SWR112SCADA Sys Repl Integ Tel 411 411 $ - 403500053565.04SWR112Rehab Pumping Station Control Telemetry (Asset Mgmt) SEWER 197,035 - 30,000 17,465 - 12,535 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 $ 150,000 SWR108 1,821,985 464,976 200,000 403500053565.04Emergency stationary generators or pumps 357,009 157,009 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 $ 1,000,000 SWR111 Wastewater System Improvements - TOTAL 8,740,774 1,880,891 $ 1,407,420 $ 284,401 $ 67,468 $ 1,055,551 $ 3,875,000 $ 450,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 5,375,000 Page 594 of 729 Z:\ComDev\2013\A132321.01 - Boynton Water Supply Plan\Reference Docs\RAI\CIP\Utility CIP 2014-15 Budget w Project Sheets (Fund 403) - Proposed 07012014:Fund 403 CIP FY14-15 (Proposed)2 of 31/5/2015 4:34 PM CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CIP FINANCIAL SUMMARY REPORT with FUND BALANCE Proposed Account Project Project 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/20162016/2017 2017/2018 2017/2018 PROJECT CIP Adopted Project Name Available PRIOR YR Project # TOTAL Budget + PY TOTALExpendituresEncumbrancesPlanPlanPlanPlanPlan Budget EXPENSES FundDept/DivExp AcctObj Code Encumbrance Studies/Analyses/Misc. 536WTR SWRAlternative Energy Evaluation Study 100,000 - - - 100,000 403500031.90 $ 100,000 WTR135 100,000 - - 403500053631.90Lower East Coast Study 100,000 $ 100,000 SWR116 STM034 403500059096.10WTR134Water Distribution System Hydraulic Analysis/Master Plan 362,278 310,178 - - $ - 150,000 - - 403500053331.90WTR134Water Distribution System Hydraulic Analysis/Master PlanR - 150,000 $ 150,000 WTR017 170,000 - 120,000 403500053631.90Rate Study 120,000 50,000 $ 50,000 SWR011 STM028 200,000 - 197,340 403500053631.90WTR150Interactive Voice Response for improved Customer Service 200,000 2,660 $ - 403500053531.90SWRSEWER Master Plan and Updates 200,000 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 $ 100,000 100,000 - 403500053831.90STMForce Main Reorganization Study 100,000 $ 100,000 STM031 Stormwater Master Plan and Updates (STM031) / O & M 403500053831.90 448,057 248,057 100,000 100,000 100,000 $ 100,000 STM034Manual/Asset Management, Heart of Boynton Beach (STM034) Update base map/aerial photogrammetry (ready for CADD) 606,803 206,803 200,000 403500053531.90 200,000 - 100,000 100,000 $ 200,000 SWR011 SEWER PORTION Update Base Map/Aerial Photogrammetry (ready for CADD) 403500053331.90 400,000 200,000 - 200,000 100,000 100,000 $ 200,000 WTR017WATER PORTION Studies/Analyses/Misc. - TOTAL 2,837,138 765,038 $ 920,000 $ - $ 2,660 $ 917,340 $ 800,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,100,000 Regional Plant 3,846,823 3,144,156 365,685 403500058065.06REG029Bio-solid Pelletization Program 365,685 $ - Regional Plant - TOTAL 3,846,823 3,144,156 $ 365,685 $ - $ - $ 365,685 