Agenda 01-04-00]anuary4, 2000
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
6:30 P.M.
OPENINGS:
Call to Order - Mayor Jerry Broening
Invocation ' Rabbi Max Roth - Temple Beth Kodesh
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Mayor Pro Tern William Sherman
D. Agenda Approval:
1. Additions, Deletions, Corrections
2. Adoption
II. ADMTNISTRA'I'~VE:
Ao
Board
B, Appointments to be made:
Appointment
To Be Made Board
Accept resignation of Aaron Rinker, Regular member of the
Mayor Broening
I Weiland
III Sherman
Children & Youth Advisory Board
Children & Youth Advisory Board
Children & Youth Advisory Board
Alt 1 yr ten
Stu/NonVoting 1 yr ten
Reg 2 yr ten
I Weiland
II Denahan
III Sherman
IV Tillman
Bldg. Board of Adjustment & Appeals Reg
Bldg. Board of Adjustment & Appeals Reg
Bldg. Board of Adjustment & Appeals Alt
Bldg. Board of Adjustment & Appeals Alt
3 yr ten
3 yr ten
1 yr ten
1 yr ten
II Denanan Code Compliance Board
Reg
3 yr ten
t Weiland
II Denahan
III Sherman
Community Relations Board
Community Relations Board
Community Relations Board
Alt
Reg
Reg
1 yr ten
3 yr ten
3 yr ten
Mayor ,Broening
Planning & Development Board Alt
1 yr terr
III. ANNOUNCEMENTS & PRESENTATIONS:
A. Announcements:
Code Compliance
Ith of Term
ration Date
n to 4/00 Tabled (3)
n to 4/00 Tabled (3)
1 to 4/01
~ to 4/01 Tabled ¢3)
~ to 4/02 Tabled (3)
~ to 4/00 Tabled (3)
~ to 4/00 Tabled (3)
i to g/02
~ to 4/0o Tabled (3)
~ to 4/02 Tabled (3)
~ to 4/01
to 4/00
nuary8, 2000 on
.' 1. "Breakfast In Boynton & Green Market" - Saturday,
~iI the Library Lawn
Agenda
Regular City Commission
3anuary 4, 2000
B. Presentations:
1. Proclamations:
a. Martin Luther King, .Ir. Day - January 17, 2000
2. Presentation of Holiday Parad~ Awards - Meg Hooper, Special Events
Manager
IV. CONSENT AGENDA: .... ' ' ~? ,:
Matters in this sect on of the Agenda are proposed and recommended by the City Manager for
"Consent Agenda" approval of the action indicated in'each;item, ~Rh ail Of the: accompanying
mater a to ~oecome .~ part of the Pub c Record and subject to sta~,camments.
A. Minutes:
1. Agenda Preview Conference of De~cember 16, 1999
2. Regular City Commission Meeting Of December 21, t999
Bids - Recommend Approval - All expenditures are approved in the 1999-2000
Adopted Budget
1. Approve extension of bid pridn'g for the "PURCHASE OF TWO (2) NEW
AND UNUSED 80 KW. MOBILE GENERATOR SETS" in the amount of
$62,180 to O-KGenerators z)f Deerfield Beach, Florida
C. Resolutions:
Proposed Resolution No. R99- Re: Approving an Interlocal
Agreement with Palm Beach County for partial grant funding of the Phase
2 Downtown Regior~al St0rmWate~ Fadli~y
Proposed Resolution No. R99- Re: Approving the release of the
restoration surety n the amount of $1t,000 for the Via Lugano project
Proposed Resolution No. R99- Re: Approve Work Authorization
#10 with Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. in the amount of $244,070 for the
desfgn, permitting and bidding services: for Industrial Avenue Corridor
Stormwater Improvements
Proposed Resolution No. R99- Re: Approving Work
Authorization #11 with Camp, Dresser & McKee, Thc. in the amount of
B69,619 for the design, permRting and bidding services for the Costa
e a Subdivision Stormwater Impr. ovements
Agenda
Regular Ci~Commission
3anuary4,2000
VI.
D. Ratification of Planning & Development Board Action':
None
Approve additional vehicles (15 total) to the vehicle purch
1999/00 budget (Total cost of replacement vehicles - $701,00
Approve funds for Housing Rehabilitation Case #2-99.002~ '
residing at 3821 North Dixie Highway, in the amount of $13,2[
Authorize piggybacking the Pal,m, Beach County Contract
TRAFF]'c S]:GNAL INStALLATiON for the placement :of Onde
the Gateway. Beulevard.Improve~ent Proje~:. 'Fh~ total co.~
estimated not the exceed $~Z~,440; ' '
CITY MANAGER'S ,REPORt:
A. Presentation on Optio,n,s, for the Construction of the Dow~
~:etention Bas n (Pbnd .B 9
~se list in the FY
;ally Carole Lewis,
3
~99056, "ANNUAL
ground conduit on
t of the project is
own Stormwater
PUBLIC AUDIEN~CE:
INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMTI'ED TO 3-MINUTE PRESENTATIONS
VII. PUBLIC HEARZNG: 7:00P.M. ORASSOONTHEREAFTERASTHEAGENDAPERMI'TS
VIII.
BIDS:
Project Name:
Agent/Owner:
Location:
Description:
Project Name: KENMONT
(TABLED TO .IANUAR Y .~8ru)
Agent: Diane Hiteman, Esquire
Owner: Mr, Ods W. Walker
Location: 707 NW 3m Street
Description: Request for abandonment of that alley
707 NW 3"d Street
The Learning: Depot - Pre-School
Scott and Kathy Freeland
SW 3rd Street at Woolbfight Road
Request conditional use approval to construct a 4,632
square foot day care center on 0.52 acre
~gment that abuts
None
Agenda
Regular CityCommission
3anuazy4~ 2000
TX. DEVELOPMENTPLANS:
None
X. NEW BUS][NESS: . ~ -
Otc
-P~pesed~;Or~i~ance Ne, O99;36 .~Re ' Vacant property consisting of
'rS;~9~C~S
o[Jand ;(.L0we:s;i~ome center);-amending Ordinance 89;38 o
S~id QW by ~me6~n~J,[h~,~E~re~ Land Use.; Element of the
Ce~pr~ensi~ Plan of ~e~ G~: by adopting the proper land use of
¢~ain prbpe~ from Indu~i;te [~da[ ~eCail cammerd~i',
Proposed Or
Ri~Chard
Pa~ners, ~n,
Wootbri!~t
amendihg; C
Plar~ned
comi rci :)
nance ~. 0~-37
5.89 ;aCl'i' :Pat'¢~l.
~e: Regarding the application of
~dng,. [nc;,; A, gent for Woolbright
the sQuthWe~c,corner of :[-95 and
feet s0uth of Woolbright Road)
iing a certain tract of land from
,.-trdc (p_TD~r~ tc~ .£-3 (Community:
3. PrOposed Ord Re:
Amendi0g Chapter 2 Zoning,
, (E)(1); provd ng that all
;iness
;hall be considered and
~ent Board~, providing that each
nO~. sPecific~l y ~mended shall
Proposed Ordinance No. 099;39: .:Re: Adopting amendments to the
COmprehensiv~ Plan base, on: oew~--~angesin theGrowth Management
Law~ Cha~ter~ [t6~,:t~lt~rkiai~$ta~utesi; to revise and update the existing
O~ie~tives; piod~i .data[;.ar~d ~aysis of the Intergovernmental
t~rdinati0n Eler~ri~ a~d~e .F~tur~iLand Use Element
Agenda
Regular City Commission
3anuary 4, 2000
C. Resolutions:
Other:
1.
Proposed Resolution No. R99- Re: Establishir
per hour for each hour of delay from the scheduled
funeral if the delay is greater than one hour
Ratification of Code Compliance Board action:
fee of $200
~rdval time of the
a. Reduce the fine in Case #98-2166 (2015 S. Federal Highway)
from $8,350 plus.S634.12 in administrative costs to $634.12
CFABLED TO .IANUARY 4~)
b. Reduce the fine in Case #96-5939 (2280 NV 2nd Street) from
$24,325 plus $730.15 in administrative costs, to $2,000
c. Reduce the fine in Case #98-1960 (2280 NW 2"d Street) from
$11,400 plus $634.12 in administrative costs, tc~ $1,000
/
d. Reduce the fine in Case #98-2776 (134 SE[3~ Avenue) from
$8,900 plus $730.15 in administrative costs, to 7500
/
Discussion on relocation and amortization of non-conforming billboards
XZT. UNFZNTSHED BUS/NESS:
Review and Consideration of the pre-application(s) receive(], for submittal to
Palm Beach County, Department of Economic Development, uhder the Round III
Core Grant Program (TABLED TO.~ANUARY I~''~)
X/II. OTHER:
X[V. AD.1OURNMENT:
NOT[CE
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH T~E APPEAL IS TO BE EASED.
(F.S. 286.0105)
THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXILIARY AiDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILTTY AN
EQUAL OPPORTUNTrY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENIOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR ACTIVTrY CONDdCTED BY THE CITY. PLEASE
CONTACT 3OYCE COSTELLO, (561) 742-6013 AT LEAST TWENTY-FOUR HOURS 3RIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR ACTIVTTY IN ORDER FOR THE
CiTY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST.
REVZSED FTNAL 12/31/99 7:50 AM
TT-ADMZNISTRATZVE
ITEM A
TO: Sue Kruse
City Clerk
Scott Blasie
Code Compliance Administrator
FRObl: ]anet M. Prainito
Deputy City Clerk
DATE: 12/14/99
RE: Resignation from Code Compliance Board
Aaron Rinker, Regular member of the Code Compliance Boa
City Clerk's Office this morning to announce that he had ac
in Washington, D.C. He will no longer be able to serve
requested that his telephone call serve as his resignation.
d, contacted the
epted a new job
the board anc/
cc: Board Chairperson, Recording Secretary
Requested C~ry Commission
Mee6ng Dates
[] November 16. [999
[] December 7, 1999
[] December2] 1999
[] January 4. 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
II-
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date Final Form Must be Turned
~n to Cit~ Clerk's Office
November 3. 1999 5:00 p.m.)
November 17, I999 (5:00p.m./
December 8.1999 (5:00 p.m.~
December 22. I999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Coma'nission
Meeting. Dates
[] January 18, 2000
[] February 1, 2000
[] February 15,2000
[] March 7, 2000
[] Administrative [] Developt
[] Consent Agenda [] New Bu
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfatisr
[] Announcement [] Presentat
iDMINISTRATIVE
ITEM B
te Final Form Must be Turned
n to City Clerk's Office
Jan ry 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Jm uary 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Fet mary 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Fe ~ruary 16, 2000 [5:00 p.m.)
tent Plans
d Business
RECOMMENDATION: Replace Dorothy Davis, Regular member of the Advisory Board on Children & Youth whose
two-year term expires in April, 2001.
EXPLANATION:
Ms. Davis has exceeded the allowable number of absences to retain membership on a City
advisory board.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
Sue Kmse, City Clerk
City Clerk's Office
City Attorney Fhaance Human Resources
12/22/1999 8:50 AM
\\ch\main~shrdata\cc xwpxcc agendaXremovalskremove dorothy davis - cyab.dot
S:~BULLETIN~FORMSkAGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
Announcements & Presentations
Proclamations
WHEREAS, the significant contributions made by the late Dr. Martin Luther King, ur are recoonized
nationwide in that the third Monday of January has been established as a national holiday in ~mmem~ration
of Dr. King's birthday, January 15, 1929; and
WHEREAS, Dr. King dedicated his life so that all Americans may ~njoy
citizen under the Declaration of Independence and the United States Consti
WHEREAS, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday Celebration Comr
combines numerous community organizations and municipalities is playing a I
observances of this day by off~dng a variety of historical and cu ture program
he freedoms guaranteed every
tion: and
~tee of Boynton Beach. which
lajor role in the coordination of
through the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald Broening, by virtue of the authority ve~ted in me as Mayor of the City
· of BoyntonBeach, Flodda, hereby proclaim January 17,_2000 as.
DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DAY
in the City of Boynton Beach, Flodda, and call upon all citizens to rededicat{
cause of brotherhood and sisterhood among all people.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused
Beach, Flodda, to be affixed at Boynton Beach, Flodda this 4· day of Januar
themselves to advancing the
le Seal of the City of Boynton
Two Thousand.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
\~h~naJn~hrdata~cc~wo~cagenda~oclamal~ns'~orocl 01 ma~n lut~ king.~cc
Gerald Taylor, May(
City of Boynton Bea
zi.r_ANNOUNCEMENTS & PRESENTATZONS
TI'EM B-2
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORi,.
Requested City Commission
Meetlne Dates
[] November 16. 1999
[] December7. 1999
[] Deeember2I, 1999
[] January 4, 2000
Dato Final Form Must be Tumgd
in to City Clerk's Office
Novemt~r 3, 1999 (5:00 p.nx)
November 17, 1999 I5:00 p.m.)
Deco~xber 8,1999 (5:00 p.m.1
December 22,1999 (5:00
Reqa~ed City comm~Sion
Merging Dat~
[] January 18,2000
[] r~ ~.2ooo
[] February 15, 2000
[] March 7. 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[] Administmlive [] Developm
[] Consem Agenda [] New Busi
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfinish~
[] Announcement [] Presenta
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of 15 minutes of City Commission meeting scheduled on January Cth, to present 3am~
by Meg Hoopor, Special Events Manager.
EXPLANATION:
Plaques to be presented to award winners and sponsors for their participation in the 1999 Annual
Mayor Broeulng assist with congratulating them.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
Recognition to participant~ and sponsors for their involvement in the 1999 Annual Holiday Pm'ad
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A
Departmem Head s S~gnature City Man~er's
Leisure Services Departmem
Department Name
City Attorney / Finance /
S:~BULLETIN~OR2dS'AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
January 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m~)
Fela m~ry 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Feb nary 16, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
,mt Plans
[ Business
Holiday Parade Awards
toliday Parade. Request
5ignat~e '
Human Resources
IV-CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM B.1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Cormuission
Meetin~ Dates
[] November 16, 1999
[] December 7, 1999
[] December21, 1999
[] January 4, 2000
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to CiW Clerk's Office
November 3, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 8, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 22. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] January 18.2000
[] February i. 2000
[] February 15, 2000
[] March 7, 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[] Administrative [] Developm
[] Consent Agenda [] New Bush
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfmishe{
[] Announcement [] Presentari(
RECOMMENDATION: A motion to approve extension of bid pricing for the "PURCHASE
UNUSED 80 KW MOBILE GENERATOR SETS" in the amount of: $62,180.00 to
Deerfield Beach, Florida.
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City CIerk's Office
!
Janu~ 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
JanumT~ 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Feb' ary 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Febr a~y 16, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
mt Plans
Business
OF TWO (2) NEW AND
-K GENERATORS , of
Procurement Services has reviewed the Utility Department's request to extend bid pricing for "PURCHASE OF TWO (2)
NEW AND UNUSED 80 KW MOBILE GENERATOR SETS" BID#069-2821-99/SP awarde[l to: O-K GENERATORS
of Deerfield Beach, Florida with a total mount of: $62.180.00.
Procurement Services requests Commission's review, evaluation and approval.
EXPLANATION: In the 1999/2000 budget, the purchase of two (2) 80 KW Mobile Generators was approved.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
BUDGETED ACCOUNT#:
401-2816-536-64-02
BUDGETED AMOUNT:
$72,000.00
ALTERNATIVES: /
/ ~r~l~s~ Age~tS~ Signature
Procurement Services
Department Name
C'igJq~lanager's Si~aamre
City Attorney Finance / Human Resources
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES # 99-301
as_ing Agent _, __
Utility Direct'or
DATE:
December 14, 1999
SUBJECT: A.g. enda Item ! Capital Outlay
Ufili~ Bid #069:.282'1-991SP
2_ 80kw P6rtable Generators
The Utility Pumping StationS Division is requesting approval for the pumha~se of two (2)
80kw portable ger~e~rators u!ilizing °ur bid #069-2821-991SP that was awar~led to OK
Generators of De~.~eldBe~ch, Florida. This bid was awarded by CommisSion August 3,
1999, and O KGer~erators stated that they were willing to hold pdces, termS, and conditions
valid for one year f~mm date of award. ' .
Each Generator cost $31,090.00 for a total ors 62 180.00. Funds are available in account
401-2816-536-64.02. Please present this atthe next Commission meeting for their
approval. If you have.any questions contact Mark Law at ext. 6403 or Ton' ~ Lombardi at ext.
6421.
Attachments
CC: Mark Law
Tony Lombardi
Jim Harmon
Barb Conboy _
C-eorganne Barden
PURCHASE OF TWO (2) NEW AND UNUSED 80KW MOBILE GENERATOR SETS
' '"Offe~'fmm the ~;~i'~ s~eiJ herein are the on y offers
BID OPENING DATE: JUNE 30, 1999 '~-: ~' ~
, ~e]vt~d timely as of tl~e abo~ye receiving date and time.
BID OPENING TIME: 2:30 P.M. ' ..........
· ~l~o~'t~e~ bff~m~s~l~te~ i~ ~sponse to this solicitation,
BID #: 069-2821-99/SP if any, are hereby rejected as late"
VENDORS ADS POWER SYSTEMS, INC. ., DIETZ ENTERPRISES ' FL DETROIT DIESEL-ALL SON
81N. DEERFIELDAVENUE 1201SE RALROADAVENUE 2277NW 14TH STREET
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441 STUART, FL 34994 MIAM , FL 33125
(954)428-8330 (561)286-6553 1305)638-5300
RICHARD SWEENEY GEORGE W. DIETZ .N,I E THIEME
UNIT PRICE $39,857.00 $4212~)3,00 $36,500,00
EXTENDED TOTAL $79,714.00
$84,586.00 $73,000.00
CALENDAR DAYS 120 ' 9~ :~ ' NOT !ND CATED
WILL HOLD PRICES FOR ONE YEAR NO NO ' 'YES
NUMBER OF BID PROPOSALS
SUBMITTED I I
1
SPECIFICATION "CHECK- OFF" ~ ~ ·
SHEETS SUBMITTED YES * YES * YES
MANUFACTURER SYNERGY INTERIqATIONAL ' CUMMINS/ONAN F)ETROJT~31ESEL
MODEL SI-80-C 80DG~DA
80DSEJ
ANTI-KICKBACK AFFIDAVIT
SUBMITTED
YES YES YES
~ONFIRMATION OF MINORITY FORM SUBMITTED/NOT A FORM SUBI~I i ED/NOT A FORM SUBMITTED/NOT A
OWNED BUSINESS SUBMITTED MINORITY OWNED BUSINESS MINORITY OWNED BUSINESS MINORITY OWNED BUSINESS
PURCHASE OF TWO (2) NEW AND UNUSED 80KW MOBILE GENERATOR SETS
· fiefs from the vendors sted here n are tl~e on y offers
BID OPENING DATE: JUNE 30, 1999 ..............
BID OPENING TIME: 2:30 P.M. ' recelv'e'dtth~ilY~l~0f!hi~a~oYerec~vngdateendtime'
All other offers submitted It response to th s so cta on,
BID #: 069-2821-99/SP If a.y. are hereby rejected as late"
VENDORS ADS POWER SYSTEMS, INC. DIETZ EN~-htPRISES
: EE DETROIT D ESEL-ALL SON
81 N. DEERFIELD AVENUE 1201 S.E RAILROAD AVENUE ' 2277 N,W. 14TH STREET
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441
STUART, FL 34994 MIAMI, FL 33125
(954)428-8330 (561 )286-6553
(305)638-5300
CONFIRMATION OF DRUG-FREE RICHARD SWEENEY ~EORGE V~/, DiETZ N. E, THIEME
WORKPLACE SUBMITTED YES YES YES
COMMENTS *SEE NOTAT ONS * SEE NOTATIONS ' ~PEcIFICATION BACKUP;
SPECIFICATION BACKUP; 'EX(3EPTIONTO~'~PEC F CAT ONS PRODUCT BACKUP'SUBMITTED
CERTIFICATE'OF~ORIGIN FOR A
VEHICLE; PRODUCT BACKUP
SUBMITTED
PURCHASE OF TWO (2) NEW AND UNUSED 80KW MOBILE GENERATOR SETS
BID OPENING DATE: JUN E 3(} 1999 "off. re from the velldors listed herein are the only offers
recei~;ed time y~a~0f, the abovi~ rece v ng date and time.
BID OPENING TIME: 2:30 P.M. '~ "'-'
All o~her offers subm ttbd n response to th s so c tat on
BID #: 069-2821-99/SP ~
if any, are hereby mJectad as late"
VENDORS HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL
~IGI'~MORGA~GENE~L MECH O:.K GENERATORS
3849 W BLUE HERON BLVD. 3'~81 N.Ei 11TH AVENUE 373 N. RIVER AVENUE
RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33404 pOMPANo BEAcH, FL 33064 ' DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441
(561 )848-4336 -
(954)943-5535 ~
J, KURK WALTON ROBi::RT'L M~RG,~N ....... .ii ~-~800-386-3i 87
" R:,w- BIRDSONG
'UNIT PRICE . ............. $35~186.00 ~ ~3'5;~338-.00 - $3;I ,090,00
EXTENDED TOTAL., .............. r
6_0
WILL HOLD PRICES FOR ONE YEAR YES :"'YES ~ ' ........... YES
BID PR -
NUMBER OF OPOSALS ~,' ~..
SUBMITTED 1 1 ::' '
SPECIFICATIQN "CHECK-OFF ............ '
SHEETS SUBMITTED . YES * YES * YES
MANUFACTURER ·
COEEMAN ED '~'UM.M]'I~4B~,? ? ~
..... ' ONAN
ERATOR ............. ~: .................. '
MODEL ..... 105~ GEN ' ..................... ' '
ANTI-KICKBACK AFFIDAVIT
SUBMITTED
- YES
CONFIRMATION OF MINORITY FORM SUBM~I ~ ~D/NOT A IS A MINORITY OWNED FORM SIJBMI~ED/NOT A
OWNED BUSINESS SUBMITTED MINORITY OWNED BUSINESS BuSINESS/NoT CERTIFIED MINORITY oWNED BU~ NESS
PURCHASE OF TWO (2) NEW AND UNUSED 80KW MOBILE GENERATOR SETS
'Offers from the vendors Itste(I here n are he on[y offers
BID OPENING DATE: JUNE 30 1999 re~elged timelyas of the above receiving clare and time.
BI D OPENING 'TIME: 2:30 P.M. A~l otheroffsrssubmitted in response to this solicitation,
BID ~: 069-2821-99/SP if any, am hereby rejected as late"
VENDORS HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL MGI-MORGAN GENERAL MECH. O-K GENERATORS
3849 W. BLUE HERON BLVD. 3781 N.E. 11TH AVENUE 373 N. RIVER AVENUE
RIVIERA BEACH, FL 33404 POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064 DEERFIELD BEACH, FL 33441
(561 )848-4336 (954}943-5535 1-800-385-3187
J. KURK WALTON ROBERT L. MORGAN R.W. BIRDSONG
CONFIRMATION OF DRUG-FREE
WORKPLACE SUBMITTED YES YES YES
COMMENTS * SEE NOTATIONS * SEE NOTATIONS PRODUCT BACKUP SUBMITTED
COMMENT SHEET; PRODUCT PRODUCT BACKUP SUBMITTED '
BACKUP SUBMITTED
Requested City Comtmssmn
Meeting Dates
[] November 16, 1999
[] December7, 1999
[] December 21. i999
[] Janumy 4. 2000
IV-CONSENT AGENDA
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ITEM C.1
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOR
Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission
in ~o C~ty Clerk's Office Meeting Dates
November3,1999 (5:00p.m.) [] Jarmarylg, 2000
November 17~ 1999 (5:00 p.m.) [] ~ebraary 1, 2000
December8 1999(5:00p.m.) [] FebruatYlS, 2000
December 22, I999~(5:00 p.m.) [] M~ch 7, 2000
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
lanuary 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Jantlary 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.I
Febr 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Feb~maty 16, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[] Administxative [] Development Plans
[] Consent Agenda [] New Business
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfinished Business
[] Announcement [] Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve Interlocai Agreement with Palm Beach County
the Phase 2 Downtown Regional Stormwater Facility. (Four original documents are attaehec
EXPLANATION: The subject agreement will authorize the City to receive $250,000 in gran~
basis) for constructing a portion of the Downtown Regional Stormwater Facility consisting 0
trench to serve that portion of the project along SE 1~ Ave., SE 4tb St., and Ocean Ave. west
the drainage improvements for the Ocean Ave. Promenade project.
PROGRAM IMPACT: The funding pi'ovided by this grant will allow for construction of the
Ocean Ave.
FISCAL IMPACT: The grant amount is not to exceed $250,000.
br partial grant funding of
)
funding (on a reimbursable
~ piping and exfiltratinn
~f US Highway 1, including
drainage system along
ALTERNATIVES: Refusing the~ire this funding to be provided from anot ~er, currently unallocated
source. ~ ~
Utilities
Department Name
Xc: Peter Mazzella (w/attachments)
John Guidry
Finance Dept. (w/attachments)
City Attorney
File
City Attorney/~ance/Human Resources
S flBULLETfN~ORMSLAGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
RESOLUTION NO. R00-
a RESOLUTION ~ :'
CITY
BEACH
OF
AND
the City Commission of thee City of Boynton Beach, Florida,
~on recommendation of staff, has deemed it tobe in the best interests of the
:itizens and residents-of the City of Boynton Beach, FlOrida to execute a an
ntedocal Agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and the Board of
County CommissiOners of Palm Beach County, Flodda,, a~proving the partial
grant funding of the Phase 2 Downtown Regional Stormwater Facility;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
)F THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT~
Section 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute
~n ntedocal Agreement between the City of Boynton Beach and the Board of
County Commissioners of Palm Beach County, which Agreement is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A".
~ That this Resolution shall become effective immediately
Jpon passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTEDthis
ATTEST:
City Clerk
~Corporate Seal)
day of January, 2000.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Mayor Pm Tern
Commissioner
Commissioner
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
PALM BEACH COUNTY
AND
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
This ][nterlocal Agreement ~s made the day of_ , 1999_ between
the City of Boynton Beachi a Ct)pi~ip~ality located in Palm Beach County, Florida (hereinatker"City")
and Palm Beach County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Ihereinafter "County"), each
one constituting a public agency as defined in Parr I of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS. Section 163.01. Florida Statutes, known as the "Florida Interlocal Cooperation
Act of 1969" authorizes local governments to make the most efficient use oftheir powers by enabling
them to cooperate with other localities on a basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide services
and facilities that will harmonize geographic, economm, population and other factors influencing the
needs and development of local communiues: and
WHEREAS. Part I of Chapter 163. Florida Statutes, permits public agencies as defined
therein to enter into interlocal agreements with each other to jointly exercise any power, privilege,
or authority which such agenctes share in common and which each might exercise separately; and
WHEREAS. pursuant to Chapter 125.01. Florida Statutes (I997), the Board of County
Commissioners of Palm Beach County is empowered to establish and administer programs of
conservation and to enter into agreements with other governmental agencies within or outside the
boundaries of the County for joint performance_ or performance of one unit on behalf of the other,
of any of either governmental entity's authorized functions: and
WHEREAS, the County desires to environmentally restore and enhance the Lake Worth
Lagoon in order to increase native habitat and improve fisheries; and
WI-W~REAS, the County recognizes that an improvement in the qualit~ of the lagoon waters
/
is essential to the restoration of the lagoon as a habkat for littoral and estuarin~ flora and fauna; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Department of Environmental Protectioni. (FDEP) Agreement
$-P505, as amended by Amendment No. 1, the County has received a grant firom the FDEP for the
purpose of conducting environmental enhancement and restoration of the Lake Worth Lagoon; and
VOtEREAS, the County wishes to encourage munici alifies that · Ir' '
p oo aer me Lake Worth
Lagoon to protect and enhance their littoral and estuarine habitats by improvi: tg the water quality of
the lagoon; and
WHEREAS, the County and the City recognize that management of fr sh water inflows to the
Lake Worth Lagoon is essential to limiting undesirable salinity fluctuations, turbidity, BOD and flow
of nutrients, all of which threaten the habitat therein; and
VOtEREAS, the City desires to collect stormwater fxom a4- 25 acre d~ :veloped area and treat
that water before releasing it into the Lake Worth Lagoon; and
WHEREAS, the County and the City expect that such treatment will lik ~ly improve the quality
of the waters of the Lagoon; and
WHEREAS, the City has applied to the Lake Worth Lagoon Partner ;hip Grant Program to
request a grant to assist in the construction of Phase 2 of the Downtown Regional Stormwater Facility;
and
/
WHEREAS, the City and the County have mutually agreed to cooperate in a City project to
construct Phase 2 of the Downtown Regional Stormwater Facility
NOW TI-IEREFORE_ in consideration of the mutual represenranons, terms, and covenants
hereinafter set forth:'the parties hereby agree as f011oWg:
1 Purpose 0flnterlocal Agreement and Recitals. The purpose of'this Interlocal Agreement
is to establish provisions for the transfer of FDEP funds from the County to the City for the
limited pUrpose ~f ass~stingl iff the co~stru~non of Phase'2' of tlie~ Db~cntSwn Pcegio~ial
Storraw~ter Facility, and-th, set forth the terms_ conditions ahd~ obligatk6h's of each' 65' the
respective parties hereto>:,The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein .and are true and
correct.
Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement
A. "Act" shall mean Part 1 of Chapter 163. Florida Statutes.
B. "Agreement" shall mean this lntertocal Agreement, including any amendments or
supplements hereto, executed and delivered in accordance with the terms hereo£
C. "Construction" shall mean the act of physically building the project, or any of the
components of the project_ and shall include the process of building, clearing, fining,
excavation, or pawng, or the substantial improvement in the size or use of any
structure or the appearance of any land. It shall include the transportation, installation
or deployment of any completed components of the project. It shall nor include
designing, engineering~ drafting or planning of the project, nor shall it include
monitoring of the project after completion, installation or deployment
D "Project" shall mean the activities described as PFoject 9, pages 2 through 4 of
Attachment A- 1 of Agreement SP505_ as amended, attached hereto and made a pan
4
6
hereof as Exhibit A, and as described above in Section I and below- in Section 8
Documents Incorporated. Except as otherwise provided herein, the ~ity agrees that it shall
/
comply with all terms a~d conditions of Agreement S~305, as amended, between Palm Beach
County Board of County Commissioners and FDEP attached hereto and made a part hereof
as ]Exhibit A.
County's Representative/~Ionitoring Position. The Countv's r )resentative/conrracr
monitor during the term of this Agreement is identified below:
Name R/chard E. Walesky, Director
Address: Palm Beach County Deparrmem of Envi mmental Resources
Managemem
3323 Belvedere Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Phone: (561) 233-2400
Fax: (561) 233-2414
City's Representative/lVIonitoring Position. The City's representa ive/contract monitor
during the term of this Agreement is identified below
Name: John A. Guidry, Director of Utilities
Address: 5469 West Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach_ FL 33437
Phone (561) 375-640 l
Effective Date/Term. The term afthis Agreement shall be effective on :he date of execution
of the Agreement by both pames and shall continue in full force and ell ect for up to eighteen
months, inclusive_ unless otherwise terminated as provided herein Th~ County reserves the
fight to extend this Agreement for an additional six months, or anothe~ term consistent with
Paragraph 2 of Agreemem &PS05. as amended, immediately follov 5ng the term of the
Agreement for good cause shown in writing and submitted to the Col nty no less than two
months before the date of expiration
4
8
Responsibilities and Duties of the Connty. The County agrees to pay the City an amount
not to exceed $250,000 to be used for the limited purpose of reimbursement ['or costs
associated Wi~h construction oftheProject described below in Section 8; provided the City
meetsthe m~mmum match requirement of $500,000as noted in Attachment A-1 of Agreement
SP505. as amended. Activities eligible for match requirements include pre-construction costs
such, as platming and design, engineering, an(~ permi~,t[ng~costsTas ~ll~as cdnstruetion costs,
incurred on or atSer January l, ~2000, in accordance with Footno~te 6 ~)fExhibit A_ Attachment
A-l, Page 1. However. construction costs:are not reimbursable under this Agreement until
the effective date of the Agreement.
Responsibilities and Duties of the City.
A. The City agrees to construct Phase 2 of the Downtown Regional Stormwater Facility
and do all the work related to this Project as ~nore particularly described in Exhibit A.
Attachment A-1. Project 9, pages 2 through 4: and
The City agrees to provide the funds for the balance of the Project not ~unded by the
County; and
C. The City agrees to subrfiit quarterly reports and invoices to the County by April 14.
July 14_ October 14 and January 14: and
D. The City agrees to complete the Project in a timel? fashion, sausfying all necessary
permits and inspections: and
E. Within two weeks of conqpletion of the Project. the City agrees to submit a final
Project report to the County I'he City understands that this Project report will be
forwarded to the FDEP in conformance with the requirements of Paragraph 5 of
12.
Agreeme~,r SP505. as amended
F In the event that the project ~s not completed at the end of the contracted period of
time, the final amount of the grant will be prorated based on the amount of
construction completed and the original match-to-grant ratio
Payments/Invoicing[ and Reimbursement. City shall submit invoices to County which will
include a reference to this Agreement, identify the Project, and identif~' the amount due and
payable to City. Invoices shall be itemized in sufficient detail for prep ,ment audit thereof
City shall supply any further documentation deemed necessary by Cour Invoices received
from City will be reviewed and approved by the Department of Envi 'onmental Resources
Management. 3323 Belvedere Road. West Palm Beach. FL 33406-15 J~8. who will indicate
that expenditures have been made in conformity with this Agreement a~ td who will then send
the invoices to County's Finance Department for final approval and p~ 'ment.
Funding Source. The County and City agree thatthe sole funding sour : for this Agreement
is grant money obtained by County from the FDEP and shall not exc~ ed a total amount of
$250_000 It is also understood that the County's performance anc obligation to pay is
contingent upon an annual appropriation to FDEP by the Legislature
Access and Audits. City shall maintain adequate records to justify all c targes, expenses, and
costs incurred in accordance with generally accepted accounting princit als. Both the County
and the FDEP shall have access to all books, records and documen ~ as required in this
section for the purpose of inspection or audit during normal business hours during the term
of this Agreement and for at least three (3) years after completion of the Project.
Renewal. This Agreement may not be renewed
6
13
15
17
18.
19
Breach/Opportuni~ to Cure. The parties hereto expressly covenant and agree that in the
event either party is in default of its obligations herein, the party not in default shall provide
tothe party, in default thirty (3¢) days wrmen notice,to cure saiddefhult')ef0re exercising an5
of its rights as provided for in this Agreement
termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either parry to this Agreement upon 30
days,~ritten~noti~¢ ~o~theother parry. ..... · ~ _ -
Enforcement Costs. Any costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) associated
with the enforcement of the terms and/or conditions of this Agreement shall be borne by the
respecnve parues,-provided, however_ that this clause pertains only to the pa~xies to this
Agreement
Notice. All notices required to be given under this Agreemem shall be deemed sufficient to
each party when delivered by United States Mail ro the County and City
representative/contract monitors identified above in Sections 4 and 5. respectively, and with
a copy sent to the Palm Beach County ,attorney's Office. 301 North Olive Avenue_ Sixth
Floor, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Delegation ot' Duty, Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to authorize the delegation
of the constitutional or statutory duties of stare. County, or city officers.
Filing. A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circmt Court in and for
Palm Beach County.
Liability. The parttes to this Agreement and their respective officers and employees shall not
be deemed to assume any liability for the acts. omissions, and negligence of the other party
Further. nothing hereto shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity by either party,
20
21
pursuant to Section 768.28. Florida Statutes.