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Grand Total all Utilities CIP $ 82,819,015 $ 18,046,427 $ 26,148,423 $ 3,362,069 $ 1,635,173 $ 21,151,181 $ 19,858,000 $ 13,380,000 $ 4,193,000 $ 2,006,000 $ 1,757,000 $ 41,194,000 Font color code 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/20162016/20172017/20182017/2018 Green Revenues Actual 6/30PlanPlanPlanPlanPlan Red Expenditures Blue Fund 403 Projected Beginning Bal. - Reserves $ 7,580,548 17,516,639 2,821,388 (516,291) (217,035) 273,709 Encumbrances R - roll available "adopted" budget or carry-over to new budget year Future Debt - - 4,500,000 500,000 - - Grant/Misc Revenue Interest - 262,750 42,321 (7,744) (3,256) 4,106 Exp. To be funded - 2012 Bond Issue (Fund 410) 12,000,000 - Transfer Net Revenues from Operations 2,933,333 4,900,000 5,500,000 4,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Expenditures (3,362,069) (19,858,000) (13,380,000) (4,193,000) (2,006,000) (1,757,000) Encumbrances (1,635,173) Sub-Total Balance Prior Year Adjustment - review - Fund 403 Projected Ending Balance$ 17,516,639 2,821,388 (516,291) (217,035) 273,709 1,020,815 Page 595 of 729 Z:\ComDev\2013\A132321.01 - Boynton Water Supply Plan\Reference Docs\RAI\CIP\Utility CIP 2014-15 Budget w Project Sheets (Fund 403) - Proposed 07012014:Fund 403 CIP FY14-15 (Proposed)3 of 31/5/2015 4:34 PM CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 5 YEAR PLAN with PROJECT BUDGETS and FUNDING SOURCE FUNDING SOURCES (Per Project) PROJECTProject 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/20162016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 PROJECTTotal CIP Project Name Adopted Budget Fund Capacity PRIOR YR Project # TOTALExpendituresEncumbrancesAvailable BudgetProposedPlanPlanPlanPlan5 Yr. TOTALBondsFunding PM/STATUS + PY EXPENSES ReservesExpan. Fees Neighborhood Utility Improvements Miscellaneous Utility Projects REU004REUSE Distribution System 8 MGD Program 8,000,000 155,581 - - - - 1,844,419 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,844,419 6,000,000 $ 7,844,419 $ 7,844,419 Jose Huertas/RFQ $ - WTR017Miscellaneous Utility Projects - Engineering Services 2,919,250 2,919,250 - - - $ - - $ - Raw water main, transmission line from west wellfield to east water WTR136 75,495 6,700 68,795 59,426 9,369 - - $ - $ - treatment plant (engineering services) Raw water main, transmission line from west wellfield to east water Chris WTR136 7,612,000 - 3,112,000 507,583 2,606,620 (2,203) 4,500,000 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 R Roschek/Construction treatment plant WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION Ionic exchange, water treatment located at the west plant ($4.1M) & WTR136 16,397,998 8,823,674 600 8,823,074 7,574,324 - $ 7,574,324 7,574,324 $ 7,574,324 Micheal Low/ R pump station ($1.744M) WTR136Ionic exchange, water treatment located at the west plant 6,769,787 6,311,159 458,628 153,796 304,832 - $ - - - $ - Micheal Low/ East Plant growth changes, storage tank, high service pumps, energy WTR112 4,260,000 - - 4,260,000 - 4,260,000 - - $ 4,260,000 $ 4,260,000 Micheal Low/ efficiency Phase IV Interim Improvements, West Plant, EXPANSION - shields WTR098 555,178 555,178 - - $ - $ - COMPLETED for protection OSG start-up 12/13 Remote Storage and Pumping Facility (NE Quadrant), WTR 360,000 - 180,000 180,000 $ 360,000 360,000 $ 360,000 Chris Roschek/ EXPANSION Water Supply and Plant Improvements - TOTAL 46,949,708 9,947,868 12,463,097 721,405 2,920,821 8,820,871 13,918,743 6,260,000 2,180,000 2,180,000 - 24,538,743 $ 6,464,419 $ - $ 18,074,324 $ 24,538,743 Wastewater System Improvements Phase I New Force Main from East Plant Site to Regional Plant, new SWR114 1,920,096 2,545 1,557,551 7,639 1,128,487 421,425 360,000 - - - - $ 360,000 360,000 - - $ 360,000 force main LS at SE 6th Avenue, new LS at SE 6th Avenue Jose Huertas R (PENCE PARK) SWR114Regional Plant Force Main 6,627,255 6,606,135 21,120 13,190 7,700 230 - - - - - $ - - - $ - Jose Huertas Wastewater System Improvements - TOTAL 8,547,351 6,608,680 1,578,671 20,829 1,136,187 421,655 360,000 - - - - 360,000 $ 360,000 $ - $ - $ 360,000 Grand Total all Utilities CIP 14,041,768 742,234 4,057,007 9,242,526 $ 14,278,743 $ 6,260,000 $ 2,180,000 $ 2,180,000 $ - $ 24,898,743 $ 6,824,419 $ - $ 18,074,324 $ 24,898,743 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/20162016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 Actual @ 9/30Actual @ 6/30PlanPlanPlanPlanPlan Fund 404 Projected Beginning Bal. - Cap. FeesFund 404 Projected Beginning Bal. - Cap. Fees$ 17,740,600Fund 404 Projected Beginning Bal. - Cap. Fees$ 19,751,845$ 9,003,480$ 7,239,095$ 3,451,486 $ 3,446,001$ 3,457,691 Funding Sources Capital Facility Charges (Water)Capital Facility Charges (Water) 1,555,483Capital Facility Charges (Water) 94,492 250,000 300,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 Capital Facility Charges (Sewer)Capital Facility Charges (Sewer) 948,307Capital Facility Charges (Sewer) 50,536 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Future DebtFuture DebtFuture Debt 7,574,324 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - GrantGrant 77,791Grant - InterestInterest (107,667) Interest 36,145 90,035 72,391 34,515 51,690 51,865 Exp. to be funded - 2012 Bond Issue (Fund 410)Exp. to be funded - 2012 Bond Issue (Fund 410) - Exp. to be funded - 2012 Bond Issue (Fund 410) 3,112,000 4,500,000 2,473,914 3,293,172 E Expendituresx (462,669)Expenditures (742,234) (14,278,743) (6,260,000) (2,180,000) (2,180,000) - - (9,242,296) Adopted Project Budget to rolledAdopted Project Budget to rolledAdopted Project Budget to rolled Red Expenditures Fund 404 Projected Ending Bal. - Cap FeesFund 404 