Indemnification. Without waiver of limitation as provided for in Section 768.28(5 ]. Florida
Statutes. and to the extent permitted.by law. the County agrees ro indemnify and hold
harmless the City from any claims, losses_ demands or cause of action c fwhatsoever kind or
nature that the City, its agents or employees, may or could sustain as a I ssult of or emanating
out of the terms and conditions contained .in this agreement that rest [t from the County's
negligence or willful misconduct. Without waiver of limitation as pr,~vided for in Section
768.28(5). Florida Statutes. and to the extent permitted by law, the Cit f agrees to indemnify
and hold harmless County from any claims, losses, demands or cause of action of whatsoever
kind or nature that the County, its agems or employees, may or could sustain as a result of
or emanating out of the terms and conditions contained in tiffs Agreeme tt that result from the
City's negligence or willful misconduct. Nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of
sovereign immumty by either party, pursuant to Section 768.28_ Flori~
Insurance. Without waiving the right to Sovereign Immunity as provic
Florida Statutes, the City acknowledges it is self-insured under State
statutes with coverage limits of$100_000 Per Person and $200_000 Pe~
monetary waiver limits that may change and be set forth by the legislatr
agrees to recognize as acceptable coverage for General Liability and
insurance.
In the event the City voluntarily elects to maintain a Commet
and/or a Business Auto Liability insurance~policy, in lieu of exclusiv
Section 768.28 Florida Statutes. the City shall agree ro add the Cou
.a Statutes.
ed by Section 768.28
Sovereign Immunity
Occurrence, or such
re. which the County
Automobile Liability
:iai General Liability
self-insurance under
~ty as an "Additional
8
22
23
Insured" with respect to liability arising out of the City's operanons ot premises owned by
or rented to the City which is subject to this Agreement. Said insurance policies shall have
a,~urn lirrf~t of $500,000 combined single limit of.bodily:injury 6Lproperty damage
The City shall either self-insure or mamtain~insurance for Worker's Compensation insurance
for all o£its employees connected with the work of this Agreement and_ m case any work ts
su~ocontmeted, the~ ~y,shall,, require~the :~sub¢ontmemr ,similarJ. y?~;to~:;pr6~id:~ Worker's
Compensation fur all~o~tbe subcontractor's employees unless such employees.are provided
coverage by ,the City
The City shall agree to have adequate property insurance including builder's risk
coverage while the project is in the course of construcnon, maintained in adequate limits of
coverage on the building and contents based on the Cky' s probable ma:(~mum loss estimates
against the perils of fire. wind. flood, and other hazards. City shall agree to be fully
responsible for any deductible or self-insured retennon
When requested, the City agrees ro provide a Certificate of Insurance or aff~davit
evidencing the required insurance coverages or Sovereign h-nmunity status above.
Compliance With Law. The City shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local
rules and regulations in providing services under this Agreement The City acknowledges
that this requirement includes compliance with all applicable federal_ state and local health and
safety rules and regulations. The Cit~ further agrees to tnclude this provtsion, tn all
subcontracts issued as a result of this Agreement
Amendments. This Agreement may only be amended by written Agreement executed by
both parries hereto
9
24
25
26¸
27
28
29
Remedies. This Aereement shall be construed by and governed by the laws of the State of
Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce the Agreemem will be held in Palm
Beach County. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended o be exclusive of any
other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative an shall bein addition
ro every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at w or in equity or by
statute or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any party of any riglht, power, or remedy
hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof
Time of the l~ssence. The parries expressly agree that rime is o:' the essence in this
Agreement and the failure by a party to complete performance within he rime specified, or
within a reasonable time if no time is specified herein, shall, at the opti >n of the other parry
without liability, ~n addition to any other rights or remedies, relieve ~ other party of any
obligation ro accept such performance
Equal Opportunity Provision. The County and the City agree that no person shall, on the
grounds of race~ color, sex, national origin, disability, religion, ances ry, marital status_ or
sexual orientation be excluded from the benefits o£ or be subjected ro any form of
discrimination under any activity carried out by the performance ofthi s Agreement
Captions. The captions and section designations herein set forth are ?or convenience only
and shall have no substantive meaning.
Severability. Inthe event that any section, paragraph, sentence, claus,,, or provision hereof
be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such shall no affect the remaining
portions of this Agreement anct the same shall remain in full force and effect.
Entirety of A~reement. This Agreement represents the entire under ;tanding between the
10
parties, and supersedes all other negotiations_ representations, or agreement, either written
or oral_ relating to this Agreemem
tN WITNESS WHEREOF_ the COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, Florida has caused this
Agreement'to be signed,by the"Chair of the Board of Cotinty Commishoners and the seal of said
Board to be affixed hereto and attested by the Clerk of said Board, pursuant to authority granted by
said Board. and the CITY, OF BOYNTON BEACH has caused, this Agreement to'be signed in its
name by its Mayor and its seal to be affixed hereto, attested t~y its Clerk. the date and year first above
.wr, kten. : - -- ' ·
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLOR_IDA
BY'ITS BOARD OF COIJNTY:
COMMIS SION'ERS
By B5
Mayor Date Chair Date
ATTEST: ATTEST
DOROTHY H. WILKEN. CLERK
By._ By:
Date Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
By:. By:
City's Attorney
County's Attorney
DEP AGREEMENT NO. SP$05
STATE OF FLORIDA GRL42~T ASSISTANCE
PURSUANT TO LINE 1TEI~! 1299A OF TIlE 1998 - 99 APPROPRE%TIONS ACT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into betweon the STATE OF F
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, whose address: isGg0~2 Commonwealth Boulcw
(hereinafter referred to as tho "Department") and thc PALM BEACH COU
COMMISSIONERS. whose address is 3323 Belvedere Road, Building 502. West Palm
referred to as 7Grantee"), a local,government, to perform Lal~e Worth Lagoon~ Restoratio~
In consideration of rte mutual benefits to be doric-ed hcrefrom, the Depar~mem
asToItdws:
Th~ Gray, tee does hereby agree to a~ani~nister and manage subgmms for Lake
Eiih~then~ by,ente~ring} into subagree/n~'~with the :v'~iOu~:'Sub~,tan~ee
a~cord~fi~e a'itl~ ~te~ ~nd eb~diiiOn~ sot i f~r~!i.in thi~ :;~gree~2ut~; A~ta~hm~
attaclunents and e.xhilsi,ts named heieia W~91~ ~e aitache}d hereto and incorpora
herein shatl preclude the Grantoe from fundingapproved projects done directly l
This Ag~ent shall begin upon eXeCUtion by,th parties and shalP?e~n*~n
tnclus~ve. In accnrdance x~th $ccUun 287.C~8(2). Florida statul~?,~,It~::G
reimbursement fo[ services rendered prior to ~e execution dam }of 'this Agre~
amended to provide-for addmunal serwces ff ad~iittonal fundingt~ ma~ a~,mlabl
As consideration for the sendCeS rendefeXl
shall pay the Grantee or
be reimbursed on a cos~ r
of the table of Page 1
,ORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
rd. Tallahassec. Florida 32399
xlTY BOARD OF COUNTY
mob, Florida 33406 (hereinafter
and Enhancement Projects.
and ti~ Grantee do hereby agree
Worth Lagoon Restoration and
~'whc~;wiil'perfom projects in
nt A,(SooPe of Services), and all
.ed he,eib by iefercnce Nothing
, the Gmntee.
~ffec't for thC-six (36) months,
mtee:~hall :hot be eligible for
neut. This Agreement may b~
~bY th~ Legi.~i~turo.
Contract Payment
c finds that thc work
Column E
f Serdces described in
identified above
thc individual match
thereof. All
Florida
The State of Florida's performance and obligation to pay under this Agrecme:
appropriation by thc Legislature
The Grant~ shall submit invoices on a com'enicnt bas s, burl no~ more frequ
fr~,~uenfi~ th~quanerly. Invoices, shall~be submitted in conjunction with pr-ol
p~rf6¢n~,:problcms encountered, laroblem re~olution, schedule updates and ~r~
peni:~l. ~f ad',anc~ pa)merit ts authonzed~ thcGrantec shall report (and docume~
d~ring the mpOrti~tg period, the Agreement,expenditures to date, intcres~ earne
indicate ,~ho methedTor repaymcnv ~f th,c. intercst t.o the Dcpanmcnt (see:paragr
and agreed by the panics thai thc tenn 'quarterly' shall reflect the calendar qu~
Sqptem~ 30 anc~ Decmnber 31. The Gmtuea and each subgmntcc s reqmm~
U~n Coiuplction Of the project for whielt they ~re responsible for cund~otint
submitted io tho Department's Ag?cement Manager no later than thirty (30) d~
which mst ocCUr al least ~sixty (60) days prior to thc comp etlon da.c established
OEP Agreement No. SP$05, Page 1 of $
EXHIBIT A
: is contingent upon an annual
ratty than monthly and not less
ross reports describing the work
~osed work for thc nexX reporting
t) the amount of funds exponded
during the quarter and clearly
lph 19). It. is hereby understood
rtcrs e~iding March 31. June 30.
.o submit a final project report
Said project reports shall be
s folloMng project completion
ia paragraph 2 above.
Pursmint to Section 215.422. Florida Statutes. the Departmcut's Agreement Manager shall have five (5) working.~
days. unless othenvise specified herein, to inspect and approve tile services for pa)anent: the Department must
stlbmit and file
10.
lt.
consult with the
to2 allow public access
Florida Statutes, and
this
t. The Department.
the term
audit
12.
the
000. an
~ Section
$100,000, a
has complied
; a~re less than
that the entity or
the right to recover
within six
is in effect
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
-John MoUlton
Delmrtmcnt of Enviroumental Protection
Southeast District Office
Post Office BOX 15425
West PalmBeach, Florida 33416-5425
-Audit Director (MS40)
Department of Envirunmentai Protection
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassce. Florid~ 32399-2400
-Audit Manager
OffiCe of the Auditor General
P.O. Box t735
Tallahassee. F ofida 32302
To ensure compliance vdth Section 216.349. Florida Statutes. Chapter 10.600,
provided as Attactunent C. Although tiffs d~cument is provided as an attactuner
acknowledges-that this role is siib~ect to,periodic reVision by the Auditor General
to comply w/th the effective version of the nile at the time of satisfying the audit
The Grantee is authorized to: subcontract with the entities identified in A~t~. ch
0thenvisesuhcontract, assign; ~,~transfer any work under this Agreement wi~o~
Depaxtmant s Agreemant Maa?ag~..T~e Gmat~e~agrees to be responmble for the
included m any suboantract:.c0useated to by the Department and agrees to bel r~
momes due under any subcontract. Itts understood and agreed bythe Grantee
liable to any subcontractor ~'or; ~, y expenses or !3abilities incurred under the s
shall be solely liable to the Subc0atraet~r for,allle'XPeases and liabilities incurred
Rules of the Auditor General is
tto this Agreement. the Grantee
and as such, the Grantee agrees
~eqmrements of this Agreement.
neat A. The Grantee shall not
t~the prior ',sxitten consent of the
fulfillment of all work elements
[pousible for the payment of all
~at tie Depaxtment shall not be
bcantract axtd that the Grantee
ruder the ~ubcontracu
In accordang with Section 21 ~6~3~7,,Florida Statutes, the Grantee is hereby Proh~bited.~om using funds provided
by this Agreement for~the pm3~°s~e of l~bbying the/'Legislature, the judieial',branch ~r a state agency.
A person or affiliate 3vh0 has been placed on :thei~
crime may not perform wor~ ~i~ grantee~ ~n ,h~a~oi, supplier,
any p,blic entity; an~ ma~ abt, transact t/asa'n~.~s ~4th any public entity
provided in Siecfiun 287.017, KS., for Categaqt Two, for a
the convicted vendor list.
conviction for a public entity
threshold 'amount
The Grantee shall comply '.,,5th all applicable federal, state and local roles and
to the Department ander th~s Agl'nement, .The G~mtee acknowledges that thi~
with all appli~able;federal, stat~:and local,health and safety
include fl~is,l~rovision in aIl subcontracts issued
providing services
.grees to
The Department's Agreement Manager for this Agreement is identified below.
Nam~
Adtire.~:
Phone:
Fax:
Jolm Moulton
Department of Environmental Proto
Southeast District Offi?~
400 l~lorth Congmes A~ enue
~Wast:Palm Beach, Florida 33416-5
561/681-6600
561/681-6755
:fion
25
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Page 3 of 5
18.
19.
The Grantee's Agreement Mmmger lbr this Agreement is identified bclmv.
Name: Pdchard,E..~W, alesky
Address: pahr~: nB~t} County Environmental Resources
,3323:Bel~'edcr~R°a.d; Building 502
West PaimBeaeh. Florida 33406
Phone: 5611233-2~.00 ....
In accordance with Sectio,n. 2 16.18 l{l$)Co)~ FIo~da Statutes; tbt¢ Department, upon v, Titten request from the
Grantee and x~tten approval froal tile Comp)r611~:r, may l~ro',<id~ afl advance to the Grantee Tlte Oranme m.~v
temporarily revest the advanced funds, pr0~id au)7~lt~rest ~n~om¢ si~atl e~ther be returned ~o the
Depamnent, wnhm thmv (30) 3ays o£e~.ch,~,iq pptied agmust tho Depamnent s 0bhgaUon to
p~,, if applicable Under tltis~ Agreentent iii[[i ~(~t,~be retm'n~ to the Department within the
timeframe identifi;'d aloove Or invoicos.m/ilt~b~( B:~e same tim~rame that shms~ the 0ffset of the
interest earned,
the
which must be
~ the State
the
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
the life
)f th~s
, the
comply fully with
and cause each
The Grant~07~,arrants and relxesents that ~t :}s sell;funded for liabihty ~r~n~ ~.., ~al~,~pr~ato and allowable under
Flo~flzi,!a,~,~,,an~-tlla~ such self-insuranee-offers~gr~/teeuoa,~apph~,l~)~t~:~e~,~iiffieers, employees,
Tho Oranme covenasts tliat ~t presently has n~ mterest!aadf,,l~kl aot la~m)~erest,whach would cenfl~ct m
any:marmer'Og d~gtee ~J.h the performance of:sen.~cosmqu~ed:
Tho purchase of:'non-expendablo eqmpment costing $5~1(1 or, mon~ is nOt'authorized under the terms of this
Agreeinent. ), .
The Department may at any time, by wdttcn order des gnated to, t~ a change order make any change in the work
witltin the 'gmeral ~cop0. of this Agra.merit: (~.g., specifi~ffons, time, method or manner of performance,
r~uirements, ere0. All~c~ge ord0rs: ,qr~ subject to thc J~utual.agreement of both parties as evidenced
xsfitmg Any change order x~ltich CaUSeS an lncrease or d~r~ in the Grantees cost or tune shall
formal amendment to this Agreement., -
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Page 4 of 5
25.
It is understood and agreed that thc Grantco, and its subgrantccs, shall not be compensated under this Agreement
for any chenticat or biological sampling 'and anal)sis perfom~ed ,as a compouent of the projects dcscribod in
AUachmcnt A. Therefore ,'tlxe Department's Quality Assurance (QA) Requirements and Data Validatian
Rcquiremcnis shall notapph to dfis/~grcemcnt.
26. This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties. Any a~teratians, variations, changes,
modifications or ~ve~ of provisions of this Agreement slmll only be ~valid whan they have bcen reduced to
uTiting; ,dui:.' Signed bv cach of the parties hereto, and attached to the original of this Agrecment unless
otherwise pro~4c~ hcr~in, ·
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties have caused this Agr<ment to bo duly executed, tho day and :,'ear la~
written below.
PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD
OF coUNvY COMMmS Or, ZS
R99 588 D
Title: Chair Maude Ford Lee
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPAI~TMENT OF
ENVIRONMETAL PROTECTION
/") x ~ ,,- '~ ,.
Secreta~ or designee
s/, /
Date:
Date:
FELD No.: 5%6000785
D~ Agreemeyt Marmger
DEP Contracts Adminigtrat6r
Approved as to form and lega]
DE~ k~'
Attorney
*For Agreements with governmental boards/commissions: If someone other than the Chairman signs this Agreement, a
resolution, statement or other document authorizing that person to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Agreement or
must accompany the Agreement,
List of attachments/e.xhibits included as part of this Agreement:
Specify Letter/
Type Number
Att,achmcnt A
Attacluncnt B
Attachment C
Description (include number of pages)
Scope of Servicos (23 Pages)
Comptroller Contract Paytnent Requirements I 1 Page)
Chapter 10.6{30. Rules of the Auditor General (5 Pages)
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Page 5 of 5
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
l~:gislative Line Item Appropriation 1299A pmvi.d,~l, $1,000,~00 for Lake Worth Lagoon Restomti.o,n end Euhenecment Projects. A total o~ ~..en
(1 l) Grant Applications (bt various pmj~.*ts ,.,.-era submiUed by qualified ,applicants and reviewed by a Select on Commiuec compri~l of
re ~resentattvcs ?om t~ ¢ Depm-une: o' Env rax ne ,tai l>rotectioa,~e 8$~th ~lo[id~.~ Water btanagemumt Distri,ct,~ the U S Fish mci W dl fu
Serene. thc West Palm Beach F,~hing Club and the Flon~!a ~ ~a~gaQ~ DlstncL 'Tlie lollowlng tabl¢-,dantffiea the projecls 'ah ch thc
Selcutinn Cormnittea approved on OCtober 14, 199S for fuhding~d~s~-peCifi~ ffppropfiation.
L-~KE WORTIt l-axOoo N ~ p,.l~T I ~.~. ,}fi~ l) ZN I,~CE,I ~l~N~r PROJECTS
Requclst
(Grant Award
Number:
I ~ifici~ R~ef S~l'D~fiet S~02 000 S51,000 .50 ~ $5L 0~07 :~ ; ;$51~O00 ~ SIO2.00(
2 Do~wn ~ Ci~'6f S5,000.000 SI,000,000 .80 ' ~ ' ' $300 000: ~ Sl.~.~0 SL~00,00C
Wa~ R~oeaF Bo~mon B~ '
3 :" Pump~e ~IMafi~a'~Out F~ ~ ~ ; T~aa °~ ~epa~ ' ~'~ , $125,000 ~2,500 .66 > ~2,500 ':.~, ~'~;~< ~8~0 $125~00c
4 : M~P~k ;To~o~e $160;000 $80,000 .50 $80.~ ;" ~;000 $1fi0,00(
: Mana~em~t
5 . P~ofPalm B~ch .
~ Po~ of Palm $147,408: ~: $ Fd7,408~ ~94,8i{
: M~ D~nag¢ B~ah
..... plan,Impro~em~n~ ' . ,-
7 ~ P~nu~ Island
En~m~e~m Co~ Boa~
Admini~fiea
, projecm 1 ~) ' Co~missioncm
Totaba'4 ~ S9,347,393 S2,023.500 -I $1,000.0~ ~ ~ $3,460,229 ~,431,I3;
Notes: - -
~Should the City of West Palm Beach (Project No. 6) not receive permits on a timely basis ('Mthin sixty (60) days of cxccating a subagrecment
with Palm Beach Count)'), their allocation will be transferred to thc Cit~ o£Boynten Beach (ProjeCt No. 2).
lAt the time af applicatinn for the grant, 9c grant applicants agreed to pay for this much of tim project. Except as provided for in paragraph 3 of
this Agreement,'/nd[vidual ma/c~ cdmmitmeats-~hall be identified and monitored for each grentee/subgrantcn and ishall, at a minimum, meet the
proposed ma~tch-l~rcentages idimti~. ~d ia, the grant app cat oas submitted for project eva uat on a~d selection.
:La dctermin/~g compliance with match requirements, each grunteeJsubgrantea may use activities undertaken on or after thc projected project s 'tnrt
date established ir[ Attachmeat A, Projects I - 7'(as appropriate)
*For Projects I - 7, only construction activith.'s (as described below and pofforrned during the term o£ this Agreement)' will be eligible for
raimimrsement under this Agreement For purposes of this ^grccmcnt the term "Construction" shall mcan the
Construction shall mean the act of physically building the project, or any of thc components of the project, and shall include the
process o£building, cleating, filling, excavation, or poving, or the substantial improvement in the size or use of any structure or
the appearance o£anv land. It shall include the transportation, nstellatinn or deployment o£eny completed components of the
project. It shall not ]gctude~dcsigning¢ anginecring, drafting or plannin~ of the project, nor shall it include monitoring of the
project after comptetion~ installation or dcplosaneat.
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment A, Page I of 23
10.620 AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
(1) When an audit is i'equired pursuant to Section 216.349, Fledda Statates, the audit shall be
an examination conducted n accordance w~th attestation standa~s promulgated by the
American Institute of Certified PublicAccountants. Grantor. State agenc es may also impose
additional requirements.
(2) ~he report produced in compliance with Section 216.349, Florida S
s~:hedul~ of Sta~, finan;cial assistance which meets the requirel
agen¢~(s~ ,~nd=a.,,~dttefi r~po~ whiCh~ incJudes an opinion on managel
t~ e'r~[~; .~csmpliae,~e ~ith gr~n~ requirernents. ~.dditionatly, the re
schedul~ :of Stat~'finan~iai assistance and i~houJd indicate whetbe[', ii
the appl cab e man~g~n~ent Assertions:are fairly stated in all matedal
General A~th~or~ and L~Wj~n~R emented - Se~ ~p ~i 1 45~ Fl0rida, Statutes. and. Section 216.349
His o~j~. Ne~ ~-9~ ~rne~ 06-30-9;~ ~3~-~t 0~-3~-95. 0~'30-97
atutes, shall contai~ a
"tents of the granting
[ent~ s assertion about
)oft. should refer to the
the auditor' s opinion,
'espects.
~dda;Statutes.
These Rules, a-s amended,,shall ~take effect September 30, 1997, and are applicable to audits for
fiscal yearn ~nding.Septer~ber 30, :I 997, aAd ~thereaffer
General Aut~b~;ity a~B La~lmpt~ted - Section 1~1.45, FI0rida Statutes;'ahd Se~-tiod 2'1S.3A,9, Rot[da Statutes.
Histo~, New~06;-30-92 ,Amende~ 0~.~ 30--93, 06-30-94, 06-30-95, 09-30-96. 09-30-97. "
Renurnbered 09-30-97 (formerly 10.640)
DEP Contract No. SP505, Attachment C, Page 4 of $
APPENDIX
~EXCERPT~ FR~M~ FEO RIDA STATUTES~ 1997:
t6:349 Fmancm[ re~ew~of grants and mds'appropnat[cns;'aadit or'attest~it on statement -
(1) grant or
to
that is
(a) If the amouqts~receNed exceg(~ $1o0~000~ hale',an audt erfo~rmed:' n accordance wth
the,rules of the ~Aud~t~t Geneml?promulgated-,~pa~,s~ 1~'),~45;' - ~ , ~ :,',, -
(b) ~ [~e ~o~ts,,, ~reee ~ ~d,., , , $2~0~.~ut d~ e~eed. , ~$~00,000 have an a ud't
p~o~ m acco~a~ ~;the~ [pt~ 0f~{he~AudAbe Gene~al~pmmulgated pumuant to
S ~ 4~ 0[ :~a~e ~ ~;~ Pqe~r~d ~y pn ~pendent ~i~e~ p~bhc accountant
~¢~:tbe~a~ a~z~m~sc~ ~lt the mvso
(c) If ~e amounts received do ~ot exceed $25.0oa, have t~e head of the entity or
o~iza~ion affest~ u~d~ penalties of pedu~, ~ the en~ity or o~aniz~tion has
co'plied with t~ pr~isi6nS of th~ grant.
All audits pe~o~ed or a~e~tio~ ~ateme~ts prepared under this subse~ion shall be filed with
the grant ~g agency and ~th ~he A~d ~r GeneFal.
Hi~. - s. 29, ch. 9~-109; ~ 78, c~ 92-~ 42
Note: The above excerpt from the Flodda Statutes is based on Section 216.349. Florida Statutes
(1996 Supplement) which was not amended during the 1997 legislative session. The codified
1997 Florida Statutes were not available at the time theses Rules were updated.
DEP Contract No. SP505, Attachment C, Page 5 of 5
Pages 2 -23 of Attachment A of Agreement SP505, as amende~, have
been omitted from Exhibit A since they are not relevant to projects for
SFY99~00. For acopy of these pages, please call Ginny Powel~, Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management,
Phone 561/223-2512.
Pages 2 -23 of Attachment ~ of Agreement SP505, as amended, have
been,omitted from~xhibit P/sirrce th~ey arc n0~ r~leVant to projects for
$~99:09~ ~Or~{[ ¢opy:0f theseP ~,~:eS~ pleas~:~ati.,?,r~ Ginnypdwell..Palm
,B ~¢h' C0tmt¥~D ePhFanon~ ofE~o mnenial ~e Sbi~ ice.Management,,
Phone 561/233-2512. - '
ATTACHMENT B
Comptroller Contract Payment Requirements
Department of Bauking and Finance, Bureau of Auditing Manual (10/07t97)
Cost Reimbursement Contracts
reimbursement is being claimed indicating that the item has been paid. Check numI~
copies of actual checks. Each piece of documentation should clearly reflect
expenditures for categories in the approved contract budget should be reimbursed.
Invoices for cost reimbursement contracts must be supported by an itemized listing of expenditures by category
(salary, travel; ~xpenses, etc.) Support[rig documentation must be provided for each mount for which
ers may bc provided in lieu of
the dates of service. Only
Listed below are examples oft3~pes of documentation representing the minimum rec firoments:
A payroll register or similar documentation should be st ~m/tted. The payroll register
should shoxv gross salary charges, fringe benefits, other c eductions mad net pay. If an
individual for whom reimbursement is being claimed is t aid by the hour, a document
reflecting the hours worked times the rate of pay will be ac, :eptable.
Fringe Benefits should be supported by invoices showing the amount paid on behalf of
the employee (e.g., insurance premiums paid). If the cc ntract specifically states that
fringe benefits will be based on a specified percentage tether than the actual cost of
fringe benefits, then the calculation for the fringe benefits a nount must be shown.
Exception: Governmental entities are not required to pre vide check numbers or copies
of checks for fringe benefits.
Reimbursement for travel must be in aCCordance with Sect on 112.061, Florida Statutes,
which includes submission of the claim on the approyed State travel voucher or
electronic means. ·
Reimbursement will be made based on paid invoiees/receipts. If nonexpendable property
is purchased using State'~nds, the contract should includea provision for the transfer of
the property to the State ~hen services are terminated. Doeumentatinn must be provided
to show compliance with Department of Management Services Rule 60A-1.017, Florida
Administrative Code, regarding the requirements for contracts which include services and
that provide for the contractor.to purchase tangible personal property as defined in
Section 273.02, Florida Statutes, for subsequent traasfer to the State.
(I) Salaries:
(2) Fringe Benefits:
(3) Travel:
(4) Other direct costs:
(5) In-house charges:
(6) Indirect costs:
Charges which may be of an internal nature (e.g., pc
reimbursed on a usage log which shows the units times tho
must be reasonable.
If the contract specifies that indirect costs will be paid base
calculation should be shown.
Pursuant to 216.346, Florida Statutes, a contract bee, veer
contract involving the State University system or the Stat{
the agency receiving the contract or grant moneys shall cha
the total cost &tho comract or grunt for overhead or indit
required for the pa>ment ofdirect costs.
stage, copies, etc.) may be
rate being charged. The rates
d on a specified rate, then the
state agencies including any
Community College system,
rge no more than 5 percent of
:ct cost or any other cost not
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment B, Page 1 of I
ATTACHMENT C
RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
CHAPTER 10.600
AUDITS OF STATE GRANTS AND AIDS APPROPRIATIONS
UNDER SECTION 216.349, FLORIDA STATUTES
EFFECTIVE 9-30-97
DEP Contract No. SP505, Attachment C, Page i of 5
RULES OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
CHAPTER 10, 600
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rule
Section No. Description Pa.qe
10.610
10.620
10.630
PREFACETO RULES ....................................... 2
DEFINITIONS ............................ ......................... 3
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS ......... ................ I ......... 4
EFFECTIVE DATE..' .......... : ...... ............ :..t ........ 4
APPENDIX'....: .................................................... 5
PREFACE 3~O RULES,
, Section 216.349, Florida Statutes; Imposes audit requirements ~
and..aids appropdat ons-fmm State ,~ni:ies.' The grants ~nd aids appro
Sedbon: 216.349 Flodda :Statutes, a~e;thi~se ~lesignated as "grants a
appropriations a~t. The begirmingLl~Oiht bfany a'udrt ~'equ~ired by ~-his sec!
deterrninat on of wh ~;h sta{e mo~;S ~-ece Yeti by the a~{6e-are grants ~
as descdbed above.
.The Auditor General has.no authority or responsibility to determine
are covered by th s sect on of, the F Odda Statutes. Because of responsi
administering State agency and the Comptroller of the State of Flodda, e
able to assist the audtee in- deterrn ning which grants and 'aids, come u
Fiorida Statutes. The administering stat~ agency shou d also'be consu ted
form requirements for the .requ~ired report and sch'edule.
These rules apply onlyto grants made by State agencies from ap
as "grants and aids" in a Flo~da aPp~'bpdation~ act. TheSe rules do
from soumes of money other: th~ :{t~ose designated aS "grants' an
appropriations act.
~n recipients of grants
~dations referred to '~n
3d aids" in a Flodda
on of law should be a
nd aids appropriations
which grants and aids
)ilities assigned to the
iher or both should be
3der Section 216.349,
regarding any specific
ropdations designated
apply to grants.made
aids" in a Florida
There may be occasions when State g'rants and aids appropriat ons moneys received
from a State agency include Federal moneys. Certain changes to these rul~s have been made to
assist State agency Federal award pass:through recipier~t~ in their effort to implement new
Federal reqUir~mer~ts (i.e., Single Audit Amendr~ents of 1996 and revisec~ OMB Circular A-133)
while still complying with the Sect on 216.349, Flodda Statutes, rec~.~Jirements. The most
significant change to these ~les is the requirement that theiauditor conduct an examination in
accbrdance with AICPA attestation ~anda~s and issue an examina ion attestation report
addreSSing compliance with ~h6 grant ~equ ~;ements.
Since the primary objective of~a Section 216 349, F orida Statute.'
the recipient' s co~nplianc~ With f~t~e g~:an~ provisions (including a determ
grant funds were used for authorized purposes) an examinaUon conduct
AICPA attestation standards ShOuld be' sufficient to meet this objectiv
standards are not s gn ficant y different from AICPA auditing standards
work necessary to meet this object ve would not. vary s g,n ficantly wheth
audit or as 'part of an attestation engagement. An .exar~i~afi0n done in a,
audit is to determine
~ation of whether the
;d in accordance with
· AICPA attestation
ind the love of audit
.'r done as part of an
;cordance with AICPA
DEP Contract No. SP505, Attachment C, Page 2 of 5
attestation stanaams provides a high level of assurance (i.e., an opinion) and should satisfy the
monitoring needs of pass-through Federal award recipients. Examinations intended to satisfy
such monitonng needs would be limited to the five types of compliance requ rements specified in
OMB Circular A-133 for lin~ited scope aud ts
Another advantage..e~faa eyamination, conducted in accordance with AICPA attestation
standards is that the a~ii~Y~s 'ex~in~(ior~'.~'[tes{ation report is essentially the same regardless
of whether or not the grants and aids recipient s a local government, not-for-profit or for-profit
organization, or had a financial statement addit, The USe of the same report to Satist;y app icable
Federal sub~ecipient n~ pit~g requirements and/or State grants and aids a;epropi'iat ohs audit
eqmrements sheuld eas? admm[strahve~burdens
imposed On sta[eragenc~s. ~i: i..-~ ,. ~ .~ ,
which
Federal
3lng
~ral and
require a
financial
ng
(1
(c)
Genera[/
:listrict or
however
not-for-
116,
or a
DEP Contract No. SP505, Attachment C, Page3 of 5
DEP AGREE~ NO. SP505
AMENDMENT NO. 1
THIS AGREEMENT as entered into on the 2na day of March, 1999, ~etween the STATE OF
,F,.LORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (hereinafter referred to as the
Department'~) and the PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY coMMIssIONERS (hereinafter
referred to as the "Grantee") is hereby amended.
WI-~REAS, Line Rem appropriation 1185 of the 1999-2000 General Appropriations Act awarded aa
additional $1,500;000 to the Department for restoration and enhancement projects for the Lake Worth
Lagoon; and,
WHEREAS, the Department received and approved eight (8) addifiona
which shall be funded in part, from such appropriation; and,
WHEREAS, a time extension is necessary to complete the proposed proje
~REAS, the Gramee shall be compensated for its administrative role i:
Lake WotthiLag~oaSubgrants as set forth in Attachment A-I, Supplemental Scope
grant project proposals
s; and,
managing the additional
,f Semees; and,
WHEREAS, other changes to the Agreement are necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE,:the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
All references to Attachment A, Scope of Services, are hereby revised to include Attachment A-l,
Supplemental Scope of Services, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
paragraph 2 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the followin
2. This Agreement shall begin upon execution by both parties and
sixty (60) months, inclusive. However, all services set forth in
Services, shall be completed no later than March l, 2002; and
Attachment A-I, Supplemental Scope of Services, shall be eomple
2004. In accordance with Section 287.058(2), Florida Statutes,
eligible for reimbursement for services rendered prior to the
Agreement. This Agreement may be amended to provide for additi
funding is made available by the Legislature.
hall remain m effect for
attachment A, Scope of
all services set forth in
ed no later than March 1,
the Grantee shall not be
execution date of this
~nal services if additional
Paragraph 3 is hereby revised to increase the maximum compensation amc
from $1,000,000 to ~2,500,000 (aa increase of $1,500,000).
Paragraph 12 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the followi~
12.
In addition to the provisions contained in paragraph 11, the Grant,
applicable provisions contained in Attachment C (Revised), Spec
attached hereto and made a part hereof. A revised copy ef Attaehme
must be provided to the Grantee with each amendment which author
ant under this Agreement
:e shall comply with the
iai Audit Requirements,
bt C (Revised), Exhibit-l,
zes a funding increase or
decrease. The revised Exhibit-1 shall summarize the funding sources supporting the Agreement
for purposes of assisting the Grantee in complying with the requirements of Attachment C
(Revised). I/the Grantee fails to receive a revised copy of Attachment C (Revised), Exhibit-l,
the Grantee shall notify the DEP's Contracts Administrator at 850/922-5942 to request a copy of
the updated information.
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Amendment No. 1, Page 1 of 2
- Paragraph 17 is hereby revised to Change the phone number provided for contacting the /-"
Department's Agreement Manager to the following: ~.._r-
: ~Phone: 561/6814774.
A~achment C (Revised), Special Audit Requirements, is hereby added to~the Agreement.
Attaclunent C; Rules ofthe Auditor General, is hereby:deleted in its entire~. ' -
. In all other respects? the Agreementofwhich this
IN '~VITNESS WHEREOF; the parties b-ave caused ~s ,A~n,.¢ndment t~ be duly eXec~d the day and
year lastwntt~n~elo~, ~ ~ ~ .~ - ' · , ~ ~
OF C0 ; OM MmSXOSERS,
OF
By:
Title:
Secrei~r~ or design&
Date: Date:
ATTEST:
Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
DEPContraets Administrator ~ ~3
Approved as to form and legality:
County. Attorney
*For Agreements with governmental boards/commissions: If someone other,titan the Chairman signs this
Amendment, a resolution, g_ntement or other document authorizing that person to sign the Amendment on
behal~ 0fthe Grantee must accompany the Amendment.
List of attachments/exhibits included as part of this Amendment:
Specify Letter/
Type Number
Description (include number of pages)
Attachment A- 1
Attachment C (Revised)
Supplemental Scope of ServiceS (25 Pages)
Special Audit Requirements (10 Pages)
DEP Agreement Nm SP$05, Amendment N~ 1, Page 2 of 2
ATTACHM~IT
SUPPLEMENTAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
Legish6ve Line Item Appropriation 1185 provided $1,500,000 for Lake Worth Lagoon Restoration and Eubancemem Projects. A total o£thhteen (13) Grant Applications for
various projects were submitted by qualified applicants and reviewed by a Seleetten Committee comprised of ropresentative~ from thc Deparlment of Environmental Protcciion,
the South Florida Waier Management District, the US. Environmental Prote~n Agency, the West palm Beach Fishing Club and the Flodd~ Inland Navigation District The
following table ide~dfies the projects which the gelectlon Cammilteo approved on September 1, 1999 for funding under this specie appmpriafic~
LAKE WORTH LAGOON RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROJE~TS
PUNDED PURSUANT TO SIrY99-0~ LINE rrEM APPROPRIATION NO. 118.6
Pmj~t Proj~t Des~fiptlon l~sponsibl¢ Original Original Grant (ArB)/A Grant A~ard [C/(1-R)]-C P~'ds~d Total
]qumber ' Lecal Estimated Request (Percentages · Granted (Grant Award
Go~rament C. bst of Projgt rounded ta the Subgrantc~ + Minh~um
nearest Min~um Match)
hundr~lth.) Match
(A) (B) (R)' (C) (D)
9 Downtown Regio/m[ City 6f 750,000 250000 .67 2501000 5OO,O00 750,00O
Stermwatc? Facility BOynton Beach ~ :
10 Hypolusu Installation of Hypoluxo Tewh 6f [,414,510 707,255 50 [ 450:000 450,000 900,000
11 J Stormw~te~ rowivofLake · 146,000 73,000 .50 734000'
0uffall/Tre~tm~nt Parle 73,000 146,000
I Retrofit '
12 - Palm Beech Par 3 ' To,,4n bf Pfilm 440,000 200,000 .55 20C 000 ' 239,560 439,560
Golf Course Habitat' B~a~h
Restcratlon:
13 Munic{l~ ~,(~ity of Rix4era 20'2,360 i01,180 .50 100 000 100,000 200,000
Stcmiwat~r Beech
systcm
I Pro~vam~
14 I Ren~isssuge Project, City of We~t 2,450,000 300,000 .88 20(] 000 1,426,016 1,626,016
~- Phase I- Tfeatrsent palm B~aeh
& Divemion~
15 ~ Jolin'a{sl~ Pfilm'Bea~h 826,000 206,500 .75 202 475 607,425 809,900
· Restoration County Board
of County
~ Commissioners
16 ~.LMm WortliGolf. palm Beach 8,700,000 437,500 .95 -0- N/A NJA
Cour~ RestorationS iC~gunty Board
of County
Commiaaioners
17 Contta~t Palm Beagh N/A N/A N/A 24 525 N/A N/A
Admialstmtice County Board
pro. iect~ 9-16) J~ommission~ra
: ~ A T~h~'7 ~i $14,92g,870 ] $2,275,345 - $I,500 000 3,396,001 $4,871,476
Note~:
· the grant applicants agreed to pay this percentage of the project. Exc ~t as provided for in para~aph 3 of this
Agreement, be identified and monitored for each grentedsubgi'ontee end shall, at a minimum, meet the proposed
grant applications submitted ~or project evaluation and selection.
r in the Town's FY2000 budget as of October 1, 1999 If matching funds are not approved by
Town ~f Palm'i~eec~ allocation.will be re-allecated to the Lake Worth Golf Course Rastomti ~n Project.
proposed.
CAllecatio~
the
is re-allocated to the PBC ERM for this project, PBC ERM will r
ceive the allocation contingent upon its
his Amendment for Projects 9-16
in determining compliance with match requir~
2000.
(as described below and performed during the tema o
For pm'poses of this Agreement, the term "Con~tmedon" shall mean th
bnilding the project, or ally of the components of the projec
~excavation, or paving, or the substantial improvement in the size or use of ~
installation or deployment of eny completed compen
planning of the project, nor shall it include monitoring og
as set forth in ARactunent A-l, shall be
lents, each grantee/subgrentce may use
this Agreement) will be eligible for
following:
; end shall include the process
ny structure or the appearance
ts of the project It shall not
the project after completion,
.DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment A-l, Page 1 of 25
PRO.~ECT 9
0RGINAL
i~roject! -
Applicant:
Agent/Title:
Es~rrm~¢.d
Is Funding Match ~¢d¥ Av~able
20001
(appro:dmate)
1 3tthe spaceprovided, fully describe the~scope,
methods and locatton of thg~rO~sed
pd)tnership project. -
Ph~e 1 of~e ~to~water ~provements Project inciuded cons~tion of~e~3,Xe~e
poCd a~d piping east of U.S Hi.way
co~ts for ~at pqmmn w~e e~t~mated at ~5 mdhon P~e 2 ~v~I1 ex~end p~pMg
po~0ns of Basins,2 & 3 (se~ map) Pret~eatment of~e ~tml 2.5 ~ches
over i~e imperious area wi~l be afforde
~plemented ~ exfil~atmn ~ench or d~ detention in the upland areas.
~ 9
Phase 2 of the ~to~water t~provements for the Do.town Ware~hed ~cl~
tm~ Hne p~pm[ crosmng U~S. H~ghway I ~n mvo locatmns, plUS ~dmonaI
piing ~d eXfirtrafion mnc~ intended to inmrcept aha ~eat sto~ater th:it~S
wing into ~e U.S. 1 ~&,or Seacrest Boulev~d drmna~e systems Bo~
_ roa~my_~amge.~tem~t4y-dmc~ge to ~e-L~eWogh Da~0on-~th6~t
prekea~ent.
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment A-l, Page 2 of 25
ORIGINAL
Project Name:
Page 2 of 3
Downto~vn Watershed
Plow wilt your project assist in the attainment of the principal ggal of the Lake Worth
Lagoon Management Plan, i.e., the restoration/improvement of Ibc Lake V/orth
Lagoon, · -
The drainage system will include baffle boxes at both inlets to r ;move debris,
~edini~nt, oils ~d gre/s~s before storm~vater reaches, the pond. l'he open area of the
p~ond, S~pp[¢n'/ent~d bY mechanical aeration (f°untalns)wilI ~ 2~er reduce BOD
l~di ¢ ~f ~ Lak~ ~.W~orth~Lagoo 'while also increasin diSs0 /ed oX' en
r_aaln~o h , ~- . _ ~ : .,~ g Yg
concentration in, the discharge fi:om t,hp.pond. The drainage~we s associated ~with the
,prm~ ~vill reduce fi:eshwatef:discharges ~o f~c Lagoor4 as will ~ e,UPland
~retre~ment. '
This proposal will, therefore; s,up, lporz at I
5ig on ag ment onow :
Lake
(upload
The Ci~ s s~ormwater uti~pa' ~ilI provide consistent cleaning a
treatment system, so ,as to guarantee tong-term treatment effect
3. Plow will you measure the success/benefits of your off or'ts on
Water quality monitoring of the pond discharge can be compar
from the U.S. Highway 1 and Seacrest Boulevard Systems. VaI
and suspended S01ids can be measured and used to estimate the
loading to the Lagoon.
~d maintenance of the
vcncss.
Lake Worth Lagoon.
i with water quality
ecs for BOD, nutrients
net decrease in
0RGINAL
Project Nam.e:
Page 3 of 3
Downtown Watershed
The Sk~t6h sh°Wnbei6w indilates tlii I%aii0n 6f t~ P~6~6i~d p~ping in Basins 2
& 3, and its relation t° the pond:in Basin 1, :
'Ce~t m~a~io-n:' I-certi.fy. that to::the ~st'°f my kn°wledge, all °~(qe sta~emenrs
Enviromental R~o~ces M~age~e~t :' ~': ~:
3323 Be~vedereK~,~g- 5~2 Title:" Direc~er of Utilities
we,,ur-'~ p a'~ Beach., FL 33~6-1548 ~
Date:
DF.P Aoreement No. SP505. Attach.meat A-l, Page 4 of 25
PROJECT 1.0
Lake WoNh Lagoon I'~rluershlp
Gra,,t Program
ORIGINAL
Project:'
Hypoluxo Znsta!lation of Sewers (HIS)
A,pplicant: To~rn of Hypoluxo
..... Age_n_.ffTiHe:~ Kenneth M. Schultz~ Mayor
A,ddress: :7585 S..Fed'eral Highway, tlypoluxo, FL 33462
~hone:
' 561-582-0i55
Estimated Cost 0f Pr0ject $ -1,414,510 Amount of Grant ]Ri
Is FundLug B~atch Already Available Yes - Conditioned upon Cou
Project Star~ Date (approx.) Winter 1999-2000 Completion Dab
In the space provided, fully describe the scope/methods and I
partnership project.
There are two single-family residential communities in the Town of Hypoluxo
abutth~g the Lake Worth Lagoon usin~'~elfti¢ t~-nlis. Just'~ak'6fFJ.S. #I there
the entire length of the Town of Hypoluxo maintained by the City of Boynton
developmer/ts in the Town of Hypoluxo are connected to this sewer line. Ther
being built adjacent to one of the referred to single-family developments. It is
out" for connecting seventy-one (7I) homes to its sewer system.
With this project, Hypoluxo Installation of Sewers (HIS), all septic tanks east ~
be eliminated. Having sewers.throughout.the Town of Hypoluxo is a goal in ~
Plan. The awardingofthis grantwill assist the town in satisfyingthis importa
project willhave a tremendous impact on cleaning-up the Lake Worth Lagoon
residential lot~, over sixty (60%) of them are directly on the Iatra~oastal Wste~
it. Some.homes have septic tanks within ten (10) fe~t of the water.
With lt~ -iraplemen m~-on- of-PI[ S-mTc~clu~i v~ -W i th~d~ ~-r~/f ~1 u-~-~ ~- ~i' '/tfi
disrupted areas will b'e raumed to pre-construction condkion.
A. preliminary study estimates the cost of $1,414,510 for the project. TM.
is based upon 99 lots, each with approximately 75 feet of frontage.
quest $ 707,255
mil approval of Special
Summer 2001
)catiou of the proposed
east of U.S. #1 and
s a north-soutit sewer line
Beach. All ~ther housing
~' is a new development
;oing to provide a "stub
~' U'.S. #~ in Hypoluxo will
~s Town s Comprehensive
~t element of our plan. The
Of the ninety-nine (99)
way or a canal leading to
fr;-izm-ding hll-roaa's iind-; ....
estimated cost
While the actual costs may vary slightly, the Town of Hypoluxo requests favorable
consideration, nevertheless, of its efforts to clean up the environment knowing there will
be minor adaptations of this proposal when the study is completed.. The Town,of
Hypoluxo does want to model for other communities the removal of septi~ tanks
bordering the Intracoastal Waterway.
DRP A~re~ment No. SP505. At'iac~ament A-l, Page 5 of 25 ,
Project Name:
Page 2 of 3
Hvpoluxo Installation of Sawers (RIS)
2. How will your project assist in the attainment of t ~e principal goal of the'Lake Worth
Lago on' M a n ag e men t-Pi ,'tn; .-t. e.,. tke r~s t ova t~to~:/t mp yore men t o [~ t h e L a I c e ~. o rth L ago o n.
The discharge of contaminants from septic tanks into the soil will be eliminated. Soma homes in the area
have been using.
including chemicals.
3. iq'ow will you measure the snccess/ben~fits of your efforts on the Lake X, Vorth Lagoon.
With the removal of over 100 septic tanks the Lake Worth Lagoon will benefit enormously.~ Our success
will be measured afl:er the installation of sewers is complete and there are no septic tznks in Hypoluxo
affecting the Lagoon. Life will return to the Lake Worth Lagoon. It is possible the Town of Hypoluxo
will be a prototyplc model for other communities encouraging thereto remove s~ptic, tanks contaminating
the Lake Wor'~h Lagoon. Quality of the Intracoastal Waterway will be measured before and afl:er the HIS
project. The return of life to the Lagoon will be measured. The condition ofth~ Lake ~,Vorth Lagoon as
~ftodsy is Imown. Our goat with this project is to support the return of the Lake W'6rth Eagoon to its
original state as it was when there was a Barefoot Mailman.
Pre3ectNnllle: H.ypoluxo Installation of Sewers (IllS)
I'~n~e 3 0£3
4. AddiHona! Nam-:u [ve/Drnwings tim! ~1 dd to tire previous qnesHon:
~one a~s the who, what, whe~ where and why questions 0f~his prO~s~
~swered. ~y ~ere is a necessity for t~s project is obvious to ~1 of us v
L~e Wo~h Lag~n ~d live ne~ to it. ~en ~e project b '~mpleted, in 1
dependent upon ~e suppo~ o~is ~t proposal. The ~S project is: ~ov ~
family resid~nfi~ ~ in the To~ of~yp~luxo.
~1 financial data in ~s propos~ ~e estimate~. It is requited tha~ we be
thb proposal when firm data ~e ~ewn.
~/~ v' . ........:..
they are
ho ehjoy the
~art, ~'a
o single-
e to amend
II 0 I~ E.S ,A'D D I T]'0.'N:.'!
The Town of Hypoluxo ia readyto support fl~is project to improve file Lake V;orth Lagoon '
.CertffTc~.l/m~ 1r cert[£y that to tile best or m)'[Imowledge, all el' tile stntem2nts edntnined 'in '
,'tpplicntmn nre-corveet n. nd coi~iplet& - ......... ~ flus
County Grant Coordinator ~ PHnt Nam e: KENNETH H. SCHUL~Z
~nVJronnleut,,l] I'(esotn-ces Management
3323 I~elvedere Road, Bldg..502
5Vest Pnhn ][leach; FL, 33406-1548
Tille: MAY0
DEP A~reement No. SP505~' Attachment A-1, Page 7 of 25
PROJECT 11
Lake Worth Lagoon Partnership
Grant P~'ol~ram ·
Project: S~ormwat er Ouffall/Treatment' Pcetrofit
....... · ............ _A. pa~Jj.Ca..n_t; .._ T6~ of Lake Park · Agent/rifle: ~Brb:n Sulliv.~n - Public Works ~Divector
Address: 535 ~ark Avenue.,:Lake i~ ~4~3 '
EstimatedCostOi~Peoject $146~000 g~rii0ui~tofGrantP, equeSt $73,000
Yei =approved by voters in ~t997 referendum
Project ~tart Date ~al~proximately) Au~ustlZl~00 Completion Date February 200I
1. In the space provided, .fully describe the SCope, methods and lofiatiari of the proposed
pa~nership project.
This submittal requests support for the
implement their Stormwater Master Plan,
untrea~,ed stormwater~runoffto the
the re~ofit of ~he e~i~fing drainage system s
installation of' stormwater manag
runoff prior to its being
specifically, this application [
flow diversion structure (smart box). This will
purpose of capttlring pollutants from ,,
posed a chronic problem for the Marina over the years.
efforts tc
t the
More
dual
Which. has
DEP A~eement No. SP505, Attachraent A-l, Page ti of 25
Project Name: Lake Worth Lagoon Partnership
Page 2 of 3
2. ~ow will your project assist in the attainment of the principal goat of the Lake Worth
Lagoon Managemen't ]?lan, i.e., the restoration/improvement of the Lake Worth Lagoon.
The installation will be accomplish, ed as pa? o£ the other stormwater management
improvements being made around the municipal marina. The Grant ?rogram was helpful in
funding these related improvements last year. Inclusion of the propo.sed stormwater
management devices in the existing drainage system will provide a direct reductmn in pollu~ants
conveyed by stormwater t~' the lagoon from the Town of Lake Park'§ ~outhem d;rainage area,
which occupies approximately !32 ~acres. Areas included in th/s d.r~
entirely built out, ~nd include residential, COmmercial and industri~l
was develop,ed prior to the common use of stormwater management sy
the propeCies loca,te4 ~!thin the drainage area. have water managen
assist with the tregtrn.ent 9f~ stormw~ater. ~It has been noted that near
seagrass beds, now ~ist,,: ~Unformnately~ ~wkhin a zone of approximate
the sea'ask'bedS i~a:~e been severely impacted or 'are nomex~stent, rf
attributable tO the st0rmwater discharg6s. , With the installation of
facilities, significant improvement in St0m~ a/er treatment will occur.
3. How will, you measure the success/bonefits of your efforts on the
With the installation ora CDS st~water treatment unit, meas
accomphshed qmte s~mply by momtonng (measuring) the volume of
the s/ottawa/er treatment unit. 'The sYtstim is designed with a ha:
serviced on a-regular basis by Town pu01ic W~orks staff. Th~s baskel
particulate and' floating pollutants. With {he inilusion of the smart box
MI1 also serve to capture floating debris moving through the marina's
Oil and g~-eas~, absorbing rings c~ alsc~[be deployed within the CD.c
those pollutants
rage basin are essentially
!opertiesl S~nc~:this area
5terns, essentially none of
tent systems designed to
the ' e~mg, 0Uffal!~ so~me
!Y 2091fe~t 6_ft~e ouffall,
~is ism0~ nl~ely d~eetl)
srormwater management
Lake Worth Lagoon.
~rement of success can be
pollutants removed from
ket/filter which ig io be
/filter captures suspended
it is Planned that ~he unit
northern flushing culverL
chamber to help capture
DFP Agreement No. SP505_ Attachment A-l, Page 9 of 25
Project Name: Lake '~Vorth Lagoon Parlnershlp
Page3 of 3
4. Additional Narrative?Drawings that add to the previous questions.
Bei~v is a small sketch-id~enfifyi~g the~'locafion of the~,pmposed.,insta'~tation r61ative to the
existing ouffall and the ToWn's marina.
CDS Technology K~y Fe~6res
, ~ 32 a]cre
:"-7 ..... I :-'""'~
.~,e-'-' Exis[ing Marinz
P~oposed 60" Flushing Culvert
,,
Certification: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, all of the statements contained in this
application are co rrect and complete.
6 copies to the submitted and
I original (marked) sent to the
County Grant Coordinator ~
Environmental Resources Management
3323 Belvedere Road, Bldg. 502
West Palm Beach, FL 33406-1548
Signature: . ,~ ~; J..~{t_~
Print Name: tB~ia~Sullivan
Title: Public Works Direotor.~
Date: June 14, 1999
DEP A~reement No. SP505. Attaekment A-l, Page I0 of 25
PROJECT 12
Lake Worth Lagoon partnership
Cra.ut Program
P~oje~: - ~r 3 Golf Course Habitat Restoration
Agent/Title:
Address:
Phone:
James M. BoW_y~gr, P.E.. Town Bn~ine~er
_p_~. 2B_o2g2_~patm Beach. Florida 33480
_,5_6l- t - ' .....
Amount of Oi~an~ P. equest: ~$200,000
Estimated Cost-ofProject:---,~440 000
Is Funding Match Already Available? rn Yes [] No [~ ee Town Council Kcsolution
)ting intent to authorize
.riding if grant is approved.]
Project Start Date (approx.)~
_ Completion D-'
l. In the space provided, fully describe the scope, methods ~
partnership project.
This project is located at the Town of Palm Beach Par 3 g~
Boulevard (SR_AAA) Palm Beack The project would be cons
envisioned that a rock berm be constructed g-10 feet away ftc
placed and red man.oyes planted at approximately uhree feet <
would be 2000 LF-'-.
L ..':z_ i--.{7 .... -_H-~.-~;i'll~;-6[tr'~sroj'eit'assist in the attainment of the prin
Lagoon Management Plf-n', i~7,--li-r~rr, stinmti~n4;,m~
Lagoon.
This project will establish 200.0 linear feet of man_=rove hah
the Worth Lagoon Management Plan, as number 26, Appen
,~:_A~l_m]st 2000
nd location of the proposed
~lf course, 2345 South Ocean
racted from the uplands. It is
m the wall, filter fabric and fill
,n center. Total project len~h
dpal goal of the Lake Worth
x~ em~nt _. o f_!h_e., b.a_k _% >~°_rt_h_
tan This project is identified in
Iix D table, Habitat Restoration
and Enhancement projects Summary.
How will you measure the success/benefits of your efforts on the Lake Worth Lagoon.
The measurement of success will be in the survivability of the mangrove plantings ant
associated use by marine life.
13Rp A~reement Nh. RPgO5 Attacbn~nt A-1. Pa~e 11 of 25
Project Name: Palm Beach Par 3 Golf'Course Habitat Restoration
Page 2 of 2-
4. Additional Narrative/Drawings that add to the previous questions.
exhibits si ' cant bait fish and predator fish activity (Snook, Jack Crevelle). The
Thts area , gnifi .., ....... . ' rovide a si ~ficant enhancement to
~ . ' - , ,ow ~e etatmn will p gm
~r~h~i~h~a] 2000 linear ~ee~.of ~, ,, g, , ·
existing marine resources m t~ area.
6 copies to the submitted and 1 original (marked)
sent to the County Grant Coordinator ~
Environmental Resources Management
3323 Belvedere Road, Bldg. 502
Certification.: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, all of the statements contained in this
application are correct and complete' Signature: ~.__~OL( ~. ~j.,4~.~
Print Name: Leslv S. Smith
Title: Town Council President .
Date: 6/8/99
13!~P Ac~,~n~ont lq'r, RP~[I~; Attachment A-I. Pa~,e t2 0f25
- ' PROJ]gCT 13
ORIGINAL
Project:
Applicant:
~gent~itlgf
Address:
Phone:
Lake Worth Lagoon Partnersh p
Grant Program
Municipal Stormwater M~,a~ement SYstem ImprOvements Pro,ram ........
City of Riviera Beach
Williaff/J- Hunter, CiW Ms ,a ?er
600 W. Blue Heron West Boulevard, Riviera Beach,
[561) 8454010
Estimated Cost of Project $_202,360 Amount of Grant Reques
Is Funding MatchAlready Available Funds will be included in
Project Start Date (approx.) ~Compl~ion Date At
1. In the space provided, fully describe the scope, methoc
proposed project.
The City of Riviera Beach intends t~ implement a Municipal Stormy
i~i3~0v~ments program. ! It will be. implemented under t~e pro_v, ls(c
Environmental Prote~tion~ Agency (E~A) an~d Nanon..al.~P.ol!u~t~u~L~x~
('NPDES), MuniciPal Separate Storm ~ewer Systems 0visas), renm~
Lake Worth Lagoon Management Plan.
~e provisions ~of the M$~:pe .nnit r ~t, uir~ .t~,.e City ~o
k~ and activities Thee ~s~ an.a acuwues are rocu~=u
~nspection and 'maintenance of structural controls, ~mplementaUon o
implementation of ~teriqnality criteria for flood control projects; pcs
and certification pfoced~k Additional areas ~clude illicit discharge
and enf°rc~ment'r°adx~i,x~ municipal solid ,~aste, high-risk facititi,
Municipal soti~ waste is ~overed-by other federal,.state-and local prog
to the permk.
The inspection and mmnt~nance of .s~'ucu~al~ co~%se ~itl. tioll~¢(
investi ations and enforcement program elemen~ reqmr=
g ' ' '~ ~it-' to col
illicit disctmrgesand improper disposal. It also reqmres
and on poffio~s of the Mg4s and maintain a log of the results of the
additiov, al :requirement .is io implemenz an investigation program
soume(s) of illicit conne~t/~ns or discharges to the MS4 within it its ju~
l] AU6 - 9 1999
:NVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
Florida33404
: $__lOl,lgO
eFY 1999/00 Budeet
~ust 2001
and location of the
:r Management System
as of the United States
arge Elimination Ss~em
x~ber FLS000018 and the
stormwater management
~or areas, which include:
development regulations,
5¢ides/herbicides training
inspections, investigation
and constructipn .s_it_es: ............
ams and is not applicable ........
discharge ~nspections,
~duct field inspections for
:ct information on outfalls
~spections performed. An
to identify and stop any
isdiedon.
Project: Municipal Stormwamr Management System Improvements ?re,ram Page 2 of 3
identifies several
The Municipal . The
MS4 t of
.~ Lake
2.~ the Lake
Island
Worth
three ~ajor a~eas: wa~er and
natural resources, The mom
the war. er
Singer
10. 12 and 60
into the 'Lkke
of tho
determine if
~equire repairs to
In add[60n to
separaze
llation of a .
designed to
of watcrbodies
is associated
v of the
Lagoon?
watersheds
to closely
Lake Worth
Department of
States
The City is
The monitoring
and major
permit
above. Pre
been made.
I~I~P ~or~m~t lqn gPqflq Attachment A-t, Paae 14 0[25
Proj eot: Muni¢il~al Stormwater Management System Imcrovements Pro,ram Page 3 of 3
Additional Narrative/Drawings that addto the~previous
Certification: I certhS' that to the best of my knowiedge;-att 'oFth~
contained in this application are correct and complete.
1 marked original sent to the
County Grant Coordinator ~ Printed Name: Willia~n J. Hunter
Environmental Resources Management
3323 Belevedere Road, Bldg. 502 Title: City M~nager
West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Date: Au~*ust 9, 1999
PROJECT 14
ORIGINAL
Applicant:
Agent/Title:
Address:
Phone:
Estimated Coat
Is Funding
Project $
1, In the~
Lake Worth Lagoon Partnership
Renaissance Prgject Phase 1-Tr~ama~em and Diversion
City of West Palm Beanh
Ken Rearden, Public Utilities Direetm'
Amu~unt of Grant R~quest $300 000
Cdmpleti0n D&te: September, 2000
proposed partnership
consultants and
the Arm
Florid
Co~
East Coast. Once
the environment.
city staff, local nngineering
, (EPA),
(DEP) and the South
infilt development along the
· Reduce damaging f~'6ii{watet:' slugs" and pollutant load mpa~ t~!¢}.!~e ~a~ Worth Lagoon by diverting sto~
water throug~ ~n~ proces~ to a storage c~lt, ,~ . ,
* Convert ~e~cap~fl ~0ffinto mw Wmer supply, ' ' :' ~: ' '~ '
* Provide in6}~;;~ ~ood ~otecti0n to lbw4yinz ~e~'wifhifi ~e in~ City~f West Palm Beach. and
. FulfiI1 water ~t~'~Tquantity and d~ pretrea{me~t requ~remenig for ~e ipcoming CityPlace devel°pment
and the Palm B~ C~ty Convenuon Center.
and a 35
a construction
~ to redirect-~torm water.that-wou-ld
the first 1/2 inch
pipeline, CON/SPANs
Lo convey water east to west. Thc CON/SPANs will be
a store the volum~ needed }'Or dry pretreatment. Future phases
:ollect and treat all ~unoff from the watershed and store it within
and
$1.67 million ta
Second, the
area.
· $100,000 of the requested $300,000.
resubmitted. First, the astimated conxtruction cost hasjumped from
of meeting requirements of FDOT as well as other design changes.
Clea~' Lake, which had raised some concerns, has been relocated to an upland
F:\wpb_Xwpb_rdps'~LW Grant RcnaPh I .doe
Project Name: The Renaissance Proiect Phas~ I'-Treatment and Diversion
o
Pa~e 2 of
2. How will your Project assist in the attainment of the principal gaal of the aka Worth Lagoon
Management plan i.e., the restoration/improvement of the Lake Worth Lagoon?
The Project will ameliorate freshwater "!lugs" and pollutant loads to the Lake Worth L~
storm water runoff' away from the C-51 drainage basin; this will help restore the I~agoo
based asmarine ecosystem. By curtailing storm Water dii¢harges into the Lagoon, the
sedimentation, nutrieut loading, toxic substances and pathogens. Additionally, the Pn
d scharge rate to help limit freshwgtar "slugs" tg)he~Lagoon, then:by minimizing.und sirabla salinity fluctuations,
Finally, the Project also sar~es as a rn~del to'other municipalities for i~tagrated wa~¢r n~anagement,
/
3. How will you rae~asure the success/benefits of your efforts on the Lake Worth-Lagoon?
1
The City will be able to q ~uantity of
water z flow and toad
reductions and comparing t~
Water quannty will be recorded and water ~ I be take
Management System during patio
pump station, the settling basin spillway and th
one-year period, and then ~e-evaluated to optimize sampling,protocol.
Par-erectors to beobtained on a daily and wee?? h;asis will bej sample~i hy the certified
parameters (with the exception of BOD an~t 0'ils a~d Greas~). Pararheters to be obmi
annua basis (asivell asB~D and Oils and Grease~;) will bds~rnpled,~n~ analyzed by~
Florida DEt~ an~t?or HRS. Semi-annual rep0i'~ sh&ll be prePa~rc~i, ihdladl~_o test. result:
number, SF~rMD permit number, sample location and flow CondiuOns.:
The following parameters~wilI be sampled on a d~.ily basis.
Parameters Analvzed Units
pH (Range> 6.0 & <8.5) Sta~ndasd
D sso red Oxygea rr/~../l
Turbidity nit/
Total Dissolved'Solids CI'DS) mgfft
Fecal Coliforms mff100ml
Total Colif0rms mff100mi
Samples will be analyzed
parameters listed below.
Parameters Anah'zed
^mmenia as N
Nitrite and Nitrate as
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus. as P
Aluminum
Arsenic. total
The following parameters will be sampled on a weekly Cadmium
................................................... Chro/rLium
basis.
Parameters An alxy. ed Units Copper
Conductivity, Field umhoslcm Iron
Water Temperature degrees C Lead
?alkalinity raga Selenium
Biochemical Oxygen Demand BOD mgffl Zinc
Chlorides mg/I
Hardness mg/I
Oil and Grease mg/l
Total Suspended Solids [TSS) m~.
Samples will be analyzed on aseml-annual basis (dry and wet screemng, minimum I
Organoehtoride Pesticides (8081A), Chloridated Herbicides (815 lA), Purgeable Halt
Organic Compounds (602).
goon by diverting untreated
~to a healthy, macrophyte
'oject will reduce
:ct will reduce the peak
location(s) of the Water
n :will be followed for a
City laboratory ['or all listed
~ed on a monthly and semi-
Laboratory certified by
· the DEP/HRS certified lab
~n a monthly basis for thc
Units
m~
m~
u~
u~
u~
inch rainfall) for
:arbons (601) and Volatile
F:\wpb~wpb_r dpskLWG~n t R ca apb I .doc
Project Name: The Renaissance Proiect Phase I - Treatment and Diversion
Page 3 of 3
.4. Additipnal'Narrat!ve/Dray,~jngs that:arid ~o the Pr?'ious q~e'$fi°ns'
In addition to reducang the City's dtscharges into the .Lake Worth LagoOn. lh~Projeot will also:
· T-~-,-~,~e the City's water suonlv by Uti zin~ the ca6ttirefi storm water and recycling captured-seepage water
· an'g~lo~ns:.,~ : of Water. per year, and
· ~chobee
Certification: ! certify that to the ~e~t of my knowledge, all of the statements contained in this application are
correct and complete.
6 copies to be submitted, including
I marked original sent to the
County Grant Coordinator @
Environmental Resources Management
3323 Belevedere Road. Bldg. 502
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Print ~qame: Ken Rearden
Tkle:'~ ~iliu'es Director_
F:\wpb_\wpb_rdps',LWGrantRcnaPhl .doc
DEP Am'cement No. SP505. Attachment A-l, Page 18 of 25
PROJECT 15
^pplicanu
:~gcnt/Tide:
Address:
John' s Island Restoration
Palm Beach County D~pt. o~ ~nvironm~t 1 R o r ~ ~anag~menr
Richard E. Walesky, Director .
3323 Belvedere Roa~, Bld$. 502, West Palm
(56t) 233-2400
Estimate~ Cost ~f Project ~ 82fi ,.GQ0 Al~]tcl,int or ('brant Req,tcs
Funding Match Al,~r;~d~' :Xva~l~b[~ Fu~dinff Ant~e~ r~ n~
lh~nject Start Date (:q)proxim:~rc) ~ov~be~ '2000 Comptetio~ D~'
p:n'tncr~hil~ proj ecl.
John's Island is an approximately 7 acre spoil island located in the Town of Palm I
of West Palm Beach, Florda John s Island is just north of the Canal 51 (C-51
Lagoon and is east of the Atlantic Intracoasial Waterway (Icw). Figure:l sho,
restoration of John's tsland. Features include: restoration of approximat, ely 1.7 ac
creation of approximately 3.3 acres of red mangroves, and enhancement of ~
maritime t-rarnrnock. As the name implies, John's Island is only accessible by
materials will be transported by tug aud barge; All exotic plant specie~, as apl:
5 acres w I be removed and chipped on Site. There will be Construction of a t
total length of ap:proximately 0.:~ mile that will include excavation, lgra~ing
removal of approxirnat~ly 17,000 yds.~ of spoi rnateriall Appi-oximatei~ ~(} tons c
rip-rap will be used to stabilize the the entrance to thetidal channels[ Planting w
13 800 red mangrove seed ings (Rhizophor~ mangle) approximat~l~ ,1 l~j(00. F
(Spartina altemiflora), and approximately 500 maritime hammock tr~es and
accornplished with; the red rnan~r0ves being placed 3, feet on' center, tile rnaril!i~
7 feet on center, and the smooth cordgrass placed 2 feet on center around the
tidal channels.
~emch, FL 33406
$
=~ ~qqq
~ Feb~ar~ 2001
o~theprOll~ed
leach southeast of the City
i discharge at Lake Worth
~W-the conceptual plan for
res of existing mangroves,
pproximately 1.4 acres of
boat. All equiprnen[ and
'opdate, on approximately
dal channel system with a
:o wetland elevation,, anb[
(1.-3 f~ot diameter boutder
I consist of: approximately
I,ugs of smooth cordgrass
s~hrubs. Par:trig wifl be
18'hammock plants placed
vetland perimeter and the
rlRP A~reement N'n .qP~itq Ai~achment A-l_ Pa~e 19 of 25
P,-oj==t ~:,,,,e: John' s Island Restoration
Originally, a substantial poFtion of the ~e~ that;3ohn's Island'now ocCUpy Were.submerged shallow-water
habitat
has be~me -h~pesia
Elimination
habitats
ical
DEP Anreement No. SP505. Atmctunent A-1, Page 20 of 25
'John's Island Restoration
Page 3 of 3
- 4, Addit.ionat Narrative/Drawings that add to th'e previous questions.
t
i original (marked) sent to tile
County Grant Coordinator ~
Environmental Resources .M[anagement
3323 Belvedere Road, Bldg. 502
West ]Palm Beach: FL 33406-1548
Certification: I certify that to tile best of ]'n.',' knowledge, nil of th e statements contained in this
applieati~n are correct and complete. ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ . ~ ~
6 copies to the submitted and Sign:tture: Richard E. Wale~v
Print Name: Y
Title: Director
PROJECT 16
ApF£icant:
Lnke Wocth L:~goon Partnership
Lake Worth Golf Course Restoration
Palm ~each County Depar;t~en~ of Environmental Resources.Ma~.ag~ment.
Age,t/Title: _
'd E. Wal~
tess:
Esthnated Cost
Funding b.latch Alrend v A
}~'oject Stnr£ D~e
ntRequest~ 437,500
Cv. mpletio~t Da%e Feb.' 2002.
I~ In tile spnce prov led. fully
;srt nership proj ec!.
The L~ke Worth Golf Course
westel
of
shorel
water as natura!ly occurs
mxn~m~ zing the are~
60% c F the shoreline is fringed with all
with ti- exotics Australian pine
plan fDr the LWGC. Features include:
mang~ ~ve fringe, Creation of appro~
oyster reef, 40.3 acres of sea
. _p.!ag_t
of app, rommately
118,4(~0 red
cordg~lass (
placed 3 feet on center, at
perimeter.
1.2 linear miles of shoreline along the
in the City of Lake Worth. in addition to filling
ICW dredging, additidnal dredging along the
radual slope fr~om the shore to deeper
~p drop from 0 to -7 feet N.G.V.D.~
and shallow sub-tidal resources. Approximately
roves (red, black, and white) mixed
Figu[e 1 shows the conceptual restoration
of approximately' 1.7 acres of'existing
,acres af red mangrove wetland, 1.3 acres of
and 0.8 acres of idal chann.e!..._Al!_exotic
inter- and.