Projected Ending Bal. - Cap Fees$ 19,751,845Fund 404 Projected Ending Bal. - Cap Fees$ 9,003,480$ 7,239,095$ 3,451,486$ 3,446,001 $ 3,457,691$ 3,649,557 Blue Encumbrances Page 596 of 729 Z:\ComDev\2013\A132321.01 - Boynton Water Supply Plan\Reference Docs\RAI\CIP\Utility CIP 2014-15 Budget w Project Sheets (Fund 404) - Proposed 07012014:Fund 404 CIP FY14-151 of 11/5/2015 Page 597 of 729 Page 598 of 729 Page 599 of 729 Page 600 of 729 Page 601 of 729 Page 602 of 729 Page 603 of 729 Page 604 of 729 Page 605 of 729 Page 606 of 729 Page 607 of 729 Page 608 of 729 Page 609 of 729 Page 610 of 729 Page 611 of 729 Page 612 of 729 Page 613 of 729 Page 614 of 729 Page 615 of 729 Page 616 of 729 Page 617 of 729 Page 618 of 729 Page 619 of 729 Page 620 of 729 )<,-&-8% +YEVERX]%KVIIQIRX 8LI'MX]SJ&S]RXSR&IEGL*PSVMHE XLI'MX] QEOIWXLMW+YEVERX]%KVIIQIRX XLMW +YEVERX] HEXIH1EVGLEWJSPPS[W 8LI'MX]LIVIF]KYEVERXIIWXLIJYPPERHTVSQTXTE]QIRX[LIRHYI[LIXLIVF] +YEVERX] EGGIPIVEXMSRSVSXLIV[MWISJXLITVMRGMTEPSJERHMRXIVIWXSRXLI&S]RXSR&IEGL'SQQYRMX] 6IHIZIPSTQIRX%KIRG]8E\-RGVIQIRX6IZIRYI&SRH7IVMIW XLI&SRH MWWYIHSJIZIRHEXI LIVI[MXLMRXLITVMRGMTEPEQSYRXSJ 8LI'MX]JYVXLIVEKVIIWXLEXXLMW+YEVERX]WLEPPFIKSZIVRIHF]ERH +SZIVRMRK0E[ GSRWXVYIHMREGGSVHERGI[MXLXLIPE[WSJXLI7XEXISJ*PSVMHEERHMWTIVJSVQEFPIMRXLI7XEXISJ *PSVMHE 8IVQWYWIHLIVIMRERHRSXSXLIV[MWIHIJMRIHLIVIMRLEZIXLIQIERMRKWEWGVMFIH (IJMRMXMSRW XLIVIXSMR6IWSPYXMSR2S XLI6IWSPYXMSR EHSTXIH(IGIQFIVF]XLI&S]RXSR &IEGL'SQQYRMX]6IHIZIPSTQIRX%KIRG] XLI%KIRG] EWEQIRHIHERHWYTTPIQIRXIH TEVXMGYPEVP]F]6IWSPYXMSR2SCCCEHSTXIHF]XLI%KIRG]SR1EVGL 8LMW+YEVERX]QE]RSXFIEQIRHIHSVXIVQMREXIHF]XLI'MX]JSVWSPSRKEWXLI 8IVQMREXMSR &SRHMW3YXWXERHMRK 8LI'MX]EKVIIWXSJYVRMWLXLI%KIRG][MXLWYGL *MRERGMEPERH3XLIV-RJSVQEXMSR MRJSVQEXMSRVIKEVHMRKXLI'MX]EWQE]FIVIUYIWXIHF]XLI%KIRG]MRSVHIVXSIREFPIXLI%KIRG]XS GSQTP][MXLMXWSFPMKEXMSRWTYVWYERXXS7IGXMSRSJXLI6IWSPYXMSR *SVWSPSRKEW7IGXMSRLIVISJMWMRIJJIGXYTSRVIGIMTXSJXIPITLSRMG +YEVERXSV(YXMIW RSXMGIWYGLRSXMGIWYFWIUYIRXP]GSRJMVQIHMR[VMXMRKF]VIKMWXIVIHSVGIVXMJMIHQEMPSVYTSRVIGIMTX SJ[VMXXIRRSXMGIF]VIKMWXIVIHSVGIVXMJMIHQEMPF]XLI'MX]JVSQXLI,SPHIVSJXLI&SRHXLEXEHIFX WIVZMGITE]QIRXSRXLI&SRHVIUYMVIHXSLEZIFIIRQEHIF]XLI%KIRG]LEWRSXFIIRQEHIXLI'MX] [MXLMRSRI&YWMRIWW(E]EJXIVVIGIMTXSJRSXMGISJWYGLRSRTE]QIRX[MPPTE]XSXLI,SPHIVSJXLI &SRHJYRHWWYJJMGMIRXJSVXLITE]QIRXSJER]WYGLKYEVERXIIHEQSYRXW[LMGLEVIXLIRHYI 2SX[MXLWXERHMRKER]SXLIVTVSZMWMSRSJXLMW+YEVERX]XLI'MX]MWRSXERH 0MQMXIH3FPMKEXMSR WLEPPRSXFIPMEFPIJSVXLITE]QIRXSJER]EQSYRXLIVIYRHIVSVJSVXLITIVJSVQERGISJER]SFPMKEXMSR SVEKVIIQIRXLIVIYRHIVJVSQER]WSYVGISXLIVXLERXLI2SR%H:EPSVIQ6IZIRYIWETTVSTVMEXIH JSVWYGLTYVTSWIMRXLIQERRIVERHXSXLII\XIRXHIWGVMFIHMRXLMW7IGXMSR8LIXIVQ2SR%H :EPSVIQ6IZIRYIWQIERWEPPVIZIRYIWSJXLI'MX]HIVMZIHJVSQER]WSYVGISXLIVXLERXLII\IVGMWI SJXLIEHZEPSVIQXE\MRKTS[IVSJXLI'MX]FYXSRP]XSXLII\XIRXXLIWEQIQE]PE[JYPP]FIYWIHXS QEOITE]QIRXWLIVIYRHIV2STIVWSRSVIRXMX]WLEPPLEZIER]VMKLXXSVIWSVXXSPIKEPSVIUYMXEFPI