, and placement
p-rap. Planting of: approximately
and approximately 16,000.plugs of smooth
thee red. mangroves being
2 feet on cehter around the wetland
D~P Aareement l~n gP~;fl5 Attachment A-1. PaRe 22 of 25
Nan,e: Lake Worth Golf Course Restoration
Pnge '~
Restoration of the LWGC will help reverse the histodc trend ofwetlan(
Worth Lagoon. The proposed project modification will restore degrade(
to a more natural ecosystem with.
diversity. The planting
habitat and partially offset
Lagoon over the years. Creatior
more :natural ?oral pr,
to colonize.
quality through filtering:
shelter to fish an.d wildlife, 11 3o
Munyc)n Island and. [h~se
Worth Lagoon.
both of which are
Elimination of the exotic species wilt reduce the probability of colonizal
adjacent areas by eliminating seed sources. ,~; Successful establishmen
habitats through survival o~ the native an8 i~etland plant species w
productive biological system, and reduce the~itity of exotic species to cc
oysters recr¥itin_~_to..tb..e 9r.0Jep.t _a.r.e.8..w_i!l.re.s_u[(~h.an ~crease n the amc
resources in'the Lake Worth l_agoon. The~success of.the p~ojecLw
biological monitoring program. The monit~ririg program wou d ncude
determine plant survivorship momtonng of~ Fesource recruttment (seagra
sampling with a seine net in the tidal channel,~s~$tem, and performing wilc
site utilization by wildlife species.
habitat loss in the Lake
ecosystem components
', stability, and biological
) to reestablish wildlife
reefs will restore 8
are likely
as provide forage and
on
located in the Lake
on by exotic species in
o f native ano wetland
Il contribute to a more
Ionize. Seagrasses and
~nt of inter- and sub-tidal
Il b~_ ~v~hmt~d ~clnO ~. .....
vegetative sampling to
;s and oyster reefs), fish
life surveys to document
Lake Worth Golf Course Restoration
rrojeet marne:
Page 3 of 3
4. Additional ..... '
Certification: I certify that to the best o['my knowledge, nil of the statements contained in"this
6 copies to the submitted and
I original (marked) sent to the
County Grant Coordinator t~l
Environmental Resources Management
3323 l~elvedere ~oad, Bldg. 502
West ~Palm Beach, FL 33406-1548
Print Name: Richard E. Wa!esky
Title: Director
YI~P Amr~na~f M'n gP~eg at*aehm~nt A-1. Pa~e 24 of 25
PROJECT 17
.Administrative Functions:
Administrative functions provided by the County staff for Lake Worth
Enhancement Projects (DEP Agreement No. SP505) include the following:
1. Preparation and administration of subgrants associatedwith individu
2. Site inspections to track complianeewith the terms of subgrantee co~
3. Review of subgramee invoices, progress reports and site inspection
individual contracts and Scope of Services.
. Preparation of reports:submitted to theDepartmem on project status
Preparation:of'project modifications ~o the Scope of Services as
c6ordination:of~o~raet m0dificafi0ns With the Departmem and Sub~
· - KEMAINDEi~OF:PA~GE INTENTIONALLY LEFT B
DEP Agreement No. SPS05, Attachment A-l, Page 25 of 25
,agoon Restoration and
[ projects.
tracts.
reports, consistent with
and funding.
aay be. appropriate and
tllten.
ATTACHMENT C
(REVISED) ~
The administration of funds awarded by the Department of Environs, ental Protection to the
recipient (which may ~e i~fferred'to' as~the-' COritractOr: ~ Grantee,, or othe~name m the
con'tract/~greement): may he subject to audits a,n,d/br monitoring by the Department of
Environrn~ntal:Pr6iee~tioni:~a~Se~l~fl intki~:sedti~n:'~;5' ,' ~ -
In a mdits
33, as revised
on-site visits
and/or
with
AUDITS
PART I::FEDERALLY FUNDED
This part is applicable if the recipient is a State or local govemment or a non-profit organization
as defined in OMB Circular A-133, as revised.
1~ In the event that the recipient expends $300,000 or more in Federal awards in its fiscal year,
the recipient must have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB
Circular A-133, as revised. EXI-IIBIT 1 to this Attachment indicates Federal funds awarded
through the Department of Environmental Protection by this agreement. In determining the
Federal awards expended in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider all sources of Federal
awards, including Federal funds received from the Department of Environmental Protection.
The, determination of amounts of Federal awards expended should be in accordance with the
guidelines established by OMB Circular A-133, as revised. The recipient is responsible for the
procurement of an independent auditor to conduct the audit required by this part. The
recipient is required to follow the auditor procurement standards specified in Section 305,
OMB Circular A-133, as revised. An audit of the recipient conducted by the Auditor General
in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133, as revised, will meet the
requirements of this parc
2. In connection with the audit requirements addressed in paragraph 1., the recipient shall fulfill
the requiremenis relative to auditee responsibilities, financial statements, audit findings follow-
up, and report submission asprovided in Sections .300, .310, .315, and .320 of OMB Circular
A-193, as revised. This includes, but is not limited to, preparation of financial statements, a
schedule of expenditures of Federal awards, a summary schedule of prior audit findings, and a
corrective action plan.
DEP Agreement No SP505, Attachment C (Revised), Page 1 of 10
If not otherwise disclosed as required by Section .310 (b)(2) of OM~B Circular A-133, as
revised, the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards shall identify exoenditures bv contract
number for each contract with the Department of Environmental Prqt~ction in effect during
the audit period.
If the recipient expends less than $300,0.00 in Federal awards in i~s fiscal year, an audit
conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-133; as revised, is not
required. In the event that the recipient expends less than $300~000 ~n Federal awards in its
fisca! yea! and elects Jo have an audit conducted in. accordance Vfith the provisions of OMB
CimuIar A-133, as rewsed, the cost of the audit must be paid froTM nob-Federal and non-State
funds (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from recipient fu~ ds.obtained from other
than Federal/State entities).
PART H: STATE GRANTS AND AIDS
1. This pan is applicable if the recipient is a local government or a
organization as defined in Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor Gener
In the event that the recipient receives more than $25,000 in State gn
year, the recipient must have a limited scope audit conducted in
216.349, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor
this Attachment indicates State grants and aids amounts awarded thy
Environmental Protection by this agreement. In determining the grant:
fiscal year, the recipient shall consider aggregate grants and aids rece
agencies, including grants and aids funds received from the Depart
Protection.
The audit report must include an auditor's examination attestatic
assertion report (alternatively, management's assertion may be inciu
representation letter), and a schedule of State financial assistance. E2
this Attachment provide examples of these reports/schedule.
The auditor's examinfi, tion attestation report must indicate whether m;
to compliance with the following requirements is fairly stated, in all-m~
· activities allowed or unallowed
· allowable costs/cost principles
matching (if applicable)
o reporting
In the event that the recipient receives State grants and aids totaliJ
fiscal year, the head of the recipient entity or organization must prov
under penalty of perjury, that the recipient has complied with the allow
other applicable provisions) of the State grants and aids contract
Attachment provides an example attestation document that should be ~
to attest to compliance with grants and aids provisions.
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment C (Revised), Page 2 of 10
~on-profit or for profit
xl.
nts and aids in its fiscal
:cordance with Section
;eneral. EXI-IIBIT 1 to
edgh the Department of
and aids received in its
red directly from State
ment of Environmental
n reporq management
led in the management
~IIBITS 2, 3, and 4 to
lagement's assertion as
terial respects:
$25,000 or less in its
a written attestation,
able cost provisions (or
EXI-I/BIT 5 to this
~sed by the agency head
PART HI:~ OTHER AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
~is part is reserved to specify any additional audit requirements imposed, if applicable, by the
State agency that are solely a matter of that State agency's policy (i.e., the audit is not required
by Federal or State laws and is not in conflict with other Federal or State audit requirements).)
1. Copies-ofaudi~ reports:'f0r audits:conducted in accordance with OMB ~ircular, A-133, as
re,figed;' and ~req~red ~oy 'PAP, T; I of this Attachment shall,be submitted, :whe~ required bY
Seeti0~: g20' (d~,:OMB CircUlar A,l'33, as revised, or when required~by numbei~2 below, by
or on Bei~atf b~ reCipieat directly'to each ofthe fOllowMg;
A. The Department of Environmental Protection at each of the following addresses:
John Moulton
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Southeast District Office
Post Office Box 15425
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-5425
Audit: Director
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Office of Inspector General
2600 Blair Stone Road, MS40
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
B. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse designated in OMB Circular A-133, as revised (the
number 'of copies required by Sections .320 (d)(1) and (2), OMB Circular A-133, as
revised, should be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse), at the following
address:
Federal Audit Clearinghouse
Bureau of the Census
1201 East 10th Street
Jeffersonville, IN 47132
C. Other Federal agencies and pass-through entities in accordance with Sections .320 (e) and
(f), OMB Circular A-133, as revised.
D. The State of Florida Auditor General at the following address:
Audit Manager
Office of the Auditor General
P.O. Box 1735
Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1735
DEP Agreement No. SP505. Attachment C [Revised), Page 3 of 10
2. Pursuant to Section .320 (f), OMB Circular.A-!33, as revised, the recipient shall submk a
copy of the reporting package described in Section..320 (c),~OMB Circular A-133, as revised,
and any management letters issued by the auditor, to each of the following:
John Moulton
Florida Depa~ hnent of Environmental Protection
Southeast District Office
Post Office Box 15425
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-5425
Audit Director
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Office of Inspector General
2600 Blair Stone Road, MS40
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
Audit Manager
Office of the Auditor General
P.O. Box 1735
Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1735
3. Copies of reports required by PART II of this Attachment, and management letters prepared
in conducting audits related to State grants and aids audits, required by PART II of this
Attachment, shall be submitted by oi~ on behalf of the recipient ~ to each of the
following:
A. The Department of Environmental Protection at each of the followi~ig addresses:
John Moulton
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Southeast District Office
Post Office Box 15425
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-5425
Audit Director
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Office of Inspector General
2600 Blair Stone Road, MS40
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
B. The Office of the Auditor General at the following address:
Audit Manager
Office of the Auditor General
P.O. Box 1735
Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1735
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment C (Revised), Page 4 of I0
4. Copies of reports or management letters required by PART 1II of this Attachment shall be
submitted by or'on behalf of the recipient directly to:
A. The Department of Environmental Protection at each &the following addresses:
lohn Moulton
· Florida Dep .art~, ent of Environmental Protection
S0t~theast District Office
Post Office Box 1542'5,'~
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-5425
Any reports, management letters, attestations, or other information required to be submitted
to the Department of Environmental ProtectiOn pursuant tO' this-agreement shall be submitted
within 180 days of the recipient's fiscal jear end (or as otherwise allowed by Florida Statutes)
or within 30 days of the recipient's regeipt of the audit report, whichever occurs first. Other
submissions shOuld:he .timely.. in aceo~rdan~e with OMB CircUlar A2133 and/or Florida
Statutes, as applicable;
6 Recipients when sub~tting audit reports to the Department of Environmental Protection for
audits done in aCCordance with OMB Circular A-133, should indicate the date that the '~'
recipient received the'~t reportJn~cbrraspondence accompanying the audit report.
PART V: RECORD RETENTION
The recipient shall ensure that audit working papers are made available to the Department of
Environmental Protection, or its designee, upon request for a period:of3 years from the date the
audit report is issued, unless extended in writing by the Department of Environmental Protection.
DEP Agreement No. SP$05, Attachment C (Revised), Page 5 of 10
EXEIIBIT - 2
[Date]'
We
~n our~ op3mon, ~m~f~agement,
~ ~' ~ ~ } ~c~rnplied~'~
! i ] is f~ly statedg~ In
Sincerel~
· ,i . i~~
Notes:
1,
ON
about [name
compliance-with the
~establishe,d in the grant
~chedut~ of State
includ/~d in th~
· enti(y]'s
standards established by the ~erican
a ~st basis,
performing ~ch other
that our ex_armnauon
t does not provide, a legal
asse~ion ~Mentify management's assertion -for example, that
t: lhe afore~ent~o~ed requiremqn ts ;duPing the fiscal year ended
I1 material ~espectS.a 4 ?
its 'assertion in a separate report accompanying the practitioner's report, refer to
examined by reference to the report title used
he or she should use the same description of the compliance
and related criteria (if applicable), will be specified and/or referred to
it should not be necessary to repeat the compliance requirements,~aud related
the manner prescribed in SAS Codification Sections AT
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment C (R~vised), Page 7 of 10
EXFFFRIT - 3
MANAGEMENT ASSERTION REPORT
I, .. , hereby assert that,
(head of recipient entity) (recip
complied with allowable cost requirements [or other applicable re~cuirer
aids appropriations identified'on the attached Schedule of State Financi~
fiscal year ended
(month, day, year)
(signature)
(title)
(date)
If this assertion report is used, one copy shall be submitted after the reci~
each of the parties designated in the contracts/grants for the idei
appropriations.
This statement does not need to be notarized.
ent entity name)
rents] of the grams and
1 Assistance during the
ient's fiscal year end to
ified grants and aids
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attaclunent C (Revised), Page g of 10
Sample Organization
Schedule of State Financial g~ssistance
State Federal Federal
State Agency Contract/ CFDA Through
· . d.: : :~: G~ant ..... ' N~/iber Sta~e ...... State. ;-. ,~ Total
rogram~itie ';~:~ber N6tea Receipts ;: ~ii~L~ ~ Receipts
repayment ' ·
of Healtl~
.}Head S~r~ ~ } ~501 93.6Q0 . :, .50,000 (1) 50,000 (1). ~,~ 100~000
~Chldren -
of ~ld:er ~
Affai~
~u~ : ' ~501 Not 200,000 (1): 0 200,000
C~e fo~ the ~plicable ~
~m~unity GC601 93.003 0 150,000 (1) 150,0~
'Care for the
~r~e 6C777 93.666 60,000 60,000 120,000
o,ooo 4m, (2)s2o,ooo
State Grants and Aids Appropriations moneys. The grand total of State Grants and Aids
Appropriations moneys is $550,000.
$390,000 of this amount is included in the expenditures presented in the Schedule of
Expenditures of Federal Awards. The remaining $20,000 was received under contract
number GC601 but was not expended.
NOTE A:
CAUTION:
Federal CFDA numbers apply only to Federal programs.
The purpose of this schedule is format illustration only. The contract or ~
grant numbers, CFDA numbers and program rifles are not intended to
represent actual data.
DEP Agreement No.' SP505, Attachment C (Revised), Page 9 of 10
EXHrI~IT - ~
MANAGEMENT ATTESTATION STATEMENT
CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER(S)
(head of recipient entity)
(recipient enfityname)
· hereby~ attest, under penalties of perjury, that,
/
complied with allowable cost requirements [or
other applicable requirements] of the grants and aids appropriations contraets/grants~dentified
above during the fiscal year ended
(month, day, year)
(signature)
(title)
(date)
One copy of this attestation statement shall be submitted after the recipient's fiscal year end to
each of the parties designated in the contracts/grants for the identified grants and aids
appropriations.
This statement does not need to be notarized,
DEP Agreement No. SP505, Attachment C (Revised), Page 10 of I0
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
IV-CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM C,2
Requested City Comm~smon
Meeting-Dates
[] November 16. 1999
[] December 7, 1999
Date Final Form Must be Turned
~n to CRY CleriCs Off'tee
November3. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17,1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Re~!uested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] Jama~y 18.2000
[] February 1, 2000
Date inal Form M ,ust be Turned
i~to CRy Clerk s Office
[] December21. 1999
.December 8, 1999(5:00 panj [] ~ Fehrumy 15, 2000
Febn ry2,2OOO(5:OOp.m.)
[] January 4. 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
December 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
[] Administrative
[] Consent Agenda
[] Public Hearing
[] Bids
] Announcemen~
[] March 7, 2000
Febn ar3, 16, 2000 (5 00 p m )
[] Developme tt Plans
[] New Business
[] Legal
[] Unfinished Business
[] Presentafioa
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend Commission approval of resolution releasing the restoration surety in the amount of $~ 1,000.00 for the Via
Lugano Project.
EXPLANATION: _
All site requirements have been completed and a request for surety release has been received from the Developer of the
above referenced project.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
N/A
FISCAL IM~PACT:
N/A
ALTERNATIVES:
N/A ~
ENGINEERING
Department Name
City Menag~'s Signature V -
City Attorney / Finance Human Resources
J:\S HRDATA~Engineering~Eng. CK~4genda Item Request - Via Lugmao Rest. Surety Release.dot
RESOLUTION NO. R00-
~ RESOLUT~Q~ ~9~ T~E CfITy CO~!,S~IQN O~
AUTHoRIZinG A , RELEASE: OF CAS~
~ESTO~TI~ SUeZTY "'PA~
OF $~,00'6~00 ~6~ZZ P~6g~C~ ~0~ ~S
DATE.
WHEREAS, the developer of this parcel, previously
posted cash restoration sureuy in the amoun5 of $11,000.00
for the-project known as Via Lugano; and
WHEREAS, a final inspection has been conducted on this
)rojecu ahd the system appears to be functioning properly;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
Boynton Beach,
staff,
surety
FLORIDA, THAT:
The City Commission of the City of
Florida, based upon the recommendation of
hereby approves the release of the cash
in the amounu of $11,000.00 to PAC Land
Corporation, for the project known as Via Lugano
~ That this Resolution shall
effective immediately upon passage.
restoration
Development
become
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
day Of January, 2000.
CITY OF BOYNTON BELCH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Commissioner
Commissioner
P
A
C
P.A.C. LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
A EEAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
730 ;BONNIE BRAE STREET
WI~TER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
TELEPHONE (407) 628-3065
FAX (407) 645-0112
November 22, 1999
Mr. Ken Hall
Boynton Beach Florida 33425
Re: Via Lugano Apartments
Dear Ken:
At this time we would like to request the release of the Engineering Bond posted with
the City of Boynton Beach at the time we were issued Building Permits for Via Lugano
Apartments. The bond was in the form of cash, in the amount of $11,000.00. Please
schedule my request for the next available City Commission meeting.
Sincerely,
P.A.C. Land Development Corp.
Thomas L. Cavanaugh
Vice President
TLC/db
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. ENG 98-025
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Diane Rcese
Finance Director
Bulcnt L Kastarlak
Director of Development ~2~'
February 18. 1998
VIA LUGANO - ADMINISTRATION FEE & RESTORATION SURETY
Attached please find two checks from PAC Land Development Corporation issued by First
Union National Bank of Florida for the above referenced project. Check #5962 in the amoum of
$1 I. 115.00 represents thc administration fee for said project and needs to be placed in account #
00 t-000-4-413-20. The second check #5961 for $11.000.00 is a cash bond for restoration work
involved with the Via Lugano Project. It is to be returned upon satisfactory performance'and
final site inspection.
B [K/ck
Attachment: 2 checks
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] November 16, 1999
[] December7, 1999
[] December21, 1999
[] January 4, 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOR
Date Final Form Must be Turned
into City Clerk's Office
NovemberS. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17, I999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 8, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] Janum'y 18,2000
[] February 1. 2000
[] February 15, 2000
[] March 7, 2000
[] Adminislrative
[] Consent Agenda
[] Public Heating
[] Bids
] Announcement
IV-CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM C.3
D ~t3~e Final Form Must be Turned
into City Clerk'~ Office
.lanu~y 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
January 19, 2000 (5:00 pan.)
Febl aaty 2,2000(5:00 p.m.)
FeE 'uary 16, 2000 I5:00 p.m.)
[] Develop ent Plans
[] New Busi ess
[] Legal
[] Unfmished Business
[] Presentation
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve work authorization #10 with Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. in the amount of $244,070.00 for the
design, permitting, and bidding services for Industrial Avenue Corridor Stormwatar Improvements.
EXPLANATION:
As requested by the City Commission during the November 15, 1999 Stormwater Workshop, the attached work
authorization #I0 is offered to complete the required engineering services for the above listed project.
PROGRAM IMPACT: - .
Completion of this project will improve stormwater management in this flood prone areaJ
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total cost of this agreement is not to exceed $244,070.00. Funds for the design, permining, and bidding services
are available in the 1996 Revenue B6nd Issue Account g407-5000-590.96-07. Funds f~r the eventual construction
of all of the improvements have not been fully identified.
ALTERNATIVES:
Continue to pump this area with portable equiptment after storm incidents. Not taking this action could continue to
result in public and private property damage.
S :~BULLETINkFORMS~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Dale S
City Attgmey / Finance / Human Resources
Utilities
Deparmaent Name
John Guidry
Dale Sugerman
City Clerk's Office w/Originals
City Attorney
Mark Law
File
S ABULLETFNWORMS~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK AUTHORIZATION
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. DATE:
CDM PROJECT NO. 6276 -
I. PROJECTS DESCRIPTION
The Professional Engineering Services for the project include
Con'idor Stonnwater improvements.
The purpose of the Industrial Avenue Corridor Stormwater ]
(Exhibit "A") is to develop construction documents
a storm sewer system, stormwater pump station (
E-4
Avenue
~ plans for
road
in the
of Boynton
II. CONTRACT REFERENCE
This ~Work.Authorization shall be performed under the terms and conditions described
within the Master Agreement for Stormwater Utility Projects dated the~ 16th day of
December 1991 by and between the City of Boynton Beach and Cum Dresser & McKce
I/lc.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Professional Engineenng Services are for implementation of cot ~'uction documents
and associated construction plans for the project. The construction do :uments and
associated construction plans will be provided to the City, as follows:
The project as described in detail in Exhibit "A" consists of a storm sewer system and
associated road reconstruction, pump station (if necessary) and two pr
ponds that will collect the stormwater in the Industrial Avenue area, t~
the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) E-4 Canal. The total leng
approximately 2.2 miles, including the local roads of Lake Boynton E:
areg, ~ scoped in Exhibit "A", is essentially bounded by the Boynton
Boynton Beach BI-vd. to the north, the Interstate 95 to the east, Lake B
the west and Woolbright Road to the south. The Engineer will design
storm sewer system, road reconstruction, stormwater pump station (if
retention ponds facilities to provide flood relief and retrofit treatment.
discharges to the LWDD E-4 Canal.
)posed retention
mt and convey to
h of the project is
tares. This project
[udustrial Park and
~ynton Estates to
and penuit the
~ecessary), and two
The system
bs4944.doc 1
Attached herewith are the Scope of Services and Exhibits "A" and "B" which detail the
work effort for this Work Authorization.
IV. PROJECT STATUS REVIEW
The Engineer shall provide the CITY with a monthly progress letter throughout the
p_r~kect. Addition~ally the CITY will be provided two (2) sets of construction drawings
~d SPecifie~ati0nS tO review at the 30, 60} and 90 percent completion ~ifis~6n?. Five
copie~ of the preliminary design report shall be provided for review tO the CITY.
V. PROJECT S~HEDULE ~ ~)EL~~S ~-
The Engnneer shall,commence services xmmedmtely upon auth0nzauon 9~ the CITY
Utility Direc'tor; ahli comp~te ~ sei~ice~s ~t&l b,~ th'e C1TY' The professorial
engmeenng services will :~ completed ~i~ ~ fo!I0wmg ,schedule:
· ,Prehrmnary Design Report ? ' 2:months
· Design & Permitting Serviges : ~ months
· Bidding Services 2 months
This schedule is dependent on timely receipt of survey information which the,City is
responsible four obtaining. Tt}e design and permitting services schedule should be
consid.e.r ~ed ~ to the submissi°n 0f the conSt/,action plans and permit p,~ka~ tO>the
resPective permitting agencies described her~in. '
vi. CONSUl,TING ENGINEER INSURANCE REq)UIREMENTS
· Workem' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Florida Stamres~
· Comprehensive Automotive Liability with a minimum, coverage of $1,000,000
annUal aggregate for bodily injury or accidental death.
Comprehensive General Liability with a mj_nlmum limit of $1,000,000 annual
aggregate covering property damage.
Liability for Property Damage while operating motor vehicle, with minimum limits
of $1,000,000 annual aggregate.
· Contractual Liability including limits established for Items VI B, C, and D. above.
Professional Liability with minimum limits of $1,000:,000 annual aggregate.
bs4944.doc
2
VII. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
The total mount to be paid to ,th,,e ~,ngineer by the City of Boynton B~ach Under this
Work Authorization for Exhibit A , services shall not exceed the upper limit amount of
$244,070. The Engineer will invoicethe City on a monthly basis as r~quired for payment
based °n,~°stl, incurred i° d~t~' _
Exhibits B-1 through 'B4 breakdown theBudget Estimate forTasks 1 throUgh 6 for
the project. This proposal fees do not include the permit application Iees.
VIII. TERMINATION
This. Work Authorization may be terminated by the City, upon thirty
notice to'the other party. If terminated, the Engmeer shall complete a
services rendered through the date of termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day ~
written.
CAMP DRESSER & McKee INC.
CITY OF BOYNTON ]
City Manager
Donald G. Munksgaard, P E, DEE
Senior Vice. President
30) days written
ad shall be paid for
nd year first above
EACH, FLORIDA
bs4944.doc 3
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
SCOPE OE SERVICES
December 1999
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC.
INTRODUCTION
For the purpose of this scope of services the term CITY refers to the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida and the ~e~ CDM refers to Camp Dresser & McKee ~uc.
The design services, which are being provided by CDM, include the preparation of a preliminary
engineering report, contract documents, construction plans, specifications and construction cost
estimate. Th~permitting services, which will be provided by' CDM, inciuae~the engir~ering
required to o, bmin the necessary permits to construct this project. It is anticipated ~at permits
will be required from the following agencies with jurisdiction over the projec~ South Florida
WaterManagement:District (S~), Florida Department of TransportatiOn (FDO~ and Lake
Worth Drainage District (LWDD).
PROJECT DESCRIFrlON
This project consists of a storm sewer system, associated road reconstruction, pump station (if
necessary), and twe retention ponds that will collect the stormwater in the Industrial Avenue
area, treat and convey to the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) E4 Canal along a ditch
located on the north side of Woolbright Road (FDOT right-of-way). This will require an
analysis of the FDOT drainage system to the E4 Canal. The total length of the project ~s
approximately 2.2 miles, including the local roads of Lake Boynton Estates. The Engineer will
design and obtain permits for the storm sewer system, road reconstruction, stormwater pump
station (ifn~ecessary) and two retention ponds facilities which ultimately discharge to the LWDD
E4 Canal through the Woolbright Road ditch.
These improvements are intended to provide flood relief and retrofit treatment to the East
Industrial Park as well as to provide desired levels of service along the eastern roads of Boynton
Lake Estates. The existing typical section along the project area consists of two 10-foot lane
rural undivided roadway (20 feet wide with roadside swaies~ within 50 feet of available right-of-
way. These streets have relatively~low traffic volume and primarily provide access to the local
residences and businesses. The following local roads will be incorporated as part of the design:
I. East Industrial Park: The proposed improvements in this alleyway include a new storm
sewer, stormwater pump station (if necessary) and a complete road reconstruction. The
existing road typical section will be utilized.
BS4945.doc A- 1
o
Proposed Alleyway: This new alleyway will connect the East with the %
alleyways. The proposed improvements include road and stormwater cot
will develop two (2)pr0P0sedtypic~'sections and will be included as pm
Design RePort. The typi~ see~on recommended will depend on the rigt
and will be developed to accommodate existing local traffic.
NW 6~h Street:. The proposed improyementsin this local road include, a n.
a complete road reconstruction. The ex/stlng r0ad typiCal:section will be
West~Ocean Avenue: The,proposed impro~ments in this ~ocal, road
sewer'and a: Complete road reconstmct/en. ;The'existing road tYPical sec
The proposed nnprovements in th~s local roa6 ~nclude a ~
and,~a, co:r~'[flefe road:zeconstmc~on. Th~ *xisti~g road]typical section Wil
SV~I .Court: ,'T, he ~proposed ~mprovements m this local road lnclude ane
a complete road reconstm~n.-~The gXisting road typical s~-'tion will.be
SWlS3 Avenue: The pr0posed-improvements in this local road include a~
and,a complete road reconstruction.~ The existing road typical section will
W~t Ocean Dr~v¢:. The proposed:improvements in this local road includ~
aUd,a~eo ~mPle~e~oad rec6r~trUction. The existing road ~YPical section wi[
est Industrial Park
~tmction. CDM
t of the Preliminary
l~of-way' available
;w storm sewer and
ailized.
de anew storm
)n will. be,utilized.
Jew storm sewer
be utilized;
storm sewer and
~filized.
.ew storm sewer
be utilized.
a new storm sewer
be utilized.
SW, 2n?.~xzenue! The proposed.improvements in this local road include ~r inor modifications
to the ex/isting stomawater system; no road mC°nstmction will be necessary.
10. W 3 Avenue: ~e proposed ~mprovements in tins local road ~nclude minor modifications
to the ex/sting stormwater system; no,road :reconstruction will be necessary.
11. SW 4th Avenue: The proposed improvements in this local road include m/nor modifications
to the ex/sting stormwater system; no road reco~stmction will be necessary.
Two stormwater ponds are propose6as part of this project. The flint stormwater pond will
require a modification of an ex/Sting permit; this peymitted pond does not have a positive ouffall
to the L. ~WI~_D E4 Canal. This pond ~s located on the Store~AlI Storage property ~n the Boynton
Industrial Park. ~The CYrY is currently working onian agreement with the property owners in
order to:utilize and modifY this pond:to, a~commodate the E~t Industrial Park road runoff. The
second, stormwater pond is located on the recenil~y.qaC uired proprtye by the C1TY~ y~gl 'n north of
The Vmmgs at Boynton Beach PUD vacant land Tract "C"). This pond will ~lso mcmve the
overflow of the first stormwater pond mentioned above, plus the roadway runoff of the Lake
Boynton Estates local roads as described above.
BS4945.doe
A-2
TASK 1 - PRI~I,IMINARY DESIGN REPORT
Subtask 1.1 Engineering Design Analys~s.,
CDM will preparea4~r, eliminary Desigh Report; ouflining~t!xe'design elements, standards and
crite~rig- ~a~)w~ll:be. USed in:t!3o development ~0f the. d~gn :ant[ const~,ion-plans- f0r the, project.
Thi~ rePort ~vill provide suffioien~ detail and:in~6m/~t/°a:!o sh0~/that ~e~pr0t~os~d,, ,:::~:::,7
improvements are permittab!e,and feasiblele'f~ --for~constmction according to the~re,cognize~t~
standards fO~ th~,prajec~;~_ ~'he~stcmdards. fo: .'r~ the project §halt;be the~ C ~IT~y: and th~cu~g~t:~OT
design standari~Tor ~oadmay, ang~st0mw~termanagemefit:' ~ - : -'
The?report ~Will be submitted in conjunction~ with the 30 percent.complete 3plans:whic-h Will-show
th e proposed srorm~ sewer- ali geanent, i 0catio~ offal 1 kp~eme~t, stormw ater facilities ¢ structures,
curbs, pedes~ facilities and related imprqvements for approval by the CITY. The preliminary
des~,gn Will?shO~,v.exmtmg utaht~es~ as~prow~¢dby fl~ CI~¥~.m ~ nght~q~ WaY' an~ pg~ ~,~al
utilmes:eonflmts. Tl~is:mport~wil}!also mc~!~!?pr~liminary mns~tmcUtm ~os~e~tlmate:fO~ all
the proposed improvments. CDM will subini~ to ~e CITY fi,~e draft eo~ies and five tidal
copies ~f the report; ~ ~ : ~
Subtask~t~2 stormwater Model Evaluation.
This tasl~ ~ffi?In~Cl~de a modificatiofi of the existing!CDM 199~ City of .Bioyntcm Beach
Sto~ter:~ste~ pl~,, Stormwater:Management Model (SWMM): Th~modeI ~flt:i/~elude
con~iaeratloa~ 6f the lo.wing items:
~.. Subbasin.Are~.~.
· DeSign StOrms (25 year & 100 ye~-72 hour stomas),;SD'WMD mles
· Critie~ Durafidn S~orm (between 1-hour and 10-days), lVDOT roles
· Land ~se char,acteristics
· Imper~,ions Areas
BS4945.do¢ A-3
Flow, Slope and Length (i.e. distance and slope of mnoff areas)
Existing Stormwater and Surface Water Flow Patterns
Physical Conveyance Features
The existing ~992.CDM model~will bemused as the basis for design. The model will be revise~d
for appropriate.application for design. CDM will then use SWMM to eValua{e stormwater
conveyance :and detention structures. This model.will be utilized as the supporting
documentation for the permit application packages to be submitted to the dif~e~ rent agencies as
descril~ed in Task 3 bet°w. CDM Will est}mate ~he 2.5-ifich 16-h0ur, 5-year 2 10-year 72-
hour. r 72-horn
Subtask 1~3 Dat~Needs Memorandum.
CDM will'iden~ry data needs for the CITY to provide, or as
authorization:
TASK 2 - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
CDM will work with CITY staff to accommodate the proposed storm sewer ~out to the extend
practicable,-wit139ut impacting the existing water and sanitary sewer utilities i~ the project area
as recommehded in Ta~k 1 above Any service§ renuired to desion hermit cr~nstmct ~ in~ect
potential u~lities adjustments wil{ be additional services to this w~l~autho~i}~fion.
/
CDM will proceed with.this task and prepare the design documents for the 60 percent design
plans, upo~ :auth0rization from the CIT~ Utility Director, after the Preliminar~ Design Report
(30 percent d~sign plans) prepared in Task 1 alcove have been reviewed and a~prove~t by t~e
CITY.
CDM will prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the improv,
consu'uction plans will consists of plan sheets listed in Table 1 below and inc!
to the performance of specific work and preparation of details and documents
· Erosion Control as per FDOT and SFWMD standards
· Typical Sections
· Roadway Reconstruction
· Restoration of existing signing and marking per FDOT traffic opera~
· Restoration of existing sidewalks
· Testing materials including specifications for testing
· Driveway restorations
· St0rmwater structures and culverts
· Stdrmwater force main- (if necessary)
· Mechanical design (Pump Station, if necessary)
:ments. These
ude but not limited
as follows:
ons standards
BS4945.do¢ A~4
Structural design (Pump Station, if necessary)
Instrumentation and telemetry design (if necessary)
Electrical design (if necessary)
FDOT standard indexes and standards specifications s~hall I~e used as recommended?by CDM or
as may ~be m~dified with the C~TY appr~val~`` Special Fg~visi~r~s~will be~as:appr~ve` d~ by4he
CITY. The follOwing table describesCan apPr0×~mate sI/eet count for'the construction plans:
' ' TABLE1
CDM will proceed with this task and prepare th~ design documents for t~ ~0 pement design
plan~: ~fi :~iii~0rizati0n'from the CITY Utili~irectqr, after the 60 p~/~ent d6sign plar£ have
beeii i~ :~6d and aofroffed__ by_ the CITY. The :100 percent des~gn'plan .s~'CVilt be sUbrmtted to the
ClT~ b~50i'~' ti5 ~onstm6tion and after l~ermitS: an~roval and utihti6s come,es' cbmments~ uave
been ~dressed~. CDM wffi subrmt five sets of-~"x36" saze and five of t2"xl8"(half s~zes)~.
TASK 3 - -PERMIT ASSISTANCE
CDM will provide permit assistance required to obtain the necessary permits to construct this
project. It is anticipated that permits will be required from the following agencies with
jurisdiction over the project: South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Lake Worth. Drainage District (LWDD). No permit
from!Palm!p/erich C6unty (PBC) is anticipated at this time. Any Services reqUired to comply
with PBC permit criteria will be additional services to this work authorization.
CDM will work with SFWMD, FDOT and LWDD to facilitate the pern~,'~.tti,ng of this project,
CDM will prepare and submit permit package aCp~ati0ns that are required, as discussed below,
to obtain approval from.the agencies and to resp~,pd to Up to three R_ .ec~.ueS~ For Additional
Information (RAI) from the a~encies (one R_AI l~r,agency) to clarify in~'ormatien in the permit
A-5
application package. CDM will attend to up two (2) meetings with SFWMD~ one (1) meeting
with FDOT and one (1)meeting with LWDD. A t~tal Of four meetings are estimated for budget
purposes.
CDM will prepare a SFWMD i~dividual:Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) application for
the p~op0sed~c0nstmction improvements. It is understoofl that no wetland im~act~ are
anticipated as part of this project. Any services require~ to conduct an envirr nmental and/or
wetland assessments (if requested by SFWMD) will be considered as additio] tal services. One
RAI will be included as part of the scope of work. The following elements ~ e typically required
m the ERP application:
· Basin'delineation
· Peak~fl~:qyantities mid analysis (25 .year & 100 year-72 hour storms)
· Requkec[ detention v01ume~,:and treatment amounts
· Wetlands and habitat impacts (Not anticipated)
· Co~tmction sequence or phases (if applicable)
· Proposed construction layout
· Construction techniques
· Stormw. ater control techniques
CDM will prepare a FDOT Drainage Connection Permit application for the oposed
construction improvements. One RAI will be included as part of the scope ol work. The
following computation is required in the FDOT permit application, in additio~ t m the SFWMD
permit requirements:
· CriticalDuration Storms (1,2 4 8&24-hrand2,3 & 10-days) forthe~ollowingremm
periods: 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 & 100-year.
CDM will prepare a LWDD Drainage Connection Permit application for the l~roposed
construction improvements. One RAI will be included as part of the scope of work. The
following computations are required in the LWDD permit application, in add/tion to the
SFWMD permit requirements:
· 25-year and 100-year 3-days Design Storms
TASK 4 - PROBABI,E CONTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
CDM will estimate the probable cost of construction for the project at the 30 nd 60 percent
completion milestones and a final construction cost estimate at the completiori of the project.
TASK 5 - BED SERVICES
CDM will provide services associated with the bidding of the project upon ac,
construction plans and contract documents prepared in Task 2 above.
',eptance of the
BS4945.do¢ A-6
CDM will attend a pre-bid conference and interpret and clarify plans and specifications as
needed at the pre-bid meeting and during the bidding process. CDM will tabulate the bid
proposals, make an analysis of the bids and make recommendations to the CITY for awarding
the bid ~8 th~ i53 ~whe..s..~,~dd~;i~ th~ o~..~i~d~rgs mt ~q~u;ali~ie~, or~fOr,s6me: othe~ ~n
such ~rfJ~..~v0,UM(i~bil~e/ii the:.b, est~,~te~st of the c~.~:
TASK 6~ dPU~LICAW~ARENI~SS
CDM will ~atten~ up tOtsv0 public information meetings ro be held
deteme~i by:theC~and-make: S ~elCvan[ t6;the d~ign an
public regarding'~ project as g~[v~n, by:~f~zefis,.~r ~r~tgd~groul~s
BS4945.doc A-7
EXHIBIT "B-l"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
December 21, 1999
SERVICES DESCRIPTION
CDM SALARY COST - Tasks 1 through 6 (Exhibit B-2 )
OTHER DIRECT COSTS [Exhibit "B-3")
OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL - (Exhibit "B-4")
TOTAL
These proposal fees do not include the permits application fees
COST
$216,570
$18,135
$9,365
$244,070
EXHIBIT 'B-2"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION DOCOMENTS
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. s~ior I P~cip. U I S~i0~ ~;~f~;,io~ ~f~o~'l
01 Prelimina~ Design Repo~ 0 ~ 8C ~ ~6 ~ i06' 90 70 ~ 49a $35.200.0(
02 gons~ofion~umon~ 0 7~ 12( 280 0 720 40fl 60 165~ $114,050.0C
03 Pomit ~sis~nm 12 60 8( I0~ 0 80 40 48 42C $35,160.0{
~ Final ~s~ofion ~ Es~a~ 4 40 3{ lC 0 0 ~ 4 88 $9,630.0(
05 Bid 8~s 8 24 40' 7~ 0 0
.06 P~bli~ Awa~enoss ~ 1~ 32 2{ 0 0 ~ 0 7C $7,300.0r
, 0 3 6 2 8 2 5 000
Sol ' :~1 ' ',~ Ol 20 1 ~ I $ ~ 7. I
EXHIBIT "B-3"
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
iNDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
December 21, 1999
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.
DESCRIPTION TOTAL
~6Pi~ $7o.00
?resentation boards $200.00
TelephOne $200.00
Postage $160.00
Express Service , $360.00
Automobile Mileage $910.00
Automobile Rental $900.00
Meals $360.00
Hotel Room $595.00
Plans Reproduction (Half Size) $480.00
~f~'~'~on-(~ii Siz~ $, .oo
Computer Time $2,860.00
CADD $8,580.00
Air Fare $900.00
Data & Media $60.00
EXHIBIT "B~4"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
December 21, 1999
'~' ~' ~' ~' SIJBCONTRACTED
COMPANY TASK SERVICES
Nodarse & Associates, Inc.
Geotechnical Investigation
$9,365
Exhibit "B-4"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOR
Requested City Commission
Meetin$ Dates
[] November 16, 1999
[] December7, 1999
December21, 1999
Jmluary 4, 2000
Date Final Form Must be Tamed
into City Clerk's Office
November3, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 8,1999 [5:00p.m.)
Dec~mber 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] January 18,2000
[] February 1. 2000
[] Febraary 15, 2000
[] March 7, 2000
[] Administrative
NATURE OF [] Consent Agenda
AGENDA ITEM [] Public Hearing
[-' Bids
D~ ~ Final Form Must be ruined
in to City Clerk's Office
Jant ttyS, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Jan ary t9,2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Fei ~ary 2, 2000(5:00 p.m3
Fe uary 16,2000 [5:00p.m.)
Developn ent Plans
New Busi less
Legal
Unfinished Business
[] Announcearent [] Presentatiln
/
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve work authorization # I0 with Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. in the am6unt of $244,070.00 for the
design, permitting, and bidding services for Industrial Avenue Corridor Stormwater Imp[ovements.
/
EXPLANATION:
As requested by the City commission during the November 15, 1999 Stormwater Workshop, the attached work
authorization #10 is offered to complete the required engineering services for the above listed pro ect.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
Completion of this project will improve stormwater management in this flood prone area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
total cost of this agreement is not to exceed $244,070.00. Funds for the design, permitting and bidding services
are available in the 1996 Revenue Bond Issue Account #407-5000-590.96-07. Funds for the eventual construction
of all of the improvements have not been fully identified.
ALTERNATIVES:
Continue to pump this area with portable equiptment after storm incidents. Not taking this action could continue to
result in public and private property damage.
S :kB ULLETIN~ORaMS~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST-FORM
Dal~
Jok
· · City A¢oraeY,/~F~ce / Hum~n//Rpspur~ces .:
Utilities
Department Name
lohn Guidry
Dale Sugerman
City Clerk's Office w/Oflginals
City Attorney
Mark Law
File
S :~BLrLLET1N~ORMS'~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK AUTHORIZATION
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.
DATE:
CDM PROJECT NO. 6276 -
I. PROJECTS DESCRIPTION
The Professional Engineering Services for the project include the Indi
Corridor Stormwater Improvements
The p, ~?,,ose of the Industrial Avenue Corridor Stormwater Improvem
(Exhibit 'A") is to develop construction documents and, associated Co]
a storm sewer system, stormwater pump station (if necessary), associa
recQnstmcfion ~and tw0prgposed, reteg~on ponds that.will go!lect the
Indu~ ~t~'.a[ Avenue ~ea~ treat, ~m3~dicoavey to the Lake Worth Drainage
E-4 Canal along ~.~teh on the i~otlh Side of Woolbright Road. These
intended to provide flood relief and retrofit treatment to the East lndm
a~ tO provide desired stormwater levels of service along the eastern
Lake Estates.
CONTRACT REFERENCE
This Work Authorization shall be performed under the terms and conc
within the Master Agreement for Stormwater Utility Projects dated th~
December 1991 by and between the City of Boynton Beach and Caml~
Inc.
,trial Avenue
rots Project
~stmction plans for
Ied road
tormwater in the
District ~LWDD)
tmprovements are
trial Park as well
[ds of Boynton
itions described
16th day of
Dresser & McKee
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Professional Engineering Services are for implementation of construction documents
and associated constmctionplans for the project. The construction documents and
associated construction plans will be provided to the City, as follows:
The project as described in detail in Exhibit "A" consists of a storm sewer system and
associated road reconstruction, pump station (if necessary) and two prOposed retention
ponds that will collect the stormwater in the Industrial Avenue area, treat and convey to
the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) E4 Canal. The total length of the project is
approximately 2.2 miles, including the local roads of Lake Boynton ~tates. This project
area, as ~coped in Extfibit "A?, is essentially bounded by the.Boynton ~mdustrial Park and
Boynton Beach Blv~ to the north, the Interstate 95 to the east, I~ake B~ynton Estates to
the west and Woolbright Road to the south. The Engineer will design ~md perrrfit the
storm sewer system, road reconstruction stormwater pump station (if 9ecessary), and two
retention ponds facilities to provide flood retief and retrofit treatment. The system
discharges to the LWDD E-4 Canal.
bs4944.doc
Attached herewith are the Scope of Services and Exhibits "A" and "B" which detail the ..
work effort for this Woi:k Authorization.
IV. PROJECT STATUS REVIEW
The Engineer shall provide the CITY with a monthly progress letter throughout the
project. Additionally the CITY will be provided two (2) sets of construction drawings
and' specific~tiong to review at the 30, ~60~ and 90 percent completion milestone. Five
copies of the preliminary design report shall be provided for review to thei~C1T¥.
V. PROJ~CT~:.~HEDULE ~ DEIS, IVt~RAB~S, ' ~ ~
The Eagiil~er :shall: cpmmence services i~amediat ~ely upon. authorization~of the 'CITY
rdtiliey~ectOr;:~/and~omplete':all~seivCeS.:r~Utsi;eaby:the CITY:. Th~ p~0fe~gionai
engir/eeringsem, iceswill.becomplet&d.,~i~:i~ef011owingsChednie:: : .
· Pmlimin~'I~eSign Report 2 months
· Design &Permitting Services 4months
· Bidding Services 2 months
This schedule is dependent on timely receipt of survey information which the City is
responsible for obtaining. The design and permitting services schedule should be
consid~d up tO'the submission of the construction plans and permit packager to the
respe~fi~:pe/mitting agencies described herein. '
VI. CONSULTING ENGINEER INSLrRANCE REQUIREMENTS
Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Florida Statutes.
COmprehensive Automotive Liability with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000
armual~aggregate for bodily injury or accidental death.
Comprehensive General Liability with a minimum limit of $1,000,000 annual
aggregate covering property damage.
Liability for Property Damage, while operating motor vehicle, with minimum limits
of$1,0O0,000 annual aggregate.
· Contractual Liability including limits established for Items VI B, C, and D. above.
· Professional Liability with minimum limits of $1,000;000 annual aggregate.
bs4944.doe 2
VII. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
The total amount robe paid to :,th,? ~,ngineer by the City of Boynton Beach under this
Work Authorization for Exhibit A , services shall not exceed the uplSer limit mount of
$244,070. The Engineer witI ~0ice the City on a monthly basis as r~quired for payment
based on costs incurred to date.
Exhibits "B-I" through '~B-4V breakdown the Budget Estimate for Ta~ks 1 through 6 for
the project. This proposal fees do not include the permit application
VIII. TERMINATION
This.Work Authorization may be terminated by the City, upon :hixty
notice to the other party. If terminated; the Engineer shall complete
services rendered through the date of termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day
written.
CAMP DRESSER & McKee INC.
CITY OF BOYNTON B
30) days written
td shall be paid for
nd year first above
EACH, FLORIDA
G. unksgaard, P.E., DEE
Senior Vice President
City Manager
bs4944.doe 3
EXIHRIT "A"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR STORMWATEI~'IMPROVEMENTS
~ SCOPEOF SER~VICES -; .
December 1999
CAMP DRESSER& McKrEE INC.
INTRODUCTION
For the purpose of this scope of services, the term CITY refers tothe C.~.ty'ofBoynton Beach.
Florida. and the term CDM refers to Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
The design services, which are being provided by CDM, include the preparation of a preliminary
engineering report, contract documents, construction plans, specifications ~a~ :~ construction cost
estimate; The perrrfitting:services; which will!be provided by CDM, include ~-engineering
required to obt~n the necessary permits to construct this project. It is anticipated'that permits
will l~e required from the following agencies with jurisdiction over the project: South Florida
V~ ater ~Ma~agemel!t District ( SFWMD ),' ~orida Department of ~ransp0rtati0n i(FDOT) and Lake
Worth Drainage District (LWDD).
PROIECT DESCRIlYrlON
This project consists of a storm sewer system, associated road reconstruction, pump station (if
necessary), and two retention ponds that will collect the stormwater in the Industrial Avenue
area, treat and convey to the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) E-4 Canal along a ditch
located on the north side of Woolbright Road (FDOT right-of-way). This will reqmre an
analysis of the FDOT drainage system to the E4 Canal. The total length of the project is
approximatel.~ 2.2 miles, including the local roads of Lake Boynton Estates. The Engineer will
design'~and obtain permits for the storm sewer system, road reconstruction, stormwater pump
station (if necessary) and two retention ponds facilities which ultimately discharge to the LWDD
E4 Canal through the Woolbright Road ditch.
These improvements are intended to provide flood relief and retrofit treatment to the East
Industrial Park as well as to. provide desired levels of service along the eastern roads of Boynton
Lake Estates~ The existing typical section along the project area consists of two 10-foot lane
rural undivided roadway (20 feet wide with roadside swales) within 50 feet of available right-of-
way. These streets have relatively low traffic volume and primarily provide access to the local
residences and businesses. The following local roads will be incorporated as part of the design:
East Industrial Park: The proposed improvements in this alleyway include a new storm
sewer, stormwater pump station (if necessary) and a complete road reconstruction. The
existing road typical section will be utilized.
BS4945.doc A- 1
will devel0p tWO (2) .proposed.typical sections and will be inctuded as pm
Design Report. The typical section recommended wit1 depend on the ~g~
and will be developed to accommodate existing local traffic.
Proposed Alleyway: This new alleyway will connect the East with the West Industrial Park
alleyways. The proposed improvements include road and stormwater construction. CDM
: of the Preliminary
t-of-way available
3. NW 6th Street: The proposed improvements in th/s local road include an
a complete road reconstruction. The existing mad typical section wil} be
4. ~W, est~,Ocean A~enue: ~The~pr:oposed:impr0vements in this local road:inck
sewex and a::ec~,mgleteiroad reconstruction. ,The existing~oad typical secti
5. N~I~ ATenue. ::The proposed ~mproYemea~s in th~s:tocal road includea~
and~a:eomplete road., rec0nstmetion, The existing road typical section:,~:
6. SW l!t Court:,The propose(~ imprc~¥ementS in this:lo,ca! road~includea:n
a gomplete r°ad reconstrue~n:, The existing read,typical section
SW l Avenue: Thepmpo,sed.~mpr0vemen, ts in this; local mad mc!ude
and a complete rOad recons~ction. The eiisting road tytfical~section :wit
8. West Ocean Drive:. The proposed improvements in this local road includ{
and a. comP~ete!road reconstruction. The existing road typical, section~wi!i
9. ' i , ':X'] ' ! ' , ~ [:! ' ' :i
I0. SW 3~a Avenue: :The Pr0Posed improvements in this local road inclade n
m the existi,g st0rmwatex system; no road reconstruction will be necessm
11. SW 4, Avenue: ~The proposed ~mprovements m th~s local road include m
to the exis :t~g stormwarer Sy. stem; no road reconstruction will be necessax
Two stormwarer ponds are proposed as part 0f this project. The first stormw,
require a modification of an existing permit; this permitted pond does not hay
to the LWDD E4 Canal. This pond is loca!~d on the Stem-All Storage prope
Industrial park. The CITY is .c~z~ ently working on an ;agreement wi~ ~e i~ro
order to :utilize and~m0dify this pond to accommodme the East Industnal Park
~w storm sewer and
~tilized.
de a new storm -
)n wilt~beutilized.
w storm sex,/er
)e utiliZed., ~
~ storm sewer and
ttilized;
ew StOITn sewer
be utilized.
a new. storm sewer
be utilized.
inor modifications
¥.
inor modifications
~,.
nor modifications
y.
ret pond will
· , a positive ouffall
rty in the Boypton
,eny owners in
:oad runoff. The
second stormwater pond is located on the recently acquired,property by the c~rY, lying north of
The Vinings at ~oynton Beach PUD (vacant !and TraCt "C' ). This pond will ~lso receive the
overflow of the first stormwater pond mentioned above, plus the roadway mn0ff of the Lake
Boynton Estates local roads as described above.
BS4945.doe A-2
TASK 1 -
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT
Subtask 1.1 Engineering Design Analysis.
C~M-will~pr~pare a:Pr~t:~nninar~Design R~
c~6~a~ ~at~wilI~bemsed~in" the dex/et0[~er
This report Will Pr0Viae sufficien~i~t~il an
improvemen[s are pe~yq~ble and feasible
stand_ards ~fdt,the pra3ect~, ~Re standards,:fc~
design stancrard~r mdw~Y ~c[ storm~
port,outlinlng{he'design blements~, stand.ds and
t~0~the degig~ and eOn~ti'on:~lan~s'fo~theprbject.
t2informatmn to shOW;'that the,~mp0sed
[or construction according to the recogniz~ed
:~e'pr6ject;sll~l~b~' theC~ and ~e!¢ment la]DOT
ermanagemen£ !~ ,:~: .,: ~,
the
whieh.~ill show
f~eilities7 structures,
the. and five final
s ubta~l~l v2[St0l'mwate~Mod~ Evaluatiom
Th~s ~as~ wffi ~elude a modifiCl~fion of tile ex~stmg GDM 1992 C~ty of Boynton BeaCh
Std~wfi~t~M~r Plan, Stormwater Managemeat MOdel (SWMJvl). The model will,include
constderat~ of :the- following ~tems. ·
· ,". Sdbb~in Areas~
· D~Sigr3 Storms (25 year & 100 year-72 hour stonns)~ SFWMD roles
· C~tmal Duratmn Storm (between 1-hour and 10-days), FDOT roles
Land ~e Characteristics
BS4945.doe A-3
Flow, Slope and Length (i.e. distance and sloPeof rtmoff areas)
Existing Stormwater and Surface Water Flow:Patterns
Physical Conveyance Features
The exigting 1992 CDM model will be used as the basis for design.
for appropriate application for design. CDM will then use SWMM to,
conveyance and detention structures. This model Will be utilized as the s
documentation for the permit application packages m be submitted
described in Task 3 below. CDM will estimate
be revised
~ stormwater
ditch
. This wilt,~in¢}ude
Subtask 1.3 Data Needs Memorandum.
CDM WilI'i:dentify dataneeds for the CITY to provide, or as additional s,
/iuthorization.
TASK 2 - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
CDM will work with C1TY staff to accommodate the proposed storm sewer
practicable,:withou~ impacting the existing water and sanitary sewer utilities i project area
as recommended in Task 1 above. Any services required to design, permit, cgnstruct or inspect
potential utilities adjustments will be additional services to this work authorization.
CDM will proceed with this task and prepare the design documents for the 60 percent design
plans, upon authorization from the CITY Utility Director, after the Preliminary Design Rel~ort
(30 percent design plans) prepared in Task 1 above have been reviewed and approved by the
CITY.
CDM will prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the improv
construction plans will consists of plan sheets listed in Table I below and incl
to the performance of specific work and preparation of details and documents
· Erosion Control as per FDOTand SFWMD standards
· Typical Sections
· Roadway Reconstruction
· Restoration of existing signing and marking per FDOT traffic oporto
· Restoration of existing sidewalks
· Testing materials including specifications for testing
· Driveway restorations
· Stormwater structures and culverts
· Stormwater rome main (if necessary)
· Mechanical design (Pump:Station, if necessary)
ments. These
ado but not limited
as follows:
ions standards
BS4945.do¢ A-4
· Structural design(Pump Station, if necessary)
· Instrumentation and telemetry design (if necessary)
· Electrical design (if necessary)
FDOT standard indexes and standards specifications'shall be used as recommended by CDM or
as may be modified'with the CITY approval: Special Pr6visi0ns will be as approved by the ~
CITY. The folloydng table describes an approximate sheet count-for the construction plans:
· TABLE
the' "ProjeCt
CDM will proceed ~ith this task and prepare the design documents for th~ 90 pement design
plan~:uP~a~.¢~thod!~tion from the CITy Utility Direc~tor, after the 60 potent'design plan have
b~i~:i:~iev~ed,and approved by the CITY. The 100~ercent:design pl~¢il~be S~br~itted to the
C~:~riB~'t~.~nstmction and after'permits apProval and utilities comp~*s comments~have
been. adctmssem CDM will submit five sets of 24"x36" size and five of 12'x~8"(half sizes).
TASK 3 -' PERMIT ASSISTANCE
CDM will provide permit assistance required to obtain the necessary permits to construct this
project. It is anticipated that permits will be required from the following agencies with
jurisdiction over the project: South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Florida
Dep~ent of Transportation (FDOT) and Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), No permit
from'i~almBeach COUnty (PBC) is anticipated:at this time, Any services ~equired to comply
v~ith PBC permit criteria will be additional services to this work authorization,
CDM will work with SFWMD, FDOT and LWDD to facilitate the permitting of this project.
CDM will prepare and submit permit package applications that are requir&t, as discussed below,
to obtain approval from the agencies and to respond to up to three Request For Additional
Information (RAI) from the agencies (one RAI per agency) to clarifY information in the permit
~S4~4S.do~
one (I) meeting
timated for budget
application package. CDM will attend to up two (2) meetings with SFWMD
with FDOT and one (1) meeting with LWDD. A total of four meetings are e:
purposes.
CDM will prepare,a SFWMD individual Environmental ResOurce Permit (Et
the:proposed construction improvements., It is understood that no wetland irt
anticipated as part of this project. Any semdces: required to conduct an envir¢
wetland assessments (if requested by SFWMD) will be considered as additiol
RAI willbe ineludedas part of the scope of work. The following elements
in the ERP application:
P) application for
pacts are ~ -
nmenml and/or
tal services. One
~i-tYPi~ally required
· Basin delineation
· . Peak ~ow, cl~a~:fities and anokysis (2~.year.& 100 year-72 hour storms)
· ReqUired.de~Lenfion volumes and tre~nt amoituts
· Wetlands: an~ habitat impacts (Not anticipated)
· Cortstru~on Sequence or phases (if applicable)
· ~op°Sed:constmction layout
· Construction techniques
· Stormwater control techniques
CDM will prepare aPDOT Drainage Connection Permit application for the
construction improvements. One RAI will be included as part of the scope
following computation is required in the FDOT permit application, in additio:
permit requirements:
Critical Duration Storms (1, 2, 4, 8 & 24-hr and 2, 3 & 10-days) for the
periods: 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 & 100-year.
'oposed
work. The
~ to the SFWMD
[ollowing return
CDM will prepare a LWDD Drainage Connection Permit application for the t ,roposed
construction improvements. One RAI will be included as part of the scope of work. The
following computations are required in the LWDD permit application, in add~ tion to the
SFWMD permit requirements:
· 25-year and 100-year 3-days Design Storms
TASK 4 - PROBABLE CONTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
CDM will estimate the probable cost of construction for the project at the 313 ad 50 percent
completion milestones and a final construction cost estimate at the completio~t of the project.
TASK 5 - BID SERVICES
CDM will provide services associated with the bidding of the project upon ar
construction plans and contract documents prepared in Task 2 above.
BS4945.doc A-6
)tance of the
CDM will attend a pre-bid conference and interpret and clarify plans and specifications as
needed at the pre-bid meeting and during the bidding process. CDM will tabulate the bid
proposals, make an anal~,sis of the bids and make recommendations to thc CITY for awarding
th~ contract~for ~o~S~ruetion. ' CD/V[ will ?r:O~ide~fl0et~ment ationm ~h6 CITY!fOr riot ,awarding
the bid to the~ toxve~t, bidder~ff the apParer~[t0~ ~c[de~ isnot qualified, or for ~ome o~he~reas&
such, aw, ard.w0nld~otb~ia, thebestintere~t6~the:Ct-17y~ ~ : : ..: :~,
CDM wilI attend up to' t~o public information m~etings t0 he!heli! at a time
determined !~Y', the .CITY and m'ak~ Pr~sentati ~o~,s:.r~,li~v~t
improvemefits on the~q ~omm, ~:~a:t~gpe'gy ~wffe}~} ~;CDI~ Win, answef~que~¢dm';&~
public regarding the P zojec~ as. gD en-by~itizenS, i,
B$4945.doc A.-7
EXHIBIT "B-l"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
December 21, 1999
S 'RVICZS O SCim,IoN
CDMS~ARYCOST ~ T~sk~] ~ttiro~igh 6 (Exhibit "B~2")
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Exhibit "B-3")
OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL - (Exhibit "B-4")
These proposal fees do not include the permits application fees
COST
$216,570
$18,135
$9,365
$244,070
EXHIBIT
PROPOSED SCOPI~ OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
1999
CampDresser &McKee, Inc. :s~.io, ,~.~ip.v ~.~o~ P,~..,o.~ P,of~,o~ ~.,o~ ~' I ~"~"vl ~ I ~o~
~1~ Preli~a~s;~Repo~ ~ - ~0 80 50 10~ ~0 7C 494 $35,200,0~
02 ~ns~efion~umen~ 70 120 280 01 72g 400 6( 1650 $114,050.0g
03 Pe~it ~a~ 1~ 60 80 I00 0] 8~ 40 4~ 420 $35,160.0g
~ Fin~ ~ns~o~on ~ Estimag t 40 30 10 O: ~ 0 88 $9,630.0g
05 Bid 8~i~s ~ 40 70 0; ~ 0 ~ i66 $15,230.00
06 Public Aw~enes~ 61 12 32 20 0 ~ 0 ( 70 ~7,300.00
EXHIBIT "B-3"
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
December 21, 1999
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.
Copies
Presentation boards
Telephone
Postage
Express Service
Automobile Mileage
Automobile Rental
Meals
[-Iotel Room
P3~ s_g_~p~oAu ~kon ~ aJ£ ,Si_z~O_
Plans Reproduction (Full Size)
Eomputer Time
Report Bindings
Air Fare
Data & Media
$70.00
$200.00
$200.00
$160.00
$360.00
$910.00
$900.00
$360.00
$595.00
$1,440,00
$2,860.00
$60.00
~0,00
$60.00
[TOTAL COST
$18,135.00[
Exhibit "B-3"
EXHIBIT "B-4"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF'BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE CORRIDOR
cONSTRU!~TION DOCUMENTS
December 21, 1999
.......... ~ ?~ ..... SUBCONTRACTED
COMPANY TASK
SERVICES
Nodars¢ & Associates, Inc.
Geotechnical Investigation
$9,365
Exhibit "B-4"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
IV-CONSENTAGENDA
TI'EH C.4
Requested City Commission
- Meeting Dates
[] November 16, 1999
[] December7. 1999
[] Dec~rnl~r 21, I993
[] Ianu~y 4, 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to Cit7 Clcrk'sOffice
November 3, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 8, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] Janumy 18, 2000
[] February i, 2000
[] Febmary 15,2000
[] March 7, 2000
[] Administrative []
[] Consent Agenda []
[] Public Hearing []
[] Bids []
[] Announcement []
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
Ianuary 5, 2000 (5:00 p,m.)
la'al ary 19~ 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Feb! laty 2, 2000 (5:00 p.mJ
F~b uary 16, 2000 (5:00 pan.)
Develop ent Plans
New Business
Legal
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to approve work authorization #11 with Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. in the amotmt of $69, 619.00 for the
design, permitting, and bidding services for the Costa Bella Subdivision Stormwater Im~ovements.
/
EXPLANATION:
As requested by the City Commission during the November 15, 1999 Stormwater Workshop, the attached work
authorization #1 l is offered to complete the required engineering services for the above I sted project.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
Completion of this project will improve stormwater management in this flood prone ere~
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total cost of this agreement is not to exceed 5;69, 619.00. Funds for the design, permitth
available in the 1996 Revenue Bond Issue Account g407-5000-590.96-07. Funds for t
all of the improvements have not been fully identified.
ALTERNATIVES:
Continue to pump this area with portable equiptment after storm incidents. Not taking th s action could continue to
result in private property damage.
SABULLETIN~ORMS~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
and bidding servtces are
te eventual construction of
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Signature
CRy Attome3~ / F~ance / Hman Resources
Utilities
Depamnent Name
John Guid .ry
Dale Sugerman
City Clerk's Office w/Originals
City Attorney
Mark Law
File
S:~BULLETII~FORMS~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
ENGINEERING SERVICES WORK AUTHORIZATION
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.
DATE:
CDM PROJECT NO. 6276 -
I. PROJECTS DESCRIPTION
The Professional Engineering Services for the project include the Costa Bella
Subdivision Stormwater Improvements.
~e purpose of. the Costa Bella Subdivision Stormwater Improvements Project (Exhibit
A?') is to develop construction documents and associated c0nstructio~ plans for a
potential stormwater pump station, detention area and/or gravity storm sewer that will
alleviate the existing localized flooding on NW 10~ Street. N6 modifications to the
ex}sOng road or stormwater system is anticipated with the exception 0~ a potential pump
station/and or gravity storm sewer adjustments for emergency ~ood rdlie{, public t~ealth
and Safety reasons.
II. CONTRACT REFERENCE
Ttii.'s:Work Authorization shall be performed under the terms and conditions described
within the Master Agreement for Stormwater Utility Projects dated ti: 16th day of
December 1991 by and between the City of Boynton Beach and Cam Dresser & McKee
Illc.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The ProfeSsional Engineering Services are for implementation of corn truction documents
and associated construction plans for two separate projects. The conm ruction documents
and associated construction plans will be provided to the City, as follo~vs:
/
The project as described in detail in Exhibit "A" consists of a stormwvaterer um station
· P P
and/or grayjty storm sew~ adjustments that will alleviate the existing localized flooding
on NW 10u- Street, NW 8~ Avenue and adjacent areas to the Costa Bella Subdivision.
This project area essentially is bounded by NW 9th Way and NW l0th Avenue to the
north, the Sky Lake Subdivision tO the west, Old Boynton Road to the south and NW 8th
Street to the east. The Engineer will design a stormwater pump station, detention area,
and/or gravity storm sewer adjustment to provide emergency flood rellef of an inadequate
drainage system. It is our understanding that this project will be treate~t as maintenance
improvements due to public health and safety nature of this project. NO modificatiOns to
the existing road system is anticipated with the exception of a potential pump station,
detention area, and/or gravity storm sewer for emergency flood relief.
Attached herewith are the Scope of Services and Exhibits "A" and "B" which detail the
work effort for this Work Authorization.
PROJECT STATUS REVIEW
The Engineer shall provide the CITY with a monthly progress letter thr0ughg~[ the
project. Additionally the CITy will be provided two (2) bets?0f-conmction: drawings
and specifications to review at the 30, 60, and 90 percent 9omple~on ,mil' estoi~e, Five
copies of the Prelfminary design report shah be providdff:iO~'~r~i~ io'~ClTY
vi.
PROJECT SCHEDISLE A25D DELD/ERABLES
This schedule is dependent on timely receipt of survey informatiOn, which the City is
res?ons~i~le for obtaining. The design and permitting services schedule should be
d0figi~i/ed~dp to the Submission Of the construction plans and Peri~t packagest0 the
re~'~i~p'~ma/t~dng agencies described herein .
CONSULTING ENGINEER INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
· Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with Florida Statutes,
· Comprehensive Automotive Liability with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000
armuai aggregate for bodily injury or accidental death.
· Comprehensive General Liability with a minimum limit of 5;t ;000,000 annual
aggregate covering property damagel
· Liability for Property Damage, while operating motor vehicle, with minimum limits
of $1,000,000 annual aggregate.
· Contractual Liability including limits established for Items VI B, C, and D. above.
· Professional Liability with minimum limits of $1,000,000 annual-aggregate.
0000kBS4944\12/21t99 2
VII. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICF, S
The total mount to be pa~d to the Engineer by the City of Boynton Beach under this
W Au ' ' ''' '
0rk , .thonzatmn for Exhibit A services shall not exceed the upper hrmt mount of
$69,6t9. The Engineer will invoice the City on a monthly basis as re~tuired for payment
based on costs incurred to date.
Exhibits "B-I" through "B4" breakdown the Budget Estimate for Tasks 1 through 6 for
the project, This proposal fees do not inClude the permit application fees.
VIII. TERMINATION
This Work Authorization may be terminated by the City, upon th/rty
notice to the other party. If terminated, the Engineer shall complete a
services rendered through the date of termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the da)
written.
30) days written
ad shall be paid for
ad year first above
CAMP DPJESSER & McKee INC.
Donald G. Munksgaard, P.E., DEE
Senior Vice President
CITY OF BOYNTON'BEACH, FLORIDA
City Manager
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
COSTA BELLA SUBDIVISION STORMWA-TER,IMPROVEME~S
SCOPE OF SERVICES
INTRODUCTION
For ther~urposeoJ['this sCOpe of services, the term CITY refers to the CiW of B0ynton Beach,
Florida a~d the term CDM refers to Camp Dresser & McKee Ine. ~
The design services, which are to be provided by CDM, include the preparation of a preliminary
engineeri~tg report; contract documents; construction plans speciflcatibns and construction cost
estimate. The permitting services that Will be provided by CDM, include the eng~neenng
required tS obtain, the necessary permits to construct this project. It is~anticipated that two
pe~t~ Will.be required from the' f611owing agencies with jurisdiction 10vet the project: Palm
BeachCoUnty (PBC) and the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD).
PROJECT. DESCRIFrlON
The purpose of the Costa Betla Subdivision Stormwater Improvements is intended to develop
construction documents and associated construction plans for a stormwater pump station and/or
gravity stormsewer that will alleviate an existing localized flooding condition on NW 10th
~treet~ NW 8t~ Avenue and adiacent areas to the Costa Bella SUbdivision.
This project is essentially bounded by NW 9th Way and NW l0th Avenue to the north, the Sky
Lake SubdiviSion to the west, Old Boynton Road to the south and NW 8th Street to the east.
CDM will design a stormwater pump station, detention area, and/or gravity system
improvements m provide emergency relief of an inadequate stormwater system. No
modifications to the existing road and stormwater system are anticipated with the exception of a
potential pump station, detention area, and/or gravity storm sewer for emergency flood relief.
It is our understanding that chronic flooding problems exist in this subdivision because it is in the
bottom of aclosed depression with very limited discharge capacity. The subdivision has a small
dry retention pond that does not properly drain which exacerbates the localize flooding problem.
The purpose of this project is to provide emergency flood relief to the subdivision.
BS4.946.doc
A-1
TASK I - PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT
Subtask 1.1 Engineering Design Analysis.
CDM will prepare a Preliminary Design Report, outlining the design elemen
criteria that will be USed in the development of the design and construction p
This report will provide sufficient detail and information to show that the pre
improvements are feasible to construct according to the recognized standard~
The standards for the project shall be die CITY standards for pump stations
FDOT design standards for roadway ang~dminage.
CDM, as part of this report, will collect and review available information st
existing surveys, as-builts plans, ,soilsAnvest~ga~on reports, utility service e,
requirements of all the agencies kayi~ju!~/s~cti~n over the project and anD
which may have an impact on the planning, design, approval, permitting, c
operation of the pro2ect. All topographical information is to be provided b
be
s, standards and
ans for the proJect.
posed
for the project.
nd the current
as records, maps,
~flicts, other
~th~4~formation
or
CITY and is to
CDM will review the
. i requirements including
additional permit requirements b7 any of the agencies with~urisdicfion ov0r~e ~oject,
addit~ona!. ~u~eY: nee4ed; ~d/or:~fies adj~4~rrtents. Re ~ep0~: Will Jndl~id~:~ussibn of the
geotechnical iervices pefformed,:in ~ prc~}eet ~rea~ including: field data,:3e~41t~ of iaboratory
analysis and geotechrdcal recommendations. The geotechnical services will:fie provided by
Nodarse & Associates, Inc.
CDM will evaluate the subdivision drainage system and recommend imp[ovements that could
c0st.effectively be installed to alleviate the chronic flooding problem of this s abdivision. The
C~5~' may de~ide to purchaSe Lot 7 of the sUbdivision to l~ent a dwelling 1 eing built in front
of the retention pond and to provide access to the drainage easements.
CDM will meet with the CITY staff to discuss the project, to identify operatit
system, to determine stormwater force main muting andto ensurethat the scl
meets the needs of, the CITY. CDM will also meet with PBC and LWDD in
CITY staff to .dis~cuss permits reqmrements CDM aS part of this report wilI
CITY to contact the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) an,
exemption cf an Environmental Resource Permit for this project. No permit:
anticipated at this. time. Any services required to comply with SFWMD pent
additional services to this work authorization.