EGXMSRSVVIZIRYIWXSVIUYMVISVGSQTIPXLI'MX]XSQEOIER]TE]QIRXLIVIYRHIVJVSQER]WSYVGI SXLIVXLERWYGL2SR%H:EPSVIQ6IZIRYIW 8LI'MX]GSZIRERXWXLEXWLSYPHMXFIVIUYMVIHXSQEOIER]TE]QIRXLIVIYRHIVMX[MPPETTVSTVMEXIMR MXWERRYEPFYHKIXF]EQIRHQIRXMJVIUYMVIHJVSQ2SR%H:EPSVIQ6IZIRYIWEQSYRXWWYJJMGMIRX XSQEOIWYGLTE]QIRX-RXLIIZIRXXLEXXLIEQSYRXTVIZMSYWP]FYHKIXIHJSVWYGLTYVTSWIEXER]XMQI Page 621 of 729 MWMRWYJJMGMIRXXSQEOIER]TE]QIRXVIUYMVIHXSFIQEHILIVIYRHIVXLI'MX]GSZIRERXWXSXEOI MQQIHMEXIEGXMSRXSEQIRHMXWFYHKIXWSEWXSFYHKIXERHETTVSTVMEXIEREQSYRXJVSQ2SR%H :EPSVIQ6IZIRYIWWYJJMGMIRXXSQEOIWYGLTE]QIRX7YGLGSZIRERXXSFYHKIXERHETTVSTVMEXIJVSQ 2SR%H:EPSVIQ6IZIRYIWWLEPPFIGYQYPEXMZIXSXLII\XIRXRSXTEMHERHWLEPPGSRXMRYIYRXMPWYGL 2SR%H:EPSVIQ6IZIRYIWWYJJMGMIRXXSQEOIEPPVIUYMVIHTE]QIRXWLEZIFIIRFYHKIXIH ETTVSTVMEXIHERHYWIHXSQEOITE]QIRXWVIUYMVIHXSFIQEHILIVIYRHIV 8LMW+YEVERX]QE]FIIRJSVGIHF]XLI,SPHIVSJXLI&SRH[LMGLMWE )RJSVGIQIRX FIRIJMGMEV]SJXLITVSZMWMSRWLIVISJ -2;-82)77;,)6)3*XLIYRHIVWMKRIHLEWGEYWIHXLMW+YEVERX]XSFII\IGYXIHEWSJXLIXL HE]SJ1EVGL '-8=3*&3=2832&)%',*036-(% &]CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC -XW'MX]1EREKIV Page 622 of 729 Page 623 of 729 Page 624 of 729 Page 625 of 729 Page 626 of 729 Page 627 of 729 Page 628 of 729 Page 629 of 729 Page 630 of 729 Page 631 of 729 Page 632 of 729 Page 633 of 729 Page 634 of 729 Page 635 of 729 Page 636 of 729 Page 637 of 729 Page 638 of 729 Page 639 of 729 Page 640 of 729 Page 641 of 729 Page 642 of 729 Page 643 of 729 Page 644 of 729 Page 645 of 729 Page 646 of 729 Page 647 of 729 Page 648 of 729 Page 649 of 729 Page 650 of 729 Page 651 of 729 Page 652 of 729 Page 653 of 729 Page 654 of 729 Page 655 of 729 Page 656 of 729 Page 657 of 729 Page 658 of 729 Page 659 of 729 Page 660 of 729 Page 661 of 729 Page 662 of 729 Page 663 of 729 Page 664 of 729 Page 665 of 729 Page 666 of 729 Page 667 of 729 Page 668 of 729 Page 669 of 729 Page 670 of 729 Page 671 of 729 Page 672 of 729 Page 673 of 729 Page 674 of 729 Page 675 of 729 Page 676 of 729 Page 677 of 729 Page 678 of 729 Page 679 of 729 Page 680 of 729 Page 681 of 729 Page 682 of 729 Page 683 of 729 Page 684 of 729 Page 685 of 729 Page 686 of 729 Page 687 of 729 Page 688 of 729 Page 689 of 729 Page 690 of 729 Page 691 of 729 Page 692 of 729 Page 693 of 729 Page 694 of 729 Page 695 of 729 Page 696 of 729 Page 697 of 729 Page 698 of 729 Page 699 of 729 Page 700 of 729 Page 701 of 729 Page 702 of 729 Page 703 of 729 Page 704 of 729 Page 705 of 729 Page 706 of 729 Page 707 of 729 Page 708 of 729 Page 709 of 729 Page 710 of 729 Page 711 of 729 Page 712 of 729 Page 713 of 729 Page 714 of 729 Page 715 of 729 Page 716 of 729 Page 717 of 729 Page 718 of 729 Page 719 of 729 Page 720 of 729 Page 721 of 729 Page 722 of 729 Page 723 of 729 Page 724 of 729 Page 725 of 729 Page 726 of 729 Page 727 of 729 Page 728 of 729 Page 729 of 729