The report will be submitted in conjunction with the 30 percent design plans,
prpposed pump station, drainage structures adjustments and related improven
by the CITY. The preliminary design will show all existing utilities, aS provi
BS4946xloe
A-2
nal needs of the
,~cted routing best
onjanction with
mommend to the -
request a letter of
rom SFWMD is
it criter/a will be
'hich ~will show the
ents for approval
ted by the CITY, in
the fight-of-way and potential utilities conflicts. This report will also include a preliminary
construction cost estimate for all the proposed improvements.
Subtask 1.2 Stormwater ModeI Evaluation.
This task: vail ifi¢lUde a brief'mualys~s of the,flooding con~t[fions at:the p~.oj, t.s~t~ to dete ~ ~rn~ e
st6tmwatei, ~oWs a~i:I :Vo~ui~i~..U~fili~ingi,~:S t°rmwaf~
model Will indade consideml20ff of ihe ~oitowihg it~'hg::
· Subba~in;Areas
·
·
ppropriate
versus
up
Subtask 1 3;DCa~I:q~e~ Memorandum.
CDM will" ~' ~ ~f~f ~eds'fo~'*~' ~ ~ ' ~' ~e CITY tO pr~0ivid~ or as~additionat sePvic~s to this work
authonzaUom ·
TASK 2 - GONSTRIJCTION ~OCUMENTS
md
CDM will work ~¢ith CITY St~t~t6 accommodate the proposed stormwater force main or gravity
system layout to the~exte~ndpract~cable vathout ~mpactmg the exmtmg stonnwater system or y
other utititiesifi thi~l~r0J~kfi~a ~ts reco~efided in Task i above. Any services required to
design, permit,' construct'or in~p~6Ct potehtial utilities adjustments will be additional services to
this work authorization.
CDM will procee~ Wi~ this task and prepare the design documents for the 60 percent design
plan's, upoi~ofiZ~°n from ttie CIT~ Utility Director, after the Preliminar~ Design Report
(30 pei~d~:d~s~ga:~i~s) prepared in Task 1 al~o~e have been reviewed and approved by the
crr¥.
The design services associated with this task have been generally been developed upon the use of
one stormwater pump station and/or additional storage to prevent localized flooding. This pump
station will be utiJized for emergency flood relief only and it is not intended to disrupt the normal
operatihg ~6n~ti~s!t~0r the existingpond and ch/ainage system of the subdiv/sion,
SS4946.doc A-3
CDM will prepare plans and specifications for the construction of the improvements. These
construction plans will consists of the plan~,sheets listedSn Table 1 beltTM and include but not
limited to the performance of specific work and preparation of details and doeuments as follows:
· Erosion Control as per FDOT and PBC standards
· Restoration of existing sidewalks
· Testing materials including specifications for resting
· Driveway restorations
· Stormwater structures and culverts
· Stormwater force main (if necessary)
· Mechanical design (Pump Station)
· Structural design (Pump Station)
Instrumentation and telemetry design
· Electrical design
CITY and/or FDOT standard specifications shall be used, as may be modifie~ with the CITY
approval. Speci~ !~oVisions will be as approved by the CITY. The following table describes an
approximate sl~e, et cmmt :for the construction plans:
TABLE 1
S l-lEl~r DESCRIPTION
Cover
General Notes
Key Sheet '
Stormwater Force Main Plans (if necessary)
Pump Station Plan
Structural Plan
Electrical Plan.
Instrumentation and Telemetry Design
NUMBER OF SIqEETS
1
1
1
3
1
1
2
Details 2
TOTAL 13
CDM will proceed with this task and prepare the design documents for the 90 percent design
plans, upon authorization from the CITY Utility Director, after the 60 percent design plan have
been reviewed and approved by the CITY. The 100 percent design plans will
CITY prior to construction and after permits approval and utilities companies
been addressed. CDM will submit five sets of 24"x36" size and five sets of 1:
TASK 3 - PERMIT ASSISTANCE
be submitted to the
:omments have
!"x 18"(half sizes).
CDM wilt provide permit assistance requked to obtain the necessary permits t construct this
project. It is anticipated that permits will be required from the following agen :les with
jurisdiction over the project: Palm Beach County (PBC) and the Lake Worth ~ ~rainage District
(LWDD). No pem~it from SFWMD is anticipated at this time, Any services required to comply
with SFWMD permit criteria will be additional servmes to this work authorization.
BS~*046.doc
CDM will work with PBC and LWDD to facilitate the permitting Of this project. CDM Will
prepare and submit permit package applications that are required Or needed to obtain approval
~ro~n the agencies and to resp°nd to up tO two Request For Additional Information (RAI) from
the agencies (one RAI per agency) to. cia~y .mformafio~il~;~h~: pemait: apPlic~tiof~ pac~ge::'
CDM will attend to one (1) meeting with PBC anal ~one (l) mee/ing ~ith:LWDD2 A total of ~:wo
meetings are estimated for budget ~oses. ' ' -': ::. ~ ~-
· Basin delineation
· Peak flow ~quantifies and~analysis
· ~Uk,,~ detentmn ~volumes ·
· Propg~ed(eon~ ,t~Ucfion layout
· C0ns~raction, ~chniques ,' ,,
· St Control techniques
CDM~;w/~,pre~are:~'B¥C-i~D Di//inage Connection Permit application for the proposed
constmctioii impro~reme~ts. ~he following computauon ss reqmred in the LWDDpenmt
appliqatiq,n.
· 25-~ and i~dyear 3-days Design Storms
CDM~/~r~are ~B~ 'Ri~ht-0f-Way Use Permk application for the proposed construction
~mprov_ejne~ts! i~ ~:e~i ,at ~o~pu?Ison ss anuc~pated for the PBC penmt apphcaUon.
TASK 4 - PROBABIkE CONTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
CDM Will estimate ttiepfobable cost of construction for the project at the 30 and 60 percent
completion milestOnes affd a final constmcUon cost esUmate at the compleUon of the project.
TASK 5 - BID SERVICES
CDM will provide services associated with the bidding of the project upon acceptance of the
construct[~ plans and ~°ntract documents prepared in Task 2 above.
CDM will attend a pre.~bid conference, interpret and clarify plans and specifications as needed at
the pre-bid meeting an~t during the bidding ~rocess.' CDM Will tabulate the bid proposals, make
an analysis of the bids and make recommendations to the CITY for awarding the contract for
construction. CDM will provide documentation to the CITY for not awarding the bid te the
lowest bidder if the apparent Iow bidder is not qualified, or for some other reason such award
would not be in the best interest of the CITY.
BS4946.do¢ A-5
Task 6 - PUBLIC AWARENESS
CDM will attend up to one public infommtion meeting to be held at a time an~ place to be
determined by the CITY and make presentations relevant to the design and affect of the
improvements on the community and property owners. CDM will answer questions" from the
public regarding the project as given by citizens, or interested groups.
A-6
EXHIBIT "B-l"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
COSTA !~ ~EL:LA ER !MPROVEMTNS
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
December 21, 1999
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Exhibit "B-3")
OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL - (Exhibit "B-4")
$4,504
$3,355
This proposal fees do not include the permits application fees
EXHIBIT "B-I"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
COSTA BELLASUBD!~s!oN. STORMWATER IMPROVEMTNS
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
December 21, 1999
SERVICES DESCRIPTION COSI
~DM SALARY-COST, Ta~ks 1 through 6 '(Exhibit "B~2") $6i,760
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Exhibit "B-3") ............... $4;504
.......... TOTAL -~-' ' '" * $69,619
These proposal ~ees do not include the permits application'fees
EXHIBIT "B-2"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
COSTA BELLA SUBDIVISION STORMWATER IMPROVEMTNS
' CONSTRUCTioN DoCUME~ITS
Ciii~ii~br~g~r &'M~K~e~ Inc.
~ T~g
'01 Pt~ min~gnRe~ (m~l. 30 ~sn) 0 16 30 60 1~ 30 ~ 20 196 $15,190.00
02 Constmofion ~umen~ 0 24, 60 70 0 100 6( 10 324 $24.900,00
03 Pe~it ~s~ 4 1( 20 24 0 16 16 96 $8,400.00
~ Fi~ ~nstm~on ~Esfi~ 2 16 0 0 0 6 32 $3,170.00
05 [ Bid Se~s 2 1( ~ 32, 0 0 20 94 $8,320.00
06 [ Publio Awareness 0 . - ~ ~ ~ ..~ 0 0 ( 0 H $1,780.00
[ I'OTAL HOURS' 7601 $61,760,001
O[}M c~t~. Exhibit "B-2"
EXHIBIT "B-3"
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICE8 BUDGET
CITY OF BoYIqTON BEACH
COSTA BELLA SUBDIVISION STORMWATER IMPROVEMTNS
December 21, 1999
Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.
_: Desem oN roTS ToT .
Copies ea./sheet $40.00
Presentation boards ea. $40.00'
Telephone ea. $100 00
Postage ea. $64.00
Express Service ea. .$210 00
Automobile Mileage Miles , $226.30
Automobile Rental day $150.00
Meals day $180.00
Plans i~epr(~duetion ~Ial~S~ze) ea,tshe~t
Computer Time ~ ': ~ ~-$1;02T80
C~D ~ ~ ~ $1,380,00
~pon Bin~ngs , ea. $50,~
Exhibit "B-3"
EXHIBIT "B-4"
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES BUDGET
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
COSTA BELLA SUBDIViSIONSTORMWATER IMPROVEMTNS
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
December 21, 1999
COMPANY TASK
SUBCONTRACTED
SERVICES
Nodarse & Associates, Inc.
Geotechnical Investigation
$3,355
TOTAL $3,355
Requested City Commission
Me~fing Dates
[] November t~, 1999
[] December7. 1999
[] Decernber2I. 1999
[] January 4. 2000
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQLTEST FORM
Date Final Form Must be Turned
m to City Clerk's Office
November 3. [999 (5:0{~ p.mJ
November 17, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 8. 1999 (5:0¢ p.m.)
December 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Comn~ssmn
Meetin~ Dates
[] January 18, 2000
[] February i. 2000
[] February 15,2000
[] March 7, 2000
ZV-CONSENT AGENDA
Ti'EH E
Date Final Form Must be Turned
a~a~u~aaa~n to City Clerk's Office
NATURE OF
AGENDAITEM
[] Administrative [] Developn~entPlans
[] Consent Agenda [] New Business~
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfmish
[] Announcement [] Presentat
RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve additional vehicles (1S total), to the vehicle pm
budget.
EXPLANATION: A total of 14 replacement vehicles and one new trailer was deleted from
Bus/ness
chase list in the FY99/00
he draft 1999-2000
budget document in error. However, funding for the requested vehicles was not deleted and is available in the Vehicle
ReservefReplacemeni Fund and the New Vehicle Account. Attached is a list of the vehicles showing the requesting
department, replacement vehicle number, type of vehicle and the dollar amount.
PROGRAM IMPACT: Allows scheduled replacement of vehicles to occur.
FISCAL IMPACT: Total cost for replacement vehicles are $701,000. The new carge trailer cost is $5,000.00. As
indicated, funding for all of these vehicles is available.
ALTERNATIVES: Delay Purchase of vehicles and include in the next budget year (FY00/
City Mana~
.).
s Signaiu~e V
S:kBULLETINkFOKMS AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
,' Departnient Name
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
City'Attorney / Finance / Human- l~esources
S :kB ULLETIN~ORM SkAGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENT/NEW VEHICLES
Vehicle Replacement
Department Number Vehicle Tvoe Amount
Fire Depamnent g830 Additional Funds $ 16,000
Parks #8074 Trailer $ 3,500
Parks #0513 rmck with utility body $ 19,000
Parks #0572 Cargo van $ 19,500
Parks #0541 Dump truck $ 45,000
TOTAL ~rParks:
$ 87,000
Solid Waste Division #0068 Cherry Picker $ 90,000
SolidWaste Division #0069 Cherry Picker $ 90,000
Solid Waste Division g~0085 Front Loader $150,000
Solid Waste Division ~0095 Cherry Picker/Roll-off $ 90,000
TOTAL for Solid Waste Division: $420.000
Utilities #8059 Tractor/Backhoe $ 80,000
Utilities #0178 Cargo van $ 18.000
Utilities ~0189 Cargo van $ 28,000
Utilities #0192 4x4 pickup truck $ 25.000
Utilities #0177 Cargo van $ 22.000
Utilities NEW Cargo lxailer $ 5,000
TOTAL for Utilities:
$178,000
TOTAL:
$701,000
IV-CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM F
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission
Meetino Dates
[] November 16, 1999
[] December 7. 1999
[] December 21. 1999
[] January 4, 2000
Date Final Form Must be
Turned in to CKv Clerk's Office
November 3. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17, 1999 (5:00
p.m.)
December 8. 1999 (5:00 p,m.)
December 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m )
Requested' C~ty
Commission Meefina Dates
[] January 18. 2000
[] February 1, 2000
[] February 15 2000
[] March 7, 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[] Administrative [] Developmen
[] Consent Agenda [] New Busine,,
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfinished B
[] Announcement [] Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of funds for Housing Rehabitit
Carole Lewis. residing at 3821 N. Dixie Highway, n the amount of $13,283.00. This amoul
Florida State Housing nitiatives Partnership (SHIP) grant funding in the amount of $10,i
Beach Home Improvement funding in the amount of $3,283.00, that includes $633.00 repn
contingency for any unforeseen problems that may be disclosed.
EXPLANATION: HousingRehabilitation is the second strategy used with SI-
applied for assistance to have her home. which she has resided in 19 years, rehabilitab
Improvement Program. Ms. Lewis has been certified as very-low income with $12,168.00 re(
part of which are City of Boynton Beach code violations~ would encompass a new mol, a,'
replacement of her carport.
PROGRAM IMPACT: The rehabilitation of this property would be the removal of a~
in the community be making it safe, which meets the U.S. Housing and Urban Development',,
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs associated with the rehabilitation of older dwellin
of ieveraglng local funds with State Grant (SHIP) funds gives the City the ability to address
bearing (he entire burden.
ALTERNATIVES:
economically viable to repair in the future.
v 'D~ep~rt~ent Hl~ad's Signature
Department of Development
Division of Community Redevelopment
Department Name
Failure to do complete and adequate repair of the dwelling
City Attorney I Finance t Ht
Date Final Form Must be
Tumed in to City Clerk's Office
/
January ~, 2000 (5:00 3.m.)
January 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Februaq 2, 2000 (5:00 p,m.)
Februar ~ 16 2000 (5 00 p m )
Plans
slness
3n Case ,~r2-99-002, Sally
t includes the leveraging of
~00.00 and City of Boynton
senting a five pement (5%)
IP funds. The applicant has
~d through the City's Home
eived annually. The repairs,
well as the demolition and
,ther substandard structure
National Objective.
IS are quite high. The ability
Ibis issue effectively without
will result in it not becoming
man Resources
FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
227 Nort~ Bronough Street. Suite 5000 · Tallahassee, Flodda 32301-1329
(850) 488-4197 I Fax (850) 4'~0-2510
RESIDENT INCOMI
- HOME OWNER
Effective Date: I-.~/~ i I, c~,~ Xllocation Year~
A. Recipient Information (sefect one)
a. Curreot homeowner:
b. Home buyer: ~ Existing Dwelling Newly Con, Strutted Dwelling
B. Subsidy Use (check a that
'Down Paymeht Assistsnce .... Ptin~:ipal Buy,Down
CI0sing Costs ~ Rehabilitation
I~te,~'t- Subs~y ; ~Emerge~icy'Repair
Guarantee' i ; Other'
C. Household Ir~form
Names -~AII Household Membem ~ ~ ,- . ,i ; ~.eleUo~ship Age
D. Assets; AIl household
Income from
Member · - Asset Description Cash Value Assets
5
5
? J_
Total Income from Assets D(b)
if line D(a) is greater than $5,000, multiply that amount by the rate specked by
HUD (applicable rate 2,0 %! anti e!ller results in D(c). o~hem~ise leave blank. D(c) $
SHIP-RJC (Owner)
Rev. 0411999
Page 1 of 3
E. Anticipated Annual Income: includes unearned income and support paid on behalf of minors.
M~nber
1
2
Wages I
Salaries
(include tips,
commission,
bonuses and
Benefits !
Pensions
Public
Assistance
Other Income
Asset Income
(Enter the
greater of
box D(b)
or box D(c),
adore.
in box E(e)
below)
(a) -
Totals :
This arrt~oun~ i~ the Annual Anticipated Ho~Jseh~ld ncome -
Recipient Statement: The information on this form is to be used to determine maximum income
for eligibility. I/we h~ve provided, for each person set forth in item C, accepfable
current and anticipated annual ncome. I/we certify that the statements are [rue and complete to
the best of my/our knowledge and belief and are given under penalty of peri ~ry.
WARNING: Florida Statute 817 provides that willful false statements or mi.< 'epresentetion
concerning income and assets or liabilities, relating to financial condit on s a misdemeanor of the
first degree and Js punishable by fines and imprisonment provided un'er S 1 75.082 or 775.83.
Date
Signature of Head of Household
Signature of Spouse or Co-Head of Household
Date
SHIP-RIC (Owner)
Rev. 04/1999
Page 2 of 3
SHIP Administrator Statement: Based on the representations herein, and upon the proofs and
documentation submitted pursuant to item F, hereof, the family or individual(s) named in item C of this
Resident income Certification is/are eligible under the provisions of Chapter 420. Part V, Flodda Statutes,
the family or individual(s) constitute(s) a: (check one)
size
Statistical Area~A~ (:~ountyT,~l=[~A[ ........... ,~ ......... ~ ...................... ~. ~ ~
Name
Title
(Print or
H. Household Data (to be.completed by Administrator or designee)
Number of Persons
Special Target I Special Needs
(Check all that apply)
NOTE: Information concerning the race or ethnicity of the ocouoants is being gathered for statistical use only. NO
occupant is required to give such information unless he or she desires t= do so, and refusal to give such
information will not effect any right he or she has as an ocoupanL
SHIP-RIC [Owner)
Rev. 04/1 ~99
Page 3 of 3
Requested Ci~ Commission
Meeting Dates
[] November 16. 1999
[] December 7. 1999
[] December 2L 1999
[] Jauuary 4, 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
IV-CONSENT AGENDA
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH ITEM G
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOR.._
Date Final Foma Must be Turned
in to Cit~ Clerk's Office
November 3, 1999 (5:00 p.m I
November 17, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 8, 1999 (5:00p.rm)
December 22, I999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] January 18,2000
[] February 1, 2000
[-~ Yebrtway 15,2000
[] March 7. 2000
r-] Adminis~ative []
[] Consent Agenda []
[] Public Hearing []
[] Bids
[] Announcement --]
Dan~ Final Form Must be Turned
lin to City Clerk's Office
Jan cry 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
J tary 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.I
Feb: am'3, 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Felc ~ary 16,2000 f5:00p.m.)
Developn ant Plans
New Busi ~ess
Legal
Unfmished Business
Presentation
RECO1VIMENDATION: Motion to authorize piggybacking of the Palm Beach County Cont
Traffic Signal Installation" for the placement of underground conduit on the Gateway Blvd.
EXPLANATION: As a part of an agreement with FP&L approved by the City Commission
the undergrounding of overhead electric cables, the City agreed to install underground cond
PROGRAM IMPACT: The purpose of the undergrounding of the overhead electric cables i
the finished project.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the project will be dicatated by field conditions encoun
process. The contract cost of the cable installation has been estimated to be a maximum of $
such as location services, and reclamation work is estimated not to exceed $5,000. The total
estimated not to exceed $ 24,440. Careful monitoring of the work will guarantee the quality
lowestcost oftheinstallation. Funds are available in Account ~t105-3237-51
ALTERNATIVES: The overhead electric cables could be left in place, and not placed under
Engineering
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~
Department Nam.e City Attomey/ Finance,
ret #99056, "Annual
Improvement Project.
m January 5, 1999~ for
aits.
to improve aesthetics of
ered by the construction
19,440. Associated costs
:ost of the project is
~fthe work and the
3-63-08.
ground.
Signa~re
Human Resources
S :\B ULLETiN~ORMS~.OENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
NO. 99-149
Wilfre4 HawkinS, Interim City Manager
Jo~ A. Guidry, Interim Director of Engineering ~ ~ ·
December 22, 1999
GATEWAY BOULEVT~RD PRO.CT --UND~iGROU?qD FP&L CABLES
As part of an agreement with FP&L approved by the commission on January 5, 1999 for the
undergrounding of overhead electric cables, the City agreed tO install underground conduits (see attached
for review).
At this point we have paid FP&L for the cost of converting to the underground system and now we must
arrange to install the underground conduits in accordance with the plans (attached for review).
Authorization is requested to piggyback the Palm Beach County Contract "Annual Traffic Signal Contract"
#99056 (attached for review). The contractor holding this contract is Design Traffic Iastallation, inc. i have
met with a representative of the company and they are willing to do the work ~mder, the COunty agreement.
Extracting from the Contract using th& FP&L plans for the wOrk, the ~foiiowing is an estimate for the work to
be done. The estimate for installing the conduit is high, controlled by the worse case conditions. As field
COnditions dictate, the actua~ cost of the conduit irctallafion is exPected to be lower. T~ere are other field
conditions that will influence the cost.~fthe project that cannot be~identified as to the exact amount at this
time. There will be location costs associated with identifying e~ting utilities and obstructions and
reclamation costs in the event sod, s ,h~;bbery or trees must betaken out or replaced as a result of the work. An
allowance must be made for these field determined confingeficie~.
Location
Between Seacrest and NE 1s~ I_ane
At NE 2nd Collrt
Between NE 3ra St and NE'4m St
Between NE 4th Ct and NE 4th St
At NE 4th St.
Totals
6" Conduit (LF)
100
130
306
536 LF- 6"
4" Conduit (LF)
120
120
240 LF- 2"
Engineering Department Memorandum No. 99-149
Re: Gateway Blvd. Project - Underground FPL Cables
December 22, 1999
Page Two
From the County Conlract:
2"- 240 LF ~ $14.00/LF $ 3,360
6" _ 536 LF ~ $30.00/LF $16,080
Total required to install $19,440
Contingencies for fieldneeds $ 5,000
Total for project $24.440
Careful monitoring of the work will guarantee the quality of the work and the lowest cost of the installation.
If awarded, the contractor has agreed to begin work within 30 days.
Funding for this work with be from the $2,000,000 grant received from Palm Beach County, and the account
setup for the construction of the Gateway Roadway Improvement Project, Account # 105-3237-513-63-08.
If there are any questions please contact Larry Roberts at ext. 6282.
JAG/LR
C:~ly Documents\G-ateway Blvd. - Underground FPL Cables.doc
V. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
A.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
December 29, 1999
Wilfred J. Hawkins, Interim CityManager
· Dale S~ Sugerman, Assistant.C;rty.Manager
SUBJECT: Options for {
are
)Pond
purpose of
of those two
I bidder that
million
in prices that
have Pond "B"
jeopardy.
matter wi~h the City Commission at their December:H, 1999 meeting,
I~he va~iou~S alternatives that we .hav® for!letting this project
' ur a reaSonable amount of money. I see the following
1. ' Re,bid the project.
This a|temafive can be easily accomplished. All of the bi(
it and settin..g. ~
such an' alternative is tl~at it will .~
get the, project finished* ~n a timely manner. R,
to a proiect that is approximately 60 da,
~ will not. necessad!y gUarantee ti
)[ice.
Award ,t~ b d 'as received.
This alternative can also be easily accomplished. The
received is a qualified bid and it is from a solid contracto
this bid should result in a project that is done on time. ThE
rng material is in
new bid opening
edously harm our
;-bidding will add
,s late already. In
~e City that we will
;ole bid that was
· The awarding of
problem with this
bid is th_a,t the bid price is approximate y $1.7 million dolla's higher than the
Eng neer s est mate f th s I~id were to be awarded, we would not be getting
good value for our dollars spent.
Split the Award
note bidders dudng the second round of bidding, we
variety of
did
Award a-~Des gp~Build Contract
th~
that= has been
509
: the CM
~ fees), the
the use of
of
Split the Award and also Award a Design/Build Contract
The final option is to award three of the component parts
(the ones that were priced in line with the Engineer's
apparent tow bidder and to award a design/build contract
& Constructor's Inc. for the one component part of the
Pond construction) that was so out of line with the original E
This alternative is possible, and it may save us some mon
but there are also some down sides to such an arrangeme
not offeredto dO the design/build on just the Pond c(~npol
They may or may not be amenable to such an arrangem~
type of arrangement would have the same problem as
~herein it would be much better to have just one contract
job, rather than having two contractors doing it at two differ~
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon all of the input I have received on this project, and taking a h
these options, it would be my recommendation that the City Commissio
Option 4, Awarding a Design/Build contract to CDM Engineers & Contn
this option has all of the advantages and none of the disadvantages. It w~
Begin the project immediately.
Have the project built by the individuals who designed it.
Bring the project in under the amount it would have come
to use the competitive bidding process.
Give all of the participating parties an opportunity to actuall
to the incentives built into the arrangement.
I will be happy to discuss all of these options, and my recommendatior
2000 City Commission meeting. Once the Commission chooses one of
will be ready to formalize their decision at their January 18, 2000
meeting. In the meantime, should you have any questions about this me
do not hesitate to contact me directly.
of the odginal bid
estimate) to the
o CDM Engineer's
)roject (the actual
stimate.
~y in the long run,
nt. First, CDM has
~ent of the project.
;nt. Secondly, this
found in option 3
)r doing the entire
~nt times.
~rd look at each of
look seriously at
~ctors, Inc. To me,
~uld allow us to:
i if we were forced
save money due
at the January 4,
these options, we
gularly scheduled
~orandum, please
Dale S. Sugerman
Assistant City Manager
CC:
James A. Cherof. City Attomey
John Guidry, Director of Utilities
Don Munksgaard, Senior Vice President, CDM
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] November I6, 1999
[] December ?, 1999
[] December2L 1999
[] January 4. 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH VII-PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOg .- ITEM A
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
November 3. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November I7, I999 (5:00 p.m./
December 8, 1999 (5:00 p.m.
December 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested City Commlssmn
Meeting Dates
[] lanu~ 18,2000
[] Februat3 1.2000
[] February 15.2000
[] March 7, 2000
-'] AdminisU'ative []
[] Consent Agenda []
[] Pubtic Hearing []
[] Bids []
[] Announcement []
RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the January 4, 2000 City Co--i,
Hearing, At the December 28, 1999 meeting, the Planning & Development Board tabled
approval for The Learning Depot. Staffhas recommended approval of this application. A~}l~i~.
been met. For further details pertaining to this request see attached Department of Develo~i 1
300.
Dal .~ FinalEorm Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
Jan ary 5,2000(5:00 p.m_)
Jan tary I9, 2000 (5:00 p_m.)
Fei xary 2, 20Q0 (5:00 p.m.)
Fe~ alary 16, 2000 (5:00p.m.}
Developn ant Plans
New Business
Legal
Unfm/she~ Business
Presantatitn
'6 :a~qii~ unde~ ~lic
abfiiX~ requirements have
l~oran~mm NO. P&Z 99-
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT NAME:
AGENT/OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
PROGRAM IMPACT: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
The Learning Depot - PreSchool
Scott and Kathy Freeland
SW 3rd Street ~ Woolbright Road
Request conditional use approval to construct a 4,623 square foot da,
City Manag~
I~epartmen~ 9~ Develo ~nent Acting Director
Planning and Zoning Director
are center on 0~52 acres.
City Attorney / Finance · Human Resources
DE
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:'
SUBJECT:
Chairman and Members
- PJanrt ng and Deve epment Board
MiChael Rumpf
Director, of Plannin~Zonmg
Lusia G .a?
· Senioi; iSl~ner ~
.Dece;htt~er 7, ~999
T ~Lea;~fllhg DepOt- COUS-99-007
Oe~difi~"~ ;U~e-Dsy. Care Center
.......... INTRODUCTION
Contained herein is a d~SC~ption of the subject project. The site is situated on a .52 acre of vacant land
zoned R-l-AA ~ Residential. It is located on the northeast comer of Woolbfight Road and
SW 3~ Street. '1 .~ a day care center for children. A day care center is a
district.
Project Name; Learning Depot
Applicant/Agent
Scott and~Catherine Freeland
General Descriptien: Conditional use approval for a day care center.
Property Size:
22,658 square feet (.52 acres)
Land use:
Residential Low Density (LDR) - Max. 4.84 du/ac.
Zoning:
Single Family Residential District (R-l-AA)
Location:
The northeast corner of Woolbright Road and SW 3r* Street
(See Exhibit "A"- Location Map).
Building area:
4,623 square feet under roof.
Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning:
North-
East-
South-
West-
Single family home zoned R-l-AA
Vacant lot zoned R-l-AA
Woolbright Road and beyond that - Little League City park Zoned Recreation.
Single family home zoned R-l-AA
The Learning Depot
COUS 99-007
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND ANALYSI?,
Sect[on 11.2.D of the Land'De~/elopment Regulations contains the folio ng standards to which
conditional uses are requ red tc conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Division's evaluation of the applicat on as it per, ins to standards.
1. Ingress. and egress t4) the~,~zcbject,~rope~ a~d proposed S~ructUres :thereon, ~Vith the particular
i'eTferencb tO a'utomObile~ a~ -ped~str~an ~afety and convert/Or,Ce, traffi~ 'f[dw, and dentrol, and
access in case of flre or ca~as~rophe.
The subject These
a circular
Due to 1
Florida per[y, the
SW 3"~
Off-street
SW3rd Street.
in
, noise, will
The site plan provides the
areas are
adjacent
Refuse and service areas, ;with pa~ticularreference 2 above.
Roll out trash containers ~jll ~ =the method of refuse disposa. The co ta hers wil be oca
· - ....~ ,~ . ~ ted
behind a S~(: (6) ~'ooth!gh!~g~l~e~enclosu~e;, ~h[Ch ~ll be pro~adv ,sci~=e~e~d an,~ ~..~,.--,~ -r.-,h
p~,r,-up w[u De a[ CUEDsI~e;, '
Ut/lit/es, wJth feference te4~ ec~t, iO~ availability, and compatibility.
Water and sewer uti~iti~ are currently, provided to the site. With ncorporation of
Department ,COmments~,~ a~ §,~ are avai ~ble, and consistent wi~h *h. Utility
· , ~ · . ..... Comprehensive Plan
policies and City regulatiOnS.
Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, haracte~
The appl!cant is proposing to provide landscaping on the site to meet ti' e City's current zoning
code regulations· A landscape buffer including a continuous hedge, and r ;quir~d buffer trees will
be provided along the road right-of-way and vehicu ar use areas. Buffedr g requirements for this
use are the same as requir~ed for a commercial use when it abuts a res Jential deve opment A
six- (6) foot high masonr~ block wall is provided adjacent to the residential property to the north
The Learning Depot
COUS 99-007
and east of the site. With incorporation of staff comments, screening and buffering will meet the
code.
Required setbacks and other spaces.
10.
11.
Economic
The
family
Park
family
.~elL~with the
The
height
a major
has remained
dea~t~end street. It is well
'i~'B(~jriton Beach. The
3, as ~set forth in the
With 'n~orpqration off.staff ¢ ~o~men~s, ~he proposed ~roject :~vitl~cOm~pl~';wi~h requirements
within this section of city code:
stated
I
The Learning Depot
COUS 99-007
12.
COrnp/iance with, and abaternent ~ nuisances and hazards in accorda
stan~/ard, s within Section 4 of the zoning regu/ations; a/so, conforman~
Beach Noi~e c6n~o~ OrdinanCe:
any nuisance, hazard or e:
SUMMARY/RECOMMENDATION
;e with the performance
to the City of Boynton
.~ssive noise,
'abut
the project
·, ..... building permit.
.i; Staff recommends, tl~t~ the app cat (3r~ be~appr ,oved subject to meet ng a I the ~nd t
ohs
n
Exhibit
·,, :,~ ¢[tctud~ng co~pilanca~:w~t~,the pa~¢n Bea¢lii'-Co~nty 'Fdaffic Performance Standards.
',LG/dim
;Attachments
MAP
EXHIBIT ,"A'
EXHIBIT "B'
EXHIBIT "B'
.............. ,,_ ....... =~:.:=:....,= EXHIBIT "B'~
EXHIBIT "B'
EXHIBIT '~C"
Project name: LEARNING DEPOT PRE-SCHOOL
File number: COUS 99-007
Reference: Conditional Use. File # COUS 99-007 5vith a November 23. 1999 P]annin~ and Zonin~
Devartrnent date stamp) markin~
DEPARTMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS ,i ~
~omments: None ii:~ '
,;UTILITIES
be$790-O2~r a, ,~ ~ek
2. Comp PI~ i~k~ ~}~,~i~es the conse~at~on of potable
amr ~
, Ci~ w ~ .be used for imgatmn here ot~g
~e reaany ~a!l~A ~ chanue the nl~s accord~n~lv.
3. ~s office fll not ~ lm~ sure~ for ~nstallat~on of the water
ratlines, on ~on~t~ ~.the systems ~ ~tly complete~
the Ci~ befOr~ mo ~ i pem~ent motor is set. Not~ that s~i~
pe~nt Water m~ is a pr~r~qUisit~ to obtaining th~ cmifiCate
occup~cy.
4. Appropriate backflow prev~ntem will b~ requi~d on ~ domestic
s~ic~ to the building, ~d ~ tiro sprinkler line ifther~ is one, in
accordanc~ ~ Sec. 26-207.
5. A building pe~it for ~is project shall not b~ issued until ~is offic~
h~ approwd tho pl~s for ~e water ~or sewer imp~vemenm
required m se~e ~ project. (Soc. 26-15) Please provid~ ~o
co=ected copies of the ongino~rNg plan, wi~ d~tails, dir~tly to the
Utilities D~pt. for review.
6. Provide drainage calculations sho~ng ~e mount of rainfall
retained on-sRe, at time of building pe~R surimi.
FI~
Comm~n~: Non~
POLICE
Comments: Nono
ENG~EE~G DIVISION
Comments:
Page 2
Learning Depot Pre-School
File No.: COUS 99-007
DEPARTMENTS '~ .....CLUDE REJECT
7. ' 'playPr°videarea.a Cross section of the stormwater, retention area and the open
8. The site Will require an excavation/fill permit
9. The site will generate substantial traffic through the residential
community in addition m alt the existing traffic toF0rest Park
Elementary School. We reCOmmend lhat ~heneighborhood's posen be '
weighed heavily,regarding the appm¢al Or disapi~roval ~f the hquest~ '
BUILD1NG DIVISION 'i, :' ' '
Comments~
10. At time of permit review, provide detailed drawings and documentatio;
on the plans that w, ill veri~y the ~ccessible rout~from the accessible
parking Spaces'to ~e accessible building e~t~ance ii'in compliance with
the ~egulations of~he Florida AcceSsibility Cod~ for. Building
Con,ruction. The documemation shall inclu~de~butnot be limited to,
identifying the type of material, surface finish, ,/,idth,,cross slope, slope
and lengt~ of the ~ntire accessible route including, Wkere applicable,
landings, ramps and handrails.
11. Co~dermg that derail drawings of the building signage were not
provided a~d the location of the signage ~vas noi sh0~ on-the elevation ·
vi6¢3 drawings of ibc building, pla~ ~e following note on the site plan
and ?ach drawmg Cepmt~ngthe elevatmns ofth~build~ng Building
s~*~,~ ~ge ~s not approved foethis:project. Separate site plan review and
approval is required for ~buflding sig!lage."
2. At time of Cermit review, move.the location of ~e proposed buffer wall
that is loca[ed alo nor pr0p? ll/ e o de o the utility
easement. Structures shall not efic?o~eh into hn ~ement.
'13.
At time of permit review, submit sigged and~ sealed working drawings of
the p~oposed construction :
;14. At ti~ne of permit submittal, pre~vide~an executed City unity oftitte form.
The ~form shall combine all lots or fiarcels W~thin the sub'ect site asone
tot. ~The processing of the form shall follow the Unity of title procedures.
::15. A
t tnne of permit rewew, attach a current survey of the subject property
o bqth sets of permit documents.
Page 3
Learning Depot Pre-School
File No.: COUS 99-007
16. C~mpliance with the Building Codes will be evaluated.at:time of permi~
reviews. ,iT2ae~permit fee; water and sewer faei[it~ 'fee~, Fi~'D~eht
fe~s, COunty fees and State fees will be determine4J~attim~:~f~p~t%.~
PA~S
commenm,~;. . .
18. Label ~ont, re~ ~d
19. In--dh e ms~ wld~ W gT,f~.jPl~ ~ugbe ~0~n t~ ~ale.
0. lgde ~Io the
2 lng extenor~ r on
21. On the no~ s~de of
landscape s~p mdmate eleva~on of~ml[w~ ~ ~on from the
streW. (Ch. 23, ~. II E.)
22. Procde a note onlhe l~dScaPe5 ~dicafingt~e:~thod of i~igation
23. Add ~pe of sod ~d mulch
not pem~aed. (Ch.4,
24. Indicate the ske ~ianglesat ~e Vehic~i~ acces~azs (Ch. 7 5, Sec. 5.
25, ~e building design shall be compatible Wi~ ~e su~o~ding built
environment Indicate the colors to be used on the elevation drawings.
(Ch. 9, Sec. 11, A. & B.)
Page 4
Learning Depot Pre-School
File No.: COUS 99-007
Recommend that a hedge be placed on the outside of the required buffer
wall along the east elevation and mulch in between north wall and
adjacent fences.
27.
Ail plans must be signed and sealed prior to submittal for building
permit.
28. Orient the landscape plan the same direction as the site plan.
DEVELOPMENT ORDER O
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PROJECT NAME: The Learning Depot
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Scott and Catherine Freeland
APPEICAN:F'SADDRESS: The northwest corner of Woolbdght Road and SW3~d Stree~
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: .J~nu~ary~ 2~00
TYPE OF REL EF SOUGHT Conditional Use/Site Plan Approval
LOCATION OF PROPERTY:The northwest corner of Woolbright Road and SW 3~ Street
DRAW NG(S): SEE EXHIB T "C' ATTACHED HER;,ETO
THIS MATTER came before the City commission 0f the City of Boynt0n'Beach Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above Th? city Commiss on hereby adopts the
findings ~nd recommendation of the Pl~nhii~ '~lndDe~/elol~ment Bbai'd, Which Bbard found ~S f01lows:
OR
X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
The Applicant
X HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
The conditions for development requested by the Applicant. administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "D' with notation "included".
The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
X GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
All further development on the property shall be made in accoraance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
j:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WPt,PROJECTS\THE LEARNING DEPO'~ LEARNING DEPOT- COUS\DeveloD Order CC 1-4-00.doc
XT-LEGAL
ITE q
ORDINANCE NO. O99~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING VACANT PROPERTY CONSISTING
OF 5.89 ACRES OF LAND (LOWE'S HOME
CENTER); AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38 OF
SAID CITY BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND
USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OF THE CITY BY ADOPTING THE PROPER
LAND USE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY~ MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER;
SAID LAND USE DESTGNATION IS BEING
CHANGED FROM INDUSTRIAL TO LOCAL
RETAIL COMMERCIAL; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS, SENILITY~ AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the
each, Florida has adopted a Comprehensive Futuz
Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use
Drdinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local
Comprehensive Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, the procedure for amendment of a
Ise Element of a Comprehensive Plan as set forth
163, ~ ~ ' · ~ -_- , has been followed; and
WHEREAS, after public hearing and study
Commission deems it in the best interest of the
of said City ~o
Comprehensive Plan
NOW,
City of Boynton
Land Use
lement by
~overnment
uture Land
in Chapter
the city
~abitants
amend the aforesaid Element of the
as adopted by the City herein.
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
)F THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
~ Ordinance No. 89-38 of
amended u~ ~r~!~t ,the~ollowing:
That the i Eu~ure ~a~nd~ Use .oil the
land shat~l be designated~as Local Retail Commercial. Said
land is ~ l~a.r~..~I~l~c~ribe~ as~ fol~t~ws:
~he City is hereby
following described
described as9arcel
plat there®f,
Beach County, Florida.
~ That any maps adopted in accordance with the
?uture LandUse Element shall be amended accordingly.
~ All ordinances or parts of ordinances in
~onflict herewith are hereby, repealed.
~ Should any section or provision of ~his
)rdinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of
compe~en~ jurisdiction ~o be invalid., such decision shall nou
affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
after adoption,
effective upon
:ompliance.
This Ordinance shall become effective 31 days
unless challenged. If challenged, it becomes
the issuance of a final order finding it in
FIRST READING this ~/ day of ~_~ , 1999.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this day of
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Commissioner
Commissioner
tTTEST:
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
s:¢a\ord\Loew' s Home Center Lan~ Use
XI-LEGAL
]:TEM A.2
ORDINANCE NO. O99-,.~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
REGARDING THE' APPLICATION 'OF RICHARD
BASEHART OF BASEHART CONSULTING, INC.,
AGENT FOR WOOLBRIGHT PARTNERS, INC., (A
5.89 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST OF 1-95 AND
' 390 FEET
A
PLANNED I
WHEREAS, the CiW Commission of the City of Boynton B
as adopted Ordinance No, 91-70, in which a Revised Zoni
adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, Richard Basehart of Basehart ConsulUng, I
Noolbright Partners, Inc., owner of the property more particuli
aereinafter, has heretofore filed a PeUtion, pursuant to Section
YZoning, of the Cede of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, FI
purpose of rezoning a certain tract of land consisting of 5.89 a~
being more particularly described hereinafter, from Plann
Development District CPID} to C-3 (Community Commercial); ar
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it in the best ir
inhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Revised Zc
hereinafter set forth.
each, Florida
ag Map was
:., agent for
rly described
of Appendix
Idda, for the
res, said land
~d Industrial
~d
terests of the
ning Map as
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I1' ORDA~ZNED BY THE crrY
COHMZSS[ON OF THE CTTY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORZDA, THAT:
Section :~1: ~The following: !desCribed~,:land, Iocated~:,in the City of
and the s District
to C-3 (Community Commercial). A location map is at~ached hereto as
and r~ade a part of this Ordinance.by reference., Attached as Exhibit
is a copy of the conditions/requirements for this re. zoning, which are
heroin.
Section 2: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City shall be
mended accordingly.
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are
Section 4:
Section 5:
Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
the remainder of this Ordinance.
This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
:IRST READING this o¢/ day of ~ 1999.
SECOND,, I~NAL READING and PASSAGE this day of _
cTrY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR[DA
Mayor
Vice Hayor
Mayor ProTem
Commissioner
Commissioner
City Clerk
(Corporate Seal)
s:ca\Ord\Rezoning Lowe~ - 5.89 Acres
'~::.J'O .400.'OgO FEET
_, . _ -_. _'-
,'1
',iL .
Exhibit "B"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Lowe's Home Center
File number: LUAR 99-004
Reference: Land use Amendment File # LUAR 99-004
DEPARTMENTS II~CLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
· PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. Amend master plan for Boyaton Commerce Center PID to eliminate the
5.98 acres and adjust data accordingly.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
2. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
3. To be determined.
\\CH~M~I N~SHRDATA~PLANNING~$HARED&WP~PF[OJECTSll. O~'S HOME CENT1.-'RSLUAR~CO .0. OF AIaPROVAf. P&D 11-23-9~.DOC
XI-LEGAL
ITEH A.3
ORDINANCE NO. 099-.,.~¢~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2
zoNrNG, LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION SECTrON 6 (E)
(1); PROVIDING THAT ALL APPLICATIONS FOR CONDITIONAL
USES' LocATED. WITHIN THE CENT, HAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
AND THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AREA ~HALL BE
CONSIDERED AND REVIEWED BY THE pLANNiNG AND
AMENDED SHALL REMAIN ,IN
PROVIDING
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
FULL FORCE Ak
WHEREAS, the City Commission has det,ermined that il
miform all review process for site plans and conditional uses with
duties of the ~iannihg and de~el0i~ent board; and
WHEREAS, in.the,interests:of efficiency the City Commis
he functions and duties: ~f;/the CRA board within the CBD ay
Performed by the planning and development board; and
NOW, THEREFORE, iBE 1T'0RDAINED BY THE CITY CO[~IMI
~OYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
is necessary to make
respect to functions and
ion has determined that
CRA district are best
;SION OF THE CITY OF
Section 1. That Chapter' 2, Zoning, Land Development Regulation, Section 6 (E)
(1), is hereby amended by adding the words and figures in the underlined type and by
deleting the words and figures.iri,the struck-through type as follows:
Sec~ 6 (E) (1) Permitted and conditional uses. With
business district, no building, structure, land, or wa1
thereof, shall be used except for one or more of the
listed below. Uses specified below which are followed
(*) shall be deemed to be conditional uses, which may
and granted in accordance with Section 11.2 of
regular ons ...... ~
~n the central
er, or portion
ollowing uses
by an asterisk
be considered
these zoning
aoDlicationS ~v~hin th~,CBD and the CRA district shall Ibe considered
and rev eWed bv Dlann~o !and dev~ oornent board n a oroceed nos.
/
~ Each and ever~ other provision of Chapter ~ not herein specifically
amended shall remain in full force an'd effect as previously enactedt
/
Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the
~ame are hereby repealed.
Section 4. Should any section or provJsfon of this ordinance or portion hereof,/_~l
any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
~nvalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this ordinance. ' .....
Section
to, codi~fY. Said ~iordinance
passage.
of , 2000.
cITY OF B6'YNTO~' BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
vice Mayo~
ATTEST:
Mayo[ Pro Tern
Commissioner
City Clerk
Commissioner
S:ca\ord\ P & D Reviews within the CBD
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Tamed
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
Requested Cil~ Commission
Meefin~ Dates
Dat~ Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
[] Novemberl6, 1999
November 3, 1999 (5:00 p.m.) [] January 18, 2000
Jmluary5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
[] December?,1999
November 17, I999 (5:00 p.m0 [] February I, 2000
January 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
[] December 21. 1999
[] Januar~ 4, 2000
December 8, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 22, 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
[] Febraaryl5,2000
[] March 7, 2000
Febr~my 2, 2000 (5:00 pan.)
/
February 16, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[] Administrative [] Development Plans
[] Consent Agenda [] New Business
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids ~] Unfinished Business
[] Announcement [] Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: Please place the request below on the January 4, 2000 City Commissin
Legal - 1~' Reading. This ordinance amends the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan puts
requiring specific policies to promote siting of public schools and increased intergovernmental coz
that this item was reviewed and approved for transmittal to the State Department o£Community A
17, 1999. On November 29th, the City received DCA's comments on the proposed amendments
amendments as included herein. The city now has 60 days, or until January 29 to adopt the propo:
to the DCA for fmal (compliance) review. For further details pertaining to this request, see attach~
~ meeting agenda under
~ant to Florida law
rdination. You will recall
:fairs (DCA) on August
ad incorporated
ed amendments and return
t ordinance.
EXPLANATION:
Project: School Siting Amendment (CPTA) 99-003/99-PSI
Agent: City of Boynton Beach
Description: Request to amend the goals, objectives and policies within the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental
Coordination Elements to include school siting and school board coordination requirements as mandated
by Florida law.
PROGRAM IM]?ACT: Represents a required step in the proper maintenance of the city's comprehensive plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: Subject amendments are pursuant to state; however, modifications may still be made to the
amendments, if found necessary, and adopted as scheduled.
-- D~partrae~ of Dev{!opment Acting
Director
Planning and Zoning Director
City Manager's Signature
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: EAR-Based Comprehensive Plan Amendments
APPLICANT: The City of Boynton Beach
DATE OF HEARING BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: January 4. 2000
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment- School Siting and
intergovernmental Coordination
LOCATION OF PROPERTY:
DRAWING(S): None
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynto~ Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board. which Bbard found as follows:
OR
X THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach. Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
X HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "D" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
X GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the Cily Clerk.
/
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordaJnce with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
J:\SHRDATA\Planning~SHARED\WP~SPECPROJ\EAR\Develop Order CC l-4-00.dcc
ORDINANCE NO. 099-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSIQN OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA ADOPTING
AMENDMENTS TO ITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
BASED ON NEW CHANGES IN THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT LAW, CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA
STATUES, TO REVISE AND UPDATE THE E)',ISTING
OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, DATA AND ANALYSIS OF
THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDI] ~IATION
ELEMENT AND THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEI~ ENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANDATES SET F¢ RTH IN
CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES; PRCVIDING
FOR A TRANSMITTAL TO THE STATE LAND
PLANNING AGENCY; PROVIDING FOR CON :LICTS.
SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State Legislature of the State of Florid
all municipalities draft and adopt Comprehensive Plans to
consistent planning with regard to land within their corporate lin
WHEREAS, the State Legislature of the State of Florid
all municipalities draft revisions to their Comprehensive Plan regarding
Intergovernmental Coordination and School Siting issues; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature of the State of Florida has mandated that
all municipa ities must adopt such revisions by October 1, 1999, and December 31,
1999: and
WHEREAS, all amendments to the Comprehensive Plan must be adopted i~
accordance with detailed procedures which must be strictly followed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach has held all duly required public
hearings prior to submission of these amendments to the plan to the State
Department of Community Affairs i~ accordance with Chapter "63, Florida Statutes;
and
WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to adopt the revision amendments
consistent with its current Comprehensive Plan to guide and- controJ the future
development of the City, and to preserve, promote and protec! the public's health,
safety, ana welfare;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
has mandated that
rovide thorough and
its; and
has mandated that
~ The City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida hereby adopts the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental
Coordination amenaments to its Comprehensive Plan, which amendments
consist of the pages which are attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and made a
~part hereof and which will be incorporated into the current Comprehensive
Plan. A copy of the Comprehensive Plan, as amended, is on file in the Office
of the City Clerk of the City of Boynton Beach.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to tran§mit five (5) copies of
the amendments to the current Comprehensive Plan to the/State Land Planning
Agency, along with a copy to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and to
,any other unit of local government who has filed a written request~, for a copy, within
,ten (10) working days after adoption, in accordance with Section 163.3184(7),
Florida Statutes.
.Section 3. AJ laws and ordinances applying to the City of Boynton Beach
in conflict with any provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section 4. Should any section or provision of this Orainance or any portion
,thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be nvalid, such decision
shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5. The effective date of this Plan Amendment shall be the date a
'final order of compliance is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or
· r' rice
Administration Commission find ng the amendments in comp lance m acco da
with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development
orders, development permits, or land use dependent on this amendment may be
issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order on
noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may
nevertheless be effective by adoption.of a resolution affirming its effective status, a
copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Department of Community Affairs,
,Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida
32399-2100.
FIRST READING this __ day of January, 2000.
SECOND. FINAL READING AND PASSAGE this . day of January, 2000.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vice Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
City Clerk
s:ca/ord~Amend Comic. Plan Amd, 122099
EXHIBIT "A"
FUTURE LANDUSE ELEMENT
Objective 1.19
Policy 1.19.8
~ny June I, !9~9, The City shall evaluate and allow a range of
land uses for which the area, location, and int~ nsity of these
uses provide a full range of housing choices, ct mmercial uses
to ultimately increase tax base, employment o[ portunities,
recreation and open space opportunities, and ublic uses
includins school sites for both existing and pro 'e. cted
P0pulatigns, provided that all other compr~hel sire plan
policies are compiled with.
The Ci_ty shall continue to mcPiC; adopt and enforce ad enforce
regulations to keep existing public schools which are in operation in the
Public and Private Governmental/Institutional land use category,
Furore nublic ~ ~'~ t, ......... · ' -
: --~ v ......... wbhc schools shall be a oermlted use m
the Low Density Residential. Moderate Density Residential, Hi_eh
Density Reside~tiak Office/Commercial. Mixed U~, ~nd Public and
Go rnmental/In~s, nmnonal land use desmnanons ................
eem=!vinz w:.thDesi~nared sites shall comnlv with stu~ law and the
follow,ne locational and'design criteria;
Policy 1.19.8.a
At a minimum, the threshold acreage for new schools shall be as
follows:
a) Elementary_ Schools: A minimum of four (4) acres for the first two
hundred (200) students plus one (1) acre for each additional one hundred (100)
students.
b] Middle Schools/Junior High Schools: A minimum of six (6) acres for
the first three hundred (300) students plus one (1'~ acre for each additional fifty_
(50] students up to one hundred (100) students.
c) Senior High Schools: A minimum of seven (7) acres for the first three
hundred (300) students plus one (1) acre for each additional fifty (50) students
up to one thousand (1.000). students, plus one (1~ acre for each additional one
hundred students thereafter.
d)
Area Vocational-Technical Schoot: A minimum of twenty (20)
acres for the first five hundred (500) students vlus one (1) acre
for each additional fifty_ (50) students up to ofie thcJusand (I ,000)
students.
Communi _ty College: A main campus site shall be a minimum of
one hundred (100~ acres. Each separate center site shall contairl ~
minimum of forty_ (40) acres for the first five hundred (500~
students plus two (2) acres for each additional one hundred (100)
smdents. Soecial-ouroose center site acreage shall be aDvrooriate
to contain ~e fundtio~s id¢l~ificd in the program. '- -
Policy 1.19.8.b
Upon issuance ora development order for a new school, the
necessary public facilities such as. but not limitedlto, sanitary
sewer, solid waste, votabte water, drainage, and roads and
appropriate bus stops are to be in place to serve the proposed
use. Furthermore. the SchooI Board shall obtairl a written
a~reement from, the service vrovider assuring adequate capacity is
available.
Policy 1.18.8.c
Policy 1.19.8.d
Public facilities should be in close proximi .ty and operating at the
adopted level of service, before a development order can be
issued for a new school,
mi!
The CRv shall reouest that the School Board sub t for review
information on renovations, additions, and proposed expansions
to property owned by the School Board to assure the availabili _ty
of public facilities and land use consistency, as the proposal
relates to future planned imp_ rovements.
Policy 1.19.8.e Planners for the School Board, County and the City ~hall be
included in both the development of the school location criteria
and the school siting process.
Policy 1.19.8.f
Development of school location criteria should be initiated and
the location of potential sites for new schools can be determined
as early as possible so that sttes can be acquired well in advance
of the need for the new schools.
Policy 1.19.8.g
The Ci_ty and the School Board planners should consider making
schools and their location the focal point for new developments.
Policy 1.19.8.h
The Ci_ty shall advise the School Board of all Plan amendments
that may affect the location of new schools and proposed
improvements.
Policy 1.19.8.i.
During pre-development program planning and site selection
activities, the City, as service provider, will corrdinate with the
Palm Beach County Public libraries, parks, and other facilitie~
with public schools, where compatible, and the votential exists to
create logical focal points for commumty acttwnes. Early review
and coordination will be modified as necessary to timely consider
these potentials. In conjunction with co-locatiomil facilities.
efforts shall be made to provide access for bicyclists, t)edestrians
and transit riders from collectors rather than arterial roadways.
Co-located facilities that are situated along arterials should have
on-site amenities to be serviced by mass transit or community
shuttle services.
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Objective 8.7
Through IPARC the Palm Beach Coun _fy Intergovernmental
Coordination Program, the City shall coordinate {efforts with the
Town of Ocean Ridge, as well as other adjacent ~oastal
communities, that enables the exchange of ideas and plans, and
provides the arena for resolution of conflicts that concern two or
more municipalities. Issues to be addressed should include land
use, water and seWer service, water quality, hurricane
preparedness, beach access, etc.
Policy 8.7.2
The City shall, continue to provide/coordinate utility service to
the Town of Ocean Ridge via the on-going agreeml ent with regard
to water and sewer hook-up.
Policy 8.7.3
The City shall continue to establish procedures to maintain and monitor
existing interlocal agreements for provisions of water.and sewer
service with adjacent municipalities and unincorporatea area.
Policy 8.7.4
Objective 8.10
Policy 8.10.4
The City shall consider utilizing the Palm Beach Countywide
Planning Council's or the Regional Planning Cou lc'fl's Informal
Mediation Process if future coordination between
municipalities does not resolve pemnem issues th:
scope of the two entities·
The Ci_ty of Boynton Beach shall coordinate with
Beach County_ Intergovernmental Coordination Pr6
in notifvine adjacent municipalities of Drovosed land use
amendments, iiezonings, and annexations ~hat ma,,4 affect
adioinine_ _ municivalities._ -.
The City shall continue coordinatin~ with Palm Beach County
regarding the prevention of enclaves, pockets, or Other
undesirable land configurations adjacent to. or in ~he proximi _ty
the DTqo
are within the
Palm Beach
· ram (IPARC~
to. corporate limits, prior to annexation of any parcels into the
city_
Policy 8.10.5
Policy 8.10.6
The Ci_ty shall continue to promote annexation of ] and where
service delivery_ systems in the Utility_ Service Are ~ (Reserve
Annexation Area) will be consistent with the boun laries of the
corporate limits,
The City shall pursue interlocal affreements with ] )cal
governmental municipalities that have identified ol adopted future
land use designations for adjacent unincoroorated,areas.,_.These
aereements ~ould establish-"joint plannin~ areas' (JPA s)
pursuant to Chapter 163.3171. F.S.
Policy 8.10.7
but are not limited to, the following: /
· Cooperative planning and review of land development activities withi
covered by the agreement:
· Specification of service delivery:
· Funding and cost-sharing issues within JPA's; and
· Enforcement/implementation
The City shall encourage joint planning agreements that include.
areas
Policy 8.10.8
To discourage urban sprawl, the City shall continue its present
annexation policy of allowing controlled growth in a manner which
discourages conflict with adjacent uses ensuring ~hat the proper
infrastructure is in place or concurrent with development.
ObJective 8.11
By 199!, The City shall participate in inter,overnmental
coordination nrocesses with the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council and all other local uovernment~ in a
voluntarv.disnute resolutoin nrocess for the nurnose of
facilitating iniergovernmenta~ coordination.-Th~ IPARC
process is established pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Coordinated Review Interlocal Aereement.
effective October 1, 1993, and shall include results and any
written determination from the IPARC Process as data and
analvsis to DCA ~Sth proposed and ad.o. nted. Co.mnrehensive
and to afi~rcss area ::Sde ]and u:e nee~s anti ."astL~cat.~en fer
Policy 8.11.1
Policy 8.11.2
Policy 8.11.-~3
Policy 8.11
The City shall nartici¢ate inthe Palm Beach County IPARC
Process'and shill coordinate with the Treasure C~st Reeional
Planning Council and all other local eovernments in a vdluntarv
dispute resolution process for the pu~ose of facilitating
intergovernmental coordinatiom The IPARC process is
established ~ursuant to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Coordinatec~ Reviewlnterlocal Aereement. effecti~ce October 1.
1993..and shall in~lude reSUlts an~d.anv written determination
from the IPARC Process as data and analysis to DCA with
nro~osed and ado¢ted Comprehensive Plan amcmdments.
Ey !99!, Throt,gh IPARC, the City shall nofigy a
governments and the County of land use conflicts
adjacent land uses. In addition, it should be deter
the comprehensive plans of the two entities addr~
Where the interjurisdictional conflict has caused a
nuisance, the property owners directly involved in
to, the conflict will be notified that the conflict is
by both entities.
Jjacent local
generated by
nined whether
s the conflicts.
)ublic
and adjacent
xing addressed
o,~.;.-...~ m.,,;.,~, r' ..... ;~ [PARC as the
The City shall use the .,~_.=
e~ties-to mitigate land use conflicts that directly affect posible
Comurehensive Plan amendments. The mitigation strategies
coulci consist of jointly adopted future land use plan for the
bordering land uses, or at a mimmum, and if appropriate, the
buffering of the incompatible uses~. Inh~ the interin~, the City
shall oppose requests for changes in l~a~_,d_ use in unincorporated
Palm Beach County that are i~ the City s Reserve ~nnexafion
Area and not consistent with the adopted Boynton Beach or Palm
Beach County Comprehensive Plan. The Ci_ty shall participate in
the efforts of Palm Beach County and the Treasure Coast
Planning Council to monitor and coordinate annexation plans of
the County_' 's municipalities.
XI-LEGAL
ITEM B.1
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH~ FLORIDA ADOPTING
AMENDMENTS TO ITS COMPREHENSIVE =LAN
BASED ON NEW CHANGEJS IN THE GR(tWTH
~IANAGEMENT LAW, CHAPTER 1-63 FL(: RIDA
TATUES, TO REVisE AND UPDATE THE EXI.c
OBJECTIVES, POLICIES, ~DATA AND ANALYSI
THE INTERGOVERNMEN'i'
ELEMENT AND THE FUTURE
ACCORDANCEWITHTHE MA
CHAPTER 163~,, FLOBIDA S
F~R A 'TRANSMITTAL ~F£
P,LANN1NG AGENCY; PROVE
AL COORDIN,
.AND_ US,E ELEME
~[DATES' SET FOR
gATUTES; PROV
'T~,E. STATE
lING '-FOR~.CONFL
CTIVE DATE.
TING
~ OF
TION
~IT IN
'HIN
}lNG
_AND
ICTS,
has mandated that
vide thorough and
and
as mandated that
Plan regarding
II municipalities draft and adopt Comprehensive Plans to pr~
;onsistent planning With regard t0:la~ndwithin their corpmate,limit
WHEREAS, the State Legislature ;of the state of ,Florida
ill municipalities draft revisions to their Comprehensiw
Intergovernmental Coordination and School iting issues; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature.of le State of Florida has mandated that
ill municipalities must adopt such revisions bY October 1, 1999, and December 31,
1999; and
WHEREAS, all amendments to the Comprehensive Plan must be adopted ~n
accordance with detailed procedures which r~ust be stdctly,follov~ed;- and
WHEREAS, the City of Boynton Beach_ has held al dIdu y requ red. pub c
hearings prior to submission of these amendments to the plan to the State
Department of Community Affairs in accordance with Chapter 1~3, Florida Statutes;
and
WHEREAS, the City Commission des~ires to adopt the revision amendments
.onsistent with its current Comprehensive Plan to guide andl control the future
:levelopment of the City, and to preserve, promote and protect the public's health,
safety, and welfare;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
]'HE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1. The City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida hereby adopts the Future Land Use and Intergovernmental
Coordination amendments to its Comprehensve Plan which amendments
s Exhlt~ t~.A,, and made a
file in the Office
(5) copies of
~g
Council, and to
within
;,i,n' ;-a~(~e,,!~¢~ce?.~¢h,.;~SectiOn 163.3184(7),
~ AIt.~!aws and,..ordinances,applying'to the City of Boynton Beach
in conflict with any-provisions of"tthis ordinance ,are hereby repealed,
- Section.4. Should anysection or provision of thisOrdinance or any portion
thereof be declared by a courl of competent juriSdiction to be invalid, such decision
shall not affect~the remainder of ~this Ordinance.
Section'5. The effectivedate~of thisPlan Amendment shall be the date a
inal order of compliance is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or
Administration Commission finding the amendments in compliance in accordance
with Section 163.3184, Florida Statu[es, whichever occurs eadier. No development
orders, development permits, or land use, dependent on this amendment may be
issued or commence before it has become effective, If a final order on
noncompliance-is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may
nevertheless be effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a
copy of which resolution shall :be sent to the Department of Community Affairs,
Bureau of Local Planning, 2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida
32399-2100.
FIRST READING this day of January, 2000.
SECOND, FINAL READING AND PASSAGE this day of January, 2000.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
Mayor
Vic~ 'Mayor
Mayor Pro Tern
Commissioner
Commissioner
ATTEST:
3ity Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
FLrrLrRE LAND USE ELEMENT
-~ ..... , ~/10, The City shall evaluate and allOw a range of
Policy 1.19.8
Policy 1.19.8.a
Institafional land use category,
At a,minimm.,~the:~threshold acreage for new schools shall be as
follows:
a) Elementary Schools: A minimum of four ¢4~ acres for the first two
hundred t200~ students plus one/D acre for each additional one hundred il00)
students.
Middle Schools/Junior High Schools: A minimum of six (6) acres for
the first three hundred 1300'~ students plus one il) acre for each additionitl fifty
(50) students uu to one hundred (100) students.
Senior High Schools: A minimum of seven (7] acres for the first three
hundred (300~ students plus one il) acre for each additional fifty_ (~0) StUdent~
up to one thousand (1.000). students, plus one (B acre for each additional one
hundred students ttfereafter.
d~
Area Vocational-Techrlical School: A minirfR~a of twenty_ (20)
acres for the first five hundred (500) students plus one (D acre
for each additional fifty (50) students up to one thousand (1.000)
students.
e) Communi _fy College: A tuain campus site shall be a minimum of
one hundred (100,~ actesl. Each separate center site ghall contain a
minimum of fort~ (40~ acres .for the first fi e hundred (500~
students plus tw~ .¢2~ ac~es for each additional one h{mdred l l00~
students, soecial-~uroose~center site acreage shall ge am)rooriate
to contain the functions identi~fied in the oro~ram.
Policy 1.19.8.b
Upon issuance of a development order for anew school, the
necessary, public facilities such as. but not limited to. sanitary
the
anql the school sitin~ vrocess.
Policy 1.19.8.f
Policy 1.19.8.h The. Circe ahall :adxrise ~ School Board of all Plan amendments
thai; ma.w affect.~the tocation of new schools and prooosed
ir~Pr0vements..
Policy 1.19.8.i. D~fib~.~re-develooment oroeram nlannine and site selection
- acti~e~, the'Ci/V~ as'se~vic~ oro,~ider, w]tl corrdi~ate with the
Palm:Beach County_ Public libraries, parks, and otl~er facilities
Objective
with public schools~ where compatible, and the potential exists to
create logical focal points for community activities. Earn review
coastal
with the
and
and
Policy 8.7.2
Policy 8.7.3
Policy 8.7.4
Objective 8.10
Policy 8.10.4
service [o
maintain and monitor
that are within the
igatl coordinate with the Palm Beach
o~dLri~iiSn Pro~ram (IPARC~
i'~'/~Oi~$~¢d land use
~anne[at[pns ,that may affect
The Cit~ shall~ cO.hue c~d~;di~atin~:!~:ith:¢~!palm
Beach
County
re~ardt~,the~m~v~ii{ion i~oekots, or other
unne~at~IC,ialtac, onnml[~,n~.:ama, eenr*to, or ~n me nroxtmtrv
Policy 8.10.5
to. corn_ orate limits, prior to annexation of any parcels into the
City_.
The City shall continue to promote annexation of land where
service delivery systems in the Utility_ Service Area ~Reserve
Annexation Area) will be consistent with the boundaries of the
corn_ orate limits.
Policy 8.10.6 local
Policy 8.10.7
· Enforcement/implementation
Policy8.10.8 TO diS%u, rage urban sprawl the City shall continue its vresent
anneXati°n Pla[icy of allowing controlled growth in a manner which
ai~c~hd~S: ~0nfliet with' adjacent uses ensuring that the proper
infrasn-ucture is in
data and
Policy
8.11.2
Policy 8.11
Policy 8.11
Where the interjuriidictioaal conflic~ has cau~s~d a public
nmsance the property o~ners dlrec~y~ ~x(~!y~dm, anda/tjacent
to, the-~onfl~ct will be notilsed ~at tie, e~o~;~ !9 being ~addressed
by both entities. ~ ...... ., ~
shall
gies
the
· appropriate, the
the City
tn umncorporated
t or Palm
[] November 1~, t999
[] December7. 1999
[] December21, 1999
[] Jallu~ry 4, 2000
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to Gitv Clerk's Office
N. ovember 3~ 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17. 1999 ~5:00p.m.)
December 8. 1999 (5:00 :p,tn.)
December 22, }999 (&00 p.m.~
Re~luested City Conmmsston
Meeting Dates
[] January. 18. 2000
[] February 1, 2000
February 1.5, 2000
[] March 7.200n.
XI-LEGAL
ITEM C.1
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
lanuary 5. 2000 (5:00 pm.l
January I9, 2000 (5:00 pmo
February 2, 2000 (5:00 a.m.)
February 16. 2000(5:00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ri'EM
[] Administrative [] Development Plans
[] Consent Agenda [] New ~usiness
[] Public:Hearing [] Legal.
[] Bids [] Unfinished Business
[] Announcemem [] Presentation
RECOMM]ENDATION:. . Motion to approve resolution: instituting $200 per hour fine for late arriving funerals.
_ga~x~.~ .T~. O.N. This .fee was reco..n~n, ended b~- the Cemetery Board on November 9 based on funeral directors
aunermg to mew set arnval times. This has re~lted in funerals interfering with subseqm nt funerals and keepingn°t
employees working overtime.
PROGRAM IMPACT: City's overtime will be paid by parties responsible for delaying ti
FISCAL I1VIPACT: See above.
ALTERNAT/VES: Continuecharging flat fee without consequence to late arriving funer:
COSt.
Department Head's Signature
Department Name
S:kBULLETINWORMS\AGENDA ITEM R~QUEST FORM.DOC
City Attorney / Fi_nan
workers.
Is and city absorbs extgls.
Signature
'/~uman Resources
RESOLUTION NO. R 00-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE C1TY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR/DA
provides that the City
commission shall;~fr°m 'time to time, by ResolUtion, proviae for the sale of
cemetery lots, fix the price to be charged therefor, and the terms and conditions
of such sales, and shall fix the schedule of fees to be charged for~ permits,
buria s, openings and closings, and other services; and
WHEREA~, there have been several occasions when funeral arrival times
were delayed through no fault of the City, which resulted in the City making/-
overtime payments to City staff; and
WHEREA~, to offset the expenditure of overtime payments due to a
delay Whiqh is not caused by the City, the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida deems it to be in the best interests of the citizens and residents of
the City to pass through the cost, by establishing a fee of S200.00 per hour for
each hour or part thereof of delay from the scheduled ardval time of the funeral,
if delay is greater than one hour.
NOW~ THEREFOREw BE Z'I' RESOLVED BY THE CZTY COf41flISSI'ON
OF THE CZTY OF BOYNT. ON BEACH, FLORZDA THAT:
~Section 1. Each Whereas clause set forth above is hereby ratified as
being true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference;
Section 2. The City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida,
hereby establishes a fee in the amount of $200.00 per hour for each hour or part
thereof of delay from the scheduled arrival time of the funeral, if delay is greater
than one hour.
Section 3.. This Resolution shall take effect February 1, 2000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of January, 2000.
C~-Y OF BOYNTON BEACH~ FLORIDA
Mayor
~/ice Mayor
~layor Pro Tern
Commissioner
Commissioner
City Clerk
s:ca\Reso\Cemetery Fee - F~ne/Penaity
MEETZNG MZNUTES
CEMETERY BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NovEMBER 9~ 1999
B. C~HARGES FOR LATE ARR./lNG FUNERALS (Tabled)
Mr. Nyqu st moved [o remove this item from the tabte. Mr. Henstey seconaea me motion that
carried unanimO~l:Y ' ~:' '
Th~_~embers: ask~e,d~Mr. Aniki if there' ha~e been occasions of late arrivals since this issue was
discussed tas~ month Mr. Aniki responded that there Were no lam arrivals ~a~ month, and
there have been no/ate arrivals to date ~is month;
· ' in a enal~ in the event the issue surfaces again. She
. ~d e~ recommended ?n~tut g ~ mmended a charge of $[00 for the fir~
Ms a~ .~.~ the ~enalW be ba~d on time and reco
sugge~ u,~ ~ .
hour.
Discussion ensued regarding whe~er or not other cemeteries have insti~te~ ~his W~ of
'.Im ~a~ Hemorial do~ not have ~nalW charges, but
· ~ ,~- H~ns V pointed eu~that..Pa ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~e board members are -
pertain, m, .......ley _ "'; '' ~' s a~ng a~er ~.uu w.,,,. , , -
- · - '-~ of ~200 per hour f0¢ ~nera . , ...... m,v a~r~ ~at ~f a wolat~on
tnere s d ~ · . . rea nuw=w,, .... , =
agre~ ~ sinca~e ove~[m~c~u --. L .... ,a ~, m~ ~ame ~e~day includ~g
S200 if the ~ne~l is one (~) hour ~ate. i nts tee wuu,~ ......
weekenas and holidays.
Mr. Hensley moved that a $200 per hour fine i3e instituted evewda¥ from the arrival time that
was given if greater than an hour. Mr. Nyquist seconded the motion that carded unanimously'.
Wildner questioned whether the funeral directors would be notified that the board is
the
When Mr.
instituting this policy, Secretary Kruse advised that this issue would' first have to go before
City Commission for approval of an Ordinance.
C. - s_ -' - -. _ o --"---- ---' --
SecretarY Kruse announced' that she included this item on the agenda because there had been
a disCUss on in this regard during the board members' visit to the Cemetery and she did not
recall further discussion or direction during the last meeting.
When Ms. Padgett said she thought Ms. Hall was going to take care of the landsCaping, iris. Hall
advised that everything came to a standstill because of Hurricane irene. Facilities Management
is working on getting three prices for the sidewalk addition include the Chattahochee. Streets
will do the asphalt addition. On Monda¥~ Ns. Hall will go to Homestead to look at the Fox'tail
Palms. Because of the floods from HurriCane irene, some of the nurseries are under quarantine
6
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] Novemb~ 16. 1999
[] December 7. 1999
[] December2I_ 1999
] January 4. 2000
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date Final Fotm Must be Turned
in to Ciw Clerk's Office
November3. I999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 8. I999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 22. 1999 5:00 p.m,)
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
[] January 18,2000
[] February 1,2000
] February 15, 2000
[] March 7. 2000
XI-LEGAL
ITEM D.l.a
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to Cit~ Clerk's Office
Sanuary 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.
January 19, 2000 ~5:00 p.m
February 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
Febraary 16, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[] Admimstrative
[] Consent Agenda
[] Public Hearing
[] Bids
RECOMMENDATION: The Code Compliance Board recommends reducing the fine in Ca:
$8.350.00 plus $634.12 in administrative costs, to $634.12. The vote was 6-1.
EXPLANATION: The property subject to the lien is located at 2015 S. Federal Highway, an
by Arby's Restaurant. The motion to reduce the lien to administrative costs was based prim:
whether or not proper notification was given to the property owners. An error in addressi~
the certifie~d letter requesting the owners to appear before the Board resulted in the letter b,
proceeded to physically post the property as required by Florida Statute. The property ow~
considerable amount of money in restoring the property to the standards required by City O
[] Development Plans
[] New .Business
'[5~ Legal
[] Unfmishe~ Business
[] Presentatk
~98=2166, from
I was formerly occupied
rily on thc question of
the envelope containing
~g returned. Staff then
r also expended a
'dinance.
PROGRAM IMPACT: The property is in compliance and hopefully will be leased ~o a new t
FISCAL IMPACT: Administrative cost~ are recovered.
ALTERNATIVES: Modify the Code Compliance Board's recommendation not to exceed $8,
in administrative costs.
Dep~fft Head's~ Signature
- '/CityM~na~er:
City Attorney / F~nance /
~O~ c~~'~
Department Name
50.00 plus the $634.12
;ignamre
S:~BULLETEq~ORMSkAGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NOVEMBER 17. 1999~ ~-
Motion
Mr. Lambert moved-that Case No.-99~1571 be tabled until-the Code Compliance Board
Meeting to be held, on January 19 2~000. Motion seconded by Mr Rossi Motion
carriea 7-0.
RECESS AT 9:00 P.M.
THE,ME~,NG RECONVENEDAT 9:!~0 A.M.
C, LIEN REDUCTIONS
Case ~98.3095
Christopher & Pamela Slunt
3350 E. Atlantic Drive
Mr. Blasie asked if anyone were present and there was no re§ponse. Mr. Blasie
requested that the case be tabled until next month's meeting.
Motion
Mr. Foot moved that Case ¢¢98-3095 be tabled until the Code Compliance Board
Meeting to be held on December 15, 1999. Motion seconded by Mr. Lambert. Motion
carded 7-0.
Case f~98-2166
F.FCA/IIP 1989 Property C,o.. 20t5 S. Federal Highway
Financial Center c/o Arby s 44
Scottsdale, AZ 85225
Mr. Blasie stated the applicant is present this evening and the property is now in
compliance. The total fine is $8,350 plus administrative costs of $634.12. Mr. Blasie
presented photographs presented before and after photographs of the property.
Mr. Bill Layton stated he was an Attorney and his address is 101 North J. Street, Lake
Wort.h,, Flonda. Attorney Layton said that the notice of non-compliance ,.vas returned to
the City because of insufficient address. Mr, Layton said that the only address ~n the
City's records was Scottsdale. Adzona and that was insufficient. Mr, Layton said that
his clients found out therewerecode violations when they hired a realtor to sell the
property. Mr. LaYton said:~i~~ Clients have spent between $22,000 to 24,000 bringing
the property into total compliance- Mr. Layton said his client's 'POsition is that as soon
as they knew there was a problem, they spent the money to fix it up and before that,
they had no idea that there was a problem. Although there was a notice posted at the
property, my client is in Arizona.
24
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR DA
NOVEMBER 17, 1999
Cha'rman DeL'so asked f Ar~y's's st' the owner and the Attorne re 'ed '
, ~_. , _· , . .. y p . thatArbys
was not the owner, but a company named FFCPA, from whom Arby's w~s leasing.
Chairman DeLJso asked if the City has the return rece pt on this case. Mr Btasie stated
the letter-Was 'retUrned and the City made serVice by posting. Als0; Mr. Blasie
confirmed that the not Ce of headng did not have the street address
Attorney [gwe statedtbat posting, is,,an alternative means .of no,ce, I
usingthis! s~ub~ti~ute ~pe of no,ce .suCh as Posting, in certain iihS
someone ~esid~s on' the prspe~ and i'§ evading serVise b~ runt~ing ~
when someone is located so far away, technically posting is a form of
City can.ctb~im jurisdiction, However, it isup to th~ Board to determine ti
Mr.
)ut the iment of
~nces is when
way. However,
service and the
lis.
is in
the
the
The
Mr., I.
it is
know
var
of business?
he city and
owner not
for
the City
[ send
; spirit ,of the
it v
Motion
advised
in ,~
of this ~Board's
been
o~h
Mr.
1998
25
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
NO'CEMBER 'i7, 1999
be reduced
Chair Hammer:
Mr. Foot
MotiOn ~
and assessing a fine in the amoUnt of $4,500.
The realtor for the'
and :stated ~thaf the,,COdS,,Enfomement
told
Mr. Blasie stated the property
viol
ThE
and was ,1998 for
r 'was
15
his
The
Mr.
ver~
26
HARVEY, WADDELL & MONAHAN
WILLIAM M. LAYTON
Atto heys and Counselors at Law
P. O l~ox 2,.31
!01 Hol'~ %1#
T*I .(lis I ) 1i5.~3 I
F~ ~561} 585-1~i7
~ub ~ Worth
$OgRPI4 M, ~ r~. ESQ.
~ 127
Tcl.(~l }
F~(56~) 9~-2080
December 21. 1999
A=~s~t~on: J~net
City of Boynton Beach
AttenTion: Gerald Broening, Mayor
2015 ~outh Federal Highway
~ien Reduction Hearin~
Dear
Please accept thim lette= as a request ~or po~tponemen= of the
hearin~ o~ ~his T~==sr which i~ schedu~e~ for ~,0d p.m. this
evening.
I understand this matter will be reset for the hearing on
January 4, 2000, at 7:00 p.m.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
WML:fgm
Very zruly yours,
william M. Layton
Requested City Cormaftssion
Meeting Dates
[] November 16, [999
[] December 7, 1999
[] December 21, 1999
[] January 4. 2000
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to Cit,/Clerk's Office
November 3.1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17. I999 (5:0G p.m.)
December 8. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
December 22. 1999 (5:0t3 p.r~)
Requested City Commlsmon
Meeting Dates
[] January 18,2000
[] February 1, 2000
[] February 15, 2000
[] MarehT, 2000
XI-LEGAL
ITEM D.l.b
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to CiW Clerk's Office
January 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
!
Jail~ary 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
February 2, 2000 (5:00 p.m3
February I6, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[] Adraknislrative [] Developm. ent Plans
[] Consent Agenda [] New Business
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfmishc~ Business
[] Announcement [] Presentatibn
RECOM34ENDATION: The Code Compliance Board recommends reducing the fine in Case #96-5939 from
$24,325.00 plus $730.15 in administrative costs, to $2,000.00. The vote was 5-2.
EXPLANATION: This is the one of two liens_ on this property. This is a single-family rental property located at 2280
NW 2"d. Street. The applicant for reduction stated he was before the board because our lien~.were impeding the sale
of his house in Boca Raton. According to the applicant, he had deeded the property in Boy, ton back to the bank in
lieu of foreclosure. XVhen the bankdiscovered Boynton Beach had two liens on the properS, they did not record the
deed. The applicant .claims he did not know about the liens, nor did he realize the bank did not record the deed. The
Board's decision to significantly reduce the lien was based on the following three factors:
1) The applicant testified he could not afford to pay any tines.
2) The $100.00 a day t'me was excessive for the gravity of the violation.
3) The Board felt it would beto the City s advantage to reduce the lien because the property will undoubtedly revert
back te the bank via foreclosure with the likelihood of our liens being extinguished.
PROGRAM IMPACT: The property ~s in compliance.
FISCAL IMPACT: Administrative costs are recovered, plus an additional $1,269.85.
aA~d Tnr.EniRNATstr afiJeV~c oSs: .~/Mmtil3Fffi'g'E}de C°mpliance B°ard' s ree°mme~., ndati°n n°~t t° ext~ceed $2~,325'00 plus $730'15 in
Department Name
City Attorney / Finance Human Resources
S:\BULLETIN~FOILMS~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
MINUTES
C~DE COMPLIANCE BOARD
B0'~NTON BEACH, FLORIDA
15,1999
LIEN REDUCTIONS
Case #96-5939 Robert & Sheryl Meika 2280 NW2"d Street
450 NE l0th Street
BocaRaton, FL 33430
Mr. Blasie stated this applicant has two ien reductions and th s s the first case.
This case was cted in 1996 and'there i,s a 1998 case. Each case had a d fferent
ir~sPecter~"bU~basica y the ~i0latier~s v~_ere the ~a.~ei:
Mr. Lambert asked why there Would be twO'cases? Mr. Blasie said a different
inspeCtOr sited the property in 1998 and staff did not realize that there already
was a lien onthe property.
Mr. Blasie sale the property was originally cited on December 31 1996 for
violations ofth~ citYs Appearance Code and came before the Board on Mamh
19, 1997 and no one appeared. A compliance date of April 15 1997 was set or
be fined $25.00 per da~/: The property complied today. ~here were 973 days of
n°n-compii~nce; whiCh comes to ~24,325.00, plus administrative costs of
$730; 15. Mr. Bias e presented three pictures taken on r October 21, 1998 and two
pictures: that were taken today to the Board for their review.
Chairman DeLiso inquired if the respondent has always been the owner. Of the
~ properly was cited
Mr. m and
and
was r~
/ 50;evict the tenant.
;pt
and kept breaking out the
.try to keep,the property
Mr. Meka said he deeded the Rmperty back !o the bank, but the bank never
recorded the deed bec,~use ~ie ~i~n~d an ~d~i{ When he d~eded the property
back to the? bank stating that ther~e~/ere noel ens gnthe pr~operty. M~, Melka said
that at that time,', he ,did not I~n(~w..there~ W~e~-e any liens on t~e property.
Therefore, because th~ bank'never~recbrded th:e deed the property is st n h s
name, The~ bank 'w' ~fObab y go'.. tll~rou,gh~ _ a.~fo~e.c!°su., . re .wh. ~:h~ w wpe. out the
lien.
Mr. Melka said he has a buyer for his house in Boca Raton and had a closing set
for this corn ng ,Monday, but because of the lien 0n-the Boynton Beach property,
5
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
December 15, 1999
he is unable to se h s house n Boca Raton and the deal fell thrpugh. He said
that he moved Out of his house and rented a small place because he thought his
house was sold and he said he is really in a jam. Mr. Melka said that he has now
brought the property into compliance.
Chairman DeLiso inquired about the condition of the screens and
said that the tenants kept tearing the screens, so he removed all
Chairman DeLiso asked if he was plann ng to put screen ng n?
the property would be foreclosed upon. Chairman DeL so asked
why heWa~ present tonight.and he said h~ was here for a lien rE
he could seiki his house i'n Boca Raton Mr Meika sa d that he
insUranCe until the lien is satisfied and he is going to ose the buyE
Mr. Foot asked how much of a reduction is the respondent oo
replied as .much as possible.
Mr. Lambert said he was under the impression that the lien w~
property. Mr. Blasie stated that the lien goes against the proper[!
property the respondent owns in Palm Beach County. Mr.
applicable provision in the Code.
Mr. Lambert noted that the property had been cited three yea~
respondent stated that the tenant parked his van on the grass.
that for a couple hundred dollars for sod, there s now a $24,(:
property. Mr. Melka said the sod cost h~m approximately $500.
this past year he has been totally broke and could not even el
because he couldn't afford the eviction costs.
Chairman DeLiso sa~d that a lien of $24,000 for a front yard is ~
Chairman DeLiso noted that the fine was $100.00 per day Af
the respondent
the screening.
Mr. Melka said
lhe respondent
duction so that
~nnot get title
:lng for and he
!nt against the
and any other
asie cited the
s ago and the
Ir. Lamber[ felt
00 lien on the
Mr. Melka said
ict the tenants
i lot of money.
er reading the
minutes of that meeting, it was d scovered that the Board votec~ to amend the
fine to $100 per day and the motion Carried unanimously. Mr. BIlasie sad they
were not able to get the fine certification minutes becaus~ the ca~e was just put
on the agenda this aftemoon. :However, Mr. Bias e sa d that the ~arrative would
be indicative that the certification, was $~00 Der day. The narrative indicates that
the fine was certified on June 18, 1997 at $100 per day.
Mr. Melka said he was not aware that he had owned the property, for the past six
months. Mr. Blasie said that he had the recorded certification an.~ confirmed the
fine was $100 per day. Mr. Lambert quest oned if the respondent i:~ fact still owns
the property Ass stant City Attorney Bober said he could not determine th s
unless I~e h~d all the documents to Io(~k at. However, regardless of who owns the
property, the Board could still act on whether to reduce the lien.
6
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH,, FLORIDA.
Chairman~DeLiso noted that in effect, the lien redUction was-for the property.
B0ca~Raton; since the Boynton propertY was going tobe foreclos, ed dpon. ~
Motion
in
Based, on the -testimony and evidence presented in Case NO. 96-5939, and
having been advised that 'the Respondent has' complied With all lien reduction
procb~ures set'forth~ in SeCtions 2-84 through 2-89'0f the City: of Boyhton~ Beach
C0de ~3f-'OrdinanCes, Mr. ':F0ot moved that th{S BOard r~ommend to:-t~e),:t City
~d~ ~f~Mamh~ :i,9~.'l:9~7~e,::red~ced~ to~ a~a~ihi~t~a~v~ C~tS of,$~3~e~-~:~?' ~MOt~0n
Mr. Lambert felt the fine was too'low for'.three years. Mr. Foot said that this man
), and this Board-has~been compassionate in the past!-NOW, the
no and this man is not worthy of compassion.
Mr. Lambert we have seen the respondent and the
) said.he could not
on reducing the fine. but not as Iow as
might not be able to
vote on this:
vlr. Foot said he asked= for the
running :the
Mr. :'Foet
Chairman DeLiso called for a vote on the question.
Mr. Walsh asked ifthis Board does
the respondent I
'advantage
be losers all the way
~ relief tothe respondent and he
the Boynton Beach property. If
a foreclosure, his lien
Mr. Walsh said that if the
the Board should take
otherwise, the City could
Attorney
Atto~
the question and
of the vote.
Chai uested that
vote was 4-3 for del
Rossi and Chairman DeLisO dissenfin(.
Secretary call the roll. The
(Messrs. Lambert, Miriani,
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
December 15, 1999
Chairman DeLiso said he was not against reducing the fine, but he would like a
higher fine. Mr. Lambert pointed out that this Board only makes
recommendations to the City Commission and the fina dec sioq rests with the
Commission. Ms. Hammer questioned how the City could get any money from
the respondent who says he has nothing and Ms. Hammer believes him
Mr. Foot asked if the deficiency on the Boynton property goes against the Boca
property? Mr. Foot wanted to know if the bank foreclosed on the Boynton Beach
property, would the balance of the lien go to the Boca property. Attorney Bober
stated the mortgage would take precedence and would be a supenor
encumbrance on the property and it is theoretically possible that all or a portion
of the citY's lien coul(~ be wil~ed out by any foreclosUre. Attorney Bober stated if
Mr. Melka's property in Boca is foreclosed upon, the City would be named as a
defendant in that foreclosure because the City of Boynton Beach would have an
interest by virtue of the fact that the City had a lien in the same county.
/
Mr. Foot said there is a motion on the floor and requested that a~ vote be called
for the motion. If someone on the Board has any Other figure in mind Mr. Foot
said he would amend his motion in order to mo~,e on Mr. Larfibert suggested
amending the motion to $2,000 fine.
Mr. Foot said he would amend his motion to make the
$2,000.00 and Ms. Hammer seconded the amended motion.
Ms. Williams said that the respondent has a financial hardship
that the City would have anything to gain. This Board shoL
compassion and not charge him an astronomical fine for the
violation. Ms. Williams said that aroun(~ everyone's home there
with dead grass and did not think a fine of $24,000 for three yea~
and his financial situation should be taken into consideration.
ine a total of
3d did not think
Id show some
gravity of the
are neighbors
was warranted
Chairman DeLiso said that the respondent did nothing for three
respondent would not have done anything today unless he w'ahted
property in Boca.
~ars and felt the
to sell his
Mr. Lambert requested that a vote on the amended motion be called.
Chairman DeLiso called the question on the amended moti(F)n to increase
the total fine to $2,000. Motion carried 5-2 (Mr. Miriani and Ms. Williams
dissenting.)
Case #98-1960
Robert & Cheryl Melka
450 NE 10thStreet
Boca Raton, FL 33430
2280 NW 2nd Street
8
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
XI'LEGAL
ITEM D.I.c
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates inlo City Clerk's Office
Requested CRy Commission
Meeting Da~s
Dare F hal Form Must be Turned
kn to city Clerk's 0ffice
November 1C 1999
November3, 1999 (5:00p.m.) [] January 18.2000
Jm~um'y 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
[] December 7 1999
November 17. I999 (5:00p.m.) [] February 1. 2000
lanuary 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
[] Decemb~' 21, ~999
December 8, t999 (5:00 p.m0 [] Februgry 15, 2000
Febt ~ary 2. 2000'(5:00 p.m.)
[] January4, 2000
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
December 22, 1999 (5':00 p.m.
[] Administrative
[] Consent Agenda
[] Public Hearing
[] Bids
] Announcement
March 7, 2000
Feb ua~y 16, 2000 (5:00p.m.)
[] Developu ent Plans
[] New Bus'~ess
[] Legal
[] Unfini~hefl Business
[] Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: The Code Compliance Board recommends reducing the fine in Case #98-1960 from
$11,400.00 plus $634.12 in administrative costs, to $1,000.00. The vote was 5-2.
EXPLANATION: This is the one of two liens on this property. This is a single-family renta~ property located at 2280
NW 2ha. Street. The applicant for reduction stated hewas before the board because our liens were impeding the sale
of his house in Boca Raton, According to the applicant, he had deeded the property in Boyn Ion back to the bank in
lieu of foreclosure. When the bank discovered Boynton Beach had two liens on the propert), they did not record the
deed. The applicant claims he didnot know about the Hens, nor did he realize the bank did tot record the deed. The
Board's decision to significantly reduce the lien was based on the following three factors:
l) The applicant testified he could not afford to pay any fines.
The $100.00 a day fine was excessive for the gravity of the violation.
3) The Board felt it would be to the City's advantage to reduce the lien because the proper will undoubtedly revert
back to the bank via foreclosure with the likelihood of our liens being extinguished.
PROGRAM IMPACT: The property is in compliance.
HSCAL IMPACT: Administrative costs are recovered, plus an additional $365.88.
AI.TERNAT1VES: Modify the C~de Compliance Board's recommendation not to exceed $1
administrative, cost .~' ,~. /
400.00 plus $634.12 in
Signature{
Department Name
City Attorney Finance / Human Resources
SABULLET1N~ORMS~AGENDA ITEM REQL~EST FORM.DOC
;E BOARD
December 15, 1999
Chairman DeLiso Said he was not against reducing the fine. but he would likea
higher 'fine. Mr. Lambert pointed out that this Board only make~
recommendations to the City Commission and the final dec sion rests witl~ ~1:~~'
Com~i~sS~9n- MS ~a~mer questioned h~ the ~ity ¢ould~get a~y mon, e~
,t~ ~p~d._~nt who say~h~aS nothing, and Ms;, !Hammer believes him~,:,~? :
Mr. Foot,asked if the Boca
ch
Mr. r~
d~
Mr. Foot sa d th~ere is a motio~ on the floor ~n~l i~bq~ested that a vote be called
for the motioti.' ff someone on the Bea!~d ~a,~ a~!~b~her ~gure n m~nd M~ ~qot
sa~d he would arnend ~s motion. I~ ,crater :t~me~,e on. ' Mr.
Lambert
suggested
amending the motion t0"$2,000 fi,nel -: '
Mr. Foot said he would amend to fine a total of
$2
Ms. Williams said that the responden¢ has a financia, l, ]ard~ship and did not think
that the City would have ~a~yth'ing to' 'gaiP. ,,ThiS:i':E da~'d ~ould show' ~ome
compassion and not, charg~i- ~ii~ ~n~ aStro~omiCa!i; ~i qe,,. for the i gravity of the
violation.; Ms. WillJa,ms sai~ ~tfiat ',ar°8ndi eve~o~e'~ ! eme there ~are n~ighbors
w~th dead grass and d~d not-th nka fine of $24,000 f¢~ hree years was war~'anted
and his financial' Situation shodld be;~ken in(O conSi~ atBn.
Chairman DeLiso said that the;respoddent did aothi~g for thre~ years and felt the
respondent wou d not h'ave don~ ~nlY;th,ng';~ted~y;~ess he,~anted to Sei,hs
property in Boca.
Mr. Lambert requested that a vote on the amended motion be called.
Chairman DeLiso called the qUestiOn on the amended motion to increase
the total fine to $2,000.
dissenting.)
Case ¢~98-1960
Robert ~ Cheryl Melka
450 NE ~i0thStreet
Boca Raton, FL 33430
2280 NW 2nd Street
8
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
December 15, 1999
Mr. Blasie said this is the same property address with the same property owner.
The property was cited for the screen enclosures and trash anU debris in the
back yard. Mr. Blasie stated the property complied today for a total fine of
$11,400 plus administrative costs of $634.12.
Motion
Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case N~
having been advised that the Respondent has complied with;
procedures set forth in Sections 2-84 through 2-89 of the City o
Code of Ordinances, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board recomr
Commission that the fine instituted in Case No. 98-960, by virtue
Order of August 19, 1998 be reduced to $1,000.00. Motion sE
Foot.
98-1960, and
I lien reduction
Boynton Beach
~end to the City
of this Board's
,conded by Mr.
Motion carried 5-2 (Mr. Miriani and Ms. Williams dissenting).
Mr. Miriani noted that the total fine for both cases is now $3,000 inclusive.
Case #98-2776
VA Property Management
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
P.O. Box 4142
St. Petersburg, FL 33731
134 SE 3rd Avenue
Mr. Blasie stated that the property was originally cited on August 23, 1998 for
violation of the Community Appearance Code. The case first came before the
Board on November 18, 1998 and no one appeared. A compliance date of
December 14, 1998 was set or be fined $25.00. The property w~as brought into
compliance on December 6, 1999 for 356 days of non-complianc.~, for a total fine
of $8,900 plus administrative costs of $730~15. Chairman Blasie distributed
photographs to the Board for their review. There was one before p ctura and two
after pictures taken on December 15th.
..
Mr. REchard Pacely took the podium and stated he represented the Veteran's
Administration In Palm Beach County. Mr. Pacely said th~ property was
conveyed by foreclosure and presented a copy of the Certificate of Title that was
recorded in July 2, 1998. The Veteran's Administration was unaware that they
owned the property. Mr. Pacely said that Attorney David Newman notified the
VA on December 21, 1998 that they were the successful b dder ~3n the property
on July 2, ;1998. The VA had not taken custody of the property arid assigned it to
Mr. Pacely on December 21s~ . An eviction took place on December 31, 1998.
Mr. Pacely said he was unaware of the code violations until Jane 1999. Mr.
Pacely said he spoke with Mr. Blasie and Assistant City Attorney Igwe.
9
Requested City Commms~on
Meeting Dates
] November 16. I999
[] DecemberT. 1999
[] December 21,!9~9
[] January 4, 2000
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date F:nal Form Mustbe Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
November 3. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
November 17. 1999 (5:00 p.m.)
DecemberS. 1999 (5:00 p.m;)
December 22,1999 (5:00 p.m.)
Requested Ci[5 Commission
Meeting Dates
[] Janua~ 18,2000
[] February 1, 2000
x'r,LEGAL
ITEM D.l.d
Dare Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
January 5, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
January~ 19, 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
February 2~ 2000 (5:00 p.ra.)
/
Feb~ua~y~ 16~ 2000 (5:00 p.m.)
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
[-- Administrative [] Develop,merit Plans
[] Consent Agenda [] New Business
[] Public Hearing [] Legal
[] Bids [] Unfinished Business
[] Anaouncemem [] Presentation
RECOMMENDATION: The Code Compliance Board recommends reducing the fine in Case g98-2776 from $8,900.00
plus $730.15 in administrative costs to $500.00. The vote was 6-1.
EXPLANATION: The applicant for the reduction is Mr. Richard Pasley of South Palm Realty Inc. & the VA
Property Management. The Board's decision to reduce the fine was based upon the following criteria:
1) The VA did not know they received the property until six months after the fact.
2) The violations were corrected once they discovered the lien on the property.'
3) The VA works in partnership with the City of Boynton Beach and the Code Compliance Staff.
/
PROGRAM IMPACT: The property is in compliance and hopefully will be sold to a new owner.
FISCAL 134PACT: Administrative costs are recovered, less $230.15
ALTERNATIVES: Modify the Code Compliance Board's recommendation not to exceed $8
administrative costs.
City ManOr'
}00.00 plus $730.15 in
Dcpan:ment Name
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
SABULLETIN~ORMS~AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
December 15, 1999
Mr. Blasie said tl~i~ is the same preperty address with the same property owne[?
The property was cited for the screen enclosures and trash and debris in the
back yard. Mr. Blasie ,stated the property complied today for a total fine of
$11,,400 p!~Js a.,dminist~a~e,c~°~ts_P~ $634.12 ~, . .
Motion
[3a~se~ on the testimony and evidence presented in .Case No. 98-1960, and
ha~ihg 'been advised that the ResPondent has cgmPlled V~ith all lien reduction
pm~res,setlforth ~n Se~S,~4't~oug~2~ the~i~of Bo~n~n Beach
'~'~:'O~di~a~ces:, Mr. L~b~ ~ th~'~h~:s~ B~a~f~c~mm~d~ te the C~y
com~t~[~that the fine insfi~d~n: c~Se'N~98~60~'~vi~e of ~his:B6~rd'S
Order' 0f~AUgu~ 1.9, 1998-be ~du~d t0 $1;Q00~0Q. M~on Seconded byMr.
Foot.
Motion carried 5-2 (Mr. Miriani and Ms. Williams dissenting).
Mr. Miriani notedthat the total fine for both cases is now $3,000 inclusive.
Case f~98-2776
VA Property Management
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
P.O. Box 4142
st. rpetersburg, FL 33731
134 SE 3rd Avenue
Mr. Blasie stated that the property was originally cited on August 23 1998 for
violation of the Community Appearance Code. The case first came before the
Board on November 18, 1998 and no~ one al~peared. A compliance.,date of
December 14, 1998 was set or be fined $25.00. The property was brought~ into
compliance on December 6, 1999 for 356' days of non-compliance, for a total fine
of $8 900 plus administrative costs of $730. 15. Charman Blase distributed
photographs to th'e Board for their review. 'The~e was One before picture and two
after pictures taken on December 15th.
Mr. RichardPacely took the podium and stated he represented the Veteran's
Administration in Palm Beach County. Mr. Pacely said the property was
conveyed by foreclosure and presented a copy of the Certificate of Title that was
recorded in July 2, 1998. The Veteran's Administration was, unaware that they
owned the property. Mr. Pacel~; said that Attorney David NeWman notified the
VA on December 21, 1998 that they Were the sUccesSful bidder on the property
on Ju y 2, 1998. The VA had not tal~en custody of the proPerty and assigned :it t(~
Mr. Pacely on December 21st . An eviction took place on December 31, 1998.
Mr. Pacely said he was unaware of the code violations until June 1999. Mr.
Pacely said he spoke with Mr. Blasie and Assistant City Attorney lgwe.
9
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
December 15, 1999
Mr. Pacely said in the past when the VA has come before the CiE
of the fine they, would come before the City Commission
conditional abatement of the fine. This is where the purchaser a
the City that they would bring the property into compliance and
did not bring the property into compliance, the City would
However, Mr. Pacely said this is no longer done in the City. TI'
had to put bids out to get the property into compliance and the pr~
brought into compliance. It cost $5,600 to put on a new roof and
the houseand-plant grass. Mr. Pacely said he is respectfull
abatement 0fthe fine. He has, been authorized by the ve~;erans
pay an-administ~atire fee to, reimburse the Cty for their costs u
a~bu,nt of $500. There-is a .buyer ready and willing to take the pr
Mr. Foot asked what-..happened to the property once the VA
December. Mr. Pacely sai~t!ithe property nas be~n under contra(
timeS for sale. The VA did not know there was a lien on the pre
they found' out, the .bUyer did not want to wait to get the :problerr
Mr. Pacely pointed oUt thatl,the notice of hear ng was mailed t°
4142 in St. Petersburg, Florida and that has not been there addre
Mr. Pacely stated that whenever the VA has a compliance prol'
rectify it immediately..Mr. Pacely explained how,the bid proces,,
Vete~:ans Administration' and why ;[ took so-long to bring th
compliance, which is comrnonly 90, days.
Chairman DeLiso said the Board, has two choices tonight. 'i7
make the fine astronomically ,high and:the property would rem~
there is a buyer who is willing to take possession: of the property
always worked with the City in the past.
Mr. Pacely said he is requesting the fine be reduced to administ
he is authorized to sign a check up to $500. If the check were for
he would have to request a govemment voucher and that would
days, Mr. Pacely also pointed out that he cannot pay a fine;
administrative costs.
Mr. Blasie said he would try to get the lien reduction on the C
agenda for their first meeting in January.
¢ for a reduction
and request a
:knowledged to
f the purcnaser
reinstitute suit.
erefore, the VA
)perry has been
$3,700 to paint
r r~equesting an
,dministration to
,to a maximum
)perty.
took it over ~n
t three different
perry and when
'resolved. Also,
the VA to P.O.
ss since 1998.
lem, they try to
works with the
proper~y into
.~ Board could
lin vacant. Or,
and the VA has
'ative costs and
the full amounT,
:ake another 90
e can only pay
ity Commission
Motion
Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No, 98-2778, and
having been advised that the Respondent has complied with all lien reduction
procedures set forth in Sections 2-84 through 2-89 of the Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances, Mr. Lambert moved that this Board recommend to the City
10
MEETING MINUTES
CODE COMPLIANCE BOARD
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
December 15; 1999' ~
Commission that,,the fine instituted in Case No. 98-2776 by virtUe rOf this,Board's
Or, der of November 18. 1998 be reduced to adm n strative costs in the amount of
:$5(~O~O~O.A'vloti~nlSecOndedby M~' Wiliiams~' : ,~ · :-
Li.onel
Inspector Lewis, stated thatthe property was cite~l thr. ougt~routlne r~SpeCtion, and
service ~was obtained :by postinc~., The City reC°~e~!s 3,9,~ d,ays~ ~ ,: -~ ~'
Motion
Based on the testimony and evidence presented in Case No: 99-1888, Mr.
Lambert moved that th s Board find, as a matte.r, ~f,fact :and as a conclusion of
aw that Lagene Ad er & Julme L one are n vi~lation of Code .Sections Chapter
15, Article 1X-15-120 (D), Inc. and 10-52 of t~e B.B,~: of Ordinances Mr,
Lambert moved to order that the. Respondents ~rrect ;the ~iotations on :or before
January 17 2000. If the Respondentsdo not c~P~]¥.withlthi~'Order, a fine in the
amouRt of $25 00 per. d~a,.y shall .be impo~! ',leThe Respondents are further
ordered to contact the C~;~y of Boynton: Biea~iC~d~ ,.'COmpliance` Division to
arrange for reinspection of the property to VerifY compliance with this order.
Motior~ seconded by Vice Chair Hammer.- ~
Motion carried 7-0.
Case No. 98.3448:
Property Address:
Violations:
Jean E. and Marie J, Losier
1533 NE 2~ Street
.Chapter 15, ~,Article IX-I 5-120
(D), Inc.;Please define and de-
weed rock driveway; repair or
replace wood fence.
Inspector Melillo stated that the property was origina y cited on August 24,. 1999
for Community Appearance Code Violations. The Property was cited through
routine inspection and service was made by certified .mail.
11
TO:
THRU:
FRO I~t:
RE:
DATE:
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
MEMORANDUM
Honorable Mayor and Qb/Commission
.lames Chemf, City Attorney
Nicholas Igwe, Assistant City Attorney ~-~..~___..~-~
Phase out: of non conforming signs and billboards
Friday, December 03, 1999
Xt. LEGAL
D. 2
The Cib/through several ordinances codified under Chapter 21 of its Land Development
Regulations have provided that all non conforming signs and billboards located within
the Qb/limits be removedf changed, or altered to conform to the provision of the
signage code by December 31, 1999.
Presently, there are several non conforming sings and billboards located within the Qb/
im ts who 'may not be able to meet the December 31, 1999, phase out deadline. Ob/
employees .ha~/e met with Republic Media [nc. operators of three outdoor billboards in
the Qb/to discuss options. Republic Media has a 1987 lease agreement with the
andowner to operate and maintain the billboards through September 30, 2003. There
are additional three Or four non conforming billboards n the Qb/owned by other
billboard operators,
Based upon discussion with the Interim Qb/Manager, one option !~to enter into lease
agreements, permitting the billboards coml~anies to relocate on Ocy owned property
along Inter-state 95. :rhis option would require Commission's discussion and direction
given that it involves a significant policy issue.
CC: Wilfred Hawkins, Intedm City manager
M ke Rumpf, Director of Planning
Scott Blasie, Code Enforcement Supervisor
S:ca/Comm/Signage C.o~e memo to Comm.
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
CZTY OF BOYNTON BEACH
MEbtORANDUM
Honorable Mayor and City Commission
3ames Cherof, City Attorney ey .t~ t~
Nicholas Igwe, Assistant City Attorn
Phase out of non conforming signs and billboards
Friday, December 03, 1999
XI. LEGAL
D. 2
The City through several ordinances codified under Chapter 21 of its Land Development
Regulations have provided that all non conforming signs and billboards located within
the Qty limits be removed, Changed, or altered to conform to the provision of the
signage code by December 31, :[999.
Presently, there are several non conforming sings and billboards located within the City
limits who may not be able to meet the December 31, 1999, phase out deadline. City
employees have met with Republic Media Inc. operators of three o~ ~tdoor billboards in
the City to discuss opUons. Republic Media has a 1987 lease agre~ ment with the
landowner to operate and maintain the billboards through Septemt er 30, 2003. There
are additional three or four non conforming billboards in the Qb/o~ vned by other
billboard operators.
Based upon discussion with the Interim Qty Manager, one option i~ to enter into lease
agreements, permitting the billboards companies to relocate on Qty owned property
along Inter-State 95. This option would require Commission's discussion and direction
given that it involves a significant policy issue.
CC: Wilfred Hawkins, Interim City manager
Mike RumPf, Director of Planning
ScattSlasie, Code Enforcement Supervisor
S:ca/Comm/Stgnage Code memo to Comm.